[
  {
    "id": 1,
    "title": "Patch spacing could tune droplet freezing variability",
    "hypothesis": "At fixed hydrophilic surface fraction, an intermediate spacing of hydrophilic patches on a hydrophobic surface will narrow the distribution of droplet freezing temperatures more than either finer or coarser spacing.",
    "test": "Freeze equal-volume purified-water droplets on three patterned surfaces and a uniform control through repeated cooling cycles. Match roughness, contamination, and cooling rate; measure individual freezing temperatures.",
    "against": "Distribution widths show no reproducible intermediate minimum after accounting for measurement uncertainty.",
    "category": "A. Water, interfaces, and confined liquids",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Patch spacing could tune droplet freezing variability",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 245,
    "literature_query": "Patch spacing could tune droplet freezing variability At fixed hydrophilic surface fraction an experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0001",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 1,
      "title": "Patch spacing could tune droplet freezing variability",
      "hypothesis": "At fixed hydrophilic surface fraction, an intermediate spacing of hydrophilic patches on a hydrophobic surface will narrow the distribution of droplet freezing temperatures more than either finer or coarser spacing.",
      "test": "Freeze equal-volume purified-water droplets on three patterned surfaces and a uniform control through repeated cooling cycles. Match roughness, contamination, and cooling rate; measure individual freezing temperatures.",
      "against": "Distribution widths show no reproducible intermediate minimum after accounting for measurement uncertainty.",
      "category": "A. Water, interfaces, and confined liquids",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Patch spacing could tune droplet freezing variability",
      "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
      "access_score": 2,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 245,
      "literature_query": "Patch spacing could tune droplet freezing variability At fixed hydrophilic surface fraction an experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 7,
      "source_ids": "S6e41175cf705;Sb034d527976e;S5c6fa4bedfa8;S81d08e94483a;S1e5c1ad7e186;Sf0262de81480;Sa1e88297f6a8",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 2,
    "title": "Asymmetric pore entrances could rectify oscillatory flow",
    "hypothesis": "A tapered pore connecting identical reservoirs will produce net liquid transport under zero-mean oscillatory pressure only above an inertial threshold, with direction determined by taper orientation.",
    "test": "Measure reservoir volume changes across tapered and cylindrical microchannels over a frequency and amplitude sweep; reverse the tapered device and verify zero mean applied pressure.",
    "against": "Net flow does not reverse with geometry, persists in symmetric controls, or disappears when pressure offsets are corrected.",
    "category": "A. Water, interfaces, and confined liquids",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Asymmetric pore entrances could rectify oscillatory flow",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "excluded: broad prior-art overlap",
    "rank": 2,
    "literature_query": "Asymmetric pore entrances could rectify oscillatory flow tapered connecting identical reservoirs produce net experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0002",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 3,
    "title": "Humidity cycling could set a repeatable salt deposit spacing",
    "hypothesis": "Repeated partial dissolution and drying of a thin salt film on a grooved surface will select a narrower crystal-spacing distribution than one continuous drying step with equal cumulative water removal.",
    "test": "Image benign salt films during controlled humidity cycles; compare matched initial salt loading, grooves, temperature, and final dryness.",
    "against": "Cycling does not narrow spacing, or the apparent effect is explained entirely by differing final crystal sizes.",
    "category": "A. Water, interfaces, and confined liquids",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Humidity cycling could set a repeatable salt deposit spacing",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 30,
    "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 1,
    "literature_query": "Humidity cycling could set repeatable salt deposit spacing Repeated partial dissolution drying of experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0003",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": true,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 3,
      "title": "Humidity cycling could set a repeatable salt deposit spacing",
      "hypothesis": "Repeated partial dissolution and drying of a thin salt film on a grooved surface will select a narrower crystal-spacing distribution than one continuous drying step with equal cumulative water removal.",
      "test": "Image benign salt films during controlled humidity cycles; compare matched initial salt loading, grooves, temperature, and final dryness.",
      "against": "Cycling does not narrow spacing, or the apparent effect is explained entirely by differing final crystal sizes.",
      "category": "A. Water, interfaces, and confined liquids",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Humidity cycling could set a repeatable salt deposit spacing",
      "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
      "access_score": 4,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 30,
      "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 1,
      "literature_query": "Humidity cycling could set repeatable salt deposit spacing Repeated partial dissolution drying of experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 9,
      "source_ids": "S8e48081b4baa;S86d0a0dda644;S3b8e7705f07f;Sc0af0d8cc453;S9e600ab54020;S3923c89cf099;S8fbd9125d634;S90158fadeeae;S8e79211967c6",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Controlled humidity already changes salt morphology. Check specifically whether cyclic partial dissolution on grooves narrows nearest-neighbor spacing at matched water loss; do not claim humidity-dependent crystallization itself as new.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": {
      "deep_rank": "1",
      "id": "3",
      "title": "Humidity cycling could set a repeatable salt deposit spacing",
      "original_300_rank": "1",
      "pilot_class": "P",
      "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
      "hypothesis": "Repeated partial dissolution and drying of a thin salt film on a grooved surface will select a narrower crystal-spacing distribution than one continuous drying step with equal cumulative water removal.",
      "primary_outcome": "Coefficient of variation of nearest-neighbor crystal spacing per independently prepared slide; record mean spacing separately.",
      "comparison": "Constant humidity versus cyclic partial dissolution/drying; include an unpatterned slide and several groove pitches.",
      "controls": "Initial NaCl mass, surface chemistry, groove geometry, final water loss, temperature, and crystal size. Separate salt dissolution from crystal movement.",
      "pilot": "First establish repeatable imaging and a humidity schedule that partly dissolves crystals without washing salt away. Register crystal centers using blinded images, then compare slide-level spacing distributions.",
      "novelty_gap": "Humidity-dependent salt morphology is already studied. The possible contribution is cycle-induced narrowing of spacing on grooves at matched mass loss, not the humidity effect itself.",
      "stop_rule": "Do not proceed if cycling changes salt loading or the control cannot reach comparable dryness. A precisely estimated absence of narrowing rejects the selected schedule.",
      "source_keys": "SALT25;EFF89",
      "truth_probability": "not estimated",
      "novelty_status": "unverified"
    },
    "dossier_text": "# 01. H0003 — Humidity cycling could set a repeatable salt deposit spacing\n\nOriginal 300-folder rank: 1. Pilot class: P. Resource class: modest bench or workshop; calibration still required.\n\n## Original hypothesis\n\nRepeated partial dissolution and drying of a thin salt film on a grooved surface will select a narrower crystal-spacing distribution than one continuous drying step with equal cumulative water removal.\n\n## Why investigate this\n\nLow-cost material system with direct imaging and a measurable distributional prediction. It can fail cleanly without ambiguous functional performance claims.\n\n## Literature assessment and exact novelty question\n\nHumidity-dependent salt morphology is already studied. The possible contribution is cycle-induced narrowing of spacing on grooves at matched mass loss, not the humidity effect itself. Worldwide originality remains unverified.\n\n## Primary measurement\n\nCoefficient of variation of nearest-neighbor crystal spacing per independently prepared slide; record mean spacing separately.\n\n## Comparison\n\nConstant humidity versus cyclic partial dissolution/drying; include an unpatterned slide and several groove pitches.\n\n## Critical controls\n\nInitial NaCl mass, surface chemistry, groove geometry, final water loss, temperature, and crystal size. Separate salt dissolution from crystal movement.\n\n## Pilot plan\n\nFirst establish repeatable imaging and a humidity schedule that partly dissolves crystals without washing salt away. Register crystal centers using blinded images, then compare slide-level spacing distributions.\n\n## What would count against it\n\nDo not proceed if cycling changes salt loading or the control cannot reach comparable dryness. A precisely estimated absence of narrowing rejects the selected schedule.\n\n## Replication and analysis\n\nTreat separately prepared specimens, batches, or devices as independent units. Technical repeats and images are nested measurements. First estimate calibration error and independent-preparation variability. Set the minimum meaningful effect in the primary outcome's units before confirmation, then choose sample size from that effect and pilot variance; a convenient pilot count is not a powered study.\n\nRandomize run order and blind sample labels where practical. Freeze image processing, fitting choices, exclusions, and the primary comparison before evaluating confirmatory data. Report effect size and uncertainty; use a blocked or mixed-effects analysis when specimens share a batch. A wide interval is inconclusive. Include the measurement and matching controls even when the directional effect appears large.\n\nA useful go/no-go gate is whether the hypothesized effect can be distinguished from calibration uncertainty and the strongest alternative explanation. Stop material purchases if the closest literature already measures the identical contrast, unless a replication has an explicit purpose. Do not use these abbreviated plans as complete laboratory protocols.\n\n## Data to preserve\n\nKeep unedited images or sensor streams, calibration files, preparation IDs, run order, environmental logs, input histories, raw outcome values, exclusions, and the exact analysis version. No values are prefilled in the observation template. Use `data/Published Benchmarks.csv` only as literature context; values from a different system are not observations of this hypothesis.\n\n## Sources and transfer limits\n\n### SALT25\n\n[Morphological Signatures of Salt Crystals under Controlled Humidity Using Advanced Image Analysis](https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.5c04762)\n\nAccess: Indexed abstract examined. Type: primary experiment.\n\nBackground findings and transfer limits: see [source assessments](../research/Primary%20Source%20Assessments.md) under this source key.\n\n### EFF89\n\n[Crystal growth in salt efflorescence](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0022024889902340)\n\nAccess: Indexed abstract examined. Type: primary experiment.\n\nBackground findings and transfer limits: see [source assessments](../research/Primary%20Source%20Assessments.md) under this source key.\n\n"
  },
  {
    "id": 4,
    "title": "Alternating pore wettability could suppress drying cracks",
    "hypothesis": "Alternating wetting and less-wetting bands inside a porous silica strip will reduce drying-crack propagation by interrupting synchronized capillary stress.",
    "test": "Dry patterned and uniformly treated strips with matched porosity, overall wettability, thickness, and solvent loading; measure crack length and mass-loss curves.",
    "against": "Crack reduction vanishes when drying rate is matched or cracks preferentially grow along the bands.",
    "category": "A. Water, interfaces, and confined liquids",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Alternating pore wettability could suppress drying cracks",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0004",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 5,
    "title": "Dissolved gas could change the recovery of liquid slip",
    "hypothesis": "Following pressure-driven collapse of gas pockets on a textured hydrophobic surface, water with more dissolved gas will recover apparent slip faster during depressurization.",
    "test": "Compare degassed and gas-equilibrated water in identical transparent channels; measure gas-pocket area and flow resistance before and after pressure cycles.",
    "against": "Recovery time is independent of dissolved gas or resistance changes occur without pocket recovery.",
    "category": "A. Water, interfaces, and confined liquids",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Dissolved gas could change the recovery of liquid slip",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 246,
    "literature_query": "Dissolved gas could change recovery of liquid slip Following pressure-driven collapse pockets on experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0005",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 5,
      "title": "Dissolved gas could change the recovery of liquid slip",
      "hypothesis": "Following pressure-driven collapse of gas pockets on a textured hydrophobic surface, water with more dissolved gas will recover apparent slip faster during depressurization.",
      "test": "Compare degassed and gas-equilibrated water in identical transparent channels; measure gas-pocket area and flow resistance before and after pressure cycles.",
      "against": "Recovery time is independent of dissolved gas or resistance changes occur without pocket recovery.",
      "category": "A. Water, interfaces, and confined liquids",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Dissolved gas could change the recovery of liquid slip",
      "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
      "access_score": 2,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 246,
      "literature_query": "Dissolved gas could change recovery of liquid slip Following pressure-driven collapse pockets on experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 4,
      "source_ids": "S7e38a49ad48a;S1eaaf2b0f4e5;S53179d49d87b;S62ff8a86b691",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 6,
    "title": "Soft pore walls could broaden capillary filling times",
    "hypothesis": "Soft channels with identical initial dimensions will show a broader distribution of filling times than rigid channels because local wall deformation amplifies small pressure differences.",
    "test": "Track capillary fronts in replicated soft and rigid channels; directly measure deformation and match contact angle and liquid viscosity.",
    "against": "Variability is unchanged after fabrication variability is accounted for, or no deformation accompanies it.",
    "category": "A. Water, interfaces, and confined liquids",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Soft pore walls could broaden capillary filling times",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 247,
    "literature_query": "Soft pore walls could broaden capillary filling times channels identical initial dimensions show experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0006",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 6,
      "title": "Soft pore walls could broaden capillary filling times",
      "hypothesis": "Soft channels with identical initial dimensions will show a broader distribution of filling times than rigid channels because local wall deformation amplifies small pressure differences.",
      "test": "Track capillary fronts in replicated soft and rigid channels; directly measure deformation and match contact angle and liquid viscosity.",
      "against": "Variability is unchanged after fabrication variability is accounted for, or no deformation accompanies it.",
      "category": "A. Water, interfaces, and confined liquids",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Soft pore walls could broaden capillary filling times",
      "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
      "access_score": 2,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 247,
      "literature_query": "Soft pore walls could broaden capillary filling times channels identical initial dimensions show experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 7,
      "source_ids": "Sf3a278bf5710;S458bb87543b8;Sbbd3ad6f4695;S90a655ebcbcf;Scc6effea677d;Sfb330cfcb1be;S6968eaa89809",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 7,
    "title": "Evaporation pulses could reverse ring deposition",
    "hypothesis": "Alternating humid and dry intervals during colloidal-droplet evaporation can shift deposition from the rim toward the center without changing particle chemistry.",
    "test": "Compare constant-humidity and pulsed-humidity drying with equal total drying time; map final particle mass and measure internal flow using tracer particles.",
    "against": "Central enrichment is absent or results solely from different contact-line motion rather than the proposed flow redistribution.",
    "category": "A. Water, interfaces, and confined liquids",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Evaporation pulses could reverse ring deposition",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 30,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0007",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 8,
    "title": "Surface charge gradients could select bubble detachment sites",
    "hypothesis": "At fixed roughness and average wettability, a lateral surface-charge gradient will bias the locations where dissolved-gas bubbles detach under mild pressure reduction.",
    "test": "Image bubble events on gradient, reversed-gradient, and uniform surfaces; independently characterize charge and contact angle.",
    "against": "Detachment positions do not follow gradient reversal or correlate only with roughness defects.",
    "category": "A. Water, interfaces, and confined liquids",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Surface charge gradients could select bubble detachment sites",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 49,
    "literature_query": "Surface charge gradients could select bubble detachment sites At fixed roughness average wettability experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0008",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 8,
      "title": "Surface charge gradients could select bubble detachment sites",
      "hypothesis": "At fixed roughness and average wettability, a lateral surface-charge gradient will bias the locations where dissolved-gas bubbles detach under mild pressure reduction.",
      "test": "Image bubble events on gradient, reversed-gradient, and uniform surfaces; independently characterize charge and contact angle.",
      "against": "Detachment positions do not follow gradient reversal or correlate only with roughness defects.",
      "category": "A. Water, interfaces, and confined liquids",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Surface charge gradients could select bubble detachment sites",
      "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 49,
      "literature_query": "Surface charge gradients could select bubble detachment sites At fixed roughness average wettability experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 8,
      "source_ids": "S7aa701ff6c4f;S8da76d4520f0;S6fb1c030634a;S0e68d85914b8;S773aa62a8eda;S32c77450017c;Sb576616cbf82;Sb5d2f410bacb",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 9,
    "title": "Confinement could alter mixed-solvent evaporation order",
    "hypothesis": "Narrowing an open porous channel will change the early vapor composition of a binary solvent mixture beyond the change expected from its measured liquid temperature.",
    "test": "Measure vapor composition and liquid composition above channels of several widths using a benign, compatible solvent pair under controlled airflow.",
    "against": "A bulk evaporation model using actual temperature and composition explains the observations within uncertainty.",
    "category": "A. Water, interfaces, and confined liquids",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Confinement could alter mixed-solvent evaporation order",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 3,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 179,
    "literature_query": "Confinement could alter mixed-solvent evaporation order Narrowing an open porous channel change early experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0009",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 9,
      "title": "Confinement could alter mixed-solvent evaporation order",
      "hypothesis": "Narrowing an open porous channel will change the early vapor composition of a binary solvent mixture beyond the change expected from its measured liquid temperature.",
      "test": "Measure vapor composition and liquid composition above channels of several widths using a benign, compatible solvent pair under controlled airflow.",
      "against": "A bulk evaporation model using actual temperature and composition explains the observations within uncertainty.",
      "category": "A. Water, interfaces, and confined liquids",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Confinement could alter mixed-solvent evaporation order",
      "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 3,
      "screen_score": 26,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 179,
      "literature_query": "Confinement could alter mixed-solvent evaporation order Narrowing an open porous channel change early experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 6,
      "source_ids": "S4295d832232b;Seb0b9e2b5e30;Sa3bf5a646dca;Scf99666f1804;S93b660ec1846;S3e8bd8b6343f",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 10,
    "title": "Compliant membranes could delay frost bridging",
    "hypothesis": "Small reversible membrane deflections between frost-growth intervals will delay neighboring frost crystals from bridging compared with a stationary membrane at the same surface temperature.",
    "test": "Image frost on actuated and stationary membranes with matched texture, humidity, and thermal history; measure time to a connected frost network.",
    "against": "Bridging times are unchanged or any delay is explained by actuator heating.",
    "category": "A. Water, interfaces, and confined liquids",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Compliant membranes could delay frost bridging",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 248,
    "literature_query": "Compliant membranes could delay frost bridging reversible membrane deflections frost-growth intervals neighboring crystals experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0010",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 10,
      "title": "Compliant membranes could delay frost bridging",
      "hypothesis": "Small reversible membrane deflections between frost-growth intervals will delay neighboring frost crystals from bridging compared with a stationary membrane at the same surface temperature.",
      "test": "Image frost on actuated and stationary membranes with matched texture, humidity, and thermal history; measure time to a connected frost network.",
      "against": "Bridging times are unchanged or any delay is explained by actuator heating.",
      "category": "A. Water, interfaces, and confined liquids",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Compliant membranes could delay frost bridging",
      "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
      "access_score": 2,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 248,
      "literature_query": "Compliant membranes could delay frost bridging reversible membrane deflections frost-growth intervals neighboring crystals experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 5,
      "source_ids": "S215b7accade3;S669b9b7d9112;S09d3b8322ba6;Sf0262de81480;S7dad8488f230",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 11,
    "title": "Rotated reinforcement layers could improve damage localization",
    "hypothesis": "In a fiber composite with fixed fiber content, a slowly rotating layer orientation will confine low-energy impact damage more effectively than alternating two orientations.",
    "test": "Fabricate matched coupons and compare damage area by imaging after equal impacts, alongside residual bending strength.",
    "against": "Damage area or retained strength is no better after accounting for thickness and manufacturing defects.",
    "category": "B. Materials and mechanical behavior",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Rotated reinforcement layers could improve damage localization",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0011",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 12,
    "title": "Graded pores could stabilize compression recovery",
    "hypothesis": "A foam with a smooth pore-size gradient will retain more recoverable thickness after repeated compression than a uniform foam with the same density and polymer chemistry.",
    "test": "Cycle matched foams through the same strain history; measure hysteresis, residual deformation, and local collapse by imaging.",
    "against": "Recovery is unchanged or improved recovery merely reflects a lower actual local strain.",
    "category": "B. Materials and mechanical behavior",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Graded pores could stabilize compression recovery",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 30,
    "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 2,
    "literature_query": "Graded pores could stabilize compression recovery foam smooth pore-size gradient retain recoverable thickness experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0012",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": true,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 12,
      "title": "Graded pores could stabilize compression recovery",
      "hypothesis": "A foam with a smooth pore-size gradient will retain more recoverable thickness after repeated compression than a uniform foam with the same density and polymer chemistry.",
      "test": "Cycle matched foams through the same strain history; measure hysteresis, residual deformation, and local collapse by imaging.",
      "against": "Recovery is unchanged or improved recovery merely reflects a lower actual local strain.",
      "category": "B. Materials and mechanical behavior",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Graded pores could stabilize compression recovery",
      "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
      "access_score": 4,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 30,
      "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 2,
      "literature_query": "Graded pores could stabilize compression recovery foam smooth pore-size gradient retain recoverable thickness experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 10,
      "source_ids": "S15b533d354bf;Sbd72b0d11e02;Sf8d00bb8e73e;S0e164d4a3435;Sbbd0bf9b0a57;S63f56a23b005;S38e8d98b4e19;Sab7f34cfe567;S0f7ac287737c;See30b177d7e7",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Foam recovery under cyclic loading is studied. The candidate gap is a matched-density spatial pore gradient and recovered thickness, rather than foam recoverability generally.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": {
      "deep_rank": "12",
      "id": "12",
      "title": "Graded pores could stabilize compression recovery",
      "original_300_rank": "2",
      "pilot_class": "C",
      "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
      "hypothesis": "A foam with a smooth pore-size gradient will retain more recoverable thickness after repeated compression than a uniform foam with the same density and polymer chemistry.",
      "primary_outcome": "Recovered thickness fraction after a predefined rest following a fixed number of compression cycles.",
      "comparison": "Uniform foam versus a smooth pore gradient of the same polymer, mean density, thickness, and total void fraction; reverse the gradient orientation.",
      "controls": "Local strain, density, cell openness, foam chemistry, loading work, rest time, and any adhesive joining layers.",
      "pilot": "Use existing characterized foams or facility-made samples. Measure density and pore profiles before loading. Record complete force-displacement loops and local strain, then compare recovery across independent samples.",
      "novelty_gap": "Graded foams and cyclic recovery both have close prior art. A new result needs a matched-density pore-gradient comparison and evidence that recovery is not simply lower local loading.",
      "stop_rule": "Stop if matching mean density requires unmatched chemistry or bonded layers dominate the result. Reject the directional prediction if recovery is equal at matched strain histories.",
      "source_keys": "FOAM20;FOAM23;FOAM22",
      "truth_probability": "not estimated",
      "novelty_status": "unverified"
    },
    "dossier_text": "# 12. H0012 — Graded pores could stabilize compression recovery\n\nOriginal 300-folder rank: 2. Pilot class: C. Resource class: modest bench or workshop; calibration still required.\n\n## Original hypothesis\n\nA foam with a smooth pore-size gradient will retain more recoverable thickness after repeated compression than a uniform foam with the same density and polymer chemistry.\n\n## Why investigate this\n\nCompression and dimensional recovery are direct measurements; established foam studies supply useful apparatus and artifact controls.\n\n## Literature assessment and exact novelty question\n\nGraded foams and cyclic recovery both have close prior art. A new result needs a matched-density pore-gradient comparison and evidence that recovery is not simply lower local loading. Worldwide originality remains unverified.\n\n## Primary measurement\n\nRecovered thickness fraction after a predefined rest following a fixed number of compression cycles.\n\n## Comparison\n\nUniform foam versus a smooth pore gradient of the same polymer, mean density, thickness, and total void fraction; reverse the gradient orientation.\n\n## Critical controls\n\nLocal strain, density, cell openness, foam chemistry, loading work, rest time, and any adhesive joining layers.\n\n## Pilot plan\n\nUse existing characterized foams or facility-made samples. Measure density and pore profiles before loading. Record complete force-displacement loops and local strain, then compare recovery across independent samples.\n\n## What would count against it\n\nStop if matching mean density requires unmatched chemistry or bonded layers dominate the result. Reject the directional prediction if recovery is equal at matched strain histories.\n\n## Replication and analysis\n\nTreat separately prepared specimens, batches, or devices as independent units. Technical repeats and images are nested measurements. First estimate calibration error and independent-preparation variability. Set the minimum meaningful effect in the primary outcome's units before confirmation, then choose sample size from that effect and pilot variance; a convenient pilot count is not a powered study.\n\nRandomize run order and blind sample labels where practical. Freeze image processing, fitting choices, exclusions, and the primary comparison before evaluating confirmatory data. Report effect size and uncertainty; use a blocked or mixed-effects analysis when specimens share a batch. A wide interval is inconclusive. Include the measurement and matching controls even when the directional effect appears large.\n\nA useful go/no-go gate is whether the hypothesized effect can be distinguished from calibration uncertainty and the strongest alternative explanation. Stop material purchases if the closest literature already measures the identical contrast, unless a replication has an explicit purpose. Do not use these abbreviated plans as complete laboratory protocols.\n\n## Data to preserve\n\nKeep unedited images or sensor streams, calibration files, preparation IDs, run order, environmental logs, input histories, raw outcome values, exclusions, and the exact analysis version. No values are prefilled in the observation template. Use `data/Published Benchmarks.csv` only as literature context; values from a different system are not observations of this hypothesis.\n\n## Sources and transfer limits\n\n### FOAM20\n\n[Compression properties of polymeric syntactic foam composites under cyclic loading](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.107764)\n\nAccess: Indexed abstract, experimental description, and conclusions examined. Type: primary experiment.\n\nBackground findings and transfer limits: see [source assessments](../research/Primary%20Source%20Assessments.md) under this source key.\n\n### FOAM23\n\n[Quasi-Static Mechanical Response of Density-Graded Polyurea Elastomeric Foams](https://doi.org/10.1021/acsapm.3c00062)\n\nAccess: Indexed article sections examined; direct publisher fetch restricted. Type: primary experiment.\n\nBackground findings and transfer limits: see [source assessments](../research/Primary%20Source%20Assessments.md) under this source key.\n\n### FOAM22\n\n[Tuning the Mechanical Behavior of Density-Graded Elastomeric Foam Structures via Interlayer Properties](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9607669/)\n\nAccess: Indexed article sections examined. Type: primary experimental/modeling study.\n\nBackground findings and transfer limits: see [source assessments](../research/Primary%20Source%20Assessments.md) under this source key.\n\n"
  },
  {
    "id": 13,
    "title": "Reversible bonds could benefit from irregular rest intervals",
    "hypothesis": "A reversible-bond hydrogel will recover more fracture resistance under alternating short and long rest intervals than under equal rest intervals with the same total rest time.",
    "test": "Apply matched subcritical loading cycles and measure subsequent fracture energy; include a permanently cross-linked gel control.",
    "against": "Recovery follows total rest time alone or the same pattern appears in the permanent-bond control.",
    "category": "B. Materials and mechanical behavior",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Reversible bonds could benefit from irregular rest intervals",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0013",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 14,
    "title": "Interfacial texture could redirect delamination",
    "hypothesis": "Shallow sinusoidal interfacial grooves will steer delamination into a longer path and increase fracture energy relative to straight grooves with equal area and depth.",
    "test": "Conduct peel tests on matched bonded strips; image the crack path and measure adhesive thickness and surface area.",
    "against": "Energy differences disappear after area correction or the crack bypasses the patterned interface.",
    "category": "B. Materials and mechanical behavior",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Interfacial texture could redirect delamination",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 3,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 180,
    "literature_query": "Interfacial texture could redirect delamination Shallow sinusoidal grooves steer longer path fracture energy experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0014",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 14,
      "title": "Interfacial texture could redirect delamination",
      "hypothesis": "Shallow sinusoidal interfacial grooves will steer delamination into a longer path and increase fracture energy relative to straight grooves with equal area and depth.",
      "test": "Conduct peel tests on matched bonded strips; image the crack path and measure adhesive thickness and surface area.",
      "against": "Energy differences disappear after area correction or the crack bypasses the patterned interface.",
      "category": "B. Materials and mechanical behavior",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Interfacial texture could redirect delamination",
      "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 3,
      "screen_score": 26,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 180,
      "literature_query": "Interfacial texture could redirect delamination Shallow sinusoidal grooves steer longer path fracture energy experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 3,
      "source_ids": "S0523c40d4677;S0326d06260dd;S4465781110e0",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 15,
    "title": "Filler spacing could control heat-induced crack initiation",
    "hypothesis": "At fixed filler volume fraction, a narrow distribution of particle-to-particle spacings will delay thermal-cycle crack initiation in a brittle composite relative to clustered particles.",
    "test": "Prepare dispersed and clustered samples with matched porosity; thermal-cycle them and image the first cracks.",
    "against": "Initiation times do not differ or track porosity rather than spacing.",
    "category": "B. Materials and mechanical behavior",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Filler spacing could control heat-induced crack initiation",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 50,
    "literature_query": "Filler spacing could control heat-induced crack initiation At fixed volume fraction narrow distribution experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0015",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 15,
      "title": "Filler spacing could control heat-induced crack initiation",
      "hypothesis": "At fixed filler volume fraction, a narrow distribution of particle-to-particle spacings will delay thermal-cycle crack initiation in a brittle composite relative to clustered particles.",
      "test": "Prepare dispersed and clustered samples with matched porosity; thermal-cycle them and image the first cracks.",
      "against": "Initiation times do not differ or track porosity rather than spacing.",
      "category": "B. Materials and mechanical behavior",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Filler spacing could control heat-induced crack initiation",
      "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 50,
      "literature_query": "Filler spacing could control heat-induced crack initiation At fixed volume fraction narrow distribution experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 2,
      "source_ids": "S933ac81a24f2;S95e8db1cfadf",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 16,
    "title": "Precompression could tune acoustic damping reversibly",
    "hypothesis": "A soft lattice containing near-contact struts will exhibit a maximum in acoustic damping at an intermediate static precompression where contacts repeatedly open and close.",
    "test": "Sweep precompression while measuring vibration decay and imaging contacts; compare with a lattice lacking near-contact gaps.",
    "against": "No intermediate maximum occurs or it persists unchanged without intermittent contacts.",
    "category": "B. Materials and mechanical behavior",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Precompression could tune acoustic damping reversibly",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 51,
    "literature_query": "Precompression could tune acoustic damping reversibly soft lattice containing near-contact struts exhibit maximum experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0016",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 16,
      "title": "Precompression could tune acoustic damping reversibly",
      "hypothesis": "A soft lattice containing near-contact struts will exhibit a maximum in acoustic damping at an intermediate static precompression where contacts repeatedly open and close.",
      "test": "Sweep precompression while measuring vibration decay and imaging contacts; compare with a lattice lacking near-contact gaps.",
      "against": "No intermediate maximum occurs or it persists unchanged without intermittent contacts.",
      "category": "B. Materials and mechanical behavior",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Precompression could tune acoustic damping reversibly",
      "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 51,
      "literature_query": "Precompression could tune acoustic damping reversibly soft lattice containing near-contact struts exhibit maximum experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 5,
      "source_ids": "S3dc442ee1111;S4d78893b42a9;S5b3a37984bcb;S69937b1fd744;S04c5cbe4e544",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 17,
    "title": "Alternating swelling layers could resist crease formation",
    "hypothesis": "A hydrogel bilayer with fine alternating high- and low-swelling stripes will delay large surface creases relative to a compositionally uniform bilayer with the same average swelling.",
    "test": "Track swelling and surface shape in matched samples; vary stripe period and measure the strain at first crease formation.",
    "against": "Creasing starts at the same or lower strain throughout the tested periods.",
    "category": "B. Materials and mechanical behavior",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Alternating swelling layers could resist crease formation",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0017",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 18,
    "title": "Defect gradients could arrest lattice failure",
    "hypothesis": "A gradual increase in deliberately missing struts toward a lattice boundary will reduce abrupt catastrophic failure compared with randomly placed missing struts of the same total number.",
    "test": "Compress printed lattices; compare load drops, energy absorption, and failure progression while matching print orientation.",
    "against": "Failure remains equally abrupt or energy absorption declines without improved stability.",
    "category": "B. Materials and mechanical behavior",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Defect gradients could arrest lattice failure",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 52,
    "literature_query": "Defect gradients could arrest lattice failure gradual in deliberately missing struts toward boundary experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0018",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 18,
      "title": "Defect gradients could arrest lattice failure",
      "hypothesis": "A gradual increase in deliberately missing struts toward a lattice boundary will reduce abrupt catastrophic failure compared with randomly placed missing struts of the same total number.",
      "test": "Compress printed lattices; compare load drops, energy absorption, and failure progression while matching print orientation.",
      "against": "Failure remains equally abrupt or energy absorption declines without improved stability.",
      "category": "B. Materials and mechanical behavior",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Defect gradients could arrest lattice failure",
      "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 52,
      "literature_query": "Defect gradients could arrest lattice failure gradual in deliberately missing struts toward boundary experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 3,
      "source_ids": "S9b14bdde1af1;S3d866c7247bf;S65651e2a7266",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 19,
    "title": "Moisture pulses could distinguish polymer aging mechanisms",
    "hypothesis": "A biodegradable polymer film will lose tensile strength faster under alternating wet and dry periods than under constant intermediate humidity with the same time-integrated water uptake.",
    "test": "Measure water uptake, molecular mass, and tensile strength during both exposures at fixed temperature.",
    "against": "Strength and molecular-mass changes agree once actual absorbed-water exposure is matched.",
    "category": "B. Materials and mechanical behavior",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Moisture pulses could distinguish polymer aging mechanisms",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0019",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 20,
    "title": "Particle shape mixtures could reduce granular settling",
    "hypothesis": "Adding a small fraction of mildly elongated grains to spherical grains will reduce vibration-induced bed compaction by forming transient interlocking structures.",
    "test": "Vibrate matched beds at controlled acceleration; measure packing fraction and image rearrangements across several shape fractions.",
    "against": "Compaction does not decrease or differences are explained by initial packing fraction alone.",
    "category": "B. Materials and mechanical behavior",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Particle shape mixtures could reduce granular settling",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 30,
    "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 3,
    "literature_query": "Particle shape mixtures could granular settling Adding fraction of mildly elongated grains to experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0020",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": true,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 20,
      "title": "Particle shape mixtures could reduce granular settling",
      "hypothesis": "Adding a small fraction of mildly elongated grains to spherical grains will reduce vibration-induced bed compaction by forming transient interlocking structures.",
      "test": "Vibrate matched beds at controlled acceleration; measure packing fraction and image rearrangements across several shape fractions.",
      "against": "Compaction does not decrease or differences are explained by initial packing fraction alone.",
      "category": "B. Materials and mechanical behavior",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Particle shape mixtures could reduce granular settling",
      "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
      "access_score": 4,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 30,
      "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 3,
      "literature_query": "Particle shape mixtures could granular settling Adding fraction of mildly elongated grains to experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 11,
      "source_ids": "S110391b140e3;S6cce9c428461;S9d0f127bb051;Se339c41926d2;S8b3b853b6421;Sd3e1fd4d9653;Sd803f1dcc4af;S12a2e8a055ac;Sfb38f343b853;Sf3fa9a787f2f;S60fed4b594dd",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Nonspherical grain packing and mixing are studied. Verify the small elongated-grain fraction, matched initial packing, and weak-vibration compaction regime.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": {
      "deep_rank": "13",
      "id": "20",
      "title": "Particle shape mixtures could reduce granular settling",
      "original_300_rank": "3",
      "pilot_class": "C",
      "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
      "hypothesis": "Adding a small fraction of mildly elongated grains to spherical grains will reduce vibration-induced bed compaction by forming transient interlocking structures.",
      "primary_outcome": "Change in bed packing fraction after a prescribed weak-vibration dose.",
      "comparison": "Spheres alone versus several small fractions of mildly elongated grains; include matched-friction shape controls.",
      "controls": "Initial packing, grain volume and density, friction, aspect ratio, acceleration waveform, container size, and vibration work.",
      "pilot": "Calibrate bed volume from images and grain mass. Measure acceleration on the container. Test a small composition sweep before choosing one fraction for independent confirmation.",
      "novelty_gap": "Cylinder-sphere vibrated mixtures are already studied. The claim must stay restricted to a small elongated-grain fraction and reduced compaction from transient interlocking.",
      "stop_rule": "Abandon the interlocking explanation if the difference is fully attributable to higher initial packing or different friction. A reversed compaction effect is a useful negative result.",
      "source_keys": "GRAIN17;GRAIN15",
      "truth_probability": "not estimated",
      "novelty_status": "unverified"
    },
    "dossier_text": "# 13. H0020 — Particle shape mixtures could reduce granular settling\n\nOriginal 300-folder rank: 3. Pilot class: C. Resource class: modest bench or workshop; calibration still required.\n\n## Original hypothesis\n\nAdding a small fraction of mildly elongated grains to spherical grains will reduce vibration-induced bed compaction by forming transient interlocking structures.\n\n## Why investigate this\n\nAn enclosed granular bed provides a cheap, repeatable physical system; packing change is measurable without specialist chemistry.\n\n## Literature assessment and exact novelty question\n\nCylinder-sphere vibrated mixtures are already studied. The claim must stay restricted to a small elongated-grain fraction and reduced compaction from transient interlocking. Worldwide originality remains unverified.\n\n## Primary measurement\n\nChange in bed packing fraction after a prescribed weak-vibration dose.\n\n## Comparison\n\nSpheres alone versus several small fractions of mildly elongated grains; include matched-friction shape controls.\n\n## Critical controls\n\nInitial packing, grain volume and density, friction, aspect ratio, acceleration waveform, container size, and vibration work.\n\n## Pilot plan\n\nCalibrate bed volume from images and grain mass. Measure acceleration on the container. Test a small composition sweep before choosing one fraction for independent confirmation.\n\n## What would count against it\n\nAbandon the interlocking explanation if the difference is fully attributable to higher initial packing or different friction. A reversed compaction effect is a useful negative result.\n\n## Replication and analysis\n\nTreat separately prepared specimens, batches, or devices as independent units. Technical repeats and images are nested measurements. First estimate calibration error and independent-preparation variability. Set the minimum meaningful effect in the primary outcome's units before confirmation, then choose sample size from that effect and pilot variance; a convenient pilot count is not a powered study.\n\nRandomize run order and blind sample labels where practical. Freeze image processing, fitting choices, exclusions, and the primary comparison before evaluating confirmatory data. Report effect size and uncertainty; use a blocked or mixed-effects analysis when specimens share a batch. A wide interval is inconclusive. Include the measurement and matching controls even when the directional effect appears large.\n\nA useful go/no-go gate is whether the hypothesized effect can be distinguished from calibration uncertainty and the strongest alternative explanation. Stop material purchases if the closest literature already measures the identical contrast, unless a replication has an explicit purpose. Do not use these abbreviated plans as complete laboratory protocols.\n\n## Data to preserve\n\nKeep unedited images or sensor streams, calibration files, preparation IDs, run order, environmental logs, input histories, raw outcome values, exclusions, and the exact analysis version. No values are prefilled in the observation template. Use `data/Published Benchmarks.csv` only as literature context; values from a different system are not observations of this hypothesis.\n\n## Sources and transfer limits\n\n### GRAIN17\n\n[Experimental study on the packing densification of mixtures of spherical and cylindrical particles subjected to 3D vibrations](https://doi.org/10.1080/02726351.2017.1373378)\n\nAccess: Indexed abstract examined. Type: primary experiment.\n\nBackground findings and transfer limits: see [source assessments](../research/Primary%20Source%20Assessments.md) under this source key.\n\n### GRAIN15\n\n[Experimental study on the 3D vibrated packing densification of binary sphere mixtures](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674200115001492)\n\nAccess: Indexed abstract examined. Type: primary experiment.\n\nBackground findings and transfer limits: see [source assessments](../research/Primary%20Source%20Assessments.md) under this source key.\n\n"
  },
  {
    "id": 21,
    "title": "Thermal asymmetry could rectify transient cooling",
    "hypothesis": "A layered solid with temperature-dependent conductivity will show different cooling transients when its layer order is reversed, even with matched total heat capacity and identical boundary contacts.",
    "test": "Apply equal heat pulses to reversed stacks; measure internal temperatures and independently calibrate contact resistance.",
    "against": "Reversal differences disappear after contact resistance and boundary losses are included.",
    "category": "C. Heat and energy transport",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Thermal asymmetry could rectify transient cooling",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0021",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 22,
    "title": "Phase-change pore spacing could reduce thermal overshoot",
    "hypothesis": "Separating phase-change material into closely spaced cavities will reduce peak temperature during short heat pulses relative to one cavity of equal total volume.",
    "test": "Compare matched heat spreaders across pulse durations; measure melt fraction and peak temperature with equal input energy.",
    "against": "Peak reduction is absent or attributable solely to extra conductive material.",
    "category": "C. Heat and energy transport",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Phase-change pore spacing could reduce thermal overshoot",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 53,
    "literature_query": "Phase-change pore spacing could thermal overshoot Separating material closely spaced cavities peak temperature experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0022",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 22,
      "title": "Phase-change pore spacing could reduce thermal overshoot",
      "hypothesis": "Separating phase-change material into closely spaced cavities will reduce peak temperature during short heat pulses relative to one cavity of equal total volume.",
      "test": "Compare matched heat spreaders across pulse durations; measure melt fraction and peak temperature with equal input energy.",
      "against": "Peak reduction is absent or attributable solely to extra conductive material.",
      "category": "C. Heat and energy transport",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Phase-change pore spacing could reduce thermal overshoot",
      "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 53,
      "literature_query": "Phase-change pore spacing could thermal overshoot Separating material closely spaced cavities peak temperature experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 5,
      "source_ids": "S2141567c6f1f;S4b96bfae1940;S326e8a423fd6;S198db7edbea1;Sf2b45c478d93",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 23,
    "title": "Humidity could produce a thermal-contact memory",
    "hypothesis": "A porous ceramic contact will retain a measurable change in thermal conductance after a humidity pulse because liquid bridges persist at asperities.",
    "test": "Measure conductance before, during, and after humidity exposure at fixed contact force; compare nonporous and hydrophobized controls.",
    "against": "Conductance returns immediately or follows instrument drift rather than retained water.",
    "category": "C. Heat and energy transport",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Humidity could produce a thermal-contact memory",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 54,
    "literature_query": "Humidity could produce thermal-contact memory porous ceramic contact retain measurable change in thermal experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0023",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 23,
      "title": "Humidity could produce a thermal-contact memory",
      "hypothesis": "A porous ceramic contact will retain a measurable change in thermal conductance after a humidity pulse because liquid bridges persist at asperities.",
      "test": "Measure conductance before, during, and after humidity exposure at fixed contact force; compare nonporous and hydrophobized controls.",
      "against": "Conductance returns immediately or follows instrument drift rather than retained water.",
      "category": "C. Heat and energy transport",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Humidity could produce a thermal-contact memory",
      "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 54,
      "literature_query": "Humidity could produce thermal-contact memory porous ceramic contact retain measurable change in thermal experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 5,
      "source_ids": "S082cab45d1fa;Sd88a08e92170;Sc5ce83d7de70;S846f7cc83805;Sc83385e8605c",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 24,
    "title": "Unequal fin spacing could delay convection onset",
    "hypothesis": "Slightly alternating fin gaps will shift the onset of oscillatory natural convection compared with uniform gaps at equal average spacing and surface area.",
    "test": "Sweep heat input in matched fin arrays; measure temperature fluctuations and flow fields in still air.",
    "against": "Onset conditions agree within uncertainty after geometry and temperature are matched.",
    "category": "C. Heat and energy transport",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Unequal fin spacing could delay convection onset",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 3,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0024",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 25,
    "title": "Flow pauses could improve heat removal per pumping energy",
    "hypothesis": "Short pauses in microchannel coolant flow will improve heat removed per unit pumping energy over steady flow in a limited regime where boundary layers repeatedly reform.",
    "test": "Compare steady and pulsed flow at equal mean pumping power and heat input; measure maximum wall temperature as well as total heat removal.",
    "against": "Any apparent efficiency gain disappears when actual hydraulic work and temperature excursions are included.",
    "category": "C. Heat and energy transport",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Flow pauses could improve heat removal per pumping energy",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 55,
    "literature_query": "Flow pauses could improve heat removal per pumping energy Short in microchannel coolant experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0025",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 25,
      "title": "Flow pauses could improve heat removal per pumping energy",
      "hypothesis": "Short pauses in microchannel coolant flow will improve heat removed per unit pumping energy over steady flow in a limited regime where boundary layers repeatedly reform.",
      "test": "Compare steady and pulsed flow at equal mean pumping power and heat input; measure maximum wall temperature as well as total heat removal.",
      "against": "Any apparent efficiency gain disappears when actual hydraulic work and temperature excursions are included.",
      "category": "C. Heat and energy transport",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Flow pauses could improve heat removal per pumping energy",
      "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 55,
      "literature_query": "Flow pauses could improve heat removal per pumping energy Short in microchannel coolant experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 4,
      "source_ids": "Sf16dfaa7e42d;Sf00f37bf7bc3;S6cafff37070a;S02970b7d4403",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 26,
    "title": "Particle alignment could decouple heat flow directions",
    "hypothesis": "Aligning elongated insulating inclusions in a conductive composite will suppress transverse thermal conductivity more strongly than longitudinal conductivity at low inclusion fractions.",
    "test": "Measure both directions in aligned and random samples; characterize voids, inclusion orientation, and electrical conductivity separately.",
    "against": "Thermal anisotropy is absent or follows unintended void alignment.",
    "category": "C. Heat and energy transport",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Particle alignment could decouple heat flow directions",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 56,
    "literature_query": "Particle alignment could decouple heat flow directions Aligning elongated insulating inclusions in conductive experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0026",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 26,
      "title": "Particle alignment could decouple heat flow directions",
      "hypothesis": "Aligning elongated insulating inclusions in a conductive composite will suppress transverse thermal conductivity more strongly than longitudinal conductivity at low inclusion fractions.",
      "test": "Measure both directions in aligned and random samples; characterize voids, inclusion orientation, and electrical conductivity separately.",
      "against": "Thermal anisotropy is absent or follows unintended void alignment.",
      "category": "C. Heat and energy transport",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Particle alignment could decouple heat flow directions",
      "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 56,
      "literature_query": "Particle alignment could decouple heat flow directions Aligning elongated insulating inclusions in conductive experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 6,
      "source_ids": "S877346e91888;Sa16160d3678d;S0b6156a2561f;Sd419f87b4d75;S1d2515204e7c;Scbbf3ec6ae90",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 27,
    "title": "Freeze-front modulation could suppress large ice lenses",
    "hypothesis": "Brief pauses in directional freezing of a water-saturated porous material will reduce the largest ice-lens thickness relative to continuous freezing with the same overall advance time.",
    "test": "Image ice formation in transparent model sediments while matching initial saturation and average front velocity.",
    "against": "Maximum lens thickness is unchanged or grows under interrupted freezing.",
    "category": "C. Heat and energy transport",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Freeze-front modulation could suppress large ice lenses",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 57,
    "literature_query": "Freeze-front modulation could suppress large ice lenses Brief pauses in directional freezing of experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0027",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 27,
      "title": "Freeze-front modulation could suppress large ice lenses",
      "hypothesis": "Brief pauses in directional freezing of a water-saturated porous material will reduce the largest ice-lens thickness relative to continuous freezing with the same overall advance time.",
      "test": "Image ice formation in transparent model sediments while matching initial saturation and average front velocity.",
      "against": "Maximum lens thickness is unchanged or grows under interrupted freezing.",
      "category": "C. Heat and energy transport",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Freeze-front modulation could suppress large ice lenses",
      "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 57,
      "literature_query": "Freeze-front modulation could suppress large ice lenses Brief pauses in directional freezing of experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 6,
      "source_ids": "S5945dc38cb42;Se248bee1b7a2;S0332cfb813ef;S53721329ee6c;Sbe1bd1c8c387;Se337e656eff4",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 28,
    "title": "Radiative patterns could affect dew without changing average cooling",
    "hypothesis": "Alternating high- and low-emissivity patches will concentrate dew into larger, more readily shed droplets than a uniform surface with the same average nighttime cooling power.",
    "test": "Use a controlled radiative-cooling chamber; map local temperature, droplet size, and collected water for matched surface chemistry.",
    "against": "Collection gains disappear when local temperature and wettability differences are controlled.",
    "category": "C. Heat and energy transport",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Radiative patterns could affect dew without changing average cooling",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0028",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 29,
    "title": "Granular thermal conductivity could remember shear direction",
    "hypothesis": "A sheared bed of nonspherical ceramic grains will retain directional thermal conductivity after shear stops because its contact network remains anisotropic.",
    "test": "Measure conductivity in multiple directions before and after controlled shear; image grain orientation and hold packing fraction constant.",
    "against": "Anisotropy vanishes on stopping shear or is fully explained by bulk density changes.",
    "category": "C. Heat and energy transport",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Granular thermal conductivity could remember shear direction",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "excluded: broad prior-art overlap",
    "rank": 12,
    "literature_query": "Granular thermal conductivity could remember shear direction sheared bed of nonspherical ceramic grains experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0029",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 30,
    "title": "Wicking-path branching could stabilize evaporative cooling",
    "hypothesis": "A branching wick will maintain a lower temperature variance during fluctuating heat input than parallel straight wicks with equal liquid conductance and evaporating area.",
    "test": "Compare matched wick systems under repeatable heat pulses; image dry patches and measure replenishment rates.",
    "against": "Temperature variance and dryout frequency are unchanged at matched conductance.",
    "category": "C. Heat and energy transport",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Wicking-path branching could stabilize evaporative cooling",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 58,
    "literature_query": "Wicking-path branching could stabilize evaporative cooling wick maintain lower temperature variance fluctuating heat experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0030",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 30,
      "title": "Wicking-path branching could stabilize evaporative cooling",
      "hypothesis": "A branching wick will maintain a lower temperature variance during fluctuating heat input than parallel straight wicks with equal liquid conductance and evaporating area.",
      "test": "Compare matched wick systems under repeatable heat pulses; image dry patches and measure replenishment rates.",
      "against": "Temperature variance and dryout frequency are unchanged at matched conductance.",
      "category": "C. Heat and energy transport",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Wicking-path branching could stabilize evaporative cooling",
      "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 58,
      "literature_query": "Wicking-path branching could stabilize evaporative cooling wick maintain lower temperature variance fluctuating heat experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 5,
      "source_ids": "Sb3198e30159a;S3fcb17b62cd8;S00eb4cc22a1c;S4f1d04b9efcb;S242c92a3e16f",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 31,
    "title": "Controlled disorder could widen an optical absorption band",
    "hypothesis": "Small correlated variations in resonator spacing will broaden a thin optical absorber's useful band without reducing integrated absorption as much as equally strong uncorrelated disorder.",
    "test": "Compare correlated, random, and periodic patterned samples by angle-resolved spectroscopy, using matched material volume.",
    "against": "Correlated disorder offers no reproducible bandwidth–absorption advantage.",
    "category": "D. Light and optical sensing",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Controlled disorder could widen an optical absorption band",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 249,
    "literature_query": "Controlled disorder could widen an optical absorption band correlated variations in resonator spacing experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0031",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 31,
      "title": "Controlled disorder could widen an optical absorption band",
      "hypothesis": "Small correlated variations in resonator spacing will broaden a thin optical absorber's useful band without reducing integrated absorption as much as equally strong uncorrelated disorder.",
      "test": "Compare correlated, random, and periodic patterned samples by angle-resolved spectroscopy, using matched material volume.",
      "against": "Correlated disorder offers no reproducible bandwidth–absorption advantage.",
      "category": "D. Light and optical sensing",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Controlled disorder could widen an optical absorption band",
      "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
      "access_score": 2,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 249,
      "literature_query": "Controlled disorder could widen an optical absorption band correlated variations in resonator spacing experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 5,
      "source_ids": "S16138cb037e8;Seb8ff9378d3d;Sfda8d4f1a408;Scfe53ca07bcc;S30be825a6f2c",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 32,
    "title": "Swelling gradients could separate humidity from temperature signals",
    "hypothesis": "Two optically coupled polymer layers with different water uptake will produce a pair of spectral shifts that distinguishes humidity changes from temperature changes better than one layer.",
    "test": "Independently sweep temperature and humidity, calibrate both resonances, and validate on held-out environmental cycles.",
    "against": "The two responses remain too similar to separate the variables within measurement noise.",
    "category": "D. Light and optical sensing",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Swelling gradients could separate humidity from temperature signals",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 25,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 220,
    "literature_query": "Swelling gradients could separate humidity temperature signals optically coupled polymer layers different water experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0032",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 32,
      "title": "Swelling gradients could separate humidity from temperature signals",
      "hypothesis": "Two optically coupled polymer layers with different water uptake will produce a pair of spectral shifts that distinguishes humidity changes from temperature changes better than one layer.",
      "test": "Independently sweep temperature and humidity, calibrate both resonances, and validate on held-out environmental cycles.",
      "against": "The two responses remain too similar to separate the variables within measurement noise.",
      "category": "D. Light and optical sensing",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Swelling gradients could separate humidity from temperature signals",
      "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 25,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 220,
      "literature_query": "Swelling gradients could separate humidity temperature signals optically coupled polymer layers different water experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 6,
      "source_ids": "Sa5d0a9c29f7f;S25bb6aeed5bb;Sbdb2be4816fb;S48e77d6905b5;S33beaf81c0e1;S97d7e756cee7",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 33,
    "title": "Pore orientation could identify condensation onset optically",
    "hypothesis": "An anisotropic porous film will show a change in polarization-dependent scattering before visible bulk condensation because its smallest pores fill first.",
    "test": "Record polarized scattering and water uptake during slow humidity ramps; compare isotropic films with matched pore volume.",
    "against": "No earlier polarization signal occurs or the signal tracks temperature drift.",
    "category": "D. Light and optical sensing",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Pore orientation could identify condensation onset optically",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 59,
    "literature_query": "Pore orientation could identify condensation onset optically An anisotropic porous film show change experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0033",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 33,
      "title": "Pore orientation could identify condensation onset optically",
      "hypothesis": "An anisotropic porous film will show a change in polarization-dependent scattering before visible bulk condensation because its smallest pores fill first.",
      "test": "Record polarized scattering and water uptake during slow humidity ramps; compare isotropic films with matched pore volume.",
      "against": "No earlier polarization signal occurs or the signal tracks temperature drift.",
      "category": "D. Light and optical sensing",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Pore orientation could identify condensation onset optically",
      "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 59,
      "literature_query": "Pore orientation could identify condensation onset optically An anisotropic porous film show change experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 6,
      "source_ids": "S4c5918a58250;Sd48e5ed82f64;Sa87ddca6558b;S078f68d93a7d;Sd59281f09ef5;S39aa160eb81b",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 34,
    "title": "Gentle vibration could reduce optical fouling accumulation",
    "hypothesis": "Intermittent low-amplitude vibration of a submerged optical window will reduce particle adhesion at lower average energy than continuous vibration with equal peak amplitude.",
    "test": "Monitor transmission and deposited mass in a standard inert-particle suspension; compare equal-energy schedules and stationary controls.",
    "against": "Pulsing provides no fouling reduction per unit energy or merely resuspends particles elsewhere in the beam.",
    "category": "D. Light and optical sensing",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Gentle vibration could reduce optical fouling accumulation",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 60,
    "literature_query": "Gentle vibration could optical fouling accumulation Intermittent low-amplitude of submerged window particle adhesion experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0034",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 34,
      "title": "Gentle vibration could reduce optical fouling accumulation",
      "hypothesis": "Intermittent low-amplitude vibration of a submerged optical window will reduce particle adhesion at lower average energy than continuous vibration with equal peak amplitude.",
      "test": "Monitor transmission and deposited mass in a standard inert-particle suspension; compare equal-energy schedules and stationary controls.",
      "against": "Pulsing provides no fouling reduction per unit energy or merely resuspends particles elsewhere in the beam.",
      "category": "D. Light and optical sensing",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Gentle vibration could reduce optical fouling accumulation",
      "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 60,
      "literature_query": "Gentle vibration could optical fouling accumulation Intermittent low-amplitude of submerged window particle adhesion experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 7,
      "source_ids": "Sf87ecd7b3aab;Sd855e71c61f5;Sf17907800070;S742db078da9a;Sd191957393e4;Sc65faf3d5991;S7f89a1e21ac0",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 35,
    "title": "Layer-order reversal could expose optical aging location",
    "hypothesis": "A two-layer luminescent sensor with distinct emission bands will reveal whether degradation begins near the exposed surface through a layer-order-dependent change in emission ratio.",
    "test": "Age reversed stacks under matched light and oxygen exposure; measure emission spectra and depth-resolved chemical changes.",
    "against": "Ratios do not identify the damaged layer or are dominated by changing reabsorption.",
    "category": "D. Light and optical sensing",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Layer-order reversal could expose optical aging location",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 61,
    "literature_query": "Layer-order reversal could expose optical aging location two-layer luminescent sensor distinct emission bands experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0035",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 35,
      "title": "Layer-order reversal could expose optical aging location",
      "hypothesis": "A two-layer luminescent sensor with distinct emission bands will reveal whether degradation begins near the exposed surface through a layer-order-dependent change in emission ratio.",
      "test": "Age reversed stacks under matched light and oxygen exposure; measure emission spectra and depth-resolved chemical changes.",
      "against": "Ratios do not identify the damaged layer or are dominated by changing reabsorption.",
      "category": "D. Light and optical sensing",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Layer-order reversal could expose optical aging location",
      "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 61,
      "literature_query": "Layer-order reversal could expose optical aging location two-layer luminescent sensor distinct emission bands experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 7,
      "source_ids": "Sd37ad70d1272;Sd915f81d6fbe;S2631dbecb6c7;S6247b20bd427;S8f7f6689aea0;S9be4e8bffbc3;S0be55b84c616",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 36,
    "title": "Reversible wrinkles could tune diffuse reflection",
    "hypothesis": "A transparent elastic film with reversible wrinkles will vary its diffuse-to-specular reflection ratio predictably with strain while approximately preserving total reflected power.",
    "test": "Measure angular reflection and wrinkle geometry through repeated strain cycles; include flat-film and permanently rough controls.",
    "against": "Reflection changes are dominated by absorption or show irreproducible strain hysteresis.",
    "category": "D. Light and optical sensing",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Reversible wrinkles could tune diffuse reflection",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 62,
    "literature_query": "Reversible wrinkles could tune diffuse reflection transparent elastic film vary diffuse-to-specular ratio predictably experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0036",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 36,
      "title": "Reversible wrinkles could tune diffuse reflection",
      "hypothesis": "A transparent elastic film with reversible wrinkles will vary its diffuse-to-specular reflection ratio predictably with strain while approximately preserving total reflected power.",
      "test": "Measure angular reflection and wrinkle geometry through repeated strain cycles; include flat-film and permanently rough controls.",
      "against": "Reflection changes are dominated by absorption or show irreproducible strain hysteresis.",
      "category": "D. Light and optical sensing",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Reversible wrinkles could tune diffuse reflection",
      "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 62,
      "literature_query": "Reversible wrinkles could tune diffuse reflection transparent elastic film vary diffuse-to-specular ratio predictably experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 7,
      "source_ids": "S7347dd161718;Se040f63c8cc9;S422e684b447d;Se39f1f6d3305;S5558f6f134b9;S9365e573cc19;S500e17e37862",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 37,
    "title": "Spectral fluctuations could detect single-pore blockage",
    "hypothesis": "Partial blockage of a fluid-filled optical porous film will alter resonance fluctuation times before it produces a resolvable average wavelength shift.",
    "test": "Introduce inert blocking particles at low concentrations; compare spectral time series with microscopy of occupied pores and flow-only controls.",
    "against": "Fluctuation changes do not precede average shifts or occur equally without blockage.",
    "category": "D. Light and optical sensing",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Spectral fluctuations could detect single-pore blockage",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 250,
    "literature_query": "Spectral fluctuations could detect single-pore blockage Partial of fluid-filled optical porous film alter experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0037",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 37,
      "title": "Spectral fluctuations could detect single-pore blockage",
      "hypothesis": "Partial blockage of a fluid-filled optical porous film will alter resonance fluctuation times before it produces a resolvable average wavelength shift.",
      "test": "Introduce inert blocking particles at low concentrations; compare spectral time series with microscopy of occupied pores and flow-only controls.",
      "against": "Fluctuation changes do not precede average shifts or occur equally without blockage.",
      "category": "D. Light and optical sensing",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Spectral fluctuations could detect single-pore blockage",
      "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
      "access_score": 2,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 250,
      "literature_query": "Spectral fluctuations could detect single-pore blockage Partial of fluid-filled optical porous film alter experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 7,
      "source_ids": "Sb85d2f91c9af;S8f2542766ac2;S6cf9662e570e;S625a14011eed;Sd44814885788;S1cf7d794921e;S2aff81d42029",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 38,
    "title": "Shape mixtures could make scattering less angle-sensitive",
    "hypothesis": "A controlled mixture of two dielectric particle shapes will give a flatter angular scattering profile across a selected visible band than either shape alone at equal solids loading.",
    "test": "Measure wavelength- and angle-resolved scattering in dilute samples; verify size distributions and suppress multiple scattering.",
    "against": "Mixtures are no flatter than weighted single-shape measurements predict for the selected target profile.",
    "category": "D. Light and optical sensing",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Shape mixtures could make scattering less angle-sensitive",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 63,
    "literature_query": "Shape mixtures could make scattering angle-sensitive controlled mixture of dielectric particle shapes give experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0038",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 38,
      "title": "Shape mixtures could make scattering less angle-sensitive",
      "hypothesis": "A controlled mixture of two dielectric particle shapes will give a flatter angular scattering profile across a selected visible band than either shape alone at equal solids loading.",
      "test": "Measure wavelength- and angle-resolved scattering in dilute samples; verify size distributions and suppress multiple scattering.",
      "against": "Mixtures are no flatter than weighted single-shape measurements predict for the selected target profile.",
      "category": "D. Light and optical sensing",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Shape mixtures could make scattering less angle-sensitive",
      "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 63,
      "literature_query": "Shape mixtures could make scattering angle-sensitive controlled mixture of dielectric particle shapes give experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 4,
      "source_ids": "S6b216ae096e2;S52726c604976;S66c3e29cf37b;S4855086ce1a4",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 39,
    "title": "An optical cavity could amplify reversible solvent swelling",
    "hypothesis": "Placing a solvent-responsive thin film at an optical cavity field maximum will improve detectable concentration changes relative to an equal film outside the cavity, despite added cavity drift.",
    "test": "Compare calibrated vapor exposures using cavity, bare-film, and nonresponsive-reference sensors; include drift in detection-limit estimates.",
    "against": "The cavity offers no improvement in the measured detection limit after noise and drift are counted.",
    "category": "D. Light and optical sensing",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "An optical cavity could amplify reversible solvent swelling",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 251,
    "literature_query": "An optical cavity could amplify reversible solvent swelling Placing solvent-responsive thin film at experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0039",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 39,
      "title": "An optical cavity could amplify reversible solvent swelling",
      "hypothesis": "Placing a solvent-responsive thin film at an optical cavity field maximum will improve detectable concentration changes relative to an equal film outside the cavity, despite added cavity drift.",
      "test": "Compare calibrated vapor exposures using cavity, bare-film, and nonresponsive-reference sensors; include drift in detection-limit estimates.",
      "against": "The cavity offers no improvement in the measured detection limit after noise and drift are counted.",
      "category": "D. Light and optical sensing",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "An optical cavity could amplify reversible solvent swelling",
      "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
      "access_score": 2,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 251,
      "literature_query": "An optical cavity could amplify reversible solvent swelling Placing solvent-responsive thin film at experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 5,
      "source_ids": "S25bb6aeed5bb;Sef8bcfb53dc2;Scdc74c865e40;S1287f5e21299;Saab53511a87c",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 40,
    "title": "Directional illumination could distinguish surface from bulk scattering",
    "hypothesis": "Reversing illumination through an asymmetric transparent coating will change the ratio of surface-defect to bulk-particle scattering enough to separate the two contributions.",
    "test": "Prepare samples with known surface defects, bulk particles, or both; compare bidirectional scattering with a calibrated optical model.",
    "against": "The contributions cannot be recovered reliably on independently prepared samples.",
    "category": "D. Light and optical sensing",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Directional illumination could distinguish surface from bulk scattering",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "excluded: broad prior-art overlap",
    "rank": 289,
    "literature_query": "Directional illumination could distinguish surface bulk scattering Reversing through an asymmetric transparent coating experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0040",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 41,
    "title": "Rest pulses could reduce electrode concentration gradients",
    "hypothesis": "Short current interruptions during charging will reduce near-surface ion concentration gradients enough to improve charge efficiency at equal total charging time in a suitable aqueous model cell.",
    "test": "Compare matched charge schedules and delivered charge; measure concentration profiles, voltage losses, and recovered charge.",
    "against": "Efficiency gains disappear when time, charge, and side reactions are matched.",
    "category": "E. Electrochemistry and ionic systems",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Rest pulses could reduce electrode concentration gradients",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 25,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0041",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 42,
    "title": "Pore-size gradients could slow salt blockage",
    "hypothesis": "An electrode with pores widening toward the electrolyte reservoir will tolerate more salt precipitation before losing half its ionic conductance than the reversed gradient.",
    "test": "Cycle precipitation and dissolution in inert porous electrodes; match total porosity, surface chemistry, and salt inventory.",
    "against": "Orientation does not affect conductance retention or only changes initial conductance.",
    "category": "E. Electrochemistry and ionic systems",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Pore-size gradients could slow salt blockage",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 25,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 221,
    "literature_query": "Pore-size gradients could slow salt blockage An electrode pores widening toward electrolyte reservoir experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0042",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 42,
      "title": "Pore-size gradients could slow salt blockage",
      "hypothesis": "An electrode with pores widening toward the electrolyte reservoir will tolerate more salt precipitation before losing half its ionic conductance than the reversed gradient.",
      "test": "Cycle precipitation and dissolution in inert porous electrodes; match total porosity, surface chemistry, and salt inventory.",
      "against": "Orientation does not affect conductance retention or only changes initial conductance.",
      "category": "E. Electrochemistry and ionic systems",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Pore-size gradients could slow salt blockage",
      "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 25,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 221,
      "literature_query": "Pore-size gradients could slow salt blockage An electrode pores widening toward electrolyte reservoir experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 7,
      "source_ids": "Se2b95bd140fa;S6c4a6d921248;Sf463b4e90f0d;S1829b095f098;S9a93314f15e7;S4cf6cd5ac615;Se2de54eb4859",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 43,
    "title": "Binder distribution could alter wetting hysteresis",
    "hypothesis": "Localizing a hydrophobic binder at particle contacts will reduce electrolyte infiltration hysteresis compared with uniform binder coverage at the same binder fraction.",
    "test": "Measure infiltration and drainage curves in matched porous electrode samples; image binder distribution and pore structure.",
    "against": "Hysteresis remains unchanged after pore geometry is controlled.",
    "category": "E. Electrochemistry and ionic systems",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Binder distribution could alter wetting hysteresis",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 64,
    "literature_query": "Binder distribution could alter wetting hysteresis Localizing hydrophobic at particle contacts electrolyte infiltration experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0043",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 43,
      "title": "Binder distribution could alter wetting hysteresis",
      "hypothesis": "Localizing a hydrophobic binder at particle contacts will reduce electrolyte infiltration hysteresis compared with uniform binder coverage at the same binder fraction.",
      "test": "Measure infiltration and drainage curves in matched porous electrode samples; image binder distribution and pore structure.",
      "against": "Hysteresis remains unchanged after pore geometry is controlled.",
      "category": "E. Electrochemistry and ionic systems",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Binder distribution could alter wetting hysteresis",
      "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 64,
      "literature_query": "Binder distribution could alter wetting hysteresis Localizing hydrophobic at particle contacts electrolyte infiltration experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 7,
      "source_ids": "Sfd033164977b;Sf24e9147a8a2;S71a090be102b;S0ddb554d46ae;S4effdae0ae16;S8d77cc56d702;S9cbab23af1d2",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 44,
    "title": "Alternating ion-selective stripes could suppress concentration hotspots",
    "hypothesis": "Narrow alternating charged stripes on a membrane will reduce lateral concentration variation under current compared with large charged domains of the same net charge.",
    "test": "Image ion-sensitive fluorescence near membranes across stripe widths; measure current, temperature, and total ion transport.",
    "against": "Hotspots persist equally or reduced variation comes only from reduced overall transport.",
    "category": "E. Electrochemistry and ionic systems",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Alternating ion-selective stripes could suppress concentration hotspots",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0044",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 45,
    "title": "Electrode curvature could predict gas bubble residence",
    "hypothesis": "At fixed surface chemistry and current density, mildly convex electrode regions will have shorter gas-bubble residence times than flat regions because bubbles contact a smaller effective area.",
    "test": "Image gas evolution on matched curved and flat electrodes in a specialist laboratory; resolve local current density and surface roughness.",
    "against": "Residence times do not decrease after local current and roughness are accounted for.",
    "category": "E. Electrochemistry and ionic systems",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Electrode curvature could predict gas bubble residence",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0045",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 46,
    "title": "Mechanical relaxation could restore gel-electrolyte conductivity",
    "hypothesis": "After repeated compression, a physically cross-linked gel electrolyte will recover ionic conductivity on the same timescale as network stress relaxation, rather than solvent redistribution.",
    "test": "Measure conductivity, stress relaxation, and spatial solvent content during recovery; compare gels with different reversible bond lifetimes.",
    "against": "Recovery tracks solvent movement alone or does not change with bond lifetime.",
    "category": "E. Electrochemistry and ionic systems",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Mechanical relaxation could restore gel-electrolyte conductivity",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 65,
    "literature_query": "Mechanical relaxation could restore gel-electrolyte conductivity repeated compression physically cross-linked gel electrolyte recover experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0046",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 46,
      "title": "Mechanical relaxation could restore gel-electrolyte conductivity",
      "hypothesis": "After repeated compression, a physically cross-linked gel electrolyte will recover ionic conductivity on the same timescale as network stress relaxation, rather than solvent redistribution.",
      "test": "Measure conductivity, stress relaxation, and spatial solvent content during recovery; compare gels with different reversible bond lifetimes.",
      "against": "Recovery tracks solvent movement alone or does not change with bond lifetime.",
      "category": "E. Electrochemistry and ionic systems",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Mechanical relaxation could restore gel-electrolyte conductivity",
      "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 65,
      "literature_query": "Mechanical relaxation could restore gel-electrolyte conductivity repeated compression physically cross-linked gel electrolyte recover experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 7,
      "source_ids": "S24a3ad4240aa;Sce199abe03f5;Sa7acfb4d5e1e;S6318eaed1ee7;S5e015c440ecb;S49b94b22d8f2;S7c67a58f3d94",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 47,
    "title": "Substrate texture could narrow metal-deposition variability",
    "hypothesis": "An array of shallow identical pits will reduce spatial variation in initial metal nucleation density relative to a flat substrate at equal overpotential.",
    "test": "Use a controlled benign metal-deposition model, image early nuclei, and match surface chemistry and electrochemically active area.",
    "against": "Nucleation remains equally variable or concentrates unpredictably at defects outside the pits.",
    "category": "E. Electrochemistry and ionic systems",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Substrate texture could narrow metal-deposition variability",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 252,
    "literature_query": "Substrate texture could narrow metal-deposition variability An array of shallow identical pits spatial experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0047",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 47,
      "title": "Substrate texture could narrow metal-deposition variability",
      "hypothesis": "An array of shallow identical pits will reduce spatial variation in initial metal nucleation density relative to a flat substrate at equal overpotential.",
      "test": "Use a controlled benign metal-deposition model, image early nuclei, and match surface chemistry and electrochemically active area.",
      "against": "Nucleation remains equally variable or concentrates unpredictably at defects outside the pits.",
      "category": "E. Electrochemistry and ionic systems",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Substrate texture could narrow metal-deposition variability",
      "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
      "access_score": 2,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 252,
      "literature_query": "Substrate texture could narrow metal-deposition variability An array of shallow identical pits spatial experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 4,
      "source_ids": "Sb69327c5d9ec;Sef453e394775;See681e6fd188;S728c278e9e5a",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 48,
    "title": "Separator compression gradients could create ionic asymmetry",
    "hypothesis": "A separator compressed more strongly on one face will show direction-dependent transient ion transport after voltage reversal even when its steady-state resistance is symmetric.",
    "test": "Measure reversal transients in an otherwise symmetric cell; reverse the separator and compare uniformly compressed controls.",
    "against": "Transient asymmetry does not reverse with separator orientation or arises from electrode differences.",
    "category": "E. Electrochemistry and ionic systems",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Separator compression gradients could create ionic asymmetry",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 25,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0048",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 49,
    "title": "Redox cycling could distinguish accessible from trapped pores",
    "hypothesis": "The frequency dependence of a reversible redox probe response will estimate connected pore volume more accurately than total liquid uptake in a porous carbon.",
    "test": "Compare electrochemical frequency responses with tracer exchange and three-dimensional pore imaging across samples with known dead-end pores.",
    "against": "Estimated connected volume fails independent validation or depends mainly on uncontrolled surface chemistry.",
    "category": "E. Electrochemistry and ionic systems",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Redox cycling could distinguish accessible from trapped pores",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 253,
    "literature_query": "Redox cycling could distinguish accessible trapped pores frequency dependence of reversible probe response experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0049",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 49,
      "title": "Redox cycling could distinguish accessible from trapped pores",
      "hypothesis": "The frequency dependence of a reversible redox probe response will estimate connected pore volume more accurately than total liquid uptake in a porous carbon.",
      "test": "Compare electrochemical frequency responses with tracer exchange and three-dimensional pore imaging across samples with known dead-end pores.",
      "against": "Estimated connected volume fails independent validation or depends mainly on uncontrolled surface chemistry.",
      "category": "E. Electrochemistry and ionic systems",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Redox cycling could distinguish accessible from trapped pores",
      "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
      "access_score": 2,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 253,
      "literature_query": "Redox cycling could distinguish accessible trapped pores frequency dependence of reversible probe response experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 5,
      "source_ids": "S2d934760a472;S70a4233cf864;S41f585024338;S7a544e7b6c46;Sf1e36d2434c9",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 50,
    "title": "Salt mixtures could stabilize conductivity during drying",
    "hypothesis": "A gel containing two compatible salts with different water-binding tendencies will retain conductivity across partial drying better than either single-salt gel at equal initial ionic strength.",
    "test": "Measure conductivity, water content, and crystallization during controlled humidity ramps; verify compatibility before cell testing.",
    "against": "The mixture provides no benefit at equal residual water content or crystallizes earlier.",
    "category": "E. Electrochemistry and ionic systems",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Salt mixtures could stabilize conductivity during drying",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 25,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 222,
    "literature_query": "Salt mixtures could stabilize conductivity drying gel containing compatible salts different water-binding tendencies experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0050",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 50,
      "title": "Salt mixtures could stabilize conductivity during drying",
      "hypothesis": "A gel containing two compatible salts with different water-binding tendencies will retain conductivity across partial drying better than either single-salt gel at equal initial ionic strength.",
      "test": "Measure conductivity, water content, and crystallization during controlled humidity ramps; verify compatibility before cell testing.",
      "against": "The mixture provides no benefit at equal residual water content or crystallizes earlier.",
      "category": "E. Electrochemistry and ionic systems",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Salt mixtures could stabilize conductivity during drying",
      "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 25,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 222,
      "literature_query": "Salt mixtures could stabilize conductivity drying gel containing compatible salts different water-binding tendencies experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 6,
      "source_ids": "Se8b868a7a3e6;Sb6366a14dbd1;S510bfdca0d0e;S24d27ba8da13;S14be934fa679;S93ee76141aa6",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 51,
    "title": "Nutrient pulse spacing could alter microbial attachment",
    "hypothesis": "In a nonpathogenic bacterial model, widely spaced nutrient pulses will change the attached-to-free-cell ratio relative to frequent pulses delivering the same total nutrient mass.",
    "test": "Use matched flow chambers and a characterized laboratory strain; count both populations and measure nutrient depletion and growth.",
    "against": "Attachment differences vanish after total biomass, flow, and nutrient exposure are matched.",
    "category": "F. Nonhuman microbiology and biophysics",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Nutrient pulse spacing could alter microbial attachment",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 25,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 223,
    "literature_query": "Nutrient pulse spacing could alter microbial attachment In nonpathogenic bacterial model widely spaced experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0051",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 51,
      "title": "Nutrient pulse spacing could alter microbial attachment",
      "hypothesis": "In a nonpathogenic bacterial model, widely spaced nutrient pulses will change the attached-to-free-cell ratio relative to frequent pulses delivering the same total nutrient mass.",
      "test": "Use matched flow chambers and a characterized laboratory strain; count both populations and measure nutrient depletion and growth.",
      "against": "Attachment differences vanish after total biomass, flow, and nutrient exposure are matched.",
      "category": "F. Nonhuman microbiology and biophysics",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Nutrient pulse spacing could alter microbial attachment",
      "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 25,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 223,
      "literature_query": "Nutrient pulse spacing could alter microbial attachment In nonpathogenic bacterial model widely spaced experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 4,
      "source_ids": "Sb3eef63ff678;Se6070b33e79e;S7fda85910ad2;Scfed63497dec",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 52,
    "title": "Surface elasticity could shift algal colony spacing",
    "hypothesis": "Nonpathogenic microalgae growing on a soft hydrated surface will form different colony-spacing distributions as substrate elasticity changes at fixed surface chemistry and light.",
    "test": "Image replicate surfaces with calibrated stiffness; match nutrient diffusion, thickness, and initial cell density.",
    "against": "Spacing is unchanged or follows nutrient diffusivity instead of elasticity.",
    "category": "F. Nonhuman microbiology and biophysics",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Surface elasticity could shift algal colony spacing",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 25,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0052",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 53,
    "title": "Light pulse irregularity could affect photosynthetic recovery",
    "hypothesis": "A model green alga will recover photosynthetic yield faster after irregular light pulses than regular pulses with matched spectrum, peak intensity, total photons, and exposure time.",
    "test": "Use chlorophyll fluorescence and oxygen evolution during exposure and recovery; control temperature and culture density.",
    "against": "Recovery is equal or worse under irregular pulses across independent cultures.",
    "category": "F. Nonhuman microbiology and biophysics",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Light pulse irregularity could affect photosynthetic recovery",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0053",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 54,
    "title": "Flow reversals could alter extracellular polymer architecture",
    "hypothesis": "Periodic gentle flow reversal will produce a more directionally uniform extracellular polymer network in a nonpathogenic biofilm than unidirectional flow with equal cumulative shear exposure.",
    "test": "Image polymer orientation and measure mechanical response in matched flow chambers; monitor biomass and nutrient delivery.",
    "against": "Network orientation remains unchanged or the effect is fully explained by biomass differences.",
    "category": "F. Nonhuman microbiology and biophysics",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Flow reversals could alter extracellular polymer architecture",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 25,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 224,
    "literature_query": "Flow reversals could alter extracellular polymer architecture Periodic gentle reversal produce directionally uniform experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0054",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 54,
      "title": "Flow reversals could alter extracellular polymer architecture",
      "hypothesis": "Periodic gentle flow reversal will produce a more directionally uniform extracellular polymer network in a nonpathogenic biofilm than unidirectional flow with equal cumulative shear exposure.",
      "test": "Image polymer orientation and measure mechanical response in matched flow chambers; monitor biomass and nutrient delivery.",
      "against": "Network orientation remains unchanged or the effect is fully explained by biomass differences.",
      "category": "F. Nonhuman microbiology and biophysics",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Flow reversals could alter extracellular polymer architecture",
      "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 25,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 224,
      "literature_query": "Flow reversals could alter extracellular polymer architecture Periodic gentle reversal produce directionally uniform experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 5,
      "source_ids": "S9159eccc65c4;S83f2df6249db;S647fb4f1b1dd;Saba5f661506a;S18d0e3ac3ae6",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 55,
    "title": "Osmotic history could change yeast volume recovery",
    "hypothesis": "Two mild osmotic pulses separated by a recovery interval will shorten baker's yeast volume-recovery time after a later matched pulse compared with one exposure of equal total duration.",
    "test": "Track single-cell volume in microfluidic chambers; match growth stage, temperature, and total osmotic exposure.",
    "against": "Recovery is not faster or reflects selective survival rather than reversible adaptation.",
    "category": "F. Nonhuman microbiology and biophysics",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Osmotic history could change yeast volume recovery",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 25,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0055",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 56,
    "title": "Mineral roughness could alter enzyme retention",
    "hypothesis": "Nanoscale mineral roughness will increase retention of an extracellular enzyme during washing without proportionally reducing its catalytic activity.",
    "test": "Adsorb a purified nonhazardous model enzyme onto chemically matched mineral surfaces; measure retained protein and product formation.",
    "against": "Activity increases only in proportion to nonspecific retained mass or retained enzyme is mostly inactive.",
    "category": "F. Nonhuman microbiology and biophysics",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Mineral roughness could alter enzyme retention",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 25,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0056",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 57,
    "title": "Membrane curvature could change leakage after temperature cycles",
    "hypothesis": "Small lipid vesicles will accumulate more irreversible leakage per mild temperature cycle than larger vesicles of identical composition because curvature stresses amplify transient defects.",
    "test": "Track encapsulated dye release across size-separated vesicles; correct for area-to-volume ratio and initial defects.",
    "against": "Leakage differences vanish after geometric scaling or reflect composition differences.",
    "category": "F. Nonhuman microbiology and biophysics",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Membrane curvature could change leakage after temperature cycles",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0057",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 58,
    "title": "Drying rate could determine microbial matrix pore connectivity",
    "hypothesis": "Slowly drying a nonpathogenic microbial extracellular matrix will preserve more connected pores after rehydration than rapidly drying it to the same final water content.",
    "test": "Use isolated matrices; compare tracer diffusion, imaging, and rehydration curves with matched sample thickness.",
    "against": "Connectivity is unchanged or differences disappear after complete rehydration.",
    "category": "F. Nonhuman microbiology and biophysics",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Drying rate could determine microbial matrix pore connectivity",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 25,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 225,
    "literature_query": "Drying rate could determine microbial matrix pore connectivity Slowly nonpathogenic extracellular preserve connected experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0058",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 58,
      "title": "Drying rate could determine microbial matrix pore connectivity",
      "hypothesis": "Slowly drying a nonpathogenic microbial extracellular matrix will preserve more connected pores after rehydration than rapidly drying it to the same final water content.",
      "test": "Use isolated matrices; compare tracer diffusion, imaging, and rehydration curves with matched sample thickness.",
      "against": "Connectivity is unchanged or differences disappear after complete rehydration.",
      "category": "F. Nonhuman microbiology and biophysics",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Drying rate could determine microbial matrix pore connectivity",
      "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 25,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 225,
      "literature_query": "Drying rate could determine microbial matrix pore connectivity Slowly nonpathogenic extracellular preserve connected experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 3,
      "source_ids": "Sde98e053d6ec;Sbf86ec4138c3;S690fe1668f74",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 59,
    "title": "Root exudate timing could shape mineral dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "Pulsed exposure to a defined mixture of plant-associated organic acids will dissolve a model mineral differently from constant exposure at the same total dose and time-averaged pH.",
    "test": "Use a cell-free mineral flow system; measure dissolved ions, actual pH histories, and surface changes.",
    "against": "A model using the measured pH and acid concentration histories fully explains the results without a surface-history effect.",
    "category": "F. Nonhuman microbiology and biophysics",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Root exudate timing could shape mineral dissolution",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 25,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 226,
    "literature_query": "Root exudate timing could shape mineral dissolution Pulsed exposure to defined mixture of experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0059",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 59,
      "title": "Root exudate timing could shape mineral dissolution",
      "hypothesis": "Pulsed exposure to a defined mixture of plant-associated organic acids will dissolve a model mineral differently from constant exposure at the same total dose and time-averaged pH.",
      "test": "Use a cell-free mineral flow system; measure dissolved ions, actual pH histories, and surface changes.",
      "against": "A model using the measured pH and acid concentration histories fully explains the results without a surface-history effect.",
      "category": "F. Nonhuman microbiology and biophysics",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Root exudate timing could shape mineral dissolution",
      "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 25,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 226,
      "literature_query": "Root exudate timing could shape mineral dissolution Pulsed exposure to defined mixture of experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 4,
      "source_ids": "S189302a02ddc;S820f55f8ce58;S6b47e1f518a3;S74f93cdbf4de",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 60,
    "title": "Cell-free enzyme confinement could change inhibition recovery",
    "hypothesis": "A reversibly inhibited enzyme confined in porous beads will recover activity more slowly than free enzyme after inhibitor removal because the pores retain inhibitor locally.",
    "test": "Measure activity and inhibitor washout for multiple bead sizes; match active enzyme amount and include nonporous carrier controls.",
    "against": "Recovery does not track bead size or inhibitor retention after external mixing is controlled.",
    "category": "F. Nonhuman microbiology and biophysics",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme confinement could change inhibition recovery",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 25,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0060",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 61,
    "title": "Root-zone temperature oscillations could alter branching",
    "hypothesis": "A nonfood model plant exposed to mild root-zone temperature oscillations will develop a different lateral-root density than plants held at the same mean temperature and light cycle.",
    "test": "Grow replicated seedlings in transparent chambers; record root growth, dissolved oxygen, and actual temperature histories.",
    "against": "Branching differences disappear after overall root growth and oxygen availability are matched.",
    "category": "G. Plant, fungal, and ecological physical processes",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Root-zone temperature oscillations could alter branching",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 25,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0061",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 62,
    "title": "Soil grain layering could improve passive root-zone aeration",
    "hypothesis": "Alternating thin coarse and fine mineral layers will restore root-zone oxygen faster after watering than a homogeneous mixture with the same grain inventory.",
    "test": "Begin with plant-free columns; measure oxygen and water profiles after matched irrigation, then validate with model seedlings.",
    "against": "Oxygen recovery is no faster at matched retained water or roots erase the layering effect.",
    "category": "G. Plant, fungal, and ecological physical processes",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Soil grain layering could improve passive root-zone aeration",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 25,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0062",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 63,
    "title": "Mycelial bridges could respond to gap humidity gradients",
    "hypothesis": "A nonpathogenic saprotrophic fungus will bridge a small air gap more reliably when humidity increases toward the destination than under uniform humidity with the same mean value.",
    "test": "Image hyphal growth in contained chambers; match substrate nutrients, gap geometry, temperature, and airflow.",
    "against": "Bridging frequency does not depend on gradient orientation or follows airflow instead.",
    "category": "G. Plant, fungal, and ecological physical processes",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Mycelial bridges could respond to gap humidity gradients",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 25,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 227,
    "literature_query": "Mycelial bridges could respond to gap humidity gradients nonpathogenic saprotrophic fungus bridge air experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0063",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 63,
      "title": "Mycelial bridges could respond to gap humidity gradients",
      "hypothesis": "A nonpathogenic saprotrophic fungus will bridge a small air gap more reliably when humidity increases toward the destination than under uniform humidity with the same mean value.",
      "test": "Image hyphal growth in contained chambers; match substrate nutrients, gap geometry, temperature, and airflow.",
      "against": "Bridging frequency does not depend on gradient orientation or follows airflow instead.",
      "category": "G. Plant, fungal, and ecological physical processes",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Mycelial bridges could respond to gap humidity gradients",
      "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 25,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 227,
      "literature_query": "Mycelial bridges could respond to gap humidity gradients nonpathogenic saprotrophic fungus bridge air experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 4,
      "source_ids": "Se6c31872ff1f;Sabfa504012f8;Sc712c9d9000d;S45bedeee70ea",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 64,
    "title": "Leaf-scale roughness could change fog capture selectivity",
    "hypothesis": "Mixed large and small surface ridges will capture a broader range of fog-droplet sizes than a single ridge scale at equal wettability and projected area.",
    "test": "Test leaf-inspired inert replicas in a controlled fog stream; measure capture by droplet size and drainage separately.",
    "against": "Mixed ridges provide no size-range advantage after drainage and airflow are accounted for.",
    "category": "G. Plant, fungal, and ecological physical processes",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Leaf-scale roughness could change fog capture selectivity",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 66,
    "literature_query": "Leaf-scale roughness could change fog capture selectivity Mixed large surface ridges broader range experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0064",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 64,
      "title": "Leaf-scale roughness could change fog capture selectivity",
      "hypothesis": "Mixed large and small surface ridges will capture a broader range of fog-droplet sizes than a single ridge scale at equal wettability and projected area.",
      "test": "Test leaf-inspired inert replicas in a controlled fog stream; measure capture by droplet size and drainage separately.",
      "against": "Mixed ridges provide no size-range advantage after drainage and airflow are accounted for.",
      "category": "G. Plant, fungal, and ecological physical processes",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Leaf-scale roughness could change fog capture selectivity",
      "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 66,
      "literature_query": "Leaf-scale roughness could change fog capture selectivity Mixed large surface ridges broader range experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 6,
      "source_ids": "S2b8c30ebc48b;S32d4bfbf21c7;S8d1cb00fe891;S4d6b66e4786a;S56b1267d1ea1;Sc2aa96726a65",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 65,
    "title": "Seed orientation could alter hydration variability",
    "hypothesis": "Consistent orientation of a model plant's seeds relative to a moisture gradient will reduce variation in hydration time compared with random orientations.",
    "test": "Image water uptake and germination in matched seeds on controlled wetting substrates; separate hydration from subsequent growth effects.",
    "against": "Hydration variance is unchanged or dominated by seed mass and coat damage.",
    "category": "G. Plant, fungal, and ecological physical processes",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Seed orientation could alter hydration variability",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 25,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0065",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 66,
    "title": "Wet–dry cycling could shift mineral-bound phosphate release",
    "hypothesis": "Repeated partial drying will change the fraction of phosphate released from an iron-oxide mineral during rewetting compared with continuous hydration of equal duration.",
    "test": "Use sterile mineral suspensions; measure dissolved phosphate, mineral surface area, and iron chemistry after controlled cycles.",
    "against": "Release is unchanged after surface-area and redox changes are included.",
    "category": "G. Plant, fungal, and ecological physical processes",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Wet–dry cycling could shift mineral-bound phosphate release",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 3,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 181,
    "literature_query": "Wet dry cycling could shift mineral-bound phosphate release Repeated partial drying change fraction experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0066",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 66,
      "title": "Wet–dry cycling could shift mineral-bound phosphate release",
      "hypothesis": "Repeated partial drying will change the fraction of phosphate released from an iron-oxide mineral during rewetting compared with continuous hydration of equal duration.",
      "test": "Use sterile mineral suspensions; measure dissolved phosphate, mineral surface area, and iron chemistry after controlled cycles.",
      "against": "Release is unchanged after surface-area and redox changes are included.",
      "category": "G. Plant, fungal, and ecological physical processes",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Wet–dry cycling could shift mineral-bound phosphate release",
      "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 3,
      "screen_score": 26,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 181,
      "literature_query": "Wet dry cycling could shift mineral-bound phosphate release Repeated partial drying change fraction experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 6,
      "source_ids": "S706ccb840510;S68e21859acd7;Sb7ffffc95fb2;Sa333f9bd6ac8;S458bdc104a17;S37a945d96e35",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 67,
    "title": "Fungal substrate geometry could tune network redundancy",
    "hypothesis": "Regularly spaced narrow nutrient-free gaps will produce a fungal network with more alternate connecting paths than random gaps of the same total area.",
    "test": "Grow a nonpathogenic model fungus on patterned substrates; quantify network topology at matched biomass and substrate nutrient mass.",
    "against": "Alternate-path density does not increase or reflects larger total network length alone.",
    "category": "G. Plant, fungal, and ecological physical processes",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Fungal substrate geometry could tune network redundancy",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0067",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 68,
    "title": "Algal sinking could depend on nutrient fluctuation history",
    "hypothesis": "A nonpathogenic microalgal culture exposed to nutrient fluctuations will have a different sinking-speed distribution than a steady-fed culture at matched cell size and density.",
    "test": "Use settling microscopy; measure cell shape, aggregation, medium viscosity, and nutrient histories in independent cultures.",
    "against": "Sinking distributions agree after size and aggregation are controlled.",
    "category": "G. Plant, fungal, and ecological physical processes",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Algal sinking could depend on nutrient fluctuation history",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 25,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 228,
    "literature_query": "Algal sinking could depend on nutrient fluctuation history nonpathogenic microalgal culture exposed to experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0068",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 68,
      "title": "Algal sinking could depend on nutrient fluctuation history",
      "hypothesis": "A nonpathogenic microalgal culture exposed to nutrient fluctuations will have a different sinking-speed distribution than a steady-fed culture at matched cell size and density.",
      "test": "Use settling microscopy; measure cell shape, aggregation, medium viscosity, and nutrient histories in independent cultures.",
      "against": "Sinking distributions agree after size and aggregation are controlled.",
      "category": "G. Plant, fungal, and ecological physical processes",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Algal sinking could depend on nutrient fluctuation history",
      "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 25,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 228,
      "literature_query": "Algal sinking could depend on nutrient fluctuation history nonpathogenic microalgal culture exposed to experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 6,
      "source_ids": "Se55d57bfa8af;S6f4919fe1f38;S9b47558c4ab1;Sac16edfb48c4;Sb04a2dbf95f4;S6cb33e28987f",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 69,
    "title": "Root mucilage could stabilize water films between grains",
    "hypothesis": "A defined plant-mucilage preparation will preserve connected water films between mineral grains at lower water content than a viscosity-matched nonadsorbing polymer.",
    "test": "Image drying grain packs and measure hydraulic conductance; match initial viscosity, grain size, and polymer concentration.",
    "against": "Film connectivity shows no advantage or is explained entirely by bulk viscosity.",
    "category": "G. Plant, fungal, and ecological physical processes",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Root mucilage could stabilize water films between grains",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 25,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 229,
    "literature_query": "Root mucilage could stabilize water films grains defined plant-mucilage preparation preserve connected mineral experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0069",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 69,
      "title": "Root mucilage could stabilize water films between grains",
      "hypothesis": "A defined plant-mucilage preparation will preserve connected water films between mineral grains at lower water content than a viscosity-matched nonadsorbing polymer.",
      "test": "Image drying grain packs and measure hydraulic conductance; match initial viscosity, grain size, and polymer concentration.",
      "against": "Film connectivity shows no advantage or is explained entirely by bulk viscosity.",
      "category": "G. Plant, fungal, and ecological physical processes",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Root mucilage could stabilize water films between grains",
      "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 25,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 229,
      "literature_query": "Root mucilage could stabilize water films grains defined plant-mucilage preparation preserve connected mineral experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 6,
      "source_ids": "S703587891020;Sda2034441e42;Sa93845bdaae4;S55a9e8a34b60;S79801f5bb170;Sb3c217ab5d25",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 70,
    "title": "Moss canopy spacing could alter rehydration efficiency",
    "hypothesis": "An intermediate spacing between moss shoots will maximize retained water after a short mist pulse by balancing interception and drainage.",
    "test": "Arrange comparable shoots at several spacings; measure retained water per dry biomass under matched mist and airflow, using inert replicas to separate geometry effects.",
    "against": "Retention changes monotonically or any maximum disappears after exposed area is accounted for.",
    "category": "G. Plant, fungal, and ecological physical processes",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Moss canopy spacing could alter rehydration efficiency",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 30,
    "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 4,
    "literature_query": "Moss canopy spacing could alter rehydration efficiency An intermediate shoots maximize retained water experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0070",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": true,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 70,
      "title": "Moss canopy spacing could alter rehydration efficiency",
      "hypothesis": "An intermediate spacing between moss shoots will maximize retained water after a short mist pulse by balancing interception and drainage.",
      "test": "Arrange comparable shoots at several spacings; measure retained water per dry biomass under matched mist and airflow, using inert replicas to separate geometry effects.",
      "against": "Retention changes monotonically or any maximum disappears after exposed area is accounted for.",
      "category": "G. Plant, fungal, and ecological physical processes",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Moss canopy spacing could alter rehydration efficiency",
      "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
      "access_score": 4,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 30,
      "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 4,
      "literature_query": "Moss canopy spacing could alter rehydration efficiency An intermediate shoots maximize retained water experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 5,
      "source_ids": "Sebaa5950c470;Sc9e9400d543e;S39b672cb0505;Sb179e06eb71c;Sd1c52f1978ef",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Moss shoot spacing and growth are studied. Verify the proposed water-retention maximum after a short mist pulse normalized by dry biomass and exposed area.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": {
      "deep_rank": "10",
      "id": "70",
      "title": "Moss canopy spacing could alter rehydration efficiency",
      "original_300_rank": "4",
      "pilot_class": "P",
      "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
      "hypothesis": "An intermediate spacing between moss shoots will maximize retained water after a short mist pulse by balancing interception and drainage.",
      "primary_outcome": "Water retained after a fixed drainage interval per dry biomass; retain water per projected area as a separate outcome.",
      "comparison": "At least several shoot spacings using comparable shoots from one nonhuman moss species; add inert geometric replicas.",
      "controls": "Shoot dimensions, species, prior hydration, mist size and dose, airflow, biomass, exposed area, and drainage time.",
      "pilot": "First check repeatable weighing without evaporation dominating the measurement. Use independent shoot arrays and randomized exposure positions. Test whether an interior spacing maximum persists under both normalizations.",
      "novelty_gap": "Density-dependent moss growth and hydration history have prior art. The narrower target is short-mist retention versus spacing with explicit interception and drainage controls.",
      "stop_rule": "Do not claim an optimum if only two spacings were tested or if it disappears after correcting for exposed area. Reject an interior maximum when a precise monotonic trend is found.",
      "source_keys": "MOSS01;BRACKEN89",
      "truth_probability": "not estimated",
      "novelty_status": "unverified"
    },
    "dossier_text": "# 10. H0070 — Moss canopy spacing could alter rehydration efficiency\n\nOriginal 300-folder rank: 4. Pilot class: P. Resource class: modest bench or workshop; calibration still required.\n\n## Original hypothesis\n\nAn intermediate spacing between moss shoots will maximize retained water after a short mist pulse by balancing interception and drainage.\n\n## Why investigate this\n\nThe response can be measured gravimetrically and biological growth need not be studied to test the immediate physical retention claim.\n\n## Literature assessment and exact novelty question\n\nDensity-dependent moss growth and hydration history have prior art. The narrower target is short-mist retention versus spacing with explicit interception and drainage controls. Worldwide originality remains unverified.\n\n## Primary measurement\n\nWater retained after a fixed drainage interval per dry biomass; retain water per projected area as a separate outcome.\n\n## Comparison\n\nAt least several shoot spacings using comparable shoots from one nonhuman moss species; add inert geometric replicas.\n\n## Critical controls\n\nShoot dimensions, species, prior hydration, mist size and dose, airflow, biomass, exposed area, and drainage time.\n\n## Pilot plan\n\nFirst check repeatable weighing without evaporation dominating the measurement. Use independent shoot arrays and randomized exposure positions. Test whether an interior spacing maximum persists under both normalizations.\n\n## What would count against it\n\nDo not claim an optimum if only two spacings were tested or if it disappears after correcting for exposed area. Reject an interior maximum when a precise monotonic trend is found.\n\n## Replication and analysis\n\nTreat separately prepared specimens, batches, or devices as independent units. Technical repeats and images are nested measurements. First estimate calibration error and independent-preparation variability. Set the minimum meaningful effect in the primary outcome's units before confirmation, then choose sample size from that effect and pilot variance; a convenient pilot count is not a powered study.\n\nRandomize run order and blind sample labels where practical. Freeze image processing, fitting choices, exclusions, and the primary comparison before evaluating confirmatory data. Report effect size and uncertainty; use a blocked or mixed-effects analysis when specimens share a batch. A wide interval is inconclusive. Include the measurement and matching controls even when the directional effect appears large.\n\nA useful go/no-go gate is whether the hypothesized effect can be distinguished from calibration uncertainty and the strongest alternative explanation. Stop material purchases if the closest literature already measures the identical contrast, unless a replication has an explicit purpose. Do not use these abbreviated plans as complete laboratory protocols.\n\n## Data to preserve\n\nKeep unedited images or sensor streams, calibration files, preparation IDs, run order, environmental logs, input histories, raw outcome values, exclusions, and the exact analysis version. No values are prefilled in the observation template. Use `data/Published Benchmarks.csv` only as literature context; values from a different system are not observations of this hypothesis.\n\n## Sources and transfer limits\n\n### MOSS01\n\n[The impact of watering regime and ambient relative humidity on the effect of density on growth in two boreal forest mosses](https://doi.org/10.1179/jbr.2001.23.1.43)\n\nAccess: Indexed abstract examined. Type: primary experiment.\n\nBackground findings and transfer limits: see [source assessments](../research/Primary%20Source%20Assessments.md) under this source key.\n\n### BRACKEN89\n\n[Rainfall interception by bracken in open habitats: relations between leaf area, canopy storage and drainage rate](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/002216948990111X)\n\nAccess: Indexed abstract examined. Type: primary experiment.\n\nBackground findings and transfer limits: see [source assessments](../research/Primary%20Source%20Assessments.md) under this source key.\n\n"
  },
  {
    "id": 71,
    "title": "Mineral mixtures could alter ice-nucleation repeatability",
    "hypothesis": "Combining two mineral particle types will change cycle-to-cycle freezing variability more than predicted from independent nucleation by each type.",
    "test": "Freeze droplets containing individual minerals and mixtures at matched total surface area; monitor aggregation and repeat with fresh particles.",
    "against": "Independent-site predictions explain mixture behavior within uncertainty.",
    "category": "H. Minerals, sediment, and atmospheric processes",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Mineral mixtures could alter ice-nucleation repeatability",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 3,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 254,
    "literature_query": "Mineral mixtures could alter ice-nucleation repeatability Combining particle types change cycle-to-cycle freezing variability experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0071",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 71,
      "title": "Mineral mixtures could alter ice-nucleation repeatability",
      "hypothesis": "Combining two mineral particle types will change cycle-to-cycle freezing variability more than predicted from independent nucleation by each type.",
      "test": "Freeze droplets containing individual minerals and mixtures at matched total surface area; monitor aggregation and repeat with fresh particles.",
      "against": "Independent-site predictions explain mixture behavior within uncertainty.",
      "category": "H. Minerals, sediment, and atmospheric processes",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Mineral mixtures could alter ice-nucleation repeatability",
      "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 3,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 254,
      "literature_query": "Mineral mixtures could alter ice-nucleation repeatability Combining particle types change cycle-to-cycle freezing variability experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 5,
      "source_ids": "Sa5eec8f33242;Sf981caa842dc;S901fc3a9ab1d;S100965dee809;S73230c680a31",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 72,
    "title": "Grain angularity could control salt-crust cracking",
    "hypothesis": "More angular mineral grains will produce finer salt-crust crack spacing during evaporation than rounded grains with the same size distribution and porosity.",
    "test": "Dry matched saline grain beds; map cracks, evaporation rate, and salt depth distribution.",
    "against": "Crack spacing is unchanged after drying rate and porosity are matched.",
    "category": "H. Minerals, sediment, and atmospheric processes",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Grain angularity could control salt-crust cracking",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 30,
    "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 5,
    "literature_query": "Grain angularity could control salt-crust cracking angular mineral grains produce finer crack spacing experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0072",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": true,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 72,
      "title": "Grain angularity could control salt-crust cracking",
      "hypothesis": "More angular mineral grains will produce finer salt-crust crack spacing during evaporation than rounded grains with the same size distribution and porosity.",
      "test": "Dry matched saline grain beds; map cracks, evaporation rate, and salt depth distribution.",
      "against": "Crack spacing is unchanged after drying rate and porosity are matched.",
      "category": "H. Minerals, sediment, and atmospheric processes",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Grain angularity could control salt-crust cracking",
      "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
      "access_score": 4,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 30,
      "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 5,
      "literature_query": "Grain angularity could control salt-crust cracking angular mineral grains produce finer crack spacing experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 5,
      "source_ids": "Sd26658ad09e1;S1c28aefeedd4;S57a7b6bd8a2c;S75a3e8b08895;Sb9f002527609",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Grain angularity and salt precipitation are established topics. Check whether crack spacing, rather than precipitation amount or crust thickness, remains an unmeasured response.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": {
      "deep_rank": "14",
      "id": "72",
      "title": "Grain angularity could control salt-crust cracking",
      "original_300_rank": "5",
      "pilot_class": "P",
      "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
      "hypothesis": "More angular mineral grains will produce finer salt-crust crack spacing during evaporation than rounded grains with the same size distribution and porosity.",
      "primary_outcome": "Median crack spacing in the final crust, measured per independent grain bed; crack coverage is secondary.",
      "comparison": "Angular and rounded silica grains with matched size distributions and closely matched porosity.",
      "controls": "Grain mineralogy, pore-size distribution, salt concentration, salt mass, evaporation rate, crust thickness, and support restraint.",
      "pilot": "Image growth and cracking throughout drying rather than only at the endpoint. Measure mass loss and crust thickness. Compare crack spacing after matching drying stage and thickness.",
      "novelty_gap": "Angularity already changes precipitation and crust thickness. A distinct contribution requires a crack-spacing difference beyond thickness and evaporation effects.",
      "stop_rule": "Stop the independent-angularity claim if pore structure or crust thickness cannot be characterized. Reject it if matched-thickness crusts show no spacing difference with adequate precision.",
      "source_keys": "ANG14;CRUST12",
      "truth_probability": "not estimated",
      "novelty_status": "unverified"
    },
    "dossier_text": "# 14. H0072 — Grain angularity could control salt-crust cracking\n\nOriginal 300-folder rank: 5. Pilot class: P. Resource class: modest bench or workshop; calibration still required.\n\n## Original hypothesis\n\nMore angular mineral grains will produce finer salt-crust crack spacing during evaporation than rounded grains with the same size distribution and porosity.\n\n## Why investigate this\n\nBenign salts and inert grain beds make a direct imaging pilot plausible, and close literature identifies the strongest confounders.\n\n## Literature assessment and exact novelty question\n\nAngularity already changes precipitation and crust thickness. A distinct contribution requires a crack-spacing difference beyond thickness and evaporation effects. Worldwide originality remains unverified.\n\n## Primary measurement\n\nMedian crack spacing in the final crust, measured per independent grain bed; crack coverage is secondary.\n\n## Comparison\n\nAngular and rounded silica grains with matched size distributions and closely matched porosity.\n\n## Critical controls\n\nGrain mineralogy, pore-size distribution, salt concentration, salt mass, evaporation rate, crust thickness, and support restraint.\n\n## Pilot plan\n\nImage growth and cracking throughout drying rather than only at the endpoint. Measure mass loss and crust thickness. Compare crack spacing after matching drying stage and thickness.\n\n## What would count against it\n\nStop the independent-angularity claim if pore structure or crust thickness cannot be characterized. Reject it if matched-thickness crusts show no spacing difference with adequate precision.\n\n## Replication and analysis\n\nTreat separately prepared specimens, batches, or devices as independent units. Technical repeats and images are nested measurements. First estimate calibration error and independent-preparation variability. Set the minimum meaningful effect in the primary outcome's units before confirmation, then choose sample size from that effect and pilot variance; a convenient pilot count is not a powered study.\n\nRandomize run order and blind sample labels where practical. Freeze image processing, fitting choices, exclusions, and the primary comparison before evaluating confirmatory data. Report effect size and uncertainty; use a blocked or mixed-effects analysis when specimens share a batch. A wide interval is inconclusive. Include the measurement and matching controls even when the directional effect appears large.\n\nA useful go/no-go gate is whether the hypothesized effect can be distinguished from calibration uncertainty and the strongest alternative explanation. Stop material purchases if the closest literature already measures the identical contrast, unless a replication has an explicit purpose. Do not use these abbreviated plans as complete laboratory protocols.\n\n## Data to preserve\n\nKeep unedited images or sensor streams, calibration files, preparation IDs, run order, environmental logs, input histories, raw outcome values, exclusions, and the exact analysis version. No values are prefilled in the observation template. Use `data/Published Benchmarks.csv` only as literature context; values from a different system are not observations of this hypothesis.\n\n## Sources and transfer limits\n\n### ANG14\n\n[Effects of grain angularity on NaCl precipitation in porous media during evaporation](https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR016125)\n\nAccess: Indexed abstract and article sections examined. Type: primary experiment.\n\nBackground findings and transfer limits: see [source assessments](../research/Primary%20Source%20Assessments.md) under this source key.\n\n### CRUST12\n\n[Experimental study of the effect of sodium chloride on drying of porous media: the crusty-patchy efflorescence transition](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0017931012007478)\n\nAccess: Indexed abstract examined. Type: primary experiment.\n\nBackground findings and transfer limits: see [source assessments](../research/Primary%20Source%20Assessments.md) under this source key.\n\n"
  },
  {
    "id": 73,
    "title": "Repeated weak shaking could sort grains by friction",
    "hypothesis": "In equal-size, equal-density granular mixtures, weak cyclic shaking will segregate grains by surface friction before detectable segregation by shape.",
    "test": "Use labeled grains with calibrated friction and matched geometry; image depth distributions while varying vibration amplitude.",
    "against": "No friction-dependent segregation occurs or shape differences explain it.",
    "category": "H. Minerals, sediment, and atmospheric processes",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Repeated weak shaking could sort grains by friction",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "excluded: broad prior-art overlap",
    "rank": 21,
    "literature_query": "Repeated weak shaking could sort grains by friction In equal-size equal-density granular mixtures experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0073",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 74,
    "title": "Dust coatings could change dew-release timing",
    "hypothesis": "A thin discontinuous mineral-dust coating will delay morning evaporation of dew more than a continuous coating with equal dust mass because isolated patches pin liquid edges.",
    "test": "Condense equal water loads on patterned and uniform dust deposits; measure evaporation and contact-line motion under matched heating.",
    "against": "Drying times agree after temperature and initial droplet geometry are controlled.",
    "category": "H. Minerals, sediment, and atmospheric processes",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Dust coatings could change dew-release timing",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 67,
    "literature_query": "Dust coatings could change dew-release timing thin discontinuous mineral-dust coating delay morning evaporation experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0074",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 74,
      "title": "Dust coatings could change dew-release timing",
      "hypothesis": "A thin discontinuous mineral-dust coating will delay morning evaporation of dew more than a continuous coating with equal dust mass because isolated patches pin liquid edges.",
      "test": "Condense equal water loads on patterned and uniform dust deposits; measure evaporation and contact-line motion under matched heating.",
      "against": "Drying times agree after temperature and initial droplet geometry are controlled.",
      "category": "H. Minerals, sediment, and atmospheric processes",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Dust coatings could change dew-release timing",
      "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 67,
      "literature_query": "Dust coatings could change dew-release timing thin discontinuous mineral-dust coating delay morning evaporation experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 3,
      "source_ids": "Sea5784ea166a;Scf2a4d201bd7;Sae928bd356b5",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 75,
    "title": "Clay orientation could store a salinity-history signal",
    "hypothesis": "Clay films exposed to alternating low and high salinity will retain a different platelet orientation after rinsing than films exposed once to the same final salinity.",
    "test": "Compare scattering, permeability, and swelling after standardized rinsing; match total exposure duration and ion composition.",
    "against": "Final structures converge or differences reflect residual salt alone.",
    "category": "H. Minerals, sediment, and atmospheric processes",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Clay orientation could store a salinity-history signal",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0075",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 76,
    "title": "Intermittent flow could change mineral armoring",
    "hypothesis": "Pauses in water flow over a dissolving mineral will promote a more continuous secondary-mineral coating than steady flow delivering the same total water volume.",
    "test": "Use controlled flow cells; measure dissolution flux and coating coverage with matched temperature and inlet chemistry.",
    "against": "Coating and flux agree once actual residence-time distributions are included.",
    "category": "H. Minerals, sediment, and atmospheric processes",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Intermittent flow could change mineral armoring",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 25,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 230,
    "literature_query": "Intermittent flow could change mineral armoring Pauses in water over dissolving promote continuous experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0076",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 76,
      "title": "Intermittent flow could change mineral armoring",
      "hypothesis": "Pauses in water flow over a dissolving mineral will promote a more continuous secondary-mineral coating than steady flow delivering the same total water volume.",
      "test": "Use controlled flow cells; measure dissolution flux and coating coverage with matched temperature and inlet chemistry.",
      "against": "Coating and flux agree once actual residence-time distributions are included.",
      "category": "H. Minerals, sediment, and atmospheric processes",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Intermittent flow could change mineral armoring",
      "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 25,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 230,
      "literature_query": "Intermittent flow could change mineral armoring Pauses in water over dissolving promote continuous experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 5,
      "source_ids": "Sd1a12fc47d1d;S73281ca3b65c;S53a527dc1499;S024dd0f7f16e;Sfd9bdb21f452",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 77,
    "title": "Aerosol mixing order could alter water uptake hysteresis",
    "hypothesis": "Internally mixed model salt–organic aerosol particles will show different humidity-cycle hysteresis depending on whether the organic or salt phase formed first.",
    "test": "Generate equal-composition particles by two preparation orders; measure size, phase structure, and water uptake in specialist aerosol equipment.",
    "against": "Hysteresis is preparation-independent after particle size and composition are matched.",
    "category": "H. Minerals, sediment, and atmospheric processes",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Aerosol mixing order could alter water uptake hysteresis",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0077",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 78,
    "title": "Porous rock geometry could control trapped gas persistence",
    "hypothesis": "Pore networks with repeated widening–narrowing sequences will retain gas longer during water imbibition than networks with identical throat sizes in randomized order.",
    "test": "Use transparent rock replicas; image gas volume and dissolution during matched water flow and dissolved-gas conditions.",
    "against": "Persistence depends only on throat-size distribution rather than its spatial order.",
    "category": "H. Minerals, sediment, and atmospheric processes",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Porous rock geometry could control trapped gas persistence",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 68,
    "literature_query": "Porous rock geometry could control trapped gas persistence Pore networks repeated widening narrowing experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0078",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 78,
      "title": "Porous rock geometry could control trapped gas persistence",
      "hypothesis": "Pore networks with repeated widening–narrowing sequences will retain gas longer during water imbibition than networks with identical throat sizes in randomized order.",
      "test": "Use transparent rock replicas; image gas volume and dissolution during matched water flow and dissolved-gas conditions.",
      "against": "Persistence depends only on throat-size distribution rather than its spatial order.",
      "category": "H. Minerals, sediment, and atmospheric processes",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Porous rock geometry could control trapped gas persistence",
      "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 68,
      "literature_query": "Porous rock geometry could control trapped gas persistence Pore networks repeated widening narrowing experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 8,
      "source_ids": "Sf07620805575;Sd278d29a5441;Sdb953d1c0a41;S7e1e225ec655;Sc93664111b08;Sa76f6961a5cb;S03e2793a2715;S25b3ce7619ba",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 79,
    "title": "Thin water films could accelerate mineral contact aging",
    "hypothesis": "Intermittent nanometer-scale water films will increase the resting friction of mineral contacts faster than either very dry contacts or continuously submerged contacts.",
    "test": "Measure friction after controlled dwell times under calibrated humidity and load; image contact chemistry where possible.",
    "against": "Aging changes monotonically with water availability or reflects corrosion of the apparatus.",
    "category": "H. Minerals, sediment, and atmospheric processes",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Thin water films could accelerate mineral contact aging",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0079",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 80,
    "title": "Sediment layering could select erosion pulse frequencies",
    "hypothesis": "Thin alternating grain-size layers will have a flow-pulse frequency at which erosion exceeds that under steady flow with the same average hydraulic power.",
    "test": "Use a recirculating flume with layered and mixed beds; measure sediment loss and actual bed shear stress across pulse frequencies.",
    "against": "No frequency-specific excess remains after peak shear and total work are accounted for.",
    "category": "H. Minerals, sediment, and atmospheric processes",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Sediment layering could select erosion pulse frequencies",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0080",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 81,
    "title": "Resonator gradients could broaden vibration isolation",
    "hypothesis": "A smooth gradient in resonator masses will give a wider useful vibration-isolation band than a periodic array with the same total mass, at the cost of reduced peak attenuation.",
    "test": "Measure transmission spectra for matched arrays, including random-mass controls and equal boundary conditions.",
    "against": "The gradient does not broaden the predefined attenuation band beyond measurement uncertainty.",
    "category": "I. Acoustics, dynamics, and passive devices",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Resonator gradients could broaden vibration isolation",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "excluded: broad prior-art overlap",
    "rank": 295,
    "literature_query": "Resonator gradients could broaden vibration isolation smooth gradient in masses give wider useful experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0081",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 82,
    "title": "Mechanical noise could improve threshold flow detection",
    "hypothesis": "A small amount of controlled mechanical noise will improve detection of a weak periodic flow signal by a threshold-based flexible sensor within a finite noise range.",
    "test": "Apply calibrated flow signals and independent noise; compare detection errors on held-out trials at fixed false-alarm rate.",
    "against": "No noise level improves detection, or apparent gains arise from changing the decision threshold after seeing results.",
    "category": "I. Acoustics, dynamics, and passive devices",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Mechanical noise could improve threshold flow detection",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "excluded: broad prior-art overlap",
    "rank": 23,
    "literature_query": "Mechanical noise could improve threshold flow detection amount of controlled weak periodic signal experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0082",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 83,
    "title": "Asymmetric bristles could rectify liquid-driven motion",
    "hypothesis": "A floating object with tilted flexible bristles will drift under symmetric oscillatory water flow, with drift direction reversing when bristle tilt reverses.",
    "test": "Compare reversed-tilt, upright-bristle, and bare objects; measure background currents and net flow independently.",
    "against": "Drift fails to reverse or follows a residual current rather than bristle orientation.",
    "category": "I. Acoustics, dynamics, and passive devices",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Asymmetric bristles could rectify liquid-driven motion",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "excluded: broad prior-art overlap",
    "rank": 24,
    "literature_query": "Asymmetric bristles could rectify liquid-driven motion floating object tilted flexible drift symmetric oscillatory experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0083",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 84,
    "title": "Contact sequencing could reduce frictional energy loss",
    "hypothesis": "A compliant footpad whose contact elements release sequentially will require less detachment work than simultaneous-release pads with the same maximum holding force.",
    "test": "Measure force–displacement curves for patterned elastomer pads with matched chemistry, contact area, speed, and peak adhesion.",
    "against": "Reduced work disappears when peak force and actual contact area are matched.",
    "category": "I. Acoustics, dynamics, and passive devices",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Contact sequencing could reduce frictional energy loss",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 69,
    "literature_query": "Contact sequencing could frictional energy loss compliant footpad whose elements release sequentially require experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0084",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 84,
      "title": "Contact sequencing could reduce frictional energy loss",
      "hypothesis": "A compliant footpad whose contact elements release sequentially will require less detachment work than simultaneous-release pads with the same maximum holding force.",
      "test": "Measure force–displacement curves for patterned elastomer pads with matched chemistry, contact area, speed, and peak adhesion.",
      "against": "Reduced work disappears when peak force and actual contact area are matched.",
      "category": "I. Acoustics, dynamics, and passive devices",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Contact sequencing could reduce frictional energy loss",
      "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 69,
      "literature_query": "Contact sequencing could frictional energy loss compliant footpad whose elements release sequentially require experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 4,
      "source_ids": "S94ef11c56fa8;Saba0490747dd;S8317c77adc37;S5fd6ba57a38f",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 85,
    "title": "Flexible walls could damp pressure spikes selectively",
    "hypothesis": "A fluid channel with spaced compliant wall segments will reduce short pressure spikes more than slow pressure changes while preserving mean flow better than a uniformly soft wall.",
    "test": "Apply calibrated pressure waveforms; measure upstream and downstream pressure and mean flow in geometrically matched channels.",
    "against": "Selectivity or flow preservation is no better than the uniformly compliant control.",
    "category": "I. Acoustics, dynamics, and passive devices",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Flexible walls could damp pressure spikes selectively",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 70,
    "literature_query": "Flexible walls could damp pressure spikes selectively fluid channel spaced compliant wall segments experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0085",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 85,
      "title": "Flexible walls could damp pressure spikes selectively",
      "hypothesis": "A fluid channel with spaced compliant wall segments will reduce short pressure spikes more than slow pressure changes while preserving mean flow better than a uniformly soft wall.",
      "test": "Apply calibrated pressure waveforms; measure upstream and downstream pressure and mean flow in geometrically matched channels.",
      "against": "Selectivity or flow preservation is no better than the uniformly compliant control.",
      "category": "I. Acoustics, dynamics, and passive devices",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Flexible walls could damp pressure spikes selectively",
      "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 70,
      "literature_query": "Flexible walls could damp pressure spikes selectively fluid channel spaced compliant wall segments experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 5,
      "source_ids": "S49c2667ae584;S10c57238a7e6;S6f7e89c5df70;S9f7b8e995328;S1b38929a4775",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 86,
    "title": "Bistable elements could retain a vibration-dose record",
    "hypothesis": "An array of bistable elements with distributed switching barriers will encode cumulative high-amplitude vibration exposure in its final state more reliably than an array with identical barriers.",
    "test": "Apply independently generated vibration histories and test whether final states predict a predefined dose metric on held-out histories.",
    "against": "Different doses give indistinguishable states or state predictions depend mainly on the final pulse.",
    "category": "I. Acoustics, dynamics, and passive devices",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Bistable elements could retain a vibration-dose record",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 71,
    "literature_query": "Bistable elements could retain vibration-dose record An array of distributed switching barriers encode experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0086",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 86,
      "title": "Bistable elements could retain a vibration-dose record",
      "hypothesis": "An array of bistable elements with distributed switching barriers will encode cumulative high-amplitude vibration exposure in its final state more reliably than an array with identical barriers.",
      "test": "Apply independently generated vibration histories and test whether final states predict a predefined dose metric on held-out histories.",
      "against": "Different doses give indistinguishable states or state predictions depend mainly on the final pulse.",
      "category": "I. Acoustics, dynamics, and passive devices",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Bistable elements could retain a vibration-dose record",
      "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 71,
      "literature_query": "Bistable elements could retain vibration-dose record An array of distributed switching barriers encode experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 2,
      "source_ids": "S1920d77d7c38;Sc7d9117b2097",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 87,
    "title": "Elastic asymmetry could bias passive mixing",
    "hypothesis": "Two flexible flaps of unequal stiffness in an oscillating microflow will mix tracers more effectively than equal-stiffness flaps at equal pumping energy.",
    "test": "Image tracer concentration fields and flap motion; compare mixing indices with equal residence time and channel geometry.",
    "against": "Mixing gains disappear when actual hydraulic energy or residence time is matched.",
    "category": "I. Acoustics, dynamics, and passive devices",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Elastic asymmetry could bias passive mixing",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 72,
    "literature_query": "Elastic asymmetry could bias passive mixing flexible flaps of unequal stiffness in an experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0087",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 87,
      "title": "Elastic asymmetry could bias passive mixing",
      "hypothesis": "Two flexible flaps of unequal stiffness in an oscillating microflow will mix tracers more effectively than equal-stiffness flaps at equal pumping energy.",
      "test": "Image tracer concentration fields and flap motion; compare mixing indices with equal residence time and channel geometry.",
      "against": "Mixing gains disappear when actual hydraulic energy or residence time is matched.",
      "category": "I. Acoustics, dynamics, and passive devices",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Elastic asymmetry could bias passive mixing",
      "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 72,
      "literature_query": "Elastic asymmetry could bias passive mixing flexible flaps of unequal stiffness in an experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 1,
      "source_ids": "Sbbc4c816a578",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 88,
    "title": "Coupled droplets could synchronize evaporation oscillations",
    "hypothesis": "Two droplets on thermally connected supports will develop correlated shape or contact-line fluctuations during evaporation more strongly than droplets on thermally isolated supports.",
    "test": "Record both droplets simultaneously; vary thermal coupling while isolating airflow, vibration, and vapor exchange.",
    "against": "Correlation does not vary with thermal coupling or is explained by common environmental noise.",
    "category": "I. Acoustics, dynamics, and passive devices",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Coupled droplets could synchronize evaporation oscillations",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 73,
    "literature_query": "Coupled droplets could synchronize evaporation oscillations on thermally connected supports develop correlated shape experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0088",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 88,
      "title": "Coupled droplets could synchronize evaporation oscillations",
      "hypothesis": "Two droplets on thermally connected supports will develop correlated shape or contact-line fluctuations during evaporation more strongly than droplets on thermally isolated supports.",
      "test": "Record both droplets simultaneously; vary thermal coupling while isolating airflow, vibration, and vapor exchange.",
      "against": "Correlation does not vary with thermal coupling or is explained by common environmental noise.",
      "category": "I. Acoustics, dynamics, and passive devices",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Coupled droplets could synchronize evaporation oscillations",
      "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 73,
      "literature_query": "Coupled droplets could synchronize evaporation oscillations on thermally connected supports develop correlated shape experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 7,
      "source_ids": "Sfc7b6f3e652b;Se2f970795a8f;S8675c980f9a6;S013bc1a194a0;S33e70b783d7b;Sc393732fc802;Sc37ab874645f",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 89,
    "title": "Modular joints could localize fatigue warnings",
    "hypothesis": "A structure containing replaceable compliant joints will develop a measurable local resonance shift before global stiffness declines during cyclic loading.",
    "test": "Track local and global vibration modes during fatigue in matched jointed and monolithic structures; independently image damage.",
    "against": "Local shifts do not precede global changes or are indistinguishable from temperature drift.",
    "category": "I. Acoustics, dynamics, and passive devices",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Modular joints could localize fatigue warnings",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 74,
    "literature_query": "Modular joints could localize fatigue warnings structure containing replaceable compliant develop measurable local experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0089",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 89,
      "title": "Modular joints could localize fatigue warnings",
      "hypothesis": "A structure containing replaceable compliant joints will develop a measurable local resonance shift before global stiffness declines during cyclic loading.",
      "test": "Track local and global vibration modes during fatigue in matched jointed and monolithic structures; independently image damage.",
      "against": "Local shifts do not precede global changes or are indistinguishable from temperature drift.",
      "category": "I. Acoustics, dynamics, and passive devices",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Modular joints could localize fatigue warnings",
      "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 74,
      "literature_query": "Modular joints could localize fatigue warnings structure containing replaceable compliant develop measurable local experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 3,
      "source_ids": "S7c2f9809f253;Sd8c7901ad82b;Sed4856facbaa",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 90,
    "title": "Geometric frustration could stabilize soft actuator position",
    "hypothesis": "A soft actuator constrained by competing geometric folds will hold intermediate positions with less continuous input energy than a single-fold actuator under equal load.",
    "test": "Compare energy consumption, displacement drift, and repeatability over matched position cycles; include the energy needed to switch states.",
    "against": "Total cycle energy is not reduced or intermediate positions drift beyond the predefined tolerance.",
    "category": "I. Acoustics, dynamics, and passive devices",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Geometric frustration could stabilize soft actuator position",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "excluded: broad prior-art overlap",
    "rank": 299,
    "literature_query": "Geometric frustration could stabilize soft actuator position constrained by competing folds hold intermediate experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0090",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 91,
    "title": "Alternating sensor placement could separate drift from gradients",
    "hypothesis": "Periodically swapping two identical temperature sensors between two locations will estimate a small steady temperature gradient more accurately than leaving them fixed for the same measurement duration.",
    "test": "Use a calibrated gradient fixture; include swap-induced disturbance, settling time, and independent reference readings in error estimates.",
    "against": "Swapping fails to reduce total error once disturbance and lost measurement time are counted.",
    "category": "J. Measurement and experimental technology",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Alternating sensor placement could separate drift from gradients",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0091",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 92,
    "title": "Inert reference particles could correct drying-image bias",
    "hypothesis": "Embedding a sparse population of dimensionally stable reference particles in a shrinking gel will improve optical estimates of true local deformation by separating focus drift from sample motion.",
    "test": "Compare image-derived strain with independent displacement measurements in gels with and without reference particles.",
    "against": "Accuracy does not improve or the particles change the gel's deformation enough to invalidate the correction.",
    "category": "J. Measurement and experimental technology",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Inert reference particles could correct drying-image bias",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 75,
    "literature_query": "Inert reference particles could correct drying-image bias Embedding sparse population of dimensionally stable experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0092",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 92,
      "title": "Inert reference particles could correct drying-image bias",
      "hypothesis": "Embedding a sparse population of dimensionally stable reference particles in a shrinking gel will improve optical estimates of true local deformation by separating focus drift from sample motion.",
      "test": "Compare image-derived strain with independent displacement measurements in gels with and without reference particles.",
      "against": "Accuracy does not improve or the particles change the gel's deformation enough to invalidate the correction.",
      "category": "J. Measurement and experimental technology",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Inert reference particles could correct drying-image bias",
      "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 75,
      "literature_query": "Inert reference particles could correct drying-image bias Embedding sparse population of dimensionally stable experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 5,
      "source_ids": "S05e6263fb858;S5854416dbca5;Sd6a641c490ce;S0cf721241758;S7eab5c736b69",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 93,
    "title": "Paired tracers could identify adsorption versus dead volume",
    "hypothesis": "Comparing breakthrough curves of matched-diffusivity adsorbing and nonadsorbing tracers will separate surface retention from stagnant-pore delay more reliably than either tracer alone.",
    "test": "Use pore networks with independently measured adsorption and known dead-end volumes; validate parameter recovery on unseen networks.",
    "against": "The fitted mechanisms remain nonidentifiable or parameter estimates fail independent measurements.",
    "category": "J. Measurement and experimental technology",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Paired tracers could identify adsorption versus dead volume",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 76,
    "literature_query": "Paired tracers could identify adsorption versus dead volume Comparing breakthrough curves of matched-diffusivity experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0093",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 93,
      "title": "Paired tracers could identify adsorption versus dead volume",
      "hypothesis": "Comparing breakthrough curves of matched-diffusivity adsorbing and nonadsorbing tracers will separate surface retention from stagnant-pore delay more reliably than either tracer alone.",
      "test": "Use pore networks with independently measured adsorption and known dead-end volumes; validate parameter recovery on unseen networks.",
      "against": "The fitted mechanisms remain nonidentifiable or parameter estimates fail independent measurements.",
      "category": "J. Measurement and experimental technology",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Paired tracers could identify adsorption versus dead volume",
      "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 76,
      "literature_query": "Paired tracers could identify adsorption versus dead volume Comparing breakthrough curves of matched-diffusivity experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 7,
      "source_ids": "S4000f3894be6;S7a8965afb4c9;Sddc7e139b85f;S8a2462b71a00;S3e2faf477dd0;S14af26398594;S8f118daae045",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 94,
    "title": "Frequency scheduling could improve impedance stability",
    "hypothesis": "Interleaving low- and high-frequency impedance measurements will reduce bias from slow sample drift compared with a monotonic frequency sweep of equal duration.",
    "test": "Measure a deliberately drifting reference circuit and a stable electrochemical model; compare fitted parameters with continuously monitored references.",
    "against": "Interleaving gives no accuracy gain or introduces greater settling artifacts.",
    "category": "J. Measurement and experimental technology",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Frequency scheduling could improve impedance stability",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Replacement after conservative prior-art screening: a bounded comparative test with measurable outcomes; exact novelty remains unverified.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 255,
    "literature_query": "Frequency scheduling could improve impedance stability Interleaving low- and high-frequency impedance measurements will reduce bias from slow sample drift compared with a monotonic frequency sweep of equal duration. experimental study",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0094",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 94,
      "title": "Frequency scheduling could improve impedance stability",
      "hypothesis": "Interleaving low- and high-frequency impedance measurements will reduce bias from slow sample drift compared with a monotonic frequency sweep of equal duration.",
      "test": "Measure a deliberately drifting reference circuit and a stable electrochemical model; compare fitted parameters with continuously monitored references.",
      "against": "Interleaving gives no accuracy gain or introduces greater settling artifacts.",
      "category": "J. Measurement and experimental technology",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Frequency scheduling could improve impedance stability",
      "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
      "access_score": 2,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Replacement after conservative prior-art screening: a bounded comparative test with measurable outcomes; exact novelty remains unverified.",
      "status": "not selected",
      "rank": 255,
      "literature_query": "Frequency scheduling could improve impedance stability Interleaving low- and high-frequency impedance measurements will reduce bias from slow sample drift compared with a monotonic frequency sweep of equal duration. experimental study",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 6,
      "source_ids": "Saa50925ae5a3;S3a502f5f1fb4;S892e47011789;Sabba13c629be;S2cd7f3e89d92;S2c796c659e42",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 95,
    "title": "Passive thermal references could reveal illumination artifacts",
    "hypothesis": "A nonresponsive optical reference patch with matched light absorption will improve separation of a sensor's chemical response from illumination-induced heating compared with a low-absorption reference.",
    "test": "Vary illumination and analyte concentration independently; compare corrected readings against direct temperature and concentration measurements.",
    "against": "The matched reference provides no lower error across independent exposures.",
    "category": "J. Measurement and experimental technology",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Passive thermal references could reveal illumination artifacts",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0095",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 96,
    "title": "Reversed sample orientation could expose hidden convection",
    "hypothesis": "Repeating a diffusion measurement with the cell inverted relative to gravity will reveal weak buoyancy contamination before it becomes obvious in concentration images.",
    "test": "Compare orientations in a calibrated diffusion cell over a small density-difference range; use tracer velocimetry as an independent check.",
    "against": "Orientation differences do not track measured flow or remain equally large with density-matched solutions.",
    "category": "J. Measurement and experimental technology",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Reversed sample orientation could expose hidden convection",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 25,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0096",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 97,
    "title": "Randomized pulse intervals could distinguish sensor memory",
    "hypothesis": "Randomizing intervals between identical analyte pulses will separate sensor recovery kinetics from slowly drifting baseline more reliably than regular intervals over the same total duration.",
    "test": "Compare schedules in a sensor with independently measured recovery; assess fitted kinetics on a separate pulse sequence.",
    "against": "Recovery estimates are no more accurate or depend on the chosen drift model rather than independent measurements.",
    "category": "J. Measurement and experimental technology",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Randomized pulse intervals could distinguish sensor memory",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Replacement after conservative prior-art screening: a bounded comparative test with measurable outcomes; exact novelty remains unverified.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 77,
    "literature_query": "Randomized pulse intervals could distinguish sensor memory Randomizing intervals between identical analyte pulses will separate sensor recovery kinetics from slowly drifting baseline more reliably than regular intervals over the  experimental study",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0097",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": true,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 97,
      "title": "Randomized pulse intervals could distinguish sensor memory",
      "hypothesis": "Randomizing intervals between identical analyte pulses will separate sensor recovery kinetics from slowly drifting baseline more reliably than regular intervals over the same total duration.",
      "test": "Compare schedules in a sensor with independently measured recovery; assess fitted kinetics on a separate pulse sequence.",
      "against": "Recovery estimates are no more accurate or depend on the chosen drift model rather than independent measurements.",
      "category": "J. Measurement and experimental technology",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Randomized pulse intervals could distinguish sensor memory",
      "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Replacement after conservative prior-art screening: a bounded comparative test with measurable outcomes; exact novelty remains unverified.",
      "status": "not selected",
      "rank": 77,
      "literature_query": "Randomized pulse intervals could distinguish sensor memory Randomizing intervals between identical analyte pulses will separate sensor recovery kinetics from slowly drifting baseline more reliably than regular intervals over the  experimental study",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 4,
      "source_ids": "Sb950b709b785;Sa7484ee388df;S69debab719d1;S94ce44e61806",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": {
      "deep_rank": "26",
      "id": "97",
      "title": "Randomized pulse intervals could distinguish sensor memory",
      "original_300_rank": "77",
      "pilot_class": "C",
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "hypothesis": "Randomizing intervals between identical analyte pulses will separate sensor recovery kinetics from slowly drifting baseline more reliably than regular intervals over the same total duration.",
      "primary_outcome": "Error in estimated sensor recovery time constant on a separate validation pulse sequence.",
      "comparison": "Equal-interval versus randomized-interval identical pulses, with identical pulse count, duration, total analyte dose, and total observation time.",
      "controls": "Drift process, sampling, sensor temperature, input delivery, signal-to-noise, fitting model, and parameter bounds.",
      "pilot": "First use a transparent kinetic model with known parameters to test identifiability. Then use a calibrated nonhuman benchtop sensor and a separately measured input. Freeze the fitting method before blinded validation.",
      "novelty_gap": "Transient processing and drift compensation are established. The unverified question is whether randomized timing improves recovery-parameter estimation under equal information and duration.",
      "stop_rule": "Drop the claim if improvements depend on changing the drift model after seeing results, extra measurement time, or unbalanced input doses.",
      "source_keys": "SENSOR21;SENSOR11;SENSOR23",
      "truth_probability": "not estimated",
      "novelty_status": "unverified"
    },
    "dossier_text": "# 26. H0097 — Randomized pulse intervals could distinguish sensor memory\n\nOriginal 300-folder rank: 77. Pilot class: C. Resource class: equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop.\n\n## Original hypothesis\n\nRandomizing intervals between identical analyte pulses will separate sensor recovery kinetics from slowly drifting baseline more reliably than regular intervals over the same total duration.\n\n## Why investigate this\n\nThis can start with low-cost model-based checks, and published sensor work shows why recovery and drift must be separated.\n\n## Literature assessment and exact novelty question\n\nTransient processing and drift compensation are established. The unverified question is whether randomized timing improves recovery-parameter estimation under equal information and duration. Worldwide originality remains unverified.\n\n## Primary measurement\n\nError in estimated sensor recovery time constant on a separate validation pulse sequence.\n\n## Comparison\n\nEqual-interval versus randomized-interval identical pulses, with identical pulse count, duration, total analyte dose, and total observation time.\n\n## Critical controls\n\nDrift process, sampling, sensor temperature, input delivery, signal-to-noise, fitting model, and parameter bounds.\n\n## Pilot plan\n\nFirst use a transparent kinetic model with known parameters to test identifiability. Then use a calibrated nonhuman benchtop sensor and a separately measured input. Freeze the fitting method before blinded validation.\n\n## What would count against it\n\nDrop the claim if improvements depend on changing the drift model after seeing results, extra measurement time, or unbalanced input doses.\n\n## Replication and analysis\n\nTreat separately prepared specimens, batches, or devices as independent units. Technical repeats and images are nested measurements. First estimate calibration error and independent-preparation variability. Set the minimum meaningful effect in the primary outcome's units before confirmation, then choose sample size from that effect and pilot variance; a convenient pilot count is not a powered study.\n\nRandomize run order and blind sample labels where practical. Freeze image processing, fitting choices, exclusions, and the primary comparison before evaluating confirmatory data. Report effect size and uncertainty; use a blocked or mixed-effects analysis when specimens share a batch. A wide interval is inconclusive. Include the measurement and matching controls even when the directional effect appears large.\n\nA useful go/no-go gate is whether the hypothesized effect can be distinguished from calibration uncertainty and the strongest alternative explanation. Stop material purchases if the closest literature already measures the identical contrast, unless a replication has an explicit purpose. Do not use these abbreviated plans as complete laboratory protocols.\n\n## Data to preserve\n\nKeep unedited images or sensor streams, calibration files, preparation IDs, run order, environmental logs, input histories, raw outcome values, exclusions, and the exact analysis version. No values are prefilled in the observation template. Use `data/Published Benchmarks.csv` only as literature context; values from a different system are not observations of this hypothesis.\n\n## Sources and transfer limits\n\n### SENSOR21\n\n[Resolving Fast Gas Transients with Metal Oxide Sensors](https://doi.org/10.1021/acssensors.0c02006)\n\nAccess: Indexed article methods and results examined. Type: primary experiment/method.\n\nBackground findings and transfer limits: see [source assessments](../research/Primary%20Source%20Assessments.md) under this source key.\n\n### SENSOR11\n\n[Robust gas detection at sub ppm concentrations](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.snb.2011.08.031)\n\nAccess: Indexed abstract examined. Type: primary experiment.\n\nBackground findings and transfer limits: see [source assessments](../research/Primary%20Source%20Assessments.md) under this source key.\n\n### SENSOR23\n\n[Response Surface Modeling of the Steady-State Impedance Responses of Gas Sensor Arrays Comprising Functionalized Carbon Nanotubes](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10610975/)\n\nAccess: Indexed article sections examined. Type: primary experiment/model.\n\nBackground findings and transfer limits: see [source assessments](../research/Primary%20Source%20Assessments.md) under this source key.\n\n"
  },
  {
    "id": 98,
    "title": "Dual-scale roughness standards could improve particle sizing",
    "hypothesis": "An imaging calibration target containing two known texture scales will detect focus-dependent particle-sizing bias more sensitively than a target containing only one scale.",
    "test": "Image targets and independently sized particles over controlled focus offsets; compare corrected particle-size errors on held-out images.",
    "against": "The two-scale target gives no meaningful improvement after equalizing image area and contrast.",
    "category": "J. Measurement and experimental technology",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Dual-scale roughness standards could improve particle sizing",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Replacement after conservative prior-art screening: a bounded comparative test with measurable outcomes; exact novelty remains unverified.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 78,
    "literature_query": "Dual-scale roughness standards could improve particle sizing An imaging calibration target containing two known texture scales will detect focus-dependent particle-sizing bias more sensitively than a target containing only one scal experimental study",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0098",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 98,
      "title": "Dual-scale roughness standards could improve particle sizing",
      "hypothesis": "An imaging calibration target containing two known texture scales will detect focus-dependent particle-sizing bias more sensitively than a target containing only one scale.",
      "test": "Image targets and independently sized particles over controlled focus offsets; compare corrected particle-size errors on held-out images.",
      "against": "The two-scale target gives no meaningful improvement after equalizing image area and contrast.",
      "category": "J. Measurement and experimental technology",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Dual-scale roughness standards could improve particle sizing",
      "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Replacement after conservative prior-art screening: a bounded comparative test with measurable outcomes; exact novelty remains unverified.",
      "status": "not selected",
      "rank": 78,
      "literature_query": "Dual-scale roughness standards could improve particle sizing An imaging calibration target containing two known texture scales will detect focus-dependent particle-sizing bias more sensitively than a target containing only one scal experimental study",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 7,
      "source_ids": "S31ea357e4c87;S67b255b381a8;S757867b39558;Sc1393c7297f0;S0bb42b8a80f1;S469ddaa3d40e;Sb3435a782db9",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 99,
    "title": "Sample-free bypass cycles could quantify tubing memory",
    "hypothesis": "Briefly routing a measurement stream through a sample-free bypass between exposures will distinguish tubing desorption from sample release more accurately than blank flushing through the sample chamber.",
    "test": "Use a flow system with independently characterized tubing adsorption and a model releasing sample; measure carryover in both routes.",
    "against": "The contributions cannot be recovered independently or valve transients dominate the signal.",
    "category": "J. Measurement and experimental technology",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Sample-free bypass cycles could quantify tubing memory",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 79,
    "literature_query": "Sample-free bypass cycles could quantify tubing memory Briefly routing measurement stream through exposures experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0099",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 99,
      "title": "Sample-free bypass cycles could quantify tubing memory",
      "hypothesis": "Briefly routing a measurement stream through a sample-free bypass between exposures will distinguish tubing desorption from sample release more accurately than blank flushing through the sample chamber.",
      "test": "Use a flow system with independently characterized tubing adsorption and a model releasing sample; measure carryover in both routes.",
      "against": "The contributions cannot be recovered independently or valve transients dominate the signal.",
      "category": "J. Measurement and experimental technology",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Sample-free bypass cycles could quantify tubing memory",
      "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 79,
      "literature_query": "Sample-free bypass cycles could quantify tubing memory Briefly routing measurement stream through exposures experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 1,
      "source_ids": "S5f07c404dce2",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 100,
    "title": "Orthogonal perturbations could separate fouling from sensitivity loss",
    "hypothesis": "Applying a small temperature perturbation and a small flow perturbation to a chemical sensor will distinguish surface fouling from intrinsic sensitivity loss better than a concentration calibration alone.",
    "test": "Prepare independently verified fouled, aged, and unaffected sensors; compare response signatures and blinded classification on separately prepared devices.",
    "against": "The signatures overlap within measurement uncertainty or fail to generalize across independent devices.",
    "category": "J. Measurement and experimental technology",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Orthogonal perturbations could separate fouling from sensitivity loss",
    "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 80,
    "literature_query": "Orthogonal perturbations could separate fouling sensitivity loss Applying temperature perturbation flow to chemical experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0100",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 100,
      "title": "Orthogonal perturbations could separate fouling from sensitivity loss",
      "hypothesis": "Applying a small temperature perturbation and a small flow perturbation to a chemical sensor will distinguish surface fouling from intrinsic sensitivity loss better than a concentration calibration alone.",
      "test": "Prepare independently verified fouled, aged, and unaffected sensors; compare response signatures and blinded classification on separately prepared devices.",
      "against": "The signatures overlap within measurement uncertainty or fail to generalize across independent devices.",
      "category": "J. Measurement and experimental technology",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Orthogonal perturbations could separate fouling from sensitivity loss",
      "source_file": "HYPOTHESES.md",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 80,
      "literature_query": "Orthogonal perturbations could separate fouling sensitivity loss Applying temperature perturbation flow to chemical experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 3,
      "source_ids": "Sfd4597cf7fb0;S8948c85d48c4;S0b0a5232c9af",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 101,
    "title": "Cooling reversal and polymorph selection",
    "hypothesis": "A brief warming step before nucleation will change the polymorph ratio of a benign model compound relative to uninterrupted cooling with the same final temperature.",
    "test": "Compare cooling schedules using diffraction and microscopy; match concentration, agitation, and time before sampling.",
    "against": "Polymorph ratios are unchanged across independent preparations.",
    "category": "CRYSTALLIZATION AND MOLECULAR ASSEMBLY",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Cooling reversal and polymorph selection",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0101",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 102,
    "title": "Seed age and crystal branching",
    "hypothesis": "Freshly fractured seed crystals will generate fewer branches during growth than aged seeds of the same dimensions because their surfaces have fewer adsorbed impurities.",
    "test": "Grow matched seeds after controlled aging; measure impurity coverage, branch density, and growth rate.",
    "against": "Branch differences disappear when growth rate and surface contamination are measured.",
    "category": "CRYSTALLIZATION AND MOLECULAR ASSEMBLY",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Seed age and crystal branching",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0102",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 103,
    "title": "Acoustic timing and crystal size",
    "hypothesis": "Low-energy acoustic pulses delivered only during nucleation will narrow crystal-size distributions more efficiently than pulses delivered only during growth at equal acoustic energy.",
    "test": "Compare pulse timing in a benign crystallization system; monitor temperature, nuclei counts, and final sizes.",
    "against": "Nucleation-only pulses do not narrow the distribution at matched yield.",
    "category": "CRYSTALLIZATION AND MOLECULAR ASSEMBLY",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Acoustic timing and crystal size",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0103",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 104,
    "title": "Confinement and crystal handedness domains",
    "hypothesis": "In an achiral compound capable of forming chiral crystals, narrow growth chambers will reduce the number of opposite-handed domains per crystal relative to wide chambers.",
    "test": "Identify a suitable established model compound; compare diffraction or polarized images at matched growth rate.",
    "against": "Domain density does not depend on chamber width after crystal size is accounted for.",
    "category": "CRYSTALLIZATION AND MOLECULAR ASSEMBLY",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Confinement and crystal handedness domains",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0104",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 105,
    "title": "Impurity pulse and growth-face memory",
    "hypothesis": "A short exposure to a growth-inhibiting impurity will suppress one crystal face after the surrounding solution has been replaced, with recovery time increasing with impurity affinity.",
    "test": "Use flow-cell crystal growth, calibrated solution exchange, and face-resolved imaging.",
    "against": "Growth recovers at the solution-exchange timescale regardless of affinity.",
    "category": "CRYSTALLIZATION AND MOLECULAR ASSEMBLY",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Impurity pulse and growth-face memory",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0105",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 106,
    "title": "Crowding and supramolecular ring closure",
    "hypothesis": "An inert molecular crowder will favor closed rings over open chains in a reversible assembly system within an intermediate crowding range.",
    "test": "Measure ring and chain fractions across crowder concentrations with two independent structural methods; control solvent activity.",
    "against": "Ring enrichment is absent or explained by specific crowder binding.",
    "category": "CRYSTALLIZATION AND MOLECULAR ASSEMBLY",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Crowding and supramolecular ring closure",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0106",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 107,
    "title": "Gravity and crystal inclusion bands",
    "hypothesis": "Reversing a growing crystal's orientation relative to gravity will reverse asymmetry in trapped liquid inclusions when solutal convection dominates incorporation.",
    "test": "Grow oriented crystals in a transparent cell; map inclusions and measure flow with tracers.",
    "against": "Inclusion asymmetry fails to reverse despite a verified reversal of convective flow.",
    "category": "CRYSTALLIZATION AND MOLECULAR ASSEMBLY",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Gravity and crystal inclusion bands",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 25,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 231,
    "literature_query": "Gravity crystal inclusion bands Reversing growing orientation to reverse asymmetry in trapped liquid experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0107",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 107,
      "title": "Gravity and crystal inclusion bands",
      "hypothesis": "Reversing a growing crystal's orientation relative to gravity will reverse asymmetry in trapped liquid inclusions when solutal convection dominates incorporation.",
      "test": "Grow oriented crystals in a transparent cell; map inclusions and measure flow with tracers.",
      "against": "Inclusion asymmetry fails to reverse despite a verified reversal of convective flow.",
      "category": "CRYSTALLIZATION AND MOLECULAR ASSEMBLY",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Gravity and crystal inclusion bands",
      "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 25,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 231,
      "literature_query": "Gravity crystal inclusion bands Reversing growing orientation to reverse asymmetry in trapped liquid experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 4,
      "source_ids": "S835cb114f91c;S5dd0f436cf77;S71841d3027b0;S3b333e1276b5",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 108,
    "title": "Slow solvent exchange and defect annealing",
    "hypothesis": "Stepwise solvent exchange in a porous molecular crystal will preserve more accessible pore volume than one abrupt exchange with equal final composition.",
    "test": "Compare diffraction, gas uptake, and crack imaging after matched drying.",
    "against": "Accessible volume and defect density do not improve under stepwise exchange.",
    "category": "CRYSTALLIZATION AND MOLECULAR ASSEMBLY",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Slow solvent exchange and defect annealing",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0108",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 109,
    "title": "Oscillating supersaturation and facet recovery",
    "hypothesis": "Small supersaturation oscillations that briefly dissolve protrusions will reduce crystal-surface roughness at equal net deposited mass.",
    "test": "Track facets in a flow cell under oscillating and steady conditions; measure mass and topography.",
    "against": "Roughness remains unchanged or falls only because less material is deposited.",
    "category": "CRYSTALLIZATION AND MOLECULAR ASSEMBLY",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Oscillating supersaturation and facet recovery",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 25,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 232,
    "literature_query": "Oscillating supersaturation facet recovery oscillations briefly dissolve protrusions crystal-surface roughness at net deposited experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0109",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 109,
      "title": "Oscillating supersaturation and facet recovery",
      "hypothesis": "Small supersaturation oscillations that briefly dissolve protrusions will reduce crystal-surface roughness at equal net deposited mass.",
      "test": "Track facets in a flow cell under oscillating and steady conditions; measure mass and topography.",
      "against": "Roughness remains unchanged or falls only because less material is deposited.",
      "category": "CRYSTALLIZATION AND MOLECULAR ASSEMBLY",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Oscillating supersaturation and facet recovery",
      "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 25,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 232,
      "literature_query": "Oscillating supersaturation facet recovery oscillations briefly dissolve protrusions crystal-surface roughness at net deposited experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 4,
      "source_ids": "S92a0b95d9b29;S03bb6f6769bd;S4da513d69a80;Se428c687a197",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 110,
    "title": "Isotope dilution and assembly kinetics",
    "hypothesis": "Replacing a small solvent fraction with its stable isotopic counterpart will change the assembly rate of a hydrogen-bonded model aggregate more than its final assembled fraction.",
    "test": "Measure time-resolved assembly and equilibrium fractions while independently measuring viscosity and temperature.",
    "against": "Rate changes are fully explained by viscosity, or equilibrium changes are comparably large.",
    "category": "CRYSTALLIZATION AND MOLECULAR ASSEMBLY",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Isotope dilution and assembly kinetics",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0110",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 111,
    "title": "Magnetic field rotation and particle chaining",
    "hypothesis": "A slowly rotating magnetic field will produce shorter, more branched chains of magnetic colloids than a static field with equal magnitude and exposure time.",
    "test": "Image dilute suspensions across rotation rates; match viscosity and particle loading.",
    "against": "Branching and chain length are unchanged or arise from heating.",
    "category": "MAGNETIC AND ELECTRONIC MATERIALS",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Magnetic field rotation and particle chaining",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0111",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 112,
    "title": "Alternating anisotropy and domain-wall pinning",
    "hypothesis": "A magnetic strip with alternating easy-axis orientations will show more uniform domain-wall stopping positions than a strip with random orientations of the same distribution.",
    "test": "Use patterned research samples and magnetic microscopy; compare repeated wall motion at matched drive.",
    "against": "Stopping-position variance does not decrease.",
    "category": "MAGNETIC AND ELECTRONIC MATERIALS",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Alternating anisotropy and domain-wall pinning",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0112",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 113,
    "title": "Strain release and magnetic relaxation",
    "hypothesis": "A thin magnetic film will relax toward its initial magnetization faster after gradual strain release than abrupt release from the same strain.",
    "test": "Measure magnetization and mechanical strain simultaneously under temperature-controlled conditions.",
    "against": "Relaxation curves agree after actual strain histories are included.",
    "category": "MAGNETIC AND ELECTRONIC MATERIALS",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Strain release and magnetic relaxation",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0113",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 114,
    "title": "Particle shell thickness and magnetic heating drift",
    "hypothesis": "A thicker inert shell around magnetic nanoparticles will reduce cycle-to-cycle heating drift by limiting aggregation, despite lowering heating per total sample mass.",
    "test": "Measure heating, aggregation, and magnetic response over repeated field cycles in specialist equipment.",
    "against": "Drift is unchanged or reduction is unrelated to aggregation.",
    "category": "MAGNETIC AND ELECTRONIC MATERIALS",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Particle shell thickness and magnetic heating drift",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0114",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 115,
    "title": "Spatial disorder and electrical percolation noise",
    "hypothesis": "Near the conductive threshold, correlated filler spacing will produce lower low-frequency resistance noise than randomly distributed filler at matched mean resistance.",
    "test": "Fabricate composites and measure noise spectra with four-terminal contacts; image filler networks.",
    "against": "Noise differences disappear after contact artifacts and resistance are controlled.",
    "category": "MAGNETIC AND ELECTRONIC MATERIALS",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Spatial disorder and electrical percolation noise",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0115",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 116,
    "title": "Grain-boundary passivation and humidity response",
    "hypothesis": "Selective passivation of grain boundaries in an oxide film will reduce humidity-induced conductance drift more than uniform partial passivation at equal coating mass.",
    "test": "Compare conductance, water uptake, and boundary coverage in matched films.",
    "against": "Selective treatment has no advantage after total water uptake is considered.",
    "category": "MAGNETIC AND ELECTRONIC MATERIALS",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Grain-boundary passivation and humidity response",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 256,
    "literature_query": "Grain-boundary passivation humidity response Selective of grain boundaries in an oxide film humidity-induced experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0116",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 116,
      "title": "Grain-boundary passivation and humidity response",
      "hypothesis": "Selective passivation of grain boundaries in an oxide film will reduce humidity-induced conductance drift more than uniform partial passivation at equal coating mass.",
      "test": "Compare conductance, water uptake, and boundary coverage in matched films.",
      "against": "Selective treatment has no advantage after total water uptake is considered.",
      "category": "MAGNETIC AND ELECTRONIC MATERIALS",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Grain-boundary passivation and humidity response",
      "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
      "access_score": 2,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 256,
      "literature_query": "Grain-boundary passivation humidity response Selective of grain boundaries in an oxide film humidity-induced experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 4,
      "source_ids": "S787fa7ebf3dd;S39c89432f2d9;S2050ae186d84;S6608aa7a7aa3",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 117,
    "title": "Mechanical cycling and contact-network recovery",
    "hypothesis": "A conductive elastomer stretched along alternating perpendicular directions will retain its initial resistance better than one stretched repeatedly along a single direction at matched strain energy.",
    "test": "Measure resistance tensors, hysteresis, and filler orientation through cycling.",
    "against": "Resistance retention is equal or worse with alternating directions.",
    "category": "MAGNETIC AND ELECTRONIC MATERIALS",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Mechanical cycling and contact-network recovery",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0117",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 118,
    "title": "Dielectric layer order and charge retention",
    "hypothesis": "Reversing two dielectric layers with different trap densities will change surface-charge decay under humid conditions even when total thickness and initial potential are matched.",
    "test": "Measure potential decay, leakage, and water adsorption on reversed stacks.",
    "against": "Decay differences vanish after leakage and surface chemistry are matched.",
    "category": "MAGNETIC AND ELECTRONIC MATERIALS",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Dielectric layer order and charge retention",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0118",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 119,
    "title": "Thermal cycling and conductive-path redundancy",
    "hypothesis": "A conductor network with multiple weak parallel paths will retain conductivity after thermal cycling better than a single strong path with equal initial resistance and conductor mass.",
    "test": "Compare patterned networks under equal temperature histories; image broken links.",
    "against": "Redundant networks show no improved retention across independent samples.",
    "category": "MAGNETIC AND ELECTRONIC MATERIALS",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Thermal cycling and conductive-path redundancy",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0119",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 120,
    "title": "Magnetic gradients and colloid redistribution",
    "hypothesis": "Intermittent magnetic-gradient exposure will yield a more uniform particle layer after field removal than continuous exposure with the same integrated gradient force.",
    "test": "Image particle concentration and sedimentation during both schedules; control heating and fluid motion.",
    "against": "Uniformity does not improve or requires extra mixing energy.",
    "category": "MAGNETIC AND ELECTRONIC MATERIALS",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Magnetic gradients and colloid redistribution",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0120",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 121,
    "title": "Pore-length mixtures and filtration stability",
    "hypothesis": "A membrane mixing short and long parallel pores will maintain more stable flux under intermittent particle loading than a uniform-length membrane with the same initial permeability.",
    "test": "Compare flux and blockage maps at matched pore diameters, total area, and particle dose.",
    "against": "Flux stability is no better at matched initial permeability.",
    "category": "MEMBRANES, SEPARATION, AND TRANSPORT",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Pore-length mixtures and filtration stability",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Replacement after conservative prior-art screening: a bounded comparative test with measurable outcomes; exact novelty remains unverified.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 81,
    "literature_query": "Pore-length mixtures and filtration stability A membrane mixing short and long parallel pores will maintain more stable flux under intermittent particle loading than a uniform-length membrane with the same initial pe experimental study",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0121",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 121,
      "title": "Pore-length mixtures and filtration stability",
      "hypothesis": "A membrane mixing short and long parallel pores will maintain more stable flux under intermittent particle loading than a uniform-length membrane with the same initial permeability.",
      "test": "Compare flux and blockage maps at matched pore diameters, total area, and particle dose.",
      "against": "Flux stability is no better at matched initial permeability.",
      "category": "MEMBRANES, SEPARATION, AND TRANSPORT",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Pore-length mixtures and filtration stability",
      "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Replacement after conservative prior-art screening: a bounded comparative test with measurable outcomes; exact novelty remains unverified.",
      "status": "not selected",
      "rank": 81,
      "literature_query": "Pore-length mixtures and filtration stability A membrane mixing short and long parallel pores will maintain more stable flux under intermittent particle loading than a uniform-length membrane with the same initial pe experimental study",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 4,
      "source_ids": "Sf5e497d68e7a;S67defa280de4;Sc3451a8ba289;S9a751cc842ff",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 122,
    "title": "Surface mobility and solute release",
    "hypothesis": "A membrane with mobile tethered chains will release reversibly adsorbed solute faster after a clean-water switch than one with immobilized chains of the same chemistry and density.",
    "test": "Measure breakthrough and washout while characterizing chain mobility and pore geometry.",
    "against": "Release times are unchanged after adsorption capacity is matched.",
    "category": "MEMBRANES, SEPARATION, AND TRANSPORT",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Surface mobility and solute release",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Replacement after conservative prior-art screening: a bounded comparative test with measurable outcomes; exact novelty remains unverified.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 82,
    "literature_query": "Surface mobility and solute release A membrane with mobile tethered chains will release reversibly adsorbed solute faster after a clean-water switch than one with immobilized chains of the same chemistry an experimental study",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0122",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 122,
      "title": "Surface mobility and solute release",
      "hypothesis": "A membrane with mobile tethered chains will release reversibly adsorbed solute faster after a clean-water switch than one with immobilized chains of the same chemistry and density.",
      "test": "Measure breakthrough and washout while characterizing chain mobility and pore geometry.",
      "against": "Release times are unchanged after adsorption capacity is matched.",
      "category": "MEMBRANES, SEPARATION, AND TRANSPORT",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Surface mobility and solute release",
      "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Replacement after conservative prior-art screening: a bounded comparative test with measurable outcomes; exact novelty remains unverified.",
      "status": "not selected",
      "rank": 82,
      "literature_query": "Surface mobility and solute release A membrane with mobile tethered chains will release reversibly adsorbed solute faster after a clean-water switch than one with immobilized chains of the same chemistry an experimental study",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 5,
      "source_ids": "S3b1264814add;S5708a08a7fed;S4c142dc5d083;Sbe327905318b;S73a3e5df27e9",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 123,
    "title": "Crossflow reversal and size selectivity",
    "hypothesis": "Brief crossflow reversals will preserve membrane size selectivity during colloid filtration better than uninterrupted crossflow at equal pumping work.",
    "test": "Track rejection of multiple particle sizes and flux; quantify deposited layers.",
    "against": "Selectivity preservation disappears when pumping work and flux are matched.",
    "category": "MEMBRANES, SEPARATION, AND TRANSPORT",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Crossflow reversal and size selectivity",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 83,
    "literature_query": "Crossflow reversal size selectivity Brief reversals preserve membrane colloid filtration better uninterrupted at experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0123",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 123,
      "title": "Crossflow reversal and size selectivity",
      "hypothesis": "Brief crossflow reversals will preserve membrane size selectivity during colloid filtration better than uninterrupted crossflow at equal pumping work.",
      "test": "Track rejection of multiple particle sizes and flux; quantify deposited layers.",
      "against": "Selectivity preservation disappears when pumping work and flux are matched.",
      "category": "MEMBRANES, SEPARATION, AND TRANSPORT",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Crossflow reversal and size selectivity",
      "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 83,
      "literature_query": "Crossflow reversal size selectivity Brief reversals preserve membrane colloid filtration better uninterrupted at experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 4,
      "source_ids": "S51b7406cc84e;S437e15f79c5f;S8c4d4383d508;S83834d4cadc3",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 124,
    "title": "Hydrogel charge spacing and ion partitioning",
    "hypothesis": "At equal fixed-charge density, clustering charged groups in a hydrogel will change partitioning of divalent relative to monovalent ions.",
    "test": "Measure equilibrium ion concentrations with matched swelling and ionic strength; characterize charge distribution.",
    "against": "Partition ratios agree after water content and total charge are matched.",
    "category": "MEMBRANES, SEPARATION, AND TRANSPORT",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Hydrogel charge spacing and ion partitioning",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 257,
    "literature_query": "Hydrogel charge spacing ion partitioning At fixed-charge density clustering charged groups in change experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0124",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 124,
      "title": "Hydrogel charge spacing and ion partitioning",
      "hypothesis": "At equal fixed-charge density, clustering charged groups in a hydrogel will change partitioning of divalent relative to monovalent ions.",
      "test": "Measure equilibrium ion concentrations with matched swelling and ionic strength; characterize charge distribution.",
      "against": "Partition ratios agree after water content and total charge are matched.",
      "category": "MEMBRANES, SEPARATION, AND TRANSPORT",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Hydrogel charge spacing and ion partitioning",
      "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
      "access_score": 2,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 257,
      "literature_query": "Hydrogel charge spacing ion partitioning At fixed-charge density clustering charged groups in change experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 5,
      "source_ids": "Se21dbb87904a;S155935e9537e;S54caa4181224;S80ec4a10deac;S24dbab7b8aeb",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 125,
    "title": "Flexible pore mouths and clog release",
    "hypothesis": "A compliant pore entrance will shed soft-particle clogs at lower reverse pressure than a rigid entrance of equal open diameter.",
    "test": "Image standardized soft beads under pressure ramps; measure pore deformation.",
    "against": "Release pressure is unchanged or pore damage accounts for unclogging.",
    "category": "MEMBRANES, SEPARATION, AND TRANSPORT",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Flexible pore mouths and clog release",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Replacement after conservative prior-art screening: a bounded comparative test with measurable outcomes; exact novelty remains unverified.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 84,
    "literature_query": "Flexible pore mouths and clog release A compliant pore entrance will shed soft-particle clogs at lower reverse pressure than a rigid entrance of equal open diameter. experimental study",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0125",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": true,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 125,
      "title": "Flexible pore mouths and clog release",
      "hypothesis": "A compliant pore entrance will shed soft-particle clogs at lower reverse pressure than a rigid entrance of equal open diameter.",
      "test": "Image standardized soft beads under pressure ramps; measure pore deformation.",
      "against": "Release pressure is unchanged or pore damage accounts for unclogging.",
      "category": "MEMBRANES, SEPARATION, AND TRANSPORT",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Flexible pore mouths and clog release",
      "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Replacement after conservative prior-art screening: a bounded comparative test with measurable outcomes; exact novelty remains unverified.",
      "status": "not selected",
      "rank": 84,
      "literature_query": "Flexible pore mouths and clog release A compliant pore entrance will shed soft-particle clogs at lower reverse pressure than a rigid entrance of equal open diameter. experimental study",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 6,
      "source_ids": "S123e978db662;S7f77cd7f002c;Sa780b62809bf;S2517919199e1;Sc07655841023;S7977c2132233",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": {
      "deep_rank": "25",
      "id": "125",
      "title": "Flexible pore mouths and clog release",
      "original_300_rank": "84",
      "pilot_class": "C",
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "hypothesis": "A compliant pore entrance will shed soft-particle clogs at lower reverse pressure than a rigid entrance of equal open diameter.",
      "primary_outcome": "Reverse pressure at first reproducible unclogging without pore damage.",
      "comparison": "Compliant versus rigid pore entrances with matched unloaded diameter, using the same soft model particles.",
      "controls": "Actual loaded pore diameter, particle modulus and swelling, adhesion, roughness, pressure ramp, fluid viscosity, and clog age.",
      "pilot": "Begin with a macroscopic transparent elastic constriction if microfabrication is unavailable. Image particle and pore deformation simultaneously; calibrate pressure and verify repeated pore recovery.",
      "novelty_gap": "Soft-particle clogging is known. The potential addition is entrance compliance independently of loaded aperture and particle deformation. The 2018 hopper paper has an indexed 2026 erratum; consult it before numerical reuse.",
      "stop_rule": "Stop if the compliant pore is simply wider under load or ruptures. Equal release pressures after matching loaded geometry contradict the claimed benefit.",
      "source_keys": "CLOG18;MICROGEL19",
      "truth_probability": "not estimated",
      "novelty_status": "unverified"
    },
    "dossier_text": "# 25. H0125 — Flexible pore mouths and clog release\n\nOriginal 300-folder rank: 84. Pilot class: C. Resource class: equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop.\n\n## Original hypothesis\n\nA compliant pore entrance will shed soft-particle clogs at lower reverse pressure than a rigid entrance of equal open diameter.\n\n## Why investigate this\n\nParticle softness and constriction clogging have primary experimental precedent. Reverse-pressure release is a sharply defined endpoint.\n\n## Literature assessment and exact novelty question\n\nSoft-particle clogging is known. The potential addition is entrance compliance independently of loaded aperture and particle deformation. The 2018 hopper paper has an indexed 2026 erratum; consult it before numerical reuse. Worldwide originality remains unverified.\n\n## Primary measurement\n\nReverse pressure at first reproducible unclogging without pore damage.\n\n## Comparison\n\nCompliant versus rigid pore entrances with matched unloaded diameter, using the same soft model particles.\n\n## Critical controls\n\nActual loaded pore diameter, particle modulus and swelling, adhesion, roughness, pressure ramp, fluid viscosity, and clog age.\n\n## Pilot plan\n\nBegin with a macroscopic transparent elastic constriction if microfabrication is unavailable. Image particle and pore deformation simultaneously; calibrate pressure and verify repeated pore recovery.\n\n## What would count against it\n\nStop if the compliant pore is simply wider under load or ruptures. Equal release pressures after matching loaded geometry contradict the claimed benefit.\n\n## Replication and analysis\n\nTreat separately prepared specimens, batches, or devices as independent units. Technical repeats and images are nested measurements. First estimate calibration error and independent-preparation variability. Set the minimum meaningful effect in the primary outcome's units before confirmation, then choose sample size from that effect and pilot variance; a convenient pilot count is not a powered study.\n\nRandomize run order and blind sample labels where practical. Freeze image processing, fitting choices, exclusions, and the primary comparison before evaluating confirmatory data. Report effect size and uncertainty; use a blocked or mixed-effects analysis when specimens share a batch. A wide interval is inconclusive. Include the measurement and matching controls even when the directional effect appears large.\n\nA useful go/no-go gate is whether the hypothesized effect can be distinguished from calibration uncertainty and the strongest alternative explanation. Stop material purchases if the closest literature already measures the identical contrast, unless a replication has an explicit purpose. Do not use these abbreviated plans as complete laboratory protocols.\n\n## Data to preserve\n\nKeep unedited images or sensor streams, calibration files, preparation IDs, run order, environmental logs, input histories, raw outcome values, exclusions, and the exact analysis version. No values are prefilled in the observation template. Use `data/Published Benchmarks.csv` only as literature context; values from a different system are not observations of this hypothesis.\n\n## Sources and transfer limits\n\n### CLOG18\n\n[Clogging of soft particles in two-dimensional hoppers](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29347308/)\n\nAccess: Indexed abstract and correction notice examined. Type: primary experiment/simulation.\n\nBackground findings and transfer limits: see [source assessments](../research/Primary%20Source%20Assessments.md) under this source key.\n\n### MICROGEL19\n\n[Conformational changes influence clogging behavior of micrometer-sized microgels in idealized multiple constrictions](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6592940/)\n\nAccess: Indexed article sections examined. Type: primary experiment.\n\nBackground findings and transfer limits: see [source assessments](../research/Primary%20Source%20Assessments.md) under this source key.\n\n"
  },
  {
    "id": 126,
    "title": "Adsorbent layer sequence and breakthrough width",
    "hypothesis": "Placing fast, low-capacity adsorbent upstream of slow, high-capacity adsorbent will narrow breakthrough transitions compared with the reversed sequence.",
    "test": "Use a benign dye mixture and matched adsorbent masses; measure residence-time distributions and outlet concentrations.",
    "against": "Sequence has no effect beyond ordinary dead-volume differences.",
    "category": "MEMBRANES, SEPARATION, AND TRANSPORT",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Adsorbent layer sequence and breakthrough width",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Replacement after conservative prior-art screening: a bounded comparative test with measurable outcomes; exact novelty remains unverified.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 85,
    "literature_query": "Adsorbent layer sequence and breakthrough width Placing fast, low-capacity adsorbent upstream of slow, high-capacity adsorbent will narrow breakthrough transitions compared with the reversed sequence. experimental study",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0126",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 126,
      "title": "Adsorbent layer sequence and breakthrough width",
      "hypothesis": "Placing fast, low-capacity adsorbent upstream of slow, high-capacity adsorbent will narrow breakthrough transitions compared with the reversed sequence.",
      "test": "Use a benign dye mixture and matched adsorbent masses; measure residence-time distributions and outlet concentrations.",
      "against": "Sequence has no effect beyond ordinary dead-volume differences.",
      "category": "MEMBRANES, SEPARATION, AND TRANSPORT",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Adsorbent layer sequence and breakthrough width",
      "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Replacement after conservative prior-art screening: a bounded comparative test with measurable outcomes; exact novelty remains unverified.",
      "status": "not selected",
      "rank": 85,
      "literature_query": "Adsorbent layer sequence and breakthrough width Placing fast, low-capacity adsorbent upstream of slow, high-capacity adsorbent will narrow breakthrough transitions compared with the reversed sequence. experimental study",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 3,
      "source_ids": "Se23f78caf2e2;S858b4be6b7d3;S589530b42e21",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 127,
    "title": "Surface pattern direction and particle rejection",
    "hypothesis": "Diagonal nonadhesive stripes on a filter surface will direct deposited particles toward channel edges more effectively than transverse stripes of equal coverage.",
    "test": "Map deposition in a transparent crossflow cell with matched flow and stripe chemistry.",
    "against": "Particle redistribution does not follow stripe orientation.",
    "category": "MEMBRANES, SEPARATION, AND TRANSPORT",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Surface pattern direction and particle rejection",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 25,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 233,
    "literature_query": "Surface pattern direction particle rejection Diagonal nonadhesive stripes on filter direct deposited particles experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0127",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 127,
      "title": "Surface pattern direction and particle rejection",
      "hypothesis": "Diagonal nonadhesive stripes on a filter surface will direct deposited particles toward channel edges more effectively than transverse stripes of equal coverage.",
      "test": "Map deposition in a transparent crossflow cell with matched flow and stripe chemistry.",
      "against": "Particle redistribution does not follow stripe orientation.",
      "category": "MEMBRANES, SEPARATION, AND TRANSPORT",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Surface pattern direction and particle rejection",
      "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 25,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 233,
      "literature_query": "Surface pattern direction particle rejection Diagonal nonadhesive stripes on filter direct deposited particles experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 4,
      "source_ids": "S7ce0a171fe33;S8d577d2c3b74;S8a41829524b3;Sf07bb429c2b1",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 128,
    "title": "Osmotic cycling and membrane fatigue",
    "hypothesis": "Alternating osmotic gradients will cause more permeability drift than a constant gradient with equal cumulative magnitude because repeated swelling stresses accumulate.",
    "test": "Measure permeability, swelling, and defects in model polymer membranes with chemically compatible solutes.",
    "against": "Drift is unchanged or explained by irreversible solute adsorption.",
    "category": "MEMBRANES, SEPARATION, AND TRANSPORT",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Osmotic cycling and membrane fatigue",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0128",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 129,
    "title": "Dual pore populations and solvent exchange tails",
    "hypothesis": "A membrane containing two well-separated pore diameters will show a longer solvent-exchange tail than a single-population membrane with equal permeability and void volume.",
    "test": "Measure exchange using a nonadsorbing tracer and independently characterized pore distributions.",
    "against": "Measured exchange tails are indistinguishable.",
    "category": "MEMBRANES, SEPARATION, AND TRANSPORT",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Dual pore populations and solvent exchange tails",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Replacement after conservative prior-art screening: a bounded comparative test with measurable outcomes; exact novelty remains unverified.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 86,
    "literature_query": "Dual pore populations and solvent exchange tails A membrane containing two well-separated pore diameters will show a longer solvent-exchange tail than a single-population membrane with equal permeability and void volume experimental study",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0129",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 129,
      "title": "Dual pore populations and solvent exchange tails",
      "hypothesis": "A membrane containing two well-separated pore diameters will show a longer solvent-exchange tail than a single-population membrane with equal permeability and void volume.",
      "test": "Measure exchange using a nonadsorbing tracer and independently characterized pore distributions.",
      "against": "Measured exchange tails are indistinguishable.",
      "category": "MEMBRANES, SEPARATION, AND TRANSPORT",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Dual pore populations and solvent exchange tails",
      "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Replacement after conservative prior-art screening: a bounded comparative test with measurable outcomes; exact novelty remains unverified.",
      "status": "not selected",
      "rank": 86,
      "literature_query": "Dual pore populations and solvent exchange tails A membrane containing two well-separated pore diameters will show a longer solvent-exchange tail than a single-population membrane with equal permeability and void volume experimental study",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 6,
      "source_ids": "S2565d7e52e74;S6250a5bf709e;S958ac0cc9ba7;S46db8ff7eb91;S24c52d5cc251;Scfa4058c49df",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 130,
    "title": "Competitive adsorption and regeneration order",
    "hypothesis": "Removing a weakly bound solute before changing conditions to release a strongly bound solute will recover more adsorbent capacity than releasing both together.",
    "test": "Use a reversible benign two-solute adsorption system; compare recovered mass, purity, and subsequent capacity.",
    "against": "Capacity recovery is unchanged at matched total regeneration input.",
    "category": "MEMBRANES, SEPARATION, AND TRANSPORT",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Competitive adsorption and regeneration order",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Replacement after conservative prior-art screening: a bounded comparative test with measurable outcomes; exact novelty remains unverified.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 87,
    "literature_query": "Competitive adsorption and regeneration order Removing a weakly bound solute before changing conditions to release a strongly bound solute will recover more adsorbent capacity than releasing both together. experimental study",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0130",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": true,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 130,
      "title": "Competitive adsorption and regeneration order",
      "hypothesis": "Removing a weakly bound solute before changing conditions to release a strongly bound solute will recover more adsorbent capacity than releasing both together.",
      "test": "Use a reversible benign two-solute adsorption system; compare recovered mass, purity, and subsequent capacity.",
      "against": "Capacity recovery is unchanged at matched total regeneration input.",
      "category": "MEMBRANES, SEPARATION, AND TRANSPORT",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Competitive adsorption and regeneration order",
      "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Replacement after conservative prior-art screening: a bounded comparative test with measurable outcomes; exact novelty remains unverified.",
      "status": "not selected",
      "rank": 87,
      "literature_query": "Competitive adsorption and regeneration order Removing a weakly bound solute before changing conditions to release a strongly bound solute will recover more adsorbent capacity than releasing both together. experimental study",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 3,
      "source_ids": "Sbd940583129d;S1026983f3bc7;S15089cb040b7",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": {
      "deep_rank": "27",
      "id": "130",
      "title": "Competitive adsorption and regeneration order",
      "original_300_rank": "87",
      "pilot_class": "C",
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "hypothesis": "Removing a weakly bound solute before changing conditions to release a strongly bound solute will recover more adsorbent capacity than releasing both together.",
      "primary_outcome": "Recovered adsorption capacity in a fresh standard challenge after regeneration.",
      "comparison": "Weak-solute-first staged release versus simultaneous release and reversed-stage order, using the same regeneration resources.",
      "controls": "Initial loading of each solute, solvent volume and composition, pH, temperature, energy, adsorbent mass loss, and final rinse state.",
      "pilot": "First find a compatible benign pair with spectrally separable signals and reversible binding. Close both solute mass balances. Measure fresh challenge capacity rather than inferring regeneration from released color.",
      "novelty_gap": "Adsorption, chemical regeneration, and repeated cycles are known. The potential gap is competitive two-solute release order at matched resources and measured retained capacity.",
      "stop_rule": "Stop if either solute degrades, cannot be independently quantified, or requires unsuitable handling conditions. Reject improvement if it disappears after adsorbent loss and solvent dose are matched.",
      "source_keys": "ADS16;ADS14",
      "truth_probability": "not estimated",
      "novelty_status": "unverified"
    },
    "dossier_text": "# 27. H0130 — Competitive adsorption and regeneration order\n\nOriginal 300-folder rank: 87. Pilot class: C. Resource class: equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop.\n\n## Original hypothesis\n\nRemoving a weakly bound solute before changing conditions to release a strongly bound solute will recover more adsorbent capacity than releasing both together.\n\n## Why investigate this\n\nPrimary adsorption studies provide testable mass-balance methods and show that desorption efficiency alone does not establish reusable capacity.\n\n## Literature assessment and exact novelty question\n\nAdsorption, chemical regeneration, and repeated cycles are known. The potential gap is competitive two-solute release order at matched resources and measured retained capacity. Worldwide originality remains unverified.\n\n## Primary measurement\n\nRecovered adsorption capacity in a fresh standard challenge after regeneration.\n\n## Comparison\n\nWeak-solute-first staged release versus simultaneous release and reversed-stage order, using the same regeneration resources.\n\n## Critical controls\n\nInitial loading of each solute, solvent volume and composition, pH, temperature, energy, adsorbent mass loss, and final rinse state.\n\n## Pilot plan\n\nFirst find a compatible benign pair with spectrally separable signals and reversible binding. Close both solute mass balances. Measure fresh challenge capacity rather than inferring regeneration from released color.\n\n## What would count against it\n\nStop if either solute degrades, cannot be independently quantified, or requires unsuitable handling conditions. Reject improvement if it disappears after adsorbent loss and solvent dose are matched.\n\n## Replication and analysis\n\nTreat separately prepared specimens, batches, or devices as independent units. Technical repeats and images are nested measurements. First estimate calibration error and independent-preparation variability. Set the minimum meaningful effect in the primary outcome's units before confirmation, then choose sample size from that effect and pilot variance; a convenient pilot count is not a powered study.\n\nRandomize run order and blind sample labels where practical. Freeze image processing, fitting choices, exclusions, and the primary comparison before evaluating confirmatory data. Report effect size and uncertainty; use a blocked or mixed-effects analysis when specimens share a batch. A wide interval is inconclusive. Include the measurement and matching controls even when the directional effect appears large.\n\nA useful go/no-go gate is whether the hypothesized effect can be distinguished from calibration uncertainty and the strongest alternative explanation. Stop material purchases if the closest literature already measures the identical contrast, unless a replication has an explicit purpose. Do not use these abbreviated plans as complete laboratory protocols.\n\n## Data to preserve\n\nKeep unedited images or sensor streams, calibration files, preparation IDs, run order, environmental logs, input histories, raw outcome values, exclusions, and the exact analysis version. No values are prefilled in the observation template. Use `data/Published Benchmarks.csv` only as literature context; values from a different system are not observations of this hypothesis.\n\n## Sources and transfer limits\n\n### ADS16\n\n[Studies on competitive adsorption of dyes onto carbon and regeneration of adsorbent](https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2016.413)\n\nAccess: Indexed abstract examined. Type: primary experiment.\n\nBackground findings and transfer limits: see [source assessments](../research/Primary%20Source%20Assessments.md) under this source key.\n\n### ADS14\n\n[Adsorption/desorption of a dye by a chitosan derivative: Experiments and phenomenological modeling](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.03.063)\n\nAccess: Indexed abstract and article sections examined. Type: primary experiment/model.\n\nBackground findings and transfer limits: see [source assessments](../research/Primary%20Source%20Assessments.md) under this source key.\n\n"
  },
  {
    "id": 131,
    "title": "Catalyst spacing and intermediate capture",
    "hypothesis": "At fixed catalyst amounts, placing two sequential catalysts at an intermediate separation will maximize final product yield when the intermediate can also decay.",
    "test": "Use a safe model reaction cascade; vary separation and independently measure intermediate lifetime and diffusion.",
    "against": "Yield lacks the predicted separation optimum.",
    "category": "REACTION KINETICS AND CATALYSIS",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Catalyst spacing and intermediate capture",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0131",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 132,
    "title": "Support curvature and enzyme orientation",
    "hypothesis": "Purified enzyme adsorbed on mildly curved supports will retain more activity per bound molecule than on highly curved or flat supports over a particular curvature range.",
    "test": "Measure bound mass, orientation indicators, and activity on chemically matched supports.",
    "against": "No activity maximum remains after loading and substrate transport are controlled.",
    "category": "REACTION KINETICS AND CATALYSIS",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Support curvature and enzyme orientation",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 25,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0132",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 133,
    "title": "Reagent order and induction time",
    "hypothesis": "In a precipitation-free model reaction with a reversible inhibitor, changing addition order will alter induction time even at identical final concentrations.",
    "test": "Compare rapid-mixing sequences using time-resolved spectroscopy and independent mixing-time calibration.",
    "against": "Induction differences vanish once mixing and temperature histories are matched.",
    "category": "REACTION KINETICS AND CATALYSIS",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Reagent order and induction time",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0133",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 134,
    "title": "Catalyst wetting cycles and active-site recovery",
    "hypothesis": "Brief solvent-only washes between reaction periods will recover catalyst activity more efficiently than a continuous dilute feed using equal solvent volume.",
    "test": "Measure product rate, adsorbed intermediates, and catalyst loss in a benign model system.",
    "against": "Recovery is no better or simply reflects removal of dissolved product.",
    "category": "REACTION KINETICS AND CATALYSIS",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Catalyst wetting cycles and active-site recovery",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0134",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 135,
    "title": "Confinement and competing reaction selectivity",
    "hypothesis": "A porous support that slows a bulky reactant more than a small reactant will shift competing-reaction selectivity beyond its effect on total reaction rate.",
    "test": "Measure uptake, diffusion, and product ratios with free and supported catalysts.",
    "against": "Product ratios follow bulk concentrations without an additional transport effect.",
    "category": "REACTION KINETICS AND CATALYSIS",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Confinement and competing reaction selectivity",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0135",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 136,
    "title": "Surface coverage oscillations and catalyst stability",
    "hypothesis": "Alternating low and moderate substrate concentrations will slow irreversible catalyst deactivation compared with constant concentration at equal substrate dose and conversion.",
    "test": "Track conversion, catalyst structure, and accumulated product over matched runs.",
    "against": "Deactivation is unchanged when actual conversion and exposure are matched.",
    "category": "REACTION KINETICS AND CATALYSIS",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Surface coverage oscillations and catalyst stability",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0136",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 137,
    "title": "Inert packing and reaction-temperature variance",
    "hypothesis": "A reactor containing a graded distribution of inert heat-conducting particles will have lower local temperature variance than uniform packing at equal pressure drop and catalyst loading.",
    "test": "Use a low-hazard bench reaction with distributed thermometry; compare conversion and thermal maps.",
    "against": "Variance is not lower or the gain requires a different mean temperature.",
    "category": "REACTION KINETICS AND CATALYSIS",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Inert packing and reaction-temperature variance",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0137",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 138,
    "title": "Buffer mobility and local reaction rate",
    "hypothesis": "Immobilizing a buffer near a proton-sensitive catalyst will reduce reaction-rate fluctuations compared with the same total mobile buffer capacity.",
    "test": "Measure local pH and product formation under controlled reactant pulses.",
    "against": "Rate stabilization is absent or explained solely by a shifted mean pH.",
    "category": "REACTION KINETICS AND CATALYSIS",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Buffer mobility and local reaction rate",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0138",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 139,
    "title": "Product-binding additives and cascade timing",
    "hypothesis": "A reversible product-binding additive will delay downstream activation in a reaction cascade without substantially changing final yield once binding capacity saturates.",
    "test": "Use a cell-free benign cascade; measure free product, total product, and downstream response.",
    "against": "Final yield falls substantially or activation delay does not scale with binding capacity.",
    "category": "REACTION KINETICS AND CATALYSIS",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Product-binding additives and cascade timing",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 25,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0139",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 140,
    "title": "Catalyst surface reconstruction after rest",
    "hypothesis": "A model catalyst will recover a reproducible fraction of lost activity during reactant-free rest if reversible surface reconstruction dominates deactivation.",
    "test": "Compare rest durations, surface spectra, and restarted rates while ruling out temperature changes and leaching.",
    "against": "Activity fails to recover or recovery lacks corresponding surface changes.",
    "category": "REACTION KINETICS AND CATALYSIS",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Catalyst surface reconstruction after rest",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0140",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 141,
    "title": "RNA folding and crowding history",
    "hypothesis": "An isolated noncoding model RNA will reach different long-lived folding-state fractions when crowding is introduced before rather than after folding.",
    "test": "Compare structural fluorescence and chemical probing at matched final solution composition.",
    "against": "State fractions converge within the measured folding timescale.",
    "category": "CELL-FREE MOLECULAR BIOLOGY",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "RNA folding and crowding history",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0141",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 142,
    "title": "DNA topology and nuclease accessibility",
    "hypothesis": "Closed circular model DNA will show a different pattern of cleavage-site accessibility than matched linear DNA beyond effects attributable to total cleavage rate.",
    "test": "Use purified enzymes and sequence-matched DNA; map cleavage positions and verify topology.",
    "against": "Normalized site patterns are identical.",
    "category": "CELL-FREE MOLECULAR BIOLOGY",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "DNA topology and nuclease accessibility",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 25,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0142",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 143,
    "title": "Enzyme anchoring distance and cascade efficiency",
    "hypothesis": "Two immobilized enzymes will show a maximum cascade efficiency at a finite anchoring distance when close packing obstructs substrate access.",
    "test": "Vary linker lengths and measure both individual enzyme activities and cascade flux.",
    "against": "Flux lacks an optimum after active loading is controlled.",
    "category": "CELL-FREE MOLECULAR BIOLOGY",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Enzyme anchoring distance and cascade efficiency",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 25,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0143",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 144,
    "title": "Protein hydration history and aggregation lag",
    "hypothesis": "A purified model protein rehydrated through intermediate humidity stages will have a longer aggregation lag than rapidly rehydrated protein at identical final concentration.",
    "test": "Measure soluble fraction, aggregation kinetics, and structural recovery in independent preparations.",
    "against": "Lag differences vanish after preexisting aggregates are removed.",
    "category": "CELL-FREE MOLECULAR BIOLOGY",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Protein hydration history and aggregation lag",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 25,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0144",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 145,
    "title": "Lipid asymmetry and vesicle fusion",
    "hypothesis": "Vesicles with unequal lipid compositions across their two leaflets will fuse with a model membrane at a different rate from symmetric vesicles of the same total composition.",
    "test": "Measure leaflet asymmetry, fusion, and leakage separately at matched size.",
    "against": "Fusion differences track leakage or disappear when size is matched.",
    "category": "CELL-FREE MOLECULAR BIOLOGY",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Lipid asymmetry and vesicle fusion",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0145",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 146,
    "title": "Molecular crowding gradients and reaction fronts",
    "hypothesis": "A stable gradient of inert crowding molecules will bend a cell-free enzyme reaction front toward the region with faster substrate diffusion.",
    "test": "Image reaction fronts and independently measure diffusion and local enzyme activity.",
    "against": "Front bending disagrees with measured diffusion or occurs without a gradient.",
    "category": "CELL-FREE MOLECULAR BIOLOGY",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Molecular crowding gradients and reaction fronts",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 25,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0146",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 147,
    "title": "Cofactor pulse timing and enzyme damage",
    "hypothesis": "Intermittent cofactor availability will reduce irreversible inactivation of a purified cofactor-dependent enzyme relative to continuous supply at matched total turnover.",
    "test": "Track activity loss, cofactor chemistry, and product yield in a suitable benign system.",
    "against": "Inactivation per turnover is unchanged.",
    "category": "CELL-FREE MOLECULAR BIOLOGY",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Cofactor pulse timing and enzyme damage",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 25,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0147",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 148,
    "title": "DNA brush density and reversible binding",
    "hypothesis": "An intermediate surface DNA-brush density will maximize reversible capture-and-release yield of a complementary strand by balancing capture sites and steric obstruction.",
    "test": "Measure capture, release, and nonspecific binding across calibrated grafting densities.",
    "against": "Recoverable yield increases monotonically or has no reproducible optimum.",
    "category": "CELL-FREE MOLECULAR BIOLOGY",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "DNA brush density and reversible binding",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0148",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 149,
    "title": "Vesicle shape and encapsulated mixing",
    "hypothesis": "Repeated reversible deformation of lipid vesicles will accelerate mixing of internal macromolecules without increasing membrane leakage.",
    "test": "Track internal tracer distributions and external release under gentle calibrated deformation.",
    "against": "Mixing improves only when leakage or vesicle rupture occurs.",
    "category": "CELL-FREE MOLECULAR BIOLOGY",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Vesicle shape and encapsulated mixing",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0149",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 150,
    "title": "Protein condensate aging and exchange asymmetry",
    "hypothesis": "A purified model protein condensate will lose large-probe permeability faster than small-probe permeability during aging, before visible solidification.",
    "test": "Measure probe exchange, rheology, and morphology at fixed composition.",
    "against": "Probe selectivity is stable or explained by changing probe binding alone.",
    "category": "CELL-FREE MOLECULAR BIOLOGY",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Protein condensate aging and exchange asymmetry",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 25,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0150",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 151,
    "title": "Algal cell-cycle phase and light stress",
    "hypothesis": "A synchronized nonpathogenic alga will show different recovery from identical light stress depending on cell-cycle phase even after cell size is matched.",
    "test": "Measure fluorescence recovery and growth in phase-characterized cultures with equal photon exposure.",
    "against": "Recovery differences disappear after size and baseline photosynthetic state are controlled.",
    "category": "NONHUMAN ORGANISM PHYSIOLOGY",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Algal cell-cycle phase and light stress",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 22,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0151",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 152,
    "title": "Yeast budding orientation and confinement",
    "hypothesis": "Mild geometric confinement will bias successive budding directions in a laboratory yeast strain without changing the mean division interval.",
    "test": "Track lineages in chambers of varied shape; match nutrients, temperature, and wall chemistry.",
    "against": "Orientation remains unchanged or shifts only when growth is impaired.",
    "category": "NONHUMAN ORGANISM PHYSIOLOGY",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Yeast budding orientation and confinement",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 25,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0152",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 153,
    "title": "Bacterial swimming and viscosity gradients",
    "hypothesis": "A nonpathogenic motile model bacterium will accumulate asymmetrically in a viscosity gradient even when nutrient concentration is uniform.",
    "test": "Track single-cell speed, orientation, and residence time; use reversed gradients and nonmotile controls.",
    "against": "Accumulation follows nutrient contamination or disappears after passive transport is accounted for.",
    "category": "NONHUMAN ORGANISM PHYSIOLOGY",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Bacterial swimming and viscosity gradients",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 25,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0153",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 154,
    "title": "Fungal branching and substrate elasticity transitions",
    "hypothesis": "A nonpathogenic fungus crossing from a stiff to a soft substrate will change branching frequency transiently beyond its steady behavior on either substrate.",
    "test": "Image growth across mechanically characterized boundaries with matched chemistry and nutrient diffusion.",
    "against": "Branching simply matches the local steady-state rate without a transient.",
    "category": "NONHUMAN ORGANISM PHYSIOLOGY",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Fungal branching and substrate elasticity transitions",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 25,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0154",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 155,
    "title": "Plant stomatal response and humidity ramp rate",
    "hypothesis": "A model plant will show greater stomatal aperture hysteresis during fast humidity ramps than slow ramps with the same endpoints and light.",
    "test": "Image apertures while measuring leaf temperature, water status, and gas exchange.",
    "against": "Hysteresis is independent of ramp rate after leaf water status is controlled.",
    "category": "NONHUMAN ORGANISM PHYSIOLOGY",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Plant stomatal response and humidity ramp rate",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 25,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 234,
    "literature_query": "Plant stomatal response humidity ramp rate model show greater aperture hysteresis fast ramps experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0155",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 155,
      "title": "Plant stomatal response and humidity ramp rate",
      "hypothesis": "A model plant will show greater stomatal aperture hysteresis during fast humidity ramps than slow ramps with the same endpoints and light.",
      "test": "Image apertures while measuring leaf temperature, water status, and gas exchange.",
      "against": "Hysteresis is independent of ramp rate after leaf water status is controlled.",
      "category": "NONHUMAN ORGANISM PHYSIOLOGY",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Plant stomatal response and humidity ramp rate",
      "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 25,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 234,
      "literature_query": "Plant stomatal response humidity ramp rate model show greater aperture hysteresis fast ramps experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 7,
      "source_ids": "Seffed4f05742;Sb842e5926c4a;S4e2ba3807c06;S4065cd96c9f5;S6e2446d90864;S57194e784fe2;S767752052198",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 156,
    "title": "Diatom sinking and silica deposition timing",
    "hypothesis": "A nonpathogenic model diatom will alter sinking speed after short silica-availability pulses through shell changes that exceed effects from cell size alone.",
    "test": "Measure shell deposition, size, buoyant density, and settling in independent cultures.",
    "against": "Settling differences are fully explained by size and aggregation.",
    "category": "NONHUMAN ORGANISM PHYSIOLOGY",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Diatom sinking and silica deposition timing",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 25,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 235,
    "literature_query": "Diatom sinking silica deposition timing nonpathogenic model alter speed short silica-availability pulses through experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0156",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 156,
      "title": "Diatom sinking and silica deposition timing",
      "hypothesis": "A nonpathogenic model diatom will alter sinking speed after short silica-availability pulses through shell changes that exceed effects from cell size alone.",
      "test": "Measure shell deposition, size, buoyant density, and settling in independent cultures.",
      "against": "Settling differences are fully explained by size and aggregation.",
      "category": "NONHUMAN ORGANISM PHYSIOLOGY",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Diatom sinking and silica deposition timing",
      "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 25,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 235,
      "literature_query": "Diatom sinking silica deposition timing nonpathogenic model alter speed short silica-availability pulses through experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 5,
      "source_ids": "Sd3cf14431a1e;Sb04a2dbf95f4;S1bf25fef9e45;S0824de22a923;S2559a5c14b77",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 157,
    "title": "Moss drying order and chlorophyll recovery",
    "hypothesis": "Gradual drying from the shoot tips toward the base will preserve photosynthetic recovery better than the reverse drying sequence at equal final water loss.",
    "test": "Use controlled localized humidity and measure spatial water content and recovery.",
    "against": "Recovery is sequence-independent after actual local drying exposure is matched.",
    "category": "NONHUMAN ORGANISM PHYSIOLOGY",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Moss drying order and chlorophyll recovery",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 25,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 236,
    "literature_query": "Moss drying order chlorophyll recovery Gradual shoot tips toward base preserve photosynthetic better experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0157",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 157,
      "title": "Moss drying order and chlorophyll recovery",
      "hypothesis": "Gradual drying from the shoot tips toward the base will preserve photosynthetic recovery better than the reverse drying sequence at equal final water loss.",
      "test": "Use controlled localized humidity and measure spatial water content and recovery.",
      "against": "Recovery is sequence-independent after actual local drying exposure is matched.",
      "category": "NONHUMAN ORGANISM PHYSIOLOGY",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Moss drying order and chlorophyll recovery",
      "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 25,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 236,
      "literature_query": "Moss drying order chlorophyll recovery Gradual shoot tips toward base preserve photosynthetic better experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 8,
      "source_ids": "S602674f346a9;S50c540fd2ccf;S6bfd18f8d5f8;S96e4d5c54e19;Seace27b0dd3f;S203a6fba2eb9;Seb7f2d98b8d5;S733fb7e90667",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 158,
    "title": "Seedling mechanical pulses and root turning",
    "hypothesis": "Brief noninjurious lateral mechanical pulses will bias subsequent root curvature more than a constant load with the same integrated force.",
    "test": "Image model seedlings; monitor actual force, growth rate, and gravity orientation.",
    "against": "Curvature depends only on cumulative force or tissue damage.",
    "category": "NONHUMAN ORGANISM PHYSIOLOGY",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Seedling mechanical pulses and root turning",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 25,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0158",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 159,
    "title": "Bacterial chain length and flow alignment",
    "hypothesis": "In a nonpathogenic chain-forming bacterium, longer chains will align with weak flow at lower shear than shorter chains without requiring active motility.",
    "test": "Measure chain length and orientation under calibrated shear; compare passive shape controls.",
    "against": "Alignment thresholds do not vary with length after shape and flexibility are included.",
    "category": "NONHUMAN ORGANISM PHYSIOLOGY",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Bacterial chain length and flow alignment",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 25,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 237,
    "literature_query": "Bacterial chain length flow alignment In nonpathogenic chain-forming bacterium longer chains align weak experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0159",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 159,
      "title": "Bacterial chain length and flow alignment",
      "hypothesis": "In a nonpathogenic chain-forming bacterium, longer chains will align with weak flow at lower shear than shorter chains without requiring active motility.",
      "test": "Measure chain length and orientation under calibrated shear; compare passive shape controls.",
      "against": "Alignment thresholds do not vary with length after shape and flexibility are included.",
      "category": "NONHUMAN ORGANISM PHYSIOLOGY",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Bacterial chain length and flow alignment",
      "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 25,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 237,
      "literature_query": "Bacterial chain length flow alignment In nonpathogenic chain-forming bacterium longer chains align weak experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 5,
      "source_ids": "S6877b72d8e6c;S28b09bdd8744;Sc4dcf35af6da;S84403ef2e37f;Sbe57e4044cb7",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 160,
    "title": "Fungal respiration and oxygen pulse spacing",
    "hypothesis": "A nonpathogenic fungal culture will produce different respiration transients under spaced oxygen pulses than under steady oxygen with matched total delivery.",
    "test": "Measure oxygen uptake, carbon dioxide release, biomass, and dissolved oxygen in controlled culture.",
    "against": "Transient differences are explained entirely by gas-transfer limitations.",
    "category": "NONHUMAN ORGANISM PHYSIOLOGY",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Fungal respiration and oxygen pulse spacing",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 25,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0160",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 161,
    "title": "Basalt weathering and wetting front speed",
    "hypothesis": "A slow wetting front through crushed basalt will release a different dissolved-ion ratio than rapid wetting at equal water-to-rock ratio.",
    "test": "Use sterile columns; measure ion ratios, pH, residence times, and reactive surface area.",
    "against": "Ratios agree after measured residence time and pH are included.",
    "category": "SOILS, ROCKS, AND PLANETARY ANALOGUES",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Basalt weathering and wetting front speed",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 3,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 182,
    "literature_query": "Basalt weathering wetting front speed slow through crushed release different dissolved-ion ratio rapid experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0161",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 161,
      "title": "Basalt weathering and wetting front speed",
      "hypothesis": "A slow wetting front through crushed basalt will release a different dissolved-ion ratio than rapid wetting at equal water-to-rock ratio.",
      "test": "Use sterile columns; measure ion ratios, pH, residence times, and reactive surface area.",
      "against": "Ratios agree after measured residence time and pH are included.",
      "category": "SOILS, ROCKS, AND PLANETARY ANALOGUES",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Basalt weathering and wetting front speed",
      "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 3,
      "screen_score": 26,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 182,
      "literature_query": "Basalt weathering wetting front speed slow through crushed release different dissolved-ion ratio rapid experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 5,
      "source_ids": "S614111810de4;Sbeea7eccdbad;S330408ca722c;S6e6f102490f9;Se4dbe2382215",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 162,
    "title": "Freeze orientation and rock permeability",
    "hypothesis": "Repeated freezing perpendicular to bedding will increase permeability more than freezing parallel to bedding in a layered rock at equal ice content.",
    "test": "Measure three-dimensional cracks and directional permeability before and after controlled cycles.",
    "against": "Permeability changes are orientation-independent after initial defects are matched.",
    "category": "SOILS, ROCKS, AND PLANETARY ANALOGUES",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Freeze orientation and rock permeability",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0162",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 163,
    "title": "Carbonate nucleation and grain contact density",
    "hypothesis": "Carbonate precipitation will preferentially cement grain contacts rather than open surfaces as contact density rises at fixed total mineral surface area.",
    "test": "Use synthetic grain packs and benign precipitation chemistry; map cement location and strength.",
    "against": "Cement localization does not scale with contact density.",
    "category": "SOILS, ROCKS, AND PLANETARY ANALOGUES",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Carbonate nucleation and grain contact density",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 3,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 183,
    "literature_query": "Carbonate nucleation grain contact density precipitation preferentially cement contacts rather open surfaces as experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0163",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 163,
      "title": "Carbonate nucleation and grain contact density",
      "hypothesis": "Carbonate precipitation will preferentially cement grain contacts rather than open surfaces as contact density rises at fixed total mineral surface area.",
      "test": "Use synthetic grain packs and benign precipitation chemistry; map cement location and strength.",
      "against": "Cement localization does not scale with contact density.",
      "category": "SOILS, ROCKS, AND PLANETARY ANALOGUES",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Carbonate nucleation and grain contact density",
      "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 3,
      "screen_score": 26,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 183,
      "literature_query": "Carbonate nucleation grain contact density precipitation preferentially cement contacts rather open surfaces as experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 7,
      "source_ids": "Sa05b970965e8;Seb4385c4e9c1;Se9fbc4bab8a3;S9609712b1850;Sab273a803c47;S1594ff53b395;S6d450a9a6f70",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 164,
    "title": "Salt hydration and cyclic sediment motion",
    "hypothesis": "A sediment containing a hydrating salt will undergo directional grain migration under repeated humidity cycles when a temperature gradient biases crystallization position.",
    "test": "Track labeled grains in sealed model beds; reverse the gradient and compare salt-free controls.",
    "against": "Motion does not reverse with the gradient or occurs equally without salt.",
    "category": "SOILS, ROCKS, AND PLANETARY ANALOGUES",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Salt hydration and cyclic sediment motion",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 88,
    "literature_query": "Salt hydration cyclic sediment motion containing hydrating undergo directional grain migration repeated humidity experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0164",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 164,
      "title": "Salt hydration and cyclic sediment motion",
      "hypothesis": "A sediment containing a hydrating salt will undergo directional grain migration under repeated humidity cycles when a temperature gradient biases crystallization position.",
      "test": "Track labeled grains in sealed model beds; reverse the gradient and compare salt-free controls.",
      "against": "Motion does not reverse with the gradient or occurs equally without salt.",
      "category": "SOILS, ROCKS, AND PLANETARY ANALOGUES",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Salt hydration and cyclic sediment motion",
      "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 88,
      "literature_query": "Salt hydration cyclic sediment motion containing hydrating undergo directional grain migration repeated humidity experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 6,
      "source_ids": "S86d0a0dda644;S7a3443af05a2;S9e600ab54020;S8d36d66831a2;S43fc2f6af912;Sdeba7d1470c9",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 165,
    "title": "Regolith grain shape and thermal fatigue",
    "hypothesis": "Angular mineral grains will develop more contact-adjacent microcracks during vacuum thermal cycling than rounded grains of the same mineral and size.",
    "test": "Use specialist vacuum equipment; measure cracks, packing, and actual grain temperatures.",
    "against": "Crack rates agree after contact load and temperature histories are matched.",
    "category": "SOILS, ROCKS, AND PLANETARY ANALOGUES",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Regolith grain shape and thermal fatigue",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0165",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 166,
    "title": "Clay lens spacing and gas escape",
    "hypothesis": "Closely spaced thin clay lenses will redirect rising gas into fewer escape channels than one thick lens with equal clay mass.",
    "test": "Image gas migration in transparent sediment analogues at matched injection rate and saturation.",
    "against": "Escape-channel concentration is unchanged or follows cracks from sample preparation.",
    "category": "SOILS, ROCKS, AND PLANETARY ANALOGUES",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Clay lens spacing and gas escape",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0166",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 167,
    "title": "Mineral boundary chemistry and dissolution pits",
    "hypothesis": "At fixed crystal orientation, dissolution pits will nucleate more frequently near boundaries containing trace substituted ions than near chemically uniform boundaries.",
    "test": "Use well-characterized model minerals and surface microscopy during mild dissolution.",
    "against": "Pit nucleation is unrelated to measured boundary chemistry after defect density is considered.",
    "category": "SOILS, ROCKS, AND PLANETARY ANALOGUES",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Mineral boundary chemistry and dissolution pits",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 25,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0167",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 168,
    "title": "Impact analogue packing and ejecta sorting",
    "hypothesis": "A layered granular target with a dense surface crust will eject a narrower grain-size range than a homogeneous target at matched low impact energy.",
    "test": "Use enclosed low-energy laboratory impacts; measure ejecta mass, size, and speed.",
    "against": "Ejecta size spread is unchanged after total ejected mass is matched.",
    "category": "SOILS, ROCKS, AND PLANETARY ANALOGUES",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Impact analogue packing and ejecta sorting",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 89,
    "literature_query": "Impact analogue packing ejecta sorting layered granular target dense surface crust eject narrower experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0168",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 168,
      "title": "Impact analogue packing and ejecta sorting",
      "hypothesis": "A layered granular target with a dense surface crust will eject a narrower grain-size range than a homogeneous target at matched low impact energy.",
      "test": "Use enclosed low-energy laboratory impacts; measure ejecta mass, size, and speed.",
      "against": "Ejecta size spread is unchanged after total ejected mass is matched.",
      "category": "SOILS, ROCKS, AND PLANETARY ANALOGUES",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Impact analogue packing and ejecta sorting",
      "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 89,
      "literature_query": "Impact analogue packing ejecta sorting layered granular target dense surface crust eject narrower experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 3,
      "source_ids": "S11b086fe3f95;S14c0a4b7e74a;S5d38143f61f2",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 169,
    "title": "Porous ice impurities and sublimation structure",
    "hypothesis": "Dispersed inert mineral grains in porous ice will leave a more connected residue after sublimation than the same mineral mass initially concentrated in layers.",
    "test": "Image specialist cold-chamber samples before and after controlled sublimation.",
    "against": "Residue connectivity is equal or lower for dispersed grains.",
    "category": "SOILS, ROCKS, AND PLANETARY ANALOGUES",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Porous ice impurities and sublimation structure",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0169",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 170,
    "title": "Abrasion history and sediment charging",
    "hypothesis": "Repeated gentle abrasion will change the sign or magnitude distribution of grain charging before measurable changes in grain size occur.",
    "test": "Measure individual-grain charge, surface chemistry, humidity, and size through controlled tumbling.",
    "against": "Charge changes track humidity drift or only appear after size changes.",
    "category": "SOILS, ROCKS, AND PLANETARY ANALOGUES",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Abrasion history and sediment charging",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 90,
    "literature_query": "Abrasion history sediment charging Repeated gentle change sign or magnitude distribution of grain experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0170",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 170,
      "title": "Abrasion history and sediment charging",
      "hypothesis": "Repeated gentle abrasion will change the sign or magnitude distribution of grain charging before measurable changes in grain size occur.",
      "test": "Measure individual-grain charge, surface chemistry, humidity, and size through controlled tumbling.",
      "against": "Charge changes track humidity drift or only appear after size changes.",
      "category": "SOILS, ROCKS, AND PLANETARY ANALOGUES",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Abrasion history and sediment charging",
      "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 90,
      "literature_query": "Abrasion history sediment charging Repeated gentle change sign or magnitude distribution of grain experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 5,
      "source_ids": "Sbff3b9b688cd;S4306c482a1c9;S3de6216a60a1;Sea234417ad60;Sb5f168649815",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 171,
    "title": "Droplet collision phase and coalescence",
    "hypothesis": "Droplets carrying synchronized shape oscillations will have phase-dependent coalescence probabilities at fixed impact speed and composition.",
    "test": "Use high-speed imaging with controlled oscillation phase and matched air-film conditions.",
    "against": "Coalescence probability is independent of phase after collision geometry is matched.",
    "category": "FLUID DYNAMICS AND SOFT MATTER",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Droplet collision phase and coalescence",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 25,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 238,
    "literature_query": "Droplet collision phase coalescence Droplets carrying synchronized shape oscillations have phase-dependent probabilities at experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0171",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 171,
      "title": "Droplet collision phase and coalescence",
      "hypothesis": "Droplets carrying synchronized shape oscillations will have phase-dependent coalescence probabilities at fixed impact speed and composition.",
      "test": "Use high-speed imaging with controlled oscillation phase and matched air-film conditions.",
      "against": "Coalescence probability is independent of phase after collision geometry is matched.",
      "category": "FLUID DYNAMICS AND SOFT MATTER",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Droplet collision phase and coalescence",
      "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 25,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 238,
      "literature_query": "Droplet collision phase coalescence Droplets carrying synchronized shape oscillations have phase-dependent probabilities at experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 4,
      "source_ids": "S3e579bc52927;S78d705304da6;S655c3dd2ff60;Scd363eff38bc",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 172,
    "title": "Yield-stress fluid and obstacle spacing",
    "hypothesis": "A pair of obstacles at intermediate separation will create a larger persistent unyielded region than either very close or widely separated obstacles.",
    "test": "Map velocity and stress proxies in a transparent model yield-stress fluid at fixed flow rate.",
    "against": "Unyielded volume lacks a reproducible intermediate maximum.",
    "category": "FLUID DYNAMICS AND SOFT MATTER",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Yield-stress fluid and obstacle spacing",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 91,
    "literature_query": "Yield-stress fluid obstacle spacing pair of obstacles at intermediate separation create persistent unyielded experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0172",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 172,
      "title": "Yield-stress fluid and obstacle spacing",
      "hypothesis": "A pair of obstacles at intermediate separation will create a larger persistent unyielded region than either very close or widely separated obstacles.",
      "test": "Map velocity and stress proxies in a transparent model yield-stress fluid at fixed flow rate.",
      "against": "Unyielded volume lacks a reproducible intermediate maximum.",
      "category": "FLUID DYNAMICS AND SOFT MATTER",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Yield-stress fluid and obstacle spacing",
      "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 91,
      "literature_query": "Yield-stress fluid obstacle spacing pair of obstacles at intermediate separation create persistent unyielded experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 6,
      "source_ids": "S4b6a7dfe6df9;S3468851adb60;Sa3ffde3305b0;Sa61c168542fe;Sf07f6bb209ab;Sf42788b2fad2",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 173,
    "title": "Flexible fibers and suspension reversibility",
    "hypothesis": "A dilute suspension of flexible fibers will fail to return to its initial arrangement after a reversed shear cycle at lower strain amplitude than rigid fibers.",
    "test": "Track particles in low-inertia flow; match shape, concentration, and Brownian effects.",
    "against": "Flexible and rigid suspensions have identical reversal error within uncertainty.",
    "category": "FLUID DYNAMICS AND SOFT MATTER",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Flexible fibers and suspension reversibility",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 92,
    "literature_query": "Flexible fibers suspension reversibility dilute of fail to return initial arrangement reversed shear experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0173",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 173,
      "title": "Flexible fibers and suspension reversibility",
      "hypothesis": "A dilute suspension of flexible fibers will fail to return to its initial arrangement after a reversed shear cycle at lower strain amplitude than rigid fibers.",
      "test": "Track particles in low-inertia flow; match shape, concentration, and Brownian effects.",
      "against": "Flexible and rigid suspensions have identical reversal error within uncertainty.",
      "category": "FLUID DYNAMICS AND SOFT MATTER",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Flexible fibers and suspension reversibility",
      "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 92,
      "literature_query": "Flexible fibers suspension reversibility dilute of fail to return initial arrangement reversed shear experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 6,
      "source_ids": "S546ef391079a;Sa8f08945b099;S734468fcc0a4;S4874a8994afc;S33fc034bed94;S1cc1e3cef2f4",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 174,
    "title": "Emulsion size order and drainage",
    "hypothesis": "A vertical emulsion with small droplets above large droplets will drain at a different rate from the reversed arrangement at equal total dispersed volume.",
    "test": "Image droplet sizes, liquid profiles, and coalescence during drainage.",
    "against": "Drainage is orientation-independent after initial liquid distribution is matched.",
    "category": "FLUID DYNAMICS AND SOFT MATTER",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Emulsion size order and drainage",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 30,
    "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 6,
    "literature_query": "Emulsion size order drainage vertical droplets above large drain at different rate reversed experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0174",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": true,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 174,
      "title": "Emulsion size order and drainage",
      "hypothesis": "A vertical emulsion with small droplets above large droplets will drain at a different rate from the reversed arrangement at equal total dispersed volume.",
      "test": "Image droplet sizes, liquid profiles, and coalescence during drainage.",
      "against": "Drainage is orientation-independent after initial liquid distribution is matched.",
      "category": "FLUID DYNAMICS AND SOFT MATTER",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Emulsion size order and drainage",
      "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
      "access_score": 4,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 30,
      "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 6,
      "literature_query": "Emulsion size order drainage vertical droplets above large drain at different rate reversed experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 4,
      "source_ids": "Se0627b02c1cf;S96d0489e6dba;S961fe91f56a8;Sfb5b89646b32",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Emulsion drainage and polydispersity are studied. Check the proposed reversal of vertical size order at matched overall composition and liquid profile.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": {
      "deep_rank": "17",
      "id": "174",
      "title": "Emulsion size order and drainage",
      "original_300_rank": "6",
      "pilot_class": "C",
      "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
      "hypothesis": "A vertical emulsion with small droplets above large droplets will drain at a different rate from the reversed arrangement at equal total dispersed volume.",
      "primary_outcome": "Drainage rate and vertical liquid-fraction profile after equal initial settling time.",
      "comparison": "Small droplets over large droplets versus reversed ordering, plus a homogeneously mixed size control.",
      "controls": "Oil fraction, density contrast, stabilizer coverage, viscosity, initial vertical liquid profile, droplet size distribution, and coalescence.",
      "pilot": "First demonstrate that the imposed size layers persist long enough for measurement. Use a benign compatible oil-water system. Record droplet size and layer concentration as well as drained liquid.",
      "novelty_gap": "Creaming and size-dependent drainage are known. The proposed gap is reversal of size order at identical total composition and initial liquid profile.",
      "stop_rule": "Drop this candidate if size layers mix immediately or coalescence differs between arms. A result explained by density stratification alone does not support the intended mechanism.",
      "source_keys": "CREAM97;DRAIN16",
      "truth_probability": "not estimated",
      "novelty_status": "unverified"
    },
    "dossier_text": "# 17. H0174 — Emulsion size order and drainage\n\nOriginal 300-folder rank: 6. Pilot class: C. Resource class: modest bench or workshop; calibration still required.\n\n## Original hypothesis\n\nA vertical emulsion with small droplets above large droplets will drain at a different rate from the reversed arrangement at equal total dispersed volume.\n\n## Why investigate this\n\nA transparent chamber permits direct comparison, but the prerequisite is a stable controlled size gradient rather than a visually similar emulsion.\n\n## Literature assessment and exact novelty question\n\nCreaming and size-dependent drainage are known. The proposed gap is reversal of size order at identical total composition and initial liquid profile. Worldwide originality remains unverified.\n\n## Primary measurement\n\nDrainage rate and vertical liquid-fraction profile after equal initial settling time.\n\n## Comparison\n\nSmall droplets over large droplets versus reversed ordering, plus a homogeneously mixed size control.\n\n## Critical controls\n\nOil fraction, density contrast, stabilizer coverage, viscosity, initial vertical liquid profile, droplet size distribution, and coalescence.\n\n## Pilot plan\n\nFirst demonstrate that the imposed size layers persist long enough for measurement. Use a benign compatible oil-water system. Record droplet size and layer concentration as well as drained liquid.\n\n## What would count against it\n\nDrop this candidate if size layers mix immediately or coalescence differs between arms. A result explained by density stratification alone does not support the intended mechanism.\n\n## Replication and analysis\n\nTreat separately prepared specimens, batches, or devices as independent units. Technical repeats and images are nested measurements. First estimate calibration error and independent-preparation variability. Set the minimum meaningful effect in the primary outcome's units before confirmation, then choose sample size from that effect and pilot variance; a convenient pilot count is not a powered study.\n\nRandomize run order and blind sample labels where practical. Freeze image processing, fitting choices, exclusions, and the primary comparison before evaluating confirmatory data. Report effect size and uncertainty; use a blocked or mixed-effects analysis when specimens share a batch. A wide interval is inconclusive. Include the measurement and matching controls even when the directional effect appears large.\n\nA useful go/no-go gate is whether the hypothesized effect can be distinguished from calibration uncertainty and the strongest alternative explanation. Stop material purchases if the closest literature already measures the identical contrast, unless a replication has an explicit purpose. Do not use these abbreviated plans as complete laboratory protocols.\n\n## Data to preserve\n\nKeep unedited images or sensor streams, calibration files, preparation IDs, run order, environmental logs, input histories, raw outcome values, exclusions, and the exact analysis version. No values are prefilled in the observation template. Use `data/Published Benchmarks.csv` only as literature context; values from a different system are not observations of this hypothesis.\n\n## Sources and transfer limits\n\n### CREAM97\n\n[Concentration Profiles in Creaming Oil-in-Water Emulsion Layers Determined with Stray Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging](https://doi.org/10.1021/la9610056)\n\nAccess: Indexed abstract examined. Type: primary experiment.\n\nBackground findings and transfer limits: see [source assessments](../research/Primary%20Source%20Assessments.md) under this source key.\n\n### DRAIN16\n\n[Late stage drainage of block copolymer stabilized emulsion drops](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27834433/)\n\nAccess: Indexed abstract examined. Type: primary experiment/model.\n\nBackground findings and transfer limits: see [source assessments](../research/Primary%20Source%20Assessments.md) under this source key.\n\n"
  },
  {
    "id": 175,
    "title": "Surfactant exchange and wave damping",
    "hypothesis": "Slowly exchanging surfactants will show stronger frequency-dependent surface-wave damping than rapidly exchanging surfactants at matched equilibrium surface tension.",
    "test": "Measure wave decay and adsorption kinetics with controlled contamination and temperature.",
    "against": "Damping differences vanish when surface elasticity and viscosity are measured.",
    "category": "FLUID DYNAMICS AND SOFT MATTER",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Surfactant exchange and wave damping",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0175",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 176,
    "title": "Interfacial particle shape and rupture",
    "hypothesis": "An interface coated with a mixture of rod-like and spherical particles will resist local puncture better than either shape alone at equal surface coverage.",
    "test": "Measure rupture force, particle arrangement, and interfacial rheology using chemically matched particles.",
    "against": "The mixture offers no puncture-resistance advantage at matched coverage.",
    "category": "FLUID DYNAMICS AND SOFT MATTER",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Interfacial particle shape and rupture",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0176",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 177,
    "title": "Shear pauses and suspension thickening",
    "hypothesis": "Short pauses below the structural relaxation time will preserve thickened-state memory in a dense suspension more strongly than longer pauses at equal cumulative shear.",
    "test": "Measure restart stress and particle organization across controlled pause intervals.",
    "against": "Restart stress depends only on current shear rate rather than pause history.",
    "category": "FLUID DYNAMICS AND SOFT MATTER",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Shear pauses and suspension thickening",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0177",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 178,
    "title": "Vortex pairs and polymer stretching",
    "hypothesis": "Two counter-rotating vortices will produce greater polymer-chain extension near their shared boundary than a single vortex at matched maximum shear rate.",
    "test": "Use dilute fluorescent model polymers and flow imaging; control residence-time distributions.",
    "against": "Extension differences disappear after local strain history is matched.",
    "category": "FLUID DYNAMICS AND SOFT MATTER",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Vortex pairs and polymer stretching",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 258,
    "literature_query": "Vortex pairs polymer stretching counter-rotating vortices produce greater polymer-chain extension near their shared experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0178",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 178,
      "title": "Vortex pairs and polymer stretching",
      "hypothesis": "Two counter-rotating vortices will produce greater polymer-chain extension near their shared boundary than a single vortex at matched maximum shear rate.",
      "test": "Use dilute fluorescent model polymers and flow imaging; control residence-time distributions.",
      "against": "Extension differences disappear after local strain history is matched.",
      "category": "FLUID DYNAMICS AND SOFT MATTER",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Vortex pairs and polymer stretching",
      "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
      "access_score": 2,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 258,
      "literature_query": "Vortex pairs polymer stretching counter-rotating vortices produce greater polymer-chain extension near their shared experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 5,
      "source_ids": "Saf07738f6032;S25ec8c49f5eb;S1e8b0c9ffa1e;Sce3cbf67faa2;S152da80fdab8",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 179,
    "title": "Elastic capsules and constriction trains",
    "hypothesis": "Soft capsules passing through a train of alternating constrictions will sort by relaxation time more strongly than through identical constrictions at equal pressure drop.",
    "test": "Track capsules of matched size but different relaxation times; measure transit and recovery.",
    "against": "Alternation adds no separation beyond size-dependent transit effects.",
    "category": "FLUID DYNAMICS AND SOFT MATTER",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Elastic capsules and constriction trains",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0179",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 180,
    "title": "Foam bubble-size arrangement and collapse",
    "hypothesis": "A foam with spatially alternating large and small bubbles will resist a propagating collapse event better than randomly arranged bubbles with the same size distribution.",
    "test": "Create small controlled foams; trigger a single rupture and track neighboring failures.",
    "against": "Collapse extent is unchanged or explained by differences in liquid fraction.",
    "category": "FLUID DYNAMICS AND SOFT MATTER",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Foam bubble-size arrangement and collapse",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0180",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 181,
    "title": "Helical pores and acoustic handedness",
    "hypothesis": "A porous slab with helical channels will transmit opposing rotational acoustic modes differently, with the preference reversing when helix handedness reverses.",
    "test": "Measure mode-resolved transmission in matched specialist acoustic fixtures; compare straight-channel controls.",
    "against": "Transmission preference fails to reverse or follows fixture asymmetry.",
    "category": "OPTOMECHANICS, SOUND, AND FUNCTIONAL SURFACES",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Helical pores and acoustic handedness",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0181",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 182,
    "title": "Soft lens creep and exposure timing",
    "hypothesis": "A soft optical lens measured after short unloading periods will retain less cumulative focal drift than one held continuously at the same mean deformation.",
    "test": "Measure shape, focal length, and temperature under matched mechanical work and duration.",
    "against": "Drift reduction disappears when actual strain histories are included.",
    "category": "OPTOMECHANICS, SOUND, AND FUNCTIONAL SURFACES",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Soft lens creep and exposure timing",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0182",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 183,
    "title": "Patterned adhesion and dust shedding angle",
    "hypothesis": "An array of low-adhesion paths connecting to an edge will shed inert dust at a lower tilt angle than isolated low-adhesion islands of equal area.",
    "test": "Measure dust removal, charge, humidity, and surface topography with controlled particle loading.",
    "against": "Shedding thresholds are unchanged or depend only on electrostatic charging.",
    "category": "OPTOMECHANICS, SOUND, AND FUNCTIONAL SURFACES",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Patterned adhesion and dust shedding angle",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 30,
    "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 7,
    "literature_query": "Patterned adhesion dust shedding angle An array of low-adhesion paths connecting to edge experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0183",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": true,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 183,
      "title": "Patterned adhesion and dust shedding angle",
      "hypothesis": "An array of low-adhesion paths connecting to an edge will shed inert dust at a lower tilt angle than isolated low-adhesion islands of equal area.",
      "test": "Measure dust removal, charge, humidity, and surface topography with controlled particle loading.",
      "against": "Shedding thresholds are unchanged or depend only on electrostatic charging.",
      "category": "OPTOMECHANICS, SOUND, AND FUNCTIONAL SURFACES",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Patterned adhesion and dust shedding angle",
      "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
      "access_score": 4,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 30,
      "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 7,
      "literature_query": "Patterned adhesion dust shedding angle An array of low-adhesion paths connecting to edge experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 12,
      "source_ids": "Se28e72669994;Se30bb94d5fbb;S3de8c37c06db;Sec6910c24293;Seffae725482c;S1c677ccea088;Scba5ef227301;S7113139b19ba;S85c73d09175c;S64c082313d41;Se9f720baf58a;S0d2b574fa46c",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Tilt-driven dust shedding and patterned adhesion are studied. Verify whether connected low-adhesion exit paths improve shedding over isolated islands at matched charge and coverage.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": {
      "deep_rank": "2",
      "id": "183",
      "title": "Patterned adhesion and dust shedding angle",
      "original_300_rank": "7",
      "pilot_class": "P",
      "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
      "hypothesis": "An array of low-adhesion paths connecting to an edge will shed inert dust at a lower tilt angle than isolated low-adhesion islands of equal area.",
      "primary_outcome": "Tilt angle at which a predefined fraction of deposited inert particles leaves the surface.",
      "comparison": "Connected low-adhesion paths leading to an edge versus isolated islands with the same treated area; include a uniform treatment.",
      "controls": "Particle size and mass, humidity, charge, surface roughness, path width, treatment chemistry, tilt rate, and edge geometry.",
      "pilot": "Use contained inert particles, not uncontrolled environmental dust. Calibrate tilt and deposited mass, neutralize or measure static effects, and record particle paths with blinded surface labels.",
      "novelty_gap": "Patterned surfaces and gravity-driven dust removal already exist. Connectivity to an exit edge at matched area and charge is the particular question to verify.",
      "stop_rule": "Stop if connected paths also change roughness or charge uncontrollably. Reject the routing mechanism if removal improves without preferential travel along paths.",
      "source_keys": "ADH14;DUST18;DUST23",
      "truth_probability": "not estimated",
      "novelty_status": "unverified"
    },
    "dossier_text": "# 02. H0183 — Patterned adhesion and dust shedding angle\n\nOriginal 300-folder rank: 7. Pilot class: P. Resource class: modest bench or workshop; calibration still required.\n\n## Original hypothesis\n\nAn array of low-adhesion paths connecting to an edge will shed inert dust at a lower tilt angle than isolated low-adhesion islands of equal area.\n\n## Why investigate this\n\nLow-energy tilt tests yield a clear threshold and can distinguish routing from a generic lower-adhesion coating.\n\n## Literature assessment and exact novelty question\n\nPatterned surfaces and gravity-driven dust removal already exist. Connectivity to an exit edge at matched area and charge is the particular question to verify. Worldwide originality remains unverified.\n\n## Primary measurement\n\nTilt angle at which a predefined fraction of deposited inert particles leaves the surface.\n\n## Comparison\n\nConnected low-adhesion paths leading to an edge versus isolated islands with the same treated area; include a uniform treatment.\n\n## Critical controls\n\nParticle size and mass, humidity, charge, surface roughness, path width, treatment chemistry, tilt rate, and edge geometry.\n\n## Pilot plan\n\nUse contained inert particles, not uncontrolled environmental dust. Calibrate tilt and deposited mass, neutralize or measure static effects, and record particle paths with blinded surface labels.\n\n## What would count against it\n\nStop if connected paths also change roughness or charge uncontrollably. Reject the routing mechanism if removal improves without preferential travel along paths.\n\n## Replication and analysis\n\nTreat separately prepared specimens, batches, or devices as independent units. Technical repeats and images are nested measurements. First estimate calibration error and independent-preparation variability. Set the minimum meaningful effect in the primary outcome's units before confirmation, then choose sample size from that effect and pilot variance; a convenient pilot count is not a powered study.\n\nRandomize run order and blind sample labels where practical. Freeze image processing, fitting choices, exclusions, and the primary comparison before evaluating confirmatory data. Report effect size and uncertainty; use a blocked or mixed-effects analysis when specimens share a batch. A wide interval is inconclusive. Include the measurement and matching controls even when the directional effect appears large.\n\nA useful go/no-go gate is whether the hypothesized effect can be distinguished from calibration uncertainty and the strongest alternative explanation. Stop material purchases if the closest literature already measures the identical contrast, unless a replication has an explicit purpose. Do not use these abbreviated plans as complete laboratory protocols.\n\n## Data to preserve\n\nKeep unedited images or sensor streams, calibration files, preparation IDs, run order, environmental logs, input histories, raw outcome values, exclusions, and the exact analysis version. No values are prefilled in the observation template. Use `data/Published Benchmarks.csv` only as literature context; values from a different system are not observations of this hypothesis.\n\n## Sources and transfer limits\n\n### ADH14\n\n[Modulating Particle Adhesion with Micro-patterned Surfaces](https://doi.org/10.1021/am500887w)\n\nAccess: Indexed abstract and supporting-information description examined. Type: primary experiment.\n\nBackground findings and transfer limits: see [source assessments](../research/Primary%20Source%20Assessments.md) under this source key.\n\n### DUST18\n\n[Environmental dust removal from inclined hydrophobic glass surface: avalanche influence on dynamics of dust particles](https://doi.org/10.1039/C8RA07503D)\n\nAccess: Indexed article sections examined. Type: primary experiment.\n\nBackground findings and transfer limits: see [source assessments](../research/Primary%20Source%20Assessments.md) under this source key.\n\n### DUST23\n\n[Engineering Large-Area Antidust Surfaces by Harnessing Interparticle Forces](https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.2c19211)\n\nAccess: Indexed abstract examined. Type: primary experiment.\n\nBackground findings and transfer limits: see [source assessments](../research/Primary%20Source%20Assessments.md) under this source key.\n\n"
  },
  {
    "id": 184,
    "title": "Photothermal spot spacing and bending",
    "hypothesis": "Two separated light-heating spots will produce a larger reversible bend per absorbed energy in a patterned bilayer than one merged spot over a finite separation range.",
    "test": "Measure curvature and thermal maps at equal absorbed energy; compare uniform bilayers.",
    "against": "No separation-dependent gain remains after heat losses are included.",
    "category": "OPTOMECHANICS, SOUND, AND FUNCTIONAL SURFACES",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Photothermal spot spacing and bending",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 93,
    "literature_query": "Photothermal spot spacing bending separated light-heating spots produce reversible bend per absorbed energy experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0184",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 184,
      "title": "Photothermal spot spacing and bending",
      "hypothesis": "Two separated light-heating spots will produce a larger reversible bend per absorbed energy in a patterned bilayer than one merged spot over a finite separation range.",
      "test": "Measure curvature and thermal maps at equal absorbed energy; compare uniform bilayers.",
      "against": "No separation-dependent gain remains after heat losses are included.",
      "category": "OPTOMECHANICS, SOUND, AND FUNCTIONAL SURFACES",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Photothermal spot spacing and bending",
      "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 93,
      "literature_query": "Photothermal spot spacing bending separated light-heating spots produce reversible bend per absorbed energy experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 7,
      "source_ids": "S0e8ac2bfb144;Sa6361fef57e6;Sbddc93afb58e;S780472061ce3;S9f3ffbf3999b;Sb52f9517e0bb;Sdc3c2576af10",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 185,
    "title": "Acoustic microstreaming and bubble arrangement",
    "hypothesis": "A staggered array of pinned gas bubbles will mix a liquid more uniformly than aligned bubbles at equal acoustic energy and gas volume.",
    "test": "Map tracer mixing and bubble motion in a specialist microfluidic setup.",
    "against": "Uniformity improves only because acoustic energy or bubble volume differs.",
    "category": "OPTOMECHANICS, SOUND, AND FUNCTIONAL SURFACES",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Acoustic microstreaming and bubble arrangement",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0185",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 186,
    "title": "Wrinkle direction and scratch deflection",
    "hypothesis": "Wrinkles oblique to a moving contact will deflect shallow scratches more than wrinkles parallel or perpendicular to it at matched normal load.",
    "test": "Map scratch trajectories, depth, and debris on mechanically matched films.",
    "against": "Deflection is absent or accompanied by greater total damage without a directional effect.",
    "category": "OPTOMECHANICS, SOUND, AND FUNCTIONAL SURFACES",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Wrinkle direction and scratch deflection",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0186",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 187,
    "title": "Reconfigurable apertures and diffraction stability",
    "hypothesis": "An aperture array with compensating paired motions will preserve its principal diffraction angle during thermal expansion better than a fixed array of equal initial spacing.",
    "test": "Measure diffraction and geometry through temperature cycles; isolate refractive-index changes.",
    "against": "Angular stability is no better than the fixed control.",
    "category": "OPTOMECHANICS, SOUND, AND FUNCTIONAL SURFACES",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Reconfigurable apertures and diffraction stability",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0187",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 188,
    "title": "Vibration direction and liquid shedding",
    "hypothesis": "Tangential vibration will remove droplets using less mechanical energy than normal vibration on a surface with directional grooves, within a finite droplet-size range.",
    "test": "Measure detachment, actual work, and groove orientation at matched droplet volumes.",
    "against": "Energy advantage vanishes after actuator coupling and heating are measured.",
    "category": "OPTOMECHANICS, SOUND, AND FUNCTIONAL SURFACES",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Vibration direction and liquid shedding",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 94,
    "literature_query": "Vibration direction liquid shedding Tangential remove droplets using mechanical energy normal on surface experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0188",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 188,
      "title": "Vibration direction and liquid shedding",
      "hypothesis": "Tangential vibration will remove droplets using less mechanical energy than normal vibration on a surface with directional grooves, within a finite droplet-size range.",
      "test": "Measure detachment, actual work, and groove orientation at matched droplet volumes.",
      "against": "Energy advantage vanishes after actuator coupling and heating are measured.",
      "category": "OPTOMECHANICS, SOUND, AND FUNCTIONAL SURFACES",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Vibration direction and liquid shedding",
      "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 94,
      "literature_query": "Vibration direction liquid shedding Tangential remove droplets using mechanical energy normal on surface experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 4,
      "source_ids": "S2e5dbfdf5b26;Sc39417d88600;Se3e299cc4097;Sab9cd5005f51",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 189,
    "title": "Transparent conductor cracks and optical warning",
    "hypothesis": "A patterned transparent conductor will show a polarization-dependent scattering increase before its electrical resistance rises substantially during bending fatigue.",
    "test": "Track scattering, resistance, and crack images; use calibrated temperature and strain controls.",
    "against": "Optical changes do not precede electrical changes or originate from substrate deformation alone.",
    "category": "OPTOMECHANICS, SOUND, AND FUNCTIONAL SURFACES",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Transparent conductor cracks and optical warning",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 259,
    "literature_query": "Transparent conductor cracks optical warning patterned show polarization-dependent scattering electrical resistance rises substantially experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0189",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 189,
      "title": "Transparent conductor cracks and optical warning",
      "hypothesis": "A patterned transparent conductor will show a polarization-dependent scattering increase before its electrical resistance rises substantially during bending fatigue.",
      "test": "Track scattering, resistance, and crack images; use calibrated temperature and strain controls.",
      "against": "Optical changes do not precede electrical changes or originate from substrate deformation alone.",
      "category": "OPTOMECHANICS, SOUND, AND FUNCTIONAL SURFACES",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Transparent conductor cracks and optical warning",
      "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
      "access_score": 2,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 259,
      "literature_query": "Transparent conductor cracks optical warning patterned show polarization-dependent scattering electrical resistance rises substantially experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 6,
      "source_ids": "S19ceae358e16;Sc6596619f1aa;Sb7fff86da34d;S6e49e46ae162;S6237b4332665;S42a9acbbdd40",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 190,
    "title": "Microtexture hierarchy and frost removal force",
    "hypothesis": "A surface with two mechanically compliant texture scales will require less force to remove an existing frost layer than a single-scale texture at equal frost mass.",
    "test": "Measure removal force, frost morphology, temperature, and coating compliance.",
    "against": "Force differences disappear when frost contact area and mass are matched.",
    "category": "OPTOMECHANICS, SOUND, AND FUNCTIONAL SURFACES",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Microtexture hierarchy and frost removal force",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0190",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 191,
    "title": "Reference cavity and gas-sensor drift",
    "hypothesis": "A sealed reference cavity beside a gas-sensitive cavity will reduce pressure-induced baseline error better than a reference located remotely at the same measured temperature.",
    "test": "Apply controlled pressure and temperature changes with constant analyte concentration.",
    "against": "Adjacent referencing does not reduce independently measured concentration error.",
    "category": "RESEARCH INSTRUMENTS AND PHYSICAL INFERENCE",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Reference cavity and gas-sensor drift",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0191",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 192,
    "title": "Tracer-size series and pore flexibility",
    "hypothesis": "A series of inert tracer sizes will reveal pressure-induced pore deformation through a changing exclusion curve before bulk permeability changes become detectable.",
    "test": "Measure tracer passage and direct pore images over pressure cycles; control adsorption.",
    "against": "Exclusion changes do not match pore deformation or occur equally in rigid controls.",
    "category": "RESEARCH INSTRUMENTS AND PHYSICAL INFERENCE",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Tracer-size series and pore flexibility",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0192",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 193,
    "title": "Spatially shuffled sampling and reaction-front bias",
    "hypothesis": "Shuffling the order of spatial measurements will reduce reconstruction bias for a moving chemical front compared with sequential scanning at equal scan duration.",
    "test": "Compare reconstructed fronts with simultaneous wide-field reference images.",
    "against": "Shuffling provides no reduction in position or speed error.",
    "category": "RESEARCH INSTRUMENTS AND PHYSICAL INFERENCE",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Spatially shuffled sampling and reaction-front bias",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Replacement after conservative prior-art screening: a bounded comparative test with measurable outcomes; exact novelty remains unverified.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 95,
    "literature_query": "Spatially shuffled sampling and reaction-front bias Shuffling the order of spatial measurements will reduce reconstruction bias for a moving chemical front compared with sequential scanning at equal scan duration. experimental study",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0193",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 193,
      "title": "Spatially shuffled sampling and reaction-front bias",
      "hypothesis": "Shuffling the order of spatial measurements will reduce reconstruction bias for a moving chemical front compared with sequential scanning at equal scan duration.",
      "test": "Compare reconstructed fronts with simultaneous wide-field reference images.",
      "against": "Shuffling provides no reduction in position or speed error.",
      "category": "RESEARCH INSTRUMENTS AND PHYSICAL INFERENCE",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Spatially shuffled sampling and reaction-front bias",
      "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Replacement after conservative prior-art screening: a bounded comparative test with measurable outcomes; exact novelty remains unverified.",
      "status": "not selected",
      "rank": 95,
      "literature_query": "Spatially shuffled sampling and reaction-front bias Shuffling the order of spatial measurements will reduce reconstruction bias for a moving chemical front compared with sequential scanning at equal scan duration. experimental study",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 6,
      "source_ids": "S90dbcba0c682;S26f2cdee82d6;Scb0a13ded750;S75dd4a29f42e;Sad8a89e234c3;Sdc1482ce9801",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 194,
    "title": "Temperature microsteps and sensor adsorption",
    "hypothesis": "Small reversible temperature steps will separate slow analyte desorption from electronic baseline drift when the two have distinct relaxation signatures.",
    "test": "Use model sensors with independently measured adsorption and a stable electronic reference; validate on blinded mixtures of effects.",
    "against": "The signatures cannot recover known contributions on independent runs.",
    "category": "RESEARCH INSTRUMENTS AND PHYSICAL INFERENCE",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Temperature microsteps and sensor adsorption",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0194",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 195,
    "title": "Dual load cells and soft-sample slip",
    "hypothesis": "Measuring force at both ends of a soft specimen will detect grip slip earlier than single-end force sensing combined with overall displacement.",
    "test": "Compare force imbalance against direct grip imaging under slow deformation; quantify inertia and alignment errors.",
    "against": "Slip detection is no earlier at an equal false-alarm rate.",
    "category": "RESEARCH INSTRUMENTS AND PHYSICAL INFERENCE",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Dual load cells and soft-sample slip",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 25,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0195",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 196,
    "title": "Optical path reversal and window contamination",
    "hypothesis": "Reversing a spectrometer's illumination path through matched reference channels will help distinguish window contamination from true bulk absorption.",
    "test": "Introduce independently known absorber concentrations and controlled window films; assess recovery on unseen samples.",
    "against": "Bulk absorption estimates remain equally biased after reversal correction.",
    "category": "RESEARCH INSTRUMENTS AND PHYSICAL INFERENCE",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Optical path reversal and window contamination",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 25,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0196",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 197,
    "title": "Time-reversed heating and thermal contact inference",
    "hypothesis": "Heating a two-part sample from each side in separate runs will estimate interfacial thermal resistance more accurately than one-sided heating alone.",
    "test": "Use known contact standards and distributed thermometry; include sensor lag in parameter fitting.",
    "against": "Combined runs do not improve recovery of independently measured resistance.",
    "category": "RESEARCH INSTRUMENTS AND PHYSICAL INFERENCE",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Time-reversed heating and thermal contact inference",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 25,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0197",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 198,
    "title": "Independent clocks and periodic artifact detection",
    "hypothesis": "Running two sensors at slightly different sampling intervals will distinguish real physical oscillations from sampling-related artifacts more reliably than synchronized acquisition alone.",
    "test": "Record a calibrated oscillatory source with deliberately injected timing artifacts; compare recovered spectra.",
    "against": "Artifact rejection does not improve at matched data volume and duration.",
    "category": "RESEARCH INSTRUMENTS AND PHYSICAL INFERENCE",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Independent clocks and periodic artifact detection",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0198",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 199,
    "title": "Blank substrate mosaics and deposition inference",
    "hypothesis": "Interleaving chemically inert witness patches among reactive patches will estimate spatial deposition bias more accurately than placing all blanks at the sample edge.",
    "test": "Apply a controlled deposition field; compare inferred reactive uptake with independent mass measurements.",
    "against": "Distributed blanks fail to reduce uptake-estimation error or alter the deposition field appreciably.",
    "category": "RESEARCH INSTRUMENTS AND PHYSICAL INFERENCE",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Blank substrate mosaics and deposition inference",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Replacement after conservative prior-art screening: a bounded comparative test with measurable outcomes; exact novelty remains unverified.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 96,
    "literature_query": "Blank substrate mosaics and deposition inference Interleaving chemically inert witness patches among reactive patches will estimate spatial deposition bias more accurately than placing all blanks at the sample edge. experimental study",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0199",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": true,
    "conditional_model_analysis": true,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 3,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 199,
      "title": "Blank substrate mosaics and deposition inference",
      "hypothesis": "Interleaving chemically inert witness patches among reactive patches will estimate spatial deposition bias more accurately than placing all blanks at the sample edge.",
      "test": "Apply a controlled deposition field; compare inferred reactive uptake with independent mass measurements.",
      "against": "Distributed blanks fail to reduce uptake-estimation error or alter the deposition field appreciably.",
      "category": "RESEARCH INSTRUMENTS AND PHYSICAL INFERENCE",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Blank substrate mosaics and deposition inference",
      "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Replacement after conservative prior-art screening: a bounded comparative test with measurable outcomes; exact novelty remains unverified.",
      "status": "not selected",
      "rank": 96,
      "literature_query": "Blank substrate mosaics and deposition inference Interleaving chemically inert witness patches among reactive patches will estimate spatial deposition bias more accurately than placing all blanks at the sample edge. experimental study",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 6,
      "source_ids": "Sa65ece555251;S56d6f1a18b21;S007cca4f58c7;S31dee50fe7d3;S74fe30f7bbe2;S5a580491f42d",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": {
      "deep_rank": "11",
      "id": "199",
      "title": "Blank substrate mosaics and deposition inference",
      "original_300_rank": "96",
      "pilot_class": "P",
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "hypothesis": "Interleaving chemically inert witness patches among reactive patches will estimate spatial deposition bias more accurately than placing all blanks at the sample edge.",
      "primary_outcome": "Error in estimated reactive uptake after correcting a spatial deposition field; validate against an independent ground truth.",
      "comparison": "Equal numbers and areas of inert witness patches distributed among reactive regions versus placed only along the edge.",
      "controls": "Witness chemistry, local deposition perturbation, deposition smoothness, spatial correlation length, calibration model, noise, and total witnessed area.",
      "pilot": "Run the supplied explicitly labeled mathematical sensitivity study first. For physical work, use a benign deposition analogue and independent full-field mass or thickness measurement. Freeze interpolation and validation positions in advance.",
      "novelty_gap": "Witness plates and spatial deposition mapping are established. The narrow question is reference layout under a defined field model at equal witness count, including negative controls.",
      "stop_rule": "Drop any universal superiority claim: edge samples can suffice for simple gradients and may win for edge-localized structure. Confirm only the preregistered regime with independent physical data.",
      "source_keys": "WITNESS23;CVD07",
      "truth_probability": "not estimated",
      "novelty_status": "unverified"
    },
    "dossier_text": "# 11. H0199 — Blank substrate mosaics and deposition inference\n\nOriginal 300-folder rank: 96. Pilot class: P. Resource class: equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop.\n\n## Original hypothesis\n\nInterleaving chemically inert witness patches among reactive patches will estimate spatial deposition bias more accurately than placing all blanks at the sample edge.\n\n## Why investigate this\n\nA computational pilot can expose failure conditions cheaply, followed by a controlled deposition test using known spatial ground truth.\n\n## Literature assessment and exact novelty question\n\nWitness plates and spatial deposition mapping are established. The narrow question is reference layout under a defined field model at equal witness count, including negative controls. Worldwide originality remains unverified.\n\n## Primary measurement\n\nError in estimated reactive uptake after correcting a spatial deposition field; validate against an independent ground truth.\n\n## Comparison\n\nEqual numbers and areas of inert witness patches distributed among reactive regions versus placed only along the edge.\n\n## Critical controls\n\nWitness chemistry, local deposition perturbation, deposition smoothness, spatial correlation length, calibration model, noise, and total witnessed area.\n\n## Pilot plan\n\nRun the supplied explicitly labeled mathematical sensitivity study first. For physical work, use a benign deposition analogue and independent full-field mass or thickness measurement. Freeze interpolation and validation positions in advance.\n\n## What would count against it\n\nDrop any universal superiority claim: edge samples can suffice for simple gradients and may win for edge-localized structure. Confirm only the preregistered regime with independent physical data.\n\n## Replication and analysis\n\nTreat separately prepared specimens, batches, or devices as independent units. Technical repeats and images are nested measurements. First estimate calibration error and independent-preparation variability. Set the minimum meaningful effect in the primary outcome's units before confirmation, then choose sample size from that effect and pilot variance; a convenient pilot count is not a powered study.\n\nRandomize run order and blind sample labels where practical. Freeze image processing, fitting choices, exclusions, and the primary comparison before evaluating confirmatory data. Report effect size and uncertainty; use a blocked or mixed-effects analysis when specimens share a batch. A wide interval is inconclusive. Include the measurement and matching controls even when the directional effect appears large.\n\nA useful go/no-go gate is whether the hypothesized effect can be distinguished from calibration uncertainty and the strongest alternative explanation. Stop material purchases if the closest literature already measures the identical contrast, unless a replication has an explicit purpose. Do not use these abbreviated plans as complete laboratory protocols.\n\n## Data to preserve\n\nKeep unedited images or sensor streams, calibration files, preparation IDs, run order, environmental logs, input histories, raw outcome values, exclusions, and the exact analysis version. No values are prefilled in the observation template. Use `data/Published Benchmarks.csv` only as literature context; values from a different system are not observations of this hypothesis.\n\n## Sources and transfer limits\n\n### WITNESS23\n\n[In Situ Optimized Substrate Witness Plates: Ground Truth for Key Processes on the Moon and Other Planets](https://doi.org/10.1029/2023EA003004)\n\nAccess: Indexed article sections examined. Type: primary instrument/model proposal.\n\nBackground findings and transfer limits: see [source assessments](../research/Primary%20Source%20Assessments.md) under this source key.\n\n### CVD07\n\n[Combinatorial Experiments Using a Spatially Programmable Chemical Vapor Deposition System](https://drum.lib.umd.edu/items/2c80c156-06cb-496d-9b62-8dadfa998ce8)\n\nAccess: Repository abstract screened. Type: original research thesis.\n\nBackground findings and transfer limits: see [source assessments](../research/Primary%20Source%20Assessments.md) under this source key.\n\n"
  },
  {
    "id": 200,
    "title": "Multi-amplitude perturbations and hidden saturation",
    "hypothesis": "Applying two small perturbation amplitudes will reveal incipient sensor saturation before a single-amplitude calibration detects a significant slope change.",
    "test": "Test devices with independently characterized nonlinear response; compare detection thresholds at equal measurement time and false-alarm rate.",
    "against": "The two-amplitude method provides no earlier reliable warning.",
    "category": "RESEARCH INSTRUMENTS AND PHYSICAL INFERENCE",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Multi-amplitude perturbations and hidden saturation",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 101-200.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0200",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 201,
    "title": "Lubricant reservoir connectivity",
    "hypothesis": "Connected microscopic lubricant reservoirs will delay friction increase longer than isolated reservoirs at equal lubricant volume and surface texture.",
    "test": "Compare sliding coupons with matched geometry and load; measure friction, wear, and lubricant migration.",
    "against": "Connected reservoirs provide no longer low-friction lifetime.",
    "category": "TRIBOLOGY AND CONTACT MECHANICS",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Lubricant reservoir connectivity",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0201",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 202,
    "title": "Sliding reversal and debris escape",
    "hypothesis": "A short reverse stroke between long forward strokes will remove wear debris more effectively than continuous sliding at equal distance and work.",
    "test": "Track debris and wear on matched contacts; measure actual frictional work and contact temperature.",
    "against": "Wear reduction disappears when work and debris transport are matched.",
    "category": "TRIBOLOGY AND CONTACT MECHANICS",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Sliding reversal and debris escape",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 30,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0202",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 203,
    "title": "Viscoelastic coating thickness and stick-slip",
    "hypothesis": "An intermediate soft-coating thickness will minimize stick-slip amplitude by dissipating shear without permitting large contact deformation.",
    "test": "Sweep coating thickness at matched surface chemistry, load, speed, and substrate stiffness.",
    "against": "Stick-slip amplitude has no reproducible minimum.",
    "category": "TRIBOLOGY AND CONTACT MECHANICS",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Viscoelastic coating thickness and stick-slip",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 25,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0203",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 204,
    "title": "Contact humidity and rolling resistance",
    "hypothesis": "A hydrophilic microsphere will exhibit a delayed rise in rolling resistance after a humidity increase because capillary bridges require finite formation time.",
    "test": "Measure rolling resistance and contact-area evolution after controlled humidity steps; use hydrophobic controls.",
    "against": "Resistance changes immediately or independently of capillary-bridge formation.",
    "category": "TRIBOLOGY AND CONTACT MECHANICS",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Contact humidity and rolling resistance",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 97,
    "literature_query": "Contact humidity rolling resistance hydrophilic microsphere exhibit delayed rise in because capillary bridges experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0204",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 204,
      "title": "Contact humidity and rolling resistance",
      "hypothesis": "A hydrophilic microsphere will exhibit a delayed rise in rolling resistance after a humidity increase because capillary bridges require finite formation time.",
      "test": "Measure rolling resistance and contact-area evolution after controlled humidity steps; use hydrophobic controls.",
      "against": "Resistance changes immediately or independently of capillary-bridge formation.",
      "category": "TRIBOLOGY AND CONTACT MECHANICS",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Contact humidity and rolling resistance",
      "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 97,
      "literature_query": "Contact humidity rolling resistance hydrophilic microsphere exhibit delayed rise in because capillary bridges experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 8,
      "source_ids": "S3239cac5b40e;S0bf4128d888c;S9b5b3940fb15;Se0542443e708;S228af7d15caf;S0c9c51201310;S91c673d0b0bb;S0d7e3928b86c",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 205,
    "title": "Lubricant molecular size distribution",
    "hypothesis": "A lubricant with a narrow molecular-size distribution will show less friction variability in a nanoconfined contact than a broad distribution with matched bulk viscosity.",
    "test": "Use specialist surface-force measurements; match chemistry, water content, temperature, and mean film thickness.",
    "against": "Friction variability is unchanged after film thickness is controlled.",
    "category": "TRIBOLOGY AND CONTACT MECHANICS",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Lubricant molecular size distribution",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0205",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 206,
    "title": "Roughness orientation and fretting wear",
    "hypothesis": "Crossing roughness directions on two contacting surfaces will reduce localized fretting damage compared with aligned roughness at equal initial contact stiffness.",
    "test": "Apply small oscillatory displacement; map wear, contact stiffness, and trapped debris.",
    "against": "Damage is unchanged or reduced only because actual contact force differs.",
    "category": "TRIBOLOGY AND CONTACT MECHANICS",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Roughness orientation and fretting wear",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 30,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0206",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 207,
    "title": "Elastic recovery and seal leakage",
    "hypothesis": "A seal with a faster surface-layer relaxation time than its core will recover lower leakage after brief unloading than a uniform seal of equal static stiffness.",
    "test": "Measure leakage and surface recovery during repeated unloading with matched pressure and geometry.",
    "against": "Leakage recovery does not improve or depends only on average stiffness.",
    "category": "TRIBOLOGY AND CONTACT MECHANICS",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Elastic recovery and seal leakage",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 30,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0207",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 208,
    "title": "Particle softness and abrasive embedding",
    "hypothesis": "Soft contaminant particles will become embedded in a compliant coating at lower load than hard particles of equal size, reducing later abrasion of the opposing surface.",
    "test": "Track labeled particles, embedding depth, and counterface wear under controlled loading.",
    "against": "Embedding does not reduce subsequent wear at matched particle retention.",
    "category": "TRIBOLOGY AND CONTACT MECHANICS",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Particle softness and abrasive embedding",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 30,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0208",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 209,
    "title": "Alternating load and boundary-film repair",
    "hypothesis": "Brief low-load intervals will restore a reversible boundary lubricant film more efficiently than equally long complete stops at matched total sliding distance.",
    "test": "Measure film coverage, restart friction, and temperature using a benign lubricant system.",
    "against": "Low-load intervals do not improve coverage or friction relative to stops.",
    "category": "TRIBOLOGY AND CONTACT MECHANICS",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Alternating load and boundary-film repair",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0209",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 210,
    "title": "Curved contact edges and crack initiation",
    "hypothesis": "Rounding the exit edge of a bonded sliding contact will delay interfacial crack initiation more than rounding the entrance edge at equal contact area.",
    "test": "Compare direction-reversed sliding specimens; image cracks and map local strain.",
    "against": "Initiation does not follow edge orientation after strain and adhesion are controlled.",
    "category": "TRIBOLOGY AND CONTACT MECHANICS",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Curved contact edges and crack initiation",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0210",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 211,
    "title": "Microvoid shape and crack branching",
    "hypothesis": "Oblate microvoids oriented obliquely to a tensile axis will induce more crack branching than spherical voids at equal void volume fraction.",
    "test": "Test transparent model solids with designed voids; measure crack paths, strength, and absorbed energy.",
    "against": "Branching is unchanged after initial flaw size is matched.",
    "category": "FRACTURE, FATIGUE, AND STRUCTURAL STABILITY",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Microvoid shape and crack branching",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0211",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 212,
    "title": "Fatigue order and ligament survival",
    "hypothesis": "A decreasing sequence of cyclic load amplitudes will leave greater residual strength than an increasing sequence with identical cycle counts at each amplitude in a model composite.",
    "test": "Randomize independently prepared specimens; monitor damage and measure final strength.",
    "against": "Residual strength does not depend reproducibly on sequence.",
    "category": "FRACTURE, FATIGUE, AND STRUCTURAL STABILITY",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Fatigue order and ligament survival",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0212",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 213,
    "title": "Interlayer slip and vibration fatigue",
    "hypothesis": "A laminate permitting limited reversible interlayer slip will accumulate less vibration-fatigue damage than fully bonded layers at equal peak outer-surface strain.",
    "test": "Measure slip, heating, strain fields, and damage during matched vibration exposure.",
    "against": "Damage reduction vanishes when actual layer strains are matched.",
    "category": "FRACTURE, FATIGUE, AND STRUCTURAL STABILITY",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Interlayer slip and vibration fatigue",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0213",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 214,
    "title": "Notch spacing and failure precursors",
    "hypothesis": "Two nearby notches will produce more spatially localized acoustic-emission precursors than a single notch with equal total removed area.",
    "test": "Compare emission locations with direct crack imaging under controlled tensile loading.",
    "against": "Localization does not improve or signals originate from grips.",
    "category": "FRACTURE, FATIGUE, AND STRUCTURAL STABILITY",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Notch spacing and failure precursors",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0214",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 215,
    "title": "Residual compression and microcrack closure",
    "hypothesis": "A shallow compressive residual-stress layer will suppress permeability growth from fatigue microcracks more strongly than it suppresses total crack length.",
    "test": "Measure residual stress, permeability, and crack geometry before and after cycling.",
    "against": "Permeability reduction scales only with crack-length reduction.",
    "category": "FRACTURE, FATIGUE, AND STRUCTURAL STABILITY",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Residual compression and microcrack closure",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0215",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 216,
    "title": "Fiber termination staggering",
    "hypothesis": "Staggering fiber ends across a bonded region will reduce peak matrix strain more than clustering ends at equal fiber length and fraction.",
    "test": "Use image-based strain measurements and microscopy in matched composites.",
    "against": "Peak strain is unchanged or concentrated at another equally severe location.",
    "category": "FRACTURE, FATIGUE, AND STRUCTURAL STABILITY",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Fiber termination staggering",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0216",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 217,
    "title": "Buckling mode competition",
    "hypothesis": "A column with two weak geometric asymmetries of opposing direction will switch buckling modes more abruptly with temperature than a column with one asymmetry.",
    "test": "Measure shape and load-displacement behavior while independently tracking thermal expansion.",
    "against": "No reproducible mode switching occurs within the tested temperature range.",
    "category": "FRACTURE, FATIGUE, AND STRUCTURAL STABILITY",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Buckling mode competition",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0217",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 218,
    "title": "Reversible prestress and impact rebound",
    "hypothesis": "A membrane with moderate reversible prestress will return a larger fraction of low-energy impact energy than either a slack or highly prestressed membrane.",
    "test": "Measure rebound, deformation, and damping at matched membrane mass and impact conditions.",
    "against": "Energy return has no intermediate maximum.",
    "category": "FRACTURE, FATIGUE, AND STRUCTURAL STABILITY",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Reversible prestress and impact rebound",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 30,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0218",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 219,
    "title": "Crack-healing reservoir orientation",
    "hypothesis": "Benign healing-agent reservoirs oriented across the expected crack path will deliver more fluid into cracks than parallel reservoirs at equal reservoir volume.",
    "test": "Use transparent model polymers and low-hazard healing fluids; measure released volume and recovered strength.",
    "against": "Delivery and recovery do not depend on orientation.",
    "category": "FRACTURE, FATIGUE, AND STRUCTURAL STABILITY",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Crack-healing reservoir orientation",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0219",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 220,
    "title": "Porous shell and collapse consistency",
    "hypothesis": "A thin dense outer skin on a porous shell will reduce specimen-to-specimen collapse-load variability at equal total mass compared with uniformly porous shells.",
    "test": "Measure defects and collapse across independent fabricated shells.",
    "against": "Variability is not reduced after fabrication tolerances are included.",
    "category": "FRACTURE, FATIGUE, AND STRUCTURAL STABILITY",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Porous shell and collapse consistency",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 30,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0220",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 221,
    "title": "Electret pore connectivity",
    "hypothesis": "Disconnected pores will retain deposited charge longer than connected pores in otherwise matched insulating foams under humid conditions.",
    "test": "Measure charge decay, water uptake, and pore connectivity at matched initial potential.",
    "against": "Retention is unchanged after water uptake and surface leakage are controlled.",
    "category": "CHARGE, DIELECTRIC, AND ELECTROMECHANICAL PHENOMENA",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Electret pore connectivity",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 98,
    "literature_query": "Electret pore connectivity Disconnected pores retain deposited charge longer connected in otherwise insulating experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0221",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 221,
      "title": "Electret pore connectivity",
      "hypothesis": "Disconnected pores will retain deposited charge longer than connected pores in otherwise matched insulating foams under humid conditions.",
      "test": "Measure charge decay, water uptake, and pore connectivity at matched initial potential.",
      "against": "Retention is unchanged after water uptake and surface leakage are controlled.",
      "category": "CHARGE, DIELECTRIC, AND ELECTROMECHANICAL PHENOMENA",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Electret pore connectivity",
      "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 98,
      "literature_query": "Electret pore connectivity Disconnected pores retain deposited charge longer connected in otherwise insulating experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 7,
      "source_ids": "S7dc336c71442;S838140609848;S7b8c731f67ff;S2208db6fd87c;S490ceda1cc7f;S328df6ed8526;Sd729f34b49fa",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 222,
    "title": "Triboelectric contact timing",
    "hypothesis": "Repeated contacts separated by full mechanical recovery will produce more reproducible charge transfer than rapid contacts with equal total contact time.",
    "test": "Measure charge, real contact area, and temperature on chemically matched surfaces.",
    "against": "Charge variability is unchanged after actual contact area is included.",
    "category": "CHARGE, DIELECTRIC, AND ELECTROMECHANICAL PHENOMENA",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Triboelectric contact timing",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0222",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 223,
    "title": "Dielectric inclusion orientation",
    "hypothesis": "Aligned plate-like insulating inclusions will reduce local electric-field hotspots more effectively than randomly oriented inclusions when their planes lie parallel to electrodes.",
    "test": "Use dielectric imaging and validated field models; match filler fraction and void content.",
    "against": "Hotspot intensity is no lower or is dominated by added voids.",
    "category": "CHARGE, DIELECTRIC, AND ELECTROMECHANICAL PHENOMENA",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Dielectric inclusion orientation",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 25,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0223",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 224,
    "title": "Piezoelectric segmentation",
    "hypothesis": "Electrically isolated segments in a flexible piezoelectric strip will preserve more usable output under nonuniform bending than a continuous electrode with equal active area.",
    "test": "Apply measured curvature fields; compare delivered energy into matched optimized loads.",
    "against": "Segmentation provides no energy advantage after circuit losses are counted.",
    "category": "CHARGE, DIELECTRIC, AND ELECTROMECHANICAL PHENOMENA",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Piezoelectric segmentation",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 3,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0224",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 225,
    "title": "Charge drainage and surface topology",
    "hypothesis": "A sparse connected conductive mesh beneath an insulating surface will reduce residual surface-potential variability faster than disconnected conductive islands at equal metal coverage.",
    "test": "Deposit controlled charge and map decay; measure leakage and dielectric thickness.",
    "against": "Spatial variability decays at the same rate in both structures.",
    "category": "CHARGE, DIELECTRIC, AND ELECTROMECHANICAL PHENOMENA",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Charge drainage and surface topology",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 3,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0225",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 226,
    "title": "Ionic actuator recovery and electrode porosity",
    "hypothesis": "An intermediate electrode porosity will minimize recovery time of an ionic actuator by balancing ion access against distributed electrical resistance.",
    "test": "Measure bending recovery, impedance, and ion uptake across matched actuators.",
    "against": "Recovery time has no intermediate minimum after thickness is controlled.",
    "category": "CHARGE, DIELECTRIC, AND ELECTROMECHANICAL PHENOMENA",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Ionic actuator recovery and electrode porosity",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 99,
    "literature_query": "Ionic actuator recovery electrode porosity An intermediate minimize time of by balancing ion experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0226",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 226,
      "title": "Ionic actuator recovery and electrode porosity",
      "hypothesis": "An intermediate electrode porosity will minimize recovery time of an ionic actuator by balancing ion access against distributed electrical resistance.",
      "test": "Measure bending recovery, impedance, and ion uptake across matched actuators.",
      "against": "Recovery time has no intermediate minimum after thickness is controlled.",
      "category": "CHARGE, DIELECTRIC, AND ELECTROMECHANICAL PHENOMENA",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Ionic actuator recovery and electrode porosity",
      "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 99,
      "literature_query": "Ionic actuator recovery electrode porosity An intermediate minimize time of by balancing ion experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 6,
      "source_ids": "S4478f3a04323;S02e622cc5c3e;S742352d47a1a;Sfd814019ac2a;Sdabe2201cf1e;S69cccb5746b5",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 227,
    "title": "Flexoelectric signal and strain localization",
    "hypothesis": "A smooth strain gradient will produce a more repeatable flexoelectric response than a sharp localized gradient with equal integrated curvature.",
    "test": "Use specialist low-noise measurements and reverse bending; control piezoelectric and triboelectric artifacts.",
    "against": "Repeatability does not improve or signals fail polarity reversal controls.",
    "category": "CHARGE, DIELECTRIC, AND ELECTROMECHANICAL PHENOMENA",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Flexoelectric signal and strain localization",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0227",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 228,
    "title": "Dielectric relaxation and mechanical confinement",
    "hypothesis": "Lateral confinement of a polar polymer will shift its dielectric relaxation time beyond the shift predicted from its measured density change alone.",
    "test": "Measure dielectric spectra, density, and stress in constrained and free films.",
    "against": "Density-adjusted spectra agree within uncertainty.",
    "category": "CHARGE, DIELECTRIC, AND ELECTROMECHANICAL PHENOMENA",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Dielectric relaxation and mechanical confinement",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0228",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 229,
    "title": "Photoconductor pulse spacing",
    "hypothesis": "In a trap-dominated photoconductor, widely separated weak light pulses will yield less baseline accumulation than frequent pulses with equal total photon dose.",
    "test": "Measure current transients and trap relaxation with matched temperature and spectrum.",
    "against": "Baseline accumulation is independent of pulse spacing after dark recovery is measured.",
    "category": "CHARGE, DIELECTRIC, AND ELECTROMECHANICAL PHENOMENA",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Photoconductor pulse spacing",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0229",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 230,
    "title": "Electrostatic dust removal and particle pairs",
    "hypothesis": "Closely spaced particle pairs will require stronger electrostatic removal fields than isolated particles of equal size because contact shielding reduces force per particle.",
    "test": "Image controlled inert-particle arrangements while measuring charge and detachment thresholds.",
    "against": "Pair thresholds do not exceed isolated thresholds after adhesion is controlled.",
    "category": "CHARGE, DIELECTRIC, AND ELECTROMECHANICAL PHENOMENA",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Electrostatic dust removal and particle pairs",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0230",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 231,
    "title": "Luminescent particle spacing and reabsorption",
    "hypothesis": "Spatially separating luminescent particles into thin layers will increase escaping emission relative to a uniform mixture at equal absorbed excitation and particle mass.",
    "test": "Measure absolute emission, spectra, and angular distribution with an integrating sphere.",
    "against": "Emission escape does not improve after excitation absorption is matched.",
    "category": "OPTICAL, THERMAL, AND ACOUSTIC PHENOMENA",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Luminescent particle spacing and reabsorption",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0231",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 232,
    "title": "Interference coating and curvature",
    "hypothesis": "A multilayer optical coating on a gently curved substrate will exhibit more spatial spectral variation from layer strain than an otherwise identical flat coating.",
    "test": "Map spectra, thickness, and strain while separating incidence-angle effects.",
    "against": "Measured variation is explained entirely by viewing angle and thickness.",
    "category": "OPTICAL, THERMAL, AND ACOUSTIC PHENOMENA",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Interference coating and curvature",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0232",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 233,
    "title": "Thermochromic domain size",
    "hypothesis": "Smaller thermochromic domains will reduce cycle-to-cycle transition-temperature variability but broaden the ensemble optical transition.",
    "test": "Image domain switching and measure optical curves across matched compositions.",
    "against": "Variability and transition width do not change in the predicted directions.",
    "category": "OPTICAL, THERMAL, AND ACOUSTIC PHENOMENA",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Thermochromic domain size",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0233",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 234,
    "title": "Thermal lens relaxation and container shape",
    "hypothesis": "A noncircular container will produce direction-dependent relaxation of a liquid thermal lens after heating ends, even at equal liquid volume and wall conductance.",
    "test": "Measure wavefront evolution and temperature fields in matched containers.",
    "against": "Relaxation is isotropic after wall heat-transfer differences are included.",
    "category": "OPTICAL, THERMAL, AND ACOUSTIC PHENOMENA",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Thermal lens relaxation and container shape",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0234",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 235,
    "title": "Photobleaching and oxygen diffusion distance",
    "hypothesis": "A thin oxygen-permeable cover will shift photobleaching from oxygen-limited to light-limited behavior as its thickness decreases.",
    "test": "Measure bleaching, oxygen concentration, and absorbed photons over cover thicknesses.",
    "against": "Bleaching kinetics lack the predicted transport-dependent crossover.",
    "category": "OPTICAL, THERMAL, AND ACOUSTIC PHENOMENA",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Photobleaching and oxygen diffusion distance",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0235",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 236,
    "title": "Acoustic absorber pore neck variance",
    "hypothesis": "A narrow distribution of pore-neck lengths will improve peak acoustic absorption but reduce bandwidth relative to a broad distribution at equal porosity.",
    "test": "Measure impedance and absorption in matched porous samples.",
    "against": "Peak and bandwidth do not show the predicted tradeoff.",
    "category": "OPTICAL, THERMAL, AND ACOUSTIC PHENOMENA",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Acoustic absorber pore neck variance",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0236",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 237,
    "title": "Elastic-wave guiding around defects",
    "hypothesis": "A graded elastic-wave guide will scatter less energy from a small off-center defect than an abrupt guide with the same confinement width.",
    "test": "Measure transmitted and scattered wave fields; match damping and defect size.",
    "against": "Scattering is not reduced within the chosen operating band.",
    "category": "OPTICAL, THERMAL, AND ACOUSTIC PHENOMENA",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Elastic-wave guiding around defects",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0237",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 238,
    "title": "Thermal expansion compensation geometry",
    "hypothesis": "A folded two-material beam will maintain tip position over temperature better when expansion compensation is distributed among several folds rather than concentrated at one junction.",
    "test": "Measure displacement, strain, and hysteresis across matched material amounts.",
    "against": "Distributed compensation gives no lower drift after dimensional tolerances are included.",
    "category": "OPTICAL, THERMAL, AND ACOUSTIC PHENOMENA",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Thermal expansion compensation geometry",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0238",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 239,
    "title": "Radiative coupling and thermometer error",
    "hypothesis": "A small thermometer inside a reflective enclosure will respond more strongly to enclosure-wall temperature than an otherwise matched thermometer behind a low-emissivity radiation shield.",
    "test": "Independently vary air and wall temperatures; calibrate conduction through supports.",
    "against": "Shielding does not reduce wall-induced error at matched airflow.",
    "category": "OPTICAL, THERMAL, AND ACOUSTIC PHENOMENA",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Radiative coupling and thermometer error",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 25,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0239",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 240,
    "title": "Sound transmission through liquid films",
    "hypothesis": "A confined liquid film will show a nonmonotonic acoustic transmission change as thickness crosses the viscous penetration depth.",
    "test": "Measure transmission across thickness and frequency sweeps with matched boundaries.",
    "against": "A model lacking viscous coupling explains all measured changes equally well.",
    "category": "OPTICAL, THERMAL, AND ACOUSTIC PHENOMENA",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Sound transmission through liquid films",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0240",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 241,
    "title": "Plant vein geometry and lesion bypass",
    "hypothesis": "A leaf region with more closed vein loops will retain water supply better after a small standardized vein blockage than a region with equal vein length but fewer loops.",
    "test": "Use nonfood model plants, vascular tracers, and matched local geometry; measure hydration and photosynthesis.",
    "against": "Loop density does not predict retained supply after lesion size is controlled.",
    "category": "NONHUMAN BIOLOGICAL ORGANIZATION",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Plant vein geometry and lesion bypass",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 25,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0241",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 242,
    "title": "Pollen wall hydration heterogeneity",
    "hypothesis": "Pollen grains with more spatially variable wall thickness will deform less uniformly during hydration than grains with uniform walls of the same mean thickness.",
    "test": "Use nonhazardous model-plant pollen, wall imaging, and controlled humidity ramps.",
    "against": "Deformation heterogeneity does not correlate with thickness variation after size is matched.",
    "category": "NONHUMAN BIOLOGICAL ORGANIZATION",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Pollen wall hydration heterogeneity",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0242",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 243,
    "title": "Yeast vacuole fragmentation and osmotic recovery",
    "hypothesis": "Laboratory yeast cells with more fragmented vacuoles before a mild osmotic step will show a different volume-recovery timescale independent of initial cell size.",
    "test": "Track live-cell morphology and recovery while controlling growth stage and viability.",
    "against": "Recovery does not depend on initial vacuole organization after controls.",
    "category": "NONHUMAN BIOLOGICAL ORGANIZATION",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Yeast vacuole fragmentation and osmotic recovery",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 25,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0243",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 244,
    "title": "Algal flagellar coordination and calcium transients",
    "hypothesis": "Small reversible extracellular calcium changes will alter flagellar coordination before they measurably change mean swimming speed in a nonpathogenic model alga.",
    "test": "Use high-speed microscopy and calcium controls; monitor motility and viability.",
    "against": "Coordination and speed change together within measurement resolution.",
    "category": "NONHUMAN BIOLOGICAL ORGANIZATION",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Algal flagellar coordination and calcium transients",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0244",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 245,
    "title": "Root hair spacing and phosphate depletion zones",
    "hypothesis": "Evenly spaced root hairs will produce a more uniform phosphate-depletion field than clustered hairs of equal total length.",
    "test": "Compare model seedlings in transparent substrates; map phosphate and account for uptake per hair.",
    "against": "Depletion uniformity is explained by total uptake rather than spacing.",
    "category": "NONHUMAN BIOLOGICAL ORGANIZATION",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Root hair spacing and phosphate depletion zones",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 25,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0245",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 246,
    "title": "Fungal cord junction angle and transport",
    "hypothesis": "Acute-angle junctions in a nonpathogenic fungal network will transmit a nutrient tracer more asymmetrically than near-right-angle junctions at matched cord diameters.",
    "test": "Map tracer transport and growth in patterned cultures; control source location and flow demand.",
    "against": "Transport asymmetry is independent of junction geometry.",
    "category": "NONHUMAN BIOLOGICAL ORGANIZATION",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Fungal cord junction angle and transport",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 25,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 239,
    "literature_query": "Fungal cord junction angle transport Acute-angle junctions in nonpathogenic network transmit nutrient tracer experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0246",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 246,
      "title": "Fungal cord junction angle and transport",
      "hypothesis": "Acute-angle junctions in a nonpathogenic fungal network will transmit a nutrient tracer more asymmetrically than near-right-angle junctions at matched cord diameters.",
      "test": "Map tracer transport and growth in patterned cultures; control source location and flow demand.",
      "against": "Transport asymmetry is independent of junction geometry.",
      "category": "NONHUMAN BIOLOGICAL ORGANIZATION",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Fungal cord junction angle and transport",
      "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 25,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 239,
      "literature_query": "Fungal cord junction angle transport Acute-angle junctions in nonpathogenic network transmit nutrient tracer experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 6,
      "source_ids": "Scc121c56b28b;S3be627d74737;S8e281fe1c43e;S726a206ce950;S7c00ee74333c;Sffea7e52aa22",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 247,
    "title": "Bacterial surface tether length",
    "hypothesis": "A longer flexible tether will increase rotational freedom of attached nonpathogenic bacteria under weak flow without proportionally increasing detachment.",
    "test": "Use characterized laboratory strains or inert cell-shaped controls; measure tether length, motion, and retention.",
    "against": "Motion and detachment rise proportionally or tether length has no effect.",
    "category": "NONHUMAN BIOLOGICAL ORGANIZATION",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Bacterial surface tether length",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 25,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 240,
    "literature_query": "Bacterial surface tether length longer flexible rotational freedom of attached nonpathogenic bacteria weak experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0247",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 247,
      "title": "Bacterial surface tether length",
      "hypothesis": "A longer flexible tether will increase rotational freedom of attached nonpathogenic bacteria under weak flow without proportionally increasing detachment.",
      "test": "Use characterized laboratory strains or inert cell-shaped controls; measure tether length, motion, and retention.",
      "against": "Motion and detachment rise proportionally or tether length has no effect.",
      "category": "NONHUMAN BIOLOGICAL ORGANIZATION",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Bacterial surface tether length",
      "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 25,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 240,
      "literature_query": "Bacterial surface tether length longer flexible rotational freedom of attached nonpathogenic bacteria weak experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 8,
      "source_ids": "S5898db243ac3;S7387a9e4faa6;Sd4a67667b760;S5d9a61252544;S9b8efb55cc31;S5ca4cd4d6271;S189708b08870;S3f4df46d74b1",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 248,
    "title": "Seed coat microcracks and oxygen entry",
    "hypothesis": "Sparse seed-coat microcracks will increase oxygen entry before causing a detectable increase in bulk water uptake in a model plant.",
    "test": "Measure oxygen, water uptake, and coat defects without introducing chemical damage.",
    "against": "Oxygen and water entry change together or cracks do not predict either.",
    "category": "NONHUMAN BIOLOGICAL ORGANIZATION",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Seed coat microcracks and oxygen entry",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 25,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0248",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 249,
    "title": "Moss capillary connectivity and wind drying",
    "hypothesis": "Breaking lateral capillary connections among moss shoots will accelerate drying more strongly under wind than in still air at equal initial water content.",
    "test": "Compare intact and geometrically matched separated shoot arrays; measure water profiles and airflow.",
    "against": "The connectivity effect does not interact with airflow.",
    "category": "NONHUMAN BIOLOGICAL ORGANIZATION",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Moss capillary connectivity and wind drying",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 100,
    "literature_query": "Moss capillary connectivity wind drying Breaking lateral connections among shoots accelerate strongly in experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0249",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 249,
      "title": "Moss capillary connectivity and wind drying",
      "hypothesis": "Breaking lateral capillary connections among moss shoots will accelerate drying more strongly under wind than in still air at equal initial water content.",
      "test": "Compare intact and geometrically matched separated shoot arrays; measure water profiles and airflow.",
      "against": "The connectivity effect does not interact with airflow.",
      "category": "NONHUMAN BIOLOGICAL ORGANIZATION",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Moss capillary connectivity and wind drying",
      "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 100,
      "literature_query": "Moss capillary connectivity wind drying Breaking lateral connections among shoots accelerate strongly in experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 8,
      "source_ids": "Sefdb3da69039;Sef66d2cb9857;Secd0f06e1ba6;S602674f346a9;S437b02015b11;S36d2380fc71c;S46deec537671;Sb99713277c2b",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 250,
    "title": "Diatom chain flexibility and turbulent breakup",
    "hypothesis": "More flexible chains of a nonpathogenic model diatom will survive a greater range of mild turbulent strains than rigid chains of equal length.",
    "test": "Measure chain mechanics, breakup, and local strain in a controlled laboratory flow.",
    "against": "Survival is unrelated to flexibility after chain length and joint strength are matched.",
    "category": "NONHUMAN BIOLOGICAL ORGANIZATION",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Diatom chain flexibility and turbulent breakup",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 101,
    "literature_query": "Diatom chain flexibility turbulent breakup flexible chains of nonpathogenic model survive greater range experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0250",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 250,
      "title": "Diatom chain flexibility and turbulent breakup",
      "hypothesis": "More flexible chains of a nonpathogenic model diatom will survive a greater range of mild turbulent strains than rigid chains of equal length.",
      "test": "Measure chain mechanics, breakup, and local strain in a controlled laboratory flow.",
      "against": "Survival is unrelated to flexibility after chain length and joint strength are matched.",
      "category": "NONHUMAN BIOLOGICAL ORGANIZATION",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Diatom chain flexibility and turbulent breakup",
      "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 101,
      "literature_query": "Diatom chain flexibility turbulent breakup flexible chains of nonpathogenic model survive greater range experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 5,
      "source_ids": "S67a0bb3fb808;S0a744254af8d;S8fe26034a824;Sc210262f3157;Sa1c717b9b8fe",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 251,
    "title": "RNA loop length and refolding memory",
    "hypothesis": "A longer noncoding RNA loop will prolong the lifetime of a mechanically induced alternative fold without necessarily changing its equilibrium abundance.",
    "test": "Measure single-molecule refolding and bulk structure for sequence-controlled model RNAs.",
    "against": "Lifetime differences track equilibrium abundance alone or disappear with sequence controls.",
    "category": "CELL-FREE BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOMOLECULAR MECHANICS",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "RNA loop length and refolding memory",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0251",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 252,
    "title": "Protein linker flexibility and domain recovery",
    "hypothesis": "A flexible linker between two purified protein domains will improve recovery of domain activity after mild reversible stretching compared with a rigid linker of equal length.",
    "test": "Measure mechanical response and separate domain activities in cell-free preparations.",
    "against": "Activity recovery is unchanged after unfolding extent is matched.",
    "category": "CELL-FREE BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOMOLECULAR MECHANICS",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Protein linker flexibility and domain recovery",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 25,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0252",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 253,
    "title": "DNA end chemistry and surface retention",
    "hypothesis": "Changing terminal chemistry while preserving sequence will alter the release-time distribution of short DNA from a mineral surface more than its initial adsorption amount.",
    "test": "Measure adsorption and washout for purified model strands at fixed ionic conditions.",
    "against": "Release differences disappear when initial bound amount is matched.",
    "category": "CELL-FREE BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOMOLECULAR MECHANICS",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "DNA end chemistry and surface retention",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0253",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 254,
    "title": "Enzyme oligomer exchange and dilution",
    "hypothesis": "An enzyme with reversible oligomerization will retain a transient catalytic-rate memory after rapid dilution longer than a monomeric control with matched turnover.",
    "test": "Measure oligomer state and activity simultaneously; calibrate mixing and substrate depletion.",
    "against": "Rate memory does not follow oligomer relaxation.",
    "category": "CELL-FREE BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOMOLECULAR MECHANICS",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Enzyme oligomer exchange and dilution",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 25,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0254",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 255,
    "title": "Lipid domain boundaries and pore formation",
    "hypothesis": "Transient membrane leakage will occur more often near boundaries between lipid phases than within domains under mild mechanical stress.",
    "test": "Image domains and localized leakage in model membranes at matched tension.",
    "against": "Leakage locations are random after boundary length and observation sensitivity are included.",
    "category": "CELL-FREE BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOMOLECULAR MECHANICS",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Lipid domain boundaries and pore formation",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0255",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 256,
    "title": "Peptide assembly and surface curvature sign",
    "hypothesis": "A purified benign assembly-forming peptide will nucleate at different rates on concave and convex surfaces of equal curvature magnitude and chemistry.",
    "test": "Measure nucleation, adsorption, and structure on matched model surfaces.",
    "against": "Rate differences vanish after peptide adsorption is matched.",
    "category": "CELL-FREE BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOMOLECULAR MECHANICS",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Peptide assembly and surface curvature sign",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0256",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 257,
    "title": "Chromatin analogue spacing and compaction",
    "hypothesis": "In a purified nucleosome-array model, alternating linker lengths will produce a broader distribution of compact states than uniform linkers of the same mean length.",
    "test": "Use nonhuman model components and structural measurements at matched salt and array length.",
    "against": "Compaction-state distributions are indistinguishable.",
    "category": "CELL-FREE BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOMOLECULAR MECHANICS",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Chromatin analogue spacing and compaction",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0257",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 258,
    "title": "Condensate fusion and internal crosslinks",
    "hypothesis": "Sparse reversible internal crosslinks will delay shape relaxation after condensate fusion more strongly than they slow small-molecule diffusion.",
    "test": "Measure fusion shape dynamics and tracer diffusion in a purified benign system.",
    "against": "Both timescales change proportionally or crosslinks cause irreversible aggregation.",
    "category": "CELL-FREE BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOMOLECULAR MECHANICS",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Condensate fusion and internal crosslinks",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0258",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 259,
    "title": "ATP regeneration location and cell-free synthesis",
    "hypothesis": "Localizing a benign energy-regeneration enzyme near a cell-free synthesis complex will stabilize output during energy pulses more than dispersing the same active amount.",
    "test": "Use characterized nonhuman cell-free components; measure local energy indicators, yield, and transport.",
    "against": "Output stability is unchanged after total regeneration rate is matched.",
    "category": "CELL-FREE BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOMOLECULAR MECHANICS",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "ATP regeneration location and cell-free synthesis",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 25,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0259",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 260,
    "title": "Membrane protein crowding and lateral diffusion",
    "hypothesis": "At fixed membrane area occupancy, clustering purified inert membrane proteins will leave faster long-range tracer diffusion than uniform dispersion by preserving open pathways.",
    "test": "Measure protein arrangement and lipid-tracer diffusion in reconstituted membranes.",
    "against": "Diffusion does not improve or apparent improvement reflects different tracer binding.",
    "category": "CELL-FREE BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOMOLECULAR MECHANICS",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Membrane protein crowding and lateral diffusion",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 25,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0260",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 261,
    "title": "Iron oxide aging and organic displacement",
    "hypothesis": "Fresh iron oxide will release a larger fraction of adsorbed benign organic acid upon phosphate addition than aged oxide at equal initial loading and surface area.",
    "test": "Measure release, mineral structure, and competitive adsorption under controlled pH.",
    "against": "Release fractions agree after surface area and initial binding strength are matched.",
    "category": "ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY AND MINERAL INTERFACES",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Iron oxide aging and organic displacement",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 3,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0261",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 262,
    "title": "Carbonate coatings and clay swelling",
    "hypothesis": "A discontinuous carbonate coating will restrain clay swelling less effectively than a continuous coating with equal carbonate mass.",
    "test": "Map coating continuity and measure swelling and permeability during hydration.",
    "against": "Swelling follows coating mass alone rather than continuity.",
    "category": "ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY AND MINERAL INTERFACES",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Carbonate coatings and clay swelling",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 102,
    "literature_query": "Carbonate coatings clay swelling discontinuous coating restrain effectively continuous mass experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0262",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 262,
      "title": "Carbonate coatings and clay swelling",
      "hypothesis": "A discontinuous carbonate coating will restrain clay swelling less effectively than a continuous coating with equal carbonate mass.",
      "test": "Map coating continuity and measure swelling and permeability during hydration.",
      "against": "Swelling follows coating mass alone rather than continuity.",
      "category": "ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY AND MINERAL INTERFACES",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Carbonate coatings and clay swelling",
      "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 102,
      "literature_query": "Carbonate coatings clay swelling discontinuous coating restrain effectively continuous mass experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 7,
      "source_ids": "Sfae020a10605;Sb0fa1cafc224;S4d816bf509ef;S941aef31683b;See7929c14f38;S8f874151d8ae;Sbab16b075e8b",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 263,
    "title": "Biochar pore accessibility and dissolved carbon",
    "hypothesis": "Prewetting biochar with degassed water will reduce the early burst of dissolved organic carbon by changing which pores become water-accessible.",
    "test": "Measure wetting, trapped gas, and dissolved carbon for matched biochar samples.",
    "against": "Carbon release is unchanged or differences arise from added chemical treatment.",
    "category": "ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY AND MINERAL INTERFACES",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Biochar pore accessibility and dissolved carbon",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0263",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 264,
    "title": "Mineral surface charge cycling",
    "hypothesis": "Reversible pH cycles will broaden the distribution of adsorption energies on a mixed mineral surface without changing its bulk composition.",
    "test": "Measure adsorption isotherms, surface spectra, and mineral dissolution before and after cycling.",
    "against": "Energy distributions remain unchanged or bulk dissolution accounts for the change.",
    "category": "ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY AND MINERAL INTERFACES",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Mineral surface charge cycling",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0264",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 265,
    "title": "Silica gel aging and trace-ion trapping",
    "hypothesis": "Slower silica-gel formation will trap a smaller fraction of a benign trace ion irreversibly than rapid formation at equal final gel density.",
    "test": "Measure ion exchange, pore structure, and total retained ions after standardized washing.",
    "against": "Irreversible retention is independent of formation rate after pore accessibility is matched.",
    "category": "ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY AND MINERAL INTERFACES",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Silica gel aging and trace-ion trapping",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 103,
    "literature_query": "Silica gel aging trace-ion trapping Slower silica-gel formation trap smaller fraction of benign experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0265",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 265,
      "title": "Silica gel aging and trace-ion trapping",
      "hypothesis": "Slower silica-gel formation will trap a smaller fraction of a benign trace ion irreversibly than rapid formation at equal final gel density.",
      "test": "Measure ion exchange, pore structure, and total retained ions after standardized washing.",
      "against": "Irreversible retention is independent of formation rate after pore accessibility is matched.",
      "category": "ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY AND MINERAL INTERFACES",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Silica gel aging and trace-ion trapping",
      "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 103,
      "literature_query": "Silica gel aging trace-ion trapping Slower silica-gel formation trap smaller fraction of benign experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 7,
      "source_ids": "S6e5a743959a1;S2a4c9ae69924;S3c8baa41fede;S248c0448da23;S3a0c21607734;S5febb99efef1;S12516dffb69b",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 266,
    "title": "Organic coatings and mineral photochemistry",
    "hypothesis": "A thin patchy organic coating will enhance a benign mineral-mediated photoreaction more than a continuous coating of equal mass by preserving exposed reactive boundaries.",
    "test": "Measure product formation, absorbed light, and coating distribution in a validated low-hazard model system.",
    "against": "Rates follow only exposed mineral area without a boundary contribution.",
    "category": "ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY AND MINERAL INTERFACES",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Organic coatings and mineral photochemistry",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0266",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 267,
    "title": "Salinity fronts and colloid release",
    "hypothesis": "A gradual decrease in salinity will release fewer clay colloids from a sand column than an abrupt decrease at equal final salinity and total water volume.",
    "test": "Measure particle output, pressure, and local salinity histories.",
    "against": "Total colloid release is unchanged after residence time is controlled.",
    "category": "ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY AND MINERAL INTERFACES",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Salinity fronts and colloid release",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 104,
    "literature_query": "Salinity fronts colloid release gradual decrease in fewer clay colloids sand column an experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0267",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 267,
      "title": "Salinity fronts and colloid release",
      "hypothesis": "A gradual decrease in salinity will release fewer clay colloids from a sand column than an abrupt decrease at equal final salinity and total water volume.",
      "test": "Measure particle output, pressure, and local salinity histories.",
      "against": "Total colloid release is unchanged after residence time is controlled.",
      "category": "ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY AND MINERAL INTERFACES",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Salinity fronts and colloid release",
      "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 104,
      "literature_query": "Salinity fronts colloid release gradual decrease in fewer clay colloids sand column an experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 5,
      "source_ids": "S9985b44d0627;S08f0e4e41324;S6f7960264986;Sfee78e0c450b;S5362ebfc39fd",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 268,
    "title": "Dissolved silica and carbonate texture",
    "hypothesis": "A low dissolved-silica concentration will change carbonate crystal roughness before it measurably changes total precipitation rate.",
    "test": "Measure roughness, precipitation mass, and solution composition across silica levels.",
    "against": "Roughness changes only when overall precipitation rate changes.",
    "category": "ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY AND MINERAL INTERFACES",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Dissolved silica and carbonate texture",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0268",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 269,
    "title": "Mineral pair contacts and redox gradients",
    "hypothesis": "Contacts between two chemically distinct benign minerals will sustain sharper local redox gradients than isolated grains at equal exposed surface area.",
    "test": "Map electrochemical potential and dissolved species in controlled oxygen conditions.",
    "against": "Gradients are explained by each mineral independently without a contact effect.",
    "category": "ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY AND MINERAL INTERFACES",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Mineral pair contacts and redox gradients",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 3,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 262,
    "literature_query": "Mineral pair contacts redox gradients chemically distinct benign minerals sustain sharper local isolated experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0269",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 269,
      "title": "Mineral pair contacts and redox gradients",
      "hypothesis": "Contacts between two chemically distinct benign minerals will sustain sharper local redox gradients than isolated grains at equal exposed surface area.",
      "test": "Map electrochemical potential and dissolved species in controlled oxygen conditions.",
      "against": "Gradients are explained by each mineral independently without a contact effect.",
      "category": "ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY AND MINERAL INTERFACES",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Mineral pair contacts and redox gradients",
      "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
      "access_score": 2,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 3,
      "screen_score": 23,
      "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 262,
      "literature_query": "Mineral pair contacts redox gradients chemically distinct benign minerals sustain sharper local isolated experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 4,
      "source_ids": "Saa6f31893d08;S2556626e326a;Sb6a839dbeee7;S065aec5ac081",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 270,
    "title": "Soil aggregate compression and rewetting",
    "hypothesis": "Mild compression before drying will increase rewetting fragmentation of weak soil analog aggregates more than compression after drying at equal final density.",
    "test": "Use defined sterile mineral-organic mixtures; image cracks, wetting, and fragment sizes.",
    "against": "Fragmentation depends only on final density and water content.",
    "category": "ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY AND MINERAL INTERFACES",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Soil aggregate compression and rewetting",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 30,
    "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 8,
    "literature_query": "Soil aggregate compression rewetting Mild drying fragmentation of weak analog aggregates at final experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0270",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 270,
      "title": "Soil aggregate compression and rewetting",
      "hypothesis": "Mild compression before drying will increase rewetting fragmentation of weak soil analog aggregates more than compression after drying at equal final density.",
      "test": "Use defined sterile mineral-organic mixtures; image cracks, wetting, and fragment sizes.",
      "against": "Fragmentation depends only on final density and water content.",
      "category": "ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMISTRY AND MINERAL INTERFACES",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Soil aggregate compression and rewetting",
      "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
      "access_score": 4,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 30,
      "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 8,
      "literature_query": "Soil aggregate compression rewetting Mild drying fragmentation of weak analog aggregates at final experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 9,
      "source_ids": "S3cbb9b75b3d5;S2fcba6ba494b;S0a107f34b89f;Scc1c94d8e994;Sd0a25e0ec9fa;Scf4075aeb14a;S162a9020a334;S662dc518a441;S8eec221d9eaa",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Compaction and wet-dry aggregate breakdown are studied. Check the order of compression relative to drying at equal final density and water content.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 271,
    "title": "Granular intruder shape and force chains",
    "hypothesis": "A rounded triangular intruder will generate more intermittent drag than a circular intruder of equal projected width in a slow granular flow.",
    "test": "Measure drag fluctuations and image force chains using model grains; match depth and speed.",
    "against": "Intermittency is unchanged after mean drag and boundary effects are matched.",
    "category": "GRANULAR, LIQUID, AND MULTIPHASE DYNAMICS",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Granular intruder shape and force chains",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 105,
    "literature_query": "Granular intruder shape force chains rounded triangular generate intermittent drag circular of projected experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0271",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 271,
      "title": "Granular intruder shape and force chains",
      "hypothesis": "A rounded triangular intruder will generate more intermittent drag than a circular intruder of equal projected width in a slow granular flow.",
      "test": "Measure drag fluctuations and image force chains using model grains; match depth and speed.",
      "against": "Intermittency is unchanged after mean drag and boundary effects are matched.",
      "category": "GRANULAR, LIQUID, AND MULTIPHASE DYNAMICS",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Granular intruder shape and force chains",
      "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 105,
      "literature_query": "Granular intruder shape force chains rounded triangular generate intermittent drag circular of projected experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 8,
      "source_ids": "Sbf940b889755;Sc01acb3b77a8;Se7f399103794;Sa3407aec3ec2;Sed721fe318d5;S7d82d8cd897b;S2bd722ebbf55;Se5c84c7de2e8",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 272,
    "title": "Bubble size sequence and channel pressure",
    "hypothesis": "A repeating small-large bubble sequence will show lower pressure fluctuation variance than a random sequence with the same bubble-size distribution in a narrow channel.",
    "test": "Measure bubble shapes, spacing, and pressure at matched gas fraction and mean flow.",
    "against": "Variance is not reduced after spacing and mean pressure drop are controlled.",
    "category": "GRANULAR, LIQUID, AND MULTIPHASE DYNAMICS",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Bubble size sequence and channel pressure",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 106,
    "literature_query": "Bubble size sequence channel pressure repeating small-large show lower fluctuation variance random bubble-size experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0272",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 272,
      "title": "Bubble size sequence and channel pressure",
      "hypothesis": "A repeating small-large bubble sequence will show lower pressure fluctuation variance than a random sequence with the same bubble-size distribution in a narrow channel.",
      "test": "Measure bubble shapes, spacing, and pressure at matched gas fraction and mean flow.",
      "against": "Variance is not reduced after spacing and mean pressure drop are controlled.",
      "category": "GRANULAR, LIQUID, AND MULTIPHASE DYNAMICS",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Bubble size sequence and channel pressure",
      "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 106,
      "literature_query": "Bubble size sequence channel pressure repeating small-large show lower fluctuation variance random bubble-size experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 5,
      "source_ids": "Sd4fbc225841e;S19f4b618f353;S73d10d7152f3;Sa9ee10396997;S958b272bcc48",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 273,
    "title": "Capillary bridge rupture and grain rotation",
    "hypothesis": "Allowing grain rotation during separation will increase variability in capillary-bridge rupture distance compared with rotationally fixed grains of the same roughness.",
    "test": "Measure bridge shape, force, and rupture while controlling liquid volume and separation speed.",
    "against": "Rupture variability is unchanged or explained by liquid-volume variation.",
    "category": "GRANULAR, LIQUID, AND MULTIPHASE DYNAMICS",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Capillary bridge rupture and grain rotation",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 107,
    "literature_query": "Capillary bridge rupture grain rotation Allowing separation variability in capillary-bridge distance rotationally fixed experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0273",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 273,
      "title": "Capillary bridge rupture and grain rotation",
      "hypothesis": "Allowing grain rotation during separation will increase variability in capillary-bridge rupture distance compared with rotationally fixed grains of the same roughness.",
      "test": "Measure bridge shape, force, and rupture while controlling liquid volume and separation speed.",
      "against": "Rupture variability is unchanged or explained by liquid-volume variation.",
      "category": "GRANULAR, LIQUID, AND MULTIPHASE DYNAMICS",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Capillary bridge rupture and grain rotation",
      "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 107,
      "literature_query": "Capillary bridge rupture grain rotation Allowing separation variability in capillary-bridge distance rotationally fixed experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 5,
      "source_ids": "S7e08fd0034bb;S9de04307a1af;S2b39f80013ad;S88e23670d2f7;Sd57f4114803d",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 274,
    "title": "Shear band migration and grain stiffness",
    "hypothesis": "A smooth stiffness gradient across a granular bed will cause a shear band to migrate toward softer grains under repeated loading at uniform grain size.",
    "test": "Image strain and force networks in model beds; reverse the gradient and match friction.",
    "against": "Migration does not reverse or follows friction differences instead of stiffness.",
    "category": "GRANULAR, LIQUID, AND MULTIPHASE DYNAMICS",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Shear band migration and grain stiffness",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 108,
    "literature_query": "Shear band migration grain stiffness smooth gradient across granular bed cause to migrate experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0274",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 274,
      "title": "Shear band migration and grain stiffness",
      "hypothesis": "A smooth stiffness gradient across a granular bed will cause a shear band to migrate toward softer grains under repeated loading at uniform grain size.",
      "test": "Image strain and force networks in model beds; reverse the gradient and match friction.",
      "against": "Migration does not reverse or follows friction differences instead of stiffness.",
      "category": "GRANULAR, LIQUID, AND MULTIPHASE DYNAMICS",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Shear band migration and grain stiffness",
      "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 108,
      "literature_query": "Shear band migration grain stiffness smooth gradient across granular bed cause to migrate experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 7,
      "source_ids": "Sdb69d1081da1;Sce17b70d8012;Sbffff9b668a2;S982ce24e1efa;S58e9d63afe7b;Sfdce14710388;S40d73216c34f",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 275,
    "title": "Droplet trains and evaporation shielding",
    "hypothesis": "Unequal spacing in a droplet train will create greater lifetime variability than equal spacing with the same mean separation because vapor shielding is locally nonlinear.",
    "test": "Track identical droplets under controlled airflow and temperature; measure vapor fields where feasible.",
    "against": "Lifetime variance is explained entirely by initial droplet-size variation.",
    "category": "GRANULAR, LIQUID, AND MULTIPHASE DYNAMICS",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Droplet trains and evaporation shielding",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 109,
    "literature_query": "Droplet trains evaporation shielding Unequal spacing in train create greater lifetime variability mean experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0275",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 275,
      "title": "Droplet trains and evaporation shielding",
      "hypothesis": "Unequal spacing in a droplet train will create greater lifetime variability than equal spacing with the same mean separation because vapor shielding is locally nonlinear.",
      "test": "Track identical droplets under controlled airflow and temperature; measure vapor fields where feasible.",
      "against": "Lifetime variance is explained entirely by initial droplet-size variation.",
      "category": "GRANULAR, LIQUID, AND MULTIPHASE DYNAMICS",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Droplet trains and evaporation shielding",
      "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 109,
      "literature_query": "Droplet trains evaporation shielding Unequal spacing in train create greater lifetime variability mean experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 4,
      "source_ids": "Sf2a3fcae1391;S45a4f340bb54;S86f861dfdcd8;S5261171eed4a",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 276,
    "title": "Immiscible displacement and wettability disorder scale",
    "hypothesis": "An intermediate correlation length of wettability patches will maximize trapped defending-fluid volume at fixed average wettability and pore geometry.",
    "test": "Use transparent pore networks with controlled patch scales; measure displacement and trapping.",
    "against": "Trapped volume has no reproducible maximum across scales.",
    "category": "GRANULAR, LIQUID, AND MULTIPHASE DYNAMICS",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Immiscible displacement and wettability disorder scale",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0276",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 277,
    "title": "Soft particles and jammed outlet release",
    "hypothesis": "A small fraction of softer particles will shorten clog lifetimes at a granular outlet without substantially changing the clog-formation rate.",
    "test": "Track outlet flow and particle deformation across softness fractions at matched size and friction.",
    "against": "Lifetime and formation rate change together or neither depends on softness.",
    "category": "GRANULAR, LIQUID, AND MULTIPHASE DYNAMICS",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Soft particles and jammed outlet release",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 110,
    "literature_query": "Soft particles jammed outlet release fraction of softer shorten clog lifetimes at granular experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0277",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 277,
      "title": "Soft particles and jammed outlet release",
      "hypothesis": "A small fraction of softer particles will shorten clog lifetimes at a granular outlet without substantially changing the clog-formation rate.",
      "test": "Track outlet flow and particle deformation across softness fractions at matched size and friction.",
      "against": "Lifetime and formation rate change together or neither depends on softness.",
      "category": "GRANULAR, LIQUID, AND MULTIPHASE DYNAMICS",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Soft particles and jammed outlet release",
      "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 110,
      "literature_query": "Soft particles jammed outlet release fraction of softer shorten clog lifetimes at granular experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 7,
      "source_ids": "S123e978db662;S4d00efd27466;S8e87e5d4a79a;S7093c972ec86;Sd087b9f2198f;S68a5bc9ec334;S6e99f2e17aa9",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 278,
    "title": "Viscoelastic jet breakup and nozzle history",
    "hypothesis": "A viscoelastic liquid exiting a nozzle after a long rest will have a different initial breakup length than during steady operation because polymer stretching has not reached its stationary state.",
    "test": "Measure startup flow, pressure, and jet shape while controlling temperature and throughput.",
    "against": "Breakup differences are fully explained by transient flow rate.",
    "category": "GRANULAR, LIQUID, AND MULTIPHASE DYNAMICS",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Viscoelastic jet breakup and nozzle history",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 111,
    "literature_query": "Viscoelastic jet breakup nozzle history liquid exiting long rest have different initial length experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0278",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 278,
      "title": "Viscoelastic jet breakup and nozzle history",
      "hypothesis": "A viscoelastic liquid exiting a nozzle after a long rest will have a different initial breakup length than during steady operation because polymer stretching has not reached its stationary state.",
      "test": "Measure startup flow, pressure, and jet shape while controlling temperature and throughput.",
      "against": "Breakup differences are fully explained by transient flow rate.",
      "category": "GRANULAR, LIQUID, AND MULTIPHASE DYNAMICS",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Viscoelastic jet breakup and nozzle history",
      "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 111,
      "literature_query": "Viscoelastic jet breakup nozzle history liquid exiting long rest have different initial length experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 5,
      "source_ids": "S10a382772ae1;S37c7b7b39685;S905aa95c8d38;Sd8984c68102a;S69878b9593b5",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 279,
    "title": "Liquid marbles and coating redistribution",
    "hypothesis": "A particle-coated droplet will lose more coating after alternating-axis rolling than single-axis rolling at equal path length because new contact regions are repeatedly exposed.",
    "test": "Measure coating coverage, particle loss, and droplet deformation on clean surfaces.",
    "against": "Loss depends only on traveled distance and load.",
    "category": "GRANULAR, LIQUID, AND MULTIPHASE DYNAMICS",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Liquid marbles and coating redistribution",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0279",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 280,
    "title": "Foam drainage and wall curvature",
    "hypothesis": "A gently concave wall will retain a thicker draining foam layer than a convex wall of equal curvature magnitude at matched wettability.",
    "test": "Measure liquid fraction, bubble motion, and retained thickness in matched fixtures.",
    "against": "Thickness differences disappear after capillary boundary pressure is included.",
    "category": "GRANULAR, LIQUID, AND MULTIPHASE DYNAMICS",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Foam drainage and wall curvature",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 30,
    "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 9,
    "literature_query": "Foam drainage wall curvature gently concave retain thicker draining layer convex of magnitude experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0280",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": true,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 280,
      "title": "Foam drainage and wall curvature",
      "hypothesis": "A gently concave wall will retain a thicker draining foam layer than a convex wall of equal curvature magnitude at matched wettability.",
      "test": "Measure liquid fraction, bubble motion, and retained thickness in matched fixtures.",
      "against": "Thickness differences disappear after capillary boundary pressure is included.",
      "category": "GRANULAR, LIQUID, AND MULTIPHASE DYNAMICS",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Foam drainage and wall curvature",
      "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
      "access_score": 4,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 30,
      "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 9,
      "literature_query": "Foam drainage wall curvature gently concave retain thicker draining layer convex of magnitude experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 12,
      "source_ids": "S48d318c285df;S7a2088bc24b5;Saa997df62bed;Sabdc1b3b0de3;Sebf767d96c8e;Sf41c9a746353;Sea6b64a26ef4;Scf9cfe2ba005;S837aebba99e3;Sddcc45e38bcc;Sbce03a6657ef;S1ddb5e0b0cb5",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Container shape and wettability already influence foam drainage. Verify equal-magnitude concave versus convex wall curvature with matched wetting and liquid fraction.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": {
      "deep_rank": "18",
      "id": "280",
      "title": "Foam drainage and wall curvature",
      "original_300_rank": "9",
      "pilot_class": "C",
      "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
      "hypothesis": "A gently concave wall will retain a thicker draining foam layer than a convex wall of equal curvature magnitude at matched wettability.",
      "primary_outcome": "Retained foam-layer thickness and local liquid fraction after a predefined drainage time.",
      "comparison": "Concave and convex walls of equal curvature magnitude, plus a flat wall.",
      "controls": "Wettability, wall material, foam liquid fraction, bubble-size distribution, wall area, preparation age, and temperature.",
      "pilot": "Prepare one foam batch and allocate randomized portions to matched transparent fixtures. Track wall films and bulk drainage separately. Check repeatability with a second foam preparation.",
      "novelty_gap": "Container shape, diameter, and wettability are established foam-drainage variables. Only the strictly matched curvature-sign comparison could add a narrower result.",
      "stop_rule": "If the effect follows changed wetting or contact area, reject curvature as the independent explanation. A confidently equal retention contradicts the prediction.",
      "source_keys": "FOAMD09;FOAMD00",
      "truth_probability": "not estimated",
      "novelty_status": "unverified"
    },
    "dossier_text": "# 18. H0280 — Foam drainage and wall curvature\n\nOriginal 300-folder rank: 9. Pilot class: C. Resource class: modest bench or workshop; calibration still required.\n\n## Original hypothesis\n\nA gently concave wall will retain a thicker draining foam layer than a convex wall of equal curvature magnitude at matched wettability.\n\n## Why investigate this\n\nGeometry changes are easy to fabricate and imaging can directly reveal the proposed retention difference.\n\n## Literature assessment and exact novelty question\n\nContainer shape, diameter, and wettability are established foam-drainage variables. Only the strictly matched curvature-sign comparison could add a narrower result. Worldwide originality remains unverified.\n\n## Primary measurement\n\nRetained foam-layer thickness and local liquid fraction after a predefined drainage time.\n\n## Comparison\n\nConcave and convex walls of equal curvature magnitude, plus a flat wall.\n\n## Critical controls\n\nWettability, wall material, foam liquid fraction, bubble-size distribution, wall area, preparation age, and temperature.\n\n## Pilot plan\n\nPrepare one foam batch and allocate randomized portions to matched transparent fixtures. Track wall films and bulk drainage separately. Check repeatability with a second foam preparation.\n\n## What would count against it\n\nIf the effect follows changed wetting or contact area, reject curvature as the independent explanation. A confidently equal retention contradicts the prediction.\n\n## Replication and analysis\n\nTreat separately prepared specimens, batches, or devices as independent units. Technical repeats and images are nested measurements. First estimate calibration error and independent-preparation variability. Set the minimum meaningful effect in the primary outcome's units before confirmation, then choose sample size from that effect and pilot variance; a convenient pilot count is not a powered study.\n\nRandomize run order and blind sample labels where practical. Freeze image processing, fitting choices, exclusions, and the primary comparison before evaluating confirmatory data. Report effect size and uncertainty; use a blocked or mixed-effects analysis when specimens share a batch. A wide interval is inconclusive. Include the measurement and matching controls even when the directional effect appears large.\n\nA useful go/no-go gate is whether the hypothesized effect can be distinguished from calibration uncertainty and the strongest alternative explanation. Stop material purchases if the closest literature already measures the identical contrast, unless a replication has an explicit purpose. Do not use these abbreviated plans as complete laboratory protocols.\n\n## Data to preserve\n\nKeep unedited images or sensor streams, calibration files, preparation IDs, run order, environmental logs, input histories, raw outcome values, exclusions, and the exact analysis version. No values are prefilled in the observation template. Use `data/Published Benchmarks.csv` only as literature context; values from a different system are not observations of this hypothesis.\n\n## Sources and transfer limits\n\n### FOAMD09\n\n[Container effects on the free drainage of wet foams](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2008.11.021)\n\nAccess: Indexed abstract and article sections examined. Type: primary experiment.\n\nBackground findings and transfer limits: see [source assessments](../research/Primary%20Source%20Assessments.md) under this source key.\n\n### FOAMD00\n\n[Free drainage of aqueous foams: container shape effects on capillarity and vertical gradients](https://repository.upenn.edu/bitstreams/7e8e2fdb-e8a3-4971-bc3d-eb0b261fe048/download)\n\nAccess: Author-repository abstract and introduction examined. Type: primary theory/experiment.\n\nBackground findings and transfer limits: see [source assessments](../research/Primary%20Source%20Assessments.md) under this source key.\n\n"
  },
  {
    "id": 281,
    "title": "Solar still condenser segmentation",
    "hypothesis": "Separating a condenser into thermally isolated drainage strips will improve collected water per absorbed solar energy relative to one continuous sheet in a limited airflow range.",
    "test": "Use controlled illumination; measure temperatures, condensate return, energy input, and water collection.",
    "against": "Collection gains disappear after actual condenser temperature and energy are matched.",
    "category": "PASSIVE DEVICES AND SUSTAINABLE PROCESSES",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Solar still condenser segmentation",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 112,
    "literature_query": "Solar still condenser segmentation Separating thermally isolated drainage strips improve collected water per experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0281",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 281,
      "title": "Solar still condenser segmentation",
      "hypothesis": "Separating a condenser into thermally isolated drainage strips will improve collected water per absorbed solar energy relative to one continuous sheet in a limited airflow range.",
      "test": "Use controlled illumination; measure temperatures, condensate return, energy input, and water collection.",
      "against": "Collection gains disappear after actual condenser temperature and energy are matched.",
      "category": "PASSIVE DEVICES AND SUSTAINABLE PROCESSES",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Solar still condenser segmentation",
      "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 112,
      "literature_query": "Solar still condenser segmentation Separating thermally isolated drainage strips improve collected water per experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 7,
      "source_ids": "S36dd8fd46f1d;S732bbdbc051f;S30f6cdaf750b;S8d09d903516c;Sda26b7f2e769;S265d7549a93a;Sd669144bbfec",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 282,
    "title": "Wick mineral loading and fouling location",
    "hypothesis": "A wick with sacrificial high-surface-area patches near its edge will concentrate mineral deposits away from its main supply path and delay flow loss.",
    "test": "Evaporate a benign salt solution through matched wicks; map salt and hydraulic conductance.",
    "against": "Deposits do not localize or hydraulic lifetime is unchanged.",
    "category": "PASSIVE DEVICES AND SUSTAINABLE PROCESSES",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Wick mineral loading and fouling location",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 113,
    "literature_query": "Wick mineral loading fouling location sacrificial high-surface-area patches near edge concentrate deposits away experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0282",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 282,
      "title": "Wick mineral loading and fouling location",
      "hypothesis": "A wick with sacrificial high-surface-area patches near its edge will concentrate mineral deposits away from its main supply path and delay flow loss.",
      "test": "Evaporate a benign salt solution through matched wicks; map salt and hydraulic conductance.",
      "against": "Deposits do not localize or hydraulic lifetime is unchanged.",
      "category": "PASSIVE DEVICES AND SUSTAINABLE PROCESSES",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Wick mineral loading and fouling location",
      "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 113,
      "literature_query": "Wick mineral loading fouling location sacrificial high-surface-area patches near edge concentrate deposits away experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 4,
      "source_ids": "S6abbad0b56e2;S6e7bfd453386;Sf7fa4e776436;S69ad7d1e6b14",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 283,
    "title": "Passive valve flap thickness gradient",
    "hypothesis": "A flap thickening toward its hinge will offer a larger forward-to-reverse flow ratio than a uniform flap of equal mass and opening pressure.",
    "test": "Measure flow curves, fatigue, and deformation in matched low-pressure liquid valves.",
    "against": "Rectification is no better after opening pressure and leakage are matched.",
    "category": "PASSIVE DEVICES AND SUSTAINABLE PROCESSES",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Passive valve flap thickness gradient",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 114,
    "literature_query": "Passive valve flap thickness gradient thickening toward hinge offer forward-to-reverse flow ratio uniform experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0283",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 283,
      "title": "Passive valve flap thickness gradient",
      "hypothesis": "A flap thickening toward its hinge will offer a larger forward-to-reverse flow ratio than a uniform flap of equal mass and opening pressure.",
      "test": "Measure flow curves, fatigue, and deformation in matched low-pressure liquid valves.",
      "against": "Rectification is no better after opening pressure and leakage are matched.",
      "category": "PASSIVE DEVICES AND SUSTAINABLE PROCESSES",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Passive valve flap thickness gradient",
      "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 114,
      "literature_query": "Passive valve flap thickness gradient thickening toward hinge offer forward-to-reverse flow ratio uniform experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 6,
      "source_ids": "Sec5f90328ca6;S4ec37d885635;S408b07645546;S4c9e94ccdd2d;S3f85ff1db9ff;S5b43dbac1d9a",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 284,
    "title": "Desiccant channel width grading",
    "hypothesis": "Channels widening downstream through a desiccant bed will reduce the growth of pressure drop during water uptake relative to constant-width channels with equal dry resistance.",
    "test": "Measure water uptake, swelling, and pressure drop under controlled humid airflow.",
    "against": "Pressure-drop growth is unchanged at matched absorbed water mass.",
    "category": "PASSIVE DEVICES AND SUSTAINABLE PROCESSES",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Desiccant channel width grading",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 115,
    "literature_query": "Desiccant channel width grading Channels widening downstream through bed growth of pressure drop experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0284",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 284,
      "title": "Desiccant channel width grading",
      "hypothesis": "Channels widening downstream through a desiccant bed will reduce the growth of pressure drop during water uptake relative to constant-width channels with equal dry resistance.",
      "test": "Measure water uptake, swelling, and pressure drop under controlled humid airflow.",
      "against": "Pressure-drop growth is unchanged at matched absorbed water mass.",
      "category": "PASSIVE DEVICES AND SUSTAINABLE PROCESSES",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Desiccant channel width grading",
      "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 115,
      "literature_query": "Desiccant channel width grading Channels widening downstream through bed growth of pressure drop experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 4,
      "source_ids": "S6b8d4d446c76;S1305432b109a;S32ca39cab969;S4a750888408a",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 285,
    "title": "Energy harvester mass distribution",
    "hypothesis": "Distributing a moving mass across two weakly coupled positions will broaden the useful frequency response of a vibration harvester without increasing total moving mass.",
    "test": "Measure delivered electrical energy across calibrated vibration spectra and optimized loads.",
    "against": "Bandwidth broadening disappears when circuit efficiency and input motion are included.",
    "category": "PASSIVE DEVICES AND SUSTAINABLE PROCESSES",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Energy harvester mass distribution",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0285",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 286,
    "title": "Reusable sorbent support elasticity",
    "hypothesis": "An elastic support will preserve more adsorption capacity through benign wash-and-dry regeneration cycles than a rigid support by reducing sorbent cracking.",
    "test": "Measure capacity, particle loss, cracks, and accessible surface area over cycles.",
    "against": "Retention is unchanged or follows support chemistry rather than mechanical compliance.",
    "category": "PASSIVE DEVICES AND SUSTAINABLE PROCESSES",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Reusable sorbent support elasticity",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 3,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0286",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 287,
    "title": "Heat exchanger flow partitioning",
    "hypothesis": "A passive manifold with gradually varying branch resistance will distribute flow more evenly as viscosity changes than identical branches fed from a simple header.",
    "test": "Measure branch flows across benign liquids and temperatures at matched pumping power.",
    "against": "Flow uniformity is no more stable across viscosity changes.",
    "category": "PASSIVE DEVICES AND SUSTAINABLE PROCESSES",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Heat exchanger flow partitioning",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 116,
    "literature_query": "Heat exchanger flow partitioning passive manifold gradually varying branch resistance distribute evenly as experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0287",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 287,
      "title": "Heat exchanger flow partitioning",
      "hypothesis": "A passive manifold with gradually varying branch resistance will distribute flow more evenly as viscosity changes than identical branches fed from a simple header.",
      "test": "Measure branch flows across benign liquids and temperatures at matched pumping power.",
      "against": "Flow uniformity is no more stable across viscosity changes.",
      "category": "PASSIVE DEVICES AND SUSTAINABLE PROCESSES",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Heat exchanger flow partitioning",
      "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 116,
      "literature_query": "Heat exchanger flow partitioning passive manifold gradually varying branch resistance distribute evenly as experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 3,
      "source_ids": "S28fafdc23d20;S3cd7f7bd5354;S532d0cd4899c",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 288,
    "title": "Dew collector drainage interruptions",
    "hypothesis": "Short nonwetting interruptions along a wetting drainage track will prevent backward spreading and improve net dew collection within a finite interruption-length range.",
    "test": "Compare collection and droplet motion at matched cooling power and surface coverage.",
    "against": "No improvement remains after temperature and total wetting area are matched.",
    "category": "PASSIVE DEVICES AND SUSTAINABLE PROCESSES",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Dew collector drainage interruptions",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 117,
    "literature_query": "Dew collector drainage interruptions Short nonwetting along wetting track prevent backward spreading improve experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0288",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 288,
      "title": "Dew collector drainage interruptions",
      "hypothesis": "Short nonwetting interruptions along a wetting drainage track will prevent backward spreading and improve net dew collection within a finite interruption-length range.",
      "test": "Compare collection and droplet motion at matched cooling power and surface coverage.",
      "against": "No improvement remains after temperature and total wetting area are matched.",
      "category": "PASSIVE DEVICES AND SUSTAINABLE PROCESSES",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Dew collector drainage interruptions",
      "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 117,
      "literature_query": "Dew collector drainage interruptions Short nonwetting along wetting track prevent backward spreading improve experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 3,
      "source_ids": "S9840fb6d20e1;Sa3ba1d46322a;S40f61c20b8e7",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 289,
    "title": "Gravity separator compliant baffles",
    "hypothesis": "Flexible baffles will reduce particle resuspension during flow surges better than rigid baffles of the same resting shape in a settling chamber.",
    "test": "Measure effluent particle concentration and baffle motion at matched residence time and surge energy.",
    "against": "Resuspension is no lower after hydraulic differences are included.",
    "category": "PASSIVE DEVICES AND SUSTAINABLE PROCESSES",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Gravity separator compliant baffles",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 118,
    "literature_query": "Gravity separator compliant baffles Flexible particle resuspension flow surges better rigid of resting experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0289",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 289,
      "title": "Gravity separator compliant baffles",
      "hypothesis": "Flexible baffles will reduce particle resuspension during flow surges better than rigid baffles of the same resting shape in a settling chamber.",
      "test": "Measure effluent particle concentration and baffle motion at matched residence time and surge energy.",
      "against": "Resuspension is no lower after hydraulic differences are included.",
      "category": "PASSIVE DEVICES AND SUSTAINABLE PROCESSES",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Gravity separator compliant baffles",
      "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 118,
      "literature_query": "Gravity separator compliant baffles Flexible particle resuspension flow surges better rigid of resting experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 6,
      "source_ids": "S48ff49f0970a;S423e0b017f71;Sbde4597f987a;Sdc159cee68d5;Sca97ea2db96f;S7fcc893c3185",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 290,
    "title": "Evaporative salt recovery geometry",
    "hypothesis": "A removable porous insert placed above a brine reservoir will localize crystallization more effectively when its cross-section narrows upward than when it is uniform.",
    "test": "Measure crystal location, recovered salt, and liquid supply for benign salts at equal evaporation rate.",
    "against": "Localization and recoverability do not improve or capillary flow fails earlier.",
    "category": "PASSIVE DEVICES AND SUSTAINABLE PROCESSES",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Evaporative salt recovery geometry",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 30,
    "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 10,
    "literature_query": "Evaporative salt recovery geometry removable porous insert placed above brine reservoir localize crystallization experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0290",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": true,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 290,
      "title": "Evaporative salt recovery geometry",
      "hypothesis": "A removable porous insert placed above a brine reservoir will localize crystallization more effectively when its cross-section narrows upward than when it is uniform.",
      "test": "Measure crystal location, recovered salt, and liquid supply for benign salts at equal evaporation rate.",
      "against": "Localization and recoverability do not improve or capillary flow fails earlier.",
      "category": "PASSIVE DEVICES AND SUSTAINABLE PROCESSES",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Evaporative salt recovery geometry",
      "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
      "access_score": 4,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 30,
      "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 10,
      "literature_query": "Evaporative salt recovery geometry removable porous insert placed above brine reservoir localize crystallization experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 11,
      "source_ids": "Sf3f3e0e158b7;S30bd71b4c511;S71945bdda9b9;Sed328063315b;Se309e8f5138b;S8e48081b4baa;S3f78dd1e7dd8;Sd48b8b0d2bc0;Sc2a4676ec23e;Saf65bba9dd0b;S1a29a585779e",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Porous inserts and controlled salt harvesting are studied. Verify upward taper versus uniform shape at matched evaporation and quantified capillary supply.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": {
      "deep_rank": "8",
      "id": "290",
      "title": "Evaporative salt recovery geometry",
      "original_300_rank": "10",
      "pilot_class": "P",
      "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
      "hypothesis": "A removable porous insert placed above a brine reservoir will localize crystallization more effectively when its cross-section narrows upward than when it is uniform.",
      "primary_outcome": "Fraction of recovered crystallized salt located in a predefined removable upper region.",
      "comparison": "Upward-tapered porous insert versus uniform insert and reversed taper; compare equal salt inventory and evaporation rate.",
      "controls": "Pore size, wettability, total insert volume, exposed area, capillary supply, temperature, and salt concentration.",
      "pilot": "Begin with NaCl and a compatible unheated wick under controlled evaporation. Map crystal position and weigh recovered salt. Measure uptake conductance before and after deposition.",
      "novelty_gap": "Geometry-based salt localization and harvesting have strong prior art. Verify that taper alone, with measured supply and evaporation, adds information beyond known capillary transport.",
      "stop_rule": "Stop if the taper simply dries out sooner or changes total evaporation. Reject better localization if equal-rate controls recover the same upper-region fraction.",
      "source_keys": "CAP15;ANG14",
      "truth_probability": "not estimated",
      "novelty_status": "unverified"
    },
    "dossier_text": "# 08. H0290 — Evaporative salt recovery geometry\n\nOriginal 300-folder rank: 10. Pilot class: P. Resource class: modest bench or workshop; calibration still required.\n\n## Original hypothesis\n\nA removable porous insert placed above a brine reservoir will localize crystallization more effectively when its cross-section narrows upward than when it is uniform.\n\n## Why investigate this\n\nVisible salt location and mass recovery make a low-temperature proof-of-concept possible; geometry can be varied without inventing a new chemical material.\n\n## Literature assessment and exact novelty question\n\nGeometry-based salt localization and harvesting have strong prior art. Verify that taper alone, with measured supply and evaporation, adds information beyond known capillary transport. Worldwide originality remains unverified.\n\n## Primary measurement\n\nFraction of recovered crystallized salt located in a predefined removable upper region.\n\n## Comparison\n\nUpward-tapered porous insert versus uniform insert and reversed taper; compare equal salt inventory and evaporation rate.\n\n## Critical controls\n\nPore size, wettability, total insert volume, exposed area, capillary supply, temperature, and salt concentration.\n\n## Pilot plan\n\nBegin with NaCl and a compatible unheated wick under controlled evaporation. Map crystal position and weigh recovered salt. Measure uptake conductance before and after deposition.\n\n## What would count against it\n\nStop if the taper simply dries out sooner or changes total evaporation. Reject better localization if equal-rate controls recover the same upper-region fraction.\n\n## Replication and analysis\n\nTreat separately prepared specimens, batches, or devices as independent units. Technical repeats and images are nested measurements. First estimate calibration error and independent-preparation variability. Set the minimum meaningful effect in the primary outcome's units before confirmation, then choose sample size from that effect and pilot variance; a convenient pilot count is not a powered study.\n\nRandomize run order and blind sample labels where practical. Freeze image processing, fitting choices, exclusions, and the primary comparison before evaluating confirmatory data. Report effect size and uncertainty; use a blocked or mixed-effects analysis when specimens share a batch. A wide interval is inconclusive. Include the measurement and matching controls even when the directional effect appears large.\n\nA useful go/no-go gate is whether the hypothesized effect can be distinguished from calibration uncertainty and the strongest alternative explanation. Stop material purchases if the closest literature already measures the identical contrast, unless a replication has an explicit purpose. Do not use these abbreviated plans as complete laboratory protocols.\n\n## Data to preserve\n\nKeep unedited images or sensor streams, calibration files, preparation IDs, run order, environmental logs, input histories, raw outcome values, exclusions, and the exact analysis version. No values are prefilled in the observation template. Use `data/Published Benchmarks.csv` only as literature context; values from a different system are not observations of this hypothesis.\n\n## Sources and transfer limits\n\n### CAP15\n\n[Evaporation with sodium chloride crystallization in a capillary tube](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022024815002936)\n\nAccess: Indexed abstract and methods examined. Type: primary experiment/model.\n\nBackground findings and transfer limits: see [source assessments](../research/Primary%20Source%20Assessments.md) under this source key.\n\n### ANG14\n\n[Effects of grain angularity on NaCl precipitation in porous media during evaporation](https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR016125)\n\nAccess: Indexed abstract and article sections examined. Type: primary experiment.\n\nBackground findings and transfer limits: see [source assessments](../research/Primary%20Source%20Assessments.md) under this source key.\n\n"
  },
  {
    "id": 291,
    "title": "Mass balance and hidden adsorption",
    "hypothesis": "Simultaneously measuring inlet, outlet, and apparatus-retained tracer will identify hidden adsorption more reliably than outlet breakthrough alone.",
    "test": "Test systems with independently known adsorption and dead volume; evaluate predictions on unseen runs.",
    "against": "Added mass-balance measurements fail to reduce adsorption-estimation error.",
    "category": "EXPERIMENTAL INFERENCE AND INSTRUMENT DESIGN",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Mass balance and hidden adsorption",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 25,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0291",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 292,
    "title": "Rotated specimens and anisotropy errors",
    "hypothesis": "Measuring the same specimen at several in-plane rotations will separate intrinsic transport anisotropy from fixed instrument asymmetry more accurately than measuring separate oriented specimens.",
    "test": "Use calibrated anisotropic and isotropic standards; include repositioning uncertainty.",
    "against": "Rotation-based estimates are no more accurate after repositioning error is counted.",
    "category": "EXPERIMENTAL INFERENCE AND INSTRUMENT DESIGN",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Rotated specimens and anisotropy errors",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 25,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0292",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 293,
    "title": "Reference relaxation and rheometer drift",
    "hypothesis": "A stable reference material measured between soft samples will correct slow rheometer drift more accurately than a reference measured only at the start and end.",
    "test": "Introduce controlled thermal drift and compare recovered sample moduli with independent standards.",
    "against": "Interleaving references does not reduce modulus error at equal total measurement time.",
    "category": "EXPERIMENTAL INFERENCE AND INSTRUMENT DESIGN",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Reference relaxation and rheometer drift",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0293",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 294,
    "title": "Paired evaporation blanks",
    "hypothesis": "An empty vessel plus a nonreactive liquid blank will separate vessel sorption from evaporation loss better than either blank alone in gravimetric uptake experiments.",
    "test": "Use known mass transfers and independent vapor measurements; compare blind estimates.",
    "against": "The paired correction does not recover known uptake more accurately.",
    "category": "EXPERIMENTAL INFERENCE AND INSTRUMENT DESIGN",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Paired evaporation blanks",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0294",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 295,
    "title": "Pressure tap spacing and clog localization",
    "hypothesis": "Nonuniformly spaced pressure taps will localize a single developing channel obstruction more accurately than uniformly spaced taps of equal number for a known flow geometry.",
    "test": "Introduce blinded blockages at many positions; measure localization error with calibrated noise.",
    "against": "Nonuniform spacing provides no advantage on held-out blockage positions.",
    "category": "EXPERIMENTAL INFERENCE AND INSTRUMENT DESIGN",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Pressure tap spacing and clog localization",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 119,
    "literature_query": "Pressure tap spacing clog localization Nonuniformly spaced taps localize single developing channel obstruction experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0295",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 295,
      "title": "Pressure tap spacing and clog localization",
      "hypothesis": "Nonuniformly spaced pressure taps will localize a single developing channel obstruction more accurately than uniformly spaced taps of equal number for a known flow geometry.",
      "test": "Introduce blinded blockages at many positions; measure localization error with calibrated noise.",
      "against": "Nonuniform spacing provides no advantage on held-out blockage positions.",
      "category": "EXPERIMENTAL INFERENCE AND INSTRUMENT DESIGN",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Pressure tap spacing and clog localization",
      "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 119,
      "literature_query": "Pressure tap spacing clog localization Nonuniformly spaced taps localize single developing channel obstruction experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 2,
      "source_ids": "S11f647863fa4;S83ee8202129c",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 296,
    "title": "Thermal camera viewing-angle correction",
    "hypothesis": "Combining two viewing angles will distinguish emissivity artifacts from real surface-temperature variations better than one angle plus a single emissivity value.",
    "test": "Use patterned emissivity standards at independently measured temperatures.",
    "against": "Two-angle estimates do not reduce temperature error across unseen patterns.",
    "category": "EXPERIMENTAL INFERENCE AND INSTRUMENT DESIGN",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Thermal camera viewing-angle correction",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0296",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 297,
    "title": "Acoustic reference path and fluid property sensing",
    "hypothesis": "A parallel sealed acoustic reference path will separate transducer aging from fluid sound-speed changes better than repeated electronic calibration alone.",
    "test": "Vary fluid properties and transducer condition independently; compare estimated sound speed with a standard.",
    "against": "The reference path does not reduce property-estimation error after thermal drift is included.",
    "category": "EXPERIMENTAL INFERENCE AND INSTRUMENT DESIGN",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Acoustic reference path and fluid property sensing",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0297",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 298,
    "title": "Interrupted weighing and balance settling",
    "hypothesis": "A predefined schedule of brief unloading intervals will estimate slow balance zero drift more accurately than uninterrupted weighing during a long small-mass experiment.",
    "test": "Use a stable mass plus controlled simulated mass changes; include handling and settling errors.",
    "against": "Total mass-change error is unchanged or increased.",
    "category": "EXPERIMENTAL INFERENCE AND INSTRUMENT DESIGN",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Interrupted weighing and balance settling",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 25,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 241,
    "literature_query": "Interrupted weighing balance settling predefined schedule of brief unloading intervals estimate slow zero experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0298",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 298,
      "title": "Interrupted weighing and balance settling",
      "hypothesis": "A predefined schedule of brief unloading intervals will estimate slow balance zero drift more accurately than uninterrupted weighing during a long small-mass experiment.",
      "test": "Use a stable mass plus controlled simulated mass changes; include handling and settling errors.",
      "against": "Total mass-change error is unchanged or increased.",
      "category": "EXPERIMENTAL INFERENCE AND INSTRUMENT DESIGN",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Interrupted weighing and balance settling",
      "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 25,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 241,
      "literature_query": "Interrupted weighing balance settling predefined schedule of brief unloading intervals estimate slow zero experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 1,
      "source_ids": "S31bd2f67f86e",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "id": 299,
    "title": "Independent tracer and mixing calibration",
    "hypothesis": "A nonreacting tracer matched to reactant diffusivity will distinguish mixing-limited from chemistry-limited delay more reliably than a bulk mixing-time estimate.",
    "test": "Test benign reactions with independently measured kinetics across mixer geometries.",
    "against": "Tracer-informed estimates do not recover intrinsic kinetics more accurately.",
    "category": "EXPERIMENTAL INFERENCE AND INSTRUMENT DESIGN",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Independent tracer and mixing calibration",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0299",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": 300,
    "title": "Cross-method null tests for microdeformation",
    "hypothesis": "Combining optical displacement and capacitance sensing will reject environmental false deformation signals more reliably than doubling either sensor's measurement duration.",
    "test": "Apply calibrated tiny displacements and independent humidity, temperature, and optical disturbances; compare equal-time false-alarm rates.",
    "against": "The combined method shows no lower false-alarm rate at matched displacement sensitivity.",
    "category": "EXPERIMENTAL INFERENCE AND INSTRUMENT DESIGN",
    "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Cross-method null tests for microdeformation",
    "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 120,
    "literature_query": "Cross-method null tests microdeformation Combining optical displacement capacitance sensing reject environmental false deformation experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0300",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "id": 300,
      "title": "Cross-method null tests for microdeformation",
      "hypothesis": "Combining optical displacement and capacitance sensing will reject environmental false deformation signals more reliably than doubling either sensor's measurement duration.",
      "test": "Apply calibrated tiny displacements and independent humidity, temperature, and optical disturbances; compare equal-time false-alarm rates.",
      "against": "The combined method shows no lower false-alarm rate at matched displacement sensitivity.",
      "category": "EXPERIMENTAL INFERENCE AND INSTRUMENT DESIGN",
      "controls": "Match composition, geometry, temperature, actual energy or material exposure, and measurement sensitivity; include the controls specified in the original test.",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Cross-method null tests for microdeformation",
      "source_file": "100 More Hypotheses - 201-300.txt",
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 120,
      "literature_query": "Cross-method null tests microdeformation Combining optical displacement capacitance sensing reject environmental false deformation experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 6,
      "source_ids": "S45a0590abd97;S0452d3312b80;Sbeef8952b464;Sa1f7291b0749;S967c6cf91cbe;Se07d205fc4cb",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Extrusion pauses",
    "hypothesis": "Brief extrusion pauses will increase surface roughness more in slowly relaxing polymer melts.",
    "test": "Measure roughness and melt relaxation across pause durations.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Polymer processing",
    "controls": "Composition, temperature, specimen dimensions, and processing history",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Extrusion pauses",
    "id": 301,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0301",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Cooling direction",
    "hypothesis": "One-sided cooling will produce greater residual curvature than symmetric cooling in equal-thickness polymer sheets.",
    "test": "Map curvature and residual strain after matched cooling histories.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Polymer processing",
    "controls": "Composition, temperature, specimen dimensions, and processing history",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Cooling direction",
    "id": 302,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 3,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0302",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Draw reversal",
    "hypothesis": "Reversing draw direction before solidification will reduce final chain orientation relative to continuous drawing.",
    "test": "Compare birefringence and tensile anisotropy at matched total strain.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Polymer processing",
    "controls": "Composition, temperature, specimen dimensions, and processing history",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Draw reversal",
    "id": 303,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0303",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pellet moisture heterogeneity",
    "hypothesis": "Uneven pellet moisture will increase extrudate defect variability beyond that from equal mean moisture.",
    "test": "Compare uniform and mixed-moisture feedstocks using microscopy and mass analysis.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Polymer processing",
    "controls": "Composition, temperature, specimen dimensions, and processing history",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Pellet moisture heterogeneity",
    "id": 304,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0304",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Solvent removal staging",
    "hypothesis": "An initial slow solvent-removal stage will reduce internal voids in thick cast polymer films.",
    "test": "Image voids after staged and constant-rate drying.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Polymer processing",
    "controls": "Composition, temperature, specimen dimensions, and processing history",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Solvent removal staging",
    "id": 305,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0305",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Melt filtering delay",
    "hypothesis": "Longer residence after melt filtration will increase newly formed gel inclusions in a thermally sensitive model polymer.",
    "test": "Count inclusions and measure molecular-mass distributions over residence times.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Polymer processing",
    "controls": "Composition, temperature, specimen dimensions, and processing history",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Melt filtering delay",
    "id": 306,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 121,
    "literature_query": "Melt filtering delay Longer residence filtration newly formed gel inclusions in thermally sensitive experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0306",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Melt filtering delay",
      "hypothesis": "Longer residence after melt filtration will increase newly formed gel inclusions in a thermally sensitive model polymer.",
      "test": "Count inclusions and measure molecular-mass distributions over residence times.",
      "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
      "category": "Polymer processing",
      "controls": "Composition, temperature, specimen dimensions, and processing history",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Melt filtering delay",
      "id": 306,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 121,
      "literature_query": "Melt filtering delay Longer residence filtration newly formed gel inclusions in thermally sensitive experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 4,
      "source_ids": "S1436ea98f70f;S6c70830e64f4;S5e10c648c67c;S14717c8eb332",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Shear alignment persistence",
    "hypothesis": "Confined polymer melt films will retain shear-induced orientation longer than bulk samples after flow stops.",
    "test": "Track birefringence relaxation across film thicknesses.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Polymer processing",
    "controls": "Composition, temperature, specimen dimensions, and processing history",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Shear alignment persistence",
    "id": 307,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 260,
    "literature_query": "Shear alignment persistence Confined polymer melt films retain shear-induced orientation longer bulk samples experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0307",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Shear alignment persistence",
      "hypothesis": "Confined polymer melt films will retain shear-induced orientation longer than bulk samples after flow stops.",
      "test": "Track birefringence relaxation across film thicknesses.",
      "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
      "category": "Polymer processing",
      "controls": "Composition, temperature, specimen dimensions, and processing history",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Shear alignment persistence",
      "id": 307,
      "access_score": 2,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 260,
      "literature_query": "Shear alignment persistence Confined polymer melt films retain shear-induced orientation longer bulk samples experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 5,
      "source_ids": "S922fc77cac11;Sb0ec4c8e94d6;Sd5602f14f164;Sccf947fa5e22;S5b92a079d1b2",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Annealing under curvature",
    "hypothesis": "Annealing a bent semicrystalline strip will bias crystallite orientation relative to flat annealing.",
    "test": "Measure diffraction orientation and subsequent bending recovery.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Polymer processing",
    "controls": "Composition, temperature, specimen dimensions, and processing history",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Annealing under curvature",
    "id": 308,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0308",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Regrind particle uniformity",
    "hypothesis": "Uniform regrind particle sizes will reduce local fusion defects during low-pressure molding.",
    "test": "Compare defect maps across feedstocks with matched recycled fraction.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Polymer processing",
    "controls": "Composition, temperature, specimen dimensions, and processing history",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Regrind particle uniformity",
    "id": 309,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0309",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Release surface compliance",
    "hypothesis": "A compliant mold-release layer will reduce demolding crack incidence in brittle polymer replicas.",
    "test": "Measure demolding forces and crack counts across layer stiffnesses.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Polymer processing",
    "controls": "Composition, temperature, specimen dimensions, and processing history",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Release surface compliance",
    "id": 310,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0310",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Green-body density gradients",
    "hypothesis": "Gentler initial density gradients will reduce warpage during ceramic sintering.",
    "test": "Map initial density and final shape in model ceramic compacts.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Ceramics and sintering",
    "controls": "Powder chemistry, initial density, heating schedule, and atmosphere",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Green-body density gradients",
    "id": 311,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0311",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Bimodal powder necking",
    "hypothesis": "Small particles placed selectively at large-particle contacts will accelerate initial sintering neck formation.",
    "test": "Image interrupted sintering compared with randomly mixed powders.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Ceramics and sintering",
    "controls": "Powder chemistry, initial density, heating schedule, and atmosphere",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Bimodal powder necking",
    "id": 312,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0312",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Binder escape channels",
    "hypothesis": "Temporary channels will reduce internal cracking during binder removal from thick ceramic parts.",
    "test": "Compare tomography and mass-loss curves with channel-free controls.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Ceramics and sintering",
    "controls": "Powder chemistry, initial density, heating schedule, and atmosphere",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Binder escape channels",
    "id": 313,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0313",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Sintering support friction",
    "hypothesis": "Lower support friction will reduce in-plane distortion during constrained ceramic shrinkage.",
    "test": "Measure shrinkage fields on supports with calibrated friction.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Ceramics and sintering",
    "controls": "Powder chemistry, initial density, heating schedule, and atmosphere",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Sintering support friction",
    "id": 314,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0314",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Interrupted grain growth",
    "hypothesis": "Brief lower-temperature holds between hot stages will narrow ceramic grain-size distributions.",
    "test": "Compare microscopy after schedules with matched final density.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Ceramics and sintering",
    "controls": "Powder chemistry, initial density, heating schedule, and atmosphere",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Interrupted grain growth",
    "id": 315,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 122,
    "literature_query": "Interrupted grain growth Brief lower-temperature holds hot stages narrow ceramic grain-size distributions experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0315",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Interrupted grain growth",
      "hypothesis": "Brief lower-temperature holds between hot stages will narrow ceramic grain-size distributions.",
      "test": "Compare microscopy after schedules with matched final density.",
      "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
      "category": "Ceramics and sintering",
      "controls": "Powder chemistry, initial density, heating schedule, and atmosphere",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Interrupted grain growth",
      "id": 315,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 122,
      "literature_query": "Interrupted grain growth Brief lower-temperature holds hot stages narrow ceramic grain-size distributions experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 3,
      "source_ids": "S1b0cca57be6c;Sbb4e49d0b206;S715a94e360bf",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pore shape rounding",
    "hypothesis": "Pre-rounded pores will produce less strength variability than angular pores at equal ceramic porosity.",
    "test": "Measure fracture-strength distributions and pore geometry.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Ceramics and sintering",
    "controls": "Powder chemistry, initial density, heating schedule, and atmosphere",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Pore shape rounding",
    "id": 316,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0316",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Fiber sacrificial orientation",
    "hypothesis": "Aligned sacrificial fibers will create more directionally uniform permeability than randomly oriented fibers after burnout.",
    "test": "Measure directional permeability and channel connectivity.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Ceramics and sintering",
    "controls": "Powder chemistry, initial density, heating schedule, and atmosphere",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Fiber sacrificial orientation",
    "id": 317,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0317",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Coating shrinkage matching",
    "hypothesis": "A graded ceramic coating will crack less when its shrinkage profile approaches that of its substrate.",
    "test": "Measure shrinkage curves and crack density across graded compositions.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Ceramics and sintering",
    "controls": "Powder chemistry, initial density, heating schedule, and atmosphere",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Coating shrinkage matching",
    "id": 318,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0318",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Particle humidity conditioning",
    "hypothesis": "Uniform humidity conditioning will improve consistency of ceramic powder compaction pressure.",
    "test": "Record compaction curves for conditioned and unconditioned batches.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Ceramics and sintering",
    "controls": "Powder chemistry, initial density, heating schedule, and atmosphere",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Particle humidity conditioning",
    "id": 319,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "excluded: broad prior-art overlap",
    "rank": 75,
    "literature_query": "Particle humidity conditioning Uniform improve consistency of ceramic powder compaction pressure experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0319",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Laser scan turn spacing",
    "hypothesis": "Larger separation between scan reversals will reduce local thermal cracking during ceramic laser processing.",
    "test": "Map temperatures and cracks in specialist processing equipment.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Ceramics and sintering",
    "controls": "Powder chemistry, initial density, heating schedule, and atmosphere",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Laser scan turn spacing",
    "id": 320,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0320",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Twin spacing and springback",
    "hypothesis": "Intermediate twin-boundary spacing will minimize springback variability in a suitable model alloy.",
    "test": "Measure microscopy and bending recovery across matched alloy treatments.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Metal microstructures",
    "controls": "Alloy composition, grain size, loading, and temperature",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Twin spacing and springback",
    "id": 321,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 3,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 184,
    "literature_query": "Twin spacing springback Intermediate twin-boundary minimize variability in suitable model alloy experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0321",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Twin spacing and springback",
      "hypothesis": "Intermediate twin-boundary spacing will minimize springback variability in a suitable model alloy.",
      "test": "Measure microscopy and bending recovery across matched alloy treatments.",
      "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
      "category": "Metal microstructures",
      "controls": "Alloy composition, grain size, loading, and temperature",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Twin spacing and springback",
      "id": 321,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 3,
      "screen_score": 26,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 184,
      "literature_query": "Twin spacing springback Intermediate twin-boundary minimize variability in suitable model alloy experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 5,
      "source_ids": "S91be244f4c96;S339ee3be490f;S4282a97ed8c4;S347cbbb10a9f;S3ba66686572e",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Prestrain direction memory",
    "hypothesis": "Crosswise prestrain will shift later yielding more strongly than parallel prestrain at equal plastic work.",
    "test": "Compare directional yield surfaces after calibrated prestrains.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Metal microstructures",
    "controls": "Alloy composition, grain size, loading, and temperature",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Prestrain direction memory",
    "id": 322,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0322",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Grain-boundary oxidation depth",
    "hypothesis": "Curved grain boundaries will show greater oxidation-depth variability than straight boundaries in matched metal films.",
    "test": "Map boundary curvature and oxide penetration after controlled exposure.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Metal microstructures",
    "controls": "Alloy composition, grain size, loading, and temperature",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Grain-boundary oxidation depth",
    "id": 323,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 261,
    "literature_query": "Grain-boundary oxidation depth Curved grain boundaries show greater oxidation-depth variability straight in metal experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0323",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Grain-boundary oxidation depth",
      "hypothesis": "Curved grain boundaries will show greater oxidation-depth variability than straight boundaries in matched metal films.",
      "test": "Map boundary curvature and oxide penetration after controlled exposure.",
      "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
      "category": "Metal microstructures",
      "controls": "Alloy composition, grain size, loading, and temperature",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Grain-boundary oxidation depth",
      "id": 323,
      "access_score": 2,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 261,
      "literature_query": "Grain-boundary oxidation depth Curved grain boundaries show greater oxidation-depth variability straight in metal experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 7,
      "source_ids": "Se2d6194fcc1d;S048bb18a830a;S8070164b298e;Sf479fc33deaa;S36958e90383f;S10979ae4fe84;Sf22406fed593",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Fine precipitate dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "Broad precipitate-size distributions will create a longer dissolution tail than narrow distributions at equal precipitate volume.",
    "test": "Track precipitates during controlled annealing.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Metal microstructures",
    "controls": "Alloy composition, grain size, loading, and temperature",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Fine precipitate dissolution",
    "id": 324,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0324",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Surface work hardening gradient",
    "hypothesis": "A smooth work-hardening gradient will delay surface strain localization relative to an abrupt gradient.",
    "test": "Map local strain during tensile loading.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Metal microstructures",
    "controls": "Alloy composition, grain size, loading, and temperature",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Surface work hardening gradient",
    "id": 325,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0325",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Rolling texture and hydrogen-free cracking",
    "hypothesis": "Strong rolling texture will change crack-path tortuosity in inert-environment fatigue independent of grain size.",
    "test": "Measure fatigue paths in texture-controlled sheet samples.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Metal microstructures",
    "controls": "Alloy composition, grain size, loading, and temperature",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Rolling texture and hydrogen-free cracking",
    "id": 326,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 123,
    "literature_query": "Rolling texture hydrogen-free cracking Strong change crack-path tortuosity in inert-environment fatigue independent of experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0326",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Rolling texture and hydrogen-free cracking",
      "hypothesis": "Strong rolling texture will change crack-path tortuosity in inert-environment fatigue independent of grain size.",
      "test": "Measure fatigue paths in texture-controlled sheet samples.",
      "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
      "category": "Metal microstructures",
      "controls": "Alloy composition, grain size, loading, and temperature",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Rolling texture and hydrogen-free cracking",
      "id": 326,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 123,
      "literature_query": "Rolling texture hydrogen-free cracking Strong change crack-path tortuosity in inert-environment fatigue independent of experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 5,
      "source_ids": "Sf9ec022ce706;Sa3651e750768;S9b0f4d796130;S77d09055e026;S5c6e0d8f2ab4",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Metal foam joint rounding",
    "hypothesis": "Rounded strut junctions will reduce fatigue-life variability in metal foams.",
    "test": "Cycle geometrically matched foams and image junction damage.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Metal microstructures",
    "controls": "Alloy composition, grain size, loading, and temperature",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Metal foam joint rounding",
    "id": 327,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 124,
    "literature_query": "Metal foam joint rounding Rounded strut junctions fatigue-life variability in foams experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0327",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Metal foam joint rounding",
      "hypothesis": "Rounded strut junctions will reduce fatigue-life variability in metal foams.",
      "test": "Cycle geometrically matched foams and image junction damage.",
      "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
      "category": "Metal microstructures",
      "controls": "Alloy composition, grain size, loading, and temperature",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Metal foam joint rounding",
      "id": 327,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 124,
      "literature_query": "Metal foam joint rounding Rounded strut junctions fatigue-life variability in foams experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 6,
      "source_ids": "S7573c03f2257;S2199c9e778aa;S8e4ceeb695c4;Sbb17aab0892d;Sfc2950f6cbb8;S41c8a6c8acd3",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Quench agitation intermittency",
    "hypothesis": "Intermittent quench agitation will reduce distortion in thin asymmetric metal coupons within a finite pulse range.",
    "test": "Measure cooling fields and final distortion in controlled facilities.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Metal microstructures",
    "controls": "Alloy composition, grain size, loading, and temperature",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Quench agitation intermittency",
    "id": 328,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0328",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Recovery anneal sequencing",
    "hypothesis": "Two separated recovery anneals will reduce residual-stress variability more than one continuous anneal of equal duration.",
    "test": "Map stress and hardness after matched temperature exposures.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Metal microstructures",
    "controls": "Alloy composition, grain size, loading, and temperature",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Recovery anneal sequencing",
    "id": 329,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0329",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Dislocation escape length",
    "hypothesis": "Narrower freestanding metal ribbons will show faster post-load stress relaxation through surface dislocation escape.",
    "test": "Measure relaxation and defect motion across ribbon widths.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Metal microstructures",
    "controls": "Alloy composition, grain size, loading, and temperature",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Dislocation escape length",
    "id": 330,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0330",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Adhesive edge porosity",
    "hypothesis": "A narrow porous edge zone will reduce peel-front force oscillations relative to a uniformly dense adhesive.",
    "test": "Measure peel force and front shape on patterned bonds.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Adhesion and joining",
    "controls": "Adhesive chemistry, contact area, curing conditions, and loading speed",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Adhesive edge porosity",
    "id": 331,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 125,
    "literature_query": "Adhesive edge porosity narrow porous zone peel-front force oscillations to uniformly dense experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0331",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Adhesive edge porosity",
      "hypothesis": "A narrow porous edge zone will reduce peel-front force oscillations relative to a uniformly dense adhesive.",
      "test": "Measure peel force and front shape on patterned bonds.",
      "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
      "category": "Adhesion and joining",
      "controls": "Adhesive chemistry, contact area, curing conditions, and loading speed",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Adhesive edge porosity",
      "id": 331,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 125,
      "literature_query": "Adhesive edge porosity narrow porous zone peel-front force oscillations to uniformly dense experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 7,
      "source_ids": "Sdb990403f5dc;S4d2fb5682f27;Sfe4875263948;S8a3e57ccd11e;S4bb77bec720c;Sa00647beb4a3;S0d95292af421",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Cure illumination direction",
    "hypothesis": "Opposed illumination will reduce through-thickness cure gradients more than one-sided illumination at equal absorbed light.",
    "test": "Map conversion and modulus through transparent model adhesives.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Adhesion and joining",
    "controls": "Adhesive chemistry, contact area, curing conditions, and loading speed",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Cure illumination direction",
    "id": 332,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 126,
    "literature_query": "Cure illumination direction Opposed through-thickness gradients one-sided at absorbed light experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0332",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Cure illumination direction",
      "hypothesis": "Opposed illumination will reduce through-thickness cure gradients more than one-sided illumination at equal absorbed light.",
      "test": "Map conversion and modulus through transparent model adhesives.",
      "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
      "category": "Adhesion and joining",
      "controls": "Adhesive chemistry, contact area, curing conditions, and loading speed",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Cure illumination direction",
      "id": 332,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 126,
      "literature_query": "Cure illumination direction Opposed through-thickness gradients one-sided at absorbed light experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 5,
      "source_ids": "Sd063d6b8fd79;S9afc977e59df;S2c29ea973ef3;Scc9787c1ee42;S3065cae342ca",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Joint taper and creep",
    "hypothesis": "A gradual adhesive-thickness taper will reduce concentrated creep strain at lap-joint ends.",
    "test": "Track full-field strain during sustained loading.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Adhesion and joining",
    "controls": "Adhesive chemistry, contact area, curing conditions, and loading speed",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Joint taper and creep",
    "id": 333,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 30,
    "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 11,
    "literature_query": "Joint taper creep gradual adhesive-thickness concentrated strain at lap-joint ends experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0333",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": true,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Joint taper and creep",
      "hypothesis": "A gradual adhesive-thickness taper will reduce concentrated creep strain at lap-joint ends.",
      "test": "Track full-field strain during sustained loading.",
      "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
      "category": "Adhesion and joining",
      "controls": "Adhesive chemistry, contact area, curing conditions, and loading speed",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Joint taper and creep",
      "id": 333,
      "access_score": 4,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 30,
      "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 11,
      "literature_query": "Joint taper creep gradual adhesive-thickness concentrated strain at lap-joint ends experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 6,
      "source_ids": "S2391781ec744;S24eed725502a;S5251f4d1dcf8;S07e5d404a58e;S235b30342b0f;Sc847a51e6b18",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Tapered adhesive joints and creep are studied. Verify whether the proposed bondline-thickness profile improves peak creep strain independently of joint stiffness.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": {
      "deep_rank": "9",
      "id": "333",
      "title": "Joint taper and creep",
      "original_300_rank": "11",
      "pilot_class": "P",
      "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
      "hypothesis": "A gradual adhesive-thickness taper will reduce concentrated creep strain at lap-joint ends.",
      "primary_outcome": "Maximum local adhesive creep strain at a predefined loading time and safe constant load.",
      "comparison": "Gradually tapered bondline versus uniform bondline with matched average thickness and bonded area.",
      "controls": "Adhesive chemistry, cure conversion, adherend stiffness, voids, temperature, applied load, alignment, and optical strain calibration.",
      "pilot": "Use a compatible room-temperature adhesive and mechanically safe coupons. Validate image-based strain against known displacement. Include sham tapered fixtures to detect grip-induced strain.",
      "novelty_gap": "Bondline thickness, tapering, and adhesive strain mapping are known. Novelty would lie in a particular taper profile reducing creep peaks independently of overall joint stiffness and defects.",
      "stop_rule": "Reject the interpretation if changes come from lower load, different cure, or unmeasured voids. Equal peak creep strain with a narrow interval counts against the claim.",
      "source_keys": "ADH19;DIC16",
      "truth_probability": "not estimated",
      "novelty_status": "unverified"
    },
    "dossier_text": "# 09. H0333 — Joint taper and creep\n\nOriginal 300-folder rank: 11. Pilot class: P. Resource class: modest bench or workshop; calibration still required.\n\n## Original hypothesis\n\nA gradual adhesive-thickness taper will reduce concentrated creep strain at lap-joint ends.\n\n## Why investigate this\n\nStatic loading and time-lapse imaging permit a direct mechanical comparison; established methods show how to resolve local strain.\n\n## Literature assessment and exact novelty question\n\nBondline thickness, tapering, and adhesive strain mapping are known. Novelty would lie in a particular taper profile reducing creep peaks independently of overall joint stiffness and defects. Worldwide originality remains unverified.\n\n## Primary measurement\n\nMaximum local adhesive creep strain at a predefined loading time and safe constant load.\n\n## Comparison\n\nGradually tapered bondline versus uniform bondline with matched average thickness and bonded area.\n\n## Critical controls\n\nAdhesive chemistry, cure conversion, adherend stiffness, voids, temperature, applied load, alignment, and optical strain calibration.\n\n## Pilot plan\n\nUse a compatible room-temperature adhesive and mechanically safe coupons. Validate image-based strain against known displacement. Include sham tapered fixtures to detect grip-induced strain.\n\n## What would count against it\n\nReject the interpretation if changes come from lower load, different cure, or unmeasured voids. Equal peak creep strain with a narrow interval counts against the claim.\n\n## Replication and analysis\n\nTreat separately prepared specimens, batches, or devices as independent units. Technical repeats and images are nested measurements. First estimate calibration error and independent-preparation variability. Set the minimum meaningful effect in the primary outcome's units before confirmation, then choose sample size from that effect and pilot variance; a convenient pilot count is not a powered study.\n\nRandomize run order and blind sample labels where practical. Freeze image processing, fitting choices, exclusions, and the primary comparison before evaluating confirmatory data. Report effect size and uncertainty; use a blocked or mixed-effects analysis when specimens share a batch. A wide interval is inconclusive. Include the measurement and matching controls even when the directional effect appears large.\n\nA useful go/no-go gate is whether the hypothesized effect can be distinguished from calibration uncertainty and the strongest alternative explanation. Stop material purchases if the closest literature already measures the identical contrast, unless a replication has an explicit purpose. Do not use these abbreviated plans as complete laboratory protocols.\n\n## Data to preserve\n\nKeep unedited images or sensor streams, calibration files, preparation IDs, run order, environmental logs, input histories, raw outcome values, exclusions, and the exact analysis version. No values are prefilled in the observation template. Use `data/Published Benchmarks.csv` only as literature context; values from a different system are not observations of this hypothesis.\n\n## Sources and transfer limits\n\n### ADH19\n\n[Experimental characterisation and numerical modelling of the influence of bondline thickness, loading rate, and deformation mode on ductile adhesive interfaces](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022509619301073)\n\nAccess: Indexed abstract and article sections examined. Type: primary experiment/model.\n\nBackground findings and transfer limits: see [source assessments](../research/Primary%20Source%20Assessments.md) under this source key.\n\n### DIC16\n\n[Analysis of adhesive-layer strain in a stepped lap-repaired carbon-fiber panel using digital image correlation](https://doi.org/10.1080/01694243.2016.1264660)\n\nAccess: Indexed abstract examined. Type: primary experiment/model.\n\nBackground findings and transfer limits: see [source assessments](../research/Primary%20Source%20Assessments.md) under this source key.\n\n"
  },
  {
    "title": "Primer island connectivity",
    "hypothesis": "Connected primer islands will improve wet-aging bond retention more than isolated islands of equal coverage.",
    "test": "Compare bond strength and water-ingress maps.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Adhesion and joining",
    "controls": "Adhesive chemistry, contact area, curing conditions, and loading speed",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Primer island connectivity",
    "id": 334,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0334",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Bondline particle compressibility",
    "hypothesis": "Compressible spacer particles will reduce assembly-induced voids compared with rigid spacers of equal size.",
    "test": "Image bondlines after controlled joining pressure.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Adhesion and joining",
    "controls": "Adhesive chemistry, contact area, curing conditions, and loading speed",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Bondline particle compressibility",
    "id": 335,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0335",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Reversible adhesive cooling rate",
    "hypothesis": "Slow cooling will increase repeatability of reversible adhesive release temperatures.",
    "test": "Measure release curves over repeated thermal cycles.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Adhesion and joining",
    "controls": "Adhesive chemistry, contact area, curing conditions, and loading speed",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Reversible adhesive cooling rate",
    "id": 336,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 127,
    "literature_query": "Reversible adhesive cooling rate Slow repeatability of release temperatures experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0336",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Reversible adhesive cooling rate",
      "hypothesis": "Slow cooling will increase repeatability of reversible adhesive release temperatures.",
      "test": "Measure release curves over repeated thermal cycles.",
      "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
      "category": "Adhesion and joining",
      "controls": "Adhesive chemistry, contact area, curing conditions, and loading speed",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Reversible adhesive cooling rate",
      "id": 336,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 127,
      "literature_query": "Reversible adhesive cooling rate Slow repeatability of release temperatures experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 5,
      "source_ids": "Sdc25e53fac97;Seb6c5543ed68;S224804069dcb;S7b9da51e3dbd;Sc229011250ac",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Weld bead spacing",
    "hypothesis": "Staggered low-energy weld spots will reduce distortion relative to aligned spots at equal joined area.",
    "test": "Measure joint geometry and mechanical strength.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Adhesion and joining",
    "controls": "Adhesive chemistry, contact area, curing conditions, and loading speed",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Weld bead spacing",
    "id": 337,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0337",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Solvent welding contact delay",
    "hypothesis": "A short solvent-evaporation delay before contact will maximize bond strength in a compatible polymer pair.",
    "test": "Sweep delay and measure solvent content and failure location.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Adhesion and joining",
    "controls": "Adhesive chemistry, contact area, curing conditions, and loading speed",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Solvent welding contact delay",
    "id": 338,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0338",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Adhesive filler boundary segregation",
    "hypothesis": "Filler concentrated near bondline midplanes will reduce edge moisture sensitivity relative to uniform filler.",
    "test": "Measure aging strength and spatial moisture uptake.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Adhesion and joining",
    "controls": "Adhesive chemistry, contact area, curing conditions, and loading speed",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Adhesive filler boundary segregation",
    "id": 339,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 128,
    "literature_query": "Adhesive filler boundary segregation concentrated near bondline midplanes edge moisture sensitivity to uniform experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0339",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Adhesive filler boundary segregation",
      "hypothesis": "Filler concentrated near bondline midplanes will reduce edge moisture sensitivity relative to uniform filler.",
      "test": "Measure aging strength and spatial moisture uptake.",
      "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
      "category": "Adhesion and joining",
      "controls": "Adhesive chemistry, contact area, curing conditions, and loading speed",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Adhesive filler boundary segregation",
      "id": 339,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 128,
      "literature_query": "Adhesive filler boundary segregation concentrated near bondline midplanes edge moisture sensitivity to uniform experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 5,
      "source_ids": "Scba1a397e689;S91d39dab65f4;Se79604ee65f1;Scb7c00bc1032;S7650d4533336",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Repair patch stiffness steps",
    "hypothesis": "Several small stiffness steps will reduce interfacial strain peaks around a repair patch.",
    "test": "Map strain in matched patched model laminates.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Adhesion and joining",
    "controls": "Adhesive chemistry, contact area, curing conditions, and loading speed",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Repair patch stiffness steps",
    "id": 340,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0340",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Gel deswelling fronts",
    "hypothesis": "A lateral stiffness gradient will curve a deswelling front in a hydrogel strip.",
    "test": "Image front position and local modulus during controlled solvent exchange.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Hydrogels and responsive solids",
    "controls": "Water content, chemistry, sample dimensions, and stimulus intensity",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Gel deswelling fronts",
    "id": 341,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 30,
    "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 12,
    "literature_query": "Gel deswelling fronts lateral stiffness gradient curve front in hydrogel strip experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0341",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": true,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Gel deswelling fronts",
      "hypothesis": "A lateral stiffness gradient will curve a deswelling front in a hydrogel strip.",
      "test": "Image front position and local modulus during controlled solvent exchange.",
      "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
      "category": "Hydrogels and responsive solids",
      "controls": "Water content, chemistry, sample dimensions, and stimulus intensity",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Gel deswelling fronts",
      "id": 341,
      "access_score": 4,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 30,
      "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 12,
      "literature_query": "Gel deswelling fronts lateral stiffness gradient curve front in hydrogel strip experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 8,
      "source_ids": "S06efb601f3b9;S54eb4c7be77b;S5ce55d76a613;S4da9f2b0b7de;Se34ac284acb0;Se0167c57b8a0;Sd352aa760a30;Sece6499c105c",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Stiffness-gradient hydrogels are studied. Verify front curvature during deswelling under a lateral gradient rather than fabrication of gradients alone.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": {
      "deep_rank": "28",
      "id": "341",
      "title": "Gel deswelling fronts",
      "original_300_rank": "12",
      "pilot_class": "C",
      "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
      "hypothesis": "A lateral stiffness gradient will curve a deswelling front in a hydrogel strip.",
      "primary_outcome": "Signed curvature of a deswelling front at a fixed mean solvent content.",
      "comparison": "Lateral modulus gradient, reversed gradient, and uniform-modulus gel with the same mean stiffness.",
      "controls": "Polymer chemistry, permeability, water uptake, thickness, boundary restraint, temperature, and solute diffusion.",
      "pilot": "First map both modulus and permeability: stiffness alone is not transport. Image a compatible solvent-exchange front with a nonbinding tracer and compare with a poroelastic model.",
      "novelty_gap": "Gradient gels and coupled swelling-flow models are established. A possible gap is front curvature after permeability and osmotic driving forces are independently accounted for.",
      "stop_rule": "Drop the stiffness-only claim if stiffness and permeability cannot be separated. A front that does not reverse curvature with the gradient weakens the mechanism.",
      "source_keys": "GEL24;GEL23",
      "truth_probability": "not estimated",
      "novelty_status": "unverified"
    },
    "dossier_text": "# 28. H0341 — Gel deswelling fronts\n\nOriginal 300-folder rank: 12. Pilot class: C. Resource class: modest bench or workshop; calibration still required.\n\n## Original hypothesis\n\nA lateral stiffness gradient will curve a deswelling front in a hydrogel strip.\n\n## Why investigate this\n\nThe moving-front geometry gives a specific observable and reversing the gradient supplies a strong directional control.\n\n## Literature assessment and exact novelty question\n\nGradient gels and coupled swelling-flow models are established. A possible gap is front curvature after permeability and osmotic driving forces are independently accounted for. Worldwide originality remains unverified.\n\n## Primary measurement\n\nSigned curvature of a deswelling front at a fixed mean solvent content.\n\n## Comparison\n\nLateral modulus gradient, reversed gradient, and uniform-modulus gel with the same mean stiffness.\n\n## Critical controls\n\nPolymer chemistry, permeability, water uptake, thickness, boundary restraint, temperature, and solute diffusion.\n\n## Pilot plan\n\nFirst map both modulus and permeability: stiffness alone is not transport. Image a compatible solvent-exchange front with a nonbinding tracer and compare with a poroelastic model.\n\n## What would count against it\n\nDrop the stiffness-only claim if stiffness and permeability cannot be separated. A front that does not reverse curvature with the gradient weakens the mechanism.\n\n## Replication and analysis\n\nTreat separately prepared specimens, batches, or devices as independent units. Technical repeats and images are nested measurements. First estimate calibration error and independent-preparation variability. Set the minimum meaningful effect in the primary outcome's units before confirmation, then choose sample size from that effect and pilot variance; a convenient pilot count is not a powered study.\n\nRandomize run order and blind sample labels where practical. Freeze image processing, fitting choices, exclusions, and the primary comparison before evaluating confirmatory data. Report effect size and uncertainty; use a blocked or mixed-effects analysis when specimens share a batch. A wide interval is inconclusive. Include the measurement and matching controls even when the directional effect appears large.\n\nA useful go/no-go gate is whether the hypothesized effect can be distinguished from calibration uncertainty and the strongest alternative explanation. Stop material purchases if the closest literature already measures the identical contrast, unless a replication has an explicit purpose. Do not use these abbreviated plans as complete laboratory protocols.\n\n## Data to preserve\n\nKeep unedited images or sensor streams, calibration files, preparation IDs, run order, environmental logs, input histories, raw outcome values, exclusions, and the exact analysis version. No values are prefilled in the observation template. Use `data/Published Benchmarks.csv` only as literature context; values from a different system are not observations of this hypothesis.\n\n## Sources and transfer limits\n\n### GEL24\n\n[A theory of hydrogel mechanics that couples swelling and external flow](https://doi.org/10.1039/D4SM00424H)\n\nAccess: Indexed abstract examined. Type: primary theory.\n\nBackground findings and transfer limits: see [source assessments](../research/Primary%20Source%20Assessments.md) under this source key.\n\n### GEL23\n\n[Concurrent stiffening and softening in hydrogels under dehydration](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9812377/)\n\nAccess: Indexed abstract and experimental sections examined. Type: primary experiment/theory.\n\nBackground findings and transfer limits: see [source assessments](../research/Primary%20Source%20Assessments.md) under this source key.\n\n"
  },
  {
    "title": "Crosslink mobility and indentation",
    "hypothesis": "Mobile crosslinks will produce greater indentation recovery after long holds than fixed crosslinks at equal initial modulus.",
    "test": "Compare force relaxation and recovered topography.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Hydrogels and responsive solids",
    "controls": "Water content, chemistry, sample dimensions, and stimulus intensity",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Crosslink mobility and indentation",
    "id": 342,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0342",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Embedded droplet reservoirs",
    "hypothesis": "Dispersed benign liquid reservoirs will delay gel stiffening during drying.",
    "test": "Measure local water content and modulus against reservoir-free gels.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Hydrogels and responsive solids",
    "controls": "Water content, chemistry, sample dimensions, and stimulus intensity",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Embedded droplet reservoirs",
    "id": 343,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 129,
    "literature_query": "Embedded droplet reservoirs Dispersed benign liquid delay gel stiffening drying experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0343",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Embedded droplet reservoirs",
      "hypothesis": "Dispersed benign liquid reservoirs will delay gel stiffening during drying.",
      "test": "Measure local water content and modulus against reservoir-free gels.",
      "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
      "category": "Hydrogels and responsive solids",
      "controls": "Water content, chemistry, sample dimensions, and stimulus intensity",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Embedded droplet reservoirs",
      "id": 343,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 129,
      "literature_query": "Embedded droplet reservoirs Dispersed benign liquid delay gel stiffening drying experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 6,
      "source_ids": "Sddc2b7d5198b;S956d6b0520e8;Scc66be304532;S351147a3d135;S6807a0d900e1;Sd27af53c2bba",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Photogel pattern overlap",
    "hypothesis": "Overlapping exposure boundaries will produce smoother strain fields than sharply separated exposure zones.",
    "test": "Map conversion and swelling deformation in photogels.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Hydrogels and responsive solids",
    "controls": "Water content, chemistry, sample dimensions, and stimulus intensity",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Photogel pattern overlap",
    "id": 344,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 130,
    "literature_query": "Photogel pattern overlap Overlapping exposure boundaries produce smoother strain fields sharply separated zones experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0344",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Photogel pattern overlap",
      "hypothesis": "Overlapping exposure boundaries will produce smoother strain fields than sharply separated exposure zones.",
      "test": "Map conversion and swelling deformation in photogels.",
      "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
      "category": "Hydrogels and responsive solids",
      "controls": "Water content, chemistry, sample dimensions, and stimulus intensity",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Photogel pattern overlap",
      "id": 344,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 130,
      "literature_query": "Photogel pattern overlap Overlapping exposure boundaries produce smoother strain fields sharply separated zones experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 6,
      "source_ids": "S51f89deb21a1;S66d5adf181fc;S025ad8a2dc74;Sa2bfe8583fa8;S218110beb0f7;S003b3d70e8a4",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Gel salt-front steering",
    "hypothesis": "A fixed-charge gradient will steer an advancing salt-induced contraction front.",
    "test": "Image contraction while independently mapping ion concentration.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Hydrogels and responsive solids",
    "controls": "Water content, chemistry, sample dimensions, and stimulus intensity",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Gel salt-front steering",
    "id": 345,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 131,
    "literature_query": "Gel salt-front steering fixed-charge gradient steer an advancing salt-induced contraction front experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0345",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Gel salt-front steering",
      "hypothesis": "A fixed-charge gradient will steer an advancing salt-induced contraction front.",
      "test": "Image contraction while independently mapping ion concentration.",
      "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
      "category": "Hydrogels and responsive solids",
      "controls": "Water content, chemistry, sample dimensions, and stimulus intensity",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Gel salt-front steering",
      "id": 345,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 131,
      "literature_query": "Gel salt-front steering fixed-charge gradient steer an advancing salt-induced contraction front experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 7,
      "source_ids": "S561b2103cc1d;S8803789a793b;Sa32690864bab;S00384c3c9903;S11c32835c740;Se8b292bd8d28;S2970ba742133",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Hydrogel skin perforation",
    "hypothesis": "Sparse skin perforations will reduce swelling delay more than expected from their fractional open area.",
    "test": "Measure uptake and deformation across perforation densities.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Hydrogels and responsive solids",
    "controls": "Water content, chemistry, sample dimensions, and stimulus intensity",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Hydrogel skin perforation",
    "id": 346,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 30,
    "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 13,
    "literature_query": "Hydrogel skin perforation Sparse perforations swelling delay expected their fractional open area experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0346",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": true,
    "conditional_model_analysis": true,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 3,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Hydrogel skin perforation",
      "hypothesis": "Sparse skin perforations will reduce swelling delay more than expected from their fractional open area.",
      "test": "Measure uptake and deformation across perforation densities.",
      "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
      "category": "Hydrogels and responsive solids",
      "controls": "Water content, chemistry, sample dimensions, and stimulus intensity",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Hydrogel skin perforation",
      "id": 346,
      "access_score": 4,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 30,
      "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 13,
      "literature_query": "Hydrogel skin perforation Sparse perforations swelling delay expected their fractional open area experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 8,
      "source_ids": "S63418e23595f;S159bda684105;Sfc642378a5df;Sf0a0573087a3;S8ccb6b51ca36;Sa63c68894636;Sfb3b515a8fa2;Sb8bab948cf79",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "The search returned irrelevant clinical perforation papers, which were excluded. Improve searches for synthetic hydrogel skin transport and compare time gains with actual open area.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": {
      "deep_rank": "15",
      "id": "346",
      "title": "Hydrogel skin perforation",
      "original_300_rank": "13",
      "pilot_class": "C",
      "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
      "hypothesis": "Sparse skin perforations will reduce swelling delay more than expected from their fractional open area.",
      "primary_outcome": "Time to half of equilibrium swelling, with the same final swelling ratio.",
      "comparison": "Dense-skin gel with sparse holes versus intact skin and a uniformly thinned skin with comparable transport area.",
      "controls": "Actual open area, hole damage, skin thickness, bulk network, sample size, final uptake, and mechanical restraint.",
      "pilot": "Confirm a genuine transport-limiting synthetic skin before perforation. Measure time-dependent mass and dimensions. Compare with a simple diffusion model using measured geometry.",
      "novelty_gap": "Poroelastic swelling kinetics are established. The narrower contribution would be a gain exceeding an area-only transport model without damaging the network.",
      "stop_rule": "Stop if there is no measurable skin resistance or holes introduce cracks. Reject the disproportionate-gain claim when an area-only model explains the result.",
      "source_keys": "GEL10;GELKIN16",
      "truth_probability": "not estimated",
      "novelty_status": "unverified"
    },
    "dossier_text": "# 15. H0346 — Hydrogel skin perforation\n\nOriginal 300-folder rank: 13. Pilot class: C. Resource class: modest bench or workshop; calibration still required.\n\n## Original hypothesis\n\nSparse skin perforations will reduce swelling delay more than expected from their fractional open area.\n\n## Why investigate this\n\nIf a skin exists, its transport bottleneck is directly testable. Mass uptake offers an independent check on optical swelling.\n\n## Literature assessment and exact novelty question\n\nPoroelastic swelling kinetics are established. The narrower contribution would be a gain exceeding an area-only transport model without damaging the network. Worldwide originality remains unverified.\n\n## Primary measurement\n\nTime to half of equilibrium swelling, with the same final swelling ratio.\n\n## Comparison\n\nDense-skin gel with sparse holes versus intact skin and a uniformly thinned skin with comparable transport area.\n\n## Critical controls\n\nActual open area, hole damage, skin thickness, bulk network, sample size, final uptake, and mechanical restraint.\n\n## Pilot plan\n\nConfirm a genuine transport-limiting synthetic skin before perforation. Measure time-dependent mass and dimensions. Compare with a simple diffusion model using measured geometry.\n\n## What would count against it\n\nStop if there is no measurable skin resistance or holes introduce cracks. Reject the disproportionate-gain claim when an area-only model explains the result.\n\n## Replication and analysis\n\nTreat separately prepared specimens, batches, or devices as independent units. Technical repeats and images are nested measurements. First estimate calibration error and independent-preparation variability. Set the minimum meaningful effect in the primary outcome's units before confirmation, then choose sample size from that effect and pilot variance; a convenient pilot count is not a powered study.\n\nRandomize run order and blind sample labels where practical. Freeze image processing, fitting choices, exclusions, and the primary comparison before evaluating confirmatory data. Report effect size and uncertainty; use a blocked or mixed-effects analysis when specimens share a batch. A wide interval is inconclusive. Include the measurement and matching controls even when the directional effect appears large.\n\nA useful go/no-go gate is whether the hypothesized effect can be distinguished from calibration uncertainty and the strongest alternative explanation. Stop material purchases if the closest literature already measures the identical contrast, unless a replication has an explicit purpose. Do not use these abbreviated plans as complete laboratory protocols.\n\n## Data to preserve\n\nKeep unedited images or sensor streams, calibration files, preparation IDs, run order, environmental logs, input histories, raw outcome values, exclusions, and the exact analysis version. No values are prefilled in the observation template. Use `data/Published Benchmarks.csv` only as literature context; values from a different system are not observations of this hypothesis.\n\n## Sources and transfer limits\n\n### GEL10\n\n[Poroelastic swelling kinetics of thin hydrogel layers: comparison of theory and experiment](https://doi.org/10.1039/C0SM00434K)\n\nAccess: Indexed abstract examined. Type: primary experiment/theory.\n\nBackground findings and transfer limits: see [source assessments](../research/Primary%20Source%20Assessments.md) under this source key.\n\n### GELKIN16\n\n[Constitutive equations for the kinetics of swelling of hydrogels](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167663616302332)\n\nAccess: Indexed abstract examined. Type: primary theory/experiment.\n\nBackground findings and transfer limits: see [source assessments](../research/Primary%20Source%20Assessments.md) under this source key.\n\n"
  },
  {
    "title": "Interpenetrating network order",
    "hypothesis": "Reversing network-formation order will change damage recovery even at equal final network composition.",
    "test": "Compare hysteresis and microscopic structure after repeated strain.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Hydrogels and responsive solids",
    "controls": "Water content, chemistry, sample dimensions, and stimulus intensity",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Interpenetrating network order",
    "id": 347,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0347",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Gel cavity pressure memory",
    "hypothesis": "Closed cavities will prolong gel volume recovery after compression compared with vented cavities.",
    "test": "Track pressure proxies and shape recovery in transparent gels.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Hydrogels and responsive solids",
    "controls": "Water content, chemistry, sample dimensions, and stimulus intensity",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Gel cavity pressure memory",
    "id": 348,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 132,
    "literature_query": "Gel cavity pressure memory Closed cavities prolong volume recovery compression vented experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0348",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Gel cavity pressure memory",
      "hypothesis": "Closed cavities will prolong gel volume recovery after compression compared with vented cavities.",
      "test": "Track pressure proxies and shape recovery in transparent gels.",
      "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
      "category": "Hydrogels and responsive solids",
      "controls": "Water content, chemistry, sample dimensions, and stimulus intensity",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Gel cavity pressure memory",
      "id": 348,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 132,
      "literature_query": "Gel cavity pressure memory Closed cavities prolong volume recovery compression vented experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 3,
      "source_ids": "Sf9d81ac98319;Sb11664dd530d;S5c2b68d92161",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Stimulus gradient rotation",
    "hypothesis": "Rotating a thermal gradient will create a persistent helical shape in a slowly relaxing responsive strip.",
    "test": "Measure three-dimensional shape and recovery after gradient removal.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Hydrogels and responsive solids",
    "controls": "Water content, chemistry, sample dimensions, and stimulus intensity",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Stimulus gradient rotation",
    "id": 349,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0349",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Hydrogel particle contacts",
    "hypothesis": "Flat-faced gel particles will form a stronger compressed packing than spherical particles at equal swelling and solid fraction.",
    "test": "Measure packing modulus and contact rearrangements.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Hydrogels and responsive solids",
    "controls": "Water content, chemistry, sample dimensions, and stimulus intensity",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Hydrogel particle contacts",
    "id": 350,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 30,
    "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 14,
    "literature_query": "Hydrogel particle contacts Flat-faced gel particles form stronger compressed packing spherical at swelling experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0350",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": true,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Hydrogel particle contacts",
      "hypothesis": "Flat-faced gel particles will form a stronger compressed packing than spherical particles at equal swelling and solid fraction.",
      "test": "Measure packing modulus and contact rearrangements.",
      "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
      "category": "Hydrogels and responsive solids",
      "controls": "Water content, chemistry, sample dimensions, and stimulus intensity",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Hydrogel particle contacts",
      "id": 350,
      "access_score": 4,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 30,
      "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 14,
      "literature_query": "Hydrogel particle contacts Flat-faced gel particles form stronger compressed packing spherical at swelling experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 10,
      "source_ids": "S7efa6d897040;S09e3ad87faf5;S2f5989e9b73a;Sa29c9be2e06d;Sd4c82262763c;S93a450162896;S384f6c3c8f05;Sb3e89af9e51f;S140ea26caf01;Sa83266634ada",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Soft polygonal particle compaction is studied. Verify swelling-matched hydrogel contact geometry and recovered packing modulus.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": {
      "deep_rank": "16",
      "id": "350",
      "title": "Hydrogel particle contacts",
      "original_300_rank": "14",
      "pilot_class": "C",
      "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
      "hypothesis": "Flat-faced gel particles will form a stronger compressed packing than spherical particles at equal swelling and solid fraction.",
      "primary_outcome": "Small-strain packing modulus at a predefined solid fraction; recovery after unloading is secondary.",
      "comparison": "Flat-faced hydrogel particles versus spheres with matched single-particle modulus, swelling, and volume.",
      "controls": "Particle friction, size spread, confinement, solid fraction, fluid viscosity, temperature, and relaxation time.",
      "pilot": "First validate the force-imaging analysis on published spherical-packing data. Independently measure single-particle mechanics before comparing shaped packings.",
      "novelty_gap": "Soft-particle compaction and shape effects are known. A new claim requires shape effects independent of friction, particle modulus, and density.",
      "stop_rule": "Stop if molding changes gel chemistry or friction. Reject a shape-specific strengthening claim if the modulus difference vanishes under matched conditions.",
      "source_keys": "HYDRODATA;SOFT22;SHAPE14",
      "truth_probability": "not estimated",
      "novelty_status": "unverified"
    },
    "dossier_text": "# 16. H0350 — Hydrogel particle contacts\n\nOriginal 300-folder rank: 14. Pilot class: C. Resource class: modest bench or workshop; calibration still required.\n\n## Original hypothesis\n\nFlat-faced gel particles will form a stronger compressed packing than spherical particles at equal swelling and solid fraction.\n\n## Why investigate this\n\nPublic nonhuman data provide a measurement benchmark, and packing stiffness is a well-defined mechanical response.\n\n## Literature assessment and exact novelty question\n\nSoft-particle compaction and shape effects are known. A new claim requires shape effects independent of friction, particle modulus, and density. Worldwide originality remains unverified.\n\n## Primary measurement\n\nSmall-strain packing modulus at a predefined solid fraction; recovery after unloading is secondary.\n\n## Comparison\n\nFlat-faced hydrogel particles versus spheres with matched single-particle modulus, swelling, and volume.\n\n## Critical controls\n\nParticle friction, size spread, confinement, solid fraction, fluid viscosity, temperature, and relaxation time.\n\n## Pilot plan\n\nFirst validate the force-imaging analysis on published spherical-packing data. Independently measure single-particle mechanics before comparing shaped packings.\n\n## What would count against it\n\nStop if molding changes gel chemistry or friction. Reject a shape-specific strengthening claim if the modulus difference vanishes under matched conditions.\n\n## Replication and analysis\n\nTreat separately prepared specimens, batches, or devices as independent units. Technical repeats and images are nested measurements. First estimate calibration error and independent-preparation variability. Set the minimum meaningful effect in the primary outcome's units before confirmation, then choose sample size from that effect and pilot variance; a convenient pilot count is not a powered study.\n\nRandomize run order and blind sample labels where practical. Freeze image processing, fitting choices, exclusions, and the primary comparison before evaluating confirmatory data. Report effect size and uncertainty; use a blocked or mixed-effects analysis when specimens share a batch. A wide interval is inconclusive. Include the measurement and matching controls even when the directional effect appears large.\n\nA useful go/no-go gate is whether the hypothesized effect can be distinguished from calibration uncertainty and the strongest alternative explanation. Stop material purchases if the closest literature already measures the identical contrast, unless a replication has an explicit purpose. Do not use these abbreviated plans as complete laboratory protocols.\n\n## Data to preserve\n\nKeep unedited images or sensor streams, calibration files, preparation IDs, run order, environmental logs, input histories, raw outcome values, exclusions, and the exact analysis version. No values are prefilled in the observation template. Use `data/Published Benchmarks.csv` only as literature context; values from a different system are not observations of this hypothesis.\n\n## Sources and transfer limits\n\n### HYDRODATA\n\n[Transparent experiments: releasing data from mechanical tests on three dimensional hydrogel sphere packings](https://doi.org/10.1007/s10035-019-0985-4)\n\nAccess: Open article methods and data structure examined. Type: primary experiment/data descriptor.\n\nBackground findings and transfer limits: see [source assessments](../research/Primary%20Source%20Assessments.md) under this source key.\n\n### SOFT22\n\n[Three-dimensional compaction of soft granular packings](https://doi.org/10.1039/D1SM01241J)\n\nAccess: Indexed abstract examined. Type: primary simulation/theory.\n\nBackground findings and transfer limits: see [source assessments](../research/Primary%20Source%20Assessments.md) under this source key.\n\n### SHAPE14\n\n[Particle shape effects on the stress response of granular packings](https://doi.org/10.1039/C3SM52047A)\n\nAccess: Title and indexed record screened. Type: primary research lead.\n\nBackground findings and transfer limits: see [source assessments](../research/Primary%20Source%20Assessments.md) under this source key.\n\n"
  },
  {
    "title": "Auxetic cell orientation",
    "hypothesis": "Alternating auxetic-cell orientations will reduce lateral strain variability under compression.",
    "test": "Measure local strain in printed lattice panels.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Composites and architected materials",
    "controls": "Constituent fractions, mass, dimensions, and fabrication tolerances",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Auxetic cell orientation",
    "id": 351,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 25,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0351",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Hollow inclusion wall variance",
    "hypothesis": "Narrower hollow-particle wall-thickness distributions will reduce sudden collapse events in lightweight composites.",
    "test": "Record compression force drops and inclusion fractures.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Composites and architected materials",
    "controls": "Constituent fractions, mass, dimensions, and fabrication tolerances",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Hollow inclusion wall variance",
    "id": 352,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0352",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Hierarchical beam joints",
    "hypothesis": "Adding compliant secondary joints will reduce sensitivity of lattice stiffness to one missing primary beam.",
    "test": "Compare intact and deliberately damaged lattices.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Composites and architected materials",
    "controls": "Constituent fractions, mass, dimensions, and fabrication tolerances",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Hierarchical beam joints",
    "id": 353,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0353",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Embedded mesh pretension",
    "hypothesis": "Moderate mesh pretension will reduce impact indentation in soft composites without increasing permanent damage.",
    "test": "Measure indentation and recovery across pretension levels.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Composites and architected materials",
    "controls": "Constituent fractions, mass, dimensions, and fabrication tolerances",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Embedded mesh pretension",
    "id": 354,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0354",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Conductive fiber crossings",
    "hypothesis": "Bonding only selected fiber crossings will preserve conductivity under bending better than bonding every crossing.",
    "test": "Track resistance and crossing damage during cycling.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Composites and architected materials",
    "controls": "Constituent fractions, mass, dimensions, and fabrication tolerances",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Conductive fiber crossings",
    "id": 355,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 133,
    "literature_query": "Conductive fiber crossings Bonding only selected preserve conductivity bending better every crossing experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0355",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Conductive fiber crossings",
      "hypothesis": "Bonding only selected fiber crossings will preserve conductivity under bending better than bonding every crossing.",
      "test": "Track resistance and crossing damage during cycling.",
      "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
      "category": "Composites and architected materials",
      "controls": "Constituent fractions, mass, dimensions, and fabrication tolerances",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Conductive fiber crossings",
      "id": 355,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 133,
      "literature_query": "Conductive fiber crossings Bonding only selected preserve conductivity bending better every crossing experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 2,
      "source_ids": "Saf747fbd4c71;Sfa276153b162",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Graded cell chirality",
    "hypothesis": "A gradual chirality transition will spread torsional strain more uniformly than an abrupt transition.",
    "test": "Map rotations in architected cylinders.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Composites and architected materials",
    "controls": "Constituent fractions, mass, dimensions, and fabrication tolerances",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Graded cell chirality",
    "id": 356,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 25,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0356",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Inclusion corner rounding",
    "hypothesis": "Rounded stiff inclusions will reduce matrix cavitation compared with sharp inclusions at equal volume.",
    "test": "Image cavitation during tensile loading.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Composites and architected materials",
    "controls": "Constituent fractions, mass, dimensions, and fabrication tolerances",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Inclusion corner rounding",
    "id": 357,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0357",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Layer registration offsets",
    "hypothesis": "Small deliberate layer offsets will reduce aligned weak-plane failure in stacked cellular solids.",
    "test": "Compare fracture paths across controlled offsets.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Composites and architected materials",
    "controls": "Constituent fractions, mass, dimensions, and fabrication tolerances",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Layer registration offsets",
    "id": 358,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 25,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0358",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Foam skin permeability",
    "hypothesis": "A permeable outer skin will reduce compression-rate sensitivity by allowing trapped gas escape.",
    "test": "Measure stress across loading rates and skin permeabilities.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Composites and architected materials",
    "controls": "Constituent fractions, mass, dimensions, and fabrication tolerances",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Foam skin permeability",
    "id": 359,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 134,
    "literature_query": "Foam skin permeability permeable outer compression-rate sensitivity by allowing trapped gas escape experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0359",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Foam skin permeability",
      "hypothesis": "A permeable outer skin will reduce compression-rate sensitivity by allowing trapped gas escape.",
      "test": "Measure stress across loading rates and skin permeabilities.",
      "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
      "category": "Composites and architected materials",
      "controls": "Constituent fractions, mass, dimensions, and fabrication tolerances",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Foam skin permeability",
      "id": 359,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 134,
      "literature_query": "Foam skin permeability permeable outer compression-rate sensitivity by allowing trapped gas escape experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 7,
      "source_ids": "S7f7cd2af1a65;Sb4a6b22bcc9c;S3f3fd36773e9;S2a37c273e994;S2c5d79bab80f;S3246f3c8438c;S944c7e4e29be",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Embedded void connectivity",
    "hypothesis": "Connected voids will increase damping at intermediate compression frequencies through internal gas flow.",
    "test": "Measure frequency-dependent damping with sealed and vented controls.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Composites and architected materials",
    "controls": "Constituent fractions, mass, dimensions, and fabrication tolerances",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Embedded void connectivity",
    "id": 360,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0360",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Contact-line corner angle",
    "hypothesis": "Rounded chemical-pattern corners will reduce droplet pinning variability compared with sharp corners.",
    "test": "Measure advancing and receding contact angles across identical patterns.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Wetting and droplets",
    "controls": "Liquid composition, temperature, surface cleanliness, and droplet volume",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Contact-line corner angle",
    "id": 361,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 135,
    "literature_query": "Contact-line corner angle Rounded chemical-pattern corners droplet pinning variability sharp experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0361",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Contact-line corner angle",
      "hypothesis": "Rounded chemical-pattern corners will reduce droplet pinning variability compared with sharp corners.",
      "test": "Measure advancing and receding contact angles across identical patterns.",
      "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
      "category": "Wetting and droplets",
      "controls": "Liquid composition, temperature, surface cleanliness, and droplet volume",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Contact-line corner angle",
      "id": 361,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 135,
      "literature_query": "Contact-line corner angle Rounded chemical-pattern corners droplet pinning variability sharp experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 8,
      "source_ids": "Sccf5035cd7c1;S4353a015d90b;Sfb0955b27fda;Sec23345fcecd;Sd3d5e3326ad4;S8352f6aa339d;S18fe42948195;S12717717470f",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Condensate collision offset",
    "hypothesis": "Off-center collisions will shed condensate from tilted fibers more efficiently than central collisions.",
    "test": "Use high-speed imaging of controlled droplet pairs.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Wetting and droplets",
    "controls": "Liquid composition, temperature, surface cleanliness, and droplet volume",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Condensate collision offset",
    "id": 362,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 25,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 242,
    "literature_query": "Condensate collision offset Off-center collisions shed tilted fibers efficiently central experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0362",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Condensate collision offset",
      "hypothesis": "Off-center collisions will shed condensate from tilted fibers more efficiently than central collisions.",
      "test": "Use high-speed imaging of controlled droplet pairs.",
      "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
      "category": "Wetting and droplets",
      "controls": "Liquid composition, temperature, surface cleanliness, and droplet volume",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Condensate collision offset",
      "id": 362,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 25,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 242,
      "literature_query": "Condensate collision offset Off-center collisions shed tilted fibers efficiently central experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 5,
      "source_ids": "S845c9db7d175;S407c98084eb3;S9f44292d69b9;Sab013e6b18c4;S182b8228c021",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Liquid bridge asymmetry",
    "hypothesis": "Unequal wetting angles at bridge endpoints will bias the rupture position toward one support.",
    "test": "Image bridge necking while swapping endpoint treatments.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Wetting and droplets",
    "controls": "Liquid composition, temperature, surface cleanliness, and droplet volume",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Liquid bridge asymmetry",
    "id": 363,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0363",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Droplet shell permeability",
    "hypothesis": "A permeable elastic droplet shell will suppress rebound more strongly after long contact than short contact.",
    "test": "Measure rebound and volume exchange over impact speeds.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Wetting and droplets",
    "controls": "Liquid composition, temperature, surface cleanliness, and droplet volume",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Droplet shell permeability",
    "id": 364,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 136,
    "literature_query": "Droplet shell permeability permeable elastic suppress rebound strongly long contact short experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0364",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Droplet shell permeability",
      "hypothesis": "A permeable elastic droplet shell will suppress rebound more strongly after long contact than short contact.",
      "test": "Measure rebound and volume exchange over impact speeds.",
      "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
      "category": "Wetting and droplets",
      "controls": "Liquid composition, temperature, surface cleanliness, and droplet volume",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Droplet shell permeability",
      "id": 364,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 136,
      "literature_query": "Droplet shell permeability permeable elastic suppress rebound strongly long contact short experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 8,
      "source_ids": "S40bedcb83f10;S909ec1c509b3;Sebd204321216;Sbbaf6c21c051;Sb66a3a1e11f1;S4af0eb959501;S326c23e87952;Sb5be65eacc6c",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Surface nanobubble spacing",
    "hypothesis": "Closer gas-pocket spacing will increase collective collapse under pressure beyond independent-pocket predictions.",
    "test": "Image patterned gas pockets during calibrated pressure ramps.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Wetting and droplets",
    "controls": "Liquid composition, temperature, surface cleanliness, and droplet volume",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Surface nanobubble spacing",
    "id": 365,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0365",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Dew droplet edge roughness",
    "hypothesis": "A roughness gradient confined to track edges will guide dew without increasing overall retention as much as uniform roughening.",
    "test": "Track droplet paths and collected mass.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Wetting and droplets",
    "controls": "Liquid composition, temperature, surface cleanliness, and droplet volume",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Dew droplet edge roughness",
    "id": 366,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 137,
    "literature_query": "Dew droplet edge roughness gradient confined to track edges guide increasing overall retention experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0366",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Dew droplet edge roughness",
      "hypothesis": "A roughness gradient confined to track edges will guide dew without increasing overall retention as much as uniform roughening.",
      "test": "Track droplet paths and collected mass.",
      "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
      "category": "Wetting and droplets",
      "controls": "Liquid composition, temperature, surface cleanliness, and droplet volume",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Dew droplet edge roughness",
      "id": 366,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 137,
      "literature_query": "Dew droplet edge roughness gradient confined to track edges guide increasing overall retention experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 3,
      "source_ids": "S03f04f27de8a;S6df486a67aba;Sbf2802a0947a",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Spreading solvent prefilm",
    "hypothesis": "A thin compatible prefilm will reduce spreading-time variability on mildly heterogeneous surfaces.",
    "test": "Measure spreading fronts with controlled prefilm thickness.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Wetting and droplets",
    "controls": "Liquid composition, temperature, surface cleanliness, and droplet volume",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Spreading solvent prefilm",
    "id": 367,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 30,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0367",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Droplet footprint eccentricity",
    "hypothesis": "Elongated footprints will enhance evaporation-rate sensitivity to airflow direction.",
    "test": "Rotate patterned droplets relative to calibrated airflow.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Wetting and droplets",
    "controls": "Liquid composition, temperature, surface cleanliness, and droplet volume",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Droplet footprint eccentricity",
    "id": 368,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 25,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 243,
    "literature_query": "Droplet footprint eccentricity Elongated footprints enhance evaporation-rate sensitivity to airflow direction experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0368",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Droplet footprint eccentricity",
      "hypothesis": "Elongated footprints will enhance evaporation-rate sensitivity to airflow direction.",
      "test": "Rotate patterned droplets relative to calibrated airflow.",
      "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
      "category": "Wetting and droplets",
      "controls": "Liquid composition, temperature, surface cleanliness, and droplet volume",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Droplet footprint eccentricity",
      "id": 368,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 25,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 243,
      "literature_query": "Droplet footprint eccentricity Elongated footprints enhance evaporation-rate sensitivity to airflow direction experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 5,
      "source_ids": "S0b531217eca9;S76fb3c8e2c6c;Sccf5035cd7c1;S6769239c56b7;Sf03be95fd232",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Contact-line elastic ridge",
    "hypothesis": "Faster-relaxing soft substrates will show less stick-slip during slow droplet withdrawal.",
    "test": "Measure ridge dynamics and contact-line motion.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Wetting and droplets",
    "controls": "Liquid composition, temperature, surface cleanliness, and droplet volume",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Contact-line elastic ridge",
    "id": 369,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 138,
    "literature_query": "Contact-line elastic ridge Faster-relaxing soft substrates show stick-slip slow droplet withdrawal experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0369",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Contact-line elastic ridge",
      "hypothesis": "Faster-relaxing soft substrates will show less stick-slip during slow droplet withdrawal.",
      "test": "Measure ridge dynamics and contact-line motion.",
      "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
      "category": "Wetting and droplets",
      "controls": "Liquid composition, temperature, surface cleanliness, and droplet volume",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Contact-line elastic ridge",
      "id": 369,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 138,
      "literature_query": "Contact-line elastic ridge Faster-relaxing soft substrates show stick-slip slow droplet withdrawal experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 7,
      "source_ids": "Sda3db398f992;Seef850543d62;Sc954fd9f52e3;Sf03be95fd232;S3e95c7873665;S19f9feefa245;Scb810934bd58",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Immersed drop detachment",
    "hypothesis": "A density gradient in the surrounding liquid will shift pendant-drop detachment volume without changing interfacial tension.",
    "test": "Measure detachment alongside density and tension profiles.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Wetting and droplets",
    "controls": "Liquid composition, temperature, surface cleanliness, and droplet volume",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Immersed drop detachment",
    "id": 370,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0370",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Channel corner fillets",
    "hypothesis": "Rounded channel corners will reduce long-tail residence times for nonadsorbing tracers.",
    "test": "Measure breakthrough curves in sharp and filleted channels.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Microfluidics and liquid transport",
    "controls": "Flow rate, fluid properties, channel dimensions, and input energy",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Channel corner fillets",
    "id": 371,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0371",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Branch compliance matching",
    "hypothesis": "Matching branch compliance rather than resistance alone will improve pulse splitting uniformity.",
    "test": "Measure transient branch flows in transparent networks.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Microfluidics and liquid transport",
    "controls": "Flow rate, fluid properties, channel dimensions, and input energy",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Branch compliance matching",
    "id": 372,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 139,
    "literature_query": "Branch compliance matching rather resistance alone improve pulse splitting uniformity experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0372",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Branch compliance matching",
      "hypothesis": "Matching branch compliance rather than resistance alone will improve pulse splitting uniformity.",
      "test": "Measure transient branch flows in transparent networks.",
      "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
      "category": "Microfluidics and liquid transport",
      "controls": "Flow rate, fluid properties, channel dimensions, and input energy",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Branch compliance matching",
      "id": 372,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 139,
      "literature_query": "Branch compliance matching rather resistance alone improve pulse splitting uniformity experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 1,
      "source_ids": "Sde900b06ae89",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Oscillatory inlet phase",
    "hypothesis": "Phase-offset inlet oscillations will reduce unmixed regions in a two-inlet junction.",
    "test": "Map tracer concentration at equal average throughput.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Microfluidics and liquid transport",
    "controls": "Flow rate, fluid properties, channel dimensions, and input energy",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Oscillatory inlet phase",
    "id": 373,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0373",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Dead-end cavity inclination",
    "hypothesis": "Inclined dead-end cavities will exchange solute faster than perpendicular cavities under oscillatory flow.",
    "test": "Image tracer clearance across cavity angles.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Microfluidics and liquid transport",
    "controls": "Flow rate, fluid properties, channel dimensions, and input energy",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Dead-end cavity inclination",
    "id": 374,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 140,
    "literature_query": "Dead-end cavity inclination Inclined cavities exchange solute faster perpendicular oscillatory flow experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0374",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Dead-end cavity inclination",
      "hypothesis": "Inclined dead-end cavities will exchange solute faster than perpendicular cavities under oscillatory flow.",
      "test": "Image tracer clearance across cavity angles.",
      "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
      "category": "Microfluidics and liquid transport",
      "controls": "Flow rate, fluid properties, channel dimensions, and input energy",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Dead-end cavity inclination",
      "id": 374,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 140,
      "literature_query": "Dead-end cavity inclination Inclined cavities exchange solute faster perpendicular oscillatory flow experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 7,
      "source_ids": "Sc6d2434edd88;Sfc71a4a5783b;Sf696f7eec5c6;Sa1bdd7164dbe;S7714ae8a3013;Sad414cee11f8;Sddc05b0cee80",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Microchannel wall waviness",
    "hypothesis": "Low-amplitude long-wavelength wall waviness will reduce bubble trapping relative to abrupt steps.",
    "test": "Count trapped bubbles under controlled injections.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Microfluidics and liquid transport",
    "controls": "Flow rate, fluid properties, channel dimensions, and input energy",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Microchannel wall waviness",
    "id": 375,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0375",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Capillary network junction order",
    "hypothesis": "Reordering identical junctions will change passive filling sequence beyond total path resistance.",
    "test": "Track filling in geometrically permuted networks.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Microfluidics and liquid transport",
    "controls": "Flow rate, fluid properties, channel dimensions, and input energy",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Capillary network junction order",
    "id": 376,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 141,
    "literature_query": "Capillary network junction order Reordering identical junctions change passive filling sequence beyond total experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0376",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Capillary network junction order",
      "hypothesis": "Reordering identical junctions will change passive filling sequence beyond total path resistance.",
      "test": "Track filling in geometrically permuted networks.",
      "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
      "category": "Microfluidics and liquid transport",
      "controls": "Flow rate, fluid properties, channel dimensions, and input energy",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Capillary network junction order",
      "id": 376,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 141,
      "literature_query": "Capillary network junction order Reordering identical junctions change passive filling sequence beyond total experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 6,
      "source_ids": "Se111d08c1456;S9721ac0089e9;Sd1b35fd9d06a;Sc707715722a6;S27faf8730e58;S505b78e5eb91",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pulsatile viscosity contrast",
    "hypothesis": "Pulsed flow will amplify lateral segregation of two miscible liquids with different viscosities.",
    "test": "Image concentration profiles while controlling molecular diffusion.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Microfluidics and liquid transport",
    "controls": "Flow rate, fluid properties, channel dimensions, and input energy",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Pulsatile viscosity contrast",
    "id": 377,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 142,
    "literature_query": "Pulsatile viscosity contrast Pulsed flow amplify lateral segregation of miscible liquids different viscosities experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0377",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Pulsatile viscosity contrast",
      "hypothesis": "Pulsed flow will amplify lateral segregation of two miscible liquids with different viscosities.",
      "test": "Image concentration profiles while controlling molecular diffusion.",
      "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
      "category": "Microfluidics and liquid transport",
      "controls": "Flow rate, fluid properties, channel dimensions, and input energy",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Pulsatile viscosity contrast",
      "id": 377,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 142,
      "literature_query": "Pulsatile viscosity contrast Pulsed flow amplify lateral segregation of miscible liquids different viscosities experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 6,
      "source_ids": "S7979ba050951;S40714621d821;S6cf6c91ae4e6;Sd9778c5bb5c0;Sfa70b62eec90;Se7c4ccbfaf24",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Elastic tube wave reflections",
    "hypothesis": "A gradual compliance transition will reduce pressure-wave reflection compared with a sharp transition.",
    "test": "Measure incident and reflected pulses along matched tubes.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Microfluidics and liquid transport",
    "controls": "Flow rate, fluid properties, channel dimensions, and input energy",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Elastic tube wave reflections",
    "id": 378,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0378",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Reservoir meniscus coupling",
    "hypothesis": "Small reservoir headspaces will introduce measurable anti-correlated flow fluctuations in connected channels.",
    "test": "Measure pressure and flow while varying headspace volume.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Microfluidics and liquid transport",
    "controls": "Flow rate, fluid properties, channel dimensions, and input energy",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Reservoir meniscus coupling",
    "id": 379,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 143,
    "literature_query": "Reservoir meniscus coupling headspaces introduce measurable anti-correlated flow fluctuations in connected channels experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0379",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Reservoir meniscus coupling",
      "hypothesis": "Small reservoir headspaces will introduce measurable anti-correlated flow fluctuations in connected channels.",
      "test": "Measure pressure and flow while varying headspace volume.",
      "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
      "category": "Microfluidics and liquid transport",
      "controls": "Flow rate, fluid properties, channel dimensions, and input energy",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Reservoir meniscus coupling",
      "id": 379,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 143,
      "literature_query": "Reservoir meniscus coupling headspaces introduce measurable anti-correlated flow fluctuations in connected channels experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 8,
      "source_ids": "S5fb25229a99f;S8ea0bdf5746a;Sdb560970bb0f;S2158a145d0a7;S069434412869;S597525b4d403;S03ca37fa294f;S94b9c494198b",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Capillary stop edge wear",
    "hypothesis": "Repeated wetting cycles will shift valve burst pressure more strongly at sharp than rounded capillary stops.",
    "test": "Track burst-pressure distributions and edge geometry.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Microfluidics and liquid transport",
    "controls": "Flow rate, fluid properties, channel dimensions, and input energy",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Capillary stop edge wear",
    "id": 380,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 144,
    "literature_query": "Capillary stop edge wear Repeated wetting cycles shift valve burst pressure strongly at experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0380",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Capillary stop edge wear",
      "hypothesis": "Repeated wetting cycles will shift valve burst pressure more strongly at sharp than rounded capillary stops.",
      "test": "Track burst-pressure distributions and edge geometry.",
      "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
      "category": "Microfluidics and liquid transport",
      "controls": "Flow rate, fluid properties, channel dimensions, and input energy",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Capillary stop edge wear",
      "id": 380,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 144,
      "literature_query": "Capillary stop edge wear Repeated wetting cycles shift valve burst pressure strongly at experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 7,
      "source_ids": "S14beb0abaa2d;S73768b5bf61c;S9ba9a64ca286;Sf6294c8a20fb;S174b23493d34;Sbc1175b4eb90;S38e24d7264fb",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Droplet charge asymmetry",
    "hypothesis": "Asymmetrically charged droplets will aggregate more directionally than uniformly charged droplets of equal mean charge.",
    "test": "Image dilute emulsions and characterize charge distributions.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Emulsions and colloids",
    "controls": "Particle or droplet loading, chemistry, temperature, and preparation energy",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Droplet charge asymmetry",
    "id": 381,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 145,
    "literature_query": "Droplet charge asymmetry Asymmetrically charged droplets aggregate directionally uniformly of mean experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0381",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Droplet charge asymmetry",
      "hypothesis": "Asymmetrically charged droplets will aggregate more directionally than uniformly charged droplets of equal mean charge.",
      "test": "Image dilute emulsions and characterize charge distributions.",
      "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
      "category": "Emulsions and colloids",
      "controls": "Particle or droplet loading, chemistry, temperature, and preparation energy",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Droplet charge asymmetry",
      "id": 381,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 145,
      "literature_query": "Droplet charge asymmetry Asymmetrically charged droplets aggregate directionally uniformly of mean experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 8,
      "source_ids": "Sa1d324690f72;S68765f369707;S55c2f3f2f394;Sed6ce1083b31;Sa8e0208c9874;Sa986712ea09f;Se3a69a542c98;Sd7b20567e885",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Colloid softness and depletion",
    "hypothesis": "Soft colloids will form more reversible depletion clusters than rigid colloids at matched attraction strength.",
    "test": "Measure cluster breakup and particle deformation.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Emulsions and colloids",
    "controls": "Particle or droplet loading, chemistry, temperature, and preparation energy",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Colloid softness and depletion",
    "id": 382,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0382",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Emulsion temperature cycling",
    "hypothesis": "Mild temperature cycling will broaden droplet sizes faster in weakly stabilized than strongly stabilized emulsions.",
    "test": "Track size distributions and interfacial coverage.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Emulsions and colloids",
    "controls": "Particle or droplet loading, chemistry, temperature, and preparation energy",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Emulsion temperature cycling",
    "id": 383,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 146,
    "literature_query": "Emulsion temperature cycling Mild broaden droplet sizes faster in weakly stabilized strongly emulsions experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0383",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Emulsion temperature cycling",
      "hypothesis": "Mild temperature cycling will broaden droplet sizes faster in weakly stabilized than strongly stabilized emulsions.",
      "test": "Track size distributions and interfacial coverage.",
      "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
      "category": "Emulsions and colloids",
      "controls": "Particle or droplet loading, chemistry, temperature, and preparation energy",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Emulsion temperature cycling",
      "id": 383,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 146,
      "literature_query": "Emulsion temperature cycling Mild broaden droplet sizes faster in weakly stabilized strongly emulsions experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 8,
      "source_ids": "Sd31197c21cde;S1ece1bd12f89;S075111318500;Se04b6550e74d;Se853861f624a;Sc6aafd9ed711;S42278d054581;Sb550f7e4bcd8",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Mixed stabilizer exchange",
    "hypothesis": "A slow-exchanging stabilizer will reduce loss of a fast-exchanging stabilizer from droplet interfaces.",
    "test": "Measure labeled stabilizer exchange and coalescence.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Emulsions and colloids",
    "controls": "Particle or droplet loading, chemistry, temperature, and preparation energy",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Mixed stabilizer exchange",
    "id": 384,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 147,
    "literature_query": "Mixed stabilizer exchange slow-exchanging loss of fast-exchanging droplet interfaces experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0384",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Mixed stabilizer exchange",
      "hypothesis": "A slow-exchanging stabilizer will reduce loss of a fast-exchanging stabilizer from droplet interfaces.",
      "test": "Measure labeled stabilizer exchange and coalescence.",
      "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
      "category": "Emulsions and colloids",
      "controls": "Particle or droplet loading, chemistry, temperature, and preparation energy",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Mixed stabilizer exchange",
      "id": 384,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 147,
      "literature_query": "Mixed stabilizer exchange slow-exchanging loss of fast-exchanging droplet interfaces experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 5,
      "source_ids": "S6f8c3998729a;S9e75d0273fcb;Sb650b3af3962;S38cf435b6e59;S7f0287f3b027",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Particle roughness and sediment beds",
    "hypothesis": "Rough colloids will produce more permeable sediment beds than smooth colloids at equal settled solid fraction.",
    "test": "Measure bed structure and permeability.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Emulsions and colloids",
    "controls": "Particle or droplet loading, chemistry, temperature, and preparation energy",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Particle roughness and sediment beds",
    "id": 385,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0385",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Colloidal crystal boundary mobility",
    "hypothesis": "A weak periodic shear will increase grain-boundary mobility more than grain-interior disorder.",
    "test": "Image ordered colloids during sub-yield oscillation.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Emulsions and colloids",
    "controls": "Particle or droplet loading, chemistry, temperature, and preparation energy",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Colloidal crystal boundary mobility",
    "id": 386,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 148,
    "literature_query": "Colloidal crystal boundary mobility weak periodic shear grain-boundary grain-interior disorder experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0386",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Colloidal crystal boundary mobility",
      "hypothesis": "A weak periodic shear will increase grain-boundary mobility more than grain-interior disorder.",
      "test": "Image ordered colloids during sub-yield oscillation.",
      "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
      "category": "Emulsions and colloids",
      "controls": "Particle or droplet loading, chemistry, temperature, and preparation energy",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Colloidal crystal boundary mobility",
      "id": 386,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 148,
      "literature_query": "Colloidal crystal boundary mobility weak periodic shear grain-boundary grain-interior disorder experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 8,
      "source_ids": "Se40798bbf42c;S423c755b08ad;S42ae66654df7;S475574c708bd;S0b7eef927ad9;S7cdae346969b;Sa70d4692be4e;S2843f857ec88",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Hollow particle buoyancy drift",
    "hypothesis": "Porous hollow particles will show slower buoyancy equilibration than nonporous particles after liquid exchange.",
    "test": "Track settling and internal liquid uptake.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Emulsions and colloids",
    "controls": "Particle or droplet loading, chemistry, temperature, and preparation energy",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Hollow particle buoyancy drift",
    "id": 387,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0387",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Droplet interfacial age",
    "hypothesis": "Older droplet interfaces will resist sudden area expansion more strongly than fresh interfaces at equal bulk stabilizer concentration.",
    "test": "Measure dynamic tension and expansion response.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Emulsions and colloids",
    "controls": "Particle or droplet loading, chemistry, temperature, and preparation energy",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Droplet interfacial age",
    "id": 388,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 149,
    "literature_query": "Droplet interfacial age Older interfaces resist sudden area expansion strongly fresh at bulk experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0388",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Droplet interfacial age",
      "hypothesis": "Older droplet interfaces will resist sudden area expansion more strongly than fresh interfaces at equal bulk stabilizer concentration.",
      "test": "Measure dynamic tension and expansion response.",
      "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
      "category": "Emulsions and colloids",
      "controls": "Particle or droplet loading, chemistry, temperature, and preparation energy",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Droplet interfacial age",
      "id": 388,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 149,
      "literature_query": "Droplet interfacial age Older interfaces resist sudden area expansion strongly fresh at bulk experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 7,
      "source_ids": "Se2ce71140da9;Se1a8ba011b9f;S470d8ef0fe79;S85bd20ed2b87;Se670b1ef399a;Sf9a51365070a;Sc84fabee933a",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Colloid shape polydispersity",
    "hypothesis": "Small shape variation will suppress ordered packing more strongly than comparable relative size variation.",
    "test": "Compare scattering and microscopy in concentrated suspensions.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Emulsions and colloids",
    "controls": "Particle or droplet loading, chemistry, temperature, and preparation energy",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Colloid shape polydispersity",
    "id": 389,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0389",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Emulsion confinement layering",
    "hypothesis": "Channel heights near integer droplet diameters will reduce droplet rearrangement noise.",
    "test": "Measure flow fluctuations across confinement ratios.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Emulsions and colloids",
    "controls": "Particle or droplet loading, chemistry, temperature, and preparation energy",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Emulsion confinement layering",
    "id": 390,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 150,
    "literature_query": "Emulsion confinement layering Channel heights near integer droplet diameters rearrangement noise experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0390",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Emulsion confinement layering",
      "hypothesis": "Channel heights near integer droplet diameters will reduce droplet rearrangement noise.",
      "test": "Measure flow fluctuations across confinement ratios.",
      "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
      "category": "Emulsions and colloids",
      "controls": "Particle or droplet loading, chemistry, temperature, and preparation energy",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Emulsion confinement layering",
      "id": 390,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 150,
      "literature_query": "Emulsion confinement layering Channel heights near integer droplet diameters rearrangement noise experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 7,
      "source_ids": "S9be258d6fdf8;S7c6a07eefbb8;S27600bddd324;Sc8ec7bf00f04;S273b1d20d763;S8adf178886bb;S161972a27098",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Foam film age contrast",
    "hypothesis": "A single young film among aged films will redirect a local foam rearrangement.",
    "test": "Image controlled foams after selective film renewal.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Foams and granular systems",
    "controls": "Particle properties, packing fraction, liquid fraction, and driving conditions",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Foam film age contrast",
    "id": 391,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 151,
    "literature_query": "Foam film age contrast single young among aged films redirect local rearrangement experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0391",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Foam film age contrast",
      "hypothesis": "A single young film among aged films will redirect a local foam rearrangement.",
      "test": "Image controlled foams after selective film renewal.",
      "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
      "category": "Foams and granular systems",
      "controls": "Particle properties, packing fraction, liquid fraction, and driving conditions",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Foam film age contrast",
      "id": 391,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 151,
      "literature_query": "Foam film age contrast single young among aged films redirect local rearrangement experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 7,
      "source_ids": "S358acb26048f;S98da38fd1905;Sade6986b14f0;S02ebcec15e9e;S1100b9f9f424;S7ac9bb6c2169;S4e8c429974bb",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Foam edge drainage asymmetry",
    "hypothesis": "Asymmetric boundary wetting will produce a lateral liquid-fraction gradient during drainage.",
    "test": "Map liquid fraction while reversing boundary treatments.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Foams and granular systems",
    "controls": "Particle properties, packing fraction, liquid fraction, and driving conditions",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Foam edge drainage asymmetry",
    "id": 392,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 152,
    "literature_query": "Foam edge drainage asymmetry Asymmetric boundary wetting produce lateral liquid-fraction gradient experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0392",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Foam edge drainage asymmetry",
      "hypothesis": "Asymmetric boundary wetting will produce a lateral liquid-fraction gradient during drainage.",
      "test": "Map liquid fraction while reversing boundary treatments.",
      "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
      "category": "Foams and granular systems",
      "controls": "Particle properties, packing fraction, liquid fraction, and driving conditions",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Foam edge drainage asymmetry",
      "id": 392,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 152,
      "literature_query": "Foam edge drainage asymmetry Asymmetric boundary wetting produce lateral liquid-fraction gradient experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 8,
      "source_ids": "S20a0d625a052;S26673a5d07e2;S9ec9d3620429;Sae572da07d95;S62817a91cfb1;S48d318c285df;S9aaedbf7e4dd;S53deb908695e",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Granular vibration polarization",
    "hypothesis": "Elliptically polarized vibration will generate stronger shape-dependent segregation than linear vibration at equal energy.",
    "test": "Track mixed-shape grains in enclosed beds.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Foams and granular systems",
    "controls": "Particle properties, packing fraction, liquid fraction, and driving conditions",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Granular vibration polarization",
    "id": 393,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 30,
    "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 15,
    "literature_query": "Granular vibration polarization Elliptically polarized generate stronger shape-dependent segregation linear at energy experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0393",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": true,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Granular vibration polarization",
      "hypothesis": "Elliptically polarized vibration will generate stronger shape-dependent segregation than linear vibration at equal energy.",
      "test": "Track mixed-shape grains in enclosed beds.",
      "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
      "category": "Foams and granular systems",
      "controls": "Particle properties, packing fraction, liquid fraction, and driving conditions",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Granular vibration polarization",
      "id": 393,
      "access_score": 4,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 30,
      "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 15,
      "literature_query": "Granular vibration polarization Elliptically polarized generate stronger shape-dependent segregation linear at energy experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 12,
      "source_ids": "S471caa80eeb8;Sbe697ba5cd83;S5a22759e8598;S4dee7e831f25;Sd803f1dcc4af;S06323666c2da;S385383f6fdb2;S01013e1f1ee4;Sfd4af0ee3bb5;S2909861f8249;S60fed4b594dd;Sece5e61901bc",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Vibration-based granular segregation is studied. The gap would need the elliptical-versus-linear forcing contrast at matched measured energy and shape distribution.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": {
      "deep_rank": "29",
      "id": "393",
      "title": "Granular vibration polarization",
      "original_300_rank": "15",
      "pilot_class": "C",
      "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
      "hypothesis": "Elliptically polarized vibration will generate stronger shape-dependent segregation than linear vibration at equal energy.",
      "primary_outcome": "Species separation index after a fixed measured vibration-energy dose.",
      "comparison": "Linear versus elliptical container motion using matched particle mixtures and measured acceleration histories.",
      "controls": "Component masses, grain size and shape, frequency, peak acceleration, delivered work, wall friction, bed depth, and convection.",
      "pilot": "Use an accelerometer on the bed container rather than nominal motor settings. Map both segregation and bulk circulation. Repeat with reversed ellipse rotation.",
      "novelty_gap": "Vibration-induced separation is old. The specific polarization advantage must survive matching energy and disentangling convection from shape-dependent transport.",
      "stop_rule": "Do not attribute a gain to polarization if it follows unequal vertical acceleration or convection. No difference under matched forcing rejects the chosen regime.",
      "source_keys": "VIB73;VIB04",
      "truth_probability": "not estimated",
      "novelty_status": "unverified"
    },
    "dossier_text": "# 29. H0393 — Granular vibration polarization\n\nOriginal 300-folder rank: 15. Pilot class: C. Resource class: modest bench or workshop; calibration still required.\n\n## Original hypothesis\n\nElliptically polarized vibration will generate stronger shape-dependent segregation than linear vibration at equal energy.\n\n## Why investigate this\n\nAn enclosed bed is practical, but matching forcing is essential; existing segregation experiments identify inertia and convection as alternatives.\n\n## Literature assessment and exact novelty question\n\nVibration-induced separation is old. The specific polarization advantage must survive matching energy and disentangling convection from shape-dependent transport. Worldwide originality remains unverified.\n\n## Primary measurement\n\nSpecies separation index after a fixed measured vibration-energy dose.\n\n## Comparison\n\nLinear versus elliptical container motion using matched particle mixtures and measured acceleration histories.\n\n## Critical controls\n\nComponent masses, grain size and shape, frequency, peak acceleration, delivered work, wall friction, bed depth, and convection.\n\n## Pilot plan\n\nUse an accelerometer on the bed container rather than nominal motor settings. Map both segregation and bulk circulation. Repeat with reversed ellipse rotation.\n\n## What would count against it\n\nDo not attribute a gain to polarization if it follows unequal vertical acceleration or convection. No difference under matched forcing rejects the chosen regime.\n\n## Replication and analysis\n\nTreat separately prepared specimens, batches, or devices as independent units. Technical repeats and images are nested measurements. First estimate calibration error and independent-preparation variability. Set the minimum meaningful effect in the primary outcome's units before confirmation, then choose sample size from that effect and pilot variance; a convenient pilot count is not a powered study.\n\nRandomize run order and blind sample labels where practical. Freeze image processing, fitting choices, exclusions, and the primary comparison before evaluating confirmatory data. Report effect size and uncertainty; use a blocked or mixed-effects analysis when specimens share a batch. A wide interval is inconclusive. Include the measurement and matching controls even when the directional effect appears large.\n\nA useful go/no-go gate is whether the hypothesized effect can be distinguished from calibration uncertainty and the strongest alternative explanation. Stop material purchases if the closest literature already measures the identical contrast, unless a replication has an explicit purpose. Do not use these abbreviated plans as complete laboratory protocols.\n\n## Data to preserve\n\nKeep unedited images or sensor streams, calibration files, preparation IDs, run order, environmental logs, input histories, raw outcome values, exclusions, and the exact analysis version. No values are prefilled in the observation template. Use `data/Published Benchmarks.csv` only as literature context; values from a different system are not observations of this hypothesis.\n\n## Sources and transfer limits\n\n### VIB73\n\n[Observation of particle segregation in vibrated granular systems](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0032591073800646)\n\nAccess: Indexed abstract examined. Type: primary experiment.\n\nBackground findings and transfer limits: see [source assessments](../research/Primary%20Source%20Assessments.md) under this source key.\n\n### VIB04\n\n[Vibration-induced granular segregation: a phenomenon driven by three mechanisms](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15089141/)\n\nAccess: Indexed abstract examined. Type: primary experiment.\n\nBackground findings and transfer limits: see [source assessments](../research/Primary%20Source%20Assessments.md) under this source key.\n\n"
  },
  {
    "title": "Grain surface patchiness",
    "hypothesis": "Patchy friction will produce more intermittent hopper flow than uniform friction at equal mean coefficient.",
    "test": "Measure discharge and particle rotations.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Foams and granular systems",
    "controls": "Particle properties, packing fraction, liquid fraction, and driving conditions",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Grain surface patchiness",
    "id": 394,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 30,
    "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 16,
    "literature_query": "Grain surface patchiness Patchy friction produce intermittent hopper flow uniform at mean coefficient experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0394",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": true,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Grain surface patchiness",
      "hypothesis": "Patchy friction will produce more intermittent hopper flow than uniform friction at equal mean coefficient.",
      "test": "Measure discharge and particle rotations.",
      "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
      "category": "Foams and granular systems",
      "controls": "Particle properties, packing fraction, liquid fraction, and driving conditions",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Grain surface patchiness",
      "id": 394,
      "access_score": 4,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 30,
      "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 16,
      "literature_query": "Grain surface patchiness Patchy friction produce intermittent hopper flow uniform at mean coefficient experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 8,
      "source_ids": "Sbf1176f79307;S1e6bd5f10d5a;Sb292dc2f44e1;S53dd98d9f74b;Sb55d05b13373;Sded978086c8a;Sde4f6de02799;Se1e71f9ad82d",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Friction-dependent hopper intermittency is studied. Verify patchy friction versus spatially uniform friction at matched mean coefficient.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": {
      "deep_rank": "3",
      "id": "394",
      "title": "Grain surface patchiness",
      "original_300_rank": "16",
      "pilot_class": "P",
      "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
      "hypothesis": "Patchy friction will produce more intermittent hopper flow than uniform friction at equal mean coefficient.",
      "primary_outcome": "Temporal intermittency of discharge, defined in advance as zero-flow fraction or a registered velocity-distribution statistic.",
      "comparison": "Patchy-friction grains versus uniformly coated grains with matched mean friction; include two patch scales.",
      "controls": "Grain size, density, mean friction, roughness, coating mass, outlet width, wall friction, and fill height.",
      "pilot": "Calibrate friction distributions before hopper trials. Record long enough to measure rare clogs, retain all interrupted runs, and use independently prepared grain batches.",
      "novelty_gap": "Hopper intermittency and mean-friction effects are established. The distinct variable is friction patchiness at matched mean friction and morphology.",
      "stop_rule": "Stop if patches change mean friction or geometry. Reject patchiness as the cause if a uniform-friction control reproduces the full intermittency distribution.",
      "source_keys": "HOPPER16;FRICTION17",
      "truth_probability": "not estimated",
      "novelty_status": "unverified"
    },
    "dossier_text": "# 03. H0394 — Grain surface patchiness\n\nOriginal 300-folder rank: 16. Pilot class: P. Resource class: modest bench or workshop; calibration still required.\n\n## Original hypothesis\n\nPatchy friction will produce more intermittent hopper flow than uniform friction at equal mean coefficient.\n\n## Why investigate this\n\nTabletop hopper measurements are direct and repeated video can quantify the prediction without advanced material characterization.\n\n## Literature assessment and exact novelty question\n\nHopper intermittency and mean-friction effects are established. The distinct variable is friction patchiness at matched mean friction and morphology. Worldwide originality remains unverified.\n\n## Primary measurement\n\nTemporal intermittency of discharge, defined in advance as zero-flow fraction or a registered velocity-distribution statistic.\n\n## Comparison\n\nPatchy-friction grains versus uniformly coated grains with matched mean friction; include two patch scales.\n\n## Critical controls\n\nGrain size, density, mean friction, roughness, coating mass, outlet width, wall friction, and fill height.\n\n## Pilot plan\n\nCalibrate friction distributions before hopper trials. Record long enough to measure rare clogs, retain all interrupted runs, and use independently prepared grain batches.\n\n## What would count against it\n\nStop if patches change mean friction or geometry. Reject patchiness as the cause if a uniform-friction control reproduces the full intermittency distribution.\n\n## Replication and analysis\n\nTreat separately prepared specimens, batches, or devices as independent units. Technical repeats and images are nested measurements. First estimate calibration error and independent-preparation variability. Set the minimum meaningful effect in the primary outcome's units before confirmation, then choose sample size from that effect and pilot variance; a convenient pilot count is not a powered study.\n\nRandomize run order and blind sample labels where practical. Freeze image processing, fitting choices, exclusions, and the primary comparison before evaluating confirmatory data. Report effect size and uncertainty; use a blocked or mixed-effects analysis when specimens share a batch. A wide interval is inconclusive. Include the measurement and matching controls even when the directional effect appears large.\n\nA useful go/no-go gate is whether the hypothesized effect can be distinguished from calibration uncertainty and the strongest alternative explanation. Stop material purchases if the closest literature already measures the identical contrast, unless a replication has an explicit purpose. Do not use these abbreviated plans as complete laboratory protocols.\n\n## Data to preserve\n\nKeep unedited images or sensor streams, calibration files, preparation IDs, run order, environmental logs, input histories, raw outcome values, exclusions, and the exact analysis version. No values are prefilled in the observation template. Use `data/Published Benchmarks.csv` only as literature context; values from a different system are not observations of this hypothesis.\n\n## Sources and transfer limits\n\n### HOPPER16\n\n[Intermittency and velocity fluctuations in hopper flows prone to clogging](https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.94.022901)\n\nAccess: Indexed abstract examined. Type: primary experiment.\n\nBackground findings and transfer limits: see [source assessments](../research/Primary%20Source%20Assessments.md) under this source key.\n\n### FRICTION17\n\n[Shear-driven segregation of dry granular materials with different friction coefficients](https://doi.org/10.1039/C6SM01946C)\n\nAccess: Indexed abstract examined. Type: primary experiment/simulation.\n\nBackground findings and transfer limits: see [source assessments](../research/Primary%20Source%20Assessments.md) under this source key.\n\n"
  },
  {
    "title": "Granular confinement elasticity",
    "hypothesis": "Soft sidewalls will broaden the distribution of force-chain lifetimes under slow compression.",
    "test": "Use photoelastic grains and calibrated wall stiffness.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Foams and granular systems",
    "controls": "Particle properties, packing fraction, liquid fraction, and driving conditions",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Granular confinement elasticity",
    "id": 395,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 28,
    "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 47,
    "literature_query": "Granular confinement elasticity Soft sidewalls broaden distribution of force-chain lifetimes slow compression experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0395",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Granular confinement elasticity",
      "hypothesis": "Soft sidewalls will broaden the distribution of force-chain lifetimes under slow compression.",
      "test": "Use photoelastic grains and calibrated wall stiffness.",
      "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
      "category": "Foams and granular systems",
      "controls": "Particle properties, packing fraction, liquid fraction, and driving conditions",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Granular confinement elasticity",
      "id": 395,
      "access_score": 4,
      "measurement_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 28,
      "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 47,
      "literature_query": "Granular confinement elasticity Soft sidewalls broaden distribution of force-chain lifetimes slow compression experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 7,
      "source_ids": "Sebf7e2de5a0d;S8f2a0c044d5a;S2d8a3e360bd3;S47416b8c53f9;S7570dcb7b231;S2fdd18e1bc6a;S33763dbcc3e0",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Foam bubble shell elasticity",
    "hypothesis": "Elastic bubble coatings will reduce irreversible neighbor exchanges during sub-yield cycling.",
    "test": "Image rearrangements and measure coating mechanics.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Foams and granular systems",
    "controls": "Particle properties, packing fraction, liquid fraction, and driving conditions",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Foam bubble shell elasticity",
    "id": 396,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 153,
    "literature_query": "Foam bubble shell elasticity Elastic coatings irreversible neighbor exchanges sub-yield cycling experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0396",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Foam bubble shell elasticity",
      "hypothesis": "Elastic bubble coatings will reduce irreversible neighbor exchanges during sub-yield cycling.",
      "test": "Image rearrangements and measure coating mechanics.",
      "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
      "category": "Foams and granular systems",
      "controls": "Particle properties, packing fraction, liquid fraction, and driving conditions",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Foam bubble shell elasticity",
      "id": 396,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 153,
      "literature_query": "Foam bubble shell elasticity Elastic coatings irreversible neighbor exchanges sub-yield cycling experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 7,
      "source_ids": "Sa583b38c4a99;Sef55ec588219;S4725dfded2aa;Sd59df9e40fb1;Sd250e10f0473;S147aaba29a6d;S2ad83806e279",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Rotating drum fill history",
    "hypothesis": "Filling a drum in alternating layers will preserve segregation memory longer than premixing the same grains.",
    "test": "Track labeled grains through controlled rotations.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Foams and granular systems",
    "controls": "Particle properties, packing fraction, liquid fraction, and driving conditions",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Rotating drum fill history",
    "id": 397,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0397",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Grain hole orientation",
    "hypothesis": "Perforated grains will align their holes with shear more slowly than solid shape-matched grains.",
    "test": "Image orientations in a slow shear cell.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Foams and granular systems",
    "controls": "Particle properties, packing fraction, liquid fraction, and driving conditions",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Grain hole orientation",
    "id": 398,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 28,
    "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 48,
    "literature_query": "Grain hole orientation Perforated grains align their holes shear slowly solid shape-matched experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0398",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Grain hole orientation",
      "hypothesis": "Perforated grains will align their holes with shear more slowly than solid shape-matched grains.",
      "test": "Image orientations in a slow shear cell.",
      "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
      "category": "Foams and granular systems",
      "controls": "Particle properties, packing fraction, liquid fraction, and driving conditions",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Grain hole orientation",
      "id": 398,
      "access_score": 4,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 28,
      "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 48,
      "literature_query": "Grain hole orientation Perforated grains align their holes shear slowly solid shape-matched experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 5,
      "source_ids": "Sfb38f343b853;S9626d118422f;S932a9f8e95c8;S3c72b98315d8;S1bc582c985ee",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Granular acoustic probing",
    "hypothesis": "Weak acoustic pulses will detect approaching compaction saturation before bulk height stabilizes.",
    "test": "Track sound transmission and bed height during cycling.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Foams and granular systems",
    "controls": "Particle properties, packing fraction, liquid fraction, and driving conditions",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Granular acoustic probing",
    "id": 399,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "excluded: broad prior-art overlap",
    "rank": 114,
    "literature_query": "Granular acoustic probing Weak pulses detect approaching compaction saturation bulk height stabilizes experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0399",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Foam channel branching",
    "hypothesis": "Gradual channel branching will reduce bubble fragmentation relative to abrupt branching at equal flow division.",
    "test": "Count fragmentation and measure local deformation.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Foams and granular systems",
    "controls": "Particle properties, packing fraction, liquid fraction, and driving conditions",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Foam channel branching",
    "id": 400,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 154,
    "literature_query": "Foam channel branching Gradual bubble fragmentation to abrupt at flow division experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0400",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Foam channel branching",
      "hypothesis": "Gradual channel branching will reduce bubble fragmentation relative to abrupt branching at equal flow division.",
      "test": "Count fragmentation and measure local deformation.",
      "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
      "category": "Foams and granular systems",
      "controls": "Particle properties, packing fraction, liquid fraction, and driving conditions",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Foam channel branching",
      "id": 400,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 154,
      "literature_query": "Foam channel branching Gradual bubble fragmentation to abrupt at flow division experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 3,
      "source_ids": "Sc56c377af0ab;Sbabb577c50bb;S80d579bc8131",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Contact asperity height spread",
    "hypothesis": "Narrow asperity-height distributions will reduce thermal-conductance variability under repeated clamping.",
    "test": "Measure conductance and contact maps across repeated assemblies.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Conduction and thermal interfaces",
    "controls": "Temperature range, contact pressure, geometry, and material composition",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Contact asperity height spread",
    "id": 401,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 155,
    "literature_query": "Contact asperity height spread Narrow asperity-height distributions thermal-conductance variability repeated clamping experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0401",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Contact asperity height spread",
      "hypothesis": "Narrow asperity-height distributions will reduce thermal-conductance variability under repeated clamping.",
      "test": "Measure conductance and contact maps across repeated assemblies.",
      "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
      "category": "Conduction and thermal interfaces",
      "controls": "Temperature range, contact pressure, geometry, and material composition",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Contact asperity height spread",
      "id": 401,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 155,
      "literature_query": "Contact asperity height spread Narrow asperity-height distributions thermal-conductance variability repeated clamping experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 3,
      "source_ids": "S4f0f51a0a99c;Se50364ded937;Sf3e3c3e08ba5",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Thermal grease particle migration",
    "hypothesis": "Alternating shear will redistribute thermal-grease filler less unevenly than unidirectional shear.",
    "test": "Map filler and thermal resistance after cycling.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Conduction and thermal interfaces",
    "controls": "Temperature range, contact pressure, geometry, and material composition",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Thermal grease particle migration",
    "id": 402,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0402",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Porous heat-spreader venting",
    "hypothesis": "Vented pores will reduce transient thermal lag compared with sealed pores containing humid air.",
    "test": "Measure temperature steps and internal humidity.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Conduction and thermal interfaces",
    "controls": "Temperature range, contact pressure, geometry, and material composition",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Porous heat-spreader venting",
    "id": 403,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0403",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Anisotropic insert rotation",
    "hypothesis": "Rotating anisotropic inserts will shift heat concentration without changing average conductivity.",
    "test": "Map heat fields across insert orientations.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Conduction and thermal interfaces",
    "controls": "Temperature range, contact pressure, geometry, and material composition",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Anisotropic insert rotation",
    "id": 404,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0404",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Contact dwell dependence",
    "hypothesis": "Thermal contact conductance will increase with dwell time more strongly for viscoelastic than elastic pads.",
    "test": "Measure conductance and deformation during fixed-load holds.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Conduction and thermal interfaces",
    "controls": "Temperature range, contact pressure, geometry, and material composition",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Contact dwell dependence",
    "id": 405,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0405",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Interface waviness wavelength",
    "hypothesis": "Longer-wavelength waviness will produce larger cold spots at equal roughness amplitude.",
    "test": "Map temperature under uniform heating.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Conduction and thermal interfaces",
    "controls": "Temperature range, contact pressure, geometry, and material composition",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Interface waviness wavelength",
    "id": 406,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0406",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Thin-film boundary roughness",
    "hypothesis": "Correlated roughness on opposite film faces will alter in-plane thermal transport more than uncorrelated roughness.",
    "test": "Measure transport in specialist matched thin-film samples.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Conduction and thermal interfaces",
    "controls": "Temperature range, contact pressure, geometry, and material composition",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Thin-film boundary roughness",
    "id": 407,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0407",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Compressive thermal ratcheting",
    "hypothesis": "Unequal expansion of bonded layers will increase thermal resistance progressively under asymmetric temperature cycles.",
    "test": "Track resistance and interface separation.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Conduction and thermal interfaces",
    "controls": "Temperature range, contact pressure, geometry, and material composition",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Compressive thermal ratcheting",
    "id": 408,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0408",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Particle contact oxidation",
    "hypothesis": "Thin oxide shells will increase thermal-network sensitivity to compression in metal-particle beds.",
    "test": "Measure conductance versus load and oxide thickness.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Conduction and thermal interfaces",
    "controls": "Temperature range, contact pressure, geometry, and material composition",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Particle contact oxidation",
    "id": 409,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0409",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Thermal adhesive cure gradient",
    "hypothesis": "Through-thickness cure gradients will create direction-dependent transient thermal impedance.",
    "test": "Reverse heat-flow measurements through characterized adhesive layers.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Conduction and thermal interfaces",
    "controls": "Temperature range, contact pressure, geometry, and material composition",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Thermal adhesive cure gradient",
    "id": 410,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 156,
    "literature_query": "Thermal adhesive cure gradient Through-thickness gradients create direction-dependent transient impedance experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0410",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Thermal adhesive cure gradient",
      "hypothesis": "Through-thickness cure gradients will create direction-dependent transient thermal impedance.",
      "test": "Reverse heat-flow measurements through characterized adhesive layers.",
      "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
      "category": "Conduction and thermal interfaces",
      "controls": "Temperature range, contact pressure, geometry, and material composition",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Thermal adhesive cure gradient",
      "id": 410,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 156,
      "literature_query": "Thermal adhesive cure gradient Through-thickness gradients create direction-dependent transient impedance experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 4,
      "source_ids": "Sd0a6b11d98de;Sb7945f154d06;S7d9ce3ed440f;Sdec34a84ddf0",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Heated patch ordering",
    "hypothesis": "Alternating large and small heated patches will destabilize natural-convection plumes sooner than equal patches.",
    "test": "Image plumes while sweeping input power.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Convection and heat exchange",
    "controls": "Fluid properties, thermal input, geometry, and boundary temperatures",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Heated patch ordering",
    "id": 411,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0411",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Sidewall heat leakage",
    "hypothesis": "Small asymmetric sidewall heating will shift convection-roll orientation before changing total heat transfer.",
    "test": "Map flow orientation and calorimetric output.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Convection and heat exchange",
    "controls": "Fluid properties, thermal input, geometry, and boundary temperatures",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Sidewall heat leakage",
    "id": 412,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 157,
    "literature_query": "Sidewall heat leakage asymmetric heating shift convection-roll orientation changing total transfer experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0412",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Sidewall heat leakage",
      "hypothesis": "Small asymmetric sidewall heating will shift convection-roll orientation before changing total heat transfer.",
      "test": "Map flow orientation and calorimetric output.",
      "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
      "category": "Convection and heat exchange",
      "controls": "Fluid properties, thermal input, geometry, and boundary temperatures",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Sidewall heat leakage",
      "id": 412,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 157,
      "literature_query": "Sidewall heat leakage asymmetric heating shift convection-roll orientation changing total transfer experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 5,
      "source_ids": "S3c931f68c835;S3ba6ea111d7a;S9e4853a797a9;S3da71c255d57;S11d136a48402",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Oscillating fin flexibility",
    "hypothesis": "Flexible fins will improve cooling only above a flow-dependent oscillation threshold.",
    "test": "Measure fin motion and heat transfer across airflow speeds.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Convection and heat exchange",
    "controls": "Fluid properties, thermal input, geometry, and boundary temperatures",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Oscillating fin flexibility",
    "id": 413,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "excluded: broad prior-art overlap",
    "rank": 119,
    "literature_query": "Oscillating fin flexibility Flexible fins improve cooling only above flow-dependent oscillation threshold experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0413",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Coolant inlet stratification",
    "hypothesis": "A stratified inlet temperature will persist farther in flattened than circular ducts at equal hydraulic diameter.",
    "test": "Map downstream fluid temperatures.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Convection and heat exchange",
    "controls": "Fluid properties, thermal input, geometry, and boundary temperatures",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Coolant inlet stratification",
    "id": 414,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0414",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Convection cavity tilt memory",
    "hypothesis": "Rapid tilt reversal will retain circulation direction longer in high-viscosity fluids.",
    "test": "Track circulation after controlled tilt changes.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Convection and heat exchange",
    "controls": "Fluid properties, thermal input, geometry, and boundary temperatures",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Convection cavity tilt memory",
    "id": 415,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0415",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Bubble-free boiling precursor",
    "hypothesis": "Microscale wall-temperature fluctuations will increase before visible nucleation in clean heated liquids.",
    "test": "Use specialist synchronized thermal imaging and microscopy.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Convection and heat exchange",
    "controls": "Fluid properties, thermal input, geometry, and boundary temperatures",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Bubble-free boiling precursor",
    "id": 416,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 25,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0416",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Heat exchanger surface aging",
    "hypothesis": "Spatially uneven surface aging will increase wall-temperature variability more than uniform aging at equal mean resistance.",
    "test": "Map heat transfer with controlled benign deposits.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Convection and heat exchange",
    "controls": "Fluid properties, thermal input, geometry, and boundary temperatures",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Heat exchanger surface aging",
    "id": 417,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0417",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pulsed fan coast interval",
    "hypothesis": "Short fan-off intervals will preserve convective heat removal disproportionately when boundary-layer inertia is large.",
    "test": "Measure heat removal and actual fan energy.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Convection and heat exchange",
    "controls": "Fluid properties, thermal input, geometry, and boundary temperatures",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Pulsed fan coast interval",
    "id": 418,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0418",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Buoyant jet nozzle shape",
    "hypothesis": "A flattened nozzle will change buoyant-jet merging height relative to a circular nozzle at equal flow.",
    "test": "Image thermal plumes from matched nozzles.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Convection and heat exchange",
    "controls": "Fluid properties, thermal input, geometry, and boundary temperatures",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Buoyant jet nozzle shape",
    "id": 419,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 158,
    "literature_query": "Buoyant jet nozzle shape flattened change buoyant-jet merging height to circular at flow experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0419",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Buoyant jet nozzle shape",
      "hypothesis": "A flattened nozzle will change buoyant-jet merging height relative to a circular nozzle at equal flow.",
      "test": "Image thermal plumes from matched nozzles.",
      "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
      "category": "Convection and heat exchange",
      "controls": "Fluid properties, thermal input, geometry, and boundary temperatures",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Buoyant jet nozzle shape",
      "id": 419,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 158,
      "literature_query": "Buoyant jet nozzle shape flattened change buoyant-jet merging height to circular at flow experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 3,
      "source_ids": "S89c87c0d8037;S7b2b4b15ff94;Sfaadb22c0541",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Inclined cavity baffles",
    "hypothesis": "Thin inclined baffles will suppress temperature oscillations more efficiently than horizontal baffles of equal area.",
    "test": "Measure temperature spectra and heat transfer.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Convection and heat exchange",
    "controls": "Fluid properties, thermal input, geometry, and boundary temperatures",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Inclined cavity baffles",
    "id": 420,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0420",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Melt capsule wall elasticity",
    "hypothesis": "Elastic capsule walls will reduce void formation during repeated solidification.",
    "test": "Image voids and track latent-heat capacity.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Phase-change heat systems",
    "controls": "Energy input, phase-change mass, geometry, and environmental losses",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Melt capsule wall elasticity",
    "id": 421,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0421",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Nucleator localization",
    "hypothesis": "Wall-localized nucleators will reduce supercooling variability more than dispersed nucleators of equal mass.",
    "test": "Measure freezing temperatures across independent cycles.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Phase-change heat systems",
    "controls": "Energy input, phase-change mass, geometry, and environmental losses",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Nucleator localization",
    "id": 422,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0422",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Phase-change layer orientation",
    "hypothesis": "Vertical phase-change layers will melt less uniformly than horizontal layers when buoyancy is significant.",
    "test": "Map melt fronts under matched heating.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Phase-change heat systems",
    "controls": "Energy input, phase-change mass, geometry, and environmental losses",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Phase-change layer orientation",
    "id": 423,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0423",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Solidification pause location",
    "hypothesis": "A pause near mid-solidification will reduce final shrinkage-cavity size more than an early pause.",
    "test": "Compare cavity tomography across pause timings.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Phase-change heat systems",
    "controls": "Energy input, phase-change mass, geometry, and environmental losses",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Solidification pause location",
    "id": 424,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0424",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Thermal storage capsule packing",
    "hypothesis": "Ordered capsule packing will reduce discharge-temperature variability relative to random packing.",
    "test": "Measure outlet temperature and flow distribution.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Phase-change heat systems",
    "controls": "Energy input, phase-change mass, geometry, and environmental losses",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Thermal storage capsule packing",
    "id": 425,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 159,
    "literature_query": "Thermal storage capsule packing Ordered discharge-temperature variability to random experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0425",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Thermal storage capsule packing",
      "hypothesis": "Ordered capsule packing will reduce discharge-temperature variability relative to random packing.",
      "test": "Measure outlet temperature and flow distribution.",
      "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
      "category": "Phase-change heat systems",
      "controls": "Energy input, phase-change mass, geometry, and environmental losses",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Thermal storage capsule packing",
      "id": 425,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 159,
      "literature_query": "Thermal storage capsule packing Ordered discharge-temperature variability to random experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 4,
      "source_ids": "S7383bf9d7c10;S4dab13c1da7f;S8ff657af6ed1;S56ed5b3bcf15",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Melt viscosity gradient",
    "hypothesis": "A viscosity gradient will bend a melt front even with uniform thermal conductivity.",
    "test": "Image model phase-change mixtures with measured properties.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Phase-change heat systems",
    "controls": "Energy input, phase-change mass, geometry, and environmental losses",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Melt viscosity gradient",
    "id": 426,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0426",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Solid seed anchoring",
    "hypothesis": "Anchored solid seeds will stabilize freezing location over more cycles than freely mobile seeds.",
    "test": "Track seed position and nucleation events.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Phase-change heat systems",
    "controls": "Energy input, phase-change mass, geometry, and environmental losses",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Solid seed anchoring",
    "id": 427,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0427",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Capsule surface grooves",
    "hypothesis": "Axial grooves will accelerate external condensate removal and improve latent-storage charging under moist airflow.",
    "test": "Measure condensate and charging energy.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Phase-change heat systems",
    "controls": "Energy input, phase-change mass, geometry, and environmental losses",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Capsule surface grooves",
    "id": 428,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0428",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Thermal expansion headspace",
    "hypothesis": "An intermediate headspace volume will minimize cyclic capsule pressure variability.",
    "test": "Measure pressure over controlled phase-change cycles.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Phase-change heat systems",
    "controls": "Energy input, phase-change mass, geometry, and environmental losses",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Thermal expansion headspace",
    "id": 429,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0429",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Multiple melting bands",
    "hypothesis": "Two separated melting transitions will reduce output-temperature swings under variable heat pulses.",
    "test": "Compare calorimetry and discharge curves with single-transition controls.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Phase-change heat systems",
    "controls": "Energy input, phase-change mass, geometry, and environmental losses",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Multiple melting bands",
    "id": 430,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0430",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Condensation fiber twist",
    "hypothesis": "Twisted paired fibers will transport condensate farther before detachment than parallel fibers.",
    "test": "Image condensate motion and collection.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Evaporation and condensation",
    "controls": "Humidity, pressure, airflow, surface temperature, and liquid purity",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Condensation fiber twist",
    "id": 431,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0431",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Evaporator edge insulation",
    "hypothesis": "Insulating only an evaporator edge will reduce salt accumulation there at equal total evaporation.",
    "test": "Map temperature and benign salt deposition.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Evaporation and condensation",
    "controls": "Humidity, pressure, airflow, surface temperature, and liquid purity",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Evaporator edge insulation",
    "id": 432,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 30,
    "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 17,
    "literature_query": "Evaporator edge insulation Insulating only an salt accumulation there at total evaporation experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0432",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": true,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Evaporator edge insulation",
      "hypothesis": "Insulating only an evaporator edge will reduce salt accumulation there at equal total evaporation.",
      "test": "Map temperature and benign salt deposition.",
      "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
      "category": "Evaporation and condensation",
      "controls": "Humidity, pressure, airflow, surface temperature, and liquid purity",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Evaporator edge insulation",
      "id": 432,
      "access_score": 4,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 30,
      "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 17,
      "literature_query": "Evaporator edge insulation Insulating only an salt accumulation there at total evaporation experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 9,
      "source_ids": "Sadc525b4b592;S6d1446a4ea35;S5a6a8dda50fe;Sf5ee52ea1bc1;Seaf271c6e1f4;S3f1c9d3fb017;S931bd24c0aca;S016b5f4bd0c1;S1a29a585779e",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Nonuniform evaporator temperatures and salt deposition are studied. Verify insulation confined to the edge and salt redistribution at equal total evaporation.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": {
      "deep_rank": "19",
      "id": "432",
      "title": "Evaporator edge insulation",
      "original_300_rank": "17",
      "pilot_class": "C",
      "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
      "hypothesis": "Insulating only an evaporator edge will reduce salt accumulation there at equal total evaporation.",
      "primary_outcome": "Salt-deposit fraction within a predefined edge band after a fixed evaporated-water mass.",
      "comparison": "Edge-only thermal insulation versus equal insulation away from the edge and a no-insulation control.",
      "controls": "Total evaporation, salt inventory, temperature field, wettability, inlet geometry, exposed area, and capillary supply.",
      "pilot": "Map temperatures and weigh water loss continuously. Compare deposition at equal cumulative evaporation, not equal clock time. Measure any insulation-induced flow obstruction.",
      "novelty_gap": "Heat localization and salt-resistant evaporators have extensive prior art. The target is edge thermal control independently of changed overall evaporation or liquid supply.",
      "stop_rule": "Stop if insulation changes wettability or blocks supply. Equal deposition after matching evaporation rejects the selected insulation geometry.",
      "source_keys": "BRIDGE23;CAP15",
      "truth_probability": "not estimated",
      "novelty_status": "unverified"
    },
    "dossier_text": "# 19. H0432 — Evaporator edge insulation\n\nOriginal 300-folder rank: 17. Pilot class: C. Resource class: modest bench or workshop; calibration still required.\n\n## Original hypothesis\n\nInsulating only an evaporator edge will reduce salt accumulation there at equal total evaporation.\n\n## Why investigate this\n\nLow-temperature evaporators can be imaged and weighed, and edge location is an explicit outcome.\n\n## Literature assessment and exact novelty question\n\nHeat localization and salt-resistant evaporators have extensive prior art. The target is edge thermal control independently of changed overall evaporation or liquid supply. Worldwide originality remains unverified.\n\n## Primary measurement\n\nSalt-deposit fraction within a predefined edge band after a fixed evaporated-water mass.\n\n## Comparison\n\nEdge-only thermal insulation versus equal insulation away from the edge and a no-insulation control.\n\n## Critical controls\n\nTotal evaporation, salt inventory, temperature field, wettability, inlet geometry, exposed area, and capillary supply.\n\n## Pilot plan\n\nMap temperatures and weigh water loss continuously. Compare deposition at equal cumulative evaporation, not equal clock time. Measure any insulation-induced flow obstruction.\n\n## What would count against it\n\nStop if insulation changes wettability or blocks supply. Equal deposition after matching evaporation rejects the selected insulation geometry.\n\n## Replication and analysis\n\nTreat separately prepared specimens, batches, or devices as independent units. Technical repeats and images are nested measurements. First estimate calibration error and independent-preparation variability. Set the minimum meaningful effect in the primary outcome's units before confirmation, then choose sample size from that effect and pilot variance; a convenient pilot count is not a powered study.\n\nRandomize run order and blind sample labels where practical. Freeze image processing, fitting choices, exclusions, and the primary comparison before evaluating confirmatory data. Report effect size and uncertainty; use a blocked or mixed-effects analysis when specimens share a batch. A wide interval is inconclusive. Include the measurement and matching controls even when the directional effect appears large.\n\nA useful go/no-go gate is whether the hypothesized effect can be distinguished from calibration uncertainty and the strongest alternative explanation. Stop material purchases if the closest literature already measures the identical contrast, unless a replication has an explicit purpose. Do not use these abbreviated plans as complete laboratory protocols.\n\n## Data to preserve\n\nKeep unedited images or sensor streams, calibration files, preparation IDs, run order, environmental logs, input histories, raw outcome values, exclusions, and the exact analysis version. No values are prefilled in the observation template. Use `data/Published Benchmarks.csv` only as literature context; values from a different system are not observations of this hypothesis.\n\n## Sources and transfer limits\n\n### BRIDGE23\n\n[Water bridge solar evaporator with salt-resistance and heat localization for efficient desalination](https://doi.org/10.1039/D2TA09244A)\n\nAccess: Indexed article and supplementary-file descriptions screened. Type: primary research lead.\n\nBackground findings and transfer limits: see [source assessments](../research/Primary%20Source%20Assessments.md) under this source key.\n\n### CAP15\n\n[Evaporation with sodium chloride crystallization in a capillary tube](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022024815002936)\n\nAccess: Indexed abstract and methods examined. Type: primary experiment/model.\n\nBackground findings and transfer limits: see [source assessments](../research/Primary%20Source%20Assessments.md) under this source key.\n\n"
  },
  {
    "title": "Vapor gap shape",
    "hypothesis": "A tapered vapor gap will reduce stagnant condensation zones relative to a uniform gap.",
    "test": "Map condensation rate and vapor concentration.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Evaporation and condensation",
    "controls": "Humidity, pressure, airflow, surface temperature, and liquid purity",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Vapor gap shape",
    "id": 433,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0433",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pulsed humidity nucleation",
    "hypothesis": "Brief humidity overshoots will increase condensation-site density without proportionally increasing final droplet mass.",
    "test": "Count nuclei and track droplet growth.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Evaporation and condensation",
    "controls": "Humidity, pressure, airflow, surface temperature, and liquid purity",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Pulsed humidity nucleation",
    "id": 434,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 160,
    "literature_query": "Pulsed humidity nucleation Brief overshoots condensation-site density proportionally increasing final droplet mass experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0434",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Pulsed humidity nucleation",
      "hypothesis": "Brief humidity overshoots will increase condensation-site density without proportionally increasing final droplet mass.",
      "test": "Count nuclei and track droplet growth.",
      "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
      "category": "Evaporation and condensation",
      "controls": "Humidity, pressure, airflow, surface temperature, and liquid purity",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Pulsed humidity nucleation",
      "id": 434,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 160,
      "literature_query": "Pulsed humidity nucleation Brief overshoots condensation-site density proportionally increasing final droplet mass experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 3,
      "source_ids": "S4018c60e35c3;S39a0838da969;Sc9a083268882",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Droplet coalescence heat pulses",
    "hypothesis": "Local temperature pulses following coalescence will measurably delay nearby condensation.",
    "test": "Synchronize thermal imaging and droplet microscopy.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Evaporation and condensation",
    "controls": "Humidity, pressure, airflow, surface temperature, and liquid purity",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Droplet coalescence heat pulses",
    "id": 435,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 25,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 244,
    "literature_query": "Droplet coalescence heat pulses Local temperature following measurably delay nearby condensation experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0435",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Droplet coalescence heat pulses",
      "hypothesis": "Local temperature pulses following coalescence will measurably delay nearby condensation.",
      "test": "Synchronize thermal imaging and droplet microscopy.",
      "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
      "category": "Evaporation and condensation",
      "controls": "Humidity, pressure, airflow, surface temperature, and liquid purity",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Droplet coalescence heat pulses",
      "id": 435,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 25,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 244,
      "literature_query": "Droplet coalescence heat pulses Local temperature following measurably delay nearby condensation experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 6,
      "source_ids": "Sb1984d7e53fa;S77b9216e4b1d;S46f4bcc0b713;S2c5532f1db8f;Sc3c7f139b128;Sa06046532937",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Porous condenser thickness",
    "hypothesis": "Intermediate porous-coating thickness will maximize condensate drainage before liquid flooding.",
    "test": "Measure collection across coating thicknesses.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Evaporation and condensation",
    "controls": "Humidity, pressure, airflow, surface temperature, and liquid purity",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Porous condenser thickness",
    "id": 436,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0436",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Evaporative surface rotation",
    "hypothesis": "Slow periodic orientation changes will reduce persistent dry patches in a wick.",
    "test": "Image wetness and measure evaporation.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Evaporation and condensation",
    "controls": "Humidity, pressure, airflow, surface temperature, and liquid purity",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Evaporative surface rotation",
    "id": 437,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 30,
    "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 18,
    "literature_query": "Evaporative surface rotation Slow periodic orientation changes persistent dry patches in wick experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0437",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": true,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Evaporative surface rotation",
      "hypothesis": "Slow periodic orientation changes will reduce persistent dry patches in a wick.",
      "test": "Image wetness and measure evaporation.",
      "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
      "category": "Evaporation and condensation",
      "controls": "Humidity, pressure, airflow, surface temperature, and liquid purity",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Evaporative surface rotation",
      "id": 437,
      "access_score": 4,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 30,
      "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 18,
      "literature_query": "Evaporative surface rotation Slow periodic orientation changes persistent dry patches in wick experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 10,
      "source_ids": "S00eb80f2cf9d;S2a6a04177782;Sb5b6ba7139c2;S832e30284ea5;Sfd5a9d831e33;S7334e9bc2b72;S7099331a2120;S66bc5162e596;S864e269d307f;S67e5cad3492e",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Capillary evaporator dry patches are studied. Verify periodic orientation changes after correcting for instantaneous hydrostatic head.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": {
      "deep_rank": "20",
      "id": "437",
      "title": "Evaporative surface rotation",
      "original_300_rank": "18",
      "pilot_class": "C",
      "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
      "hypothesis": "Slow periodic orientation changes will reduce persistent dry patches in a wick.",
      "primary_outcome": "Time-integrated dry-area fraction under a predefined evaporation load.",
      "comparison": "Periodically reoriented wick versus stationary wick; add a stationary control with the same time-averaged hydrostatic head.",
      "controls": "Instantaneous head, liquid supply, motion-induced airflow, wick porosity, input heat, exposed area, and evaporation.",
      "pilot": "Image a moisture-sensitive but nonreactive marker only after proving it does not change wetting. Record rotation, inlet height, and total water loss. Separate rewetting from added convection.",
      "novelty_gap": "Gravity effects and wick dry-out are well studied. A potential contribution must exceed the prediction from changing instantaneous hydrostatic head.",
      "stop_rule": "Drop the novelty claim if a quasi-static head model predicts the full gain. Stop if rotation simply supplies extra mixing or cooling energy.",
      "source_keys": "WICK07;WICK24",
      "truth_probability": "not estimated",
      "novelty_status": "unverified"
    },
    "dossier_text": "# 20. H0437 — Evaporative surface rotation\n\nOriginal 300-folder rank: 18. Pilot class: C. Resource class: modest bench or workshop; calibration still required.\n\n## Original hypothesis\n\nSlow periodic orientation changes will reduce persistent dry patches in a wick.\n\n## Why investigate this\n\nTime-lapse imaging and mass tracking can resolve dry patches, while reversal offers a direct mechanical intervention.\n\n## Literature assessment and exact novelty question\n\nGravity effects and wick dry-out are well studied. A potential contribution must exceed the prediction from changing instantaneous hydrostatic head. Worldwide originality remains unverified.\n\n## Primary measurement\n\nTime-integrated dry-area fraction under a predefined evaporation load.\n\n## Comparison\n\nPeriodically reoriented wick versus stationary wick; add a stationary control with the same time-averaged hydrostatic head.\n\n## Critical controls\n\nInstantaneous head, liquid supply, motion-induced airflow, wick porosity, input heat, exposed area, and evaporation.\n\n## Pilot plan\n\nImage a moisture-sensitive but nonreactive marker only after proving it does not change wetting. Record rotation, inlet height, and total water loss. Separate rewetting from added convection.\n\n## What would count against it\n\nDrop the novelty claim if a quasi-static head model predicts the full gain. Stop if rotation simply supplies extra mixing or cooling energy.\n\n## Replication and analysis\n\nTreat separately prepared specimens, batches, or devices as independent units. Technical repeats and images are nested measurements. First estimate calibration error and independent-preparation variability. Set the minimum meaningful effect in the primary outcome's units before confirmation, then choose sample size from that effect and pilot variance; a convenient pilot count is not a powered study.\n\nRandomize run order and blind sample labels where practical. Freeze image processing, fitting choices, exclusions, and the primary comparison before evaluating confirmatory data. Report effect size and uncertainty; use a blocked or mixed-effects analysis when specimens share a batch. A wide interval is inconclusive. Include the measurement and matching controls even when the directional effect appears large.\n\nA useful go/no-go gate is whether the hypothesized effect can be distinguished from calibration uncertainty and the strongest alternative explanation. Stop material purchases if the closest literature already measures the identical contrast, unless a replication has an explicit purpose. Do not use these abbreviated plans as complete laboratory protocols.\n\n## Data to preserve\n\nKeep unedited images or sensor streams, calibration files, preparation IDs, run order, environmental logs, input histories, raw outcome values, exclusions, and the exact analysis version. No values are prefilled in the observation template. Use `data/Published Benchmarks.csv` only as literature context; values from a different system are not observations of this hypothesis.\n\n## Sources and transfer limits\n\n### WICK07\n\n[Heat and Mass Transport in Heat Pipe Wick Structures](https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/facpub/1581/)\n\nAccess: Author-repository abstract examined. Type: primary experiment.\n\nBackground findings and transfer limits: see [source assessments](../research/Primary%20Source%20Assessments.md) under this source key.\n\n### WICK24\n\n[Numerical investigation of the saturation effect on wick dry-out in a capillary driven evaporative cooling system](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0735193324002525)\n\nAccess: Indexed abstract examined. Type: primary model with experimental validation.\n\nBackground findings and transfer limits: see [source assessments](../research/Primary%20Source%20Assessments.md) under this source key.\n\n"
  },
  {
    "title": "Vapor adsorption preconditioning",
    "hypothesis": "Humidity preconditioning will shorten condensation induction more on porous than smooth surfaces.",
    "test": "Measure induction and retained water.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Evaporation and condensation",
    "controls": "Humidity, pressure, airflow, surface temperature, and liquid purity",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Vapor adsorption preconditioning",
    "id": 438,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 161,
    "literature_query": "Vapor adsorption preconditioning Humidity shorten condensation induction on porous smooth surfaces experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0438",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Vapor adsorption preconditioning",
      "hypothesis": "Humidity preconditioning will shorten condensation induction more on porous than smooth surfaces.",
      "test": "Measure induction and retained water.",
      "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
      "category": "Evaporation and condensation",
      "controls": "Humidity, pressure, airflow, surface temperature, and liquid purity",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Vapor adsorption preconditioning",
      "id": 438,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 161,
      "literature_query": "Vapor adsorption preconditioning Humidity shorten condensation induction on porous smooth surfaces experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 5,
      "source_ids": "S03077c9ca090;S3830e837210f;S35c0509775f7;S0176876ff733;S549029b80a2d",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Condensate track junction angles",
    "hypothesis": "Acute track junctions will retain less liquid than right-angle junctions at equal wettability.",
    "test": "Measure residual droplets after drainage.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Evaporation and condensation",
    "controls": "Humidity, pressure, airflow, surface temperature, and liquid purity",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Condensate track junction angles",
    "id": 439,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 30,
    "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 19,
    "literature_query": "Condensate track junction angles Acute junctions retain liquid right-angle at wettability experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0439",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": true,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Condensate track junction angles",
      "hypothesis": "Acute track junctions will retain less liquid than right-angle junctions at equal wettability.",
      "test": "Measure residual droplets after drainage.",
      "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
      "category": "Evaporation and condensation",
      "controls": "Humidity, pressure, airflow, surface temperature, and liquid purity",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Condensate track junction angles",
      "id": 439,
      "access_score": 4,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 30,
      "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 19,
      "literature_query": "Condensate track junction angles Acute junctions retain liquid right-angle at wettability experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 11,
      "source_ids": "Scbf6d920508c;S6292208800cf;Sa15757655d31;S0f244ac93d74;Se6a310080af2;Sd9291d1925fa;Sfdab8996262a;Sccebda685bfb;Se72f23b2a5dd;Sbff96bade934;Sd5218185f58e",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Junction geometry and droplet transport are studied. Verify residual condensate at acute versus right-angle open wetting tracks, rather than enclosed-channel sorting.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": {
      "deep_rank": "4",
      "id": "439",
      "title": "Condensate track junction angles",
      "original_300_rank": "19",
      "pilot_class": "P",
      "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
      "hypothesis": "Acute track junctions will retain less liquid than right-angle junctions at equal wettability.",
      "primary_outcome": "Residual liquid volume at a track junction after a fixed drainage interval.",
      "comparison": "Acute-angle and right-angle open wetting-track junctions of matched width and treated area.",
      "controls": "Contact-angle hysteresis, track width, slope, substrate roughness, initial liquid volume, evaporation, and junction curvature.",
      "pilot": "Begin at a readily imaged millimeter scale. Calibrate volume from side-view shape or direct weighing. Reverse flow direction and test a uniform wetting control.",
      "novelty_gap": "Capillary transport at junctions is established. The proposed comparison concerns residual open-track condensate, not generic enclosed-channel sorting.",
      "stop_rule": "Reject an angle-specific interpretation if different corner radii or hysteresis explain retention. Precisely equal residual volumes contradict the chosen geometry claim.",
      "source_keys": "JUNCTION04;OPEN12",
      "truth_probability": "not estimated",
      "novelty_status": "unverified"
    },
    "dossier_text": "# 04. H0439 — Condensate track junction angles\n\nOriginal 300-folder rank: 19. Pilot class: P. Resource class: modest bench or workshop; calibration still required.\n\n## Original hypothesis\n\nAcute track junctions will retain less liquid than right-angle junctions at equal wettability.\n\n## Why investigate this\n\nOpen-track geometry is easy to observe and provides a simple measurable retention endpoint.\n\n## Literature assessment and exact novelty question\n\nCapillary transport at junctions is established. The proposed comparison concerns residual open-track condensate, not generic enclosed-channel sorting. Worldwide originality remains unverified.\n\n## Primary measurement\n\nResidual liquid volume at a track junction after a fixed drainage interval.\n\n## Comparison\n\nAcute-angle and right-angle open wetting-track junctions of matched width and treated area.\n\n## Critical controls\n\nContact-angle hysteresis, track width, slope, substrate roughness, initial liquid volume, evaporation, and junction curvature.\n\n## Pilot plan\n\nBegin at a readily imaged millimeter scale. Calibrate volume from side-view shape or direct weighing. Reverse flow direction and test a uniform wetting control.\n\n## What would count against it\n\nReject an angle-specific interpretation if different corner radii or hysteresis explain retention. Precisely equal residual volumes contradict the chosen geometry claim.\n\n## Replication and analysis\n\nTreat separately prepared specimens, batches, or devices as independent units. Technical repeats and images are nested measurements. First estimate calibration error and independent-preparation variability. Set the minimum meaningful effect in the primary outcome's units before confirmation, then choose sample size from that effect and pilot variance; a convenient pilot count is not a powered study.\n\nRandomize run order and blind sample labels where practical. Freeze image processing, fitting choices, exclusions, and the primary comparison before evaluating confirmatory data. Report effect size and uncertainty; use a blocked or mixed-effects analysis when specimens share a batch. A wide interval is inconclusive. Include the measurement and matching controls even when the directional effect appears large.\n\nA useful go/no-go gate is whether the hypothesized effect can be distinguished from calibration uncertainty and the strongest alternative explanation. Stop material purchases if the closest literature already measures the identical contrast, unless a replication has an explicit purpose. Do not use these abbreviated plans as complete laboratory protocols.\n\n## Data to preserve\n\nKeep unedited images or sensor streams, calibration files, preparation IDs, run order, environmental logs, input histories, raw outcome values, exclusions, and the exact analysis version. No values are prefilled in the observation template. Use `data/Published Benchmarks.csv` only as literature context; values from a different system are not observations of this hypothesis.\n\n## Sources and transfer limits\n\n### JUNCTION04\n\n[Fluid motion through an unsaturated fracture junction](https://doi.org/10.1029/2003WR002588)\n\nAccess: Indexed record screened. Type: primary research lead.\n\nBackground findings and transfer limits: see [source assessments](../research/Primary%20Source%20Assessments.md) under this source key.\n\n### OPEN12\n\n[Colloid retention at the meniscus-wall contact line in an open microchannel](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22130000/)\n\nAccess: Indexed abstract examined. Type: primary experiment/model.\n\nBackground findings and transfer limits: see [source assessments](../research/Primary%20Source%20Assessments.md) under this source key.\n\n"
  },
  {
    "title": "Evaporating droplet thermal coupling",
    "hypothesis": "Closely spaced droplets on conductive supports will have more synchronized evaporation rates.",
    "test": "Compare independent mass-loss curves across spacing.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Evaporation and condensation",
    "controls": "Humidity, pressure, airflow, surface temperature, and liquid purity",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Evaporating droplet thermal coupling",
    "id": 440,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 162,
    "literature_query": "Evaporating droplet thermal coupling Closely spaced droplets on conductive supports have synchronized evaporation experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0440",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Evaporating droplet thermal coupling",
      "hypothesis": "Closely spaced droplets on conductive supports will have more synchronized evaporation rates.",
      "test": "Compare independent mass-loss curves across spacing.",
      "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
      "category": "Evaporation and condensation",
      "controls": "Humidity, pressure, airflow, surface temperature, and liquid purity",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Evaporating droplet thermal coupling",
      "id": 440,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 162,
      "literature_query": "Evaporating droplet thermal coupling Closely spaced droplets on conductive supports have synchronized evaporation experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 7,
      "source_ids": "S10c98d005227;S75d7a194df5d;Sbf1fe75586ac;S17b2fc0b63b6;S85189443e236;Sc9ee01ba65e2;Sb054cb21efc5",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Emissivity patch size",
    "hypothesis": "Smaller emissivity patches will reduce surface-temperature contrast under radiative cooling.",
    "test": "Map temperature across matched average emissivity.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Radiation and thermal optics",
    "controls": "Spectral properties, temperature, geometry, and absorbed power",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Emissivity patch size",
    "id": 441,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0441",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Angular radiation shields",
    "hypothesis": "Angled reflective shields will reduce sensitivity to a warm horizon more than flat shields of equal area.",
    "test": "Measure cooling under controlled angular radiation.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Radiation and thermal optics",
    "controls": "Spectral properties, temperature, geometry, and absorbed power",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Angular radiation shields",
    "id": 442,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0442",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Thermochromic cycling width",
    "hypothesis": "Narrower switching hysteresis will improve average temperature regulation under slowly varying radiation.",
    "test": "Measure temperature and optical state during radiation cycles.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Radiation and thermal optics",
    "controls": "Spectral properties, temperature, geometry, and absorbed power",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Thermochromic cycling width",
    "id": 443,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0443",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Subsurface reflective particles",
    "hypothesis": "Reflective particles buried shallowly will reduce heating without increasing surface abrasion as much as exposed particles.",
    "test": "Measure absorption, wear, and temperature.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Radiation and thermal optics",
    "controls": "Spectral properties, temperature, geometry, and absorbed power",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Subsurface reflective particles",
    "id": 444,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0444",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Radiative cavity venting",
    "hypothesis": "Small vents will alter apparent cavity emissivity less than equal-area openings near the cavity base.",
    "test": "Measure calibrated radiation across vent positions.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Radiation and thermal optics",
    "controls": "Spectral properties, temperature, geometry, and absorbed power",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Radiative cavity venting",
    "id": 445,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0445",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Infrared coating strain",
    "hypothesis": "Repeated strain will shift infrared emissivity before visible cracks appear in a brittle coating.",
    "test": "Track spectra and microscopic damage.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Radiation and thermal optics",
    "controls": "Spectral properties, temperature, geometry, and absorbed power",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Infrared coating strain",
    "id": 446,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0446",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Porous optical thickness",
    "hypothesis": "Drying-induced pore collapse will change near-infrared transmission before visible transparency.",
    "test": "Measure spectra and pore volume during drying.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Radiation and thermal optics",
    "controls": "Spectral properties, temperature, geometry, and absorbed power",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Porous optical thickness",
    "id": 447,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 163,
    "literature_query": "Porous optical thickness Drying-induced pore collapse change near-infrared transmission visible transparency experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0447",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Porous optical thickness",
      "hypothesis": "Drying-induced pore collapse will change near-infrared transmission before visible transparency.",
      "test": "Measure spectra and pore volume during drying.",
      "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
      "category": "Radiation and thermal optics",
      "controls": "Spectral properties, temperature, geometry, and absorbed power",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Porous optical thickness",
      "id": 447,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 163,
      "literature_query": "Porous optical thickness Drying-induced pore collapse change near-infrared transmission visible transparency experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 6,
      "source_ids": "Sf858fa38d7c4;S1dbc54b72463;S8c9c499c6a27;S410e6960de0a;S27dbfad81d94;S23f2065001d1",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Polarized heating orientation",
    "hypothesis": "Aligned absorbing fibers will show orientation-dependent photothermal bending under polarized illumination.",
    "test": "Rotate polarization and measure curvature.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Radiation and thermal optics",
    "controls": "Spectral properties, temperature, geometry, and absorbed power",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Polarized heating orientation",
    "id": 448,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 164,
    "literature_query": "Polarized heating orientation Aligned absorbing fibers show orientation-dependent photothermal bending illumination experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0448",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Polarized heating orientation",
      "hypothesis": "Aligned absorbing fibers will show orientation-dependent photothermal bending under polarized illumination.",
      "test": "Rotate polarization and measure curvature.",
      "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
      "category": "Radiation and thermal optics",
      "controls": "Spectral properties, temperature, geometry, and absorbed power",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Polarized heating orientation",
      "id": 448,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 164,
      "literature_query": "Polarized heating orientation Aligned absorbing fibers show orientation-dependent photothermal bending illumination experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 7,
      "source_ids": "S3710e2cd5592;Sd6fa686966a3;S59e045ab75ea;Se29a1b206aa5;Sf15ee60612b0;S7ac560667330;S72ce48252141",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Radiation baffle contamination",
    "hypothesis": "Dust near baffle entrances will increase stray thermal radiation more than equal dust deep inside.",
    "test": "Apply controlled inert dust and measure detector offsets.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Radiation and thermal optics",
    "controls": "Spectral properties, temperature, geometry, and absorbed power",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Radiation baffle contamination",
    "id": 449,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0449",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Temperature-dependent scattering",
    "hypothesis": "A reversible refractive-index mismatch will change thermal-light escape from particle-filled films.",
    "test": "Measure temperature-dependent scattering and emission separately.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Radiation and thermal optics",
    "controls": "Spectral properties, temperature, geometry, and absorbed power",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Temperature-dependent scattering",
    "id": 450,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0450",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Electrode rest orientation",
    "hypothesis": "Vertical orientation will accelerate post-pulse concentration recovery compared with horizontal orientation when buoyancy assists transport.",
    "test": "Measure concentration and voltage recovery in safe aqueous model cells.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Aqueous electrochemistry",
    "controls": "Electrolyte composition, electrode area, temperature, and delivered charge",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Electrode rest orientation",
    "id": 451,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 25,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0451",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Current collector pattern",
    "hypothesis": "Radial current-collector patterns will reduce potential variation on circular electrodes relative to edge strips.",
    "test": "Map local potential at matched conductor mass.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Aqueous electrochemistry",
    "controls": "Electrolyte composition, electrode area, temperature, and delivered charge",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Current collector pattern",
    "id": 452,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0452",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Electrolyte mixing delay",
    "hypothesis": "A delayed gentle mixing step will recover more useful voltage than immediate mixing after a concentration-building pulse.",
    "test": "Compare recovery and mixing energy across delays.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Aqueous electrochemistry",
    "controls": "Electrolyte composition, electrode area, temperature, and delivered charge",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Electrolyte mixing delay",
    "id": 453,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0453",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Surface oxide patch spacing",
    "hypothesis": "Closely spaced oxide patches will homogenize initial reaction current better than widely spaced patches of equal coverage.",
    "test": "Use local electrochemical mapping.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Aqueous electrochemistry",
    "controls": "Electrolyte composition, electrode area, temperature, and delivered charge",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Surface oxide patch spacing",
    "id": 454,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0454",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Electrode edge rounding",
    "hypothesis": "Rounded electrode edges will reduce local gas-generation hotspots relative to sharp edges.",
    "test": "Image specialist aqueous gas-evolution experiments with local-current controls.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Aqueous electrochemistry",
    "controls": "Electrolyte composition, electrode area, temperature, and delivered charge",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Electrode edge rounding",
    "id": 455,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0455",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Aqueous buffer placement",
    "hypothesis": "Buffer confined near an electrode will reduce bulk electrolyte use for a target local-pH stability.",
    "test": "Measure local pH and side reactions.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Aqueous electrochemistry",
    "controls": "Electrolyte composition, electrode area, temperature, and delivered charge",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Aqueous buffer placement",
    "id": 456,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0456",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Reference electrode distance",
    "hypothesis": "Closer reference placement will reduce apparent pulse hysteresis caused by uncompensated resistance.",
    "test": "Compare voltage transients with independent resistance measurements.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Aqueous electrochemistry",
    "controls": "Electrolyte composition, electrode area, temperature, and delivered charge",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Reference electrode distance",
    "id": 457,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 3,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0457",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Electrode polishing direction",
    "hypothesis": "Directional polishing will bias initial deposit elongation at low overpotential.",
    "test": "Rotate polishing direction and image benign metal deposits.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Aqueous electrochemistry",
    "controls": "Electrolyte composition, electrode area, temperature, and delivered charge",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Electrode polishing direction",
    "id": 458,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0458",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Electrolyte headspace exchange",
    "hypothesis": "A larger air-exposed headspace will change long-rest voltage drift in oxygen-sensitive aqueous model cells.",
    "test": "Measure dissolved oxygen and voltage.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Aqueous electrochemistry",
    "controls": "Electrolyte composition, electrode area, temperature, and delivered charge",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Electrolyte headspace exchange",
    "id": 459,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 25,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0459",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Porous electrode saturation",
    "hypothesis": "Partial wetting will produce larger impedance variability than full wetting at equal measured active area.",
    "test": "Measure wetting maps and impedance repeatability.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Aqueous electrochemistry",
    "controls": "Electrolyte composition, electrode area, temperature, and delivered charge",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Porous electrode saturation",
    "id": 460,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0460",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Salt domain spacing",
    "hypothesis": "Closer salt-rich domains will reduce conductivity loss during gel stretching.",
    "test": "Measure conductivity and domain spacing under strain.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Ion gels and polymer electrolytes",
    "controls": "Salt content, water content, thickness, and temperature",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Salt domain spacing",
    "id": 461,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 165,
    "literature_query": "Salt domain spacing Closer salt-rich domains conductivity loss gel stretching experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0461",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Salt domain spacing",
      "hypothesis": "Closer salt-rich domains will reduce conductivity loss during gel stretching.",
      "test": "Measure conductivity and domain spacing under strain.",
      "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
      "category": "Ion gels and polymer electrolytes",
      "controls": "Salt content, water content, thickness, and temperature",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Salt domain spacing",
      "id": 461,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 165,
      "literature_query": "Salt domain spacing Closer salt-rich domains conductivity loss gel stretching experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 6,
      "source_ids": "S712be4af7d9c;S55cd67f48a1d;Saed9c1977234;S4dfdf9916ea3;See4349df97d4;Sf7439eae30b1",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Polymer backbone alignment",
    "hypothesis": "Backbone alignment will increase conductivity anisotropy more at low than high water content.",
    "test": "Measure directional conductivity across hydration levels.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Ion gels and polymer electrolytes",
    "controls": "Salt content, water content, thickness, and temperature",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Polymer backbone alignment",
    "id": 462,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0462",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Gel interface roughening",
    "hypothesis": "Mild interfacial roughening will reduce contact-impedance drift under repeated bending.",
    "test": "Measure contact and bulk impedance separately.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Ion gels and polymer electrolytes",
    "controls": "Salt content, water content, thickness, and temperature",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Gel interface roughening",
    "id": 463,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 166,
    "literature_query": "Gel interface roughening Mild interfacial contact-impedance drift repeated bending experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0463",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Gel interface roughening",
      "hypothesis": "Mild interfacial roughening will reduce contact-impedance drift under repeated bending.",
      "test": "Measure contact and bulk impedance separately.",
      "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
      "category": "Ion gels and polymer electrolytes",
      "controls": "Salt content, water content, thickness, and temperature",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Gel interface roughening",
      "id": 463,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 166,
      "literature_query": "Gel interface roughening Mild interfacial contact-impedance drift repeated bending experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 6,
      "source_ids": "S1f9321b8a633;Sf7439eae30b1;Sfcebb12c816d;S12fee04fbf4f;S783b70d7e33e;Sb965d2534bf0",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Plasticizer evaporation gradient",
    "hypothesis": "Edge sealing will reduce lateral conductivity gradients during plasticizer loss.",
    "test": "Map composition and local conductivity.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Ion gels and polymer electrolytes",
    "controls": "Salt content, water content, thickness, and temperature",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Plasticizer evaporation gradient",
    "id": 464,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0464",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Ion-pair relaxation",
    "hypothesis": "Slower ion-pair relaxation will increase conductivity hysteresis during temperature ramps.",
    "test": "Measure spectroscopy and conductivity across ramp rates.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Ion gels and polymer electrolytes",
    "controls": "Salt content, water content, thickness, and temperature",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Ion-pair relaxation",
    "id": 465,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0465",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Gel compression dwell",
    "hypothesis": "Long compression holds will increase post-release conductivity overshoot when ions redistribute slowly.",
    "test": "Measure transient conductivity and thickness recovery.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Ion gels and polymer electrolytes",
    "controls": "Salt content, water content, thickness, and temperature",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Gel compression dwell",
    "id": 466,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 167,
    "literature_query": "Gel compression dwell Long holds post-release conductivity overshoot ions redistribute slowly experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0466",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Gel compression dwell",
      "hypothesis": "Long compression holds will increase post-release conductivity overshoot when ions redistribute slowly.",
      "test": "Measure transient conductivity and thickness recovery.",
      "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
      "category": "Ion gels and polymer electrolytes",
      "controls": "Salt content, water content, thickness, and temperature",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Gel compression dwell",
      "id": 466,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 167,
      "literature_query": "Gel compression dwell Long holds post-release conductivity overshoot ions redistribute slowly experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 7,
      "source_ids": "S2886d0ee03ea;Sf51ed41036b9;Sd566279e8304;S9c468e3be691;S123f70a42215;S5697a250685e;Sfcebb12c816d",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Multilayer salt asymmetry",
    "hypothesis": "Opposite salt gradients in adjacent layers will reduce net concentration polarization.",
    "test": "Measure concentration profiles during matched current pulses.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Ion gels and polymer electrolytes",
    "controls": "Salt content, water content, thickness, and temperature",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Multilayer salt asymmetry",
    "id": 467,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 168,
    "literature_query": "Multilayer salt asymmetry Opposite gradients in adjacent layers net concentration polarization experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0467",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Multilayer salt asymmetry",
      "hypothesis": "Opposite salt gradients in adjacent layers will reduce net concentration polarization.",
      "test": "Measure concentration profiles during matched current pulses.",
      "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
      "category": "Ion gels and polymer electrolytes",
      "controls": "Salt content, water content, thickness, and temperature",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Multilayer salt asymmetry",
      "id": 467,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 168,
      "literature_query": "Multilayer salt asymmetry Opposite gradients in adjacent layers net concentration polarization experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 4,
      "source_ids": "Sec8c4badf70c;S7ded11843398;S68e4172fce19;Sd2fbf058dbc0",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Crosslink-size distribution",
    "hypothesis": "Narrower network-mesh distributions will reduce variation in ion transit times.",
    "test": "Compare diffusion measurements and network characterization.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Ion gels and polymer electrolytes",
    "controls": "Salt content, water content, thickness, and temperature",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Crosslink-size distribution",
    "id": 468,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0468",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Gel drying orientation",
    "hypothesis": "Drying perpendicular to aligned channels will preserve more ionic anisotropy than drying along them.",
    "test": "Measure structure and directional conductivity after rehydration.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Ion gels and polymer electrolytes",
    "controls": "Salt content, water content, thickness, and temperature",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Gel drying orientation",
    "id": 469,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 169,
    "literature_query": "Gel drying orientation perpendicular to aligned channels preserve ionic anisotropy along them experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0469",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Gel drying orientation",
      "hypothesis": "Drying perpendicular to aligned channels will preserve more ionic anisotropy than drying along them.",
      "test": "Measure structure and directional conductivity after rehydration.",
      "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
      "category": "Ion gels and polymer electrolytes",
      "controls": "Salt content, water content, thickness, and temperature",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Gel drying orientation",
      "id": 469,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 169,
      "literature_query": "Gel drying orientation perpendicular to aligned channels preserve ionic anisotropy along them experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 5,
      "source_ids": "S16ecde2d7999;S5d3d4a47a5d4;S00871481487d;S3ae503b3b683;S70025501988e",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Electrolyte microcrack closure",
    "hypothesis": "Small compressive bias will restore conductivity across reversible gel microcracks.",
    "test": "Image cracks while measuring local resistance.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Ion gels and polymer electrolytes",
    "controls": "Salt content, water content, thickness, and temperature",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Electrolyte microcrack closure",
    "id": 470,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 170,
    "literature_query": "Electrolyte microcrack closure compressive bias restore conductivity across reversible gel microcracks experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0470",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Electrolyte microcrack closure",
      "hypothesis": "Small compressive bias will restore conductivity across reversible gel microcracks.",
      "test": "Image cracks while measuring local resistance.",
      "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
      "category": "Ion gels and polymer electrolytes",
      "controls": "Salt content, water content, thickness, and temperature",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Electrolyte microcrack closure",
      "id": 470,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 170,
      "literature_query": "Electrolyte microcrack closure compressive bias restore conductivity across reversible gel microcracks experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 8,
      "source_ids": "Sce199abe03f5;S24a3ad4240aa;Sc9f4c25e3fa9;S0d99adfbef0f;Sb3742261d747;S5b0879809f97;S5e015c440ecb;S7c67a58f3d94",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Porous capacitor channel orientation",
    "hypothesis": "Through-thickness channels will reduce rate-dependent capacitance loss more than in-plane channels.",
    "test": "Measure benign aqueous model capacitors over charging rates.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Electrical storage model systems",
    "controls": "Active mass, voltage range, energy input, and thermal conditions",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Porous capacitor channel orientation",
    "id": 471,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0471",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Carbon surface aging order",
    "hypothesis": "Air aging before wetting will produce different leakage drift than aging after wetting.",
    "test": "Track surface chemistry and leakage in model capacitors.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Electrical storage model systems",
    "controls": "Active mass, voltage range, energy input, and thermal conditions",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Carbon surface aging order",
    "id": 472,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0472",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Capacitor separator waviness",
    "hypothesis": "Low-amplitude separator waviness will reduce pressure-induced short-risk hotspots.",
    "test": "Map contact pressure and leakage in low-energy test cells.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Electrical storage model systems",
    "controls": "Active mass, voltage range, energy input, and thermal conditions",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Capacitor separator waviness",
    "id": 473,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 25,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0473",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Electrode thickness alternation",
    "hypothesis": "Alternating thin and thick porous layers will broaden relaxation times less than a single thick layer of equal mass.",
    "test": "Measure impedance and discharge transients.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Electrical storage model systems",
    "controls": "Active mass, voltage range, energy input, and thermal conditions",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Electrode thickness alternation",
    "id": 474,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0474",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Collector contact redundancy",
    "hypothesis": "Multiple small collector contacts will retain lower resistance during bending than one large contact of equal area.",
    "test": "Cycle model electrodes and map resistance.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Electrical storage model systems",
    "controls": "Active mass, voltage range, energy input, and thermal conditions",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Collector contact redundancy",
    "id": 475,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 171,
    "literature_query": "Collector contact redundancy Multiple contacts retain lower resistance bending large of area experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0475",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Collector contact redundancy",
      "hypothesis": "Multiple small collector contacts will retain lower resistance during bending than one large contact of equal area.",
      "test": "Cycle model electrodes and map resistance.",
      "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
      "category": "Electrical storage model systems",
      "controls": "Active mass, voltage range, energy input, and thermal conditions",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Collector contact redundancy",
      "id": 475,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 171,
      "literature_query": "Collector contact redundancy Multiple contacts retain lower resistance bending large of area experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 2,
      "source_ids": "S7e1d2e89f645;Sd904cbb3b873",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Aqueous storage duty cycle",
    "hypothesis": "Long idle intervals will increase self-discharge per stored-energy hour when slow surface reactions dominate.",
    "test": "Measure energy recovery across matched duty schedules.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Electrical storage model systems",
    "controls": "Active mass, voltage range, energy input, and thermal conditions",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Aqueous storage duty cycle",
    "id": 476,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0476",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Prewetting pressure cycles",
    "hypothesis": "Gentle vacuum-free pressure cycling will increase accessible capacitance by removing trapped gas.",
    "test": "Measure saturation and capacitance before and after cycling.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Electrical storage model systems",
    "controls": "Active mass, voltage range, energy input, and thermal conditions",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Prewetting pressure cycles",
    "id": 477,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0477",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Capacitor packaging flexibility",
    "hypothesis": "Moderately compliant packaging will reduce contact-resistance growth during swelling.",
    "test": "Track pressure and resistance in safe model devices.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Electrical storage model systems",
    "controls": "Active mass, voltage range, energy input, and thermal conditions",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Capacitor packaging flexibility",
    "id": 478,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 172,
    "literature_query": "Capacitor packaging flexibility Moderately compliant contact-resistance growth swelling experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0478",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Capacitor packaging flexibility",
      "hypothesis": "Moderately compliant packaging will reduce contact-resistance growth during swelling.",
      "test": "Track pressure and resistance in safe model devices.",
      "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
      "category": "Electrical storage model systems",
      "controls": "Active mass, voltage range, energy input, and thermal conditions",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Capacitor packaging flexibility",
      "id": 478,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 172,
      "literature_query": "Capacitor packaging flexibility Moderately compliant contact-resistance growth swelling experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 3,
      "source_ids": "S9b9c183e1190;Sf21e3801372a;Sb1fd41bd3dbc",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pore-mouth coating depth",
    "hypothesis": "Shallow hydrophilic coatings will improve charging speed more than deep coatings at equal added mass.",
    "test": "Measure uptake and frequency-dependent capacitance.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Electrical storage model systems",
    "controls": "Active mass, voltage range, energy input, and thermal conditions",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Pore-mouth coating depth",
    "id": 479,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0479",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Electrode drying before assembly",
    "hypothesis": "Partial residual hydration will reduce initial conditioning variability compared with complete drying.",
    "test": "Measure hydration and early-cycle response.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Electrical storage model systems",
    "controls": "Active mass, voltage range, energy input, and thermal conditions",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Electrode drying before assembly",
    "id": 480,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 173,
    "literature_query": "Electrode drying assembly Partial residual hydration initial conditioning variability complete experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0480",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Electrode drying before assembly",
      "hypothesis": "Partial residual hydration will reduce initial conditioning variability compared with complete drying.",
      "test": "Measure hydration and early-cycle response.",
      "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
      "category": "Electrical storage model systems",
      "controls": "Active mass, voltage range, energy input, and thermal conditions",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Electrode drying before assembly",
      "id": 480,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 173,
      "literature_query": "Electrode drying assembly Partial residual hydration initial conditioning variability complete experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 3,
      "source_ids": "Sad0aeecd77bb;Sb0a21e7d19f0;S3a1e2e20e187",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Coating defect alignment",
    "hypothesis": "Aligned defects in two coating layers will accelerate corrosion more than staggered defects.",
    "test": "Map corrosion beneath patterned low-hazard coatings.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Corrosion and protective surfaces",
    "controls": "Environment chemistry, exposure time, coating thickness, and metal composition",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Coating defect alignment",
    "id": 481,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0481",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Scratch endpoint shape",
    "hypothesis": "Rounded scratch endpoints will reduce localized corrosion initiation compared with pointed endpoints.",
    "test": "Track corrosion fronts in benign salt exposure.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Corrosion and protective surfaces",
    "controls": "Environment chemistry, exposure time, coating thickness, and metal composition",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Scratch endpoint shape",
    "id": 482,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 174,
    "literature_query": "Scratch endpoint shape Rounded endpoints localized corrosion initiation pointed experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0482",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Scratch endpoint shape",
      "hypothesis": "Rounded scratch endpoints will reduce localized corrosion initiation compared with pointed endpoints.",
      "test": "Track corrosion fronts in benign salt exposure.",
      "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
      "category": "Corrosion and protective surfaces",
      "controls": "Environment chemistry, exposure time, coating thickness, and metal composition",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Scratch endpoint shape",
      "id": 482,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 174,
      "literature_query": "Scratch endpoint shape Rounded endpoints localized corrosion initiation pointed experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 5,
      "source_ids": "S89c30e32bf02;Scbc0448c0725;Sc69283fef2ee;S81a2e8175102;S65ccdbd5ace3",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Humidity ramp asymmetry",
    "hypothesis": "Fast wetting and slow drying will cause more corrosion than the reverse schedule at equal wet duration.",
    "test": "Measure mass change and local electrochemistry.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Corrosion and protective surfaces",
    "controls": "Environment chemistry, exposure time, coating thickness, and metal composition",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Humidity ramp asymmetry",
    "id": 483,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 175,
    "literature_query": "Humidity ramp asymmetry Fast wetting slow drying cause corrosion reverse schedule at wet experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0483",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Humidity ramp asymmetry",
      "hypothesis": "Fast wetting and slow drying will cause more corrosion than the reverse schedule at equal wet duration.",
      "test": "Measure mass change and local electrochemistry.",
      "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
      "category": "Corrosion and protective surfaces",
      "controls": "Environment chemistry, exposure time, coating thickness, and metal composition",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Humidity ramp asymmetry",
      "id": 483,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 175,
      "literature_query": "Humidity ramp asymmetry Fast wetting slow drying cause corrosion reverse schedule at wet experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 3,
      "source_ids": "Sf6c63b6500f6;S5f60cdc2f82c;S12d5dd29624f",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Protective particle settling",
    "hypothesis": "Preventing particle settling during coating cure will reduce spatial corrosion variability.",
    "test": "Compare filler maps and corrosion exposure results.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Corrosion and protective surfaces",
    "controls": "Environment chemistry, exposure time, coating thickness, and metal composition",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Protective particle settling",
    "id": 484,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 176,
    "literature_query": "Protective particle settling Preventing coating cure spatial corrosion variability experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0484",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Protective particle settling",
      "hypothesis": "Preventing particle settling during coating cure will reduce spatial corrosion variability.",
      "test": "Compare filler maps and corrosion exposure results.",
      "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
      "category": "Corrosion and protective surfaces",
      "controls": "Environment chemistry, exposure time, coating thickness, and metal composition",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Protective particle settling",
      "id": 484,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 176,
      "literature_query": "Protective particle settling Preventing coating cure spatial corrosion variability experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 5,
      "source_ids": "S28f79d75adcd;S64f3c7e7be31;S96314850f84b;Sc086641d9dec;S5ac1cfdc3118",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Galvanic spacing",
    "hypothesis": "Increasing separation between dissimilar-metal contacts will delay localized attack under a thin electrolyte film.",
    "test": "Measure current and attack location across spacing.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Corrosion and protective surfaces",
    "controls": "Environment chemistry, exposure time, coating thickness, and metal composition",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Galvanic spacing",
    "id": 485,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0485",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Rust layer permeability cycling",
    "hypothesis": "Repeated mild compression will increase rust-layer transport more than static compression.",
    "test": "Measure permeability and corrosion rate in controlled model layers.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Corrosion and protective surfaces",
    "controls": "Environment chemistry, exposure time, coating thickness, and metal composition",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Rust layer permeability cycling",
    "id": 486,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0486",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Coating strain release",
    "hypothesis": "Gradual strain release will close coating microcracks more effectively than abrupt release.",
    "test": "Image cracks and measure barrier recovery.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Corrosion and protective surfaces",
    "controls": "Environment chemistry, exposure time, coating thickness, and metal composition",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Coating strain release",
    "id": 487,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0487",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Benign inhibitor release patches",
    "hypothesis": "Distributed small inhibitor reservoirs will protect isolated scratches longer than one reservoir of equal volume.",
    "test": "Measure release and corrosion progression.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Corrosion and protective surfaces",
    "controls": "Environment chemistry, exposure time, coating thickness, and metal composition",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Benign inhibitor release patches",
    "id": 488,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0488",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Surface finish crossing",
    "hypothesis": "Crosshatched polishing will produce less directional underfilm corrosion than single-direction polishing.",
    "test": "Map corrosion front shapes.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Corrosion and protective surfaces",
    "controls": "Environment chemistry, exposure time, coating thickness, and metal composition",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Surface finish crossing",
    "id": 489,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0489",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Condensate chloride redistribution",
    "hypothesis": "Intermittent droplet shedding will create stronger local salt concentration than continuous wetting.",
    "test": "Measure deposited salt maps and subsequent attack.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Corrosion and protective surfaces",
    "controls": "Environment chemistry, exposure time, coating thickness, and metal composition",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Condensate chloride redistribution",
    "id": 490,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 177,
    "literature_query": "Condensate chloride redistribution Intermittent droplet shedding create stronger local salt concentration continuous wetting experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0490",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Condensate chloride redistribution",
      "hypothesis": "Intermittent droplet shedding will create stronger local salt concentration than continuous wetting.",
      "test": "Measure deposited salt maps and subsequent attack.",
      "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
      "category": "Corrosion and protective surfaces",
      "controls": "Environment chemistry, exposure time, coating thickness, and metal composition",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Condensate chloride redistribution",
      "id": 490,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 177,
      "literature_query": "Condensate chloride redistribution Intermittent droplet shedding create stronger local salt concentration continuous wetting experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 4,
      "source_ids": "S584b0804ce2e;Sf1c0b4fd8248;S38dd2ca83d5c;S49c4887007fb",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Insulator edge thickness",
    "hypothesis": "Thicker rounded edges will reduce surface discharge variability in specialist low-energy dielectric tests.",
    "test": "Map discharge locations under controlled voltage ramps.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Dielectrics and electrostatics",
    "controls": "Humidity, temperature, geometry, initial charge, and measurement noise",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Insulator edge thickness",
    "id": 491,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0491",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Dielectric pore filling sequence",
    "hypothesis": "Water entering connected pores will increase dielectric loss earlier than mass uptake predicts.",
    "test": "Measure dielectric spectra and gravimetric uptake.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Dielectrics and electrostatics",
    "controls": "Humidity, temperature, geometry, initial charge, and measurement noise",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Dielectric pore filling sequence",
    "id": 492,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0492",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Charge patch separation",
    "hypothesis": "Closely spaced opposite-charge patches will decay more slowly through external leakage than isolated patches.",
    "test": "Map surface potentials and leakage routes.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Dielectrics and electrostatics",
    "controls": "Humidity, temperature, geometry, initial charge, and measurement noise",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Charge patch separation",
    "id": 493,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0493",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Electrode mesh pitch",
    "hypothesis": "Fine mesh electrodes will reduce dielectric-force nonuniformity at fixed open area.",
    "test": "Measure deformation of calibrated soft dielectric films.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Dielectrics and electrostatics",
    "controls": "Humidity, temperature, geometry, initial charge, and measurement noise",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Electrode mesh pitch",
    "id": 494,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0494",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Humidity shield vent direction",
    "hypothesis": "Downward-facing vents will reduce transient charge loss during humid airflow pulses.",
    "test": "Measure local humidity and charge decay.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Dielectrics and electrostatics",
    "controls": "Humidity, temperature, geometry, initial charge, and measurement noise",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Humidity shield vent direction",
    "id": 495,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 178,
    "literature_query": "Humidity shield vent direction Downward-facing vents transient charge loss humid airflow pulses experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0495",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Humidity shield vent direction",
      "hypothesis": "Downward-facing vents will reduce transient charge loss during humid airflow pulses.",
      "test": "Measure local humidity and charge decay.",
      "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
      "category": "Dielectrics and electrostatics",
      "controls": "Humidity, temperature, geometry, initial charge, and measurement noise",
      "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
      "family_key": "Humidity shield vent direction",
      "id": 495,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 4,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 27,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 178,
      "literature_query": "Humidity shield vent direction Downward-facing vents transient charge loss humid airflow pulses experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Apparatus must be specified from the proposed test and checked against available facilities; no equipment inventory has been supplied.",
      "source_lead_count": 4,
      "source_ids": "S18655650de22;S4b55420e5603;S8355a592c71a;Sfb61b5daadfa",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Polymer orientation and charging",
    "hypothesis": "Aligned polymer chains will produce direction-dependent frictional charge transfer.",
    "test": "Rotate sliding direction while measuring contact mechanics.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Dielectrics and electrostatics",
    "controls": "Humidity, temperature, geometry, initial charge, and measurement noise",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Polymer orientation and charging",
    "id": 496,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 25,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0496",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Dielectric filler shell continuity",
    "hypothesis": "Continuous insulating shells will suppress leakage hotspots more than patchy shells of equal mass.",
    "test": "Map local conduction in matched composites.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Dielectrics and electrostatics",
    "controls": "Humidity, temperature, geometry, initial charge, and measurement noise",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Dielectric filler shell continuity",
    "id": 497,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0497",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Electrostatic adhesion waiting time",
    "hypothesis": "A longer field-free wait after contact will reduce pull-off hysteresis when trapped charge relaxes.",
    "test": "Measure charge and adhesion across delays.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Dielectrics and electrostatics",
    "controls": "Humidity, temperature, geometry, initial charge, and measurement noise",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Electrostatic adhesion waiting time",
    "id": 498,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0498",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Dust charge relaxation spread",
    "hypothesis": "A broader particle conductivity distribution will prolong ensemble charge decay tails.",
    "test": "Measure individual charge decay and bulk potential.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Dielectrics and electrostatics",
    "controls": "Humidity, temperature, geometry, initial charge, and measurement noise",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Dust charge relaxation spread",
    "id": 499,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0499",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Dielectric layer wrinkle phase",
    "hypothesis": "Misaligned wrinkles in adjacent dielectric layers will reduce concentrated electric strain.",
    "test": "Map deformation under controlled low-energy fields.",
    "against": "The stated directional prediction is absent or reversed in independent preparations after the listed controls are matched; reject it within the tested range if confidence intervals exclude the predefined minimum effect.",
    "category": "Dielectrics and electrostatics",
    "controls": "Humidity, temperature, geometry, initial charge, and measurement noise",
    "origin": "individually drafted proposal",
    "family_key": "Dielectric layer wrinkle phase",
    "id": 500,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 4,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Apparatus inventory and pilot compatibility review required.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0500",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Modulated excitation recovery — porous silica-bound oxygen-sensitive dye",
    "hypothesis": "For porous silica-bound oxygen-sensitive dye, alternating short illumination and dark intervals will reduce calibration drift relative to continuous excitation at equal absorbed photons.",
    "test": "Measure lifetime, intensity, and oxygen calibration before and after matched light schedules.",
    "against": "Calibration drift is not smaller under interrupted illumination.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Modulated excitation recovery",
    "system": "porous silica-bound oxygen-sensitive dye",
    "id": 501,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0501",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Barrier-free reverse face — porous silica-bound oxygen-sensitive dye",
    "hypothesis": "For porous silica-bound oxygen-sensitive dye, exposing both faces to gas will shorten recovery more than initial response when internal oxygen gradients persist.",
    "test": "Compare one-face and two-face exposure using independently calibrated gas steps.",
    "against": "Recovery gains do not exceed response gains within uncertainty.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Barrier-free reverse face",
    "system": "porous silica-bound oxygen-sensitive dye",
    "id": 502,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0502",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Lateral reference proximity — porous silica-bound oxygen-sensitive dye",
    "hypothesis": "For porous silica-bound oxygen-sensitive dye, a nearby oxygen-insensitive reference patch will correct illumination drift better than a remote reference.",
    "test": "Introduce controlled light gradients and compare recovered oxygen against an independent probe.",
    "against": "Nearby referencing does not reduce oxygen-estimation error.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Lateral reference proximity",
    "system": "porous silica-bound oxygen-sensitive dye",
    "id": 503,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0503",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Porosity gradient direction — porous silica-bound oxygen-sensitive dye",
    "hypothesis": "For porous silica-bound oxygen-sensitive dye, increasing porosity toward the gas-facing surface will reduce response-time dispersion compared with the reversed gradient.",
    "test": "Prepare reversed gradients and measure lifetime response maps after gas steps.",
    "against": "Response-time dispersion does not depend on gradient direction.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Porosity gradient direction",
    "system": "porous silica-bound oxygen-sensitive dye",
    "id": 504,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0504",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Excitation spot travel — porous silica-bound oxygen-sensitive dye",
    "hypothesis": "For porous silica-bound oxygen-sensitive dye, moving the excitation spot will preserve calibration longer than stationary excitation at equal total absorbed energy.",
    "test": "Compare spatial bleaching and repeated gas calibrations under stationary and scanned illumination.",
    "against": "Calibration lifetime is no longer after accounting for local photon dose.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Excitation spot travel",
    "system": "porous silica-bound oxygen-sensitive dye",
    "id": 505,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0505",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Humidity pre-equilibration — porous silica-bound oxygen-sensitive dye",
    "hypothesis": "For porous silica-bound oxygen-sensitive dye, slow humidity pre-equilibration will reduce oxygen-calibration hysteresis relative to abrupt conditioning.",
    "test": "Measure oxygen response after matched final humidity reached by different paths.",
    "against": "Oxygen hysteresis is independent of conditioning path.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Humidity pre-equilibration",
    "system": "porous silica-bound oxygen-sensitive dye",
    "id": 506,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 263,
    "literature_query": "Humidity pre-equilibration porous silica-bound oxygen-sensitive dye slow oxygen-calibration hysteresis to abrupt conditioning experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0506",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Humidity pre-equilibration — porous silica-bound oxygen-sensitive dye",
      "hypothesis": "For porous silica-bound oxygen-sensitive dye, slow humidity pre-equilibration will reduce oxygen-calibration hysteresis relative to abrupt conditioning.",
      "test": "Measure oxygen response after matched final humidity reached by different paths.",
      "against": "Oxygen hysteresis is independent of conditioning path.",
      "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
      "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Humidity pre-equilibration",
      "system": "porous silica-bound oxygen-sensitive dye",
      "id": 506,
      "access_score": 2,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 23,
      "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 263,
      "literature_query": "Humidity pre-equilibration porous silica-bound oxygen-sensitive dye slow oxygen-calibration hysteresis to abrupt conditioning experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
      "source_lead_count": 4,
      "source_ids": "S7901cda44c99;S6f150e18aadf;Sbc63fe6cfcb0;S9f5f1f576435",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Temperature pulse diagnosis — porous silica-bound oxygen-sensitive dye",
    "hypothesis": "For porous silica-bound oxygen-sensitive dye, a small reversible temperature pulse will distinguish dye loss from reduced oxygen permeability.",
    "test": "Create independently verified dye-loss and permeability-change samples and compare transient signatures.",
    "against": "Signatures fail to identify the two changes on blinded samples.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Temperature pulse diagnosis",
    "system": "porous silica-bound oxygen-sensitive dye",
    "id": 507,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0507",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Edge sealing tradeoff — porous silica-bound oxygen-sensitive dye",
    "hypothesis": "For porous silica-bound oxygen-sensitive dye, edge sealing will reduce spatial calibration variation while lengthening recovery disproportionately near the center.",
    "test": "Map response before and after edge sealing with a gas-permeable central face.",
    "against": "Spatial variation or recovery lacks the predicted position-dependent change.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Edge sealing tradeoff",
    "system": "porous silica-bound oxygen-sensitive dye",
    "id": 508,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0508",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Host relaxation hold — porous silica-bound oxygen-sensitive dye",
    "hypothesis": "For porous silica-bound oxygen-sensitive dye, an unloaded rest after mild flexing will restore part of the oxygen response without restoring bleached intensity.",
    "test": "Measure lifetime calibration and intensity during mechanical recovery.",
    "against": "Response recovery tracks intensity recovery alone or does not occur.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Host relaxation hold",
    "system": "porous silica-bound oxygen-sensitive dye",
    "id": 509,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0509",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Depth-resolved calibration — porous silica-bound oxygen-sensitive dye",
    "hypothesis": "For porous silica-bound oxygen-sensitive dye, calibrating emission from two optical depths will detect diffusion limitation earlier than bulk intensity alone.",
    "test": "Vary gas-step speed and compare depth-resolved signals with independent oxygen transport measurements.",
    "against": "Depth-resolved measurements provide no earlier reliable diffusion warning.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Depth-resolved calibration",
    "system": "porous silica-bound oxygen-sensitive dye",
    "id": 510,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0510",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Modulated excitation recovery — silicone-bound oxygen-sensitive dye",
    "hypothesis": "For silicone-bound oxygen-sensitive dye, alternating short illumination and dark intervals will reduce calibration drift relative to continuous excitation at equal absorbed photons.",
    "test": "Measure lifetime, intensity, and oxygen calibration before and after matched light schedules.",
    "against": "Calibration drift is not smaller under interrupted illumination.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Modulated excitation recovery",
    "system": "silicone-bound oxygen-sensitive dye",
    "id": 511,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0511",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Barrier-free reverse face — silicone-bound oxygen-sensitive dye",
    "hypothesis": "For silicone-bound oxygen-sensitive dye, exposing both faces to gas will shorten recovery more than initial response when internal oxygen gradients persist.",
    "test": "Compare one-face and two-face exposure using independently calibrated gas steps.",
    "against": "Recovery gains do not exceed response gains within uncertainty.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Barrier-free reverse face",
    "system": "silicone-bound oxygen-sensitive dye",
    "id": 512,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0512",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Lateral reference proximity — silicone-bound oxygen-sensitive dye",
    "hypothesis": "For silicone-bound oxygen-sensitive dye, a nearby oxygen-insensitive reference patch will correct illumination drift better than a remote reference.",
    "test": "Introduce controlled light gradients and compare recovered oxygen against an independent probe.",
    "against": "Nearby referencing does not reduce oxygen-estimation error.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Lateral reference proximity",
    "system": "silicone-bound oxygen-sensitive dye",
    "id": 513,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0513",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Porosity gradient direction — silicone-bound oxygen-sensitive dye",
    "hypothesis": "For silicone-bound oxygen-sensitive dye, increasing porosity toward the gas-facing surface will reduce response-time dispersion compared with the reversed gradient.",
    "test": "Prepare reversed gradients and measure lifetime response maps after gas steps.",
    "against": "Response-time dispersion does not depend on gradient direction.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Porosity gradient direction",
    "system": "silicone-bound oxygen-sensitive dye",
    "id": 514,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0514",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Excitation spot travel — silicone-bound oxygen-sensitive dye",
    "hypothesis": "For silicone-bound oxygen-sensitive dye, moving the excitation spot will preserve calibration longer than stationary excitation at equal total absorbed energy.",
    "test": "Compare spatial bleaching and repeated gas calibrations under stationary and scanned illumination.",
    "against": "Calibration lifetime is no longer after accounting for local photon dose.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Excitation spot travel",
    "system": "silicone-bound oxygen-sensitive dye",
    "id": 515,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0515",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Humidity pre-equilibration — silicone-bound oxygen-sensitive dye",
    "hypothesis": "For silicone-bound oxygen-sensitive dye, slow humidity pre-equilibration will reduce oxygen-calibration hysteresis relative to abrupt conditioning.",
    "test": "Measure oxygen response after matched final humidity reached by different paths.",
    "against": "Oxygen hysteresis is independent of conditioning path.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Humidity pre-equilibration",
    "system": "silicone-bound oxygen-sensitive dye",
    "id": 516,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0516",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Temperature pulse diagnosis — silicone-bound oxygen-sensitive dye",
    "hypothesis": "For silicone-bound oxygen-sensitive dye, a small reversible temperature pulse will distinguish dye loss from reduced oxygen permeability.",
    "test": "Create independently verified dye-loss and permeability-change samples and compare transient signatures.",
    "against": "Signatures fail to identify the two changes on blinded samples.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Temperature pulse diagnosis",
    "system": "silicone-bound oxygen-sensitive dye",
    "id": 517,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0517",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Edge sealing tradeoff — silicone-bound oxygen-sensitive dye",
    "hypothesis": "For silicone-bound oxygen-sensitive dye, edge sealing will reduce spatial calibration variation while lengthening recovery disproportionately near the center.",
    "test": "Map response before and after edge sealing with a gas-permeable central face.",
    "against": "Spatial variation or recovery lacks the predicted position-dependent change.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Edge sealing tradeoff",
    "system": "silicone-bound oxygen-sensitive dye",
    "id": 518,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0518",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Host relaxation hold — silicone-bound oxygen-sensitive dye",
    "hypothesis": "For silicone-bound oxygen-sensitive dye, an unloaded rest after mild flexing will restore part of the oxygen response without restoring bleached intensity.",
    "test": "Measure lifetime calibration and intensity during mechanical recovery.",
    "against": "Response recovery tracks intensity recovery alone or does not occur.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Host relaxation hold",
    "system": "silicone-bound oxygen-sensitive dye",
    "id": 519,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0519",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Depth-resolved calibration — silicone-bound oxygen-sensitive dye",
    "hypothesis": "For silicone-bound oxygen-sensitive dye, calibrating emission from two optical depths will detect diffusion limitation earlier than bulk intensity alone.",
    "test": "Vary gas-step speed and compare depth-resolved signals with independent oxygen transport measurements.",
    "against": "Depth-resolved measurements provide no earlier reliable diffusion warning.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Depth-resolved calibration",
    "system": "silicone-bound oxygen-sensitive dye",
    "id": 520,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0520",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Modulated excitation recovery — ethylcellulose-bound oxygen-sensitive dye",
    "hypothesis": "For ethylcellulose-bound oxygen-sensitive dye, alternating short illumination and dark intervals will reduce calibration drift relative to continuous excitation at equal absorbed photons.",
    "test": "Measure lifetime, intensity, and oxygen calibration before and after matched light schedules.",
    "against": "Calibration drift is not smaller under interrupted illumination.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Modulated excitation recovery",
    "system": "ethylcellulose-bound oxygen-sensitive dye",
    "id": 521,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0521",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Barrier-free reverse face — ethylcellulose-bound oxygen-sensitive dye",
    "hypothesis": "For ethylcellulose-bound oxygen-sensitive dye, exposing both faces to gas will shorten recovery more than initial response when internal oxygen gradients persist.",
    "test": "Compare one-face and two-face exposure using independently calibrated gas steps.",
    "against": "Recovery gains do not exceed response gains within uncertainty.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Barrier-free reverse face",
    "system": "ethylcellulose-bound oxygen-sensitive dye",
    "id": 522,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0522",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Lateral reference proximity — ethylcellulose-bound oxygen-sensitive dye",
    "hypothesis": "For ethylcellulose-bound oxygen-sensitive dye, a nearby oxygen-insensitive reference patch will correct illumination drift better than a remote reference.",
    "test": "Introduce controlled light gradients and compare recovered oxygen against an independent probe.",
    "against": "Nearby referencing does not reduce oxygen-estimation error.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Lateral reference proximity",
    "system": "ethylcellulose-bound oxygen-sensitive dye",
    "id": 523,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0523",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Porosity gradient direction — ethylcellulose-bound oxygen-sensitive dye",
    "hypothesis": "For ethylcellulose-bound oxygen-sensitive dye, increasing porosity toward the gas-facing surface will reduce response-time dispersion compared with the reversed gradient.",
    "test": "Prepare reversed gradients and measure lifetime response maps after gas steps.",
    "against": "Response-time dispersion does not depend on gradient direction.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Porosity gradient direction",
    "system": "ethylcellulose-bound oxygen-sensitive dye",
    "id": 524,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0524",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Excitation spot travel — ethylcellulose-bound oxygen-sensitive dye",
    "hypothesis": "For ethylcellulose-bound oxygen-sensitive dye, moving the excitation spot will preserve calibration longer than stationary excitation at equal total absorbed energy.",
    "test": "Compare spatial bleaching and repeated gas calibrations under stationary and scanned illumination.",
    "against": "Calibration lifetime is no longer after accounting for local photon dose.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Excitation spot travel",
    "system": "ethylcellulose-bound oxygen-sensitive dye",
    "id": 525,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0525",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Humidity pre-equilibration — ethylcellulose-bound oxygen-sensitive dye",
    "hypothesis": "For ethylcellulose-bound oxygen-sensitive dye, slow humidity pre-equilibration will reduce oxygen-calibration hysteresis relative to abrupt conditioning.",
    "test": "Measure oxygen response after matched final humidity reached by different paths.",
    "against": "Oxygen hysteresis is independent of conditioning path.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Humidity pre-equilibration",
    "system": "ethylcellulose-bound oxygen-sensitive dye",
    "id": 526,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0526",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Temperature pulse diagnosis — ethylcellulose-bound oxygen-sensitive dye",
    "hypothesis": "For ethylcellulose-bound oxygen-sensitive dye, a small reversible temperature pulse will distinguish dye loss from reduced oxygen permeability.",
    "test": "Create independently verified dye-loss and permeability-change samples and compare transient signatures.",
    "against": "Signatures fail to identify the two changes on blinded samples.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Temperature pulse diagnosis",
    "system": "ethylcellulose-bound oxygen-sensitive dye",
    "id": 527,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0527",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Edge sealing tradeoff — ethylcellulose-bound oxygen-sensitive dye",
    "hypothesis": "For ethylcellulose-bound oxygen-sensitive dye, edge sealing will reduce spatial calibration variation while lengthening recovery disproportionately near the center.",
    "test": "Map response before and after edge sealing with a gas-permeable central face.",
    "against": "Spatial variation or recovery lacks the predicted position-dependent change.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Edge sealing tradeoff",
    "system": "ethylcellulose-bound oxygen-sensitive dye",
    "id": 528,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0528",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Host relaxation hold — ethylcellulose-bound oxygen-sensitive dye",
    "hypothesis": "For ethylcellulose-bound oxygen-sensitive dye, an unloaded rest after mild flexing will restore part of the oxygen response without restoring bleached intensity.",
    "test": "Measure lifetime calibration and intensity during mechanical recovery.",
    "against": "Response recovery tracks intensity recovery alone or does not occur.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Host relaxation hold",
    "system": "ethylcellulose-bound oxygen-sensitive dye",
    "id": 529,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0529",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Depth-resolved calibration — ethylcellulose-bound oxygen-sensitive dye",
    "hypothesis": "For ethylcellulose-bound oxygen-sensitive dye, calibrating emission from two optical depths will detect diffusion limitation earlier than bulk intensity alone.",
    "test": "Vary gas-step speed and compare depth-resolved signals with independent oxygen transport measurements.",
    "against": "Depth-resolved measurements provide no earlier reliable diffusion warning.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Depth-resolved calibration",
    "system": "ethylcellulose-bound oxygen-sensitive dye",
    "id": 530,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0530",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Modulated excitation recovery — fluoropolymer-bound oxygen-sensitive dye",
    "hypothesis": "For fluoropolymer-bound oxygen-sensitive dye, alternating short illumination and dark intervals will reduce calibration drift relative to continuous excitation at equal absorbed photons.",
    "test": "Measure lifetime, intensity, and oxygen calibration before and after matched light schedules.",
    "against": "Calibration drift is not smaller under interrupted illumination.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Modulated excitation recovery",
    "system": "fluoropolymer-bound oxygen-sensitive dye",
    "id": 531,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0531",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Barrier-free reverse face — fluoropolymer-bound oxygen-sensitive dye",
    "hypothesis": "For fluoropolymer-bound oxygen-sensitive dye, exposing both faces to gas will shorten recovery more than initial response when internal oxygen gradients persist.",
    "test": "Compare one-face and two-face exposure using independently calibrated gas steps.",
    "against": "Recovery gains do not exceed response gains within uncertainty.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Barrier-free reverse face",
    "system": "fluoropolymer-bound oxygen-sensitive dye",
    "id": 532,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0532",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Lateral reference proximity — fluoropolymer-bound oxygen-sensitive dye",
    "hypothesis": "For fluoropolymer-bound oxygen-sensitive dye, a nearby oxygen-insensitive reference patch will correct illumination drift better than a remote reference.",
    "test": "Introduce controlled light gradients and compare recovered oxygen against an independent probe.",
    "against": "Nearby referencing does not reduce oxygen-estimation error.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Lateral reference proximity",
    "system": "fluoropolymer-bound oxygen-sensitive dye",
    "id": 533,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0533",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Porosity gradient direction — fluoropolymer-bound oxygen-sensitive dye",
    "hypothesis": "For fluoropolymer-bound oxygen-sensitive dye, increasing porosity toward the gas-facing surface will reduce response-time dispersion compared with the reversed gradient.",
    "test": "Prepare reversed gradients and measure lifetime response maps after gas steps.",
    "against": "Response-time dispersion does not depend on gradient direction.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Porosity gradient direction",
    "system": "fluoropolymer-bound oxygen-sensitive dye",
    "id": 534,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0534",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Excitation spot travel — fluoropolymer-bound oxygen-sensitive dye",
    "hypothesis": "For fluoropolymer-bound oxygen-sensitive dye, moving the excitation spot will preserve calibration longer than stationary excitation at equal total absorbed energy.",
    "test": "Compare spatial bleaching and repeated gas calibrations under stationary and scanned illumination.",
    "against": "Calibration lifetime is no longer after accounting for local photon dose.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Excitation spot travel",
    "system": "fluoropolymer-bound oxygen-sensitive dye",
    "id": 535,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0535",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Humidity pre-equilibration — fluoropolymer-bound oxygen-sensitive dye",
    "hypothesis": "For fluoropolymer-bound oxygen-sensitive dye, slow humidity pre-equilibration will reduce oxygen-calibration hysteresis relative to abrupt conditioning.",
    "test": "Measure oxygen response after matched final humidity reached by different paths.",
    "against": "Oxygen hysteresis is independent of conditioning path.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Humidity pre-equilibration",
    "system": "fluoropolymer-bound oxygen-sensitive dye",
    "id": 536,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0536",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Temperature pulse diagnosis — fluoropolymer-bound oxygen-sensitive dye",
    "hypothesis": "For fluoropolymer-bound oxygen-sensitive dye, a small reversible temperature pulse will distinguish dye loss from reduced oxygen permeability.",
    "test": "Create independently verified dye-loss and permeability-change samples and compare transient signatures.",
    "against": "Signatures fail to identify the two changes on blinded samples.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Temperature pulse diagnosis",
    "system": "fluoropolymer-bound oxygen-sensitive dye",
    "id": 537,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0537",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Edge sealing tradeoff — fluoropolymer-bound oxygen-sensitive dye",
    "hypothesis": "For fluoropolymer-bound oxygen-sensitive dye, edge sealing will reduce spatial calibration variation while lengthening recovery disproportionately near the center.",
    "test": "Map response before and after edge sealing with a gas-permeable central face.",
    "against": "Spatial variation or recovery lacks the predicted position-dependent change.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Edge sealing tradeoff",
    "system": "fluoropolymer-bound oxygen-sensitive dye",
    "id": 538,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0538",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Host relaxation hold — fluoropolymer-bound oxygen-sensitive dye",
    "hypothesis": "For fluoropolymer-bound oxygen-sensitive dye, an unloaded rest after mild flexing will restore part of the oxygen response without restoring bleached intensity.",
    "test": "Measure lifetime calibration and intensity during mechanical recovery.",
    "against": "Response recovery tracks intensity recovery alone or does not occur.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Host relaxation hold",
    "system": "fluoropolymer-bound oxygen-sensitive dye",
    "id": 539,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0539",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Depth-resolved calibration — fluoropolymer-bound oxygen-sensitive dye",
    "hypothesis": "For fluoropolymer-bound oxygen-sensitive dye, calibrating emission from two optical depths will detect diffusion limitation earlier than bulk intensity alone.",
    "test": "Vary gas-step speed and compare depth-resolved signals with independent oxygen transport measurements.",
    "against": "Depth-resolved measurements provide no earlier reliable diffusion warning.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Depth-resolved calibration",
    "system": "fluoropolymer-bound oxygen-sensitive dye",
    "id": 540,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0540",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Modulated excitation recovery — sol-gel oxygen-sensitive film",
    "hypothesis": "For sol-gel oxygen-sensitive film, alternating short illumination and dark intervals will reduce calibration drift relative to continuous excitation at equal absorbed photons.",
    "test": "Measure lifetime, intensity, and oxygen calibration before and after matched light schedules.",
    "against": "Calibration drift is not smaller under interrupted illumination.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Modulated excitation recovery",
    "system": "sol-gel oxygen-sensitive film",
    "id": 541,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0541",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Barrier-free reverse face — sol-gel oxygen-sensitive film",
    "hypothesis": "For sol-gel oxygen-sensitive film, exposing both faces to gas will shorten recovery more than initial response when internal oxygen gradients persist.",
    "test": "Compare one-face and two-face exposure using independently calibrated gas steps.",
    "against": "Recovery gains do not exceed response gains within uncertainty.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Barrier-free reverse face",
    "system": "sol-gel oxygen-sensitive film",
    "id": 542,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0542",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Lateral reference proximity — sol-gel oxygen-sensitive film",
    "hypothesis": "For sol-gel oxygen-sensitive film, a nearby oxygen-insensitive reference patch will correct illumination drift better than a remote reference.",
    "test": "Introduce controlled light gradients and compare recovered oxygen against an independent probe.",
    "against": "Nearby referencing does not reduce oxygen-estimation error.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Lateral reference proximity",
    "system": "sol-gel oxygen-sensitive film",
    "id": 543,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 264,
    "literature_query": "Lateral reference proximity sol-gel oxygen-sensitive film nearby oxygen-insensitive patch correct illumination drift better experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0543",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Lateral reference proximity — sol-gel oxygen-sensitive film",
      "hypothesis": "For sol-gel oxygen-sensitive film, a nearby oxygen-insensitive reference patch will correct illumination drift better than a remote reference.",
      "test": "Introduce controlled light gradients and compare recovered oxygen against an independent probe.",
      "against": "Nearby referencing does not reduce oxygen-estimation error.",
      "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
      "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Lateral reference proximity",
      "system": "sol-gel oxygen-sensitive film",
      "id": 543,
      "access_score": 2,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 23,
      "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 264,
      "literature_query": "Lateral reference proximity sol-gel oxygen-sensitive film nearby oxygen-insensitive patch correct illumination drift better experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
      "source_lead_count": 3,
      "source_ids": "Sd23531f95a64;S239c7e97f90d;Saeabd15d3996",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Porosity gradient direction — sol-gel oxygen-sensitive film",
    "hypothesis": "For sol-gel oxygen-sensitive film, increasing porosity toward the gas-facing surface will reduce response-time dispersion compared with the reversed gradient.",
    "test": "Prepare reversed gradients and measure lifetime response maps after gas steps.",
    "against": "Response-time dispersion does not depend on gradient direction.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Porosity gradient direction",
    "system": "sol-gel oxygen-sensitive film",
    "id": 544,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 265,
    "literature_query": "Porosity gradient direction sol-gel oxygen-sensitive film increasing toward gas-facing surface response-time dispersion reversed experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0544",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Porosity gradient direction — sol-gel oxygen-sensitive film",
      "hypothesis": "For sol-gel oxygen-sensitive film, increasing porosity toward the gas-facing surface will reduce response-time dispersion compared with the reversed gradient.",
      "test": "Prepare reversed gradients and measure lifetime response maps after gas steps.",
      "against": "Response-time dispersion does not depend on gradient direction.",
      "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
      "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Porosity gradient direction",
      "system": "sol-gel oxygen-sensitive film",
      "id": 544,
      "access_score": 2,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 23,
      "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 265,
      "literature_query": "Porosity gradient direction sol-gel oxygen-sensitive film increasing toward gas-facing surface response-time dispersion reversed experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
      "source_lead_count": 5,
      "source_ids": "S06b873b9fe20;S05ee688f699e;S2a4b58babb08;Sb14a8fce53d3;S7481f42a9263",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Excitation spot travel — sol-gel oxygen-sensitive film",
    "hypothesis": "For sol-gel oxygen-sensitive film, moving the excitation spot will preserve calibration longer than stationary excitation at equal total absorbed energy.",
    "test": "Compare spatial bleaching and repeated gas calibrations under stationary and scanned illumination.",
    "against": "Calibration lifetime is no longer after accounting for local photon dose.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Excitation spot travel",
    "system": "sol-gel oxygen-sensitive film",
    "id": 545,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 266,
    "literature_query": "Excitation spot travel sol-gel oxygen-sensitive film moving preserve calibration longer stationary at total experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0545",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Excitation spot travel — sol-gel oxygen-sensitive film",
      "hypothesis": "For sol-gel oxygen-sensitive film, moving the excitation spot will preserve calibration longer than stationary excitation at equal total absorbed energy.",
      "test": "Compare spatial bleaching and repeated gas calibrations under stationary and scanned illumination.",
      "against": "Calibration lifetime is no longer after accounting for local photon dose.",
      "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
      "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Excitation spot travel",
      "system": "sol-gel oxygen-sensitive film",
      "id": 545,
      "access_score": 2,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 23,
      "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 266,
      "literature_query": "Excitation spot travel sol-gel oxygen-sensitive film moving preserve calibration longer stationary at total experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
      "source_lead_count": 4,
      "source_ids": "S5ea439402ef2;Sd23531f95a64;S239c7e97f90d;S4893dda0c413",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Humidity pre-equilibration — sol-gel oxygen-sensitive film",
    "hypothesis": "For sol-gel oxygen-sensitive film, slow humidity pre-equilibration will reduce oxygen-calibration hysteresis relative to abrupt conditioning.",
    "test": "Measure oxygen response after matched final humidity reached by different paths.",
    "against": "Oxygen hysteresis is independent of conditioning path.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Humidity pre-equilibration",
    "system": "sol-gel oxygen-sensitive film",
    "id": 546,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0546",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Temperature pulse diagnosis — sol-gel oxygen-sensitive film",
    "hypothesis": "For sol-gel oxygen-sensitive film, a small reversible temperature pulse will distinguish dye loss from reduced oxygen permeability.",
    "test": "Create independently verified dye-loss and permeability-change samples and compare transient signatures.",
    "against": "Signatures fail to identify the two changes on blinded samples.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Temperature pulse diagnosis",
    "system": "sol-gel oxygen-sensitive film",
    "id": 547,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 267,
    "literature_query": "Temperature pulse diagnosis sol-gel oxygen-sensitive film reversible distinguish dye loss reduced oxygen permeability experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0547",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Temperature pulse diagnosis — sol-gel oxygen-sensitive film",
      "hypothesis": "For sol-gel oxygen-sensitive film, a small reversible temperature pulse will distinguish dye loss from reduced oxygen permeability.",
      "test": "Create independently verified dye-loss and permeability-change samples and compare transient signatures.",
      "against": "Signatures fail to identify the two changes on blinded samples.",
      "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
      "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Temperature pulse diagnosis",
      "system": "sol-gel oxygen-sensitive film",
      "id": 547,
      "access_score": 2,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 23,
      "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 267,
      "literature_query": "Temperature pulse diagnosis sol-gel oxygen-sensitive film reversible distinguish dye loss reduced oxygen permeability experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
      "source_lead_count": 7,
      "source_ids": "Sd23531f95a64;S152010c0e55d;S19dba0b6bc7c;S389fd2d97af7;S6c21899ac0af;Sfde1e57360ae;Scb9c9021fb88",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Edge sealing tradeoff — sol-gel oxygen-sensitive film",
    "hypothesis": "For sol-gel oxygen-sensitive film, edge sealing will reduce spatial calibration variation while lengthening recovery disproportionately near the center.",
    "test": "Map response before and after edge sealing with a gas-permeable central face.",
    "against": "Spatial variation or recovery lacks the predicted position-dependent change.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Edge sealing tradeoff",
    "system": "sol-gel oxygen-sensitive film",
    "id": 548,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 268,
    "literature_query": "Edge sealing tradeoff sol-gel oxygen-sensitive film spatial calibration variation lengthening recovery disproportionately near experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0548",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Edge sealing tradeoff — sol-gel oxygen-sensitive film",
      "hypothesis": "For sol-gel oxygen-sensitive film, edge sealing will reduce spatial calibration variation while lengthening recovery disproportionately near the center.",
      "test": "Map response before and after edge sealing with a gas-permeable central face.",
      "against": "Spatial variation or recovery lacks the predicted position-dependent change.",
      "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
      "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Edge sealing tradeoff",
      "system": "sol-gel oxygen-sensitive film",
      "id": 548,
      "access_score": 2,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 23,
      "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 268,
      "literature_query": "Edge sealing tradeoff sol-gel oxygen-sensitive film spatial calibration variation lengthening recovery disproportionately near experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
      "source_lead_count": 6,
      "source_ids": "Sc9e9eb761d05;S4d8cbe029366;Sc0526fe8b2f4;Sd27ef6ff8658;Sd23531f95a64;S239c7e97f90d",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Host relaxation hold — sol-gel oxygen-sensitive film",
    "hypothesis": "For sol-gel oxygen-sensitive film, an unloaded rest after mild flexing will restore part of the oxygen response without restoring bleached intensity.",
    "test": "Measure lifetime calibration and intensity during mechanical recovery.",
    "against": "Response recovery tracks intensity recovery alone or does not occur.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Host relaxation hold",
    "system": "sol-gel oxygen-sensitive film",
    "id": 549,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 269,
    "literature_query": "Host relaxation hold sol-gel oxygen-sensitive film an unloaded rest mild flexing restore part experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0549",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Host relaxation hold — sol-gel oxygen-sensitive film",
      "hypothesis": "For sol-gel oxygen-sensitive film, an unloaded rest after mild flexing will restore part of the oxygen response without restoring bleached intensity.",
      "test": "Measure lifetime calibration and intensity during mechanical recovery.",
      "against": "Response recovery tracks intensity recovery alone or does not occur.",
      "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
      "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Host relaxation hold",
      "system": "sol-gel oxygen-sensitive film",
      "id": 549,
      "access_score": 2,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 23,
      "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 269,
      "literature_query": "Host relaxation hold sol-gel oxygen-sensitive film an unloaded rest mild flexing restore part experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
      "source_lead_count": 5,
      "source_ids": "Sd23531f95a64;S239c7e97f90d;Sc28055e40731;S435a38e6d230;S6c21899ac0af",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Depth-resolved calibration — sol-gel oxygen-sensitive film",
    "hypothesis": "For sol-gel oxygen-sensitive film, calibrating emission from two optical depths will detect diffusion limitation earlier than bulk intensity alone.",
    "test": "Vary gas-step speed and compare depth-resolved signals with independent oxygen transport measurements.",
    "against": "Depth-resolved measurements provide no earlier reliable diffusion warning.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Depth-resolved calibration",
    "system": "sol-gel oxygen-sensitive film",
    "id": 550,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 270,
    "literature_query": "Depth-resolved calibration sol-gel oxygen-sensitive film calibrating emission optical depths detect diffusion limitation earlier experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0550",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Depth-resolved calibration — sol-gel oxygen-sensitive film",
      "hypothesis": "For sol-gel oxygen-sensitive film, calibrating emission from two optical depths will detect diffusion limitation earlier than bulk intensity alone.",
      "test": "Vary gas-step speed and compare depth-resolved signals with independent oxygen transport measurements.",
      "against": "Depth-resolved measurements provide no earlier reliable diffusion warning.",
      "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
      "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Depth-resolved calibration",
      "system": "sol-gel oxygen-sensitive film",
      "id": 550,
      "access_score": 2,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 23,
      "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 270,
      "literature_query": "Depth-resolved calibration sol-gel oxygen-sensitive film calibrating emission optical depths detect diffusion limitation earlier experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
      "source_lead_count": 6,
      "source_ids": "S3f9339f7e255;S9798d0d5ea3f;S5ea439402ef2;S239c7e97f90d;Sa9e3e6f5af93;Sd23531f95a64",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Modulated excitation recovery — oxygen-sensitive dye on cellulose fibers",
    "hypothesis": "For oxygen-sensitive dye on cellulose fibers, alternating short illumination and dark intervals will reduce calibration drift relative to continuous excitation at equal absorbed photons.",
    "test": "Measure lifetime, intensity, and oxygen calibration before and after matched light schedules.",
    "against": "Calibration drift is not smaller under interrupted illumination.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Modulated excitation recovery",
    "system": "oxygen-sensitive dye on cellulose fibers",
    "id": 551,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0551",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Barrier-free reverse face — oxygen-sensitive dye on cellulose fibers",
    "hypothesis": "For oxygen-sensitive dye on cellulose fibers, exposing both faces to gas will shorten recovery more than initial response when internal oxygen gradients persist.",
    "test": "Compare one-face and two-face exposure using independently calibrated gas steps.",
    "against": "Recovery gains do not exceed response gains within uncertainty.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Barrier-free reverse face",
    "system": "oxygen-sensitive dye on cellulose fibers",
    "id": 552,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0552",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Lateral reference proximity — oxygen-sensitive dye on cellulose fibers",
    "hypothesis": "For oxygen-sensitive dye on cellulose fibers, a nearby oxygen-insensitive reference patch will correct illumination drift better than a remote reference.",
    "test": "Introduce controlled light gradients and compare recovered oxygen against an independent probe.",
    "against": "Nearby referencing does not reduce oxygen-estimation error.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Lateral reference proximity",
    "system": "oxygen-sensitive dye on cellulose fibers",
    "id": 553,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0553",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Porosity gradient direction — oxygen-sensitive dye on cellulose fibers",
    "hypothesis": "For oxygen-sensitive dye on cellulose fibers, increasing porosity toward the gas-facing surface will reduce response-time dispersion compared with the reversed gradient.",
    "test": "Prepare reversed gradients and measure lifetime response maps after gas steps.",
    "against": "Response-time dispersion does not depend on gradient direction.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Porosity gradient direction",
    "system": "oxygen-sensitive dye on cellulose fibers",
    "id": 554,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0554",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Excitation spot travel — oxygen-sensitive dye on cellulose fibers",
    "hypothesis": "For oxygen-sensitive dye on cellulose fibers, moving the excitation spot will preserve calibration longer than stationary excitation at equal total absorbed energy.",
    "test": "Compare spatial bleaching and repeated gas calibrations under stationary and scanned illumination.",
    "against": "Calibration lifetime is no longer after accounting for local photon dose.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Excitation spot travel",
    "system": "oxygen-sensitive dye on cellulose fibers",
    "id": 555,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0555",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Humidity pre-equilibration — oxygen-sensitive dye on cellulose fibers",
    "hypothesis": "For oxygen-sensitive dye on cellulose fibers, slow humidity pre-equilibration will reduce oxygen-calibration hysteresis relative to abrupt conditioning.",
    "test": "Measure oxygen response after matched final humidity reached by different paths.",
    "against": "Oxygen hysteresis is independent of conditioning path.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Humidity pre-equilibration",
    "system": "oxygen-sensitive dye on cellulose fibers",
    "id": 556,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0556",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Temperature pulse diagnosis — oxygen-sensitive dye on cellulose fibers",
    "hypothesis": "For oxygen-sensitive dye on cellulose fibers, a small reversible temperature pulse will distinguish dye loss from reduced oxygen permeability.",
    "test": "Create independently verified dye-loss and permeability-change samples and compare transient signatures.",
    "against": "Signatures fail to identify the two changes on blinded samples.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Temperature pulse diagnosis",
    "system": "oxygen-sensitive dye on cellulose fibers",
    "id": 557,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0557",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Edge sealing tradeoff — oxygen-sensitive dye on cellulose fibers",
    "hypothesis": "For oxygen-sensitive dye on cellulose fibers, edge sealing will reduce spatial calibration variation while lengthening recovery disproportionately near the center.",
    "test": "Map response before and after edge sealing with a gas-permeable central face.",
    "against": "Spatial variation or recovery lacks the predicted position-dependent change.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Edge sealing tradeoff",
    "system": "oxygen-sensitive dye on cellulose fibers",
    "id": 558,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0558",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Host relaxation hold — oxygen-sensitive dye on cellulose fibers",
    "hypothesis": "For oxygen-sensitive dye on cellulose fibers, an unloaded rest after mild flexing will restore part of the oxygen response without restoring bleached intensity.",
    "test": "Measure lifetime calibration and intensity during mechanical recovery.",
    "against": "Response recovery tracks intensity recovery alone or does not occur.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Host relaxation hold",
    "system": "oxygen-sensitive dye on cellulose fibers",
    "id": 559,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0559",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Depth-resolved calibration — oxygen-sensitive dye on cellulose fibers",
    "hypothesis": "For oxygen-sensitive dye on cellulose fibers, calibrating emission from two optical depths will detect diffusion limitation earlier than bulk intensity alone.",
    "test": "Vary gas-step speed and compare depth-resolved signals with independent oxygen transport measurements.",
    "against": "Depth-resolved measurements provide no earlier reliable diffusion warning.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Depth-resolved calibration",
    "system": "oxygen-sensitive dye on cellulose fibers",
    "id": 560,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0560",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Modulated excitation recovery — oxygen-sensitive dye in hydrogel beads",
    "hypothesis": "For oxygen-sensitive dye in hydrogel beads, alternating short illumination and dark intervals will reduce calibration drift relative to continuous excitation at equal absorbed photons.",
    "test": "Measure lifetime, intensity, and oxygen calibration before and after matched light schedules.",
    "against": "Calibration drift is not smaller under interrupted illumination.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Modulated excitation recovery",
    "system": "oxygen-sensitive dye in hydrogel beads",
    "id": 561,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0561",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Barrier-free reverse face — oxygen-sensitive dye in hydrogel beads",
    "hypothesis": "For oxygen-sensitive dye in hydrogel beads, exposing both faces to gas will shorten recovery more than initial response when internal oxygen gradients persist.",
    "test": "Compare one-face and two-face exposure using independently calibrated gas steps.",
    "against": "Recovery gains do not exceed response gains within uncertainty.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Barrier-free reverse face",
    "system": "oxygen-sensitive dye in hydrogel beads",
    "id": 562,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0562",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Lateral reference proximity — oxygen-sensitive dye in hydrogel beads",
    "hypothesis": "For oxygen-sensitive dye in hydrogel beads, a nearby oxygen-insensitive reference patch will correct illumination drift better than a remote reference.",
    "test": "Introduce controlled light gradients and compare recovered oxygen against an independent probe.",
    "against": "Nearby referencing does not reduce oxygen-estimation error.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Lateral reference proximity",
    "system": "oxygen-sensitive dye in hydrogel beads",
    "id": 563,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0563",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Porosity gradient direction — oxygen-sensitive dye in hydrogel beads",
    "hypothesis": "For oxygen-sensitive dye in hydrogel beads, increasing porosity toward the gas-facing surface will reduce response-time dispersion compared with the reversed gradient.",
    "test": "Prepare reversed gradients and measure lifetime response maps after gas steps.",
    "against": "Response-time dispersion does not depend on gradient direction.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Porosity gradient direction",
    "system": "oxygen-sensitive dye in hydrogel beads",
    "id": 564,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0564",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Excitation spot travel — oxygen-sensitive dye in hydrogel beads",
    "hypothesis": "For oxygen-sensitive dye in hydrogel beads, moving the excitation spot will preserve calibration longer than stationary excitation at equal total absorbed energy.",
    "test": "Compare spatial bleaching and repeated gas calibrations under stationary and scanned illumination.",
    "against": "Calibration lifetime is no longer after accounting for local photon dose.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Excitation spot travel",
    "system": "oxygen-sensitive dye in hydrogel beads",
    "id": 565,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0565",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Humidity pre-equilibration — oxygen-sensitive dye in hydrogel beads",
    "hypothesis": "For oxygen-sensitive dye in hydrogel beads, slow humidity pre-equilibration will reduce oxygen-calibration hysteresis relative to abrupt conditioning.",
    "test": "Measure oxygen response after matched final humidity reached by different paths.",
    "against": "Oxygen hysteresis is independent of conditioning path.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Humidity pre-equilibration",
    "system": "oxygen-sensitive dye in hydrogel beads",
    "id": 566,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0566",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Temperature pulse diagnosis — oxygen-sensitive dye in hydrogel beads",
    "hypothesis": "For oxygen-sensitive dye in hydrogel beads, a small reversible temperature pulse will distinguish dye loss from reduced oxygen permeability.",
    "test": "Create independently verified dye-loss and permeability-change samples and compare transient signatures.",
    "against": "Signatures fail to identify the two changes on blinded samples.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Temperature pulse diagnosis",
    "system": "oxygen-sensitive dye in hydrogel beads",
    "id": 567,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0567",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Edge sealing tradeoff — oxygen-sensitive dye in hydrogel beads",
    "hypothesis": "For oxygen-sensitive dye in hydrogel beads, edge sealing will reduce spatial calibration variation while lengthening recovery disproportionately near the center.",
    "test": "Map response before and after edge sealing with a gas-permeable central face.",
    "against": "Spatial variation or recovery lacks the predicted position-dependent change.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Edge sealing tradeoff",
    "system": "oxygen-sensitive dye in hydrogel beads",
    "id": 568,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0568",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Host relaxation hold — oxygen-sensitive dye in hydrogel beads",
    "hypothesis": "For oxygen-sensitive dye in hydrogel beads, an unloaded rest after mild flexing will restore part of the oxygen response without restoring bleached intensity.",
    "test": "Measure lifetime calibration and intensity during mechanical recovery.",
    "against": "Response recovery tracks intensity recovery alone or does not occur.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Host relaxation hold",
    "system": "oxygen-sensitive dye in hydrogel beads",
    "id": 569,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0569",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Depth-resolved calibration — oxygen-sensitive dye in hydrogel beads",
    "hypothesis": "For oxygen-sensitive dye in hydrogel beads, calibrating emission from two optical depths will detect diffusion limitation earlier than bulk intensity alone.",
    "test": "Vary gas-step speed and compare depth-resolved signals with independent oxygen transport measurements.",
    "against": "Depth-resolved measurements provide no earlier reliable diffusion warning.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Depth-resolved calibration",
    "system": "oxygen-sensitive dye in hydrogel beads",
    "id": 570,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0570",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Modulated excitation recovery — oxygen-sensitive dye on polymer microspheres",
    "hypothesis": "For oxygen-sensitive dye on polymer microspheres, alternating short illumination and dark intervals will reduce calibration drift relative to continuous excitation at equal absorbed photons.",
    "test": "Measure lifetime, intensity, and oxygen calibration before and after matched light schedules.",
    "against": "Calibration drift is not smaller under interrupted illumination.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Modulated excitation recovery",
    "system": "oxygen-sensitive dye on polymer microspheres",
    "id": 571,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0571",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Barrier-free reverse face — oxygen-sensitive dye on polymer microspheres",
    "hypothesis": "For oxygen-sensitive dye on polymer microspheres, exposing both faces to gas will shorten recovery more than initial response when internal oxygen gradients persist.",
    "test": "Compare one-face and two-face exposure using independently calibrated gas steps.",
    "against": "Recovery gains do not exceed response gains within uncertainty.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Barrier-free reverse face",
    "system": "oxygen-sensitive dye on polymer microspheres",
    "id": 572,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0572",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Lateral reference proximity — oxygen-sensitive dye on polymer microspheres",
    "hypothesis": "For oxygen-sensitive dye on polymer microspheres, a nearby oxygen-insensitive reference patch will correct illumination drift better than a remote reference.",
    "test": "Introduce controlled light gradients and compare recovered oxygen against an independent probe.",
    "against": "Nearby referencing does not reduce oxygen-estimation error.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Lateral reference proximity",
    "system": "oxygen-sensitive dye on polymer microspheres",
    "id": 573,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0573",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Porosity gradient direction — oxygen-sensitive dye on polymer microspheres",
    "hypothesis": "For oxygen-sensitive dye on polymer microspheres, increasing porosity toward the gas-facing surface will reduce response-time dispersion compared with the reversed gradient.",
    "test": "Prepare reversed gradients and measure lifetime response maps after gas steps.",
    "against": "Response-time dispersion does not depend on gradient direction.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Porosity gradient direction",
    "system": "oxygen-sensitive dye on polymer microspheres",
    "id": 574,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0574",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Excitation spot travel — oxygen-sensitive dye on polymer microspheres",
    "hypothesis": "For oxygen-sensitive dye on polymer microspheres, moving the excitation spot will preserve calibration longer than stationary excitation at equal total absorbed energy.",
    "test": "Compare spatial bleaching and repeated gas calibrations under stationary and scanned illumination.",
    "against": "Calibration lifetime is no longer after accounting for local photon dose.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Excitation spot travel",
    "system": "oxygen-sensitive dye on polymer microspheres",
    "id": 575,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0575",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Humidity pre-equilibration — oxygen-sensitive dye on polymer microspheres",
    "hypothesis": "For oxygen-sensitive dye on polymer microspheres, slow humidity pre-equilibration will reduce oxygen-calibration hysteresis relative to abrupt conditioning.",
    "test": "Measure oxygen response after matched final humidity reached by different paths.",
    "against": "Oxygen hysteresis is independent of conditioning path.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Humidity pre-equilibration",
    "system": "oxygen-sensitive dye on polymer microspheres",
    "id": 576,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0576",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Temperature pulse diagnosis — oxygen-sensitive dye on polymer microspheres",
    "hypothesis": "For oxygen-sensitive dye on polymer microspheres, a small reversible temperature pulse will distinguish dye loss from reduced oxygen permeability.",
    "test": "Create independently verified dye-loss and permeability-change samples and compare transient signatures.",
    "against": "Signatures fail to identify the two changes on blinded samples.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Temperature pulse diagnosis",
    "system": "oxygen-sensitive dye on polymer microspheres",
    "id": 577,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0577",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Edge sealing tradeoff — oxygen-sensitive dye on polymer microspheres",
    "hypothesis": "For oxygen-sensitive dye on polymer microspheres, edge sealing will reduce spatial calibration variation while lengthening recovery disproportionately near the center.",
    "test": "Map response before and after edge sealing with a gas-permeable central face.",
    "against": "Spatial variation or recovery lacks the predicted position-dependent change.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Edge sealing tradeoff",
    "system": "oxygen-sensitive dye on polymer microspheres",
    "id": 578,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0578",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Host relaxation hold — oxygen-sensitive dye on polymer microspheres",
    "hypothesis": "For oxygen-sensitive dye on polymer microspheres, an unloaded rest after mild flexing will restore part of the oxygen response without restoring bleached intensity.",
    "test": "Measure lifetime calibration and intensity during mechanical recovery.",
    "against": "Response recovery tracks intensity recovery alone or does not occur.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Host relaxation hold",
    "system": "oxygen-sensitive dye on polymer microspheres",
    "id": 579,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0579",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Depth-resolved calibration — oxygen-sensitive dye on polymer microspheres",
    "hypothesis": "For oxygen-sensitive dye on polymer microspheres, calibrating emission from two optical depths will detect diffusion limitation earlier than bulk intensity alone.",
    "test": "Vary gas-step speed and compare depth-resolved signals with independent oxygen transport measurements.",
    "against": "Depth-resolved measurements provide no earlier reliable diffusion warning.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Depth-resolved calibration",
    "system": "oxygen-sensitive dye on polymer microspheres",
    "id": 580,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0580",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Modulated excitation recovery — oxygen-sensitive dye in a fibrous mat",
    "hypothesis": "For oxygen-sensitive dye in a fibrous mat, alternating short illumination and dark intervals will reduce calibration drift relative to continuous excitation at equal absorbed photons.",
    "test": "Measure lifetime, intensity, and oxygen calibration before and after matched light schedules.",
    "against": "Calibration drift is not smaller under interrupted illumination.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Modulated excitation recovery",
    "system": "oxygen-sensitive dye in a fibrous mat",
    "id": 581,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0581",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Barrier-free reverse face — oxygen-sensitive dye in a fibrous mat",
    "hypothesis": "For oxygen-sensitive dye in a fibrous mat, exposing both faces to gas will shorten recovery more than initial response when internal oxygen gradients persist.",
    "test": "Compare one-face and two-face exposure using independently calibrated gas steps.",
    "against": "Recovery gains do not exceed response gains within uncertainty.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Barrier-free reverse face",
    "system": "oxygen-sensitive dye in a fibrous mat",
    "id": 582,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0582",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Lateral reference proximity — oxygen-sensitive dye in a fibrous mat",
    "hypothesis": "For oxygen-sensitive dye in a fibrous mat, a nearby oxygen-insensitive reference patch will correct illumination drift better than a remote reference.",
    "test": "Introduce controlled light gradients and compare recovered oxygen against an independent probe.",
    "against": "Nearby referencing does not reduce oxygen-estimation error.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Lateral reference proximity",
    "system": "oxygen-sensitive dye in a fibrous mat",
    "id": 583,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0583",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Porosity gradient direction — oxygen-sensitive dye in a fibrous mat",
    "hypothesis": "For oxygen-sensitive dye in a fibrous mat, increasing porosity toward the gas-facing surface will reduce response-time dispersion compared with the reversed gradient.",
    "test": "Prepare reversed gradients and measure lifetime response maps after gas steps.",
    "against": "Response-time dispersion does not depend on gradient direction.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Porosity gradient direction",
    "system": "oxygen-sensitive dye in a fibrous mat",
    "id": 584,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0584",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Excitation spot travel — oxygen-sensitive dye in a fibrous mat",
    "hypothesis": "For oxygen-sensitive dye in a fibrous mat, moving the excitation spot will preserve calibration longer than stationary excitation at equal total absorbed energy.",
    "test": "Compare spatial bleaching and repeated gas calibrations under stationary and scanned illumination.",
    "against": "Calibration lifetime is no longer after accounting for local photon dose.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Excitation spot travel",
    "system": "oxygen-sensitive dye in a fibrous mat",
    "id": 585,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0585",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Humidity pre-equilibration — oxygen-sensitive dye in a fibrous mat",
    "hypothesis": "For oxygen-sensitive dye in a fibrous mat, slow humidity pre-equilibration will reduce oxygen-calibration hysteresis relative to abrupt conditioning.",
    "test": "Measure oxygen response after matched final humidity reached by different paths.",
    "against": "Oxygen hysteresis is independent of conditioning path.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Humidity pre-equilibration",
    "system": "oxygen-sensitive dye in a fibrous mat",
    "id": 586,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0586",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Temperature pulse diagnosis — oxygen-sensitive dye in a fibrous mat",
    "hypothesis": "For oxygen-sensitive dye in a fibrous mat, a small reversible temperature pulse will distinguish dye loss from reduced oxygen permeability.",
    "test": "Create independently verified dye-loss and permeability-change samples and compare transient signatures.",
    "against": "Signatures fail to identify the two changes on blinded samples.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Temperature pulse diagnosis",
    "system": "oxygen-sensitive dye in a fibrous mat",
    "id": 587,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0587",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Edge sealing tradeoff — oxygen-sensitive dye in a fibrous mat",
    "hypothesis": "For oxygen-sensitive dye in a fibrous mat, edge sealing will reduce spatial calibration variation while lengthening recovery disproportionately near the center.",
    "test": "Map response before and after edge sealing with a gas-permeable central face.",
    "against": "Spatial variation or recovery lacks the predicted position-dependent change.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Edge sealing tradeoff",
    "system": "oxygen-sensitive dye in a fibrous mat",
    "id": 588,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0588",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Host relaxation hold — oxygen-sensitive dye in a fibrous mat",
    "hypothesis": "For oxygen-sensitive dye in a fibrous mat, an unloaded rest after mild flexing will restore part of the oxygen response without restoring bleached intensity.",
    "test": "Measure lifetime calibration and intensity during mechanical recovery.",
    "against": "Response recovery tracks intensity recovery alone or does not occur.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Host relaxation hold",
    "system": "oxygen-sensitive dye in a fibrous mat",
    "id": 589,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0589",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Depth-resolved calibration — oxygen-sensitive dye in a fibrous mat",
    "hypothesis": "For oxygen-sensitive dye in a fibrous mat, calibrating emission from two optical depths will detect diffusion limitation earlier than bulk intensity alone.",
    "test": "Vary gas-step speed and compare depth-resolved signals with independent oxygen transport measurements.",
    "against": "Depth-resolved measurements provide no earlier reliable diffusion warning.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Depth-resolved calibration",
    "system": "oxygen-sensitive dye in a fibrous mat",
    "id": 590,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0590",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Modulated excitation recovery — oxygen-sensitive dye in a microporous membrane",
    "hypothesis": "For oxygen-sensitive dye in a microporous membrane, alternating short illumination and dark intervals will reduce calibration drift relative to continuous excitation at equal absorbed photons.",
    "test": "Measure lifetime, intensity, and oxygen calibration before and after matched light schedules.",
    "against": "Calibration drift is not smaller under interrupted illumination.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Modulated excitation recovery",
    "system": "oxygen-sensitive dye in a microporous membrane",
    "id": 591,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0591",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Barrier-free reverse face — oxygen-sensitive dye in a microporous membrane",
    "hypothesis": "For oxygen-sensitive dye in a microporous membrane, exposing both faces to gas will shorten recovery more than initial response when internal oxygen gradients persist.",
    "test": "Compare one-face and two-face exposure using independently calibrated gas steps.",
    "against": "Recovery gains do not exceed response gains within uncertainty.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Barrier-free reverse face",
    "system": "oxygen-sensitive dye in a microporous membrane",
    "id": 592,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0592",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Lateral reference proximity — oxygen-sensitive dye in a microporous membrane",
    "hypothesis": "For oxygen-sensitive dye in a microporous membrane, a nearby oxygen-insensitive reference patch will correct illumination drift better than a remote reference.",
    "test": "Introduce controlled light gradients and compare recovered oxygen against an independent probe.",
    "against": "Nearby referencing does not reduce oxygen-estimation error.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Lateral reference proximity",
    "system": "oxygen-sensitive dye in a microporous membrane",
    "id": 593,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0593",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Porosity gradient direction — oxygen-sensitive dye in a microporous membrane",
    "hypothesis": "For oxygen-sensitive dye in a microporous membrane, increasing porosity toward the gas-facing surface will reduce response-time dispersion compared with the reversed gradient.",
    "test": "Prepare reversed gradients and measure lifetime response maps after gas steps.",
    "against": "Response-time dispersion does not depend on gradient direction.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Porosity gradient direction",
    "system": "oxygen-sensitive dye in a microporous membrane",
    "id": 594,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0594",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Excitation spot travel — oxygen-sensitive dye in a microporous membrane",
    "hypothesis": "For oxygen-sensitive dye in a microporous membrane, moving the excitation spot will preserve calibration longer than stationary excitation at equal total absorbed energy.",
    "test": "Compare spatial bleaching and repeated gas calibrations under stationary and scanned illumination.",
    "against": "Calibration lifetime is no longer after accounting for local photon dose.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Excitation spot travel",
    "system": "oxygen-sensitive dye in a microporous membrane",
    "id": 595,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0595",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Humidity pre-equilibration — oxygen-sensitive dye in a microporous membrane",
    "hypothesis": "For oxygen-sensitive dye in a microporous membrane, slow humidity pre-equilibration will reduce oxygen-calibration hysteresis relative to abrupt conditioning.",
    "test": "Measure oxygen response after matched final humidity reached by different paths.",
    "against": "Oxygen hysteresis is independent of conditioning path.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Humidity pre-equilibration",
    "system": "oxygen-sensitive dye in a microporous membrane",
    "id": 596,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0596",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Temperature pulse diagnosis — oxygen-sensitive dye in a microporous membrane",
    "hypothesis": "For oxygen-sensitive dye in a microporous membrane, a small reversible temperature pulse will distinguish dye loss from reduced oxygen permeability.",
    "test": "Create independently verified dye-loss and permeability-change samples and compare transient signatures.",
    "against": "Signatures fail to identify the two changes on blinded samples.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Temperature pulse diagnosis",
    "system": "oxygen-sensitive dye in a microporous membrane",
    "id": 597,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0597",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Edge sealing tradeoff — oxygen-sensitive dye in a microporous membrane",
    "hypothesis": "For oxygen-sensitive dye in a microporous membrane, edge sealing will reduce spatial calibration variation while lengthening recovery disproportionately near the center.",
    "test": "Map response before and after edge sealing with a gas-permeable central face.",
    "against": "Spatial variation or recovery lacks the predicted position-dependent change.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Edge sealing tradeoff",
    "system": "oxygen-sensitive dye in a microporous membrane",
    "id": 598,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0598",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Host relaxation hold — oxygen-sensitive dye in a microporous membrane",
    "hypothesis": "For oxygen-sensitive dye in a microporous membrane, an unloaded rest after mild flexing will restore part of the oxygen response without restoring bleached intensity.",
    "test": "Measure lifetime calibration and intensity during mechanical recovery.",
    "against": "Response recovery tracks intensity recovery alone or does not occur.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Host relaxation hold",
    "system": "oxygen-sensitive dye in a microporous membrane",
    "id": 599,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0599",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Depth-resolved calibration — oxygen-sensitive dye in a microporous membrane",
    "hypothesis": "For oxygen-sensitive dye in a microporous membrane, calibrating emission from two optical depths will detect diffusion limitation earlier than bulk intensity alone.",
    "test": "Vary gas-step speed and compare depth-resolved signals with independent oxygen transport measurements.",
    "against": "Depth-resolved measurements provide no earlier reliable diffusion warning.",
    "category": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films",
    "controls": "Dye identity and loading, oxygen partial pressure, humidity, absorbed light, and actual film temperature. Use a dye independently established to be oxygen-sensitive and compatible with each host.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Luminescent oxygen-sensing films: Depth-resolved calibration",
    "system": "oxygen-sensitive dye in a microporous membrane",
    "id": 600,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled oxygen/humidity supply, compatible sensing films, calibrated optical excitation and lifetime or spectral readout.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0600",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Alternating moisture faces — balsa wood",
    "hypothesis": "For balsa wood, alternating the wetted face will reduce persistent curvature compared with repeatedly wetting one face at equal water uptake.",
    "test": "Measure curvature and spatial moisture through repeated wetting cycles.",
    "against": "Persistent curvature is not smaller under alternating exposure.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Alternating moisture faces",
    "system": "balsa wood",
    "id": 601,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0601",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "End-face sealing pattern — balsa wood",
    "hypothesis": "For balsa wood, discontinuous end-face seals will produce larger local moisture gradients than a continuous partial-area seal.",
    "test": "Map moisture after controlled humidity steps with matched sealed area.",
    "against": "Local gradients do not differ after seal permeability is measured.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: End-face sealing pattern",
    "system": "balsa wood",
    "id": 602,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 20,
    "literature_query": "End-face sealing pattern balsa wood discontinuous seals produce local moisture gradients continuous partial-area experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0602",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": true,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "End-face sealing pattern — balsa wood",
      "hypothesis": "For balsa wood, discontinuous end-face seals will produce larger local moisture gradients than a continuous partial-area seal.",
      "test": "Map moisture after controlled humidity steps with matched sealed area.",
      "against": "Local gradients do not differ after seal permeability is measured.",
      "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
      "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: End-face sealing pattern",
      "system": "balsa wood",
      "id": 602,
      "access_score": 4,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 29,
      "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 20,
      "literature_query": "End-face sealing pattern balsa wood discontinuous seals produce local moisture gradients continuous partial-area experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
      "source_lead_count": 3,
      "source_ids": "Sdfdb2fa16d5d;S06b12a789e95;S840efea171c9",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Wood edge sealing and moisture transport are studied. Verify seal connectivity at equal sealed area and directly measured permeability.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": {
      "deep_rank": "7",
      "id": "602",
      "title": "End-face sealing pattern — balsa wood",
      "original_300_rank": "20",
      "pilot_class": "P",
      "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
      "hypothesis": "For balsa wood, discontinuous end-face seals will produce larger local moisture gradients than a continuous partial-area seal.",
      "primary_outcome": "Spatial moisture-gradient variance at a fixed total water uptake.",
      "comparison": "Discontinuous end-face seals versus a continuous equal-area seal, with unsealed and fully sealed references.",
      "controls": "Wood grain, density, seal permeability, sealed area, coating intrusion, temperature, initial moisture, and specimen dimensions.",
      "pilot": "Cut adjacent samples from the same board but treat boards as independent batches. Use gravimetry plus calibrated local moisture measurements or destructive sectioning on separate specimens.",
      "novelty_gap": "Wood sealing and moisture gradients are known. Connectivity of partial sealing at matched coverage and permeability is the precise unresolved comparison.",
      "stop_rule": "Stop if seal chemistry penetrates different depths. A difference only in total uptake does not demonstrate a larger gradient at matched moisture.",
      "source_keys": "WOOD17;WOODSTATE",
      "truth_probability": "not estimated",
      "novelty_status": "unverified"
    },
    "dossier_text": "# 07. H0602 — End-face sealing pattern — balsa wood\n\nOriginal 300-folder rank: 20. Pilot class: P. Resource class: modest bench or workshop; calibration still required.\n\n## Original hypothesis\n\nFor balsa wood, discontinuous end-face seals will produce larger local moisture gradients than a continuous partial-area seal.\n\n## Why investigate this\n\nBenign wood coupons and humidity exposure support a practical pilot, and coating studies explain how to isolate boundary transport.\n\n## Literature assessment and exact novelty question\n\nWood sealing and moisture gradients are known. Connectivity of partial sealing at matched coverage and permeability is the precise unresolved comparison. Worldwide originality remains unverified.\n\n## Primary measurement\n\nSpatial moisture-gradient variance at a fixed total water uptake.\n\n## Comparison\n\nDiscontinuous end-face seals versus a continuous equal-area seal, with unsealed and fully sealed references.\n\n## Critical controls\n\nWood grain, density, seal permeability, sealed area, coating intrusion, temperature, initial moisture, and specimen dimensions.\n\n## Pilot plan\n\nCut adjacent samples from the same board but treat boards as independent batches. Use gravimetry plus calibrated local moisture measurements or destructive sectioning on separate specimens.\n\n## What would count against it\n\nStop if seal chemistry penetrates different depths. A difference only in total uptake does not demonstrate a larger gradient at matched moisture.\n\n## Replication and analysis\n\nTreat separately prepared specimens, batches, or devices as independent units. Technical repeats and images are nested measurements. First estimate calibration error and independent-preparation variability. Set the minimum meaningful effect in the primary outcome's units before confirmation, then choose sample size from that effect and pilot variance; a convenient pilot count is not a powered study.\n\nRandomize run order and blind sample labels where practical. Freeze image processing, fitting choices, exclusions, and the primary comparison before evaluating confirmatory data. Report effect size and uncertainty; use a blocked or mixed-effects analysis when specimens share a batch. A wide interval is inconclusive. Include the measurement and matching controls even when the directional effect appears large.\n\nA useful go/no-go gate is whether the hypothesized effect can be distinguished from calibration uncertainty and the strongest alternative explanation. Stop material purchases if the closest literature already measures the identical contrast, unless a replication has an explicit purpose. Do not use these abbreviated plans as complete laboratory protocols.\n\n## Data to preserve\n\nKeep unedited images or sensor streams, calibration files, preparation IDs, run order, environmental logs, input histories, raw outcome values, exclusions, and the exact analysis version. No values are prefilled in the observation template. Use `data/Published Benchmarks.csv` only as literature context; values from a different system are not observations of this hypothesis.\n\n## Sources and transfer limits\n\n### WOOD17\n\n[Understanding the influence of wood as a substrate on the permeability of coatings by NMR imaging and wet-cup](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0300944017301157)\n\nAccess: Indexed abstract examined. Type: primary experiment.\n\nBackground findings and transfer limits: see [source assessments](../research/Primary%20Source%20Assessments.md) under this source key.\n\n### WOODSTATE\n\n[Experiments on Steady-State Nonisothermal Moisture Movement in Wood](https://wfs.swst.org/index.php/wfs/article/view/117)\n\nAccess: Publisher abstract examined. Type: primary experiment.\n\nBackground findings and transfer limits: see [source assessments](../research/Primary%20Source%20Assessments.md) under this source key.\n\n"
  },
  {
    "title": "Compression during rewetting — balsa wood",
    "hypothesis": "For balsa wood, mild compression during rewetting will increase retained shape change compared with compression after equilibration.",
    "test": "Compare recovered dimensions and stiffness after identical peak load.",
    "against": "Retained shape change does not depend on loading stage.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Compression during rewetting",
    "system": "balsa wood",
    "id": 603,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 21,
    "literature_query": "Compression rewetting balsa wood mild retained shape change equilibration experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0603",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": true,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Compression during rewetting — balsa wood",
      "hypothesis": "For balsa wood, mild compression during rewetting will increase retained shape change compared with compression after equilibration.",
      "test": "Compare recovered dimensions and stiffness after identical peak load.",
      "against": "Retained shape change does not depend on loading stage.",
      "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
      "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Compression during rewetting",
      "system": "balsa wood",
      "id": 603,
      "access_score": 4,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 29,
      "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 21,
      "literature_query": "Compression rewetting balsa wood mild retained shape change equilibration experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
      "source_lead_count": 6,
      "source_ids": "S7b87f84b226b;Sdd0c57f54fd2;S96b3f33f070d;S707cac0cf336;S1b8b3f0d0bf3;S80c2468f2cc0",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": {
      "deep_rank": "21",
      "id": "603",
      "title": "Compression during rewetting — balsa wood",
      "original_300_rank": "21",
      "pilot_class": "C",
      "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
      "hypothesis": "For balsa wood, mild compression during rewetting will increase retained shape change compared with compression after equilibration.",
      "primary_outcome": "Retained compression set after unloading and complete return to the same moisture content.",
      "comparison": "Compression during rewetting versus compression after equilibration at matched peak stress and moisture.",
      "controls": "Grain direction, density, moisture profile, dwell time, viscoelastic creep, damage, and final moisture.",
      "pilot": "First separate reversible swelling from permanent set using unloaded humidity controls. Track load and strain continuously and assess microscopic crushing.",
      "novelty_gap": "Mechano-sorptive deformation under changing moisture is already reported. Novelty is low for the broad effect; only a rigorously matched timing or balsa-specific quantitative model might add value.",
      "stop_rule": "Do not call ordinary mechano-sorptive creep a new mechanism. Stop if residual set is explained by crushing or unmatched final moisture.",
      "source_keys": "MECHWOOD17;WOOD17",
      "truth_probability": "not estimated",
      "novelty_status": "unverified"
    },
    "dossier_text": "# 21. H0603 — Compression during rewetting — balsa wood\n\nOriginal 300-folder rank: 21. Pilot class: C. Resource class: modest bench or workshop; calibration still required.\n\n## Original hypothesis\n\nFor balsa wood, mild compression during rewetting will increase retained shape change compared with compression after equilibration.\n\n## Why investigate this\n\nThe expected coupling has direct mechanical precedent, so a bounded replication and timing extension are experimentally plausible.\n\n## Literature assessment and exact novelty question\n\nMechano-sorptive deformation under changing moisture is already reported. Novelty is low for the broad effect; only a rigorously matched timing or balsa-specific quantitative model might add value. Worldwide originality remains unverified.\n\n## Primary measurement\n\nRetained compression set after unloading and complete return to the same moisture content.\n\n## Comparison\n\nCompression during rewetting versus compression after equilibration at matched peak stress and moisture.\n\n## Critical controls\n\nGrain direction, density, moisture profile, dwell time, viscoelastic creep, damage, and final moisture.\n\n## Pilot plan\n\nFirst separate reversible swelling from permanent set using unloaded humidity controls. Track load and strain continuously and assess microscopic crushing.\n\n## What would count against it\n\nDo not call ordinary mechano-sorptive creep a new mechanism. Stop if residual set is explained by crushing or unmatched final moisture.\n\n## Replication and analysis\n\nTreat separately prepared specimens, batches, or devices as independent units. Technical repeats and images are nested measurements. First estimate calibration error and independent-preparation variability. Set the minimum meaningful effect in the primary outcome's units before confirmation, then choose sample size from that effect and pilot variance; a convenient pilot count is not a powered study.\n\nRandomize run order and blind sample labels where practical. Freeze image processing, fitting choices, exclusions, and the primary comparison before evaluating confirmatory data. Report effect size and uncertainty; use a blocked or mixed-effects analysis when specimens share a batch. A wide interval is inconclusive. Include the measurement and matching controls even when the directional effect appears large.\n\nA useful go/no-go gate is whether the hypothesized effect can be distinguished from calibration uncertainty and the strongest alternative explanation. Stop material purchases if the closest literature already measures the identical contrast, unless a replication has an explicit purpose. Do not use these abbreviated plans as complete laboratory protocols.\n\n## Data to preserve\n\nKeep unedited images or sensor streams, calibration files, preparation IDs, run order, environmental logs, input histories, raw outcome values, exclusions, and the exact analysis version. No values are prefilled in the observation template. Use `data/Published Benchmarks.csv` only as literature context; values from a different system are not observations of this hypothesis.\n\n## Sources and transfer limits\n\n### MECHWOOD17\n\n[Deformation of wood in compression during moisture movement](https://doi.org/10.29037/ajstd.316)\n\nAccess: Publisher abstract examined. Type: primary experiment.\n\nBackground findings and transfer limits: see [source assessments](../research/Primary%20Source%20Assessments.md) under this source key.\n\n### WOOD17\n\n[Understanding the influence of wood as a substrate on the permeability of coatings by NMR imaging and wet-cup](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0300944017301157)\n\nAccess: Indexed abstract examined. Type: primary experiment.\n\nBackground findings and transfer limits: see [source assessments](../research/Primary%20Source%20Assessments.md) under this source key.\n\n"
  },
  {
    "title": "Notch humidity cycling — balsa wood",
    "hypothesis": "For balsa wood, shallow notches will amplify local swelling strain more during fast than slow humidity cycles.",
    "test": "Use digital image correlation while measuring moisture uptake.",
    "against": "Notch strain amplification is independent of cycle speed.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Notch humidity cycling",
    "system": "balsa wood",
    "id": 604,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 22,
    "literature_query": "Notch humidity cycling balsa wood shallow notches amplify local swelling strain fast slow experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0604",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Notch humidity cycling — balsa wood",
      "hypothesis": "For balsa wood, shallow notches will amplify local swelling strain more during fast than slow humidity cycles.",
      "test": "Use digital image correlation while measuring moisture uptake.",
      "against": "Notch strain amplification is independent of cycle speed.",
      "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
      "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Notch humidity cycling",
      "system": "balsa wood",
      "id": 604,
      "access_score": 4,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 29,
      "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 22,
      "literature_query": "Notch humidity cycling balsa wood shallow notches amplify local swelling strain fast slow experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
      "source_lead_count": 7,
      "source_ids": "S05dd75066934;Sf4be0456357f;S298b6e847516;Sa9844171eb79;Se8960ac2144d;S182b76ba9218;Sb8dae30f681c",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Thermal pretreatment gradient — balsa wood",
    "hypothesis": "For balsa wood, a shallow heat-treatment gradient will direct bending during hydration more reproducibly than a sharp treatment boundary.",
    "test": "Map chemistry, modulus, and curvature across repeated humidity cycles.",
    "against": "Bending repeatability is no better with a graded treatment.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Thermal pretreatment gradient",
    "system": "balsa wood",
    "id": 605,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 23,
    "literature_query": "Thermal pretreatment gradient balsa wood shallow heat-treatment direct bending hydration reproducibly sharp treatment experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0605",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Thermal pretreatment gradient — balsa wood",
      "hypothesis": "For balsa wood, a shallow heat-treatment gradient will direct bending during hydration more reproducibly than a sharp treatment boundary.",
      "test": "Map chemistry, modulus, and curvature across repeated humidity cycles.",
      "against": "Bending repeatability is no better with a graded treatment.",
      "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
      "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Thermal pretreatment gradient",
      "system": "balsa wood",
      "id": 605,
      "access_score": 4,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 29,
      "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 23,
      "literature_query": "Thermal pretreatment gradient balsa wood shallow heat-treatment direct bending hydration reproducibly sharp treatment experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
      "source_lead_count": 8,
      "source_ids": "Scf042d53e78c;S730a529358e8;S4c0387859406;Sef9198a6b1d7;S15abf55f280f;S6c6230c1b6b3;S2b1686b9b419;Sd7efc16b3373",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Fiber junction lubrication — balsa wood",
    "hypothesis": "For balsa wood, small retained amounts of a compatible nonreactive lubricant will reduce humidity-driven acoustic emission before changing bulk stiffness.",
    "test": "Measure emission events, stiffness, and lubricant retention during cycling.",
    "against": "Emission reduction occurs only alongside comparable stiffness changes.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Fiber junction lubrication",
    "system": "balsa wood",
    "id": 606,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 24,
    "literature_query": "Fiber junction lubrication balsa wood retained amounts of compatible nonreactive lubricant humidity-driven acoustic experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0606",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Fiber junction lubrication — balsa wood",
      "hypothesis": "For balsa wood, small retained amounts of a compatible nonreactive lubricant will reduce humidity-driven acoustic emission before changing bulk stiffness.",
      "test": "Measure emission events, stiffness, and lubricant retention during cycling.",
      "against": "Emission reduction occurs only alongside comparable stiffness changes.",
      "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
      "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Fiber junction lubrication",
      "system": "balsa wood",
      "id": 606,
      "access_score": 4,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 29,
      "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 24,
      "literature_query": "Fiber junction lubrication balsa wood retained amounts of compatible nonreactive lubricant humidity-driven acoustic experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
      "source_lead_count": 8,
      "source_ids": "S942405c8a95d;S0f2b5389a1bd;S37ac78b4947f;Se47c7fd0cf25;Sd779102bb8da;Sbb912ce8157c;S07e995fa20d7;S88bd5b88acc5",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pore blockage locality — balsa wood",
    "hypothesis": "For balsa wood, blocking a few large transport channels will slow drying more than distributing equal blocker mass among small channels.",
    "test": "Image pore filling and record mass-loss curves.",
    "against": "Drying differences are explained by total blocked volume alone.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Pore blockage locality",
    "system": "balsa wood",
    "id": 607,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 25,
    "literature_query": "Pore blockage locality balsa wood blocking few large transport channels slow drying distributing experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0607",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Pore blockage locality — balsa wood",
      "hypothesis": "For balsa wood, blocking a few large transport channels will slow drying more than distributing equal blocker mass among small channels.",
      "test": "Image pore filling and record mass-loss curves.",
      "against": "Drying differences are explained by total blocked volume alone.",
      "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
      "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Pore blockage locality",
      "system": "balsa wood",
      "id": 607,
      "access_score": 4,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 29,
      "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 25,
      "literature_query": "Pore blockage locality balsa wood blocking few large transport channels slow drying distributing experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
      "source_lead_count": 9,
      "source_ids": "S3f7c478f2c8f;S99557d856508;S4962b46f9508;S11b05a6bb043;S83c3e47719d4;S30bff15129e7;S761daa4bac79;S4f9f250fedf4;S8997364b152a",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Water uptake pause — balsa wood",
    "hypothesis": "For balsa wood, a short dry pause during uptake will increase subsequent uptake variability by redistributing internal moisture.",
    "test": "Compare restart uptake maps with uninterrupted controls.",
    "against": "Restart variability is unchanged after mean moisture is matched.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Water uptake pause",
    "system": "balsa wood",
    "id": 608,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0608",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Grain-angle mixing — balsa wood",
    "hypothesis": "For balsa wood, laminating alternating small grain angles will reduce humidity-induced twist compared with a constant off-axis angle.",
    "test": "Measure three-dimensional deformation in matched laminates.",
    "against": "Twist does not decrease after adhesive effects are controlled.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Grain-angle mixing",
    "system": "balsa wood",
    "id": 609,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0609",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Surface densification depth — balsa wood",
    "hypothesis": "For balsa wood, intermediate surface densification will minimize wetting-induced roughness without strongly slowing drying.",
    "test": "Measure topography and drying across densification depths.",
    "against": "No intermediate regime improves roughness while preserving drying rate.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Surface densification depth",
    "system": "balsa wood",
    "id": 610,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 26,
    "literature_query": "Surface densification depth balsa wood intermediate minimize wetting-induced roughness strongly slowing drying experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0610",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": true,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Surface densification depth — balsa wood",
      "hypothesis": "For balsa wood, intermediate surface densification will minimize wetting-induced roughness without strongly slowing drying.",
      "test": "Measure topography and drying across densification depths.",
      "against": "No intermediate regime improves roughness while preserving drying rate.",
      "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
      "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Surface densification depth",
      "system": "balsa wood",
      "id": 610,
      "access_score": 4,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 29,
      "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 26,
      "literature_query": "Surface densification depth balsa wood intermediate minimize wetting-induced roughness strongly slowing drying experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
      "source_lead_count": 8,
      "source_ids": "S8476e8c133b8;S008d4da8129b;Scdf879feb35f;Sccb21e56f0fb;Sc2ca2cf1d299;S316d0b438050;Sa76d71268e57;Sb8a0185acc1c",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": {
      "deep_rank": "22",
      "id": "610",
      "title": "Surface densification depth — balsa wood",
      "original_300_rank": "26",
      "pilot_class": "C",
      "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
      "hypothesis": "For balsa wood, intermediate surface densification will minimize wetting-induced roughness without strongly slowing drying.",
      "primary_outcome": "Increase in surface roughness after a matched wet-dry cycle, together with drying half-time.",
      "comparison": "Several surface densification depths in balsa, plus untreated and uniformly compressed controls.",
      "controls": "Surface chemistry, temperature history, grain orientation, density, initial roughness, water uptake, and springback.",
      "pilot": "Prefer mechanically characterized existing material or trained facility preparation. Measure density depth profile and roughness before wetting. Record drying to test whether improved finish sacrifices transport.",
      "novelty_gap": "Densification reducing roughness and grain raising are already known. The particular depth optimum balancing roughness and drying remains an unverified extension.",
      "stop_rule": "Drop a depth-only explanation if heat chemistry differs. Stop if every roughness gain simply results from a proportionate drying penalty.",
      "source_keys": "DENSE24;RAISE17",
      "truth_probability": "not estimated",
      "novelty_status": "unverified"
    },
    "dossier_text": "# 22. H0610 — Surface densification depth — balsa wood\n\nOriginal 300-folder rank: 26. Pilot class: C. Resource class: modest bench or workshop; calibration still required.\n\n## Original hypothesis\n\nFor balsa wood, intermediate surface densification will minimize wetting-induced roughness without strongly slowing drying.\n\n## Why investigate this\n\nRoughness and water loss are observable, and existing densification studies provide direct context.\n\n## Literature assessment and exact novelty question\n\nDensification reducing roughness and grain raising are already known. The particular depth optimum balancing roughness and drying remains an unverified extension. Worldwide originality remains unverified.\n\n## Primary measurement\n\nIncrease in surface roughness after a matched wet-dry cycle, together with drying half-time.\n\n## Comparison\n\nSeveral surface densification depths in balsa, plus untreated and uniformly compressed controls.\n\n## Critical controls\n\nSurface chemistry, temperature history, grain orientation, density, initial roughness, water uptake, and springback.\n\n## Pilot plan\n\nPrefer mechanically characterized existing material or trained facility preparation. Measure density depth profile and roughness before wetting. Record drying to test whether improved finish sacrifices transport.\n\n## What would count against it\n\nDrop a depth-only explanation if heat chemistry differs. Stop if every roughness gain simply results from a proportionate drying penalty.\n\n## Replication and analysis\n\nTreat separately prepared specimens, batches, or devices as independent units. Technical repeats and images are nested measurements. First estimate calibration error and independent-preparation variability. Set the minimum meaningful effect in the primary outcome's units before confirmation, then choose sample size from that effect and pilot variance; a convenient pilot count is not a powered study.\n\nRandomize run order and blind sample labels where practical. Freeze image processing, fitting choices, exclusions, and the primary comparison before evaluating confirmatory data. Report effect size and uncertainty; use a blocked or mixed-effects analysis when specimens share a batch. A wide interval is inconclusive. Include the measurement and matching controls even when the directional effect appears large.\n\nA useful go/no-go gate is whether the hypothesized effect can be distinguished from calibration uncertainty and the strongest alternative explanation. Stop material purchases if the closest literature already measures the identical contrast, unless a replication has an explicit purpose. Do not use these abbreviated plans as complete laboratory protocols.\n\n## Data to preserve\n\nKeep unedited images or sensor streams, calibration files, preparation IDs, run order, environmental logs, input histories, raw outcome values, exclusions, and the exact analysis version. No values are prefilled in the observation template. Use `data/Published Benchmarks.csv` only as literature context; values from a different system are not observations of this hypothesis.\n\n## Sources and transfer limits\n\n### DENSE24\n\n[Surface changes in wood submitted to thermomechanical densification](https://doi.org/10.22320/s0718221x/2024.42)\n\nAccess: Publisher abstract examined. Type: primary experiment.\n\nBackground findings and transfer limits: see [source assessments](../research/Primary%20Source%20Assessments.md) under this source key.\n\n### RAISE17\n\n[Microstructure and Mechanism of Grain Raising in Wood](https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6412/7/9/135)\n\nAccess: Publisher abstract and article sections examined. Type: primary experiment.\n\nBackground findings and transfer limits: see [source assessments](../research/Primary%20Source%20Assessments.md) under this source key.\n\n"
  },
  {
    "title": "Alternating moisture faces — birch veneer",
    "hypothesis": "For birch veneer, alternating the wetted face will reduce persistent curvature compared with repeatedly wetting one face at equal water uptake.",
    "test": "Measure curvature and spatial moisture through repeated wetting cycles.",
    "against": "Persistent curvature is not smaller under alternating exposure.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Alternating moisture faces",
    "system": "birch veneer",
    "id": 611,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0611",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "End-face sealing pattern — birch veneer",
    "hypothesis": "For birch veneer, discontinuous end-face seals will produce larger local moisture gradients than a continuous partial-area seal.",
    "test": "Map moisture after controlled humidity steps with matched sealed area.",
    "against": "Local gradients do not differ after seal permeability is measured.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: End-face sealing pattern",
    "system": "birch veneer",
    "id": 612,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0612",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Compression during rewetting — birch veneer",
    "hypothesis": "For birch veneer, mild compression during rewetting will increase retained shape change compared with compression after equilibration.",
    "test": "Compare recovered dimensions and stiffness after identical peak load.",
    "against": "Retained shape change does not depend on loading stage.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Compression during rewetting",
    "system": "birch veneer",
    "id": 613,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0613",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Notch humidity cycling — birch veneer",
    "hypothesis": "For birch veneer, shallow notches will amplify local swelling strain more during fast than slow humidity cycles.",
    "test": "Use digital image correlation while measuring moisture uptake.",
    "against": "Notch strain amplification is independent of cycle speed.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Notch humidity cycling",
    "system": "birch veneer",
    "id": 614,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0614",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Thermal pretreatment gradient — birch veneer",
    "hypothesis": "For birch veneer, a shallow heat-treatment gradient will direct bending during hydration more reproducibly than a sharp treatment boundary.",
    "test": "Map chemistry, modulus, and curvature across repeated humidity cycles.",
    "against": "Bending repeatability is no better with a graded treatment.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Thermal pretreatment gradient",
    "system": "birch veneer",
    "id": 615,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0615",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Fiber junction lubrication — birch veneer",
    "hypothesis": "For birch veneer, small retained amounts of a compatible nonreactive lubricant will reduce humidity-driven acoustic emission before changing bulk stiffness.",
    "test": "Measure emission events, stiffness, and lubricant retention during cycling.",
    "against": "Emission reduction occurs only alongside comparable stiffness changes.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Fiber junction lubrication",
    "system": "birch veneer",
    "id": 616,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0616",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pore blockage locality — birch veneer",
    "hypothesis": "For birch veneer, blocking a few large transport channels will slow drying more than distributing equal blocker mass among small channels.",
    "test": "Image pore filling and record mass-loss curves.",
    "against": "Drying differences are explained by total blocked volume alone.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Pore blockage locality",
    "system": "birch veneer",
    "id": 617,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0617",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Water uptake pause — birch veneer",
    "hypothesis": "For birch veneer, a short dry pause during uptake will increase subsequent uptake variability by redistributing internal moisture.",
    "test": "Compare restart uptake maps with uninterrupted controls.",
    "against": "Restart variability is unchanged after mean moisture is matched.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Water uptake pause",
    "system": "birch veneer",
    "id": 618,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0618",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Grain-angle mixing — birch veneer",
    "hypothesis": "For birch veneer, laminating alternating small grain angles will reduce humidity-induced twist compared with a constant off-axis angle.",
    "test": "Measure three-dimensional deformation in matched laminates.",
    "against": "Twist does not decrease after adhesive effects are controlled.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Grain-angle mixing",
    "system": "birch veneer",
    "id": 619,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0619",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Surface densification depth — birch veneer",
    "hypothesis": "For birch veneer, intermediate surface densification will minimize wetting-induced roughness without strongly slowing drying.",
    "test": "Measure topography and drying across densification depths.",
    "against": "No intermediate regime improves roughness while preserving drying rate.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Surface densification depth",
    "system": "birch veneer",
    "id": 620,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0620",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Alternating moisture faces — cork sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For cork sheet, alternating the wetted face will reduce persistent curvature compared with repeatedly wetting one face at equal water uptake.",
    "test": "Measure curvature and spatial moisture through repeated wetting cycles.",
    "against": "Persistent curvature is not smaller under alternating exposure.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Alternating moisture faces",
    "system": "cork sheet",
    "id": 621,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0621",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "End-face sealing pattern — cork sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For cork sheet, discontinuous end-face seals will produce larger local moisture gradients than a continuous partial-area seal.",
    "test": "Map moisture after controlled humidity steps with matched sealed area.",
    "against": "Local gradients do not differ after seal permeability is measured.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: End-face sealing pattern",
    "system": "cork sheet",
    "id": 622,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0622",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Compression during rewetting — cork sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For cork sheet, mild compression during rewetting will increase retained shape change compared with compression after equilibration.",
    "test": "Compare recovered dimensions and stiffness after identical peak load.",
    "against": "Retained shape change does not depend on loading stage.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Compression during rewetting",
    "system": "cork sheet",
    "id": 623,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0623",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Notch humidity cycling — cork sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For cork sheet, shallow notches will amplify local swelling strain more during fast than slow humidity cycles.",
    "test": "Use digital image correlation while measuring moisture uptake.",
    "against": "Notch strain amplification is independent of cycle speed.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Notch humidity cycling",
    "system": "cork sheet",
    "id": 624,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0624",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Thermal pretreatment gradient — cork sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For cork sheet, a shallow heat-treatment gradient will direct bending during hydration more reproducibly than a sharp treatment boundary.",
    "test": "Map chemistry, modulus, and curvature across repeated humidity cycles.",
    "against": "Bending repeatability is no better with a graded treatment.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Thermal pretreatment gradient",
    "system": "cork sheet",
    "id": 625,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0625",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Fiber junction lubrication — cork sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For cork sheet, small retained amounts of a compatible nonreactive lubricant will reduce humidity-driven acoustic emission before changing bulk stiffness.",
    "test": "Measure emission events, stiffness, and lubricant retention during cycling.",
    "against": "Emission reduction occurs only alongside comparable stiffness changes.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Fiber junction lubrication",
    "system": "cork sheet",
    "id": 626,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0626",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pore blockage locality — cork sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For cork sheet, blocking a few large transport channels will slow drying more than distributing equal blocker mass among small channels.",
    "test": "Image pore filling and record mass-loss curves.",
    "against": "Drying differences are explained by total blocked volume alone.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Pore blockage locality",
    "system": "cork sheet",
    "id": 627,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0627",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Water uptake pause — cork sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For cork sheet, a short dry pause during uptake will increase subsequent uptake variability by redistributing internal moisture.",
    "test": "Compare restart uptake maps with uninterrupted controls.",
    "against": "Restart variability is unchanged after mean moisture is matched.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Water uptake pause",
    "system": "cork sheet",
    "id": 628,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0628",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Grain-angle mixing — cork sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For cork sheet, laminating alternating small grain angles will reduce humidity-induced twist compared with a constant off-axis angle.",
    "test": "Measure three-dimensional deformation in matched laminates.",
    "against": "Twist does not decrease after adhesive effects are controlled.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Grain-angle mixing",
    "system": "cork sheet",
    "id": 629,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0629",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Surface densification depth — cork sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For cork sheet, intermediate surface densification will minimize wetting-induced roughness without strongly slowing drying.",
    "test": "Measure topography and drying across densification depths.",
    "against": "No intermediate regime improves roughness while preserving drying rate.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Surface densification depth",
    "system": "cork sheet",
    "id": 630,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0630",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Alternating moisture faces — bamboo strip",
    "hypothesis": "For bamboo strip, alternating the wetted face will reduce persistent curvature compared with repeatedly wetting one face at equal water uptake.",
    "test": "Measure curvature and spatial moisture through repeated wetting cycles.",
    "against": "Persistent curvature is not smaller under alternating exposure.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Alternating moisture faces",
    "system": "bamboo strip",
    "id": 631,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0631",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "End-face sealing pattern — bamboo strip",
    "hypothesis": "For bamboo strip, discontinuous end-face seals will produce larger local moisture gradients than a continuous partial-area seal.",
    "test": "Map moisture after controlled humidity steps with matched sealed area.",
    "against": "Local gradients do not differ after seal permeability is measured.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: End-face sealing pattern",
    "system": "bamboo strip",
    "id": 632,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0632",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Compression during rewetting — bamboo strip",
    "hypothesis": "For bamboo strip, mild compression during rewetting will increase retained shape change compared with compression after equilibration.",
    "test": "Compare recovered dimensions and stiffness after identical peak load.",
    "against": "Retained shape change does not depend on loading stage.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Compression during rewetting",
    "system": "bamboo strip",
    "id": 633,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0633",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Notch humidity cycling — bamboo strip",
    "hypothesis": "For bamboo strip, shallow notches will amplify local swelling strain more during fast than slow humidity cycles.",
    "test": "Use digital image correlation while measuring moisture uptake.",
    "against": "Notch strain amplification is independent of cycle speed.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Notch humidity cycling",
    "system": "bamboo strip",
    "id": 634,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0634",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Thermal pretreatment gradient — bamboo strip",
    "hypothesis": "For bamboo strip, a shallow heat-treatment gradient will direct bending during hydration more reproducibly than a sharp treatment boundary.",
    "test": "Map chemistry, modulus, and curvature across repeated humidity cycles.",
    "against": "Bending repeatability is no better with a graded treatment.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Thermal pretreatment gradient",
    "system": "bamboo strip",
    "id": 635,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0635",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Fiber junction lubrication — bamboo strip",
    "hypothesis": "For bamboo strip, small retained amounts of a compatible nonreactive lubricant will reduce humidity-driven acoustic emission before changing bulk stiffness.",
    "test": "Measure emission events, stiffness, and lubricant retention during cycling.",
    "against": "Emission reduction occurs only alongside comparable stiffness changes.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Fiber junction lubrication",
    "system": "bamboo strip",
    "id": 636,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0636",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pore blockage locality — bamboo strip",
    "hypothesis": "For bamboo strip, blocking a few large transport channels will slow drying more than distributing equal blocker mass among small channels.",
    "test": "Image pore filling and record mass-loss curves.",
    "against": "Drying differences are explained by total blocked volume alone.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Pore blockage locality",
    "system": "bamboo strip",
    "id": 637,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0637",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Water uptake pause — bamboo strip",
    "hypothesis": "For bamboo strip, a short dry pause during uptake will increase subsequent uptake variability by redistributing internal moisture.",
    "test": "Compare restart uptake maps with uninterrupted controls.",
    "against": "Restart variability is unchanged after mean moisture is matched.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Water uptake pause",
    "system": "bamboo strip",
    "id": 638,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0638",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Grain-angle mixing — bamboo strip",
    "hypothesis": "For bamboo strip, laminating alternating small grain angles will reduce humidity-induced twist compared with a constant off-axis angle.",
    "test": "Measure three-dimensional deformation in matched laminates.",
    "against": "Twist does not decrease after adhesive effects are controlled.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Grain-angle mixing",
    "system": "bamboo strip",
    "id": 639,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0639",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Surface densification depth — bamboo strip",
    "hypothesis": "For bamboo strip, intermediate surface densification will minimize wetting-induced roughness without strongly slowing drying.",
    "test": "Measure topography and drying across densification depths.",
    "against": "No intermediate regime improves roughness while preserving drying rate.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Surface densification depth",
    "system": "bamboo strip",
    "id": 640,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0640",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Alternating moisture faces — pine sapwood",
    "hypothesis": "For pine sapwood, alternating the wetted face will reduce persistent curvature compared with repeatedly wetting one face at equal water uptake.",
    "test": "Measure curvature and spatial moisture through repeated wetting cycles.",
    "against": "Persistent curvature is not smaller under alternating exposure.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Alternating moisture faces",
    "system": "pine sapwood",
    "id": 641,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0641",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "End-face sealing pattern — pine sapwood",
    "hypothesis": "For pine sapwood, discontinuous end-face seals will produce larger local moisture gradients than a continuous partial-area seal.",
    "test": "Map moisture after controlled humidity steps with matched sealed area.",
    "against": "Local gradients do not differ after seal permeability is measured.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: End-face sealing pattern",
    "system": "pine sapwood",
    "id": 642,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0642",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Compression during rewetting — pine sapwood",
    "hypothesis": "For pine sapwood, mild compression during rewetting will increase retained shape change compared with compression after equilibration.",
    "test": "Compare recovered dimensions and stiffness after identical peak load.",
    "against": "Retained shape change does not depend on loading stage.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Compression during rewetting",
    "system": "pine sapwood",
    "id": 643,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0643",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Notch humidity cycling — pine sapwood",
    "hypothesis": "For pine sapwood, shallow notches will amplify local swelling strain more during fast than slow humidity cycles.",
    "test": "Use digital image correlation while measuring moisture uptake.",
    "against": "Notch strain amplification is independent of cycle speed.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Notch humidity cycling",
    "system": "pine sapwood",
    "id": 644,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0644",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Thermal pretreatment gradient — pine sapwood",
    "hypothesis": "For pine sapwood, a shallow heat-treatment gradient will direct bending during hydration more reproducibly than a sharp treatment boundary.",
    "test": "Map chemistry, modulus, and curvature across repeated humidity cycles.",
    "against": "Bending repeatability is no better with a graded treatment.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Thermal pretreatment gradient",
    "system": "pine sapwood",
    "id": 645,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0645",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Fiber junction lubrication — pine sapwood",
    "hypothesis": "For pine sapwood, small retained amounts of a compatible nonreactive lubricant will reduce humidity-driven acoustic emission before changing bulk stiffness.",
    "test": "Measure emission events, stiffness, and lubricant retention during cycling.",
    "against": "Emission reduction occurs only alongside comparable stiffness changes.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Fiber junction lubrication",
    "system": "pine sapwood",
    "id": 646,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0646",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pore blockage locality — pine sapwood",
    "hypothesis": "For pine sapwood, blocking a few large transport channels will slow drying more than distributing equal blocker mass among small channels.",
    "test": "Image pore filling and record mass-loss curves.",
    "against": "Drying differences are explained by total blocked volume alone.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Pore blockage locality",
    "system": "pine sapwood",
    "id": 647,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0647",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Water uptake pause — pine sapwood",
    "hypothesis": "For pine sapwood, a short dry pause during uptake will increase subsequent uptake variability by redistributing internal moisture.",
    "test": "Compare restart uptake maps with uninterrupted controls.",
    "against": "Restart variability is unchanged after mean moisture is matched.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Water uptake pause",
    "system": "pine sapwood",
    "id": 648,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0648",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Grain-angle mixing — pine sapwood",
    "hypothesis": "For pine sapwood, laminating alternating small grain angles will reduce humidity-induced twist compared with a constant off-axis angle.",
    "test": "Measure three-dimensional deformation in matched laminates.",
    "against": "Twist does not decrease after adhesive effects are controlled.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Grain-angle mixing",
    "system": "pine sapwood",
    "id": 649,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0649",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Surface densification depth — pine sapwood",
    "hypothesis": "For pine sapwood, intermediate surface densification will minimize wetting-induced roughness without strongly slowing drying.",
    "test": "Measure topography and drying across densification depths.",
    "against": "No intermediate regime improves roughness while preserving drying rate.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Surface densification depth",
    "system": "pine sapwood",
    "id": 650,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0650",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Alternating moisture faces — beech veneer",
    "hypothesis": "For beech veneer, alternating the wetted face will reduce persistent curvature compared with repeatedly wetting one face at equal water uptake.",
    "test": "Measure curvature and spatial moisture through repeated wetting cycles.",
    "against": "Persistent curvature is not smaller under alternating exposure.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Alternating moisture faces",
    "system": "beech veneer",
    "id": 651,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0651",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "End-face sealing pattern — beech veneer",
    "hypothesis": "For beech veneer, discontinuous end-face seals will produce larger local moisture gradients than a continuous partial-area seal.",
    "test": "Map moisture after controlled humidity steps with matched sealed area.",
    "against": "Local gradients do not differ after seal permeability is measured.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: End-face sealing pattern",
    "system": "beech veneer",
    "id": 652,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0652",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Compression during rewetting — beech veneer",
    "hypothesis": "For beech veneer, mild compression during rewetting will increase retained shape change compared with compression after equilibration.",
    "test": "Compare recovered dimensions and stiffness after identical peak load.",
    "against": "Retained shape change does not depend on loading stage.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Compression during rewetting",
    "system": "beech veneer",
    "id": 653,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0653",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Notch humidity cycling — beech veneer",
    "hypothesis": "For beech veneer, shallow notches will amplify local swelling strain more during fast than slow humidity cycles.",
    "test": "Use digital image correlation while measuring moisture uptake.",
    "against": "Notch strain amplification is independent of cycle speed.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Notch humidity cycling",
    "system": "beech veneer",
    "id": 654,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0654",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Thermal pretreatment gradient — beech veneer",
    "hypothesis": "For beech veneer, a shallow heat-treatment gradient will direct bending during hydration more reproducibly than a sharp treatment boundary.",
    "test": "Map chemistry, modulus, and curvature across repeated humidity cycles.",
    "against": "Bending repeatability is no better with a graded treatment.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Thermal pretreatment gradient",
    "system": "beech veneer",
    "id": 655,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0655",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Fiber junction lubrication — beech veneer",
    "hypothesis": "For beech veneer, small retained amounts of a compatible nonreactive lubricant will reduce humidity-driven acoustic emission before changing bulk stiffness.",
    "test": "Measure emission events, stiffness, and lubricant retention during cycling.",
    "against": "Emission reduction occurs only alongside comparable stiffness changes.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Fiber junction lubrication",
    "system": "beech veneer",
    "id": 656,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0656",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pore blockage locality — beech veneer",
    "hypothesis": "For beech veneer, blocking a few large transport channels will slow drying more than distributing equal blocker mass among small channels.",
    "test": "Image pore filling and record mass-loss curves.",
    "against": "Drying differences are explained by total blocked volume alone.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Pore blockage locality",
    "system": "beech veneer",
    "id": 657,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0657",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Water uptake pause — beech veneer",
    "hypothesis": "For beech veneer, a short dry pause during uptake will increase subsequent uptake variability by redistributing internal moisture.",
    "test": "Compare restart uptake maps with uninterrupted controls.",
    "against": "Restart variability is unchanged after mean moisture is matched.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Water uptake pause",
    "system": "beech veneer",
    "id": 658,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0658",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Grain-angle mixing — beech veneer",
    "hypothesis": "For beech veneer, laminating alternating small grain angles will reduce humidity-induced twist compared with a constant off-axis angle.",
    "test": "Measure three-dimensional deformation in matched laminates.",
    "against": "Twist does not decrease after adhesive effects are controlled.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Grain-angle mixing",
    "system": "beech veneer",
    "id": 659,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0659",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Surface densification depth — beech veneer",
    "hypothesis": "For beech veneer, intermediate surface densification will minimize wetting-induced roughness without strongly slowing drying.",
    "test": "Measure topography and drying across densification depths.",
    "against": "No intermediate regime improves roughness while preserving drying rate.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Surface densification depth",
    "system": "beech veneer",
    "id": 660,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0660",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Alternating moisture faces — compressed cellulose board",
    "hypothesis": "For compressed cellulose board, alternating the wetted face will reduce persistent curvature compared with repeatedly wetting one face at equal water uptake.",
    "test": "Measure curvature and spatial moisture through repeated wetting cycles.",
    "against": "Persistent curvature is not smaller under alternating exposure.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Alternating moisture faces",
    "system": "compressed cellulose board",
    "id": 661,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0661",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "End-face sealing pattern — compressed cellulose board",
    "hypothesis": "For compressed cellulose board, discontinuous end-face seals will produce larger local moisture gradients than a continuous partial-area seal.",
    "test": "Map moisture after controlled humidity steps with matched sealed area.",
    "against": "Local gradients do not differ after seal permeability is measured.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: End-face sealing pattern",
    "system": "compressed cellulose board",
    "id": 662,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0662",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Compression during rewetting — compressed cellulose board",
    "hypothesis": "For compressed cellulose board, mild compression during rewetting will increase retained shape change compared with compression after equilibration.",
    "test": "Compare recovered dimensions and stiffness after identical peak load.",
    "against": "Retained shape change does not depend on loading stage.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Compression during rewetting",
    "system": "compressed cellulose board",
    "id": 663,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0663",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Notch humidity cycling — compressed cellulose board",
    "hypothesis": "For compressed cellulose board, shallow notches will amplify local swelling strain more during fast than slow humidity cycles.",
    "test": "Use digital image correlation while measuring moisture uptake.",
    "against": "Notch strain amplification is independent of cycle speed.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Notch humidity cycling",
    "system": "compressed cellulose board",
    "id": 664,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0664",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Thermal pretreatment gradient — compressed cellulose board",
    "hypothesis": "For compressed cellulose board, a shallow heat-treatment gradient will direct bending during hydration more reproducibly than a sharp treatment boundary.",
    "test": "Map chemistry, modulus, and curvature across repeated humidity cycles.",
    "against": "Bending repeatability is no better with a graded treatment.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Thermal pretreatment gradient",
    "system": "compressed cellulose board",
    "id": 665,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0665",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Fiber junction lubrication — compressed cellulose board",
    "hypothesis": "For compressed cellulose board, small retained amounts of a compatible nonreactive lubricant will reduce humidity-driven acoustic emission before changing bulk stiffness.",
    "test": "Measure emission events, stiffness, and lubricant retention during cycling.",
    "against": "Emission reduction occurs only alongside comparable stiffness changes.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Fiber junction lubrication",
    "system": "compressed cellulose board",
    "id": 666,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0666",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pore blockage locality — compressed cellulose board",
    "hypothesis": "For compressed cellulose board, blocking a few large transport channels will slow drying more than distributing equal blocker mass among small channels.",
    "test": "Image pore filling and record mass-loss curves.",
    "against": "Drying differences are explained by total blocked volume alone.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Pore blockage locality",
    "system": "compressed cellulose board",
    "id": 667,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0667",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Water uptake pause — compressed cellulose board",
    "hypothesis": "For compressed cellulose board, a short dry pause during uptake will increase subsequent uptake variability by redistributing internal moisture.",
    "test": "Compare restart uptake maps with uninterrupted controls.",
    "against": "Restart variability is unchanged after mean moisture is matched.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Water uptake pause",
    "system": "compressed cellulose board",
    "id": 668,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0668",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Grain-angle mixing — compressed cellulose board",
    "hypothesis": "For compressed cellulose board, laminating alternating small grain angles will reduce humidity-induced twist compared with a constant off-axis angle.",
    "test": "Measure three-dimensional deformation in matched laminates.",
    "against": "Twist does not decrease after adhesive effects are controlled.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Grain-angle mixing",
    "system": "compressed cellulose board",
    "id": 669,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0669",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Surface densification depth — compressed cellulose board",
    "hypothesis": "For compressed cellulose board, intermediate surface densification will minimize wetting-induced roughness without strongly slowing drying.",
    "test": "Measure topography and drying across densification depths.",
    "against": "No intermediate regime improves roughness while preserving drying rate.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Surface densification depth",
    "system": "compressed cellulose board",
    "id": 670,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0670",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Alternating moisture faces — flax fiber board",
    "hypothesis": "For flax fiber board, alternating the wetted face will reduce persistent curvature compared with repeatedly wetting one face at equal water uptake.",
    "test": "Measure curvature and spatial moisture through repeated wetting cycles.",
    "against": "Persistent curvature is not smaller under alternating exposure.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Alternating moisture faces",
    "system": "flax fiber board",
    "id": 671,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0671",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "End-face sealing pattern — flax fiber board",
    "hypothesis": "For flax fiber board, discontinuous end-face seals will produce larger local moisture gradients than a continuous partial-area seal.",
    "test": "Map moisture after controlled humidity steps with matched sealed area.",
    "against": "Local gradients do not differ after seal permeability is measured.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: End-face sealing pattern",
    "system": "flax fiber board",
    "id": 672,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0672",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Compression during rewetting — flax fiber board",
    "hypothesis": "For flax fiber board, mild compression during rewetting will increase retained shape change compared with compression after equilibration.",
    "test": "Compare recovered dimensions and stiffness after identical peak load.",
    "against": "Retained shape change does not depend on loading stage.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Compression during rewetting",
    "system": "flax fiber board",
    "id": 673,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0673",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Notch humidity cycling — flax fiber board",
    "hypothesis": "For flax fiber board, shallow notches will amplify local swelling strain more during fast than slow humidity cycles.",
    "test": "Use digital image correlation while measuring moisture uptake.",
    "against": "Notch strain amplification is independent of cycle speed.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Notch humidity cycling",
    "system": "flax fiber board",
    "id": 674,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0674",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Thermal pretreatment gradient — flax fiber board",
    "hypothesis": "For flax fiber board, a shallow heat-treatment gradient will direct bending during hydration more reproducibly than a sharp treatment boundary.",
    "test": "Map chemistry, modulus, and curvature across repeated humidity cycles.",
    "against": "Bending repeatability is no better with a graded treatment.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Thermal pretreatment gradient",
    "system": "flax fiber board",
    "id": 675,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0675",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Fiber junction lubrication — flax fiber board",
    "hypothesis": "For flax fiber board, small retained amounts of a compatible nonreactive lubricant will reduce humidity-driven acoustic emission before changing bulk stiffness.",
    "test": "Measure emission events, stiffness, and lubricant retention during cycling.",
    "against": "Emission reduction occurs only alongside comparable stiffness changes.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Fiber junction lubrication",
    "system": "flax fiber board",
    "id": 676,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0676",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pore blockage locality — flax fiber board",
    "hypothesis": "For flax fiber board, blocking a few large transport channels will slow drying more than distributing equal blocker mass among small channels.",
    "test": "Image pore filling and record mass-loss curves.",
    "against": "Drying differences are explained by total blocked volume alone.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Pore blockage locality",
    "system": "flax fiber board",
    "id": 677,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0677",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Water uptake pause — flax fiber board",
    "hypothesis": "For flax fiber board, a short dry pause during uptake will increase subsequent uptake variability by redistributing internal moisture.",
    "test": "Compare restart uptake maps with uninterrupted controls.",
    "against": "Restart variability is unchanged after mean moisture is matched.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Water uptake pause",
    "system": "flax fiber board",
    "id": 678,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0678",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Grain-angle mixing — flax fiber board",
    "hypothesis": "For flax fiber board, laminating alternating small grain angles will reduce humidity-induced twist compared with a constant off-axis angle.",
    "test": "Measure three-dimensional deformation in matched laminates.",
    "against": "Twist does not decrease after adhesive effects are controlled.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Grain-angle mixing",
    "system": "flax fiber board",
    "id": 679,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0679",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Surface densification depth — flax fiber board",
    "hypothesis": "For flax fiber board, intermediate surface densification will minimize wetting-induced roughness without strongly slowing drying.",
    "test": "Measure topography and drying across densification depths.",
    "against": "No intermediate regime improves roughness while preserving drying rate.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Surface densification depth",
    "system": "flax fiber board",
    "id": 680,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0680",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Alternating moisture faces — hemp fiber board",
    "hypothesis": "For hemp fiber board, alternating the wetted face will reduce persistent curvature compared with repeatedly wetting one face at equal water uptake.",
    "test": "Measure curvature and spatial moisture through repeated wetting cycles.",
    "against": "Persistent curvature is not smaller under alternating exposure.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Alternating moisture faces",
    "system": "hemp fiber board",
    "id": 681,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0681",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "End-face sealing pattern — hemp fiber board",
    "hypothesis": "For hemp fiber board, discontinuous end-face seals will produce larger local moisture gradients than a continuous partial-area seal.",
    "test": "Map moisture after controlled humidity steps with matched sealed area.",
    "against": "Local gradients do not differ after seal permeability is measured.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: End-face sealing pattern",
    "system": "hemp fiber board",
    "id": 682,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0682",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Compression during rewetting — hemp fiber board",
    "hypothesis": "For hemp fiber board, mild compression during rewetting will increase retained shape change compared with compression after equilibration.",
    "test": "Compare recovered dimensions and stiffness after identical peak load.",
    "against": "Retained shape change does not depend on loading stage.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Compression during rewetting",
    "system": "hemp fiber board",
    "id": 683,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0683",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Notch humidity cycling — hemp fiber board",
    "hypothesis": "For hemp fiber board, shallow notches will amplify local swelling strain more during fast than slow humidity cycles.",
    "test": "Use digital image correlation while measuring moisture uptake.",
    "against": "Notch strain amplification is independent of cycle speed.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Notch humidity cycling",
    "system": "hemp fiber board",
    "id": 684,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0684",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Thermal pretreatment gradient — hemp fiber board",
    "hypothesis": "For hemp fiber board, a shallow heat-treatment gradient will direct bending during hydration more reproducibly than a sharp treatment boundary.",
    "test": "Map chemistry, modulus, and curvature across repeated humidity cycles.",
    "against": "Bending repeatability is no better with a graded treatment.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Thermal pretreatment gradient",
    "system": "hemp fiber board",
    "id": 685,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0685",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Fiber junction lubrication — hemp fiber board",
    "hypothesis": "For hemp fiber board, small retained amounts of a compatible nonreactive lubricant will reduce humidity-driven acoustic emission before changing bulk stiffness.",
    "test": "Measure emission events, stiffness, and lubricant retention during cycling.",
    "against": "Emission reduction occurs only alongside comparable stiffness changes.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Fiber junction lubrication",
    "system": "hemp fiber board",
    "id": 686,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0686",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pore blockage locality — hemp fiber board",
    "hypothesis": "For hemp fiber board, blocking a few large transport channels will slow drying more than distributing equal blocker mass among small channels.",
    "test": "Image pore filling and record mass-loss curves.",
    "against": "Drying differences are explained by total blocked volume alone.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Pore blockage locality",
    "system": "hemp fiber board",
    "id": 687,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0687",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Water uptake pause — hemp fiber board",
    "hypothesis": "For hemp fiber board, a short dry pause during uptake will increase subsequent uptake variability by redistributing internal moisture.",
    "test": "Compare restart uptake maps with uninterrupted controls.",
    "against": "Restart variability is unchanged after mean moisture is matched.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Water uptake pause",
    "system": "hemp fiber board",
    "id": 688,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0688",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Grain-angle mixing — hemp fiber board",
    "hypothesis": "For hemp fiber board, laminating alternating small grain angles will reduce humidity-induced twist compared with a constant off-axis angle.",
    "test": "Measure three-dimensional deformation in matched laminates.",
    "against": "Twist does not decrease after adhesive effects are controlled.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Grain-angle mixing",
    "system": "hemp fiber board",
    "id": 689,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0689",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Surface densification depth — hemp fiber board",
    "hypothesis": "For hemp fiber board, intermediate surface densification will minimize wetting-induced roughness without strongly slowing drying.",
    "test": "Measure topography and drying across densification depths.",
    "against": "No intermediate regime improves roughness while preserving drying rate.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Surface densification depth",
    "system": "hemp fiber board",
    "id": 690,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0690",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Alternating moisture faces — bagasse fiber board",
    "hypothesis": "For bagasse fiber board, alternating the wetted face will reduce persistent curvature compared with repeatedly wetting one face at equal water uptake.",
    "test": "Measure curvature and spatial moisture through repeated wetting cycles.",
    "against": "Persistent curvature is not smaller under alternating exposure.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Alternating moisture faces",
    "system": "bagasse fiber board",
    "id": 691,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0691",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "End-face sealing pattern — bagasse fiber board",
    "hypothesis": "For bagasse fiber board, discontinuous end-face seals will produce larger local moisture gradients than a continuous partial-area seal.",
    "test": "Map moisture after controlled humidity steps with matched sealed area.",
    "against": "Local gradients do not differ after seal permeability is measured.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: End-face sealing pattern",
    "system": "bagasse fiber board",
    "id": 692,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0692",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Compression during rewetting — bagasse fiber board",
    "hypothesis": "For bagasse fiber board, mild compression during rewetting will increase retained shape change compared with compression after equilibration.",
    "test": "Compare recovered dimensions and stiffness after identical peak load.",
    "against": "Retained shape change does not depend on loading stage.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Compression during rewetting",
    "system": "bagasse fiber board",
    "id": 693,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0693",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Notch humidity cycling — bagasse fiber board",
    "hypothesis": "For bagasse fiber board, shallow notches will amplify local swelling strain more during fast than slow humidity cycles.",
    "test": "Use digital image correlation while measuring moisture uptake.",
    "against": "Notch strain amplification is independent of cycle speed.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Notch humidity cycling",
    "system": "bagasse fiber board",
    "id": 694,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0694",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Thermal pretreatment gradient — bagasse fiber board",
    "hypothesis": "For bagasse fiber board, a shallow heat-treatment gradient will direct bending during hydration more reproducibly than a sharp treatment boundary.",
    "test": "Map chemistry, modulus, and curvature across repeated humidity cycles.",
    "against": "Bending repeatability is no better with a graded treatment.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Thermal pretreatment gradient",
    "system": "bagasse fiber board",
    "id": 695,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0695",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Fiber junction lubrication — bagasse fiber board",
    "hypothesis": "For bagasse fiber board, small retained amounts of a compatible nonreactive lubricant will reduce humidity-driven acoustic emission before changing bulk stiffness.",
    "test": "Measure emission events, stiffness, and lubricant retention during cycling.",
    "against": "Emission reduction occurs only alongside comparable stiffness changes.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Fiber junction lubrication",
    "system": "bagasse fiber board",
    "id": 696,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0696",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pore blockage locality — bagasse fiber board",
    "hypothesis": "For bagasse fiber board, blocking a few large transport channels will slow drying more than distributing equal blocker mass among small channels.",
    "test": "Image pore filling and record mass-loss curves.",
    "against": "Drying differences are explained by total blocked volume alone.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Pore blockage locality",
    "system": "bagasse fiber board",
    "id": 697,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0697",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Water uptake pause — bagasse fiber board",
    "hypothesis": "For bagasse fiber board, a short dry pause during uptake will increase subsequent uptake variability by redistributing internal moisture.",
    "test": "Compare restart uptake maps with uninterrupted controls.",
    "against": "Restart variability is unchanged after mean moisture is matched.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Water uptake pause",
    "system": "bagasse fiber board",
    "id": 698,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0698",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Grain-angle mixing — bagasse fiber board",
    "hypothesis": "For bagasse fiber board, laminating alternating small grain angles will reduce humidity-induced twist compared with a constant off-axis angle.",
    "test": "Measure three-dimensional deformation in matched laminates.",
    "against": "Twist does not decrease after adhesive effects are controlled.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Grain-angle mixing",
    "system": "bagasse fiber board",
    "id": 699,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0699",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Surface densification depth — bagasse fiber board",
    "hypothesis": "For bagasse fiber board, intermediate surface densification will minimize wetting-induced roughness without strongly slowing drying.",
    "test": "Measure topography and drying across densification depths.",
    "against": "No intermediate regime improves roughness while preserving drying rate.",
    "category": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids",
    "controls": "Dry density, grain or fiber direction, specimen size, equilibrium moisture, treatment chemistry, and actual temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Wood and plant-derived porous solids: Surface densification depth",
    "system": "bagasse fiber board",
    "id": 700,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Cutting and clamping tools, balance, humidity enclosure, calibrated imaging, and moisture or stiffness measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0700",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Solvent-front pauses — cellulose strip chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For cellulose strip chromatography, a short solvent-front pause will broaden strongly retained bands more than weakly retained bands.",
    "test": "Interrupt flow reproducibly and image multiple independently characterized tracers.",
    "against": "Broadening does not depend on tracer retention.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Solvent-front pauses",
    "system": "cellulose strip chromatography",
    "id": 701,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0701",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Loading footprint aspect ratio — cellulose strip chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For cellulose strip chromatography, a narrow transverse loading line will reduce migration-direction dispersion relative to a circular spot of equal area.",
    "test": "Compare band variance at matched loaded mass and travel distance.",
    "against": "Variance is no smaller after initial footprint is included.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Loading footprint aspect ratio",
    "system": "cellulose strip chromatography",
    "id": 702,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0702",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Substrate tension — cellulose strip chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For cellulose strip chromatography, mild uniform tension will reduce lateral band wandering by stabilizing pore alignment.",
    "test": "Image tracer trajectories at several non-damaging tensions.",
    "against": "Wandering does not decrease or is explained by changed mean front speed.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Substrate tension",
    "system": "cellulose strip chromatography",
    "id": 703,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0703",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Chamber humidity history — cellulose strip chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For cellulose strip chromatography, humidity cycling before development will alter selectivity more than mean migration speed.",
    "test": "Measure pairwise tracer separation and front position after conditioning.",
    "against": "Selectivity remains unchanged once retained water is matched.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Chamber humidity history",
    "system": "cellulose strip chromatography",
    "id": 704,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0704",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Front curvature correction — cellulose strip chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For cellulose strip chromatography, edge reservoir wicks will flatten the advancing solvent front and reduce edge-band distortion.",
    "test": "Compare full-width front maps with and without edge reservoirs.",
    "against": "Front flatness and band distortion do not improve together.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Front curvature correction",
    "system": "cellulose strip chromatography",
    "id": 705,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0705",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Gradient prewetting — cellulose strip chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For cellulose strip chromatography, a shallow prewetting gradient will reduce startup fingering compared with uniform partial wetting.",
    "test": "Map solvent fronts and tracer transport at matched initial liquid content.",
    "against": "Fingering is no lower after uptake rate is matched.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Gradient prewetting",
    "system": "cellulose strip chromatography",
    "id": 706,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0706",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Repeated low-mass loading — cellulose strip chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For cellulose strip chromatography, several dried low-mass loads will produce sharper bands than one wet load of equal solute mass.",
    "test": "Compare initial deposits and developed band widths.",
    "against": "Final sharpness does not improve after initial spot width is considered.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Repeated low-mass loading",
    "system": "cellulose strip chromatography",
    "id": 707,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0707",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Reversed development — cellulose strip chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For cellulose strip chromatography, reversing development direction after a short first run will expose retention hysteresis beyond simple diffusion.",
    "test": "Track tracer displacement against a nonretained reference.",
    "against": "Return displacements agree with a reversible transport model.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Reversed development",
    "system": "cellulose strip chromatography",
    "id": 708,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0708",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Temperature ramp timing — cellulose strip chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For cellulose strip chromatography, a mild temperature ramp late in development will alter late-band spacing more than the same ramp early.",
    "test": "Measure band positions and solvent evaporation across matched ramp energies.",
    "against": "Spacing depends only on mean temperature and travel distance.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Temperature ramp timing",
    "system": "cellulose strip chromatography",
    "id": 709,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0709",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Support contact pattern — cellulose strip chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For cellulose strip chromatography, sparse support contacts will produce less local band distortion than continuous support under unequal heating.",
    "test": "Map support temperature and tracer paths.",
    "against": "Sparse contacts do not reduce distortion after temperature differences are measured.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Support contact pattern",
    "system": "cellulose strip chromatography",
    "id": 710,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0710",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Solvent-front pauses — silica thin-layer chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For silica thin-layer chromatography, a short solvent-front pause will broaden strongly retained bands more than weakly retained bands.",
    "test": "Interrupt flow reproducibly and image multiple independently characterized tracers.",
    "against": "Broadening does not depend on tracer retention.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Solvent-front pauses",
    "system": "silica thin-layer chromatography",
    "id": 711,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 27,
    "literature_query": "Solvent-front pauses silica thin-layer chromatography short pause broaden strongly retained bands weakly experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0711",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Solvent-front pauses — silica thin-layer chromatography",
      "hypothesis": "For silica thin-layer chromatography, a short solvent-front pause will broaden strongly retained bands more than weakly retained bands.",
      "test": "Interrupt flow reproducibly and image multiple independently characterized tracers.",
      "against": "Broadening does not depend on tracer retention.",
      "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
      "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Solvent-front pauses",
      "system": "silica thin-layer chromatography",
      "id": 711,
      "access_score": 4,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 29,
      "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 27,
      "literature_query": "Solvent-front pauses silica thin-layer chromatography short pause broaden strongly retained bands weakly experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
      "source_lead_count": 5,
      "source_ids": "S7cc333e3f18e;Sf216f977fbdb;Sec17388040da;S82ab8f132ed4;S638f265bae94",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Loading footprint aspect ratio — silica thin-layer chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For silica thin-layer chromatography, a narrow transverse loading line will reduce migration-direction dispersion relative to a circular spot of equal area.",
    "test": "Compare band variance at matched loaded mass and travel distance.",
    "against": "Variance is no smaller after initial footprint is included.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Loading footprint aspect ratio",
    "system": "silica thin-layer chromatography",
    "id": 712,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0712",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Substrate tension — silica thin-layer chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For silica thin-layer chromatography, mild uniform tension will reduce lateral band wandering by stabilizing pore alignment.",
    "test": "Image tracer trajectories at several non-damaging tensions.",
    "against": "Wandering does not decrease or is explained by changed mean front speed.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Substrate tension",
    "system": "silica thin-layer chromatography",
    "id": 713,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0713",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Chamber humidity history — silica thin-layer chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For silica thin-layer chromatography, humidity cycling before development will alter selectivity more than mean migration speed.",
    "test": "Measure pairwise tracer separation and front position after conditioning.",
    "against": "Selectivity remains unchanged once retained water is matched.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Chamber humidity history",
    "system": "silica thin-layer chromatography",
    "id": 714,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 28,
    "literature_query": "Chamber humidity history silica thin-layer chromatography cycling development alter selectivity mean migration speed experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0714",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Chamber humidity history — silica thin-layer chromatography",
      "hypothesis": "For silica thin-layer chromatography, humidity cycling before development will alter selectivity more than mean migration speed.",
      "test": "Measure pairwise tracer separation and front position after conditioning.",
      "against": "Selectivity remains unchanged once retained water is matched.",
      "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
      "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Chamber humidity history",
      "system": "silica thin-layer chromatography",
      "id": 714,
      "access_score": 4,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 29,
      "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 28,
      "literature_query": "Chamber humidity history silica thin-layer chromatography cycling development alter selectivity mean migration speed experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
      "source_lead_count": 4,
      "source_ids": "S0efb84468f06;S7901cda44c99;S6f150e18aadf;S638f265bae94",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Front curvature correction — silica thin-layer chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For silica thin-layer chromatography, edge reservoir wicks will flatten the advancing solvent front and reduce edge-band distortion.",
    "test": "Compare full-width front maps with and without edge reservoirs.",
    "against": "Front flatness and band distortion do not improve together.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Front curvature correction",
    "system": "silica thin-layer chromatography",
    "id": 715,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 29,
    "literature_query": "Front curvature correction silica thin-layer chromatography edge reservoir wicks flatten advancing solvent edge-band experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0715",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Front curvature correction — silica thin-layer chromatography",
      "hypothesis": "For silica thin-layer chromatography, edge reservoir wicks will flatten the advancing solvent front and reduce edge-band distortion.",
      "test": "Compare full-width front maps with and without edge reservoirs.",
      "against": "Front flatness and band distortion do not improve together.",
      "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
      "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Front curvature correction",
      "system": "silica thin-layer chromatography",
      "id": 715,
      "access_score": 4,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 29,
      "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 29,
      "literature_query": "Front curvature correction silica thin-layer chromatography edge reservoir wicks flatten advancing solvent edge-band experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
      "source_lead_count": 4,
      "source_ids": "S7cc333e3f18e;Seda99c809750;S031dd9ac29da;S9b268e5e905a",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Gradient prewetting — silica thin-layer chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For silica thin-layer chromatography, a shallow prewetting gradient will reduce startup fingering compared with uniform partial wetting.",
    "test": "Map solvent fronts and tracer transport at matched initial liquid content.",
    "against": "Fingering is no lower after uptake rate is matched.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Gradient prewetting",
    "system": "silica thin-layer chromatography",
    "id": 716,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0716",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Repeated low-mass loading — silica thin-layer chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For silica thin-layer chromatography, several dried low-mass loads will produce sharper bands than one wet load of equal solute mass.",
    "test": "Compare initial deposits and developed band widths.",
    "against": "Final sharpness does not improve after initial spot width is considered.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Repeated low-mass loading",
    "system": "silica thin-layer chromatography",
    "id": 717,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0717",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Reversed development — silica thin-layer chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For silica thin-layer chromatography, reversing development direction after a short first run will expose retention hysteresis beyond simple diffusion.",
    "test": "Track tracer displacement against a nonretained reference.",
    "against": "Return displacements agree with a reversible transport model.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Reversed development",
    "system": "silica thin-layer chromatography",
    "id": 718,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0718",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Temperature ramp timing — silica thin-layer chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For silica thin-layer chromatography, a mild temperature ramp late in development will alter late-band spacing more than the same ramp early.",
    "test": "Measure band positions and solvent evaporation across matched ramp energies.",
    "against": "Spacing depends only on mean temperature and travel distance.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Temperature ramp timing",
    "system": "silica thin-layer chromatography",
    "id": 719,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0719",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Support contact pattern — silica thin-layer chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For silica thin-layer chromatography, sparse support contacts will produce less local band distortion than continuous support under unequal heating.",
    "test": "Map support temperature and tracer paths.",
    "against": "Sparse contacts do not reduce distortion after temperature differences are measured.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Support contact pattern",
    "system": "silica thin-layer chromatography",
    "id": 720,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0720",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Solvent-front pauses — alumina thin-layer chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For alumina thin-layer chromatography, a short solvent-front pause will broaden strongly retained bands more than weakly retained bands.",
    "test": "Interrupt flow reproducibly and image multiple independently characterized tracers.",
    "against": "Broadening does not depend on tracer retention.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Solvent-front pauses",
    "system": "alumina thin-layer chromatography",
    "id": 721,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0721",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Loading footprint aspect ratio — alumina thin-layer chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For alumina thin-layer chromatography, a narrow transverse loading line will reduce migration-direction dispersion relative to a circular spot of equal area.",
    "test": "Compare band variance at matched loaded mass and travel distance.",
    "against": "Variance is no smaller after initial footprint is included.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Loading footprint aspect ratio",
    "system": "alumina thin-layer chromatography",
    "id": 722,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0722",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Substrate tension — alumina thin-layer chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For alumina thin-layer chromatography, mild uniform tension will reduce lateral band wandering by stabilizing pore alignment.",
    "test": "Image tracer trajectories at several non-damaging tensions.",
    "against": "Wandering does not decrease or is explained by changed mean front speed.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Substrate tension",
    "system": "alumina thin-layer chromatography",
    "id": 723,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0723",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Chamber humidity history — alumina thin-layer chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For alumina thin-layer chromatography, humidity cycling before development will alter selectivity more than mean migration speed.",
    "test": "Measure pairwise tracer separation and front position after conditioning.",
    "against": "Selectivity remains unchanged once retained water is matched.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Chamber humidity history",
    "system": "alumina thin-layer chromatography",
    "id": 724,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0724",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Front curvature correction — alumina thin-layer chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For alumina thin-layer chromatography, edge reservoir wicks will flatten the advancing solvent front and reduce edge-band distortion.",
    "test": "Compare full-width front maps with and without edge reservoirs.",
    "against": "Front flatness and band distortion do not improve together.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Front curvature correction",
    "system": "alumina thin-layer chromatography",
    "id": 725,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0725",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Gradient prewetting — alumina thin-layer chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For alumina thin-layer chromatography, a shallow prewetting gradient will reduce startup fingering compared with uniform partial wetting.",
    "test": "Map solvent fronts and tracer transport at matched initial liquid content.",
    "against": "Fingering is no lower after uptake rate is matched.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Gradient prewetting",
    "system": "alumina thin-layer chromatography",
    "id": 726,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0726",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Repeated low-mass loading — alumina thin-layer chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For alumina thin-layer chromatography, several dried low-mass loads will produce sharper bands than one wet load of equal solute mass.",
    "test": "Compare initial deposits and developed band widths.",
    "against": "Final sharpness does not improve after initial spot width is considered.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Repeated low-mass loading",
    "system": "alumina thin-layer chromatography",
    "id": 727,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0727",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Reversed development — alumina thin-layer chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For alumina thin-layer chromatography, reversing development direction after a short first run will expose retention hysteresis beyond simple diffusion.",
    "test": "Track tracer displacement against a nonretained reference.",
    "against": "Return displacements agree with a reversible transport model.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Reversed development",
    "system": "alumina thin-layer chromatography",
    "id": 728,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0728",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Temperature ramp timing — alumina thin-layer chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For alumina thin-layer chromatography, a mild temperature ramp late in development will alter late-band spacing more than the same ramp early.",
    "test": "Measure band positions and solvent evaporation across matched ramp energies.",
    "against": "Spacing depends only on mean temperature and travel distance.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Temperature ramp timing",
    "system": "alumina thin-layer chromatography",
    "id": 729,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0729",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Support contact pattern — alumina thin-layer chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For alumina thin-layer chromatography, sparse support contacts will produce less local band distortion than continuous support under unequal heating.",
    "test": "Map support temperature and tracer paths.",
    "against": "Sparse contacts do not reduce distortion after temperature differences are measured.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Support contact pattern",
    "system": "alumina thin-layer chromatography",
    "id": 730,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0730",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Solvent-front pauses — starch-coated paper chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For starch-coated paper chromatography, a short solvent-front pause will broaden strongly retained bands more than weakly retained bands.",
    "test": "Interrupt flow reproducibly and image multiple independently characterized tracers.",
    "against": "Broadening does not depend on tracer retention.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Solvent-front pauses",
    "system": "starch-coated paper chromatography",
    "id": 731,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0731",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Loading footprint aspect ratio — starch-coated paper chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For starch-coated paper chromatography, a narrow transverse loading line will reduce migration-direction dispersion relative to a circular spot of equal area.",
    "test": "Compare band variance at matched loaded mass and travel distance.",
    "against": "Variance is no smaller after initial footprint is included.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Loading footprint aspect ratio",
    "system": "starch-coated paper chromatography",
    "id": 732,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 30,
    "literature_query": "Loading footprint aspect ratio starch-coated paper chromatography narrow transverse line migration-direction dispersion to experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0732",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Loading footprint aspect ratio — starch-coated paper chromatography",
      "hypothesis": "For starch-coated paper chromatography, a narrow transverse loading line will reduce migration-direction dispersion relative to a circular spot of equal area.",
      "test": "Compare band variance at matched loaded mass and travel distance.",
      "against": "Variance is no smaller after initial footprint is included.",
      "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
      "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Loading footprint aspect ratio",
      "system": "starch-coated paper chromatography",
      "id": 732,
      "access_score": 4,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 29,
      "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 30,
      "literature_query": "Loading footprint aspect ratio starch-coated paper chromatography narrow transverse line migration-direction dispersion to experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
      "source_lead_count": 7,
      "source_ids": "S0a5712cbb776;S5ed2016a1f8f;Sd5367a210877;Scd774353fe31;S0f4401e682db;S6b52e5ae23da;S8d1d3f7dbb00",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Substrate tension — starch-coated paper chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For starch-coated paper chromatography, mild uniform tension will reduce lateral band wandering by stabilizing pore alignment.",
    "test": "Image tracer trajectories at several non-damaging tensions.",
    "against": "Wandering does not decrease or is explained by changed mean front speed.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Substrate tension",
    "system": "starch-coated paper chromatography",
    "id": 733,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 31,
    "literature_query": "Substrate tension starch-coated paper chromatography mild uniform lateral band wandering by stabilizing pore experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0733",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": true,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Substrate tension — starch-coated paper chromatography",
      "hypothesis": "For starch-coated paper chromatography, mild uniform tension will reduce lateral band wandering by stabilizing pore alignment.",
      "test": "Image tracer trajectories at several non-damaging tensions.",
      "against": "Wandering does not decrease or is explained by changed mean front speed.",
      "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
      "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Substrate tension",
      "system": "starch-coated paper chromatography",
      "id": 733,
      "access_score": 4,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 29,
      "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 31,
      "literature_query": "Substrate tension starch-coated paper chromatography mild uniform lateral band wandering by stabilizing pore experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
      "source_lead_count": 4,
      "source_ids": "S0a5712cbb776;S375f38157b53;Se1b1d8b880d2;S4239852351f6",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": {
      "deep_rank": "23",
      "id": "733",
      "title": "Substrate tension — starch-coated paper chromatography",
      "original_300_rank": "31",
      "pilot_class": "C",
      "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
      "hypothesis": "For starch-coated paper chromatography, mild uniform tension will reduce lateral band wandering by stabilizing pore alignment.",
      "primary_outcome": "Lateral variance of a tracer-band centerline at a fixed migration distance.",
      "comparison": "Unstressed versus mildly tensioned starch-coated chromatography paper, with tension perpendicular and parallel to migration.",
      "controls": "Paper batch, coating uniformity, actual strain, thickness, pore changes, loaded mass, solvent front speed, humidity, and temperature.",
      "pilot": "Validate benign tracer separation and non-damaging tension first. Measure pore alignment and front shape. Normalize band wandering separately from band width and migration rate.",
      "novelty_gap": "Paper supports and band nonuniformity are known. No close strain-controlled chromatographic comparison was verified; that absence is an evidence gap, not confirmation of novelty.",
      "stop_rule": "Deprioritize if tension cracks the coating or changes mean flow enough to explain wandering. Equal wandering after speed matching rejects the prediction.",
      "source_keys": "PAPER_METHOD",
      "truth_probability": "not estimated",
      "novelty_status": "unverified"
    },
    "dossier_text": "# 23. H0733 — Substrate tension — starch-coated paper chromatography\n\nOriginal 300-folder rank: 31. Pilot class: C. Resource class: modest bench or workshop; calibration still required.\n\n## Original hypothesis\n\nFor starch-coated paper chromatography, mild uniform tension will reduce lateral band wandering by stabilizing pore alignment.\n\n## Why investigate this\n\nA direct image-based measurement can reveal whether simple mechanical stabilization improves separation reproducibility.\n\n## Literature assessment and exact novelty question\n\nPaper supports and band nonuniformity are known. No close strain-controlled chromatographic comparison was verified; that absence is an evidence gap, not confirmation of novelty. Worldwide originality remains unverified.\n\n## Primary measurement\n\nLateral variance of a tracer-band centerline at a fixed migration distance.\n\n## Comparison\n\nUnstressed versus mildly tensioned starch-coated chromatography paper, with tension perpendicular and parallel to migration.\n\n## Critical controls\n\nPaper batch, coating uniformity, actual strain, thickness, pore changes, loaded mass, solvent front speed, humidity, and temperature.\n\n## Pilot plan\n\nValidate benign tracer separation and non-damaging tension first. Measure pore alignment and front shape. Normalize band wandering separately from band width and migration rate.\n\n## What would count against it\n\nDeprioritize if tension cracks the coating or changes mean flow enough to explain wandering. Equal wandering after speed matching rejects the prediction.\n\n## Replication and analysis\n\nTreat separately prepared specimens, batches, or devices as independent units. Technical repeats and images are nested measurements. First estimate calibration error and independent-preparation variability. Set the minimum meaningful effect in the primary outcome's units before confirmation, then choose sample size from that effect and pilot variance; a convenient pilot count is not a powered study.\n\nRandomize run order and blind sample labels where practical. Freeze image processing, fitting choices, exclusions, and the primary comparison before evaluating confirmatory data. Report effect size and uncertainty; use a blocked or mixed-effects analysis when specimens share a batch. A wide interval is inconclusive. Include the measurement and matching controls even when the directional effect appears large.\n\nA useful go/no-go gate is whether the hypothesized effect can be distinguished from calibration uncertainty and the strongest alternative explanation. Stop material purchases if the closest literature already measures the identical contrast, unless a replication has an explicit purpose. Do not use these abbreviated plans as complete laboratory protocols.\n\n## Data to preserve\n\nKeep unedited images or sensor streams, calibration files, preparation IDs, run order, environmental logs, input histories, raw outcome values, exclusions, and the exact analysis version. No values are prefilled in the observation template. Use `data/Published Benchmarks.csv` only as literature context; values from a different system are not observations of this hypothesis.\n\n## Sources and transfer limits\n\n### PAPER_METHOD\n\n[Large-Scale, Preparative Paper Chromatography](https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6629043/)\n\nAccess: Indexed abstract and methods examined. Type: primary methods paper.\n\nBackground findings and transfer limits: see [source assessments](../research/Primary%20Source%20Assessments.md) under this source key.\n\n"
  },
  {
    "title": "Chamber humidity history — starch-coated paper chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For starch-coated paper chromatography, humidity cycling before development will alter selectivity more than mean migration speed.",
    "test": "Measure pairwise tracer separation and front position after conditioning.",
    "against": "Selectivity remains unchanged once retained water is matched.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Chamber humidity history",
    "system": "starch-coated paper chromatography",
    "id": 734,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0734",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Front curvature correction — starch-coated paper chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For starch-coated paper chromatography, edge reservoir wicks will flatten the advancing solvent front and reduce edge-band distortion.",
    "test": "Compare full-width front maps with and without edge reservoirs.",
    "against": "Front flatness and band distortion do not improve together.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Front curvature correction",
    "system": "starch-coated paper chromatography",
    "id": 735,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0735",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Gradient prewetting — starch-coated paper chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For starch-coated paper chromatography, a shallow prewetting gradient will reduce startup fingering compared with uniform partial wetting.",
    "test": "Map solvent fronts and tracer transport at matched initial liquid content.",
    "against": "Fingering is no lower after uptake rate is matched.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Gradient prewetting",
    "system": "starch-coated paper chromatography",
    "id": 736,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 32,
    "literature_query": "Gradient prewetting starch-coated paper chromatography shallow startup fingering uniform partial wetting experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0736",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Gradient prewetting — starch-coated paper chromatography",
      "hypothesis": "For starch-coated paper chromatography, a shallow prewetting gradient will reduce startup fingering compared with uniform partial wetting.",
      "test": "Map solvent fronts and tracer transport at matched initial liquid content.",
      "against": "Fingering is no lower after uptake rate is matched.",
      "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
      "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Gradient prewetting",
      "system": "starch-coated paper chromatography",
      "id": 736,
      "access_score": 4,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 29,
      "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 32,
      "literature_query": "Gradient prewetting starch-coated paper chromatography shallow startup fingering uniform partial wetting experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
      "source_lead_count": 6,
      "source_ids": "Sa3953f1a899a;S045f9378c4ab;S0a5712cbb776;S2c0e7dcca7ed;S4239852351f6;S3678da676c86",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Repeated low-mass loading — starch-coated paper chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For starch-coated paper chromatography, several dried low-mass loads will produce sharper bands than one wet load of equal solute mass.",
    "test": "Compare initial deposits and developed band widths.",
    "against": "Final sharpness does not improve after initial spot width is considered.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Repeated low-mass loading",
    "system": "starch-coated paper chromatography",
    "id": 737,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 33,
    "literature_query": "Repeated low-mass loading starch-coated paper chromatography several dried loads produce sharper bands wet experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0737",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Repeated low-mass loading — starch-coated paper chromatography",
      "hypothesis": "For starch-coated paper chromatography, several dried low-mass loads will produce sharper bands than one wet load of equal solute mass.",
      "test": "Compare initial deposits and developed band widths.",
      "against": "Final sharpness does not improve after initial spot width is considered.",
      "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
      "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Repeated low-mass loading",
      "system": "starch-coated paper chromatography",
      "id": 737,
      "access_score": 4,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 29,
      "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 33,
      "literature_query": "Repeated low-mass loading starch-coated paper chromatography several dried loads produce sharper bands wet experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
      "source_lead_count": 5,
      "source_ids": "S0a5712cbb776;S4239852351f6;S69d1705748dd;S045f9378c4ab;S7d319091b7ac",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Reversed development — starch-coated paper chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For starch-coated paper chromatography, reversing development direction after a short first run will expose retention hysteresis beyond simple diffusion.",
    "test": "Track tracer displacement against a nonretained reference.",
    "against": "Return displacements agree with a reversible transport model.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Reversed development",
    "system": "starch-coated paper chromatography",
    "id": 738,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 34,
    "literature_query": "Reversed development starch-coated paper chromatography reversing direction short first run expose retention hysteresis experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0738",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Reversed development — starch-coated paper chromatography",
      "hypothesis": "For starch-coated paper chromatography, reversing development direction after a short first run will expose retention hysteresis beyond simple diffusion.",
      "test": "Track tracer displacement against a nonretained reference.",
      "against": "Return displacements agree with a reversible transport model.",
      "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
      "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Reversed development",
      "system": "starch-coated paper chromatography",
      "id": 738,
      "access_score": 4,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 29,
      "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 34,
      "literature_query": "Reversed development starch-coated paper chromatography reversing direction short first run expose retention hysteresis experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
      "source_lead_count": 3,
      "source_ids": "S0a5712cbb776;S74a2ea32a70b;S1a6a5184d504",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Temperature ramp timing — starch-coated paper chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For starch-coated paper chromatography, a mild temperature ramp late in development will alter late-band spacing more than the same ramp early.",
    "test": "Measure band positions and solvent evaporation across matched ramp energies.",
    "against": "Spacing depends only on mean temperature and travel distance.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Temperature ramp timing",
    "system": "starch-coated paper chromatography",
    "id": 739,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 35,
    "literature_query": "Temperature ramp timing starch-coated paper chromatography mild late in development alter late-band spacing experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0739",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Temperature ramp timing — starch-coated paper chromatography",
      "hypothesis": "For starch-coated paper chromatography, a mild temperature ramp late in development will alter late-band spacing more than the same ramp early.",
      "test": "Measure band positions and solvent evaporation across matched ramp energies.",
      "against": "Spacing depends only on mean temperature and travel distance.",
      "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
      "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Temperature ramp timing",
      "system": "starch-coated paper chromatography",
      "id": 739,
      "access_score": 4,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 29,
      "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 35,
      "literature_query": "Temperature ramp timing starch-coated paper chromatography mild late in development alter late-band spacing experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
      "source_lead_count": 4,
      "source_ids": "Sbc438c50c164;Sbc6150e911c4;Sac83bb5951fe;S4c02882b62b0",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Support contact pattern — starch-coated paper chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For starch-coated paper chromatography, sparse support contacts will produce less local band distortion than continuous support under unequal heating.",
    "test": "Map support temperature and tracer paths.",
    "against": "Sparse contacts do not reduce distortion after temperature differences are measured.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Support contact pattern",
    "system": "starch-coated paper chromatography",
    "id": 740,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 36,
    "literature_query": "Support contact pattern starch-coated paper chromatography sparse contacts produce local band distortion continuous experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0740",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Support contact pattern — starch-coated paper chromatography",
      "hypothesis": "For starch-coated paper chromatography, sparse support contacts will produce less local band distortion than continuous support under unequal heating.",
      "test": "Map support temperature and tracer paths.",
      "against": "Sparse contacts do not reduce distortion after temperature differences are measured.",
      "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
      "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Support contact pattern",
      "system": "starch-coated paper chromatography",
      "id": 740,
      "access_score": 4,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 29,
      "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 36,
      "literature_query": "Support contact pattern starch-coated paper chromatography sparse contacts produce local band distortion continuous experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
      "source_lead_count": 4,
      "source_ids": "S0a5712cbb776;S9f7a334e4122;S488fc7f70aa7;S4239852351f6",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Solvent-front pauses — agarose-coated strip chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For agarose-coated strip chromatography, a short solvent-front pause will broaden strongly retained bands more than weakly retained bands.",
    "test": "Interrupt flow reproducibly and image multiple independently characterized tracers.",
    "against": "Broadening does not depend on tracer retention.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Solvent-front pauses",
    "system": "agarose-coated strip chromatography",
    "id": 741,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0741",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Loading footprint aspect ratio — agarose-coated strip chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For agarose-coated strip chromatography, a narrow transverse loading line will reduce migration-direction dispersion relative to a circular spot of equal area.",
    "test": "Compare band variance at matched loaded mass and travel distance.",
    "against": "Variance is no smaller after initial footprint is included.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Loading footprint aspect ratio",
    "system": "agarose-coated strip chromatography",
    "id": 742,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0742",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Substrate tension — agarose-coated strip chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For agarose-coated strip chromatography, mild uniform tension will reduce lateral band wandering by stabilizing pore alignment.",
    "test": "Image tracer trajectories at several non-damaging tensions.",
    "against": "Wandering does not decrease or is explained by changed mean front speed.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Substrate tension",
    "system": "agarose-coated strip chromatography",
    "id": 743,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0743",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Chamber humidity history — agarose-coated strip chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For agarose-coated strip chromatography, humidity cycling before development will alter selectivity more than mean migration speed.",
    "test": "Measure pairwise tracer separation and front position after conditioning.",
    "against": "Selectivity remains unchanged once retained water is matched.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Chamber humidity history",
    "system": "agarose-coated strip chromatography",
    "id": 744,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0744",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Front curvature correction — agarose-coated strip chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For agarose-coated strip chromatography, edge reservoir wicks will flatten the advancing solvent front and reduce edge-band distortion.",
    "test": "Compare full-width front maps with and without edge reservoirs.",
    "against": "Front flatness and band distortion do not improve together.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Front curvature correction",
    "system": "agarose-coated strip chromatography",
    "id": 745,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0745",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Gradient prewetting — agarose-coated strip chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For agarose-coated strip chromatography, a shallow prewetting gradient will reduce startup fingering compared with uniform partial wetting.",
    "test": "Map solvent fronts and tracer transport at matched initial liquid content.",
    "against": "Fingering is no lower after uptake rate is matched.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Gradient prewetting",
    "system": "agarose-coated strip chromatography",
    "id": 746,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0746",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Repeated low-mass loading — agarose-coated strip chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For agarose-coated strip chromatography, several dried low-mass loads will produce sharper bands than one wet load of equal solute mass.",
    "test": "Compare initial deposits and developed band widths.",
    "against": "Final sharpness does not improve after initial spot width is considered.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Repeated low-mass loading",
    "system": "agarose-coated strip chromatography",
    "id": 747,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0747",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Reversed development — agarose-coated strip chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For agarose-coated strip chromatography, reversing development direction after a short first run will expose retention hysteresis beyond simple diffusion.",
    "test": "Track tracer displacement against a nonretained reference.",
    "against": "Return displacements agree with a reversible transport model.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Reversed development",
    "system": "agarose-coated strip chromatography",
    "id": 748,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0748",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Temperature ramp timing — agarose-coated strip chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For agarose-coated strip chromatography, a mild temperature ramp late in development will alter late-band spacing more than the same ramp early.",
    "test": "Measure band positions and solvent evaporation across matched ramp energies.",
    "against": "Spacing depends only on mean temperature and travel distance.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Temperature ramp timing",
    "system": "agarose-coated strip chromatography",
    "id": 749,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0749",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Support contact pattern — agarose-coated strip chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For agarose-coated strip chromatography, sparse support contacts will produce less local band distortion than continuous support under unequal heating.",
    "test": "Map support temperature and tracer paths.",
    "against": "Sparse contacts do not reduce distortion after temperature differences are measured.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Support contact pattern",
    "system": "agarose-coated strip chromatography",
    "id": 750,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0750",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Solvent-front pauses — cellulose acetate strip chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For cellulose acetate strip chromatography, a short solvent-front pause will broaden strongly retained bands more than weakly retained bands.",
    "test": "Interrupt flow reproducibly and image multiple independently characterized tracers.",
    "against": "Broadening does not depend on tracer retention.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Solvent-front pauses",
    "system": "cellulose acetate strip chromatography",
    "id": 751,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0751",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Loading footprint aspect ratio — cellulose acetate strip chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For cellulose acetate strip chromatography, a narrow transverse loading line will reduce migration-direction dispersion relative to a circular spot of equal area.",
    "test": "Compare band variance at matched loaded mass and travel distance.",
    "against": "Variance is no smaller after initial footprint is included.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Loading footprint aspect ratio",
    "system": "cellulose acetate strip chromatography",
    "id": 752,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0752",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Substrate tension — cellulose acetate strip chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For cellulose acetate strip chromatography, mild uniform tension will reduce lateral band wandering by stabilizing pore alignment.",
    "test": "Image tracer trajectories at several non-damaging tensions.",
    "against": "Wandering does not decrease or is explained by changed mean front speed.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Substrate tension",
    "system": "cellulose acetate strip chromatography",
    "id": 753,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0753",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Chamber humidity history — cellulose acetate strip chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For cellulose acetate strip chromatography, humidity cycling before development will alter selectivity more than mean migration speed.",
    "test": "Measure pairwise tracer separation and front position after conditioning.",
    "against": "Selectivity remains unchanged once retained water is matched.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Chamber humidity history",
    "system": "cellulose acetate strip chromatography",
    "id": 754,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0754",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Front curvature correction — cellulose acetate strip chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For cellulose acetate strip chromatography, edge reservoir wicks will flatten the advancing solvent front and reduce edge-band distortion.",
    "test": "Compare full-width front maps with and without edge reservoirs.",
    "against": "Front flatness and band distortion do not improve together.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Front curvature correction",
    "system": "cellulose acetate strip chromatography",
    "id": 755,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0755",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Gradient prewetting — cellulose acetate strip chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For cellulose acetate strip chromatography, a shallow prewetting gradient will reduce startup fingering compared with uniform partial wetting.",
    "test": "Map solvent fronts and tracer transport at matched initial liquid content.",
    "against": "Fingering is no lower after uptake rate is matched.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Gradient prewetting",
    "system": "cellulose acetate strip chromatography",
    "id": 756,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0756",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Repeated low-mass loading — cellulose acetate strip chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For cellulose acetate strip chromatography, several dried low-mass loads will produce sharper bands than one wet load of equal solute mass.",
    "test": "Compare initial deposits and developed band widths.",
    "against": "Final sharpness does not improve after initial spot width is considered.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Repeated low-mass loading",
    "system": "cellulose acetate strip chromatography",
    "id": 757,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0757",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Reversed development — cellulose acetate strip chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For cellulose acetate strip chromatography, reversing development direction after a short first run will expose retention hysteresis beyond simple diffusion.",
    "test": "Track tracer displacement against a nonretained reference.",
    "against": "Return displacements agree with a reversible transport model.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Reversed development",
    "system": "cellulose acetate strip chromatography",
    "id": 758,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0758",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Temperature ramp timing — cellulose acetate strip chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For cellulose acetate strip chromatography, a mild temperature ramp late in development will alter late-band spacing more than the same ramp early.",
    "test": "Measure band positions and solvent evaporation across matched ramp energies.",
    "against": "Spacing depends only on mean temperature and travel distance.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Temperature ramp timing",
    "system": "cellulose acetate strip chromatography",
    "id": 759,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0759",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Support contact pattern — cellulose acetate strip chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For cellulose acetate strip chromatography, sparse support contacts will produce less local band distortion than continuous support under unequal heating.",
    "test": "Map support temperature and tracer paths.",
    "against": "Sparse contacts do not reduce distortion after temperature differences are measured.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Support contact pattern",
    "system": "cellulose acetate strip chromatography",
    "id": 760,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0760",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Solvent-front pauses — glass-fiber strip chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For glass-fiber strip chromatography, a short solvent-front pause will broaden strongly retained bands more than weakly retained bands.",
    "test": "Interrupt flow reproducibly and image multiple independently characterized tracers.",
    "against": "Broadening does not depend on tracer retention.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Solvent-front pauses",
    "system": "glass-fiber strip chromatography",
    "id": 761,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0761",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Loading footprint aspect ratio — glass-fiber strip chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For glass-fiber strip chromatography, a narrow transverse loading line will reduce migration-direction dispersion relative to a circular spot of equal area.",
    "test": "Compare band variance at matched loaded mass and travel distance.",
    "against": "Variance is no smaller after initial footprint is included.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Loading footprint aspect ratio",
    "system": "glass-fiber strip chromatography",
    "id": 762,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0762",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Substrate tension — glass-fiber strip chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For glass-fiber strip chromatography, mild uniform tension will reduce lateral band wandering by stabilizing pore alignment.",
    "test": "Image tracer trajectories at several non-damaging tensions.",
    "against": "Wandering does not decrease or is explained by changed mean front speed.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Substrate tension",
    "system": "glass-fiber strip chromatography",
    "id": 763,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0763",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Chamber humidity history — glass-fiber strip chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For glass-fiber strip chromatography, humidity cycling before development will alter selectivity more than mean migration speed.",
    "test": "Measure pairwise tracer separation and front position after conditioning.",
    "against": "Selectivity remains unchanged once retained water is matched.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Chamber humidity history",
    "system": "glass-fiber strip chromatography",
    "id": 764,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0764",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Front curvature correction — glass-fiber strip chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For glass-fiber strip chromatography, edge reservoir wicks will flatten the advancing solvent front and reduce edge-band distortion.",
    "test": "Compare full-width front maps with and without edge reservoirs.",
    "against": "Front flatness and band distortion do not improve together.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Front curvature correction",
    "system": "glass-fiber strip chromatography",
    "id": 765,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0765",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Gradient prewetting — glass-fiber strip chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For glass-fiber strip chromatography, a shallow prewetting gradient will reduce startup fingering compared with uniform partial wetting.",
    "test": "Map solvent fronts and tracer transport at matched initial liquid content.",
    "against": "Fingering is no lower after uptake rate is matched.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Gradient prewetting",
    "system": "glass-fiber strip chromatography",
    "id": 766,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0766",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Repeated low-mass loading — glass-fiber strip chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For glass-fiber strip chromatography, several dried low-mass loads will produce sharper bands than one wet load of equal solute mass.",
    "test": "Compare initial deposits and developed band widths.",
    "against": "Final sharpness does not improve after initial spot width is considered.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Repeated low-mass loading",
    "system": "glass-fiber strip chromatography",
    "id": 767,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0767",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Reversed development — glass-fiber strip chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For glass-fiber strip chromatography, reversing development direction after a short first run will expose retention hysteresis beyond simple diffusion.",
    "test": "Track tracer displacement against a nonretained reference.",
    "against": "Return displacements agree with a reversible transport model.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Reversed development",
    "system": "glass-fiber strip chromatography",
    "id": 768,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0768",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Temperature ramp timing — glass-fiber strip chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For glass-fiber strip chromatography, a mild temperature ramp late in development will alter late-band spacing more than the same ramp early.",
    "test": "Measure band positions and solvent evaporation across matched ramp energies.",
    "against": "Spacing depends only on mean temperature and travel distance.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Temperature ramp timing",
    "system": "glass-fiber strip chromatography",
    "id": 769,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0769",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Support contact pattern — glass-fiber strip chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For glass-fiber strip chromatography, sparse support contacts will produce less local band distortion than continuous support under unequal heating.",
    "test": "Map support temperature and tracer paths.",
    "against": "Sparse contacts do not reduce distortion after temperature differences are measured.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Support contact pattern",
    "system": "glass-fiber strip chromatography",
    "id": 770,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0770",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Solvent-front pauses — silica-coated glass-fiber chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For silica-coated glass-fiber chromatography, a short solvent-front pause will broaden strongly retained bands more than weakly retained bands.",
    "test": "Interrupt flow reproducibly and image multiple independently characterized tracers.",
    "against": "Broadening does not depend on tracer retention.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Solvent-front pauses",
    "system": "silica-coated glass-fiber chromatography",
    "id": 771,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0771",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Loading footprint aspect ratio — silica-coated glass-fiber chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For silica-coated glass-fiber chromatography, a narrow transverse loading line will reduce migration-direction dispersion relative to a circular spot of equal area.",
    "test": "Compare band variance at matched loaded mass and travel distance.",
    "against": "Variance is no smaller after initial footprint is included.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Loading footprint aspect ratio",
    "system": "silica-coated glass-fiber chromatography",
    "id": 772,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0772",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Substrate tension — silica-coated glass-fiber chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For silica-coated glass-fiber chromatography, mild uniform tension will reduce lateral band wandering by stabilizing pore alignment.",
    "test": "Image tracer trajectories at several non-damaging tensions.",
    "against": "Wandering does not decrease or is explained by changed mean front speed.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Substrate tension",
    "system": "silica-coated glass-fiber chromatography",
    "id": 773,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0773",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Chamber humidity history — silica-coated glass-fiber chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For silica-coated glass-fiber chromatography, humidity cycling before development will alter selectivity more than mean migration speed.",
    "test": "Measure pairwise tracer separation and front position after conditioning.",
    "against": "Selectivity remains unchanged once retained water is matched.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Chamber humidity history",
    "system": "silica-coated glass-fiber chromatography",
    "id": 774,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0774",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Front curvature correction — silica-coated glass-fiber chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For silica-coated glass-fiber chromatography, edge reservoir wicks will flatten the advancing solvent front and reduce edge-band distortion.",
    "test": "Compare full-width front maps with and without edge reservoirs.",
    "against": "Front flatness and band distortion do not improve together.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Front curvature correction",
    "system": "silica-coated glass-fiber chromatography",
    "id": 775,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0775",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Gradient prewetting — silica-coated glass-fiber chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For silica-coated glass-fiber chromatography, a shallow prewetting gradient will reduce startup fingering compared with uniform partial wetting.",
    "test": "Map solvent fronts and tracer transport at matched initial liquid content.",
    "against": "Fingering is no lower after uptake rate is matched.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Gradient prewetting",
    "system": "silica-coated glass-fiber chromatography",
    "id": 776,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0776",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Repeated low-mass loading — silica-coated glass-fiber chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For silica-coated glass-fiber chromatography, several dried low-mass loads will produce sharper bands than one wet load of equal solute mass.",
    "test": "Compare initial deposits and developed band widths.",
    "against": "Final sharpness does not improve after initial spot width is considered.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Repeated low-mass loading",
    "system": "silica-coated glass-fiber chromatography",
    "id": 777,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0777",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Reversed development — silica-coated glass-fiber chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For silica-coated glass-fiber chromatography, reversing development direction after a short first run will expose retention hysteresis beyond simple diffusion.",
    "test": "Track tracer displacement against a nonretained reference.",
    "against": "Return displacements agree with a reversible transport model.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Reversed development",
    "system": "silica-coated glass-fiber chromatography",
    "id": 778,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0778",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Temperature ramp timing — silica-coated glass-fiber chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For silica-coated glass-fiber chromatography, a mild temperature ramp late in development will alter late-band spacing more than the same ramp early.",
    "test": "Measure band positions and solvent evaporation across matched ramp energies.",
    "against": "Spacing depends only on mean temperature and travel distance.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Temperature ramp timing",
    "system": "silica-coated glass-fiber chromatography",
    "id": 779,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0779",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Support contact pattern — silica-coated glass-fiber chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For silica-coated glass-fiber chromatography, sparse support contacts will produce less local band distortion than continuous support under unequal heating.",
    "test": "Map support temperature and tracer paths.",
    "against": "Sparse contacts do not reduce distortion after temperature differences are measured.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Support contact pattern",
    "system": "silica-coated glass-fiber chromatography",
    "id": 780,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0780",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Solvent-front pauses — crosslinked dextran layer chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For crosslinked dextran layer chromatography, a short solvent-front pause will broaden strongly retained bands more than weakly retained bands.",
    "test": "Interrupt flow reproducibly and image multiple independently characterized tracers.",
    "against": "Broadening does not depend on tracer retention.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Solvent-front pauses",
    "system": "crosslinked dextran layer chromatography",
    "id": 781,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0781",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Loading footprint aspect ratio — crosslinked dextran layer chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For crosslinked dextran layer chromatography, a narrow transverse loading line will reduce migration-direction dispersion relative to a circular spot of equal area.",
    "test": "Compare band variance at matched loaded mass and travel distance.",
    "against": "Variance is no smaller after initial footprint is included.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Loading footprint aspect ratio",
    "system": "crosslinked dextran layer chromatography",
    "id": 782,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0782",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Substrate tension — crosslinked dextran layer chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For crosslinked dextran layer chromatography, mild uniform tension will reduce lateral band wandering by stabilizing pore alignment.",
    "test": "Image tracer trajectories at several non-damaging tensions.",
    "against": "Wandering does not decrease or is explained by changed mean front speed.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Substrate tension",
    "system": "crosslinked dextran layer chromatography",
    "id": 783,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0783",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Chamber humidity history — crosslinked dextran layer chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For crosslinked dextran layer chromatography, humidity cycling before development will alter selectivity more than mean migration speed.",
    "test": "Measure pairwise tracer separation and front position after conditioning.",
    "against": "Selectivity remains unchanged once retained water is matched.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Chamber humidity history",
    "system": "crosslinked dextran layer chromatography",
    "id": 784,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0784",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Front curvature correction — crosslinked dextran layer chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For crosslinked dextran layer chromatography, edge reservoir wicks will flatten the advancing solvent front and reduce edge-band distortion.",
    "test": "Compare full-width front maps with and without edge reservoirs.",
    "against": "Front flatness and band distortion do not improve together.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Front curvature correction",
    "system": "crosslinked dextran layer chromatography",
    "id": 785,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0785",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Gradient prewetting — crosslinked dextran layer chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For crosslinked dextran layer chromatography, a shallow prewetting gradient will reduce startup fingering compared with uniform partial wetting.",
    "test": "Map solvent fronts and tracer transport at matched initial liquid content.",
    "against": "Fingering is no lower after uptake rate is matched.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Gradient prewetting",
    "system": "crosslinked dextran layer chromatography",
    "id": 786,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0786",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Repeated low-mass loading — crosslinked dextran layer chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For crosslinked dextran layer chromatography, several dried low-mass loads will produce sharper bands than one wet load of equal solute mass.",
    "test": "Compare initial deposits and developed band widths.",
    "against": "Final sharpness does not improve after initial spot width is considered.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Repeated low-mass loading",
    "system": "crosslinked dextran layer chromatography",
    "id": 787,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0787",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Reversed development — crosslinked dextran layer chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For crosslinked dextran layer chromatography, reversing development direction after a short first run will expose retention hysteresis beyond simple diffusion.",
    "test": "Track tracer displacement against a nonretained reference.",
    "against": "Return displacements agree with a reversible transport model.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Reversed development",
    "system": "crosslinked dextran layer chromatography",
    "id": 788,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0788",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Temperature ramp timing — crosslinked dextran layer chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For crosslinked dextran layer chromatography, a mild temperature ramp late in development will alter late-band spacing more than the same ramp early.",
    "test": "Measure band positions and solvent evaporation across matched ramp energies.",
    "against": "Spacing depends only on mean temperature and travel distance.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Temperature ramp timing",
    "system": "crosslinked dextran layer chromatography",
    "id": 789,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0789",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Support contact pattern — crosslinked dextran layer chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For crosslinked dextran layer chromatography, sparse support contacts will produce less local band distortion than continuous support under unequal heating.",
    "test": "Map support temperature and tracer paths.",
    "against": "Sparse contacts do not reduce distortion after temperature differences are measured.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Support contact pattern",
    "system": "crosslinked dextran layer chromatography",
    "id": 790,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0790",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Solvent-front pauses — chitosan-coated cellulose chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For chitosan-coated cellulose chromatography, a short solvent-front pause will broaden strongly retained bands more than weakly retained bands.",
    "test": "Interrupt flow reproducibly and image multiple independently characterized tracers.",
    "against": "Broadening does not depend on tracer retention.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Solvent-front pauses",
    "system": "chitosan-coated cellulose chromatography",
    "id": 791,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0791",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Loading footprint aspect ratio — chitosan-coated cellulose chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For chitosan-coated cellulose chromatography, a narrow transverse loading line will reduce migration-direction dispersion relative to a circular spot of equal area.",
    "test": "Compare band variance at matched loaded mass and travel distance.",
    "against": "Variance is no smaller after initial footprint is included.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Loading footprint aspect ratio",
    "system": "chitosan-coated cellulose chromatography",
    "id": 792,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0792",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Substrate tension — chitosan-coated cellulose chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For chitosan-coated cellulose chromatography, mild uniform tension will reduce lateral band wandering by stabilizing pore alignment.",
    "test": "Image tracer trajectories at several non-damaging tensions.",
    "against": "Wandering does not decrease or is explained by changed mean front speed.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Substrate tension",
    "system": "chitosan-coated cellulose chromatography",
    "id": 793,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0793",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Chamber humidity history — chitosan-coated cellulose chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For chitosan-coated cellulose chromatography, humidity cycling before development will alter selectivity more than mean migration speed.",
    "test": "Measure pairwise tracer separation and front position after conditioning.",
    "against": "Selectivity remains unchanged once retained water is matched.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Chamber humidity history",
    "system": "chitosan-coated cellulose chromatography",
    "id": 794,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0794",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Front curvature correction — chitosan-coated cellulose chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For chitosan-coated cellulose chromatography, edge reservoir wicks will flatten the advancing solvent front and reduce edge-band distortion.",
    "test": "Compare full-width front maps with and without edge reservoirs.",
    "against": "Front flatness and band distortion do not improve together.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Front curvature correction",
    "system": "chitosan-coated cellulose chromatography",
    "id": 795,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0795",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Gradient prewetting — chitosan-coated cellulose chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For chitosan-coated cellulose chromatography, a shallow prewetting gradient will reduce startup fingering compared with uniform partial wetting.",
    "test": "Map solvent fronts and tracer transport at matched initial liquid content.",
    "against": "Fingering is no lower after uptake rate is matched.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Gradient prewetting",
    "system": "chitosan-coated cellulose chromatography",
    "id": 796,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0796",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Repeated low-mass loading — chitosan-coated cellulose chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For chitosan-coated cellulose chromatography, several dried low-mass loads will produce sharper bands than one wet load of equal solute mass.",
    "test": "Compare initial deposits and developed band widths.",
    "against": "Final sharpness does not improve after initial spot width is considered.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Repeated low-mass loading",
    "system": "chitosan-coated cellulose chromatography",
    "id": 797,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0797",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Reversed development — chitosan-coated cellulose chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For chitosan-coated cellulose chromatography, reversing development direction after a short first run will expose retention hysteresis beyond simple diffusion.",
    "test": "Track tracer displacement against a nonretained reference.",
    "against": "Return displacements agree with a reversible transport model.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Reversed development",
    "system": "chitosan-coated cellulose chromatography",
    "id": 798,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0798",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Temperature ramp timing — chitosan-coated cellulose chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For chitosan-coated cellulose chromatography, a mild temperature ramp late in development will alter late-band spacing more than the same ramp early.",
    "test": "Measure band positions and solvent evaporation across matched ramp energies.",
    "against": "Spacing depends only on mean temperature and travel distance.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Temperature ramp timing",
    "system": "chitosan-coated cellulose chromatography",
    "id": 799,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0799",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Support contact pattern — chitosan-coated cellulose chromatography",
    "hypothesis": "For chitosan-coated cellulose chromatography, sparse support contacts will produce less local band distortion than continuous support under unequal heating.",
    "test": "Map support temperature and tracer paths.",
    "against": "Sparse contacts do not reduce distortion after temperature differences are measured.",
    "category": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography",
    "controls": "Use compatible benign tracer mixtures, a verified separating mobile phase, matched loading, layer thickness, chamber saturation, and temperature.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Capillary and thin-layer chromatography: Support contact pattern",
    "system": "chitosan-coated cellulose chromatography",
    "id": 800,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible chromatography media, benign separable tracer mixture, development chamber, calibrated imaging, and temperature/humidity logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0800",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Inlet widening profile — glass-bead water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For glass-bead water suspension, a gradual inlet expansion will reduce particle carryover more than an abrupt expansion at equal chamber volume.",
    "test": "Measure outlet particle mass and velocity fields.",
    "against": "Carryover is not reduced after residence time is matched.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Inlet widening profile",
    "system": "glass-bead water suspension",
    "id": 801,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0801",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Baffle gap sequence — glass-bead water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For glass-bead water suspension, progressively widening baffle gaps will reduce resuspension during flow increases.",
    "test": "Compare outlet transients with reversed and uniform gap sequences.",
    "against": "Gap order does not change resuspension at matched hydraulic work.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Baffle gap sequence",
    "system": "glass-bead water suspension",
    "id": 802,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 37,
    "literature_query": "Baffle gap sequence glass-bead water suspension progressively widening gaps resuspension flow increases experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0802",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": true,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Baffle gap sequence — glass-bead water suspension",
      "hypothesis": "For glass-bead water suspension, progressively widening baffle gaps will reduce resuspension during flow increases.",
      "test": "Compare outlet transients with reversed and uniform gap sequences.",
      "against": "Gap order does not change resuspension at matched hydraulic work.",
      "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
      "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Baffle gap sequence",
      "system": "glass-bead water suspension",
      "id": 802,
      "access_score": 4,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 29,
      "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 37,
      "literature_query": "Baffle gap sequence glass-bead water suspension progressively widening gaps resuspension flow increases experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
      "source_lead_count": 1,
      "source_ids": "S3e680f4a4cf6",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": {
      "deep_rank": "24",
      "id": "802",
      "title": "Baffle gap sequence — glass-bead water suspension",
      "original_300_rank": "37",
      "pilot_class": "C",
      "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
      "hypothesis": "For glass-bead water suspension, progressively widening baffle gaps will reduce resuspension during flow increases.",
      "primary_outcome": "Integrated downstream particle mass during a standardized flow surge.",
      "comparison": "Progressively widening baffle gaps versus reversed and uniform gaps with equal initial hydraulic resistance.",
      "controls": "Glass-bead distribution, initial bed, residence time, inlet pulse, mean flow, settling area, and pumping work.",
      "pilot": "Use a transparent water chamber and inert beads. Map circulation before adding particles. Measure baseline capture and surge carryover independently.",
      "novelty_gap": "Baffle position and sedimentation performance are studied. A possible new result is ordering of multiple gaps under matched transient forcing, not baffle effectiveness generally.",
      "stop_rule": "Stop if widening gaps change residence time or work uncontrollably. Reject the sequence claim if reversed arrangements perform equivalently.",
      "source_keys": "BAFFLE12;BAFFLE11",
      "truth_probability": "not estimated",
      "novelty_status": "unverified"
    },
    "dossier_text": "# 24. H0802 — Baffle gap sequence — glass-bead water suspension\n\nOriginal 300-folder rank: 37. Pilot class: C. Resource class: modest bench or workshop; calibration still required.\n\n## Original hypothesis\n\nFor glass-bead water suspension, progressively widening baffle gaps will reduce resuspension during flow increases.\n\n## Why investigate this\n\nExisting baffle experiments support the apparatus and the importance of circulation; the ordering comparison is mechanically simple.\n\n## Literature assessment and exact novelty question\n\nBaffle position and sedimentation performance are studied. A possible new result is ordering of multiple gaps under matched transient forcing, not baffle effectiveness generally. Worldwide originality remains unverified.\n\n## Primary measurement\n\nIntegrated downstream particle mass during a standardized flow surge.\n\n## Comparison\n\nProgressively widening baffle gaps versus reversed and uniform gaps with equal initial hydraulic resistance.\n\n## Critical controls\n\nGlass-bead distribution, initial bed, residence time, inlet pulse, mean flow, settling area, and pumping work.\n\n## Pilot plan\n\nUse a transparent water chamber and inert beads. Map circulation before adding particles. Measure baseline capture and surge carryover independently.\n\n## What would count against it\n\nStop if widening gaps change residence time or work uncontrollably. Reject the sequence claim if reversed arrangements perform equivalently.\n\n## Replication and analysis\n\nTreat separately prepared specimens, batches, or devices as independent units. Technical repeats and images are nested measurements. First estimate calibration error and independent-preparation variability. Set the minimum meaningful effect in the primary outcome's units before confirmation, then choose sample size from that effect and pilot variance; a convenient pilot count is not a powered study.\n\nRandomize run order and blind sample labels where practical. Freeze image processing, fitting choices, exclusions, and the primary comparison before evaluating confirmatory data. Report effect size and uncertainty; use a blocked or mixed-effects analysis when specimens share a batch. A wide interval is inconclusive. Include the measurement and matching controls even when the directional effect appears large.\n\nA useful go/no-go gate is whether the hypothesized effect can be distinguished from calibration uncertainty and the strongest alternative explanation. Stop material purchases if the closest literature already measures the identical contrast, unless a replication has an explicit purpose. Do not use these abbreviated plans as complete laboratory protocols.\n\n## Data to preserve\n\nKeep unedited images or sensor streams, calibration files, preparation IDs, run order, environmental logs, input histories, raw outcome values, exclusions, and the exact analysis version. No values are prefilled in the observation template. Use `data/Published Benchmarks.csv` only as literature context; values from a different system are not observations of this hypothesis.\n\n## Sources and transfer limits\n\n### BAFFLE12\n\n[Experimental Investigation of Baffle Position, Flow Field, Sediment Concentration, and Efficiency of Rectangular Primary Sedimentation Tanks](https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HY.1943-7900.0000598)\n\nAccess: Indexed abstract examined. Type: primary experiment.\n\nBackground findings and transfer limits: see [source assessments](../research/Primary%20Source%20Assessments.md) under this source key.\n\n### BAFFLE11\n\n[Experimental investigation of effects of baffle configurations on the performance of a secondary sedimentation tank](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1026309811001192)\n\nAccess: Title and indexed record screened. Type: primary research lead.\n\nBackground findings and transfer limits: see [source assessments](../research/Primary%20Source%20Assessments.md) under this source key.\n\n"
  },
  {
    "title": "Pulsed drain timing — glass-bead water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For glass-bead water suspension, draining settled particles during low-flow intervals will reduce losses relative to draining during high flow.",
    "test": "Measure recovered solids and effluent concentration across schedules.",
    "against": "Recovery does not improve at equal drain volume.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Pulsed drain timing",
    "system": "glass-bead water suspension",
    "id": 803,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 38,
    "literature_query": "Pulsed drain timing glass-bead water suspension draining settled particles low-flow intervals losses to experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0803",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": true,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Pulsed drain timing — glass-bead water suspension",
      "hypothesis": "For glass-bead water suspension, draining settled particles during low-flow intervals will reduce losses relative to draining during high flow.",
      "test": "Measure recovered solids and effluent concentration across schedules.",
      "against": "Recovery does not improve at equal drain volume.",
      "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
      "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Pulsed drain timing",
      "system": "glass-bead water suspension",
      "id": 803,
      "access_score": 4,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 29,
      "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 38,
      "literature_query": "Pulsed drain timing glass-bead water suspension draining settled particles low-flow intervals losses to experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
      "source_lead_count": 3,
      "source_ids": "Sb19f86e06aca;S3e680f4a4cf6;Sab62de3ddb6b",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": {
      "deep_rank": "6",
      "id": "803",
      "title": "Pulsed drain timing — glass-bead water suspension",
      "original_300_rank": "38",
      "pilot_class": "P",
      "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
      "hypothesis": "For glass-bead water suspension, draining settled particles during low-flow intervals will reduce losses relative to draining during high flow.",
      "primary_outcome": "Effluent particle loss per mass intentionally recovered during a drain event.",
      "comparison": "Equal-volume bottom drainage during low-flow versus high-flow intervals, plus no-drain control.",
      "controls": "Bed height, particle size, drain opening profile, withdrawn volume, inlet pulse, chamber level, and total operation duration.",
      "pilot": "Use clean inert glass beads rather than wastewater. Capture and weigh both intended discharge and escaped solids. Begin with gentle low-pressure operation and include restart transients.",
      "novelty_gap": "Resuspension and withdrawal transients are established. The exact phase-of-drainage comparison requires checking against sedimentation and clarifier operations literature.",
      "stop_rule": "Reject a useful timing advantage if reduced carryover is offset by lower recovered mass or increased restart losses. No mass balance means no interpretable result.",
      "source_keys": "RESUSP16;TRANSIENT21",
      "truth_probability": "not estimated",
      "novelty_status": "unverified"
    },
    "dossier_text": "# 06. H0803 — Pulsed drain timing — glass-bead water suspension\n\nOriginal 300-folder rank: 38. Pilot class: P. Resource class: modest bench or workshop; calibration still required.\n\n## Original hypothesis\n\nFor glass-bead water suspension, draining settled particles during low-flow intervals will reduce losses relative to draining during high flow.\n\n## Why investigate this\n\nThe mass balance is straightforward and a useful operational contrast can be tested with a small flow loop.\n\n## Literature assessment and exact novelty question\n\nResuspension and withdrawal transients are established. The exact phase-of-drainage comparison requires checking against sedimentation and clarifier operations literature. Worldwide originality remains unverified.\n\n## Primary measurement\n\nEffluent particle loss per mass intentionally recovered during a drain event.\n\n## Comparison\n\nEqual-volume bottom drainage during low-flow versus high-flow intervals, plus no-drain control.\n\n## Critical controls\n\nBed height, particle size, drain opening profile, withdrawn volume, inlet pulse, chamber level, and total operation duration.\n\n## Pilot plan\n\nUse clean inert glass beads rather than wastewater. Capture and weigh both intended discharge and escaped solids. Begin with gentle low-pressure operation and include restart transients.\n\n## What would count against it\n\nReject a useful timing advantage if reduced carryover is offset by lower recovered mass or increased restart losses. No mass balance means no interpretable result.\n\n## Replication and analysis\n\nTreat separately prepared specimens, batches, or devices as independent units. Technical repeats and images are nested measurements. First estimate calibration error and independent-preparation variability. Set the minimum meaningful effect in the primary outcome's units before confirmation, then choose sample size from that effect and pilot variance; a convenient pilot count is not a powered study.\n\nRandomize run order and blind sample labels where practical. Freeze image processing, fitting choices, exclusions, and the primary comparison before evaluating confirmatory data. Report effect size and uncertainty; use a blocked or mixed-effects analysis when specimens share a batch. A wide interval is inconclusive. Include the measurement and matching controls even when the directional effect appears large.\n\nA useful go/no-go gate is whether the hypothesized effect can be distinguished from calibration uncertainty and the strongest alternative explanation. Stop material purchases if the closest literature already measures the identical contrast, unless a replication has an explicit purpose. Do not use these abbreviated plans as complete laboratory protocols.\n\n## Data to preserve\n\nKeep unedited images or sensor streams, calibration files, preparation IDs, run order, environmental logs, input histories, raw outcome values, exclusions, and the exact analysis version. No values are prefilled in the observation template. Use `data/Published Benchmarks.csv` only as literature context; values from a different system are not observations of this hypothesis.\n\n## Sources and transfer limits\n\n### RESUSP16\n\n[Modeling and Experimental Testing of Sediment Resuspension in Water Distribution Storage Tanks](https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPURL.cgi?Dockey=P100OKRX.TXT)\n\nAccess: Indexed report record and returned sections screened. Type: original government research report.\n\nBackground findings and transfer limits: see [source assessments](../research/Primary%20Source%20Assessments.md) under this source key.\n\n### TRANSIENT21\n\n[An experimental study of how hydraulic transients cause mobilisation of material within drinking water distribution systems](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0043135421000889)\n\nAccess: Indexed abstract and article sections examined. Type: primary experiment.\n\nBackground findings and transfer limits: see [source assessments](../research/Primary%20Source%20Assessments.md) under this source key.\n\n"
  },
  {
    "title": "Sloped floor microtexture — glass-bead water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For glass-bead water suspension, shallow downstream grooves will reduce retained solids after a gravity-only discharge.",
    "test": "Map residual deposits and collected mass.",
    "against": "Residual mass is unchanged after floor friction is measured.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Sloped floor microtexture",
    "system": "glass-bead water suspension",
    "id": 804,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0804",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Split inlet phase — glass-bead water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For glass-bead water suspension, out-of-phase inlet pulses will reduce coherent recirculation and improve settling.",
    "test": "Measure flow fields and size-resolved removal at equal mean throughput.",
    "against": "Improvement is absent or explained by longer residence time.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Split inlet phase",
    "system": "glass-bead water suspension",
    "id": 805,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 39,
    "literature_query": "Split inlet phase glass-bead water suspension out-of-phase pulses coherent recirculation improve settling experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0805",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Split inlet phase — glass-bead water suspension",
      "hypothesis": "For glass-bead water suspension, out-of-phase inlet pulses will reduce coherent recirculation and improve settling.",
      "test": "Measure flow fields and size-resolved removal at equal mean throughput.",
      "against": "Improvement is absent or explained by longer residence time.",
      "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
      "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Split inlet phase",
      "system": "glass-bead water suspension",
      "id": 805,
      "access_score": 4,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 29,
      "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 39,
      "literature_query": "Split inlet phase glass-bead water suspension out-of-phase pulses coherent recirculation improve settling experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
      "source_lead_count": 4,
      "source_ids": "Sd679eeec3db5;S5cb1d3a35eb1;Sdc005714df32;S9872ebf3d68b",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Wall compliance surge buffer — glass-bead water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For glass-bead water suspension, a compliant inlet wall will reduce short-surge particle breakthrough.",
    "test": "Measure pressure, wall motion, and outlet particles during identical surges.",
    "against": "Breakthrough is unchanged at matched mean flow.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Wall compliance surge buffer",
    "system": "glass-bead water suspension",
    "id": 806,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0806",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Bed thickness warning — glass-bead water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For glass-bead water suspension, pressure fluctuations will detect incipient resuspension before outlet turbidity rises.",
    "test": "Track pressure spectra, bed images, and calibrated turbidity.",
    "against": "Pressure gives no earlier warning at a matched false-alarm rate.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Bed thickness warning",
    "system": "glass-bead water suspension",
    "id": 807,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0807",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Distributed outlet sampling — glass-bead water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For glass-bead water suspension, many small outlets will reduce preferential particle escape compared with one equal-area outlet.",
    "test": "Map concentration near outlets and total carryover.",
    "against": "Carryover does not decrease after flow uniformity is included.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Distributed outlet sampling",
    "system": "glass-bead water suspension",
    "id": 808,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0808",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Tilt reversal cleanup — glass-bead water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For glass-bead water suspension, a brief small tilt reversal will release trapped solids more effectively than a constant tilt.",
    "test": "Measure cleanup mass and subsequent effluent contamination.",
    "against": "Released mass is no higher or contamination eliminates the gain.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Tilt reversal cleanup",
    "system": "glass-bead water suspension",
    "id": 809,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0809",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Quiet-zone placement — glass-bead water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For glass-bead water suspension, placing a quiet zone downstream of recirculation will outperform an equal zone upstream.",
    "test": "Compare size-dependent removal and tracer residence distributions.",
    "against": "Zone placement has no independent effect on removal.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Quiet-zone placement",
    "system": "glass-bead water suspension",
    "id": 810,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0810",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Inlet widening profile — cellulose-particle water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For cellulose-particle water suspension, a gradual inlet expansion will reduce particle carryover more than an abrupt expansion at equal chamber volume.",
    "test": "Measure outlet particle mass and velocity fields.",
    "against": "Carryover is not reduced after residence time is matched.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Inlet widening profile",
    "system": "cellulose-particle water suspension",
    "id": 811,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0811",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Baffle gap sequence — cellulose-particle water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For cellulose-particle water suspension, progressively widening baffle gaps will reduce resuspension during flow increases.",
    "test": "Compare outlet transients with reversed and uniform gap sequences.",
    "against": "Gap order does not change resuspension at matched hydraulic work.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Baffle gap sequence",
    "system": "cellulose-particle water suspension",
    "id": 812,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0812",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pulsed drain timing — cellulose-particle water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For cellulose-particle water suspension, draining settled particles during low-flow intervals will reduce losses relative to draining during high flow.",
    "test": "Measure recovered solids and effluent concentration across schedules.",
    "against": "Recovery does not improve at equal drain volume.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Pulsed drain timing",
    "system": "cellulose-particle water suspension",
    "id": 813,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0813",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Sloped floor microtexture — cellulose-particle water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For cellulose-particle water suspension, shallow downstream grooves will reduce retained solids after a gravity-only discharge.",
    "test": "Map residual deposits and collected mass.",
    "against": "Residual mass is unchanged after floor friction is measured.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Sloped floor microtexture",
    "system": "cellulose-particle water suspension",
    "id": 814,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0814",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Split inlet phase — cellulose-particle water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For cellulose-particle water suspension, out-of-phase inlet pulses will reduce coherent recirculation and improve settling.",
    "test": "Measure flow fields and size-resolved removal at equal mean throughput.",
    "against": "Improvement is absent or explained by longer residence time.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Split inlet phase",
    "system": "cellulose-particle water suspension",
    "id": 815,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0815",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Wall compliance surge buffer — cellulose-particle water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For cellulose-particle water suspension, a compliant inlet wall will reduce short-surge particle breakthrough.",
    "test": "Measure pressure, wall motion, and outlet particles during identical surges.",
    "against": "Breakthrough is unchanged at matched mean flow.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Wall compliance surge buffer",
    "system": "cellulose-particle water suspension",
    "id": 816,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0816",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Bed thickness warning — cellulose-particle water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For cellulose-particle water suspension, pressure fluctuations will detect incipient resuspension before outlet turbidity rises.",
    "test": "Track pressure spectra, bed images, and calibrated turbidity.",
    "against": "Pressure gives no earlier warning at a matched false-alarm rate.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Bed thickness warning",
    "system": "cellulose-particle water suspension",
    "id": 817,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0817",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Distributed outlet sampling — cellulose-particle water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For cellulose-particle water suspension, many small outlets will reduce preferential particle escape compared with one equal-area outlet.",
    "test": "Map concentration near outlets and total carryover.",
    "against": "Carryover does not decrease after flow uniformity is included.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Distributed outlet sampling",
    "system": "cellulose-particle water suspension",
    "id": 818,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0818",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Tilt reversal cleanup — cellulose-particle water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For cellulose-particle water suspension, a brief small tilt reversal will release trapped solids more effectively than a constant tilt.",
    "test": "Measure cleanup mass and subsequent effluent contamination.",
    "against": "Released mass is no higher or contamination eliminates the gain.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Tilt reversal cleanup",
    "system": "cellulose-particle water suspension",
    "id": 819,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0819",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Quiet-zone placement — cellulose-particle water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For cellulose-particle water suspension, placing a quiet zone downstream of recirculation will outperform an equal zone upstream.",
    "test": "Compare size-dependent removal and tracer residence distributions.",
    "against": "Zone placement has no independent effect on removal.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Quiet-zone placement",
    "system": "cellulose-particle water suspension",
    "id": 820,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0820",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Inlet widening profile — starch-granule water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For starch-granule water suspension, a gradual inlet expansion will reduce particle carryover more than an abrupt expansion at equal chamber volume.",
    "test": "Measure outlet particle mass and velocity fields.",
    "against": "Carryover is not reduced after residence time is matched.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Inlet widening profile",
    "system": "starch-granule water suspension",
    "id": 821,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0821",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Baffle gap sequence — starch-granule water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For starch-granule water suspension, progressively widening baffle gaps will reduce resuspension during flow increases.",
    "test": "Compare outlet transients with reversed and uniform gap sequences.",
    "against": "Gap order does not change resuspension at matched hydraulic work.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Baffle gap sequence",
    "system": "starch-granule water suspension",
    "id": 822,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0822",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pulsed drain timing — starch-granule water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For starch-granule water suspension, draining settled particles during low-flow intervals will reduce losses relative to draining during high flow.",
    "test": "Measure recovered solids and effluent concentration across schedules.",
    "against": "Recovery does not improve at equal drain volume.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Pulsed drain timing",
    "system": "starch-granule water suspension",
    "id": 823,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0823",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Sloped floor microtexture — starch-granule water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For starch-granule water suspension, shallow downstream grooves will reduce retained solids after a gravity-only discharge.",
    "test": "Map residual deposits and collected mass.",
    "against": "Residual mass is unchanged after floor friction is measured.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Sloped floor microtexture",
    "system": "starch-granule water suspension",
    "id": 824,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0824",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Split inlet phase — starch-granule water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For starch-granule water suspension, out-of-phase inlet pulses will reduce coherent recirculation and improve settling.",
    "test": "Measure flow fields and size-resolved removal at equal mean throughput.",
    "against": "Improvement is absent or explained by longer residence time.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Split inlet phase",
    "system": "starch-granule water suspension",
    "id": 825,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0825",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Wall compliance surge buffer — starch-granule water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For starch-granule water suspension, a compliant inlet wall will reduce short-surge particle breakthrough.",
    "test": "Measure pressure, wall motion, and outlet particles during identical surges.",
    "against": "Breakthrough is unchanged at matched mean flow.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Wall compliance surge buffer",
    "system": "starch-granule water suspension",
    "id": 826,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0826",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Bed thickness warning — starch-granule water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For starch-granule water suspension, pressure fluctuations will detect incipient resuspension before outlet turbidity rises.",
    "test": "Track pressure spectra, bed images, and calibrated turbidity.",
    "against": "Pressure gives no earlier warning at a matched false-alarm rate.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Bed thickness warning",
    "system": "starch-granule water suspension",
    "id": 827,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0827",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Distributed outlet sampling — starch-granule water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For starch-granule water suspension, many small outlets will reduce preferential particle escape compared with one equal-area outlet.",
    "test": "Map concentration near outlets and total carryover.",
    "against": "Carryover does not decrease after flow uniformity is included.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Distributed outlet sampling",
    "system": "starch-granule water suspension",
    "id": 828,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0828",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Tilt reversal cleanup — starch-granule water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For starch-granule water suspension, a brief small tilt reversal will release trapped solids more effectively than a constant tilt.",
    "test": "Measure cleanup mass and subsequent effluent contamination.",
    "against": "Released mass is no higher or contamination eliminates the gain.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Tilt reversal cleanup",
    "system": "starch-granule water suspension",
    "id": 829,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0829",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Quiet-zone placement — starch-granule water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For starch-granule water suspension, placing a quiet zone downstream of recirculation will outperform an equal zone upstream.",
    "test": "Compare size-dependent removal and tracer residence distributions.",
    "against": "Zone placement has no independent effect on removal.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Quiet-zone placement",
    "system": "starch-granule water suspension",
    "id": 830,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0830",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Inlet widening profile — rounded sand water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For rounded sand water suspension, a gradual inlet expansion will reduce particle carryover more than an abrupt expansion at equal chamber volume.",
    "test": "Measure outlet particle mass and velocity fields.",
    "against": "Carryover is not reduced after residence time is matched.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Inlet widening profile",
    "system": "rounded sand water suspension",
    "id": 831,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 40,
    "literature_query": "Inlet widening profile rounded sand water suspension gradual expansion particle carryover an abrupt experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0831",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Inlet widening profile — rounded sand water suspension",
      "hypothesis": "For rounded sand water suspension, a gradual inlet expansion will reduce particle carryover more than an abrupt expansion at equal chamber volume.",
      "test": "Measure outlet particle mass and velocity fields.",
      "against": "Carryover is not reduced after residence time is matched.",
      "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
      "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Inlet widening profile",
      "system": "rounded sand water suspension",
      "id": 831,
      "access_score": 4,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 29,
      "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 40,
      "literature_query": "Inlet widening profile rounded sand water suspension gradual expansion particle carryover an abrupt experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
      "source_lead_count": 1,
      "source_ids": "S628be43ddaeb",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Baffle gap sequence — rounded sand water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For rounded sand water suspension, progressively widening baffle gaps will reduce resuspension during flow increases.",
    "test": "Compare outlet transients with reversed and uniform gap sequences.",
    "against": "Gap order does not change resuspension at matched hydraulic work.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Baffle gap sequence",
    "system": "rounded sand water suspension",
    "id": 832,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0832",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pulsed drain timing — rounded sand water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For rounded sand water suspension, draining settled particles during low-flow intervals will reduce losses relative to draining during high flow.",
    "test": "Measure recovered solids and effluent concentration across schedules.",
    "against": "Recovery does not improve at equal drain volume.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Pulsed drain timing",
    "system": "rounded sand water suspension",
    "id": 833,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0833",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Sloped floor microtexture — rounded sand water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For rounded sand water suspension, shallow downstream grooves will reduce retained solids after a gravity-only discharge.",
    "test": "Map residual deposits and collected mass.",
    "against": "Residual mass is unchanged after floor friction is measured.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Sloped floor microtexture",
    "system": "rounded sand water suspension",
    "id": 834,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 41,
    "literature_query": "Sloped floor microtexture rounded sand water suspension shallow downstream grooves retained solids gravity-only experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0834",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": true,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Sloped floor microtexture — rounded sand water suspension",
      "hypothesis": "For rounded sand water suspension, shallow downstream grooves will reduce retained solids after a gravity-only discharge.",
      "test": "Map residual deposits and collected mass.",
      "against": "Residual mass is unchanged after floor friction is measured.",
      "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
      "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Sloped floor microtexture",
      "system": "rounded sand water suspension",
      "id": 834,
      "access_score": 4,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 29,
      "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 41,
      "literature_query": "Sloped floor microtexture rounded sand water suspension shallow downstream grooves retained solids gravity-only experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
      "source_lead_count": 3,
      "source_ids": "S49ecf06c2192;Sbe15d814cada;Sedb0d9e2fbb2",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": {
      "deep_rank": "30",
      "id": "834",
      "title": "Sloped floor microtexture — rounded sand water suspension",
      "original_300_rank": "41",
      "pilot_class": "C",
      "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
      "hypothesis": "For rounded sand water suspension, shallow downstream grooves will reduce retained solids after a gravity-only discharge.",
      "primary_outcome": "Dry solid mass remaining after a standardized gravity discharge and rinse-free waiting period.",
      "comparison": "Downstream floor grooves versus smooth floor and transverse grooves of equal roughness amplitude.",
      "controls": "Grain moisture, floor material and friction, slope, groove dimensions, particle loading, liquid-film thickness, and discharge head.",
      "pilot": "First test whether grains roll, slide, or jam in the grooves. Record particle trajectories and residual mass, and include a matched static-friction test.",
      "novelty_gap": "Sand-surface friction and roughness effects are established. The chosen drainage-groove benefit has weak direct support and is retained only as a small, inexpensive conditional pilot.",
      "stop_rule": "Stop if grooves trap grains or raise static friction. A reversed effect should remove this candidate from later investment.",
      "source_keys": "SANDF88;SAND20",
      "truth_probability": "not estimated",
      "novelty_status": "unverified"
    },
    "dossier_text": "# 30. H0834 — Sloped floor microtexture — rounded sand water suspension\n\nOriginal 300-folder rank: 41. Pilot class: C. Resource class: modest bench or workshop; calibration still required.\n\n## Original hypothesis\n\nFor rounded sand water suspension, shallow downstream grooves will reduce retained solids after a gravity-only discharge.\n\n## Why investigate this\n\nCoupons and tilt fixtures make a small pilot accessible; the failure modes can be directly observed.\n\n## Literature assessment and exact novelty question\n\nSand-surface friction and roughness effects are established. The chosen drainage-groove benefit has weak direct support and is retained only as a small, inexpensive conditional pilot. Worldwide originality remains unverified.\n\n## Primary measurement\n\nDry solid mass remaining after a standardized gravity discharge and rinse-free waiting period.\n\n## Comparison\n\nDownstream floor grooves versus smooth floor and transverse grooves of equal roughness amplitude.\n\n## Critical controls\n\nGrain moisture, floor material and friction, slope, groove dimensions, particle loading, liquid-film thickness, and discharge head.\n\n## Pilot plan\n\nFirst test whether grains roll, slide, or jam in the grooves. Record particle trajectories and residual mass, and include a matched static-friction test.\n\n## What would count against it\n\nStop if grooves trap grains or raise static friction. A reversed effect should remove this candidate from later investment.\n\n## Replication and analysis\n\nTreat separately prepared specimens, batches, or devices as independent units. Technical repeats and images are nested measurements. First estimate calibration error and independent-preparation variability. Set the minimum meaningful effect in the primary outcome's units before confirmation, then choose sample size from that effect and pilot variance; a convenient pilot count is not a powered study.\n\nRandomize run order and blind sample labels where practical. Freeze image processing, fitting choices, exclusions, and the primary comparison before evaluating confirmatory data. Report effect size and uncertainty; use a blocked or mixed-effects analysis when specimens share a batch. A wide interval is inconclusive. Include the measurement and matching controls even when the directional effect appears large.\n\nA useful go/no-go gate is whether the hypothesized effect can be distinguished from calibration uncertainty and the strongest alternative explanation. Stop material purchases if the closest literature already measures the identical contrast, unless a replication has an explicit purpose. Do not use these abbreviated plans as complete laboratory protocols.\n\n## Data to preserve\n\nKeep unedited images or sensor streams, calibration files, preparation IDs, run order, environmental logs, input histories, raw outcome values, exclusions, and the exact analysis version. No values are prefilled in the observation template. Use `data/Published Benchmarks.csv` only as literature context; values from a different system are not observations of this hypothesis.\n\n## Sources and transfer limits\n\n### SANDF88\n\n[Behavior of Sand Particles in Sand-Steel Friction](https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.28.107)\n\nAccess: Publisher abstract examined. Type: primary experiment.\n\nBackground findings and transfer limits: see [source assessments](../research/Primary%20Source%20Assessments.md) under this source key.\n\n### SAND20\n\n[Sliding on wet sand](https://doi.org/10.1007/s10035-020-01022-0)\n\nAccess: Open abstract and methods examined. Type: primary experiment.\n\nBackground findings and transfer limits: see [source assessments](../research/Primary%20Source%20Assessments.md) under this source key.\n\n"
  },
  {
    "title": "Split inlet phase — rounded sand water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For rounded sand water suspension, out-of-phase inlet pulses will reduce coherent recirculation and improve settling.",
    "test": "Measure flow fields and size-resolved removal at equal mean throughput.",
    "against": "Improvement is absent or explained by longer residence time.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Split inlet phase",
    "system": "rounded sand water suspension",
    "id": 835,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0835",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Wall compliance surge buffer — rounded sand water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For rounded sand water suspension, a compliant inlet wall will reduce short-surge particle breakthrough.",
    "test": "Measure pressure, wall motion, and outlet particles during identical surges.",
    "against": "Breakthrough is unchanged at matched mean flow.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Wall compliance surge buffer",
    "system": "rounded sand water suspension",
    "id": 836,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 42,
    "literature_query": "Wall compliance surge buffer rounded sand water suspension compliant inlet short-surge particle breakthrough experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0836",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": true,
    "conditional_model_analysis": true,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 3,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Wall compliance surge buffer — rounded sand water suspension",
      "hypothesis": "For rounded sand water suspension, a compliant inlet wall will reduce short-surge particle breakthrough.",
      "test": "Measure pressure, wall motion, and outlet particles during identical surges.",
      "against": "Breakthrough is unchanged at matched mean flow.",
      "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
      "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Wall compliance surge buffer",
      "system": "rounded sand water suspension",
      "id": 836,
      "access_score": 4,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 29,
      "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 42,
      "literature_query": "Wall compliance surge buffer rounded sand water suspension compliant inlet short-surge particle breakthrough experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
      "source_lead_count": 7,
      "source_ids": "Sdc159cee68d5;S8e562ed55feb;S3f6fa9162cb8;S01e8308e7d38;S2d4963304884;Sf549f6289256;S36af36e92a3a",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": {
      "deep_rank": "5",
      "id": "836",
      "title": "Wall compliance surge buffer — rounded sand water suspension",
      "original_300_rank": "42",
      "pilot_class": "P",
      "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
      "hypothesis": "For rounded sand water suspension, a compliant inlet wall will reduce short-surge particle breakthrough.",
      "primary_outcome": "Effluent particle mass during the first standardized inlet surge.",
      "comparison": "Compliant inlet buffer versus a rigid equal-volume buffer and rigid no-buffer channel.",
      "controls": "Mean residence time, initial sediment bed, input surge energy, pressure, flow, wall chemistry, and chamber volume.",
      "pilot": "Use benign water and inert sand. Calibrate pressure attenuation without particles first, then test whether reduced surge amplitude reduces particle release.",
      "novelty_gap": "The two underlying principles are known. Any contribution would be quantified coupling to particle breakthrough with matched residence time and energy.",
      "stop_rule": "Do not claim improvement from merely storing more water. Reject the proposed coupling if pressure is attenuated without reduced particle release.",
      "source_keys": "COMPLIANT15;TRANSIENT21",
      "truth_probability": "not estimated",
      "novelty_status": "unverified"
    },
    "dossier_text": "# 05. H0836 — Wall compliance surge buffer — rounded sand water suspension\n\nOriginal 300-folder rank: 42. Pilot class: P. Resource class: modest bench or workshop; calibration still required.\n\n## Original hypothesis\n\nFor rounded sand water suspension, a compliant inlet wall will reduce short-surge particle breakthrough.\n\n## Why investigate this\n\nBoth passive compliant flow stabilization and transient particle mobilization have direct experimental support, giving a clear combined test.\n\n## Literature assessment and exact novelty question\n\nThe two underlying principles are known. Any contribution would be quantified coupling to particle breakthrough with matched residence time and energy. Worldwide originality remains unverified.\n\n## Primary measurement\n\nEffluent particle mass during the first standardized inlet surge.\n\n## Comparison\n\nCompliant inlet buffer versus a rigid equal-volume buffer and rigid no-buffer channel.\n\n## Critical controls\n\nMean residence time, initial sediment bed, input surge energy, pressure, flow, wall chemistry, and chamber volume.\n\n## Pilot plan\n\nUse benign water and inert sand. Calibrate pressure attenuation without particles first, then test whether reduced surge amplitude reduces particle release.\n\n## What would count against it\n\nDo not claim improvement from merely storing more water. Reject the proposed coupling if pressure is attenuated without reduced particle release.\n\n## Replication and analysis\n\nTreat separately prepared specimens, batches, or devices as independent units. Technical repeats and images are nested measurements. First estimate calibration error and independent-preparation variability. Set the minimum meaningful effect in the primary outcome's units before confirmation, then choose sample size from that effect and pilot variance; a convenient pilot count is not a powered study.\n\nRandomize run order and blind sample labels where practical. Freeze image processing, fitting choices, exclusions, and the primary comparison before evaluating confirmatory data. Report effect size and uncertainty; use a blocked or mixed-effects analysis when specimens share a batch. A wide interval is inconclusive. Include the measurement and matching controls even when the directional effect appears large.\n\nA useful go/no-go gate is whether the hypothesized effect can be distinguished from calibration uncertainty and the strongest alternative explanation. Stop material purchases if the closest literature already measures the identical contrast, unless a replication has an explicit purpose. Do not use these abbreviated plans as complete laboratory protocols.\n\n## Data to preserve\n\nKeep unedited images or sensor streams, calibration files, preparation IDs, run order, environmental logs, input histories, raw outcome values, exclusions, and the exact analysis version. No values are prefilled in the observation template. Use `data/Published Benchmarks.csv` only as literature context; values from a different system are not observations of this hypothesis.\n\n## Sources and transfer limits\n\n### COMPLIANT15\n\n[Experimental and numerical studies of a microfluidic device with compliant chambers for flow stabilization](https://doi.org/10.1088/0960-1317/25/7/075003)\n\nAccess: Indexed abstract examined. Type: primary experiment/simulation.\n\nBackground findings and transfer limits: see [source assessments](../research/Primary%20Source%20Assessments.md) under this source key.\n\n### TRANSIENT21\n\n[An experimental study of how hydraulic transients cause mobilisation of material within drinking water distribution systems](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0043135421000889)\n\nAccess: Indexed abstract and article sections examined. Type: primary experiment.\n\nBackground findings and transfer limits: see [source assessments](../research/Primary%20Source%20Assessments.md) under this source key.\n\n"
  },
  {
    "title": "Bed thickness warning — rounded sand water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For rounded sand water suspension, pressure fluctuations will detect incipient resuspension before outlet turbidity rises.",
    "test": "Track pressure spectra, bed images, and calibrated turbidity.",
    "against": "Pressure gives no earlier warning at a matched false-alarm rate.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Bed thickness warning",
    "system": "rounded sand water suspension",
    "id": 837,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 43,
    "literature_query": "Bed thickness warning rounded sand water suspension pressure fluctuations detect incipient resuspension outlet experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0837",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Bed thickness warning — rounded sand water suspension",
      "hypothesis": "For rounded sand water suspension, pressure fluctuations will detect incipient resuspension before outlet turbidity rises.",
      "test": "Track pressure spectra, bed images, and calibrated turbidity.",
      "against": "Pressure gives no earlier warning at a matched false-alarm rate.",
      "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
      "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Bed thickness warning",
      "system": "rounded sand water suspension",
      "id": 837,
      "access_score": 4,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 29,
      "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 43,
      "literature_query": "Bed thickness warning rounded sand water suspension pressure fluctuations detect incipient resuspension outlet experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
      "source_lead_count": 4,
      "source_ids": "S8688e8a7ba55;Sf940fb509644;Sf25a88ab4dad;Sa2adc9ddd334",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Distributed outlet sampling — rounded sand water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For rounded sand water suspension, many small outlets will reduce preferential particle escape compared with one equal-area outlet.",
    "test": "Map concentration near outlets and total carryover.",
    "against": "Carryover does not decrease after flow uniformity is included.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Distributed outlet sampling",
    "system": "rounded sand water suspension",
    "id": 838,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 44,
    "literature_query": "Distributed outlet sampling rounded sand water suspension many outlets preferential particle escape equal-area experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0838",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Distributed outlet sampling — rounded sand water suspension",
      "hypothesis": "For rounded sand water suspension, many small outlets will reduce preferential particle escape compared with one equal-area outlet.",
      "test": "Map concentration near outlets and total carryover.",
      "against": "Carryover does not decrease after flow uniformity is included.",
      "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
      "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Distributed outlet sampling",
      "system": "rounded sand water suspension",
      "id": 838,
      "access_score": 4,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 29,
      "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 44,
      "literature_query": "Distributed outlet sampling rounded sand water suspension many outlets preferential particle escape equal-area experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
      "source_lead_count": 4,
      "source_ids": "Sa5ec1c2c8924;Scc7c879dcbf6;Sc5e9b91c75c0;S8ec55dd030dd",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Tilt reversal cleanup — rounded sand water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For rounded sand water suspension, a brief small tilt reversal will release trapped solids more effectively than a constant tilt.",
    "test": "Measure cleanup mass and subsequent effluent contamination.",
    "against": "Released mass is no higher or contamination eliminates the gain.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Tilt reversal cleanup",
    "system": "rounded sand water suspension",
    "id": 839,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 45,
    "literature_query": "Tilt reversal cleanup rounded sand water suspension brief release trapped solids effectively constant experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0839",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Tilt reversal cleanup — rounded sand water suspension",
      "hypothesis": "For rounded sand water suspension, a brief small tilt reversal will release trapped solids more effectively than a constant tilt.",
      "test": "Measure cleanup mass and subsequent effluent contamination.",
      "against": "Released mass is no higher or contamination eliminates the gain.",
      "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
      "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Tilt reversal cleanup",
      "system": "rounded sand water suspension",
      "id": 839,
      "access_score": 4,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 29,
      "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 45,
      "literature_query": "Tilt reversal cleanup rounded sand water suspension brief release trapped solids effectively constant experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
      "source_lead_count": 5,
      "source_ids": "Sb0d1651166b1;S6d8d8030797e;Sad0138bba3cd;Sd32e7b04dc30;S65ad2dc1dacb",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Quiet-zone placement — rounded sand water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For rounded sand water suspension, placing a quiet zone downstream of recirculation will outperform an equal zone upstream.",
    "test": "Compare size-dependent removal and tracer residence distributions.",
    "against": "Zone placement has no independent effect on removal.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Quiet-zone placement",
    "system": "rounded sand water suspension",
    "id": 840,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 46,
    "literature_query": "Quiet-zone placement rounded sand water suspension placing quiet zone downstream of recirculation outperform experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0840",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Quiet-zone placement — rounded sand water suspension",
      "hypothesis": "For rounded sand water suspension, placing a quiet zone downstream of recirculation will outperform an equal zone upstream.",
      "test": "Compare size-dependent removal and tracer residence distributions.",
      "against": "Zone placement has no independent effect on removal.",
      "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
      "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Quiet-zone placement",
      "system": "rounded sand water suspension",
      "id": 840,
      "access_score": 4,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 29,
      "resource_class": "modest bench or workshop; calibration still required",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 1–3 weeks after apparatus readiness",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 46,
      "literature_query": "Quiet-zone placement rounded sand water suspension placing quiet zone downstream of recirculation outperform experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
      "source_lead_count": 2,
      "source_ids": "Sbd240905a135;S0b344c007f11",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Inlet widening profile — angular silica water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For angular silica water suspension, a gradual inlet expansion will reduce particle carryover more than an abrupt expansion at equal chamber volume.",
    "test": "Measure outlet particle mass and velocity fields.",
    "against": "Carryover is not reduced after residence time is matched.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Inlet widening profile",
    "system": "angular silica water suspension",
    "id": 841,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0841",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Baffle gap sequence — angular silica water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For angular silica water suspension, progressively widening baffle gaps will reduce resuspension during flow increases.",
    "test": "Compare outlet transients with reversed and uniform gap sequences.",
    "against": "Gap order does not change resuspension at matched hydraulic work.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Baffle gap sequence",
    "system": "angular silica water suspension",
    "id": 842,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0842",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pulsed drain timing — angular silica water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For angular silica water suspension, draining settled particles during low-flow intervals will reduce losses relative to draining during high flow.",
    "test": "Measure recovered solids and effluent concentration across schedules.",
    "against": "Recovery does not improve at equal drain volume.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Pulsed drain timing",
    "system": "angular silica water suspension",
    "id": 843,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0843",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Sloped floor microtexture — angular silica water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For angular silica water suspension, shallow downstream grooves will reduce retained solids after a gravity-only discharge.",
    "test": "Map residual deposits and collected mass.",
    "against": "Residual mass is unchanged after floor friction is measured.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Sloped floor microtexture",
    "system": "angular silica water suspension",
    "id": 844,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0844",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Split inlet phase — angular silica water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For angular silica water suspension, out-of-phase inlet pulses will reduce coherent recirculation and improve settling.",
    "test": "Measure flow fields and size-resolved removal at equal mean throughput.",
    "against": "Improvement is absent or explained by longer residence time.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Split inlet phase",
    "system": "angular silica water suspension",
    "id": 845,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0845",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Wall compliance surge buffer — angular silica water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For angular silica water suspension, a compliant inlet wall will reduce short-surge particle breakthrough.",
    "test": "Measure pressure, wall motion, and outlet particles during identical surges.",
    "against": "Breakthrough is unchanged at matched mean flow.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Wall compliance surge buffer",
    "system": "angular silica water suspension",
    "id": 846,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0846",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Bed thickness warning — angular silica water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For angular silica water suspension, pressure fluctuations will detect incipient resuspension before outlet turbidity rises.",
    "test": "Track pressure spectra, bed images, and calibrated turbidity.",
    "against": "Pressure gives no earlier warning at a matched false-alarm rate.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Bed thickness warning",
    "system": "angular silica water suspension",
    "id": 847,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0847",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Distributed outlet sampling — angular silica water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For angular silica water suspension, many small outlets will reduce preferential particle escape compared with one equal-area outlet.",
    "test": "Map concentration near outlets and total carryover.",
    "against": "Carryover does not decrease after flow uniformity is included.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Distributed outlet sampling",
    "system": "angular silica water suspension",
    "id": 848,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0848",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Tilt reversal cleanup — angular silica water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For angular silica water suspension, a brief small tilt reversal will release trapped solids more effectively than a constant tilt.",
    "test": "Measure cleanup mass and subsequent effluent contamination.",
    "against": "Released mass is no higher or contamination eliminates the gain.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Tilt reversal cleanup",
    "system": "angular silica water suspension",
    "id": 849,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0849",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Quiet-zone placement — angular silica water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For angular silica water suspension, placing a quiet zone downstream of recirculation will outperform an equal zone upstream.",
    "test": "Compare size-dependent removal and tracer residence distributions.",
    "against": "Zone placement has no independent effect on removal.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Quiet-zone placement",
    "system": "angular silica water suspension",
    "id": 850,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0850",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Inlet widening profile — inert polymer-bead water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For inert polymer-bead water suspension, a gradual inlet expansion will reduce particle carryover more than an abrupt expansion at equal chamber volume.",
    "test": "Measure outlet particle mass and velocity fields.",
    "against": "Carryover is not reduced after residence time is matched.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Inlet widening profile",
    "system": "inert polymer-bead water suspension",
    "id": 851,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0851",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Baffle gap sequence — inert polymer-bead water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For inert polymer-bead water suspension, progressively widening baffle gaps will reduce resuspension during flow increases.",
    "test": "Compare outlet transients with reversed and uniform gap sequences.",
    "against": "Gap order does not change resuspension at matched hydraulic work.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Baffle gap sequence",
    "system": "inert polymer-bead water suspension",
    "id": 852,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0852",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pulsed drain timing — inert polymer-bead water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For inert polymer-bead water suspension, draining settled particles during low-flow intervals will reduce losses relative to draining during high flow.",
    "test": "Measure recovered solids and effluent concentration across schedules.",
    "against": "Recovery does not improve at equal drain volume.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Pulsed drain timing",
    "system": "inert polymer-bead water suspension",
    "id": 853,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0853",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Sloped floor microtexture — inert polymer-bead water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For inert polymer-bead water suspension, shallow downstream grooves will reduce retained solids after a gravity-only discharge.",
    "test": "Map residual deposits and collected mass.",
    "against": "Residual mass is unchanged after floor friction is measured.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Sloped floor microtexture",
    "system": "inert polymer-bead water suspension",
    "id": 854,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0854",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Split inlet phase — inert polymer-bead water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For inert polymer-bead water suspension, out-of-phase inlet pulses will reduce coherent recirculation and improve settling.",
    "test": "Measure flow fields and size-resolved removal at equal mean throughput.",
    "against": "Improvement is absent or explained by longer residence time.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Split inlet phase",
    "system": "inert polymer-bead water suspension",
    "id": 855,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0855",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Wall compliance surge buffer — inert polymer-bead water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For inert polymer-bead water suspension, a compliant inlet wall will reduce short-surge particle breakthrough.",
    "test": "Measure pressure, wall motion, and outlet particles during identical surges.",
    "against": "Breakthrough is unchanged at matched mean flow.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Wall compliance surge buffer",
    "system": "inert polymer-bead water suspension",
    "id": 856,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0856",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Bed thickness warning — inert polymer-bead water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For inert polymer-bead water suspension, pressure fluctuations will detect incipient resuspension before outlet turbidity rises.",
    "test": "Track pressure spectra, bed images, and calibrated turbidity.",
    "against": "Pressure gives no earlier warning at a matched false-alarm rate.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Bed thickness warning",
    "system": "inert polymer-bead water suspension",
    "id": 857,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0857",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Distributed outlet sampling — inert polymer-bead water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For inert polymer-bead water suspension, many small outlets will reduce preferential particle escape compared with one equal-area outlet.",
    "test": "Map concentration near outlets and total carryover.",
    "against": "Carryover does not decrease after flow uniformity is included.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Distributed outlet sampling",
    "system": "inert polymer-bead water suspension",
    "id": 858,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0858",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Tilt reversal cleanup — inert polymer-bead water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For inert polymer-bead water suspension, a brief small tilt reversal will release trapped solids more effectively than a constant tilt.",
    "test": "Measure cleanup mass and subsequent effluent contamination.",
    "against": "Released mass is no higher or contamination eliminates the gain.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Tilt reversal cleanup",
    "system": "inert polymer-bead water suspension",
    "id": 859,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0859",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Quiet-zone placement — inert polymer-bead water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For inert polymer-bead water suspension, placing a quiet zone downstream of recirculation will outperform an equal zone upstream.",
    "test": "Compare size-dependent removal and tracer residence distributions.",
    "against": "Zone placement has no independent effect on removal.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Quiet-zone placement",
    "system": "inert polymer-bead water suspension",
    "id": 860,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0860",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Inlet widening profile — hollow glass-bead water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For hollow glass-bead water suspension, a gradual inlet expansion will reduce particle carryover more than an abrupt expansion at equal chamber volume.",
    "test": "Measure outlet particle mass and velocity fields.",
    "against": "Carryover is not reduced after residence time is matched.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Inlet widening profile",
    "system": "hollow glass-bead water suspension",
    "id": 861,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0861",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Baffle gap sequence — hollow glass-bead water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For hollow glass-bead water suspension, progressively widening baffle gaps will reduce resuspension during flow increases.",
    "test": "Compare outlet transients with reversed and uniform gap sequences.",
    "against": "Gap order does not change resuspension at matched hydraulic work.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Baffle gap sequence",
    "system": "hollow glass-bead water suspension",
    "id": 862,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0862",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pulsed drain timing — hollow glass-bead water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For hollow glass-bead water suspension, draining settled particles during low-flow intervals will reduce losses relative to draining during high flow.",
    "test": "Measure recovered solids and effluent concentration across schedules.",
    "against": "Recovery does not improve at equal drain volume.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Pulsed drain timing",
    "system": "hollow glass-bead water suspension",
    "id": 863,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0863",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Sloped floor microtexture — hollow glass-bead water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For hollow glass-bead water suspension, shallow downstream grooves will reduce retained solids after a gravity-only discharge.",
    "test": "Map residual deposits and collected mass.",
    "against": "Residual mass is unchanged after floor friction is measured.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Sloped floor microtexture",
    "system": "hollow glass-bead water suspension",
    "id": 864,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0864",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Split inlet phase — hollow glass-bead water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For hollow glass-bead water suspension, out-of-phase inlet pulses will reduce coherent recirculation and improve settling.",
    "test": "Measure flow fields and size-resolved removal at equal mean throughput.",
    "against": "Improvement is absent or explained by longer residence time.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Split inlet phase",
    "system": "hollow glass-bead water suspension",
    "id": 865,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0865",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Wall compliance surge buffer — hollow glass-bead water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For hollow glass-bead water suspension, a compliant inlet wall will reduce short-surge particle breakthrough.",
    "test": "Measure pressure, wall motion, and outlet particles during identical surges.",
    "against": "Breakthrough is unchanged at matched mean flow.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Wall compliance surge buffer",
    "system": "hollow glass-bead water suspension",
    "id": 866,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0866",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Bed thickness warning — hollow glass-bead water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For hollow glass-bead water suspension, pressure fluctuations will detect incipient resuspension before outlet turbidity rises.",
    "test": "Track pressure spectra, bed images, and calibrated turbidity.",
    "against": "Pressure gives no earlier warning at a matched false-alarm rate.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Bed thickness warning",
    "system": "hollow glass-bead water suspension",
    "id": 867,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0867",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Distributed outlet sampling — hollow glass-bead water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For hollow glass-bead water suspension, many small outlets will reduce preferential particle escape compared with one equal-area outlet.",
    "test": "Map concentration near outlets and total carryover.",
    "against": "Carryover does not decrease after flow uniformity is included.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Distributed outlet sampling",
    "system": "hollow glass-bead water suspension",
    "id": 868,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0868",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Tilt reversal cleanup — hollow glass-bead water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For hollow glass-bead water suspension, a brief small tilt reversal will release trapped solids more effectively than a constant tilt.",
    "test": "Measure cleanup mass and subsequent effluent contamination.",
    "against": "Released mass is no higher or contamination eliminates the gain.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Tilt reversal cleanup",
    "system": "hollow glass-bead water suspension",
    "id": 869,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0869",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Quiet-zone placement — hollow glass-bead water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For hollow glass-bead water suspension, placing a quiet zone downstream of recirculation will outperform an equal zone upstream.",
    "test": "Compare size-dependent removal and tracer residence distributions.",
    "against": "Zone placement has no independent effect on removal.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Quiet-zone placement",
    "system": "hollow glass-bead water suspension",
    "id": 870,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0870",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Inlet widening profile — calcium-carbonate water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For calcium-carbonate water suspension, a gradual inlet expansion will reduce particle carryover more than an abrupt expansion at equal chamber volume.",
    "test": "Measure outlet particle mass and velocity fields.",
    "against": "Carryover is not reduced after residence time is matched.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Inlet widening profile",
    "system": "calcium-carbonate water suspension",
    "id": 871,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0871",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Baffle gap sequence — calcium-carbonate water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For calcium-carbonate water suspension, progressively widening baffle gaps will reduce resuspension during flow increases.",
    "test": "Compare outlet transients with reversed and uniform gap sequences.",
    "against": "Gap order does not change resuspension at matched hydraulic work.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Baffle gap sequence",
    "system": "calcium-carbonate water suspension",
    "id": 872,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0872",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pulsed drain timing — calcium-carbonate water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For calcium-carbonate water suspension, draining settled particles during low-flow intervals will reduce losses relative to draining during high flow.",
    "test": "Measure recovered solids and effluent concentration across schedules.",
    "against": "Recovery does not improve at equal drain volume.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Pulsed drain timing",
    "system": "calcium-carbonate water suspension",
    "id": 873,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0873",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Sloped floor microtexture — calcium-carbonate water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For calcium-carbonate water suspension, shallow downstream grooves will reduce retained solids after a gravity-only discharge.",
    "test": "Map residual deposits and collected mass.",
    "against": "Residual mass is unchanged after floor friction is measured.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Sloped floor microtexture",
    "system": "calcium-carbonate water suspension",
    "id": 874,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0874",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Split inlet phase — calcium-carbonate water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For calcium-carbonate water suspension, out-of-phase inlet pulses will reduce coherent recirculation and improve settling.",
    "test": "Measure flow fields and size-resolved removal at equal mean throughput.",
    "against": "Improvement is absent or explained by longer residence time.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Split inlet phase",
    "system": "calcium-carbonate water suspension",
    "id": 875,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0875",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Wall compliance surge buffer — calcium-carbonate water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For calcium-carbonate water suspension, a compliant inlet wall will reduce short-surge particle breakthrough.",
    "test": "Measure pressure, wall motion, and outlet particles during identical surges.",
    "against": "Breakthrough is unchanged at matched mean flow.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Wall compliance surge buffer",
    "system": "calcium-carbonate water suspension",
    "id": 876,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0876",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Bed thickness warning — calcium-carbonate water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For calcium-carbonate water suspension, pressure fluctuations will detect incipient resuspension before outlet turbidity rises.",
    "test": "Track pressure spectra, bed images, and calibrated turbidity.",
    "against": "Pressure gives no earlier warning at a matched false-alarm rate.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Bed thickness warning",
    "system": "calcium-carbonate water suspension",
    "id": 877,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0877",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Distributed outlet sampling — calcium-carbonate water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For calcium-carbonate water suspension, many small outlets will reduce preferential particle escape compared with one equal-area outlet.",
    "test": "Map concentration near outlets and total carryover.",
    "against": "Carryover does not decrease after flow uniformity is included.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Distributed outlet sampling",
    "system": "calcium-carbonate water suspension",
    "id": 878,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0878",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Tilt reversal cleanup — calcium-carbonate water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For calcium-carbonate water suspension, a brief small tilt reversal will release trapped solids more effectively than a constant tilt.",
    "test": "Measure cleanup mass and subsequent effluent contamination.",
    "against": "Released mass is no higher or contamination eliminates the gain.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Tilt reversal cleanup",
    "system": "calcium-carbonate water suspension",
    "id": 879,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0879",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Quiet-zone placement — calcium-carbonate water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For calcium-carbonate water suspension, placing a quiet zone downstream of recirculation will outperform an equal zone upstream.",
    "test": "Compare size-dependent removal and tracer residence distributions.",
    "against": "Zone placement has no independent effect on removal.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Quiet-zone placement",
    "system": "calcium-carbonate water suspension",
    "id": 880,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0880",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Inlet widening profile — porous ceramic-bead water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For porous ceramic-bead water suspension, a gradual inlet expansion will reduce particle carryover more than an abrupt expansion at equal chamber volume.",
    "test": "Measure outlet particle mass and velocity fields.",
    "against": "Carryover is not reduced after residence time is matched.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Inlet widening profile",
    "system": "porous ceramic-bead water suspension",
    "id": 881,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0881",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Baffle gap sequence — porous ceramic-bead water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For porous ceramic-bead water suspension, progressively widening baffle gaps will reduce resuspension during flow increases.",
    "test": "Compare outlet transients with reversed and uniform gap sequences.",
    "against": "Gap order does not change resuspension at matched hydraulic work.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Baffle gap sequence",
    "system": "porous ceramic-bead water suspension",
    "id": 882,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0882",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pulsed drain timing — porous ceramic-bead water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For porous ceramic-bead water suspension, draining settled particles during low-flow intervals will reduce losses relative to draining during high flow.",
    "test": "Measure recovered solids and effluent concentration across schedules.",
    "against": "Recovery does not improve at equal drain volume.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Pulsed drain timing",
    "system": "porous ceramic-bead water suspension",
    "id": 883,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0883",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Sloped floor microtexture — porous ceramic-bead water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For porous ceramic-bead water suspension, shallow downstream grooves will reduce retained solids after a gravity-only discharge.",
    "test": "Map residual deposits and collected mass.",
    "against": "Residual mass is unchanged after floor friction is measured.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Sloped floor microtexture",
    "system": "porous ceramic-bead water suspension",
    "id": 884,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0884",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Split inlet phase — porous ceramic-bead water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For porous ceramic-bead water suspension, out-of-phase inlet pulses will reduce coherent recirculation and improve settling.",
    "test": "Measure flow fields and size-resolved removal at equal mean throughput.",
    "against": "Improvement is absent or explained by longer residence time.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Split inlet phase",
    "system": "porous ceramic-bead water suspension",
    "id": 885,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0885",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Wall compliance surge buffer — porous ceramic-bead water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For porous ceramic-bead water suspension, a compliant inlet wall will reduce short-surge particle breakthrough.",
    "test": "Measure pressure, wall motion, and outlet particles during identical surges.",
    "against": "Breakthrough is unchanged at matched mean flow.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Wall compliance surge buffer",
    "system": "porous ceramic-bead water suspension",
    "id": 886,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0886",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Bed thickness warning — porous ceramic-bead water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For porous ceramic-bead water suspension, pressure fluctuations will detect incipient resuspension before outlet turbidity rises.",
    "test": "Track pressure spectra, bed images, and calibrated turbidity.",
    "against": "Pressure gives no earlier warning at a matched false-alarm rate.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Bed thickness warning",
    "system": "porous ceramic-bead water suspension",
    "id": 887,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0887",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Distributed outlet sampling — porous ceramic-bead water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For porous ceramic-bead water suspension, many small outlets will reduce preferential particle escape compared with one equal-area outlet.",
    "test": "Map concentration near outlets and total carryover.",
    "against": "Carryover does not decrease after flow uniformity is included.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Distributed outlet sampling",
    "system": "porous ceramic-bead water suspension",
    "id": 888,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0888",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Tilt reversal cleanup — porous ceramic-bead water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For porous ceramic-bead water suspension, a brief small tilt reversal will release trapped solids more effectively than a constant tilt.",
    "test": "Measure cleanup mass and subsequent effluent contamination.",
    "against": "Released mass is no higher or contamination eliminates the gain.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Tilt reversal cleanup",
    "system": "porous ceramic-bead water suspension",
    "id": 889,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0889",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Quiet-zone placement — porous ceramic-bead water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For porous ceramic-bead water suspension, placing a quiet zone downstream of recirculation will outperform an equal zone upstream.",
    "test": "Compare size-dependent removal and tracer residence distributions.",
    "against": "Zone placement has no independent effect on removal.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Quiet-zone placement",
    "system": "porous ceramic-bead water suspension",
    "id": 890,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0890",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Inlet widening profile — inert fiber-fragment water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For inert fiber-fragment water suspension, a gradual inlet expansion will reduce particle carryover more than an abrupt expansion at equal chamber volume.",
    "test": "Measure outlet particle mass and velocity fields.",
    "against": "Carryover is not reduced after residence time is matched.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Inlet widening profile",
    "system": "inert fiber-fragment water suspension",
    "id": 891,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0891",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Baffle gap sequence — inert fiber-fragment water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For inert fiber-fragment water suspension, progressively widening baffle gaps will reduce resuspension during flow increases.",
    "test": "Compare outlet transients with reversed and uniform gap sequences.",
    "against": "Gap order does not change resuspension at matched hydraulic work.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Baffle gap sequence",
    "system": "inert fiber-fragment water suspension",
    "id": 892,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0892",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pulsed drain timing — inert fiber-fragment water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For inert fiber-fragment water suspension, draining settled particles during low-flow intervals will reduce losses relative to draining during high flow.",
    "test": "Measure recovered solids and effluent concentration across schedules.",
    "against": "Recovery does not improve at equal drain volume.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Pulsed drain timing",
    "system": "inert fiber-fragment water suspension",
    "id": 893,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0893",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Sloped floor microtexture — inert fiber-fragment water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For inert fiber-fragment water suspension, shallow downstream grooves will reduce retained solids after a gravity-only discharge.",
    "test": "Map residual deposits and collected mass.",
    "against": "Residual mass is unchanged after floor friction is measured.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Sloped floor microtexture",
    "system": "inert fiber-fragment water suspension",
    "id": 894,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0894",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Split inlet phase — inert fiber-fragment water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For inert fiber-fragment water suspension, out-of-phase inlet pulses will reduce coherent recirculation and improve settling.",
    "test": "Measure flow fields and size-resolved removal at equal mean throughput.",
    "against": "Improvement is absent or explained by longer residence time.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Split inlet phase",
    "system": "inert fiber-fragment water suspension",
    "id": 895,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0895",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Wall compliance surge buffer — inert fiber-fragment water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For inert fiber-fragment water suspension, a compliant inlet wall will reduce short-surge particle breakthrough.",
    "test": "Measure pressure, wall motion, and outlet particles during identical surges.",
    "against": "Breakthrough is unchanged at matched mean flow.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Wall compliance surge buffer",
    "system": "inert fiber-fragment water suspension",
    "id": 896,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0896",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Bed thickness warning — inert fiber-fragment water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For inert fiber-fragment water suspension, pressure fluctuations will detect incipient resuspension before outlet turbidity rises.",
    "test": "Track pressure spectra, bed images, and calibrated turbidity.",
    "against": "Pressure gives no earlier warning at a matched false-alarm rate.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Bed thickness warning",
    "system": "inert fiber-fragment water suspension",
    "id": 897,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0897",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Distributed outlet sampling — inert fiber-fragment water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For inert fiber-fragment water suspension, many small outlets will reduce preferential particle escape compared with one equal-area outlet.",
    "test": "Map concentration near outlets and total carryover.",
    "against": "Carryover does not decrease after flow uniformity is included.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Distributed outlet sampling",
    "system": "inert fiber-fragment water suspension",
    "id": 898,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0898",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Tilt reversal cleanup — inert fiber-fragment water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For inert fiber-fragment water suspension, a brief small tilt reversal will release trapped solids more effectively than a constant tilt.",
    "test": "Measure cleanup mass and subsequent effluent contamination.",
    "against": "Released mass is no higher or contamination eliminates the gain.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Tilt reversal cleanup",
    "system": "inert fiber-fragment water suspension",
    "id": 899,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0899",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Quiet-zone placement — inert fiber-fragment water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For inert fiber-fragment water suspension, placing a quiet zone downstream of recirculation will outperform an equal zone upstream.",
    "test": "Compare size-dependent removal and tracer residence distributions.",
    "against": "Zone placement has no independent effect on removal.",
    "category": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation",
    "controls": "Particle size distribution, loading, liquid properties, residence time, chamber volume, and actual hydraulic work. Use enclosed inert model suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Settling chambers and passive particle separation: Quiet-zone placement",
    "system": "inert fiber-fragment water suspension",
    "id": 900,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent low-pressure flow chamber, controlled water delivery, balance or particle counter, and calibrated flow imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0900",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Bend spacing resonance — large-core silica optical fiber",
    "hypothesis": "For large-core silica optical fiber, periodic small bends will produce sharper wavelength-dependent losses than randomly spaced bends of equal curvature distribution.",
    "test": "Measure transmission spectra across controlled bend patterns.",
    "against": "Loss spectra are no sharper after launch variability is controlled.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Bend spacing resonance",
    "system": "large-core silica optical fiber",
    "id": 901,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0901",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Twist before bending — large-core silica optical fiber",
    "hypothesis": "For large-core silica optical fiber, pre-twist will change bending-loss hysteresis more than straight-guide attenuation.",
    "test": "Measure loss during bend cycles at several pre-twists.",
    "against": "Hysteresis changes are absent or track baseline attenuation alone.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Twist before bending",
    "system": "large-core silica optical fiber",
    "id": 902,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 271,
    "literature_query": "Twist bending large-core silica optical fiber pre-twist change bending-loss hysteresis straight-guide attenuation experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0902",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Twist before bending — large-core silica optical fiber",
      "hypothesis": "For large-core silica optical fiber, pre-twist will change bending-loss hysteresis more than straight-guide attenuation.",
      "test": "Measure loss during bend cycles at several pre-twists.",
      "against": "Hysteresis changes are absent or track baseline attenuation alone.",
      "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
      "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Twist before bending",
      "system": "large-core silica optical fiber",
      "id": 902,
      "access_score": 2,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 23,
      "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 271,
      "literature_query": "Twist bending large-core silica optical fiber pre-twist change bending-loss hysteresis straight-guide attenuation experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
      "source_lead_count": 6,
      "source_ids": "S7f30941c034e;Sbbac98d3be94;Sdf1991b2c41f;S05e6d853315e;Sb3a2d4308e3f;S4b70936466a1",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Clamp edge compliance — large-core silica optical fiber",
    "hypothesis": "For large-core silica optical fiber, soft clamp edges will reduce irreversible optical loss after repeated handling.",
    "test": "Measure transmission and local strain through clamping cycles.",
    "against": "Loss accumulation is unchanged after clamp pressure is matched.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Clamp edge compliance",
    "system": "large-core silica optical fiber",
    "id": 903,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 272,
    "literature_query": "Clamp edge compliance large-core silica optical fiber soft edges irreversible loss repeated handling experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0903",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Clamp edge compliance — large-core silica optical fiber",
      "hypothesis": "For large-core silica optical fiber, soft clamp edges will reduce irreversible optical loss after repeated handling.",
      "test": "Measure transmission and local strain through clamping cycles.",
      "against": "Loss accumulation is unchanged after clamp pressure is matched.",
      "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
      "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Clamp edge compliance",
      "system": "large-core silica optical fiber",
      "id": 903,
      "access_score": 2,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 23,
      "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 272,
      "literature_query": "Clamp edge compliance large-core silica optical fiber soft edges irreversible loss repeated handling experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
      "source_lead_count": 3,
      "source_ids": "Sbbac98d3be94;Sdf1991b2c41f;Sf86f7dfc0720",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Thermal gradient direction — large-core silica optical fiber",
    "hypothesis": "For large-core silica optical fiber, reversing a lateral thermal gradient will reverse the dominant output-pattern distortion.",
    "test": "Record output fields while reversing independently mapped temperature gradients.",
    "against": "Distortion does not reverse with the gradient.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Thermal gradient direction",
    "system": "large-core silica optical fiber",
    "id": 904,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0904",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Coating swelling delay — large-core silica optical fiber",
    "hypothesis": "For large-core silica optical fiber, a swelling outer coating will produce delayed attenuation after humidity changes.",
    "test": "Measure coating dimensions, humidity, and transmission transients.",
    "against": "Attenuation follows immediate optical temperature shifts rather than swelling.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Coating swelling delay",
    "system": "large-core silica optical fiber",
    "id": 905,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 273,
    "literature_query": "Coating swelling delay large-core silica optical fiber outer produce delayed attenuation humidity changes experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0905",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Coating swelling delay — large-core silica optical fiber",
      "hypothesis": "For large-core silica optical fiber, a swelling outer coating will produce delayed attenuation after humidity changes.",
      "test": "Measure coating dimensions, humidity, and transmission transients.",
      "against": "Attenuation follows immediate optical temperature shifts rather than swelling.",
      "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
      "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Coating swelling delay",
      "system": "large-core silica optical fiber",
      "id": 905,
      "access_score": 2,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 23,
      "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 273,
      "literature_query": "Coating swelling delay large-core silica optical fiber outer produce delayed attenuation humidity changes experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
      "source_lead_count": 3,
      "source_ids": "S5443f53292b6;S9dafbfb262b7;S6cfda4cbcf35",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Alternating curvature recovery — large-core silica optical fiber",
    "hypothesis": "For large-core silica optical fiber, alternating bend direction will reduce residual output-pattern drift relative to repeated same-direction bending.",
    "test": "Compare output images at equal strain cycles.",
    "against": "Residual drift is no smaller after return geometry is matched.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Alternating curvature recovery",
    "system": "large-core silica optical fiber",
    "id": 906,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0906",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Localized heating identification — large-core silica optical fiber",
    "hypothesis": "For large-core silica optical fiber, two-wavelength transmission will distinguish localized heating from a small bend more accurately than one wavelength.",
    "test": "Apply independently calibrated perturbations and classify blinded trials.",
    "against": "Two wavelengths do not improve classification at matched photon counts.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Localized heating identification",
    "system": "large-core silica optical fiber",
    "id": 907,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0907",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Input diffuser stability — large-core silica optical fiber",
    "hypothesis": "For large-core silica optical fiber, a weak input diffuser will reduce handling-induced intensity variation at a cost in mean throughput.",
    "test": "Measure transmission statistics during controlled connector motion.",
    "against": "Variability does not decrease or is explained solely by lower received light.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Input diffuser stability",
    "system": "large-core silica optical fiber",
    "id": 908,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0908",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Axial preload window — large-core silica optical fiber",
    "hypothesis": "For large-core silica optical fiber, moderate axial preload will minimize vibration-induced transmission noise.",
    "test": "Sweep preload while recording motion and optical noise.",
    "against": "No reproducible noise minimum remains after vibration amplitude is included.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Axial preload window",
    "system": "large-core silica optical fiber",
    "id": 909,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0909",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Distributed support spacing — large-core silica optical fiber",
    "hypothesis": "For large-core silica optical fiber, graded support spacing will suppress narrow mechanical noise peaks more than uniform support spacing.",
    "test": "Measure vibration spectra and optical intensity at equal support count.",
    "against": "Peak optical noise is not reduced within the specified frequency range.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Distributed support spacing",
    "system": "large-core silica optical fiber",
    "id": 910,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0910",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Bend spacing resonance — small-core silica optical fiber",
    "hypothesis": "For small-core silica optical fiber, periodic small bends will produce sharper wavelength-dependent losses than randomly spaced bends of equal curvature distribution.",
    "test": "Measure transmission spectra across controlled bend patterns.",
    "against": "Loss spectra are no sharper after launch variability is controlled.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Bend spacing resonance",
    "system": "small-core silica optical fiber",
    "id": 911,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0911",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Twist before bending — small-core silica optical fiber",
    "hypothesis": "For small-core silica optical fiber, pre-twist will change bending-loss hysteresis more than straight-guide attenuation.",
    "test": "Measure loss during bend cycles at several pre-twists.",
    "against": "Hysteresis changes are absent or track baseline attenuation alone.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Twist before bending",
    "system": "small-core silica optical fiber",
    "id": 912,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0912",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Clamp edge compliance — small-core silica optical fiber",
    "hypothesis": "For small-core silica optical fiber, soft clamp edges will reduce irreversible optical loss after repeated handling.",
    "test": "Measure transmission and local strain through clamping cycles.",
    "against": "Loss accumulation is unchanged after clamp pressure is matched.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Clamp edge compliance",
    "system": "small-core silica optical fiber",
    "id": 913,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0913",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Thermal gradient direction — small-core silica optical fiber",
    "hypothesis": "For small-core silica optical fiber, reversing a lateral thermal gradient will reverse the dominant output-pattern distortion.",
    "test": "Record output fields while reversing independently mapped temperature gradients.",
    "against": "Distortion does not reverse with the gradient.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Thermal gradient direction",
    "system": "small-core silica optical fiber",
    "id": 914,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0914",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Coating swelling delay — small-core silica optical fiber",
    "hypothesis": "For small-core silica optical fiber, a swelling outer coating will produce delayed attenuation after humidity changes.",
    "test": "Measure coating dimensions, humidity, and transmission transients.",
    "against": "Attenuation follows immediate optical temperature shifts rather than swelling.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Coating swelling delay",
    "system": "small-core silica optical fiber",
    "id": 915,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0915",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Alternating curvature recovery — small-core silica optical fiber",
    "hypothesis": "For small-core silica optical fiber, alternating bend direction will reduce residual output-pattern drift relative to repeated same-direction bending.",
    "test": "Compare output images at equal strain cycles.",
    "against": "Residual drift is no smaller after return geometry is matched.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Alternating curvature recovery",
    "system": "small-core silica optical fiber",
    "id": 916,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0916",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Localized heating identification — small-core silica optical fiber",
    "hypothesis": "For small-core silica optical fiber, two-wavelength transmission will distinguish localized heating from a small bend more accurately than one wavelength.",
    "test": "Apply independently calibrated perturbations and classify blinded trials.",
    "against": "Two wavelengths do not improve classification at matched photon counts.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Localized heating identification",
    "system": "small-core silica optical fiber",
    "id": 917,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0917",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Input diffuser stability — small-core silica optical fiber",
    "hypothesis": "For small-core silica optical fiber, a weak input diffuser will reduce handling-induced intensity variation at a cost in mean throughput.",
    "test": "Measure transmission statistics during controlled connector motion.",
    "against": "Variability does not decrease or is explained solely by lower received light.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Input diffuser stability",
    "system": "small-core silica optical fiber",
    "id": 918,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0918",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Axial preload window — small-core silica optical fiber",
    "hypothesis": "For small-core silica optical fiber, moderate axial preload will minimize vibration-induced transmission noise.",
    "test": "Sweep preload while recording motion and optical noise.",
    "against": "No reproducible noise minimum remains after vibration amplitude is included.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Axial preload window",
    "system": "small-core silica optical fiber",
    "id": 919,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0919",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Distributed support spacing — small-core silica optical fiber",
    "hypothesis": "For small-core silica optical fiber, graded support spacing will suppress narrow mechanical noise peaks more than uniform support spacing.",
    "test": "Measure vibration spectra and optical intensity at equal support count.",
    "against": "Peak optical noise is not reduced within the specified frequency range.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Distributed support spacing",
    "system": "small-core silica optical fiber",
    "id": 920,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0920",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Bend spacing resonance — multimode polymer optical fiber",
    "hypothesis": "For multimode polymer optical fiber, periodic small bends will produce sharper wavelength-dependent losses than randomly spaced bends of equal curvature distribution.",
    "test": "Measure transmission spectra across controlled bend patterns.",
    "against": "Loss spectra are no sharper after launch variability is controlled.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Bend spacing resonance",
    "system": "multimode polymer optical fiber",
    "id": 921,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0921",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Twist before bending — multimode polymer optical fiber",
    "hypothesis": "For multimode polymer optical fiber, pre-twist will change bending-loss hysteresis more than straight-guide attenuation.",
    "test": "Measure loss during bend cycles at several pre-twists.",
    "against": "Hysteresis changes are absent or track baseline attenuation alone.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Twist before bending",
    "system": "multimode polymer optical fiber",
    "id": 922,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0922",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Clamp edge compliance — multimode polymer optical fiber",
    "hypothesis": "For multimode polymer optical fiber, soft clamp edges will reduce irreversible optical loss after repeated handling.",
    "test": "Measure transmission and local strain through clamping cycles.",
    "against": "Loss accumulation is unchanged after clamp pressure is matched.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Clamp edge compliance",
    "system": "multimode polymer optical fiber",
    "id": 923,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0923",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Thermal gradient direction — multimode polymer optical fiber",
    "hypothesis": "For multimode polymer optical fiber, reversing a lateral thermal gradient will reverse the dominant output-pattern distortion.",
    "test": "Record output fields while reversing independently mapped temperature gradients.",
    "against": "Distortion does not reverse with the gradient.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Thermal gradient direction",
    "system": "multimode polymer optical fiber",
    "id": 924,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0924",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Coating swelling delay — multimode polymer optical fiber",
    "hypothesis": "For multimode polymer optical fiber, a swelling outer coating will produce delayed attenuation after humidity changes.",
    "test": "Measure coating dimensions, humidity, and transmission transients.",
    "against": "Attenuation follows immediate optical temperature shifts rather than swelling.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Coating swelling delay",
    "system": "multimode polymer optical fiber",
    "id": 925,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0925",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Alternating curvature recovery — multimode polymer optical fiber",
    "hypothesis": "For multimode polymer optical fiber, alternating bend direction will reduce residual output-pattern drift relative to repeated same-direction bending.",
    "test": "Compare output images at equal strain cycles.",
    "against": "Residual drift is no smaller after return geometry is matched.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Alternating curvature recovery",
    "system": "multimode polymer optical fiber",
    "id": 926,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0926",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Localized heating identification — multimode polymer optical fiber",
    "hypothesis": "For multimode polymer optical fiber, two-wavelength transmission will distinguish localized heating from a small bend more accurately than one wavelength.",
    "test": "Apply independently calibrated perturbations and classify blinded trials.",
    "against": "Two wavelengths do not improve classification at matched photon counts.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Localized heating identification",
    "system": "multimode polymer optical fiber",
    "id": 927,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0927",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Input diffuser stability — multimode polymer optical fiber",
    "hypothesis": "For multimode polymer optical fiber, a weak input diffuser will reduce handling-induced intensity variation at a cost in mean throughput.",
    "test": "Measure transmission statistics during controlled connector motion.",
    "against": "Variability does not decrease or is explained solely by lower received light.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Input diffuser stability",
    "system": "multimode polymer optical fiber",
    "id": 928,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0928",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Axial preload window — multimode polymer optical fiber",
    "hypothesis": "For multimode polymer optical fiber, moderate axial preload will minimize vibration-induced transmission noise.",
    "test": "Sweep preload while recording motion and optical noise.",
    "against": "No reproducible noise minimum remains after vibration amplitude is included.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Axial preload window",
    "system": "multimode polymer optical fiber",
    "id": 929,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0929",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Distributed support spacing — multimode polymer optical fiber",
    "hypothesis": "For multimode polymer optical fiber, graded support spacing will suppress narrow mechanical noise peaks more than uniform support spacing.",
    "test": "Measure vibration spectra and optical intensity at equal support count.",
    "against": "Peak optical noise is not reduced within the specified frequency range.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Distributed support spacing",
    "system": "multimode polymer optical fiber",
    "id": 930,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0930",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Bend spacing resonance — fluoropolymer-clad optical fiber",
    "hypothesis": "For fluoropolymer-clad optical fiber, periodic small bends will produce sharper wavelength-dependent losses than randomly spaced bends of equal curvature distribution.",
    "test": "Measure transmission spectra across controlled bend patterns.",
    "against": "Loss spectra are no sharper after launch variability is controlled.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Bend spacing resonance",
    "system": "fluoropolymer-clad optical fiber",
    "id": 931,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0931",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Twist before bending — fluoropolymer-clad optical fiber",
    "hypothesis": "For fluoropolymer-clad optical fiber, pre-twist will change bending-loss hysteresis more than straight-guide attenuation.",
    "test": "Measure loss during bend cycles at several pre-twists.",
    "against": "Hysteresis changes are absent or track baseline attenuation alone.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Twist before bending",
    "system": "fluoropolymer-clad optical fiber",
    "id": 932,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0932",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Clamp edge compliance — fluoropolymer-clad optical fiber",
    "hypothesis": "For fluoropolymer-clad optical fiber, soft clamp edges will reduce irreversible optical loss after repeated handling.",
    "test": "Measure transmission and local strain through clamping cycles.",
    "against": "Loss accumulation is unchanged after clamp pressure is matched.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Clamp edge compliance",
    "system": "fluoropolymer-clad optical fiber",
    "id": 933,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0933",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Thermal gradient direction — fluoropolymer-clad optical fiber",
    "hypothesis": "For fluoropolymer-clad optical fiber, reversing a lateral thermal gradient will reverse the dominant output-pattern distortion.",
    "test": "Record output fields while reversing independently mapped temperature gradients.",
    "against": "Distortion does not reverse with the gradient.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Thermal gradient direction",
    "system": "fluoropolymer-clad optical fiber",
    "id": 934,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0934",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Coating swelling delay — fluoropolymer-clad optical fiber",
    "hypothesis": "For fluoropolymer-clad optical fiber, a swelling outer coating will produce delayed attenuation after humidity changes.",
    "test": "Measure coating dimensions, humidity, and transmission transients.",
    "against": "Attenuation follows immediate optical temperature shifts rather than swelling.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Coating swelling delay",
    "system": "fluoropolymer-clad optical fiber",
    "id": 935,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0935",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Alternating curvature recovery — fluoropolymer-clad optical fiber",
    "hypothesis": "For fluoropolymer-clad optical fiber, alternating bend direction will reduce residual output-pattern drift relative to repeated same-direction bending.",
    "test": "Compare output images at equal strain cycles.",
    "against": "Residual drift is no smaller after return geometry is matched.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Alternating curvature recovery",
    "system": "fluoropolymer-clad optical fiber",
    "id": 936,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0936",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Localized heating identification — fluoropolymer-clad optical fiber",
    "hypothesis": "For fluoropolymer-clad optical fiber, two-wavelength transmission will distinguish localized heating from a small bend more accurately than one wavelength.",
    "test": "Apply independently calibrated perturbations and classify blinded trials.",
    "against": "Two wavelengths do not improve classification at matched photon counts.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Localized heating identification",
    "system": "fluoropolymer-clad optical fiber",
    "id": 937,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0937",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Input diffuser stability — fluoropolymer-clad optical fiber",
    "hypothesis": "For fluoropolymer-clad optical fiber, a weak input diffuser will reduce handling-induced intensity variation at a cost in mean throughput.",
    "test": "Measure transmission statistics during controlled connector motion.",
    "against": "Variability does not decrease or is explained solely by lower received light.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Input diffuser stability",
    "system": "fluoropolymer-clad optical fiber",
    "id": 938,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0938",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Axial preload window — fluoropolymer-clad optical fiber",
    "hypothesis": "For fluoropolymer-clad optical fiber, moderate axial preload will minimize vibration-induced transmission noise.",
    "test": "Sweep preload while recording motion and optical noise.",
    "against": "No reproducible noise minimum remains after vibration amplitude is included.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Axial preload window",
    "system": "fluoropolymer-clad optical fiber",
    "id": 939,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0939",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Distributed support spacing — fluoropolymer-clad optical fiber",
    "hypothesis": "For fluoropolymer-clad optical fiber, graded support spacing will suppress narrow mechanical noise peaks more than uniform support spacing.",
    "test": "Measure vibration spectra and optical intensity at equal support count.",
    "against": "Peak optical noise is not reduced within the specified frequency range.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Distributed support spacing",
    "system": "fluoropolymer-clad optical fiber",
    "id": 940,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0940",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Bend spacing resonance — silicone optical waveguide",
    "hypothesis": "For silicone optical waveguide, periodic small bends will produce sharper wavelength-dependent losses than randomly spaced bends of equal curvature distribution.",
    "test": "Measure transmission spectra across controlled bend patterns.",
    "against": "Loss spectra are no sharper after launch variability is controlled.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Bend spacing resonance",
    "system": "silicone optical waveguide",
    "id": 941,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0941",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Twist before bending — silicone optical waveguide",
    "hypothesis": "For silicone optical waveguide, pre-twist will change bending-loss hysteresis more than straight-guide attenuation.",
    "test": "Measure loss during bend cycles at several pre-twists.",
    "against": "Hysteresis changes are absent or track baseline attenuation alone.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Twist before bending",
    "system": "silicone optical waveguide",
    "id": 942,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0942",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Clamp edge compliance — silicone optical waveguide",
    "hypothesis": "For silicone optical waveguide, soft clamp edges will reduce irreversible optical loss after repeated handling.",
    "test": "Measure transmission and local strain through clamping cycles.",
    "against": "Loss accumulation is unchanged after clamp pressure is matched.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Clamp edge compliance",
    "system": "silicone optical waveguide",
    "id": 943,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0943",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Thermal gradient direction — silicone optical waveguide",
    "hypothesis": "For silicone optical waveguide, reversing a lateral thermal gradient will reverse the dominant output-pattern distortion.",
    "test": "Record output fields while reversing independently mapped temperature gradients.",
    "against": "Distortion does not reverse with the gradient.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Thermal gradient direction",
    "system": "silicone optical waveguide",
    "id": 944,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0944",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Coating swelling delay — silicone optical waveguide",
    "hypothesis": "For silicone optical waveguide, a swelling outer coating will produce delayed attenuation after humidity changes.",
    "test": "Measure coating dimensions, humidity, and transmission transients.",
    "against": "Attenuation follows immediate optical temperature shifts rather than swelling.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Coating swelling delay",
    "system": "silicone optical waveguide",
    "id": 945,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0945",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Alternating curvature recovery — silicone optical waveguide",
    "hypothesis": "For silicone optical waveguide, alternating bend direction will reduce residual output-pattern drift relative to repeated same-direction bending.",
    "test": "Compare output images at equal strain cycles.",
    "against": "Residual drift is no smaller after return geometry is matched.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Alternating curvature recovery",
    "system": "silicone optical waveguide",
    "id": 946,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0946",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Localized heating identification — silicone optical waveguide",
    "hypothesis": "For silicone optical waveguide, two-wavelength transmission will distinguish localized heating from a small bend more accurately than one wavelength.",
    "test": "Apply independently calibrated perturbations and classify blinded trials.",
    "against": "Two wavelengths do not improve classification at matched photon counts.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Localized heating identification",
    "system": "silicone optical waveguide",
    "id": 947,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0947",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Input diffuser stability — silicone optical waveguide",
    "hypothesis": "For silicone optical waveguide, a weak input diffuser will reduce handling-induced intensity variation at a cost in mean throughput.",
    "test": "Measure transmission statistics during controlled connector motion.",
    "against": "Variability does not decrease or is explained solely by lower received light.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Input diffuser stability",
    "system": "silicone optical waveguide",
    "id": 948,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0948",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Axial preload window — silicone optical waveguide",
    "hypothesis": "For silicone optical waveguide, moderate axial preload will minimize vibration-induced transmission noise.",
    "test": "Sweep preload while recording motion and optical noise.",
    "against": "No reproducible noise minimum remains after vibration amplitude is included.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Axial preload window",
    "system": "silicone optical waveguide",
    "id": 949,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0949",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Distributed support spacing — silicone optical waveguide",
    "hypothesis": "For silicone optical waveguide, graded support spacing will suppress narrow mechanical noise peaks more than uniform support spacing.",
    "test": "Measure vibration spectra and optical intensity at equal support count.",
    "against": "Peak optical noise is not reduced within the specified frequency range.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Distributed support spacing",
    "system": "silicone optical waveguide",
    "id": 950,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0950",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Bend spacing resonance — hydrogel optical waveguide",
    "hypothesis": "For hydrogel optical waveguide, periodic small bends will produce sharper wavelength-dependent losses than randomly spaced bends of equal curvature distribution.",
    "test": "Measure transmission spectra across controlled bend patterns.",
    "against": "Loss spectra are no sharper after launch variability is controlled.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Bend spacing resonance",
    "system": "hydrogel optical waveguide",
    "id": 951,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 274,
    "literature_query": "Bend spacing resonance hydrogel optical waveguide periodic bends produce sharper wavelength-dependent losses randomly experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0951",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Bend spacing resonance — hydrogel optical waveguide",
      "hypothesis": "For hydrogel optical waveguide, periodic small bends will produce sharper wavelength-dependent losses than randomly spaced bends of equal curvature distribution.",
      "test": "Measure transmission spectra across controlled bend patterns.",
      "against": "Loss spectra are no sharper after launch variability is controlled.",
      "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
      "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Bend spacing resonance",
      "system": "hydrogel optical waveguide",
      "id": 951,
      "access_score": 2,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 23,
      "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 274,
      "literature_query": "Bend spacing resonance hydrogel optical waveguide periodic bends produce sharper wavelength-dependent losses randomly experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
      "source_lead_count": 7,
      "source_ids": "S05855df2f7a2;S60f5557a55a2;S939eb039c3cc;S0e61711e741f;Sd96c2f4d0785;S55cb6d2bc399;S80ff08681545",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Twist before bending — hydrogel optical waveguide",
    "hypothesis": "For hydrogel optical waveguide, pre-twist will change bending-loss hysteresis more than straight-guide attenuation.",
    "test": "Measure loss during bend cycles at several pre-twists.",
    "against": "Hysteresis changes are absent or track baseline attenuation alone.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Twist before bending",
    "system": "hydrogel optical waveguide",
    "id": 952,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0952",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Clamp edge compliance — hydrogel optical waveguide",
    "hypothesis": "For hydrogel optical waveguide, soft clamp edges will reduce irreversible optical loss after repeated handling.",
    "test": "Measure transmission and local strain through clamping cycles.",
    "against": "Loss accumulation is unchanged after clamp pressure is matched.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Clamp edge compliance",
    "system": "hydrogel optical waveguide",
    "id": 953,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0953",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Thermal gradient direction — hydrogel optical waveguide",
    "hypothesis": "For hydrogel optical waveguide, reversing a lateral thermal gradient will reverse the dominant output-pattern distortion.",
    "test": "Record output fields while reversing independently mapped temperature gradients.",
    "against": "Distortion does not reverse with the gradient.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Thermal gradient direction",
    "system": "hydrogel optical waveguide",
    "id": 954,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 275,
    "literature_query": "Thermal gradient direction hydrogel optical waveguide reversing lateral reverse dominant output-pattern distortion experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0954",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Thermal gradient direction — hydrogel optical waveguide",
      "hypothesis": "For hydrogel optical waveguide, reversing a lateral thermal gradient will reverse the dominant output-pattern distortion.",
      "test": "Record output fields while reversing independently mapped temperature gradients.",
      "against": "Distortion does not reverse with the gradient.",
      "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
      "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Thermal gradient direction",
      "system": "hydrogel optical waveguide",
      "id": 954,
      "access_score": 2,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 23,
      "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 275,
      "literature_query": "Thermal gradient direction hydrogel optical waveguide reversing lateral reverse dominant output-pattern distortion experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
      "source_lead_count": 4,
      "source_ids": "Sfa62f601d39c;Sc3595689587e;S797e176afdf4;S69debb5b64d6",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Coating swelling delay — hydrogel optical waveguide",
    "hypothesis": "For hydrogel optical waveguide, a swelling outer coating will produce delayed attenuation after humidity changes.",
    "test": "Measure coating dimensions, humidity, and transmission transients.",
    "against": "Attenuation follows immediate optical temperature shifts rather than swelling.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Coating swelling delay",
    "system": "hydrogel optical waveguide",
    "id": 955,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0955",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Alternating curvature recovery — hydrogel optical waveguide",
    "hypothesis": "For hydrogel optical waveguide, alternating bend direction will reduce residual output-pattern drift relative to repeated same-direction bending.",
    "test": "Compare output images at equal strain cycles.",
    "against": "Residual drift is no smaller after return geometry is matched.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Alternating curvature recovery",
    "system": "hydrogel optical waveguide",
    "id": 956,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0956",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Localized heating identification — hydrogel optical waveguide",
    "hypothesis": "For hydrogel optical waveguide, two-wavelength transmission will distinguish localized heating from a small bend more accurately than one wavelength.",
    "test": "Apply independently calibrated perturbations and classify blinded trials.",
    "against": "Two wavelengths do not improve classification at matched photon counts.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Localized heating identification",
    "system": "hydrogel optical waveguide",
    "id": 957,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0957",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Input diffuser stability — hydrogel optical waveguide",
    "hypothesis": "For hydrogel optical waveguide, a weak input diffuser will reduce handling-induced intensity variation at a cost in mean throughput.",
    "test": "Measure transmission statistics during controlled connector motion.",
    "against": "Variability does not decrease or is explained solely by lower received light.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Input diffuser stability",
    "system": "hydrogel optical waveguide",
    "id": 958,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 276,
    "literature_query": "Input diffuser stability hydrogel optical waveguide weak handling-induced intensity variation at cost in experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0958",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Input diffuser stability — hydrogel optical waveguide",
      "hypothesis": "For hydrogel optical waveguide, a weak input diffuser will reduce handling-induced intensity variation at a cost in mean throughput.",
      "test": "Measure transmission statistics during controlled connector motion.",
      "against": "Variability does not decrease or is explained solely by lower received light.",
      "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
      "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Input diffuser stability",
      "system": "hydrogel optical waveguide",
      "id": 958,
      "access_score": 2,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 23,
      "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 276,
      "literature_query": "Input diffuser stability hydrogel optical waveguide weak handling-induced intensity variation at cost in experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
      "source_lead_count": 7,
      "source_ids": "Sb7f0c42ac7c4;S38189481f4d5;Se1505cacc81a;S308b89fa18df;S42f757500146;Se9484b5ed6be;S144d88757f2b",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Axial preload window — hydrogel optical waveguide",
    "hypothesis": "For hydrogel optical waveguide, moderate axial preload will minimize vibration-induced transmission noise.",
    "test": "Sweep preload while recording motion and optical noise.",
    "against": "No reproducible noise minimum remains after vibration amplitude is included.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Axial preload window",
    "system": "hydrogel optical waveguide",
    "id": 959,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 277,
    "literature_query": "Axial preload window hydrogel optical waveguide moderate minimize vibration-induced transmission noise experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0959",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Axial preload window — hydrogel optical waveguide",
      "hypothesis": "For hydrogel optical waveguide, moderate axial preload will minimize vibration-induced transmission noise.",
      "test": "Sweep preload while recording motion and optical noise.",
      "against": "No reproducible noise minimum remains after vibration amplitude is included.",
      "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
      "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Axial preload window",
      "system": "hydrogel optical waveguide",
      "id": 959,
      "access_score": 2,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 23,
      "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 277,
      "literature_query": "Axial preload window hydrogel optical waveguide moderate minimize vibration-induced transmission noise experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
      "source_lead_count": 4,
      "source_ids": "S6979b823bd52;S09c161d46512;Sef82097674b0;Sd9c1ced29c52",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Distributed support spacing — hydrogel optical waveguide",
    "hypothesis": "For hydrogel optical waveguide, graded support spacing will suppress narrow mechanical noise peaks more than uniform support spacing.",
    "test": "Measure vibration spectra and optical intensity at equal support count.",
    "against": "Peak optical noise is not reduced within the specified frequency range.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Distributed support spacing",
    "system": "hydrogel optical waveguide",
    "id": 960,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 278,
    "literature_query": "Distributed support spacing hydrogel optical waveguide graded suppress narrow mechanical noise peaks uniform experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0960",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Distributed support spacing — hydrogel optical waveguide",
      "hypothesis": "For hydrogel optical waveguide, graded support spacing will suppress narrow mechanical noise peaks more than uniform support spacing.",
      "test": "Measure vibration spectra and optical intensity at equal support count.",
      "against": "Peak optical noise is not reduced within the specified frequency range.",
      "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
      "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Distributed support spacing",
      "system": "hydrogel optical waveguide",
      "id": 960,
      "access_score": 2,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 23,
      "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 278,
      "literature_query": "Distributed support spacing hydrogel optical waveguide graded suppress narrow mechanical noise peaks uniform experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
      "source_lead_count": 6,
      "source_ids": "Se485ce6f6f0a;S1e660c291b9c;S38189481f4d5;S3649d234b8f6;S972364484272;S30d9aa911eb7",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Bend spacing resonance — liquid-core optical waveguide",
    "hypothesis": "For liquid-core optical waveguide, periodic small bends will produce sharper wavelength-dependent losses than randomly spaced bends of equal curvature distribution.",
    "test": "Measure transmission spectra across controlled bend patterns.",
    "against": "Loss spectra are no sharper after launch variability is controlled.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Bend spacing resonance",
    "system": "liquid-core optical waveguide",
    "id": 961,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0961",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Twist before bending — liquid-core optical waveguide",
    "hypothesis": "For liquid-core optical waveguide, pre-twist will change bending-loss hysteresis more than straight-guide attenuation.",
    "test": "Measure loss during bend cycles at several pre-twists.",
    "against": "Hysteresis changes are absent or track baseline attenuation alone.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Twist before bending",
    "system": "liquid-core optical waveguide",
    "id": 962,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0962",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Clamp edge compliance — liquid-core optical waveguide",
    "hypothesis": "For liquid-core optical waveguide, soft clamp edges will reduce irreversible optical loss after repeated handling.",
    "test": "Measure transmission and local strain through clamping cycles.",
    "against": "Loss accumulation is unchanged after clamp pressure is matched.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Clamp edge compliance",
    "system": "liquid-core optical waveguide",
    "id": 963,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0963",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Thermal gradient direction — liquid-core optical waveguide",
    "hypothesis": "For liquid-core optical waveguide, reversing a lateral thermal gradient will reverse the dominant output-pattern distortion.",
    "test": "Record output fields while reversing independently mapped temperature gradients.",
    "against": "Distortion does not reverse with the gradient.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Thermal gradient direction",
    "system": "liquid-core optical waveguide",
    "id": 964,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0964",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Coating swelling delay — liquid-core optical waveguide",
    "hypothesis": "For liquid-core optical waveguide, a swelling outer coating will produce delayed attenuation after humidity changes.",
    "test": "Measure coating dimensions, humidity, and transmission transients.",
    "against": "Attenuation follows immediate optical temperature shifts rather than swelling.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Coating swelling delay",
    "system": "liquid-core optical waveguide",
    "id": 965,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0965",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Alternating curvature recovery — liquid-core optical waveguide",
    "hypothesis": "For liquid-core optical waveguide, alternating bend direction will reduce residual output-pattern drift relative to repeated same-direction bending.",
    "test": "Compare output images at equal strain cycles.",
    "against": "Residual drift is no smaller after return geometry is matched.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Alternating curvature recovery",
    "system": "liquid-core optical waveguide",
    "id": 966,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0966",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Localized heating identification — liquid-core optical waveguide",
    "hypothesis": "For liquid-core optical waveguide, two-wavelength transmission will distinguish localized heating from a small bend more accurately than one wavelength.",
    "test": "Apply independently calibrated perturbations and classify blinded trials.",
    "against": "Two wavelengths do not improve classification at matched photon counts.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Localized heating identification",
    "system": "liquid-core optical waveguide",
    "id": 967,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0967",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Input diffuser stability — liquid-core optical waveguide",
    "hypothesis": "For liquid-core optical waveguide, a weak input diffuser will reduce handling-induced intensity variation at a cost in mean throughput.",
    "test": "Measure transmission statistics during controlled connector motion.",
    "against": "Variability does not decrease or is explained solely by lower received light.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Input diffuser stability",
    "system": "liquid-core optical waveguide",
    "id": 968,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0968",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Axial preload window — liquid-core optical waveguide",
    "hypothesis": "For liquid-core optical waveguide, moderate axial preload will minimize vibration-induced transmission noise.",
    "test": "Sweep preload while recording motion and optical noise.",
    "against": "No reproducible noise minimum remains after vibration amplitude is included.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Axial preload window",
    "system": "liquid-core optical waveguide",
    "id": 969,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0969",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Distributed support spacing — liquid-core optical waveguide",
    "hypothesis": "For liquid-core optical waveguide, graded support spacing will suppress narrow mechanical noise peaks more than uniform support spacing.",
    "test": "Measure vibration spectra and optical intensity at equal support count.",
    "against": "Peak optical noise is not reduced within the specified frequency range.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Distributed support spacing",
    "system": "liquid-core optical waveguide",
    "id": 970,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0970",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Bend spacing resonance — hollow polymer light guide",
    "hypothesis": "For hollow polymer light guide, periodic small bends will produce sharper wavelength-dependent losses than randomly spaced bends of equal curvature distribution.",
    "test": "Measure transmission spectra across controlled bend patterns.",
    "against": "Loss spectra are no sharper after launch variability is controlled.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Bend spacing resonance",
    "system": "hollow polymer light guide",
    "id": 971,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0971",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Twist before bending — hollow polymer light guide",
    "hypothesis": "For hollow polymer light guide, pre-twist will change bending-loss hysteresis more than straight-guide attenuation.",
    "test": "Measure loss during bend cycles at several pre-twists.",
    "against": "Hysteresis changes are absent or track baseline attenuation alone.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Twist before bending",
    "system": "hollow polymer light guide",
    "id": 972,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0972",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Clamp edge compliance — hollow polymer light guide",
    "hypothesis": "For hollow polymer light guide, soft clamp edges will reduce irreversible optical loss after repeated handling.",
    "test": "Measure transmission and local strain through clamping cycles.",
    "against": "Loss accumulation is unchanged after clamp pressure is matched.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Clamp edge compliance",
    "system": "hollow polymer light guide",
    "id": 973,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0973",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Thermal gradient direction — hollow polymer light guide",
    "hypothesis": "For hollow polymer light guide, reversing a lateral thermal gradient will reverse the dominant output-pattern distortion.",
    "test": "Record output fields while reversing independently mapped temperature gradients.",
    "against": "Distortion does not reverse with the gradient.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Thermal gradient direction",
    "system": "hollow polymer light guide",
    "id": 974,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0974",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Coating swelling delay — hollow polymer light guide",
    "hypothesis": "For hollow polymer light guide, a swelling outer coating will produce delayed attenuation after humidity changes.",
    "test": "Measure coating dimensions, humidity, and transmission transients.",
    "against": "Attenuation follows immediate optical temperature shifts rather than swelling.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Coating swelling delay",
    "system": "hollow polymer light guide",
    "id": 975,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0975",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Alternating curvature recovery — hollow polymer light guide",
    "hypothesis": "For hollow polymer light guide, alternating bend direction will reduce residual output-pattern drift relative to repeated same-direction bending.",
    "test": "Compare output images at equal strain cycles.",
    "against": "Residual drift is no smaller after return geometry is matched.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Alternating curvature recovery",
    "system": "hollow polymer light guide",
    "id": 976,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0976",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Localized heating identification — hollow polymer light guide",
    "hypothesis": "For hollow polymer light guide, two-wavelength transmission will distinguish localized heating from a small bend more accurately than one wavelength.",
    "test": "Apply independently calibrated perturbations and classify blinded trials.",
    "against": "Two wavelengths do not improve classification at matched photon counts.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Localized heating identification",
    "system": "hollow polymer light guide",
    "id": 977,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0977",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Input diffuser stability — hollow polymer light guide",
    "hypothesis": "For hollow polymer light guide, a weak input diffuser will reduce handling-induced intensity variation at a cost in mean throughput.",
    "test": "Measure transmission statistics during controlled connector motion.",
    "against": "Variability does not decrease or is explained solely by lower received light.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Input diffuser stability",
    "system": "hollow polymer light guide",
    "id": 978,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0978",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Axial preload window — hollow polymer light guide",
    "hypothesis": "For hollow polymer light guide, moderate axial preload will minimize vibration-induced transmission noise.",
    "test": "Sweep preload while recording motion and optical noise.",
    "against": "No reproducible noise minimum remains after vibration amplitude is included.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Axial preload window",
    "system": "hollow polymer light guide",
    "id": 979,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0979",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Distributed support spacing — hollow polymer light guide",
    "hypothesis": "For hollow polymer light guide, graded support spacing will suppress narrow mechanical noise peaks more than uniform support spacing.",
    "test": "Measure vibration spectra and optical intensity at equal support count.",
    "against": "Peak optical noise is not reduced within the specified frequency range.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Distributed support spacing",
    "system": "hollow polymer light guide",
    "id": 980,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0980",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Bend spacing resonance — elastomer-clad glass fiber",
    "hypothesis": "For elastomer-clad glass fiber, periodic small bends will produce sharper wavelength-dependent losses than randomly spaced bends of equal curvature distribution.",
    "test": "Measure transmission spectra across controlled bend patterns.",
    "against": "Loss spectra are no sharper after launch variability is controlled.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Bend spacing resonance",
    "system": "elastomer-clad glass fiber",
    "id": 981,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0981",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Twist before bending — elastomer-clad glass fiber",
    "hypothesis": "For elastomer-clad glass fiber, pre-twist will change bending-loss hysteresis more than straight-guide attenuation.",
    "test": "Measure loss during bend cycles at several pre-twists.",
    "against": "Hysteresis changes are absent or track baseline attenuation alone.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Twist before bending",
    "system": "elastomer-clad glass fiber",
    "id": 982,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0982",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Clamp edge compliance — elastomer-clad glass fiber",
    "hypothesis": "For elastomer-clad glass fiber, soft clamp edges will reduce irreversible optical loss after repeated handling.",
    "test": "Measure transmission and local strain through clamping cycles.",
    "against": "Loss accumulation is unchanged after clamp pressure is matched.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Clamp edge compliance",
    "system": "elastomer-clad glass fiber",
    "id": 983,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0983",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Thermal gradient direction — elastomer-clad glass fiber",
    "hypothesis": "For elastomer-clad glass fiber, reversing a lateral thermal gradient will reverse the dominant output-pattern distortion.",
    "test": "Record output fields while reversing independently mapped temperature gradients.",
    "against": "Distortion does not reverse with the gradient.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Thermal gradient direction",
    "system": "elastomer-clad glass fiber",
    "id": 984,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0984",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Coating swelling delay — elastomer-clad glass fiber",
    "hypothesis": "For elastomer-clad glass fiber, a swelling outer coating will produce delayed attenuation after humidity changes.",
    "test": "Measure coating dimensions, humidity, and transmission transients.",
    "against": "Attenuation follows immediate optical temperature shifts rather than swelling.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Coating swelling delay",
    "system": "elastomer-clad glass fiber",
    "id": 985,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0985",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Alternating curvature recovery — elastomer-clad glass fiber",
    "hypothesis": "For elastomer-clad glass fiber, alternating bend direction will reduce residual output-pattern drift relative to repeated same-direction bending.",
    "test": "Compare output images at equal strain cycles.",
    "against": "Residual drift is no smaller after return geometry is matched.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Alternating curvature recovery",
    "system": "elastomer-clad glass fiber",
    "id": 986,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0986",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Localized heating identification — elastomer-clad glass fiber",
    "hypothesis": "For elastomer-clad glass fiber, two-wavelength transmission will distinguish localized heating from a small bend more accurately than one wavelength.",
    "test": "Apply independently calibrated perturbations and classify blinded trials.",
    "against": "Two wavelengths do not improve classification at matched photon counts.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Localized heating identification",
    "system": "elastomer-clad glass fiber",
    "id": 987,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0987",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Input diffuser stability — elastomer-clad glass fiber",
    "hypothesis": "For elastomer-clad glass fiber, a weak input diffuser will reduce handling-induced intensity variation at a cost in mean throughput.",
    "test": "Measure transmission statistics during controlled connector motion.",
    "against": "Variability does not decrease or is explained solely by lower received light.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Input diffuser stability",
    "system": "elastomer-clad glass fiber",
    "id": 988,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0988",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Axial preload window — elastomer-clad glass fiber",
    "hypothesis": "For elastomer-clad glass fiber, moderate axial preload will minimize vibration-induced transmission noise.",
    "test": "Sweep preload while recording motion and optical noise.",
    "against": "No reproducible noise minimum remains after vibration amplitude is included.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Axial preload window",
    "system": "elastomer-clad glass fiber",
    "id": 989,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0989",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Distributed support spacing — elastomer-clad glass fiber",
    "hypothesis": "For elastomer-clad glass fiber, graded support spacing will suppress narrow mechanical noise peaks more than uniform support spacing.",
    "test": "Measure vibration spectra and optical intensity at equal support count.",
    "against": "Peak optical noise is not reduced within the specified frequency range.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Distributed support spacing",
    "system": "elastomer-clad glass fiber",
    "id": 990,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0990",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Bend spacing resonance — cellulose-derived flexible light guide",
    "hypothesis": "For cellulose-derived flexible light guide, periodic small bends will produce sharper wavelength-dependent losses than randomly spaced bends of equal curvature distribution.",
    "test": "Measure transmission spectra across controlled bend patterns.",
    "against": "Loss spectra are no sharper after launch variability is controlled.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Bend spacing resonance",
    "system": "cellulose-derived flexible light guide",
    "id": 991,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0991",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Twist before bending — cellulose-derived flexible light guide",
    "hypothesis": "For cellulose-derived flexible light guide, pre-twist will change bending-loss hysteresis more than straight-guide attenuation.",
    "test": "Measure loss during bend cycles at several pre-twists.",
    "against": "Hysteresis changes are absent or track baseline attenuation alone.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Twist before bending",
    "system": "cellulose-derived flexible light guide",
    "id": 992,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0992",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Clamp edge compliance — cellulose-derived flexible light guide",
    "hypothesis": "For cellulose-derived flexible light guide, soft clamp edges will reduce irreversible optical loss after repeated handling.",
    "test": "Measure transmission and local strain through clamping cycles.",
    "against": "Loss accumulation is unchanged after clamp pressure is matched.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Clamp edge compliance",
    "system": "cellulose-derived flexible light guide",
    "id": 993,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0993",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Thermal gradient direction — cellulose-derived flexible light guide",
    "hypothesis": "For cellulose-derived flexible light guide, reversing a lateral thermal gradient will reverse the dominant output-pattern distortion.",
    "test": "Record output fields while reversing independently mapped temperature gradients.",
    "against": "Distortion does not reverse with the gradient.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Thermal gradient direction",
    "system": "cellulose-derived flexible light guide",
    "id": 994,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0994",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Coating swelling delay — cellulose-derived flexible light guide",
    "hypothesis": "For cellulose-derived flexible light guide, a swelling outer coating will produce delayed attenuation after humidity changes.",
    "test": "Measure coating dimensions, humidity, and transmission transients.",
    "against": "Attenuation follows immediate optical temperature shifts rather than swelling.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Coating swelling delay",
    "system": "cellulose-derived flexible light guide",
    "id": 995,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0995",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Alternating curvature recovery — cellulose-derived flexible light guide",
    "hypothesis": "For cellulose-derived flexible light guide, alternating bend direction will reduce residual output-pattern drift relative to repeated same-direction bending.",
    "test": "Compare output images at equal strain cycles.",
    "against": "Residual drift is no smaller after return geometry is matched.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Alternating curvature recovery",
    "system": "cellulose-derived flexible light guide",
    "id": 996,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0996",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Localized heating identification — cellulose-derived flexible light guide",
    "hypothesis": "For cellulose-derived flexible light guide, two-wavelength transmission will distinguish localized heating from a small bend more accurately than one wavelength.",
    "test": "Apply independently calibrated perturbations and classify blinded trials.",
    "against": "Two wavelengths do not improve classification at matched photon counts.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Localized heating identification",
    "system": "cellulose-derived flexible light guide",
    "id": 997,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0997",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Input diffuser stability — cellulose-derived flexible light guide",
    "hypothesis": "For cellulose-derived flexible light guide, a weak input diffuser will reduce handling-induced intensity variation at a cost in mean throughput.",
    "test": "Measure transmission statistics during controlled connector motion.",
    "against": "Variability does not decrease or is explained solely by lower received light.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Input diffuser stability",
    "system": "cellulose-derived flexible light guide",
    "id": 998,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0998",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Axial preload window — cellulose-derived flexible light guide",
    "hypothesis": "For cellulose-derived flexible light guide, moderate axial preload will minimize vibration-induced transmission noise.",
    "test": "Sweep preload while recording motion and optical noise.",
    "against": "No reproducible noise minimum remains after vibration amplitude is included.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Axial preload window",
    "system": "cellulose-derived flexible light guide",
    "id": 999,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H0999",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Distributed support spacing — cellulose-derived flexible light guide",
    "hypothesis": "For cellulose-derived flexible light guide, graded support spacing will suppress narrow mechanical noise peaks more than uniform support spacing.",
    "test": "Measure vibration spectra and optical intensity at equal support count.",
    "against": "Peak optical noise is not reduced within the specified frequency range.",
    "category": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides",
    "controls": "Wavelength, launch conditions, length, temperature, initial attenuation, and actual bend geometry. Verify optical guidance in each specimen before testing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Optical fibers and flexible waveguides: Distributed support spacing",
    "system": "cellulose-derived flexible light guide",
    "id": 1000,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified waveguides, stable optical source, power meter or camera, mechanical fixtures, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1000",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Gas pulse recovery — microporous polypropylene gas-transfer sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For microporous polypropylene gas-transfer sheet, short gas-pressure rests will restore transfer after reversible pore flooding.",
    "test": "Measure oxygen flux and wetted pore fraction during repeated pressure cycles.",
    "against": "Flux does not recover or recovery occurs without reduced flooding.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Gas pulse recovery",
    "system": "microporous polypropylene gas-transfer sheet",
    "id": 1001,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1001",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Flow direction switching — microporous polypropylene gas-transfer sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For microporous polypropylene gas-transfer sheet, alternating liquid-flow direction will reduce spatial transfer nonuniformity.",
    "test": "Map oxygen uptake along the membrane under equal pumping work.",
    "against": "Nonuniformity is unchanged after flow distribution is matched.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Flow direction switching",
    "system": "microporous polypropylene gas-transfer sheet",
    "id": 1002,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1002",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Support mesh offset — microporous polypropylene gas-transfer sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For microporous polypropylene gas-transfer sheet, offset support meshes will reduce blocked transfer area compared with aligned meshes.",
    "test": "Measure local flux and deformation at equal support density.",
    "against": "Offsetting does not improve usable transfer area.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Support mesh offset",
    "system": "microporous polypropylene gas-transfer sheet",
    "id": 1003,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1003",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Humidity condensate threshold — microporous polypropylene gas-transfer sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For microporous polypropylene gas-transfer sheet, a gas-side humidity gradient will create localized transfer loss before bulk condensation appears.",
    "test": "Map humidity, local flux, and condensate images.",
    "against": "Flux loss begins only with visible bulk condensation.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Humidity condensate threshold",
    "system": "microporous polypropylene gas-transfer sheet",
    "id": 1004,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 185,
    "literature_query": "Humidity condensate threshold microporous polypropylene gas-transfer sheet gas-side gradient create localized transfer loss experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1004",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Humidity condensate threshold — microporous polypropylene gas-transfer sheet",
      "hypothesis": "For microporous polypropylene gas-transfer sheet, a gas-side humidity gradient will create localized transfer loss before bulk condensation appears.",
      "test": "Map humidity, local flux, and condensate images.",
      "against": "Flux loss begins only with visible bulk condensation.",
      "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
      "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Humidity condensate threshold",
      "system": "microporous polypropylene gas-transfer sheet",
      "id": 1004,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 26,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 185,
      "literature_query": "Humidity condensate threshold microporous polypropylene gas-transfer sheet gas-side gradient create localized transfer loss experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
      "source_lead_count": 2,
      "source_ids": "S451d3d68c643;S825923dfb2aa",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pressure ramp wetting — microporous polypropylene gas-transfer sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For microporous polypropylene gas-transfer sheet, a slower liquid-pressure ramp will increase wetting penetration at the same maximum pressure.",
    "test": "Measure wetted area and retained liquid after ramps.",
    "against": "Wetting is independent of ramp duration.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Pressure ramp wetting",
    "system": "microporous polypropylene gas-transfer sheet",
    "id": 1005,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1005",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Surface rinse direction — microporous polypropylene gas-transfer sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For microporous polypropylene gas-transfer sheet, tangential rinsing will restore flux with less liquid intrusion than normal rinsing.",
    "test": "Compare flux recovery and liquid breakthrough after controlled benign fouling.",
    "against": "Tangential rinsing has no recovery-versus-intrusion advantage.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Surface rinse direction",
    "system": "microporous polypropylene gas-transfer sheet",
    "id": 1006,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1006",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Membrane tension balance — microporous polypropylene gas-transfer sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For microporous polypropylene gas-transfer sheet, intermediate tension will minimize flux variability caused by flow-induced flutter.",
    "test": "Measure membrane motion and flux at several tensions.",
    "against": "Flux variability lacks a reproducible intermediate minimum.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Membrane tension balance",
    "system": "microporous polypropylene gas-transfer sheet",
    "id": 1007,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 186,
    "literature_query": "Membrane tension balance microporous polypropylene gas-transfer sheet intermediate minimize flux variability caused by experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1007",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Membrane tension balance — microporous polypropylene gas-transfer sheet",
      "hypothesis": "For microporous polypropylene gas-transfer sheet, intermediate tension will minimize flux variability caused by flow-induced flutter.",
      "test": "Measure membrane motion and flux at several tensions.",
      "against": "Flux variability lacks a reproducible intermediate minimum.",
      "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
      "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Membrane tension balance",
      "system": "microporous polypropylene gas-transfer sheet",
      "id": 1007,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 26,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 186,
      "literature_query": "Membrane tension balance microporous polypropylene gas-transfer sheet intermediate minimize flux variability caused by experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
      "source_lead_count": 8,
      "source_ids": "S70c6a14b80e6;S8b165fc2b790;S7605d3abd41e;S1cfccfde07c0;S846ccb308fb7;Sa6fa6c4e2fc1;Secc514380506;Se68cd691729b",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pore-mouth deposit placement — microporous polypropylene gas-transfer sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For microporous polypropylene gas-transfer sheet, deposits at pore entrances will reduce gas transfer more than equal deposits on pore walls.",
    "test": "Use compatible inert deposits and characterize their location.",
    "against": "Transfer loss follows total deposited mass alone.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Pore-mouth deposit placement",
    "system": "microporous polypropylene gas-transfer sheet",
    "id": 1008,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1008",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Gas channel taper — microporous polypropylene gas-transfer sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For microporous polypropylene gas-transfer sheet, a taper matched to gas consumption will flatten the longitudinal transfer profile.",
    "test": "Compare oxygen-transfer maps in tapered and constant channels.",
    "against": "Transfer uniformity is no better after pressure differences are included.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Gas channel taper",
    "system": "microporous polypropylene gas-transfer sheet",
    "id": 1009,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1009",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Liquid interruption memory — microporous polypropylene gas-transfer sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For microporous polypropylene gas-transfer sheet, brief liquid-flow interruptions will leave a longer flux memory when surface adsorption is stronger.",
    "test": "Measure restart flux and independent benign-solute adsorption.",
    "against": "Memory duration is unrelated to adsorption after mixing is controlled.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Liquid interruption memory",
    "system": "microporous polypropylene gas-transfer sheet",
    "id": 1010,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 187,
    "literature_query": "Liquid interruption memory microporous polypropylene gas-transfer sheet brief liquid-flow interruptions leave longer flux experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1010",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Liquid interruption memory — microporous polypropylene gas-transfer sheet",
      "hypothesis": "For microporous polypropylene gas-transfer sheet, brief liquid-flow interruptions will leave a longer flux memory when surface adsorption is stronger.",
      "test": "Measure restart flux and independent benign-solute adsorption.",
      "against": "Memory duration is unrelated to adsorption after mixing is controlled.",
      "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
      "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Liquid interruption memory",
      "system": "microporous polypropylene gas-transfer sheet",
      "id": 1010,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 26,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 187,
      "literature_query": "Liquid interruption memory microporous polypropylene gas-transfer sheet brief liquid-flow interruptions leave longer flux experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
      "source_lead_count": 4,
      "source_ids": "Sa6fa6c4e2fc1;S8b165fc2b790;S8ecaad186e32;S70c6a14b80e6",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Gas pulse recovery — microporous polyethylene gas-transfer sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For microporous polyethylene gas-transfer sheet, short gas-pressure rests will restore transfer after reversible pore flooding.",
    "test": "Measure oxygen flux and wetted pore fraction during repeated pressure cycles.",
    "against": "Flux does not recover or recovery occurs without reduced flooding.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Gas pulse recovery",
    "system": "microporous polyethylene gas-transfer sheet",
    "id": 1011,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1011",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Flow direction switching — microporous polyethylene gas-transfer sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For microporous polyethylene gas-transfer sheet, alternating liquid-flow direction will reduce spatial transfer nonuniformity.",
    "test": "Map oxygen uptake along the membrane under equal pumping work.",
    "against": "Nonuniformity is unchanged after flow distribution is matched.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Flow direction switching",
    "system": "microporous polyethylene gas-transfer sheet",
    "id": 1012,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1012",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Support mesh offset — microporous polyethylene gas-transfer sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For microporous polyethylene gas-transfer sheet, offset support meshes will reduce blocked transfer area compared with aligned meshes.",
    "test": "Measure local flux and deformation at equal support density.",
    "against": "Offsetting does not improve usable transfer area.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Support mesh offset",
    "system": "microporous polyethylene gas-transfer sheet",
    "id": 1013,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1013",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Humidity condensate threshold — microporous polyethylene gas-transfer sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For microporous polyethylene gas-transfer sheet, a gas-side humidity gradient will create localized transfer loss before bulk condensation appears.",
    "test": "Map humidity, local flux, and condensate images.",
    "against": "Flux loss begins only with visible bulk condensation.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Humidity condensate threshold",
    "system": "microporous polyethylene gas-transfer sheet",
    "id": 1014,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1014",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pressure ramp wetting — microporous polyethylene gas-transfer sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For microporous polyethylene gas-transfer sheet, a slower liquid-pressure ramp will increase wetting penetration at the same maximum pressure.",
    "test": "Measure wetted area and retained liquid after ramps.",
    "against": "Wetting is independent of ramp duration.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Pressure ramp wetting",
    "system": "microporous polyethylene gas-transfer sheet",
    "id": 1015,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1015",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Surface rinse direction — microporous polyethylene gas-transfer sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For microporous polyethylene gas-transfer sheet, tangential rinsing will restore flux with less liquid intrusion than normal rinsing.",
    "test": "Compare flux recovery and liquid breakthrough after controlled benign fouling.",
    "against": "Tangential rinsing has no recovery-versus-intrusion advantage.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Surface rinse direction",
    "system": "microporous polyethylene gas-transfer sheet",
    "id": 1016,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1016",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Membrane tension balance — microporous polyethylene gas-transfer sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For microporous polyethylene gas-transfer sheet, intermediate tension will minimize flux variability caused by flow-induced flutter.",
    "test": "Measure membrane motion and flux at several tensions.",
    "against": "Flux variability lacks a reproducible intermediate minimum.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Membrane tension balance",
    "system": "microporous polyethylene gas-transfer sheet",
    "id": 1017,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1017",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pore-mouth deposit placement — microporous polyethylene gas-transfer sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For microporous polyethylene gas-transfer sheet, deposits at pore entrances will reduce gas transfer more than equal deposits on pore walls.",
    "test": "Use compatible inert deposits and characterize their location.",
    "against": "Transfer loss follows total deposited mass alone.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Pore-mouth deposit placement",
    "system": "microporous polyethylene gas-transfer sheet",
    "id": 1018,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1018",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Gas channel taper — microporous polyethylene gas-transfer sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For microporous polyethylene gas-transfer sheet, a taper matched to gas consumption will flatten the longitudinal transfer profile.",
    "test": "Compare oxygen-transfer maps in tapered and constant channels.",
    "against": "Transfer uniformity is no better after pressure differences are included.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Gas channel taper",
    "system": "microporous polyethylene gas-transfer sheet",
    "id": 1019,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1019",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Liquid interruption memory — microporous polyethylene gas-transfer sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For microporous polyethylene gas-transfer sheet, brief liquid-flow interruptions will leave a longer flux memory when surface adsorption is stronger.",
    "test": "Measure restart flux and independent benign-solute adsorption.",
    "against": "Memory duration is unrelated to adsorption after mixing is controlled.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Liquid interruption memory",
    "system": "microporous polyethylene gas-transfer sheet",
    "id": 1020,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1020",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Gas pulse recovery — PTFE gas-transfer sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For PTFE gas-transfer sheet, short gas-pressure rests will restore transfer after reversible pore flooding.",
    "test": "Measure oxygen flux and wetted pore fraction during repeated pressure cycles.",
    "against": "Flux does not recover or recovery occurs without reduced flooding.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Gas pulse recovery",
    "system": "PTFE gas-transfer sheet",
    "id": 1021,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1021",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Flow direction switching — PTFE gas-transfer sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For PTFE gas-transfer sheet, alternating liquid-flow direction will reduce spatial transfer nonuniformity.",
    "test": "Map oxygen uptake along the membrane under equal pumping work.",
    "against": "Nonuniformity is unchanged after flow distribution is matched.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Flow direction switching",
    "system": "PTFE gas-transfer sheet",
    "id": 1022,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1022",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Support mesh offset — PTFE gas-transfer sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For PTFE gas-transfer sheet, offset support meshes will reduce blocked transfer area compared with aligned meshes.",
    "test": "Measure local flux and deformation at equal support density.",
    "against": "Offsetting does not improve usable transfer area.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Support mesh offset",
    "system": "PTFE gas-transfer sheet",
    "id": 1023,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1023",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Humidity condensate threshold — PTFE gas-transfer sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For PTFE gas-transfer sheet, a gas-side humidity gradient will create localized transfer loss before bulk condensation appears.",
    "test": "Map humidity, local flux, and condensate images.",
    "against": "Flux loss begins only with visible bulk condensation.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Humidity condensate threshold",
    "system": "PTFE gas-transfer sheet",
    "id": 1024,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1024",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pressure ramp wetting — PTFE gas-transfer sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For PTFE gas-transfer sheet, a slower liquid-pressure ramp will increase wetting penetration at the same maximum pressure.",
    "test": "Measure wetted area and retained liquid after ramps.",
    "against": "Wetting is independent of ramp duration.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Pressure ramp wetting",
    "system": "PTFE gas-transfer sheet",
    "id": 1025,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1025",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Surface rinse direction — PTFE gas-transfer sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For PTFE gas-transfer sheet, tangential rinsing will restore flux with less liquid intrusion than normal rinsing.",
    "test": "Compare flux recovery and liquid breakthrough after controlled benign fouling.",
    "against": "Tangential rinsing has no recovery-versus-intrusion advantage.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Surface rinse direction",
    "system": "PTFE gas-transfer sheet",
    "id": 1026,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1026",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Membrane tension balance — PTFE gas-transfer sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For PTFE gas-transfer sheet, intermediate tension will minimize flux variability caused by flow-induced flutter.",
    "test": "Measure membrane motion and flux at several tensions.",
    "against": "Flux variability lacks a reproducible intermediate minimum.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Membrane tension balance",
    "system": "PTFE gas-transfer sheet",
    "id": 1027,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1027",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pore-mouth deposit placement — PTFE gas-transfer sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For PTFE gas-transfer sheet, deposits at pore entrances will reduce gas transfer more than equal deposits on pore walls.",
    "test": "Use compatible inert deposits and characterize their location.",
    "against": "Transfer loss follows total deposited mass alone.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Pore-mouth deposit placement",
    "system": "PTFE gas-transfer sheet",
    "id": 1028,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1028",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Gas channel taper — PTFE gas-transfer sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For PTFE gas-transfer sheet, a taper matched to gas consumption will flatten the longitudinal transfer profile.",
    "test": "Compare oxygen-transfer maps in tapered and constant channels.",
    "against": "Transfer uniformity is no better after pressure differences are included.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Gas channel taper",
    "system": "PTFE gas-transfer sheet",
    "id": 1029,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1029",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Liquid interruption memory — PTFE gas-transfer sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For PTFE gas-transfer sheet, brief liquid-flow interruptions will leave a longer flux memory when surface adsorption is stronger.",
    "test": "Measure restart flux and independent benign-solute adsorption.",
    "against": "Memory duration is unrelated to adsorption after mixing is controlled.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Liquid interruption memory",
    "system": "PTFE gas-transfer sheet",
    "id": 1030,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1030",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Gas pulse recovery — PVDF gas-transfer sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For PVDF gas-transfer sheet, short gas-pressure rests will restore transfer after reversible pore flooding.",
    "test": "Measure oxygen flux and wetted pore fraction during repeated pressure cycles.",
    "against": "Flux does not recover or recovery occurs without reduced flooding.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Gas pulse recovery",
    "system": "PVDF gas-transfer sheet",
    "id": 1031,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1031",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Flow direction switching — PVDF gas-transfer sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For PVDF gas-transfer sheet, alternating liquid-flow direction will reduce spatial transfer nonuniformity.",
    "test": "Map oxygen uptake along the membrane under equal pumping work.",
    "against": "Nonuniformity is unchanged after flow distribution is matched.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Flow direction switching",
    "system": "PVDF gas-transfer sheet",
    "id": 1032,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1032",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Support mesh offset — PVDF gas-transfer sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For PVDF gas-transfer sheet, offset support meshes will reduce blocked transfer area compared with aligned meshes.",
    "test": "Measure local flux and deformation at equal support density.",
    "against": "Offsetting does not improve usable transfer area.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Support mesh offset",
    "system": "PVDF gas-transfer sheet",
    "id": 1033,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1033",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Humidity condensate threshold — PVDF gas-transfer sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For PVDF gas-transfer sheet, a gas-side humidity gradient will create localized transfer loss before bulk condensation appears.",
    "test": "Map humidity, local flux, and condensate images.",
    "against": "Flux loss begins only with visible bulk condensation.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Humidity condensate threshold",
    "system": "PVDF gas-transfer sheet",
    "id": 1034,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1034",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pressure ramp wetting — PVDF gas-transfer sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For PVDF gas-transfer sheet, a slower liquid-pressure ramp will increase wetting penetration at the same maximum pressure.",
    "test": "Measure wetted area and retained liquid after ramps.",
    "against": "Wetting is independent of ramp duration.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Pressure ramp wetting",
    "system": "PVDF gas-transfer sheet",
    "id": 1035,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1035",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Surface rinse direction — PVDF gas-transfer sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For PVDF gas-transfer sheet, tangential rinsing will restore flux with less liquid intrusion than normal rinsing.",
    "test": "Compare flux recovery and liquid breakthrough after controlled benign fouling.",
    "against": "Tangential rinsing has no recovery-versus-intrusion advantage.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Surface rinse direction",
    "system": "PVDF gas-transfer sheet",
    "id": 1036,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1036",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Membrane tension balance — PVDF gas-transfer sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For PVDF gas-transfer sheet, intermediate tension will minimize flux variability caused by flow-induced flutter.",
    "test": "Measure membrane motion and flux at several tensions.",
    "against": "Flux variability lacks a reproducible intermediate minimum.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Membrane tension balance",
    "system": "PVDF gas-transfer sheet",
    "id": 1037,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1037",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pore-mouth deposit placement — PVDF gas-transfer sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For PVDF gas-transfer sheet, deposits at pore entrances will reduce gas transfer more than equal deposits on pore walls.",
    "test": "Use compatible inert deposits and characterize their location.",
    "against": "Transfer loss follows total deposited mass alone.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Pore-mouth deposit placement",
    "system": "PVDF gas-transfer sheet",
    "id": 1038,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1038",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Gas channel taper — PVDF gas-transfer sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For PVDF gas-transfer sheet, a taper matched to gas consumption will flatten the longitudinal transfer profile.",
    "test": "Compare oxygen-transfer maps in tapered and constant channels.",
    "against": "Transfer uniformity is no better after pressure differences are included.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Gas channel taper",
    "system": "PVDF gas-transfer sheet",
    "id": 1039,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1039",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Liquid interruption memory — PVDF gas-transfer sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For PVDF gas-transfer sheet, brief liquid-flow interruptions will leave a longer flux memory when surface adsorption is stronger.",
    "test": "Measure restart flux and independent benign-solute adsorption.",
    "against": "Memory duration is unrelated to adsorption after mixing is controlled.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Liquid interruption memory",
    "system": "PVDF gas-transfer sheet",
    "id": 1040,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1040",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Gas pulse recovery — silicone-coated porous gas-transfer sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For silicone-coated porous gas-transfer sheet, short gas-pressure rests will restore transfer after reversible pore flooding.",
    "test": "Measure oxygen flux and wetted pore fraction during repeated pressure cycles.",
    "against": "Flux does not recover or recovery occurs without reduced flooding.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Gas pulse recovery",
    "system": "silicone-coated porous gas-transfer sheet",
    "id": 1041,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1041",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Flow direction switching — silicone-coated porous gas-transfer sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For silicone-coated porous gas-transfer sheet, alternating liquid-flow direction will reduce spatial transfer nonuniformity.",
    "test": "Map oxygen uptake along the membrane under equal pumping work.",
    "against": "Nonuniformity is unchanged after flow distribution is matched.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Flow direction switching",
    "system": "silicone-coated porous gas-transfer sheet",
    "id": 1042,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1042",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Support mesh offset — silicone-coated porous gas-transfer sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For silicone-coated porous gas-transfer sheet, offset support meshes will reduce blocked transfer area compared with aligned meshes.",
    "test": "Measure local flux and deformation at equal support density.",
    "against": "Offsetting does not improve usable transfer area.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Support mesh offset",
    "system": "silicone-coated porous gas-transfer sheet",
    "id": 1043,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1043",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Humidity condensate threshold — silicone-coated porous gas-transfer sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For silicone-coated porous gas-transfer sheet, a gas-side humidity gradient will create localized transfer loss before bulk condensation appears.",
    "test": "Map humidity, local flux, and condensate images.",
    "against": "Flux loss begins only with visible bulk condensation.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Humidity condensate threshold",
    "system": "silicone-coated porous gas-transfer sheet",
    "id": 1044,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1044",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pressure ramp wetting — silicone-coated porous gas-transfer sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For silicone-coated porous gas-transfer sheet, a slower liquid-pressure ramp will increase wetting penetration at the same maximum pressure.",
    "test": "Measure wetted area and retained liquid after ramps.",
    "against": "Wetting is independent of ramp duration.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Pressure ramp wetting",
    "system": "silicone-coated porous gas-transfer sheet",
    "id": 1045,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1045",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Surface rinse direction — silicone-coated porous gas-transfer sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For silicone-coated porous gas-transfer sheet, tangential rinsing will restore flux with less liquid intrusion than normal rinsing.",
    "test": "Compare flux recovery and liquid breakthrough after controlled benign fouling.",
    "against": "Tangential rinsing has no recovery-versus-intrusion advantage.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Surface rinse direction",
    "system": "silicone-coated porous gas-transfer sheet",
    "id": 1046,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1046",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Membrane tension balance — silicone-coated porous gas-transfer sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For silicone-coated porous gas-transfer sheet, intermediate tension will minimize flux variability caused by flow-induced flutter.",
    "test": "Measure membrane motion and flux at several tensions.",
    "against": "Flux variability lacks a reproducible intermediate minimum.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Membrane tension balance",
    "system": "silicone-coated porous gas-transfer sheet",
    "id": 1047,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1047",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pore-mouth deposit placement — silicone-coated porous gas-transfer sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For silicone-coated porous gas-transfer sheet, deposits at pore entrances will reduce gas transfer more than equal deposits on pore walls.",
    "test": "Use compatible inert deposits and characterize their location.",
    "against": "Transfer loss follows total deposited mass alone.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Pore-mouth deposit placement",
    "system": "silicone-coated porous gas-transfer sheet",
    "id": 1048,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1048",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Gas channel taper — silicone-coated porous gas-transfer sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For silicone-coated porous gas-transfer sheet, a taper matched to gas consumption will flatten the longitudinal transfer profile.",
    "test": "Compare oxygen-transfer maps in tapered and constant channels.",
    "against": "Transfer uniformity is no better after pressure differences are included.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Gas channel taper",
    "system": "silicone-coated porous gas-transfer sheet",
    "id": 1049,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1049",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Liquid interruption memory — silicone-coated porous gas-transfer sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For silicone-coated porous gas-transfer sheet, brief liquid-flow interruptions will leave a longer flux memory when surface adsorption is stronger.",
    "test": "Measure restart flux and independent benign-solute adsorption.",
    "against": "Memory duration is unrelated to adsorption after mixing is controlled.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Liquid interruption memory",
    "system": "silicone-coated porous gas-transfer sheet",
    "id": 1050,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1050",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Gas pulse recovery — hydrophobic ceramic gas-transfer sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For hydrophobic ceramic gas-transfer sheet, short gas-pressure rests will restore transfer after reversible pore flooding.",
    "test": "Measure oxygen flux and wetted pore fraction during repeated pressure cycles.",
    "against": "Flux does not recover or recovery occurs without reduced flooding.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Gas pulse recovery",
    "system": "hydrophobic ceramic gas-transfer sheet",
    "id": 1051,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1051",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Flow direction switching — hydrophobic ceramic gas-transfer sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For hydrophobic ceramic gas-transfer sheet, alternating liquid-flow direction will reduce spatial transfer nonuniformity.",
    "test": "Map oxygen uptake along the membrane under equal pumping work.",
    "against": "Nonuniformity is unchanged after flow distribution is matched.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Flow direction switching",
    "system": "hydrophobic ceramic gas-transfer sheet",
    "id": 1052,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1052",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Support mesh offset — hydrophobic ceramic gas-transfer sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For hydrophobic ceramic gas-transfer sheet, offset support meshes will reduce blocked transfer area compared with aligned meshes.",
    "test": "Measure local flux and deformation at equal support density.",
    "against": "Offsetting does not improve usable transfer area.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Support mesh offset",
    "system": "hydrophobic ceramic gas-transfer sheet",
    "id": 1053,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1053",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Humidity condensate threshold — hydrophobic ceramic gas-transfer sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For hydrophobic ceramic gas-transfer sheet, a gas-side humidity gradient will create localized transfer loss before bulk condensation appears.",
    "test": "Map humidity, local flux, and condensate images.",
    "against": "Flux loss begins only with visible bulk condensation.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Humidity condensate threshold",
    "system": "hydrophobic ceramic gas-transfer sheet",
    "id": 1054,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1054",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pressure ramp wetting — hydrophobic ceramic gas-transfer sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For hydrophobic ceramic gas-transfer sheet, a slower liquid-pressure ramp will increase wetting penetration at the same maximum pressure.",
    "test": "Measure wetted area and retained liquid after ramps.",
    "against": "Wetting is independent of ramp duration.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Pressure ramp wetting",
    "system": "hydrophobic ceramic gas-transfer sheet",
    "id": 1055,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1055",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Surface rinse direction — hydrophobic ceramic gas-transfer sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For hydrophobic ceramic gas-transfer sheet, tangential rinsing will restore flux with less liquid intrusion than normal rinsing.",
    "test": "Compare flux recovery and liquid breakthrough after controlled benign fouling.",
    "against": "Tangential rinsing has no recovery-versus-intrusion advantage.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Surface rinse direction",
    "system": "hydrophobic ceramic gas-transfer sheet",
    "id": 1056,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1056",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Membrane tension balance — hydrophobic ceramic gas-transfer sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For hydrophobic ceramic gas-transfer sheet, intermediate tension will minimize flux variability caused by flow-induced flutter.",
    "test": "Measure membrane motion and flux at several tensions.",
    "against": "Flux variability lacks a reproducible intermediate minimum.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Membrane tension balance",
    "system": "hydrophobic ceramic gas-transfer sheet",
    "id": 1057,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1057",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pore-mouth deposit placement — hydrophobic ceramic gas-transfer sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For hydrophobic ceramic gas-transfer sheet, deposits at pore entrances will reduce gas transfer more than equal deposits on pore walls.",
    "test": "Use compatible inert deposits and characterize their location.",
    "against": "Transfer loss follows total deposited mass alone.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Pore-mouth deposit placement",
    "system": "hydrophobic ceramic gas-transfer sheet",
    "id": 1058,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1058",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Gas channel taper — hydrophobic ceramic gas-transfer sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For hydrophobic ceramic gas-transfer sheet, a taper matched to gas consumption will flatten the longitudinal transfer profile.",
    "test": "Compare oxygen-transfer maps in tapered and constant channels.",
    "against": "Transfer uniformity is no better after pressure differences are included.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Gas channel taper",
    "system": "hydrophobic ceramic gas-transfer sheet",
    "id": 1059,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1059",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Liquid interruption memory — hydrophobic ceramic gas-transfer sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For hydrophobic ceramic gas-transfer sheet, brief liquid-flow interruptions will leave a longer flux memory when surface adsorption is stronger.",
    "test": "Measure restart flux and independent benign-solute adsorption.",
    "against": "Memory duration is unrelated to adsorption after mixing is controlled.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Liquid interruption memory",
    "system": "hydrophobic ceramic gas-transfer sheet",
    "id": 1060,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1060",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Gas pulse recovery — wax-treated cellulose gas-transfer sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For wax-treated cellulose gas-transfer sheet, short gas-pressure rests will restore transfer after reversible pore flooding.",
    "test": "Measure oxygen flux and wetted pore fraction during repeated pressure cycles.",
    "against": "Flux does not recover or recovery occurs without reduced flooding.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Gas pulse recovery",
    "system": "wax-treated cellulose gas-transfer sheet",
    "id": 1061,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1061",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Flow direction switching — wax-treated cellulose gas-transfer sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For wax-treated cellulose gas-transfer sheet, alternating liquid-flow direction will reduce spatial transfer nonuniformity.",
    "test": "Map oxygen uptake along the membrane under equal pumping work.",
    "against": "Nonuniformity is unchanged after flow distribution is matched.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Flow direction switching",
    "system": "wax-treated cellulose gas-transfer sheet",
    "id": 1062,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1062",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Support mesh offset — wax-treated cellulose gas-transfer sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For wax-treated cellulose gas-transfer sheet, offset support meshes will reduce blocked transfer area compared with aligned meshes.",
    "test": "Measure local flux and deformation at equal support density.",
    "against": "Offsetting does not improve usable transfer area.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Support mesh offset",
    "system": "wax-treated cellulose gas-transfer sheet",
    "id": 1063,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1063",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Humidity condensate threshold — wax-treated cellulose gas-transfer sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For wax-treated cellulose gas-transfer sheet, a gas-side humidity gradient will create localized transfer loss before bulk condensation appears.",
    "test": "Map humidity, local flux, and condensate images.",
    "against": "Flux loss begins only with visible bulk condensation.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Humidity condensate threshold",
    "system": "wax-treated cellulose gas-transfer sheet",
    "id": 1064,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1064",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pressure ramp wetting — wax-treated cellulose gas-transfer sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For wax-treated cellulose gas-transfer sheet, a slower liquid-pressure ramp will increase wetting penetration at the same maximum pressure.",
    "test": "Measure wetted area and retained liquid after ramps.",
    "against": "Wetting is independent of ramp duration.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Pressure ramp wetting",
    "system": "wax-treated cellulose gas-transfer sheet",
    "id": 1065,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1065",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Surface rinse direction — wax-treated cellulose gas-transfer sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For wax-treated cellulose gas-transfer sheet, tangential rinsing will restore flux with less liquid intrusion than normal rinsing.",
    "test": "Compare flux recovery and liquid breakthrough after controlled benign fouling.",
    "against": "Tangential rinsing has no recovery-versus-intrusion advantage.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Surface rinse direction",
    "system": "wax-treated cellulose gas-transfer sheet",
    "id": 1066,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1066",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Membrane tension balance — wax-treated cellulose gas-transfer sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For wax-treated cellulose gas-transfer sheet, intermediate tension will minimize flux variability caused by flow-induced flutter.",
    "test": "Measure membrane motion and flux at several tensions.",
    "against": "Flux variability lacks a reproducible intermediate minimum.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Membrane tension balance",
    "system": "wax-treated cellulose gas-transfer sheet",
    "id": 1067,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1067",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pore-mouth deposit placement — wax-treated cellulose gas-transfer sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For wax-treated cellulose gas-transfer sheet, deposits at pore entrances will reduce gas transfer more than equal deposits on pore walls.",
    "test": "Use compatible inert deposits and characterize their location.",
    "against": "Transfer loss follows total deposited mass alone.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Pore-mouth deposit placement",
    "system": "wax-treated cellulose gas-transfer sheet",
    "id": 1068,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 22,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1068",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Gas channel taper — wax-treated cellulose gas-transfer sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For wax-treated cellulose gas-transfer sheet, a taper matched to gas consumption will flatten the longitudinal transfer profile.",
    "test": "Compare oxygen-transfer maps in tapered and constant channels.",
    "against": "Transfer uniformity is no better after pressure differences are included.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Gas channel taper",
    "system": "wax-treated cellulose gas-transfer sheet",
    "id": 1069,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1069",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Liquid interruption memory — wax-treated cellulose gas-transfer sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For wax-treated cellulose gas-transfer sheet, brief liquid-flow interruptions will leave a longer flux memory when surface adsorption is stronger.",
    "test": "Measure restart flux and independent benign-solute adsorption.",
    "against": "Memory duration is unrelated to adsorption after mixing is controlled.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Liquid interruption memory",
    "system": "wax-treated cellulose gas-transfer sheet",
    "id": 1070,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1070",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Gas pulse recovery — hydrophobic glass-fiber gas-transfer sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For hydrophobic glass-fiber gas-transfer sheet, short gas-pressure rests will restore transfer after reversible pore flooding.",
    "test": "Measure oxygen flux and wetted pore fraction during repeated pressure cycles.",
    "against": "Flux does not recover or recovery occurs without reduced flooding.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Gas pulse recovery",
    "system": "hydrophobic glass-fiber gas-transfer sheet",
    "id": 1071,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1071",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Flow direction switching — hydrophobic glass-fiber gas-transfer sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For hydrophobic glass-fiber gas-transfer sheet, alternating liquid-flow direction will reduce spatial transfer nonuniformity.",
    "test": "Map oxygen uptake along the membrane under equal pumping work.",
    "against": "Nonuniformity is unchanged after flow distribution is matched.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Flow direction switching",
    "system": "hydrophobic glass-fiber gas-transfer sheet",
    "id": 1072,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1072",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Support mesh offset — hydrophobic glass-fiber gas-transfer sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For hydrophobic glass-fiber gas-transfer sheet, offset support meshes will reduce blocked transfer area compared with aligned meshes.",
    "test": "Measure local flux and deformation at equal support density.",
    "against": "Offsetting does not improve usable transfer area.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Support mesh offset",
    "system": "hydrophobic glass-fiber gas-transfer sheet",
    "id": 1073,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1073",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Humidity condensate threshold — hydrophobic glass-fiber gas-transfer sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For hydrophobic glass-fiber gas-transfer sheet, a gas-side humidity gradient will create localized transfer loss before bulk condensation appears.",
    "test": "Map humidity, local flux, and condensate images.",
    "against": "Flux loss begins only with visible bulk condensation.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Humidity condensate threshold",
    "system": "hydrophobic glass-fiber gas-transfer sheet",
    "id": 1074,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1074",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pressure ramp wetting — hydrophobic glass-fiber gas-transfer sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For hydrophobic glass-fiber gas-transfer sheet, a slower liquid-pressure ramp will increase wetting penetration at the same maximum pressure.",
    "test": "Measure wetted area and retained liquid after ramps.",
    "against": "Wetting is independent of ramp duration.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Pressure ramp wetting",
    "system": "hydrophobic glass-fiber gas-transfer sheet",
    "id": 1075,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1075",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Surface rinse direction — hydrophobic glass-fiber gas-transfer sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For hydrophobic glass-fiber gas-transfer sheet, tangential rinsing will restore flux with less liquid intrusion than normal rinsing.",
    "test": "Compare flux recovery and liquid breakthrough after controlled benign fouling.",
    "against": "Tangential rinsing has no recovery-versus-intrusion advantage.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Surface rinse direction",
    "system": "hydrophobic glass-fiber gas-transfer sheet",
    "id": 1076,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1076",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Membrane tension balance — hydrophobic glass-fiber gas-transfer sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For hydrophobic glass-fiber gas-transfer sheet, intermediate tension will minimize flux variability caused by flow-induced flutter.",
    "test": "Measure membrane motion and flux at several tensions.",
    "against": "Flux variability lacks a reproducible intermediate minimum.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Membrane tension balance",
    "system": "hydrophobic glass-fiber gas-transfer sheet",
    "id": 1077,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1077",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pore-mouth deposit placement — hydrophobic glass-fiber gas-transfer sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For hydrophobic glass-fiber gas-transfer sheet, deposits at pore entrances will reduce gas transfer more than equal deposits on pore walls.",
    "test": "Use compatible inert deposits and characterize their location.",
    "against": "Transfer loss follows total deposited mass alone.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Pore-mouth deposit placement",
    "system": "hydrophobic glass-fiber gas-transfer sheet",
    "id": 1078,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1078",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Gas channel taper — hydrophobic glass-fiber gas-transfer sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For hydrophobic glass-fiber gas-transfer sheet, a taper matched to gas consumption will flatten the longitudinal transfer profile.",
    "test": "Compare oxygen-transfer maps in tapered and constant channels.",
    "against": "Transfer uniformity is no better after pressure differences are included.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Gas channel taper",
    "system": "hydrophobic glass-fiber gas-transfer sheet",
    "id": 1079,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1079",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Liquid interruption memory — hydrophobic glass-fiber gas-transfer sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For hydrophobic glass-fiber gas-transfer sheet, brief liquid-flow interruptions will leave a longer flux memory when surface adsorption is stronger.",
    "test": "Measure restart flux and independent benign-solute adsorption.",
    "against": "Memory duration is unrelated to adsorption after mixing is controlled.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Liquid interruption memory",
    "system": "hydrophobic glass-fiber gas-transfer sheet",
    "id": 1080,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1080",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Gas pulse recovery — hydrophobic polymer hollow fiber",
    "hypothesis": "For hydrophobic polymer hollow fiber, short gas-pressure rests will restore transfer after reversible pore flooding.",
    "test": "Measure oxygen flux and wetted pore fraction during repeated pressure cycles.",
    "against": "Flux does not recover or recovery occurs without reduced flooding.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Gas pulse recovery",
    "system": "hydrophobic polymer hollow fiber",
    "id": 1081,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1081",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Flow direction switching — hydrophobic polymer hollow fiber",
    "hypothesis": "For hydrophobic polymer hollow fiber, alternating liquid-flow direction will reduce spatial transfer nonuniformity.",
    "test": "Map oxygen uptake along the membrane under equal pumping work.",
    "against": "Nonuniformity is unchanged after flow distribution is matched.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Flow direction switching",
    "system": "hydrophobic polymer hollow fiber",
    "id": 1082,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1082",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Support mesh offset — hydrophobic polymer hollow fiber",
    "hypothesis": "For hydrophobic polymer hollow fiber, offset support meshes will reduce blocked transfer area compared with aligned meshes.",
    "test": "Measure local flux and deformation at equal support density.",
    "against": "Offsetting does not improve usable transfer area.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Support mesh offset",
    "system": "hydrophobic polymer hollow fiber",
    "id": 1083,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1083",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Humidity condensate threshold — hydrophobic polymer hollow fiber",
    "hypothesis": "For hydrophobic polymer hollow fiber, a gas-side humidity gradient will create localized transfer loss before bulk condensation appears.",
    "test": "Map humidity, local flux, and condensate images.",
    "against": "Flux loss begins only with visible bulk condensation.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Humidity condensate threshold",
    "system": "hydrophobic polymer hollow fiber",
    "id": 1084,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1084",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pressure ramp wetting — hydrophobic polymer hollow fiber",
    "hypothesis": "For hydrophobic polymer hollow fiber, a slower liquid-pressure ramp will increase wetting penetration at the same maximum pressure.",
    "test": "Measure wetted area and retained liquid after ramps.",
    "against": "Wetting is independent of ramp duration.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Pressure ramp wetting",
    "system": "hydrophobic polymer hollow fiber",
    "id": 1085,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1085",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Surface rinse direction — hydrophobic polymer hollow fiber",
    "hypothesis": "For hydrophobic polymer hollow fiber, tangential rinsing will restore flux with less liquid intrusion than normal rinsing.",
    "test": "Compare flux recovery and liquid breakthrough after controlled benign fouling.",
    "against": "Tangential rinsing has no recovery-versus-intrusion advantage.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Surface rinse direction",
    "system": "hydrophobic polymer hollow fiber",
    "id": 1086,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1086",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Membrane tension balance — hydrophobic polymer hollow fiber",
    "hypothesis": "For hydrophobic polymer hollow fiber, intermediate tension will minimize flux variability caused by flow-induced flutter.",
    "test": "Measure membrane motion and flux at several tensions.",
    "against": "Flux variability lacks a reproducible intermediate minimum.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Membrane tension balance",
    "system": "hydrophobic polymer hollow fiber",
    "id": 1087,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1087",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pore-mouth deposit placement — hydrophobic polymer hollow fiber",
    "hypothesis": "For hydrophobic polymer hollow fiber, deposits at pore entrances will reduce gas transfer more than equal deposits on pore walls.",
    "test": "Use compatible inert deposits and characterize their location.",
    "against": "Transfer loss follows total deposited mass alone.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Pore-mouth deposit placement",
    "system": "hydrophobic polymer hollow fiber",
    "id": 1088,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1088",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Gas channel taper — hydrophobic polymer hollow fiber",
    "hypothesis": "For hydrophobic polymer hollow fiber, a taper matched to gas consumption will flatten the longitudinal transfer profile.",
    "test": "Compare oxygen-transfer maps in tapered and constant channels.",
    "against": "Transfer uniformity is no better after pressure differences are included.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Gas channel taper",
    "system": "hydrophobic polymer hollow fiber",
    "id": 1089,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1089",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Liquid interruption memory — hydrophobic polymer hollow fiber",
    "hypothesis": "For hydrophobic polymer hollow fiber, brief liquid-flow interruptions will leave a longer flux memory when surface adsorption is stronger.",
    "test": "Measure restart flux and independent benign-solute adsorption.",
    "against": "Memory duration is unrelated to adsorption after mixing is controlled.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Liquid interruption memory",
    "system": "hydrophobic polymer hollow fiber",
    "id": 1090,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1090",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Gas pulse recovery — hydrophobic silica-coated mesh",
    "hypothesis": "For hydrophobic silica-coated mesh, short gas-pressure rests will restore transfer after reversible pore flooding.",
    "test": "Measure oxygen flux and wetted pore fraction during repeated pressure cycles.",
    "against": "Flux does not recover or recovery occurs without reduced flooding.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Gas pulse recovery",
    "system": "hydrophobic silica-coated mesh",
    "id": 1091,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1091",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Flow direction switching — hydrophobic silica-coated mesh",
    "hypothesis": "For hydrophobic silica-coated mesh, alternating liquid-flow direction will reduce spatial transfer nonuniformity.",
    "test": "Map oxygen uptake along the membrane under equal pumping work.",
    "against": "Nonuniformity is unchanged after flow distribution is matched.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Flow direction switching",
    "system": "hydrophobic silica-coated mesh",
    "id": 1092,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1092",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Support mesh offset — hydrophobic silica-coated mesh",
    "hypothesis": "For hydrophobic silica-coated mesh, offset support meshes will reduce blocked transfer area compared with aligned meshes.",
    "test": "Measure local flux and deformation at equal support density.",
    "against": "Offsetting does not improve usable transfer area.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Support mesh offset",
    "system": "hydrophobic silica-coated mesh",
    "id": 1093,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1093",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Humidity condensate threshold — hydrophobic silica-coated mesh",
    "hypothesis": "For hydrophobic silica-coated mesh, a gas-side humidity gradient will create localized transfer loss before bulk condensation appears.",
    "test": "Map humidity, local flux, and condensate images.",
    "against": "Flux loss begins only with visible bulk condensation.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Humidity condensate threshold",
    "system": "hydrophobic silica-coated mesh",
    "id": 1094,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1094",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pressure ramp wetting — hydrophobic silica-coated mesh",
    "hypothesis": "For hydrophobic silica-coated mesh, a slower liquid-pressure ramp will increase wetting penetration at the same maximum pressure.",
    "test": "Measure wetted area and retained liquid after ramps.",
    "against": "Wetting is independent of ramp duration.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Pressure ramp wetting",
    "system": "hydrophobic silica-coated mesh",
    "id": 1095,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1095",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Surface rinse direction — hydrophobic silica-coated mesh",
    "hypothesis": "For hydrophobic silica-coated mesh, tangential rinsing will restore flux with less liquid intrusion than normal rinsing.",
    "test": "Compare flux recovery and liquid breakthrough after controlled benign fouling.",
    "against": "Tangential rinsing has no recovery-versus-intrusion advantage.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Surface rinse direction",
    "system": "hydrophobic silica-coated mesh",
    "id": 1096,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1096",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Membrane tension balance — hydrophobic silica-coated mesh",
    "hypothesis": "For hydrophobic silica-coated mesh, intermediate tension will minimize flux variability caused by flow-induced flutter.",
    "test": "Measure membrane motion and flux at several tensions.",
    "against": "Flux variability lacks a reproducible intermediate minimum.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Membrane tension balance",
    "system": "hydrophobic silica-coated mesh",
    "id": 1097,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1097",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pore-mouth deposit placement — hydrophobic silica-coated mesh",
    "hypothesis": "For hydrophobic silica-coated mesh, deposits at pore entrances will reduce gas transfer more than equal deposits on pore walls.",
    "test": "Use compatible inert deposits and characterize their location.",
    "against": "Transfer loss follows total deposited mass alone.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Pore-mouth deposit placement",
    "system": "hydrophobic silica-coated mesh",
    "id": 1098,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1098",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Gas channel taper — hydrophobic silica-coated mesh",
    "hypothesis": "For hydrophobic silica-coated mesh, a taper matched to gas consumption will flatten the longitudinal transfer profile.",
    "test": "Compare oxygen-transfer maps in tapered and constant channels.",
    "against": "Transfer uniformity is no better after pressure differences are included.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Gas channel taper",
    "system": "hydrophobic silica-coated mesh",
    "id": 1099,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1099",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Liquid interruption memory — hydrophobic silica-coated mesh",
    "hypothesis": "For hydrophobic silica-coated mesh, brief liquid-flow interruptions will leave a longer flux memory when surface adsorption is stronger.",
    "test": "Measure restart flux and independent benign-solute adsorption.",
    "against": "Memory duration is unrelated to adsorption after mixing is controlled.",
    "category": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes",
    "controls": "Use nonreactive air-water oxygen transfer, verified liquid exclusion, equal active area, temperature, gas pressure, and measured liquid-side mixing.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Hydrophobic gas-transfer membranes: Liquid interruption memory",
    "system": "hydrophobic silica-coated mesh",
    "id": 1100,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible membrane, low-pressure gas/water flow loop, calibrated dissolved-oxygen measurement, and leak detection.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1100",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Strain dwell conditioning — carbon-black silicone composite",
    "hypothesis": "For carbon-black silicone composite, several short strain holds will reduce later resistance hysteresis more than one long hold of equal duration.",
    "test": "Measure resistance-strain loops and recovery after matched conditioning.",
    "against": "Hysteresis reduction is no greater with repeated holds.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Strain dwell conditioning",
    "system": "carbon-black silicone composite",
    "id": 1101,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1101",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Lead orientation sensitivity — carbon-black silicone composite",
    "hypothesis": "For carbon-black silicone composite, diagonal voltage contacts will detect shear-induced network changes more strongly than axial contacts.",
    "test": "Measure multi-terminal resistance during calibrated shear.",
    "against": "Diagonal contacts provide no greater shear signal after baseline resistance is normalized.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Lead orientation sensitivity",
    "system": "carbon-black silicone composite",
    "id": 1102,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1102",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Compression release staging — carbon-black silicone composite",
    "hypothesis": "For carbon-black silicone composite, staged unloading will reduce resistance overshoot compared with abrupt unloading.",
    "test": "Record thickness and resistance transients after identical compression.",
    "against": "Overshoot is unchanged once mechanical recovery is included.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Compression release staging",
    "system": "carbon-black silicone composite",
    "id": 1103,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1103",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Thermal compensation patch — carbon-black silicone composite",
    "hypothesis": "For carbon-black silicone composite, an unloaded adjacent reference patch will correct thermal drift during deformation.",
    "test": "Independently vary temperature and strain and compare corrected readings.",
    "against": "Reference correction does not reduce strain-estimation error.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Thermal compensation patch",
    "system": "carbon-black silicone composite",
    "id": 1104,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1104",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Filler-free surface skin — carbon-black silicone composite",
    "hypothesis": "For carbon-black silicone composite, a thin insulating skin will reduce humidity-driven resistance drift while preserving strain response.",
    "test": "Measure humidity and strain calibration across skin thicknesses.",
    "against": "Drift reduction requires comparable loss of strain sensitivity.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Filler-free surface skin",
    "system": "carbon-black silicone composite",
    "id": 1105,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 188,
    "literature_query": "Filler-free surface skin carbon-black silicone composite thin insulating humidity-driven resistance drift preserving strain experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1105",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Filler-free surface skin — carbon-black silicone composite",
      "hypothesis": "For carbon-black silicone composite, a thin insulating skin will reduce humidity-driven resistance drift while preserving strain response.",
      "test": "Measure humidity and strain calibration across skin thicknesses.",
      "against": "Drift reduction requires comparable loss of strain sensitivity.",
      "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
      "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Filler-free surface skin",
      "system": "carbon-black silicone composite",
      "id": 1105,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 26,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 188,
      "literature_query": "Filler-free surface skin carbon-black silicone composite thin insulating humidity-driven resistance drift preserving strain experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
      "source_lead_count": 6,
      "source_ids": "S3a044829b453;Scad99bc613cf;Se99590419a5d;Sd98f11cc5781;Se5ecd17bbc74;Sa1b507333a1c",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Strain direction alternation — carbon-black silicone composite",
    "hypothesis": "For carbon-black silicone composite, alternating tension and shear will reveal network damage earlier than tension cycles alone.",
    "test": "Track resistance tensors and independent microscopic damage.",
    "against": "Electrical warning does not precede damage indicators from tension alone.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Strain direction alternation",
    "system": "carbon-black silicone composite",
    "id": 1106,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1106",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Microtexture pressure distribution — carbon-black silicone composite",
    "hypothesis": "For carbon-black silicone composite, rounded surface domes will reduce pressure-signal variability relative to sharp pyramids.",
    "test": "Measure pressure maps and repeatability under repeated contact.",
    "against": "Variability is not reduced after contact area is matched.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Microtexture pressure distribution",
    "system": "carbon-black silicone composite",
    "id": 1107,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1107",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Preload relaxation diagnosis — carbon-black silicone composite",
    "hypothesis": "For carbon-black silicone composite, resistance relaxation under fixed preload will predict subsequent calibration drift.",
    "test": "Compare prerecording relaxation with independently measured later drift across specimens.",
    "against": "Relaxation fails to predict drift on held-out specimens.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Preload relaxation diagnosis",
    "system": "carbon-black silicone composite",
    "id": 1108,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1108",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Localized conductor bridges — carbon-black silicone composite",
    "hypothesis": "For carbon-black silicone composite, sparse highly conductive bridges will reduce open-circuit failures without eliminating local strain sensitivity.",
    "test": "Map resistance and strain through fatigue cycles.",
    "against": "Bridges provide no lifetime gain at matched usable sensitivity.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Localized conductor bridges",
    "system": "carbon-black silicone composite",
    "id": 1109,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1109",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Measurement current scheduling — carbon-black silicone composite",
    "hypothesis": "For carbon-black silicone composite, intermittent sensing current will reduce self-heating drift relative to continuous sensing at equal data precision.",
    "test": "Measure temperature and resistance with matched noise levels.",
    "against": "Drift is unchanged after actual dissipated energy is included.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Measurement current scheduling",
    "system": "carbon-black silicone composite",
    "id": 1110,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1110",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Strain dwell conditioning — graphite silicone composite",
    "hypothesis": "For graphite silicone composite, several short strain holds will reduce later resistance hysteresis more than one long hold of equal duration.",
    "test": "Measure resistance-strain loops and recovery after matched conditioning.",
    "against": "Hysteresis reduction is no greater with repeated holds.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Strain dwell conditioning",
    "system": "graphite silicone composite",
    "id": 1111,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1111",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Lead orientation sensitivity — graphite silicone composite",
    "hypothesis": "For graphite silicone composite, diagonal voltage contacts will detect shear-induced network changes more strongly than axial contacts.",
    "test": "Measure multi-terminal resistance during calibrated shear.",
    "against": "Diagonal contacts provide no greater shear signal after baseline resistance is normalized.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Lead orientation sensitivity",
    "system": "graphite silicone composite",
    "id": 1112,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1112",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Compression release staging — graphite silicone composite",
    "hypothesis": "For graphite silicone composite, staged unloading will reduce resistance overshoot compared with abrupt unloading.",
    "test": "Record thickness and resistance transients after identical compression.",
    "against": "Overshoot is unchanged once mechanical recovery is included.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Compression release staging",
    "system": "graphite silicone composite",
    "id": 1113,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1113",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Thermal compensation patch — graphite silicone composite",
    "hypothesis": "For graphite silicone composite, an unloaded adjacent reference patch will correct thermal drift during deformation.",
    "test": "Independently vary temperature and strain and compare corrected readings.",
    "against": "Reference correction does not reduce strain-estimation error.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Thermal compensation patch",
    "system": "graphite silicone composite",
    "id": 1114,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1114",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Filler-free surface skin — graphite silicone composite",
    "hypothesis": "For graphite silicone composite, a thin insulating skin will reduce humidity-driven resistance drift while preserving strain response.",
    "test": "Measure humidity and strain calibration across skin thicknesses.",
    "against": "Drift reduction requires comparable loss of strain sensitivity.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Filler-free surface skin",
    "system": "graphite silicone composite",
    "id": 1115,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1115",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Strain direction alternation — graphite silicone composite",
    "hypothesis": "For graphite silicone composite, alternating tension and shear will reveal network damage earlier than tension cycles alone.",
    "test": "Track resistance tensors and independent microscopic damage.",
    "against": "Electrical warning does not precede damage indicators from tension alone.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Strain direction alternation",
    "system": "graphite silicone composite",
    "id": 1116,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1116",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Microtexture pressure distribution — graphite silicone composite",
    "hypothesis": "For graphite silicone composite, rounded surface domes will reduce pressure-signal variability relative to sharp pyramids.",
    "test": "Measure pressure maps and repeatability under repeated contact.",
    "against": "Variability is not reduced after contact area is matched.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Microtexture pressure distribution",
    "system": "graphite silicone composite",
    "id": 1117,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1117",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Preload relaxation diagnosis — graphite silicone composite",
    "hypothesis": "For graphite silicone composite, resistance relaxation under fixed preload will predict subsequent calibration drift.",
    "test": "Compare prerecording relaxation with independently measured later drift across specimens.",
    "against": "Relaxation fails to predict drift on held-out specimens.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Preload relaxation diagnosis",
    "system": "graphite silicone composite",
    "id": 1118,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1118",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Localized conductor bridges — graphite silicone composite",
    "hypothesis": "For graphite silicone composite, sparse highly conductive bridges will reduce open-circuit failures without eliminating local strain sensitivity.",
    "test": "Map resistance and strain through fatigue cycles.",
    "against": "Bridges provide no lifetime gain at matched usable sensitivity.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Localized conductor bridges",
    "system": "graphite silicone composite",
    "id": 1119,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1119",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Measurement current scheduling — graphite silicone composite",
    "hypothesis": "For graphite silicone composite, intermittent sensing current will reduce self-heating drift relative to continuous sensing at equal data precision.",
    "test": "Measure temperature and resistance with matched noise levels.",
    "against": "Drift is unchanged after actual dissipated energy is included.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Measurement current scheduling",
    "system": "graphite silicone composite",
    "id": 1120,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1120",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Strain dwell conditioning — carbon-fiber elastomer composite",
    "hypothesis": "For carbon-fiber elastomer composite, several short strain holds will reduce later resistance hysteresis more than one long hold of equal duration.",
    "test": "Measure resistance-strain loops and recovery after matched conditioning.",
    "against": "Hysteresis reduction is no greater with repeated holds.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Strain dwell conditioning",
    "system": "carbon-fiber elastomer composite",
    "id": 1121,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1121",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Lead orientation sensitivity — carbon-fiber elastomer composite",
    "hypothesis": "For carbon-fiber elastomer composite, diagonal voltage contacts will detect shear-induced network changes more strongly than axial contacts.",
    "test": "Measure multi-terminal resistance during calibrated shear.",
    "against": "Diagonal contacts provide no greater shear signal after baseline resistance is normalized.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Lead orientation sensitivity",
    "system": "carbon-fiber elastomer composite",
    "id": 1122,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1122",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Compression release staging — carbon-fiber elastomer composite",
    "hypothesis": "For carbon-fiber elastomer composite, staged unloading will reduce resistance overshoot compared with abrupt unloading.",
    "test": "Record thickness and resistance transients after identical compression.",
    "against": "Overshoot is unchanged once mechanical recovery is included.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Compression release staging",
    "system": "carbon-fiber elastomer composite",
    "id": 1123,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1123",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Thermal compensation patch — carbon-fiber elastomer composite",
    "hypothesis": "For carbon-fiber elastomer composite, an unloaded adjacent reference patch will correct thermal drift during deformation.",
    "test": "Independently vary temperature and strain and compare corrected readings.",
    "against": "Reference correction does not reduce strain-estimation error.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Thermal compensation patch",
    "system": "carbon-fiber elastomer composite",
    "id": 1124,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1124",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Filler-free surface skin — carbon-fiber elastomer composite",
    "hypothesis": "For carbon-fiber elastomer composite, a thin insulating skin will reduce humidity-driven resistance drift while preserving strain response.",
    "test": "Measure humidity and strain calibration across skin thicknesses.",
    "against": "Drift reduction requires comparable loss of strain sensitivity.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Filler-free surface skin",
    "system": "carbon-fiber elastomer composite",
    "id": 1125,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1125",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Strain direction alternation — carbon-fiber elastomer composite",
    "hypothesis": "For carbon-fiber elastomer composite, alternating tension and shear will reveal network damage earlier than tension cycles alone.",
    "test": "Track resistance tensors and independent microscopic damage.",
    "against": "Electrical warning does not precede damage indicators from tension alone.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Strain direction alternation",
    "system": "carbon-fiber elastomer composite",
    "id": 1126,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1126",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Microtexture pressure distribution — carbon-fiber elastomer composite",
    "hypothesis": "For carbon-fiber elastomer composite, rounded surface domes will reduce pressure-signal variability relative to sharp pyramids.",
    "test": "Measure pressure maps and repeatability under repeated contact.",
    "against": "Variability is not reduced after contact area is matched.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Microtexture pressure distribution",
    "system": "carbon-fiber elastomer composite",
    "id": 1127,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1127",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Preload relaxation diagnosis — carbon-fiber elastomer composite",
    "hypothesis": "For carbon-fiber elastomer composite, resistance relaxation under fixed preload will predict subsequent calibration drift.",
    "test": "Compare prerecording relaxation with independently measured later drift across specimens.",
    "against": "Relaxation fails to predict drift on held-out specimens.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Preload relaxation diagnosis",
    "system": "carbon-fiber elastomer composite",
    "id": 1128,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1128",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Localized conductor bridges — carbon-fiber elastomer composite",
    "hypothesis": "For carbon-fiber elastomer composite, sparse highly conductive bridges will reduce open-circuit failures without eliminating local strain sensitivity.",
    "test": "Map resistance and strain through fatigue cycles.",
    "against": "Bridges provide no lifetime gain at matched usable sensitivity.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Localized conductor bridges",
    "system": "carbon-fiber elastomer composite",
    "id": 1129,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1129",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Measurement current scheduling — carbon-fiber elastomer composite",
    "hypothesis": "For carbon-fiber elastomer composite, intermittent sensing current will reduce self-heating drift relative to continuous sensing at equal data precision.",
    "test": "Measure temperature and resistance with matched noise levels.",
    "against": "Drift is unchanged after actual dissipated energy is included.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Measurement current scheduling",
    "system": "carbon-fiber elastomer composite",
    "id": 1130,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1130",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Strain dwell conditioning — conductive polymer hydrogel",
    "hypothesis": "For conductive polymer hydrogel, several short strain holds will reduce later resistance hysteresis more than one long hold of equal duration.",
    "test": "Measure resistance-strain loops and recovery after matched conditioning.",
    "against": "Hysteresis reduction is no greater with repeated holds.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Strain dwell conditioning",
    "system": "conductive polymer hydrogel",
    "id": 1131,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 189,
    "literature_query": "Strain dwell conditioning conductive polymer hydrogel several short holds later resistance hysteresis long experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1131",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Strain dwell conditioning — conductive polymer hydrogel",
      "hypothesis": "For conductive polymer hydrogel, several short strain holds will reduce later resistance hysteresis more than one long hold of equal duration.",
      "test": "Measure resistance-strain loops and recovery after matched conditioning.",
      "against": "Hysteresis reduction is no greater with repeated holds.",
      "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
      "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Strain dwell conditioning",
      "system": "conductive polymer hydrogel",
      "id": 1131,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 26,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 189,
      "literature_query": "Strain dwell conditioning conductive polymer hydrogel several short holds later resistance hysteresis long experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
      "source_lead_count": 6,
      "source_ids": "S307e87dd3cfb;Sbfcb99bd39f0;Sf4ca9c101bfd;Sf9241604f442;S96841030f7c1;S17b29084d9ac",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Lead orientation sensitivity — conductive polymer hydrogel",
    "hypothesis": "For conductive polymer hydrogel, diagonal voltage contacts will detect shear-induced network changes more strongly than axial contacts.",
    "test": "Measure multi-terminal resistance during calibrated shear.",
    "against": "Diagonal contacts provide no greater shear signal after baseline resistance is normalized.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Lead orientation sensitivity",
    "system": "conductive polymer hydrogel",
    "id": 1132,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 190,
    "literature_query": "Lead orientation sensitivity conductive polymer hydrogel diagonal voltage contacts detect shear-induced network changes experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1132",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Lead orientation sensitivity — conductive polymer hydrogel",
      "hypothesis": "For conductive polymer hydrogel, diagonal voltage contacts will detect shear-induced network changes more strongly than axial contacts.",
      "test": "Measure multi-terminal resistance during calibrated shear.",
      "against": "Diagonal contacts provide no greater shear signal after baseline resistance is normalized.",
      "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
      "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Lead orientation sensitivity",
      "system": "conductive polymer hydrogel",
      "id": 1132,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 26,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 190,
      "literature_query": "Lead orientation sensitivity conductive polymer hydrogel diagonal voltage contacts detect shear-induced network changes experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
      "source_lead_count": 5,
      "source_ids": "S17e49e68219e;S0604955644ff;Sf9d2dcd88a25;S1f9321b8a633;S84c643308975",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Compression release staging — conductive polymer hydrogel",
    "hypothesis": "For conductive polymer hydrogel, staged unloading will reduce resistance overshoot compared with abrupt unloading.",
    "test": "Record thickness and resistance transients after identical compression.",
    "against": "Overshoot is unchanged once mechanical recovery is included.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Compression release staging",
    "system": "conductive polymer hydrogel",
    "id": 1133,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 191,
    "literature_query": "Compression release staging conductive polymer hydrogel staged unloading resistance overshoot abrupt experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1133",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Compression release staging — conductive polymer hydrogel",
      "hypothesis": "For conductive polymer hydrogel, staged unloading will reduce resistance overshoot compared with abrupt unloading.",
      "test": "Record thickness and resistance transients after identical compression.",
      "against": "Overshoot is unchanged once mechanical recovery is included.",
      "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
      "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Compression release staging",
      "system": "conductive polymer hydrogel",
      "id": 1133,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 26,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 191,
      "literature_query": "Compression release staging conductive polymer hydrogel staged unloading resistance overshoot abrupt experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
      "source_lead_count": 6,
      "source_ids": "S20fedbc4cf54;S162dc0d81bc9;S2294a8e1fb15;Se8cf6ed8631f;S0a8a32709a73;Sc48ec64a5a70",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Thermal compensation patch — conductive polymer hydrogel",
    "hypothesis": "For conductive polymer hydrogel, an unloaded adjacent reference patch will correct thermal drift during deformation.",
    "test": "Independently vary temperature and strain and compare corrected readings.",
    "against": "Reference correction does not reduce strain-estimation error.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Thermal compensation patch",
    "system": "conductive polymer hydrogel",
    "id": 1134,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 192,
    "literature_query": "Thermal compensation patch conductive polymer hydrogel an unloaded adjacent reference correct drift deformation experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1134",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Thermal compensation patch — conductive polymer hydrogel",
      "hypothesis": "For conductive polymer hydrogel, an unloaded adjacent reference patch will correct thermal drift during deformation.",
      "test": "Independently vary temperature and strain and compare corrected readings.",
      "against": "Reference correction does not reduce strain-estimation error.",
      "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
      "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Thermal compensation patch",
      "system": "conductive polymer hydrogel",
      "id": 1134,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 26,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 192,
      "literature_query": "Thermal compensation patch conductive polymer hydrogel an unloaded adjacent reference correct drift deformation experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
      "source_lead_count": 7,
      "source_ids": "S94ca3f265b76;S59290f877808;S1f9321b8a633;Sf9aee434327a;S628381590c39;S82f3e9673691;S5ae010598918",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Filler-free surface skin — conductive polymer hydrogel",
    "hypothesis": "For conductive polymer hydrogel, a thin insulating skin will reduce humidity-driven resistance drift while preserving strain response.",
    "test": "Measure humidity and strain calibration across skin thicknesses.",
    "against": "Drift reduction requires comparable loss of strain sensitivity.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Filler-free surface skin",
    "system": "conductive polymer hydrogel",
    "id": 1135,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1135",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Strain direction alternation — conductive polymer hydrogel",
    "hypothesis": "For conductive polymer hydrogel, alternating tension and shear will reveal network damage earlier than tension cycles alone.",
    "test": "Track resistance tensors and independent microscopic damage.",
    "against": "Electrical warning does not precede damage indicators from tension alone.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Strain direction alternation",
    "system": "conductive polymer hydrogel",
    "id": 1136,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1136",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Microtexture pressure distribution — conductive polymer hydrogel",
    "hypothesis": "For conductive polymer hydrogel, rounded surface domes will reduce pressure-signal variability relative to sharp pyramids.",
    "test": "Measure pressure maps and repeatability under repeated contact.",
    "against": "Variability is not reduced after contact area is matched.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Microtexture pressure distribution",
    "system": "conductive polymer hydrogel",
    "id": 1137,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 193,
    "literature_query": "Microtexture pressure distribution conductive polymer hydrogel rounded surface domes pressure-signal variability to sharp experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1137",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Microtexture pressure distribution — conductive polymer hydrogel",
      "hypothesis": "For conductive polymer hydrogel, rounded surface domes will reduce pressure-signal variability relative to sharp pyramids.",
      "test": "Measure pressure maps and repeatability under repeated contact.",
      "against": "Variability is not reduced after contact area is matched.",
      "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
      "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Microtexture pressure distribution",
      "system": "conductive polymer hydrogel",
      "id": 1137,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 26,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 193,
      "literature_query": "Microtexture pressure distribution conductive polymer hydrogel rounded surface domes pressure-signal variability to sharp experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
      "source_lead_count": 7,
      "source_ids": "S2606818e1442;Se7655e44524a;S4581fabee6e7;S9d61549bf946;S0c48d2facb28;S01ec22663b9e;Sef60824fd06e",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Preload relaxation diagnosis — conductive polymer hydrogel",
    "hypothesis": "For conductive polymer hydrogel, resistance relaxation under fixed preload will predict subsequent calibration drift.",
    "test": "Compare prerecording relaxation with independently measured later drift across specimens.",
    "against": "Relaxation fails to predict drift on held-out specimens.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Preload relaxation diagnosis",
    "system": "conductive polymer hydrogel",
    "id": 1138,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 194,
    "literature_query": "Preload relaxation diagnosis conductive polymer hydrogel resistance fixed predict subsequent calibration drift experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1138",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Preload relaxation diagnosis — conductive polymer hydrogel",
      "hypothesis": "For conductive polymer hydrogel, resistance relaxation under fixed preload will predict subsequent calibration drift.",
      "test": "Compare prerecording relaxation with independently measured later drift across specimens.",
      "against": "Relaxation fails to predict drift on held-out specimens.",
      "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
      "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Preload relaxation diagnosis",
      "system": "conductive polymer hydrogel",
      "id": 1138,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 26,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 194,
      "literature_query": "Preload relaxation diagnosis conductive polymer hydrogel resistance fixed predict subsequent calibration drift experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
      "source_lead_count": 3,
      "source_ids": "S1f9321b8a633;S94ca3f265b76;Sf9aee434327a",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Localized conductor bridges — conductive polymer hydrogel",
    "hypothesis": "For conductive polymer hydrogel, sparse highly conductive bridges will reduce open-circuit failures without eliminating local strain sensitivity.",
    "test": "Map resistance and strain through fatigue cycles.",
    "against": "Bridges provide no lifetime gain at matched usable sensitivity.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Localized conductor bridges",
    "system": "conductive polymer hydrogel",
    "id": 1139,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 195,
    "literature_query": "Localized conductor bridges conductive polymer hydrogel sparse highly open-circuit failures eliminating local strain experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1139",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Localized conductor bridges — conductive polymer hydrogel",
      "hypothesis": "For conductive polymer hydrogel, sparse highly conductive bridges will reduce open-circuit failures without eliminating local strain sensitivity.",
      "test": "Map resistance and strain through fatigue cycles.",
      "against": "Bridges provide no lifetime gain at matched usable sensitivity.",
      "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
      "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Localized conductor bridges",
      "system": "conductive polymer hydrogel",
      "id": 1139,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 26,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 195,
      "literature_query": "Localized conductor bridges conductive polymer hydrogel sparse highly open-circuit failures eliminating local strain experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
      "source_lead_count": 7,
      "source_ids": "Scdc4c3c2fa47;S10ec9fce7906;S93a9ca6f0a3c;Sb2f546491805;Saeb40db40945;S7cc4873dad11;S4581fabee6e7",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Measurement current scheduling — conductive polymer hydrogel",
    "hypothesis": "For conductive polymer hydrogel, intermittent sensing current will reduce self-heating drift relative to continuous sensing at equal data precision.",
    "test": "Measure temperature and resistance with matched noise levels.",
    "against": "Drift is unchanged after actual dissipated energy is included.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Measurement current scheduling",
    "system": "conductive polymer hydrogel",
    "id": 1140,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 196,
    "literature_query": "Measurement current scheduling conductive polymer hydrogel intermittent sensing self-heating drift to continuous at experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1140",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Measurement current scheduling — conductive polymer hydrogel",
      "hypothesis": "For conductive polymer hydrogel, intermittent sensing current will reduce self-heating drift relative to continuous sensing at equal data precision.",
      "test": "Measure temperature and resistance with matched noise levels.",
      "against": "Drift is unchanged after actual dissipated energy is included.",
      "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
      "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Measurement current scheduling",
      "system": "conductive polymer hydrogel",
      "id": 1140,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 26,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 196,
      "literature_query": "Measurement current scheduling conductive polymer hydrogel intermittent sensing self-heating drift to continuous at experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
      "source_lead_count": 8,
      "source_ids": "S1f9321b8a633;S988cb2d92d20;S5ae010598918;S62465d06300a;S79ad433743eb;S4697af371bb7;S7105335e57b7;Sce808c93cefc",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Strain dwell conditioning — graphite polyurethane composite",
    "hypothesis": "For graphite polyurethane composite, several short strain holds will reduce later resistance hysteresis more than one long hold of equal duration.",
    "test": "Measure resistance-strain loops and recovery after matched conditioning.",
    "against": "Hysteresis reduction is no greater with repeated holds.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Strain dwell conditioning",
    "system": "graphite polyurethane composite",
    "id": 1141,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1141",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Lead orientation sensitivity — graphite polyurethane composite",
    "hypothesis": "For graphite polyurethane composite, diagonal voltage contacts will detect shear-induced network changes more strongly than axial contacts.",
    "test": "Measure multi-terminal resistance during calibrated shear.",
    "against": "Diagonal contacts provide no greater shear signal after baseline resistance is normalized.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Lead orientation sensitivity",
    "system": "graphite polyurethane composite",
    "id": 1142,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1142",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Compression release staging — graphite polyurethane composite",
    "hypothesis": "For graphite polyurethane composite, staged unloading will reduce resistance overshoot compared with abrupt unloading.",
    "test": "Record thickness and resistance transients after identical compression.",
    "against": "Overshoot is unchanged once mechanical recovery is included.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Compression release staging",
    "system": "graphite polyurethane composite",
    "id": 1143,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1143",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Thermal compensation patch — graphite polyurethane composite",
    "hypothesis": "For graphite polyurethane composite, an unloaded adjacent reference patch will correct thermal drift during deformation.",
    "test": "Independently vary temperature and strain and compare corrected readings.",
    "against": "Reference correction does not reduce strain-estimation error.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Thermal compensation patch",
    "system": "graphite polyurethane composite",
    "id": 1144,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1144",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Filler-free surface skin — graphite polyurethane composite",
    "hypothesis": "For graphite polyurethane composite, a thin insulating skin will reduce humidity-driven resistance drift while preserving strain response.",
    "test": "Measure humidity and strain calibration across skin thicknesses.",
    "against": "Drift reduction requires comparable loss of strain sensitivity.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Filler-free surface skin",
    "system": "graphite polyurethane composite",
    "id": 1145,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1145",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Strain direction alternation — graphite polyurethane composite",
    "hypothesis": "For graphite polyurethane composite, alternating tension and shear will reveal network damage earlier than tension cycles alone.",
    "test": "Track resistance tensors and independent microscopic damage.",
    "against": "Electrical warning does not precede damage indicators from tension alone.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Strain direction alternation",
    "system": "graphite polyurethane composite",
    "id": 1146,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1146",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Microtexture pressure distribution — graphite polyurethane composite",
    "hypothesis": "For graphite polyurethane composite, rounded surface domes will reduce pressure-signal variability relative to sharp pyramids.",
    "test": "Measure pressure maps and repeatability under repeated contact.",
    "against": "Variability is not reduced after contact area is matched.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Microtexture pressure distribution",
    "system": "graphite polyurethane composite",
    "id": 1147,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1147",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Preload relaxation diagnosis — graphite polyurethane composite",
    "hypothesis": "For graphite polyurethane composite, resistance relaxation under fixed preload will predict subsequent calibration drift.",
    "test": "Compare prerecording relaxation with independently measured later drift across specimens.",
    "against": "Relaxation fails to predict drift on held-out specimens.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Preload relaxation diagnosis",
    "system": "graphite polyurethane composite",
    "id": 1148,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1148",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Localized conductor bridges — graphite polyurethane composite",
    "hypothesis": "For graphite polyurethane composite, sparse highly conductive bridges will reduce open-circuit failures without eliminating local strain sensitivity.",
    "test": "Map resistance and strain through fatigue cycles.",
    "against": "Bridges provide no lifetime gain at matched usable sensitivity.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Localized conductor bridges",
    "system": "graphite polyurethane composite",
    "id": 1149,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1149",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Measurement current scheduling — graphite polyurethane composite",
    "hypothesis": "For graphite polyurethane composite, intermittent sensing current will reduce self-heating drift relative to continuous sensing at equal data precision.",
    "test": "Measure temperature and resistance with matched noise levels.",
    "against": "Drift is unchanged after actual dissipated energy is included.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Measurement current scheduling",
    "system": "graphite polyurethane composite",
    "id": 1150,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1150",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Strain dwell conditioning — carbon-black natural-rubber composite",
    "hypothesis": "For carbon-black natural-rubber composite, several short strain holds will reduce later resistance hysteresis more than one long hold of equal duration.",
    "test": "Measure resistance-strain loops and recovery after matched conditioning.",
    "against": "Hysteresis reduction is no greater with repeated holds.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Strain dwell conditioning",
    "system": "carbon-black natural-rubber composite",
    "id": 1151,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1151",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Lead orientation sensitivity — carbon-black natural-rubber composite",
    "hypothesis": "For carbon-black natural-rubber composite, diagonal voltage contacts will detect shear-induced network changes more strongly than axial contacts.",
    "test": "Measure multi-terminal resistance during calibrated shear.",
    "against": "Diagonal contacts provide no greater shear signal after baseline resistance is normalized.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Lead orientation sensitivity",
    "system": "carbon-black natural-rubber composite",
    "id": 1152,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1152",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Compression release staging — carbon-black natural-rubber composite",
    "hypothesis": "For carbon-black natural-rubber composite, staged unloading will reduce resistance overshoot compared with abrupt unloading.",
    "test": "Record thickness and resistance transients after identical compression.",
    "against": "Overshoot is unchanged once mechanical recovery is included.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Compression release staging",
    "system": "carbon-black natural-rubber composite",
    "id": 1153,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1153",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Thermal compensation patch — carbon-black natural-rubber composite",
    "hypothesis": "For carbon-black natural-rubber composite, an unloaded adjacent reference patch will correct thermal drift during deformation.",
    "test": "Independently vary temperature and strain and compare corrected readings.",
    "against": "Reference correction does not reduce strain-estimation error.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Thermal compensation patch",
    "system": "carbon-black natural-rubber composite",
    "id": 1154,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1154",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Filler-free surface skin — carbon-black natural-rubber composite",
    "hypothesis": "For carbon-black natural-rubber composite, a thin insulating skin will reduce humidity-driven resistance drift while preserving strain response.",
    "test": "Measure humidity and strain calibration across skin thicknesses.",
    "against": "Drift reduction requires comparable loss of strain sensitivity.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Filler-free surface skin",
    "system": "carbon-black natural-rubber composite",
    "id": 1155,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1155",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Strain direction alternation — carbon-black natural-rubber composite",
    "hypothesis": "For carbon-black natural-rubber composite, alternating tension and shear will reveal network damage earlier than tension cycles alone.",
    "test": "Track resistance tensors and independent microscopic damage.",
    "against": "Electrical warning does not precede damage indicators from tension alone.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Strain direction alternation",
    "system": "carbon-black natural-rubber composite",
    "id": 1156,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1156",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Microtexture pressure distribution — carbon-black natural-rubber composite",
    "hypothesis": "For carbon-black natural-rubber composite, rounded surface domes will reduce pressure-signal variability relative to sharp pyramids.",
    "test": "Measure pressure maps and repeatability under repeated contact.",
    "against": "Variability is not reduced after contact area is matched.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Microtexture pressure distribution",
    "system": "carbon-black natural-rubber composite",
    "id": 1157,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1157",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Preload relaxation diagnosis — carbon-black natural-rubber composite",
    "hypothesis": "For carbon-black natural-rubber composite, resistance relaxation under fixed preload will predict subsequent calibration drift.",
    "test": "Compare prerecording relaxation with independently measured later drift across specimens.",
    "against": "Relaxation fails to predict drift on held-out specimens.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Preload relaxation diagnosis",
    "system": "carbon-black natural-rubber composite",
    "id": 1158,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1158",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Localized conductor bridges — carbon-black natural-rubber composite",
    "hypothesis": "For carbon-black natural-rubber composite, sparse highly conductive bridges will reduce open-circuit failures without eliminating local strain sensitivity.",
    "test": "Map resistance and strain through fatigue cycles.",
    "against": "Bridges provide no lifetime gain at matched usable sensitivity.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Localized conductor bridges",
    "system": "carbon-black natural-rubber composite",
    "id": 1159,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1159",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Measurement current scheduling — carbon-black natural-rubber composite",
    "hypothesis": "For carbon-black natural-rubber composite, intermittent sensing current will reduce self-heating drift relative to continuous sensing at equal data precision.",
    "test": "Measure temperature and resistance with matched noise levels.",
    "against": "Drift is unchanged after actual dissipated energy is included.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Measurement current scheduling",
    "system": "carbon-black natural-rubber composite",
    "id": 1160,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1160",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Strain dwell conditioning — carbon-coated cellulose foam",
    "hypothesis": "For carbon-coated cellulose foam, several short strain holds will reduce later resistance hysteresis more than one long hold of equal duration.",
    "test": "Measure resistance-strain loops and recovery after matched conditioning.",
    "against": "Hysteresis reduction is no greater with repeated holds.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Strain dwell conditioning",
    "system": "carbon-coated cellulose foam",
    "id": 1161,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1161",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Lead orientation sensitivity — carbon-coated cellulose foam",
    "hypothesis": "For carbon-coated cellulose foam, diagonal voltage contacts will detect shear-induced network changes more strongly than axial contacts.",
    "test": "Measure multi-terminal resistance during calibrated shear.",
    "against": "Diagonal contacts provide no greater shear signal after baseline resistance is normalized.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Lead orientation sensitivity",
    "system": "carbon-coated cellulose foam",
    "id": 1162,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1162",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Compression release staging — carbon-coated cellulose foam",
    "hypothesis": "For carbon-coated cellulose foam, staged unloading will reduce resistance overshoot compared with abrupt unloading.",
    "test": "Record thickness and resistance transients after identical compression.",
    "against": "Overshoot is unchanged once mechanical recovery is included.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Compression release staging",
    "system": "carbon-coated cellulose foam",
    "id": 1163,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1163",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Thermal compensation patch — carbon-coated cellulose foam",
    "hypothesis": "For carbon-coated cellulose foam, an unloaded adjacent reference patch will correct thermal drift during deformation.",
    "test": "Independently vary temperature and strain and compare corrected readings.",
    "against": "Reference correction does not reduce strain-estimation error.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Thermal compensation patch",
    "system": "carbon-coated cellulose foam",
    "id": 1164,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1164",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Filler-free surface skin — carbon-coated cellulose foam",
    "hypothesis": "For carbon-coated cellulose foam, a thin insulating skin will reduce humidity-driven resistance drift while preserving strain response.",
    "test": "Measure humidity and strain calibration across skin thicknesses.",
    "against": "Drift reduction requires comparable loss of strain sensitivity.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Filler-free surface skin",
    "system": "carbon-coated cellulose foam",
    "id": 1165,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1165",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Strain direction alternation — carbon-coated cellulose foam",
    "hypothesis": "For carbon-coated cellulose foam, alternating tension and shear will reveal network damage earlier than tension cycles alone.",
    "test": "Track resistance tensors and independent microscopic damage.",
    "against": "Electrical warning does not precede damage indicators from tension alone.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Strain direction alternation",
    "system": "carbon-coated cellulose foam",
    "id": 1166,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1166",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Microtexture pressure distribution — carbon-coated cellulose foam",
    "hypothesis": "For carbon-coated cellulose foam, rounded surface domes will reduce pressure-signal variability relative to sharp pyramids.",
    "test": "Measure pressure maps and repeatability under repeated contact.",
    "against": "Variability is not reduced after contact area is matched.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Microtexture pressure distribution",
    "system": "carbon-coated cellulose foam",
    "id": 1167,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1167",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Preload relaxation diagnosis — carbon-coated cellulose foam",
    "hypothesis": "For carbon-coated cellulose foam, resistance relaxation under fixed preload will predict subsequent calibration drift.",
    "test": "Compare prerecording relaxation with independently measured later drift across specimens.",
    "against": "Relaxation fails to predict drift on held-out specimens.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Preload relaxation diagnosis",
    "system": "carbon-coated cellulose foam",
    "id": 1168,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1168",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Localized conductor bridges — carbon-coated cellulose foam",
    "hypothesis": "For carbon-coated cellulose foam, sparse highly conductive bridges will reduce open-circuit failures without eliminating local strain sensitivity.",
    "test": "Map resistance and strain through fatigue cycles.",
    "against": "Bridges provide no lifetime gain at matched usable sensitivity.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Localized conductor bridges",
    "system": "carbon-coated cellulose foam",
    "id": 1169,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1169",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Measurement current scheduling — carbon-coated cellulose foam",
    "hypothesis": "For carbon-coated cellulose foam, intermittent sensing current will reduce self-heating drift relative to continuous sensing at equal data precision.",
    "test": "Measure temperature and resistance with matched noise levels.",
    "against": "Drift is unchanged after actual dissipated energy is included.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Measurement current scheduling",
    "system": "carbon-coated cellulose foam",
    "id": 1170,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1170",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Strain dwell conditioning — graphene-platelet elastomer composite",
    "hypothesis": "For graphene-platelet elastomer composite, several short strain holds will reduce later resistance hysteresis more than one long hold of equal duration.",
    "test": "Measure resistance-strain loops and recovery after matched conditioning.",
    "against": "Hysteresis reduction is no greater with repeated holds.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Strain dwell conditioning",
    "system": "graphene-platelet elastomer composite",
    "id": 1171,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1171",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Lead orientation sensitivity — graphene-platelet elastomer composite",
    "hypothesis": "For graphene-platelet elastomer composite, diagonal voltage contacts will detect shear-induced network changes more strongly than axial contacts.",
    "test": "Measure multi-terminal resistance during calibrated shear.",
    "against": "Diagonal contacts provide no greater shear signal after baseline resistance is normalized.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Lead orientation sensitivity",
    "system": "graphene-platelet elastomer composite",
    "id": 1172,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1172",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Compression release staging — graphene-platelet elastomer composite",
    "hypothesis": "For graphene-platelet elastomer composite, staged unloading will reduce resistance overshoot compared with abrupt unloading.",
    "test": "Record thickness and resistance transients after identical compression.",
    "against": "Overshoot is unchanged once mechanical recovery is included.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Compression release staging",
    "system": "graphene-platelet elastomer composite",
    "id": 1173,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1173",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Thermal compensation patch — graphene-platelet elastomer composite",
    "hypothesis": "For graphene-platelet elastomer composite, an unloaded adjacent reference patch will correct thermal drift during deformation.",
    "test": "Independently vary temperature and strain and compare corrected readings.",
    "against": "Reference correction does not reduce strain-estimation error.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Thermal compensation patch",
    "system": "graphene-platelet elastomer composite",
    "id": 1174,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1174",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Filler-free surface skin — graphene-platelet elastomer composite",
    "hypothesis": "For graphene-platelet elastomer composite, a thin insulating skin will reduce humidity-driven resistance drift while preserving strain response.",
    "test": "Measure humidity and strain calibration across skin thicknesses.",
    "against": "Drift reduction requires comparable loss of strain sensitivity.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Filler-free surface skin",
    "system": "graphene-platelet elastomer composite",
    "id": 1175,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1175",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Strain direction alternation — graphene-platelet elastomer composite",
    "hypothesis": "For graphene-platelet elastomer composite, alternating tension and shear will reveal network damage earlier than tension cycles alone.",
    "test": "Track resistance tensors and independent microscopic damage.",
    "against": "Electrical warning does not precede damage indicators from tension alone.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Strain direction alternation",
    "system": "graphene-platelet elastomer composite",
    "id": 1176,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1176",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Microtexture pressure distribution — graphene-platelet elastomer composite",
    "hypothesis": "For graphene-platelet elastomer composite, rounded surface domes will reduce pressure-signal variability relative to sharp pyramids.",
    "test": "Measure pressure maps and repeatability under repeated contact.",
    "against": "Variability is not reduced after contact area is matched.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Microtexture pressure distribution",
    "system": "graphene-platelet elastomer composite",
    "id": 1177,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1177",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Preload relaxation diagnosis — graphene-platelet elastomer composite",
    "hypothesis": "For graphene-platelet elastomer composite, resistance relaxation under fixed preload will predict subsequent calibration drift.",
    "test": "Compare prerecording relaxation with independently measured later drift across specimens.",
    "against": "Relaxation fails to predict drift on held-out specimens.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Preload relaxation diagnosis",
    "system": "graphene-platelet elastomer composite",
    "id": 1178,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1178",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Localized conductor bridges — graphene-platelet elastomer composite",
    "hypothesis": "For graphene-platelet elastomer composite, sparse highly conductive bridges will reduce open-circuit failures without eliminating local strain sensitivity.",
    "test": "Map resistance and strain through fatigue cycles.",
    "against": "Bridges provide no lifetime gain at matched usable sensitivity.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Localized conductor bridges",
    "system": "graphene-platelet elastomer composite",
    "id": 1179,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1179",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Measurement current scheduling — graphene-platelet elastomer composite",
    "hypothesis": "For graphene-platelet elastomer composite, intermittent sensing current will reduce self-heating drift relative to continuous sensing at equal data precision.",
    "test": "Measure temperature and resistance with matched noise levels.",
    "against": "Drift is unchanged after actual dissipated energy is included.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Measurement current scheduling",
    "system": "graphene-platelet elastomer composite",
    "id": 1180,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1180",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Strain dwell conditioning — carbon-filled thermoplastic elastomer",
    "hypothesis": "For carbon-filled thermoplastic elastomer, several short strain holds will reduce later resistance hysteresis more than one long hold of equal duration.",
    "test": "Measure resistance-strain loops and recovery after matched conditioning.",
    "against": "Hysteresis reduction is no greater with repeated holds.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Strain dwell conditioning",
    "system": "carbon-filled thermoplastic elastomer",
    "id": 1181,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1181",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Lead orientation sensitivity — carbon-filled thermoplastic elastomer",
    "hypothesis": "For carbon-filled thermoplastic elastomer, diagonal voltage contacts will detect shear-induced network changes more strongly than axial contacts.",
    "test": "Measure multi-terminal resistance during calibrated shear.",
    "against": "Diagonal contacts provide no greater shear signal after baseline resistance is normalized.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Lead orientation sensitivity",
    "system": "carbon-filled thermoplastic elastomer",
    "id": 1182,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1182",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Compression release staging — carbon-filled thermoplastic elastomer",
    "hypothesis": "For carbon-filled thermoplastic elastomer, staged unloading will reduce resistance overshoot compared with abrupt unloading.",
    "test": "Record thickness and resistance transients after identical compression.",
    "against": "Overshoot is unchanged once mechanical recovery is included.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Compression release staging",
    "system": "carbon-filled thermoplastic elastomer",
    "id": 1183,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1183",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Thermal compensation patch — carbon-filled thermoplastic elastomer",
    "hypothesis": "For carbon-filled thermoplastic elastomer, an unloaded adjacent reference patch will correct thermal drift during deformation.",
    "test": "Independently vary temperature and strain and compare corrected readings.",
    "against": "Reference correction does not reduce strain-estimation error.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Thermal compensation patch",
    "system": "carbon-filled thermoplastic elastomer",
    "id": 1184,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1184",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Filler-free surface skin — carbon-filled thermoplastic elastomer",
    "hypothesis": "For carbon-filled thermoplastic elastomer, a thin insulating skin will reduce humidity-driven resistance drift while preserving strain response.",
    "test": "Measure humidity and strain calibration across skin thicknesses.",
    "against": "Drift reduction requires comparable loss of strain sensitivity.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Filler-free surface skin",
    "system": "carbon-filled thermoplastic elastomer",
    "id": 1185,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1185",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Strain direction alternation — carbon-filled thermoplastic elastomer",
    "hypothesis": "For carbon-filled thermoplastic elastomer, alternating tension and shear will reveal network damage earlier than tension cycles alone.",
    "test": "Track resistance tensors and independent microscopic damage.",
    "against": "Electrical warning does not precede damage indicators from tension alone.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Strain direction alternation",
    "system": "carbon-filled thermoplastic elastomer",
    "id": 1186,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1186",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Microtexture pressure distribution — carbon-filled thermoplastic elastomer",
    "hypothesis": "For carbon-filled thermoplastic elastomer, rounded surface domes will reduce pressure-signal variability relative to sharp pyramids.",
    "test": "Measure pressure maps and repeatability under repeated contact.",
    "against": "Variability is not reduced after contact area is matched.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Microtexture pressure distribution",
    "system": "carbon-filled thermoplastic elastomer",
    "id": 1187,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1187",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Preload relaxation diagnosis — carbon-filled thermoplastic elastomer",
    "hypothesis": "For carbon-filled thermoplastic elastomer, resistance relaxation under fixed preload will predict subsequent calibration drift.",
    "test": "Compare prerecording relaxation with independently measured later drift across specimens.",
    "against": "Relaxation fails to predict drift on held-out specimens.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Preload relaxation diagnosis",
    "system": "carbon-filled thermoplastic elastomer",
    "id": 1188,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1188",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Localized conductor bridges — carbon-filled thermoplastic elastomer",
    "hypothesis": "For carbon-filled thermoplastic elastomer, sparse highly conductive bridges will reduce open-circuit failures without eliminating local strain sensitivity.",
    "test": "Map resistance and strain through fatigue cycles.",
    "against": "Bridges provide no lifetime gain at matched usable sensitivity.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Localized conductor bridges",
    "system": "carbon-filled thermoplastic elastomer",
    "id": 1189,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1189",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Measurement current scheduling — carbon-filled thermoplastic elastomer",
    "hypothesis": "For carbon-filled thermoplastic elastomer, intermittent sensing current will reduce self-heating drift relative to continuous sensing at equal data precision.",
    "test": "Measure temperature and resistance with matched noise levels.",
    "against": "Drift is unchanged after actual dissipated energy is included.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Measurement current scheduling",
    "system": "carbon-filled thermoplastic elastomer",
    "id": 1190,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1190",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Strain dwell conditioning — conductive carbon aerogel-elastomer composite",
    "hypothesis": "For conductive carbon aerogel-elastomer composite, several short strain holds will reduce later resistance hysteresis more than one long hold of equal duration.",
    "test": "Measure resistance-strain loops and recovery after matched conditioning.",
    "against": "Hysteresis reduction is no greater with repeated holds.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Strain dwell conditioning",
    "system": "conductive carbon aerogel-elastomer composite",
    "id": 1191,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1191",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Lead orientation sensitivity — conductive carbon aerogel-elastomer composite",
    "hypothesis": "For conductive carbon aerogel-elastomer composite, diagonal voltage contacts will detect shear-induced network changes more strongly than axial contacts.",
    "test": "Measure multi-terminal resistance during calibrated shear.",
    "against": "Diagonal contacts provide no greater shear signal after baseline resistance is normalized.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Lead orientation sensitivity",
    "system": "conductive carbon aerogel-elastomer composite",
    "id": 1192,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1192",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Compression release staging — conductive carbon aerogel-elastomer composite",
    "hypothesis": "For conductive carbon aerogel-elastomer composite, staged unloading will reduce resistance overshoot compared with abrupt unloading.",
    "test": "Record thickness and resistance transients after identical compression.",
    "against": "Overshoot is unchanged once mechanical recovery is included.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Compression release staging",
    "system": "conductive carbon aerogel-elastomer composite",
    "id": 1193,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1193",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Thermal compensation patch — conductive carbon aerogel-elastomer composite",
    "hypothesis": "For conductive carbon aerogel-elastomer composite, an unloaded adjacent reference patch will correct thermal drift during deformation.",
    "test": "Independently vary temperature and strain and compare corrected readings.",
    "against": "Reference correction does not reduce strain-estimation error.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Thermal compensation patch",
    "system": "conductive carbon aerogel-elastomer composite",
    "id": 1194,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1194",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Filler-free surface skin — conductive carbon aerogel-elastomer composite",
    "hypothesis": "For conductive carbon aerogel-elastomer composite, a thin insulating skin will reduce humidity-driven resistance drift while preserving strain response.",
    "test": "Measure humidity and strain calibration across skin thicknesses.",
    "against": "Drift reduction requires comparable loss of strain sensitivity.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Filler-free surface skin",
    "system": "conductive carbon aerogel-elastomer composite",
    "id": 1195,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1195",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Strain direction alternation — conductive carbon aerogel-elastomer composite",
    "hypothesis": "For conductive carbon aerogel-elastomer composite, alternating tension and shear will reveal network damage earlier than tension cycles alone.",
    "test": "Track resistance tensors and independent microscopic damage.",
    "against": "Electrical warning does not precede damage indicators from tension alone.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Strain direction alternation",
    "system": "conductive carbon aerogel-elastomer composite",
    "id": 1196,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1196",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Microtexture pressure distribution — conductive carbon aerogel-elastomer composite",
    "hypothesis": "For conductive carbon aerogel-elastomer composite, rounded surface domes will reduce pressure-signal variability relative to sharp pyramids.",
    "test": "Measure pressure maps and repeatability under repeated contact.",
    "against": "Variability is not reduced after contact area is matched.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Microtexture pressure distribution",
    "system": "conductive carbon aerogel-elastomer composite",
    "id": 1197,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1197",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Preload relaxation diagnosis — conductive carbon aerogel-elastomer composite",
    "hypothesis": "For conductive carbon aerogel-elastomer composite, resistance relaxation under fixed preload will predict subsequent calibration drift.",
    "test": "Compare prerecording relaxation with independently measured later drift across specimens.",
    "against": "Relaxation fails to predict drift on held-out specimens.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Preload relaxation diagnosis",
    "system": "conductive carbon aerogel-elastomer composite",
    "id": 1198,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1198",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Localized conductor bridges — conductive carbon aerogel-elastomer composite",
    "hypothesis": "For conductive carbon aerogel-elastomer composite, sparse highly conductive bridges will reduce open-circuit failures without eliminating local strain sensitivity.",
    "test": "Map resistance and strain through fatigue cycles.",
    "against": "Bridges provide no lifetime gain at matched usable sensitivity.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Localized conductor bridges",
    "system": "conductive carbon aerogel-elastomer composite",
    "id": 1199,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1199",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Measurement current scheduling — conductive carbon aerogel-elastomer composite",
    "hypothesis": "For conductive carbon aerogel-elastomer composite, intermittent sensing current will reduce self-heating drift relative to continuous sensing at equal data precision.",
    "test": "Measure temperature and resistance with matched noise levels.",
    "against": "Drift is unchanged after actual dissipated energy is included.",
    "category": "Piezoresistive soft composites",
    "controls": "Filler fraction, initial resistance, dimensions, temperature, strain rate, contact resistance, and measured mechanical strain.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Piezoresistive soft composites: Measurement current scheduling",
    "system": "conductive carbon aerogel-elastomer composite",
    "id": 1200,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified conductive composites, four-terminal electrical measurement, controlled mechanical loading, and temperature logging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1200",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Field ramp order — iron-microparticle silicone-oil suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For iron-microparticle silicone-oil suspension, a slow field increase followed by rapid decrease will leave more residual structure than the reversed ramp order.",
    "test": "Measure rheology and particle structure after matched field exposure.",
    "against": "Residual structure is independent of ramp order.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Field ramp order",
    "system": "iron-microparticle silicone-oil suspension",
    "id": 1201,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1201",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Crosswise field pulses — iron-microparticle silicone-oil suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For iron-microparticle silicone-oil suspension, brief crosswise field pulses will accelerate breakup of flow-aligned chains.",
    "test": "Image chains and measure stress recovery at equal field energy.",
    "against": "Breakup and recovery are no faster than without crosswise pulses.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Crosswise field pulses",
    "system": "iron-microparticle silicone-oil suspension",
    "id": 1202,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 279,
    "literature_query": "Crosswise field pulses iron-microparticle silicone-oil suspension brief accelerate breakup of flow-aligned chains experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1202",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Crosswise field pulses — iron-microparticle silicone-oil suspension",
      "hypothesis": "For iron-microparticle silicone-oil suspension, brief crosswise field pulses will accelerate breakup of flow-aligned chains.",
      "test": "Image chains and measure stress recovery at equal field energy.",
      "against": "Breakup and recovery are no faster than without crosswise pulses.",
      "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
      "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Crosswise field pulses",
      "system": "iron-microparticle silicone-oil suspension",
      "id": 1202,
      "access_score": 2,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 23,
      "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 279,
      "literature_query": "Crosswise field pulses iron-microparticle silicone-oil suspension brief accelerate breakup of flow-aligned chains experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
      "source_lead_count": 6,
      "source_ids": "Sd9ac4ab4061e;S7d84a33cdc0c;Scf8689564031;Sba306007a296;S09286695b888;S41c108e058b1",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Wall magnetic roughness — iron-microparticle silicone-oil suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For iron-microparticle silicone-oil suspension, weakly patterned magnetic walls will reduce shear localization relative to uniform walls.",
    "test": "Map velocity profiles and local particle concentration.",
    "against": "Localization is unchanged after wall slip is accounted for.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Wall magnetic roughness",
    "system": "iron-microparticle silicone-oil suspension",
    "id": 1203,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1203",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Chain age and yielding — iron-microparticle silicone-oil suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For iron-microparticle silicone-oil suspension, longer field-rest periods will broaden the distribution of initial yielding events.",
    "test": "Record stress fluctuations after controlled structure-building times.",
    "against": "Yield-event distributions do not broaden with structure age.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Chain age and yielding",
    "system": "iron-microparticle silicone-oil suspension",
    "id": 1204,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1204",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Sedimentation field rotation — iron-microparticle silicone-oil suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For iron-microparticle silicone-oil suspension, slow field rotation will reduce long-term concentration gradients without vigorous bulk mixing.",
    "test": "Measure vertical concentration and mechanical power.",
    "against": "Gradients persist or apparent gains require substantial bulk stirring.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Sedimentation field rotation",
    "system": "iron-microparticle silicone-oil suspension",
    "id": 1205,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1205",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Oscillatory shear phase — iron-microparticle silicone-oil suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For iron-microparticle silicone-oil suspension, synchronizing field maxima with low shear will increase cycle-averaged stiffness per field exposure.",
    "test": "Measure viscoelastic response across field-shear phase offsets.",
    "against": "No phase-dependent stiffness advantage is reproducible.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Oscillatory shear phase",
    "system": "iron-microparticle silicone-oil suspension",
    "id": 1206,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1206",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Field-free recovery geometry — iron-microparticle silicone-oil suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For iron-microparticle silicone-oil suspension, wider gaps will recover baseline viscosity more slowly after field removal.",
    "test": "Compare rheology and chain breakup across gap widths.",
    "against": "Recovery is gap-independent after wall effects are measured.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Field-free recovery geometry",
    "system": "iron-microparticle silicone-oil suspension",
    "id": 1207,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1207",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Particle softness coupling — iron-microparticle silicone-oil suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For iron-microparticle silicone-oil suspension, adding a small compatible soft-particle fraction will reduce brittle chain-collapse events.",
    "test": "Measure stress drops and structural rearrangements.",
    "against": "Collapse statistics do not change at matched overall solid fraction.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Particle softness coupling",
    "system": "iron-microparticle silicone-oil suspension",
    "id": 1208,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1208",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Magnetic gradient placement — iron-microparticle silicone-oil suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For iron-microparticle silicone-oil suspension, placing a weak field gradient near the outlet will increase concentration fluctuations more than near the inlet.",
    "test": "Map concentration under reversed gradient placement.",
    "against": "Placement effects vanish after total particle retention is matched.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Magnetic gradient placement",
    "system": "iron-microparticle silicone-oil suspension",
    "id": 1209,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1209",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Small-signal structural probe — iron-microparticle silicone-oil suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For iron-microparticle silicone-oil suspension, low-amplitude rheological probing will identify residual chains before mean viscosity changes significantly.",
    "test": "Compare probe response with microscopy after field cycling.",
    "against": "No earlier chain detection occurs at matched false-alarm rate.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Small-signal structural probe",
    "system": "iron-microparticle silicone-oil suspension",
    "id": 1210,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1210",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Field ramp order — carbonyl-iron mineral-oil suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For carbonyl-iron mineral-oil suspension, a slow field increase followed by rapid decrease will leave more residual structure than the reversed ramp order.",
    "test": "Measure rheology and particle structure after matched field exposure.",
    "against": "Residual structure is independent of ramp order.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Field ramp order",
    "system": "carbonyl-iron mineral-oil suspension",
    "id": 1211,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1211",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Crosswise field pulses — carbonyl-iron mineral-oil suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For carbonyl-iron mineral-oil suspension, brief crosswise field pulses will accelerate breakup of flow-aligned chains.",
    "test": "Image chains and measure stress recovery at equal field energy.",
    "against": "Breakup and recovery are no faster than without crosswise pulses.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Crosswise field pulses",
    "system": "carbonyl-iron mineral-oil suspension",
    "id": 1212,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1212",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Wall magnetic roughness — carbonyl-iron mineral-oil suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For carbonyl-iron mineral-oil suspension, weakly patterned magnetic walls will reduce shear localization relative to uniform walls.",
    "test": "Map velocity profiles and local particle concentration.",
    "against": "Localization is unchanged after wall slip is accounted for.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Wall magnetic roughness",
    "system": "carbonyl-iron mineral-oil suspension",
    "id": 1213,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1213",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Chain age and yielding — carbonyl-iron mineral-oil suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For carbonyl-iron mineral-oil suspension, longer field-rest periods will broaden the distribution of initial yielding events.",
    "test": "Record stress fluctuations after controlled structure-building times.",
    "against": "Yield-event distributions do not broaden with structure age.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Chain age and yielding",
    "system": "carbonyl-iron mineral-oil suspension",
    "id": 1214,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1214",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Sedimentation field rotation — carbonyl-iron mineral-oil suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For carbonyl-iron mineral-oil suspension, slow field rotation will reduce long-term concentration gradients without vigorous bulk mixing.",
    "test": "Measure vertical concentration and mechanical power.",
    "against": "Gradients persist or apparent gains require substantial bulk stirring.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Sedimentation field rotation",
    "system": "carbonyl-iron mineral-oil suspension",
    "id": 1215,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1215",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Oscillatory shear phase — carbonyl-iron mineral-oil suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For carbonyl-iron mineral-oil suspension, synchronizing field maxima with low shear will increase cycle-averaged stiffness per field exposure.",
    "test": "Measure viscoelastic response across field-shear phase offsets.",
    "against": "No phase-dependent stiffness advantage is reproducible.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Oscillatory shear phase",
    "system": "carbonyl-iron mineral-oil suspension",
    "id": 1216,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1216",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Field-free recovery geometry — carbonyl-iron mineral-oil suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For carbonyl-iron mineral-oil suspension, wider gaps will recover baseline viscosity more slowly after field removal.",
    "test": "Compare rheology and chain breakup across gap widths.",
    "against": "Recovery is gap-independent after wall effects are measured.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Field-free recovery geometry",
    "system": "carbonyl-iron mineral-oil suspension",
    "id": 1217,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1217",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Particle softness coupling — carbonyl-iron mineral-oil suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For carbonyl-iron mineral-oil suspension, adding a small compatible soft-particle fraction will reduce brittle chain-collapse events.",
    "test": "Measure stress drops and structural rearrangements.",
    "against": "Collapse statistics do not change at matched overall solid fraction.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Particle softness coupling",
    "system": "carbonyl-iron mineral-oil suspension",
    "id": 1218,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1218",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Magnetic gradient placement — carbonyl-iron mineral-oil suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For carbonyl-iron mineral-oil suspension, placing a weak field gradient near the outlet will increase concentration fluctuations more than near the inlet.",
    "test": "Map concentration under reversed gradient placement.",
    "against": "Placement effects vanish after total particle retention is matched.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Magnetic gradient placement",
    "system": "carbonyl-iron mineral-oil suspension",
    "id": 1219,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1219",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Small-signal structural probe — carbonyl-iron mineral-oil suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For carbonyl-iron mineral-oil suspension, low-amplitude rheological probing will identify residual chains before mean viscosity changes significantly.",
    "test": "Compare probe response with microscopy after field cycling.",
    "against": "No earlier chain detection occurs at matched false-alarm rate.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Small-signal structural probe",
    "system": "carbonyl-iron mineral-oil suspension",
    "id": 1220,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1220",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Field ramp order — magnetite water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For magnetite water suspension, a slow field increase followed by rapid decrease will leave more residual structure than the reversed ramp order.",
    "test": "Measure rheology and particle structure after matched field exposure.",
    "against": "Residual structure is independent of ramp order.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Field ramp order",
    "system": "magnetite water suspension",
    "id": 1221,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1221",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Crosswise field pulses — magnetite water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For magnetite water suspension, brief crosswise field pulses will accelerate breakup of flow-aligned chains.",
    "test": "Image chains and measure stress recovery at equal field energy.",
    "against": "Breakup and recovery are no faster than without crosswise pulses.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Crosswise field pulses",
    "system": "magnetite water suspension",
    "id": 1222,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1222",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Wall magnetic roughness — magnetite water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For magnetite water suspension, weakly patterned magnetic walls will reduce shear localization relative to uniform walls.",
    "test": "Map velocity profiles and local particle concentration.",
    "against": "Localization is unchanged after wall slip is accounted for.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Wall magnetic roughness",
    "system": "magnetite water suspension",
    "id": 1223,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1223",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Chain age and yielding — magnetite water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For magnetite water suspension, longer field-rest periods will broaden the distribution of initial yielding events.",
    "test": "Record stress fluctuations after controlled structure-building times.",
    "against": "Yield-event distributions do not broaden with structure age.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Chain age and yielding",
    "system": "magnetite water suspension",
    "id": 1224,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1224",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Sedimentation field rotation — magnetite water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For magnetite water suspension, slow field rotation will reduce long-term concentration gradients without vigorous bulk mixing.",
    "test": "Measure vertical concentration and mechanical power.",
    "against": "Gradients persist or apparent gains require substantial bulk stirring.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Sedimentation field rotation",
    "system": "magnetite water suspension",
    "id": 1225,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1225",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Oscillatory shear phase — magnetite water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For magnetite water suspension, synchronizing field maxima with low shear will increase cycle-averaged stiffness per field exposure.",
    "test": "Measure viscoelastic response across field-shear phase offsets.",
    "against": "No phase-dependent stiffness advantage is reproducible.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Oscillatory shear phase",
    "system": "magnetite water suspension",
    "id": 1226,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1226",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Field-free recovery geometry — magnetite water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For magnetite water suspension, wider gaps will recover baseline viscosity more slowly after field removal.",
    "test": "Compare rheology and chain breakup across gap widths.",
    "against": "Recovery is gap-independent after wall effects are measured.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Field-free recovery geometry",
    "system": "magnetite water suspension",
    "id": 1227,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1227",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Particle softness coupling — magnetite water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For magnetite water suspension, adding a small compatible soft-particle fraction will reduce brittle chain-collapse events.",
    "test": "Measure stress drops and structural rearrangements.",
    "against": "Collapse statistics do not change at matched overall solid fraction.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Particle softness coupling",
    "system": "magnetite water suspension",
    "id": 1228,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1228",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Magnetic gradient placement — magnetite water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For magnetite water suspension, placing a weak field gradient near the outlet will increase concentration fluctuations more than near the inlet.",
    "test": "Map concentration under reversed gradient placement.",
    "against": "Placement effects vanish after total particle retention is matched.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Magnetic gradient placement",
    "system": "magnetite water suspension",
    "id": 1229,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1229",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Small-signal structural probe — magnetite water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For magnetite water suspension, low-amplitude rheological probing will identify residual chains before mean viscosity changes significantly.",
    "test": "Compare probe response with microscopy after field cycling.",
    "against": "No earlier chain detection occurs at matched false-alarm rate.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Small-signal structural probe",
    "system": "magnetite water suspension",
    "id": 1230,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1230",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Field ramp order — magnetic-bead glycerol suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For magnetic-bead glycerol suspension, a slow field increase followed by rapid decrease will leave more residual structure than the reversed ramp order.",
    "test": "Measure rheology and particle structure after matched field exposure.",
    "against": "Residual structure is independent of ramp order.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Field ramp order",
    "system": "magnetic-bead glycerol suspension",
    "id": 1231,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1231",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Crosswise field pulses — magnetic-bead glycerol suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For magnetic-bead glycerol suspension, brief crosswise field pulses will accelerate breakup of flow-aligned chains.",
    "test": "Image chains and measure stress recovery at equal field energy.",
    "against": "Breakup and recovery are no faster than without crosswise pulses.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Crosswise field pulses",
    "system": "magnetic-bead glycerol suspension",
    "id": 1232,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1232",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Wall magnetic roughness — magnetic-bead glycerol suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For magnetic-bead glycerol suspension, weakly patterned magnetic walls will reduce shear localization relative to uniform walls.",
    "test": "Map velocity profiles and local particle concentration.",
    "against": "Localization is unchanged after wall slip is accounted for.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Wall magnetic roughness",
    "system": "magnetic-bead glycerol suspension",
    "id": 1233,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1233",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Chain age and yielding — magnetic-bead glycerol suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For magnetic-bead glycerol suspension, longer field-rest periods will broaden the distribution of initial yielding events.",
    "test": "Record stress fluctuations after controlled structure-building times.",
    "against": "Yield-event distributions do not broaden with structure age.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Chain age and yielding",
    "system": "magnetic-bead glycerol suspension",
    "id": 1234,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1234",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Sedimentation field rotation — magnetic-bead glycerol suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For magnetic-bead glycerol suspension, slow field rotation will reduce long-term concentration gradients without vigorous bulk mixing.",
    "test": "Measure vertical concentration and mechanical power.",
    "against": "Gradients persist or apparent gains require substantial bulk stirring.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Sedimentation field rotation",
    "system": "magnetic-bead glycerol suspension",
    "id": 1235,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1235",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Oscillatory shear phase — magnetic-bead glycerol suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For magnetic-bead glycerol suspension, synchronizing field maxima with low shear will increase cycle-averaged stiffness per field exposure.",
    "test": "Measure viscoelastic response across field-shear phase offsets.",
    "against": "No phase-dependent stiffness advantage is reproducible.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Oscillatory shear phase",
    "system": "magnetic-bead glycerol suspension",
    "id": 1236,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1236",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Field-free recovery geometry — magnetic-bead glycerol suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For magnetic-bead glycerol suspension, wider gaps will recover baseline viscosity more slowly after field removal.",
    "test": "Compare rheology and chain breakup across gap widths.",
    "against": "Recovery is gap-independent after wall effects are measured.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Field-free recovery geometry",
    "system": "magnetic-bead glycerol suspension",
    "id": 1237,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1237",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Particle softness coupling — magnetic-bead glycerol suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For magnetic-bead glycerol suspension, adding a small compatible soft-particle fraction will reduce brittle chain-collapse events.",
    "test": "Measure stress drops and structural rearrangements.",
    "against": "Collapse statistics do not change at matched overall solid fraction.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Particle softness coupling",
    "system": "magnetic-bead glycerol suspension",
    "id": 1238,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1238",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Magnetic gradient placement — magnetic-bead glycerol suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For magnetic-bead glycerol suspension, placing a weak field gradient near the outlet will increase concentration fluctuations more than near the inlet.",
    "test": "Map concentration under reversed gradient placement.",
    "against": "Placement effects vanish after total particle retention is matched.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Magnetic gradient placement",
    "system": "magnetic-bead glycerol suspension",
    "id": 1239,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1239",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Small-signal structural probe — magnetic-bead glycerol suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For magnetic-bead glycerol suspension, low-amplitude rheological probing will identify residual chains before mean viscosity changes significantly.",
    "test": "Compare probe response with microscopy after field cycling.",
    "against": "No earlier chain detection occurs at matched false-alarm rate.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Small-signal structural probe",
    "system": "magnetic-bead glycerol suspension",
    "id": 1240,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1240",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Field ramp order — iron-coated glass-bead oil suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For iron-coated glass-bead oil suspension, a slow field increase followed by rapid decrease will leave more residual structure than the reversed ramp order.",
    "test": "Measure rheology and particle structure after matched field exposure.",
    "against": "Residual structure is independent of ramp order.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Field ramp order",
    "system": "iron-coated glass-bead oil suspension",
    "id": 1241,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1241",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Crosswise field pulses — iron-coated glass-bead oil suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For iron-coated glass-bead oil suspension, brief crosswise field pulses will accelerate breakup of flow-aligned chains.",
    "test": "Image chains and measure stress recovery at equal field energy.",
    "against": "Breakup and recovery are no faster than without crosswise pulses.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Crosswise field pulses",
    "system": "iron-coated glass-bead oil suspension",
    "id": 1242,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1242",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Wall magnetic roughness — iron-coated glass-bead oil suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For iron-coated glass-bead oil suspension, weakly patterned magnetic walls will reduce shear localization relative to uniform walls.",
    "test": "Map velocity profiles and local particle concentration.",
    "against": "Localization is unchanged after wall slip is accounted for.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Wall magnetic roughness",
    "system": "iron-coated glass-bead oil suspension",
    "id": 1243,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1243",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Chain age and yielding — iron-coated glass-bead oil suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For iron-coated glass-bead oil suspension, longer field-rest periods will broaden the distribution of initial yielding events.",
    "test": "Record stress fluctuations after controlled structure-building times.",
    "against": "Yield-event distributions do not broaden with structure age.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Chain age and yielding",
    "system": "iron-coated glass-bead oil suspension",
    "id": 1244,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1244",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Sedimentation field rotation — iron-coated glass-bead oil suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For iron-coated glass-bead oil suspension, slow field rotation will reduce long-term concentration gradients without vigorous bulk mixing.",
    "test": "Measure vertical concentration and mechanical power.",
    "against": "Gradients persist or apparent gains require substantial bulk stirring.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Sedimentation field rotation",
    "system": "iron-coated glass-bead oil suspension",
    "id": 1245,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1245",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Oscillatory shear phase — iron-coated glass-bead oil suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For iron-coated glass-bead oil suspension, synchronizing field maxima with low shear will increase cycle-averaged stiffness per field exposure.",
    "test": "Measure viscoelastic response across field-shear phase offsets.",
    "against": "No phase-dependent stiffness advantage is reproducible.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Oscillatory shear phase",
    "system": "iron-coated glass-bead oil suspension",
    "id": 1246,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1246",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Field-free recovery geometry — iron-coated glass-bead oil suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For iron-coated glass-bead oil suspension, wider gaps will recover baseline viscosity more slowly after field removal.",
    "test": "Compare rheology and chain breakup across gap widths.",
    "against": "Recovery is gap-independent after wall effects are measured.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Field-free recovery geometry",
    "system": "iron-coated glass-bead oil suspension",
    "id": 1247,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1247",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Particle softness coupling — iron-coated glass-bead oil suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For iron-coated glass-bead oil suspension, adding a small compatible soft-particle fraction will reduce brittle chain-collapse events.",
    "test": "Measure stress drops and structural rearrangements.",
    "against": "Collapse statistics do not change at matched overall solid fraction.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Particle softness coupling",
    "system": "iron-coated glass-bead oil suspension",
    "id": 1248,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1248",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Magnetic gradient placement — iron-coated glass-bead oil suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For iron-coated glass-bead oil suspension, placing a weak field gradient near the outlet will increase concentration fluctuations more than near the inlet.",
    "test": "Map concentration under reversed gradient placement.",
    "against": "Placement effects vanish after total particle retention is matched.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Magnetic gradient placement",
    "system": "iron-coated glass-bead oil suspension",
    "id": 1249,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1249",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Small-signal structural probe — iron-coated glass-bead oil suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For iron-coated glass-bead oil suspension, low-amplitude rheological probing will identify residual chains before mean viscosity changes significantly.",
    "test": "Compare probe response with microscopy after field cycling.",
    "against": "No earlier chain detection occurs at matched false-alarm rate.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Small-signal structural probe",
    "system": "iron-coated glass-bead oil suspension",
    "id": 1250,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1250",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Field ramp order — magnetic cellulose-bead water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For magnetic cellulose-bead water suspension, a slow field increase followed by rapid decrease will leave more residual structure than the reversed ramp order.",
    "test": "Measure rheology and particle structure after matched field exposure.",
    "against": "Residual structure is independent of ramp order.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Field ramp order",
    "system": "magnetic cellulose-bead water suspension",
    "id": 1251,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1251",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Crosswise field pulses — magnetic cellulose-bead water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For magnetic cellulose-bead water suspension, brief crosswise field pulses will accelerate breakup of flow-aligned chains.",
    "test": "Image chains and measure stress recovery at equal field energy.",
    "against": "Breakup and recovery are no faster than without crosswise pulses.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Crosswise field pulses",
    "system": "magnetic cellulose-bead water suspension",
    "id": 1252,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1252",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Wall magnetic roughness — magnetic cellulose-bead water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For magnetic cellulose-bead water suspension, weakly patterned magnetic walls will reduce shear localization relative to uniform walls.",
    "test": "Map velocity profiles and local particle concentration.",
    "against": "Localization is unchanged after wall slip is accounted for.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Wall magnetic roughness",
    "system": "magnetic cellulose-bead water suspension",
    "id": 1253,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1253",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Chain age and yielding — magnetic cellulose-bead water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For magnetic cellulose-bead water suspension, longer field-rest periods will broaden the distribution of initial yielding events.",
    "test": "Record stress fluctuations after controlled structure-building times.",
    "against": "Yield-event distributions do not broaden with structure age.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Chain age and yielding",
    "system": "magnetic cellulose-bead water suspension",
    "id": 1254,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1254",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Sedimentation field rotation — magnetic cellulose-bead water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For magnetic cellulose-bead water suspension, slow field rotation will reduce long-term concentration gradients without vigorous bulk mixing.",
    "test": "Measure vertical concentration and mechanical power.",
    "against": "Gradients persist or apparent gains require substantial bulk stirring.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Sedimentation field rotation",
    "system": "magnetic cellulose-bead water suspension",
    "id": 1255,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1255",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Oscillatory shear phase — magnetic cellulose-bead water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For magnetic cellulose-bead water suspension, synchronizing field maxima with low shear will increase cycle-averaged stiffness per field exposure.",
    "test": "Measure viscoelastic response across field-shear phase offsets.",
    "against": "No phase-dependent stiffness advantage is reproducible.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Oscillatory shear phase",
    "system": "magnetic cellulose-bead water suspension",
    "id": 1256,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1256",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Field-free recovery geometry — magnetic cellulose-bead water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For magnetic cellulose-bead water suspension, wider gaps will recover baseline viscosity more slowly after field removal.",
    "test": "Compare rheology and chain breakup across gap widths.",
    "against": "Recovery is gap-independent after wall effects are measured.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Field-free recovery geometry",
    "system": "magnetic cellulose-bead water suspension",
    "id": 1257,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1257",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Particle softness coupling — magnetic cellulose-bead water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For magnetic cellulose-bead water suspension, adding a small compatible soft-particle fraction will reduce brittle chain-collapse events.",
    "test": "Measure stress drops and structural rearrangements.",
    "against": "Collapse statistics do not change at matched overall solid fraction.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Particle softness coupling",
    "system": "magnetic cellulose-bead water suspension",
    "id": 1258,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1258",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Magnetic gradient placement — magnetic cellulose-bead water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For magnetic cellulose-bead water suspension, placing a weak field gradient near the outlet will increase concentration fluctuations more than near the inlet.",
    "test": "Map concentration under reversed gradient placement.",
    "against": "Placement effects vanish after total particle retention is matched.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Magnetic gradient placement",
    "system": "magnetic cellulose-bead water suspension",
    "id": 1259,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1259",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Small-signal structural probe — magnetic cellulose-bead water suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For magnetic cellulose-bead water suspension, low-amplitude rheological probing will identify residual chains before mean viscosity changes significantly.",
    "test": "Compare probe response with microscopy after field cycling.",
    "against": "No earlier chain detection occurs at matched false-alarm rate.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Small-signal structural probe",
    "system": "magnetic cellulose-bead water suspension",
    "id": 1260,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1260",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Field ramp order — magnetite hydrogel-bead suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For magnetite hydrogel-bead suspension, a slow field increase followed by rapid decrease will leave more residual structure than the reversed ramp order.",
    "test": "Measure rheology and particle structure after matched field exposure.",
    "against": "Residual structure is independent of ramp order.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Field ramp order",
    "system": "magnetite hydrogel-bead suspension",
    "id": 1261,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 280,
    "literature_query": "Field ramp order magnetite hydrogel-bead suspension slow followed by rapid decrease leave residual experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1261",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Field ramp order — magnetite hydrogel-bead suspension",
      "hypothesis": "For magnetite hydrogel-bead suspension, a slow field increase followed by rapid decrease will leave more residual structure than the reversed ramp order.",
      "test": "Measure rheology and particle structure after matched field exposure.",
      "against": "Residual structure is independent of ramp order.",
      "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
      "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Field ramp order",
      "system": "magnetite hydrogel-bead suspension",
      "id": 1261,
      "access_score": 2,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 23,
      "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 280,
      "literature_query": "Field ramp order magnetite hydrogel-bead suspension slow followed by rapid decrease leave residual experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
      "source_lead_count": 6,
      "source_ids": "Se605665c2462;Sbe3cbe5c75ea;S6ed2ccd752a7;S29c70c8678e3;S0040209f10b5;S8062b96b5f8d",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Crosswise field pulses — magnetite hydrogel-bead suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For magnetite hydrogel-bead suspension, brief crosswise field pulses will accelerate breakup of flow-aligned chains.",
    "test": "Image chains and measure stress recovery at equal field energy.",
    "against": "Breakup and recovery are no faster than without crosswise pulses.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Crosswise field pulses",
    "system": "magnetite hydrogel-bead suspension",
    "id": 1262,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1262",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Wall magnetic roughness — magnetite hydrogel-bead suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For magnetite hydrogel-bead suspension, weakly patterned magnetic walls will reduce shear localization relative to uniform walls.",
    "test": "Map velocity profiles and local particle concentration.",
    "against": "Localization is unchanged after wall slip is accounted for.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Wall magnetic roughness",
    "system": "magnetite hydrogel-bead suspension",
    "id": 1263,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 281,
    "literature_query": "Wall magnetic roughness magnetite hydrogel-bead suspension weakly patterned walls shear localization to uniform experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1263",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Wall magnetic roughness — magnetite hydrogel-bead suspension",
      "hypothesis": "For magnetite hydrogel-bead suspension, weakly patterned magnetic walls will reduce shear localization relative to uniform walls.",
      "test": "Map velocity profiles and local particle concentration.",
      "against": "Localization is unchanged after wall slip is accounted for.",
      "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
      "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Wall magnetic roughness",
      "system": "magnetite hydrogel-bead suspension",
      "id": 1263,
      "access_score": 2,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 23,
      "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 281,
      "literature_query": "Wall magnetic roughness magnetite hydrogel-bead suspension weakly patterned walls shear localization to uniform experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
      "source_lead_count": 6,
      "source_ids": "Sf720f4567891;Seee814fb1b6a;S35656d9b7d48;Sdcd70008a8b0;S9653861c807b;S4c31e93775c1",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Chain age and yielding — magnetite hydrogel-bead suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For magnetite hydrogel-bead suspension, longer field-rest periods will broaden the distribution of initial yielding events.",
    "test": "Record stress fluctuations after controlled structure-building times.",
    "against": "Yield-event distributions do not broaden with structure age.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Chain age and yielding",
    "system": "magnetite hydrogel-bead suspension",
    "id": 1264,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 282,
    "literature_query": "Chain age yielding magnetite hydrogel-bead suspension longer field-rest periods broaden distribution of initial experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1264",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Chain age and yielding — magnetite hydrogel-bead suspension",
      "hypothesis": "For magnetite hydrogel-bead suspension, longer field-rest periods will broaden the distribution of initial yielding events.",
      "test": "Record stress fluctuations after controlled structure-building times.",
      "against": "Yield-event distributions do not broaden with structure age.",
      "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
      "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Chain age and yielding",
      "system": "magnetite hydrogel-bead suspension",
      "id": 1264,
      "access_score": 2,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 23,
      "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 282,
      "literature_query": "Chain age yielding magnetite hydrogel-bead suspension longer field-rest periods broaden distribution of initial experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
      "source_lead_count": 7,
      "source_ids": "S404165e30eb2;S4c31e93775c1;S1b9ca995387a;S8087db72d37d;S62cd32c34bc3;Scf0406423317;S6b8bc1241c9d",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Sedimentation field rotation — magnetite hydrogel-bead suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For magnetite hydrogel-bead suspension, slow field rotation will reduce long-term concentration gradients without vigorous bulk mixing.",
    "test": "Measure vertical concentration and mechanical power.",
    "against": "Gradients persist or apparent gains require substantial bulk stirring.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Sedimentation field rotation",
    "system": "magnetite hydrogel-bead suspension",
    "id": 1265,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 283,
    "literature_query": "Sedimentation field rotation magnetite hydrogel-bead suspension slow long-term concentration gradients vigorous bulk mixing experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1265",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Sedimentation field rotation — magnetite hydrogel-bead suspension",
      "hypothesis": "For magnetite hydrogel-bead suspension, slow field rotation will reduce long-term concentration gradients without vigorous bulk mixing.",
      "test": "Measure vertical concentration and mechanical power.",
      "against": "Gradients persist or apparent gains require substantial bulk stirring.",
      "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
      "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Sedimentation field rotation",
      "system": "magnetite hydrogel-bead suspension",
      "id": 1265,
      "access_score": 2,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 23,
      "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 283,
      "literature_query": "Sedimentation field rotation magnetite hydrogel-bead suspension slow long-term concentration gradients vigorous bulk mixing experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
      "source_lead_count": 5,
      "source_ids": "Se1038edbe49a;S35656d9b7d48;S9b8bbd477d5d;S6e2fc17291bf;Sf632c9276021",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Oscillatory shear phase — magnetite hydrogel-bead suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For magnetite hydrogel-bead suspension, synchronizing field maxima with low shear will increase cycle-averaged stiffness per field exposure.",
    "test": "Measure viscoelastic response across field-shear phase offsets.",
    "against": "No phase-dependent stiffness advantage is reproducible.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Oscillatory shear phase",
    "system": "magnetite hydrogel-bead suspension",
    "id": 1266,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 284,
    "literature_query": "Oscillatory shear phase magnetite hydrogel-bead suspension synchronizing field maxima low cycle-averaged stiffness per experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1266",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Oscillatory shear phase — magnetite hydrogel-bead suspension",
      "hypothesis": "For magnetite hydrogel-bead suspension, synchronizing field maxima with low shear will increase cycle-averaged stiffness per field exposure.",
      "test": "Measure viscoelastic response across field-shear phase offsets.",
      "against": "No phase-dependent stiffness advantage is reproducible.",
      "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
      "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Oscillatory shear phase",
      "system": "magnetite hydrogel-bead suspension",
      "id": 1266,
      "access_score": 2,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 23,
      "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 284,
      "literature_query": "Oscillatory shear phase magnetite hydrogel-bead suspension synchronizing field maxima low cycle-averaged stiffness per experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
      "source_lead_count": 7,
      "source_ids": "S9e9a9a531830;S0040209f10b5;Sb1770c866dd2;S7fb5b1cafa13;Se8094cd2438b;Seee814fb1b6a;S1e6a62fbc9a4",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Field-free recovery geometry — magnetite hydrogel-bead suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For magnetite hydrogel-bead suspension, wider gaps will recover baseline viscosity more slowly after field removal.",
    "test": "Compare rheology and chain breakup across gap widths.",
    "against": "Recovery is gap-independent after wall effects are measured.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Field-free recovery geometry",
    "system": "magnetite hydrogel-bead suspension",
    "id": 1267,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 285,
    "literature_query": "Field-free recovery geometry magnetite hydrogel-bead suspension wider gaps recover baseline viscosity slowly field experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1267",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Field-free recovery geometry — magnetite hydrogel-bead suspension",
      "hypothesis": "For magnetite hydrogel-bead suspension, wider gaps will recover baseline viscosity more slowly after field removal.",
      "test": "Compare rheology and chain breakup across gap widths.",
      "against": "Recovery is gap-independent after wall effects are measured.",
      "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
      "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Field-free recovery geometry",
      "system": "magnetite hydrogel-bead suspension",
      "id": 1267,
      "access_score": 2,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 23,
      "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 285,
      "literature_query": "Field-free recovery geometry magnetite hydrogel-bead suspension wider gaps recover baseline viscosity slowly field experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
      "source_lead_count": 6,
      "source_ids": "S35656d9b7d48;Sb73af39345ce;S4d38ac810af0;S1b9ca995387a;S271f05ad5377;S8de09a8d7291",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Particle softness coupling — magnetite hydrogel-bead suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For magnetite hydrogel-bead suspension, adding a small compatible soft-particle fraction will reduce brittle chain-collapse events.",
    "test": "Measure stress drops and structural rearrangements.",
    "against": "Collapse statistics do not change at matched overall solid fraction.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Particle softness coupling",
    "system": "magnetite hydrogel-bead suspension",
    "id": 1268,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 286,
    "literature_query": "Particle softness coupling magnetite hydrogel-bead suspension adding compatible soft-particle fraction brittle chain-collapse events experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1268",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Particle softness coupling — magnetite hydrogel-bead suspension",
      "hypothesis": "For magnetite hydrogel-bead suspension, adding a small compatible soft-particle fraction will reduce brittle chain-collapse events.",
      "test": "Measure stress drops and structural rearrangements.",
      "against": "Collapse statistics do not change at matched overall solid fraction.",
      "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
      "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Particle softness coupling",
      "system": "magnetite hydrogel-bead suspension",
      "id": 1268,
      "access_score": 2,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 23,
      "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 286,
      "literature_query": "Particle softness coupling magnetite hydrogel-bead suspension adding compatible soft-particle fraction brittle chain-collapse events experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
      "source_lead_count": 7,
      "source_ids": "Seee814fb1b6a;S9fc5f2d313b0;S711556020976;Se605665c2462;S2725b77339ca;Sb35daf21b558;S0040209f10b5",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Magnetic gradient placement — magnetite hydrogel-bead suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For magnetite hydrogel-bead suspension, placing a weak field gradient near the outlet will increase concentration fluctuations more than near the inlet.",
    "test": "Map concentration under reversed gradient placement.",
    "against": "Placement effects vanish after total particle retention is matched.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Magnetic gradient placement",
    "system": "magnetite hydrogel-bead suspension",
    "id": 1269,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 287,
    "literature_query": "Magnetic gradient placement magnetite hydrogel-bead suspension placing weak field near outlet concentration fluctuations experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1269",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Magnetic gradient placement — magnetite hydrogel-bead suspension",
      "hypothesis": "For magnetite hydrogel-bead suspension, placing a weak field gradient near the outlet will increase concentration fluctuations more than near the inlet.",
      "test": "Map concentration under reversed gradient placement.",
      "against": "Placement effects vanish after total particle retention is matched.",
      "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
      "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Magnetic gradient placement",
      "system": "magnetite hydrogel-bead suspension",
      "id": 1269,
      "access_score": 2,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 23,
      "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 287,
      "literature_query": "Magnetic gradient placement magnetite hydrogel-bead suspension placing weak field near outlet concentration fluctuations experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
      "source_lead_count": 8,
      "source_ids": "S0fa150c08e59;Se3b11f2dfff7;S35656d9b7d48;S12acfa9c3399;S13808fc31975;S6ed2ccd752a7;S722c419fa931;S85947a61df52",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Small-signal structural probe — magnetite hydrogel-bead suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For magnetite hydrogel-bead suspension, low-amplitude rheological probing will identify residual chains before mean viscosity changes significantly.",
    "test": "Compare probe response with microscopy after field cycling.",
    "against": "No earlier chain detection occurs at matched false-alarm rate.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Small-signal structural probe",
    "system": "magnetite hydrogel-bead suspension",
    "id": 1270,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 288,
    "literature_query": "Small-signal structural probe magnetite hydrogel-bead suspension low-amplitude rheological probing identify residual chains mean experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1270",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Small-signal structural probe — magnetite hydrogel-bead suspension",
      "hypothesis": "For magnetite hydrogel-bead suspension, low-amplitude rheological probing will identify residual chains before mean viscosity changes significantly.",
      "test": "Compare probe response with microscopy after field cycling.",
      "against": "No earlier chain detection occurs at matched false-alarm rate.",
      "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
      "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Small-signal structural probe",
      "system": "magnetite hydrogel-bead suspension",
      "id": 1270,
      "access_score": 2,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 23,
      "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 288,
      "literature_query": "Small-signal structural probe magnetite hydrogel-bead suspension low-amplitude rheological probing identify residual chains mean experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
      "source_lead_count": 7,
      "source_ids": "Sd32ad91fb623;S320ab96ea4a5;S6e8ed68f9476;S255bd3a7180c;S1e6a62fbc9a4;S20486defd777;S0040209f10b5",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Field ramp order — iron-particle grease",
    "hypothesis": "For iron-particle grease, a slow field increase followed by rapid decrease will leave more residual structure than the reversed ramp order.",
    "test": "Measure rheology and particle structure after matched field exposure.",
    "against": "Residual structure is independent of ramp order.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Field ramp order",
    "system": "iron-particle grease",
    "id": 1271,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1271",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Crosswise field pulses — iron-particle grease",
    "hypothesis": "For iron-particle grease, brief crosswise field pulses will accelerate breakup of flow-aligned chains.",
    "test": "Image chains and measure stress recovery at equal field energy.",
    "against": "Breakup and recovery are no faster than without crosswise pulses.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Crosswise field pulses",
    "system": "iron-particle grease",
    "id": 1272,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1272",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Wall magnetic roughness — iron-particle grease",
    "hypothesis": "For iron-particle grease, weakly patterned magnetic walls will reduce shear localization relative to uniform walls.",
    "test": "Map velocity profiles and local particle concentration.",
    "against": "Localization is unchanged after wall slip is accounted for.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Wall magnetic roughness",
    "system": "iron-particle grease",
    "id": 1273,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1273",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Chain age and yielding — iron-particle grease",
    "hypothesis": "For iron-particle grease, longer field-rest periods will broaden the distribution of initial yielding events.",
    "test": "Record stress fluctuations after controlled structure-building times.",
    "against": "Yield-event distributions do not broaden with structure age.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Chain age and yielding",
    "system": "iron-particle grease",
    "id": 1274,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1274",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Sedimentation field rotation — iron-particle grease",
    "hypothesis": "For iron-particle grease, slow field rotation will reduce long-term concentration gradients without vigorous bulk mixing.",
    "test": "Measure vertical concentration and mechanical power.",
    "against": "Gradients persist or apparent gains require substantial bulk stirring.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Sedimentation field rotation",
    "system": "iron-particle grease",
    "id": 1275,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1275",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Oscillatory shear phase — iron-particle grease",
    "hypothesis": "For iron-particle grease, synchronizing field maxima with low shear will increase cycle-averaged stiffness per field exposure.",
    "test": "Measure viscoelastic response across field-shear phase offsets.",
    "against": "No phase-dependent stiffness advantage is reproducible.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Oscillatory shear phase",
    "system": "iron-particle grease",
    "id": 1276,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1276",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Field-free recovery geometry — iron-particle grease",
    "hypothesis": "For iron-particle grease, wider gaps will recover baseline viscosity more slowly after field removal.",
    "test": "Compare rheology and chain breakup across gap widths.",
    "against": "Recovery is gap-independent after wall effects are measured.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Field-free recovery geometry",
    "system": "iron-particle grease",
    "id": 1277,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1277",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Particle softness coupling — iron-particle grease",
    "hypothesis": "For iron-particle grease, adding a small compatible soft-particle fraction will reduce brittle chain-collapse events.",
    "test": "Measure stress drops and structural rearrangements.",
    "against": "Collapse statistics do not change at matched overall solid fraction.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Particle softness coupling",
    "system": "iron-particle grease",
    "id": 1278,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1278",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Magnetic gradient placement — iron-particle grease",
    "hypothesis": "For iron-particle grease, placing a weak field gradient near the outlet will increase concentration fluctuations more than near the inlet.",
    "test": "Map concentration under reversed gradient placement.",
    "against": "Placement effects vanish after total particle retention is matched.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Magnetic gradient placement",
    "system": "iron-particle grease",
    "id": 1279,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1279",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Small-signal structural probe — iron-particle grease",
    "hypothesis": "For iron-particle grease, low-amplitude rheological probing will identify residual chains before mean viscosity changes significantly.",
    "test": "Compare probe response with microscopy after field cycling.",
    "against": "No earlier chain detection occurs at matched false-alarm rate.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Small-signal structural probe",
    "system": "iron-particle grease",
    "id": 1280,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1280",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Field ramp order — magnetic polymer-microsphere suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For magnetic polymer-microsphere suspension, a slow field increase followed by rapid decrease will leave more residual structure than the reversed ramp order.",
    "test": "Measure rheology and particle structure after matched field exposure.",
    "against": "Residual structure is independent of ramp order.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Field ramp order",
    "system": "magnetic polymer-microsphere suspension",
    "id": 1281,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1281",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Crosswise field pulses — magnetic polymer-microsphere suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For magnetic polymer-microsphere suspension, brief crosswise field pulses will accelerate breakup of flow-aligned chains.",
    "test": "Image chains and measure stress recovery at equal field energy.",
    "against": "Breakup and recovery are no faster than without crosswise pulses.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Crosswise field pulses",
    "system": "magnetic polymer-microsphere suspension",
    "id": 1282,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1282",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Wall magnetic roughness — magnetic polymer-microsphere suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For magnetic polymer-microsphere suspension, weakly patterned magnetic walls will reduce shear localization relative to uniform walls.",
    "test": "Map velocity profiles and local particle concentration.",
    "against": "Localization is unchanged after wall slip is accounted for.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Wall magnetic roughness",
    "system": "magnetic polymer-microsphere suspension",
    "id": 1283,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1283",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Chain age and yielding — magnetic polymer-microsphere suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For magnetic polymer-microsphere suspension, longer field-rest periods will broaden the distribution of initial yielding events.",
    "test": "Record stress fluctuations after controlled structure-building times.",
    "against": "Yield-event distributions do not broaden with structure age.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Chain age and yielding",
    "system": "magnetic polymer-microsphere suspension",
    "id": 1284,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1284",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Sedimentation field rotation — magnetic polymer-microsphere suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For magnetic polymer-microsphere suspension, slow field rotation will reduce long-term concentration gradients without vigorous bulk mixing.",
    "test": "Measure vertical concentration and mechanical power.",
    "against": "Gradients persist or apparent gains require substantial bulk stirring.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Sedimentation field rotation",
    "system": "magnetic polymer-microsphere suspension",
    "id": 1285,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1285",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Oscillatory shear phase — magnetic polymer-microsphere suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For magnetic polymer-microsphere suspension, synchronizing field maxima with low shear will increase cycle-averaged stiffness per field exposure.",
    "test": "Measure viscoelastic response across field-shear phase offsets.",
    "against": "No phase-dependent stiffness advantage is reproducible.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Oscillatory shear phase",
    "system": "magnetic polymer-microsphere suspension",
    "id": 1286,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1286",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Field-free recovery geometry — magnetic polymer-microsphere suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For magnetic polymer-microsphere suspension, wider gaps will recover baseline viscosity more slowly after field removal.",
    "test": "Compare rheology and chain breakup across gap widths.",
    "against": "Recovery is gap-independent after wall effects are measured.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Field-free recovery geometry",
    "system": "magnetic polymer-microsphere suspension",
    "id": 1287,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1287",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Particle softness coupling — magnetic polymer-microsphere suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For magnetic polymer-microsphere suspension, adding a small compatible soft-particle fraction will reduce brittle chain-collapse events.",
    "test": "Measure stress drops and structural rearrangements.",
    "against": "Collapse statistics do not change at matched overall solid fraction.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Particle softness coupling",
    "system": "magnetic polymer-microsphere suspension",
    "id": 1288,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1288",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Magnetic gradient placement — magnetic polymer-microsphere suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For magnetic polymer-microsphere suspension, placing a weak field gradient near the outlet will increase concentration fluctuations more than near the inlet.",
    "test": "Map concentration under reversed gradient placement.",
    "against": "Placement effects vanish after total particle retention is matched.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Magnetic gradient placement",
    "system": "magnetic polymer-microsphere suspension",
    "id": 1289,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1289",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Small-signal structural probe — magnetic polymer-microsphere suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For magnetic polymer-microsphere suspension, low-amplitude rheological probing will identify residual chains before mean viscosity changes significantly.",
    "test": "Compare probe response with microscopy after field cycling.",
    "against": "No earlier chain detection occurs at matched false-alarm rate.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Small-signal structural probe",
    "system": "magnetic polymer-microsphere suspension",
    "id": 1290,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1290",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Field ramp order — magnetite-coated silica suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For magnetite-coated silica suspension, a slow field increase followed by rapid decrease will leave more residual structure than the reversed ramp order.",
    "test": "Measure rheology and particle structure after matched field exposure.",
    "against": "Residual structure is independent of ramp order.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Field ramp order",
    "system": "magnetite-coated silica suspension",
    "id": 1291,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1291",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Crosswise field pulses — magnetite-coated silica suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For magnetite-coated silica suspension, brief crosswise field pulses will accelerate breakup of flow-aligned chains.",
    "test": "Image chains and measure stress recovery at equal field energy.",
    "against": "Breakup and recovery are no faster than without crosswise pulses.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Crosswise field pulses",
    "system": "magnetite-coated silica suspension",
    "id": 1292,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1292",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Wall magnetic roughness — magnetite-coated silica suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For magnetite-coated silica suspension, weakly patterned magnetic walls will reduce shear localization relative to uniform walls.",
    "test": "Map velocity profiles and local particle concentration.",
    "against": "Localization is unchanged after wall slip is accounted for.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Wall magnetic roughness",
    "system": "magnetite-coated silica suspension",
    "id": 1293,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1293",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Chain age and yielding — magnetite-coated silica suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For magnetite-coated silica suspension, longer field-rest periods will broaden the distribution of initial yielding events.",
    "test": "Record stress fluctuations after controlled structure-building times.",
    "against": "Yield-event distributions do not broaden with structure age.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Chain age and yielding",
    "system": "magnetite-coated silica suspension",
    "id": 1294,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1294",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Sedimentation field rotation — magnetite-coated silica suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For magnetite-coated silica suspension, slow field rotation will reduce long-term concentration gradients without vigorous bulk mixing.",
    "test": "Measure vertical concentration and mechanical power.",
    "against": "Gradients persist or apparent gains require substantial bulk stirring.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Sedimentation field rotation",
    "system": "magnetite-coated silica suspension",
    "id": 1295,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1295",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Oscillatory shear phase — magnetite-coated silica suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For magnetite-coated silica suspension, synchronizing field maxima with low shear will increase cycle-averaged stiffness per field exposure.",
    "test": "Measure viscoelastic response across field-shear phase offsets.",
    "against": "No phase-dependent stiffness advantage is reproducible.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Oscillatory shear phase",
    "system": "magnetite-coated silica suspension",
    "id": 1296,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1296",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Field-free recovery geometry — magnetite-coated silica suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For magnetite-coated silica suspension, wider gaps will recover baseline viscosity more slowly after field removal.",
    "test": "Compare rheology and chain breakup across gap widths.",
    "against": "Recovery is gap-independent after wall effects are measured.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Field-free recovery geometry",
    "system": "magnetite-coated silica suspension",
    "id": 1297,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1297",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Particle softness coupling — magnetite-coated silica suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For magnetite-coated silica suspension, adding a small compatible soft-particle fraction will reduce brittle chain-collapse events.",
    "test": "Measure stress drops and structural rearrangements.",
    "against": "Collapse statistics do not change at matched overall solid fraction.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Particle softness coupling",
    "system": "magnetite-coated silica suspension",
    "id": 1298,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1298",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Magnetic gradient placement — magnetite-coated silica suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For magnetite-coated silica suspension, placing a weak field gradient near the outlet will increase concentration fluctuations more than near the inlet.",
    "test": "Map concentration under reversed gradient placement.",
    "against": "Placement effects vanish after total particle retention is matched.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Magnetic gradient placement",
    "system": "magnetite-coated silica suspension",
    "id": 1299,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1299",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Small-signal structural probe — magnetite-coated silica suspension",
    "hypothesis": "For magnetite-coated silica suspension, low-amplitude rheological probing will identify residual chains before mean viscosity changes significantly.",
    "test": "Compare probe response with microscopy after field cycling.",
    "against": "No earlier chain detection occurs at matched false-alarm rate.",
    "category": "Magnetic-particle rheology",
    "controls": "Particle loading, size distribution, carrier viscosity, magnetic field, temperature, and actual shear history. Use enclosed compatible suspensions.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Magnetic-particle rheology: Small-signal structural probe",
    "system": "magnetite-coated silica suspension",
    "id": 1300,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible magnetic suspension, calibrated electromagnet, rheometer or force measurement, microscopy, and temperature control.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1300",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pulse grouping — water droplet on silica-coated piezoelectric substrate",
    "hypothesis": "For water droplet on silica-coated piezoelectric substrate, grouped short acoustic pulses will reduce heating per net transported distance.",
    "test": "Measure droplet displacement and temperature for matched travel tasks.",
    "against": "Heating is no lower once delivered acoustic energy is included.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Pulse grouping",
    "system": "water droplet on silica-coated piezoelectric substrate",
    "id": 1301,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1301",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Opposed beam timing — water droplet on silica-coated piezoelectric substrate",
    "hypothesis": "For water droplet on silica-coated piezoelectric substrate, alternating opposed beams will improve internal mixing while limiting net motion.",
    "test": "Map tracer mixing and droplet center position.",
    "against": "Mixing gains require proportionate extra translation or heating.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Opposed beam timing",
    "system": "water droplet on silica-coated piezoelectric substrate",
    "id": 1302,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1302",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Contact footprint rotation — water droplet on silica-coated piezoelectric substrate",
    "hypothesis": "For water droplet on silica-coated piezoelectric substrate, rotating an elongated footprint relative to propagation will shift the movement threshold.",
    "test": "Measure threshold power at several verified footprint angles.",
    "against": "Threshold is angle-independent after contact-line length is included.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Contact footprint rotation",
    "system": "water droplet on silica-coated piezoelectric substrate",
    "id": 1303,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1303",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Frequency hopping — water droplet on silica-coated piezoelectric substrate",
    "hypothesis": "For water droplet on silica-coated piezoelectric substrate, switching among nearby acoustic frequencies will reduce persistent unmixed regions.",
    "test": "Image tracer concentration at equal input energy and duration.",
    "against": "Residual unmixed volume is no lower than single-frequency control.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Frequency hopping",
    "system": "water droplet on silica-coated piezoelectric substrate",
    "id": 1304,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1304",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Rest interval pinning — water droplet on silica-coated piezoelectric substrate",
    "hypothesis": "For water droplet on silica-coated piezoelectric substrate, longer rests between pulses will increase restart power when contact-line aging dominates.",
    "test": "Measure restart thresholds and line motion across rest times.",
    "against": "Restart power does not depend on rest after evaporation is corrected.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Rest interval pinning",
    "system": "water droplet on silica-coated piezoelectric substrate",
    "id": 1305,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1305",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Subthreshold conditioning — water droplet on silica-coated piezoelectric substrate",
    "hypothesis": "For water droplet on silica-coated piezoelectric substrate, weak acoustic conditioning will reduce variability of the next transport event.",
    "test": "Compare displacement distributions after conditioning and silent controls.",
    "against": "Variability is unchanged at matched temperature and volume.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Subthreshold conditioning",
    "system": "water droplet on silica-coated piezoelectric substrate",
    "id": 1306,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1306",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Two-drop collision control — water droplet on silica-coated piezoelectric substrate",
    "hypothesis": "For water droplet on silica-coated piezoelectric substrate, staggered acoustic pulses will narrow collision-position variability of matched droplet pairs.",
    "test": "Track pair trajectories and collision positions.",
    "against": "Position variance is not reduced after launch timing is controlled.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Two-drop collision control",
    "system": "water droplet on silica-coated piezoelectric substrate",
    "id": 1307,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1307",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Acoustic reflection guard — water droplet on silica-coated piezoelectric substrate",
    "hypothesis": "For water droplet on silica-coated piezoelectric substrate, an absorbing boundary will reduce trajectory curvature caused by reflected waves.",
    "test": "Map acoustic fields and droplet paths with matched boundaries.",
    "against": "Curvature persists independently of reflected-wave amplitude.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Acoustic reflection guard",
    "system": "water droplet on silica-coated piezoelectric substrate",
    "id": 1308,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1308",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Evaporation compensation — water droplet on silica-coated piezoelectric substrate",
    "hypothesis": "For water droplet on silica-coated piezoelectric substrate, adjusting pulse duration using optically measured volume will stabilize transport distance during slow evaporation.",
    "test": "Compare calibrated adaptive and fixed schedules on held-out runs.",
    "against": "Distance error is no lower after equal sensing time is counted.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Evaporation compensation",
    "system": "water droplet on silica-coated piezoelectric substrate",
    "id": 1309,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1309",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Vertical motion precursor — water droplet on silica-coated piezoelectric substrate",
    "hypothesis": "For water droplet on silica-coated piezoelectric substrate, increased vertical shape oscillation will precede irregular horizontal transport.",
    "test": "Measure three-dimensional droplet motion across increasing acoustic power.",
    "against": "Vertical oscillations provide no advance warning of trajectory errors.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Vertical motion precursor",
    "system": "water droplet on silica-coated piezoelectric substrate",
    "id": 1310,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1310",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pulse grouping — glycerol-water droplet on piezoelectric substrate",
    "hypothesis": "For glycerol-water droplet on piezoelectric substrate, grouped short acoustic pulses will reduce heating per net transported distance.",
    "test": "Measure droplet displacement and temperature for matched travel tasks.",
    "against": "Heating is no lower once delivered acoustic energy is included.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Pulse grouping",
    "system": "glycerol-water droplet on piezoelectric substrate",
    "id": 1311,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1311",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Opposed beam timing — glycerol-water droplet on piezoelectric substrate",
    "hypothesis": "For glycerol-water droplet on piezoelectric substrate, alternating opposed beams will improve internal mixing while limiting net motion.",
    "test": "Map tracer mixing and droplet center position.",
    "against": "Mixing gains require proportionate extra translation or heating.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Opposed beam timing",
    "system": "glycerol-water droplet on piezoelectric substrate",
    "id": 1312,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1312",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Contact footprint rotation — glycerol-water droplet on piezoelectric substrate",
    "hypothesis": "For glycerol-water droplet on piezoelectric substrate, rotating an elongated footprint relative to propagation will shift the movement threshold.",
    "test": "Measure threshold power at several verified footprint angles.",
    "against": "Threshold is angle-independent after contact-line length is included.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Contact footprint rotation",
    "system": "glycerol-water droplet on piezoelectric substrate",
    "id": 1313,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1313",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Frequency hopping — glycerol-water droplet on piezoelectric substrate",
    "hypothesis": "For glycerol-water droplet on piezoelectric substrate, switching among nearby acoustic frequencies will reduce persistent unmixed regions.",
    "test": "Image tracer concentration at equal input energy and duration.",
    "against": "Residual unmixed volume is no lower than single-frequency control.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Frequency hopping",
    "system": "glycerol-water droplet on piezoelectric substrate",
    "id": 1314,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1314",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Rest interval pinning — glycerol-water droplet on piezoelectric substrate",
    "hypothesis": "For glycerol-water droplet on piezoelectric substrate, longer rests between pulses will increase restart power when contact-line aging dominates.",
    "test": "Measure restart thresholds and line motion across rest times.",
    "against": "Restart power does not depend on rest after evaporation is corrected.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Rest interval pinning",
    "system": "glycerol-water droplet on piezoelectric substrate",
    "id": 1315,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1315",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Subthreshold conditioning — glycerol-water droplet on piezoelectric substrate",
    "hypothesis": "For glycerol-water droplet on piezoelectric substrate, weak acoustic conditioning will reduce variability of the next transport event.",
    "test": "Compare displacement distributions after conditioning and silent controls.",
    "against": "Variability is unchanged at matched temperature and volume.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Subthreshold conditioning",
    "system": "glycerol-water droplet on piezoelectric substrate",
    "id": 1316,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1316",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Two-drop collision control — glycerol-water droplet on piezoelectric substrate",
    "hypothesis": "For glycerol-water droplet on piezoelectric substrate, staggered acoustic pulses will narrow collision-position variability of matched droplet pairs.",
    "test": "Track pair trajectories and collision positions.",
    "against": "Position variance is not reduced after launch timing is controlled.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Two-drop collision control",
    "system": "glycerol-water droplet on piezoelectric substrate",
    "id": 1317,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1317",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Acoustic reflection guard — glycerol-water droplet on piezoelectric substrate",
    "hypothesis": "For glycerol-water droplet on piezoelectric substrate, an absorbing boundary will reduce trajectory curvature caused by reflected waves.",
    "test": "Map acoustic fields and droplet paths with matched boundaries.",
    "against": "Curvature persists independently of reflected-wave amplitude.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Acoustic reflection guard",
    "system": "glycerol-water droplet on piezoelectric substrate",
    "id": 1318,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1318",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Evaporation compensation — glycerol-water droplet on piezoelectric substrate",
    "hypothesis": "For glycerol-water droplet on piezoelectric substrate, adjusting pulse duration using optically measured volume will stabilize transport distance during slow evaporation.",
    "test": "Compare calibrated adaptive and fixed schedules on held-out runs.",
    "against": "Distance error is no lower after equal sensing time is counted.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Evaporation compensation",
    "system": "glycerol-water droplet on piezoelectric substrate",
    "id": 1319,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1319",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Vertical motion precursor — glycerol-water droplet on piezoelectric substrate",
    "hypothesis": "For glycerol-water droplet on piezoelectric substrate, increased vertical shape oscillation will precede irregular horizontal transport.",
    "test": "Measure three-dimensional droplet motion across increasing acoustic power.",
    "against": "Vertical oscillations provide no advance warning of trajectory errors.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Vertical motion precursor",
    "system": "glycerol-water droplet on piezoelectric substrate",
    "id": 1320,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1320",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pulse grouping — saline droplet on protected piezoelectric substrate",
    "hypothesis": "For saline droplet on protected piezoelectric substrate, grouped short acoustic pulses will reduce heating per net transported distance.",
    "test": "Measure droplet displacement and temperature for matched travel tasks.",
    "against": "Heating is no lower once delivered acoustic energy is included.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Pulse grouping",
    "system": "saline droplet on protected piezoelectric substrate",
    "id": 1321,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1321",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Opposed beam timing — saline droplet on protected piezoelectric substrate",
    "hypothesis": "For saline droplet on protected piezoelectric substrate, alternating opposed beams will improve internal mixing while limiting net motion.",
    "test": "Map tracer mixing and droplet center position.",
    "against": "Mixing gains require proportionate extra translation or heating.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Opposed beam timing",
    "system": "saline droplet on protected piezoelectric substrate",
    "id": 1322,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1322",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Contact footprint rotation — saline droplet on protected piezoelectric substrate",
    "hypothesis": "For saline droplet on protected piezoelectric substrate, rotating an elongated footprint relative to propagation will shift the movement threshold.",
    "test": "Measure threshold power at several verified footprint angles.",
    "against": "Threshold is angle-independent after contact-line length is included.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Contact footprint rotation",
    "system": "saline droplet on protected piezoelectric substrate",
    "id": 1323,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1323",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Frequency hopping — saline droplet on protected piezoelectric substrate",
    "hypothesis": "For saline droplet on protected piezoelectric substrate, switching among nearby acoustic frequencies will reduce persistent unmixed regions.",
    "test": "Image tracer concentration at equal input energy and duration.",
    "against": "Residual unmixed volume is no lower than single-frequency control.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Frequency hopping",
    "system": "saline droplet on protected piezoelectric substrate",
    "id": 1324,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1324",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Rest interval pinning — saline droplet on protected piezoelectric substrate",
    "hypothesis": "For saline droplet on protected piezoelectric substrate, longer rests between pulses will increase restart power when contact-line aging dominates.",
    "test": "Measure restart thresholds and line motion across rest times.",
    "against": "Restart power does not depend on rest after evaporation is corrected.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Rest interval pinning",
    "system": "saline droplet on protected piezoelectric substrate",
    "id": 1325,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1325",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Subthreshold conditioning — saline droplet on protected piezoelectric substrate",
    "hypothesis": "For saline droplet on protected piezoelectric substrate, weak acoustic conditioning will reduce variability of the next transport event.",
    "test": "Compare displacement distributions after conditioning and silent controls.",
    "against": "Variability is unchanged at matched temperature and volume.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Subthreshold conditioning",
    "system": "saline droplet on protected piezoelectric substrate",
    "id": 1326,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1326",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Two-drop collision control — saline droplet on protected piezoelectric substrate",
    "hypothesis": "For saline droplet on protected piezoelectric substrate, staggered acoustic pulses will narrow collision-position variability of matched droplet pairs.",
    "test": "Track pair trajectories and collision positions.",
    "against": "Position variance is not reduced after launch timing is controlled.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Two-drop collision control",
    "system": "saline droplet on protected piezoelectric substrate",
    "id": 1327,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1327",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Acoustic reflection guard — saline droplet on protected piezoelectric substrate",
    "hypothesis": "For saline droplet on protected piezoelectric substrate, an absorbing boundary will reduce trajectory curvature caused by reflected waves.",
    "test": "Map acoustic fields and droplet paths with matched boundaries.",
    "against": "Curvature persists independently of reflected-wave amplitude.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Acoustic reflection guard",
    "system": "saline droplet on protected piezoelectric substrate",
    "id": 1328,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1328",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Evaporation compensation — saline droplet on protected piezoelectric substrate",
    "hypothesis": "For saline droplet on protected piezoelectric substrate, adjusting pulse duration using optically measured volume will stabilize transport distance during slow evaporation.",
    "test": "Compare calibrated adaptive and fixed schedules on held-out runs.",
    "against": "Distance error is no lower after equal sensing time is counted.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Evaporation compensation",
    "system": "saline droplet on protected piezoelectric substrate",
    "id": 1329,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1329",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Vertical motion precursor — saline droplet on protected piezoelectric substrate",
    "hypothesis": "For saline droplet on protected piezoelectric substrate, increased vertical shape oscillation will precede irregular horizontal transport.",
    "test": "Measure three-dimensional droplet motion across increasing acoustic power.",
    "against": "Vertical oscillations provide no advance warning of trajectory errors.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Vertical motion precursor",
    "system": "saline droplet on protected piezoelectric substrate",
    "id": 1330,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1330",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pulse grouping — sucrose-water droplet on piezoelectric substrate",
    "hypothesis": "For sucrose-water droplet on piezoelectric substrate, grouped short acoustic pulses will reduce heating per net transported distance.",
    "test": "Measure droplet displacement and temperature for matched travel tasks.",
    "against": "Heating is no lower once delivered acoustic energy is included.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Pulse grouping",
    "system": "sucrose-water droplet on piezoelectric substrate",
    "id": 1331,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1331",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Opposed beam timing — sucrose-water droplet on piezoelectric substrate",
    "hypothesis": "For sucrose-water droplet on piezoelectric substrate, alternating opposed beams will improve internal mixing while limiting net motion.",
    "test": "Map tracer mixing and droplet center position.",
    "against": "Mixing gains require proportionate extra translation or heating.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Opposed beam timing",
    "system": "sucrose-water droplet on piezoelectric substrate",
    "id": 1332,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1332",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Contact footprint rotation — sucrose-water droplet on piezoelectric substrate",
    "hypothesis": "For sucrose-water droplet on piezoelectric substrate, rotating an elongated footprint relative to propagation will shift the movement threshold.",
    "test": "Measure threshold power at several verified footprint angles.",
    "against": "Threshold is angle-independent after contact-line length is included.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Contact footprint rotation",
    "system": "sucrose-water droplet on piezoelectric substrate",
    "id": 1333,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1333",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Frequency hopping — sucrose-water droplet on piezoelectric substrate",
    "hypothesis": "For sucrose-water droplet on piezoelectric substrate, switching among nearby acoustic frequencies will reduce persistent unmixed regions.",
    "test": "Image tracer concentration at equal input energy and duration.",
    "against": "Residual unmixed volume is no lower than single-frequency control.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Frequency hopping",
    "system": "sucrose-water droplet on piezoelectric substrate",
    "id": 1334,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1334",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Rest interval pinning — sucrose-water droplet on piezoelectric substrate",
    "hypothesis": "For sucrose-water droplet on piezoelectric substrate, longer rests between pulses will increase restart power when contact-line aging dominates.",
    "test": "Measure restart thresholds and line motion across rest times.",
    "against": "Restart power does not depend on rest after evaporation is corrected.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Rest interval pinning",
    "system": "sucrose-water droplet on piezoelectric substrate",
    "id": 1335,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1335",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Subthreshold conditioning — sucrose-water droplet on piezoelectric substrate",
    "hypothesis": "For sucrose-water droplet on piezoelectric substrate, weak acoustic conditioning will reduce variability of the next transport event.",
    "test": "Compare displacement distributions after conditioning and silent controls.",
    "against": "Variability is unchanged at matched temperature and volume.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Subthreshold conditioning",
    "system": "sucrose-water droplet on piezoelectric substrate",
    "id": 1336,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1336",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Two-drop collision control — sucrose-water droplet on piezoelectric substrate",
    "hypothesis": "For sucrose-water droplet on piezoelectric substrate, staggered acoustic pulses will narrow collision-position variability of matched droplet pairs.",
    "test": "Track pair trajectories and collision positions.",
    "against": "Position variance is not reduced after launch timing is controlled.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Two-drop collision control",
    "system": "sucrose-water droplet on piezoelectric substrate",
    "id": 1337,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1337",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Acoustic reflection guard — sucrose-water droplet on piezoelectric substrate",
    "hypothesis": "For sucrose-water droplet on piezoelectric substrate, an absorbing boundary will reduce trajectory curvature caused by reflected waves.",
    "test": "Map acoustic fields and droplet paths with matched boundaries.",
    "against": "Curvature persists independently of reflected-wave amplitude.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Acoustic reflection guard",
    "system": "sucrose-water droplet on piezoelectric substrate",
    "id": 1338,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1338",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Evaporation compensation — sucrose-water droplet on piezoelectric substrate",
    "hypothesis": "For sucrose-water droplet on piezoelectric substrate, adjusting pulse duration using optically measured volume will stabilize transport distance during slow evaporation.",
    "test": "Compare calibrated adaptive and fixed schedules on held-out runs.",
    "against": "Distance error is no lower after equal sensing time is counted.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Evaporation compensation",
    "system": "sucrose-water droplet on piezoelectric substrate",
    "id": 1339,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1339",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Vertical motion precursor — sucrose-water droplet on piezoelectric substrate",
    "hypothesis": "For sucrose-water droplet on piezoelectric substrate, increased vertical shape oscillation will precede irregular horizontal transport.",
    "test": "Measure three-dimensional droplet motion across increasing acoustic power.",
    "against": "Vertical oscillations provide no advance warning of trajectory errors.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Vertical motion precursor",
    "system": "sucrose-water droplet on piezoelectric substrate",
    "id": 1340,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1340",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pulse grouping — buffer droplet on protected piezoelectric substrate",
    "hypothesis": "For buffer droplet on protected piezoelectric substrate, grouped short acoustic pulses will reduce heating per net transported distance.",
    "test": "Measure droplet displacement and temperature for matched travel tasks.",
    "against": "Heating is no lower once delivered acoustic energy is included.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Pulse grouping",
    "system": "buffer droplet on protected piezoelectric substrate",
    "id": 1341,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1341",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Opposed beam timing — buffer droplet on protected piezoelectric substrate",
    "hypothesis": "For buffer droplet on protected piezoelectric substrate, alternating opposed beams will improve internal mixing while limiting net motion.",
    "test": "Map tracer mixing and droplet center position.",
    "against": "Mixing gains require proportionate extra translation or heating.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Opposed beam timing",
    "system": "buffer droplet on protected piezoelectric substrate",
    "id": 1342,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1342",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Contact footprint rotation — buffer droplet on protected piezoelectric substrate",
    "hypothesis": "For buffer droplet on protected piezoelectric substrate, rotating an elongated footprint relative to propagation will shift the movement threshold.",
    "test": "Measure threshold power at several verified footprint angles.",
    "against": "Threshold is angle-independent after contact-line length is included.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Contact footprint rotation",
    "system": "buffer droplet on protected piezoelectric substrate",
    "id": 1343,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1343",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Frequency hopping — buffer droplet on protected piezoelectric substrate",
    "hypothesis": "For buffer droplet on protected piezoelectric substrate, switching among nearby acoustic frequencies will reduce persistent unmixed regions.",
    "test": "Image tracer concentration at equal input energy and duration.",
    "against": "Residual unmixed volume is no lower than single-frequency control.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Frequency hopping",
    "system": "buffer droplet on protected piezoelectric substrate",
    "id": 1344,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1344",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Rest interval pinning — buffer droplet on protected piezoelectric substrate",
    "hypothesis": "For buffer droplet on protected piezoelectric substrate, longer rests between pulses will increase restart power when contact-line aging dominates.",
    "test": "Measure restart thresholds and line motion across rest times.",
    "against": "Restart power does not depend on rest after evaporation is corrected.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Rest interval pinning",
    "system": "buffer droplet on protected piezoelectric substrate",
    "id": 1345,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1345",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Subthreshold conditioning — buffer droplet on protected piezoelectric substrate",
    "hypothesis": "For buffer droplet on protected piezoelectric substrate, weak acoustic conditioning will reduce variability of the next transport event.",
    "test": "Compare displacement distributions after conditioning and silent controls.",
    "against": "Variability is unchanged at matched temperature and volume.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Subthreshold conditioning",
    "system": "buffer droplet on protected piezoelectric substrate",
    "id": 1346,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1346",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Two-drop collision control — buffer droplet on protected piezoelectric substrate",
    "hypothesis": "For buffer droplet on protected piezoelectric substrate, staggered acoustic pulses will narrow collision-position variability of matched droplet pairs.",
    "test": "Track pair trajectories and collision positions.",
    "against": "Position variance is not reduced after launch timing is controlled.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Two-drop collision control",
    "system": "buffer droplet on protected piezoelectric substrate",
    "id": 1347,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1347",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Acoustic reflection guard — buffer droplet on protected piezoelectric substrate",
    "hypothesis": "For buffer droplet on protected piezoelectric substrate, an absorbing boundary will reduce trajectory curvature caused by reflected waves.",
    "test": "Map acoustic fields and droplet paths with matched boundaries.",
    "against": "Curvature persists independently of reflected-wave amplitude.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Acoustic reflection guard",
    "system": "buffer droplet on protected piezoelectric substrate",
    "id": 1348,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1348",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Evaporation compensation — buffer droplet on protected piezoelectric substrate",
    "hypothesis": "For buffer droplet on protected piezoelectric substrate, adjusting pulse duration using optically measured volume will stabilize transport distance during slow evaporation.",
    "test": "Compare calibrated adaptive and fixed schedules on held-out runs.",
    "against": "Distance error is no lower after equal sensing time is counted.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Evaporation compensation",
    "system": "buffer droplet on protected piezoelectric substrate",
    "id": 1349,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1349",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Vertical motion precursor — buffer droplet on protected piezoelectric substrate",
    "hypothesis": "For buffer droplet on protected piezoelectric substrate, increased vertical shape oscillation will precede irregular horizontal transport.",
    "test": "Measure three-dimensional droplet motion across increasing acoustic power.",
    "against": "Vertical oscillations provide no advance warning of trajectory errors.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Vertical motion precursor",
    "system": "buffer droplet on protected piezoelectric substrate",
    "id": 1350,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1350",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pulse grouping — water droplet on fluoropolymer-coated acoustic chip",
    "hypothesis": "For water droplet on fluoropolymer-coated acoustic chip, grouped short acoustic pulses will reduce heating per net transported distance.",
    "test": "Measure droplet displacement and temperature for matched travel tasks.",
    "against": "Heating is no lower once delivered acoustic energy is included.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Pulse grouping",
    "system": "water droplet on fluoropolymer-coated acoustic chip",
    "id": 1351,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "specialist research facility",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 290,
    "literature_query": "Pulse grouping water droplet on fluoropolymer-coated acoustic chip grouped short pulses heating per experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1351",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Pulse grouping — water droplet on fluoropolymer-coated acoustic chip",
      "hypothesis": "For water droplet on fluoropolymer-coated acoustic chip, grouped short acoustic pulses will reduce heating per net transported distance.",
      "test": "Measure droplet displacement and temperature for matched travel tasks.",
      "against": "Heating is no lower once delivered acoustic energy is included.",
      "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
      "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Pulse grouping",
      "system": "water droplet on fluoropolymer-coated acoustic chip",
      "id": 1351,
      "access_score": 1,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "resource_class": "specialist research facility",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 290,
      "literature_query": "Pulse grouping water droplet on fluoropolymer-coated acoustic chip grouped short pulses heating per experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
      "source_lead_count": 6,
      "source_ids": "S2368c3101cec;Sc84bde9285d0;S6d3139e8d0a4;S3313fbcb4efe;Sf75f4f3415cc;Scb04cd2a628d",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Opposed beam timing — water droplet on fluoropolymer-coated acoustic chip",
    "hypothesis": "For water droplet on fluoropolymer-coated acoustic chip, alternating opposed beams will improve internal mixing while limiting net motion.",
    "test": "Map tracer mixing and droplet center position.",
    "against": "Mixing gains require proportionate extra translation or heating.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Opposed beam timing",
    "system": "water droplet on fluoropolymer-coated acoustic chip",
    "id": 1352,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1352",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Contact footprint rotation — water droplet on fluoropolymer-coated acoustic chip",
    "hypothesis": "For water droplet on fluoropolymer-coated acoustic chip, rotating an elongated footprint relative to propagation will shift the movement threshold.",
    "test": "Measure threshold power at several verified footprint angles.",
    "against": "Threshold is angle-independent after contact-line length is included.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Contact footprint rotation",
    "system": "water droplet on fluoropolymer-coated acoustic chip",
    "id": 1353,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "specialist research facility",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 291,
    "literature_query": "Contact footprint rotation water droplet on fluoropolymer-coated acoustic chip rotating an elongated to experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1353",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Contact footprint rotation — water droplet on fluoropolymer-coated acoustic chip",
      "hypothesis": "For water droplet on fluoropolymer-coated acoustic chip, rotating an elongated footprint relative to propagation will shift the movement threshold.",
      "test": "Measure threshold power at several verified footprint angles.",
      "against": "Threshold is angle-independent after contact-line length is included.",
      "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
      "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Contact footprint rotation",
      "system": "water droplet on fluoropolymer-coated acoustic chip",
      "id": 1353,
      "access_score": 1,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "resource_class": "specialist research facility",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 291,
      "literature_query": "Contact footprint rotation water droplet on fluoropolymer-coated acoustic chip rotating an elongated to experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
      "source_lead_count": 6,
      "source_ids": "S1c0ea97366fa;S0068e980800b;S013d5f4d37b0;Saec5e13a40b5;Sea18fc06689c;S15ebeb0c54c1",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Frequency hopping — water droplet on fluoropolymer-coated acoustic chip",
    "hypothesis": "For water droplet on fluoropolymer-coated acoustic chip, switching among nearby acoustic frequencies will reduce persistent unmixed regions.",
    "test": "Image tracer concentration at equal input energy and duration.",
    "against": "Residual unmixed volume is no lower than single-frequency control.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Frequency hopping",
    "system": "water droplet on fluoropolymer-coated acoustic chip",
    "id": 1354,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "specialist research facility",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 292,
    "literature_query": "Frequency hopping water droplet on fluoropolymer-coated acoustic chip switching among nearby frequencies persistent experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1354",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Frequency hopping — water droplet on fluoropolymer-coated acoustic chip",
      "hypothesis": "For water droplet on fluoropolymer-coated acoustic chip, switching among nearby acoustic frequencies will reduce persistent unmixed regions.",
      "test": "Image tracer concentration at equal input energy and duration.",
      "against": "Residual unmixed volume is no lower than single-frequency control.",
      "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
      "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Frequency hopping",
      "system": "water droplet on fluoropolymer-coated acoustic chip",
      "id": 1354,
      "access_score": 1,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "resource_class": "specialist research facility",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 292,
      "literature_query": "Frequency hopping water droplet on fluoropolymer-coated acoustic chip switching among nearby frequencies persistent experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
      "source_lead_count": 6,
      "source_ids": "S4c8ecd15236c;S951e76c5c812;S087b6c517b96;S44b20725d454;Sab693a833764;S097916f2ac7d",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Rest interval pinning — water droplet on fluoropolymer-coated acoustic chip",
    "hypothesis": "For water droplet on fluoropolymer-coated acoustic chip, longer rests between pulses will increase restart power when contact-line aging dominates.",
    "test": "Measure restart thresholds and line motion across rest times.",
    "against": "Restart power does not depend on rest after evaporation is corrected.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Rest interval pinning",
    "system": "water droplet on fluoropolymer-coated acoustic chip",
    "id": 1355,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "specialist research facility",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 293,
    "literature_query": "Rest interval pinning water droplet on fluoropolymer-coated acoustic chip longer rests pulses restart experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1355",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Rest interval pinning — water droplet on fluoropolymer-coated acoustic chip",
      "hypothesis": "For water droplet on fluoropolymer-coated acoustic chip, longer rests between pulses will increase restart power when contact-line aging dominates.",
      "test": "Measure restart thresholds and line motion across rest times.",
      "against": "Restart power does not depend on rest after evaporation is corrected.",
      "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
      "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Rest interval pinning",
      "system": "water droplet on fluoropolymer-coated acoustic chip",
      "id": 1355,
      "access_score": 1,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "resource_class": "specialist research facility",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 293,
      "literature_query": "Rest interval pinning water droplet on fluoropolymer-coated acoustic chip longer rests pulses restart experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
      "source_lead_count": 6,
      "source_ids": "S6b6b583b8e06;Se3a6e0512fbb;Sf5137dcc7e8a;Sbaf9c00bbdf5;S9ccb410a9822;S287f3b67c1ec",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Subthreshold conditioning — water droplet on fluoropolymer-coated acoustic chip",
    "hypothesis": "For water droplet on fluoropolymer-coated acoustic chip, weak acoustic conditioning will reduce variability of the next transport event.",
    "test": "Compare displacement distributions after conditioning and silent controls.",
    "against": "Variability is unchanged at matched temperature and volume.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Subthreshold conditioning",
    "system": "water droplet on fluoropolymer-coated acoustic chip",
    "id": 1356,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "specialist research facility",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 294,
    "literature_query": "Subthreshold conditioning water droplet on fluoropolymer-coated acoustic chip weak variability of next transport experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1356",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Subthreshold conditioning — water droplet on fluoropolymer-coated acoustic chip",
      "hypothesis": "For water droplet on fluoropolymer-coated acoustic chip, weak acoustic conditioning will reduce variability of the next transport event.",
      "test": "Compare displacement distributions after conditioning and silent controls.",
      "against": "Variability is unchanged at matched temperature and volume.",
      "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
      "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Subthreshold conditioning",
      "system": "water droplet on fluoropolymer-coated acoustic chip",
      "id": 1356,
      "access_score": 1,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "resource_class": "specialist research facility",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 294,
      "literature_query": "Subthreshold conditioning water droplet on fluoropolymer-coated acoustic chip weak variability of next transport experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
      "source_lead_count": 6,
      "source_ids": "S1e0d358344e9;S7fe7bacaa271;Sfd27da1d4f57;S455ee5bd5d38;S40a88910fce5;S5e741833de3b",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Two-drop collision control — water droplet on fluoropolymer-coated acoustic chip",
    "hypothesis": "For water droplet on fluoropolymer-coated acoustic chip, staggered acoustic pulses will narrow collision-position variability of matched droplet pairs.",
    "test": "Track pair trajectories and collision positions.",
    "against": "Position variance is not reduced after launch timing is controlled.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Two-drop collision control",
    "system": "water droplet on fluoropolymer-coated acoustic chip",
    "id": 1357,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "specialist research facility",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 295,
    "literature_query": "Two-drop collision control water droplet on fluoropolymer-coated acoustic chip staggered pulses narrow collision-position experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1357",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Two-drop collision control — water droplet on fluoropolymer-coated acoustic chip",
      "hypothesis": "For water droplet on fluoropolymer-coated acoustic chip, staggered acoustic pulses will narrow collision-position variability of matched droplet pairs.",
      "test": "Track pair trajectories and collision positions.",
      "against": "Position variance is not reduced after launch timing is controlled.",
      "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
      "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Two-drop collision control",
      "system": "water droplet on fluoropolymer-coated acoustic chip",
      "id": 1357,
      "access_score": 1,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "resource_class": "specialist research facility",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 295,
      "literature_query": "Two-drop collision control water droplet on fluoropolymer-coated acoustic chip staggered pulses narrow collision-position experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
      "source_lead_count": 5,
      "source_ids": "S1f854fea06d4;Sc5d9e7694744;Scf931e9f115a;S31e284dd66e3;Sab65e19748a7",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Acoustic reflection guard — water droplet on fluoropolymer-coated acoustic chip",
    "hypothesis": "For water droplet on fluoropolymer-coated acoustic chip, an absorbing boundary will reduce trajectory curvature caused by reflected waves.",
    "test": "Map acoustic fields and droplet paths with matched boundaries.",
    "against": "Curvature persists independently of reflected-wave amplitude.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Acoustic reflection guard",
    "system": "water droplet on fluoropolymer-coated acoustic chip",
    "id": 1358,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "specialist research facility",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 296,
    "literature_query": "Acoustic reflection guard water droplet on fluoropolymer-coated chip an absorbing boundary trajectory curvature experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1358",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Acoustic reflection guard — water droplet on fluoropolymer-coated acoustic chip",
      "hypothesis": "For water droplet on fluoropolymer-coated acoustic chip, an absorbing boundary will reduce trajectory curvature caused by reflected waves.",
      "test": "Map acoustic fields and droplet paths with matched boundaries.",
      "against": "Curvature persists independently of reflected-wave amplitude.",
      "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
      "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Acoustic reflection guard",
      "system": "water droplet on fluoropolymer-coated acoustic chip",
      "id": 1358,
      "access_score": 1,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "resource_class": "specialist research facility",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 296,
      "literature_query": "Acoustic reflection guard water droplet on fluoropolymer-coated chip an absorbing boundary trajectory curvature experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
      "source_lead_count": 4,
      "source_ids": "S80f2edc6595a;Sdf34d712d3cb;S9a8bfc932832;S4c99906b7e6f",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Evaporation compensation — water droplet on fluoropolymer-coated acoustic chip",
    "hypothesis": "For water droplet on fluoropolymer-coated acoustic chip, adjusting pulse duration using optically measured volume will stabilize transport distance during slow evaporation.",
    "test": "Compare calibrated adaptive and fixed schedules on held-out runs.",
    "against": "Distance error is no lower after equal sensing time is counted.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Evaporation compensation",
    "system": "water droplet on fluoropolymer-coated acoustic chip",
    "id": 1359,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "specialist research facility",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 297,
    "literature_query": "Evaporation compensation water droplet on fluoropolymer-coated acoustic chip adjusting pulse duration using optically experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1359",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Evaporation compensation — water droplet on fluoropolymer-coated acoustic chip",
      "hypothesis": "For water droplet on fluoropolymer-coated acoustic chip, adjusting pulse duration using optically measured volume will stabilize transport distance during slow evaporation.",
      "test": "Compare calibrated adaptive and fixed schedules on held-out runs.",
      "against": "Distance error is no lower after equal sensing time is counted.",
      "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
      "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Evaporation compensation",
      "system": "water droplet on fluoropolymer-coated acoustic chip",
      "id": 1359,
      "access_score": 1,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "resource_class": "specialist research facility",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 297,
      "literature_query": "Evaporation compensation water droplet on fluoropolymer-coated acoustic chip adjusting pulse duration using optically experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
      "source_lead_count": 6,
      "source_ids": "S3eaaec82efa8;Se3a6e0512fbb;Sc84bde9285d0;Sd9022b84bd84;Scb04cd2a628d;S69fdfbc64e7d",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Vertical motion precursor — water droplet on fluoropolymer-coated acoustic chip",
    "hypothesis": "For water droplet on fluoropolymer-coated acoustic chip, increased vertical shape oscillation will precede irregular horizontal transport.",
    "test": "Measure three-dimensional droplet motion across increasing acoustic power.",
    "against": "Vertical oscillations provide no advance warning of trajectory errors.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Vertical motion precursor",
    "system": "water droplet on fluoropolymer-coated acoustic chip",
    "id": 1360,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "specialist research facility",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 298,
    "literature_query": "Vertical motion precursor water droplet on fluoropolymer-coated acoustic chip increased shape oscillation precede experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1360",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Vertical motion precursor — water droplet on fluoropolymer-coated acoustic chip",
      "hypothesis": "For water droplet on fluoropolymer-coated acoustic chip, increased vertical shape oscillation will precede irregular horizontal transport.",
      "test": "Measure three-dimensional droplet motion across increasing acoustic power.",
      "against": "Vertical oscillations provide no advance warning of trajectory errors.",
      "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
      "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Vertical motion precursor",
      "system": "water droplet on fluoropolymer-coated acoustic chip",
      "id": 1360,
      "access_score": 1,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "resource_class": "specialist research facility",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 298,
      "literature_query": "Vertical motion precursor water droplet on fluoropolymer-coated acoustic chip increased shape oscillation precede experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
      "source_lead_count": 4,
      "source_ids": "S6fcde07281c1;S5939bc75b01a;S5ad04dbebf96;Sea372ae815b5",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pulse grouping — water droplet on polymer-coated acoustic chip",
    "hypothesis": "For water droplet on polymer-coated acoustic chip, grouped short acoustic pulses will reduce heating per net transported distance.",
    "test": "Measure droplet displacement and temperature for matched travel tasks.",
    "against": "Heating is no lower once delivered acoustic energy is included.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Pulse grouping",
    "system": "water droplet on polymer-coated acoustic chip",
    "id": 1361,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1361",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Opposed beam timing — water droplet on polymer-coated acoustic chip",
    "hypothesis": "For water droplet on polymer-coated acoustic chip, alternating opposed beams will improve internal mixing while limiting net motion.",
    "test": "Map tracer mixing and droplet center position.",
    "against": "Mixing gains require proportionate extra translation or heating.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Opposed beam timing",
    "system": "water droplet on polymer-coated acoustic chip",
    "id": 1362,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1362",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Contact footprint rotation — water droplet on polymer-coated acoustic chip",
    "hypothesis": "For water droplet on polymer-coated acoustic chip, rotating an elongated footprint relative to propagation will shift the movement threshold.",
    "test": "Measure threshold power at several verified footprint angles.",
    "against": "Threshold is angle-independent after contact-line length is included.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Contact footprint rotation",
    "system": "water droplet on polymer-coated acoustic chip",
    "id": 1363,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1363",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Frequency hopping — water droplet on polymer-coated acoustic chip",
    "hypothesis": "For water droplet on polymer-coated acoustic chip, switching among nearby acoustic frequencies will reduce persistent unmixed regions.",
    "test": "Image tracer concentration at equal input energy and duration.",
    "against": "Residual unmixed volume is no lower than single-frequency control.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Frequency hopping",
    "system": "water droplet on polymer-coated acoustic chip",
    "id": 1364,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1364",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Rest interval pinning — water droplet on polymer-coated acoustic chip",
    "hypothesis": "For water droplet on polymer-coated acoustic chip, longer rests between pulses will increase restart power when contact-line aging dominates.",
    "test": "Measure restart thresholds and line motion across rest times.",
    "against": "Restart power does not depend on rest after evaporation is corrected.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Rest interval pinning",
    "system": "water droplet on polymer-coated acoustic chip",
    "id": 1365,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1365",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Subthreshold conditioning — water droplet on polymer-coated acoustic chip",
    "hypothesis": "For water droplet on polymer-coated acoustic chip, weak acoustic conditioning will reduce variability of the next transport event.",
    "test": "Compare displacement distributions after conditioning and silent controls.",
    "against": "Variability is unchanged at matched temperature and volume.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Subthreshold conditioning",
    "system": "water droplet on polymer-coated acoustic chip",
    "id": 1366,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1366",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Two-drop collision control — water droplet on polymer-coated acoustic chip",
    "hypothesis": "For water droplet on polymer-coated acoustic chip, staggered acoustic pulses will narrow collision-position variability of matched droplet pairs.",
    "test": "Track pair trajectories and collision positions.",
    "against": "Position variance is not reduced after launch timing is controlled.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Two-drop collision control",
    "system": "water droplet on polymer-coated acoustic chip",
    "id": 1367,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1367",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Acoustic reflection guard — water droplet on polymer-coated acoustic chip",
    "hypothesis": "For water droplet on polymer-coated acoustic chip, an absorbing boundary will reduce trajectory curvature caused by reflected waves.",
    "test": "Map acoustic fields and droplet paths with matched boundaries.",
    "against": "Curvature persists independently of reflected-wave amplitude.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Acoustic reflection guard",
    "system": "water droplet on polymer-coated acoustic chip",
    "id": 1368,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1368",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Evaporation compensation — water droplet on polymer-coated acoustic chip",
    "hypothesis": "For water droplet on polymer-coated acoustic chip, adjusting pulse duration using optically measured volume will stabilize transport distance during slow evaporation.",
    "test": "Compare calibrated adaptive and fixed schedules on held-out runs.",
    "against": "Distance error is no lower after equal sensing time is counted.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Evaporation compensation",
    "system": "water droplet on polymer-coated acoustic chip",
    "id": 1369,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1369",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Vertical motion precursor — water droplet on polymer-coated acoustic chip",
    "hypothesis": "For water droplet on polymer-coated acoustic chip, increased vertical shape oscillation will precede irregular horizontal transport.",
    "test": "Measure three-dimensional droplet motion across increasing acoustic power.",
    "against": "Vertical oscillations provide no advance warning of trajectory errors.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Vertical motion precursor",
    "system": "water droplet on polymer-coated acoustic chip",
    "id": 1370,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1370",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pulse grouping — water droplet on grooved acoustic chip",
    "hypothesis": "For water droplet on grooved acoustic chip, grouped short acoustic pulses will reduce heating per net transported distance.",
    "test": "Measure droplet displacement and temperature for matched travel tasks.",
    "against": "Heating is no lower once delivered acoustic energy is included.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Pulse grouping",
    "system": "water droplet on grooved acoustic chip",
    "id": 1371,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1371",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Opposed beam timing — water droplet on grooved acoustic chip",
    "hypothesis": "For water droplet on grooved acoustic chip, alternating opposed beams will improve internal mixing while limiting net motion.",
    "test": "Map tracer mixing and droplet center position.",
    "against": "Mixing gains require proportionate extra translation or heating.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Opposed beam timing",
    "system": "water droplet on grooved acoustic chip",
    "id": 1372,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1372",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Contact footprint rotation — water droplet on grooved acoustic chip",
    "hypothesis": "For water droplet on grooved acoustic chip, rotating an elongated footprint relative to propagation will shift the movement threshold.",
    "test": "Measure threshold power at several verified footprint angles.",
    "against": "Threshold is angle-independent after contact-line length is included.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Contact footprint rotation",
    "system": "water droplet on grooved acoustic chip",
    "id": 1373,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1373",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Frequency hopping — water droplet on grooved acoustic chip",
    "hypothesis": "For water droplet on grooved acoustic chip, switching among nearby acoustic frequencies will reduce persistent unmixed regions.",
    "test": "Image tracer concentration at equal input energy and duration.",
    "against": "Residual unmixed volume is no lower than single-frequency control.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Frequency hopping",
    "system": "water droplet on grooved acoustic chip",
    "id": 1374,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1374",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Rest interval pinning — water droplet on grooved acoustic chip",
    "hypothesis": "For water droplet on grooved acoustic chip, longer rests between pulses will increase restart power when contact-line aging dominates.",
    "test": "Measure restart thresholds and line motion across rest times.",
    "against": "Restart power does not depend on rest after evaporation is corrected.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Rest interval pinning",
    "system": "water droplet on grooved acoustic chip",
    "id": 1375,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1375",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Subthreshold conditioning — water droplet on grooved acoustic chip",
    "hypothesis": "For water droplet on grooved acoustic chip, weak acoustic conditioning will reduce variability of the next transport event.",
    "test": "Compare displacement distributions after conditioning and silent controls.",
    "against": "Variability is unchanged at matched temperature and volume.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Subthreshold conditioning",
    "system": "water droplet on grooved acoustic chip",
    "id": 1376,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1376",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Two-drop collision control — water droplet on grooved acoustic chip",
    "hypothesis": "For water droplet on grooved acoustic chip, staggered acoustic pulses will narrow collision-position variability of matched droplet pairs.",
    "test": "Track pair trajectories and collision positions.",
    "against": "Position variance is not reduced after launch timing is controlled.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Two-drop collision control",
    "system": "water droplet on grooved acoustic chip",
    "id": 1377,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1377",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Acoustic reflection guard — water droplet on grooved acoustic chip",
    "hypothesis": "For water droplet on grooved acoustic chip, an absorbing boundary will reduce trajectory curvature caused by reflected waves.",
    "test": "Map acoustic fields and droplet paths with matched boundaries.",
    "against": "Curvature persists independently of reflected-wave amplitude.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Acoustic reflection guard",
    "system": "water droplet on grooved acoustic chip",
    "id": 1378,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1378",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Evaporation compensation — water droplet on grooved acoustic chip",
    "hypothesis": "For water droplet on grooved acoustic chip, adjusting pulse duration using optically measured volume will stabilize transport distance during slow evaporation.",
    "test": "Compare calibrated adaptive and fixed schedules on held-out runs.",
    "against": "Distance error is no lower after equal sensing time is counted.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Evaporation compensation",
    "system": "water droplet on grooved acoustic chip",
    "id": 1379,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1379",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Vertical motion precursor — water droplet on grooved acoustic chip",
    "hypothesis": "For water droplet on grooved acoustic chip, increased vertical shape oscillation will precede irregular horizontal transport.",
    "test": "Measure three-dimensional droplet motion across increasing acoustic power.",
    "against": "Vertical oscillations provide no advance warning of trajectory errors.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Vertical motion precursor",
    "system": "water droplet on grooved acoustic chip",
    "id": 1380,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1380",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pulse grouping — water droplet on patterned-wettability acoustic chip",
    "hypothesis": "For water droplet on patterned-wettability acoustic chip, grouped short acoustic pulses will reduce heating per net transported distance.",
    "test": "Measure droplet displacement and temperature for matched travel tasks.",
    "against": "Heating is no lower once delivered acoustic energy is included.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Pulse grouping",
    "system": "water droplet on patterned-wettability acoustic chip",
    "id": 1381,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1381",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Opposed beam timing — water droplet on patterned-wettability acoustic chip",
    "hypothesis": "For water droplet on patterned-wettability acoustic chip, alternating opposed beams will improve internal mixing while limiting net motion.",
    "test": "Map tracer mixing and droplet center position.",
    "against": "Mixing gains require proportionate extra translation or heating.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Opposed beam timing",
    "system": "water droplet on patterned-wettability acoustic chip",
    "id": 1382,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1382",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Contact footprint rotation — water droplet on patterned-wettability acoustic chip",
    "hypothesis": "For water droplet on patterned-wettability acoustic chip, rotating an elongated footprint relative to propagation will shift the movement threshold.",
    "test": "Measure threshold power at several verified footprint angles.",
    "against": "Threshold is angle-independent after contact-line length is included.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Contact footprint rotation",
    "system": "water droplet on patterned-wettability acoustic chip",
    "id": 1383,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1383",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Frequency hopping — water droplet on patterned-wettability acoustic chip",
    "hypothesis": "For water droplet on patterned-wettability acoustic chip, switching among nearby acoustic frequencies will reduce persistent unmixed regions.",
    "test": "Image tracer concentration at equal input energy and duration.",
    "against": "Residual unmixed volume is no lower than single-frequency control.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Frequency hopping",
    "system": "water droplet on patterned-wettability acoustic chip",
    "id": 1384,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1384",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Rest interval pinning — water droplet on patterned-wettability acoustic chip",
    "hypothesis": "For water droplet on patterned-wettability acoustic chip, longer rests between pulses will increase restart power when contact-line aging dominates.",
    "test": "Measure restart thresholds and line motion across rest times.",
    "against": "Restart power does not depend on rest after evaporation is corrected.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Rest interval pinning",
    "system": "water droplet on patterned-wettability acoustic chip",
    "id": 1385,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1385",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Subthreshold conditioning — water droplet on patterned-wettability acoustic chip",
    "hypothesis": "For water droplet on patterned-wettability acoustic chip, weak acoustic conditioning will reduce variability of the next transport event.",
    "test": "Compare displacement distributions after conditioning and silent controls.",
    "against": "Variability is unchanged at matched temperature and volume.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Subthreshold conditioning",
    "system": "water droplet on patterned-wettability acoustic chip",
    "id": 1386,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1386",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Two-drop collision control — water droplet on patterned-wettability acoustic chip",
    "hypothesis": "For water droplet on patterned-wettability acoustic chip, staggered acoustic pulses will narrow collision-position variability of matched droplet pairs.",
    "test": "Track pair trajectories and collision positions.",
    "against": "Position variance is not reduced after launch timing is controlled.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Two-drop collision control",
    "system": "water droplet on patterned-wettability acoustic chip",
    "id": 1387,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1387",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Acoustic reflection guard — water droplet on patterned-wettability acoustic chip",
    "hypothesis": "For water droplet on patterned-wettability acoustic chip, an absorbing boundary will reduce trajectory curvature caused by reflected waves.",
    "test": "Map acoustic fields and droplet paths with matched boundaries.",
    "against": "Curvature persists independently of reflected-wave amplitude.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Acoustic reflection guard",
    "system": "water droplet on patterned-wettability acoustic chip",
    "id": 1388,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1388",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Evaporation compensation — water droplet on patterned-wettability acoustic chip",
    "hypothesis": "For water droplet on patterned-wettability acoustic chip, adjusting pulse duration using optically measured volume will stabilize transport distance during slow evaporation.",
    "test": "Compare calibrated adaptive and fixed schedules on held-out runs.",
    "against": "Distance error is no lower after equal sensing time is counted.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Evaporation compensation",
    "system": "water droplet on patterned-wettability acoustic chip",
    "id": 1389,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1389",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Vertical motion precursor — water droplet on patterned-wettability acoustic chip",
    "hypothesis": "For water droplet on patterned-wettability acoustic chip, increased vertical shape oscillation will precede irregular horizontal transport.",
    "test": "Measure three-dimensional droplet motion across increasing acoustic power.",
    "against": "Vertical oscillations provide no advance warning of trajectory errors.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Vertical motion precursor",
    "system": "water droplet on patterned-wettability acoustic chip",
    "id": 1390,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1390",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pulse grouping — water droplet on thin hydrogel-coated acoustic chip",
    "hypothesis": "For water droplet on thin hydrogel-coated acoustic chip, grouped short acoustic pulses will reduce heating per net transported distance.",
    "test": "Measure droplet displacement and temperature for matched travel tasks.",
    "against": "Heating is no lower once delivered acoustic energy is included.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Pulse grouping",
    "system": "water droplet on thin hydrogel-coated acoustic chip",
    "id": 1391,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1391",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Opposed beam timing — water droplet on thin hydrogel-coated acoustic chip",
    "hypothesis": "For water droplet on thin hydrogel-coated acoustic chip, alternating opposed beams will improve internal mixing while limiting net motion.",
    "test": "Map tracer mixing and droplet center position.",
    "against": "Mixing gains require proportionate extra translation or heating.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Opposed beam timing",
    "system": "water droplet on thin hydrogel-coated acoustic chip",
    "id": 1392,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1392",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Contact footprint rotation — water droplet on thin hydrogel-coated acoustic chip",
    "hypothesis": "For water droplet on thin hydrogel-coated acoustic chip, rotating an elongated footprint relative to propagation will shift the movement threshold.",
    "test": "Measure threshold power at several verified footprint angles.",
    "against": "Threshold is angle-independent after contact-line length is included.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Contact footprint rotation",
    "system": "water droplet on thin hydrogel-coated acoustic chip",
    "id": 1393,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1393",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Frequency hopping — water droplet on thin hydrogel-coated acoustic chip",
    "hypothesis": "For water droplet on thin hydrogel-coated acoustic chip, switching among nearby acoustic frequencies will reduce persistent unmixed regions.",
    "test": "Image tracer concentration at equal input energy and duration.",
    "against": "Residual unmixed volume is no lower than single-frequency control.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Frequency hopping",
    "system": "water droplet on thin hydrogel-coated acoustic chip",
    "id": 1394,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1394",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Rest interval pinning — water droplet on thin hydrogel-coated acoustic chip",
    "hypothesis": "For water droplet on thin hydrogel-coated acoustic chip, longer rests between pulses will increase restart power when contact-line aging dominates.",
    "test": "Measure restart thresholds and line motion across rest times.",
    "against": "Restart power does not depend on rest after evaporation is corrected.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Rest interval pinning",
    "system": "water droplet on thin hydrogel-coated acoustic chip",
    "id": 1395,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1395",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Subthreshold conditioning — water droplet on thin hydrogel-coated acoustic chip",
    "hypothesis": "For water droplet on thin hydrogel-coated acoustic chip, weak acoustic conditioning will reduce variability of the next transport event.",
    "test": "Compare displacement distributions after conditioning and silent controls.",
    "against": "Variability is unchanged at matched temperature and volume.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Subthreshold conditioning",
    "system": "water droplet on thin hydrogel-coated acoustic chip",
    "id": 1396,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1396",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Two-drop collision control — water droplet on thin hydrogel-coated acoustic chip",
    "hypothesis": "For water droplet on thin hydrogel-coated acoustic chip, staggered acoustic pulses will narrow collision-position variability of matched droplet pairs.",
    "test": "Track pair trajectories and collision positions.",
    "against": "Position variance is not reduced after launch timing is controlled.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Two-drop collision control",
    "system": "water droplet on thin hydrogel-coated acoustic chip",
    "id": 1397,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1397",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Acoustic reflection guard — water droplet on thin hydrogel-coated acoustic chip",
    "hypothesis": "For water droplet on thin hydrogel-coated acoustic chip, an absorbing boundary will reduce trajectory curvature caused by reflected waves.",
    "test": "Map acoustic fields and droplet paths with matched boundaries.",
    "against": "Curvature persists independently of reflected-wave amplitude.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Acoustic reflection guard",
    "system": "water droplet on thin hydrogel-coated acoustic chip",
    "id": 1398,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1398",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Evaporation compensation — water droplet on thin hydrogel-coated acoustic chip",
    "hypothesis": "For water droplet on thin hydrogel-coated acoustic chip, adjusting pulse duration using optically measured volume will stabilize transport distance during slow evaporation.",
    "test": "Compare calibrated adaptive and fixed schedules on held-out runs.",
    "against": "Distance error is no lower after equal sensing time is counted.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Evaporation compensation",
    "system": "water droplet on thin hydrogel-coated acoustic chip",
    "id": 1399,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1399",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Vertical motion precursor — water droplet on thin hydrogel-coated acoustic chip",
    "hypothesis": "For water droplet on thin hydrogel-coated acoustic chip, increased vertical shape oscillation will precede irregular horizontal transport.",
    "test": "Measure three-dimensional droplet motion across increasing acoustic power.",
    "against": "Vertical oscillations provide no advance warning of trajectory errors.",
    "category": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling",
    "controls": "Droplet volume, actual acoustic power, contact angle, temperature, waveform, and substrate response. Use specialist acoustic equipment and compatible liquids.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Surface-acoustic-wave droplet handling: Vertical motion precursor",
    "system": "water droplet on thin hydrogel-coated acoustic chip",
    "id": 1400,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Specialist acoustic chip, calibrated radiofrequency drive, high-speed imaging, thermal monitoring, and suitable droplet liquids.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1400",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Nucleation-window interruption — purified hen-egg lysozyme crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified hen-egg lysozyme crystallization, a brief return toward undersaturation before visible crystals appear will reduce crystal count more than final crystal mass.",
    "test": "Image nucleation and weigh or quantify final crystalline protein.",
    "against": "Crystal count and mass change proportionally or not at all.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Nucleation-window interruption",
    "system": "purified hen-egg lysozyme crystallization",
    "id": 1401,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 18,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1401",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Weak rotational mixing — purified hen-egg lysozyme crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified hen-egg lysozyme crystallization, slow rotation during early growth will reduce face-to-face growth-rate variation.",
    "test": "Image crystal faces while measuring actual mixing and temperature.",
    "against": "Face-rate variation is unchanged after crystal orientation is controlled.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Weak rotational mixing",
    "system": "purified hen-egg lysozyme crystallization",
    "id": 1402,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1402",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Droplet depth — purified hen-egg lysozyme crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified hen-egg lysozyme crystallization, shallow drops will show less vertical variation in crystal morphology than deeper drops.",
    "test": "Map crystal positions and shapes at equal solution volume using varied footprints.",
    "against": "Morphology variation does not depend on depth after evaporation is matched.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Droplet depth",
    "system": "purified hen-egg lysozyme crystallization",
    "id": 1403,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "specialist research facility",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 299,
    "literature_query": "Droplet depth purified hen-egg lysozyme crystallization shallow drops show vertical variation in crystal experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1403",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Droplet depth — purified hen-egg lysozyme crystallization",
      "hypothesis": "For purified hen-egg lysozyme crystallization, shallow drops will show less vertical variation in crystal morphology than deeper drops.",
      "test": "Map crystal positions and shapes at equal solution volume using varied footprints.",
      "against": "Morphology variation does not depend on depth after evaporation is matched.",
      "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
      "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Droplet depth",
      "system": "purified hen-egg lysozyme crystallization",
      "id": 1403,
      "access_score": 1,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "resource_class": "specialist research facility",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 299,
      "literature_query": "Droplet depth purified hen-egg lysozyme crystallization shallow drops show vertical variation in crystal experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
      "source_lead_count": 7,
      "source_ids": "S97797dbbc85e;S63553e4ee209;S64ba0b6f187b;S6d0cb9a701bc;S4ca7a56047e9;S1e3a99734f1a;S907ebbed6730",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Seed delivery spread — purified hen-egg lysozyme crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified hen-egg lysozyme crystallization, distributing a fixed seed number across several points will narrow final crystal-size variation.",
    "test": "Track seeds and grown crystals in matched chambers.",
    "against": "Size variation is unchanged after seed-size distribution is included.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Seed delivery spread",
    "system": "purified hen-egg lysozyme crystallization",
    "id": 1404,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1404",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Protein surface adsorption — purified hen-egg lysozyme crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified hen-egg lysozyme crystallization, nonbinding chamber coatings will shorten induction-time tails by reducing protein loss.",
    "test": "Measure soluble protein and nucleation distributions with validated nonbinding coatings.",
    "against": "Induction tails persist independently of measured surface loss.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Protein surface adsorption",
    "system": "purified hen-egg lysozyme crystallization",
    "id": 1405,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 18,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1405",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Temperature-cycle asymmetry — purified hen-egg lysozyme crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified hen-egg lysozyme crystallization, slow cooling with fast partial reheating will favor fewer larger crystals than symmetric cycles.",
    "test": "Measure size and diffraction quality at matched final yield.",
    "against": "Crystal number and size show no predicted shift.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Temperature-cycle asymmetry",
    "system": "purified hen-egg lysozyme crystallization",
    "id": 1406,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1406",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Microgravity analogue limits — purified hen-egg lysozyme crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified hen-egg lysozyme crystallization, density-matched suppression of convection will reduce growth striations without requiring actual spaceflight.",
    "test": "Use a compatible validated density modifier and measure flow, structure, and solubility.",
    "against": "Striation reduction is explained solely by changed solubility or viscosity.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Microgravity analogue limits",
    "system": "purified hen-egg lysozyme crystallization",
    "id": 1407,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "specialist research facility",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 300,
    "literature_query": "Microgravity analogue limits purified hen-egg lysozyme crystallization density-matched suppression of convection growth striations experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1407",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Microgravity analogue limits — purified hen-egg lysozyme crystallization",
      "hypothesis": "For purified hen-egg lysozyme crystallization, density-matched suppression of convection will reduce growth striations without requiring actual spaceflight.",
      "test": "Use a compatible validated density modifier and measure flow, structure, and solubility.",
      "against": "Striation reduction is explained solely by changed solubility or viscosity.",
      "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
      "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Microgravity analogue limits",
      "system": "purified hen-egg lysozyme crystallization",
      "id": 1407,
      "access_score": 1,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "resource_class": "specialist research facility",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 300,
      "literature_query": "Microgravity analogue limits purified hen-egg lysozyme crystallization density-matched suppression of convection growth striations experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
      "source_lead_count": 7,
      "source_ids": "S5fb34c902b00;S6270c1553b20;S1f9ede61d5bf;S8148683707f0;Sf095d6d042e8;S890820058124;Sbb0f136189e5",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Precipitant front width — purified hen-egg lysozyme crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified hen-egg lysozyme crystallization, a broader diffusion-generated precipitant front will increase the spatial width of the crystal-forming zone.",
    "test": "Map concentration and nucleation locations.",
    "against": "The crystal zone does not widen after local supersaturation is measured.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Precipitant front width",
    "system": "purified hen-egg lysozyme crystallization",
    "id": 1408,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1408",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Growth-surface rest — purified hen-egg lysozyme crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified hen-egg lysozyme crystallization, short solution-exchange rests will reduce trapped liquid inclusions during continued growth.",
    "test": "Image inclusions and growth rates with sham-exchange controls.",
    "against": "Inclusion reduction disappears when mean growth rate is matched.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Growth-surface rest",
    "system": "purified hen-egg lysozyme crystallization",
    "id": 1409,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1409",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Optical precursor timing — purified hen-egg lysozyme crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified hen-egg lysozyme crystallization, increasing low-angle scattering will predict nucleation before visible crystals more reliably than turbidity alone.",
    "test": "Record scattering and turbidity prospectively and validate predicted induction times.",
    "against": "Scattering adds no predictive value on independent preparations.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Optical precursor timing",
    "system": "purified hen-egg lysozyme crystallization",
    "id": 1410,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1410",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Nucleation-window interruption — purified thaumatin crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified thaumatin crystallization, a brief return toward undersaturation before visible crystals appear will reduce crystal count more than final crystal mass.",
    "test": "Image nucleation and weigh or quantify final crystalline protein.",
    "against": "Crystal count and mass change proportionally or not at all.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Nucleation-window interruption",
    "system": "purified thaumatin crystallization",
    "id": 1411,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 18,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1411",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Weak rotational mixing — purified thaumatin crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified thaumatin crystallization, slow rotation during early growth will reduce face-to-face growth-rate variation.",
    "test": "Image crystal faces while measuring actual mixing and temperature.",
    "against": "Face-rate variation is unchanged after crystal orientation is controlled.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Weak rotational mixing",
    "system": "purified thaumatin crystallization",
    "id": 1412,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1412",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Droplet depth — purified thaumatin crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified thaumatin crystallization, shallow drops will show less vertical variation in crystal morphology than deeper drops.",
    "test": "Map crystal positions and shapes at equal solution volume using varied footprints.",
    "against": "Morphology variation does not depend on depth after evaporation is matched.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Droplet depth",
    "system": "purified thaumatin crystallization",
    "id": 1413,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1413",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Seed delivery spread — purified thaumatin crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified thaumatin crystallization, distributing a fixed seed number across several points will narrow final crystal-size variation.",
    "test": "Track seeds and grown crystals in matched chambers.",
    "against": "Size variation is unchanged after seed-size distribution is included.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Seed delivery spread",
    "system": "purified thaumatin crystallization",
    "id": 1414,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1414",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Protein surface adsorption — purified thaumatin crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified thaumatin crystallization, nonbinding chamber coatings will shorten induction-time tails by reducing protein loss.",
    "test": "Measure soluble protein and nucleation distributions with validated nonbinding coatings.",
    "against": "Induction tails persist independently of measured surface loss.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Protein surface adsorption",
    "system": "purified thaumatin crystallization",
    "id": 1415,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 18,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1415",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Temperature-cycle asymmetry — purified thaumatin crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified thaumatin crystallization, slow cooling with fast partial reheating will favor fewer larger crystals than symmetric cycles.",
    "test": "Measure size and diffraction quality at matched final yield.",
    "against": "Crystal number and size show no predicted shift.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Temperature-cycle asymmetry",
    "system": "purified thaumatin crystallization",
    "id": 1416,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1416",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Microgravity analogue limits — purified thaumatin crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified thaumatin crystallization, density-matched suppression of convection will reduce growth striations without requiring actual spaceflight.",
    "test": "Use a compatible validated density modifier and measure flow, structure, and solubility.",
    "against": "Striation reduction is explained solely by changed solubility or viscosity.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Microgravity analogue limits",
    "system": "purified thaumatin crystallization",
    "id": 1417,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1417",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Precipitant front width — purified thaumatin crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified thaumatin crystallization, a broader diffusion-generated precipitant front will increase the spatial width of the crystal-forming zone.",
    "test": "Map concentration and nucleation locations.",
    "against": "The crystal zone does not widen after local supersaturation is measured.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Precipitant front width",
    "system": "purified thaumatin crystallization",
    "id": 1418,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1418",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Growth-surface rest — purified thaumatin crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified thaumatin crystallization, short solution-exchange rests will reduce trapped liquid inclusions during continued growth.",
    "test": "Image inclusions and growth rates with sham-exchange controls.",
    "against": "Inclusion reduction disappears when mean growth rate is matched.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Growth-surface rest",
    "system": "purified thaumatin crystallization",
    "id": 1419,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1419",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Optical precursor timing — purified thaumatin crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified thaumatin crystallization, increasing low-angle scattering will predict nucleation before visible crystals more reliably than turbidity alone.",
    "test": "Record scattering and turbidity prospectively and validate predicted induction times.",
    "against": "Scattering adds no predictive value on independent preparations.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Optical precursor timing",
    "system": "purified thaumatin crystallization",
    "id": 1420,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1420",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Nucleation-window interruption — purified glucose-isomerase crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified glucose-isomerase crystallization, a brief return toward undersaturation before visible crystals appear will reduce crystal count more than final crystal mass.",
    "test": "Image nucleation and weigh or quantify final crystalline protein.",
    "against": "Crystal count and mass change proportionally or not at all.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Nucleation-window interruption",
    "system": "purified glucose-isomerase crystallization",
    "id": 1421,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 18,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1421",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Weak rotational mixing — purified glucose-isomerase crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified glucose-isomerase crystallization, slow rotation during early growth will reduce face-to-face growth-rate variation.",
    "test": "Image crystal faces while measuring actual mixing and temperature.",
    "against": "Face-rate variation is unchanged after crystal orientation is controlled.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Weak rotational mixing",
    "system": "purified glucose-isomerase crystallization",
    "id": 1422,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1422",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Droplet depth — purified glucose-isomerase crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified glucose-isomerase crystallization, shallow drops will show less vertical variation in crystal morphology than deeper drops.",
    "test": "Map crystal positions and shapes at equal solution volume using varied footprints.",
    "against": "Morphology variation does not depend on depth after evaporation is matched.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Droplet depth",
    "system": "purified glucose-isomerase crystallization",
    "id": 1423,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1423",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Seed delivery spread — purified glucose-isomerase crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified glucose-isomerase crystallization, distributing a fixed seed number across several points will narrow final crystal-size variation.",
    "test": "Track seeds and grown crystals in matched chambers.",
    "against": "Size variation is unchanged after seed-size distribution is included.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Seed delivery spread",
    "system": "purified glucose-isomerase crystallization",
    "id": 1424,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1424",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Protein surface adsorption — purified glucose-isomerase crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified glucose-isomerase crystallization, nonbinding chamber coatings will shorten induction-time tails by reducing protein loss.",
    "test": "Measure soluble protein and nucleation distributions with validated nonbinding coatings.",
    "against": "Induction tails persist independently of measured surface loss.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Protein surface adsorption",
    "system": "purified glucose-isomerase crystallization",
    "id": 1425,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 18,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1425",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Temperature-cycle asymmetry — purified glucose-isomerase crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified glucose-isomerase crystallization, slow cooling with fast partial reheating will favor fewer larger crystals than symmetric cycles.",
    "test": "Measure size and diffraction quality at matched final yield.",
    "against": "Crystal number and size show no predicted shift.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Temperature-cycle asymmetry",
    "system": "purified glucose-isomerase crystallization",
    "id": 1426,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1426",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Microgravity analogue limits — purified glucose-isomerase crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified glucose-isomerase crystallization, density-matched suppression of convection will reduce growth striations without requiring actual spaceflight.",
    "test": "Use a compatible validated density modifier and measure flow, structure, and solubility.",
    "against": "Striation reduction is explained solely by changed solubility or viscosity.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Microgravity analogue limits",
    "system": "purified glucose-isomerase crystallization",
    "id": 1427,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1427",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Precipitant front width — purified glucose-isomerase crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified glucose-isomerase crystallization, a broader diffusion-generated precipitant front will increase the spatial width of the crystal-forming zone.",
    "test": "Map concentration and nucleation locations.",
    "against": "The crystal zone does not widen after local supersaturation is measured.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Precipitant front width",
    "system": "purified glucose-isomerase crystallization",
    "id": 1428,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1428",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Growth-surface rest — purified glucose-isomerase crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified glucose-isomerase crystallization, short solution-exchange rests will reduce trapped liquid inclusions during continued growth.",
    "test": "Image inclusions and growth rates with sham-exchange controls.",
    "against": "Inclusion reduction disappears when mean growth rate is matched.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Growth-surface rest",
    "system": "purified glucose-isomerase crystallization",
    "id": 1429,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1429",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Optical precursor timing — purified glucose-isomerase crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified glucose-isomerase crystallization, increasing low-angle scattering will predict nucleation before visible crystals more reliably than turbidity alone.",
    "test": "Record scattering and turbidity prospectively and validate predicted induction times.",
    "against": "Scattering adds no predictive value on independent preparations.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Optical precursor timing",
    "system": "purified glucose-isomerase crystallization",
    "id": 1430,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1430",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Nucleation-window interruption — purified plant urease crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified plant urease crystallization, a brief return toward undersaturation before visible crystals appear will reduce crystal count more than final crystal mass.",
    "test": "Image nucleation and weigh or quantify final crystalline protein.",
    "against": "Crystal count and mass change proportionally or not at all.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Nucleation-window interruption",
    "system": "purified plant urease crystallization",
    "id": 1431,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 18,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1431",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Weak rotational mixing — purified plant urease crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified plant urease crystallization, slow rotation during early growth will reduce face-to-face growth-rate variation.",
    "test": "Image crystal faces while measuring actual mixing and temperature.",
    "against": "Face-rate variation is unchanged after crystal orientation is controlled.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Weak rotational mixing",
    "system": "purified plant urease crystallization",
    "id": 1432,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 18,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1432",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Droplet depth — purified plant urease crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified plant urease crystallization, shallow drops will show less vertical variation in crystal morphology than deeper drops.",
    "test": "Map crystal positions and shapes at equal solution volume using varied footprints.",
    "against": "Morphology variation does not depend on depth after evaporation is matched.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Droplet depth",
    "system": "purified plant urease crystallization",
    "id": 1433,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 18,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1433",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Seed delivery spread — purified plant urease crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified plant urease crystallization, distributing a fixed seed number across several points will narrow final crystal-size variation.",
    "test": "Track seeds and grown crystals in matched chambers.",
    "against": "Size variation is unchanged after seed-size distribution is included.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Seed delivery spread",
    "system": "purified plant urease crystallization",
    "id": 1434,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 18,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1434",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Protein surface adsorption — purified plant urease crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified plant urease crystallization, nonbinding chamber coatings will shorten induction-time tails by reducing protein loss.",
    "test": "Measure soluble protein and nucleation distributions with validated nonbinding coatings.",
    "against": "Induction tails persist independently of measured surface loss.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Protein surface adsorption",
    "system": "purified plant urease crystallization",
    "id": 1435,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 18,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1435",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Temperature-cycle asymmetry — purified plant urease crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified plant urease crystallization, slow cooling with fast partial reheating will favor fewer larger crystals than symmetric cycles.",
    "test": "Measure size and diffraction quality at matched final yield.",
    "against": "Crystal number and size show no predicted shift.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Temperature-cycle asymmetry",
    "system": "purified plant urease crystallization",
    "id": 1436,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 18,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1436",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Microgravity analogue limits — purified plant urease crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified plant urease crystallization, density-matched suppression of convection will reduce growth striations without requiring actual spaceflight.",
    "test": "Use a compatible validated density modifier and measure flow, structure, and solubility.",
    "against": "Striation reduction is explained solely by changed solubility or viscosity.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Microgravity analogue limits",
    "system": "purified plant urease crystallization",
    "id": 1437,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 18,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1437",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Precipitant front width — purified plant urease crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified plant urease crystallization, a broader diffusion-generated precipitant front will increase the spatial width of the crystal-forming zone.",
    "test": "Map concentration and nucleation locations.",
    "against": "The crystal zone does not widen after local supersaturation is measured.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Precipitant front width",
    "system": "purified plant urease crystallization",
    "id": 1438,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 18,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1438",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Growth-surface rest — purified plant urease crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified plant urease crystallization, short solution-exchange rests will reduce trapped liquid inclusions during continued growth.",
    "test": "Image inclusions and growth rates with sham-exchange controls.",
    "against": "Inclusion reduction disappears when mean growth rate is matched.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Growth-surface rest",
    "system": "purified plant urease crystallization",
    "id": 1439,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 18,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1439",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Optical precursor timing — purified plant urease crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified plant urease crystallization, increasing low-angle scattering will predict nucleation before visible crystals more reliably than turbidity alone.",
    "test": "Record scattering and turbidity prospectively and validate predicted induction times.",
    "against": "Scattering adds no predictive value on independent preparations.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Optical precursor timing",
    "system": "purified plant urease crystallization",
    "id": 1440,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 18,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1440",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Nucleation-window interruption — purified catalase crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified catalase crystallization, a brief return toward undersaturation before visible crystals appear will reduce crystal count more than final crystal mass.",
    "test": "Image nucleation and weigh or quantify final crystalline protein.",
    "against": "Crystal count and mass change proportionally or not at all.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Nucleation-window interruption",
    "system": "purified catalase crystallization",
    "id": 1441,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 18,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1441",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Weak rotational mixing — purified catalase crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified catalase crystallization, slow rotation during early growth will reduce face-to-face growth-rate variation.",
    "test": "Image crystal faces while measuring actual mixing and temperature.",
    "against": "Face-rate variation is unchanged after crystal orientation is controlled.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Weak rotational mixing",
    "system": "purified catalase crystallization",
    "id": 1442,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1442",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Droplet depth — purified catalase crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified catalase crystallization, shallow drops will show less vertical variation in crystal morphology than deeper drops.",
    "test": "Map crystal positions and shapes at equal solution volume using varied footprints.",
    "against": "Morphology variation does not depend on depth after evaporation is matched.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Droplet depth",
    "system": "purified catalase crystallization",
    "id": 1443,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1443",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Seed delivery spread — purified catalase crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified catalase crystallization, distributing a fixed seed number across several points will narrow final crystal-size variation.",
    "test": "Track seeds and grown crystals in matched chambers.",
    "against": "Size variation is unchanged after seed-size distribution is included.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Seed delivery spread",
    "system": "purified catalase crystallization",
    "id": 1444,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1444",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Protein surface adsorption — purified catalase crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified catalase crystallization, nonbinding chamber coatings will shorten induction-time tails by reducing protein loss.",
    "test": "Measure soluble protein and nucleation distributions with validated nonbinding coatings.",
    "against": "Induction tails persist independently of measured surface loss.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Protein surface adsorption",
    "system": "purified catalase crystallization",
    "id": 1445,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 18,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1445",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Temperature-cycle asymmetry — purified catalase crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified catalase crystallization, slow cooling with fast partial reheating will favor fewer larger crystals than symmetric cycles.",
    "test": "Measure size and diffraction quality at matched final yield.",
    "against": "Crystal number and size show no predicted shift.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Temperature-cycle asymmetry",
    "system": "purified catalase crystallization",
    "id": 1446,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1446",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Microgravity analogue limits — purified catalase crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified catalase crystallization, density-matched suppression of convection will reduce growth striations without requiring actual spaceflight.",
    "test": "Use a compatible validated density modifier and measure flow, structure, and solubility.",
    "against": "Striation reduction is explained solely by changed solubility or viscosity.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Microgravity analogue limits",
    "system": "purified catalase crystallization",
    "id": 1447,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1447",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Precipitant front width — purified catalase crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified catalase crystallization, a broader diffusion-generated precipitant front will increase the spatial width of the crystal-forming zone.",
    "test": "Map concentration and nucleation locations.",
    "against": "The crystal zone does not widen after local supersaturation is measured.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Precipitant front width",
    "system": "purified catalase crystallization",
    "id": 1448,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1448",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Growth-surface rest — purified catalase crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified catalase crystallization, short solution-exchange rests will reduce trapped liquid inclusions during continued growth.",
    "test": "Image inclusions and growth rates with sham-exchange controls.",
    "against": "Inclusion reduction disappears when mean growth rate is matched.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Growth-surface rest",
    "system": "purified catalase crystallization",
    "id": 1449,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1449",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Optical precursor timing — purified catalase crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified catalase crystallization, increasing low-angle scattering will predict nucleation before visible crystals more reliably than turbidity alone.",
    "test": "Record scattering and turbidity prospectively and validate predicted induction times.",
    "against": "Scattering adds no predictive value on independent preparations.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Optical precursor timing",
    "system": "purified catalase crystallization",
    "id": 1450,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1450",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Nucleation-window interruption — purified ferritin crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified ferritin crystallization, a brief return toward undersaturation before visible crystals appear will reduce crystal count more than final crystal mass.",
    "test": "Image nucleation and weigh or quantify final crystalline protein.",
    "against": "Crystal count and mass change proportionally or not at all.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Nucleation-window interruption",
    "system": "purified ferritin crystallization",
    "id": 1451,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 18,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1451",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Weak rotational mixing — purified ferritin crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified ferritin crystallization, slow rotation during early growth will reduce face-to-face growth-rate variation.",
    "test": "Image crystal faces while measuring actual mixing and temperature.",
    "against": "Face-rate variation is unchanged after crystal orientation is controlled.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Weak rotational mixing",
    "system": "purified ferritin crystallization",
    "id": 1452,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1452",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Droplet depth — purified ferritin crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified ferritin crystallization, shallow drops will show less vertical variation in crystal morphology than deeper drops.",
    "test": "Map crystal positions and shapes at equal solution volume using varied footprints.",
    "against": "Morphology variation does not depend on depth after evaporation is matched.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Droplet depth",
    "system": "purified ferritin crystallization",
    "id": 1453,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1453",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Seed delivery spread — purified ferritin crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified ferritin crystallization, distributing a fixed seed number across several points will narrow final crystal-size variation.",
    "test": "Track seeds and grown crystals in matched chambers.",
    "against": "Size variation is unchanged after seed-size distribution is included.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Seed delivery spread",
    "system": "purified ferritin crystallization",
    "id": 1454,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1454",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Protein surface adsorption — purified ferritin crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified ferritin crystallization, nonbinding chamber coatings will shorten induction-time tails by reducing protein loss.",
    "test": "Measure soluble protein and nucleation distributions with validated nonbinding coatings.",
    "against": "Induction tails persist independently of measured surface loss.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Protein surface adsorption",
    "system": "purified ferritin crystallization",
    "id": 1455,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 18,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1455",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Temperature-cycle asymmetry — purified ferritin crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified ferritin crystallization, slow cooling with fast partial reheating will favor fewer larger crystals than symmetric cycles.",
    "test": "Measure size and diffraction quality at matched final yield.",
    "against": "Crystal number and size show no predicted shift.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Temperature-cycle asymmetry",
    "system": "purified ferritin crystallization",
    "id": 1456,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1456",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Microgravity analogue limits — purified ferritin crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified ferritin crystallization, density-matched suppression of convection will reduce growth striations without requiring actual spaceflight.",
    "test": "Use a compatible validated density modifier and measure flow, structure, and solubility.",
    "against": "Striation reduction is explained solely by changed solubility or viscosity.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Microgravity analogue limits",
    "system": "purified ferritin crystallization",
    "id": 1457,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1457",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Precipitant front width — purified ferritin crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified ferritin crystallization, a broader diffusion-generated precipitant front will increase the spatial width of the crystal-forming zone.",
    "test": "Map concentration and nucleation locations.",
    "against": "The crystal zone does not widen after local supersaturation is measured.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Precipitant front width",
    "system": "purified ferritin crystallization",
    "id": 1458,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1458",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Growth-surface rest — purified ferritin crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified ferritin crystallization, short solution-exchange rests will reduce trapped liquid inclusions during continued growth.",
    "test": "Image inclusions and growth rates with sham-exchange controls.",
    "against": "Inclusion reduction disappears when mean growth rate is matched.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Growth-surface rest",
    "system": "purified ferritin crystallization",
    "id": 1459,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1459",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Optical precursor timing — purified ferritin crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified ferritin crystallization, increasing low-angle scattering will predict nucleation before visible crystals more reliably than turbidity alone.",
    "test": "Record scattering and turbidity prospectively and validate predicted induction times.",
    "against": "Scattering adds no predictive value on independent preparations.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Optical precursor timing",
    "system": "purified ferritin crystallization",
    "id": 1460,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1460",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Nucleation-window interruption — purified concanavalin-A crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified concanavalin-A crystallization, a brief return toward undersaturation before visible crystals appear will reduce crystal count more than final crystal mass.",
    "test": "Image nucleation and weigh or quantify final crystalline protein.",
    "against": "Crystal count and mass change proportionally or not at all.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Nucleation-window interruption",
    "system": "purified concanavalin-A crystallization",
    "id": 1461,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 18,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1461",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Weak rotational mixing — purified concanavalin-A crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified concanavalin-A crystallization, slow rotation during early growth will reduce face-to-face growth-rate variation.",
    "test": "Image crystal faces while measuring actual mixing and temperature.",
    "against": "Face-rate variation is unchanged after crystal orientation is controlled.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Weak rotational mixing",
    "system": "purified concanavalin-A crystallization",
    "id": 1462,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1462",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Droplet depth — purified concanavalin-A crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified concanavalin-A crystallization, shallow drops will show less vertical variation in crystal morphology than deeper drops.",
    "test": "Map crystal positions and shapes at equal solution volume using varied footprints.",
    "against": "Morphology variation does not depend on depth after evaporation is matched.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Droplet depth",
    "system": "purified concanavalin-A crystallization",
    "id": 1463,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1463",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Seed delivery spread — purified concanavalin-A crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified concanavalin-A crystallization, distributing a fixed seed number across several points will narrow final crystal-size variation.",
    "test": "Track seeds and grown crystals in matched chambers.",
    "against": "Size variation is unchanged after seed-size distribution is included.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Seed delivery spread",
    "system": "purified concanavalin-A crystallization",
    "id": 1464,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1464",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Protein surface adsorption — purified concanavalin-A crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified concanavalin-A crystallization, nonbinding chamber coatings will shorten induction-time tails by reducing protein loss.",
    "test": "Measure soluble protein and nucleation distributions with validated nonbinding coatings.",
    "against": "Induction tails persist independently of measured surface loss.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Protein surface adsorption",
    "system": "purified concanavalin-A crystallization",
    "id": 1465,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 18,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1465",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Temperature-cycle asymmetry — purified concanavalin-A crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified concanavalin-A crystallization, slow cooling with fast partial reheating will favor fewer larger crystals than symmetric cycles.",
    "test": "Measure size and diffraction quality at matched final yield.",
    "against": "Crystal number and size show no predicted shift.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Temperature-cycle asymmetry",
    "system": "purified concanavalin-A crystallization",
    "id": 1466,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1466",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Microgravity analogue limits — purified concanavalin-A crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified concanavalin-A crystallization, density-matched suppression of convection will reduce growth striations without requiring actual spaceflight.",
    "test": "Use a compatible validated density modifier and measure flow, structure, and solubility.",
    "against": "Striation reduction is explained solely by changed solubility or viscosity.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Microgravity analogue limits",
    "system": "purified concanavalin-A crystallization",
    "id": 1467,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1467",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Precipitant front width — purified concanavalin-A crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified concanavalin-A crystallization, a broader diffusion-generated precipitant front will increase the spatial width of the crystal-forming zone.",
    "test": "Map concentration and nucleation locations.",
    "against": "The crystal zone does not widen after local supersaturation is measured.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Precipitant front width",
    "system": "purified concanavalin-A crystallization",
    "id": 1468,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1468",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Growth-surface rest — purified concanavalin-A crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified concanavalin-A crystallization, short solution-exchange rests will reduce trapped liquid inclusions during continued growth.",
    "test": "Image inclusions and growth rates with sham-exchange controls.",
    "against": "Inclusion reduction disappears when mean growth rate is matched.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Growth-surface rest",
    "system": "purified concanavalin-A crystallization",
    "id": 1469,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1469",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Optical precursor timing — purified concanavalin-A crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified concanavalin-A crystallization, increasing low-angle scattering will predict nucleation before visible crystals more reliably than turbidity alone.",
    "test": "Record scattering and turbidity prospectively and validate predicted induction times.",
    "against": "Scattering adds no predictive value on independent preparations.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Optical precursor timing",
    "system": "purified concanavalin-A crystallization",
    "id": 1470,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1470",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Nucleation-window interruption — purified nonhuman insulin crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified nonhuman insulin crystallization, a brief return toward undersaturation before visible crystals appear will reduce crystal count more than final crystal mass.",
    "test": "Image nucleation and weigh or quantify final crystalline protein.",
    "against": "Crystal count and mass change proportionally or not at all.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Nucleation-window interruption",
    "system": "purified nonhuman insulin crystallization",
    "id": 1471,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 18,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1471",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Weak rotational mixing — purified nonhuman insulin crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified nonhuman insulin crystallization, slow rotation during early growth will reduce face-to-face growth-rate variation.",
    "test": "Image crystal faces while measuring actual mixing and temperature.",
    "against": "Face-rate variation is unchanged after crystal orientation is controlled.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Weak rotational mixing",
    "system": "purified nonhuman insulin crystallization",
    "id": 1472,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1472",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Droplet depth — purified nonhuman insulin crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified nonhuman insulin crystallization, shallow drops will show less vertical variation in crystal morphology than deeper drops.",
    "test": "Map crystal positions and shapes at equal solution volume using varied footprints.",
    "against": "Morphology variation does not depend on depth after evaporation is matched.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Droplet depth",
    "system": "purified nonhuman insulin crystallization",
    "id": 1473,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1473",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Seed delivery spread — purified nonhuman insulin crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified nonhuman insulin crystallization, distributing a fixed seed number across several points will narrow final crystal-size variation.",
    "test": "Track seeds and grown crystals in matched chambers.",
    "against": "Size variation is unchanged after seed-size distribution is included.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Seed delivery spread",
    "system": "purified nonhuman insulin crystallization",
    "id": 1474,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1474",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Protein surface adsorption — purified nonhuman insulin crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified nonhuman insulin crystallization, nonbinding chamber coatings will shorten induction-time tails by reducing protein loss.",
    "test": "Measure soluble protein and nucleation distributions with validated nonbinding coatings.",
    "against": "Induction tails persist independently of measured surface loss.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Protein surface adsorption",
    "system": "purified nonhuman insulin crystallization",
    "id": 1475,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 18,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1475",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Temperature-cycle asymmetry — purified nonhuman insulin crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified nonhuman insulin crystallization, slow cooling with fast partial reheating will favor fewer larger crystals than symmetric cycles.",
    "test": "Measure size and diffraction quality at matched final yield.",
    "against": "Crystal number and size show no predicted shift.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Temperature-cycle asymmetry",
    "system": "purified nonhuman insulin crystallization",
    "id": 1476,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1476",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Microgravity analogue limits — purified nonhuman insulin crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified nonhuman insulin crystallization, density-matched suppression of convection will reduce growth striations without requiring actual spaceflight.",
    "test": "Use a compatible validated density modifier and measure flow, structure, and solubility.",
    "against": "Striation reduction is explained solely by changed solubility or viscosity.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Microgravity analogue limits",
    "system": "purified nonhuman insulin crystallization",
    "id": 1477,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1477",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Precipitant front width — purified nonhuman insulin crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified nonhuman insulin crystallization, a broader diffusion-generated precipitant front will increase the spatial width of the crystal-forming zone.",
    "test": "Map concentration and nucleation locations.",
    "against": "The crystal zone does not widen after local supersaturation is measured.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Precipitant front width",
    "system": "purified nonhuman insulin crystallization",
    "id": 1478,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1478",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Growth-surface rest — purified nonhuman insulin crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified nonhuman insulin crystallization, short solution-exchange rests will reduce trapped liquid inclusions during continued growth.",
    "test": "Image inclusions and growth rates with sham-exchange controls.",
    "against": "Inclusion reduction disappears when mean growth rate is matched.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Growth-surface rest",
    "system": "purified nonhuman insulin crystallization",
    "id": 1479,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1479",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Optical precursor timing — purified nonhuman insulin crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified nonhuman insulin crystallization, increasing low-angle scattering will predict nucleation before visible crystals more reliably than turbidity alone.",
    "test": "Record scattering and turbidity prospectively and validate predicted induction times.",
    "against": "Scattering adds no predictive value on independent preparations.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Optical precursor timing",
    "system": "purified nonhuman insulin crystallization",
    "id": 1480,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1480",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Nucleation-window interruption — purified nonpathogenic bacterial enzyme crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified nonpathogenic bacterial enzyme crystallization, a brief return toward undersaturation before visible crystals appear will reduce crystal count more than final crystal mass.",
    "test": "Image nucleation and weigh or quantify final crystalline protein.",
    "against": "Crystal count and mass change proportionally or not at all.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Nucleation-window interruption",
    "system": "purified nonpathogenic bacterial enzyme crystallization",
    "id": 1481,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 18,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1481",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Weak rotational mixing — purified nonpathogenic bacterial enzyme crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified nonpathogenic bacterial enzyme crystallization, slow rotation during early growth will reduce face-to-face growth-rate variation.",
    "test": "Image crystal faces while measuring actual mixing and temperature.",
    "against": "Face-rate variation is unchanged after crystal orientation is controlled.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Weak rotational mixing",
    "system": "purified nonpathogenic bacterial enzyme crystallization",
    "id": 1482,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 18,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1482",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Droplet depth — purified nonpathogenic bacterial enzyme crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified nonpathogenic bacterial enzyme crystallization, shallow drops will show less vertical variation in crystal morphology than deeper drops.",
    "test": "Map crystal positions and shapes at equal solution volume using varied footprints.",
    "against": "Morphology variation does not depend on depth after evaporation is matched.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Droplet depth",
    "system": "purified nonpathogenic bacterial enzyme crystallization",
    "id": 1483,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 18,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1483",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Seed delivery spread — purified nonpathogenic bacterial enzyme crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified nonpathogenic bacterial enzyme crystallization, distributing a fixed seed number across several points will narrow final crystal-size variation.",
    "test": "Track seeds and grown crystals in matched chambers.",
    "against": "Size variation is unchanged after seed-size distribution is included.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Seed delivery spread",
    "system": "purified nonpathogenic bacterial enzyme crystallization",
    "id": 1484,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 18,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1484",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Protein surface adsorption — purified nonpathogenic bacterial enzyme crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified nonpathogenic bacterial enzyme crystallization, nonbinding chamber coatings will shorten induction-time tails by reducing protein loss.",
    "test": "Measure soluble protein and nucleation distributions with validated nonbinding coatings.",
    "against": "Induction tails persist independently of measured surface loss.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Protein surface adsorption",
    "system": "purified nonpathogenic bacterial enzyme crystallization",
    "id": 1485,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 18,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1485",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Temperature-cycle asymmetry — purified nonpathogenic bacterial enzyme crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified nonpathogenic bacterial enzyme crystallization, slow cooling with fast partial reheating will favor fewer larger crystals than symmetric cycles.",
    "test": "Measure size and diffraction quality at matched final yield.",
    "against": "Crystal number and size show no predicted shift.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Temperature-cycle asymmetry",
    "system": "purified nonpathogenic bacterial enzyme crystallization",
    "id": 1486,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 18,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1486",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Microgravity analogue limits — purified nonpathogenic bacterial enzyme crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified nonpathogenic bacterial enzyme crystallization, density-matched suppression of convection will reduce growth striations without requiring actual spaceflight.",
    "test": "Use a compatible validated density modifier and measure flow, structure, and solubility.",
    "against": "Striation reduction is explained solely by changed solubility or viscosity.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Microgravity analogue limits",
    "system": "purified nonpathogenic bacterial enzyme crystallization",
    "id": 1487,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 18,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1487",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Precipitant front width — purified nonpathogenic bacterial enzyme crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified nonpathogenic bacterial enzyme crystallization, a broader diffusion-generated precipitant front will increase the spatial width of the crystal-forming zone.",
    "test": "Map concentration and nucleation locations.",
    "against": "The crystal zone does not widen after local supersaturation is measured.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Precipitant front width",
    "system": "purified nonpathogenic bacterial enzyme crystallization",
    "id": 1488,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 18,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1488",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Growth-surface rest — purified nonpathogenic bacterial enzyme crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified nonpathogenic bacterial enzyme crystallization, short solution-exchange rests will reduce trapped liquid inclusions during continued growth.",
    "test": "Image inclusions and growth rates with sham-exchange controls.",
    "against": "Inclusion reduction disappears when mean growth rate is matched.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Growth-surface rest",
    "system": "purified nonpathogenic bacterial enzyme crystallization",
    "id": 1489,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 18,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1489",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Optical precursor timing — purified nonpathogenic bacterial enzyme crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified nonpathogenic bacterial enzyme crystallization, increasing low-angle scattering will predict nucleation before visible crystals more reliably than turbidity alone.",
    "test": "Record scattering and turbidity prospectively and validate predicted induction times.",
    "against": "Scattering adds no predictive value on independent preparations.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Optical precursor timing",
    "system": "purified nonpathogenic bacterial enzyme crystallization",
    "id": 1490,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 18,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1490",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Nucleation-window interruption — purified model fungal enzyme crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified model fungal enzyme crystallization, a brief return toward undersaturation before visible crystals appear will reduce crystal count more than final crystal mass.",
    "test": "Image nucleation and weigh or quantify final crystalline protein.",
    "against": "Crystal count and mass change proportionally or not at all.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Nucleation-window interruption",
    "system": "purified model fungal enzyme crystallization",
    "id": 1491,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 18,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1491",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Weak rotational mixing — purified model fungal enzyme crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified model fungal enzyme crystallization, slow rotation during early growth will reduce face-to-face growth-rate variation.",
    "test": "Image crystal faces while measuring actual mixing and temperature.",
    "against": "Face-rate variation is unchanged after crystal orientation is controlled.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Weak rotational mixing",
    "system": "purified model fungal enzyme crystallization",
    "id": 1492,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 18,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1492",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Droplet depth — purified model fungal enzyme crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified model fungal enzyme crystallization, shallow drops will show less vertical variation in crystal morphology than deeper drops.",
    "test": "Map crystal positions and shapes at equal solution volume using varied footprints.",
    "against": "Morphology variation does not depend on depth after evaporation is matched.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Droplet depth",
    "system": "purified model fungal enzyme crystallization",
    "id": 1493,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 18,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1493",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Seed delivery spread — purified model fungal enzyme crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified model fungal enzyme crystallization, distributing a fixed seed number across several points will narrow final crystal-size variation.",
    "test": "Track seeds and grown crystals in matched chambers.",
    "against": "Size variation is unchanged after seed-size distribution is included.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Seed delivery spread",
    "system": "purified model fungal enzyme crystallization",
    "id": 1494,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 18,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1494",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Protein surface adsorption — purified model fungal enzyme crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified model fungal enzyme crystallization, nonbinding chamber coatings will shorten induction-time tails by reducing protein loss.",
    "test": "Measure soluble protein and nucleation distributions with validated nonbinding coatings.",
    "against": "Induction tails persist independently of measured surface loss.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Protein surface adsorption",
    "system": "purified model fungal enzyme crystallization",
    "id": 1495,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 18,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1495",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Temperature-cycle asymmetry — purified model fungal enzyme crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified model fungal enzyme crystallization, slow cooling with fast partial reheating will favor fewer larger crystals than symmetric cycles.",
    "test": "Measure size and diffraction quality at matched final yield.",
    "against": "Crystal number and size show no predicted shift.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Temperature-cycle asymmetry",
    "system": "purified model fungal enzyme crystallization",
    "id": 1496,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 18,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1496",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Microgravity analogue limits — purified model fungal enzyme crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified model fungal enzyme crystallization, density-matched suppression of convection will reduce growth striations without requiring actual spaceflight.",
    "test": "Use a compatible validated density modifier and measure flow, structure, and solubility.",
    "against": "Striation reduction is explained solely by changed solubility or viscosity.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Microgravity analogue limits",
    "system": "purified model fungal enzyme crystallization",
    "id": 1497,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 18,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1497",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Precipitant front width — purified model fungal enzyme crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified model fungal enzyme crystallization, a broader diffusion-generated precipitant front will increase the spatial width of the crystal-forming zone.",
    "test": "Map concentration and nucleation locations.",
    "against": "The crystal zone does not widen after local supersaturation is measured.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Precipitant front width",
    "system": "purified model fungal enzyme crystallization",
    "id": 1498,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 18,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1498",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Growth-surface rest — purified model fungal enzyme crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified model fungal enzyme crystallization, short solution-exchange rests will reduce trapped liquid inclusions during continued growth.",
    "test": "Image inclusions and growth rates with sham-exchange controls.",
    "against": "Inclusion reduction disappears when mean growth rate is matched.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Growth-surface rest",
    "system": "purified model fungal enzyme crystallization",
    "id": 1499,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 18,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1499",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Optical precursor timing — purified model fungal enzyme crystallization",
    "hypothesis": "For purified model fungal enzyme crystallization, increasing low-angle scattering will predict nucleation before visible crystals more reliably than turbidity alone.",
    "test": "Record scattering and turbidity prospectively and validate predicted induction times.",
    "against": "Scattering adds no predictive value on independent preparations.",
    "category": "Benign protein crystallization models",
    "controls": "Use a separately validated crystallization condition for each protein; match purity, concentration, precipitant, temperature, and sample age. No human samples.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Benign protein crystallization models: Optical precursor timing",
    "system": "purified model fungal enzyme crystallization",
    "id": 1500,
    "access_score": 1,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 18,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified compatible protein, independently validated crystallization conditions, controlled environment, and microscopy; specialist characterization may be needed.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1500",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Extraction staging — flaxseed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For flaxseed mucilage, two gentle extraction stages will preserve more recoverable elasticity than one intense extraction at equal recovered solids.",
    "test": "Measure molecular size and oscillatory rheology.",
    "against": "Elastic recovery is unchanged after solids and molecular size are considered.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Extraction staging",
    "system": "flaxseed mucilage",
    "id": 1501,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1501",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Drying support adhesion — flaxseed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For flaxseed mucilage, low-adhesion drying supports will reduce rehydration-time variability.",
    "test": "Compare uptake and film cracking across support treatments.",
    "against": "Rehydration variability does not follow support adhesion.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Drying support adhesion",
    "system": "flaxseed mucilage",
    "id": 1502,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 197,
    "literature_query": "Drying support adhesion flaxseed mucilage low-adhesion supports rehydration-time variability experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1502",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Drying support adhesion — flaxseed mucilage",
      "hypothesis": "For flaxseed mucilage, low-adhesion drying supports will reduce rehydration-time variability.",
      "test": "Compare uptake and film cracking across support treatments.",
      "against": "Rehydration variability does not follow support adhesion.",
      "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
      "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Drying support adhesion",
      "system": "flaxseed mucilage",
      "id": 1502,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 26,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 197,
      "literature_query": "Drying support adhesion flaxseed mucilage low-adhesion supports rehydration-time variability experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
      "source_lead_count": 7,
      "source_ids": "S0ebda7363a51;S5cf78bd3b428;S9ec601023664;Sb167cda9b443;S7e3453b068ad;S623d44c352e5;S6fd3e2aa3595",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Ion exposure sequence — flaxseed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For flaxseed mucilage, gradual divalent-ion addition will produce a more uniform gel than abrupt addition at equal final composition.",
    "test": "Map local modulus and ion concentration.",
    "against": "Modulus variation is no lower under gradual addition.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Ion exposure sequence",
    "system": "flaxseed mucilage",
    "id": 1503,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 198,
    "literature_query": "Ion exposure sequence flaxseed mucilage gradual divalent-ion addition produce uniform gel abrupt at experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1503",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Ion exposure sequence — flaxseed mucilage",
      "hypothesis": "For flaxseed mucilage, gradual divalent-ion addition will produce a more uniform gel than abrupt addition at equal final composition.",
      "test": "Map local modulus and ion concentration.",
      "against": "Modulus variation is no lower under gradual addition.",
      "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
      "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Ion exposure sequence",
      "system": "flaxseed mucilage",
      "id": 1503,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 26,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 198,
      "literature_query": "Ion exposure sequence flaxseed mucilage gradual divalent-ion addition produce uniform gel abrupt at experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
      "source_lead_count": 2,
      "source_ids": "Sa0832bbe2ddc;Sff553d73a8f4",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Freeze concentration memory — flaxseed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For flaxseed mucilage, partial freezing before thawing will alter relaxation spectra more than bulk viscosity.",
    "test": "Measure rheology before and after controlled partial freezing.",
    "against": "Relaxation changes are explained entirely by viscosity or concentration.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Freeze concentration memory",
    "system": "flaxseed mucilage",
    "id": 1504,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1504",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Shear rest alternation — flaxseed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For flaxseed mucilage, alternating short shear and rest intervals will preserve molecular length better than continuous shear at equal work.",
    "test": "Measure polymer size and rheology.",
    "against": "Molecular length retention is no better at matched work.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Shear rest alternation",
    "system": "flaxseed mucilage",
    "id": 1505,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1505",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Mineral contact reversibility — flaxseed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For flaxseed mucilage, adsorption onto smooth silica will recover more activity in water-film stabilization than adsorption onto rough silica.",
    "test": "Measure adsorbed mass, release, and capillary film lifetimes.",
    "against": "Recovered stabilization follows released mass without a roughness effect.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Mineral contact reversibility",
    "system": "flaxseed mucilage",
    "id": 1506,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 199,
    "literature_query": "Mineral contact reversibility flaxseed mucilage adsorption onto smooth silica recover activity in water-film experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1506",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Mineral contact reversibility — flaxseed mucilage",
      "hypothesis": "For flaxseed mucilage, adsorption onto smooth silica will recover more activity in water-film stabilization than adsorption onto rough silica.",
      "test": "Measure adsorbed mass, release, and capillary film lifetimes.",
      "against": "Recovered stabilization follows released mass without a roughness effect.",
      "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
      "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Mineral contact reversibility",
      "system": "flaxseed mucilage",
      "id": 1506,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 26,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 199,
      "literature_query": "Mineral contact reversibility flaxseed mucilage adsorption onto smooth silica recover activity in water-film experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
      "source_lead_count": 7,
      "source_ids": "S01dcdb4ef459;Sa0ad7cf35f0a;S218aea439577;S19ab3dd29ba2;S60b5c4f3f32a;S57950e1bbbeb;S7f044ad7740c",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Layered rehydration — flaxseed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For flaxseed mucilage, stacked thin dried layers will hydrate more uniformly than one thick layer at equal mass.",
    "test": "Map water content and local stiffness during hydration.",
    "against": "Spatial hydration variation is unchanged.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Layered rehydration",
    "system": "flaxseed mucilage",
    "id": 1507,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1507",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Evaporation skin timing — flaxseed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For flaxseed mucilage, surface elastic signals will precede measurable evaporation-rate decline during skin formation.",
    "test": "Measure surface rheology and gravimetric drying synchronously.",
    "against": "Elastic changes do not precede drying-rate changes.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Evaporation skin timing",
    "system": "flaxseed mucilage",
    "id": 1508,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 200,
    "literature_query": "Evaporation skin timing flaxseed mucilage surface elastic signals precede measurable evaporation-rate decline formation experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1508",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Evaporation skin timing — flaxseed mucilage",
      "hypothesis": "For flaxseed mucilage, surface elastic signals will precede measurable evaporation-rate decline during skin formation.",
      "test": "Measure surface rheology and gravimetric drying synchronously.",
      "against": "Elastic changes do not precede drying-rate changes.",
      "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
      "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Evaporation skin timing",
      "system": "flaxseed mucilage",
      "id": 1508,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 26,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 200,
      "literature_query": "Evaporation skin timing flaxseed mucilage surface elastic signals precede measurable evaporation-rate decline formation experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
      "source_lead_count": 8,
      "source_ids": "S2e72a385224c;S9f48404545d6;S76dff20068d8;S52ce825d5081;S371b12a56ace;S40fafe2e8183;Se2b183bdd191;S0ebda7363a51",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Mild thermal recovery — flaxseed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For flaxseed mucilage, mild heating after shear will restore elasticity faster than passive rest without changing polymer mass.",
    "test": "Measure recovery and molecular-size distributions.",
    "against": "Recovery improvement requires measurable degradation or concentration changes.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Mild thermal recovery",
    "system": "flaxseed mucilage",
    "id": 1509,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1509",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Particle bridging threshold — flaxseed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For flaxseed mucilage, an intermediate polymer dose will maximize reversible bridging of inert mineral particles.",
    "test": "Measure cluster size and breakup after dose sweeps.",
    "against": "No intermediate maximum occurs after free-polymer concentration is measured.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Particle bridging threshold",
    "system": "flaxseed mucilage",
    "id": 1510,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1510",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Extraction staging — chia seed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For chia seed mucilage, two gentle extraction stages will preserve more recoverable elasticity than one intense extraction at equal recovered solids.",
    "test": "Measure molecular size and oscillatory rheology.",
    "against": "Elastic recovery is unchanged after solids and molecular size are considered.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Extraction staging",
    "system": "chia seed mucilage",
    "id": 1511,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1511",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Drying support adhesion — chia seed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For chia seed mucilage, low-adhesion drying supports will reduce rehydration-time variability.",
    "test": "Compare uptake and film cracking across support treatments.",
    "against": "Rehydration variability does not follow support adhesion.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Drying support adhesion",
    "system": "chia seed mucilage",
    "id": 1512,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1512",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Ion exposure sequence — chia seed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For chia seed mucilage, gradual divalent-ion addition will produce a more uniform gel than abrupt addition at equal final composition.",
    "test": "Map local modulus and ion concentration.",
    "against": "Modulus variation is no lower under gradual addition.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Ion exposure sequence",
    "system": "chia seed mucilage",
    "id": 1513,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1513",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Freeze concentration memory — chia seed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For chia seed mucilage, partial freezing before thawing will alter relaxation spectra more than bulk viscosity.",
    "test": "Measure rheology before and after controlled partial freezing.",
    "against": "Relaxation changes are explained entirely by viscosity or concentration.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Freeze concentration memory",
    "system": "chia seed mucilage",
    "id": 1514,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1514",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Shear rest alternation — chia seed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For chia seed mucilage, alternating short shear and rest intervals will preserve molecular length better than continuous shear at equal work.",
    "test": "Measure polymer size and rheology.",
    "against": "Molecular length retention is no better at matched work.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Shear rest alternation",
    "system": "chia seed mucilage",
    "id": 1515,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1515",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Mineral contact reversibility — chia seed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For chia seed mucilage, adsorption onto smooth silica will recover more activity in water-film stabilization than adsorption onto rough silica.",
    "test": "Measure adsorbed mass, release, and capillary film lifetimes.",
    "against": "Recovered stabilization follows released mass without a roughness effect.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Mineral contact reversibility",
    "system": "chia seed mucilage",
    "id": 1516,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1516",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Layered rehydration — chia seed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For chia seed mucilage, stacked thin dried layers will hydrate more uniformly than one thick layer at equal mass.",
    "test": "Map water content and local stiffness during hydration.",
    "against": "Spatial hydration variation is unchanged.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Layered rehydration",
    "system": "chia seed mucilage",
    "id": 1517,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1517",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Evaporation skin timing — chia seed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For chia seed mucilage, surface elastic signals will precede measurable evaporation-rate decline during skin formation.",
    "test": "Measure surface rheology and gravimetric drying synchronously.",
    "against": "Elastic changes do not precede drying-rate changes.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Evaporation skin timing",
    "system": "chia seed mucilage",
    "id": 1518,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1518",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Mild thermal recovery — chia seed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For chia seed mucilage, mild heating after shear will restore elasticity faster than passive rest without changing polymer mass.",
    "test": "Measure recovery and molecular-size distributions.",
    "against": "Recovery improvement requires measurable degradation or concentration changes.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Mild thermal recovery",
    "system": "chia seed mucilage",
    "id": 1519,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1519",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Particle bridging threshold — chia seed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For chia seed mucilage, an intermediate polymer dose will maximize reversible bridging of inert mineral particles.",
    "test": "Measure cluster size and breakup after dose sweeps.",
    "against": "No intermediate maximum occurs after free-polymer concentration is measured.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Particle bridging threshold",
    "system": "chia seed mucilage",
    "id": 1520,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1520",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Extraction staging — psyllium seed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For psyllium seed mucilage, two gentle extraction stages will preserve more recoverable elasticity than one intense extraction at equal recovered solids.",
    "test": "Measure molecular size and oscillatory rheology.",
    "against": "Elastic recovery is unchanged after solids and molecular size are considered.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Extraction staging",
    "system": "psyllium seed mucilage",
    "id": 1521,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1521",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Drying support adhesion — psyllium seed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For psyllium seed mucilage, low-adhesion drying supports will reduce rehydration-time variability.",
    "test": "Compare uptake and film cracking across support treatments.",
    "against": "Rehydration variability does not follow support adhesion.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Drying support adhesion",
    "system": "psyllium seed mucilage",
    "id": 1522,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1522",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Ion exposure sequence — psyllium seed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For psyllium seed mucilage, gradual divalent-ion addition will produce a more uniform gel than abrupt addition at equal final composition.",
    "test": "Map local modulus and ion concentration.",
    "against": "Modulus variation is no lower under gradual addition.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Ion exposure sequence",
    "system": "psyllium seed mucilage",
    "id": 1523,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1523",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Freeze concentration memory — psyllium seed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For psyllium seed mucilage, partial freezing before thawing will alter relaxation spectra more than bulk viscosity.",
    "test": "Measure rheology before and after controlled partial freezing.",
    "against": "Relaxation changes are explained entirely by viscosity or concentration.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Freeze concentration memory",
    "system": "psyllium seed mucilage",
    "id": 1524,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1524",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Shear rest alternation — psyllium seed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For psyllium seed mucilage, alternating short shear and rest intervals will preserve molecular length better than continuous shear at equal work.",
    "test": "Measure polymer size and rheology.",
    "against": "Molecular length retention is no better at matched work.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Shear rest alternation",
    "system": "psyllium seed mucilage",
    "id": 1525,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1525",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Mineral contact reversibility — psyllium seed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For psyllium seed mucilage, adsorption onto smooth silica will recover more activity in water-film stabilization than adsorption onto rough silica.",
    "test": "Measure adsorbed mass, release, and capillary film lifetimes.",
    "against": "Recovered stabilization follows released mass without a roughness effect.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Mineral contact reversibility",
    "system": "psyllium seed mucilage",
    "id": 1526,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1526",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Layered rehydration — psyllium seed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For psyllium seed mucilage, stacked thin dried layers will hydrate more uniformly than one thick layer at equal mass.",
    "test": "Map water content and local stiffness during hydration.",
    "against": "Spatial hydration variation is unchanged.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Layered rehydration",
    "system": "psyllium seed mucilage",
    "id": 1527,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1527",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Evaporation skin timing — psyllium seed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For psyllium seed mucilage, surface elastic signals will precede measurable evaporation-rate decline during skin formation.",
    "test": "Measure surface rheology and gravimetric drying synchronously.",
    "against": "Elastic changes do not precede drying-rate changes.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Evaporation skin timing",
    "system": "psyllium seed mucilage",
    "id": 1528,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1528",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Mild thermal recovery — psyllium seed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For psyllium seed mucilage, mild heating after shear will restore elasticity faster than passive rest without changing polymer mass.",
    "test": "Measure recovery and molecular-size distributions.",
    "against": "Recovery improvement requires measurable degradation or concentration changes.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Mild thermal recovery",
    "system": "psyllium seed mucilage",
    "id": 1529,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1529",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Particle bridging threshold — psyllium seed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For psyllium seed mucilage, an intermediate polymer dose will maximize reversible bridging of inert mineral particles.",
    "test": "Measure cluster size and breakup after dose sweeps.",
    "against": "No intermediate maximum occurs after free-polymer concentration is measured.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Particle bridging threshold",
    "system": "psyllium seed mucilage",
    "id": 1530,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1530",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Extraction staging — quince seed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For quince seed mucilage, two gentle extraction stages will preserve more recoverable elasticity than one intense extraction at equal recovered solids.",
    "test": "Measure molecular size and oscillatory rheology.",
    "against": "Elastic recovery is unchanged after solids and molecular size are considered.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Extraction staging",
    "system": "quince seed mucilage",
    "id": 1531,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1531",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Drying support adhesion — quince seed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For quince seed mucilage, low-adhesion drying supports will reduce rehydration-time variability.",
    "test": "Compare uptake and film cracking across support treatments.",
    "against": "Rehydration variability does not follow support adhesion.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Drying support adhesion",
    "system": "quince seed mucilage",
    "id": 1532,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1532",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Ion exposure sequence — quince seed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For quince seed mucilage, gradual divalent-ion addition will produce a more uniform gel than abrupt addition at equal final composition.",
    "test": "Map local modulus and ion concentration.",
    "against": "Modulus variation is no lower under gradual addition.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Ion exposure sequence",
    "system": "quince seed mucilage",
    "id": 1533,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1533",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Freeze concentration memory — quince seed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For quince seed mucilage, partial freezing before thawing will alter relaxation spectra more than bulk viscosity.",
    "test": "Measure rheology before and after controlled partial freezing.",
    "against": "Relaxation changes are explained entirely by viscosity or concentration.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Freeze concentration memory",
    "system": "quince seed mucilage",
    "id": 1534,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1534",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Shear rest alternation — quince seed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For quince seed mucilage, alternating short shear and rest intervals will preserve molecular length better than continuous shear at equal work.",
    "test": "Measure polymer size and rheology.",
    "against": "Molecular length retention is no better at matched work.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Shear rest alternation",
    "system": "quince seed mucilage",
    "id": 1535,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1535",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Mineral contact reversibility — quince seed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For quince seed mucilage, adsorption onto smooth silica will recover more activity in water-film stabilization than adsorption onto rough silica.",
    "test": "Measure adsorbed mass, release, and capillary film lifetimes.",
    "against": "Recovered stabilization follows released mass without a roughness effect.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Mineral contact reversibility",
    "system": "quince seed mucilage",
    "id": 1536,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1536",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Layered rehydration — quince seed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For quince seed mucilage, stacked thin dried layers will hydrate more uniformly than one thick layer at equal mass.",
    "test": "Map water content and local stiffness during hydration.",
    "against": "Spatial hydration variation is unchanged.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Layered rehydration",
    "system": "quince seed mucilage",
    "id": 1537,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1537",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Evaporation skin timing — quince seed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For quince seed mucilage, surface elastic signals will precede measurable evaporation-rate decline during skin formation.",
    "test": "Measure surface rheology and gravimetric drying synchronously.",
    "against": "Elastic changes do not precede drying-rate changes.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Evaporation skin timing",
    "system": "quince seed mucilage",
    "id": 1538,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1538",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Mild thermal recovery — quince seed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For quince seed mucilage, mild heating after shear will restore elasticity faster than passive rest without changing polymer mass.",
    "test": "Measure recovery and molecular-size distributions.",
    "against": "Recovery improvement requires measurable degradation or concentration changes.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Mild thermal recovery",
    "system": "quince seed mucilage",
    "id": 1539,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1539",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Particle bridging threshold — quince seed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For quince seed mucilage, an intermediate polymer dose will maximize reversible bridging of inert mineral particles.",
    "test": "Measure cluster size and breakup after dose sweeps.",
    "against": "No intermediate maximum occurs after free-polymer concentration is measured.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Particle bridging threshold",
    "system": "quince seed mucilage",
    "id": 1540,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1540",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Extraction staging — basil seed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For basil seed mucilage, two gentle extraction stages will preserve more recoverable elasticity than one intense extraction at equal recovered solids.",
    "test": "Measure molecular size and oscillatory rheology.",
    "against": "Elastic recovery is unchanged after solids and molecular size are considered.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Extraction staging",
    "system": "basil seed mucilage",
    "id": 1541,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1541",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Drying support adhesion — basil seed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For basil seed mucilage, low-adhesion drying supports will reduce rehydration-time variability.",
    "test": "Compare uptake and film cracking across support treatments.",
    "against": "Rehydration variability does not follow support adhesion.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Drying support adhesion",
    "system": "basil seed mucilage",
    "id": 1542,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1542",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Ion exposure sequence — basil seed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For basil seed mucilage, gradual divalent-ion addition will produce a more uniform gel than abrupt addition at equal final composition.",
    "test": "Map local modulus and ion concentration.",
    "against": "Modulus variation is no lower under gradual addition.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Ion exposure sequence",
    "system": "basil seed mucilage",
    "id": 1543,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1543",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Freeze concentration memory — basil seed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For basil seed mucilage, partial freezing before thawing will alter relaxation spectra more than bulk viscosity.",
    "test": "Measure rheology before and after controlled partial freezing.",
    "against": "Relaxation changes are explained entirely by viscosity or concentration.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Freeze concentration memory",
    "system": "basil seed mucilage",
    "id": 1544,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1544",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Shear rest alternation — basil seed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For basil seed mucilage, alternating short shear and rest intervals will preserve molecular length better than continuous shear at equal work.",
    "test": "Measure polymer size and rheology.",
    "against": "Molecular length retention is no better at matched work.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Shear rest alternation",
    "system": "basil seed mucilage",
    "id": 1545,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1545",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Mineral contact reversibility — basil seed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For basil seed mucilage, adsorption onto smooth silica will recover more activity in water-film stabilization than adsorption onto rough silica.",
    "test": "Measure adsorbed mass, release, and capillary film lifetimes.",
    "against": "Recovered stabilization follows released mass without a roughness effect.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Mineral contact reversibility",
    "system": "basil seed mucilage",
    "id": 1546,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1546",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Layered rehydration — basil seed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For basil seed mucilage, stacked thin dried layers will hydrate more uniformly than one thick layer at equal mass.",
    "test": "Map water content and local stiffness during hydration.",
    "against": "Spatial hydration variation is unchanged.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Layered rehydration",
    "system": "basil seed mucilage",
    "id": 1547,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1547",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Evaporation skin timing — basil seed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For basil seed mucilage, surface elastic signals will precede measurable evaporation-rate decline during skin formation.",
    "test": "Measure surface rheology and gravimetric drying synchronously.",
    "against": "Elastic changes do not precede drying-rate changes.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Evaporation skin timing",
    "system": "basil seed mucilage",
    "id": 1548,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1548",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Mild thermal recovery — basil seed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For basil seed mucilage, mild heating after shear will restore elasticity faster than passive rest without changing polymer mass.",
    "test": "Measure recovery and molecular-size distributions.",
    "against": "Recovery improvement requires measurable degradation or concentration changes.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Mild thermal recovery",
    "system": "basil seed mucilage",
    "id": 1549,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1549",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Particle bridging threshold — basil seed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For basil seed mucilage, an intermediate polymer dose will maximize reversible bridging of inert mineral particles.",
    "test": "Measure cluster size and breakup after dose sweeps.",
    "against": "No intermediate maximum occurs after free-polymer concentration is measured.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Particle bridging threshold",
    "system": "basil seed mucilage",
    "id": 1550,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1550",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Extraction staging — cress seed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For cress seed mucilage, two gentle extraction stages will preserve more recoverable elasticity than one intense extraction at equal recovered solids.",
    "test": "Measure molecular size and oscillatory rheology.",
    "against": "Elastic recovery is unchanged after solids and molecular size are considered.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Extraction staging",
    "system": "cress seed mucilage",
    "id": 1551,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1551",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Drying support adhesion — cress seed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For cress seed mucilage, low-adhesion drying supports will reduce rehydration-time variability.",
    "test": "Compare uptake and film cracking across support treatments.",
    "against": "Rehydration variability does not follow support adhesion.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Drying support adhesion",
    "system": "cress seed mucilage",
    "id": 1552,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1552",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Ion exposure sequence — cress seed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For cress seed mucilage, gradual divalent-ion addition will produce a more uniform gel than abrupt addition at equal final composition.",
    "test": "Map local modulus and ion concentration.",
    "against": "Modulus variation is no lower under gradual addition.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Ion exposure sequence",
    "system": "cress seed mucilage",
    "id": 1553,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1553",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Freeze concentration memory — cress seed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For cress seed mucilage, partial freezing before thawing will alter relaxation spectra more than bulk viscosity.",
    "test": "Measure rheology before and after controlled partial freezing.",
    "against": "Relaxation changes are explained entirely by viscosity or concentration.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Freeze concentration memory",
    "system": "cress seed mucilage",
    "id": 1554,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1554",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Shear rest alternation — cress seed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For cress seed mucilage, alternating short shear and rest intervals will preserve molecular length better than continuous shear at equal work.",
    "test": "Measure polymer size and rheology.",
    "against": "Molecular length retention is no better at matched work.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Shear rest alternation",
    "system": "cress seed mucilage",
    "id": 1555,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1555",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Mineral contact reversibility — cress seed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For cress seed mucilage, adsorption onto smooth silica will recover more activity in water-film stabilization than adsorption onto rough silica.",
    "test": "Measure adsorbed mass, release, and capillary film lifetimes.",
    "against": "Recovered stabilization follows released mass without a roughness effect.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Mineral contact reversibility",
    "system": "cress seed mucilage",
    "id": 1556,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1556",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Layered rehydration — cress seed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For cress seed mucilage, stacked thin dried layers will hydrate more uniformly than one thick layer at equal mass.",
    "test": "Map water content and local stiffness during hydration.",
    "against": "Spatial hydration variation is unchanged.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Layered rehydration",
    "system": "cress seed mucilage",
    "id": 1557,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1557",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Evaporation skin timing — cress seed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For cress seed mucilage, surface elastic signals will precede measurable evaporation-rate decline during skin formation.",
    "test": "Measure surface rheology and gravimetric drying synchronously.",
    "against": "Elastic changes do not precede drying-rate changes.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Evaporation skin timing",
    "system": "cress seed mucilage",
    "id": 1558,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1558",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Mild thermal recovery — cress seed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For cress seed mucilage, mild heating after shear will restore elasticity faster than passive rest without changing polymer mass.",
    "test": "Measure recovery and molecular-size distributions.",
    "against": "Recovery improvement requires measurable degradation or concentration changes.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Mild thermal recovery",
    "system": "cress seed mucilage",
    "id": 1559,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1559",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Particle bridging threshold — cress seed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For cress seed mucilage, an intermediate polymer dose will maximize reversible bridging of inert mineral particles.",
    "test": "Measure cluster size and breakup after dose sweeps.",
    "against": "No intermediate maximum occurs after free-polymer concentration is measured.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Particle bridging threshold",
    "system": "cress seed mucilage",
    "id": 1560,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1560",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Extraction staging — okra seed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For okra seed mucilage, two gentle extraction stages will preserve more recoverable elasticity than one intense extraction at equal recovered solids.",
    "test": "Measure molecular size and oscillatory rheology.",
    "against": "Elastic recovery is unchanged after solids and molecular size are considered.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Extraction staging",
    "system": "okra seed mucilage",
    "id": 1561,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1561",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Drying support adhesion — okra seed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For okra seed mucilage, low-adhesion drying supports will reduce rehydration-time variability.",
    "test": "Compare uptake and film cracking across support treatments.",
    "against": "Rehydration variability does not follow support adhesion.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Drying support adhesion",
    "system": "okra seed mucilage",
    "id": 1562,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1562",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Ion exposure sequence — okra seed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For okra seed mucilage, gradual divalent-ion addition will produce a more uniform gel than abrupt addition at equal final composition.",
    "test": "Map local modulus and ion concentration.",
    "against": "Modulus variation is no lower under gradual addition.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Ion exposure sequence",
    "system": "okra seed mucilage",
    "id": 1563,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1563",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Freeze concentration memory — okra seed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For okra seed mucilage, partial freezing before thawing will alter relaxation spectra more than bulk viscosity.",
    "test": "Measure rheology before and after controlled partial freezing.",
    "against": "Relaxation changes are explained entirely by viscosity or concentration.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Freeze concentration memory",
    "system": "okra seed mucilage",
    "id": 1564,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1564",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Shear rest alternation — okra seed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For okra seed mucilage, alternating short shear and rest intervals will preserve molecular length better than continuous shear at equal work.",
    "test": "Measure polymer size and rheology.",
    "against": "Molecular length retention is no better at matched work.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Shear rest alternation",
    "system": "okra seed mucilage",
    "id": 1565,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1565",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Mineral contact reversibility — okra seed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For okra seed mucilage, adsorption onto smooth silica will recover more activity in water-film stabilization than adsorption onto rough silica.",
    "test": "Measure adsorbed mass, release, and capillary film lifetimes.",
    "against": "Recovered stabilization follows released mass without a roughness effect.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Mineral contact reversibility",
    "system": "okra seed mucilage",
    "id": 1566,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1566",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Layered rehydration — okra seed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For okra seed mucilage, stacked thin dried layers will hydrate more uniformly than one thick layer at equal mass.",
    "test": "Map water content and local stiffness during hydration.",
    "against": "Spatial hydration variation is unchanged.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Layered rehydration",
    "system": "okra seed mucilage",
    "id": 1567,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1567",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Evaporation skin timing — okra seed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For okra seed mucilage, surface elastic signals will precede measurable evaporation-rate decline during skin formation.",
    "test": "Measure surface rheology and gravimetric drying synchronously.",
    "against": "Elastic changes do not precede drying-rate changes.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Evaporation skin timing",
    "system": "okra seed mucilage",
    "id": 1568,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1568",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Mild thermal recovery — okra seed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For okra seed mucilage, mild heating after shear will restore elasticity faster than passive rest without changing polymer mass.",
    "test": "Measure recovery and molecular-size distributions.",
    "against": "Recovery improvement requires measurable degradation or concentration changes.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Mild thermal recovery",
    "system": "okra seed mucilage",
    "id": 1569,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1569",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Particle bridging threshold — okra seed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For okra seed mucilage, an intermediate polymer dose will maximize reversible bridging of inert mineral particles.",
    "test": "Measure cluster size and breakup after dose sweeps.",
    "against": "No intermediate maximum occurs after free-polymer concentration is measured.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Particle bridging threshold",
    "system": "okra seed mucilage",
    "id": 1570,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1570",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Extraction staging — fenugreek seed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For fenugreek seed mucilage, two gentle extraction stages will preserve more recoverable elasticity than one intense extraction at equal recovered solids.",
    "test": "Measure molecular size and oscillatory rheology.",
    "against": "Elastic recovery is unchanged after solids and molecular size are considered.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Extraction staging",
    "system": "fenugreek seed mucilage",
    "id": 1571,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1571",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Drying support adhesion — fenugreek seed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For fenugreek seed mucilage, low-adhesion drying supports will reduce rehydration-time variability.",
    "test": "Compare uptake and film cracking across support treatments.",
    "against": "Rehydration variability does not follow support adhesion.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Drying support adhesion",
    "system": "fenugreek seed mucilage",
    "id": 1572,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1572",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Ion exposure sequence — fenugreek seed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For fenugreek seed mucilage, gradual divalent-ion addition will produce a more uniform gel than abrupt addition at equal final composition.",
    "test": "Map local modulus and ion concentration.",
    "against": "Modulus variation is no lower under gradual addition.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Ion exposure sequence",
    "system": "fenugreek seed mucilage",
    "id": 1573,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1573",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Freeze concentration memory — fenugreek seed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For fenugreek seed mucilage, partial freezing before thawing will alter relaxation spectra more than bulk viscosity.",
    "test": "Measure rheology before and after controlled partial freezing.",
    "against": "Relaxation changes are explained entirely by viscosity or concentration.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Freeze concentration memory",
    "system": "fenugreek seed mucilage",
    "id": 1574,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1574",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Shear rest alternation — fenugreek seed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For fenugreek seed mucilage, alternating short shear and rest intervals will preserve molecular length better than continuous shear at equal work.",
    "test": "Measure polymer size and rheology.",
    "against": "Molecular length retention is no better at matched work.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Shear rest alternation",
    "system": "fenugreek seed mucilage",
    "id": 1575,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1575",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Mineral contact reversibility — fenugreek seed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For fenugreek seed mucilage, adsorption onto smooth silica will recover more activity in water-film stabilization than adsorption onto rough silica.",
    "test": "Measure adsorbed mass, release, and capillary film lifetimes.",
    "against": "Recovered stabilization follows released mass without a roughness effect.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Mineral contact reversibility",
    "system": "fenugreek seed mucilage",
    "id": 1576,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1576",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Layered rehydration — fenugreek seed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For fenugreek seed mucilage, stacked thin dried layers will hydrate more uniformly than one thick layer at equal mass.",
    "test": "Map water content and local stiffness during hydration.",
    "against": "Spatial hydration variation is unchanged.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Layered rehydration",
    "system": "fenugreek seed mucilage",
    "id": 1577,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1577",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Evaporation skin timing — fenugreek seed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For fenugreek seed mucilage, surface elastic signals will precede measurable evaporation-rate decline during skin formation.",
    "test": "Measure surface rheology and gravimetric drying synchronously.",
    "against": "Elastic changes do not precede drying-rate changes.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Evaporation skin timing",
    "system": "fenugreek seed mucilage",
    "id": 1578,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1578",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Mild thermal recovery — fenugreek seed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For fenugreek seed mucilage, mild heating after shear will restore elasticity faster than passive rest without changing polymer mass.",
    "test": "Measure recovery and molecular-size distributions.",
    "against": "Recovery improvement requires measurable degradation or concentration changes.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Mild thermal recovery",
    "system": "fenugreek seed mucilage",
    "id": 1579,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1579",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Particle bridging threshold — fenugreek seed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For fenugreek seed mucilage, an intermediate polymer dose will maximize reversible bridging of inert mineral particles.",
    "test": "Measure cluster size and breakup after dose sweeps.",
    "against": "No intermediate maximum occurs after free-polymer concentration is measured.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Particle bridging threshold",
    "system": "fenugreek seed mucilage",
    "id": 1580,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1580",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Extraction staging — mustard seed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For mustard seed mucilage, two gentle extraction stages will preserve more recoverable elasticity than one intense extraction at equal recovered solids.",
    "test": "Measure molecular size and oscillatory rheology.",
    "against": "Elastic recovery is unchanged after solids and molecular size are considered.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Extraction staging",
    "system": "mustard seed mucilage",
    "id": 1581,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1581",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Drying support adhesion — mustard seed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For mustard seed mucilage, low-adhesion drying supports will reduce rehydration-time variability.",
    "test": "Compare uptake and film cracking across support treatments.",
    "against": "Rehydration variability does not follow support adhesion.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Drying support adhesion",
    "system": "mustard seed mucilage",
    "id": 1582,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1582",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Ion exposure sequence — mustard seed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For mustard seed mucilage, gradual divalent-ion addition will produce a more uniform gel than abrupt addition at equal final composition.",
    "test": "Map local modulus and ion concentration.",
    "against": "Modulus variation is no lower under gradual addition.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Ion exposure sequence",
    "system": "mustard seed mucilage",
    "id": 1583,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1583",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Freeze concentration memory — mustard seed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For mustard seed mucilage, partial freezing before thawing will alter relaxation spectra more than bulk viscosity.",
    "test": "Measure rheology before and after controlled partial freezing.",
    "against": "Relaxation changes are explained entirely by viscosity or concentration.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Freeze concentration memory",
    "system": "mustard seed mucilage",
    "id": 1584,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1584",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Shear rest alternation — mustard seed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For mustard seed mucilage, alternating short shear and rest intervals will preserve molecular length better than continuous shear at equal work.",
    "test": "Measure polymer size and rheology.",
    "against": "Molecular length retention is no better at matched work.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Shear rest alternation",
    "system": "mustard seed mucilage",
    "id": 1585,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1585",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Mineral contact reversibility — mustard seed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For mustard seed mucilage, adsorption onto smooth silica will recover more activity in water-film stabilization than adsorption onto rough silica.",
    "test": "Measure adsorbed mass, release, and capillary film lifetimes.",
    "against": "Recovered stabilization follows released mass without a roughness effect.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Mineral contact reversibility",
    "system": "mustard seed mucilage",
    "id": 1586,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1586",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Layered rehydration — mustard seed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For mustard seed mucilage, stacked thin dried layers will hydrate more uniformly than one thick layer at equal mass.",
    "test": "Map water content and local stiffness during hydration.",
    "against": "Spatial hydration variation is unchanged.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Layered rehydration",
    "system": "mustard seed mucilage",
    "id": 1587,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1587",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Evaporation skin timing — mustard seed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For mustard seed mucilage, surface elastic signals will precede measurable evaporation-rate decline during skin formation.",
    "test": "Measure surface rheology and gravimetric drying synchronously.",
    "against": "Elastic changes do not precede drying-rate changes.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Evaporation skin timing",
    "system": "mustard seed mucilage",
    "id": 1588,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1588",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Mild thermal recovery — mustard seed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For mustard seed mucilage, mild heating after shear will restore elasticity faster than passive rest without changing polymer mass.",
    "test": "Measure recovery and molecular-size distributions.",
    "against": "Recovery improvement requires measurable degradation or concentration changes.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Mild thermal recovery",
    "system": "mustard seed mucilage",
    "id": 1589,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1589",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Particle bridging threshold — mustard seed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For mustard seed mucilage, an intermediate polymer dose will maximize reversible bridging of inert mineral particles.",
    "test": "Measure cluster size and breakup after dose sweeps.",
    "against": "No intermediate maximum occurs after free-polymer concentration is measured.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Particle bridging threshold",
    "system": "mustard seed mucilage",
    "id": 1590,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1590",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Extraction staging — Arabidopsis seed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For Arabidopsis seed mucilage, two gentle extraction stages will preserve more recoverable elasticity than one intense extraction at equal recovered solids.",
    "test": "Measure molecular size and oscillatory rheology.",
    "against": "Elastic recovery is unchanged after solids and molecular size are considered.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Extraction staging",
    "system": "Arabidopsis seed mucilage",
    "id": 1591,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1591",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Drying support adhesion — Arabidopsis seed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For Arabidopsis seed mucilage, low-adhesion drying supports will reduce rehydration-time variability.",
    "test": "Compare uptake and film cracking across support treatments.",
    "against": "Rehydration variability does not follow support adhesion.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Drying support adhesion",
    "system": "Arabidopsis seed mucilage",
    "id": 1592,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1592",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Ion exposure sequence — Arabidopsis seed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For Arabidopsis seed mucilage, gradual divalent-ion addition will produce a more uniform gel than abrupt addition at equal final composition.",
    "test": "Map local modulus and ion concentration.",
    "against": "Modulus variation is no lower under gradual addition.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Ion exposure sequence",
    "system": "Arabidopsis seed mucilage",
    "id": 1593,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1593",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Freeze concentration memory — Arabidopsis seed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For Arabidopsis seed mucilage, partial freezing before thawing will alter relaxation spectra more than bulk viscosity.",
    "test": "Measure rheology before and after controlled partial freezing.",
    "against": "Relaxation changes are explained entirely by viscosity or concentration.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Freeze concentration memory",
    "system": "Arabidopsis seed mucilage",
    "id": 1594,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1594",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Shear rest alternation — Arabidopsis seed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For Arabidopsis seed mucilage, alternating short shear and rest intervals will preserve molecular length better than continuous shear at equal work.",
    "test": "Measure polymer size and rheology.",
    "against": "Molecular length retention is no better at matched work.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Shear rest alternation",
    "system": "Arabidopsis seed mucilage",
    "id": 1595,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1595",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Mineral contact reversibility — Arabidopsis seed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For Arabidopsis seed mucilage, adsorption onto smooth silica will recover more activity in water-film stabilization than adsorption onto rough silica.",
    "test": "Measure adsorbed mass, release, and capillary film lifetimes.",
    "against": "Recovered stabilization follows released mass without a roughness effect.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Mineral contact reversibility",
    "system": "Arabidopsis seed mucilage",
    "id": 1596,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1596",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Layered rehydration — Arabidopsis seed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For Arabidopsis seed mucilage, stacked thin dried layers will hydrate more uniformly than one thick layer at equal mass.",
    "test": "Map water content and local stiffness during hydration.",
    "against": "Spatial hydration variation is unchanged.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Layered rehydration",
    "system": "Arabidopsis seed mucilage",
    "id": 1597,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1597",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Evaporation skin timing — Arabidopsis seed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For Arabidopsis seed mucilage, surface elastic signals will precede measurable evaporation-rate decline during skin formation.",
    "test": "Measure surface rheology and gravimetric drying synchronously.",
    "against": "Elastic changes do not precede drying-rate changes.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Evaporation skin timing",
    "system": "Arabidopsis seed mucilage",
    "id": 1598,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1598",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Mild thermal recovery — Arabidopsis seed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For Arabidopsis seed mucilage, mild heating after shear will restore elasticity faster than passive rest without changing polymer mass.",
    "test": "Measure recovery and molecular-size distributions.",
    "against": "Recovery improvement requires measurable degradation or concentration changes.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Mild thermal recovery",
    "system": "Arabidopsis seed mucilage",
    "id": 1599,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1599",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Particle bridging threshold — Arabidopsis seed mucilage",
    "hypothesis": "For Arabidopsis seed mucilage, an intermediate polymer dose will maximize reversible bridging of inert mineral particles.",
    "test": "Measure cluster size and breakup after dose sweeps.",
    "against": "No intermediate maximum occurs after free-polymer concentration is measured.",
    "category": "Seed-derived mucilage gels",
    "controls": "Use purified nonhuman plant material; match extraction batch, solids, ionic strength, temperature, and independently measured starting viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Seed-derived mucilage gels: Particle bridging threshold",
    "system": "Arabidopsis seed mucilage",
    "id": 1600,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Purified plant mucilage, controlled extraction/hydration, balance, rheology or mechanical testing, and calibrated imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1600",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Dark-zone transit spread — Chlorella vulgaris laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Chlorella vulgaris laboratory culture, narrowing the distribution of dark-zone transit times will improve photosynthetic recovery at equal mean light exposure.",
    "test": "Compare controlled circulation paths and fluorescence recovery.",
    "against": "Recovery is unchanged after actual photon histories are included.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Dark-zone transit spread",
    "system": "Chlorella vulgaris laboratory culture",
    "id": 1601,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1601",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Bubble release spacing — Chlorella vulgaris laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Chlorella vulgaris laboratory culture, widely spaced fine-bubble release points will reduce local cell accumulation compared with clustered releases.",
    "test": "Map cells and flow at equal gas delivery.",
    "against": "Spatial accumulation is no lower after mixing is matched.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Bubble release spacing",
    "system": "Chlorella vulgaris laboratory culture",
    "id": 1602,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1602",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Wall reflection color — Chlorella vulgaris laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Chlorella vulgaris laboratory culture, a spectrally selective rear reflector will reduce the depth gradient of photosynthetic yield.",
    "test": "Measure internal spectra and fluorescence profiles.",
    "against": "Yield gradients persist after absorbed photons are matched.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Wall reflection color",
    "system": "Chlorella vulgaris laboratory culture",
    "id": 1603,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1603",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Short settling rests — Chlorella vulgaris laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Chlorella vulgaris laboratory culture, brief circulation rests will change aggregate-size distributions before bulk growth rate changes.",
    "test": "Track aggregates and growth under equal daily mixing work.",
    "against": "Aggregation changes appear only alongside growth changes.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Short settling rests",
    "system": "Chlorella vulgaris laboratory culture",
    "id": 1604,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 289,
    "literature_query": "Short settling rests Chlorella vulgaris laboratory culture brief circulation change aggregate-size distributions bulk experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1604",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Short settling rests — Chlorella vulgaris laboratory culture",
      "hypothesis": "For Chlorella vulgaris laboratory culture, brief circulation rests will change aggregate-size distributions before bulk growth rate changes.",
      "test": "Track aggregates and growth under equal daily mixing work.",
      "against": "Aggregation changes appear only alongside growth changes.",
      "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
      "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Short settling rests",
      "system": "Chlorella vulgaris laboratory culture",
      "id": 1604,
      "access_score": 2,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 23,
      "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 289,
      "literature_query": "Short settling rests Chlorella vulgaris laboratory culture brief circulation change aggregate-size distributions bulk experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
      "source_lead_count": 3,
      "source_ids": "S13b4587c69f2;S25605da691aa;S3b104b7b5323",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Gas pulse smoothing — Chlorella vulgaris laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Chlorella vulgaris laboratory culture, smoothing carbon-dioxide delivery will reduce pH variance more than it changes mean biomass production.",
    "test": "Measure pH, dissolved carbon, and biomass.",
    "against": "pH variance is unchanged or growth changes dominate.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Gas pulse smoothing",
    "system": "Chlorella vulgaris laboratory culture",
    "id": 1605,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1605",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Culture rotation direction — Chlorella vulgaris laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Chlorella vulgaris laboratory culture, periodically reversing gentle circulation will reduce persistent wall deposits.",
    "test": "Measure attached biomass and suspended cell viability.",
    "against": "Deposits are unchanged at equal mixing work.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Culture rotation direction",
    "system": "Chlorella vulgaris laboratory culture",
    "id": 1606,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1606",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Optical self-shading warning — Chlorella vulgaris laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Chlorella vulgaris laboratory culture, spatial fluorescence variance will predict emerging self-shading earlier than bulk optical density.",
    "test": "Track yield maps and independent light fields.",
    "against": "Variance provides no earlier warning on independent cultures.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Optical self-shading warning",
    "system": "Chlorella vulgaris laboratory culture",
    "id": 1607,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1607",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Thermal pulse placement — Chlorella vulgaris laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Chlorella vulgaris laboratory culture, a mild temperature pulse during darkness will cause different recovery than the same pulse during light.",
    "test": "Measure fluorescence and growth after matched thermal doses.",
    "against": "Recovery is independent of light-phase placement.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Thermal pulse placement",
    "system": "Chlorella vulgaris laboratory culture",
    "id": 1608,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1608",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Harvest fraction scheduling — Chlorella vulgaris laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Chlorella vulgaris laboratory culture, several small removals with medium replacement will reduce physiological variability relative to one equal-volume removal.",
    "test": "Measure cell size and fluorescence distributions.",
    "against": "Variability is no lower after mean culture density is matched.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Harvest fraction scheduling",
    "system": "Chlorella vulgaris laboratory culture",
    "id": 1609,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1609",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Flow-history relaxation — Chlorella vulgaris laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Chlorella vulgaris laboratory culture, cell orientation or aggregation will retain a measurable memory after circulation stops.",
    "test": "Track orientation and aggregate statistics during rest.",
    "against": "Observed relaxation is fully explained by passive settling controls.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Flow-history relaxation",
    "system": "Chlorella vulgaris laboratory culture",
    "id": 1610,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1610",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Dark-zone transit spread — Chlamydomonas reinhardtii laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Chlamydomonas reinhardtii laboratory culture, narrowing the distribution of dark-zone transit times will improve photosynthetic recovery at equal mean light exposure.",
    "test": "Compare controlled circulation paths and fluorescence recovery.",
    "against": "Recovery is unchanged after actual photon histories are included.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Dark-zone transit spread",
    "system": "Chlamydomonas reinhardtii laboratory culture",
    "id": 1611,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1611",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Bubble release spacing — Chlamydomonas reinhardtii laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Chlamydomonas reinhardtii laboratory culture, widely spaced fine-bubble release points will reduce local cell accumulation compared with clustered releases.",
    "test": "Map cells and flow at equal gas delivery.",
    "against": "Spatial accumulation is no lower after mixing is matched.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Bubble release spacing",
    "system": "Chlamydomonas reinhardtii laboratory culture",
    "id": 1612,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1612",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Wall reflection color — Chlamydomonas reinhardtii laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Chlamydomonas reinhardtii laboratory culture, a spectrally selective rear reflector will reduce the depth gradient of photosynthetic yield.",
    "test": "Measure internal spectra and fluorescence profiles.",
    "against": "Yield gradients persist after absorbed photons are matched.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Wall reflection color",
    "system": "Chlamydomonas reinhardtii laboratory culture",
    "id": 1613,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1613",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Short settling rests — Chlamydomonas reinhardtii laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Chlamydomonas reinhardtii laboratory culture, brief circulation rests will change aggregate-size distributions before bulk growth rate changes.",
    "test": "Track aggregates and growth under equal daily mixing work.",
    "against": "Aggregation changes appear only alongside growth changes.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Short settling rests",
    "system": "Chlamydomonas reinhardtii laboratory culture",
    "id": 1614,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1614",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Gas pulse smoothing — Chlamydomonas reinhardtii laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Chlamydomonas reinhardtii laboratory culture, smoothing carbon-dioxide delivery will reduce pH variance more than it changes mean biomass production.",
    "test": "Measure pH, dissolved carbon, and biomass.",
    "against": "pH variance is unchanged or growth changes dominate.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Gas pulse smoothing",
    "system": "Chlamydomonas reinhardtii laboratory culture",
    "id": 1615,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1615",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Culture rotation direction — Chlamydomonas reinhardtii laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Chlamydomonas reinhardtii laboratory culture, periodically reversing gentle circulation will reduce persistent wall deposits.",
    "test": "Measure attached biomass and suspended cell viability.",
    "against": "Deposits are unchanged at equal mixing work.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Culture rotation direction",
    "system": "Chlamydomonas reinhardtii laboratory culture",
    "id": 1616,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1616",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Optical self-shading warning — Chlamydomonas reinhardtii laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Chlamydomonas reinhardtii laboratory culture, spatial fluorescence variance will predict emerging self-shading earlier than bulk optical density.",
    "test": "Track yield maps and independent light fields.",
    "against": "Variance provides no earlier warning on independent cultures.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Optical self-shading warning",
    "system": "Chlamydomonas reinhardtii laboratory culture",
    "id": 1617,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1617",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Thermal pulse placement — Chlamydomonas reinhardtii laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Chlamydomonas reinhardtii laboratory culture, a mild temperature pulse during darkness will cause different recovery than the same pulse during light.",
    "test": "Measure fluorescence and growth after matched thermal doses.",
    "against": "Recovery is independent of light-phase placement.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Thermal pulse placement",
    "system": "Chlamydomonas reinhardtii laboratory culture",
    "id": 1618,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1618",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Harvest fraction scheduling — Chlamydomonas reinhardtii laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Chlamydomonas reinhardtii laboratory culture, several small removals with medium replacement will reduce physiological variability relative to one equal-volume removal.",
    "test": "Measure cell size and fluorescence distributions.",
    "against": "Variability is no lower after mean culture density is matched.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Harvest fraction scheduling",
    "system": "Chlamydomonas reinhardtii laboratory culture",
    "id": 1619,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1619",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Flow-history relaxation — Chlamydomonas reinhardtii laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Chlamydomonas reinhardtii laboratory culture, cell orientation or aggregation will retain a measurable memory after circulation stops.",
    "test": "Track orientation and aggregate statistics during rest.",
    "against": "Observed relaxation is fully explained by passive settling controls.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Flow-history relaxation",
    "system": "Chlamydomonas reinhardtii laboratory culture",
    "id": 1620,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1620",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Dark-zone transit spread — Scenedesmus obliquus laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Scenedesmus obliquus laboratory culture, narrowing the distribution of dark-zone transit times will improve photosynthetic recovery at equal mean light exposure.",
    "test": "Compare controlled circulation paths and fluorescence recovery.",
    "against": "Recovery is unchanged after actual photon histories are included.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Dark-zone transit spread",
    "system": "Scenedesmus obliquus laboratory culture",
    "id": 1621,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1621",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Bubble release spacing — Scenedesmus obliquus laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Scenedesmus obliquus laboratory culture, widely spaced fine-bubble release points will reduce local cell accumulation compared with clustered releases.",
    "test": "Map cells and flow at equal gas delivery.",
    "against": "Spatial accumulation is no lower after mixing is matched.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Bubble release spacing",
    "system": "Scenedesmus obliquus laboratory culture",
    "id": 1622,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1622",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Wall reflection color — Scenedesmus obliquus laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Scenedesmus obliquus laboratory culture, a spectrally selective rear reflector will reduce the depth gradient of photosynthetic yield.",
    "test": "Measure internal spectra and fluorescence profiles.",
    "against": "Yield gradients persist after absorbed photons are matched.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Wall reflection color",
    "system": "Scenedesmus obliquus laboratory culture",
    "id": 1623,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1623",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Short settling rests — Scenedesmus obliquus laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Scenedesmus obliquus laboratory culture, brief circulation rests will change aggregate-size distributions before bulk growth rate changes.",
    "test": "Track aggregates and growth under equal daily mixing work.",
    "against": "Aggregation changes appear only alongside growth changes.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Short settling rests",
    "system": "Scenedesmus obliquus laboratory culture",
    "id": 1624,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1624",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Gas pulse smoothing — Scenedesmus obliquus laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Scenedesmus obliquus laboratory culture, smoothing carbon-dioxide delivery will reduce pH variance more than it changes mean biomass production.",
    "test": "Measure pH, dissolved carbon, and biomass.",
    "against": "pH variance is unchanged or growth changes dominate.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Gas pulse smoothing",
    "system": "Scenedesmus obliquus laboratory culture",
    "id": 1625,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1625",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Culture rotation direction — Scenedesmus obliquus laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Scenedesmus obliquus laboratory culture, periodically reversing gentle circulation will reduce persistent wall deposits.",
    "test": "Measure attached biomass and suspended cell viability.",
    "against": "Deposits are unchanged at equal mixing work.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Culture rotation direction",
    "system": "Scenedesmus obliquus laboratory culture",
    "id": 1626,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1626",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Optical self-shading warning — Scenedesmus obliquus laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Scenedesmus obliquus laboratory culture, spatial fluorescence variance will predict emerging self-shading earlier than bulk optical density.",
    "test": "Track yield maps and independent light fields.",
    "against": "Variance provides no earlier warning on independent cultures.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Optical self-shading warning",
    "system": "Scenedesmus obliquus laboratory culture",
    "id": 1627,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1627",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Thermal pulse placement — Scenedesmus obliquus laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Scenedesmus obliquus laboratory culture, a mild temperature pulse during darkness will cause different recovery than the same pulse during light.",
    "test": "Measure fluorescence and growth after matched thermal doses.",
    "against": "Recovery is independent of light-phase placement.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Thermal pulse placement",
    "system": "Scenedesmus obliquus laboratory culture",
    "id": 1628,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1628",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Harvest fraction scheduling — Scenedesmus obliquus laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Scenedesmus obliquus laboratory culture, several small removals with medium replacement will reduce physiological variability relative to one equal-volume removal.",
    "test": "Measure cell size and fluorescence distributions.",
    "against": "Variability is no lower after mean culture density is matched.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Harvest fraction scheduling",
    "system": "Scenedesmus obliquus laboratory culture",
    "id": 1629,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1629",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Flow-history relaxation — Scenedesmus obliquus laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Scenedesmus obliquus laboratory culture, cell orientation or aggregation will retain a measurable memory after circulation stops.",
    "test": "Track orientation and aggregate statistics during rest.",
    "against": "Observed relaxation is fully explained by passive settling controls.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Flow-history relaxation",
    "system": "Scenedesmus obliquus laboratory culture",
    "id": 1630,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1630",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Dark-zone transit spread — Desmodesmus communis laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Desmodesmus communis laboratory culture, narrowing the distribution of dark-zone transit times will improve photosynthetic recovery at equal mean light exposure.",
    "test": "Compare controlled circulation paths and fluorescence recovery.",
    "against": "Recovery is unchanged after actual photon histories are included.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Dark-zone transit spread",
    "system": "Desmodesmus communis laboratory culture",
    "id": 1631,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1631",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Bubble release spacing — Desmodesmus communis laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Desmodesmus communis laboratory culture, widely spaced fine-bubble release points will reduce local cell accumulation compared with clustered releases.",
    "test": "Map cells and flow at equal gas delivery.",
    "against": "Spatial accumulation is no lower after mixing is matched.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Bubble release spacing",
    "system": "Desmodesmus communis laboratory culture",
    "id": 1632,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1632",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Wall reflection color — Desmodesmus communis laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Desmodesmus communis laboratory culture, a spectrally selective rear reflector will reduce the depth gradient of photosynthetic yield.",
    "test": "Measure internal spectra and fluorescence profiles.",
    "against": "Yield gradients persist after absorbed photons are matched.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Wall reflection color",
    "system": "Desmodesmus communis laboratory culture",
    "id": 1633,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1633",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Short settling rests — Desmodesmus communis laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Desmodesmus communis laboratory culture, brief circulation rests will change aggregate-size distributions before bulk growth rate changes.",
    "test": "Track aggregates and growth under equal daily mixing work.",
    "against": "Aggregation changes appear only alongside growth changes.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Short settling rests",
    "system": "Desmodesmus communis laboratory culture",
    "id": 1634,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1634",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Gas pulse smoothing — Desmodesmus communis laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Desmodesmus communis laboratory culture, smoothing carbon-dioxide delivery will reduce pH variance more than it changes mean biomass production.",
    "test": "Measure pH, dissolved carbon, and biomass.",
    "against": "pH variance is unchanged or growth changes dominate.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Gas pulse smoothing",
    "system": "Desmodesmus communis laboratory culture",
    "id": 1635,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1635",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Culture rotation direction — Desmodesmus communis laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Desmodesmus communis laboratory culture, periodically reversing gentle circulation will reduce persistent wall deposits.",
    "test": "Measure attached biomass and suspended cell viability.",
    "against": "Deposits are unchanged at equal mixing work.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Culture rotation direction",
    "system": "Desmodesmus communis laboratory culture",
    "id": 1636,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1636",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Optical self-shading warning — Desmodesmus communis laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Desmodesmus communis laboratory culture, spatial fluorescence variance will predict emerging self-shading earlier than bulk optical density.",
    "test": "Track yield maps and independent light fields.",
    "against": "Variance provides no earlier warning on independent cultures.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Optical self-shading warning",
    "system": "Desmodesmus communis laboratory culture",
    "id": 1637,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1637",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Thermal pulse placement — Desmodesmus communis laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Desmodesmus communis laboratory culture, a mild temperature pulse during darkness will cause different recovery than the same pulse during light.",
    "test": "Measure fluorescence and growth after matched thermal doses.",
    "against": "Recovery is independent of light-phase placement.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Thermal pulse placement",
    "system": "Desmodesmus communis laboratory culture",
    "id": 1638,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1638",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Harvest fraction scheduling — Desmodesmus communis laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Desmodesmus communis laboratory culture, several small removals with medium replacement will reduce physiological variability relative to one equal-volume removal.",
    "test": "Measure cell size and fluorescence distributions.",
    "against": "Variability is no lower after mean culture density is matched.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Harvest fraction scheduling",
    "system": "Desmodesmus communis laboratory culture",
    "id": 1639,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1639",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Flow-history relaxation — Desmodesmus communis laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Desmodesmus communis laboratory culture, cell orientation or aggregation will retain a measurable memory after circulation stops.",
    "test": "Track orientation and aggregate statistics during rest.",
    "against": "Observed relaxation is fully explained by passive settling controls.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Flow-history relaxation",
    "system": "Desmodesmus communis laboratory culture",
    "id": 1640,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1640",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Dark-zone transit spread — Haematococcus pluvialis laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Haematococcus pluvialis laboratory culture, narrowing the distribution of dark-zone transit times will improve photosynthetic recovery at equal mean light exposure.",
    "test": "Compare controlled circulation paths and fluorescence recovery.",
    "against": "Recovery is unchanged after actual photon histories are included.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Dark-zone transit spread",
    "system": "Haematococcus pluvialis laboratory culture",
    "id": 1641,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1641",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Bubble release spacing — Haematococcus pluvialis laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Haematococcus pluvialis laboratory culture, widely spaced fine-bubble release points will reduce local cell accumulation compared with clustered releases.",
    "test": "Map cells and flow at equal gas delivery.",
    "against": "Spatial accumulation is no lower after mixing is matched.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Bubble release spacing",
    "system": "Haematococcus pluvialis laboratory culture",
    "id": 1642,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1642",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Wall reflection color — Haematococcus pluvialis laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Haematococcus pluvialis laboratory culture, a spectrally selective rear reflector will reduce the depth gradient of photosynthetic yield.",
    "test": "Measure internal spectra and fluorescence profiles.",
    "against": "Yield gradients persist after absorbed photons are matched.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Wall reflection color",
    "system": "Haematococcus pluvialis laboratory culture",
    "id": 1643,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1643",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Short settling rests — Haematococcus pluvialis laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Haematococcus pluvialis laboratory culture, brief circulation rests will change aggregate-size distributions before bulk growth rate changes.",
    "test": "Track aggregates and growth under equal daily mixing work.",
    "against": "Aggregation changes appear only alongside growth changes.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Short settling rests",
    "system": "Haematococcus pluvialis laboratory culture",
    "id": 1644,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1644",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Gas pulse smoothing — Haematococcus pluvialis laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Haematococcus pluvialis laboratory culture, smoothing carbon-dioxide delivery will reduce pH variance more than it changes mean biomass production.",
    "test": "Measure pH, dissolved carbon, and biomass.",
    "against": "pH variance is unchanged or growth changes dominate.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Gas pulse smoothing",
    "system": "Haematococcus pluvialis laboratory culture",
    "id": 1645,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1645",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Culture rotation direction — Haematococcus pluvialis laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Haematococcus pluvialis laboratory culture, periodically reversing gentle circulation will reduce persistent wall deposits.",
    "test": "Measure attached biomass and suspended cell viability.",
    "against": "Deposits are unchanged at equal mixing work.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Culture rotation direction",
    "system": "Haematococcus pluvialis laboratory culture",
    "id": 1646,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1646",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Optical self-shading warning — Haematococcus pluvialis laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Haematococcus pluvialis laboratory culture, spatial fluorescence variance will predict emerging self-shading earlier than bulk optical density.",
    "test": "Track yield maps and independent light fields.",
    "against": "Variance provides no earlier warning on independent cultures.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Optical self-shading warning",
    "system": "Haematococcus pluvialis laboratory culture",
    "id": 1647,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1647",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Thermal pulse placement — Haematococcus pluvialis laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Haematococcus pluvialis laboratory culture, a mild temperature pulse during darkness will cause different recovery than the same pulse during light.",
    "test": "Measure fluorescence and growth after matched thermal doses.",
    "against": "Recovery is independent of light-phase placement.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Thermal pulse placement",
    "system": "Haematococcus pluvialis laboratory culture",
    "id": 1648,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1648",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Harvest fraction scheduling — Haematococcus pluvialis laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Haematococcus pluvialis laboratory culture, several small removals with medium replacement will reduce physiological variability relative to one equal-volume removal.",
    "test": "Measure cell size and fluorescence distributions.",
    "against": "Variability is no lower after mean culture density is matched.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Harvest fraction scheduling",
    "system": "Haematococcus pluvialis laboratory culture",
    "id": 1649,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1649",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Flow-history relaxation — Haematococcus pluvialis laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Haematococcus pluvialis laboratory culture, cell orientation or aggregation will retain a measurable memory after circulation stops.",
    "test": "Track orientation and aggregate statistics during rest.",
    "against": "Observed relaxation is fully explained by passive settling controls.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Flow-history relaxation",
    "system": "Haematococcus pluvialis laboratory culture",
    "id": 1650,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1650",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Dark-zone transit spread — Dunaliella salina laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Dunaliella salina laboratory culture, narrowing the distribution of dark-zone transit times will improve photosynthetic recovery at equal mean light exposure.",
    "test": "Compare controlled circulation paths and fluorescence recovery.",
    "against": "Recovery is unchanged after actual photon histories are included.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Dark-zone transit spread",
    "system": "Dunaliella salina laboratory culture",
    "id": 1651,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1651",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Bubble release spacing — Dunaliella salina laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Dunaliella salina laboratory culture, widely spaced fine-bubble release points will reduce local cell accumulation compared with clustered releases.",
    "test": "Map cells and flow at equal gas delivery.",
    "against": "Spatial accumulation is no lower after mixing is matched.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Bubble release spacing",
    "system": "Dunaliella salina laboratory culture",
    "id": 1652,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1652",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Wall reflection color — Dunaliella salina laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Dunaliella salina laboratory culture, a spectrally selective rear reflector will reduce the depth gradient of photosynthetic yield.",
    "test": "Measure internal spectra and fluorescence profiles.",
    "against": "Yield gradients persist after absorbed photons are matched.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Wall reflection color",
    "system": "Dunaliella salina laboratory culture",
    "id": 1653,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1653",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Short settling rests — Dunaliella salina laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Dunaliella salina laboratory culture, brief circulation rests will change aggregate-size distributions before bulk growth rate changes.",
    "test": "Track aggregates and growth under equal daily mixing work.",
    "against": "Aggregation changes appear only alongside growth changes.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Short settling rests",
    "system": "Dunaliella salina laboratory culture",
    "id": 1654,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1654",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Gas pulse smoothing — Dunaliella salina laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Dunaliella salina laboratory culture, smoothing carbon-dioxide delivery will reduce pH variance more than it changes mean biomass production.",
    "test": "Measure pH, dissolved carbon, and biomass.",
    "against": "pH variance is unchanged or growth changes dominate.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Gas pulse smoothing",
    "system": "Dunaliella salina laboratory culture",
    "id": 1655,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1655",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Culture rotation direction — Dunaliella salina laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Dunaliella salina laboratory culture, periodically reversing gentle circulation will reduce persistent wall deposits.",
    "test": "Measure attached biomass and suspended cell viability.",
    "against": "Deposits are unchanged at equal mixing work.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Culture rotation direction",
    "system": "Dunaliella salina laboratory culture",
    "id": 1656,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1656",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Optical self-shading warning — Dunaliella salina laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Dunaliella salina laboratory culture, spatial fluorescence variance will predict emerging self-shading earlier than bulk optical density.",
    "test": "Track yield maps and independent light fields.",
    "against": "Variance provides no earlier warning on independent cultures.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Optical self-shading warning",
    "system": "Dunaliella salina laboratory culture",
    "id": 1657,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1657",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Thermal pulse placement — Dunaliella salina laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Dunaliella salina laboratory culture, a mild temperature pulse during darkness will cause different recovery than the same pulse during light.",
    "test": "Measure fluorescence and growth after matched thermal doses.",
    "against": "Recovery is independent of light-phase placement.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Thermal pulse placement",
    "system": "Dunaliella salina laboratory culture",
    "id": 1658,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1658",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Harvest fraction scheduling — Dunaliella salina laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Dunaliella salina laboratory culture, several small removals with medium replacement will reduce physiological variability relative to one equal-volume removal.",
    "test": "Measure cell size and fluorescence distributions.",
    "against": "Variability is no lower after mean culture density is matched.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Harvest fraction scheduling",
    "system": "Dunaliella salina laboratory culture",
    "id": 1659,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1659",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Flow-history relaxation — Dunaliella salina laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Dunaliella salina laboratory culture, cell orientation or aggregation will retain a measurable memory after circulation stops.",
    "test": "Track orientation and aggregate statistics during rest.",
    "against": "Observed relaxation is fully explained by passive settling controls.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Flow-history relaxation",
    "system": "Dunaliella salina laboratory culture",
    "id": 1660,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1660",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Dark-zone transit spread — Nannochloropsis oceanica laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Nannochloropsis oceanica laboratory culture, narrowing the distribution of dark-zone transit times will improve photosynthetic recovery at equal mean light exposure.",
    "test": "Compare controlled circulation paths and fluorescence recovery.",
    "against": "Recovery is unchanged after actual photon histories are included.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Dark-zone transit spread",
    "system": "Nannochloropsis oceanica laboratory culture",
    "id": 1661,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1661",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Bubble release spacing — Nannochloropsis oceanica laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Nannochloropsis oceanica laboratory culture, widely spaced fine-bubble release points will reduce local cell accumulation compared with clustered releases.",
    "test": "Map cells and flow at equal gas delivery.",
    "against": "Spatial accumulation is no lower after mixing is matched.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Bubble release spacing",
    "system": "Nannochloropsis oceanica laboratory culture",
    "id": 1662,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1662",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Wall reflection color — Nannochloropsis oceanica laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Nannochloropsis oceanica laboratory culture, a spectrally selective rear reflector will reduce the depth gradient of photosynthetic yield.",
    "test": "Measure internal spectra and fluorescence profiles.",
    "against": "Yield gradients persist after absorbed photons are matched.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Wall reflection color",
    "system": "Nannochloropsis oceanica laboratory culture",
    "id": 1663,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1663",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Short settling rests — Nannochloropsis oceanica laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Nannochloropsis oceanica laboratory culture, brief circulation rests will change aggregate-size distributions before bulk growth rate changes.",
    "test": "Track aggregates and growth under equal daily mixing work.",
    "against": "Aggregation changes appear only alongside growth changes.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Short settling rests",
    "system": "Nannochloropsis oceanica laboratory culture",
    "id": 1664,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1664",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Gas pulse smoothing — Nannochloropsis oceanica laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Nannochloropsis oceanica laboratory culture, smoothing carbon-dioxide delivery will reduce pH variance more than it changes mean biomass production.",
    "test": "Measure pH, dissolved carbon, and biomass.",
    "against": "pH variance is unchanged or growth changes dominate.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Gas pulse smoothing",
    "system": "Nannochloropsis oceanica laboratory culture",
    "id": 1665,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1665",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Culture rotation direction — Nannochloropsis oceanica laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Nannochloropsis oceanica laboratory culture, periodically reversing gentle circulation will reduce persistent wall deposits.",
    "test": "Measure attached biomass and suspended cell viability.",
    "against": "Deposits are unchanged at equal mixing work.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Culture rotation direction",
    "system": "Nannochloropsis oceanica laboratory culture",
    "id": 1666,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1666",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Optical self-shading warning — Nannochloropsis oceanica laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Nannochloropsis oceanica laboratory culture, spatial fluorescence variance will predict emerging self-shading earlier than bulk optical density.",
    "test": "Track yield maps and independent light fields.",
    "against": "Variance provides no earlier warning on independent cultures.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Optical self-shading warning",
    "system": "Nannochloropsis oceanica laboratory culture",
    "id": 1667,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1667",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Thermal pulse placement — Nannochloropsis oceanica laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Nannochloropsis oceanica laboratory culture, a mild temperature pulse during darkness will cause different recovery than the same pulse during light.",
    "test": "Measure fluorescence and growth after matched thermal doses.",
    "against": "Recovery is independent of light-phase placement.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Thermal pulse placement",
    "system": "Nannochloropsis oceanica laboratory culture",
    "id": 1668,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1668",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Harvest fraction scheduling — Nannochloropsis oceanica laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Nannochloropsis oceanica laboratory culture, several small removals with medium replacement will reduce physiological variability relative to one equal-volume removal.",
    "test": "Measure cell size and fluorescence distributions.",
    "against": "Variability is no lower after mean culture density is matched.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Harvest fraction scheduling",
    "system": "Nannochloropsis oceanica laboratory culture",
    "id": 1669,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1669",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Flow-history relaxation — Nannochloropsis oceanica laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Nannochloropsis oceanica laboratory culture, cell orientation or aggregation will retain a measurable memory after circulation stops.",
    "test": "Track orientation and aggregate statistics during rest.",
    "against": "Observed relaxation is fully explained by passive settling controls.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Flow-history relaxation",
    "system": "Nannochloropsis oceanica laboratory culture",
    "id": 1670,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1670",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Dark-zone transit spread — Phaeodactylum tricornutum laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Phaeodactylum tricornutum laboratory culture, narrowing the distribution of dark-zone transit times will improve photosynthetic recovery at equal mean light exposure.",
    "test": "Compare controlled circulation paths and fluorescence recovery.",
    "against": "Recovery is unchanged after actual photon histories are included.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Dark-zone transit spread",
    "system": "Phaeodactylum tricornutum laboratory culture",
    "id": 1671,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1671",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Bubble release spacing — Phaeodactylum tricornutum laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Phaeodactylum tricornutum laboratory culture, widely spaced fine-bubble release points will reduce local cell accumulation compared with clustered releases.",
    "test": "Map cells and flow at equal gas delivery.",
    "against": "Spatial accumulation is no lower after mixing is matched.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Bubble release spacing",
    "system": "Phaeodactylum tricornutum laboratory culture",
    "id": 1672,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1672",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Wall reflection color — Phaeodactylum tricornutum laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Phaeodactylum tricornutum laboratory culture, a spectrally selective rear reflector will reduce the depth gradient of photosynthetic yield.",
    "test": "Measure internal spectra and fluorescence profiles.",
    "against": "Yield gradients persist after absorbed photons are matched.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Wall reflection color",
    "system": "Phaeodactylum tricornutum laboratory culture",
    "id": 1673,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1673",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Short settling rests — Phaeodactylum tricornutum laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Phaeodactylum tricornutum laboratory culture, brief circulation rests will change aggregate-size distributions before bulk growth rate changes.",
    "test": "Track aggregates and growth under equal daily mixing work.",
    "against": "Aggregation changes appear only alongside growth changes.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Short settling rests",
    "system": "Phaeodactylum tricornutum laboratory culture",
    "id": 1674,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1674",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Gas pulse smoothing — Phaeodactylum tricornutum laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Phaeodactylum tricornutum laboratory culture, smoothing carbon-dioxide delivery will reduce pH variance more than it changes mean biomass production.",
    "test": "Measure pH, dissolved carbon, and biomass.",
    "against": "pH variance is unchanged or growth changes dominate.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Gas pulse smoothing",
    "system": "Phaeodactylum tricornutum laboratory culture",
    "id": 1675,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1675",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Culture rotation direction — Phaeodactylum tricornutum laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Phaeodactylum tricornutum laboratory culture, periodically reversing gentle circulation will reduce persistent wall deposits.",
    "test": "Measure attached biomass and suspended cell viability.",
    "against": "Deposits are unchanged at equal mixing work.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Culture rotation direction",
    "system": "Phaeodactylum tricornutum laboratory culture",
    "id": 1676,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1676",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Optical self-shading warning — Phaeodactylum tricornutum laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Phaeodactylum tricornutum laboratory culture, spatial fluorescence variance will predict emerging self-shading earlier than bulk optical density.",
    "test": "Track yield maps and independent light fields.",
    "against": "Variance provides no earlier warning on independent cultures.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Optical self-shading warning",
    "system": "Phaeodactylum tricornutum laboratory culture",
    "id": 1677,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1677",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Thermal pulse placement — Phaeodactylum tricornutum laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Phaeodactylum tricornutum laboratory culture, a mild temperature pulse during darkness will cause different recovery than the same pulse during light.",
    "test": "Measure fluorescence and growth after matched thermal doses.",
    "against": "Recovery is independent of light-phase placement.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Thermal pulse placement",
    "system": "Phaeodactylum tricornutum laboratory culture",
    "id": 1678,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1678",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Harvest fraction scheduling — Phaeodactylum tricornutum laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Phaeodactylum tricornutum laboratory culture, several small removals with medium replacement will reduce physiological variability relative to one equal-volume removal.",
    "test": "Measure cell size and fluorescence distributions.",
    "against": "Variability is no lower after mean culture density is matched.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Harvest fraction scheduling",
    "system": "Phaeodactylum tricornutum laboratory culture",
    "id": 1679,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1679",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Flow-history relaxation — Phaeodactylum tricornutum laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Phaeodactylum tricornutum laboratory culture, cell orientation or aggregation will retain a measurable memory after circulation stops.",
    "test": "Track orientation and aggregate statistics during rest.",
    "against": "Observed relaxation is fully explained by passive settling controls.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Flow-history relaxation",
    "system": "Phaeodactylum tricornutum laboratory culture",
    "id": 1680,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1680",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Dark-zone transit spread — Porphyridium purpureum laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Porphyridium purpureum laboratory culture, narrowing the distribution of dark-zone transit times will improve photosynthetic recovery at equal mean light exposure.",
    "test": "Compare controlled circulation paths and fluorescence recovery.",
    "against": "Recovery is unchanged after actual photon histories are included.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Dark-zone transit spread",
    "system": "Porphyridium purpureum laboratory culture",
    "id": 1681,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1681",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Bubble release spacing — Porphyridium purpureum laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Porphyridium purpureum laboratory culture, widely spaced fine-bubble release points will reduce local cell accumulation compared with clustered releases.",
    "test": "Map cells and flow at equal gas delivery.",
    "against": "Spatial accumulation is no lower after mixing is matched.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Bubble release spacing",
    "system": "Porphyridium purpureum laboratory culture",
    "id": 1682,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1682",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Wall reflection color — Porphyridium purpureum laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Porphyridium purpureum laboratory culture, a spectrally selective rear reflector will reduce the depth gradient of photosynthetic yield.",
    "test": "Measure internal spectra and fluorescence profiles.",
    "against": "Yield gradients persist after absorbed photons are matched.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Wall reflection color",
    "system": "Porphyridium purpureum laboratory culture",
    "id": 1683,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1683",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Short settling rests — Porphyridium purpureum laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Porphyridium purpureum laboratory culture, brief circulation rests will change aggregate-size distributions before bulk growth rate changes.",
    "test": "Track aggregates and growth under equal daily mixing work.",
    "against": "Aggregation changes appear only alongside growth changes.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Short settling rests",
    "system": "Porphyridium purpureum laboratory culture",
    "id": 1684,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1684",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Gas pulse smoothing — Porphyridium purpureum laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Porphyridium purpureum laboratory culture, smoothing carbon-dioxide delivery will reduce pH variance more than it changes mean biomass production.",
    "test": "Measure pH, dissolved carbon, and biomass.",
    "against": "pH variance is unchanged or growth changes dominate.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Gas pulse smoothing",
    "system": "Porphyridium purpureum laboratory culture",
    "id": 1685,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1685",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Culture rotation direction — Porphyridium purpureum laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Porphyridium purpureum laboratory culture, periodically reversing gentle circulation will reduce persistent wall deposits.",
    "test": "Measure attached biomass and suspended cell viability.",
    "against": "Deposits are unchanged at equal mixing work.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Culture rotation direction",
    "system": "Porphyridium purpureum laboratory culture",
    "id": 1686,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1686",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Optical self-shading warning — Porphyridium purpureum laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Porphyridium purpureum laboratory culture, spatial fluorescence variance will predict emerging self-shading earlier than bulk optical density.",
    "test": "Track yield maps and independent light fields.",
    "against": "Variance provides no earlier warning on independent cultures.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Optical self-shading warning",
    "system": "Porphyridium purpureum laboratory culture",
    "id": 1687,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1687",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Thermal pulse placement — Porphyridium purpureum laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Porphyridium purpureum laboratory culture, a mild temperature pulse during darkness will cause different recovery than the same pulse during light.",
    "test": "Measure fluorescence and growth after matched thermal doses.",
    "against": "Recovery is independent of light-phase placement.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Thermal pulse placement",
    "system": "Porphyridium purpureum laboratory culture",
    "id": 1688,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1688",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Harvest fraction scheduling — Porphyridium purpureum laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Porphyridium purpureum laboratory culture, several small removals with medium replacement will reduce physiological variability relative to one equal-volume removal.",
    "test": "Measure cell size and fluorescence distributions.",
    "against": "Variability is no lower after mean culture density is matched.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Harvest fraction scheduling",
    "system": "Porphyridium purpureum laboratory culture",
    "id": 1689,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1689",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Flow-history relaxation — Porphyridium purpureum laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Porphyridium purpureum laboratory culture, cell orientation or aggregation will retain a measurable memory after circulation stops.",
    "test": "Track orientation and aggregate statistics during rest.",
    "against": "Observed relaxation is fully explained by passive settling controls.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Flow-history relaxation",
    "system": "Porphyridium purpureum laboratory culture",
    "id": 1690,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1690",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Dark-zone transit spread — Euglena gracilis laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Euglena gracilis laboratory culture, narrowing the distribution of dark-zone transit times will improve photosynthetic recovery at equal mean light exposure.",
    "test": "Compare controlled circulation paths and fluorescence recovery.",
    "against": "Recovery is unchanged after actual photon histories are included.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Dark-zone transit spread",
    "system": "Euglena gracilis laboratory culture",
    "id": 1691,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1691",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Bubble release spacing — Euglena gracilis laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Euglena gracilis laboratory culture, widely spaced fine-bubble release points will reduce local cell accumulation compared with clustered releases.",
    "test": "Map cells and flow at equal gas delivery.",
    "against": "Spatial accumulation is no lower after mixing is matched.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Bubble release spacing",
    "system": "Euglena gracilis laboratory culture",
    "id": 1692,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1692",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Wall reflection color — Euglena gracilis laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Euglena gracilis laboratory culture, a spectrally selective rear reflector will reduce the depth gradient of photosynthetic yield.",
    "test": "Measure internal spectra and fluorescence profiles.",
    "against": "Yield gradients persist after absorbed photons are matched.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Wall reflection color",
    "system": "Euglena gracilis laboratory culture",
    "id": 1693,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1693",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Short settling rests — Euglena gracilis laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Euglena gracilis laboratory culture, brief circulation rests will change aggregate-size distributions before bulk growth rate changes.",
    "test": "Track aggregates and growth under equal daily mixing work.",
    "against": "Aggregation changes appear only alongside growth changes.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Short settling rests",
    "system": "Euglena gracilis laboratory culture",
    "id": 1694,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1694",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Gas pulse smoothing — Euglena gracilis laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Euglena gracilis laboratory culture, smoothing carbon-dioxide delivery will reduce pH variance more than it changes mean biomass production.",
    "test": "Measure pH, dissolved carbon, and biomass.",
    "against": "pH variance is unchanged or growth changes dominate.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Gas pulse smoothing",
    "system": "Euglena gracilis laboratory culture",
    "id": 1695,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1695",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Culture rotation direction — Euglena gracilis laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Euglena gracilis laboratory culture, periodically reversing gentle circulation will reduce persistent wall deposits.",
    "test": "Measure attached biomass and suspended cell viability.",
    "against": "Deposits are unchanged at equal mixing work.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Culture rotation direction",
    "system": "Euglena gracilis laboratory culture",
    "id": 1696,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1696",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Optical self-shading warning — Euglena gracilis laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Euglena gracilis laboratory culture, spatial fluorescence variance will predict emerging self-shading earlier than bulk optical density.",
    "test": "Track yield maps and independent light fields.",
    "against": "Variance provides no earlier warning on independent cultures.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Optical self-shading warning",
    "system": "Euglena gracilis laboratory culture",
    "id": 1697,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1697",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Thermal pulse placement — Euglena gracilis laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Euglena gracilis laboratory culture, a mild temperature pulse during darkness will cause different recovery than the same pulse during light.",
    "test": "Measure fluorescence and growth after matched thermal doses.",
    "against": "Recovery is independent of light-phase placement.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Thermal pulse placement",
    "system": "Euglena gracilis laboratory culture",
    "id": 1698,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1698",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Harvest fraction scheduling — Euglena gracilis laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Euglena gracilis laboratory culture, several small removals with medium replacement will reduce physiological variability relative to one equal-volume removal.",
    "test": "Measure cell size and fluorescence distributions.",
    "against": "Variability is no lower after mean culture density is matched.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Harvest fraction scheduling",
    "system": "Euglena gracilis laboratory culture",
    "id": 1699,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1699",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Flow-history relaxation — Euglena gracilis laboratory culture",
    "hypothesis": "For Euglena gracilis laboratory culture, cell orientation or aggregation will retain a measurable memory after circulation stops.",
    "test": "Track orientation and aggregate statistics during rest.",
    "against": "Observed relaxation is fully explained by passive settling controls.",
    "category": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics",
    "controls": "Use characterized nonpathogenic strains and species-appropriate media; match biomass, growth stage, temperature, nutrients, absorbed photons, and gas transfer.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Nonpathogenic microalgal culture physics: Flow-history relaxation",
    "system": "Euglena gracilis laboratory culture",
    "id": 1700,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified nonpathogenic cultures, controlled culture apparatus, optical and gas measurements, and appropriate laboratory practices.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1700",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Flow interruption pits — calcite single-crystal dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For calcite single-crystal dissolution, repeated flow interruptions will increase pit-depth variability compared with steady flow.",
    "test": "Measure surface topography and dissolved-ion release.",
    "against": "Pit variability is unchanged after total dissolved mass is matched.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Flow interruption pits",
    "system": "calcite single-crystal dissolution",
    "id": 1701,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 201,
    "literature_query": "Flow interruption pits calcite single-crystal dissolution repeated interruptions pit-depth variability steady experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1701",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Flow interruption pits — calcite single-crystal dissolution",
      "hypothesis": "For calcite single-crystal dissolution, repeated flow interruptions will increase pit-depth variability compared with steady flow.",
      "test": "Measure surface topography and dissolved-ion release.",
      "against": "Pit variability is unchanged after total dissolved mass is matched.",
      "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
      "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Flow interruption pits",
      "system": "calcite single-crystal dissolution",
      "id": 1701,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 26,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 201,
      "literature_query": "Flow interruption pits calcite single-crystal dissolution repeated interruptions pit-depth variability steady experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
      "source_lead_count": 8,
      "source_ids": "S0ed2e6fb3826;S810325f3d91e;Sf900544eac22;Sfe9cecb4002b;S0e64c9f1ef1b;Sd86bcc57fa86;S1ce15af4b355;S0c52bc59f9e9",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Mask edge enhancement — calcite single-crystal dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For calcite single-crystal dissolution, narrow inert surface masks will concentrate dissolution near mask boundaries.",
    "test": "Map retreat rates while varying boundary length at fixed masked area.",
    "against": "Retreat rates show no boundary-localized excess.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Mask edge enhancement",
    "system": "calcite single-crystal dissolution",
    "id": 1702,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1702",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Undersaturation ramp — calcite single-crystal dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For calcite single-crystal dissolution, gradual undersaturation changes will produce less rate hysteresis than abrupt changes.",
    "test": "Measure solution chemistry and retreat across ramp schedules.",
    "against": "Hysteresis is independent of ramp speed.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Undersaturation ramp",
    "system": "calcite single-crystal dissolution",
    "id": 1703,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1703",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Facet roughness memory — calcite single-crystal dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For calcite single-crystal dissolution, pre-roughened facets will retain elevated dissolution-rate fluctuations after mean rates converge.",
    "test": "Measure time-resolved retreat and roughness.",
    "against": "Fluctuations converge with the mean rate.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Facet roughness memory",
    "system": "calcite single-crystal dissolution",
    "id": 1704,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1704",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Grain contact shielding — calcite single-crystal dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For calcite single-crystal dissolution, narrow grain contacts will retain dissolution-resistant bridges longer than isolated protrusions.",
    "test": "Image matched contact and free-surface geometries.",
    "against": "Bridge lifetime is explained solely by exposed area.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Grain contact shielding",
    "system": "calcite single-crystal dissolution",
    "id": 1705,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 3,
    "screen_score": 25,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1705",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Boundary layer asymmetry — calcite single-crystal dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For calcite single-crystal dissolution, alternating flow direction will reduce upstream-downstream surface asymmetry.",
    "test": "Map topography under equal total throughput.",
    "against": "Asymmetry is no lower after local flow is measured.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Boundary layer asymmetry",
    "system": "calcite single-crystal dissolution",
    "id": 1706,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1706",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Ion pulse recovery — calcite single-crystal dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For calcite single-crystal dissolution, a short pulse of a compatible common ion will leave a transient rate memory after washout.",
    "test": "Measure local solution exchange and dissolution rate.",
    "against": "Rate follows solution composition without additional memory.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Ion pulse recovery",
    "system": "calcite single-crystal dissolution",
    "id": 1707,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1707",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Surface strain response — calcite single-crystal dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For calcite single-crystal dissolution, mild elastic strain will increase spatial variability of dissolution before changing mean rate.",
    "test": "Map strain and retreat in specialist fixtures.",
    "against": "Variability changes only with mean rate or fracture.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Surface strain response",
    "system": "calcite single-crystal dissolution",
    "id": 1708,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1708",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Microchannel confinement — calcite single-crystal dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For calcite single-crystal dissolution, confined dissolution will produce stronger temporal rate correlations than open-bath dissolution.",
    "test": "Compare time series with matched transport coefficients.",
    "against": "Correlations are fully explained by measured solution residence times.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Microchannel confinement",
    "system": "calcite single-crystal dissolution",
    "id": 1709,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1709",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Paired mineral spacing — calcite single-crystal dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For calcite single-crystal dissolution, close neighboring grains will dissolve less uniformly than widely separated grains at equal total area.",
    "test": "Measure grain-resolved mass loss across spacing.",
    "against": "Uniformity is independent of spacing after flow is controlled.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Paired mineral spacing",
    "system": "calcite single-crystal dissolution",
    "id": 1710,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 202,
    "literature_query": "Paired mineral spacing calcite single-crystal dissolution close neighboring grains dissolve uniformly widely separated experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1710",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Paired mineral spacing — calcite single-crystal dissolution",
      "hypothesis": "For calcite single-crystal dissolution, close neighboring grains will dissolve less uniformly than widely separated grains at equal total area.",
      "test": "Measure grain-resolved mass loss across spacing.",
      "against": "Uniformity is independent of spacing after flow is controlled.",
      "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
      "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Paired mineral spacing",
      "system": "calcite single-crystal dissolution",
      "id": 1710,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 26,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 202,
      "literature_query": "Paired mineral spacing calcite single-crystal dissolution close neighboring grains dissolve uniformly widely separated experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
      "source_lead_count": 7,
      "source_ids": "S0ed2e6fb3826;S2f6716c6983b;S3895f9038478;S85d5617cd1a0;S8d2783d15643;S12c6e2fda15a;S28ee6b5e4df5",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Flow interruption pits — gypsum single-crystal dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For gypsum single-crystal dissolution, repeated flow interruptions will increase pit-depth variability compared with steady flow.",
    "test": "Measure surface topography and dissolved-ion release.",
    "against": "Pit variability is unchanged after total dissolved mass is matched.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Flow interruption pits",
    "system": "gypsum single-crystal dissolution",
    "id": 1711,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1711",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Mask edge enhancement — gypsum single-crystal dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For gypsum single-crystal dissolution, narrow inert surface masks will concentrate dissolution near mask boundaries.",
    "test": "Map retreat rates while varying boundary length at fixed masked area.",
    "against": "Retreat rates show no boundary-localized excess.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Mask edge enhancement",
    "system": "gypsum single-crystal dissolution",
    "id": 1712,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1712",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Undersaturation ramp — gypsum single-crystal dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For gypsum single-crystal dissolution, gradual undersaturation changes will produce less rate hysteresis than abrupt changes.",
    "test": "Measure solution chemistry and retreat across ramp schedules.",
    "against": "Hysteresis is independent of ramp speed.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Undersaturation ramp",
    "system": "gypsum single-crystal dissolution",
    "id": 1713,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1713",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Facet roughness memory — gypsum single-crystal dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For gypsum single-crystal dissolution, pre-roughened facets will retain elevated dissolution-rate fluctuations after mean rates converge.",
    "test": "Measure time-resolved retreat and roughness.",
    "against": "Fluctuations converge with the mean rate.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Facet roughness memory",
    "system": "gypsum single-crystal dissolution",
    "id": 1714,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1714",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Grain contact shielding — gypsum single-crystal dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For gypsum single-crystal dissolution, narrow grain contacts will retain dissolution-resistant bridges longer than isolated protrusions.",
    "test": "Image matched contact and free-surface geometries.",
    "against": "Bridge lifetime is explained solely by exposed area.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Grain contact shielding",
    "system": "gypsum single-crystal dissolution",
    "id": 1715,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 3,
    "screen_score": 25,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1715",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Boundary layer asymmetry — gypsum single-crystal dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For gypsum single-crystal dissolution, alternating flow direction will reduce upstream-downstream surface asymmetry.",
    "test": "Map topography under equal total throughput.",
    "against": "Asymmetry is no lower after local flow is measured.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Boundary layer asymmetry",
    "system": "gypsum single-crystal dissolution",
    "id": 1716,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1716",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Ion pulse recovery — gypsum single-crystal dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For gypsum single-crystal dissolution, a short pulse of a compatible common ion will leave a transient rate memory after washout.",
    "test": "Measure local solution exchange and dissolution rate.",
    "against": "Rate follows solution composition without additional memory.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Ion pulse recovery",
    "system": "gypsum single-crystal dissolution",
    "id": 1717,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1717",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Surface strain response — gypsum single-crystal dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For gypsum single-crystal dissolution, mild elastic strain will increase spatial variability of dissolution before changing mean rate.",
    "test": "Map strain and retreat in specialist fixtures.",
    "against": "Variability changes only with mean rate or fracture.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Surface strain response",
    "system": "gypsum single-crystal dissolution",
    "id": 1718,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1718",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Microchannel confinement — gypsum single-crystal dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For gypsum single-crystal dissolution, confined dissolution will produce stronger temporal rate correlations than open-bath dissolution.",
    "test": "Compare time series with matched transport coefficients.",
    "against": "Correlations are fully explained by measured solution residence times.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Microchannel confinement",
    "system": "gypsum single-crystal dissolution",
    "id": 1719,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1719",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Paired mineral spacing — gypsum single-crystal dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For gypsum single-crystal dissolution, close neighboring grains will dissolve less uniformly than widely separated grains at equal total area.",
    "test": "Measure grain-resolved mass loss across spacing.",
    "against": "Uniformity is independent of spacing after flow is controlled.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Paired mineral spacing",
    "system": "gypsum single-crystal dissolution",
    "id": 1720,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1720",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Flow interruption pits — halite crystal dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For halite crystal dissolution, repeated flow interruptions will increase pit-depth variability compared with steady flow.",
    "test": "Measure surface topography and dissolved-ion release.",
    "against": "Pit variability is unchanged after total dissolved mass is matched.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Flow interruption pits",
    "system": "halite crystal dissolution",
    "id": 1721,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1721",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Mask edge enhancement — halite crystal dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For halite crystal dissolution, narrow inert surface masks will concentrate dissolution near mask boundaries.",
    "test": "Map retreat rates while varying boundary length at fixed masked area.",
    "against": "Retreat rates show no boundary-localized excess.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Mask edge enhancement",
    "system": "halite crystal dissolution",
    "id": 1722,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1722",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Undersaturation ramp — halite crystal dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For halite crystal dissolution, gradual undersaturation changes will produce less rate hysteresis than abrupt changes.",
    "test": "Measure solution chemistry and retreat across ramp schedules.",
    "against": "Hysteresis is independent of ramp speed.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Undersaturation ramp",
    "system": "halite crystal dissolution",
    "id": 1723,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1723",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Facet roughness memory — halite crystal dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For halite crystal dissolution, pre-roughened facets will retain elevated dissolution-rate fluctuations after mean rates converge.",
    "test": "Measure time-resolved retreat and roughness.",
    "against": "Fluctuations converge with the mean rate.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Facet roughness memory",
    "system": "halite crystal dissolution",
    "id": 1724,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1724",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Grain contact shielding — halite crystal dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For halite crystal dissolution, narrow grain contacts will retain dissolution-resistant bridges longer than isolated protrusions.",
    "test": "Image matched contact and free-surface geometries.",
    "against": "Bridge lifetime is explained solely by exposed area.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Grain contact shielding",
    "system": "halite crystal dissolution",
    "id": 1725,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 3,
    "screen_score": 25,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1725",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Boundary layer asymmetry — halite crystal dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For halite crystal dissolution, alternating flow direction will reduce upstream-downstream surface asymmetry.",
    "test": "Map topography under equal total throughput.",
    "against": "Asymmetry is no lower after local flow is measured.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Boundary layer asymmetry",
    "system": "halite crystal dissolution",
    "id": 1726,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1726",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Ion pulse recovery — halite crystal dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For halite crystal dissolution, a short pulse of a compatible common ion will leave a transient rate memory after washout.",
    "test": "Measure local solution exchange and dissolution rate.",
    "against": "Rate follows solution composition without additional memory.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Ion pulse recovery",
    "system": "halite crystal dissolution",
    "id": 1727,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1727",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Surface strain response — halite crystal dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For halite crystal dissolution, mild elastic strain will increase spatial variability of dissolution before changing mean rate.",
    "test": "Map strain and retreat in specialist fixtures.",
    "against": "Variability changes only with mean rate or fracture.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Surface strain response",
    "system": "halite crystal dissolution",
    "id": 1728,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1728",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Microchannel confinement — halite crystal dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For halite crystal dissolution, confined dissolution will produce stronger temporal rate correlations than open-bath dissolution.",
    "test": "Compare time series with matched transport coefficients.",
    "against": "Correlations are fully explained by measured solution residence times.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Microchannel confinement",
    "system": "halite crystal dissolution",
    "id": 1729,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1729",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Paired mineral spacing — halite crystal dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For halite crystal dissolution, close neighboring grains will dissolve less uniformly than widely separated grains at equal total area.",
    "test": "Measure grain-resolved mass loss across spacing.",
    "against": "Uniformity is independent of spacing after flow is controlled.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Paired mineral spacing",
    "system": "halite crystal dissolution",
    "id": 1730,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1730",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Flow interruption pits — quartz grain dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For quartz grain dissolution, repeated flow interruptions will increase pit-depth variability compared with steady flow.",
    "test": "Measure surface topography and dissolved-ion release.",
    "against": "Pit variability is unchanged after total dissolved mass is matched.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Flow interruption pits",
    "system": "quartz grain dissolution",
    "id": 1731,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1731",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Mask edge enhancement — quartz grain dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For quartz grain dissolution, narrow inert surface masks will concentrate dissolution near mask boundaries.",
    "test": "Map retreat rates while varying boundary length at fixed masked area.",
    "against": "Retreat rates show no boundary-localized excess.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Mask edge enhancement",
    "system": "quartz grain dissolution",
    "id": 1732,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 203,
    "literature_query": "Mask edge enhancement quartz grain dissolution narrow inert surface masks concentrate near boundaries experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1732",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Mask edge enhancement — quartz grain dissolution",
      "hypothesis": "For quartz grain dissolution, narrow inert surface masks will concentrate dissolution near mask boundaries.",
      "test": "Map retreat rates while varying boundary length at fixed masked area.",
      "against": "Retreat rates show no boundary-localized excess.",
      "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
      "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Mask edge enhancement",
      "system": "quartz grain dissolution",
      "id": 1732,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 26,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 203,
      "literature_query": "Mask edge enhancement quartz grain dissolution narrow inert surface masks concentrate near boundaries experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
      "source_lead_count": 6,
      "source_ids": "Sbe5e41f8f067;S5997259cbc96;S45fbd8d7e71b;S03524ad40d8e;S8a6c53aff43f;S5d3b0be00ab8",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Undersaturation ramp — quartz grain dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For quartz grain dissolution, gradual undersaturation changes will produce less rate hysteresis than abrupt changes.",
    "test": "Measure solution chemistry and retreat across ramp schedules.",
    "against": "Hysteresis is independent of ramp speed.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Undersaturation ramp",
    "system": "quartz grain dissolution",
    "id": 1733,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 204,
    "literature_query": "Undersaturation ramp quartz grain dissolution gradual changes produce rate hysteresis abrupt experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1733",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Undersaturation ramp — quartz grain dissolution",
      "hypothesis": "For quartz grain dissolution, gradual undersaturation changes will produce less rate hysteresis than abrupt changes.",
      "test": "Measure solution chemistry and retreat across ramp schedules.",
      "against": "Hysteresis is independent of ramp speed.",
      "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
      "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Undersaturation ramp",
      "system": "quartz grain dissolution",
      "id": 1733,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 26,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 204,
      "literature_query": "Undersaturation ramp quartz grain dissolution gradual changes produce rate hysteresis abrupt experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
      "source_lead_count": 7,
      "source_ids": "S776008ceaf16;S9f9bdcae2453;S0a083e0fc55f;S947cb9298119;S605e697a8c54;S5476726f58ad;Sc181820fbb09",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Facet roughness memory — quartz grain dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For quartz grain dissolution, pre-roughened facets will retain elevated dissolution-rate fluctuations after mean rates converge.",
    "test": "Measure time-resolved retreat and roughness.",
    "against": "Fluctuations converge with the mean rate.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Facet roughness memory",
    "system": "quartz grain dissolution",
    "id": 1734,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 205,
    "literature_query": "Facet roughness memory quartz grain dissolution pre-roughened facets retain elevated dissolution-rate fluctuations mean experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1734",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Facet roughness memory — quartz grain dissolution",
      "hypothesis": "For quartz grain dissolution, pre-roughened facets will retain elevated dissolution-rate fluctuations after mean rates converge.",
      "test": "Measure time-resolved retreat and roughness.",
      "against": "Fluctuations converge with the mean rate.",
      "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
      "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Facet roughness memory",
      "system": "quartz grain dissolution",
      "id": 1734,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 26,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 205,
      "literature_query": "Facet roughness memory quartz grain dissolution pre-roughened facets retain elevated dissolution-rate fluctuations mean experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
      "source_lead_count": 2,
      "source_ids": "Sf803510869e7;Se13a0ad9b363",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Grain contact shielding — quartz grain dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For quartz grain dissolution, narrow grain contacts will retain dissolution-resistant bridges longer than isolated protrusions.",
    "test": "Image matched contact and free-surface geometries.",
    "against": "Bridge lifetime is explained solely by exposed area.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Grain contact shielding",
    "system": "quartz grain dissolution",
    "id": 1735,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 3,
    "screen_score": 25,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1735",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Boundary layer asymmetry — quartz grain dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For quartz grain dissolution, alternating flow direction will reduce upstream-downstream surface asymmetry.",
    "test": "Map topography under equal total throughput.",
    "against": "Asymmetry is no lower after local flow is measured.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Boundary layer asymmetry",
    "system": "quartz grain dissolution",
    "id": 1736,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1736",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Ion pulse recovery — quartz grain dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For quartz grain dissolution, a short pulse of a compatible common ion will leave a transient rate memory after washout.",
    "test": "Measure local solution exchange and dissolution rate.",
    "against": "Rate follows solution composition without additional memory.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Ion pulse recovery",
    "system": "quartz grain dissolution",
    "id": 1737,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 206,
    "literature_query": "Ion pulse recovery quartz grain dissolution short of compatible common leave transient rate experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1737",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Ion pulse recovery — quartz grain dissolution",
      "hypothesis": "For quartz grain dissolution, a short pulse of a compatible common ion will leave a transient rate memory after washout.",
      "test": "Measure local solution exchange and dissolution rate.",
      "against": "Rate follows solution composition without additional memory.",
      "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
      "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Ion pulse recovery",
      "system": "quartz grain dissolution",
      "id": 1737,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 26,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 206,
      "literature_query": "Ion pulse recovery quartz grain dissolution short of compatible common leave transient rate experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
      "source_lead_count": 4,
      "source_ids": "S916d70de2dc6;S964fff77f7b8;S947cb9298119;Sbdfb8ebe5b36",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Surface strain response — quartz grain dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For quartz grain dissolution, mild elastic strain will increase spatial variability of dissolution before changing mean rate.",
    "test": "Map strain and retreat in specialist fixtures.",
    "against": "Variability changes only with mean rate or fracture.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Surface strain response",
    "system": "quartz grain dissolution",
    "id": 1738,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1738",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Microchannel confinement — quartz grain dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For quartz grain dissolution, confined dissolution will produce stronger temporal rate correlations than open-bath dissolution.",
    "test": "Compare time series with matched transport coefficients.",
    "against": "Correlations are fully explained by measured solution residence times.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Microchannel confinement",
    "system": "quartz grain dissolution",
    "id": 1739,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 207,
    "literature_query": "Microchannel confinement quartz grain dissolution confined produce stronger temporal rate correlations open-bath experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1739",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Microchannel confinement — quartz grain dissolution",
      "hypothesis": "For quartz grain dissolution, confined dissolution will produce stronger temporal rate correlations than open-bath dissolution.",
      "test": "Compare time series with matched transport coefficients.",
      "against": "Correlations are fully explained by measured solution residence times.",
      "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
      "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Microchannel confinement",
      "system": "quartz grain dissolution",
      "id": 1739,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 26,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 207,
      "literature_query": "Microchannel confinement quartz grain dissolution confined produce stronger temporal rate correlations open-bath experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
      "source_lead_count": 7,
      "source_ids": "S947cb9298119;Sbcdea463801d;Sa7e35fb45f46;S9f6c616d155f;Sfba006bf463a;S01698c1c9d14;Sc7f71f434f0d",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Paired mineral spacing — quartz grain dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For quartz grain dissolution, close neighboring grains will dissolve less uniformly than widely separated grains at equal total area.",
    "test": "Measure grain-resolved mass loss across spacing.",
    "against": "Uniformity is independent of spacing after flow is controlled.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Paired mineral spacing",
    "system": "quartz grain dissolution",
    "id": 1740,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1740",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Flow interruption pits — feldspar grain dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For feldspar grain dissolution, repeated flow interruptions will increase pit-depth variability compared with steady flow.",
    "test": "Measure surface topography and dissolved-ion release.",
    "against": "Pit variability is unchanged after total dissolved mass is matched.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Flow interruption pits",
    "system": "feldspar grain dissolution",
    "id": 1741,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1741",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Mask edge enhancement — feldspar grain dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For feldspar grain dissolution, narrow inert surface masks will concentrate dissolution near mask boundaries.",
    "test": "Map retreat rates while varying boundary length at fixed masked area.",
    "against": "Retreat rates show no boundary-localized excess.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Mask edge enhancement",
    "system": "feldspar grain dissolution",
    "id": 1742,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1742",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Undersaturation ramp — feldspar grain dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For feldspar grain dissolution, gradual undersaturation changes will produce less rate hysteresis than abrupt changes.",
    "test": "Measure solution chemistry and retreat across ramp schedules.",
    "against": "Hysteresis is independent of ramp speed.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Undersaturation ramp",
    "system": "feldspar grain dissolution",
    "id": 1743,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1743",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Facet roughness memory — feldspar grain dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For feldspar grain dissolution, pre-roughened facets will retain elevated dissolution-rate fluctuations after mean rates converge.",
    "test": "Measure time-resolved retreat and roughness.",
    "against": "Fluctuations converge with the mean rate.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Facet roughness memory",
    "system": "feldspar grain dissolution",
    "id": 1744,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1744",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Grain contact shielding — feldspar grain dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For feldspar grain dissolution, narrow grain contacts will retain dissolution-resistant bridges longer than isolated protrusions.",
    "test": "Image matched contact and free-surface geometries.",
    "against": "Bridge lifetime is explained solely by exposed area.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Grain contact shielding",
    "system": "feldspar grain dissolution",
    "id": 1745,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 3,
    "screen_score": 25,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1745",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Boundary layer asymmetry — feldspar grain dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For feldspar grain dissolution, alternating flow direction will reduce upstream-downstream surface asymmetry.",
    "test": "Map topography under equal total throughput.",
    "against": "Asymmetry is no lower after local flow is measured.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Boundary layer asymmetry",
    "system": "feldspar grain dissolution",
    "id": 1746,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1746",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Ion pulse recovery — feldspar grain dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For feldspar grain dissolution, a short pulse of a compatible common ion will leave a transient rate memory after washout.",
    "test": "Measure local solution exchange and dissolution rate.",
    "against": "Rate follows solution composition without additional memory.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Ion pulse recovery",
    "system": "feldspar grain dissolution",
    "id": 1747,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1747",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Surface strain response — feldspar grain dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For feldspar grain dissolution, mild elastic strain will increase spatial variability of dissolution before changing mean rate.",
    "test": "Map strain and retreat in specialist fixtures.",
    "against": "Variability changes only with mean rate or fracture.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Surface strain response",
    "system": "feldspar grain dissolution",
    "id": 1748,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1748",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Microchannel confinement — feldspar grain dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For feldspar grain dissolution, confined dissolution will produce stronger temporal rate correlations than open-bath dissolution.",
    "test": "Compare time series with matched transport coefficients.",
    "against": "Correlations are fully explained by measured solution residence times.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Microchannel confinement",
    "system": "feldspar grain dissolution",
    "id": 1749,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1749",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Paired mineral spacing — feldspar grain dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For feldspar grain dissolution, close neighboring grains will dissolve less uniformly than widely separated grains at equal total area.",
    "test": "Measure grain-resolved mass loss across spacing.",
    "against": "Uniformity is independent of spacing after flow is controlled.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Paired mineral spacing",
    "system": "feldspar grain dissolution",
    "id": 1750,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1750",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Flow interruption pits — olivine grain dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For olivine grain dissolution, repeated flow interruptions will increase pit-depth variability compared with steady flow.",
    "test": "Measure surface topography and dissolved-ion release.",
    "against": "Pit variability is unchanged after total dissolved mass is matched.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Flow interruption pits",
    "system": "olivine grain dissolution",
    "id": 1751,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1751",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Mask edge enhancement — olivine grain dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For olivine grain dissolution, narrow inert surface masks will concentrate dissolution near mask boundaries.",
    "test": "Map retreat rates while varying boundary length at fixed masked area.",
    "against": "Retreat rates show no boundary-localized excess.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Mask edge enhancement",
    "system": "olivine grain dissolution",
    "id": 1752,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1752",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Undersaturation ramp — olivine grain dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For olivine grain dissolution, gradual undersaturation changes will produce less rate hysteresis than abrupt changes.",
    "test": "Measure solution chemistry and retreat across ramp schedules.",
    "against": "Hysteresis is independent of ramp speed.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Undersaturation ramp",
    "system": "olivine grain dissolution",
    "id": 1753,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1753",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Facet roughness memory — olivine grain dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For olivine grain dissolution, pre-roughened facets will retain elevated dissolution-rate fluctuations after mean rates converge.",
    "test": "Measure time-resolved retreat and roughness.",
    "against": "Fluctuations converge with the mean rate.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Facet roughness memory",
    "system": "olivine grain dissolution",
    "id": 1754,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1754",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Grain contact shielding — olivine grain dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For olivine grain dissolution, narrow grain contacts will retain dissolution-resistant bridges longer than isolated protrusions.",
    "test": "Image matched contact and free-surface geometries.",
    "against": "Bridge lifetime is explained solely by exposed area.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Grain contact shielding",
    "system": "olivine grain dissolution",
    "id": 1755,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 3,
    "screen_score": 25,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1755",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Boundary layer asymmetry — olivine grain dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For olivine grain dissolution, alternating flow direction will reduce upstream-downstream surface asymmetry.",
    "test": "Map topography under equal total throughput.",
    "against": "Asymmetry is no lower after local flow is measured.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Boundary layer asymmetry",
    "system": "olivine grain dissolution",
    "id": 1756,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1756",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Ion pulse recovery — olivine grain dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For olivine grain dissolution, a short pulse of a compatible common ion will leave a transient rate memory after washout.",
    "test": "Measure local solution exchange and dissolution rate.",
    "against": "Rate follows solution composition without additional memory.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Ion pulse recovery",
    "system": "olivine grain dissolution",
    "id": 1757,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1757",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Surface strain response — olivine grain dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For olivine grain dissolution, mild elastic strain will increase spatial variability of dissolution before changing mean rate.",
    "test": "Map strain and retreat in specialist fixtures.",
    "against": "Variability changes only with mean rate or fracture.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Surface strain response",
    "system": "olivine grain dissolution",
    "id": 1758,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1758",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Microchannel confinement — olivine grain dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For olivine grain dissolution, confined dissolution will produce stronger temporal rate correlations than open-bath dissolution.",
    "test": "Compare time series with matched transport coefficients.",
    "against": "Correlations are fully explained by measured solution residence times.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Microchannel confinement",
    "system": "olivine grain dissolution",
    "id": 1759,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1759",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Paired mineral spacing — olivine grain dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For olivine grain dissolution, close neighboring grains will dissolve less uniformly than widely separated grains at equal total area.",
    "test": "Measure grain-resolved mass loss across spacing.",
    "against": "Uniformity is independent of spacing after flow is controlled.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Paired mineral spacing",
    "system": "olivine grain dissolution",
    "id": 1760,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1760",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Flow interruption pits — dolomite grain dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For dolomite grain dissolution, repeated flow interruptions will increase pit-depth variability compared with steady flow.",
    "test": "Measure surface topography and dissolved-ion release.",
    "against": "Pit variability is unchanged after total dissolved mass is matched.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Flow interruption pits",
    "system": "dolomite grain dissolution",
    "id": 1761,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1761",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Mask edge enhancement — dolomite grain dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For dolomite grain dissolution, narrow inert surface masks will concentrate dissolution near mask boundaries.",
    "test": "Map retreat rates while varying boundary length at fixed masked area.",
    "against": "Retreat rates show no boundary-localized excess.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Mask edge enhancement",
    "system": "dolomite grain dissolution",
    "id": 1762,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1762",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Undersaturation ramp — dolomite grain dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For dolomite grain dissolution, gradual undersaturation changes will produce less rate hysteresis than abrupt changes.",
    "test": "Measure solution chemistry and retreat across ramp schedules.",
    "against": "Hysteresis is independent of ramp speed.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Undersaturation ramp",
    "system": "dolomite grain dissolution",
    "id": 1763,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1763",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Facet roughness memory — dolomite grain dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For dolomite grain dissolution, pre-roughened facets will retain elevated dissolution-rate fluctuations after mean rates converge.",
    "test": "Measure time-resolved retreat and roughness.",
    "against": "Fluctuations converge with the mean rate.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Facet roughness memory",
    "system": "dolomite grain dissolution",
    "id": 1764,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1764",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Grain contact shielding — dolomite grain dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For dolomite grain dissolution, narrow grain contacts will retain dissolution-resistant bridges longer than isolated protrusions.",
    "test": "Image matched contact and free-surface geometries.",
    "against": "Bridge lifetime is explained solely by exposed area.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Grain contact shielding",
    "system": "dolomite grain dissolution",
    "id": 1765,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 3,
    "screen_score": 25,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1765",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Boundary layer asymmetry — dolomite grain dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For dolomite grain dissolution, alternating flow direction will reduce upstream-downstream surface asymmetry.",
    "test": "Map topography under equal total throughput.",
    "against": "Asymmetry is no lower after local flow is measured.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Boundary layer asymmetry",
    "system": "dolomite grain dissolution",
    "id": 1766,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1766",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Ion pulse recovery — dolomite grain dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For dolomite grain dissolution, a short pulse of a compatible common ion will leave a transient rate memory after washout.",
    "test": "Measure local solution exchange and dissolution rate.",
    "against": "Rate follows solution composition without additional memory.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Ion pulse recovery",
    "system": "dolomite grain dissolution",
    "id": 1767,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1767",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Surface strain response — dolomite grain dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For dolomite grain dissolution, mild elastic strain will increase spatial variability of dissolution before changing mean rate.",
    "test": "Map strain and retreat in specialist fixtures.",
    "against": "Variability changes only with mean rate or fracture.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Surface strain response",
    "system": "dolomite grain dissolution",
    "id": 1768,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1768",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Microchannel confinement — dolomite grain dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For dolomite grain dissolution, confined dissolution will produce stronger temporal rate correlations than open-bath dissolution.",
    "test": "Compare time series with matched transport coefficients.",
    "against": "Correlations are fully explained by measured solution residence times.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Microchannel confinement",
    "system": "dolomite grain dissolution",
    "id": 1769,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1769",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Paired mineral spacing — dolomite grain dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For dolomite grain dissolution, close neighboring grains will dissolve less uniformly than widely separated grains at equal total area.",
    "test": "Measure grain-resolved mass loss across spacing.",
    "against": "Uniformity is independent of spacing after flow is controlled.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Paired mineral spacing",
    "system": "dolomite grain dissolution",
    "id": 1770,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1770",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Flow interruption pits — brucite crystal dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For brucite crystal dissolution, repeated flow interruptions will increase pit-depth variability compared with steady flow.",
    "test": "Measure surface topography and dissolved-ion release.",
    "against": "Pit variability is unchanged after total dissolved mass is matched.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Flow interruption pits",
    "system": "brucite crystal dissolution",
    "id": 1771,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1771",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Mask edge enhancement — brucite crystal dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For brucite crystal dissolution, narrow inert surface masks will concentrate dissolution near mask boundaries.",
    "test": "Map retreat rates while varying boundary length at fixed masked area.",
    "against": "Retreat rates show no boundary-localized excess.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Mask edge enhancement",
    "system": "brucite crystal dissolution",
    "id": 1772,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1772",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Undersaturation ramp — brucite crystal dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For brucite crystal dissolution, gradual undersaturation changes will produce less rate hysteresis than abrupt changes.",
    "test": "Measure solution chemistry and retreat across ramp schedules.",
    "against": "Hysteresis is independent of ramp speed.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Undersaturation ramp",
    "system": "brucite crystal dissolution",
    "id": 1773,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1773",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Facet roughness memory — brucite crystal dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For brucite crystal dissolution, pre-roughened facets will retain elevated dissolution-rate fluctuations after mean rates converge.",
    "test": "Measure time-resolved retreat and roughness.",
    "against": "Fluctuations converge with the mean rate.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Facet roughness memory",
    "system": "brucite crystal dissolution",
    "id": 1774,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1774",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Grain contact shielding — brucite crystal dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For brucite crystal dissolution, narrow grain contacts will retain dissolution-resistant bridges longer than isolated protrusions.",
    "test": "Image matched contact and free-surface geometries.",
    "against": "Bridge lifetime is explained solely by exposed area.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Grain contact shielding",
    "system": "brucite crystal dissolution",
    "id": 1775,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 3,
    "screen_score": 25,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1775",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Boundary layer asymmetry — brucite crystal dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For brucite crystal dissolution, alternating flow direction will reduce upstream-downstream surface asymmetry.",
    "test": "Map topography under equal total throughput.",
    "against": "Asymmetry is no lower after local flow is measured.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Boundary layer asymmetry",
    "system": "brucite crystal dissolution",
    "id": 1776,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1776",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Ion pulse recovery — brucite crystal dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For brucite crystal dissolution, a short pulse of a compatible common ion will leave a transient rate memory after washout.",
    "test": "Measure local solution exchange and dissolution rate.",
    "against": "Rate follows solution composition without additional memory.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Ion pulse recovery",
    "system": "brucite crystal dissolution",
    "id": 1777,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1777",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Surface strain response — brucite crystal dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For brucite crystal dissolution, mild elastic strain will increase spatial variability of dissolution before changing mean rate.",
    "test": "Map strain and retreat in specialist fixtures.",
    "against": "Variability changes only with mean rate or fracture.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Surface strain response",
    "system": "brucite crystal dissolution",
    "id": 1778,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1778",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Microchannel confinement — brucite crystal dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For brucite crystal dissolution, confined dissolution will produce stronger temporal rate correlations than open-bath dissolution.",
    "test": "Compare time series with matched transport coefficients.",
    "against": "Correlations are fully explained by measured solution residence times.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Microchannel confinement",
    "system": "brucite crystal dissolution",
    "id": 1779,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1779",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Paired mineral spacing — brucite crystal dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For brucite crystal dissolution, close neighboring grains will dissolve less uniformly than widely separated grains at equal total area.",
    "test": "Measure grain-resolved mass loss across spacing.",
    "against": "Uniformity is independent of spacing after flow is controlled.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Paired mineral spacing",
    "system": "brucite crystal dissolution",
    "id": 1780,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1780",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Flow interruption pits — aragonite crystal dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For aragonite crystal dissolution, repeated flow interruptions will increase pit-depth variability compared with steady flow.",
    "test": "Measure surface topography and dissolved-ion release.",
    "against": "Pit variability is unchanged after total dissolved mass is matched.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Flow interruption pits",
    "system": "aragonite crystal dissolution",
    "id": 1781,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1781",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Mask edge enhancement — aragonite crystal dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For aragonite crystal dissolution, narrow inert surface masks will concentrate dissolution near mask boundaries.",
    "test": "Map retreat rates while varying boundary length at fixed masked area.",
    "against": "Retreat rates show no boundary-localized excess.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Mask edge enhancement",
    "system": "aragonite crystal dissolution",
    "id": 1782,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1782",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Undersaturation ramp — aragonite crystal dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For aragonite crystal dissolution, gradual undersaturation changes will produce less rate hysteresis than abrupt changes.",
    "test": "Measure solution chemistry and retreat across ramp schedules.",
    "against": "Hysteresis is independent of ramp speed.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Undersaturation ramp",
    "system": "aragonite crystal dissolution",
    "id": 1783,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1783",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Facet roughness memory — aragonite crystal dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For aragonite crystal dissolution, pre-roughened facets will retain elevated dissolution-rate fluctuations after mean rates converge.",
    "test": "Measure time-resolved retreat and roughness.",
    "against": "Fluctuations converge with the mean rate.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Facet roughness memory",
    "system": "aragonite crystal dissolution",
    "id": 1784,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1784",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Grain contact shielding — aragonite crystal dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For aragonite crystal dissolution, narrow grain contacts will retain dissolution-resistant bridges longer than isolated protrusions.",
    "test": "Image matched contact and free-surface geometries.",
    "against": "Bridge lifetime is explained solely by exposed area.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Grain contact shielding",
    "system": "aragonite crystal dissolution",
    "id": 1785,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 3,
    "screen_score": 25,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1785",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Boundary layer asymmetry — aragonite crystal dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For aragonite crystal dissolution, alternating flow direction will reduce upstream-downstream surface asymmetry.",
    "test": "Map topography under equal total throughput.",
    "against": "Asymmetry is no lower after local flow is measured.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Boundary layer asymmetry",
    "system": "aragonite crystal dissolution",
    "id": 1786,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1786",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Ion pulse recovery — aragonite crystal dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For aragonite crystal dissolution, a short pulse of a compatible common ion will leave a transient rate memory after washout.",
    "test": "Measure local solution exchange and dissolution rate.",
    "against": "Rate follows solution composition without additional memory.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Ion pulse recovery",
    "system": "aragonite crystal dissolution",
    "id": 1787,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1787",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Surface strain response — aragonite crystal dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For aragonite crystal dissolution, mild elastic strain will increase spatial variability of dissolution before changing mean rate.",
    "test": "Map strain and retreat in specialist fixtures.",
    "against": "Variability changes only with mean rate or fracture.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Surface strain response",
    "system": "aragonite crystal dissolution",
    "id": 1788,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1788",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Microchannel confinement — aragonite crystal dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For aragonite crystal dissolution, confined dissolution will produce stronger temporal rate correlations than open-bath dissolution.",
    "test": "Compare time series with matched transport coefficients.",
    "against": "Correlations are fully explained by measured solution residence times.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Microchannel confinement",
    "system": "aragonite crystal dissolution",
    "id": 1789,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1789",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Paired mineral spacing — aragonite crystal dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For aragonite crystal dissolution, close neighboring grains will dissolve less uniformly than widely separated grains at equal total area.",
    "test": "Measure grain-resolved mass loss across spacing.",
    "against": "Uniformity is independent of spacing after flow is controlled.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Paired mineral spacing",
    "system": "aragonite crystal dissolution",
    "id": 1790,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1790",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Flow interruption pits — fluorite crystal dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For fluorite crystal dissolution, repeated flow interruptions will increase pit-depth variability compared with steady flow.",
    "test": "Measure surface topography and dissolved-ion release.",
    "against": "Pit variability is unchanged after total dissolved mass is matched.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Flow interruption pits",
    "system": "fluorite crystal dissolution",
    "id": 1791,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1791",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Mask edge enhancement — fluorite crystal dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For fluorite crystal dissolution, narrow inert surface masks will concentrate dissolution near mask boundaries.",
    "test": "Map retreat rates while varying boundary length at fixed masked area.",
    "against": "Retreat rates show no boundary-localized excess.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Mask edge enhancement",
    "system": "fluorite crystal dissolution",
    "id": 1792,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1792",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Undersaturation ramp — fluorite crystal dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For fluorite crystal dissolution, gradual undersaturation changes will produce less rate hysteresis than abrupt changes.",
    "test": "Measure solution chemistry and retreat across ramp schedules.",
    "against": "Hysteresis is independent of ramp speed.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Undersaturation ramp",
    "system": "fluorite crystal dissolution",
    "id": 1793,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1793",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Facet roughness memory — fluorite crystal dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For fluorite crystal dissolution, pre-roughened facets will retain elevated dissolution-rate fluctuations after mean rates converge.",
    "test": "Measure time-resolved retreat and roughness.",
    "against": "Fluctuations converge with the mean rate.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Facet roughness memory",
    "system": "fluorite crystal dissolution",
    "id": 1794,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1794",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Grain contact shielding — fluorite crystal dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For fluorite crystal dissolution, narrow grain contacts will retain dissolution-resistant bridges longer than isolated protrusions.",
    "test": "Image matched contact and free-surface geometries.",
    "against": "Bridge lifetime is explained solely by exposed area.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Grain contact shielding",
    "system": "fluorite crystal dissolution",
    "id": 1795,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 3,
    "screen_score": 25,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1795",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Boundary layer asymmetry — fluorite crystal dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For fluorite crystal dissolution, alternating flow direction will reduce upstream-downstream surface asymmetry.",
    "test": "Map topography under equal total throughput.",
    "against": "Asymmetry is no lower after local flow is measured.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Boundary layer asymmetry",
    "system": "fluorite crystal dissolution",
    "id": 1796,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1796",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Ion pulse recovery — fluorite crystal dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For fluorite crystal dissolution, a short pulse of a compatible common ion will leave a transient rate memory after washout.",
    "test": "Measure local solution exchange and dissolution rate.",
    "against": "Rate follows solution composition without additional memory.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Ion pulse recovery",
    "system": "fluorite crystal dissolution",
    "id": 1797,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1797",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Surface strain response — fluorite crystal dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For fluorite crystal dissolution, mild elastic strain will increase spatial variability of dissolution before changing mean rate.",
    "test": "Map strain and retreat in specialist fixtures.",
    "against": "Variability changes only with mean rate or fracture.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Surface strain response",
    "system": "fluorite crystal dissolution",
    "id": 1798,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1798",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Microchannel confinement — fluorite crystal dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For fluorite crystal dissolution, confined dissolution will produce stronger temporal rate correlations than open-bath dissolution.",
    "test": "Compare time series with matched transport coefficients.",
    "against": "Correlations are fully explained by measured solution residence times.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Microchannel confinement",
    "system": "fluorite crystal dissolution",
    "id": 1799,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1799",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Paired mineral spacing — fluorite crystal dissolution",
    "hypothesis": "For fluorite crystal dissolution, close neighboring grains will dissolve less uniformly than widely separated grains at equal total area.",
    "test": "Measure grain-resolved mass loss across spacing.",
    "against": "Uniformity is independent of spacing after flow is controlled.",
    "category": "Mineral dissolution model systems",
    "controls": "Use suitable controlled laboratory chemistry for each mineral; match reactive area, solution saturation, flow, pH, and temperature. Slow systems may require extended monitoring.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Mineral dissolution model systems: Paired mineral spacing",
    "system": "fluorite crystal dissolution",
    "id": 1800,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Characterized minerals, controlled flow chemistry, surface imaging, and calibrated dissolved-ion analysis; quartz may require lengthy or specialist tests.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1800",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Bubble neighborhood density — periodic square-pore glass network",
    "hypothesis": "For periodic square-pore glass network, closely neighboring trapped bubbles will dissolve more slowly per initial area than isolated bubbles.",
    "test": "Image bubble shrinkage at controlled dissolved-gas concentration.",
    "against": "Neighborhood density has no effect after local transport is measured.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Bubble neighborhood density",
    "system": "periodic square-pore glass network",
    "id": 1801,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1801",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pressure staircase — periodic square-pore glass network",
    "hypothesis": "For periodic square-pore glass network, a pressure staircase will leave a broader bubble-size distribution than a smooth pressure ramp.",
    "test": "Compare trapped bubbles at equal final pressure and elapsed time.",
    "against": "Size distributions are indistinguishable after initial sizes are matched.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Pressure staircase",
    "system": "periodic square-pore glass network",
    "id": 1802,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1802",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Flow pause saturation — periodic square-pore glass network",
    "hypothesis": "For periodic square-pore glass network, short flow pauses will slow subsequent dissolution by locally saturating water.",
    "test": "Measure restart shrinkage and local dissolved gas.",
    "against": "Restart slowdown is absent or unrelated to local saturation.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Flow pause saturation",
    "system": "periodic square-pore glass network",
    "id": 1803,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 208,
    "literature_query": "Flow pause saturation periodic square-pore glass network short pauses slow subsequent dissolution by experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1803",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Flow pause saturation — periodic square-pore glass network",
      "hypothesis": "For periodic square-pore glass network, short flow pauses will slow subsequent dissolution by locally saturating water.",
      "test": "Measure restart shrinkage and local dissolved gas.",
      "against": "Restart slowdown is absent or unrelated to local saturation.",
      "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
      "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Flow pause saturation",
      "system": "periodic square-pore glass network",
      "id": 1803,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 26,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 208,
      "literature_query": "Flow pause saturation periodic square-pore glass network short pauses slow subsequent dissolution by experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
      "source_lead_count": 6,
      "source_ids": "S61178c111ae4;Sf5a9f35fae11;S28fc0d2f2140;Se9f3e00be322;S85e59e6da5e4;S3b300972fd9e",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Outlet distance memory — periodic square-pore glass network",
    "hypothesis": "For periodic square-pore glass network, bubbles farther from the outlet will retain longer pressure-cycle memory.",
    "test": "Map bubble volume and connectivity across positions.",
    "against": "Memory does not correlate with transport distance after geometry is included.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Outlet distance memory",
    "system": "periodic square-pore glass network",
    "id": 1804,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1804",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Thermal microcycle pumping — periodic square-pore glass network",
    "hypothesis": "For periodic square-pore glass network, small temperature cycles will alter trapped-gas topology before changing total gas volume.",
    "test": "Image topology and gas volume during controlled thermal cycles.",
    "against": "Topology changes only alongside proportional gas-volume changes.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Thermal microcycle pumping",
    "system": "periodic square-pore glass network",
    "id": 1805,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1805",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pore-wall compliance — periodic square-pore glass network",
    "hypothesis": "For periodic square-pore glass network, reversible wall deformation will increase dissolution-time variability near a deformation threshold.",
    "test": "Measure wall motion and bubble lifetimes across pressures.",
    "against": "Variability is independent of measured wall deformation.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Pore-wall compliance",
    "system": "periodic square-pore glass network",
    "id": 1806,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1806",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Initial wetting direction — periodic square-pore glass network",
    "hypothesis": "For periodic square-pore glass network, reversing initial wetting direction will change long-lived bubble locations.",
    "test": "Compare registered networks and independently characterized wettability.",
    "against": "Locations follow fixed defects without a directional effect.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Initial wetting direction",
    "system": "periodic square-pore glass network",
    "id": 1807,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1807",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Gas-path reconnection — periodic square-pore glass network",
    "hypothesis": "For periodic square-pore glass network, a brief low-pressure pulse will reconnect gas clusters and accelerate later removal.",
    "test": "Image connectivity and removal after sham and real pulses.",
    "against": "Removal does not improve after pressure work is included.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Gas-path reconnection",
    "system": "periodic square-pore glass network",
    "id": 1808,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1808",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Sparse vent positioning — periodic square-pore glass network",
    "hypothesis": "For periodic square-pore glass network, vents near high-connectivity nodes will remove more gas than vents near dead ends.",
    "test": "Compare equal vent area and gas initial conditions.",
    "against": "Gas removal is independent of node connectivity.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Sparse vent positioning",
    "system": "periodic square-pore glass network",
    "id": 1809,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1809",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Dissolution noise warning — periodic square-pore glass network",
    "hypothesis": "For periodic square-pore glass network, sudden pressure-noise events will predict gas-cluster disconnection.",
    "test": "Synchronize pressure and high-speed pore imaging.",
    "against": "Noise events fail to predict disconnections above chance on held-out runs.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Dissolution noise warning",
    "system": "periodic square-pore glass network",
    "id": 1810,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1810",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Bubble neighborhood density — hexagonal-pore glass network",
    "hypothesis": "For hexagonal-pore glass network, closely neighboring trapped bubbles will dissolve more slowly per initial area than isolated bubbles.",
    "test": "Image bubble shrinkage at controlled dissolved-gas concentration.",
    "against": "Neighborhood density has no effect after local transport is measured.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Bubble neighborhood density",
    "system": "hexagonal-pore glass network",
    "id": 1811,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1811",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pressure staircase — hexagonal-pore glass network",
    "hypothesis": "For hexagonal-pore glass network, a pressure staircase will leave a broader bubble-size distribution than a smooth pressure ramp.",
    "test": "Compare trapped bubbles at equal final pressure and elapsed time.",
    "against": "Size distributions are indistinguishable after initial sizes are matched.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Pressure staircase",
    "system": "hexagonal-pore glass network",
    "id": 1812,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1812",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Flow pause saturation — hexagonal-pore glass network",
    "hypothesis": "For hexagonal-pore glass network, short flow pauses will slow subsequent dissolution by locally saturating water.",
    "test": "Measure restart shrinkage and local dissolved gas.",
    "against": "Restart slowdown is absent or unrelated to local saturation.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Flow pause saturation",
    "system": "hexagonal-pore glass network",
    "id": 1813,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1813",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Outlet distance memory — hexagonal-pore glass network",
    "hypothesis": "For hexagonal-pore glass network, bubbles farther from the outlet will retain longer pressure-cycle memory.",
    "test": "Map bubble volume and connectivity across positions.",
    "against": "Memory does not correlate with transport distance after geometry is included.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Outlet distance memory",
    "system": "hexagonal-pore glass network",
    "id": 1814,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1814",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Thermal microcycle pumping — hexagonal-pore glass network",
    "hypothesis": "For hexagonal-pore glass network, small temperature cycles will alter trapped-gas topology before changing total gas volume.",
    "test": "Image topology and gas volume during controlled thermal cycles.",
    "against": "Topology changes only alongside proportional gas-volume changes.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Thermal microcycle pumping",
    "system": "hexagonal-pore glass network",
    "id": 1815,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1815",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pore-wall compliance — hexagonal-pore glass network",
    "hypothesis": "For hexagonal-pore glass network, reversible wall deformation will increase dissolution-time variability near a deformation threshold.",
    "test": "Measure wall motion and bubble lifetimes across pressures.",
    "against": "Variability is independent of measured wall deformation.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Pore-wall compliance",
    "system": "hexagonal-pore glass network",
    "id": 1816,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1816",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Initial wetting direction — hexagonal-pore glass network",
    "hypothesis": "For hexagonal-pore glass network, reversing initial wetting direction will change long-lived bubble locations.",
    "test": "Compare registered networks and independently characterized wettability.",
    "against": "Locations follow fixed defects without a directional effect.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Initial wetting direction",
    "system": "hexagonal-pore glass network",
    "id": 1817,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1817",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Gas-path reconnection — hexagonal-pore glass network",
    "hypothesis": "For hexagonal-pore glass network, a brief low-pressure pulse will reconnect gas clusters and accelerate later removal.",
    "test": "Image connectivity and removal after sham and real pulses.",
    "against": "Removal does not improve after pressure work is included.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Gas-path reconnection",
    "system": "hexagonal-pore glass network",
    "id": 1818,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1818",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Sparse vent positioning — hexagonal-pore glass network",
    "hypothesis": "For hexagonal-pore glass network, vents near high-connectivity nodes will remove more gas than vents near dead ends.",
    "test": "Compare equal vent area and gas initial conditions.",
    "against": "Gas removal is independent of node connectivity.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Sparse vent positioning",
    "system": "hexagonal-pore glass network",
    "id": 1819,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1819",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Dissolution noise warning — hexagonal-pore glass network",
    "hypothesis": "For hexagonal-pore glass network, sudden pressure-noise events will predict gas-cluster disconnection.",
    "test": "Synchronize pressure and high-speed pore imaging.",
    "against": "Noise events fail to predict disconnections above chance on held-out runs.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Dissolution noise warning",
    "system": "hexagonal-pore glass network",
    "id": 1820,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1820",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Bubble neighborhood density — random-throat glass network",
    "hypothesis": "For random-throat glass network, closely neighboring trapped bubbles will dissolve more slowly per initial area than isolated bubbles.",
    "test": "Image bubble shrinkage at controlled dissolved-gas concentration.",
    "against": "Neighborhood density has no effect after local transport is measured.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Bubble neighborhood density",
    "system": "random-throat glass network",
    "id": 1821,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1821",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pressure staircase — random-throat glass network",
    "hypothesis": "For random-throat glass network, a pressure staircase will leave a broader bubble-size distribution than a smooth pressure ramp.",
    "test": "Compare trapped bubbles at equal final pressure and elapsed time.",
    "against": "Size distributions are indistinguishable after initial sizes are matched.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Pressure staircase",
    "system": "random-throat glass network",
    "id": 1822,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1822",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Flow pause saturation — random-throat glass network",
    "hypothesis": "For random-throat glass network, short flow pauses will slow subsequent dissolution by locally saturating water.",
    "test": "Measure restart shrinkage and local dissolved gas.",
    "against": "Restart slowdown is absent or unrelated to local saturation.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Flow pause saturation",
    "system": "random-throat glass network",
    "id": 1823,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1823",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Outlet distance memory — random-throat glass network",
    "hypothesis": "For random-throat glass network, bubbles farther from the outlet will retain longer pressure-cycle memory.",
    "test": "Map bubble volume and connectivity across positions.",
    "against": "Memory does not correlate with transport distance after geometry is included.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Outlet distance memory",
    "system": "random-throat glass network",
    "id": 1824,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1824",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Thermal microcycle pumping — random-throat glass network",
    "hypothesis": "For random-throat glass network, small temperature cycles will alter trapped-gas topology before changing total gas volume.",
    "test": "Image topology and gas volume during controlled thermal cycles.",
    "against": "Topology changes only alongside proportional gas-volume changes.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Thermal microcycle pumping",
    "system": "random-throat glass network",
    "id": 1825,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1825",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pore-wall compliance — random-throat glass network",
    "hypothesis": "For random-throat glass network, reversible wall deformation will increase dissolution-time variability near a deformation threshold.",
    "test": "Measure wall motion and bubble lifetimes across pressures.",
    "against": "Variability is independent of measured wall deformation.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Pore-wall compliance",
    "system": "random-throat glass network",
    "id": 1826,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1826",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Initial wetting direction — random-throat glass network",
    "hypothesis": "For random-throat glass network, reversing initial wetting direction will change long-lived bubble locations.",
    "test": "Compare registered networks and independently characterized wettability.",
    "against": "Locations follow fixed defects without a directional effect.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Initial wetting direction",
    "system": "random-throat glass network",
    "id": 1827,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1827",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Gas-path reconnection — random-throat glass network",
    "hypothesis": "For random-throat glass network, a brief low-pressure pulse will reconnect gas clusters and accelerate later removal.",
    "test": "Image connectivity and removal after sham and real pulses.",
    "against": "Removal does not improve after pressure work is included.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Gas-path reconnection",
    "system": "random-throat glass network",
    "id": 1828,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1828",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Sparse vent positioning — random-throat glass network",
    "hypothesis": "For random-throat glass network, vents near high-connectivity nodes will remove more gas than vents near dead ends.",
    "test": "Compare equal vent area and gas initial conditions.",
    "against": "Gas removal is independent of node connectivity.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Sparse vent positioning",
    "system": "random-throat glass network",
    "id": 1829,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1829",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Dissolution noise warning — random-throat glass network",
    "hypothesis": "For random-throat glass network, sudden pressure-noise events will predict gas-cluster disconnection.",
    "test": "Synchronize pressure and high-speed pore imaging.",
    "against": "Noise events fail to predict disconnections above chance on held-out runs.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Dissolution noise warning",
    "system": "random-throat glass network",
    "id": 1830,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1830",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Bubble neighborhood density — branching silicone pore network",
    "hypothesis": "For branching silicone pore network, closely neighboring trapped bubbles will dissolve more slowly per initial area than isolated bubbles.",
    "test": "Image bubble shrinkage at controlled dissolved-gas concentration.",
    "against": "Neighborhood density has no effect after local transport is measured.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Bubble neighborhood density",
    "system": "branching silicone pore network",
    "id": 1831,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1831",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pressure staircase — branching silicone pore network",
    "hypothesis": "For branching silicone pore network, a pressure staircase will leave a broader bubble-size distribution than a smooth pressure ramp.",
    "test": "Compare trapped bubbles at equal final pressure and elapsed time.",
    "against": "Size distributions are indistinguishable after initial sizes are matched.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Pressure staircase",
    "system": "branching silicone pore network",
    "id": 1832,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1832",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Flow pause saturation — branching silicone pore network",
    "hypothesis": "For branching silicone pore network, short flow pauses will slow subsequent dissolution by locally saturating water.",
    "test": "Measure restart shrinkage and local dissolved gas.",
    "against": "Restart slowdown is absent or unrelated to local saturation.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Flow pause saturation",
    "system": "branching silicone pore network",
    "id": 1833,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1833",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Outlet distance memory — branching silicone pore network",
    "hypothesis": "For branching silicone pore network, bubbles farther from the outlet will retain longer pressure-cycle memory.",
    "test": "Map bubble volume and connectivity across positions.",
    "against": "Memory does not correlate with transport distance after geometry is included.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Outlet distance memory",
    "system": "branching silicone pore network",
    "id": 1834,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1834",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Thermal microcycle pumping — branching silicone pore network",
    "hypothesis": "For branching silicone pore network, small temperature cycles will alter trapped-gas topology before changing total gas volume.",
    "test": "Image topology and gas volume during controlled thermal cycles.",
    "against": "Topology changes only alongside proportional gas-volume changes.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Thermal microcycle pumping",
    "system": "branching silicone pore network",
    "id": 1835,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1835",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pore-wall compliance — branching silicone pore network",
    "hypothesis": "For branching silicone pore network, reversible wall deformation will increase dissolution-time variability near a deformation threshold.",
    "test": "Measure wall motion and bubble lifetimes across pressures.",
    "against": "Variability is independent of measured wall deformation.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Pore-wall compliance",
    "system": "branching silicone pore network",
    "id": 1836,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1836",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Initial wetting direction — branching silicone pore network",
    "hypothesis": "For branching silicone pore network, reversing initial wetting direction will change long-lived bubble locations.",
    "test": "Compare registered networks and independently characterized wettability.",
    "against": "Locations follow fixed defects without a directional effect.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Initial wetting direction",
    "system": "branching silicone pore network",
    "id": 1837,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1837",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Gas-path reconnection — branching silicone pore network",
    "hypothesis": "For branching silicone pore network, a brief low-pressure pulse will reconnect gas clusters and accelerate later removal.",
    "test": "Image connectivity and removal after sham and real pulses.",
    "against": "Removal does not improve after pressure work is included.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Gas-path reconnection",
    "system": "branching silicone pore network",
    "id": 1838,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1838",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Sparse vent positioning — branching silicone pore network",
    "hypothesis": "For branching silicone pore network, vents near high-connectivity nodes will remove more gas than vents near dead ends.",
    "test": "Compare equal vent area and gas initial conditions.",
    "against": "Gas removal is independent of node connectivity.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Sparse vent positioning",
    "system": "branching silicone pore network",
    "id": 1839,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1839",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Dissolution noise warning — branching silicone pore network",
    "hypothesis": "For branching silicone pore network, sudden pressure-noise events will predict gas-cluster disconnection.",
    "test": "Synchronize pressure and high-speed pore imaging.",
    "against": "Noise events fail to predict disconnections above chance on held-out runs.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Dissolution noise warning",
    "system": "branching silicone pore network",
    "id": 1840,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1840",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Bubble neighborhood density — rigid branching polymer network",
    "hypothesis": "For rigid branching polymer network, closely neighboring trapped bubbles will dissolve more slowly per initial area than isolated bubbles.",
    "test": "Image bubble shrinkage at controlled dissolved-gas concentration.",
    "against": "Neighborhood density has no effect after local transport is measured.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Bubble neighborhood density",
    "system": "rigid branching polymer network",
    "id": 1841,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1841",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pressure staircase — rigid branching polymer network",
    "hypothesis": "For rigid branching polymer network, a pressure staircase will leave a broader bubble-size distribution than a smooth pressure ramp.",
    "test": "Compare trapped bubbles at equal final pressure and elapsed time.",
    "against": "Size distributions are indistinguishable after initial sizes are matched.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Pressure staircase",
    "system": "rigid branching polymer network",
    "id": 1842,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1842",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Flow pause saturation — rigid branching polymer network",
    "hypothesis": "For rigid branching polymer network, short flow pauses will slow subsequent dissolution by locally saturating water.",
    "test": "Measure restart shrinkage and local dissolved gas.",
    "against": "Restart slowdown is absent or unrelated to local saturation.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Flow pause saturation",
    "system": "rigid branching polymer network",
    "id": 1843,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1843",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Outlet distance memory — rigid branching polymer network",
    "hypothesis": "For rigid branching polymer network, bubbles farther from the outlet will retain longer pressure-cycle memory.",
    "test": "Map bubble volume and connectivity across positions.",
    "against": "Memory does not correlate with transport distance after geometry is included.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Outlet distance memory",
    "system": "rigid branching polymer network",
    "id": 1844,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1844",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Thermal microcycle pumping — rigid branching polymer network",
    "hypothesis": "For rigid branching polymer network, small temperature cycles will alter trapped-gas topology before changing total gas volume.",
    "test": "Image topology and gas volume during controlled thermal cycles.",
    "against": "Topology changes only alongside proportional gas-volume changes.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Thermal microcycle pumping",
    "system": "rigid branching polymer network",
    "id": 1845,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1845",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pore-wall compliance — rigid branching polymer network",
    "hypothesis": "For rigid branching polymer network, reversible wall deformation will increase dissolution-time variability near a deformation threshold.",
    "test": "Measure wall motion and bubble lifetimes across pressures.",
    "against": "Variability is independent of measured wall deformation.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Pore-wall compliance",
    "system": "rigid branching polymer network",
    "id": 1846,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1846",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Initial wetting direction — rigid branching polymer network",
    "hypothesis": "For rigid branching polymer network, reversing initial wetting direction will change long-lived bubble locations.",
    "test": "Compare registered networks and independently characterized wettability.",
    "against": "Locations follow fixed defects without a directional effect.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Initial wetting direction",
    "system": "rigid branching polymer network",
    "id": 1847,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1847",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Gas-path reconnection — rigid branching polymer network",
    "hypothesis": "For rigid branching polymer network, a brief low-pressure pulse will reconnect gas clusters and accelerate later removal.",
    "test": "Image connectivity and removal after sham and real pulses.",
    "against": "Removal does not improve after pressure work is included.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Gas-path reconnection",
    "system": "rigid branching polymer network",
    "id": 1848,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1848",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Sparse vent positioning — rigid branching polymer network",
    "hypothesis": "For rigid branching polymer network, vents near high-connectivity nodes will remove more gas than vents near dead ends.",
    "test": "Compare equal vent area and gas initial conditions.",
    "against": "Gas removal is independent of node connectivity.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Sparse vent positioning",
    "system": "rigid branching polymer network",
    "id": 1849,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1849",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Dissolution noise warning — rigid branching polymer network",
    "hypothesis": "For rigid branching polymer network, sudden pressure-noise events will predict gas-cluster disconnection.",
    "test": "Synchronize pressure and high-speed pore imaging.",
    "against": "Noise events fail to predict disconnections above chance on held-out runs.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Dissolution noise warning",
    "system": "rigid branching polymer network",
    "id": 1850,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1850",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Bubble neighborhood density — packed spherical-glass-bead network",
    "hypothesis": "For packed spherical-glass-bead network, closely neighboring trapped bubbles will dissolve more slowly per initial area than isolated bubbles.",
    "test": "Image bubble shrinkage at controlled dissolved-gas concentration.",
    "against": "Neighborhood density has no effect after local transport is measured.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Bubble neighborhood density",
    "system": "packed spherical-glass-bead network",
    "id": 1851,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1851",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pressure staircase — packed spherical-glass-bead network",
    "hypothesis": "For packed spherical-glass-bead network, a pressure staircase will leave a broader bubble-size distribution than a smooth pressure ramp.",
    "test": "Compare trapped bubbles at equal final pressure and elapsed time.",
    "against": "Size distributions are indistinguishable after initial sizes are matched.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Pressure staircase",
    "system": "packed spherical-glass-bead network",
    "id": 1852,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1852",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Flow pause saturation — packed spherical-glass-bead network",
    "hypothesis": "For packed spherical-glass-bead network, short flow pauses will slow subsequent dissolution by locally saturating water.",
    "test": "Measure restart shrinkage and local dissolved gas.",
    "against": "Restart slowdown is absent or unrelated to local saturation.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Flow pause saturation",
    "system": "packed spherical-glass-bead network",
    "id": 1853,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1853",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Outlet distance memory — packed spherical-glass-bead network",
    "hypothesis": "For packed spherical-glass-bead network, bubbles farther from the outlet will retain longer pressure-cycle memory.",
    "test": "Map bubble volume and connectivity across positions.",
    "against": "Memory does not correlate with transport distance after geometry is included.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Outlet distance memory",
    "system": "packed spherical-glass-bead network",
    "id": 1854,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1854",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Thermal microcycle pumping — packed spherical-glass-bead network",
    "hypothesis": "For packed spherical-glass-bead network, small temperature cycles will alter trapped-gas topology before changing total gas volume.",
    "test": "Image topology and gas volume during controlled thermal cycles.",
    "against": "Topology changes only alongside proportional gas-volume changes.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Thermal microcycle pumping",
    "system": "packed spherical-glass-bead network",
    "id": 1855,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1855",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pore-wall compliance — packed spherical-glass-bead network",
    "hypothesis": "For packed spherical-glass-bead network, reversible wall deformation will increase dissolution-time variability near a deformation threshold.",
    "test": "Measure wall motion and bubble lifetimes across pressures.",
    "against": "Variability is independent of measured wall deformation.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Pore-wall compliance",
    "system": "packed spherical-glass-bead network",
    "id": 1856,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1856",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Initial wetting direction — packed spherical-glass-bead network",
    "hypothesis": "For packed spherical-glass-bead network, reversing initial wetting direction will change long-lived bubble locations.",
    "test": "Compare registered networks and independently characterized wettability.",
    "against": "Locations follow fixed defects without a directional effect.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Initial wetting direction",
    "system": "packed spherical-glass-bead network",
    "id": 1857,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1857",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Gas-path reconnection — packed spherical-glass-bead network",
    "hypothesis": "For packed spherical-glass-bead network, a brief low-pressure pulse will reconnect gas clusters and accelerate later removal.",
    "test": "Image connectivity and removal after sham and real pulses.",
    "against": "Removal does not improve after pressure work is included.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Gas-path reconnection",
    "system": "packed spherical-glass-bead network",
    "id": 1858,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1858",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Sparse vent positioning — packed spherical-glass-bead network",
    "hypothesis": "For packed spherical-glass-bead network, vents near high-connectivity nodes will remove more gas than vents near dead ends.",
    "test": "Compare equal vent area and gas initial conditions.",
    "against": "Gas removal is independent of node connectivity.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Sparse vent positioning",
    "system": "packed spherical-glass-bead network",
    "id": 1859,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1859",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Dissolution noise warning — packed spherical-glass-bead network",
    "hypothesis": "For packed spherical-glass-bead network, sudden pressure-noise events will predict gas-cluster disconnection.",
    "test": "Synchronize pressure and high-speed pore imaging.",
    "against": "Noise events fail to predict disconnections above chance on held-out runs.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Dissolution noise warning",
    "system": "packed spherical-glass-bead network",
    "id": 1860,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1860",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Bubble neighborhood density — packed angular-silica network",
    "hypothesis": "For packed angular-silica network, closely neighboring trapped bubbles will dissolve more slowly per initial area than isolated bubbles.",
    "test": "Image bubble shrinkage at controlled dissolved-gas concentration.",
    "against": "Neighborhood density has no effect after local transport is measured.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Bubble neighborhood density",
    "system": "packed angular-silica network",
    "id": 1861,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1861",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pressure staircase — packed angular-silica network",
    "hypothesis": "For packed angular-silica network, a pressure staircase will leave a broader bubble-size distribution than a smooth pressure ramp.",
    "test": "Compare trapped bubbles at equal final pressure and elapsed time.",
    "against": "Size distributions are indistinguishable after initial sizes are matched.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Pressure staircase",
    "system": "packed angular-silica network",
    "id": 1862,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1862",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Flow pause saturation — packed angular-silica network",
    "hypothesis": "For packed angular-silica network, short flow pauses will slow subsequent dissolution by locally saturating water.",
    "test": "Measure restart shrinkage and local dissolved gas.",
    "against": "Restart slowdown is absent or unrelated to local saturation.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Flow pause saturation",
    "system": "packed angular-silica network",
    "id": 1863,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1863",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Outlet distance memory — packed angular-silica network",
    "hypothesis": "For packed angular-silica network, bubbles farther from the outlet will retain longer pressure-cycle memory.",
    "test": "Map bubble volume and connectivity across positions.",
    "against": "Memory does not correlate with transport distance after geometry is included.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Outlet distance memory",
    "system": "packed angular-silica network",
    "id": 1864,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1864",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Thermal microcycle pumping — packed angular-silica network",
    "hypothesis": "For packed angular-silica network, small temperature cycles will alter trapped-gas topology before changing total gas volume.",
    "test": "Image topology and gas volume during controlled thermal cycles.",
    "against": "Topology changes only alongside proportional gas-volume changes.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Thermal microcycle pumping",
    "system": "packed angular-silica network",
    "id": 1865,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1865",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pore-wall compliance — packed angular-silica network",
    "hypothesis": "For packed angular-silica network, reversible wall deformation will increase dissolution-time variability near a deformation threshold.",
    "test": "Measure wall motion and bubble lifetimes across pressures.",
    "against": "Variability is independent of measured wall deformation.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Pore-wall compliance",
    "system": "packed angular-silica network",
    "id": 1866,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1866",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Initial wetting direction — packed angular-silica network",
    "hypothesis": "For packed angular-silica network, reversing initial wetting direction will change long-lived bubble locations.",
    "test": "Compare registered networks and independently characterized wettability.",
    "against": "Locations follow fixed defects without a directional effect.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Initial wetting direction",
    "system": "packed angular-silica network",
    "id": 1867,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1867",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Gas-path reconnection — packed angular-silica network",
    "hypothesis": "For packed angular-silica network, a brief low-pressure pulse will reconnect gas clusters and accelerate later removal.",
    "test": "Image connectivity and removal after sham and real pulses.",
    "against": "Removal does not improve after pressure work is included.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Gas-path reconnection",
    "system": "packed angular-silica network",
    "id": 1868,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1868",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Sparse vent positioning — packed angular-silica network",
    "hypothesis": "For packed angular-silica network, vents near high-connectivity nodes will remove more gas than vents near dead ends.",
    "test": "Compare equal vent area and gas initial conditions.",
    "against": "Gas removal is independent of node connectivity.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Sparse vent positioning",
    "system": "packed angular-silica network",
    "id": 1869,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1869",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Dissolution noise warning — packed angular-silica network",
    "hypothesis": "For packed angular-silica network, sudden pressure-noise events will predict gas-cluster disconnection.",
    "test": "Synchronize pressure and high-speed pore imaging.",
    "against": "Noise events fail to predict disconnections above chance on held-out runs.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Dissolution noise warning",
    "system": "packed angular-silica network",
    "id": 1870,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1870",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Bubble neighborhood density — layered coarse-fine bead network",
    "hypothesis": "For layered coarse-fine bead network, closely neighboring trapped bubbles will dissolve more slowly per initial area than isolated bubbles.",
    "test": "Image bubble shrinkage at controlled dissolved-gas concentration.",
    "against": "Neighborhood density has no effect after local transport is measured.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Bubble neighborhood density",
    "system": "layered coarse-fine bead network",
    "id": 1871,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1871",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pressure staircase — layered coarse-fine bead network",
    "hypothesis": "For layered coarse-fine bead network, a pressure staircase will leave a broader bubble-size distribution than a smooth pressure ramp.",
    "test": "Compare trapped bubbles at equal final pressure and elapsed time.",
    "against": "Size distributions are indistinguishable after initial sizes are matched.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Pressure staircase",
    "system": "layered coarse-fine bead network",
    "id": 1872,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1872",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Flow pause saturation — layered coarse-fine bead network",
    "hypothesis": "For layered coarse-fine bead network, short flow pauses will slow subsequent dissolution by locally saturating water.",
    "test": "Measure restart shrinkage and local dissolved gas.",
    "against": "Restart slowdown is absent or unrelated to local saturation.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Flow pause saturation",
    "system": "layered coarse-fine bead network",
    "id": 1873,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1873",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Outlet distance memory — layered coarse-fine bead network",
    "hypothesis": "For layered coarse-fine bead network, bubbles farther from the outlet will retain longer pressure-cycle memory.",
    "test": "Map bubble volume and connectivity across positions.",
    "against": "Memory does not correlate with transport distance after geometry is included.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Outlet distance memory",
    "system": "layered coarse-fine bead network",
    "id": 1874,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1874",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Thermal microcycle pumping — layered coarse-fine bead network",
    "hypothesis": "For layered coarse-fine bead network, small temperature cycles will alter trapped-gas topology before changing total gas volume.",
    "test": "Image topology and gas volume during controlled thermal cycles.",
    "against": "Topology changes only alongside proportional gas-volume changes.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Thermal microcycle pumping",
    "system": "layered coarse-fine bead network",
    "id": 1875,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1875",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pore-wall compliance — layered coarse-fine bead network",
    "hypothesis": "For layered coarse-fine bead network, reversible wall deformation will increase dissolution-time variability near a deformation threshold.",
    "test": "Measure wall motion and bubble lifetimes across pressures.",
    "against": "Variability is independent of measured wall deformation.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Pore-wall compliance",
    "system": "layered coarse-fine bead network",
    "id": 1876,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1876",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Initial wetting direction — layered coarse-fine bead network",
    "hypothesis": "For layered coarse-fine bead network, reversing initial wetting direction will change long-lived bubble locations.",
    "test": "Compare registered networks and independently characterized wettability.",
    "against": "Locations follow fixed defects without a directional effect.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Initial wetting direction",
    "system": "layered coarse-fine bead network",
    "id": 1877,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1877",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Gas-path reconnection — layered coarse-fine bead network",
    "hypothesis": "For layered coarse-fine bead network, a brief low-pressure pulse will reconnect gas clusters and accelerate later removal.",
    "test": "Image connectivity and removal after sham and real pulses.",
    "against": "Removal does not improve after pressure work is included.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Gas-path reconnection",
    "system": "layered coarse-fine bead network",
    "id": 1878,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1878",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Sparse vent positioning — layered coarse-fine bead network",
    "hypothesis": "For layered coarse-fine bead network, vents near high-connectivity nodes will remove more gas than vents near dead ends.",
    "test": "Compare equal vent area and gas initial conditions.",
    "against": "Gas removal is independent of node connectivity.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Sparse vent positioning",
    "system": "layered coarse-fine bead network",
    "id": 1879,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1879",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Dissolution noise warning — layered coarse-fine bead network",
    "hypothesis": "For layered coarse-fine bead network, sudden pressure-noise events will predict gas-cluster disconnection.",
    "test": "Synchronize pressure and high-speed pore imaging.",
    "against": "Noise events fail to predict disconnections above chance on held-out runs.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Dissolution noise warning",
    "system": "layered coarse-fine bead network",
    "id": 1880,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1880",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Bubble neighborhood density — woven glass-fiber pore network",
    "hypothesis": "For woven glass-fiber pore network, closely neighboring trapped bubbles will dissolve more slowly per initial area than isolated bubbles.",
    "test": "Image bubble shrinkage at controlled dissolved-gas concentration.",
    "against": "Neighborhood density has no effect after local transport is measured.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Bubble neighborhood density",
    "system": "woven glass-fiber pore network",
    "id": 1881,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1881",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pressure staircase — woven glass-fiber pore network",
    "hypothesis": "For woven glass-fiber pore network, a pressure staircase will leave a broader bubble-size distribution than a smooth pressure ramp.",
    "test": "Compare trapped bubbles at equal final pressure and elapsed time.",
    "against": "Size distributions are indistinguishable after initial sizes are matched.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Pressure staircase",
    "system": "woven glass-fiber pore network",
    "id": 1882,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1882",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Flow pause saturation — woven glass-fiber pore network",
    "hypothesis": "For woven glass-fiber pore network, short flow pauses will slow subsequent dissolution by locally saturating water.",
    "test": "Measure restart shrinkage and local dissolved gas.",
    "against": "Restart slowdown is absent or unrelated to local saturation.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Flow pause saturation",
    "system": "woven glass-fiber pore network",
    "id": 1883,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1883",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Outlet distance memory — woven glass-fiber pore network",
    "hypothesis": "For woven glass-fiber pore network, bubbles farther from the outlet will retain longer pressure-cycle memory.",
    "test": "Map bubble volume and connectivity across positions.",
    "against": "Memory does not correlate with transport distance after geometry is included.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Outlet distance memory",
    "system": "woven glass-fiber pore network",
    "id": 1884,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1884",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Thermal microcycle pumping — woven glass-fiber pore network",
    "hypothesis": "For woven glass-fiber pore network, small temperature cycles will alter trapped-gas topology before changing total gas volume.",
    "test": "Image topology and gas volume during controlled thermal cycles.",
    "against": "Topology changes only alongside proportional gas-volume changes.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Thermal microcycle pumping",
    "system": "woven glass-fiber pore network",
    "id": 1885,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1885",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pore-wall compliance — woven glass-fiber pore network",
    "hypothesis": "For woven glass-fiber pore network, reversible wall deformation will increase dissolution-time variability near a deformation threshold.",
    "test": "Measure wall motion and bubble lifetimes across pressures.",
    "against": "Variability is independent of measured wall deformation.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Pore-wall compliance",
    "system": "woven glass-fiber pore network",
    "id": 1886,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1886",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Initial wetting direction — woven glass-fiber pore network",
    "hypothesis": "For woven glass-fiber pore network, reversing initial wetting direction will change long-lived bubble locations.",
    "test": "Compare registered networks and independently characterized wettability.",
    "against": "Locations follow fixed defects without a directional effect.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Initial wetting direction",
    "system": "woven glass-fiber pore network",
    "id": 1887,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1887",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Gas-path reconnection — woven glass-fiber pore network",
    "hypothesis": "For woven glass-fiber pore network, a brief low-pressure pulse will reconnect gas clusters and accelerate later removal.",
    "test": "Image connectivity and removal after sham and real pulses.",
    "against": "Removal does not improve after pressure work is included.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Gas-path reconnection",
    "system": "woven glass-fiber pore network",
    "id": 1888,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1888",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Sparse vent positioning — woven glass-fiber pore network",
    "hypothesis": "For woven glass-fiber pore network, vents near high-connectivity nodes will remove more gas than vents near dead ends.",
    "test": "Compare equal vent area and gas initial conditions.",
    "against": "Gas removal is independent of node connectivity.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Sparse vent positioning",
    "system": "woven glass-fiber pore network",
    "id": 1889,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1889",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Dissolution noise warning — woven glass-fiber pore network",
    "hypothesis": "For woven glass-fiber pore network, sudden pressure-noise events will predict gas-cluster disconnection.",
    "test": "Synchronize pressure and high-speed pore imaging.",
    "against": "Noise events fail to predict disconnections above chance on held-out runs.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Dissolution noise warning",
    "system": "woven glass-fiber pore network",
    "id": 1890,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1890",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Bubble neighborhood density — porous transparent hydrogel network",
    "hypothesis": "For porous transparent hydrogel network, closely neighboring trapped bubbles will dissolve more slowly per initial area than isolated bubbles.",
    "test": "Image bubble shrinkage at controlled dissolved-gas concentration.",
    "against": "Neighborhood density has no effect after local transport is measured.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Bubble neighborhood density",
    "system": "porous transparent hydrogel network",
    "id": 1891,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 209,
    "literature_query": "Bubble neighborhood density porous transparent hydrogel network closely neighboring trapped bubbles dissolve slowly experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1891",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Bubble neighborhood density — porous transparent hydrogel network",
      "hypothesis": "For porous transparent hydrogel network, closely neighboring trapped bubbles will dissolve more slowly per initial area than isolated bubbles.",
      "test": "Image bubble shrinkage at controlled dissolved-gas concentration.",
      "against": "Neighborhood density has no effect after local transport is measured.",
      "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
      "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Bubble neighborhood density",
      "system": "porous transparent hydrogel network",
      "id": 1891,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 26,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 209,
      "literature_query": "Bubble neighborhood density porous transparent hydrogel network closely neighboring trapped bubbles dissolve slowly experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
      "source_lead_count": 3,
      "source_ids": "S43868cc10697;S9c35c3c98032;S28009dc170f3",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pressure staircase — porous transparent hydrogel network",
    "hypothesis": "For porous transparent hydrogel network, a pressure staircase will leave a broader bubble-size distribution than a smooth pressure ramp.",
    "test": "Compare trapped bubbles at equal final pressure and elapsed time.",
    "against": "Size distributions are indistinguishable after initial sizes are matched.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Pressure staircase",
    "system": "porous transparent hydrogel network",
    "id": 1892,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 210,
    "literature_query": "Pressure staircase porous transparent hydrogel network leave broader bubble-size distribution smooth ramp experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1892",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Pressure staircase — porous transparent hydrogel network",
      "hypothesis": "For porous transparent hydrogel network, a pressure staircase will leave a broader bubble-size distribution than a smooth pressure ramp.",
      "test": "Compare trapped bubbles at equal final pressure and elapsed time.",
      "against": "Size distributions are indistinguishable after initial sizes are matched.",
      "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
      "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Pressure staircase",
      "system": "porous transparent hydrogel network",
      "id": 1892,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 26,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 210,
      "literature_query": "Pressure staircase porous transparent hydrogel network leave broader bubble-size distribution smooth ramp experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
      "source_lead_count": 5,
      "source_ids": "S7f57de3aa36b;S0ddfe7a30194;Se93bdab03ead;S28009dc170f3;S34943441bc51",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Flow pause saturation — porous transparent hydrogel network",
    "hypothesis": "For porous transparent hydrogel network, short flow pauses will slow subsequent dissolution by locally saturating water.",
    "test": "Measure restart shrinkage and local dissolved gas.",
    "against": "Restart slowdown is absent or unrelated to local saturation.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Flow pause saturation",
    "system": "porous transparent hydrogel network",
    "id": 1893,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1893",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Outlet distance memory — porous transparent hydrogel network",
    "hypothesis": "For porous transparent hydrogel network, bubbles farther from the outlet will retain longer pressure-cycle memory.",
    "test": "Map bubble volume and connectivity across positions.",
    "against": "Memory does not correlate with transport distance after geometry is included.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Outlet distance memory",
    "system": "porous transparent hydrogel network",
    "id": 1894,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 211,
    "literature_query": "Outlet distance memory porous transparent hydrogel network bubbles farther retain longer pressure-cycle experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1894",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Outlet distance memory — porous transparent hydrogel network",
      "hypothesis": "For porous transparent hydrogel network, bubbles farther from the outlet will retain longer pressure-cycle memory.",
      "test": "Map bubble volume and connectivity across positions.",
      "against": "Memory does not correlate with transport distance after geometry is included.",
      "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
      "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Outlet distance memory",
      "system": "porous transparent hydrogel network",
      "id": 1894,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 26,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 211,
      "literature_query": "Outlet distance memory porous transparent hydrogel network bubbles farther retain longer pressure-cycle experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
      "source_lead_count": 5,
      "source_ids": "S8635fdd40ee6;S920d2ad0f3f4;S8e4dce4d6607;Sfea1df32bdd8;Sc6d0b64e1ca3",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Thermal microcycle pumping — porous transparent hydrogel network",
    "hypothesis": "For porous transparent hydrogel network, small temperature cycles will alter trapped-gas topology before changing total gas volume.",
    "test": "Image topology and gas volume during controlled thermal cycles.",
    "against": "Topology changes only alongside proportional gas-volume changes.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Thermal microcycle pumping",
    "system": "porous transparent hydrogel network",
    "id": 1895,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 212,
    "literature_query": "Thermal microcycle pumping porous transparent hydrogel network temperature cycles alter trapped-gas topology changing experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1895",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Thermal microcycle pumping — porous transparent hydrogel network",
      "hypothesis": "For porous transparent hydrogel network, small temperature cycles will alter trapped-gas topology before changing total gas volume.",
      "test": "Image topology and gas volume during controlled thermal cycles.",
      "against": "Topology changes only alongside proportional gas-volume changes.",
      "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
      "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Thermal microcycle pumping",
      "system": "porous transparent hydrogel network",
      "id": 1895,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 26,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 212,
      "literature_query": "Thermal microcycle pumping porous transparent hydrogel network temperature cycles alter trapped-gas topology changing experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
      "source_lead_count": 8,
      "source_ids": "Sd48e907760a3;Sd67edd30da40;S093a50f9d33e;S4568ce313554;S03075180c8c1;S7c400d61ad97;S4f14f371bbc8;Sbfa4d2c9a768",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pore-wall compliance — porous transparent hydrogel network",
    "hypothesis": "For porous transparent hydrogel network, reversible wall deformation will increase dissolution-time variability near a deformation threshold.",
    "test": "Measure wall motion and bubble lifetimes across pressures.",
    "against": "Variability is independent of measured wall deformation.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Pore-wall compliance",
    "system": "porous transparent hydrogel network",
    "id": 1896,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 213,
    "literature_query": "Pore-wall compliance porous transparent hydrogel network reversible wall deformation dissolution-time variability near threshold experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1896",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Pore-wall compliance — porous transparent hydrogel network",
      "hypothesis": "For porous transparent hydrogel network, reversible wall deformation will increase dissolution-time variability near a deformation threshold.",
      "test": "Measure wall motion and bubble lifetimes across pressures.",
      "against": "Variability is independent of measured wall deformation.",
      "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
      "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Pore-wall compliance",
      "system": "porous transparent hydrogel network",
      "id": 1896,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 26,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 213,
      "literature_query": "Pore-wall compliance porous transparent hydrogel network reversible wall deformation dissolution-time variability near threshold experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
      "source_lead_count": 7,
      "source_ids": "Sd48e907760a3;S730305efc0e5;S2c062a2930e8;S6c577b29bd57;Sfea1df32bdd8;Sf74257197a32;Seb9af8e89942",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Initial wetting direction — porous transparent hydrogel network",
    "hypothesis": "For porous transparent hydrogel network, reversing initial wetting direction will change long-lived bubble locations.",
    "test": "Compare registered networks and independently characterized wettability.",
    "against": "Locations follow fixed defects without a directional effect.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Initial wetting direction",
    "system": "porous transparent hydrogel network",
    "id": 1897,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 214,
    "literature_query": "Initial wetting direction porous transparent hydrogel network reversing change long-lived bubble locations experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1897",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Initial wetting direction — porous transparent hydrogel network",
      "hypothesis": "For porous transparent hydrogel network, reversing initial wetting direction will change long-lived bubble locations.",
      "test": "Compare registered networks and independently characterized wettability.",
      "against": "Locations follow fixed defects without a directional effect.",
      "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
      "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Initial wetting direction",
      "system": "porous transparent hydrogel network",
      "id": 1897,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 26,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 214,
      "literature_query": "Initial wetting direction porous transparent hydrogel network reversing change long-lived bubble locations experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
      "source_lead_count": 5,
      "source_ids": "S43868cc10697;Sc78c3feff070;S3c54837337b4;S41cdf7e6ff6c;S1eaaf2b0f4e5",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Gas-path reconnection — porous transparent hydrogel network",
    "hypothesis": "For porous transparent hydrogel network, a brief low-pressure pulse will reconnect gas clusters and accelerate later removal.",
    "test": "Image connectivity and removal after sham and real pulses.",
    "against": "Removal does not improve after pressure work is included.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Gas-path reconnection",
    "system": "porous transparent hydrogel network",
    "id": 1898,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 215,
    "literature_query": "Gas-path reconnection porous transparent hydrogel network brief low-pressure pulse reconnect gas clusters accelerate experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1898",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Gas-path reconnection — porous transparent hydrogel network",
      "hypothesis": "For porous transparent hydrogel network, a brief low-pressure pulse will reconnect gas clusters and accelerate later removal.",
      "test": "Image connectivity and removal after sham and real pulses.",
      "against": "Removal does not improve after pressure work is included.",
      "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
      "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Gas-path reconnection",
      "system": "porous transparent hydrogel network",
      "id": 1898,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 26,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 215,
      "literature_query": "Gas-path reconnection porous transparent hydrogel network brief low-pressure pulse reconnect gas clusters accelerate experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
      "source_lead_count": 4,
      "source_ids": "S48ce7cfee917;Sc10bed2fc220;S7242c663ad9d;S28009dc170f3",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Sparse vent positioning — porous transparent hydrogel network",
    "hypothesis": "For porous transparent hydrogel network, vents near high-connectivity nodes will remove more gas than vents near dead ends.",
    "test": "Compare equal vent area and gas initial conditions.",
    "against": "Gas removal is independent of node connectivity.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Sparse vent positioning",
    "system": "porous transparent hydrogel network",
    "id": 1899,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 216,
    "literature_query": "Sparse vent positioning porous transparent hydrogel network vents near high-connectivity nodes remove gas experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1899",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Sparse vent positioning — porous transparent hydrogel network",
      "hypothesis": "For porous transparent hydrogel network, vents near high-connectivity nodes will remove more gas than vents near dead ends.",
      "test": "Compare equal vent area and gas initial conditions.",
      "against": "Gas removal is independent of node connectivity.",
      "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
      "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Sparse vent positioning",
      "system": "porous transparent hydrogel network",
      "id": 1899,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 26,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 216,
      "literature_query": "Sparse vent positioning porous transparent hydrogel network vents near high-connectivity nodes remove gas experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
      "source_lead_count": 5,
      "source_ids": "S04e4b98e935e;S3f8f68bf171f;S3d1a62ee2192;Sf5532c9ea6c5;S4eca0d30c633",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Dissolution noise warning — porous transparent hydrogel network",
    "hypothesis": "For porous transparent hydrogel network, sudden pressure-noise events will predict gas-cluster disconnection.",
    "test": "Synchronize pressure and high-speed pore imaging.",
    "against": "Noise events fail to predict disconnections above chance on held-out runs.",
    "category": "Porous-network gas dissolution",
    "controls": "Use water and air with matched gas saturation, temperature, initial trapped volume, wettability, pressure, and measured pore geometry.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Porous-network gas dissolution: Dissolution noise warning",
    "system": "porous transparent hydrogel network",
    "id": 1900,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Transparent characterized pore network, low-pressure water/air control, dissolved-gas measurement, and calibrated microscopy.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1900",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Mixing order memory — PEG-dextran aqueous two-phase mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For PEG-dextran aqueous two-phase mixture, opposite addition orders will produce different early domain sizes but convergent equilibrium phase compositions.",
    "test": "Measure time-resolved domains and final phase concentrations.",
    "against": "Domain kinetics are identical or final compositions remain different.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Mixing order memory",
    "system": "PEG-dextran aqueous two-phase mixture",
    "id": 1901,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1901",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Thin-layer coarsening — PEG-dextran aqueous two-phase mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For PEG-dextran aqueous two-phase mixture, confinement will shift domain growth from three-dimensional coalescence toward elongated connected regions.",
    "test": "Image morphology across gap thicknesses.",
    "against": "Morphology differences are explained solely by wall adsorption.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Thin-layer coarsening",
    "system": "PEG-dextran aqueous two-phase mixture",
    "id": 1902,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1902",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Weak shear cessation — PEG-dextran aqueous two-phase mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For PEG-dextran aqueous two-phase mixture, shear-aligned domains will retain orientation longer near the phase boundary.",
    "test": "Measure orientation relaxation across independently mapped compositions.",
    "against": "Relaxation time does not increase near the boundary.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Weak shear cessation",
    "system": "PEG-dextran aqueous two-phase mixture",
    "id": 1903,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1903",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Temperature oscillation arrest — PEG-dextran aqueous two-phase mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For PEG-dextran aqueous two-phase mixture, small temperature oscillations will slow net coarsening relative to the same mean temperature.",
    "test": "Track domain size and verify reversible phase behavior.",
    "against": "Coarsening rates agree after actual temperature histories are modeled.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Temperature oscillation arrest",
    "system": "PEG-dextran aqueous two-phase mixture",
    "id": 1904,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1904",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Neutral tracer partition — PEG-dextran aqueous two-phase mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For PEG-dextran aqueous two-phase mixture, neutral tracer partition will show stronger size dependence near domain interfaces than within bulk phases.",
    "test": "Image a calibrated inert tracer-size series.",
    "against": "Apparent interfacial selectivity is explained by optical resolution or binding.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Neutral tracer partition",
    "system": "PEG-dextran aqueous two-phase mixture",
    "id": 1905,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1905",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Surface affinity gradient — PEG-dextran aqueous two-phase mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For PEG-dextran aqueous two-phase mixture, a mild surface-affinity gradient will bias domain migration without bulk flow.",
    "test": "Track domains and inert flow markers.",
    "against": "Migration disappears after correcting for residual flow.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Surface affinity gradient",
    "system": "PEG-dextran aqueous two-phase mixture",
    "id": 1906,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 217,
    "literature_query": "Surface affinity gradient PEG-dextran aqueous two-phase mixture mild surface-affinity bias domain migration bulk experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1906",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Surface affinity gradient — PEG-dextran aqueous two-phase mixture",
      "hypothesis": "For PEG-dextran aqueous two-phase mixture, a mild surface-affinity gradient will bias domain migration without bulk flow.",
      "test": "Track domains and inert flow markers.",
      "against": "Migration disappears after correcting for residual flow.",
      "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
      "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Surface affinity gradient",
      "system": "PEG-dextran aqueous two-phase mixture",
      "id": 1906,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 26,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 217,
      "literature_query": "Surface affinity gradient PEG-dextran aqueous two-phase mixture mild surface-affinity bias domain migration bulk experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
      "source_lead_count": 7,
      "source_ids": "S9adb98aedd56;S4b439148025c;Sa096afc9e2c4;Sa9ed2cc41c67;S7223479fa9f7;S69dd338731f2;Sb69ce57a3e0d",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Salt pulse topology — PEG-dextran aqueous two-phase mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For PEG-dextran aqueous two-phase mixture, a small reversible salt pulse will alter connectivity before changing total phase fraction.",
    "test": "Measure phase topology and compositions during pulse washout.",
    "against": "Topology changes are proportional to phase-fraction changes only.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Salt pulse topology",
    "system": "PEG-dextran aqueous two-phase mixture",
    "id": 1907,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 218,
    "literature_query": "Salt pulse topology PEG-dextran aqueous two-phase mixture reversible alter connectivity changing total phase experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1907",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Salt pulse topology — PEG-dextran aqueous two-phase mixture",
      "hypothesis": "For PEG-dextran aqueous two-phase mixture, a small reversible salt pulse will alter connectivity before changing total phase fraction.",
      "test": "Measure phase topology and compositions during pulse washout.",
      "against": "Topology changes are proportional to phase-fraction changes only.",
      "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
      "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Salt pulse topology",
      "system": "PEG-dextran aqueous two-phase mixture",
      "id": 1907,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 26,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 218,
      "literature_query": "Salt pulse topology PEG-dextran aqueous two-phase mixture reversible alter connectivity changing total phase experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
      "source_lead_count": 6,
      "source_ids": "S130940e552e1;S69b88564c141;Sd9ce8a72eaea;S90fde79e82d2;S07fc2f913da3;S7223479fa9f7",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Droplet collision age — PEG-dextran aqueous two-phase mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For PEG-dextran aqueous two-phase mixture, older dispersed domains will merge more slowly at equal size because interfaces accumulate slow components.",
    "test": "Measure collision and fusion while tracking interfacial composition.",
    "against": "Fusion time is age-independent after viscosity is matched.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Droplet collision age",
    "system": "PEG-dextran aqueous two-phase mixture",
    "id": 1908,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; exploratory candidate-specific title-level search only",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "selected",
    "rank": 219,
    "literature_query": "Droplet collision age PEG-dextran aqueous two-phase mixture older dispersed domains merge slowly at experiment research",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1908",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "title": "Droplet collision age — PEG-dextran aqueous two-phase mixture",
      "hypothesis": "For PEG-dextran aqueous two-phase mixture, older dispersed domains will merge more slowly at equal size because interfaces accumulate slow components.",
      "test": "Measure collision and fusion while tracking interfacial composition.",
      "against": "Fusion time is age-independent after viscosity is matched.",
      "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
      "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
      "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
      "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Droplet collision age",
      "system": "PEG-dextran aqueous two-phase mixture",
      "id": 1908,
      "access_score": 3,
      "measurement_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "distinctness_score": 3,
      "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
      "screen_score": 26,
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory or instrumented workshop",
      "pilot_time_estimate": "Planning estimate only: 3–8 weeks or longer after apparatus and compatibility validation",
      "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
      "novelty_status": "Unverified: related literature leads found; exact-claim novelty unresolved",
      "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
      "status": "selected provisional",
      "rank": 219,
      "literature_query": "Droplet collision age PEG-dextran aqueous two-phase mixture older dispersed domains merge slowly at experiment research",
      "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
      "source_lead_count": 7,
      "source_ids": "S300cfe0f8235;S44e607cea12b;Sa9ed2cc41c67;Sdccda9a3931b;Sbdf39bc0dd88;S120edc77b60c;S9b314531759a",
      "novelty_gap_to_check": "Determine whether the exact stated comparison, system, parameter range, and matched controls were already studied. A material substitution alone is not evidence of novelty.",
      "truth_probability": "Not estimated; no experimental data exist for this proposal in this collection.",
      "pilot_gate": "Check compatibility and prior art, then establish measurement repeatability and independent-preparation variation before a powered confirmatory experiment."
    },
    "focused_fields": null,
    "dossier_text": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Evaporation symmetry — PEG-dextran aqueous two-phase mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For PEG-dextran aqueous two-phase mixture, symmetric solvent loss will produce less domain-size variation than one-sided loss.",
    "test": "Map water content and domains at equal final solids.",
    "against": "Variation is unchanged after local composition is included.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Evaporation symmetry",
    "system": "PEG-dextran aqueous two-phase mixture",
    "id": 1909,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1909",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Rehydration pathway — PEG-dextran aqueous two-phase mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For PEG-dextran aqueous two-phase mixture, stepwise rehydration will restore initial domain statistics more closely than abrupt dilution.",
    "test": "Compare initial and recovered size and connectivity distributions.",
    "against": "Stepwise rehydration provides no better structural recovery.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Rehydration pathway",
    "system": "PEG-dextran aqueous two-phase mixture",
    "id": 1910,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1910",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Mixing order memory — PEG-ficoll aqueous two-phase mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For PEG-ficoll aqueous two-phase mixture, opposite addition orders will produce different early domain sizes but convergent equilibrium phase compositions.",
    "test": "Measure time-resolved domains and final phase concentrations.",
    "against": "Domain kinetics are identical or final compositions remain different.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Mixing order memory",
    "system": "PEG-ficoll aqueous two-phase mixture",
    "id": 1911,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1911",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Thin-layer coarsening — PEG-ficoll aqueous two-phase mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For PEG-ficoll aqueous two-phase mixture, confinement will shift domain growth from three-dimensional coalescence toward elongated connected regions.",
    "test": "Image morphology across gap thicknesses.",
    "against": "Morphology differences are explained solely by wall adsorption.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Thin-layer coarsening",
    "system": "PEG-ficoll aqueous two-phase mixture",
    "id": 1912,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1912",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Weak shear cessation — PEG-ficoll aqueous two-phase mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For PEG-ficoll aqueous two-phase mixture, shear-aligned domains will retain orientation longer near the phase boundary.",
    "test": "Measure orientation relaxation across independently mapped compositions.",
    "against": "Relaxation time does not increase near the boundary.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Weak shear cessation",
    "system": "PEG-ficoll aqueous two-phase mixture",
    "id": 1913,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1913",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Temperature oscillation arrest — PEG-ficoll aqueous two-phase mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For PEG-ficoll aqueous two-phase mixture, small temperature oscillations will slow net coarsening relative to the same mean temperature.",
    "test": "Track domain size and verify reversible phase behavior.",
    "against": "Coarsening rates agree after actual temperature histories are modeled.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Temperature oscillation arrest",
    "system": "PEG-ficoll aqueous two-phase mixture",
    "id": 1914,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1914",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Neutral tracer partition — PEG-ficoll aqueous two-phase mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For PEG-ficoll aqueous two-phase mixture, neutral tracer partition will show stronger size dependence near domain interfaces than within bulk phases.",
    "test": "Image a calibrated inert tracer-size series.",
    "against": "Apparent interfacial selectivity is explained by optical resolution or binding.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Neutral tracer partition",
    "system": "PEG-ficoll aqueous two-phase mixture",
    "id": 1915,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1915",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Surface affinity gradient — PEG-ficoll aqueous two-phase mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For PEG-ficoll aqueous two-phase mixture, a mild surface-affinity gradient will bias domain migration without bulk flow.",
    "test": "Track domains and inert flow markers.",
    "against": "Migration disappears after correcting for residual flow.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Surface affinity gradient",
    "system": "PEG-ficoll aqueous two-phase mixture",
    "id": 1916,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1916",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Salt pulse topology — PEG-ficoll aqueous two-phase mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For PEG-ficoll aqueous two-phase mixture, a small reversible salt pulse will alter connectivity before changing total phase fraction.",
    "test": "Measure phase topology and compositions during pulse washout.",
    "against": "Topology changes are proportional to phase-fraction changes only.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Salt pulse topology",
    "system": "PEG-ficoll aqueous two-phase mixture",
    "id": 1917,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1917",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Droplet collision age — PEG-ficoll aqueous two-phase mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For PEG-ficoll aqueous two-phase mixture, older dispersed domains will merge more slowly at equal size because interfaces accumulate slow components.",
    "test": "Measure collision and fusion while tracking interfacial composition.",
    "against": "Fusion time is age-independent after viscosity is matched.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Droplet collision age",
    "system": "PEG-ficoll aqueous two-phase mixture",
    "id": 1918,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1918",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Evaporation symmetry — PEG-ficoll aqueous two-phase mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For PEG-ficoll aqueous two-phase mixture, symmetric solvent loss will produce less domain-size variation than one-sided loss.",
    "test": "Map water content and domains at equal final solids.",
    "against": "Variation is unchanged after local composition is included.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Evaporation symmetry",
    "system": "PEG-ficoll aqueous two-phase mixture",
    "id": 1919,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1919",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Rehydration pathway — PEG-ficoll aqueous two-phase mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For PEG-ficoll aqueous two-phase mixture, stepwise rehydration will restore initial domain statistics more closely than abrupt dilution.",
    "test": "Compare initial and recovered size and connectivity distributions.",
    "against": "Stepwise rehydration provides no better structural recovery.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Rehydration pathway",
    "system": "PEG-ficoll aqueous two-phase mixture",
    "id": 1920,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1920",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Mixing order memory — PEG-starch aqueous two-phase mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For PEG-starch aqueous two-phase mixture, opposite addition orders will produce different early domain sizes but convergent equilibrium phase compositions.",
    "test": "Measure time-resolved domains and final phase concentrations.",
    "against": "Domain kinetics are identical or final compositions remain different.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Mixing order memory",
    "system": "PEG-starch aqueous two-phase mixture",
    "id": 1921,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1921",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Thin-layer coarsening — PEG-starch aqueous two-phase mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For PEG-starch aqueous two-phase mixture, confinement will shift domain growth from three-dimensional coalescence toward elongated connected regions.",
    "test": "Image morphology across gap thicknesses.",
    "against": "Morphology differences are explained solely by wall adsorption.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Thin-layer coarsening",
    "system": "PEG-starch aqueous two-phase mixture",
    "id": 1922,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1922",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Weak shear cessation — PEG-starch aqueous two-phase mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For PEG-starch aqueous two-phase mixture, shear-aligned domains will retain orientation longer near the phase boundary.",
    "test": "Measure orientation relaxation across independently mapped compositions.",
    "against": "Relaxation time does not increase near the boundary.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Weak shear cessation",
    "system": "PEG-starch aqueous two-phase mixture",
    "id": 1923,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1923",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Temperature oscillation arrest — PEG-starch aqueous two-phase mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For PEG-starch aqueous two-phase mixture, small temperature oscillations will slow net coarsening relative to the same mean temperature.",
    "test": "Track domain size and verify reversible phase behavior.",
    "against": "Coarsening rates agree after actual temperature histories are modeled.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Temperature oscillation arrest",
    "system": "PEG-starch aqueous two-phase mixture",
    "id": 1924,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1924",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Neutral tracer partition — PEG-starch aqueous two-phase mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For PEG-starch aqueous two-phase mixture, neutral tracer partition will show stronger size dependence near domain interfaces than within bulk phases.",
    "test": "Image a calibrated inert tracer-size series.",
    "against": "Apparent interfacial selectivity is explained by optical resolution or binding.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Neutral tracer partition",
    "system": "PEG-starch aqueous two-phase mixture",
    "id": 1925,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1925",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Surface affinity gradient — PEG-starch aqueous two-phase mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For PEG-starch aqueous two-phase mixture, a mild surface-affinity gradient will bias domain migration without bulk flow.",
    "test": "Track domains and inert flow markers.",
    "against": "Migration disappears after correcting for residual flow.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Surface affinity gradient",
    "system": "PEG-starch aqueous two-phase mixture",
    "id": 1926,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1926",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Salt pulse topology — PEG-starch aqueous two-phase mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For PEG-starch aqueous two-phase mixture, a small reversible salt pulse will alter connectivity before changing total phase fraction.",
    "test": "Measure phase topology and compositions during pulse washout.",
    "against": "Topology changes are proportional to phase-fraction changes only.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Salt pulse topology",
    "system": "PEG-starch aqueous two-phase mixture",
    "id": 1927,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1927",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Droplet collision age — PEG-starch aqueous two-phase mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For PEG-starch aqueous two-phase mixture, older dispersed domains will merge more slowly at equal size because interfaces accumulate slow components.",
    "test": "Measure collision and fusion while tracking interfacial composition.",
    "against": "Fusion time is age-independent after viscosity is matched.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Droplet collision age",
    "system": "PEG-starch aqueous two-phase mixture",
    "id": 1928,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1928",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Evaporation symmetry — PEG-starch aqueous two-phase mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For PEG-starch aqueous two-phase mixture, symmetric solvent loss will produce less domain-size variation than one-sided loss.",
    "test": "Map water content and domains at equal final solids.",
    "against": "Variation is unchanged after local composition is included.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Evaporation symmetry",
    "system": "PEG-starch aqueous two-phase mixture",
    "id": 1929,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1929",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Rehydration pathway — PEG-starch aqueous two-phase mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For PEG-starch aqueous two-phase mixture, stepwise rehydration will restore initial domain statistics more closely than abrupt dilution.",
    "test": "Compare initial and recovered size and connectivity distributions.",
    "against": "Stepwise rehydration provides no better structural recovery.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Rehydration pathway",
    "system": "PEG-starch aqueous two-phase mixture",
    "id": 1930,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1930",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Mixing order memory — PEG-polyvinyl-alcohol aqueous mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For PEG-polyvinyl-alcohol aqueous mixture, opposite addition orders will produce different early domain sizes but convergent equilibrium phase compositions.",
    "test": "Measure time-resolved domains and final phase concentrations.",
    "against": "Domain kinetics are identical or final compositions remain different.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Mixing order memory",
    "system": "PEG-polyvinyl-alcohol aqueous mixture",
    "id": 1931,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1931",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Thin-layer coarsening — PEG-polyvinyl-alcohol aqueous mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For PEG-polyvinyl-alcohol aqueous mixture, confinement will shift domain growth from three-dimensional coalescence toward elongated connected regions.",
    "test": "Image morphology across gap thicknesses.",
    "against": "Morphology differences are explained solely by wall adsorption.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Thin-layer coarsening",
    "system": "PEG-polyvinyl-alcohol aqueous mixture",
    "id": 1932,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1932",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Weak shear cessation — PEG-polyvinyl-alcohol aqueous mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For PEG-polyvinyl-alcohol aqueous mixture, shear-aligned domains will retain orientation longer near the phase boundary.",
    "test": "Measure orientation relaxation across independently mapped compositions.",
    "against": "Relaxation time does not increase near the boundary.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Weak shear cessation",
    "system": "PEG-polyvinyl-alcohol aqueous mixture",
    "id": 1933,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1933",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Temperature oscillation arrest — PEG-polyvinyl-alcohol aqueous mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For PEG-polyvinyl-alcohol aqueous mixture, small temperature oscillations will slow net coarsening relative to the same mean temperature.",
    "test": "Track domain size and verify reversible phase behavior.",
    "against": "Coarsening rates agree after actual temperature histories are modeled.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Temperature oscillation arrest",
    "system": "PEG-polyvinyl-alcohol aqueous mixture",
    "id": 1934,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1934",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Neutral tracer partition — PEG-polyvinyl-alcohol aqueous mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For PEG-polyvinyl-alcohol aqueous mixture, neutral tracer partition will show stronger size dependence near domain interfaces than within bulk phases.",
    "test": "Image a calibrated inert tracer-size series.",
    "against": "Apparent interfacial selectivity is explained by optical resolution or binding.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Neutral tracer partition",
    "system": "PEG-polyvinyl-alcohol aqueous mixture",
    "id": 1935,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1935",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Surface affinity gradient — PEG-polyvinyl-alcohol aqueous mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For PEG-polyvinyl-alcohol aqueous mixture, a mild surface-affinity gradient will bias domain migration without bulk flow.",
    "test": "Track domains and inert flow markers.",
    "against": "Migration disappears after correcting for residual flow.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Surface affinity gradient",
    "system": "PEG-polyvinyl-alcohol aqueous mixture",
    "id": 1936,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1936",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Salt pulse topology — PEG-polyvinyl-alcohol aqueous mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For PEG-polyvinyl-alcohol aqueous mixture, a small reversible salt pulse will alter connectivity before changing total phase fraction.",
    "test": "Measure phase topology and compositions during pulse washout.",
    "against": "Topology changes are proportional to phase-fraction changes only.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Salt pulse topology",
    "system": "PEG-polyvinyl-alcohol aqueous mixture",
    "id": 1937,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1937",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Droplet collision age — PEG-polyvinyl-alcohol aqueous mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For PEG-polyvinyl-alcohol aqueous mixture, older dispersed domains will merge more slowly at equal size because interfaces accumulate slow components.",
    "test": "Measure collision and fusion while tracking interfacial composition.",
    "against": "Fusion time is age-independent after viscosity is matched.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Droplet collision age",
    "system": "PEG-polyvinyl-alcohol aqueous mixture",
    "id": 1938,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1938",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Evaporation symmetry — PEG-polyvinyl-alcohol aqueous mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For PEG-polyvinyl-alcohol aqueous mixture, symmetric solvent loss will produce less domain-size variation than one-sided loss.",
    "test": "Map water content and domains at equal final solids.",
    "against": "Variation is unchanged after local composition is included.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Evaporation symmetry",
    "system": "PEG-polyvinyl-alcohol aqueous mixture",
    "id": 1939,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1939",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Rehydration pathway — PEG-polyvinyl-alcohol aqueous mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For PEG-polyvinyl-alcohol aqueous mixture, stepwise rehydration will restore initial domain statistics more closely than abrupt dilution.",
    "test": "Compare initial and recovered size and connectivity distributions.",
    "against": "Stepwise rehydration provides no better structural recovery.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Rehydration pathway",
    "system": "PEG-polyvinyl-alcohol aqueous mixture",
    "id": 1940,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1940",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Mixing order memory — dextran-methylcellulose aqueous mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For dextran-methylcellulose aqueous mixture, opposite addition orders will produce different early domain sizes but convergent equilibrium phase compositions.",
    "test": "Measure time-resolved domains and final phase concentrations.",
    "against": "Domain kinetics are identical or final compositions remain different.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Mixing order memory",
    "system": "dextran-methylcellulose aqueous mixture",
    "id": 1941,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1941",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Thin-layer coarsening — dextran-methylcellulose aqueous mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For dextran-methylcellulose aqueous mixture, confinement will shift domain growth from three-dimensional coalescence toward elongated connected regions.",
    "test": "Image morphology across gap thicknesses.",
    "against": "Morphology differences are explained solely by wall adsorption.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Thin-layer coarsening",
    "system": "dextran-methylcellulose aqueous mixture",
    "id": 1942,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1942",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Weak shear cessation — dextran-methylcellulose aqueous mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For dextran-methylcellulose aqueous mixture, shear-aligned domains will retain orientation longer near the phase boundary.",
    "test": "Measure orientation relaxation across independently mapped compositions.",
    "against": "Relaxation time does not increase near the boundary.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Weak shear cessation",
    "system": "dextran-methylcellulose aqueous mixture",
    "id": 1943,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1943",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Temperature oscillation arrest — dextran-methylcellulose aqueous mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For dextran-methylcellulose aqueous mixture, small temperature oscillations will slow net coarsening relative to the same mean temperature.",
    "test": "Track domain size and verify reversible phase behavior.",
    "against": "Coarsening rates agree after actual temperature histories are modeled.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Temperature oscillation arrest",
    "system": "dextran-methylcellulose aqueous mixture",
    "id": 1944,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1944",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Neutral tracer partition — dextran-methylcellulose aqueous mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For dextran-methylcellulose aqueous mixture, neutral tracer partition will show stronger size dependence near domain interfaces than within bulk phases.",
    "test": "Image a calibrated inert tracer-size series.",
    "against": "Apparent interfacial selectivity is explained by optical resolution or binding.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Neutral tracer partition",
    "system": "dextran-methylcellulose aqueous mixture",
    "id": 1945,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1945",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Surface affinity gradient — dextran-methylcellulose aqueous mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For dextran-methylcellulose aqueous mixture, a mild surface-affinity gradient will bias domain migration without bulk flow.",
    "test": "Track domains and inert flow markers.",
    "against": "Migration disappears after correcting for residual flow.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Surface affinity gradient",
    "system": "dextran-methylcellulose aqueous mixture",
    "id": 1946,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1946",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Salt pulse topology — dextran-methylcellulose aqueous mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For dextran-methylcellulose aqueous mixture, a small reversible salt pulse will alter connectivity before changing total phase fraction.",
    "test": "Measure phase topology and compositions during pulse washout.",
    "against": "Topology changes are proportional to phase-fraction changes only.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Salt pulse topology",
    "system": "dextran-methylcellulose aqueous mixture",
    "id": 1947,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1947",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Droplet collision age — dextran-methylcellulose aqueous mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For dextran-methylcellulose aqueous mixture, older dispersed domains will merge more slowly at equal size because interfaces accumulate slow components.",
    "test": "Measure collision and fusion while tracking interfacial composition.",
    "against": "Fusion time is age-independent after viscosity is matched.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Droplet collision age",
    "system": "dextran-methylcellulose aqueous mixture",
    "id": 1948,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1948",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Evaporation symmetry — dextran-methylcellulose aqueous mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For dextran-methylcellulose aqueous mixture, symmetric solvent loss will produce less domain-size variation than one-sided loss.",
    "test": "Map water content and domains at equal final solids.",
    "against": "Variation is unchanged after local composition is included.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Evaporation symmetry",
    "system": "dextran-methylcellulose aqueous mixture",
    "id": 1949,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1949",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Rehydration pathway — dextran-methylcellulose aqueous mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For dextran-methylcellulose aqueous mixture, stepwise rehydration will restore initial domain statistics more closely than abrupt dilution.",
    "test": "Compare initial and recovered size and connectivity distributions.",
    "against": "Stepwise rehydration provides no better structural recovery.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Rehydration pathway",
    "system": "dextran-methylcellulose aqueous mixture",
    "id": 1950,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1950",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Mixing order memory — gelatin-dextran aqueous mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For gelatin-dextran aqueous mixture, opposite addition orders will produce different early domain sizes but convergent equilibrium phase compositions.",
    "test": "Measure time-resolved domains and final phase concentrations.",
    "against": "Domain kinetics are identical or final compositions remain different.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Mixing order memory",
    "system": "gelatin-dextran aqueous mixture",
    "id": 1951,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1951",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Thin-layer coarsening — gelatin-dextran aqueous mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For gelatin-dextran aqueous mixture, confinement will shift domain growth from three-dimensional coalescence toward elongated connected regions.",
    "test": "Image morphology across gap thicknesses.",
    "against": "Morphology differences are explained solely by wall adsorption.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Thin-layer coarsening",
    "system": "gelatin-dextran aqueous mixture",
    "id": 1952,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1952",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Weak shear cessation — gelatin-dextran aqueous mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For gelatin-dextran aqueous mixture, shear-aligned domains will retain orientation longer near the phase boundary.",
    "test": "Measure orientation relaxation across independently mapped compositions.",
    "against": "Relaxation time does not increase near the boundary.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Weak shear cessation",
    "system": "gelatin-dextran aqueous mixture",
    "id": 1953,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1953",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Temperature oscillation arrest — gelatin-dextran aqueous mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For gelatin-dextran aqueous mixture, small temperature oscillations will slow net coarsening relative to the same mean temperature.",
    "test": "Track domain size and verify reversible phase behavior.",
    "against": "Coarsening rates agree after actual temperature histories are modeled.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Temperature oscillation arrest",
    "system": "gelatin-dextran aqueous mixture",
    "id": 1954,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1954",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Neutral tracer partition — gelatin-dextran aqueous mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For gelatin-dextran aqueous mixture, neutral tracer partition will show stronger size dependence near domain interfaces than within bulk phases.",
    "test": "Image a calibrated inert tracer-size series.",
    "against": "Apparent interfacial selectivity is explained by optical resolution or binding.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Neutral tracer partition",
    "system": "gelatin-dextran aqueous mixture",
    "id": 1955,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1955",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Surface affinity gradient — gelatin-dextran aqueous mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For gelatin-dextran aqueous mixture, a mild surface-affinity gradient will bias domain migration without bulk flow.",
    "test": "Track domains and inert flow markers.",
    "against": "Migration disappears after correcting for residual flow.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Surface affinity gradient",
    "system": "gelatin-dextran aqueous mixture",
    "id": 1956,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1956",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Salt pulse topology — gelatin-dextran aqueous mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For gelatin-dextran aqueous mixture, a small reversible salt pulse will alter connectivity before changing total phase fraction.",
    "test": "Measure phase topology and compositions during pulse washout.",
    "against": "Topology changes are proportional to phase-fraction changes only.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Salt pulse topology",
    "system": "gelatin-dextran aqueous mixture",
    "id": 1957,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1957",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Droplet collision age — gelatin-dextran aqueous mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For gelatin-dextran aqueous mixture, older dispersed domains will merge more slowly at equal size because interfaces accumulate slow components.",
    "test": "Measure collision and fusion while tracking interfacial composition.",
    "against": "Fusion time is age-independent after viscosity is matched.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Droplet collision age",
    "system": "gelatin-dextran aqueous mixture",
    "id": 1958,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1958",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Evaporation symmetry — gelatin-dextran aqueous mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For gelatin-dextran aqueous mixture, symmetric solvent loss will produce less domain-size variation than one-sided loss.",
    "test": "Map water content and domains at equal final solids.",
    "against": "Variation is unchanged after local composition is included.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Evaporation symmetry",
    "system": "gelatin-dextran aqueous mixture",
    "id": 1959,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1959",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Rehydration pathway — gelatin-dextran aqueous mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For gelatin-dextran aqueous mixture, stepwise rehydration will restore initial domain statistics more closely than abrupt dilution.",
    "test": "Compare initial and recovered size and connectivity distributions.",
    "against": "Stepwise rehydration provides no better structural recovery.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Rehydration pathway",
    "system": "gelatin-dextran aqueous mixture",
    "id": 1960,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1960",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Mixing order memory — alginate-PEG aqueous mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For alginate-PEG aqueous mixture, opposite addition orders will produce different early domain sizes but convergent equilibrium phase compositions.",
    "test": "Measure time-resolved domains and final phase concentrations.",
    "against": "Domain kinetics are identical or final compositions remain different.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Mixing order memory",
    "system": "alginate-PEG aqueous mixture",
    "id": 1961,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1961",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Thin-layer coarsening — alginate-PEG aqueous mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For alginate-PEG aqueous mixture, confinement will shift domain growth from three-dimensional coalescence toward elongated connected regions.",
    "test": "Image morphology across gap thicknesses.",
    "against": "Morphology differences are explained solely by wall adsorption.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Thin-layer coarsening",
    "system": "alginate-PEG aqueous mixture",
    "id": 1962,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1962",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Weak shear cessation — alginate-PEG aqueous mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For alginate-PEG aqueous mixture, shear-aligned domains will retain orientation longer near the phase boundary.",
    "test": "Measure orientation relaxation across independently mapped compositions.",
    "against": "Relaxation time does not increase near the boundary.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Weak shear cessation",
    "system": "alginate-PEG aqueous mixture",
    "id": 1963,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1963",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Temperature oscillation arrest — alginate-PEG aqueous mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For alginate-PEG aqueous mixture, small temperature oscillations will slow net coarsening relative to the same mean temperature.",
    "test": "Track domain size and verify reversible phase behavior.",
    "against": "Coarsening rates agree after actual temperature histories are modeled.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Temperature oscillation arrest",
    "system": "alginate-PEG aqueous mixture",
    "id": 1964,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1964",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Neutral tracer partition — alginate-PEG aqueous mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For alginate-PEG aqueous mixture, neutral tracer partition will show stronger size dependence near domain interfaces than within bulk phases.",
    "test": "Image a calibrated inert tracer-size series.",
    "against": "Apparent interfacial selectivity is explained by optical resolution or binding.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Neutral tracer partition",
    "system": "alginate-PEG aqueous mixture",
    "id": 1965,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1965",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Surface affinity gradient — alginate-PEG aqueous mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For alginate-PEG aqueous mixture, a mild surface-affinity gradient will bias domain migration without bulk flow.",
    "test": "Track domains and inert flow markers.",
    "against": "Migration disappears after correcting for residual flow.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Surface affinity gradient",
    "system": "alginate-PEG aqueous mixture",
    "id": 1966,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1966",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Salt pulse topology — alginate-PEG aqueous mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For alginate-PEG aqueous mixture, a small reversible salt pulse will alter connectivity before changing total phase fraction.",
    "test": "Measure phase topology and compositions during pulse washout.",
    "against": "Topology changes are proportional to phase-fraction changes only.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Salt pulse topology",
    "system": "alginate-PEG aqueous mixture",
    "id": 1967,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1967",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Droplet collision age — alginate-PEG aqueous mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For alginate-PEG aqueous mixture, older dispersed domains will merge more slowly at equal size because interfaces accumulate slow components.",
    "test": "Measure collision and fusion while tracking interfacial composition.",
    "against": "Fusion time is age-independent after viscosity is matched.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Droplet collision age",
    "system": "alginate-PEG aqueous mixture",
    "id": 1968,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1968",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Evaporation symmetry — alginate-PEG aqueous mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For alginate-PEG aqueous mixture, symmetric solvent loss will produce less domain-size variation than one-sided loss.",
    "test": "Map water content and domains at equal final solids.",
    "against": "Variation is unchanged after local composition is included.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Evaporation symmetry",
    "system": "alginate-PEG aqueous mixture",
    "id": 1969,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1969",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Rehydration pathway — alginate-PEG aqueous mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For alginate-PEG aqueous mixture, stepwise rehydration will restore initial domain statistics more closely than abrupt dilution.",
    "test": "Compare initial and recovered size and connectivity distributions.",
    "against": "Stepwise rehydration provides no better structural recovery.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Rehydration pathway",
    "system": "alginate-PEG aqueous mixture",
    "id": 1970,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1970",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Mixing order memory — hydroxyethylcellulose-PEG aqueous mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For hydroxyethylcellulose-PEG aqueous mixture, opposite addition orders will produce different early domain sizes but convergent equilibrium phase compositions.",
    "test": "Measure time-resolved domains and final phase concentrations.",
    "against": "Domain kinetics are identical or final compositions remain different.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Mixing order memory",
    "system": "hydroxyethylcellulose-PEG aqueous mixture",
    "id": 1971,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1971",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Thin-layer coarsening — hydroxyethylcellulose-PEG aqueous mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For hydroxyethylcellulose-PEG aqueous mixture, confinement will shift domain growth from three-dimensional coalescence toward elongated connected regions.",
    "test": "Image morphology across gap thicknesses.",
    "against": "Morphology differences are explained solely by wall adsorption.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Thin-layer coarsening",
    "system": "hydroxyethylcellulose-PEG aqueous mixture",
    "id": 1972,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1972",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Weak shear cessation — hydroxyethylcellulose-PEG aqueous mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For hydroxyethylcellulose-PEG aqueous mixture, shear-aligned domains will retain orientation longer near the phase boundary.",
    "test": "Measure orientation relaxation across independently mapped compositions.",
    "against": "Relaxation time does not increase near the boundary.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Weak shear cessation",
    "system": "hydroxyethylcellulose-PEG aqueous mixture",
    "id": 1973,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1973",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Temperature oscillation arrest — hydroxyethylcellulose-PEG aqueous mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For hydroxyethylcellulose-PEG aqueous mixture, small temperature oscillations will slow net coarsening relative to the same mean temperature.",
    "test": "Track domain size and verify reversible phase behavior.",
    "against": "Coarsening rates agree after actual temperature histories are modeled.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Temperature oscillation arrest",
    "system": "hydroxyethylcellulose-PEG aqueous mixture",
    "id": 1974,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1974",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Neutral tracer partition — hydroxyethylcellulose-PEG aqueous mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For hydroxyethylcellulose-PEG aqueous mixture, neutral tracer partition will show stronger size dependence near domain interfaces than within bulk phases.",
    "test": "Image a calibrated inert tracer-size series.",
    "against": "Apparent interfacial selectivity is explained by optical resolution or binding.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Neutral tracer partition",
    "system": "hydroxyethylcellulose-PEG aqueous mixture",
    "id": 1975,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1975",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Surface affinity gradient — hydroxyethylcellulose-PEG aqueous mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For hydroxyethylcellulose-PEG aqueous mixture, a mild surface-affinity gradient will bias domain migration without bulk flow.",
    "test": "Track domains and inert flow markers.",
    "against": "Migration disappears after correcting for residual flow.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Surface affinity gradient",
    "system": "hydroxyethylcellulose-PEG aqueous mixture",
    "id": 1976,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1976",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Salt pulse topology — hydroxyethylcellulose-PEG aqueous mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For hydroxyethylcellulose-PEG aqueous mixture, a small reversible salt pulse will alter connectivity before changing total phase fraction.",
    "test": "Measure phase topology and compositions during pulse washout.",
    "against": "Topology changes are proportional to phase-fraction changes only.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Salt pulse topology",
    "system": "hydroxyethylcellulose-PEG aqueous mixture",
    "id": 1977,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1977",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Droplet collision age — hydroxyethylcellulose-PEG aqueous mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For hydroxyethylcellulose-PEG aqueous mixture, older dispersed domains will merge more slowly at equal size because interfaces accumulate slow components.",
    "test": "Measure collision and fusion while tracking interfacial composition.",
    "against": "Fusion time is age-independent after viscosity is matched.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Droplet collision age",
    "system": "hydroxyethylcellulose-PEG aqueous mixture",
    "id": 1978,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1978",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Evaporation symmetry — hydroxyethylcellulose-PEG aqueous mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For hydroxyethylcellulose-PEG aqueous mixture, symmetric solvent loss will produce less domain-size variation than one-sided loss.",
    "test": "Map water content and domains at equal final solids.",
    "against": "Variation is unchanged after local composition is included.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Evaporation symmetry",
    "system": "hydroxyethylcellulose-PEG aqueous mixture",
    "id": 1979,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1979",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Rehydration pathway — hydroxyethylcellulose-PEG aqueous mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For hydroxyethylcellulose-PEG aqueous mixture, stepwise rehydration will restore initial domain statistics more closely than abrupt dilution.",
    "test": "Compare initial and recovered size and connectivity distributions.",
    "against": "Stepwise rehydration provides no better structural recovery.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Rehydration pathway",
    "system": "hydroxyethylcellulose-PEG aqueous mixture",
    "id": 1980,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1980",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Mixing order memory — pullulan-PEG aqueous mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For pullulan-PEG aqueous mixture, opposite addition orders will produce different early domain sizes but convergent equilibrium phase compositions.",
    "test": "Measure time-resolved domains and final phase concentrations.",
    "against": "Domain kinetics are identical or final compositions remain different.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Mixing order memory",
    "system": "pullulan-PEG aqueous mixture",
    "id": 1981,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1981",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Thin-layer coarsening — pullulan-PEG aqueous mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For pullulan-PEG aqueous mixture, confinement will shift domain growth from three-dimensional coalescence toward elongated connected regions.",
    "test": "Image morphology across gap thicknesses.",
    "against": "Morphology differences are explained solely by wall adsorption.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Thin-layer coarsening",
    "system": "pullulan-PEG aqueous mixture",
    "id": 1982,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1982",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Weak shear cessation — pullulan-PEG aqueous mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For pullulan-PEG aqueous mixture, shear-aligned domains will retain orientation longer near the phase boundary.",
    "test": "Measure orientation relaxation across independently mapped compositions.",
    "against": "Relaxation time does not increase near the boundary.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Weak shear cessation",
    "system": "pullulan-PEG aqueous mixture",
    "id": 1983,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1983",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Temperature oscillation arrest — pullulan-PEG aqueous mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For pullulan-PEG aqueous mixture, small temperature oscillations will slow net coarsening relative to the same mean temperature.",
    "test": "Track domain size and verify reversible phase behavior.",
    "against": "Coarsening rates agree after actual temperature histories are modeled.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Temperature oscillation arrest",
    "system": "pullulan-PEG aqueous mixture",
    "id": 1984,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1984",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Neutral tracer partition — pullulan-PEG aqueous mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For pullulan-PEG aqueous mixture, neutral tracer partition will show stronger size dependence near domain interfaces than within bulk phases.",
    "test": "Image a calibrated inert tracer-size series.",
    "against": "Apparent interfacial selectivity is explained by optical resolution or binding.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Neutral tracer partition",
    "system": "pullulan-PEG aqueous mixture",
    "id": 1985,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1985",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Surface affinity gradient — pullulan-PEG aqueous mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For pullulan-PEG aqueous mixture, a mild surface-affinity gradient will bias domain migration without bulk flow.",
    "test": "Track domains and inert flow markers.",
    "against": "Migration disappears after correcting for residual flow.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Surface affinity gradient",
    "system": "pullulan-PEG aqueous mixture",
    "id": 1986,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1986",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Salt pulse topology — pullulan-PEG aqueous mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For pullulan-PEG aqueous mixture, a small reversible salt pulse will alter connectivity before changing total phase fraction.",
    "test": "Measure phase topology and compositions during pulse washout.",
    "against": "Topology changes are proportional to phase-fraction changes only.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Salt pulse topology",
    "system": "pullulan-PEG aqueous mixture",
    "id": 1987,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1987",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Droplet collision age — pullulan-PEG aqueous mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For pullulan-PEG aqueous mixture, older dispersed domains will merge more slowly at equal size because interfaces accumulate slow components.",
    "test": "Measure collision and fusion while tracking interfacial composition.",
    "against": "Fusion time is age-independent after viscosity is matched.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Droplet collision age",
    "system": "pullulan-PEG aqueous mixture",
    "id": 1988,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1988",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Evaporation symmetry — pullulan-PEG aqueous mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For pullulan-PEG aqueous mixture, symmetric solvent loss will produce less domain-size variation than one-sided loss.",
    "test": "Map water content and domains at equal final solids.",
    "against": "Variation is unchanged after local composition is included.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Evaporation symmetry",
    "system": "pullulan-PEG aqueous mixture",
    "id": 1989,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1989",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Rehydration pathway — pullulan-PEG aqueous mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For pullulan-PEG aqueous mixture, stepwise rehydration will restore initial domain statistics more closely than abrupt dilution.",
    "test": "Compare initial and recovered size and connectivity distributions.",
    "against": "Stepwise rehydration provides no better structural recovery.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Rehydration pathway",
    "system": "pullulan-PEG aqueous mixture",
    "id": 1990,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1990",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Mixing order memory — gum-arabic-PEG aqueous mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For gum-arabic-PEG aqueous mixture, opposite addition orders will produce different early domain sizes but convergent equilibrium phase compositions.",
    "test": "Measure time-resolved domains and final phase concentrations.",
    "against": "Domain kinetics are identical or final compositions remain different.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Mixing order memory",
    "system": "gum-arabic-PEG aqueous mixture",
    "id": 1991,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1991",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Thin-layer coarsening — gum-arabic-PEG aqueous mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For gum-arabic-PEG aqueous mixture, confinement will shift domain growth from three-dimensional coalescence toward elongated connected regions.",
    "test": "Image morphology across gap thicknesses.",
    "against": "Morphology differences are explained solely by wall adsorption.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Thin-layer coarsening",
    "system": "gum-arabic-PEG aqueous mixture",
    "id": 1992,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1992",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Weak shear cessation — gum-arabic-PEG aqueous mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For gum-arabic-PEG aqueous mixture, shear-aligned domains will retain orientation longer near the phase boundary.",
    "test": "Measure orientation relaxation across independently mapped compositions.",
    "against": "Relaxation time does not increase near the boundary.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Weak shear cessation",
    "system": "gum-arabic-PEG aqueous mixture",
    "id": 1993,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1993",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Temperature oscillation arrest — gum-arabic-PEG aqueous mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For gum-arabic-PEG aqueous mixture, small temperature oscillations will slow net coarsening relative to the same mean temperature.",
    "test": "Track domain size and verify reversible phase behavior.",
    "against": "Coarsening rates agree after actual temperature histories are modeled.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Temperature oscillation arrest",
    "system": "gum-arabic-PEG aqueous mixture",
    "id": 1994,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1994",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Neutral tracer partition — gum-arabic-PEG aqueous mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For gum-arabic-PEG aqueous mixture, neutral tracer partition will show stronger size dependence near domain interfaces than within bulk phases.",
    "test": "Image a calibrated inert tracer-size series.",
    "against": "Apparent interfacial selectivity is explained by optical resolution or binding.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Neutral tracer partition",
    "system": "gum-arabic-PEG aqueous mixture",
    "id": 1995,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1995",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Surface affinity gradient — gum-arabic-PEG aqueous mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For gum-arabic-PEG aqueous mixture, a mild surface-affinity gradient will bias domain migration without bulk flow.",
    "test": "Track domains and inert flow markers.",
    "against": "Migration disappears after correcting for residual flow.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Surface affinity gradient",
    "system": "gum-arabic-PEG aqueous mixture",
    "id": 1996,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1996",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Salt pulse topology — gum-arabic-PEG aqueous mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For gum-arabic-PEG aqueous mixture, a small reversible salt pulse will alter connectivity before changing total phase fraction.",
    "test": "Measure phase topology and compositions during pulse washout.",
    "against": "Topology changes are proportional to phase-fraction changes only.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Salt pulse topology",
    "system": "gum-arabic-PEG aqueous mixture",
    "id": 1997,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1997",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Droplet collision age — gum-arabic-PEG aqueous mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For gum-arabic-PEG aqueous mixture, older dispersed domains will merge more slowly at equal size because interfaces accumulate slow components.",
    "test": "Measure collision and fusion while tracking interfacial composition.",
    "against": "Fusion time is age-independent after viscosity is matched.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Droplet collision age",
    "system": "gum-arabic-PEG aqueous mixture",
    "id": 1998,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1998",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Evaporation symmetry — gum-arabic-PEG aqueous mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For gum-arabic-PEG aqueous mixture, symmetric solvent loss will produce less domain-size variation than one-sided loss.",
    "test": "Map water content and domains at equal final solids.",
    "against": "Variation is unchanged after local composition is included.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Evaporation symmetry",
    "system": "gum-arabic-PEG aqueous mixture",
    "id": 1999,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H1999",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Rehydration pathway — gum-arabic-PEG aqueous mixture",
    "hypothesis": "For gum-arabic-PEG aqueous mixture, stepwise rehydration will restore initial domain statistics more closely than abrupt dilution.",
    "test": "Compare initial and recovered size and connectivity distributions.",
    "against": "Stepwise rehydration provides no better structural recovery.",
    "category": "Aqueous polymer phase separation",
    "controls": "First verify a reversible two-phase region for the chosen grades; match phase fractions, polymer masses, temperature, ionic strength, and viscosity.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Aqueous polymer phase separation: Rehydration pathway",
    "system": "gum-arabic-PEG aqueous mixture",
    "id": 2000,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Verified reversible two-phase formulation, controlled mixing and temperature, microscopy, and independent phase-composition measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2000",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Illumination sweep direction — titania-coated glass beads",
    "hypothesis": "For titania-coated glass beads, scanning light against liquid flow will flatten conversion gradients more than scanning with flow.",
    "test": "Map products and local irradiance at equal absorbed photons.",
    "against": "Conversion uniformity is independent of scan direction.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Illumination sweep direction",
    "system": "titania-coated glass beads",
    "id": 2001,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2001",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Dark oxygen recovery — titania-coated glass beads",
    "hypothesis": "For titania-coated glass beads, short dark aeration intervals will restore reaction rate more effectively than illuminated aeration.",
    "test": "Measure oxygen, products, and subsequent rate at equal gas input.",
    "against": "Recovery is no better after temperature and oxygen are matched.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Dark oxygen recovery",
    "system": "titania-coated glass beads",
    "id": 2002,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2002",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Catalyst island perimeter — titania-coated glass beads",
    "hypothesis": "For titania-coated glass beads, smaller separated catalyst islands will improve product yield per catalyst mass until transport zones overlap.",
    "test": "Vary island size at fixed catalyst mass and measure products.",
    "against": "No perimeter-dependent gain remains after light absorption is matched.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Catalyst island perimeter",
    "system": "titania-coated glass beads",
    "id": 2003,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2003",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Water-film thickness window — titania-coated glass beads",
    "hypothesis": "For titania-coated glass beads, an intermediate liquid-film thickness will maximize product formation per input photon.",
    "test": "Measure product balance, film thickness, and absorbed light.",
    "against": "Yield lacks an intermediate maximum within the predefined range.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Water-film thickness window",
    "system": "titania-coated glass beads",
    "id": 2004,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2004",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Support thermal conductivity — titania-coated glass beads",
    "hypothesis": "For titania-coated glass beads, higher support conductivity will reduce spatial rate fluctuations under intermittent light.",
    "test": "Map temperatures and product formation on matched supports.",
    "against": "Rate fluctuations persist after measured thermal gradients are reduced.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Support thermal conductivity",
    "system": "titania-coated glass beads",
    "id": 2005,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2005",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pre-adsorption timing — titania-coated glass beads",
    "hypothesis": "For titania-coated glass beads, allowing adsorption before illumination will change early product selectivity beyond the change in total conversion.",
    "test": "Measure adsorbed probe, products, and total carbon where appropriate.",
    "against": "Selectivity follows conversion alone without a timing effect.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Pre-adsorption timing",
    "system": "titania-coated glass beads",
    "id": 2006,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2006",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Washout flow pulses — titania-coated glass beads",
    "hypothesis": "For titania-coated glass beads, brief clean-water pulses will reduce product inhibition without substantial catalyst loss.",
    "test": "Measure product recovery, restart rates, and catalyst in effluent.",
    "against": "Rate recovery is absent or due to catalyst shedding.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Washout flow pulses",
    "system": "titania-coated glass beads",
    "id": 2007,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2007",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Dual-sided illumination — titania-coated glass beads",
    "hypothesis": "For titania-coated glass beads, illumination from both sides will reduce inactive catalyst depth at equal absorbed photons.",
    "test": "Measure depth-resolved activity and spectral absorption.",
    "against": "Usable depth and overall yield do not improve.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Dual-sided illumination",
    "system": "titania-coated glass beads",
    "id": 2008,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2008",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Dissolved oxygen microgradients — titania-coated glass beads",
    "hypothesis": "For titania-coated glass beads, local oxygen depletion will precede apparent catalyst deactivation under rising substrate load.",
    "test": "Measure oxygen near surfaces and independently characterize catalyst changes.",
    "against": "Rate decline occurs without prior depletion or survives oxygen restoration unchanged.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Dissolved oxygen microgradients",
    "system": "titania-coated glass beads",
    "id": 2009,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2009",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Reference adsorption control — titania-coated glass beads",
    "hypothesis": "For titania-coated glass beads, paired dark adsorption runs will substantially change inferred reaction kinetics when probe binding is slow.",
    "test": "Compare product-verified rates with disappearance-only estimates.",
    "against": "Dark correction does not change validated rate estimates beyond uncertainty.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Reference adsorption control",
    "system": "titania-coated glass beads",
    "id": 2010,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2010",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Illumination sweep direction — titania-coated ceramic foam",
    "hypothesis": "For titania-coated ceramic foam, scanning light against liquid flow will flatten conversion gradients more than scanning with flow.",
    "test": "Map products and local irradiance at equal absorbed photons.",
    "against": "Conversion uniformity is independent of scan direction.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Illumination sweep direction",
    "system": "titania-coated ceramic foam",
    "id": 2011,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2011",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Dark oxygen recovery — titania-coated ceramic foam",
    "hypothesis": "For titania-coated ceramic foam, short dark aeration intervals will restore reaction rate more effectively than illuminated aeration.",
    "test": "Measure oxygen, products, and subsequent rate at equal gas input.",
    "against": "Recovery is no better after temperature and oxygen are matched.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Dark oxygen recovery",
    "system": "titania-coated ceramic foam",
    "id": 2012,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2012",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Catalyst island perimeter — titania-coated ceramic foam",
    "hypothesis": "For titania-coated ceramic foam, smaller separated catalyst islands will improve product yield per catalyst mass until transport zones overlap.",
    "test": "Vary island size at fixed catalyst mass and measure products.",
    "against": "No perimeter-dependent gain remains after light absorption is matched.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Catalyst island perimeter",
    "system": "titania-coated ceramic foam",
    "id": 2013,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2013",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Water-film thickness window — titania-coated ceramic foam",
    "hypothesis": "For titania-coated ceramic foam, an intermediate liquid-film thickness will maximize product formation per input photon.",
    "test": "Measure product balance, film thickness, and absorbed light.",
    "against": "Yield lacks an intermediate maximum within the predefined range.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Water-film thickness window",
    "system": "titania-coated ceramic foam",
    "id": 2014,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2014",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Support thermal conductivity — titania-coated ceramic foam",
    "hypothesis": "For titania-coated ceramic foam, higher support conductivity will reduce spatial rate fluctuations under intermittent light.",
    "test": "Map temperatures and product formation on matched supports.",
    "against": "Rate fluctuations persist after measured thermal gradients are reduced.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Support thermal conductivity",
    "system": "titania-coated ceramic foam",
    "id": 2015,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2015",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pre-adsorption timing — titania-coated ceramic foam",
    "hypothesis": "For titania-coated ceramic foam, allowing adsorption before illumination will change early product selectivity beyond the change in total conversion.",
    "test": "Measure adsorbed probe, products, and total carbon where appropriate.",
    "against": "Selectivity follows conversion alone without a timing effect.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Pre-adsorption timing",
    "system": "titania-coated ceramic foam",
    "id": 2016,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2016",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Washout flow pulses — titania-coated ceramic foam",
    "hypothesis": "For titania-coated ceramic foam, brief clean-water pulses will reduce product inhibition without substantial catalyst loss.",
    "test": "Measure product recovery, restart rates, and catalyst in effluent.",
    "against": "Rate recovery is absent or due to catalyst shedding.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Washout flow pulses",
    "system": "titania-coated ceramic foam",
    "id": 2017,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2017",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Dual-sided illumination — titania-coated ceramic foam",
    "hypothesis": "For titania-coated ceramic foam, illumination from both sides will reduce inactive catalyst depth at equal absorbed photons.",
    "test": "Measure depth-resolved activity and spectral absorption.",
    "against": "Usable depth and overall yield do not improve.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Dual-sided illumination",
    "system": "titania-coated ceramic foam",
    "id": 2018,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2018",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Dissolved oxygen microgradients — titania-coated ceramic foam",
    "hypothesis": "For titania-coated ceramic foam, local oxygen depletion will precede apparent catalyst deactivation under rising substrate load.",
    "test": "Measure oxygen near surfaces and independently characterize catalyst changes.",
    "against": "Rate decline occurs without prior depletion or survives oxygen restoration unchanged.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Dissolved oxygen microgradients",
    "system": "titania-coated ceramic foam",
    "id": 2019,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2019",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Reference adsorption control — titania-coated ceramic foam",
    "hypothesis": "For titania-coated ceramic foam, paired dark adsorption runs will substantially change inferred reaction kinetics when probe binding is slow.",
    "test": "Compare product-verified rates with disappearance-only estimates.",
    "against": "Dark correction does not change validated rate estimates beyond uncertainty.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Reference adsorption control",
    "system": "titania-coated ceramic foam",
    "id": 2020,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2020",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Illumination sweep direction — titania-coated cellulose sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For titania-coated cellulose sheet, scanning light against liquid flow will flatten conversion gradients more than scanning with flow.",
    "test": "Map products and local irradiance at equal absorbed photons.",
    "against": "Conversion uniformity is independent of scan direction.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Illumination sweep direction",
    "system": "titania-coated cellulose sheet",
    "id": 2021,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2021",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Dark oxygen recovery — titania-coated cellulose sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For titania-coated cellulose sheet, short dark aeration intervals will restore reaction rate more effectively than illuminated aeration.",
    "test": "Measure oxygen, products, and subsequent rate at equal gas input.",
    "against": "Recovery is no better after temperature and oxygen are matched.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Dark oxygen recovery",
    "system": "titania-coated cellulose sheet",
    "id": 2022,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2022",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Catalyst island perimeter — titania-coated cellulose sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For titania-coated cellulose sheet, smaller separated catalyst islands will improve product yield per catalyst mass until transport zones overlap.",
    "test": "Vary island size at fixed catalyst mass and measure products.",
    "against": "No perimeter-dependent gain remains after light absorption is matched.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Catalyst island perimeter",
    "system": "titania-coated cellulose sheet",
    "id": 2023,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2023",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Water-film thickness window — titania-coated cellulose sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For titania-coated cellulose sheet, an intermediate liquid-film thickness will maximize product formation per input photon.",
    "test": "Measure product balance, film thickness, and absorbed light.",
    "against": "Yield lacks an intermediate maximum within the predefined range.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Water-film thickness window",
    "system": "titania-coated cellulose sheet",
    "id": 2024,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2024",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Support thermal conductivity — titania-coated cellulose sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For titania-coated cellulose sheet, higher support conductivity will reduce spatial rate fluctuations under intermittent light.",
    "test": "Map temperatures and product formation on matched supports.",
    "against": "Rate fluctuations persist after measured thermal gradients are reduced.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Support thermal conductivity",
    "system": "titania-coated cellulose sheet",
    "id": 2025,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2025",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pre-adsorption timing — titania-coated cellulose sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For titania-coated cellulose sheet, allowing adsorption before illumination will change early product selectivity beyond the change in total conversion.",
    "test": "Measure adsorbed probe, products, and total carbon where appropriate.",
    "against": "Selectivity follows conversion alone without a timing effect.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Pre-adsorption timing",
    "system": "titania-coated cellulose sheet",
    "id": 2026,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2026",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Washout flow pulses — titania-coated cellulose sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For titania-coated cellulose sheet, brief clean-water pulses will reduce product inhibition without substantial catalyst loss.",
    "test": "Measure product recovery, restart rates, and catalyst in effluent.",
    "against": "Rate recovery is absent or due to catalyst shedding.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Washout flow pulses",
    "system": "titania-coated cellulose sheet",
    "id": 2027,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2027",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Dual-sided illumination — titania-coated cellulose sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For titania-coated cellulose sheet, illumination from both sides will reduce inactive catalyst depth at equal absorbed photons.",
    "test": "Measure depth-resolved activity and spectral absorption.",
    "against": "Usable depth and overall yield do not improve.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Dual-sided illumination",
    "system": "titania-coated cellulose sheet",
    "id": 2028,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2028",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Dissolved oxygen microgradients — titania-coated cellulose sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For titania-coated cellulose sheet, local oxygen depletion will precede apparent catalyst deactivation under rising substrate load.",
    "test": "Measure oxygen near surfaces and independently characterize catalyst changes.",
    "against": "Rate decline occurs without prior depletion or survives oxygen restoration unchanged.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Dissolved oxygen microgradients",
    "system": "titania-coated cellulose sheet",
    "id": 2029,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2029",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Reference adsorption control — titania-coated cellulose sheet",
    "hypothesis": "For titania-coated cellulose sheet, paired dark adsorption runs will substantially change inferred reaction kinetics when probe binding is slow.",
    "test": "Compare product-verified rates with disappearance-only estimates.",
    "against": "Dark correction does not change validated rate estimates beyond uncertainty.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Reference adsorption control",
    "system": "titania-coated cellulose sheet",
    "id": 2030,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2030",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Illumination sweep direction — titania-coated silica fibers",
    "hypothesis": "For titania-coated silica fibers, scanning light against liquid flow will flatten conversion gradients more than scanning with flow.",
    "test": "Map products and local irradiance at equal absorbed photons.",
    "against": "Conversion uniformity is independent of scan direction.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Illumination sweep direction",
    "system": "titania-coated silica fibers",
    "id": 2031,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2031",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Dark oxygen recovery — titania-coated silica fibers",
    "hypothesis": "For titania-coated silica fibers, short dark aeration intervals will restore reaction rate more effectively than illuminated aeration.",
    "test": "Measure oxygen, products, and subsequent rate at equal gas input.",
    "against": "Recovery is no better after temperature and oxygen are matched.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Dark oxygen recovery",
    "system": "titania-coated silica fibers",
    "id": 2032,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2032",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Catalyst island perimeter — titania-coated silica fibers",
    "hypothesis": "For titania-coated silica fibers, smaller separated catalyst islands will improve product yield per catalyst mass until transport zones overlap.",
    "test": "Vary island size at fixed catalyst mass and measure products.",
    "against": "No perimeter-dependent gain remains after light absorption is matched.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Catalyst island perimeter",
    "system": "titania-coated silica fibers",
    "id": 2033,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2033",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Water-film thickness window — titania-coated silica fibers",
    "hypothesis": "For titania-coated silica fibers, an intermediate liquid-film thickness will maximize product formation per input photon.",
    "test": "Measure product balance, film thickness, and absorbed light.",
    "against": "Yield lacks an intermediate maximum within the predefined range.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Water-film thickness window",
    "system": "titania-coated silica fibers",
    "id": 2034,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2034",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Support thermal conductivity — titania-coated silica fibers",
    "hypothesis": "For titania-coated silica fibers, higher support conductivity will reduce spatial rate fluctuations under intermittent light.",
    "test": "Map temperatures and product formation on matched supports.",
    "against": "Rate fluctuations persist after measured thermal gradients are reduced.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Support thermal conductivity",
    "system": "titania-coated silica fibers",
    "id": 2035,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2035",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pre-adsorption timing — titania-coated silica fibers",
    "hypothesis": "For titania-coated silica fibers, allowing adsorption before illumination will change early product selectivity beyond the change in total conversion.",
    "test": "Measure adsorbed probe, products, and total carbon where appropriate.",
    "against": "Selectivity follows conversion alone without a timing effect.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Pre-adsorption timing",
    "system": "titania-coated silica fibers",
    "id": 2036,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2036",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Washout flow pulses — titania-coated silica fibers",
    "hypothesis": "For titania-coated silica fibers, brief clean-water pulses will reduce product inhibition without substantial catalyst loss.",
    "test": "Measure product recovery, restart rates, and catalyst in effluent.",
    "against": "Rate recovery is absent or due to catalyst shedding.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Washout flow pulses",
    "system": "titania-coated silica fibers",
    "id": 2037,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2037",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Dual-sided illumination — titania-coated silica fibers",
    "hypothesis": "For titania-coated silica fibers, illumination from both sides will reduce inactive catalyst depth at equal absorbed photons.",
    "test": "Measure depth-resolved activity and spectral absorption.",
    "against": "Usable depth and overall yield do not improve.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Dual-sided illumination",
    "system": "titania-coated silica fibers",
    "id": 2038,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2038",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Dissolved oxygen microgradients — titania-coated silica fibers",
    "hypothesis": "For titania-coated silica fibers, local oxygen depletion will precede apparent catalyst deactivation under rising substrate load.",
    "test": "Measure oxygen near surfaces and independently characterize catalyst changes.",
    "against": "Rate decline occurs without prior depletion or survives oxygen restoration unchanged.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Dissolved oxygen microgradients",
    "system": "titania-coated silica fibers",
    "id": 2039,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2039",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Reference adsorption control — titania-coated silica fibers",
    "hypothesis": "For titania-coated silica fibers, paired dark adsorption runs will substantially change inferred reaction kinetics when probe binding is slow.",
    "test": "Compare product-verified rates with disappearance-only estimates.",
    "against": "Dark correction does not change validated rate estimates beyond uncertainty.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Reference adsorption control",
    "system": "titania-coated silica fibers",
    "id": 2040,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2040",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Illumination sweep direction — zinc-oxide-coated glass beads",
    "hypothesis": "For zinc-oxide-coated glass beads, scanning light against liquid flow will flatten conversion gradients more than scanning with flow.",
    "test": "Map products and local irradiance at equal absorbed photons.",
    "against": "Conversion uniformity is independent of scan direction.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Illumination sweep direction",
    "system": "zinc-oxide-coated glass beads",
    "id": 2041,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2041",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Dark oxygen recovery — zinc-oxide-coated glass beads",
    "hypothesis": "For zinc-oxide-coated glass beads, short dark aeration intervals will restore reaction rate more effectively than illuminated aeration.",
    "test": "Measure oxygen, products, and subsequent rate at equal gas input.",
    "against": "Recovery is no better after temperature and oxygen are matched.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Dark oxygen recovery",
    "system": "zinc-oxide-coated glass beads",
    "id": 2042,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2042",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Catalyst island perimeter — zinc-oxide-coated glass beads",
    "hypothesis": "For zinc-oxide-coated glass beads, smaller separated catalyst islands will improve product yield per catalyst mass until transport zones overlap.",
    "test": "Vary island size at fixed catalyst mass and measure products.",
    "against": "No perimeter-dependent gain remains after light absorption is matched.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Catalyst island perimeter",
    "system": "zinc-oxide-coated glass beads",
    "id": 2043,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2043",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Water-film thickness window — zinc-oxide-coated glass beads",
    "hypothesis": "For zinc-oxide-coated glass beads, an intermediate liquid-film thickness will maximize product formation per input photon.",
    "test": "Measure product balance, film thickness, and absorbed light.",
    "against": "Yield lacks an intermediate maximum within the predefined range.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Water-film thickness window",
    "system": "zinc-oxide-coated glass beads",
    "id": 2044,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2044",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Support thermal conductivity — zinc-oxide-coated glass beads",
    "hypothesis": "For zinc-oxide-coated glass beads, higher support conductivity will reduce spatial rate fluctuations under intermittent light.",
    "test": "Map temperatures and product formation on matched supports.",
    "against": "Rate fluctuations persist after measured thermal gradients are reduced.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Support thermal conductivity",
    "system": "zinc-oxide-coated glass beads",
    "id": 2045,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2045",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pre-adsorption timing — zinc-oxide-coated glass beads",
    "hypothesis": "For zinc-oxide-coated glass beads, allowing adsorption before illumination will change early product selectivity beyond the change in total conversion.",
    "test": "Measure adsorbed probe, products, and total carbon where appropriate.",
    "against": "Selectivity follows conversion alone without a timing effect.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Pre-adsorption timing",
    "system": "zinc-oxide-coated glass beads",
    "id": 2046,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2046",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Washout flow pulses — zinc-oxide-coated glass beads",
    "hypothesis": "For zinc-oxide-coated glass beads, brief clean-water pulses will reduce product inhibition without substantial catalyst loss.",
    "test": "Measure product recovery, restart rates, and catalyst in effluent.",
    "against": "Rate recovery is absent or due to catalyst shedding.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Washout flow pulses",
    "system": "zinc-oxide-coated glass beads",
    "id": 2047,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2047",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Dual-sided illumination — zinc-oxide-coated glass beads",
    "hypothesis": "For zinc-oxide-coated glass beads, illumination from both sides will reduce inactive catalyst depth at equal absorbed photons.",
    "test": "Measure depth-resolved activity and spectral absorption.",
    "against": "Usable depth and overall yield do not improve.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Dual-sided illumination",
    "system": "zinc-oxide-coated glass beads",
    "id": 2048,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2048",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Dissolved oxygen microgradients — zinc-oxide-coated glass beads",
    "hypothesis": "For zinc-oxide-coated glass beads, local oxygen depletion will precede apparent catalyst deactivation under rising substrate load.",
    "test": "Measure oxygen near surfaces and independently characterize catalyst changes.",
    "against": "Rate decline occurs without prior depletion or survives oxygen restoration unchanged.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Dissolved oxygen microgradients",
    "system": "zinc-oxide-coated glass beads",
    "id": 2049,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2049",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Reference adsorption control — zinc-oxide-coated glass beads",
    "hypothesis": "For zinc-oxide-coated glass beads, paired dark adsorption runs will substantially change inferred reaction kinetics when probe binding is slow.",
    "test": "Compare product-verified rates with disappearance-only estimates.",
    "against": "Dark correction does not change validated rate estimates beyond uncertainty.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Reference adsorption control",
    "system": "zinc-oxide-coated glass beads",
    "id": 2050,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2050",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Illumination sweep direction — zinc-oxide-coated ceramic tile",
    "hypothesis": "For zinc-oxide-coated ceramic tile, scanning light against liquid flow will flatten conversion gradients more than scanning with flow.",
    "test": "Map products and local irradiance at equal absorbed photons.",
    "against": "Conversion uniformity is independent of scan direction.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Illumination sweep direction",
    "system": "zinc-oxide-coated ceramic tile",
    "id": 2051,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2051",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Dark oxygen recovery — zinc-oxide-coated ceramic tile",
    "hypothesis": "For zinc-oxide-coated ceramic tile, short dark aeration intervals will restore reaction rate more effectively than illuminated aeration.",
    "test": "Measure oxygen, products, and subsequent rate at equal gas input.",
    "against": "Recovery is no better after temperature and oxygen are matched.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Dark oxygen recovery",
    "system": "zinc-oxide-coated ceramic tile",
    "id": 2052,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2052",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Catalyst island perimeter — zinc-oxide-coated ceramic tile",
    "hypothesis": "For zinc-oxide-coated ceramic tile, smaller separated catalyst islands will improve product yield per catalyst mass until transport zones overlap.",
    "test": "Vary island size at fixed catalyst mass and measure products.",
    "against": "No perimeter-dependent gain remains after light absorption is matched.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Catalyst island perimeter",
    "system": "zinc-oxide-coated ceramic tile",
    "id": 2053,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2053",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Water-film thickness window — zinc-oxide-coated ceramic tile",
    "hypothesis": "For zinc-oxide-coated ceramic tile, an intermediate liquid-film thickness will maximize product formation per input photon.",
    "test": "Measure product balance, film thickness, and absorbed light.",
    "against": "Yield lacks an intermediate maximum within the predefined range.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Water-film thickness window",
    "system": "zinc-oxide-coated ceramic tile",
    "id": 2054,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2054",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Support thermal conductivity — zinc-oxide-coated ceramic tile",
    "hypothesis": "For zinc-oxide-coated ceramic tile, higher support conductivity will reduce spatial rate fluctuations under intermittent light.",
    "test": "Map temperatures and product formation on matched supports.",
    "against": "Rate fluctuations persist after measured thermal gradients are reduced.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Support thermal conductivity",
    "system": "zinc-oxide-coated ceramic tile",
    "id": 2055,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2055",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pre-adsorption timing — zinc-oxide-coated ceramic tile",
    "hypothesis": "For zinc-oxide-coated ceramic tile, allowing adsorption before illumination will change early product selectivity beyond the change in total conversion.",
    "test": "Measure adsorbed probe, products, and total carbon where appropriate.",
    "against": "Selectivity follows conversion alone without a timing effect.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Pre-adsorption timing",
    "system": "zinc-oxide-coated ceramic tile",
    "id": 2056,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2056",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Washout flow pulses — zinc-oxide-coated ceramic tile",
    "hypothesis": "For zinc-oxide-coated ceramic tile, brief clean-water pulses will reduce product inhibition without substantial catalyst loss.",
    "test": "Measure product recovery, restart rates, and catalyst in effluent.",
    "against": "Rate recovery is absent or due to catalyst shedding.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Washout flow pulses",
    "system": "zinc-oxide-coated ceramic tile",
    "id": 2057,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2057",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Dual-sided illumination — zinc-oxide-coated ceramic tile",
    "hypothesis": "For zinc-oxide-coated ceramic tile, illumination from both sides will reduce inactive catalyst depth at equal absorbed photons.",
    "test": "Measure depth-resolved activity and spectral absorption.",
    "against": "Usable depth and overall yield do not improve.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Dual-sided illumination",
    "system": "zinc-oxide-coated ceramic tile",
    "id": 2058,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2058",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Dissolved oxygen microgradients — zinc-oxide-coated ceramic tile",
    "hypothesis": "For zinc-oxide-coated ceramic tile, local oxygen depletion will precede apparent catalyst deactivation under rising substrate load.",
    "test": "Measure oxygen near surfaces and independently characterize catalyst changes.",
    "against": "Rate decline occurs without prior depletion or survives oxygen restoration unchanged.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Dissolved oxygen microgradients",
    "system": "zinc-oxide-coated ceramic tile",
    "id": 2059,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2059",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Reference adsorption control — zinc-oxide-coated ceramic tile",
    "hypothesis": "For zinc-oxide-coated ceramic tile, paired dark adsorption runs will substantially change inferred reaction kinetics when probe binding is slow.",
    "test": "Compare product-verified rates with disappearance-only estimates.",
    "against": "Dark correction does not change validated rate estimates beyond uncertainty.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Reference adsorption control",
    "system": "zinc-oxide-coated ceramic tile",
    "id": 2060,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2060",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Illumination sweep direction — carbon-nitride-coated glass",
    "hypothesis": "For carbon-nitride-coated glass, scanning light against liquid flow will flatten conversion gradients more than scanning with flow.",
    "test": "Map products and local irradiance at equal absorbed photons.",
    "against": "Conversion uniformity is independent of scan direction.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Illumination sweep direction",
    "system": "carbon-nitride-coated glass",
    "id": 2061,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2061",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Dark oxygen recovery — carbon-nitride-coated glass",
    "hypothesis": "For carbon-nitride-coated glass, short dark aeration intervals will restore reaction rate more effectively than illuminated aeration.",
    "test": "Measure oxygen, products, and subsequent rate at equal gas input.",
    "against": "Recovery is no better after temperature and oxygen are matched.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Dark oxygen recovery",
    "system": "carbon-nitride-coated glass",
    "id": 2062,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2062",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Catalyst island perimeter — carbon-nitride-coated glass",
    "hypothesis": "For carbon-nitride-coated glass, smaller separated catalyst islands will improve product yield per catalyst mass until transport zones overlap.",
    "test": "Vary island size at fixed catalyst mass and measure products.",
    "against": "No perimeter-dependent gain remains after light absorption is matched.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Catalyst island perimeter",
    "system": "carbon-nitride-coated glass",
    "id": 2063,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2063",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Water-film thickness window — carbon-nitride-coated glass",
    "hypothesis": "For carbon-nitride-coated glass, an intermediate liquid-film thickness will maximize product formation per input photon.",
    "test": "Measure product balance, film thickness, and absorbed light.",
    "against": "Yield lacks an intermediate maximum within the predefined range.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Water-film thickness window",
    "system": "carbon-nitride-coated glass",
    "id": 2064,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2064",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Support thermal conductivity — carbon-nitride-coated glass",
    "hypothesis": "For carbon-nitride-coated glass, higher support conductivity will reduce spatial rate fluctuations under intermittent light.",
    "test": "Map temperatures and product formation on matched supports.",
    "against": "Rate fluctuations persist after measured thermal gradients are reduced.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Support thermal conductivity",
    "system": "carbon-nitride-coated glass",
    "id": 2065,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2065",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pre-adsorption timing — carbon-nitride-coated glass",
    "hypothesis": "For carbon-nitride-coated glass, allowing adsorption before illumination will change early product selectivity beyond the change in total conversion.",
    "test": "Measure adsorbed probe, products, and total carbon where appropriate.",
    "against": "Selectivity follows conversion alone without a timing effect.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Pre-adsorption timing",
    "system": "carbon-nitride-coated glass",
    "id": 2066,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2066",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Washout flow pulses — carbon-nitride-coated glass",
    "hypothesis": "For carbon-nitride-coated glass, brief clean-water pulses will reduce product inhibition without substantial catalyst loss.",
    "test": "Measure product recovery, restart rates, and catalyst in effluent.",
    "against": "Rate recovery is absent or due to catalyst shedding.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Washout flow pulses",
    "system": "carbon-nitride-coated glass",
    "id": 2067,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2067",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Dual-sided illumination — carbon-nitride-coated glass",
    "hypothesis": "For carbon-nitride-coated glass, illumination from both sides will reduce inactive catalyst depth at equal absorbed photons.",
    "test": "Measure depth-resolved activity and spectral absorption.",
    "against": "Usable depth and overall yield do not improve.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Dual-sided illumination",
    "system": "carbon-nitride-coated glass",
    "id": 2068,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2068",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Dissolved oxygen microgradients — carbon-nitride-coated glass",
    "hypothesis": "For carbon-nitride-coated glass, local oxygen depletion will precede apparent catalyst deactivation under rising substrate load.",
    "test": "Measure oxygen near surfaces and independently characterize catalyst changes.",
    "against": "Rate decline occurs without prior depletion or survives oxygen restoration unchanged.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Dissolved oxygen microgradients",
    "system": "carbon-nitride-coated glass",
    "id": 2069,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2069",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Reference adsorption control — carbon-nitride-coated glass",
    "hypothesis": "For carbon-nitride-coated glass, paired dark adsorption runs will substantially change inferred reaction kinetics when probe binding is slow.",
    "test": "Compare product-verified rates with disappearance-only estimates.",
    "against": "Dark correction does not change validated rate estimates beyond uncertainty.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Reference adsorption control",
    "system": "carbon-nitride-coated glass",
    "id": 2070,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2070",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Illumination sweep direction — carbon-nitride-coated porous silica",
    "hypothesis": "For carbon-nitride-coated porous silica, scanning light against liquid flow will flatten conversion gradients more than scanning with flow.",
    "test": "Map products and local irradiance at equal absorbed photons.",
    "against": "Conversion uniformity is independent of scan direction.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Illumination sweep direction",
    "system": "carbon-nitride-coated porous silica",
    "id": 2071,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2071",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Dark oxygen recovery — carbon-nitride-coated porous silica",
    "hypothesis": "For carbon-nitride-coated porous silica, short dark aeration intervals will restore reaction rate more effectively than illuminated aeration.",
    "test": "Measure oxygen, products, and subsequent rate at equal gas input.",
    "against": "Recovery is no better after temperature and oxygen are matched.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Dark oxygen recovery",
    "system": "carbon-nitride-coated porous silica",
    "id": 2072,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2072",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Catalyst island perimeter — carbon-nitride-coated porous silica",
    "hypothesis": "For carbon-nitride-coated porous silica, smaller separated catalyst islands will improve product yield per catalyst mass until transport zones overlap.",
    "test": "Vary island size at fixed catalyst mass and measure products.",
    "against": "No perimeter-dependent gain remains after light absorption is matched.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Catalyst island perimeter",
    "system": "carbon-nitride-coated porous silica",
    "id": 2073,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2073",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Water-film thickness window — carbon-nitride-coated porous silica",
    "hypothesis": "For carbon-nitride-coated porous silica, an intermediate liquid-film thickness will maximize product formation per input photon.",
    "test": "Measure product balance, film thickness, and absorbed light.",
    "against": "Yield lacks an intermediate maximum within the predefined range.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Water-film thickness window",
    "system": "carbon-nitride-coated porous silica",
    "id": 2074,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2074",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Support thermal conductivity — carbon-nitride-coated porous silica",
    "hypothesis": "For carbon-nitride-coated porous silica, higher support conductivity will reduce spatial rate fluctuations under intermittent light.",
    "test": "Map temperatures and product formation on matched supports.",
    "against": "Rate fluctuations persist after measured thermal gradients are reduced.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Support thermal conductivity",
    "system": "carbon-nitride-coated porous silica",
    "id": 2075,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2075",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pre-adsorption timing — carbon-nitride-coated porous silica",
    "hypothesis": "For carbon-nitride-coated porous silica, allowing adsorption before illumination will change early product selectivity beyond the change in total conversion.",
    "test": "Measure adsorbed probe, products, and total carbon where appropriate.",
    "against": "Selectivity follows conversion alone without a timing effect.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Pre-adsorption timing",
    "system": "carbon-nitride-coated porous silica",
    "id": 2076,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2076",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Washout flow pulses — carbon-nitride-coated porous silica",
    "hypothesis": "For carbon-nitride-coated porous silica, brief clean-water pulses will reduce product inhibition without substantial catalyst loss.",
    "test": "Measure product recovery, restart rates, and catalyst in effluent.",
    "against": "Rate recovery is absent or due to catalyst shedding.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Washout flow pulses",
    "system": "carbon-nitride-coated porous silica",
    "id": 2077,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2077",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Dual-sided illumination — carbon-nitride-coated porous silica",
    "hypothesis": "For carbon-nitride-coated porous silica, illumination from both sides will reduce inactive catalyst depth at equal absorbed photons.",
    "test": "Measure depth-resolved activity and spectral absorption.",
    "against": "Usable depth and overall yield do not improve.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Dual-sided illumination",
    "system": "carbon-nitride-coated porous silica",
    "id": 2078,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2078",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Dissolved oxygen microgradients — carbon-nitride-coated porous silica",
    "hypothesis": "For carbon-nitride-coated porous silica, local oxygen depletion will precede apparent catalyst deactivation under rising substrate load.",
    "test": "Measure oxygen near surfaces and independently characterize catalyst changes.",
    "against": "Rate decline occurs without prior depletion or survives oxygen restoration unchanged.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Dissolved oxygen microgradients",
    "system": "carbon-nitride-coated porous silica",
    "id": 2079,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2079",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Reference adsorption control — carbon-nitride-coated porous silica",
    "hypothesis": "For carbon-nitride-coated porous silica, paired dark adsorption runs will substantially change inferred reaction kinetics when probe binding is slow.",
    "test": "Compare product-verified rates with disappearance-only estimates.",
    "against": "Dark correction does not change validated rate estimates beyond uncertainty.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Reference adsorption control",
    "system": "carbon-nitride-coated porous silica",
    "id": 2080,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2080",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Illumination sweep direction — immobilized iron-oxide model photocatalyst",
    "hypothesis": "For immobilized iron-oxide model photocatalyst, scanning light against liquid flow will flatten conversion gradients more than scanning with flow.",
    "test": "Map products and local irradiance at equal absorbed photons.",
    "against": "Conversion uniformity is independent of scan direction.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Illumination sweep direction",
    "system": "immobilized iron-oxide model photocatalyst",
    "id": 2081,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2081",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Dark oxygen recovery — immobilized iron-oxide model photocatalyst",
    "hypothesis": "For immobilized iron-oxide model photocatalyst, short dark aeration intervals will restore reaction rate more effectively than illuminated aeration.",
    "test": "Measure oxygen, products, and subsequent rate at equal gas input.",
    "against": "Recovery is no better after temperature and oxygen are matched.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Dark oxygen recovery",
    "system": "immobilized iron-oxide model photocatalyst",
    "id": 2082,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2082",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Catalyst island perimeter — immobilized iron-oxide model photocatalyst",
    "hypothesis": "For immobilized iron-oxide model photocatalyst, smaller separated catalyst islands will improve product yield per catalyst mass until transport zones overlap.",
    "test": "Vary island size at fixed catalyst mass and measure products.",
    "against": "No perimeter-dependent gain remains after light absorption is matched.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Catalyst island perimeter",
    "system": "immobilized iron-oxide model photocatalyst",
    "id": 2083,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2083",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Water-film thickness window — immobilized iron-oxide model photocatalyst",
    "hypothesis": "For immobilized iron-oxide model photocatalyst, an intermediate liquid-film thickness will maximize product formation per input photon.",
    "test": "Measure product balance, film thickness, and absorbed light.",
    "against": "Yield lacks an intermediate maximum within the predefined range.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Water-film thickness window",
    "system": "immobilized iron-oxide model photocatalyst",
    "id": 2084,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2084",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Support thermal conductivity — immobilized iron-oxide model photocatalyst",
    "hypothesis": "For immobilized iron-oxide model photocatalyst, higher support conductivity will reduce spatial rate fluctuations under intermittent light.",
    "test": "Map temperatures and product formation on matched supports.",
    "against": "Rate fluctuations persist after measured thermal gradients are reduced.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Support thermal conductivity",
    "system": "immobilized iron-oxide model photocatalyst",
    "id": 2085,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2085",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pre-adsorption timing — immobilized iron-oxide model photocatalyst",
    "hypothesis": "For immobilized iron-oxide model photocatalyst, allowing adsorption before illumination will change early product selectivity beyond the change in total conversion.",
    "test": "Measure adsorbed probe, products, and total carbon where appropriate.",
    "against": "Selectivity follows conversion alone without a timing effect.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Pre-adsorption timing",
    "system": "immobilized iron-oxide model photocatalyst",
    "id": 2086,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2086",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Washout flow pulses — immobilized iron-oxide model photocatalyst",
    "hypothesis": "For immobilized iron-oxide model photocatalyst, brief clean-water pulses will reduce product inhibition without substantial catalyst loss.",
    "test": "Measure product recovery, restart rates, and catalyst in effluent.",
    "against": "Rate recovery is absent or due to catalyst shedding.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Washout flow pulses",
    "system": "immobilized iron-oxide model photocatalyst",
    "id": 2087,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2087",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Dual-sided illumination — immobilized iron-oxide model photocatalyst",
    "hypothesis": "For immobilized iron-oxide model photocatalyst, illumination from both sides will reduce inactive catalyst depth at equal absorbed photons.",
    "test": "Measure depth-resolved activity and spectral absorption.",
    "against": "Usable depth and overall yield do not improve.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Dual-sided illumination",
    "system": "immobilized iron-oxide model photocatalyst",
    "id": 2088,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2088",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Dissolved oxygen microgradients — immobilized iron-oxide model photocatalyst",
    "hypothesis": "For immobilized iron-oxide model photocatalyst, local oxygen depletion will precede apparent catalyst deactivation under rising substrate load.",
    "test": "Measure oxygen near surfaces and independently characterize catalyst changes.",
    "against": "Rate decline occurs without prior depletion or survives oxygen restoration unchanged.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Dissolved oxygen microgradients",
    "system": "immobilized iron-oxide model photocatalyst",
    "id": 2089,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2089",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Reference adsorption control — immobilized iron-oxide model photocatalyst",
    "hypothesis": "For immobilized iron-oxide model photocatalyst, paired dark adsorption runs will substantially change inferred reaction kinetics when probe binding is slow.",
    "test": "Compare product-verified rates with disappearance-only estimates.",
    "against": "Dark correction does not change validated rate estimates beyond uncertainty.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Reference adsorption control",
    "system": "immobilized iron-oxide model photocatalyst",
    "id": 2090,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2090",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Illumination sweep direction — immobilized bismuth-oxide model photocatalyst",
    "hypothesis": "For immobilized bismuth-oxide model photocatalyst, scanning light against liquid flow will flatten conversion gradients more than scanning with flow.",
    "test": "Map products and local irradiance at equal absorbed photons.",
    "against": "Conversion uniformity is independent of scan direction.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Illumination sweep direction",
    "system": "immobilized bismuth-oxide model photocatalyst",
    "id": 2091,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2091",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Dark oxygen recovery — immobilized bismuth-oxide model photocatalyst",
    "hypothesis": "For immobilized bismuth-oxide model photocatalyst, short dark aeration intervals will restore reaction rate more effectively than illuminated aeration.",
    "test": "Measure oxygen, products, and subsequent rate at equal gas input.",
    "against": "Recovery is no better after temperature and oxygen are matched.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Dark oxygen recovery",
    "system": "immobilized bismuth-oxide model photocatalyst",
    "id": 2092,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2092",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Catalyst island perimeter — immobilized bismuth-oxide model photocatalyst",
    "hypothesis": "For immobilized bismuth-oxide model photocatalyst, smaller separated catalyst islands will improve product yield per catalyst mass until transport zones overlap.",
    "test": "Vary island size at fixed catalyst mass and measure products.",
    "against": "No perimeter-dependent gain remains after light absorption is matched.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Catalyst island perimeter",
    "system": "immobilized bismuth-oxide model photocatalyst",
    "id": 2093,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2093",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Water-film thickness window — immobilized bismuth-oxide model photocatalyst",
    "hypothesis": "For immobilized bismuth-oxide model photocatalyst, an intermediate liquid-film thickness will maximize product formation per input photon.",
    "test": "Measure product balance, film thickness, and absorbed light.",
    "against": "Yield lacks an intermediate maximum within the predefined range.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Water-film thickness window",
    "system": "immobilized bismuth-oxide model photocatalyst",
    "id": 2094,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2094",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Support thermal conductivity — immobilized bismuth-oxide model photocatalyst",
    "hypothesis": "For immobilized bismuth-oxide model photocatalyst, higher support conductivity will reduce spatial rate fluctuations under intermittent light.",
    "test": "Map temperatures and product formation on matched supports.",
    "against": "Rate fluctuations persist after measured thermal gradients are reduced.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Support thermal conductivity",
    "system": "immobilized bismuth-oxide model photocatalyst",
    "id": 2095,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2095",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pre-adsorption timing — immobilized bismuth-oxide model photocatalyst",
    "hypothesis": "For immobilized bismuth-oxide model photocatalyst, allowing adsorption before illumination will change early product selectivity beyond the change in total conversion.",
    "test": "Measure adsorbed probe, products, and total carbon where appropriate.",
    "against": "Selectivity follows conversion alone without a timing effect.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Pre-adsorption timing",
    "system": "immobilized bismuth-oxide model photocatalyst",
    "id": 2096,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2096",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Washout flow pulses — immobilized bismuth-oxide model photocatalyst",
    "hypothesis": "For immobilized bismuth-oxide model photocatalyst, brief clean-water pulses will reduce product inhibition without substantial catalyst loss.",
    "test": "Measure product recovery, restart rates, and catalyst in effluent.",
    "against": "Rate recovery is absent or due to catalyst shedding.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Washout flow pulses",
    "system": "immobilized bismuth-oxide model photocatalyst",
    "id": 2097,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2097",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Dual-sided illumination — immobilized bismuth-oxide model photocatalyst",
    "hypothesis": "For immobilized bismuth-oxide model photocatalyst, illumination from both sides will reduce inactive catalyst depth at equal absorbed photons.",
    "test": "Measure depth-resolved activity and spectral absorption.",
    "against": "Usable depth and overall yield do not improve.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Dual-sided illumination",
    "system": "immobilized bismuth-oxide model photocatalyst",
    "id": 2098,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2098",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Dissolved oxygen microgradients — immobilized bismuth-oxide model photocatalyst",
    "hypothesis": "For immobilized bismuth-oxide model photocatalyst, local oxygen depletion will precede apparent catalyst deactivation under rising substrate load.",
    "test": "Measure oxygen near surfaces and independently characterize catalyst changes.",
    "against": "Rate decline occurs without prior depletion or survives oxygen restoration unchanged.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Dissolved oxygen microgradients",
    "system": "immobilized bismuth-oxide model photocatalyst",
    "id": 2099,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2099",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Reference adsorption control — immobilized bismuth-oxide model photocatalyst",
    "hypothesis": "For immobilized bismuth-oxide model photocatalyst, paired dark adsorption runs will substantially change inferred reaction kinetics when probe binding is slow.",
    "test": "Compare product-verified rates with disappearance-only estimates.",
    "against": "Dark correction does not change validated rate estimates beyond uncertainty.",
    "category": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions",
    "controls": "Use a validated low-hazard probe reaction, compatible immobilization, equal catalyst activity, absorbed light, oxygen, temperature, and independently measured adsorption. Probe disappearance alone is not mineralization.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Supported benign photocatalytic model reactions: Reference adsorption control",
    "system": "immobilized bismuth-oxide model photocatalyst",
    "id": 2100,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated low-hazard photocatalysis setup with independent chemical product measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2100",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Edge exposure asymmetry — cellulose-polymer bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For cellulose-polymer bilayer, exposing edges while sealing faces will produce slower but more spatially uniform bending.",
    "test": "Map moisture and curvature under controlled humidity steps.",
    "against": "Bending uniformity does not improve despite slower uptake.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Edge exposure asymmetry",
    "system": "cellulose-polymer bilayer",
    "id": 2101,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2101",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Perforation orientation — cellulose-polymer bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For cellulose-polymer bilayer, transverse perforations will speed bending more than longitudinal perforations of equal removed area.",
    "test": "Measure response time, stiffness, and local strain.",
    "against": "Orientation has no independent effect after stiffness is matched.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Perforation orientation",
    "system": "cellulose-polymer bilayer",
    "id": 2102,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2102",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Humidity reset plateau — cellulose-polymer bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For cellulose-polymer bilayer, a short intermediate-humidity plateau will reduce endpoint curvature drift.",
    "test": "Compare repeated humidity cycles with equal total duration.",
    "against": "Endpoint drift is unchanged under the plateau schedule.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Humidity reset plateau",
    "system": "cellulose-polymer bilayer",
    "id": 2103,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2103",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Width tapering — cellulose-polymer bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For cellulose-polymer bilayer, gradual width tapering will localize useful tip displacement without concentrating peak interfacial strain.",
    "test": "Map shape and strain relative to constant-width controls.",
    "against": "Any displacement gain requires greater peak interfacial strain.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Width tapering",
    "system": "cellulose-polymer bilayer",
    "id": 2104,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2104",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Passive layer viscoelasticity — cellulose-polymer bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For cellulose-polymer bilayer, slower passive-layer relaxation will increase directional bending hysteresis.",
    "test": "Measure mechanical relaxation and humidity-cycle curvature.",
    "against": "Hysteresis is unrelated to passive-layer relaxation after uptake is matched.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Passive layer viscoelasticity",
    "system": "cellulose-polymer bilayer",
    "id": 2105,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2105",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Alternating active stripes — cellulose-polymer bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For cellulose-polymer bilayer, oblique hygroscopic stripes will create more repeatable twist than uniform active layers.",
    "test": "Measure three-dimensional motion over independent specimens.",
    "against": "Twist repeatability is no better after thickness variation is included.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Alternating active stripes",
    "system": "cellulose-polymer bilayer",
    "id": 2106,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2106",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Moisture pulse saturation — cellulose-polymer bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For cellulose-polymer bilayer, two separated short humidity pulses will produce greater final curvature than one equal-dose pulse near saturation.",
    "test": "Measure absorbed water and curvature for matched pulse histories.",
    "against": "Curvature depends only on final moisture without a pulse-history effect.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Moisture pulse saturation",
    "system": "cellulose-polymer bilayer",
    "id": 2107,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2107",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Neutral-axis marker sensing — cellulose-polymer bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For cellulose-polymer bilayer, paired optical markers across thickness will detect delamination earlier than tip displacement alone.",
    "test": "Track markers, tip motion, and independent interface images during cycling.",
    "against": "Markers provide no earlier reliable delamination warning.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Neutral-axis marker sensing",
    "system": "cellulose-polymer bilayer",
    "id": 2108,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2108",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Mechanical stop recovery — cellulose-polymer bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For cellulose-polymer bilayer, a compliant motion stop will preserve actuation amplitude longer than a rigid stop.",
    "test": "Measure amplitude retention and interface damage under identical cycles.",
    "against": "Amplitude retention is unchanged after maximum strain is controlled.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Mechanical stop recovery",
    "system": "cellulose-polymer bilayer",
    "id": 2109,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2109",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Counterbalanced mounting — cellulose-polymer bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For cellulose-polymer bilayer, mounting opposing actuators will reduce gravity-induced calibration drift more than humidity sensitivity.",
    "test": "Compare orientation effects and humidity response under equal loads.",
    "against": "Gravity error falls only with comparable loss of humidity response.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Counterbalanced mounting",
    "system": "cellulose-polymer bilayer",
    "id": 2110,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2110",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Edge exposure asymmetry — wood-veneer elastomer bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For wood-veneer elastomer bilayer, exposing edges while sealing faces will produce slower but more spatially uniform bending.",
    "test": "Map moisture and curvature under controlled humidity steps.",
    "against": "Bending uniformity does not improve despite slower uptake.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Edge exposure asymmetry",
    "system": "wood-veneer elastomer bilayer",
    "id": 2111,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2111",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Perforation orientation — wood-veneer elastomer bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For wood-veneer elastomer bilayer, transverse perforations will speed bending more than longitudinal perforations of equal removed area.",
    "test": "Measure response time, stiffness, and local strain.",
    "against": "Orientation has no independent effect after stiffness is matched.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Perforation orientation",
    "system": "wood-veneer elastomer bilayer",
    "id": 2112,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2112",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Humidity reset plateau — wood-veneer elastomer bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For wood-veneer elastomer bilayer, a short intermediate-humidity plateau will reduce endpoint curvature drift.",
    "test": "Compare repeated humidity cycles with equal total duration.",
    "against": "Endpoint drift is unchanged under the plateau schedule.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Humidity reset plateau",
    "system": "wood-veneer elastomer bilayer",
    "id": 2113,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2113",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Width tapering — wood-veneer elastomer bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For wood-veneer elastomer bilayer, gradual width tapering will localize useful tip displacement without concentrating peak interfacial strain.",
    "test": "Map shape and strain relative to constant-width controls.",
    "against": "Any displacement gain requires greater peak interfacial strain.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Width tapering",
    "system": "wood-veneer elastomer bilayer",
    "id": 2114,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2114",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Passive layer viscoelasticity — wood-veneer elastomer bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For wood-veneer elastomer bilayer, slower passive-layer relaxation will increase directional bending hysteresis.",
    "test": "Measure mechanical relaxation and humidity-cycle curvature.",
    "against": "Hysteresis is unrelated to passive-layer relaxation after uptake is matched.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Passive layer viscoelasticity",
    "system": "wood-veneer elastomer bilayer",
    "id": 2115,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2115",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Alternating active stripes — wood-veneer elastomer bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For wood-veneer elastomer bilayer, oblique hygroscopic stripes will create more repeatable twist than uniform active layers.",
    "test": "Measure three-dimensional motion over independent specimens.",
    "against": "Twist repeatability is no better after thickness variation is included.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Alternating active stripes",
    "system": "wood-veneer elastomer bilayer",
    "id": 2116,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2116",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Moisture pulse saturation — wood-veneer elastomer bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For wood-veneer elastomer bilayer, two separated short humidity pulses will produce greater final curvature than one equal-dose pulse near saturation.",
    "test": "Measure absorbed water and curvature for matched pulse histories.",
    "against": "Curvature depends only on final moisture without a pulse-history effect.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Moisture pulse saturation",
    "system": "wood-veneer elastomer bilayer",
    "id": 2117,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2117",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Neutral-axis marker sensing — wood-veneer elastomer bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For wood-veneer elastomer bilayer, paired optical markers across thickness will detect delamination earlier than tip displacement alone.",
    "test": "Track markers, tip motion, and independent interface images during cycling.",
    "against": "Markers provide no earlier reliable delamination warning.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Neutral-axis marker sensing",
    "system": "wood-veneer elastomer bilayer",
    "id": 2118,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2118",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Mechanical stop recovery — wood-veneer elastomer bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For wood-veneer elastomer bilayer, a compliant motion stop will preserve actuation amplitude longer than a rigid stop.",
    "test": "Measure amplitude retention and interface damage under identical cycles.",
    "against": "Amplitude retention is unchanged after maximum strain is controlled.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Mechanical stop recovery",
    "system": "wood-veneer elastomer bilayer",
    "id": 2119,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2119",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Counterbalanced mounting — wood-veneer elastomer bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For wood-veneer elastomer bilayer, mounting opposing actuators will reduce gravity-induced calibration drift more than humidity sensitivity.",
    "test": "Compare orientation effects and humidity response under equal loads.",
    "against": "Gravity error falls only with comparable loss of humidity response.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Counterbalanced mounting",
    "system": "wood-veneer elastomer bilayer",
    "id": 2120,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2120",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Edge exposure asymmetry — agarose-elastomer bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For agarose-elastomer bilayer, exposing edges while sealing faces will produce slower but more spatially uniform bending.",
    "test": "Map moisture and curvature under controlled humidity steps.",
    "against": "Bending uniformity does not improve despite slower uptake.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Edge exposure asymmetry",
    "system": "agarose-elastomer bilayer",
    "id": 2121,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2121",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Perforation orientation — agarose-elastomer bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For agarose-elastomer bilayer, transverse perforations will speed bending more than longitudinal perforations of equal removed area.",
    "test": "Measure response time, stiffness, and local strain.",
    "against": "Orientation has no independent effect after stiffness is matched.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Perforation orientation",
    "system": "agarose-elastomer bilayer",
    "id": 2122,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2122",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Humidity reset plateau — agarose-elastomer bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For agarose-elastomer bilayer, a short intermediate-humidity plateau will reduce endpoint curvature drift.",
    "test": "Compare repeated humidity cycles with equal total duration.",
    "against": "Endpoint drift is unchanged under the plateau schedule.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Humidity reset plateau",
    "system": "agarose-elastomer bilayer",
    "id": 2123,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2123",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Width tapering — agarose-elastomer bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For agarose-elastomer bilayer, gradual width tapering will localize useful tip displacement without concentrating peak interfacial strain.",
    "test": "Map shape and strain relative to constant-width controls.",
    "against": "Any displacement gain requires greater peak interfacial strain.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Width tapering",
    "system": "agarose-elastomer bilayer",
    "id": 2124,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2124",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Passive layer viscoelasticity — agarose-elastomer bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For agarose-elastomer bilayer, slower passive-layer relaxation will increase directional bending hysteresis.",
    "test": "Measure mechanical relaxation and humidity-cycle curvature.",
    "against": "Hysteresis is unrelated to passive-layer relaxation after uptake is matched.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Passive layer viscoelasticity",
    "system": "agarose-elastomer bilayer",
    "id": 2125,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2125",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Alternating active stripes — agarose-elastomer bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For agarose-elastomer bilayer, oblique hygroscopic stripes will create more repeatable twist than uniform active layers.",
    "test": "Measure three-dimensional motion over independent specimens.",
    "against": "Twist repeatability is no better after thickness variation is included.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Alternating active stripes",
    "system": "agarose-elastomer bilayer",
    "id": 2126,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2126",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Moisture pulse saturation — agarose-elastomer bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For agarose-elastomer bilayer, two separated short humidity pulses will produce greater final curvature than one equal-dose pulse near saturation.",
    "test": "Measure absorbed water and curvature for matched pulse histories.",
    "against": "Curvature depends only on final moisture without a pulse-history effect.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Moisture pulse saturation",
    "system": "agarose-elastomer bilayer",
    "id": 2127,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2127",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Neutral-axis marker sensing — agarose-elastomer bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For agarose-elastomer bilayer, paired optical markers across thickness will detect delamination earlier than tip displacement alone.",
    "test": "Track markers, tip motion, and independent interface images during cycling.",
    "against": "Markers provide no earlier reliable delamination warning.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Neutral-axis marker sensing",
    "system": "agarose-elastomer bilayer",
    "id": 2128,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2128",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Mechanical stop recovery — agarose-elastomer bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For agarose-elastomer bilayer, a compliant motion stop will preserve actuation amplitude longer than a rigid stop.",
    "test": "Measure amplitude retention and interface damage under identical cycles.",
    "against": "Amplitude retention is unchanged after maximum strain is controlled.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Mechanical stop recovery",
    "system": "agarose-elastomer bilayer",
    "id": 2129,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2129",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Counterbalanced mounting — agarose-elastomer bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For agarose-elastomer bilayer, mounting opposing actuators will reduce gravity-induced calibration drift more than humidity sensitivity.",
    "test": "Compare orientation effects and humidity response under equal loads.",
    "against": "Gravity error falls only with comparable loss of humidity response.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Counterbalanced mounting",
    "system": "agarose-elastomer bilayer",
    "id": 2130,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2130",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Edge exposure asymmetry — gelatin-polymer bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For gelatin-polymer bilayer, exposing edges while sealing faces will produce slower but more spatially uniform bending.",
    "test": "Map moisture and curvature under controlled humidity steps.",
    "against": "Bending uniformity does not improve despite slower uptake.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Edge exposure asymmetry",
    "system": "gelatin-polymer bilayer",
    "id": 2131,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2131",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Perforation orientation — gelatin-polymer bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For gelatin-polymer bilayer, transverse perforations will speed bending more than longitudinal perforations of equal removed area.",
    "test": "Measure response time, stiffness, and local strain.",
    "against": "Orientation has no independent effect after stiffness is matched.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Perforation orientation",
    "system": "gelatin-polymer bilayer",
    "id": 2132,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2132",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Humidity reset plateau — gelatin-polymer bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For gelatin-polymer bilayer, a short intermediate-humidity plateau will reduce endpoint curvature drift.",
    "test": "Compare repeated humidity cycles with equal total duration.",
    "against": "Endpoint drift is unchanged under the plateau schedule.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Humidity reset plateau",
    "system": "gelatin-polymer bilayer",
    "id": 2133,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2133",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Width tapering — gelatin-polymer bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For gelatin-polymer bilayer, gradual width tapering will localize useful tip displacement without concentrating peak interfacial strain.",
    "test": "Map shape and strain relative to constant-width controls.",
    "against": "Any displacement gain requires greater peak interfacial strain.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Width tapering",
    "system": "gelatin-polymer bilayer",
    "id": 2134,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2134",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Passive layer viscoelasticity — gelatin-polymer bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For gelatin-polymer bilayer, slower passive-layer relaxation will increase directional bending hysteresis.",
    "test": "Measure mechanical relaxation and humidity-cycle curvature.",
    "against": "Hysteresis is unrelated to passive-layer relaxation after uptake is matched.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Passive layer viscoelasticity",
    "system": "gelatin-polymer bilayer",
    "id": 2135,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2135",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Alternating active stripes — gelatin-polymer bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For gelatin-polymer bilayer, oblique hygroscopic stripes will create more repeatable twist than uniform active layers.",
    "test": "Measure three-dimensional motion over independent specimens.",
    "against": "Twist repeatability is no better after thickness variation is included.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Alternating active stripes",
    "system": "gelatin-polymer bilayer",
    "id": 2136,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2136",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Moisture pulse saturation — gelatin-polymer bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For gelatin-polymer bilayer, two separated short humidity pulses will produce greater final curvature than one equal-dose pulse near saturation.",
    "test": "Measure absorbed water and curvature for matched pulse histories.",
    "against": "Curvature depends only on final moisture without a pulse-history effect.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Moisture pulse saturation",
    "system": "gelatin-polymer bilayer",
    "id": 2137,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2137",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Neutral-axis marker sensing — gelatin-polymer bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For gelatin-polymer bilayer, paired optical markers across thickness will detect delamination earlier than tip displacement alone.",
    "test": "Track markers, tip motion, and independent interface images during cycling.",
    "against": "Markers provide no earlier reliable delamination warning.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Neutral-axis marker sensing",
    "system": "gelatin-polymer bilayer",
    "id": 2138,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2138",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Mechanical stop recovery — gelatin-polymer bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For gelatin-polymer bilayer, a compliant motion stop will preserve actuation amplitude longer than a rigid stop.",
    "test": "Measure amplitude retention and interface damage under identical cycles.",
    "against": "Amplitude retention is unchanged after maximum strain is controlled.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Mechanical stop recovery",
    "system": "gelatin-polymer bilayer",
    "id": 2139,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2139",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Counterbalanced mounting — gelatin-polymer bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For gelatin-polymer bilayer, mounting opposing actuators will reduce gravity-induced calibration drift more than humidity sensitivity.",
    "test": "Compare orientation effects and humidity response under equal loads.",
    "against": "Gravity error falls only with comparable loss of humidity response.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Counterbalanced mounting",
    "system": "gelatin-polymer bilayer",
    "id": 2140,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2140",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Edge exposure asymmetry — chitosan-polymer bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For chitosan-polymer bilayer, exposing edges while sealing faces will produce slower but more spatially uniform bending.",
    "test": "Map moisture and curvature under controlled humidity steps.",
    "against": "Bending uniformity does not improve despite slower uptake.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Edge exposure asymmetry",
    "system": "chitosan-polymer bilayer",
    "id": 2141,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2141",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Perforation orientation — chitosan-polymer bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For chitosan-polymer bilayer, transverse perforations will speed bending more than longitudinal perforations of equal removed area.",
    "test": "Measure response time, stiffness, and local strain.",
    "against": "Orientation has no independent effect after stiffness is matched.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Perforation orientation",
    "system": "chitosan-polymer bilayer",
    "id": 2142,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2142",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Humidity reset plateau — chitosan-polymer bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For chitosan-polymer bilayer, a short intermediate-humidity plateau will reduce endpoint curvature drift.",
    "test": "Compare repeated humidity cycles with equal total duration.",
    "against": "Endpoint drift is unchanged under the plateau schedule.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Humidity reset plateau",
    "system": "chitosan-polymer bilayer",
    "id": 2143,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2143",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Width tapering — chitosan-polymer bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For chitosan-polymer bilayer, gradual width tapering will localize useful tip displacement without concentrating peak interfacial strain.",
    "test": "Map shape and strain relative to constant-width controls.",
    "against": "Any displacement gain requires greater peak interfacial strain.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Width tapering",
    "system": "chitosan-polymer bilayer",
    "id": 2144,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2144",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Passive layer viscoelasticity — chitosan-polymer bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For chitosan-polymer bilayer, slower passive-layer relaxation will increase directional bending hysteresis.",
    "test": "Measure mechanical relaxation and humidity-cycle curvature.",
    "against": "Hysteresis is unrelated to passive-layer relaxation after uptake is matched.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Passive layer viscoelasticity",
    "system": "chitosan-polymer bilayer",
    "id": 2145,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2145",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Alternating active stripes — chitosan-polymer bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For chitosan-polymer bilayer, oblique hygroscopic stripes will create more repeatable twist than uniform active layers.",
    "test": "Measure three-dimensional motion over independent specimens.",
    "against": "Twist repeatability is no better after thickness variation is included.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Alternating active stripes",
    "system": "chitosan-polymer bilayer",
    "id": 2146,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2146",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Moisture pulse saturation — chitosan-polymer bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For chitosan-polymer bilayer, two separated short humidity pulses will produce greater final curvature than one equal-dose pulse near saturation.",
    "test": "Measure absorbed water and curvature for matched pulse histories.",
    "against": "Curvature depends only on final moisture without a pulse-history effect.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Moisture pulse saturation",
    "system": "chitosan-polymer bilayer",
    "id": 2147,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2147",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Neutral-axis marker sensing — chitosan-polymer bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For chitosan-polymer bilayer, paired optical markers across thickness will detect delamination earlier than tip displacement alone.",
    "test": "Track markers, tip motion, and independent interface images during cycling.",
    "against": "Markers provide no earlier reliable delamination warning.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Neutral-axis marker sensing",
    "system": "chitosan-polymer bilayer",
    "id": 2148,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2148",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Mechanical stop recovery — chitosan-polymer bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For chitosan-polymer bilayer, a compliant motion stop will preserve actuation amplitude longer than a rigid stop.",
    "test": "Measure amplitude retention and interface damage under identical cycles.",
    "against": "Amplitude retention is unchanged after maximum strain is controlled.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Mechanical stop recovery",
    "system": "chitosan-polymer bilayer",
    "id": 2149,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2149",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Counterbalanced mounting — chitosan-polymer bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For chitosan-polymer bilayer, mounting opposing actuators will reduce gravity-induced calibration drift more than humidity sensitivity.",
    "test": "Compare orientation effects and humidity response under equal loads.",
    "against": "Gravity error falls only with comparable loss of humidity response.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Counterbalanced mounting",
    "system": "chitosan-polymer bilayer",
    "id": 2150,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2150",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Edge exposure asymmetry — alginate-polymer bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For alginate-polymer bilayer, exposing edges while sealing faces will produce slower but more spatially uniform bending.",
    "test": "Map moisture and curvature under controlled humidity steps.",
    "against": "Bending uniformity does not improve despite slower uptake.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Edge exposure asymmetry",
    "system": "alginate-polymer bilayer",
    "id": 2151,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2151",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Perforation orientation — alginate-polymer bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For alginate-polymer bilayer, transverse perforations will speed bending more than longitudinal perforations of equal removed area.",
    "test": "Measure response time, stiffness, and local strain.",
    "against": "Orientation has no independent effect after stiffness is matched.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Perforation orientation",
    "system": "alginate-polymer bilayer",
    "id": 2152,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2152",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Humidity reset plateau — alginate-polymer bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For alginate-polymer bilayer, a short intermediate-humidity plateau will reduce endpoint curvature drift.",
    "test": "Compare repeated humidity cycles with equal total duration.",
    "against": "Endpoint drift is unchanged under the plateau schedule.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Humidity reset plateau",
    "system": "alginate-polymer bilayer",
    "id": 2153,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2153",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Width tapering — alginate-polymer bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For alginate-polymer bilayer, gradual width tapering will localize useful tip displacement without concentrating peak interfacial strain.",
    "test": "Map shape and strain relative to constant-width controls.",
    "against": "Any displacement gain requires greater peak interfacial strain.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Width tapering",
    "system": "alginate-polymer bilayer",
    "id": 2154,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2154",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Passive layer viscoelasticity — alginate-polymer bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For alginate-polymer bilayer, slower passive-layer relaxation will increase directional bending hysteresis.",
    "test": "Measure mechanical relaxation and humidity-cycle curvature.",
    "against": "Hysteresis is unrelated to passive-layer relaxation after uptake is matched.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Passive layer viscoelasticity",
    "system": "alginate-polymer bilayer",
    "id": 2155,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2155",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Alternating active stripes — alginate-polymer bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For alginate-polymer bilayer, oblique hygroscopic stripes will create more repeatable twist than uniform active layers.",
    "test": "Measure three-dimensional motion over independent specimens.",
    "against": "Twist repeatability is no better after thickness variation is included.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Alternating active stripes",
    "system": "alginate-polymer bilayer",
    "id": 2156,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2156",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Moisture pulse saturation — alginate-polymer bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For alginate-polymer bilayer, two separated short humidity pulses will produce greater final curvature than one equal-dose pulse near saturation.",
    "test": "Measure absorbed water and curvature for matched pulse histories.",
    "against": "Curvature depends only on final moisture without a pulse-history effect.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Moisture pulse saturation",
    "system": "alginate-polymer bilayer",
    "id": 2157,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2157",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Neutral-axis marker sensing — alginate-polymer bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For alginate-polymer bilayer, paired optical markers across thickness will detect delamination earlier than tip displacement alone.",
    "test": "Track markers, tip motion, and independent interface images during cycling.",
    "against": "Markers provide no earlier reliable delamination warning.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Neutral-axis marker sensing",
    "system": "alginate-polymer bilayer",
    "id": 2158,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2158",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Mechanical stop recovery — alginate-polymer bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For alginate-polymer bilayer, a compliant motion stop will preserve actuation amplitude longer than a rigid stop.",
    "test": "Measure amplitude retention and interface damage under identical cycles.",
    "against": "Amplitude retention is unchanged after maximum strain is controlled.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Mechanical stop recovery",
    "system": "alginate-polymer bilayer",
    "id": 2159,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2159",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Counterbalanced mounting — alginate-polymer bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For alginate-polymer bilayer, mounting opposing actuators will reduce gravity-induced calibration drift more than humidity sensitivity.",
    "test": "Compare orientation effects and humidity response under equal loads.",
    "against": "Gravity error falls only with comparable loss of humidity response.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Counterbalanced mounting",
    "system": "alginate-polymer bilayer",
    "id": 2160,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2160",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Edge exposure asymmetry — starch-polymer bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For starch-polymer bilayer, exposing edges while sealing faces will produce slower but more spatially uniform bending.",
    "test": "Map moisture and curvature under controlled humidity steps.",
    "against": "Bending uniformity does not improve despite slower uptake.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Edge exposure asymmetry",
    "system": "starch-polymer bilayer",
    "id": 2161,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2161",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Perforation orientation — starch-polymer bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For starch-polymer bilayer, transverse perforations will speed bending more than longitudinal perforations of equal removed area.",
    "test": "Measure response time, stiffness, and local strain.",
    "against": "Orientation has no independent effect after stiffness is matched.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Perforation orientation",
    "system": "starch-polymer bilayer",
    "id": 2162,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2162",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Humidity reset plateau — starch-polymer bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For starch-polymer bilayer, a short intermediate-humidity plateau will reduce endpoint curvature drift.",
    "test": "Compare repeated humidity cycles with equal total duration.",
    "against": "Endpoint drift is unchanged under the plateau schedule.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Humidity reset plateau",
    "system": "starch-polymer bilayer",
    "id": 2163,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2163",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Width tapering — starch-polymer bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For starch-polymer bilayer, gradual width tapering will localize useful tip displacement without concentrating peak interfacial strain.",
    "test": "Map shape and strain relative to constant-width controls.",
    "against": "Any displacement gain requires greater peak interfacial strain.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Width tapering",
    "system": "starch-polymer bilayer",
    "id": 2164,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2164",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Passive layer viscoelasticity — starch-polymer bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For starch-polymer bilayer, slower passive-layer relaxation will increase directional bending hysteresis.",
    "test": "Measure mechanical relaxation and humidity-cycle curvature.",
    "against": "Hysteresis is unrelated to passive-layer relaxation after uptake is matched.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Passive layer viscoelasticity",
    "system": "starch-polymer bilayer",
    "id": 2165,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2165",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Alternating active stripes — starch-polymer bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For starch-polymer bilayer, oblique hygroscopic stripes will create more repeatable twist than uniform active layers.",
    "test": "Measure three-dimensional motion over independent specimens.",
    "against": "Twist repeatability is no better after thickness variation is included.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Alternating active stripes",
    "system": "starch-polymer bilayer",
    "id": 2166,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2166",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Moisture pulse saturation — starch-polymer bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For starch-polymer bilayer, two separated short humidity pulses will produce greater final curvature than one equal-dose pulse near saturation.",
    "test": "Measure absorbed water and curvature for matched pulse histories.",
    "against": "Curvature depends only on final moisture without a pulse-history effect.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Moisture pulse saturation",
    "system": "starch-polymer bilayer",
    "id": 2167,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2167",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Neutral-axis marker sensing — starch-polymer bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For starch-polymer bilayer, paired optical markers across thickness will detect delamination earlier than tip displacement alone.",
    "test": "Track markers, tip motion, and independent interface images during cycling.",
    "against": "Markers provide no earlier reliable delamination warning.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Neutral-axis marker sensing",
    "system": "starch-polymer bilayer",
    "id": 2168,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2168",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Mechanical stop recovery — starch-polymer bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For starch-polymer bilayer, a compliant motion stop will preserve actuation amplitude longer than a rigid stop.",
    "test": "Measure amplitude retention and interface damage under identical cycles.",
    "against": "Amplitude retention is unchanged after maximum strain is controlled.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Mechanical stop recovery",
    "system": "starch-polymer bilayer",
    "id": 2169,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2169",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Counterbalanced mounting — starch-polymer bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For starch-polymer bilayer, mounting opposing actuators will reduce gravity-induced calibration drift more than humidity sensitivity.",
    "test": "Compare orientation effects and humidity response under equal loads.",
    "against": "Gravity error falls only with comparable loss of humidity response.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Counterbalanced mounting",
    "system": "starch-polymer bilayer",
    "id": 2170,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2170",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Edge exposure asymmetry — silk-fibroin polymer bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For silk-fibroin polymer bilayer, exposing edges while sealing faces will produce slower but more spatially uniform bending.",
    "test": "Map moisture and curvature under controlled humidity steps.",
    "against": "Bending uniformity does not improve despite slower uptake.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Edge exposure asymmetry",
    "system": "silk-fibroin polymer bilayer",
    "id": 2171,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2171",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Perforation orientation — silk-fibroin polymer bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For silk-fibroin polymer bilayer, transverse perforations will speed bending more than longitudinal perforations of equal removed area.",
    "test": "Measure response time, stiffness, and local strain.",
    "against": "Orientation has no independent effect after stiffness is matched.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Perforation orientation",
    "system": "silk-fibroin polymer bilayer",
    "id": 2172,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2172",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Humidity reset plateau — silk-fibroin polymer bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For silk-fibroin polymer bilayer, a short intermediate-humidity plateau will reduce endpoint curvature drift.",
    "test": "Compare repeated humidity cycles with equal total duration.",
    "against": "Endpoint drift is unchanged under the plateau schedule.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Humidity reset plateau",
    "system": "silk-fibroin polymer bilayer",
    "id": 2173,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2173",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Width tapering — silk-fibroin polymer bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For silk-fibroin polymer bilayer, gradual width tapering will localize useful tip displacement without concentrating peak interfacial strain.",
    "test": "Map shape and strain relative to constant-width controls.",
    "against": "Any displacement gain requires greater peak interfacial strain.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Width tapering",
    "system": "silk-fibroin polymer bilayer",
    "id": 2174,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2174",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Passive layer viscoelasticity — silk-fibroin polymer bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For silk-fibroin polymer bilayer, slower passive-layer relaxation will increase directional bending hysteresis.",
    "test": "Measure mechanical relaxation and humidity-cycle curvature.",
    "against": "Hysteresis is unrelated to passive-layer relaxation after uptake is matched.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Passive layer viscoelasticity",
    "system": "silk-fibroin polymer bilayer",
    "id": 2175,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2175",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Alternating active stripes — silk-fibroin polymer bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For silk-fibroin polymer bilayer, oblique hygroscopic stripes will create more repeatable twist than uniform active layers.",
    "test": "Measure three-dimensional motion over independent specimens.",
    "against": "Twist repeatability is no better after thickness variation is included.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Alternating active stripes",
    "system": "silk-fibroin polymer bilayer",
    "id": 2176,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2176",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Moisture pulse saturation — silk-fibroin polymer bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For silk-fibroin polymer bilayer, two separated short humidity pulses will produce greater final curvature than one equal-dose pulse near saturation.",
    "test": "Measure absorbed water and curvature for matched pulse histories.",
    "against": "Curvature depends only on final moisture without a pulse-history effect.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Moisture pulse saturation",
    "system": "silk-fibroin polymer bilayer",
    "id": 2177,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2177",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Neutral-axis marker sensing — silk-fibroin polymer bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For silk-fibroin polymer bilayer, paired optical markers across thickness will detect delamination earlier than tip displacement alone.",
    "test": "Track markers, tip motion, and independent interface images during cycling.",
    "against": "Markers provide no earlier reliable delamination warning.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Neutral-axis marker sensing",
    "system": "silk-fibroin polymer bilayer",
    "id": 2178,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2178",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Mechanical stop recovery — silk-fibroin polymer bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For silk-fibroin polymer bilayer, a compliant motion stop will preserve actuation amplitude longer than a rigid stop.",
    "test": "Measure amplitude retention and interface damage under identical cycles.",
    "against": "Amplitude retention is unchanged after maximum strain is controlled.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Mechanical stop recovery",
    "system": "silk-fibroin polymer bilayer",
    "id": 2179,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2179",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Counterbalanced mounting — silk-fibroin polymer bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For silk-fibroin polymer bilayer, mounting opposing actuators will reduce gravity-induced calibration drift more than humidity sensitivity.",
    "test": "Compare orientation effects and humidity response under equal loads.",
    "against": "Gravity error falls only with comparable loss of humidity response.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Counterbalanced mounting",
    "system": "silk-fibroin polymer bilayer",
    "id": 2180,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2180",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Edge exposure asymmetry — hygroscopic nylon-elastomer bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For hygroscopic nylon-elastomer bilayer, exposing edges while sealing faces will produce slower but more spatially uniform bending.",
    "test": "Map moisture and curvature under controlled humidity steps.",
    "against": "Bending uniformity does not improve despite slower uptake.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Edge exposure asymmetry",
    "system": "hygroscopic nylon-elastomer bilayer",
    "id": 2181,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2181",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Perforation orientation — hygroscopic nylon-elastomer bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For hygroscopic nylon-elastomer bilayer, transverse perforations will speed bending more than longitudinal perforations of equal removed area.",
    "test": "Measure response time, stiffness, and local strain.",
    "against": "Orientation has no independent effect after stiffness is matched.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Perforation orientation",
    "system": "hygroscopic nylon-elastomer bilayer",
    "id": 2182,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2182",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Humidity reset plateau — hygroscopic nylon-elastomer bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For hygroscopic nylon-elastomer bilayer, a short intermediate-humidity plateau will reduce endpoint curvature drift.",
    "test": "Compare repeated humidity cycles with equal total duration.",
    "against": "Endpoint drift is unchanged under the plateau schedule.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Humidity reset plateau",
    "system": "hygroscopic nylon-elastomer bilayer",
    "id": 2183,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2183",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Width tapering — hygroscopic nylon-elastomer bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For hygroscopic nylon-elastomer bilayer, gradual width tapering will localize useful tip displacement without concentrating peak interfacial strain.",
    "test": "Map shape and strain relative to constant-width controls.",
    "against": "Any displacement gain requires greater peak interfacial strain.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Width tapering",
    "system": "hygroscopic nylon-elastomer bilayer",
    "id": 2184,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2184",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Passive layer viscoelasticity — hygroscopic nylon-elastomer bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For hygroscopic nylon-elastomer bilayer, slower passive-layer relaxation will increase directional bending hysteresis.",
    "test": "Measure mechanical relaxation and humidity-cycle curvature.",
    "against": "Hysteresis is unrelated to passive-layer relaxation after uptake is matched.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Passive layer viscoelasticity",
    "system": "hygroscopic nylon-elastomer bilayer",
    "id": 2185,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2185",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Alternating active stripes — hygroscopic nylon-elastomer bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For hygroscopic nylon-elastomer bilayer, oblique hygroscopic stripes will create more repeatable twist than uniform active layers.",
    "test": "Measure three-dimensional motion over independent specimens.",
    "against": "Twist repeatability is no better after thickness variation is included.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Alternating active stripes",
    "system": "hygroscopic nylon-elastomer bilayer",
    "id": 2186,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2186",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Moisture pulse saturation — hygroscopic nylon-elastomer bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For hygroscopic nylon-elastomer bilayer, two separated short humidity pulses will produce greater final curvature than one equal-dose pulse near saturation.",
    "test": "Measure absorbed water and curvature for matched pulse histories.",
    "against": "Curvature depends only on final moisture without a pulse-history effect.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Moisture pulse saturation",
    "system": "hygroscopic nylon-elastomer bilayer",
    "id": 2187,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2187",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Neutral-axis marker sensing — hygroscopic nylon-elastomer bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For hygroscopic nylon-elastomer bilayer, paired optical markers across thickness will detect delamination earlier than tip displacement alone.",
    "test": "Track markers, tip motion, and independent interface images during cycling.",
    "against": "Markers provide no earlier reliable delamination warning.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Neutral-axis marker sensing",
    "system": "hygroscopic nylon-elastomer bilayer",
    "id": 2188,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2188",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Mechanical stop recovery — hygroscopic nylon-elastomer bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For hygroscopic nylon-elastomer bilayer, a compliant motion stop will preserve actuation amplitude longer than a rigid stop.",
    "test": "Measure amplitude retention and interface damage under identical cycles.",
    "against": "Amplitude retention is unchanged after maximum strain is controlled.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Mechanical stop recovery",
    "system": "hygroscopic nylon-elastomer bilayer",
    "id": 2189,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2189",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Counterbalanced mounting — hygroscopic nylon-elastomer bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For hygroscopic nylon-elastomer bilayer, mounting opposing actuators will reduce gravity-induced calibration drift more than humidity sensitivity.",
    "test": "Compare orientation effects and humidity response under equal loads.",
    "against": "Gravity error falls only with comparable loss of humidity response.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Counterbalanced mounting",
    "system": "hygroscopic nylon-elastomer bilayer",
    "id": 2190,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2190",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Edge exposure asymmetry — paper-metal thin-film bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For paper-metal thin-film bilayer, exposing edges while sealing faces will produce slower but more spatially uniform bending.",
    "test": "Map moisture and curvature under controlled humidity steps.",
    "against": "Bending uniformity does not improve despite slower uptake.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Edge exposure asymmetry",
    "system": "paper-metal thin-film bilayer",
    "id": 2191,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2191",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Perforation orientation — paper-metal thin-film bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For paper-metal thin-film bilayer, transverse perforations will speed bending more than longitudinal perforations of equal removed area.",
    "test": "Measure response time, stiffness, and local strain.",
    "against": "Orientation has no independent effect after stiffness is matched.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Perforation orientation",
    "system": "paper-metal thin-film bilayer",
    "id": 2192,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2192",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Humidity reset plateau — paper-metal thin-film bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For paper-metal thin-film bilayer, a short intermediate-humidity plateau will reduce endpoint curvature drift.",
    "test": "Compare repeated humidity cycles with equal total duration.",
    "against": "Endpoint drift is unchanged under the plateau schedule.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Humidity reset plateau",
    "system": "paper-metal thin-film bilayer",
    "id": 2193,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2193",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Width tapering — paper-metal thin-film bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For paper-metal thin-film bilayer, gradual width tapering will localize useful tip displacement without concentrating peak interfacial strain.",
    "test": "Map shape and strain relative to constant-width controls.",
    "against": "Any displacement gain requires greater peak interfacial strain.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Width tapering",
    "system": "paper-metal thin-film bilayer",
    "id": 2194,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2194",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Passive layer viscoelasticity — paper-metal thin-film bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For paper-metal thin-film bilayer, slower passive-layer relaxation will increase directional bending hysteresis.",
    "test": "Measure mechanical relaxation and humidity-cycle curvature.",
    "against": "Hysteresis is unrelated to passive-layer relaxation after uptake is matched.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Passive layer viscoelasticity",
    "system": "paper-metal thin-film bilayer",
    "id": 2195,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2195",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Alternating active stripes — paper-metal thin-film bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For paper-metal thin-film bilayer, oblique hygroscopic stripes will create more repeatable twist than uniform active layers.",
    "test": "Measure three-dimensional motion over independent specimens.",
    "against": "Twist repeatability is no better after thickness variation is included.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Alternating active stripes",
    "system": "paper-metal thin-film bilayer",
    "id": 2196,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2196",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Moisture pulse saturation — paper-metal thin-film bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For paper-metal thin-film bilayer, two separated short humidity pulses will produce greater final curvature than one equal-dose pulse near saturation.",
    "test": "Measure absorbed water and curvature for matched pulse histories.",
    "against": "Curvature depends only on final moisture without a pulse-history effect.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Moisture pulse saturation",
    "system": "paper-metal thin-film bilayer",
    "id": 2197,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2197",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Neutral-axis marker sensing — paper-metal thin-film bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For paper-metal thin-film bilayer, paired optical markers across thickness will detect delamination earlier than tip displacement alone.",
    "test": "Track markers, tip motion, and independent interface images during cycling.",
    "against": "Markers provide no earlier reliable delamination warning.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Neutral-axis marker sensing",
    "system": "paper-metal thin-film bilayer",
    "id": 2198,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2198",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Mechanical stop recovery — paper-metal thin-film bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For paper-metal thin-film bilayer, a compliant motion stop will preserve actuation amplitude longer than a rigid stop.",
    "test": "Measure amplitude retention and interface damage under identical cycles.",
    "against": "Amplitude retention is unchanged after maximum strain is controlled.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Mechanical stop recovery",
    "system": "paper-metal thin-film bilayer",
    "id": 2199,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2199",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Counterbalanced mounting — paper-metal thin-film bilayer",
    "hypothesis": "For paper-metal thin-film bilayer, mounting opposing actuators will reduce gravity-induced calibration drift more than humidity sensitivity.",
    "test": "Compare orientation effects and humidity response under equal loads.",
    "against": "Gravity error falls only with comparable loss of humidity response.",
    "category": "Humidity-driven soft actuators",
    "controls": "Layer thickness, modulus, moisture uptake, actual humidity history, temperature, actuator length, and adhesion. Verify reversible actuation before comparisons.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Humidity-driven soft actuators: Counterbalanced mounting",
    "system": "paper-metal thin-film bilayer",
    "id": 2200,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled humidity, mechanically characterized bilayers, imaging, and strain measurement.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2200",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Loading-side alternation — cellulose fiber filter",
    "hypothesis": "For cellulose fiber filter, alternating the upstream face will distribute deposits more evenly but may increase particle re-entrainment.",
    "test": "Measure depth profiles, efficiency, and downstream bursts.",
    "against": "Deposit uniformity and re-entrainment remain unchanged.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Loading-side alternation",
    "system": "cellulose fiber filter",
    "id": 2201,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2201",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Gentle vibration cleaning — cellulose fiber filter",
    "hypothesis": "For cellulose fiber filter, brief off-flow vibration will restore permeability with less downstream release than vibration during flow.",
    "test": "Measure recovered pressure drop and escaped particles.",
    "against": "Off-flow cleaning has no permeability-versus-release advantage.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Gentle vibration cleaning",
    "system": "cellulose fiber filter",
    "id": 2202,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2202",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Humidity conditioning timing — cellulose fiber filter",
    "hypothesis": "For cellulose fiber filter, conditioning before dust loading will alter pressure-rise kinetics more than conditioning afterward.",
    "test": "Compare matched final humidity and deposited mass.",
    "against": "Pressure rise is independent of conditioning sequence.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Humidity conditioning timing",
    "system": "cellulose fiber filter",
    "id": 2203,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2203",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Layer-spacing redistribution — cellulose fiber filter",
    "hypothesis": "For cellulose fiber filter, widening gaps downstream will reduce deposit bridging between layers.",
    "test": "Image deposits and pressure evolution at equal total thickness.",
    "against": "Bridging frequency is unchanged after loading distribution is measured.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Layer-spacing redistribution",
    "system": "cellulose fiber filter",
    "id": 2204,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2204",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Fiber-direction alternation — cellulose fiber filter",
    "hypothesis": "For cellulose fiber filter, crossed fiber layers will reduce flow-channel persistence during loading.",
    "test": "Map local airflow and deposits in aligned and crossed arrangements.",
    "against": "Channel persistence does not decrease with crossed layers.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Fiber-direction alternation",
    "system": "cellulose fiber filter",
    "id": 2205,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2205",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pulsed face velocity — cellulose fiber filter",
    "hypothesis": "For cellulose fiber filter, low-amplitude flow pulsation will broaden deposited-particle size profiles through the depth.",
    "test": "Measure size-resolved layer deposits at equal air volume.",
    "against": "Depth profiles remain indistinguishable after mean velocity is matched.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Pulsed face velocity",
    "system": "cellulose fiber filter",
    "id": 2206,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2206",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Edge-seal compliance — cellulose fiber filter",
    "hypothesis": "For cellulose fiber filter, compliant seals will reduce apparent efficiency drift during humidity cycling by preserving bypass closure.",
    "test": "Measure bypass leakage separately from media penetration.",
    "against": "Efficiency drift is unrelated to measured seal leakage.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Edge-seal compliance",
    "system": "cellulose fiber filter",
    "id": 2207,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2207",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Electrostatic neutralization timing — cellulose fiber filter",
    "hypothesis": "For cellulose fiber filter, neutralizing incoming particles will reduce early efficiency more than late loaded-filter efficiency.",
    "test": "Measure charge and size-resolved capture through loading.",
    "against": "Neutralization effects do not vary with loading stage.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Electrostatic neutralization timing",
    "system": "cellulose fiber filter",
    "id": 2208,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2208",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Deposit patch spacing — cellulose fiber filter",
    "hypothesis": "For cellulose fiber filter, distributed small preloads will delay large open-channel formation compared with one preload patch.",
    "test": "Map airflow during subsequent uniform loading.",
    "against": "Open channels form equally soon after initial permeability is matched.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Deposit patch spacing",
    "system": "cellulose fiber filter",
    "id": 2209,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2209",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pressure-noise localization — cellulose fiber filter",
    "hypothesis": "For cellulose fiber filter, pressure fluctuation changes will identify local deposit collapse before average pressure drop falls.",
    "test": "Synchronize pressure and deposit imaging.",
    "against": "Noise offers no earlier collapse detection at matched false-alarm rate.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Pressure-noise localization",
    "system": "cellulose fiber filter",
    "id": 2210,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2210",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Loading-side alternation — glass-fiber filter",
    "hypothesis": "For glass-fiber filter, alternating the upstream face will distribute deposits more evenly but may increase particle re-entrainment.",
    "test": "Measure depth profiles, efficiency, and downstream bursts.",
    "against": "Deposit uniformity and re-entrainment remain unchanged.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Loading-side alternation",
    "system": "glass-fiber filter",
    "id": 2211,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2211",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Gentle vibration cleaning — glass-fiber filter",
    "hypothesis": "For glass-fiber filter, brief off-flow vibration will restore permeability with less downstream release than vibration during flow.",
    "test": "Measure recovered pressure drop and escaped particles.",
    "against": "Off-flow cleaning has no permeability-versus-release advantage.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Gentle vibration cleaning",
    "system": "glass-fiber filter",
    "id": 2212,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2212",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Humidity conditioning timing — glass-fiber filter",
    "hypothesis": "For glass-fiber filter, conditioning before dust loading will alter pressure-rise kinetics more than conditioning afterward.",
    "test": "Compare matched final humidity and deposited mass.",
    "against": "Pressure rise is independent of conditioning sequence.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Humidity conditioning timing",
    "system": "glass-fiber filter",
    "id": 2213,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2213",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Layer-spacing redistribution — glass-fiber filter",
    "hypothesis": "For glass-fiber filter, widening gaps downstream will reduce deposit bridging between layers.",
    "test": "Image deposits and pressure evolution at equal total thickness.",
    "against": "Bridging frequency is unchanged after loading distribution is measured.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Layer-spacing redistribution",
    "system": "glass-fiber filter",
    "id": 2214,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2214",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Fiber-direction alternation — glass-fiber filter",
    "hypothesis": "For glass-fiber filter, crossed fiber layers will reduce flow-channel persistence during loading.",
    "test": "Map local airflow and deposits in aligned and crossed arrangements.",
    "against": "Channel persistence does not decrease with crossed layers.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Fiber-direction alternation",
    "system": "glass-fiber filter",
    "id": 2215,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2215",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pulsed face velocity — glass-fiber filter",
    "hypothesis": "For glass-fiber filter, low-amplitude flow pulsation will broaden deposited-particle size profiles through the depth.",
    "test": "Measure size-resolved layer deposits at equal air volume.",
    "against": "Depth profiles remain indistinguishable after mean velocity is matched.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Pulsed face velocity",
    "system": "glass-fiber filter",
    "id": 2216,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2216",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Edge-seal compliance — glass-fiber filter",
    "hypothesis": "For glass-fiber filter, compliant seals will reduce apparent efficiency drift during humidity cycling by preserving bypass closure.",
    "test": "Measure bypass leakage separately from media penetration.",
    "against": "Efficiency drift is unrelated to measured seal leakage.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Edge-seal compliance",
    "system": "glass-fiber filter",
    "id": 2217,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2217",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Electrostatic neutralization timing — glass-fiber filter",
    "hypothesis": "For glass-fiber filter, neutralizing incoming particles will reduce early efficiency more than late loaded-filter efficiency.",
    "test": "Measure charge and size-resolved capture through loading.",
    "against": "Neutralization effects do not vary with loading stage.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Electrostatic neutralization timing",
    "system": "glass-fiber filter",
    "id": 2218,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2218",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Deposit patch spacing — glass-fiber filter",
    "hypothesis": "For glass-fiber filter, distributed small preloads will delay large open-channel formation compared with one preload patch.",
    "test": "Map airflow during subsequent uniform loading.",
    "against": "Open channels form equally soon after initial permeability is matched.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Deposit patch spacing",
    "system": "glass-fiber filter",
    "id": 2219,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2219",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pressure-noise localization — glass-fiber filter",
    "hypothesis": "For glass-fiber filter, pressure fluctuation changes will identify local deposit collapse before average pressure drop falls.",
    "test": "Synchronize pressure and deposit imaging.",
    "against": "Noise offers no earlier collapse detection at matched false-alarm rate.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Pressure-noise localization",
    "system": "glass-fiber filter",
    "id": 2220,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2220",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Loading-side alternation — polypropylene fiber filter",
    "hypothesis": "For polypropylene fiber filter, alternating the upstream face will distribute deposits more evenly but may increase particle re-entrainment.",
    "test": "Measure depth profiles, efficiency, and downstream bursts.",
    "against": "Deposit uniformity and re-entrainment remain unchanged.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Loading-side alternation",
    "system": "polypropylene fiber filter",
    "id": 2221,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2221",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Gentle vibration cleaning — polypropylene fiber filter",
    "hypothesis": "For polypropylene fiber filter, brief off-flow vibration will restore permeability with less downstream release than vibration during flow.",
    "test": "Measure recovered pressure drop and escaped particles.",
    "against": "Off-flow cleaning has no permeability-versus-release advantage.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Gentle vibration cleaning",
    "system": "polypropylene fiber filter",
    "id": 2222,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2222",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Humidity conditioning timing — polypropylene fiber filter",
    "hypothesis": "For polypropylene fiber filter, conditioning before dust loading will alter pressure-rise kinetics more than conditioning afterward.",
    "test": "Compare matched final humidity and deposited mass.",
    "against": "Pressure rise is independent of conditioning sequence.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Humidity conditioning timing",
    "system": "polypropylene fiber filter",
    "id": 2223,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2223",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Layer-spacing redistribution — polypropylene fiber filter",
    "hypothesis": "For polypropylene fiber filter, widening gaps downstream will reduce deposit bridging between layers.",
    "test": "Image deposits and pressure evolution at equal total thickness.",
    "against": "Bridging frequency is unchanged after loading distribution is measured.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Layer-spacing redistribution",
    "system": "polypropylene fiber filter",
    "id": 2224,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2224",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Fiber-direction alternation — polypropylene fiber filter",
    "hypothesis": "For polypropylene fiber filter, crossed fiber layers will reduce flow-channel persistence during loading.",
    "test": "Map local airflow and deposits in aligned and crossed arrangements.",
    "against": "Channel persistence does not decrease with crossed layers.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Fiber-direction alternation",
    "system": "polypropylene fiber filter",
    "id": 2225,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2225",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pulsed face velocity — polypropylene fiber filter",
    "hypothesis": "For polypropylene fiber filter, low-amplitude flow pulsation will broaden deposited-particle size profiles through the depth.",
    "test": "Measure size-resolved layer deposits at equal air volume.",
    "against": "Depth profiles remain indistinguishable after mean velocity is matched.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Pulsed face velocity",
    "system": "polypropylene fiber filter",
    "id": 2226,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2226",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Edge-seal compliance — polypropylene fiber filter",
    "hypothesis": "For polypropylene fiber filter, compliant seals will reduce apparent efficiency drift during humidity cycling by preserving bypass closure.",
    "test": "Measure bypass leakage separately from media penetration.",
    "against": "Efficiency drift is unrelated to measured seal leakage.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Edge-seal compliance",
    "system": "polypropylene fiber filter",
    "id": 2227,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2227",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Electrostatic neutralization timing — polypropylene fiber filter",
    "hypothesis": "For polypropylene fiber filter, neutralizing incoming particles will reduce early efficiency more than late loaded-filter efficiency.",
    "test": "Measure charge and size-resolved capture through loading.",
    "against": "Neutralization effects do not vary with loading stage.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Electrostatic neutralization timing",
    "system": "polypropylene fiber filter",
    "id": 2228,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2228",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Deposit patch spacing — polypropylene fiber filter",
    "hypothesis": "For polypropylene fiber filter, distributed small preloads will delay large open-channel formation compared with one preload patch.",
    "test": "Map airflow during subsequent uniform loading.",
    "against": "Open channels form equally soon after initial permeability is matched.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Deposit patch spacing",
    "system": "polypropylene fiber filter",
    "id": 2229,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2229",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pressure-noise localization — polypropylene fiber filter",
    "hypothesis": "For polypropylene fiber filter, pressure fluctuation changes will identify local deposit collapse before average pressure drop falls.",
    "test": "Synchronize pressure and deposit imaging.",
    "against": "Noise offers no earlier collapse detection at matched false-alarm rate.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Pressure-noise localization",
    "system": "polypropylene fiber filter",
    "id": 2230,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2230",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Loading-side alternation — polyester fiber filter",
    "hypothesis": "For polyester fiber filter, alternating the upstream face will distribute deposits more evenly but may increase particle re-entrainment.",
    "test": "Measure depth profiles, efficiency, and downstream bursts.",
    "against": "Deposit uniformity and re-entrainment remain unchanged.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Loading-side alternation",
    "system": "polyester fiber filter",
    "id": 2231,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2231",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Gentle vibration cleaning — polyester fiber filter",
    "hypothesis": "For polyester fiber filter, brief off-flow vibration will restore permeability with less downstream release than vibration during flow.",
    "test": "Measure recovered pressure drop and escaped particles.",
    "against": "Off-flow cleaning has no permeability-versus-release advantage.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Gentle vibration cleaning",
    "system": "polyester fiber filter",
    "id": 2232,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2232",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Humidity conditioning timing — polyester fiber filter",
    "hypothesis": "For polyester fiber filter, conditioning before dust loading will alter pressure-rise kinetics more than conditioning afterward.",
    "test": "Compare matched final humidity and deposited mass.",
    "against": "Pressure rise is independent of conditioning sequence.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Humidity conditioning timing",
    "system": "polyester fiber filter",
    "id": 2233,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2233",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Layer-spacing redistribution — polyester fiber filter",
    "hypothesis": "For polyester fiber filter, widening gaps downstream will reduce deposit bridging between layers.",
    "test": "Image deposits and pressure evolution at equal total thickness.",
    "against": "Bridging frequency is unchanged after loading distribution is measured.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Layer-spacing redistribution",
    "system": "polyester fiber filter",
    "id": 2234,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2234",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Fiber-direction alternation — polyester fiber filter",
    "hypothesis": "For polyester fiber filter, crossed fiber layers will reduce flow-channel persistence during loading.",
    "test": "Map local airflow and deposits in aligned and crossed arrangements.",
    "against": "Channel persistence does not decrease with crossed layers.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Fiber-direction alternation",
    "system": "polyester fiber filter",
    "id": 2235,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2235",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pulsed face velocity — polyester fiber filter",
    "hypothesis": "For polyester fiber filter, low-amplitude flow pulsation will broaden deposited-particle size profiles through the depth.",
    "test": "Measure size-resolved layer deposits at equal air volume.",
    "against": "Depth profiles remain indistinguishable after mean velocity is matched.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Pulsed face velocity",
    "system": "polyester fiber filter",
    "id": 2236,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2236",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Edge-seal compliance — polyester fiber filter",
    "hypothesis": "For polyester fiber filter, compliant seals will reduce apparent efficiency drift during humidity cycling by preserving bypass closure.",
    "test": "Measure bypass leakage separately from media penetration.",
    "against": "Efficiency drift is unrelated to measured seal leakage.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Edge-seal compliance",
    "system": "polyester fiber filter",
    "id": 2237,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2237",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Electrostatic neutralization timing — polyester fiber filter",
    "hypothesis": "For polyester fiber filter, neutralizing incoming particles will reduce early efficiency more than late loaded-filter efficiency.",
    "test": "Measure charge and size-resolved capture through loading.",
    "against": "Neutralization effects do not vary with loading stage.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Electrostatic neutralization timing",
    "system": "polyester fiber filter",
    "id": 2238,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2238",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Deposit patch spacing — polyester fiber filter",
    "hypothesis": "For polyester fiber filter, distributed small preloads will delay large open-channel formation compared with one preload patch.",
    "test": "Map airflow during subsequent uniform loading.",
    "against": "Open channels form equally soon after initial permeability is matched.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Deposit patch spacing",
    "system": "polyester fiber filter",
    "id": 2239,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2239",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pressure-noise localization — polyester fiber filter",
    "hypothesis": "For polyester fiber filter, pressure fluctuation changes will identify local deposit collapse before average pressure drop falls.",
    "test": "Synchronize pressure and deposit imaging.",
    "against": "Noise offers no earlier collapse detection at matched false-alarm rate.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Pressure-noise localization",
    "system": "polyester fiber filter",
    "id": 2240,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2240",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Loading-side alternation — nylon fiber filter",
    "hypothesis": "For nylon fiber filter, alternating the upstream face will distribute deposits more evenly but may increase particle re-entrainment.",
    "test": "Measure depth profiles, efficiency, and downstream bursts.",
    "against": "Deposit uniformity and re-entrainment remain unchanged.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Loading-side alternation",
    "system": "nylon fiber filter",
    "id": 2241,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2241",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Gentle vibration cleaning — nylon fiber filter",
    "hypothesis": "For nylon fiber filter, brief off-flow vibration will restore permeability with less downstream release than vibration during flow.",
    "test": "Measure recovered pressure drop and escaped particles.",
    "against": "Off-flow cleaning has no permeability-versus-release advantage.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Gentle vibration cleaning",
    "system": "nylon fiber filter",
    "id": 2242,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2242",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Humidity conditioning timing — nylon fiber filter",
    "hypothesis": "For nylon fiber filter, conditioning before dust loading will alter pressure-rise kinetics more than conditioning afterward.",
    "test": "Compare matched final humidity and deposited mass.",
    "against": "Pressure rise is independent of conditioning sequence.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Humidity conditioning timing",
    "system": "nylon fiber filter",
    "id": 2243,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2243",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Layer-spacing redistribution — nylon fiber filter",
    "hypothesis": "For nylon fiber filter, widening gaps downstream will reduce deposit bridging between layers.",
    "test": "Image deposits and pressure evolution at equal total thickness.",
    "against": "Bridging frequency is unchanged after loading distribution is measured.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Layer-spacing redistribution",
    "system": "nylon fiber filter",
    "id": 2244,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2244",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Fiber-direction alternation — nylon fiber filter",
    "hypothesis": "For nylon fiber filter, crossed fiber layers will reduce flow-channel persistence during loading.",
    "test": "Map local airflow and deposits in aligned and crossed arrangements.",
    "against": "Channel persistence does not decrease with crossed layers.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Fiber-direction alternation",
    "system": "nylon fiber filter",
    "id": 2245,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2245",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pulsed face velocity — nylon fiber filter",
    "hypothesis": "For nylon fiber filter, low-amplitude flow pulsation will broaden deposited-particle size profiles through the depth.",
    "test": "Measure size-resolved layer deposits at equal air volume.",
    "against": "Depth profiles remain indistinguishable after mean velocity is matched.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Pulsed face velocity",
    "system": "nylon fiber filter",
    "id": 2246,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2246",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Edge-seal compliance — nylon fiber filter",
    "hypothesis": "For nylon fiber filter, compliant seals will reduce apparent efficiency drift during humidity cycling by preserving bypass closure.",
    "test": "Measure bypass leakage separately from media penetration.",
    "against": "Efficiency drift is unrelated to measured seal leakage.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Edge-seal compliance",
    "system": "nylon fiber filter",
    "id": 2247,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2247",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Electrostatic neutralization timing — nylon fiber filter",
    "hypothesis": "For nylon fiber filter, neutralizing incoming particles will reduce early efficiency more than late loaded-filter efficiency.",
    "test": "Measure charge and size-resolved capture through loading.",
    "against": "Neutralization effects do not vary with loading stage.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Electrostatic neutralization timing",
    "system": "nylon fiber filter",
    "id": 2248,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2248",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Deposit patch spacing — nylon fiber filter",
    "hypothesis": "For nylon fiber filter, distributed small preloads will delay large open-channel formation compared with one preload patch.",
    "test": "Map airflow during subsequent uniform loading.",
    "against": "Open channels form equally soon after initial permeability is matched.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Deposit patch spacing",
    "system": "nylon fiber filter",
    "id": 2249,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2249",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pressure-noise localization — nylon fiber filter",
    "hypothesis": "For nylon fiber filter, pressure fluctuation changes will identify local deposit collapse before average pressure drop falls.",
    "test": "Synchronize pressure and deposit imaging.",
    "against": "Noise offers no earlier collapse detection at matched false-alarm rate.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Pressure-noise localization",
    "system": "nylon fiber filter",
    "id": 2250,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2250",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Loading-side alternation — wool-derived fiber filter",
    "hypothesis": "For wool-derived fiber filter, alternating the upstream face will distribute deposits more evenly but may increase particle re-entrainment.",
    "test": "Measure depth profiles, efficiency, and downstream bursts.",
    "against": "Deposit uniformity and re-entrainment remain unchanged.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Loading-side alternation",
    "system": "wool-derived fiber filter",
    "id": 2251,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2251",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Gentle vibration cleaning — wool-derived fiber filter",
    "hypothesis": "For wool-derived fiber filter, brief off-flow vibration will restore permeability with less downstream release than vibration during flow.",
    "test": "Measure recovered pressure drop and escaped particles.",
    "against": "Off-flow cleaning has no permeability-versus-release advantage.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Gentle vibration cleaning",
    "system": "wool-derived fiber filter",
    "id": 2252,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2252",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Humidity conditioning timing — wool-derived fiber filter",
    "hypothesis": "For wool-derived fiber filter, conditioning before dust loading will alter pressure-rise kinetics more than conditioning afterward.",
    "test": "Compare matched final humidity and deposited mass.",
    "against": "Pressure rise is independent of conditioning sequence.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Humidity conditioning timing",
    "system": "wool-derived fiber filter",
    "id": 2253,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2253",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Layer-spacing redistribution — wool-derived fiber filter",
    "hypothesis": "For wool-derived fiber filter, widening gaps downstream will reduce deposit bridging between layers.",
    "test": "Image deposits and pressure evolution at equal total thickness.",
    "against": "Bridging frequency is unchanged after loading distribution is measured.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Layer-spacing redistribution",
    "system": "wool-derived fiber filter",
    "id": 2254,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2254",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Fiber-direction alternation — wool-derived fiber filter",
    "hypothesis": "For wool-derived fiber filter, crossed fiber layers will reduce flow-channel persistence during loading.",
    "test": "Map local airflow and deposits in aligned and crossed arrangements.",
    "against": "Channel persistence does not decrease with crossed layers.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Fiber-direction alternation",
    "system": "wool-derived fiber filter",
    "id": 2255,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2255",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pulsed face velocity — wool-derived fiber filter",
    "hypothesis": "For wool-derived fiber filter, low-amplitude flow pulsation will broaden deposited-particle size profiles through the depth.",
    "test": "Measure size-resolved layer deposits at equal air volume.",
    "against": "Depth profiles remain indistinguishable after mean velocity is matched.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Pulsed face velocity",
    "system": "wool-derived fiber filter",
    "id": 2256,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2256",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Edge-seal compliance — wool-derived fiber filter",
    "hypothesis": "For wool-derived fiber filter, compliant seals will reduce apparent efficiency drift during humidity cycling by preserving bypass closure.",
    "test": "Measure bypass leakage separately from media penetration.",
    "against": "Efficiency drift is unrelated to measured seal leakage.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Edge-seal compliance",
    "system": "wool-derived fiber filter",
    "id": 2257,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2257",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Electrostatic neutralization timing — wool-derived fiber filter",
    "hypothesis": "For wool-derived fiber filter, neutralizing incoming particles will reduce early efficiency more than late loaded-filter efficiency.",
    "test": "Measure charge and size-resolved capture through loading.",
    "against": "Neutralization effects do not vary with loading stage.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Electrostatic neutralization timing",
    "system": "wool-derived fiber filter",
    "id": 2258,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2258",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Deposit patch spacing — wool-derived fiber filter",
    "hypothesis": "For wool-derived fiber filter, distributed small preloads will delay large open-channel formation compared with one preload patch.",
    "test": "Map airflow during subsequent uniform loading.",
    "against": "Open channels form equally soon after initial permeability is matched.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Deposit patch spacing",
    "system": "wool-derived fiber filter",
    "id": 2259,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2259",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pressure-noise localization — wool-derived fiber filter",
    "hypothesis": "For wool-derived fiber filter, pressure fluctuation changes will identify local deposit collapse before average pressure drop falls.",
    "test": "Synchronize pressure and deposit imaging.",
    "against": "Noise offers no earlier collapse detection at matched false-alarm rate.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Pressure-noise localization",
    "system": "wool-derived fiber filter",
    "id": 2260,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2260",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Loading-side alternation — silica-coated fiber filter",
    "hypothesis": "For silica-coated fiber filter, alternating the upstream face will distribute deposits more evenly but may increase particle re-entrainment.",
    "test": "Measure depth profiles, efficiency, and downstream bursts.",
    "against": "Deposit uniformity and re-entrainment remain unchanged.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Loading-side alternation",
    "system": "silica-coated fiber filter",
    "id": 2261,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2261",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Gentle vibration cleaning — silica-coated fiber filter",
    "hypothesis": "For silica-coated fiber filter, brief off-flow vibration will restore permeability with less downstream release than vibration during flow.",
    "test": "Measure recovered pressure drop and escaped particles.",
    "against": "Off-flow cleaning has no permeability-versus-release advantage.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Gentle vibration cleaning",
    "system": "silica-coated fiber filter",
    "id": 2262,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2262",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Humidity conditioning timing — silica-coated fiber filter",
    "hypothesis": "For silica-coated fiber filter, conditioning before dust loading will alter pressure-rise kinetics more than conditioning afterward.",
    "test": "Compare matched final humidity and deposited mass.",
    "against": "Pressure rise is independent of conditioning sequence.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Humidity conditioning timing",
    "system": "silica-coated fiber filter",
    "id": 2263,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2263",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Layer-spacing redistribution — silica-coated fiber filter",
    "hypothesis": "For silica-coated fiber filter, widening gaps downstream will reduce deposit bridging between layers.",
    "test": "Image deposits and pressure evolution at equal total thickness.",
    "against": "Bridging frequency is unchanged after loading distribution is measured.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Layer-spacing redistribution",
    "system": "silica-coated fiber filter",
    "id": 2264,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2264",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Fiber-direction alternation — silica-coated fiber filter",
    "hypothesis": "For silica-coated fiber filter, crossed fiber layers will reduce flow-channel persistence during loading.",
    "test": "Map local airflow and deposits in aligned and crossed arrangements.",
    "against": "Channel persistence does not decrease with crossed layers.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Fiber-direction alternation",
    "system": "silica-coated fiber filter",
    "id": 2265,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2265",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pulsed face velocity — silica-coated fiber filter",
    "hypothesis": "For silica-coated fiber filter, low-amplitude flow pulsation will broaden deposited-particle size profiles through the depth.",
    "test": "Measure size-resolved layer deposits at equal air volume.",
    "against": "Depth profiles remain indistinguishable after mean velocity is matched.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Pulsed face velocity",
    "system": "silica-coated fiber filter",
    "id": 2266,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2266",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Edge-seal compliance — silica-coated fiber filter",
    "hypothesis": "For silica-coated fiber filter, compliant seals will reduce apparent efficiency drift during humidity cycling by preserving bypass closure.",
    "test": "Measure bypass leakage separately from media penetration.",
    "against": "Efficiency drift is unrelated to measured seal leakage.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Edge-seal compliance",
    "system": "silica-coated fiber filter",
    "id": 2267,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2267",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Electrostatic neutralization timing — silica-coated fiber filter",
    "hypothesis": "For silica-coated fiber filter, neutralizing incoming particles will reduce early efficiency more than late loaded-filter efficiency.",
    "test": "Measure charge and size-resolved capture through loading.",
    "against": "Neutralization effects do not vary with loading stage.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Electrostatic neutralization timing",
    "system": "silica-coated fiber filter",
    "id": 2268,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2268",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Deposit patch spacing — silica-coated fiber filter",
    "hypothesis": "For silica-coated fiber filter, distributed small preloads will delay large open-channel formation compared with one preload patch.",
    "test": "Map airflow during subsequent uniform loading.",
    "against": "Open channels form equally soon after initial permeability is matched.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Deposit patch spacing",
    "system": "silica-coated fiber filter",
    "id": 2269,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2269",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pressure-noise localization — silica-coated fiber filter",
    "hypothesis": "For silica-coated fiber filter, pressure fluctuation changes will identify local deposit collapse before average pressure drop falls.",
    "test": "Synchronize pressure and deposit imaging.",
    "against": "Noise offers no earlier collapse detection at matched false-alarm rate.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Pressure-noise localization",
    "system": "silica-coated fiber filter",
    "id": 2270,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2270",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Loading-side alternation — porous ceramic air filter",
    "hypothesis": "For porous ceramic air filter, alternating the upstream face will distribute deposits more evenly but may increase particle re-entrainment.",
    "test": "Measure depth profiles, efficiency, and downstream bursts.",
    "against": "Deposit uniformity and re-entrainment remain unchanged.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Loading-side alternation",
    "system": "porous ceramic air filter",
    "id": 2271,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2271",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Gentle vibration cleaning — porous ceramic air filter",
    "hypothesis": "For porous ceramic air filter, brief off-flow vibration will restore permeability with less downstream release than vibration during flow.",
    "test": "Measure recovered pressure drop and escaped particles.",
    "against": "Off-flow cleaning has no permeability-versus-release advantage.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Gentle vibration cleaning",
    "system": "porous ceramic air filter",
    "id": 2272,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2272",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Humidity conditioning timing — porous ceramic air filter",
    "hypothesis": "For porous ceramic air filter, conditioning before dust loading will alter pressure-rise kinetics more than conditioning afterward.",
    "test": "Compare matched final humidity and deposited mass.",
    "against": "Pressure rise is independent of conditioning sequence.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Humidity conditioning timing",
    "system": "porous ceramic air filter",
    "id": 2273,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2273",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Layer-spacing redistribution — porous ceramic air filter",
    "hypothesis": "For porous ceramic air filter, widening gaps downstream will reduce deposit bridging between layers.",
    "test": "Image deposits and pressure evolution at equal total thickness.",
    "against": "Bridging frequency is unchanged after loading distribution is measured.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Layer-spacing redistribution",
    "system": "porous ceramic air filter",
    "id": 2274,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2274",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Fiber-direction alternation — porous ceramic air filter",
    "hypothesis": "For porous ceramic air filter, crossed fiber layers will reduce flow-channel persistence during loading.",
    "test": "Map local airflow and deposits in aligned and crossed arrangements.",
    "against": "Channel persistence does not decrease with crossed layers.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Fiber-direction alternation",
    "system": "porous ceramic air filter",
    "id": 2275,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2275",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pulsed face velocity — porous ceramic air filter",
    "hypothesis": "For porous ceramic air filter, low-amplitude flow pulsation will broaden deposited-particle size profiles through the depth.",
    "test": "Measure size-resolved layer deposits at equal air volume.",
    "against": "Depth profiles remain indistinguishable after mean velocity is matched.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Pulsed face velocity",
    "system": "porous ceramic air filter",
    "id": 2276,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2276",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Edge-seal compliance — porous ceramic air filter",
    "hypothesis": "For porous ceramic air filter, compliant seals will reduce apparent efficiency drift during humidity cycling by preserving bypass closure.",
    "test": "Measure bypass leakage separately from media penetration.",
    "against": "Efficiency drift is unrelated to measured seal leakage.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Edge-seal compliance",
    "system": "porous ceramic air filter",
    "id": 2277,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2277",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Electrostatic neutralization timing — porous ceramic air filter",
    "hypothesis": "For porous ceramic air filter, neutralizing incoming particles will reduce early efficiency more than late loaded-filter efficiency.",
    "test": "Measure charge and size-resolved capture through loading.",
    "against": "Neutralization effects do not vary with loading stage.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Electrostatic neutralization timing",
    "system": "porous ceramic air filter",
    "id": 2278,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2278",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Deposit patch spacing — porous ceramic air filter",
    "hypothesis": "For porous ceramic air filter, distributed small preloads will delay large open-channel formation compared with one preload patch.",
    "test": "Map airflow during subsequent uniform loading.",
    "against": "Open channels form equally soon after initial permeability is matched.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Deposit patch spacing",
    "system": "porous ceramic air filter",
    "id": 2279,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2279",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pressure-noise localization — porous ceramic air filter",
    "hypothesis": "For porous ceramic air filter, pressure fluctuation changes will identify local deposit collapse before average pressure drop falls.",
    "test": "Synchronize pressure and deposit imaging.",
    "against": "Noise offers no earlier collapse detection at matched false-alarm rate.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Pressure-noise localization",
    "system": "porous ceramic air filter",
    "id": 2280,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2280",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Loading-side alternation — open-cell polymer foam air filter",
    "hypothesis": "For open-cell polymer foam air filter, alternating the upstream face will distribute deposits more evenly but may increase particle re-entrainment.",
    "test": "Measure depth profiles, efficiency, and downstream bursts.",
    "against": "Deposit uniformity and re-entrainment remain unchanged.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Loading-side alternation",
    "system": "open-cell polymer foam air filter",
    "id": 2281,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2281",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Gentle vibration cleaning — open-cell polymer foam air filter",
    "hypothesis": "For open-cell polymer foam air filter, brief off-flow vibration will restore permeability with less downstream release than vibration during flow.",
    "test": "Measure recovered pressure drop and escaped particles.",
    "against": "Off-flow cleaning has no permeability-versus-release advantage.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Gentle vibration cleaning",
    "system": "open-cell polymer foam air filter",
    "id": 2282,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2282",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Humidity conditioning timing — open-cell polymer foam air filter",
    "hypothesis": "For open-cell polymer foam air filter, conditioning before dust loading will alter pressure-rise kinetics more than conditioning afterward.",
    "test": "Compare matched final humidity and deposited mass.",
    "against": "Pressure rise is independent of conditioning sequence.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Humidity conditioning timing",
    "system": "open-cell polymer foam air filter",
    "id": 2283,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2283",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Layer-spacing redistribution — open-cell polymer foam air filter",
    "hypothesis": "For open-cell polymer foam air filter, widening gaps downstream will reduce deposit bridging between layers.",
    "test": "Image deposits and pressure evolution at equal total thickness.",
    "against": "Bridging frequency is unchanged after loading distribution is measured.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Layer-spacing redistribution",
    "system": "open-cell polymer foam air filter",
    "id": 2284,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2284",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Fiber-direction alternation — open-cell polymer foam air filter",
    "hypothesis": "For open-cell polymer foam air filter, crossed fiber layers will reduce flow-channel persistence during loading.",
    "test": "Map local airflow and deposits in aligned and crossed arrangements.",
    "against": "Channel persistence does not decrease with crossed layers.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Fiber-direction alternation",
    "system": "open-cell polymer foam air filter",
    "id": 2285,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2285",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pulsed face velocity — open-cell polymer foam air filter",
    "hypothesis": "For open-cell polymer foam air filter, low-amplitude flow pulsation will broaden deposited-particle size profiles through the depth.",
    "test": "Measure size-resolved layer deposits at equal air volume.",
    "against": "Depth profiles remain indistinguishable after mean velocity is matched.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Pulsed face velocity",
    "system": "open-cell polymer foam air filter",
    "id": 2286,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2286",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Edge-seal compliance — open-cell polymer foam air filter",
    "hypothesis": "For open-cell polymer foam air filter, compliant seals will reduce apparent efficiency drift during humidity cycling by preserving bypass closure.",
    "test": "Measure bypass leakage separately from media penetration.",
    "against": "Efficiency drift is unrelated to measured seal leakage.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Edge-seal compliance",
    "system": "open-cell polymer foam air filter",
    "id": 2287,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2287",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Electrostatic neutralization timing — open-cell polymer foam air filter",
    "hypothesis": "For open-cell polymer foam air filter, neutralizing incoming particles will reduce early efficiency more than late loaded-filter efficiency.",
    "test": "Measure charge and size-resolved capture through loading.",
    "against": "Neutralization effects do not vary with loading stage.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Electrostatic neutralization timing",
    "system": "open-cell polymer foam air filter",
    "id": 2288,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2288",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Deposit patch spacing — open-cell polymer foam air filter",
    "hypothesis": "For open-cell polymer foam air filter, distributed small preloads will delay large open-channel formation compared with one preload patch.",
    "test": "Map airflow during subsequent uniform loading.",
    "against": "Open channels form equally soon after initial permeability is matched.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Deposit patch spacing",
    "system": "open-cell polymer foam air filter",
    "id": 2289,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2289",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pressure-noise localization — open-cell polymer foam air filter",
    "hypothesis": "For open-cell polymer foam air filter, pressure fluctuation changes will identify local deposit collapse before average pressure drop falls.",
    "test": "Synchronize pressure and deposit imaging.",
    "against": "Noise offers no earlier collapse detection at matched false-alarm rate.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Pressure-noise localization",
    "system": "open-cell polymer foam air filter",
    "id": 2290,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2290",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Loading-side alternation — stacked inert wire-mesh filter",
    "hypothesis": "For stacked inert wire-mesh filter, alternating the upstream face will distribute deposits more evenly but may increase particle re-entrainment.",
    "test": "Measure depth profiles, efficiency, and downstream bursts.",
    "against": "Deposit uniformity and re-entrainment remain unchanged.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Loading-side alternation",
    "system": "stacked inert wire-mesh filter",
    "id": 2291,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2291",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Gentle vibration cleaning — stacked inert wire-mesh filter",
    "hypothesis": "For stacked inert wire-mesh filter, brief off-flow vibration will restore permeability with less downstream release than vibration during flow.",
    "test": "Measure recovered pressure drop and escaped particles.",
    "against": "Off-flow cleaning has no permeability-versus-release advantage.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Gentle vibration cleaning",
    "system": "stacked inert wire-mesh filter",
    "id": 2292,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2292",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Humidity conditioning timing — stacked inert wire-mesh filter",
    "hypothesis": "For stacked inert wire-mesh filter, conditioning before dust loading will alter pressure-rise kinetics more than conditioning afterward.",
    "test": "Compare matched final humidity and deposited mass.",
    "against": "Pressure rise is independent of conditioning sequence.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Humidity conditioning timing",
    "system": "stacked inert wire-mesh filter",
    "id": 2293,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2293",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Layer-spacing redistribution — stacked inert wire-mesh filter",
    "hypothesis": "For stacked inert wire-mesh filter, widening gaps downstream will reduce deposit bridging between layers.",
    "test": "Image deposits and pressure evolution at equal total thickness.",
    "against": "Bridging frequency is unchanged after loading distribution is measured.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Layer-spacing redistribution",
    "system": "stacked inert wire-mesh filter",
    "id": 2294,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2294",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Fiber-direction alternation — stacked inert wire-mesh filter",
    "hypothesis": "For stacked inert wire-mesh filter, crossed fiber layers will reduce flow-channel persistence during loading.",
    "test": "Map local airflow and deposits in aligned and crossed arrangements.",
    "against": "Channel persistence does not decrease with crossed layers.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Fiber-direction alternation",
    "system": "stacked inert wire-mesh filter",
    "id": 2295,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2295",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pulsed face velocity — stacked inert wire-mesh filter",
    "hypothesis": "For stacked inert wire-mesh filter, low-amplitude flow pulsation will broaden deposited-particle size profiles through the depth.",
    "test": "Measure size-resolved layer deposits at equal air volume.",
    "against": "Depth profiles remain indistinguishable after mean velocity is matched.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Pulsed face velocity",
    "system": "stacked inert wire-mesh filter",
    "id": 2296,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2296",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Edge-seal compliance — stacked inert wire-mesh filter",
    "hypothesis": "For stacked inert wire-mesh filter, compliant seals will reduce apparent efficiency drift during humidity cycling by preserving bypass closure.",
    "test": "Measure bypass leakage separately from media penetration.",
    "against": "Efficiency drift is unrelated to measured seal leakage.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Edge-seal compliance",
    "system": "stacked inert wire-mesh filter",
    "id": 2297,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2297",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Electrostatic neutralization timing — stacked inert wire-mesh filter",
    "hypothesis": "For stacked inert wire-mesh filter, neutralizing incoming particles will reduce early efficiency more than late loaded-filter efficiency.",
    "test": "Measure charge and size-resolved capture through loading.",
    "against": "Neutralization effects do not vary with loading stage.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Electrostatic neutralization timing",
    "system": "stacked inert wire-mesh filter",
    "id": 2298,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2298",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Deposit patch spacing — stacked inert wire-mesh filter",
    "hypothesis": "For stacked inert wire-mesh filter, distributed small preloads will delay large open-channel formation compared with one preload patch.",
    "test": "Map airflow during subsequent uniform loading.",
    "against": "Open channels form equally soon after initial permeability is matched.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Deposit patch spacing",
    "system": "stacked inert wire-mesh filter",
    "id": 2299,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2299",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pressure-noise localization — stacked inert wire-mesh filter",
    "hypothesis": "For stacked inert wire-mesh filter, pressure fluctuation changes will identify local deposit collapse before average pressure drop falls.",
    "test": "Synchronize pressure and deposit imaging.",
    "against": "Noise offers no earlier collapse detection at matched false-alarm rate.",
    "category": "Inert particle aerosol filtration",
    "controls": "Use contained inert model aerosols; match particle-size distribution, face velocity, humidity, initial pressure drop, and independently measured loading.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Inert particle aerosol filtration: Pressure-noise localization",
    "system": "stacked inert wire-mesh filter",
    "id": 2300,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Contained calibrated aerosol generator and particle counter; appropriate research facilities.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2300",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Fiber crossover bonding — cotton fiber wick",
    "hypothesis": "For cotton fiber wick, bonding selected crossovers will reduce capillary-front wandering without strongly reducing uptake speed.",
    "test": "Measure fronts and conductance across bonding densities.",
    "against": "Wandering improves only alongside proportionate conductance loss.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Fiber crossover bonding",
    "system": "cotton fiber wick",
    "id": 2301,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2301",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Tapered branching supply — cotton fiber wick",
    "hypothesis": "For cotton fiber wick, gradually tapered branches will distribute liquid more evenly under unequal evaporation.",
    "test": "Map branch moisture and evaporation at equal inlet supply.",
    "against": "Supply uniformity is no better than constant-width branches.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Tapered branching supply",
    "system": "cotton fiber wick",
    "id": 2302,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2302",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Cyclic inlet immersion — cotton fiber wick",
    "hypothesis": "For cotton fiber wick, short immersion breaks will leave stronger uptake memory in compressed than uncompressed regions.",
    "test": "Measure local uptake and retained water after restart.",
    "against": "Memory is independent of compression after pore size is considered.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Cyclic inlet immersion",
    "system": "cotton fiber wick",
    "id": 2303,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2303",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Gravity orientation cycling — cotton fiber wick",
    "hypothesis": "For cotton fiber wick, slow orientation changes will reduce permanently dry regions near the supply limit.",
    "test": "Image wetness at matched evaporation and liquid head.",
    "against": "Dry-area reduction disappears after instantaneous head is modeled.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Gravity orientation cycling",
    "system": "cotton fiber wick",
    "id": 2304,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2304",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Nonwetting pin pattern — cotton fiber wick",
    "hypothesis": "For cotton fiber wick, sparse nonwetting pins will redirect fronts more predictably than continuous nonwetting stripes.",
    "test": "Measure front paths and repeatability at equal treated area.",
    "against": "Routing repeatability is not improved.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Nonwetting pin pattern",
    "system": "cotton fiber wick",
    "id": 2305,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2305",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Salt washout direction — cotton fiber wick",
    "hypothesis": "For cotton fiber wick, flushing opposite the normal supply direction will remove benign salt deposits more efficiently.",
    "test": "Measure residual salt and restored conductance at equal wash volume.",
    "against": "Salt removal and recovery are direction-independent.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Salt washout direction",
    "system": "cotton fiber wick",
    "id": 2306,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2306",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Compression release speed — cotton fiber wick",
    "hypothesis": "For cotton fiber wick, slow decompression will reduce trapped-air voids during rewetting.",
    "test": "Image gas and measure uptake after matched compression.",
    "against": "Gas fraction is unchanged after final thickness is matched.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Compression release speed",
    "system": "cotton fiber wick",
    "id": 2307,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2307",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Evaporation-edge curvature — cotton fiber wick",
    "hypothesis": "For cotton fiber wick, rounded evaporating edges will reduce local salt supersaturation compared with sharp edges.",
    "test": "Map salt concentration and crystal onset with benign salts.",
    "against": "Supersaturation depends only on local evaporation flux.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Evaporation-edge curvature",
    "system": "cotton fiber wick",
    "id": 2308,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2308",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Fiber finish removal — cotton fiber wick",
    "hypothesis": "For cotton fiber wick, mild verified finish removal will reduce uptake variability more than it changes mean uptake.",
    "test": "Measure surface chemistry and uptake across independent samples.",
    "against": "Variability and mean change proportionally or not at all.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Fiber finish removal",
    "system": "cotton fiber wick",
    "id": 2309,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2309",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Interlayer contact pressure — cotton fiber wick",
    "hypothesis": "For cotton fiber wick, intermediate contact pressure will maximize transfer between crossed wick layers.",
    "test": "Measure transfer while independently mapping contact area and pore collapse.",
    "against": "Transfer lacks an intermediate maximum.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Interlayer contact pressure",
    "system": "cotton fiber wick",
    "id": 2310,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2310",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Fiber crossover bonding — cellulose paper wick",
    "hypothesis": "For cellulose paper wick, bonding selected crossovers will reduce capillary-front wandering without strongly reducing uptake speed.",
    "test": "Measure fronts and conductance across bonding densities.",
    "against": "Wandering improves only alongside proportionate conductance loss.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Fiber crossover bonding",
    "system": "cellulose paper wick",
    "id": 2311,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2311",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Tapered branching supply — cellulose paper wick",
    "hypothesis": "For cellulose paper wick, gradually tapered branches will distribute liquid more evenly under unequal evaporation.",
    "test": "Map branch moisture and evaporation at equal inlet supply.",
    "against": "Supply uniformity is no better than constant-width branches.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Tapered branching supply",
    "system": "cellulose paper wick",
    "id": 2312,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2312",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Cyclic inlet immersion — cellulose paper wick",
    "hypothesis": "For cellulose paper wick, short immersion breaks will leave stronger uptake memory in compressed than uncompressed regions.",
    "test": "Measure local uptake and retained water after restart.",
    "against": "Memory is independent of compression after pore size is considered.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Cyclic inlet immersion",
    "system": "cellulose paper wick",
    "id": 2313,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2313",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Gravity orientation cycling — cellulose paper wick",
    "hypothesis": "For cellulose paper wick, slow orientation changes will reduce permanently dry regions near the supply limit.",
    "test": "Image wetness at matched evaporation and liquid head.",
    "against": "Dry-area reduction disappears after instantaneous head is modeled.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Gravity orientation cycling",
    "system": "cellulose paper wick",
    "id": 2314,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2314",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Nonwetting pin pattern — cellulose paper wick",
    "hypothesis": "For cellulose paper wick, sparse nonwetting pins will redirect fronts more predictably than continuous nonwetting stripes.",
    "test": "Measure front paths and repeatability at equal treated area.",
    "against": "Routing repeatability is not improved.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Nonwetting pin pattern",
    "system": "cellulose paper wick",
    "id": 2315,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2315",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Salt washout direction — cellulose paper wick",
    "hypothesis": "For cellulose paper wick, flushing opposite the normal supply direction will remove benign salt deposits more efficiently.",
    "test": "Measure residual salt and restored conductance at equal wash volume.",
    "against": "Salt removal and recovery are direction-independent.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Salt washout direction",
    "system": "cellulose paper wick",
    "id": 2316,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2316",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Compression release speed — cellulose paper wick",
    "hypothesis": "For cellulose paper wick, slow decompression will reduce trapped-air voids during rewetting.",
    "test": "Image gas and measure uptake after matched compression.",
    "against": "Gas fraction is unchanged after final thickness is matched.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Compression release speed",
    "system": "cellulose paper wick",
    "id": 2317,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2317",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Evaporation-edge curvature — cellulose paper wick",
    "hypothesis": "For cellulose paper wick, rounded evaporating edges will reduce local salt supersaturation compared with sharp edges.",
    "test": "Map salt concentration and crystal onset with benign salts.",
    "against": "Supersaturation depends only on local evaporation flux.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Evaporation-edge curvature",
    "system": "cellulose paper wick",
    "id": 2318,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2318",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Fiber finish removal — cellulose paper wick",
    "hypothesis": "For cellulose paper wick, mild verified finish removal will reduce uptake variability more than it changes mean uptake.",
    "test": "Measure surface chemistry and uptake across independent samples.",
    "against": "Variability and mean change proportionally or not at all.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Fiber finish removal",
    "system": "cellulose paper wick",
    "id": 2319,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2319",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Interlayer contact pressure — cellulose paper wick",
    "hypothesis": "For cellulose paper wick, intermediate contact pressure will maximize transfer between crossed wick layers.",
    "test": "Measure transfer while independently mapping contact area and pore collapse.",
    "against": "Transfer lacks an intermediate maximum.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Interlayer contact pressure",
    "system": "cellulose paper wick",
    "id": 2320,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 27,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2320",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Fiber crossover bonding — glass-fiber wick",
    "hypothesis": "For glass-fiber wick, bonding selected crossovers will reduce capillary-front wandering without strongly reducing uptake speed.",
    "test": "Measure fronts and conductance across bonding densities.",
    "against": "Wandering improves only alongside proportionate conductance loss.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Fiber crossover bonding",
    "system": "glass-fiber wick",
    "id": 2321,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2321",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Tapered branching supply — glass-fiber wick",
    "hypothesis": "For glass-fiber wick, gradually tapered branches will distribute liquid more evenly under unequal evaporation.",
    "test": "Map branch moisture and evaporation at equal inlet supply.",
    "against": "Supply uniformity is no better than constant-width branches.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Tapered branching supply",
    "system": "glass-fiber wick",
    "id": 2322,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2322",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Cyclic inlet immersion — glass-fiber wick",
    "hypothesis": "For glass-fiber wick, short immersion breaks will leave stronger uptake memory in compressed than uncompressed regions.",
    "test": "Measure local uptake and retained water after restart.",
    "against": "Memory is independent of compression after pore size is considered.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Cyclic inlet immersion",
    "system": "glass-fiber wick",
    "id": 2323,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2323",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Gravity orientation cycling — glass-fiber wick",
    "hypothesis": "For glass-fiber wick, slow orientation changes will reduce permanently dry regions near the supply limit.",
    "test": "Image wetness at matched evaporation and liquid head.",
    "against": "Dry-area reduction disappears after instantaneous head is modeled.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Gravity orientation cycling",
    "system": "glass-fiber wick",
    "id": 2324,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2324",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Nonwetting pin pattern — glass-fiber wick",
    "hypothesis": "For glass-fiber wick, sparse nonwetting pins will redirect fronts more predictably than continuous nonwetting stripes.",
    "test": "Measure front paths and repeatability at equal treated area.",
    "against": "Routing repeatability is not improved.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Nonwetting pin pattern",
    "system": "glass-fiber wick",
    "id": 2325,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2325",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Salt washout direction — glass-fiber wick",
    "hypothesis": "For glass-fiber wick, flushing opposite the normal supply direction will remove benign salt deposits more efficiently.",
    "test": "Measure residual salt and restored conductance at equal wash volume.",
    "against": "Salt removal and recovery are direction-independent.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Salt washout direction",
    "system": "glass-fiber wick",
    "id": 2326,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2326",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Compression release speed — glass-fiber wick",
    "hypothesis": "For glass-fiber wick, slow decompression will reduce trapped-air voids during rewetting.",
    "test": "Image gas and measure uptake after matched compression.",
    "against": "Gas fraction is unchanged after final thickness is matched.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Compression release speed",
    "system": "glass-fiber wick",
    "id": 2327,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2327",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Evaporation-edge curvature — glass-fiber wick",
    "hypothesis": "For glass-fiber wick, rounded evaporating edges will reduce local salt supersaturation compared with sharp edges.",
    "test": "Map salt concentration and crystal onset with benign salts.",
    "against": "Supersaturation depends only on local evaporation flux.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Evaporation-edge curvature",
    "system": "glass-fiber wick",
    "id": 2328,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2328",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Fiber finish removal — glass-fiber wick",
    "hypothesis": "For glass-fiber wick, mild verified finish removal will reduce uptake variability more than it changes mean uptake.",
    "test": "Measure surface chemistry and uptake across independent samples.",
    "against": "Variability and mean change proportionally or not at all.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Fiber finish removal",
    "system": "glass-fiber wick",
    "id": 2329,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2329",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Interlayer contact pressure — glass-fiber wick",
    "hypothesis": "For glass-fiber wick, intermediate contact pressure will maximize transfer between crossed wick layers.",
    "test": "Measure transfer while independently mapping contact area and pore collapse.",
    "against": "Transfer lacks an intermediate maximum.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Interlayer contact pressure",
    "system": "glass-fiber wick",
    "id": 2330,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2330",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Fiber crossover bonding — polyester fiber wick",
    "hypothesis": "For polyester fiber wick, bonding selected crossovers will reduce capillary-front wandering without strongly reducing uptake speed.",
    "test": "Measure fronts and conductance across bonding densities.",
    "against": "Wandering improves only alongside proportionate conductance loss.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Fiber crossover bonding",
    "system": "polyester fiber wick",
    "id": 2331,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2331",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Tapered branching supply — polyester fiber wick",
    "hypothesis": "For polyester fiber wick, gradually tapered branches will distribute liquid more evenly under unequal evaporation.",
    "test": "Map branch moisture and evaporation at equal inlet supply.",
    "against": "Supply uniformity is no better than constant-width branches.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Tapered branching supply",
    "system": "polyester fiber wick",
    "id": 2332,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2332",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Cyclic inlet immersion — polyester fiber wick",
    "hypothesis": "For polyester fiber wick, short immersion breaks will leave stronger uptake memory in compressed than uncompressed regions.",
    "test": "Measure local uptake and retained water after restart.",
    "against": "Memory is independent of compression after pore size is considered.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Cyclic inlet immersion",
    "system": "polyester fiber wick",
    "id": 2333,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2333",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Gravity orientation cycling — polyester fiber wick",
    "hypothesis": "For polyester fiber wick, slow orientation changes will reduce permanently dry regions near the supply limit.",
    "test": "Image wetness at matched evaporation and liquid head.",
    "against": "Dry-area reduction disappears after instantaneous head is modeled.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Gravity orientation cycling",
    "system": "polyester fiber wick",
    "id": 2334,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2334",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Nonwetting pin pattern — polyester fiber wick",
    "hypothesis": "For polyester fiber wick, sparse nonwetting pins will redirect fronts more predictably than continuous nonwetting stripes.",
    "test": "Measure front paths and repeatability at equal treated area.",
    "against": "Routing repeatability is not improved.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Nonwetting pin pattern",
    "system": "polyester fiber wick",
    "id": 2335,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2335",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Salt washout direction — polyester fiber wick",
    "hypothesis": "For polyester fiber wick, flushing opposite the normal supply direction will remove benign salt deposits more efficiently.",
    "test": "Measure residual salt and restored conductance at equal wash volume.",
    "against": "Salt removal and recovery are direction-independent.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Salt washout direction",
    "system": "polyester fiber wick",
    "id": 2336,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2336",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Compression release speed — polyester fiber wick",
    "hypothesis": "For polyester fiber wick, slow decompression will reduce trapped-air voids during rewetting.",
    "test": "Image gas and measure uptake after matched compression.",
    "against": "Gas fraction is unchanged after final thickness is matched.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Compression release speed",
    "system": "polyester fiber wick",
    "id": 2337,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2337",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Evaporation-edge curvature — polyester fiber wick",
    "hypothesis": "For polyester fiber wick, rounded evaporating edges will reduce local salt supersaturation compared with sharp edges.",
    "test": "Map salt concentration and crystal onset with benign salts.",
    "against": "Supersaturation depends only on local evaporation flux.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Evaporation-edge curvature",
    "system": "polyester fiber wick",
    "id": 2338,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2338",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Fiber finish removal — polyester fiber wick",
    "hypothesis": "For polyester fiber wick, mild verified finish removal will reduce uptake variability more than it changes mean uptake.",
    "test": "Measure surface chemistry and uptake across independent samples.",
    "against": "Variability and mean change proportionally or not at all.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Fiber finish removal",
    "system": "polyester fiber wick",
    "id": 2339,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2339",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Interlayer contact pressure — polyester fiber wick",
    "hypothesis": "For polyester fiber wick, intermediate contact pressure will maximize transfer between crossed wick layers.",
    "test": "Measure transfer while independently mapping contact area and pore collapse.",
    "against": "Transfer lacks an intermediate maximum.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Interlayer contact pressure",
    "system": "polyester fiber wick",
    "id": 2340,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2340",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Fiber crossover bonding — nylon fiber wick",
    "hypothesis": "For nylon fiber wick, bonding selected crossovers will reduce capillary-front wandering without strongly reducing uptake speed.",
    "test": "Measure fronts and conductance across bonding densities.",
    "against": "Wandering improves only alongside proportionate conductance loss.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Fiber crossover bonding",
    "system": "nylon fiber wick",
    "id": 2341,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2341",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Tapered branching supply — nylon fiber wick",
    "hypothesis": "For nylon fiber wick, gradually tapered branches will distribute liquid more evenly under unequal evaporation.",
    "test": "Map branch moisture and evaporation at equal inlet supply.",
    "against": "Supply uniformity is no better than constant-width branches.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Tapered branching supply",
    "system": "nylon fiber wick",
    "id": 2342,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2342",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Cyclic inlet immersion — nylon fiber wick",
    "hypothesis": "For nylon fiber wick, short immersion breaks will leave stronger uptake memory in compressed than uncompressed regions.",
    "test": "Measure local uptake and retained water after restart.",
    "against": "Memory is independent of compression after pore size is considered.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Cyclic inlet immersion",
    "system": "nylon fiber wick",
    "id": 2343,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2343",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Gravity orientation cycling — nylon fiber wick",
    "hypothesis": "For nylon fiber wick, slow orientation changes will reduce permanently dry regions near the supply limit.",
    "test": "Image wetness at matched evaporation and liquid head.",
    "against": "Dry-area reduction disappears after instantaneous head is modeled.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Gravity orientation cycling",
    "system": "nylon fiber wick",
    "id": 2344,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2344",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Nonwetting pin pattern — nylon fiber wick",
    "hypothesis": "For nylon fiber wick, sparse nonwetting pins will redirect fronts more predictably than continuous nonwetting stripes.",
    "test": "Measure front paths and repeatability at equal treated area.",
    "against": "Routing repeatability is not improved.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Nonwetting pin pattern",
    "system": "nylon fiber wick",
    "id": 2345,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2345",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Salt washout direction — nylon fiber wick",
    "hypothesis": "For nylon fiber wick, flushing opposite the normal supply direction will remove benign salt deposits more efficiently.",
    "test": "Measure residual salt and restored conductance at equal wash volume.",
    "against": "Salt removal and recovery are direction-independent.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Salt washout direction",
    "system": "nylon fiber wick",
    "id": 2346,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2346",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Compression release speed — nylon fiber wick",
    "hypothesis": "For nylon fiber wick, slow decompression will reduce trapped-air voids during rewetting.",
    "test": "Image gas and measure uptake after matched compression.",
    "against": "Gas fraction is unchanged after final thickness is matched.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Compression release speed",
    "system": "nylon fiber wick",
    "id": 2347,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2347",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Evaporation-edge curvature — nylon fiber wick",
    "hypothesis": "For nylon fiber wick, rounded evaporating edges will reduce local salt supersaturation compared with sharp edges.",
    "test": "Map salt concentration and crystal onset with benign salts.",
    "against": "Supersaturation depends only on local evaporation flux.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Evaporation-edge curvature",
    "system": "nylon fiber wick",
    "id": 2348,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2348",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Fiber finish removal — nylon fiber wick",
    "hypothesis": "For nylon fiber wick, mild verified finish removal will reduce uptake variability more than it changes mean uptake.",
    "test": "Measure surface chemistry and uptake across independent samples.",
    "against": "Variability and mean change proportionally or not at all.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Fiber finish removal",
    "system": "nylon fiber wick",
    "id": 2349,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2349",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Interlayer contact pressure — nylon fiber wick",
    "hypothesis": "For nylon fiber wick, intermediate contact pressure will maximize transfer between crossed wick layers.",
    "test": "Measure transfer while independently mapping contact area and pore collapse.",
    "against": "Transfer lacks an intermediate maximum.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Interlayer contact pressure",
    "system": "nylon fiber wick",
    "id": 2350,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2350",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Fiber crossover bonding — flax fiber wick",
    "hypothesis": "For flax fiber wick, bonding selected crossovers will reduce capillary-front wandering without strongly reducing uptake speed.",
    "test": "Measure fronts and conductance across bonding densities.",
    "against": "Wandering improves only alongside proportionate conductance loss.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Fiber crossover bonding",
    "system": "flax fiber wick",
    "id": 2351,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2351",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Tapered branching supply — flax fiber wick",
    "hypothesis": "For flax fiber wick, gradually tapered branches will distribute liquid more evenly under unequal evaporation.",
    "test": "Map branch moisture and evaporation at equal inlet supply.",
    "against": "Supply uniformity is no better than constant-width branches.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Tapered branching supply",
    "system": "flax fiber wick",
    "id": 2352,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2352",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Cyclic inlet immersion — flax fiber wick",
    "hypothesis": "For flax fiber wick, short immersion breaks will leave stronger uptake memory in compressed than uncompressed regions.",
    "test": "Measure local uptake and retained water after restart.",
    "against": "Memory is independent of compression after pore size is considered.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Cyclic inlet immersion",
    "system": "flax fiber wick",
    "id": 2353,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2353",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Gravity orientation cycling — flax fiber wick",
    "hypothesis": "For flax fiber wick, slow orientation changes will reduce permanently dry regions near the supply limit.",
    "test": "Image wetness at matched evaporation and liquid head.",
    "against": "Dry-area reduction disappears after instantaneous head is modeled.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Gravity orientation cycling",
    "system": "flax fiber wick",
    "id": 2354,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2354",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Nonwetting pin pattern — flax fiber wick",
    "hypothesis": "For flax fiber wick, sparse nonwetting pins will redirect fronts more predictably than continuous nonwetting stripes.",
    "test": "Measure front paths and repeatability at equal treated area.",
    "against": "Routing repeatability is not improved.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Nonwetting pin pattern",
    "system": "flax fiber wick",
    "id": 2355,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2355",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Salt washout direction — flax fiber wick",
    "hypothesis": "For flax fiber wick, flushing opposite the normal supply direction will remove benign salt deposits more efficiently.",
    "test": "Measure residual salt and restored conductance at equal wash volume.",
    "against": "Salt removal and recovery are direction-independent.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Salt washout direction",
    "system": "flax fiber wick",
    "id": 2356,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2356",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Compression release speed — flax fiber wick",
    "hypothesis": "For flax fiber wick, slow decompression will reduce trapped-air voids during rewetting.",
    "test": "Image gas and measure uptake after matched compression.",
    "against": "Gas fraction is unchanged after final thickness is matched.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Compression release speed",
    "system": "flax fiber wick",
    "id": 2357,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2357",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Evaporation-edge curvature — flax fiber wick",
    "hypothesis": "For flax fiber wick, rounded evaporating edges will reduce local salt supersaturation compared with sharp edges.",
    "test": "Map salt concentration and crystal onset with benign salts.",
    "against": "Supersaturation depends only on local evaporation flux.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Evaporation-edge curvature",
    "system": "flax fiber wick",
    "id": 2358,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2358",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Fiber finish removal — flax fiber wick",
    "hypothesis": "For flax fiber wick, mild verified finish removal will reduce uptake variability more than it changes mean uptake.",
    "test": "Measure surface chemistry and uptake across independent samples.",
    "against": "Variability and mean change proportionally or not at all.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Fiber finish removal",
    "system": "flax fiber wick",
    "id": 2359,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2359",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Interlayer contact pressure — flax fiber wick",
    "hypothesis": "For flax fiber wick, intermediate contact pressure will maximize transfer between crossed wick layers.",
    "test": "Measure transfer while independently mapping contact area and pore collapse.",
    "against": "Transfer lacks an intermediate maximum.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Interlayer contact pressure",
    "system": "flax fiber wick",
    "id": 2360,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2360",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Fiber crossover bonding — hemp fiber wick",
    "hypothesis": "For hemp fiber wick, bonding selected crossovers will reduce capillary-front wandering without strongly reducing uptake speed.",
    "test": "Measure fronts and conductance across bonding densities.",
    "against": "Wandering improves only alongside proportionate conductance loss.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Fiber crossover bonding",
    "system": "hemp fiber wick",
    "id": 2361,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2361",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Tapered branching supply — hemp fiber wick",
    "hypothesis": "For hemp fiber wick, gradually tapered branches will distribute liquid more evenly under unequal evaporation.",
    "test": "Map branch moisture and evaporation at equal inlet supply.",
    "against": "Supply uniformity is no better than constant-width branches.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Tapered branching supply",
    "system": "hemp fiber wick",
    "id": 2362,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2362",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Cyclic inlet immersion — hemp fiber wick",
    "hypothesis": "For hemp fiber wick, short immersion breaks will leave stronger uptake memory in compressed than uncompressed regions.",
    "test": "Measure local uptake and retained water after restart.",
    "against": "Memory is independent of compression after pore size is considered.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Cyclic inlet immersion",
    "system": "hemp fiber wick",
    "id": 2363,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2363",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Gravity orientation cycling — hemp fiber wick",
    "hypothesis": "For hemp fiber wick, slow orientation changes will reduce permanently dry regions near the supply limit.",
    "test": "Image wetness at matched evaporation and liquid head.",
    "against": "Dry-area reduction disappears after instantaneous head is modeled.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Gravity orientation cycling",
    "system": "hemp fiber wick",
    "id": 2364,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2364",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Nonwetting pin pattern — hemp fiber wick",
    "hypothesis": "For hemp fiber wick, sparse nonwetting pins will redirect fronts more predictably than continuous nonwetting stripes.",
    "test": "Measure front paths and repeatability at equal treated area.",
    "against": "Routing repeatability is not improved.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Nonwetting pin pattern",
    "system": "hemp fiber wick",
    "id": 2365,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2365",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Salt washout direction — hemp fiber wick",
    "hypothesis": "For hemp fiber wick, flushing opposite the normal supply direction will remove benign salt deposits more efficiently.",
    "test": "Measure residual salt and restored conductance at equal wash volume.",
    "against": "Salt removal and recovery are direction-independent.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Salt washout direction",
    "system": "hemp fiber wick",
    "id": 2366,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2366",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Compression release speed — hemp fiber wick",
    "hypothesis": "For hemp fiber wick, slow decompression will reduce trapped-air voids during rewetting.",
    "test": "Image gas and measure uptake after matched compression.",
    "against": "Gas fraction is unchanged after final thickness is matched.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Compression release speed",
    "system": "hemp fiber wick",
    "id": 2367,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2367",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Evaporation-edge curvature — hemp fiber wick",
    "hypothesis": "For hemp fiber wick, rounded evaporating edges will reduce local salt supersaturation compared with sharp edges.",
    "test": "Map salt concentration and crystal onset with benign salts.",
    "against": "Supersaturation depends only on local evaporation flux.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Evaporation-edge curvature",
    "system": "hemp fiber wick",
    "id": 2368,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2368",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Fiber finish removal — hemp fiber wick",
    "hypothesis": "For hemp fiber wick, mild verified finish removal will reduce uptake variability more than it changes mean uptake.",
    "test": "Measure surface chemistry and uptake across independent samples.",
    "against": "Variability and mean change proportionally or not at all.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Fiber finish removal",
    "system": "hemp fiber wick",
    "id": 2369,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2369",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Interlayer contact pressure — hemp fiber wick",
    "hypothesis": "For hemp fiber wick, intermediate contact pressure will maximize transfer between crossed wick layers.",
    "test": "Measure transfer while independently mapping contact area and pore collapse.",
    "against": "Transfer lacks an intermediate maximum.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Interlayer contact pressure",
    "system": "hemp fiber wick",
    "id": 2370,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2370",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Fiber crossover bonding — bamboo-derived fiber wick",
    "hypothesis": "For bamboo-derived fiber wick, bonding selected crossovers will reduce capillary-front wandering without strongly reducing uptake speed.",
    "test": "Measure fronts and conductance across bonding densities.",
    "against": "Wandering improves only alongside proportionate conductance loss.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Fiber crossover bonding",
    "system": "bamboo-derived fiber wick",
    "id": 2371,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2371",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Tapered branching supply — bamboo-derived fiber wick",
    "hypothesis": "For bamboo-derived fiber wick, gradually tapered branches will distribute liquid more evenly under unequal evaporation.",
    "test": "Map branch moisture and evaporation at equal inlet supply.",
    "against": "Supply uniformity is no better than constant-width branches.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Tapered branching supply",
    "system": "bamboo-derived fiber wick",
    "id": 2372,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2372",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Cyclic inlet immersion — bamboo-derived fiber wick",
    "hypothesis": "For bamboo-derived fiber wick, short immersion breaks will leave stronger uptake memory in compressed than uncompressed regions.",
    "test": "Measure local uptake and retained water after restart.",
    "against": "Memory is independent of compression after pore size is considered.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Cyclic inlet immersion",
    "system": "bamboo-derived fiber wick",
    "id": 2373,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2373",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Gravity orientation cycling — bamboo-derived fiber wick",
    "hypothesis": "For bamboo-derived fiber wick, slow orientation changes will reduce permanently dry regions near the supply limit.",
    "test": "Image wetness at matched evaporation and liquid head.",
    "against": "Dry-area reduction disappears after instantaneous head is modeled.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Gravity orientation cycling",
    "system": "bamboo-derived fiber wick",
    "id": 2374,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2374",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Nonwetting pin pattern — bamboo-derived fiber wick",
    "hypothesis": "For bamboo-derived fiber wick, sparse nonwetting pins will redirect fronts more predictably than continuous nonwetting stripes.",
    "test": "Measure front paths and repeatability at equal treated area.",
    "against": "Routing repeatability is not improved.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Nonwetting pin pattern",
    "system": "bamboo-derived fiber wick",
    "id": 2375,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2375",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Salt washout direction — bamboo-derived fiber wick",
    "hypothesis": "For bamboo-derived fiber wick, flushing opposite the normal supply direction will remove benign salt deposits more efficiently.",
    "test": "Measure residual salt and restored conductance at equal wash volume.",
    "against": "Salt removal and recovery are direction-independent.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Salt washout direction",
    "system": "bamboo-derived fiber wick",
    "id": 2376,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2376",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Compression release speed — bamboo-derived fiber wick",
    "hypothesis": "For bamboo-derived fiber wick, slow decompression will reduce trapped-air voids during rewetting.",
    "test": "Image gas and measure uptake after matched compression.",
    "against": "Gas fraction is unchanged after final thickness is matched.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Compression release speed",
    "system": "bamboo-derived fiber wick",
    "id": 2377,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2377",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Evaporation-edge curvature — bamboo-derived fiber wick",
    "hypothesis": "For bamboo-derived fiber wick, rounded evaporating edges will reduce local salt supersaturation compared with sharp edges.",
    "test": "Map salt concentration and crystal onset with benign salts.",
    "against": "Supersaturation depends only on local evaporation flux.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Evaporation-edge curvature",
    "system": "bamboo-derived fiber wick",
    "id": 2378,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2378",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Fiber finish removal — bamboo-derived fiber wick",
    "hypothesis": "For bamboo-derived fiber wick, mild verified finish removal will reduce uptake variability more than it changes mean uptake.",
    "test": "Measure surface chemistry and uptake across independent samples.",
    "against": "Variability and mean change proportionally or not at all.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Fiber finish removal",
    "system": "bamboo-derived fiber wick",
    "id": 2379,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2379",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Interlayer contact pressure — bamboo-derived fiber wick",
    "hypothesis": "For bamboo-derived fiber wick, intermediate contact pressure will maximize transfer between crossed wick layers.",
    "test": "Measure transfer while independently mapping contact area and pore collapse.",
    "against": "Transfer lacks an intermediate maximum.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Interlayer contact pressure",
    "system": "bamboo-derived fiber wick",
    "id": 2380,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2380",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Fiber crossover bonding — viscose fiber wick",
    "hypothesis": "For viscose fiber wick, bonding selected crossovers will reduce capillary-front wandering without strongly reducing uptake speed.",
    "test": "Measure fronts and conductance across bonding densities.",
    "against": "Wandering improves only alongside proportionate conductance loss.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Fiber crossover bonding",
    "system": "viscose fiber wick",
    "id": 2381,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2381",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Tapered branching supply — viscose fiber wick",
    "hypothesis": "For viscose fiber wick, gradually tapered branches will distribute liquid more evenly under unequal evaporation.",
    "test": "Map branch moisture and evaporation at equal inlet supply.",
    "against": "Supply uniformity is no better than constant-width branches.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Tapered branching supply",
    "system": "viscose fiber wick",
    "id": 2382,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2382",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Cyclic inlet immersion — viscose fiber wick",
    "hypothesis": "For viscose fiber wick, short immersion breaks will leave stronger uptake memory in compressed than uncompressed regions.",
    "test": "Measure local uptake and retained water after restart.",
    "against": "Memory is independent of compression after pore size is considered.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Cyclic inlet immersion",
    "system": "viscose fiber wick",
    "id": 2383,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2383",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Gravity orientation cycling — viscose fiber wick",
    "hypothesis": "For viscose fiber wick, slow orientation changes will reduce permanently dry regions near the supply limit.",
    "test": "Image wetness at matched evaporation and liquid head.",
    "against": "Dry-area reduction disappears after instantaneous head is modeled.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Gravity orientation cycling",
    "system": "viscose fiber wick",
    "id": 2384,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2384",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Nonwetting pin pattern — viscose fiber wick",
    "hypothesis": "For viscose fiber wick, sparse nonwetting pins will redirect fronts more predictably than continuous nonwetting stripes.",
    "test": "Measure front paths and repeatability at equal treated area.",
    "against": "Routing repeatability is not improved.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Nonwetting pin pattern",
    "system": "viscose fiber wick",
    "id": 2385,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2385",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Salt washout direction — viscose fiber wick",
    "hypothesis": "For viscose fiber wick, flushing opposite the normal supply direction will remove benign salt deposits more efficiently.",
    "test": "Measure residual salt and restored conductance at equal wash volume.",
    "against": "Salt removal and recovery are direction-independent.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Salt washout direction",
    "system": "viscose fiber wick",
    "id": 2386,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2386",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Compression release speed — viscose fiber wick",
    "hypothesis": "For viscose fiber wick, slow decompression will reduce trapped-air voids during rewetting.",
    "test": "Image gas and measure uptake after matched compression.",
    "against": "Gas fraction is unchanged after final thickness is matched.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Compression release speed",
    "system": "viscose fiber wick",
    "id": 2387,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2387",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Evaporation-edge curvature — viscose fiber wick",
    "hypothesis": "For viscose fiber wick, rounded evaporating edges will reduce local salt supersaturation compared with sharp edges.",
    "test": "Map salt concentration and crystal onset with benign salts.",
    "against": "Supersaturation depends only on local evaporation flux.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Evaporation-edge curvature",
    "system": "viscose fiber wick",
    "id": 2388,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2388",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Fiber finish removal — viscose fiber wick",
    "hypothesis": "For viscose fiber wick, mild verified finish removal will reduce uptake variability more than it changes mean uptake.",
    "test": "Measure surface chemistry and uptake across independent samples.",
    "against": "Variability and mean change proportionally or not at all.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Fiber finish removal",
    "system": "viscose fiber wick",
    "id": 2389,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2389",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Interlayer contact pressure — viscose fiber wick",
    "hypothesis": "For viscose fiber wick, intermediate contact pressure will maximize transfer between crossed wick layers.",
    "test": "Measure transfer while independently mapping contact area and pore collapse.",
    "against": "Transfer lacks an intermediate maximum.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Interlayer contact pressure",
    "system": "viscose fiber wick",
    "id": 2390,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2390",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Fiber crossover bonding — porous ceramic-fiber wick",
    "hypothesis": "For porous ceramic-fiber wick, bonding selected crossovers will reduce capillary-front wandering without strongly reducing uptake speed.",
    "test": "Measure fronts and conductance across bonding densities.",
    "against": "Wandering improves only alongside proportionate conductance loss.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Fiber crossover bonding",
    "system": "porous ceramic-fiber wick",
    "id": 2391,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2391",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Tapered branching supply — porous ceramic-fiber wick",
    "hypothesis": "For porous ceramic-fiber wick, gradually tapered branches will distribute liquid more evenly under unequal evaporation.",
    "test": "Map branch moisture and evaporation at equal inlet supply.",
    "against": "Supply uniformity is no better than constant-width branches.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Tapered branching supply",
    "system": "porous ceramic-fiber wick",
    "id": 2392,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2392",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Cyclic inlet immersion — porous ceramic-fiber wick",
    "hypothesis": "For porous ceramic-fiber wick, short immersion breaks will leave stronger uptake memory in compressed than uncompressed regions.",
    "test": "Measure local uptake and retained water after restart.",
    "against": "Memory is independent of compression after pore size is considered.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Cyclic inlet immersion",
    "system": "porous ceramic-fiber wick",
    "id": 2393,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2393",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Gravity orientation cycling — porous ceramic-fiber wick",
    "hypothesis": "For porous ceramic-fiber wick, slow orientation changes will reduce permanently dry regions near the supply limit.",
    "test": "Image wetness at matched evaporation and liquid head.",
    "against": "Dry-area reduction disappears after instantaneous head is modeled.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Gravity orientation cycling",
    "system": "porous ceramic-fiber wick",
    "id": 2394,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2394",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Nonwetting pin pattern — porous ceramic-fiber wick",
    "hypothesis": "For porous ceramic-fiber wick, sparse nonwetting pins will redirect fronts more predictably than continuous nonwetting stripes.",
    "test": "Measure front paths and repeatability at equal treated area.",
    "against": "Routing repeatability is not improved.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Nonwetting pin pattern",
    "system": "porous ceramic-fiber wick",
    "id": 2395,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2395",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Salt washout direction — porous ceramic-fiber wick",
    "hypothesis": "For porous ceramic-fiber wick, flushing opposite the normal supply direction will remove benign salt deposits more efficiently.",
    "test": "Measure residual salt and restored conductance at equal wash volume.",
    "against": "Salt removal and recovery are direction-independent.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Salt washout direction",
    "system": "porous ceramic-fiber wick",
    "id": 2396,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2396",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Compression release speed — porous ceramic-fiber wick",
    "hypothesis": "For porous ceramic-fiber wick, slow decompression will reduce trapped-air voids during rewetting.",
    "test": "Image gas and measure uptake after matched compression.",
    "against": "Gas fraction is unchanged after final thickness is matched.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Compression release speed",
    "system": "porous ceramic-fiber wick",
    "id": 2397,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2397",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Evaporation-edge curvature — porous ceramic-fiber wick",
    "hypothesis": "For porous ceramic-fiber wick, rounded evaporating edges will reduce local salt supersaturation compared with sharp edges.",
    "test": "Map salt concentration and crystal onset with benign salts.",
    "against": "Supersaturation depends only on local evaporation flux.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Evaporation-edge curvature",
    "system": "porous ceramic-fiber wick",
    "id": 2398,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2398",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Fiber finish removal — porous ceramic-fiber wick",
    "hypothesis": "For porous ceramic-fiber wick, mild verified finish removal will reduce uptake variability more than it changes mean uptake.",
    "test": "Measure surface chemistry and uptake across independent samples.",
    "against": "Variability and mean change proportionally or not at all.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Fiber finish removal",
    "system": "porous ceramic-fiber wick",
    "id": 2399,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2399",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Interlayer contact pressure — porous ceramic-fiber wick",
    "hypothesis": "For porous ceramic-fiber wick, intermediate contact pressure will maximize transfer between crossed wick layers.",
    "test": "Measure transfer while independently mapping contact area and pore collapse.",
    "against": "Transfer lacks an intermediate maximum.",
    "category": "Fibrous liquid wicks",
    "controls": "Use a compatible nonreactive liquid; match fiber mass, dimensions, initial moisture, contact angle, temperature, and measured pore distribution.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Fibrous liquid wicks: Interlayer contact pressure",
    "system": "porous ceramic-fiber wick",
    "id": 2400,
    "access_score": 4,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 29,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Compatible wicks and liquid, balance, calibrated imaging, and controlled evaporation.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2400",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Flow startup curvature — rounded quartz sand bed",
    "hypothesis": "For rounded quartz sand bed, a smoothly accelerating flow will erode less mass than an abrupt start at equal peak shear and work.",
    "test": "Measure effluent solids and near-bed velocities.",
    "against": "Startup shape has no independent erosion effect.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Flow startup curvature",
    "system": "rounded quartz sand bed",
    "id": 2401,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2401",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Rest consolidation timing — rounded quartz sand bed",
    "hypothesis": "For rounded quartz sand bed, several short rests will strengthen the bed less than one equal-duration rest.",
    "test": "Measure erosion threshold and bed density after matched histories.",
    "against": "Threshold depends only on total rest time.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Rest consolidation timing",
    "system": "rounded quartz sand bed",
    "id": 2402,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2402",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Small obstacle alignment — rounded quartz sand bed",
    "hypothesis": "For rounded quartz sand bed, staggered low obstacles will reduce connected erosion channels compared with aligned obstacles.",
    "test": "Map bed topography and channel connectivity.",
    "against": "Connected channels are no less frequent after mean shear is matched.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Small obstacle alignment",
    "system": "rounded quartz sand bed",
    "id": 2403,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2403",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Surface grain substitution — rounded quartz sand bed",
    "hypothesis": "For rounded quartz sand bed, sparse larger surface grains will stabilize a disproportionate area around them.",
    "test": "Track erosion maps while varying larger-grain spacing.",
    "against": "Stabilized area is proportional only to covered area.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Surface grain substitution",
    "system": "rounded quartz sand bed",
    "id": 2404,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2404",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Water-level oscillation — rounded quartz sand bed",
    "hypothesis": "For rounded quartz sand bed, water-level oscillations without mean flow will weaken later erosion resistance.",
    "test": "Measure bed structure and later erosion thresholds.",
    "against": "Resistance is unchanged after saturation and packing are matched.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Water-level oscillation",
    "system": "rounded quartz sand bed",
    "id": 2405,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2405",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Deposition interval ordering — rounded quartz sand bed",
    "hypothesis": "For rounded quartz sand bed, alternating dilute and concentrated deposition pulses will yield different permeability than steady deposition at equal solids mass.",
    "test": "Measure deposited structure and permeability.",
    "against": "Permeability follows final density alone.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Deposition interval ordering",
    "system": "rounded quartz sand bed",
    "id": 2406,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2406",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Sidewall friction asymmetry — rounded quartz sand bed",
    "hypothesis": "For rounded quartz sand bed, unequal sidewall friction will bias the first erosion channel toward one side.",
    "test": "Reverse wall treatments and map channel onset.",
    "against": "Bias does not reverse with wall friction.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Sidewall friction asymmetry",
    "system": "rounded quartz sand bed",
    "id": 2407,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2407",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Drainage-before-flow — rounded quartz sand bed",
    "hypothesis": "For rounded quartz sand bed, brief drainage before reflooding will increase first-flush sediment loss.",
    "test": "Measure cracks, pore pressure, and initial effluent mass.",
    "against": "First-flush loss is unchanged after initial saturation is included.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Drainage-before-flow",
    "system": "rounded quartz sand bed",
    "id": 2408,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2408",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Oscillation phase and bed slope — rounded quartz sand bed",
    "hypothesis": "For rounded quartz sand bed, reversing oscillatory flow at slope-favored phases will increase net downslope transport.",
    "test": "Track particles under phase-controlled bed motion and flow.",
    "against": "Transport depends only on mean forcing without a phase effect.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Oscillation phase and bed slope",
    "system": "rounded quartz sand bed",
    "id": 2409,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2409",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Acoustic erosion warning — rounded quartz sand bed",
    "hypothesis": "For rounded quartz sand bed, acoustic scattering will reveal surface rearrangement before measurable bulk sediment release.",
    "test": "Record scattering, bed images, and effluent solids.",
    "against": "Scattering provides no advance warning on held-out runs.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Acoustic erosion warning",
    "system": "rounded quartz sand bed",
    "id": 2410,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2410",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Flow startup curvature — angular quartz sand bed",
    "hypothesis": "For angular quartz sand bed, a smoothly accelerating flow will erode less mass than an abrupt start at equal peak shear and work.",
    "test": "Measure effluent solids and near-bed velocities.",
    "against": "Startup shape has no independent erosion effect.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Flow startup curvature",
    "system": "angular quartz sand bed",
    "id": 2411,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2411",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Rest consolidation timing — angular quartz sand bed",
    "hypothesis": "For angular quartz sand bed, several short rests will strengthen the bed less than one equal-duration rest.",
    "test": "Measure erosion threshold and bed density after matched histories.",
    "against": "Threshold depends only on total rest time.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Rest consolidation timing",
    "system": "angular quartz sand bed",
    "id": 2412,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2412",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Small obstacle alignment — angular quartz sand bed",
    "hypothesis": "For angular quartz sand bed, staggered low obstacles will reduce connected erosion channels compared with aligned obstacles.",
    "test": "Map bed topography and channel connectivity.",
    "against": "Connected channels are no less frequent after mean shear is matched.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Small obstacle alignment",
    "system": "angular quartz sand bed",
    "id": 2413,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2413",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Surface grain substitution — angular quartz sand bed",
    "hypothesis": "For angular quartz sand bed, sparse larger surface grains will stabilize a disproportionate area around them.",
    "test": "Track erosion maps while varying larger-grain spacing.",
    "against": "Stabilized area is proportional only to covered area.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Surface grain substitution",
    "system": "angular quartz sand bed",
    "id": 2414,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2414",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Water-level oscillation — angular quartz sand bed",
    "hypothesis": "For angular quartz sand bed, water-level oscillations without mean flow will weaken later erosion resistance.",
    "test": "Measure bed structure and later erosion thresholds.",
    "against": "Resistance is unchanged after saturation and packing are matched.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Water-level oscillation",
    "system": "angular quartz sand bed",
    "id": 2415,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2415",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Deposition interval ordering — angular quartz sand bed",
    "hypothesis": "For angular quartz sand bed, alternating dilute and concentrated deposition pulses will yield different permeability than steady deposition at equal solids mass.",
    "test": "Measure deposited structure and permeability.",
    "against": "Permeability follows final density alone.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Deposition interval ordering",
    "system": "angular quartz sand bed",
    "id": 2416,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2416",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Sidewall friction asymmetry — angular quartz sand bed",
    "hypothesis": "For angular quartz sand bed, unequal sidewall friction will bias the first erosion channel toward one side.",
    "test": "Reverse wall treatments and map channel onset.",
    "against": "Bias does not reverse with wall friction.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Sidewall friction asymmetry",
    "system": "angular quartz sand bed",
    "id": 2417,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2417",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Drainage-before-flow — angular quartz sand bed",
    "hypothesis": "For angular quartz sand bed, brief drainage before reflooding will increase first-flush sediment loss.",
    "test": "Measure cracks, pore pressure, and initial effluent mass.",
    "against": "First-flush loss is unchanged after initial saturation is included.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Drainage-before-flow",
    "system": "angular quartz sand bed",
    "id": 2418,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2418",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Oscillation phase and bed slope — angular quartz sand bed",
    "hypothesis": "For angular quartz sand bed, reversing oscillatory flow at slope-favored phases will increase net downslope transport.",
    "test": "Track particles under phase-controlled bed motion and flow.",
    "against": "Transport depends only on mean forcing without a phase effect.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Oscillation phase and bed slope",
    "system": "angular quartz sand bed",
    "id": 2419,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2419",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Acoustic erosion warning — angular quartz sand bed",
    "hypothesis": "For angular quartz sand bed, acoustic scattering will reveal surface rearrangement before measurable bulk sediment release.",
    "test": "Record scattering, bed images, and effluent solids.",
    "against": "Scattering provides no advance warning on held-out runs.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Acoustic erosion warning",
    "system": "angular quartz sand bed",
    "id": 2420,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2420",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Flow startup curvature — glass-microsphere bed",
    "hypothesis": "For glass-microsphere bed, a smoothly accelerating flow will erode less mass than an abrupt start at equal peak shear and work.",
    "test": "Measure effluent solids and near-bed velocities.",
    "against": "Startup shape has no independent erosion effect.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Flow startup curvature",
    "system": "glass-microsphere bed",
    "id": 2421,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2421",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Rest consolidation timing — glass-microsphere bed",
    "hypothesis": "For glass-microsphere bed, several short rests will strengthen the bed less than one equal-duration rest.",
    "test": "Measure erosion threshold and bed density after matched histories.",
    "against": "Threshold depends only on total rest time.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Rest consolidation timing",
    "system": "glass-microsphere bed",
    "id": 2422,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2422",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Small obstacle alignment — glass-microsphere bed",
    "hypothesis": "For glass-microsphere bed, staggered low obstacles will reduce connected erosion channels compared with aligned obstacles.",
    "test": "Map bed topography and channel connectivity.",
    "against": "Connected channels are no less frequent after mean shear is matched.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Small obstacle alignment",
    "system": "glass-microsphere bed",
    "id": 2423,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2423",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Surface grain substitution — glass-microsphere bed",
    "hypothesis": "For glass-microsphere bed, sparse larger surface grains will stabilize a disproportionate area around them.",
    "test": "Track erosion maps while varying larger-grain spacing.",
    "against": "Stabilized area is proportional only to covered area.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Surface grain substitution",
    "system": "glass-microsphere bed",
    "id": 2424,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2424",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Water-level oscillation — glass-microsphere bed",
    "hypothesis": "For glass-microsphere bed, water-level oscillations without mean flow will weaken later erosion resistance.",
    "test": "Measure bed structure and later erosion thresholds.",
    "against": "Resistance is unchanged after saturation and packing are matched.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Water-level oscillation",
    "system": "glass-microsphere bed",
    "id": 2425,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2425",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Deposition interval ordering — glass-microsphere bed",
    "hypothesis": "For glass-microsphere bed, alternating dilute and concentrated deposition pulses will yield different permeability than steady deposition at equal solids mass.",
    "test": "Measure deposited structure and permeability.",
    "against": "Permeability follows final density alone.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Deposition interval ordering",
    "system": "glass-microsphere bed",
    "id": 2426,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2426",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Sidewall friction asymmetry — glass-microsphere bed",
    "hypothesis": "For glass-microsphere bed, unequal sidewall friction will bias the first erosion channel toward one side.",
    "test": "Reverse wall treatments and map channel onset.",
    "against": "Bias does not reverse with wall friction.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Sidewall friction asymmetry",
    "system": "glass-microsphere bed",
    "id": 2427,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2427",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Drainage-before-flow — glass-microsphere bed",
    "hypothesis": "For glass-microsphere bed, brief drainage before reflooding will increase first-flush sediment loss.",
    "test": "Measure cracks, pore pressure, and initial effluent mass.",
    "against": "First-flush loss is unchanged after initial saturation is included.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Drainage-before-flow",
    "system": "glass-microsphere bed",
    "id": 2428,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2428",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Oscillation phase and bed slope — glass-microsphere bed",
    "hypothesis": "For glass-microsphere bed, reversing oscillatory flow at slope-favored phases will increase net downslope transport.",
    "test": "Track particles under phase-controlled bed motion and flow.",
    "against": "Transport depends only on mean forcing without a phase effect.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Oscillation phase and bed slope",
    "system": "glass-microsphere bed",
    "id": 2429,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2429",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Acoustic erosion warning — glass-microsphere bed",
    "hypothesis": "For glass-microsphere bed, acoustic scattering will reveal surface rearrangement before measurable bulk sediment release.",
    "test": "Record scattering, bed images, and effluent solids.",
    "against": "Scattering provides no advance warning on held-out runs.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Acoustic erosion warning",
    "system": "glass-microsphere bed",
    "id": 2430,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2430",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Flow startup curvature — calcium-carbonate sand bed",
    "hypothesis": "For calcium-carbonate sand bed, a smoothly accelerating flow will erode less mass than an abrupt start at equal peak shear and work.",
    "test": "Measure effluent solids and near-bed velocities.",
    "against": "Startup shape has no independent erosion effect.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Flow startup curvature",
    "system": "calcium-carbonate sand bed",
    "id": 2431,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2431",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Rest consolidation timing — calcium-carbonate sand bed",
    "hypothesis": "For calcium-carbonate sand bed, several short rests will strengthen the bed less than one equal-duration rest.",
    "test": "Measure erosion threshold and bed density after matched histories.",
    "against": "Threshold depends only on total rest time.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Rest consolidation timing",
    "system": "calcium-carbonate sand bed",
    "id": 2432,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2432",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Small obstacle alignment — calcium-carbonate sand bed",
    "hypothesis": "For calcium-carbonate sand bed, staggered low obstacles will reduce connected erosion channels compared with aligned obstacles.",
    "test": "Map bed topography and channel connectivity.",
    "against": "Connected channels are no less frequent after mean shear is matched.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Small obstacle alignment",
    "system": "calcium-carbonate sand bed",
    "id": 2433,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2433",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Surface grain substitution — calcium-carbonate sand bed",
    "hypothesis": "For calcium-carbonate sand bed, sparse larger surface grains will stabilize a disproportionate area around them.",
    "test": "Track erosion maps while varying larger-grain spacing.",
    "against": "Stabilized area is proportional only to covered area.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Surface grain substitution",
    "system": "calcium-carbonate sand bed",
    "id": 2434,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2434",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Water-level oscillation — calcium-carbonate sand bed",
    "hypothesis": "For calcium-carbonate sand bed, water-level oscillations without mean flow will weaken later erosion resistance.",
    "test": "Measure bed structure and later erosion thresholds.",
    "against": "Resistance is unchanged after saturation and packing are matched.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Water-level oscillation",
    "system": "calcium-carbonate sand bed",
    "id": 2435,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2435",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Deposition interval ordering — calcium-carbonate sand bed",
    "hypothesis": "For calcium-carbonate sand bed, alternating dilute and concentrated deposition pulses will yield different permeability than steady deposition at equal solids mass.",
    "test": "Measure deposited structure and permeability.",
    "against": "Permeability follows final density alone.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Deposition interval ordering",
    "system": "calcium-carbonate sand bed",
    "id": 2436,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2436",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Sidewall friction asymmetry — calcium-carbonate sand bed",
    "hypothesis": "For calcium-carbonate sand bed, unequal sidewall friction will bias the first erosion channel toward one side.",
    "test": "Reverse wall treatments and map channel onset.",
    "against": "Bias does not reverse with wall friction.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Sidewall friction asymmetry",
    "system": "calcium-carbonate sand bed",
    "id": 2437,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2437",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Drainage-before-flow — calcium-carbonate sand bed",
    "hypothesis": "For calcium-carbonate sand bed, brief drainage before reflooding will increase first-flush sediment loss.",
    "test": "Measure cracks, pore pressure, and initial effluent mass.",
    "against": "First-flush loss is unchanged after initial saturation is included.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Drainage-before-flow",
    "system": "calcium-carbonate sand bed",
    "id": 2438,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2438",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Oscillation phase and bed slope — calcium-carbonate sand bed",
    "hypothesis": "For calcium-carbonate sand bed, reversing oscillatory flow at slope-favored phases will increase net downslope transport.",
    "test": "Track particles under phase-controlled bed motion and flow.",
    "against": "Transport depends only on mean forcing without a phase effect.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Oscillation phase and bed slope",
    "system": "calcium-carbonate sand bed",
    "id": 2439,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2439",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Acoustic erosion warning — calcium-carbonate sand bed",
    "hypothesis": "For calcium-carbonate sand bed, acoustic scattering will reveal surface rearrangement before measurable bulk sediment release.",
    "test": "Record scattering, bed images, and effluent solids.",
    "against": "Scattering provides no advance warning on held-out runs.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Acoustic erosion warning",
    "system": "calcium-carbonate sand bed",
    "id": 2440,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2440",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Flow startup curvature — kaolin-sand mixed bed",
    "hypothesis": "For kaolin-sand mixed bed, a smoothly accelerating flow will erode less mass than an abrupt start at equal peak shear and work.",
    "test": "Measure effluent solids and near-bed velocities.",
    "against": "Startup shape has no independent erosion effect.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Flow startup curvature",
    "system": "kaolin-sand mixed bed",
    "id": 2441,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2441",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Rest consolidation timing — kaolin-sand mixed bed",
    "hypothesis": "For kaolin-sand mixed bed, several short rests will strengthen the bed less than one equal-duration rest.",
    "test": "Measure erosion threshold and bed density after matched histories.",
    "against": "Threshold depends only on total rest time.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Rest consolidation timing",
    "system": "kaolin-sand mixed bed",
    "id": 2442,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2442",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Small obstacle alignment — kaolin-sand mixed bed",
    "hypothesis": "For kaolin-sand mixed bed, staggered low obstacles will reduce connected erosion channels compared with aligned obstacles.",
    "test": "Map bed topography and channel connectivity.",
    "against": "Connected channels are no less frequent after mean shear is matched.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Small obstacle alignment",
    "system": "kaolin-sand mixed bed",
    "id": 2443,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2443",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Surface grain substitution — kaolin-sand mixed bed",
    "hypothesis": "For kaolin-sand mixed bed, sparse larger surface grains will stabilize a disproportionate area around them.",
    "test": "Track erosion maps while varying larger-grain spacing.",
    "against": "Stabilized area is proportional only to covered area.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Surface grain substitution",
    "system": "kaolin-sand mixed bed",
    "id": 2444,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2444",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Water-level oscillation — kaolin-sand mixed bed",
    "hypothesis": "For kaolin-sand mixed bed, water-level oscillations without mean flow will weaken later erosion resistance.",
    "test": "Measure bed structure and later erosion thresholds.",
    "against": "Resistance is unchanged after saturation and packing are matched.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Water-level oscillation",
    "system": "kaolin-sand mixed bed",
    "id": 2445,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2445",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Deposition interval ordering — kaolin-sand mixed bed",
    "hypothesis": "For kaolin-sand mixed bed, alternating dilute and concentrated deposition pulses will yield different permeability than steady deposition at equal solids mass.",
    "test": "Measure deposited structure and permeability.",
    "against": "Permeability follows final density alone.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Deposition interval ordering",
    "system": "kaolin-sand mixed bed",
    "id": 2446,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2446",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Sidewall friction asymmetry — kaolin-sand mixed bed",
    "hypothesis": "For kaolin-sand mixed bed, unequal sidewall friction will bias the first erosion channel toward one side.",
    "test": "Reverse wall treatments and map channel onset.",
    "against": "Bias does not reverse with wall friction.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Sidewall friction asymmetry",
    "system": "kaolin-sand mixed bed",
    "id": 2447,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2447",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Drainage-before-flow — kaolin-sand mixed bed",
    "hypothesis": "For kaolin-sand mixed bed, brief drainage before reflooding will increase first-flush sediment loss.",
    "test": "Measure cracks, pore pressure, and initial effluent mass.",
    "against": "First-flush loss is unchanged after initial saturation is included.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Drainage-before-flow",
    "system": "kaolin-sand mixed bed",
    "id": 2448,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2448",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Oscillation phase and bed slope — kaolin-sand mixed bed",
    "hypothesis": "For kaolin-sand mixed bed, reversing oscillatory flow at slope-favored phases will increase net downslope transport.",
    "test": "Track particles under phase-controlled bed motion and flow.",
    "against": "Transport depends only on mean forcing without a phase effect.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Oscillation phase and bed slope",
    "system": "kaolin-sand mixed bed",
    "id": 2449,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2449",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Acoustic erosion warning — kaolin-sand mixed bed",
    "hypothesis": "For kaolin-sand mixed bed, acoustic scattering will reveal surface rearrangement before measurable bulk sediment release.",
    "test": "Record scattering, bed images, and effluent solids.",
    "against": "Scattering provides no advance warning on held-out runs.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Acoustic erosion warning",
    "system": "kaolin-sand mixed bed",
    "id": 2450,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2450",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Flow startup curvature — bentonite-sand mixed bed",
    "hypothesis": "For bentonite-sand mixed bed, a smoothly accelerating flow will erode less mass than an abrupt start at equal peak shear and work.",
    "test": "Measure effluent solids and near-bed velocities.",
    "against": "Startup shape has no independent erosion effect.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Flow startup curvature",
    "system": "bentonite-sand mixed bed",
    "id": 2451,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2451",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Rest consolidation timing — bentonite-sand mixed bed",
    "hypothesis": "For bentonite-sand mixed bed, several short rests will strengthen the bed less than one equal-duration rest.",
    "test": "Measure erosion threshold and bed density after matched histories.",
    "against": "Threshold depends only on total rest time.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Rest consolidation timing",
    "system": "bentonite-sand mixed bed",
    "id": 2452,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2452",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Small obstacle alignment — bentonite-sand mixed bed",
    "hypothesis": "For bentonite-sand mixed bed, staggered low obstacles will reduce connected erosion channels compared with aligned obstacles.",
    "test": "Map bed topography and channel connectivity.",
    "against": "Connected channels are no less frequent after mean shear is matched.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Small obstacle alignment",
    "system": "bentonite-sand mixed bed",
    "id": 2453,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2453",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Surface grain substitution — bentonite-sand mixed bed",
    "hypothesis": "For bentonite-sand mixed bed, sparse larger surface grains will stabilize a disproportionate area around them.",
    "test": "Track erosion maps while varying larger-grain spacing.",
    "against": "Stabilized area is proportional only to covered area.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Surface grain substitution",
    "system": "bentonite-sand mixed bed",
    "id": 2454,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2454",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Water-level oscillation — bentonite-sand mixed bed",
    "hypothesis": "For bentonite-sand mixed bed, water-level oscillations without mean flow will weaken later erosion resistance.",
    "test": "Measure bed structure and later erosion thresholds.",
    "against": "Resistance is unchanged after saturation and packing are matched.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Water-level oscillation",
    "system": "bentonite-sand mixed bed",
    "id": 2455,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2455",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Deposition interval ordering — bentonite-sand mixed bed",
    "hypothesis": "For bentonite-sand mixed bed, alternating dilute and concentrated deposition pulses will yield different permeability than steady deposition at equal solids mass.",
    "test": "Measure deposited structure and permeability.",
    "against": "Permeability follows final density alone.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Deposition interval ordering",
    "system": "bentonite-sand mixed bed",
    "id": 2456,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2456",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Sidewall friction asymmetry — bentonite-sand mixed bed",
    "hypothesis": "For bentonite-sand mixed bed, unequal sidewall friction will bias the first erosion channel toward one side.",
    "test": "Reverse wall treatments and map channel onset.",
    "against": "Bias does not reverse with wall friction.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Sidewall friction asymmetry",
    "system": "bentonite-sand mixed bed",
    "id": 2457,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2457",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Drainage-before-flow — bentonite-sand mixed bed",
    "hypothesis": "For bentonite-sand mixed bed, brief drainage before reflooding will increase first-flush sediment loss.",
    "test": "Measure cracks, pore pressure, and initial effluent mass.",
    "against": "First-flush loss is unchanged after initial saturation is included.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Drainage-before-flow",
    "system": "bentonite-sand mixed bed",
    "id": 2458,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2458",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Oscillation phase and bed slope — bentonite-sand mixed bed",
    "hypothesis": "For bentonite-sand mixed bed, reversing oscillatory flow at slope-favored phases will increase net downslope transport.",
    "test": "Track particles under phase-controlled bed motion and flow.",
    "against": "Transport depends only on mean forcing without a phase effect.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Oscillation phase and bed slope",
    "system": "bentonite-sand mixed bed",
    "id": 2459,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2459",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Acoustic erosion warning — bentonite-sand mixed bed",
    "hypothesis": "For bentonite-sand mixed bed, acoustic scattering will reveal surface rearrangement before measurable bulk sediment release.",
    "test": "Record scattering, bed images, and effluent solids.",
    "against": "Scattering provides no advance warning on held-out runs.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Acoustic erosion warning",
    "system": "bentonite-sand mixed bed",
    "id": 2460,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2460",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Flow startup curvature — porous ceramic-granule bed",
    "hypothesis": "For porous ceramic-granule bed, a smoothly accelerating flow will erode less mass than an abrupt start at equal peak shear and work.",
    "test": "Measure effluent solids and near-bed velocities.",
    "against": "Startup shape has no independent erosion effect.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Flow startup curvature",
    "system": "porous ceramic-granule bed",
    "id": 2461,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2461",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Rest consolidation timing — porous ceramic-granule bed",
    "hypothesis": "For porous ceramic-granule bed, several short rests will strengthen the bed less than one equal-duration rest.",
    "test": "Measure erosion threshold and bed density after matched histories.",
    "against": "Threshold depends only on total rest time.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Rest consolidation timing",
    "system": "porous ceramic-granule bed",
    "id": 2462,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2462",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Small obstacle alignment — porous ceramic-granule bed",
    "hypothesis": "For porous ceramic-granule bed, staggered low obstacles will reduce connected erosion channels compared with aligned obstacles.",
    "test": "Map bed topography and channel connectivity.",
    "against": "Connected channels are no less frequent after mean shear is matched.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Small obstacle alignment",
    "system": "porous ceramic-granule bed",
    "id": 2463,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2463",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Surface grain substitution — porous ceramic-granule bed",
    "hypothesis": "For porous ceramic-granule bed, sparse larger surface grains will stabilize a disproportionate area around them.",
    "test": "Track erosion maps while varying larger-grain spacing.",
    "against": "Stabilized area is proportional only to covered area.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Surface grain substitution",
    "system": "porous ceramic-granule bed",
    "id": 2464,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2464",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Water-level oscillation — porous ceramic-granule bed",
    "hypothesis": "For porous ceramic-granule bed, water-level oscillations without mean flow will weaken later erosion resistance.",
    "test": "Measure bed structure and later erosion thresholds.",
    "against": "Resistance is unchanged after saturation and packing are matched.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Water-level oscillation",
    "system": "porous ceramic-granule bed",
    "id": 2465,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2465",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Deposition interval ordering — porous ceramic-granule bed",
    "hypothesis": "For porous ceramic-granule bed, alternating dilute and concentrated deposition pulses will yield different permeability than steady deposition at equal solids mass.",
    "test": "Measure deposited structure and permeability.",
    "against": "Permeability follows final density alone.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Deposition interval ordering",
    "system": "porous ceramic-granule bed",
    "id": 2466,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2466",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Sidewall friction asymmetry — porous ceramic-granule bed",
    "hypothesis": "For porous ceramic-granule bed, unequal sidewall friction will bias the first erosion channel toward one side.",
    "test": "Reverse wall treatments and map channel onset.",
    "against": "Bias does not reverse with wall friction.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Sidewall friction asymmetry",
    "system": "porous ceramic-granule bed",
    "id": 2467,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2467",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Drainage-before-flow — porous ceramic-granule bed",
    "hypothesis": "For porous ceramic-granule bed, brief drainage before reflooding will increase first-flush sediment loss.",
    "test": "Measure cracks, pore pressure, and initial effluent mass.",
    "against": "First-flush loss is unchanged after initial saturation is included.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Drainage-before-flow",
    "system": "porous ceramic-granule bed",
    "id": 2468,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2468",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Oscillation phase and bed slope — porous ceramic-granule bed",
    "hypothesis": "For porous ceramic-granule bed, reversing oscillatory flow at slope-favored phases will increase net downslope transport.",
    "test": "Track particles under phase-controlled bed motion and flow.",
    "against": "Transport depends only on mean forcing without a phase effect.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Oscillation phase and bed slope",
    "system": "porous ceramic-granule bed",
    "id": 2469,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2469",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Acoustic erosion warning — porous ceramic-granule bed",
    "hypothesis": "For porous ceramic-granule bed, acoustic scattering will reveal surface rearrangement before measurable bulk sediment release.",
    "test": "Record scattering, bed images, and effluent solids.",
    "against": "Scattering provides no advance warning on held-out runs.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Acoustic erosion warning",
    "system": "porous ceramic-granule bed",
    "id": 2470,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2470",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Flow startup curvature — fine gravel bed",
    "hypothesis": "For fine gravel bed, a smoothly accelerating flow will erode less mass than an abrupt start at equal peak shear and work.",
    "test": "Measure effluent solids and near-bed velocities.",
    "against": "Startup shape has no independent erosion effect.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Flow startup curvature",
    "system": "fine gravel bed",
    "id": 2471,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2471",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Rest consolidation timing — fine gravel bed",
    "hypothesis": "For fine gravel bed, several short rests will strengthen the bed less than one equal-duration rest.",
    "test": "Measure erosion threshold and bed density after matched histories.",
    "against": "Threshold depends only on total rest time.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Rest consolidation timing",
    "system": "fine gravel bed",
    "id": 2472,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2472",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Small obstacle alignment — fine gravel bed",
    "hypothesis": "For fine gravel bed, staggered low obstacles will reduce connected erosion channels compared with aligned obstacles.",
    "test": "Map bed topography and channel connectivity.",
    "against": "Connected channels are no less frequent after mean shear is matched.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Small obstacle alignment",
    "system": "fine gravel bed",
    "id": 2473,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2473",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Surface grain substitution — fine gravel bed",
    "hypothesis": "For fine gravel bed, sparse larger surface grains will stabilize a disproportionate area around them.",
    "test": "Track erosion maps while varying larger-grain spacing.",
    "against": "Stabilized area is proportional only to covered area.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Surface grain substitution",
    "system": "fine gravel bed",
    "id": 2474,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2474",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Water-level oscillation — fine gravel bed",
    "hypothesis": "For fine gravel bed, water-level oscillations without mean flow will weaken later erosion resistance.",
    "test": "Measure bed structure and later erosion thresholds.",
    "against": "Resistance is unchanged after saturation and packing are matched.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Water-level oscillation",
    "system": "fine gravel bed",
    "id": 2475,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2475",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Deposition interval ordering — fine gravel bed",
    "hypothesis": "For fine gravel bed, alternating dilute and concentrated deposition pulses will yield different permeability than steady deposition at equal solids mass.",
    "test": "Measure deposited structure and permeability.",
    "against": "Permeability follows final density alone.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Deposition interval ordering",
    "system": "fine gravel bed",
    "id": 2476,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2476",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Sidewall friction asymmetry — fine gravel bed",
    "hypothesis": "For fine gravel bed, unequal sidewall friction will bias the first erosion channel toward one side.",
    "test": "Reverse wall treatments and map channel onset.",
    "against": "Bias does not reverse with wall friction.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Sidewall friction asymmetry",
    "system": "fine gravel bed",
    "id": 2477,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2477",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Drainage-before-flow — fine gravel bed",
    "hypothesis": "For fine gravel bed, brief drainage before reflooding will increase first-flush sediment loss.",
    "test": "Measure cracks, pore pressure, and initial effluent mass.",
    "against": "First-flush loss is unchanged after initial saturation is included.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Drainage-before-flow",
    "system": "fine gravel bed",
    "id": 2478,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2478",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Oscillation phase and bed slope — fine gravel bed",
    "hypothesis": "For fine gravel bed, reversing oscillatory flow at slope-favored phases will increase net downslope transport.",
    "test": "Track particles under phase-controlled bed motion and flow.",
    "against": "Transport depends only on mean forcing without a phase effect.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Oscillation phase and bed slope",
    "system": "fine gravel bed",
    "id": 2479,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2479",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Acoustic erosion warning — fine gravel bed",
    "hypothesis": "For fine gravel bed, acoustic scattering will reveal surface rearrangement before measurable bulk sediment release.",
    "test": "Record scattering, bed images, and effluent solids.",
    "against": "Scattering provides no advance warning on held-out runs.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Acoustic erosion warning",
    "system": "fine gravel bed",
    "id": 2480,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2480",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Flow startup curvature — cellulose-fiber sand bed",
    "hypothesis": "For cellulose-fiber sand bed, a smoothly accelerating flow will erode less mass than an abrupt start at equal peak shear and work.",
    "test": "Measure effluent solids and near-bed velocities.",
    "against": "Startup shape has no independent erosion effect.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Flow startup curvature",
    "system": "cellulose-fiber sand bed",
    "id": 2481,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2481",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Rest consolidation timing — cellulose-fiber sand bed",
    "hypothesis": "For cellulose-fiber sand bed, several short rests will strengthen the bed less than one equal-duration rest.",
    "test": "Measure erosion threshold and bed density after matched histories.",
    "against": "Threshold depends only on total rest time.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Rest consolidation timing",
    "system": "cellulose-fiber sand bed",
    "id": 2482,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2482",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Small obstacle alignment — cellulose-fiber sand bed",
    "hypothesis": "For cellulose-fiber sand bed, staggered low obstacles will reduce connected erosion channels compared with aligned obstacles.",
    "test": "Map bed topography and channel connectivity.",
    "against": "Connected channels are no less frequent after mean shear is matched.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Small obstacle alignment",
    "system": "cellulose-fiber sand bed",
    "id": 2483,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2483",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Surface grain substitution — cellulose-fiber sand bed",
    "hypothesis": "For cellulose-fiber sand bed, sparse larger surface grains will stabilize a disproportionate area around them.",
    "test": "Track erosion maps while varying larger-grain spacing.",
    "against": "Stabilized area is proportional only to covered area.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Surface grain substitution",
    "system": "cellulose-fiber sand bed",
    "id": 2484,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2484",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Water-level oscillation — cellulose-fiber sand bed",
    "hypothesis": "For cellulose-fiber sand bed, water-level oscillations without mean flow will weaken later erosion resistance.",
    "test": "Measure bed structure and later erosion thresholds.",
    "against": "Resistance is unchanged after saturation and packing are matched.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Water-level oscillation",
    "system": "cellulose-fiber sand bed",
    "id": 2485,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2485",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Deposition interval ordering — cellulose-fiber sand bed",
    "hypothesis": "For cellulose-fiber sand bed, alternating dilute and concentrated deposition pulses will yield different permeability than steady deposition at equal solids mass.",
    "test": "Measure deposited structure and permeability.",
    "against": "Permeability follows final density alone.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Deposition interval ordering",
    "system": "cellulose-fiber sand bed",
    "id": 2486,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2486",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Sidewall friction asymmetry — cellulose-fiber sand bed",
    "hypothesis": "For cellulose-fiber sand bed, unequal sidewall friction will bias the first erosion channel toward one side.",
    "test": "Reverse wall treatments and map channel onset.",
    "against": "Bias does not reverse with wall friction.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Sidewall friction asymmetry",
    "system": "cellulose-fiber sand bed",
    "id": 2487,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2487",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Drainage-before-flow — cellulose-fiber sand bed",
    "hypothesis": "For cellulose-fiber sand bed, brief drainage before reflooding will increase first-flush sediment loss.",
    "test": "Measure cracks, pore pressure, and initial effluent mass.",
    "against": "First-flush loss is unchanged after initial saturation is included.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Drainage-before-flow",
    "system": "cellulose-fiber sand bed",
    "id": 2488,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2488",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Oscillation phase and bed slope — cellulose-fiber sand bed",
    "hypothesis": "For cellulose-fiber sand bed, reversing oscillatory flow at slope-favored phases will increase net downslope transport.",
    "test": "Track particles under phase-controlled bed motion and flow.",
    "against": "Transport depends only on mean forcing without a phase effect.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Oscillation phase and bed slope",
    "system": "cellulose-fiber sand bed",
    "id": 2489,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2489",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Acoustic erosion warning — cellulose-fiber sand bed",
    "hypothesis": "For cellulose-fiber sand bed, acoustic scattering will reveal surface rearrangement before measurable bulk sediment release.",
    "test": "Record scattering, bed images, and effluent solids.",
    "against": "Scattering provides no advance warning on held-out runs.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Acoustic erosion warning",
    "system": "cellulose-fiber sand bed",
    "id": 2490,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2490",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Flow startup curvature — layered silt-sand bed",
    "hypothesis": "For layered silt-sand bed, a smoothly accelerating flow will erode less mass than an abrupt start at equal peak shear and work.",
    "test": "Measure effluent solids and near-bed velocities.",
    "against": "Startup shape has no independent erosion effect.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Flow startup curvature",
    "system": "layered silt-sand bed",
    "id": 2491,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2491",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Rest consolidation timing — layered silt-sand bed",
    "hypothesis": "For layered silt-sand bed, several short rests will strengthen the bed less than one equal-duration rest.",
    "test": "Measure erosion threshold and bed density after matched histories.",
    "against": "Threshold depends only on total rest time.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Rest consolidation timing",
    "system": "layered silt-sand bed",
    "id": 2492,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2492",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Small obstacle alignment — layered silt-sand bed",
    "hypothesis": "For layered silt-sand bed, staggered low obstacles will reduce connected erosion channels compared with aligned obstacles.",
    "test": "Map bed topography and channel connectivity.",
    "against": "Connected channels are no less frequent after mean shear is matched.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Small obstacle alignment",
    "system": "layered silt-sand bed",
    "id": 2493,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2493",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Surface grain substitution — layered silt-sand bed",
    "hypothesis": "For layered silt-sand bed, sparse larger surface grains will stabilize a disproportionate area around them.",
    "test": "Track erosion maps while varying larger-grain spacing.",
    "against": "Stabilized area is proportional only to covered area.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Surface grain substitution",
    "system": "layered silt-sand bed",
    "id": 2494,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2494",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Water-level oscillation — layered silt-sand bed",
    "hypothesis": "For layered silt-sand bed, water-level oscillations without mean flow will weaken later erosion resistance.",
    "test": "Measure bed structure and later erosion thresholds.",
    "against": "Resistance is unchanged after saturation and packing are matched.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Water-level oscillation",
    "system": "layered silt-sand bed",
    "id": 2495,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2495",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Deposition interval ordering — layered silt-sand bed",
    "hypothesis": "For layered silt-sand bed, alternating dilute and concentrated deposition pulses will yield different permeability than steady deposition at equal solids mass.",
    "test": "Measure deposited structure and permeability.",
    "against": "Permeability follows final density alone.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Deposition interval ordering",
    "system": "layered silt-sand bed",
    "id": 2496,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2496",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Sidewall friction asymmetry — layered silt-sand bed",
    "hypothesis": "For layered silt-sand bed, unequal sidewall friction will bias the first erosion channel toward one side.",
    "test": "Reverse wall treatments and map channel onset.",
    "against": "Bias does not reverse with wall friction.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Sidewall friction asymmetry",
    "system": "layered silt-sand bed",
    "id": 2497,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2497",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Drainage-before-flow — layered silt-sand bed",
    "hypothesis": "For layered silt-sand bed, brief drainage before reflooding will increase first-flush sediment loss.",
    "test": "Measure cracks, pore pressure, and initial effluent mass.",
    "against": "First-flush loss is unchanged after initial saturation is included.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Drainage-before-flow",
    "system": "layered silt-sand bed",
    "id": 2498,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2498",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Oscillation phase and bed slope — layered silt-sand bed",
    "hypothesis": "For layered silt-sand bed, reversing oscillatory flow at slope-favored phases will increase net downslope transport.",
    "test": "Track particles under phase-controlled bed motion and flow.",
    "against": "Transport depends only on mean forcing without a phase effect.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Oscillation phase and bed slope",
    "system": "layered silt-sand bed",
    "id": 2499,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2499",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Acoustic erosion warning — layered silt-sand bed",
    "hypothesis": "For layered silt-sand bed, acoustic scattering will reveal surface rearrangement before measurable bulk sediment release.",
    "test": "Record scattering, bed images, and effluent solids.",
    "against": "Scattering provides no advance warning on held-out runs.",
    "category": "Model sediment erosion and deposition",
    "controls": "Bed packing, grain distributions, saturation, channel geometry, actual bed shear stress, temperature, and total hydraulic work.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Model sediment erosion and deposition: Acoustic erosion warning",
    "system": "layered silt-sand bed",
    "id": 2500,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Controlled recirculating flow channel, solids measurement, and bed imaging.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2500",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Substrate delivery geometry — purified fungal amylase assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified fungal amylase assay, distributed substrate injection will reduce apparent induction time compared with one-point injection.",
    "test": "Measure mixing with an inert tracer and product generation.",
    "against": "Induction reduction is explained entirely by detection or mixing artifacts.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Substrate delivery geometry",
    "system": "purified fungal amylase assay",
    "id": 2501,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2501",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Wall passivation timing — purified fungal amylase assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified fungal amylase assay, passivation before enzyme addition will improve low-concentration rate repeatability.",
    "test": "Measure active enzyme loss and replicate rates.",
    "against": "Repeatability is unchanged after retained activity is matched.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Wall passivation timing",
    "system": "purified fungal amylase assay",
    "id": 2502,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2502",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Assay depth correction — purified fungal amylase assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified fungal amylase assay, shallow reaction layers will reduce rate underestimation from diffusion-limited substrate access.",
    "test": "Compare depth series with independent product sampling.",
    "against": "Rate estimates are depth-independent after optical path correction.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Assay depth correction",
    "system": "purified fungal amylase assay",
    "id": 2503,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2503",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Mixing rest ratio — purified fungal amylase assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified fungal amylase assay, intermittent gentle mixing will preserve more activity per product formed than continuous mixing.",
    "test": "Measure total product and residual enzyme activity.",
    "against": "Preserved activity is no greater at matched conversion and energy input.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Mixing rest ratio",
    "system": "purified fungal amylase assay",
    "id": 2504,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2504",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Product removal scheduling — purified fungal amylase assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified fungal amylase assay, periodic selective product removal will reduce rate decline when product inhibition is reversible.",
    "test": "Verify inhibition independently and track rate through removal cycles.",
    "against": "Rates fail to recover despite verified product removal.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Product removal scheduling",
    "system": "purified fungal amylase assay",
    "id": 2505,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2505",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Carrier adsorption age — purified fungal amylase assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified fungal amylase assay, longer benign carrier adsorption time will broaden release times without increasing active loading proportionally.",
    "test": "Measure active loading, desorption, and product formation.",
    "against": "Release-time broadening follows loading alone.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Carrier adsorption age",
    "system": "purified fungal amylase assay",
    "id": 2506,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2506",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Thermal equilibration direction — purified fungal amylase assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified fungal amylase assay, warming enzyme and substrate separately will reduce early rate variability compared with warming after mixing.",
    "test": "Measure true reaction temperature and products over time.",
    "against": "Variability is unchanged after temperature histories are included.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Thermal equilibration direction",
    "system": "purified fungal amylase assay",
    "id": 2507,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2507",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Reaction-order pulse diagnosis — purified fungal amylase assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified fungal amylase assay, small substrate pulses will reveal developing transport limitation earlier than endpoint yield.",
    "test": "Compare pulse responses with independent transport and kinetic measurements.",
    "against": "Pulses do not improve identification of transport limitation.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Reaction-order pulse diagnosis",
    "system": "purified fungal amylase assay",
    "id": 2508,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2508",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Inert crowding spatial pattern — purified fungal amylase assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified fungal amylase assay, localized inert crowding will produce a different rate map from uniform crowding at equal average concentration.",
    "test": "Map crowding, diffusion, and product while testing for direct binding.",
    "against": "Rate differences vanish after local diffusion and activity are included.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Inert crowding spatial pattern",
    "system": "purified fungal amylase assay",
    "id": 2509,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2509",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Parallel blank matching — purified fungal amylase assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified fungal amylase assay, matrix-matched inactive-enzyme blanks will reduce apparent low-rate signals more accurately than buffer blanks.",
    "test": "Use independently known small product additions to compare recovery.",
    "against": "Matrix-matched blanks do not improve measured product accuracy.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Parallel blank matching",
    "system": "purified fungal amylase assay",
    "id": 2510,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2510",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Substrate delivery geometry — purified plant peroxidase assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified plant peroxidase assay, distributed substrate injection will reduce apparent induction time compared with one-point injection.",
    "test": "Measure mixing with an inert tracer and product generation.",
    "against": "Induction reduction is explained entirely by detection or mixing artifacts.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Substrate delivery geometry",
    "system": "purified plant peroxidase assay",
    "id": 2511,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2511",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Wall passivation timing — purified plant peroxidase assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified plant peroxidase assay, passivation before enzyme addition will improve low-concentration rate repeatability.",
    "test": "Measure active enzyme loss and replicate rates.",
    "against": "Repeatability is unchanged after retained activity is matched.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Wall passivation timing",
    "system": "purified plant peroxidase assay",
    "id": 2512,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2512",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Assay depth correction — purified plant peroxidase assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified plant peroxidase assay, shallow reaction layers will reduce rate underestimation from diffusion-limited substrate access.",
    "test": "Compare depth series with independent product sampling.",
    "against": "Rate estimates are depth-independent after optical path correction.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Assay depth correction",
    "system": "purified plant peroxidase assay",
    "id": 2513,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2513",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Mixing rest ratio — purified plant peroxidase assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified plant peroxidase assay, intermittent gentle mixing will preserve more activity per product formed than continuous mixing.",
    "test": "Measure total product and residual enzyme activity.",
    "against": "Preserved activity is no greater at matched conversion and energy input.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Mixing rest ratio",
    "system": "purified plant peroxidase assay",
    "id": 2514,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2514",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Product removal scheduling — purified plant peroxidase assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified plant peroxidase assay, periodic selective product removal will reduce rate decline when product inhibition is reversible.",
    "test": "Verify inhibition independently and track rate through removal cycles.",
    "against": "Rates fail to recover despite verified product removal.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Product removal scheduling",
    "system": "purified plant peroxidase assay",
    "id": 2515,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2515",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Carrier adsorption age — purified plant peroxidase assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified plant peroxidase assay, longer benign carrier adsorption time will broaden release times without increasing active loading proportionally.",
    "test": "Measure active loading, desorption, and product formation.",
    "against": "Release-time broadening follows loading alone.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Carrier adsorption age",
    "system": "purified plant peroxidase assay",
    "id": 2516,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2516",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Thermal equilibration direction — purified plant peroxidase assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified plant peroxidase assay, warming enzyme and substrate separately will reduce early rate variability compared with warming after mixing.",
    "test": "Measure true reaction temperature and products over time.",
    "against": "Variability is unchanged after temperature histories are included.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Thermal equilibration direction",
    "system": "purified plant peroxidase assay",
    "id": 2517,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2517",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Reaction-order pulse diagnosis — purified plant peroxidase assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified plant peroxidase assay, small substrate pulses will reveal developing transport limitation earlier than endpoint yield.",
    "test": "Compare pulse responses with independent transport and kinetic measurements.",
    "against": "Pulses do not improve identification of transport limitation.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Reaction-order pulse diagnosis",
    "system": "purified plant peroxidase assay",
    "id": 2518,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2518",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Inert crowding spatial pattern — purified plant peroxidase assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified plant peroxidase assay, localized inert crowding will produce a different rate map from uniform crowding at equal average concentration.",
    "test": "Map crowding, diffusion, and product while testing for direct binding.",
    "against": "Rate differences vanish after local diffusion and activity are included.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Inert crowding spatial pattern",
    "system": "purified plant peroxidase assay",
    "id": 2519,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2519",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Parallel blank matching — purified plant peroxidase assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified plant peroxidase assay, matrix-matched inactive-enzyme blanks will reduce apparent low-rate signals more accurately than buffer blanks.",
    "test": "Use independently known small product additions to compare recovery.",
    "against": "Matrix-matched blanks do not improve measured product accuracy.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Parallel blank matching",
    "system": "purified plant peroxidase assay",
    "id": 2520,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2520",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Substrate delivery geometry — purified nonhuman catalase assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified nonhuman catalase assay, distributed substrate injection will reduce apparent induction time compared with one-point injection.",
    "test": "Measure mixing with an inert tracer and product generation.",
    "against": "Induction reduction is explained entirely by detection or mixing artifacts.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Substrate delivery geometry",
    "system": "purified nonhuman catalase assay",
    "id": 2521,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2521",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Wall passivation timing — purified nonhuman catalase assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified nonhuman catalase assay, passivation before enzyme addition will improve low-concentration rate repeatability.",
    "test": "Measure active enzyme loss and replicate rates.",
    "against": "Repeatability is unchanged after retained activity is matched.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Wall passivation timing",
    "system": "purified nonhuman catalase assay",
    "id": 2522,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2522",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Assay depth correction — purified nonhuman catalase assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified nonhuman catalase assay, shallow reaction layers will reduce rate underestimation from diffusion-limited substrate access.",
    "test": "Compare depth series with independent product sampling.",
    "against": "Rate estimates are depth-independent after optical path correction.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Assay depth correction",
    "system": "purified nonhuman catalase assay",
    "id": 2523,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2523",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Mixing rest ratio — purified nonhuman catalase assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified nonhuman catalase assay, intermittent gentle mixing will preserve more activity per product formed than continuous mixing.",
    "test": "Measure total product and residual enzyme activity.",
    "against": "Preserved activity is no greater at matched conversion and energy input.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Mixing rest ratio",
    "system": "purified nonhuman catalase assay",
    "id": 2524,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2524",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Product removal scheduling — purified nonhuman catalase assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified nonhuman catalase assay, periodic selective product removal will reduce rate decline when product inhibition is reversible.",
    "test": "Verify inhibition independently and track rate through removal cycles.",
    "against": "Rates fail to recover despite verified product removal.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Product removal scheduling",
    "system": "purified nonhuman catalase assay",
    "id": 2525,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2525",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Carrier adsorption age — purified nonhuman catalase assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified nonhuman catalase assay, longer benign carrier adsorption time will broaden release times without increasing active loading proportionally.",
    "test": "Measure active loading, desorption, and product formation.",
    "against": "Release-time broadening follows loading alone.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Carrier adsorption age",
    "system": "purified nonhuman catalase assay",
    "id": 2526,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2526",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Thermal equilibration direction — purified nonhuman catalase assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified nonhuman catalase assay, warming enzyme and substrate separately will reduce early rate variability compared with warming after mixing.",
    "test": "Measure true reaction temperature and products over time.",
    "against": "Variability is unchanged after temperature histories are included.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Thermal equilibration direction",
    "system": "purified nonhuman catalase assay",
    "id": 2527,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2527",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Reaction-order pulse diagnosis — purified nonhuman catalase assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified nonhuman catalase assay, small substrate pulses will reveal developing transport limitation earlier than endpoint yield.",
    "test": "Compare pulse responses with independent transport and kinetic measurements.",
    "against": "Pulses do not improve identification of transport limitation.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Reaction-order pulse diagnosis",
    "system": "purified nonhuman catalase assay",
    "id": 2528,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2528",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Inert crowding spatial pattern — purified nonhuman catalase assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified nonhuman catalase assay, localized inert crowding will produce a different rate map from uniform crowding at equal average concentration.",
    "test": "Map crowding, diffusion, and product while testing for direct binding.",
    "against": "Rate differences vanish after local diffusion and activity are included.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Inert crowding spatial pattern",
    "system": "purified nonhuman catalase assay",
    "id": 2529,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2529",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Parallel blank matching — purified nonhuman catalase assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified nonhuman catalase assay, matrix-matched inactive-enzyme blanks will reduce apparent low-rate signals more accurately than buffer blanks.",
    "test": "Use independently known small product additions to compare recovery.",
    "against": "Matrix-matched blanks do not improve measured product accuracy.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Parallel blank matching",
    "system": "purified nonhuman catalase assay",
    "id": 2530,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2530",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Substrate delivery geometry — purified yeast invertase assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified yeast invertase assay, distributed substrate injection will reduce apparent induction time compared with one-point injection.",
    "test": "Measure mixing with an inert tracer and product generation.",
    "against": "Induction reduction is explained entirely by detection or mixing artifacts.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Substrate delivery geometry",
    "system": "purified yeast invertase assay",
    "id": 2531,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2531",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Wall passivation timing — purified yeast invertase assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified yeast invertase assay, passivation before enzyme addition will improve low-concentration rate repeatability.",
    "test": "Measure active enzyme loss and replicate rates.",
    "against": "Repeatability is unchanged after retained activity is matched.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Wall passivation timing",
    "system": "purified yeast invertase assay",
    "id": 2532,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2532",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Assay depth correction — purified yeast invertase assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified yeast invertase assay, shallow reaction layers will reduce rate underestimation from diffusion-limited substrate access.",
    "test": "Compare depth series with independent product sampling.",
    "against": "Rate estimates are depth-independent after optical path correction.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Assay depth correction",
    "system": "purified yeast invertase assay",
    "id": 2533,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2533",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Mixing rest ratio — purified yeast invertase assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified yeast invertase assay, intermittent gentle mixing will preserve more activity per product formed than continuous mixing.",
    "test": "Measure total product and residual enzyme activity.",
    "against": "Preserved activity is no greater at matched conversion and energy input.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Mixing rest ratio",
    "system": "purified yeast invertase assay",
    "id": 2534,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2534",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Product removal scheduling — purified yeast invertase assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified yeast invertase assay, periodic selective product removal will reduce rate decline when product inhibition is reversible.",
    "test": "Verify inhibition independently and track rate through removal cycles.",
    "against": "Rates fail to recover despite verified product removal.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Product removal scheduling",
    "system": "purified yeast invertase assay",
    "id": 2535,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2535",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Carrier adsorption age — purified yeast invertase assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified yeast invertase assay, longer benign carrier adsorption time will broaden release times without increasing active loading proportionally.",
    "test": "Measure active loading, desorption, and product formation.",
    "against": "Release-time broadening follows loading alone.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Carrier adsorption age",
    "system": "purified yeast invertase assay",
    "id": 2536,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2536",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Thermal equilibration direction — purified yeast invertase assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified yeast invertase assay, warming enzyme and substrate separately will reduce early rate variability compared with warming after mixing.",
    "test": "Measure true reaction temperature and products over time.",
    "against": "Variability is unchanged after temperature histories are included.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Thermal equilibration direction",
    "system": "purified yeast invertase assay",
    "id": 2537,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2537",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Reaction-order pulse diagnosis — purified yeast invertase assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified yeast invertase assay, small substrate pulses will reveal developing transport limitation earlier than endpoint yield.",
    "test": "Compare pulse responses with independent transport and kinetic measurements.",
    "against": "Pulses do not improve identification of transport limitation.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Reaction-order pulse diagnosis",
    "system": "purified yeast invertase assay",
    "id": 2538,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2538",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Inert crowding spatial pattern — purified yeast invertase assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified yeast invertase assay, localized inert crowding will produce a different rate map from uniform crowding at equal average concentration.",
    "test": "Map crowding, diffusion, and product while testing for direct binding.",
    "against": "Rate differences vanish after local diffusion and activity are included.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Inert crowding spatial pattern",
    "system": "purified yeast invertase assay",
    "id": 2539,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2539",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Parallel blank matching — purified yeast invertase assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified yeast invertase assay, matrix-matched inactive-enzyme blanks will reduce apparent low-rate signals more accurately than buffer blanks.",
    "test": "Use independently known small product additions to compare recovery.",
    "against": "Matrix-matched blanks do not improve measured product accuracy.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Parallel blank matching",
    "system": "purified yeast invertase assay",
    "id": 2540,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2540",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Substrate delivery geometry — purified microbial lactase assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified microbial lactase assay, distributed substrate injection will reduce apparent induction time compared with one-point injection.",
    "test": "Measure mixing with an inert tracer and product generation.",
    "against": "Induction reduction is explained entirely by detection or mixing artifacts.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Substrate delivery geometry",
    "system": "purified microbial lactase assay",
    "id": 2541,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2541",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Wall passivation timing — purified microbial lactase assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified microbial lactase assay, passivation before enzyme addition will improve low-concentration rate repeatability.",
    "test": "Measure active enzyme loss and replicate rates.",
    "against": "Repeatability is unchanged after retained activity is matched.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Wall passivation timing",
    "system": "purified microbial lactase assay",
    "id": 2542,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2542",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Assay depth correction — purified microbial lactase assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified microbial lactase assay, shallow reaction layers will reduce rate underestimation from diffusion-limited substrate access.",
    "test": "Compare depth series with independent product sampling.",
    "against": "Rate estimates are depth-independent after optical path correction.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Assay depth correction",
    "system": "purified microbial lactase assay",
    "id": 2543,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2543",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Mixing rest ratio — purified microbial lactase assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified microbial lactase assay, intermittent gentle mixing will preserve more activity per product formed than continuous mixing.",
    "test": "Measure total product and residual enzyme activity.",
    "against": "Preserved activity is no greater at matched conversion and energy input.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Mixing rest ratio",
    "system": "purified microbial lactase assay",
    "id": 2544,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2544",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Product removal scheduling — purified microbial lactase assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified microbial lactase assay, periodic selective product removal will reduce rate decline when product inhibition is reversible.",
    "test": "Verify inhibition independently and track rate through removal cycles.",
    "against": "Rates fail to recover despite verified product removal.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Product removal scheduling",
    "system": "purified microbial lactase assay",
    "id": 2545,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2545",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Carrier adsorption age — purified microbial lactase assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified microbial lactase assay, longer benign carrier adsorption time will broaden release times without increasing active loading proportionally.",
    "test": "Measure active loading, desorption, and product formation.",
    "against": "Release-time broadening follows loading alone.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Carrier adsorption age",
    "system": "purified microbial lactase assay",
    "id": 2546,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2546",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Thermal equilibration direction — purified microbial lactase assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified microbial lactase assay, warming enzyme and substrate separately will reduce early rate variability compared with warming after mixing.",
    "test": "Measure true reaction temperature and products over time.",
    "against": "Variability is unchanged after temperature histories are included.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Thermal equilibration direction",
    "system": "purified microbial lactase assay",
    "id": 2547,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2547",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Reaction-order pulse diagnosis — purified microbial lactase assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified microbial lactase assay, small substrate pulses will reveal developing transport limitation earlier than endpoint yield.",
    "test": "Compare pulse responses with independent transport and kinetic measurements.",
    "against": "Pulses do not improve identification of transport limitation.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Reaction-order pulse diagnosis",
    "system": "purified microbial lactase assay",
    "id": 2548,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2548",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Inert crowding spatial pattern — purified microbial lactase assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified microbial lactase assay, localized inert crowding will produce a different rate map from uniform crowding at equal average concentration.",
    "test": "Map crowding, diffusion, and product while testing for direct binding.",
    "against": "Rate differences vanish after local diffusion and activity are included.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Inert crowding spatial pattern",
    "system": "purified microbial lactase assay",
    "id": 2549,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2549",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Parallel blank matching — purified microbial lactase assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified microbial lactase assay, matrix-matched inactive-enzyme blanks will reduce apparent low-rate signals more accurately than buffer blanks.",
    "test": "Use independently known small product additions to compare recovery.",
    "against": "Matrix-matched blanks do not improve measured product accuracy.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Parallel blank matching",
    "system": "purified microbial lactase assay",
    "id": 2550,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2550",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Substrate delivery geometry — purified nonpathogenic bacterial phosphatase assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified nonpathogenic bacterial phosphatase assay, distributed substrate injection will reduce apparent induction time compared with one-point injection.",
    "test": "Measure mixing with an inert tracer and product generation.",
    "against": "Induction reduction is explained entirely by detection or mixing artifacts.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Substrate delivery geometry",
    "system": "purified nonpathogenic bacterial phosphatase assay",
    "id": 2551,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2551",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Wall passivation timing — purified nonpathogenic bacterial phosphatase assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified nonpathogenic bacterial phosphatase assay, passivation before enzyme addition will improve low-concentration rate repeatability.",
    "test": "Measure active enzyme loss and replicate rates.",
    "against": "Repeatability is unchanged after retained activity is matched.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Wall passivation timing",
    "system": "purified nonpathogenic bacterial phosphatase assay",
    "id": 2552,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2552",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Assay depth correction — purified nonpathogenic bacterial phosphatase assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified nonpathogenic bacterial phosphatase assay, shallow reaction layers will reduce rate underestimation from diffusion-limited substrate access.",
    "test": "Compare depth series with independent product sampling.",
    "against": "Rate estimates are depth-independent after optical path correction.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Assay depth correction",
    "system": "purified nonpathogenic bacterial phosphatase assay",
    "id": 2553,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2553",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Mixing rest ratio — purified nonpathogenic bacterial phosphatase assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified nonpathogenic bacterial phosphatase assay, intermittent gentle mixing will preserve more activity per product formed than continuous mixing.",
    "test": "Measure total product and residual enzyme activity.",
    "against": "Preserved activity is no greater at matched conversion and energy input.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Mixing rest ratio",
    "system": "purified nonpathogenic bacterial phosphatase assay",
    "id": 2554,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2554",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Product removal scheduling — purified nonpathogenic bacterial phosphatase assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified nonpathogenic bacterial phosphatase assay, periodic selective product removal will reduce rate decline when product inhibition is reversible.",
    "test": "Verify inhibition independently and track rate through removal cycles.",
    "against": "Rates fail to recover despite verified product removal.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Product removal scheduling",
    "system": "purified nonpathogenic bacterial phosphatase assay",
    "id": 2555,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2555",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Carrier adsorption age — purified nonpathogenic bacterial phosphatase assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified nonpathogenic bacterial phosphatase assay, longer benign carrier adsorption time will broaden release times without increasing active loading proportionally.",
    "test": "Measure active loading, desorption, and product formation.",
    "against": "Release-time broadening follows loading alone.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Carrier adsorption age",
    "system": "purified nonpathogenic bacterial phosphatase assay",
    "id": 2556,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2556",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Thermal equilibration direction — purified nonpathogenic bacterial phosphatase assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified nonpathogenic bacterial phosphatase assay, warming enzyme and substrate separately will reduce early rate variability compared with warming after mixing.",
    "test": "Measure true reaction temperature and products over time.",
    "against": "Variability is unchanged after temperature histories are included.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Thermal equilibration direction",
    "system": "purified nonpathogenic bacterial phosphatase assay",
    "id": 2557,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2557",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Reaction-order pulse diagnosis — purified nonpathogenic bacterial phosphatase assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified nonpathogenic bacterial phosphatase assay, small substrate pulses will reveal developing transport limitation earlier than endpoint yield.",
    "test": "Compare pulse responses with independent transport and kinetic measurements.",
    "against": "Pulses do not improve identification of transport limitation.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Reaction-order pulse diagnosis",
    "system": "purified nonpathogenic bacterial phosphatase assay",
    "id": 2558,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2558",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Inert crowding spatial pattern — purified nonpathogenic bacterial phosphatase assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified nonpathogenic bacterial phosphatase assay, localized inert crowding will produce a different rate map from uniform crowding at equal average concentration.",
    "test": "Map crowding, diffusion, and product while testing for direct binding.",
    "against": "Rate differences vanish after local diffusion and activity are included.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Inert crowding spatial pattern",
    "system": "purified nonpathogenic bacterial phosphatase assay",
    "id": 2559,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2559",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Parallel blank matching — purified nonpathogenic bacterial phosphatase assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified nonpathogenic bacterial phosphatase assay, matrix-matched inactive-enzyme blanks will reduce apparent low-rate signals more accurately than buffer blanks.",
    "test": "Use independently known small product additions to compare recovery.",
    "against": "Matrix-matched blanks do not improve measured product accuracy.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Parallel blank matching",
    "system": "purified nonpathogenic bacterial phosphatase assay",
    "id": 2560,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2560",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Substrate delivery geometry — purified fungal cellulase assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified fungal cellulase assay, distributed substrate injection will reduce apparent induction time compared with one-point injection.",
    "test": "Measure mixing with an inert tracer and product generation.",
    "against": "Induction reduction is explained entirely by detection or mixing artifacts.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Substrate delivery geometry",
    "system": "purified fungal cellulase assay",
    "id": 2561,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2561",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Wall passivation timing — purified fungal cellulase assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified fungal cellulase assay, passivation before enzyme addition will improve low-concentration rate repeatability.",
    "test": "Measure active enzyme loss and replicate rates.",
    "against": "Repeatability is unchanged after retained activity is matched.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Wall passivation timing",
    "system": "purified fungal cellulase assay",
    "id": 2562,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2562",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Assay depth correction — purified fungal cellulase assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified fungal cellulase assay, shallow reaction layers will reduce rate underestimation from diffusion-limited substrate access.",
    "test": "Compare depth series with independent product sampling.",
    "against": "Rate estimates are depth-independent after optical path correction.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Assay depth correction",
    "system": "purified fungal cellulase assay",
    "id": 2563,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2563",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Mixing rest ratio — purified fungal cellulase assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified fungal cellulase assay, intermittent gentle mixing will preserve more activity per product formed than continuous mixing.",
    "test": "Measure total product and residual enzyme activity.",
    "against": "Preserved activity is no greater at matched conversion and energy input.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Mixing rest ratio",
    "system": "purified fungal cellulase assay",
    "id": 2564,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2564",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Product removal scheduling — purified fungal cellulase assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified fungal cellulase assay, periodic selective product removal will reduce rate decline when product inhibition is reversible.",
    "test": "Verify inhibition independently and track rate through removal cycles.",
    "against": "Rates fail to recover despite verified product removal.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Product removal scheduling",
    "system": "purified fungal cellulase assay",
    "id": 2565,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2565",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Carrier adsorption age — purified fungal cellulase assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified fungal cellulase assay, longer benign carrier adsorption time will broaden release times without increasing active loading proportionally.",
    "test": "Measure active loading, desorption, and product formation.",
    "against": "Release-time broadening follows loading alone.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Carrier adsorption age",
    "system": "purified fungal cellulase assay",
    "id": 2566,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2566",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Thermal equilibration direction — purified fungal cellulase assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified fungal cellulase assay, warming enzyme and substrate separately will reduce early rate variability compared with warming after mixing.",
    "test": "Measure true reaction temperature and products over time.",
    "against": "Variability is unchanged after temperature histories are included.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Thermal equilibration direction",
    "system": "purified fungal cellulase assay",
    "id": 2567,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2567",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Reaction-order pulse diagnosis — purified fungal cellulase assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified fungal cellulase assay, small substrate pulses will reveal developing transport limitation earlier than endpoint yield.",
    "test": "Compare pulse responses with independent transport and kinetic measurements.",
    "against": "Pulses do not improve identification of transport limitation.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Reaction-order pulse diagnosis",
    "system": "purified fungal cellulase assay",
    "id": 2568,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2568",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Inert crowding spatial pattern — purified fungal cellulase assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified fungal cellulase assay, localized inert crowding will produce a different rate map from uniform crowding at equal average concentration.",
    "test": "Map crowding, diffusion, and product while testing for direct binding.",
    "against": "Rate differences vanish after local diffusion and activity are included.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Inert crowding spatial pattern",
    "system": "purified fungal cellulase assay",
    "id": 2569,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2569",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Parallel blank matching — purified fungal cellulase assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified fungal cellulase assay, matrix-matched inactive-enzyme blanks will reduce apparent low-rate signals more accurately than buffer blanks.",
    "test": "Use independently known small product additions to compare recovery.",
    "against": "Matrix-matched blanks do not improve measured product accuracy.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Parallel blank matching",
    "system": "purified fungal cellulase assay",
    "id": 2570,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2570",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Substrate delivery geometry — purified plant protease assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified plant protease assay, distributed substrate injection will reduce apparent induction time compared with one-point injection.",
    "test": "Measure mixing with an inert tracer and product generation.",
    "against": "Induction reduction is explained entirely by detection or mixing artifacts.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Substrate delivery geometry",
    "system": "purified plant protease assay",
    "id": 2571,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2571",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Wall passivation timing — purified plant protease assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified plant protease assay, passivation before enzyme addition will improve low-concentration rate repeatability.",
    "test": "Measure active enzyme loss and replicate rates.",
    "against": "Repeatability is unchanged after retained activity is matched.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Wall passivation timing",
    "system": "purified plant protease assay",
    "id": 2572,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2572",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Assay depth correction — purified plant protease assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified plant protease assay, shallow reaction layers will reduce rate underestimation from diffusion-limited substrate access.",
    "test": "Compare depth series with independent product sampling.",
    "against": "Rate estimates are depth-independent after optical path correction.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Assay depth correction",
    "system": "purified plant protease assay",
    "id": 2573,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2573",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Mixing rest ratio — purified plant protease assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified plant protease assay, intermittent gentle mixing will preserve more activity per product formed than continuous mixing.",
    "test": "Measure total product and residual enzyme activity.",
    "against": "Preserved activity is no greater at matched conversion and energy input.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Mixing rest ratio",
    "system": "purified plant protease assay",
    "id": 2574,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2574",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Product removal scheduling — purified plant protease assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified plant protease assay, periodic selective product removal will reduce rate decline when product inhibition is reversible.",
    "test": "Verify inhibition independently and track rate through removal cycles.",
    "against": "Rates fail to recover despite verified product removal.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Product removal scheduling",
    "system": "purified plant protease assay",
    "id": 2575,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2575",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Carrier adsorption age — purified plant protease assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified plant protease assay, longer benign carrier adsorption time will broaden release times without increasing active loading proportionally.",
    "test": "Measure active loading, desorption, and product formation.",
    "against": "Release-time broadening follows loading alone.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Carrier adsorption age",
    "system": "purified plant protease assay",
    "id": 2576,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2576",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Thermal equilibration direction — purified plant protease assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified plant protease assay, warming enzyme and substrate separately will reduce early rate variability compared with warming after mixing.",
    "test": "Measure true reaction temperature and products over time.",
    "against": "Variability is unchanged after temperature histories are included.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Thermal equilibration direction",
    "system": "purified plant protease assay",
    "id": 2577,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2577",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Reaction-order pulse diagnosis — purified plant protease assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified plant protease assay, small substrate pulses will reveal developing transport limitation earlier than endpoint yield.",
    "test": "Compare pulse responses with independent transport and kinetic measurements.",
    "against": "Pulses do not improve identification of transport limitation.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Reaction-order pulse diagnosis",
    "system": "purified plant protease assay",
    "id": 2578,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2578",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Inert crowding spatial pattern — purified plant protease assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified plant protease assay, localized inert crowding will produce a different rate map from uniform crowding at equal average concentration.",
    "test": "Map crowding, diffusion, and product while testing for direct binding.",
    "against": "Rate differences vanish after local diffusion and activity are included.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Inert crowding spatial pattern",
    "system": "purified plant protease assay",
    "id": 2579,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2579",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Parallel blank matching — purified plant protease assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified plant protease assay, matrix-matched inactive-enzyme blanks will reduce apparent low-rate signals more accurately than buffer blanks.",
    "test": "Use independently known small product additions to compare recovery.",
    "against": "Matrix-matched blanks do not improve measured product accuracy.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Parallel blank matching",
    "system": "purified plant protease assay",
    "id": 2580,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2580",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Substrate delivery geometry — purified microbial lipase assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified microbial lipase assay, distributed substrate injection will reduce apparent induction time compared with one-point injection.",
    "test": "Measure mixing with an inert tracer and product generation.",
    "against": "Induction reduction is explained entirely by detection or mixing artifacts.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Substrate delivery geometry",
    "system": "purified microbial lipase assay",
    "id": 2581,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2581",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Wall passivation timing — purified microbial lipase assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified microbial lipase assay, passivation before enzyme addition will improve low-concentration rate repeatability.",
    "test": "Measure active enzyme loss and replicate rates.",
    "against": "Repeatability is unchanged after retained activity is matched.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Wall passivation timing",
    "system": "purified microbial lipase assay",
    "id": 2582,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2582",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Assay depth correction — purified microbial lipase assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified microbial lipase assay, shallow reaction layers will reduce rate underestimation from diffusion-limited substrate access.",
    "test": "Compare depth series with independent product sampling.",
    "against": "Rate estimates are depth-independent after optical path correction.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Assay depth correction",
    "system": "purified microbial lipase assay",
    "id": 2583,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2583",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Mixing rest ratio — purified microbial lipase assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified microbial lipase assay, intermittent gentle mixing will preserve more activity per product formed than continuous mixing.",
    "test": "Measure total product and residual enzyme activity.",
    "against": "Preserved activity is no greater at matched conversion and energy input.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Mixing rest ratio",
    "system": "purified microbial lipase assay",
    "id": 2584,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2584",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Product removal scheduling — purified microbial lipase assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified microbial lipase assay, periodic selective product removal will reduce rate decline when product inhibition is reversible.",
    "test": "Verify inhibition independently and track rate through removal cycles.",
    "against": "Rates fail to recover despite verified product removal.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Product removal scheduling",
    "system": "purified microbial lipase assay",
    "id": 2585,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2585",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Carrier adsorption age — purified microbial lipase assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified microbial lipase assay, longer benign carrier adsorption time will broaden release times without increasing active loading proportionally.",
    "test": "Measure active loading, desorption, and product formation.",
    "against": "Release-time broadening follows loading alone.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Carrier adsorption age",
    "system": "purified microbial lipase assay",
    "id": 2586,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2586",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Thermal equilibration direction — purified microbial lipase assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified microbial lipase assay, warming enzyme and substrate separately will reduce early rate variability compared with warming after mixing.",
    "test": "Measure true reaction temperature and products over time.",
    "against": "Variability is unchanged after temperature histories are included.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Thermal equilibration direction",
    "system": "purified microbial lipase assay",
    "id": 2587,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2587",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Reaction-order pulse diagnosis — purified microbial lipase assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified microbial lipase assay, small substrate pulses will reveal developing transport limitation earlier than endpoint yield.",
    "test": "Compare pulse responses with independent transport and kinetic measurements.",
    "against": "Pulses do not improve identification of transport limitation.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Reaction-order pulse diagnosis",
    "system": "purified microbial lipase assay",
    "id": 2588,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2588",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Inert crowding spatial pattern — purified microbial lipase assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified microbial lipase assay, localized inert crowding will produce a different rate map from uniform crowding at equal average concentration.",
    "test": "Map crowding, diffusion, and product while testing for direct binding.",
    "against": "Rate differences vanish after local diffusion and activity are included.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Inert crowding spatial pattern",
    "system": "purified microbial lipase assay",
    "id": 2589,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2589",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Parallel blank matching — purified microbial lipase assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified microbial lipase assay, matrix-matched inactive-enzyme blanks will reduce apparent low-rate signals more accurately than buffer blanks.",
    "test": "Use independently known small product additions to compare recovery.",
    "against": "Matrix-matched blanks do not improve measured product accuracy.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Parallel blank matching",
    "system": "purified microbial lipase assay",
    "id": 2590,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2590",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Substrate delivery geometry — purified microbial glucose-isomerase assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified microbial glucose-isomerase assay, distributed substrate injection will reduce apparent induction time compared with one-point injection.",
    "test": "Measure mixing with an inert tracer and product generation.",
    "against": "Induction reduction is explained entirely by detection or mixing artifacts.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Substrate delivery geometry",
    "system": "purified microbial glucose-isomerase assay",
    "id": 2591,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2591",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Wall passivation timing — purified microbial glucose-isomerase assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified microbial glucose-isomerase assay, passivation before enzyme addition will improve low-concentration rate repeatability.",
    "test": "Measure active enzyme loss and replicate rates.",
    "against": "Repeatability is unchanged after retained activity is matched.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Wall passivation timing",
    "system": "purified microbial glucose-isomerase assay",
    "id": 2592,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2592",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Assay depth correction — purified microbial glucose-isomerase assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified microbial glucose-isomerase assay, shallow reaction layers will reduce rate underestimation from diffusion-limited substrate access.",
    "test": "Compare depth series with independent product sampling.",
    "against": "Rate estimates are depth-independent after optical path correction.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Assay depth correction",
    "system": "purified microbial glucose-isomerase assay",
    "id": 2593,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2593",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Mixing rest ratio — purified microbial glucose-isomerase assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified microbial glucose-isomerase assay, intermittent gentle mixing will preserve more activity per product formed than continuous mixing.",
    "test": "Measure total product and residual enzyme activity.",
    "against": "Preserved activity is no greater at matched conversion and energy input.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Mixing rest ratio",
    "system": "purified microbial glucose-isomerase assay",
    "id": 2594,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2594",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Product removal scheduling — purified microbial glucose-isomerase assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified microbial glucose-isomerase assay, periodic selective product removal will reduce rate decline when product inhibition is reversible.",
    "test": "Verify inhibition independently and track rate through removal cycles.",
    "against": "Rates fail to recover despite verified product removal.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Product removal scheduling",
    "system": "purified microbial glucose-isomerase assay",
    "id": 2595,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2595",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Carrier adsorption age — purified microbial glucose-isomerase assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified microbial glucose-isomerase assay, longer benign carrier adsorption time will broaden release times without increasing active loading proportionally.",
    "test": "Measure active loading, desorption, and product formation.",
    "against": "Release-time broadening follows loading alone.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Carrier adsorption age",
    "system": "purified microbial glucose-isomerase assay",
    "id": 2596,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2596",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Thermal equilibration direction — purified microbial glucose-isomerase assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified microbial glucose-isomerase assay, warming enzyme and substrate separately will reduce early rate variability compared with warming after mixing.",
    "test": "Measure true reaction temperature and products over time.",
    "against": "Variability is unchanged after temperature histories are included.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Thermal equilibration direction",
    "system": "purified microbial glucose-isomerase assay",
    "id": 2597,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2597",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Reaction-order pulse diagnosis — purified microbial glucose-isomerase assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified microbial glucose-isomerase assay, small substrate pulses will reveal developing transport limitation earlier than endpoint yield.",
    "test": "Compare pulse responses with independent transport and kinetic measurements.",
    "against": "Pulses do not improve identification of transport limitation.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Reaction-order pulse diagnosis",
    "system": "purified microbial glucose-isomerase assay",
    "id": 2598,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2598",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Inert crowding spatial pattern — purified microbial glucose-isomerase assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified microbial glucose-isomerase assay, localized inert crowding will produce a different rate map from uniform crowding at equal average concentration.",
    "test": "Map crowding, diffusion, and product while testing for direct binding.",
    "against": "Rate differences vanish after local diffusion and activity are included.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Inert crowding spatial pattern",
    "system": "purified microbial glucose-isomerase assay",
    "id": 2599,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2599",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Parallel blank matching — purified microbial glucose-isomerase assay",
    "hypothesis": "For purified microbial glucose-isomerase assay, matrix-matched inactive-enzyme blanks will reduce apparent low-rate signals more accurately than buffer blanks.",
    "test": "Use independently known small product additions to compare recovery.",
    "against": "Matrix-matched blanks do not improve measured product accuracy.",
    "category": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport",
    "controls": "Use validated compatible benign substrates and detection; match active enzyme, substrate, pH, temperature, optical artifacts, and independently measured intrinsic kinetics.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Cell-free enzyme assay transport: Parallel blank matching",
    "system": "purified microbial glucose-isomerase assay",
    "id": 2600,
    "access_score": 2,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Validated cell-free assay, controlled reagents, and calibrated product and transport measurements.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2600",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Coupling gradient direction — Helmholtz cavity array",
    "hypothesis": "For Helmholtz cavity array, a gradual coupling-strength gradient will shift where sound energy localizes without a comparable shift in the main absorption frequency.",
    "test": "Map local pressure and total absorption with reversed gradients.",
    "against": "Localization fails to reverse or requires a comparable frequency shift.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Coupling gradient direction",
    "system": "Helmholtz cavity array",
    "id": 2601,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2601",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Boundary resonator detuning — Helmholtz cavity array",
    "hypothesis": "For Helmholtz cavity array, slight boundary detuning will reduce sensitivity to mounting changes.",
    "test": "Measure spectra across mount stiffnesses with matched interior elements.",
    "against": "Mount-induced spectral variability is not reduced.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Boundary resonator detuning",
    "system": "Helmholtz cavity array",
    "id": 2602,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2602",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Alternating loss distribution — Helmholtz cavity array",
    "hypothesis": "For Helmholtz cavity array, alternating high-loss and low-loss elements will broaden useful absorption more than uniform loss at equal total dissipation capacity.",
    "test": "Measure impedance and absorption with independently calibrated element losses.",
    "against": "Bandwidth is no larger after total loss is matched.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Alternating loss distribution",
    "system": "Helmholtz cavity array",
    "id": 2603,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2603",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Off-axis incidence memory — Helmholtz cavity array",
    "hypothesis": "For Helmholtz cavity array, reversible mechanical deformation will change angular response more than normal-incidence response.",
    "test": "Measure spectra across angles before and during mild deformation.",
    "against": "Angular and normal responses change proportionally.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Off-axis incidence memory",
    "system": "Helmholtz cavity array",
    "id": 2604,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2604",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Distributed leak tolerance — Helmholtz cavity array",
    "hypothesis": "For Helmholtz cavity array, many small leaks will degrade peak absorption less than one equal-area leak.",
    "test": "Introduce calibrated leaks and measure acoustic energy balance.",
    "against": "Degradation depends only on total leak area.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Distributed leak tolerance",
    "system": "Helmholtz cavity array",
    "id": 2605,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2605",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Humidity stabilization lining — Helmholtz cavity array",
    "hypothesis": "For Helmholtz cavity array, a thin low-sorption lining will reduce humidity-driven resonance drift without materially reducing peak absorption.",
    "test": "Measure absorption and cavity humidity over controlled cycles.",
    "against": "Drift reduction requires a comparable loss of absorption.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Humidity stabilization lining",
    "system": "Helmholtz cavity array",
    "id": 2606,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2606",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Element order permutation — Helmholtz cavity array",
    "hypothesis": "For Helmholtz cavity array, ordering elements by resonance frequency will reduce local pressure hotspots relative to random order.",
    "test": "Map pressure and absorption with identical element sets.",
    "against": "Hotspot intensity is unchanged after boundary conditions are matched.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Element order permutation",
    "system": "Helmholtz cavity array",
    "id": 2607,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2607",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pulse ringdown separation — Helmholtz cavity array",
    "hypothesis": "For Helmholtz cavity array, short-pulse ringdown will distinguish weak coupling changes from material damping more reliably than a single steady tone.",
    "test": "Create independently known coupling and damping changes and test blind recovery.",
    "against": "Ringdown does not improve parameter recovery at equal measurement time.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Pulse ringdown separation",
    "system": "Helmholtz cavity array",
    "id": 2608,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2608",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Thermal expansion compensation — Helmholtz cavity array",
    "hypothesis": "For Helmholtz cavity array, a passive neck-length compensator will reduce temperature-driven resonance drift.",
    "test": "Measure geometry and spectra against uncompensated controls.",
    "against": "Resonance drift is no smaller after actual temperature is included.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Thermal expansion compensation",
    "system": "Helmholtz cavity array",
    "id": 2609,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2609",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Partial blockage warning — Helmholtz cavity array",
    "hypothesis": "For Helmholtz cavity array, inter-element phase differences will reveal an obstructed opening before mean absorption changes substantially.",
    "test": "Introduce blinded partial blockages and record local phase and total absorption.",
    "against": "Phase offers no earlier reliable warning at a matched false-alarm rate.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Partial blockage warning",
    "system": "Helmholtz cavity array",
    "id": 2610,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2610",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Coupling gradient direction — quarter-wave tube array",
    "hypothesis": "For quarter-wave tube array, a gradual coupling-strength gradient will shift where sound energy localizes without a comparable shift in the main absorption frequency.",
    "test": "Map local pressure and total absorption with reversed gradients.",
    "against": "Localization fails to reverse or requires a comparable frequency shift.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Coupling gradient direction",
    "system": "quarter-wave tube array",
    "id": 2611,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2611",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Boundary resonator detuning — quarter-wave tube array",
    "hypothesis": "For quarter-wave tube array, slight boundary detuning will reduce sensitivity to mounting changes.",
    "test": "Measure spectra across mount stiffnesses with matched interior elements.",
    "against": "Mount-induced spectral variability is not reduced.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Boundary resonator detuning",
    "system": "quarter-wave tube array",
    "id": 2612,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2612",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Alternating loss distribution — quarter-wave tube array",
    "hypothesis": "For quarter-wave tube array, alternating high-loss and low-loss elements will broaden useful absorption more than uniform loss at equal total dissipation capacity.",
    "test": "Measure impedance and absorption with independently calibrated element losses.",
    "against": "Bandwidth is no larger after total loss is matched.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Alternating loss distribution",
    "system": "quarter-wave tube array",
    "id": 2613,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2613",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Off-axis incidence memory — quarter-wave tube array",
    "hypothesis": "For quarter-wave tube array, reversible mechanical deformation will change angular response more than normal-incidence response.",
    "test": "Measure spectra across angles before and during mild deformation.",
    "against": "Angular and normal responses change proportionally.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Off-axis incidence memory",
    "system": "quarter-wave tube array",
    "id": 2614,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2614",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Distributed leak tolerance — quarter-wave tube array",
    "hypothesis": "For quarter-wave tube array, many small leaks will degrade peak absorption less than one equal-area leak.",
    "test": "Introduce calibrated leaks and measure acoustic energy balance.",
    "against": "Degradation depends only on total leak area.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Distributed leak tolerance",
    "system": "quarter-wave tube array",
    "id": 2615,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2615",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Humidity stabilization lining — quarter-wave tube array",
    "hypothesis": "For quarter-wave tube array, a thin low-sorption lining will reduce humidity-driven resonance drift without materially reducing peak absorption.",
    "test": "Measure absorption and cavity humidity over controlled cycles.",
    "against": "Drift reduction requires a comparable loss of absorption.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Humidity stabilization lining",
    "system": "quarter-wave tube array",
    "id": 2616,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2616",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Element order permutation — quarter-wave tube array",
    "hypothesis": "For quarter-wave tube array, ordering elements by resonance frequency will reduce local pressure hotspots relative to random order.",
    "test": "Map pressure and absorption with identical element sets.",
    "against": "Hotspot intensity is unchanged after boundary conditions are matched.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Element order permutation",
    "system": "quarter-wave tube array",
    "id": 2617,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2617",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pulse ringdown separation — quarter-wave tube array",
    "hypothesis": "For quarter-wave tube array, short-pulse ringdown will distinguish weak coupling changes from material damping more reliably than a single steady tone.",
    "test": "Create independently known coupling and damping changes and test blind recovery.",
    "against": "Ringdown does not improve parameter recovery at equal measurement time.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Pulse ringdown separation",
    "system": "quarter-wave tube array",
    "id": 2618,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2618",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Thermal expansion compensation — quarter-wave tube array",
    "hypothesis": "For quarter-wave tube array, a passive neck-length compensator will reduce temperature-driven resonance drift.",
    "test": "Measure geometry and spectra against uncompensated controls.",
    "against": "Resonance drift is no smaller after actual temperature is included.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Thermal expansion compensation",
    "system": "quarter-wave tube array",
    "id": 2619,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2619",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Partial blockage warning — quarter-wave tube array",
    "hypothesis": "For quarter-wave tube array, inter-element phase differences will reveal an obstructed opening before mean absorption changes substantially.",
    "test": "Introduce blinded partial blockages and record local phase and total absorption.",
    "against": "Phase offers no earlier reliable warning at a matched false-alarm rate.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Partial blockage warning",
    "system": "quarter-wave tube array",
    "id": 2620,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2620",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Coupling gradient direction — membrane-backed cavity array",
    "hypothesis": "For membrane-backed cavity array, a gradual coupling-strength gradient will shift where sound energy localizes without a comparable shift in the main absorption frequency.",
    "test": "Map local pressure and total absorption with reversed gradients.",
    "against": "Localization fails to reverse or requires a comparable frequency shift.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Coupling gradient direction",
    "system": "membrane-backed cavity array",
    "id": 2621,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2621",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Boundary resonator detuning — membrane-backed cavity array",
    "hypothesis": "For membrane-backed cavity array, slight boundary detuning will reduce sensitivity to mounting changes.",
    "test": "Measure spectra across mount stiffnesses with matched interior elements.",
    "against": "Mount-induced spectral variability is not reduced.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Boundary resonator detuning",
    "system": "membrane-backed cavity array",
    "id": 2622,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2622",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Alternating loss distribution — membrane-backed cavity array",
    "hypothesis": "For membrane-backed cavity array, alternating high-loss and low-loss elements will broaden useful absorption more than uniform loss at equal total dissipation capacity.",
    "test": "Measure impedance and absorption with independently calibrated element losses.",
    "against": "Bandwidth is no larger after total loss is matched.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Alternating loss distribution",
    "system": "membrane-backed cavity array",
    "id": 2623,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2623",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Off-axis incidence memory — membrane-backed cavity array",
    "hypothesis": "For membrane-backed cavity array, reversible mechanical deformation will change angular response more than normal-incidence response.",
    "test": "Measure spectra across angles before and during mild deformation.",
    "against": "Angular and normal responses change proportionally.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Off-axis incidence memory",
    "system": "membrane-backed cavity array",
    "id": 2624,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2624",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Distributed leak tolerance — membrane-backed cavity array",
    "hypothesis": "For membrane-backed cavity array, many small leaks will degrade peak absorption less than one equal-area leak.",
    "test": "Introduce calibrated leaks and measure acoustic energy balance.",
    "against": "Degradation depends only on total leak area.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Distributed leak tolerance",
    "system": "membrane-backed cavity array",
    "id": 2625,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2625",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Humidity stabilization lining — membrane-backed cavity array",
    "hypothesis": "For membrane-backed cavity array, a thin low-sorption lining will reduce humidity-driven resonance drift without materially reducing peak absorption.",
    "test": "Measure absorption and cavity humidity over controlled cycles.",
    "against": "Drift reduction requires a comparable loss of absorption.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Humidity stabilization lining",
    "system": "membrane-backed cavity array",
    "id": 2626,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2626",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Element order permutation — membrane-backed cavity array",
    "hypothesis": "For membrane-backed cavity array, ordering elements by resonance frequency will reduce local pressure hotspots relative to random order.",
    "test": "Map pressure and absorption with identical element sets.",
    "against": "Hotspot intensity is unchanged after boundary conditions are matched.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Element order permutation",
    "system": "membrane-backed cavity array",
    "id": 2627,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2627",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pulse ringdown separation — membrane-backed cavity array",
    "hypothesis": "For membrane-backed cavity array, short-pulse ringdown will distinguish weak coupling changes from material damping more reliably than a single steady tone.",
    "test": "Create independently known coupling and damping changes and test blind recovery.",
    "against": "Ringdown does not improve parameter recovery at equal measurement time.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Pulse ringdown separation",
    "system": "membrane-backed cavity array",
    "id": 2628,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2628",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Thermal expansion compensation — membrane-backed cavity array",
    "hypothesis": "For membrane-backed cavity array, a passive neck-length compensator will reduce temperature-driven resonance drift.",
    "test": "Measure geometry and spectra against uncompensated controls.",
    "against": "Resonance drift is no smaller after actual temperature is included.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Thermal expansion compensation",
    "system": "membrane-backed cavity array",
    "id": 2629,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2629",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Partial blockage warning — membrane-backed cavity array",
    "hypothesis": "For membrane-backed cavity array, inter-element phase differences will reveal an obstructed opening before mean absorption changes substantially.",
    "test": "Introduce blinded partial blockages and record local phase and total absorption.",
    "against": "Phase offers no earlier reliable warning at a matched false-alarm rate.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Partial blockage warning",
    "system": "membrane-backed cavity array",
    "id": 2630,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2630",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Coupling gradient direction — microperforated panel array",
    "hypothesis": "For microperforated panel array, a gradual coupling-strength gradient will shift where sound energy localizes without a comparable shift in the main absorption frequency.",
    "test": "Map local pressure and total absorption with reversed gradients.",
    "against": "Localization fails to reverse or requires a comparable frequency shift.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Coupling gradient direction",
    "system": "microperforated panel array",
    "id": 2631,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2631",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Boundary resonator detuning — microperforated panel array",
    "hypothesis": "For microperforated panel array, slight boundary detuning will reduce sensitivity to mounting changes.",
    "test": "Measure spectra across mount stiffnesses with matched interior elements.",
    "against": "Mount-induced spectral variability is not reduced.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Boundary resonator detuning",
    "system": "microperforated panel array",
    "id": 2632,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2632",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Alternating loss distribution — microperforated panel array",
    "hypothesis": "For microperforated panel array, alternating high-loss and low-loss elements will broaden useful absorption more than uniform loss at equal total dissipation capacity.",
    "test": "Measure impedance and absorption with independently calibrated element losses.",
    "against": "Bandwidth is no larger after total loss is matched.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Alternating loss distribution",
    "system": "microperforated panel array",
    "id": 2633,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2633",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Off-axis incidence memory — microperforated panel array",
    "hypothesis": "For microperforated panel array, reversible mechanical deformation will change angular response more than normal-incidence response.",
    "test": "Measure spectra across angles before and during mild deformation.",
    "against": "Angular and normal responses change proportionally.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Off-axis incidence memory",
    "system": "microperforated panel array",
    "id": 2634,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2634",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Distributed leak tolerance — microperforated panel array",
    "hypothesis": "For microperforated panel array, many small leaks will degrade peak absorption less than one equal-area leak.",
    "test": "Introduce calibrated leaks and measure acoustic energy balance.",
    "against": "Degradation depends only on total leak area.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Distributed leak tolerance",
    "system": "microperforated panel array",
    "id": 2635,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2635",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Humidity stabilization lining — microperforated panel array",
    "hypothesis": "For microperforated panel array, a thin low-sorption lining will reduce humidity-driven resonance drift without materially reducing peak absorption.",
    "test": "Measure absorption and cavity humidity over controlled cycles.",
    "against": "Drift reduction requires a comparable loss of absorption.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Humidity stabilization lining",
    "system": "microperforated panel array",
    "id": 2636,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2636",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Element order permutation — microperforated panel array",
    "hypothesis": "For microperforated panel array, ordering elements by resonance frequency will reduce local pressure hotspots relative to random order.",
    "test": "Map pressure and absorption with identical element sets.",
    "against": "Hotspot intensity is unchanged after boundary conditions are matched.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Element order permutation",
    "system": "microperforated panel array",
    "id": 2637,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2637",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pulse ringdown separation — microperforated panel array",
    "hypothesis": "For microperforated panel array, short-pulse ringdown will distinguish weak coupling changes from material damping more reliably than a single steady tone.",
    "test": "Create independently known coupling and damping changes and test blind recovery.",
    "against": "Ringdown does not improve parameter recovery at equal measurement time.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Pulse ringdown separation",
    "system": "microperforated panel array",
    "id": 2638,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2638",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Thermal expansion compensation — microperforated panel array",
    "hypothesis": "For microperforated panel array, a passive neck-length compensator will reduce temperature-driven resonance drift.",
    "test": "Measure geometry and spectra against uncompensated controls.",
    "against": "Resonance drift is no smaller after actual temperature is included.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Thermal expansion compensation",
    "system": "microperforated panel array",
    "id": 2639,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2639",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Partial blockage warning — microperforated panel array",
    "hypothesis": "For microperforated panel array, inter-element phase differences will reveal an obstructed opening before mean absorption changes substantially.",
    "test": "Introduce blinded partial blockages and record local phase and total absorption.",
    "against": "Phase offers no earlier reliable warning at a matched false-alarm rate.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Partial blockage warning",
    "system": "microperforated panel array",
    "id": 2640,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2640",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Coupling gradient direction — labyrinthine channel array",
    "hypothesis": "For labyrinthine channel array, a gradual coupling-strength gradient will shift where sound energy localizes without a comparable shift in the main absorption frequency.",
    "test": "Map local pressure and total absorption with reversed gradients.",
    "against": "Localization fails to reverse or requires a comparable frequency shift.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Coupling gradient direction",
    "system": "labyrinthine channel array",
    "id": 2641,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2641",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Boundary resonator detuning — labyrinthine channel array",
    "hypothesis": "For labyrinthine channel array, slight boundary detuning will reduce sensitivity to mounting changes.",
    "test": "Measure spectra across mount stiffnesses with matched interior elements.",
    "against": "Mount-induced spectral variability is not reduced.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Boundary resonator detuning",
    "system": "labyrinthine channel array",
    "id": 2642,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2642",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Alternating loss distribution — labyrinthine channel array",
    "hypothesis": "For labyrinthine channel array, alternating high-loss and low-loss elements will broaden useful absorption more than uniform loss at equal total dissipation capacity.",
    "test": "Measure impedance and absorption with independently calibrated element losses.",
    "against": "Bandwidth is no larger after total loss is matched.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Alternating loss distribution",
    "system": "labyrinthine channel array",
    "id": 2643,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2643",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Off-axis incidence memory — labyrinthine channel array",
    "hypothesis": "For labyrinthine channel array, reversible mechanical deformation will change angular response more than normal-incidence response.",
    "test": "Measure spectra across angles before and during mild deformation.",
    "against": "Angular and normal responses change proportionally.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Off-axis incidence memory",
    "system": "labyrinthine channel array",
    "id": 2644,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2644",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Distributed leak tolerance — labyrinthine channel array",
    "hypothesis": "For labyrinthine channel array, many small leaks will degrade peak absorption less than one equal-area leak.",
    "test": "Introduce calibrated leaks and measure acoustic energy balance.",
    "against": "Degradation depends only on total leak area.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Distributed leak tolerance",
    "system": "labyrinthine channel array",
    "id": 2645,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2645",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Humidity stabilization lining — labyrinthine channel array",
    "hypothesis": "For labyrinthine channel array, a thin low-sorption lining will reduce humidity-driven resonance drift without materially reducing peak absorption.",
    "test": "Measure absorption and cavity humidity over controlled cycles.",
    "against": "Drift reduction requires a comparable loss of absorption.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Humidity stabilization lining",
    "system": "labyrinthine channel array",
    "id": 2646,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2646",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Element order permutation — labyrinthine channel array",
    "hypothesis": "For labyrinthine channel array, ordering elements by resonance frequency will reduce local pressure hotspots relative to random order.",
    "test": "Map pressure and absorption with identical element sets.",
    "against": "Hotspot intensity is unchanged after boundary conditions are matched.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Element order permutation",
    "system": "labyrinthine channel array",
    "id": 2647,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2647",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pulse ringdown separation — labyrinthine channel array",
    "hypothesis": "For labyrinthine channel array, short-pulse ringdown will distinguish weak coupling changes from material damping more reliably than a single steady tone.",
    "test": "Create independently known coupling and damping changes and test blind recovery.",
    "against": "Ringdown does not improve parameter recovery at equal measurement time.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Pulse ringdown separation",
    "system": "labyrinthine channel array",
    "id": 2648,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2648",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Thermal expansion compensation — labyrinthine channel array",
    "hypothesis": "For labyrinthine channel array, a passive neck-length compensator will reduce temperature-driven resonance drift.",
    "test": "Measure geometry and spectra against uncompensated controls.",
    "against": "Resonance drift is no smaller after actual temperature is included.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Thermal expansion compensation",
    "system": "labyrinthine channel array",
    "id": 2649,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2649",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Partial blockage warning — labyrinthine channel array",
    "hypothesis": "For labyrinthine channel array, inter-element phase differences will reveal an obstructed opening before mean absorption changes substantially.",
    "test": "Introduce blinded partial blockages and record local phase and total absorption.",
    "against": "Phase offers no earlier reliable warning at a matched false-alarm rate.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Partial blockage warning",
    "system": "labyrinthine channel array",
    "id": 2650,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2650",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Coupling gradient direction — slit-cavity array",
    "hypothesis": "For slit-cavity array, a gradual coupling-strength gradient will shift where sound energy localizes without a comparable shift in the main absorption frequency.",
    "test": "Map local pressure and total absorption with reversed gradients.",
    "against": "Localization fails to reverse or requires a comparable frequency shift.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Coupling gradient direction",
    "system": "slit-cavity array",
    "id": 2651,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2651",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Boundary resonator detuning — slit-cavity array",
    "hypothesis": "For slit-cavity array, slight boundary detuning will reduce sensitivity to mounting changes.",
    "test": "Measure spectra across mount stiffnesses with matched interior elements.",
    "against": "Mount-induced spectral variability is not reduced.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Boundary resonator detuning",
    "system": "slit-cavity array",
    "id": 2652,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2652",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Alternating loss distribution — slit-cavity array",
    "hypothesis": "For slit-cavity array, alternating high-loss and low-loss elements will broaden useful absorption more than uniform loss at equal total dissipation capacity.",
    "test": "Measure impedance and absorption with independently calibrated element losses.",
    "against": "Bandwidth is no larger after total loss is matched.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Alternating loss distribution",
    "system": "slit-cavity array",
    "id": 2653,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2653",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Off-axis incidence memory — slit-cavity array",
    "hypothesis": "For slit-cavity array, reversible mechanical deformation will change angular response more than normal-incidence response.",
    "test": "Measure spectra across angles before and during mild deformation.",
    "against": "Angular and normal responses change proportionally.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Off-axis incidence memory",
    "system": "slit-cavity array",
    "id": 2654,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2654",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Distributed leak tolerance — slit-cavity array",
    "hypothesis": "For slit-cavity array, many small leaks will degrade peak absorption less than one equal-area leak.",
    "test": "Introduce calibrated leaks and measure acoustic energy balance.",
    "against": "Degradation depends only on total leak area.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Distributed leak tolerance",
    "system": "slit-cavity array",
    "id": 2655,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2655",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Humidity stabilization lining — slit-cavity array",
    "hypothesis": "For slit-cavity array, a thin low-sorption lining will reduce humidity-driven resonance drift without materially reducing peak absorption.",
    "test": "Measure absorption and cavity humidity over controlled cycles.",
    "against": "Drift reduction requires a comparable loss of absorption.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Humidity stabilization lining",
    "system": "slit-cavity array",
    "id": 2656,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2656",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Element order permutation — slit-cavity array",
    "hypothesis": "For slit-cavity array, ordering elements by resonance frequency will reduce local pressure hotspots relative to random order.",
    "test": "Map pressure and absorption with identical element sets.",
    "against": "Hotspot intensity is unchanged after boundary conditions are matched.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Element order permutation",
    "system": "slit-cavity array",
    "id": 2657,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2657",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pulse ringdown separation — slit-cavity array",
    "hypothesis": "For slit-cavity array, short-pulse ringdown will distinguish weak coupling changes from material damping more reliably than a single steady tone.",
    "test": "Create independently known coupling and damping changes and test blind recovery.",
    "against": "Ringdown does not improve parameter recovery at equal measurement time.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Pulse ringdown separation",
    "system": "slit-cavity array",
    "id": 2658,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2658",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Thermal expansion compensation — slit-cavity array",
    "hypothesis": "For slit-cavity array, a passive neck-length compensator will reduce temperature-driven resonance drift.",
    "test": "Measure geometry and spectra against uncompensated controls.",
    "against": "Resonance drift is no smaller after actual temperature is included.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Thermal expansion compensation",
    "system": "slit-cavity array",
    "id": 2659,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2659",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Partial blockage warning — slit-cavity array",
    "hypothesis": "For slit-cavity array, inter-element phase differences will reveal an obstructed opening before mean absorption changes substantially.",
    "test": "Introduce blinded partial blockages and record local phase and total absorption.",
    "against": "Phase offers no earlier reliable warning at a matched false-alarm rate.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Partial blockage warning",
    "system": "slit-cavity array",
    "id": 2660,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2660",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Coupling gradient direction — flexible-neck cavity array",
    "hypothesis": "For flexible-neck cavity array, a gradual coupling-strength gradient will shift where sound energy localizes without a comparable shift in the main absorption frequency.",
    "test": "Map local pressure and total absorption with reversed gradients.",
    "against": "Localization fails to reverse or requires a comparable frequency shift.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Coupling gradient direction",
    "system": "flexible-neck cavity array",
    "id": 2661,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2661",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Boundary resonator detuning — flexible-neck cavity array",
    "hypothesis": "For flexible-neck cavity array, slight boundary detuning will reduce sensitivity to mounting changes.",
    "test": "Measure spectra across mount stiffnesses with matched interior elements.",
    "against": "Mount-induced spectral variability is not reduced.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Boundary resonator detuning",
    "system": "flexible-neck cavity array",
    "id": 2662,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2662",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Alternating loss distribution — flexible-neck cavity array",
    "hypothesis": "For flexible-neck cavity array, alternating high-loss and low-loss elements will broaden useful absorption more than uniform loss at equal total dissipation capacity.",
    "test": "Measure impedance and absorption with independently calibrated element losses.",
    "against": "Bandwidth is no larger after total loss is matched.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Alternating loss distribution",
    "system": "flexible-neck cavity array",
    "id": 2663,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2663",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Off-axis incidence memory — flexible-neck cavity array",
    "hypothesis": "For flexible-neck cavity array, reversible mechanical deformation will change angular response more than normal-incidence response.",
    "test": "Measure spectra across angles before and during mild deformation.",
    "against": "Angular and normal responses change proportionally.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Off-axis incidence memory",
    "system": "flexible-neck cavity array",
    "id": 2664,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2664",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Distributed leak tolerance — flexible-neck cavity array",
    "hypothesis": "For flexible-neck cavity array, many small leaks will degrade peak absorption less than one equal-area leak.",
    "test": "Introduce calibrated leaks and measure acoustic energy balance.",
    "against": "Degradation depends only on total leak area.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Distributed leak tolerance",
    "system": "flexible-neck cavity array",
    "id": 2665,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2665",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Humidity stabilization lining — flexible-neck cavity array",
    "hypothesis": "For flexible-neck cavity array, a thin low-sorption lining will reduce humidity-driven resonance drift without materially reducing peak absorption.",
    "test": "Measure absorption and cavity humidity over controlled cycles.",
    "against": "Drift reduction requires a comparable loss of absorption.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Humidity stabilization lining",
    "system": "flexible-neck cavity array",
    "id": 2666,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2666",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Element order permutation — flexible-neck cavity array",
    "hypothesis": "For flexible-neck cavity array, ordering elements by resonance frequency will reduce local pressure hotspots relative to random order.",
    "test": "Map pressure and absorption with identical element sets.",
    "against": "Hotspot intensity is unchanged after boundary conditions are matched.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Element order permutation",
    "system": "flexible-neck cavity array",
    "id": 2667,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2667",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pulse ringdown separation — flexible-neck cavity array",
    "hypothesis": "For flexible-neck cavity array, short-pulse ringdown will distinguish weak coupling changes from material damping more reliably than a single steady tone.",
    "test": "Create independently known coupling and damping changes and test blind recovery.",
    "against": "Ringdown does not improve parameter recovery at equal measurement time.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Pulse ringdown separation",
    "system": "flexible-neck cavity array",
    "id": 2668,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2668",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Thermal expansion compensation — flexible-neck cavity array",
    "hypothesis": "For flexible-neck cavity array, a passive neck-length compensator will reduce temperature-driven resonance drift.",
    "test": "Measure geometry and spectra against uncompensated controls.",
    "against": "Resonance drift is no smaller after actual temperature is included.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Thermal expansion compensation",
    "system": "flexible-neck cavity array",
    "id": 2669,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2669",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Partial blockage warning — flexible-neck cavity array",
    "hypothesis": "For flexible-neck cavity array, inter-element phase differences will reveal an obstructed opening before mean absorption changes substantially.",
    "test": "Introduce blinded partial blockages and record local phase and total absorption.",
    "against": "Phase offers no earlier reliable warning at a matched false-alarm rate.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Partial blockage warning",
    "system": "flexible-neck cavity array",
    "id": 2670,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2670",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Coupling gradient direction — porous-neck cavity array",
    "hypothesis": "For porous-neck cavity array, a gradual coupling-strength gradient will shift where sound energy localizes without a comparable shift in the main absorption frequency.",
    "test": "Map local pressure and total absorption with reversed gradients.",
    "against": "Localization fails to reverse or requires a comparable frequency shift.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Coupling gradient direction",
    "system": "porous-neck cavity array",
    "id": 2671,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2671",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Boundary resonator detuning — porous-neck cavity array",
    "hypothesis": "For porous-neck cavity array, slight boundary detuning will reduce sensitivity to mounting changes.",
    "test": "Measure spectra across mount stiffnesses with matched interior elements.",
    "against": "Mount-induced spectral variability is not reduced.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Boundary resonator detuning",
    "system": "porous-neck cavity array",
    "id": 2672,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2672",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Alternating loss distribution — porous-neck cavity array",
    "hypothesis": "For porous-neck cavity array, alternating high-loss and low-loss elements will broaden useful absorption more than uniform loss at equal total dissipation capacity.",
    "test": "Measure impedance and absorption with independently calibrated element losses.",
    "against": "Bandwidth is no larger after total loss is matched.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Alternating loss distribution",
    "system": "porous-neck cavity array",
    "id": 2673,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2673",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Off-axis incidence memory — porous-neck cavity array",
    "hypothesis": "For porous-neck cavity array, reversible mechanical deformation will change angular response more than normal-incidence response.",
    "test": "Measure spectra across angles before and during mild deformation.",
    "against": "Angular and normal responses change proportionally.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Off-axis incidence memory",
    "system": "porous-neck cavity array",
    "id": 2674,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2674",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Distributed leak tolerance — porous-neck cavity array",
    "hypothesis": "For porous-neck cavity array, many small leaks will degrade peak absorption less than one equal-area leak.",
    "test": "Introduce calibrated leaks and measure acoustic energy balance.",
    "against": "Degradation depends only on total leak area.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Distributed leak tolerance",
    "system": "porous-neck cavity array",
    "id": 2675,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2675",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Humidity stabilization lining — porous-neck cavity array",
    "hypothesis": "For porous-neck cavity array, a thin low-sorption lining will reduce humidity-driven resonance drift without materially reducing peak absorption.",
    "test": "Measure absorption and cavity humidity over controlled cycles.",
    "against": "Drift reduction requires a comparable loss of absorption.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Humidity stabilization lining",
    "system": "porous-neck cavity array",
    "id": 2676,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2676",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Element order permutation — porous-neck cavity array",
    "hypothesis": "For porous-neck cavity array, ordering elements by resonance frequency will reduce local pressure hotspots relative to random order.",
    "test": "Map pressure and absorption with identical element sets.",
    "against": "Hotspot intensity is unchanged after boundary conditions are matched.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Element order permutation",
    "system": "porous-neck cavity array",
    "id": 2677,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2677",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pulse ringdown separation — porous-neck cavity array",
    "hypothesis": "For porous-neck cavity array, short-pulse ringdown will distinguish weak coupling changes from material damping more reliably than a single steady tone.",
    "test": "Create independently known coupling and damping changes and test blind recovery.",
    "against": "Ringdown does not improve parameter recovery at equal measurement time.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Pulse ringdown separation",
    "system": "porous-neck cavity array",
    "id": 2678,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2678",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Thermal expansion compensation — porous-neck cavity array",
    "hypothesis": "For porous-neck cavity array, a passive neck-length compensator will reduce temperature-driven resonance drift.",
    "test": "Measure geometry and spectra against uncompensated controls.",
    "against": "Resonance drift is no smaller after actual temperature is included.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Thermal expansion compensation",
    "system": "porous-neck cavity array",
    "id": 2679,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2679",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Partial blockage warning — porous-neck cavity array",
    "hypothesis": "For porous-neck cavity array, inter-element phase differences will reveal an obstructed opening before mean absorption changes substantially.",
    "test": "Introduce blinded partial blockages and record local phase and total absorption.",
    "against": "Phase offers no earlier reliable warning at a matched false-alarm rate.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Partial blockage warning",
    "system": "porous-neck cavity array",
    "id": 2680,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2680",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Coupling gradient direction — coupled bottle-resonator array",
    "hypothesis": "For coupled bottle-resonator array, a gradual coupling-strength gradient will shift where sound energy localizes without a comparable shift in the main absorption frequency.",
    "test": "Map local pressure and total absorption with reversed gradients.",
    "against": "Localization fails to reverse or requires a comparable frequency shift.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Coupling gradient direction",
    "system": "coupled bottle-resonator array",
    "id": 2681,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2681",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Boundary resonator detuning — coupled bottle-resonator array",
    "hypothesis": "For coupled bottle-resonator array, slight boundary detuning will reduce sensitivity to mounting changes.",
    "test": "Measure spectra across mount stiffnesses with matched interior elements.",
    "against": "Mount-induced spectral variability is not reduced.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Boundary resonator detuning",
    "system": "coupled bottle-resonator array",
    "id": 2682,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2682",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Alternating loss distribution — coupled bottle-resonator array",
    "hypothesis": "For coupled bottle-resonator array, alternating high-loss and low-loss elements will broaden useful absorption more than uniform loss at equal total dissipation capacity.",
    "test": "Measure impedance and absorption with independently calibrated element losses.",
    "against": "Bandwidth is no larger after total loss is matched.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Alternating loss distribution",
    "system": "coupled bottle-resonator array",
    "id": 2683,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2683",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Off-axis incidence memory — coupled bottle-resonator array",
    "hypothesis": "For coupled bottle-resonator array, reversible mechanical deformation will change angular response more than normal-incidence response.",
    "test": "Measure spectra across angles before and during mild deformation.",
    "against": "Angular and normal responses change proportionally.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Off-axis incidence memory",
    "system": "coupled bottle-resonator array",
    "id": 2684,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2684",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Distributed leak tolerance — coupled bottle-resonator array",
    "hypothesis": "For coupled bottle-resonator array, many small leaks will degrade peak absorption less than one equal-area leak.",
    "test": "Introduce calibrated leaks and measure acoustic energy balance.",
    "against": "Degradation depends only on total leak area.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Distributed leak tolerance",
    "system": "coupled bottle-resonator array",
    "id": 2685,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2685",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Humidity stabilization lining — coupled bottle-resonator array",
    "hypothesis": "For coupled bottle-resonator array, a thin low-sorption lining will reduce humidity-driven resonance drift without materially reducing peak absorption.",
    "test": "Measure absorption and cavity humidity over controlled cycles.",
    "against": "Drift reduction requires a comparable loss of absorption.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Humidity stabilization lining",
    "system": "coupled bottle-resonator array",
    "id": 2686,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2686",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Element order permutation — coupled bottle-resonator array",
    "hypothesis": "For coupled bottle-resonator array, ordering elements by resonance frequency will reduce local pressure hotspots relative to random order.",
    "test": "Map pressure and absorption with identical element sets.",
    "against": "Hotspot intensity is unchanged after boundary conditions are matched.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Element order permutation",
    "system": "coupled bottle-resonator array",
    "id": 2687,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2687",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pulse ringdown separation — coupled bottle-resonator array",
    "hypothesis": "For coupled bottle-resonator array, short-pulse ringdown will distinguish weak coupling changes from material damping more reliably than a single steady tone.",
    "test": "Create independently known coupling and damping changes and test blind recovery.",
    "against": "Ringdown does not improve parameter recovery at equal measurement time.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Pulse ringdown separation",
    "system": "coupled bottle-resonator array",
    "id": 2688,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2688",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Thermal expansion compensation — coupled bottle-resonator array",
    "hypothesis": "For coupled bottle-resonator array, a passive neck-length compensator will reduce temperature-driven resonance drift.",
    "test": "Measure geometry and spectra against uncompensated controls.",
    "against": "Resonance drift is no smaller after actual temperature is included.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Thermal expansion compensation",
    "system": "coupled bottle-resonator array",
    "id": 2689,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2689",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Partial blockage warning — coupled bottle-resonator array",
    "hypothesis": "For coupled bottle-resonator array, inter-element phase differences will reveal an obstructed opening before mean absorption changes substantially.",
    "test": "Introduce blinded partial blockages and record local phase and total absorption.",
    "against": "Phase offers no earlier reliable warning at a matched false-alarm rate.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Partial blockage warning",
    "system": "coupled bottle-resonator array",
    "id": 2690,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2690",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Coupling gradient direction — 3D-printed coiled-channel array",
    "hypothesis": "For 3D-printed coiled-channel array, a gradual coupling-strength gradient will shift where sound energy localizes without a comparable shift in the main absorption frequency.",
    "test": "Map local pressure and total absorption with reversed gradients.",
    "against": "Localization fails to reverse or requires a comparable frequency shift.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Coupling gradient direction",
    "system": "3D-printed coiled-channel array",
    "id": 2691,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2691",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Boundary resonator detuning — 3D-printed coiled-channel array",
    "hypothesis": "For 3D-printed coiled-channel array, slight boundary detuning will reduce sensitivity to mounting changes.",
    "test": "Measure spectra across mount stiffnesses with matched interior elements.",
    "against": "Mount-induced spectral variability is not reduced.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Boundary resonator detuning",
    "system": "3D-printed coiled-channel array",
    "id": 2692,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2692",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Alternating loss distribution — 3D-printed coiled-channel array",
    "hypothesis": "For 3D-printed coiled-channel array, alternating high-loss and low-loss elements will broaden useful absorption more than uniform loss at equal total dissipation capacity.",
    "test": "Measure impedance and absorption with independently calibrated element losses.",
    "against": "Bandwidth is no larger after total loss is matched.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Alternating loss distribution",
    "system": "3D-printed coiled-channel array",
    "id": 2693,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "specialist laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2693",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Off-axis incidence memory — 3D-printed coiled-channel array",
    "hypothesis": "For 3D-printed coiled-channel array, reversible mechanical deformation will change angular response more than normal-incidence response.",
    "test": "Measure spectra across angles before and during mild deformation.",
    "against": "Angular and normal responses change proportionally.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Off-axis incidence memory",
    "system": "3D-printed coiled-channel array",
    "id": 2694,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2694",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Distributed leak tolerance — 3D-printed coiled-channel array",
    "hypothesis": "For 3D-printed coiled-channel array, many small leaks will degrade peak absorption less than one equal-area leak.",
    "test": "Introduce calibrated leaks and measure acoustic energy balance.",
    "against": "Degradation depends only on total leak area.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Distributed leak tolerance",
    "system": "3D-printed coiled-channel array",
    "id": 2695,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2695",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Humidity stabilization lining — 3D-printed coiled-channel array",
    "hypothesis": "For 3D-printed coiled-channel array, a thin low-sorption lining will reduce humidity-driven resonance drift without materially reducing peak absorption.",
    "test": "Measure absorption and cavity humidity over controlled cycles.",
    "against": "Drift reduction requires a comparable loss of absorption.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Humidity stabilization lining",
    "system": "3D-printed coiled-channel array",
    "id": 2696,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "basic bench plus calibrated imaging",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "1–3 weeks after materials and apparatus are ready",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2696",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Element order permutation — 3D-printed coiled-channel array",
    "hypothesis": "For 3D-printed coiled-channel array, ordering elements by resonance frequency will reduce local pressure hotspots relative to random order.",
    "test": "Map pressure and absorption with identical element sets.",
    "against": "Hotspot intensity is unchanged after boundary conditions are matched.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Element order permutation",
    "system": "3D-printed coiled-channel array",
    "id": 2697,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2697",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Pulse ringdown separation — 3D-printed coiled-channel array",
    "hypothesis": "For 3D-printed coiled-channel array, short-pulse ringdown will distinguish weak coupling changes from material damping more reliably than a single steady tone.",
    "test": "Create independently known coupling and damping changes and test blind recovery.",
    "against": "Ringdown does not improve parameter recovery at equal measurement time.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Pulse ringdown separation",
    "system": "3D-printed coiled-channel array",
    "id": 2698,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2698",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Thermal expansion compensation — 3D-printed coiled-channel array",
    "hypothesis": "For 3D-printed coiled-channel array, a passive neck-length compensator will reduce temperature-driven resonance drift.",
    "test": "Measure geometry and spectra against uncompensated controls.",
    "against": "Resonance drift is no smaller after actual temperature is included.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Thermal expansion compensation",
    "system": "3D-printed coiled-channel array",
    "id": 2699,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2699",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "title": "Partial blockage warning — 3D-printed coiled-channel array",
    "hypothesis": "For 3D-printed coiled-channel array, inter-element phase differences will reveal an obstructed opening before mean absorption changes substantially.",
    "test": "Introduce blinded partial blockages and record local phase and total absorption.",
    "against": "Phase offers no earlier reliable warning at a matched false-alarm rate.",
    "category": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays",
    "controls": "Array size, material loss, total cavity volume, opening area, sound level, boundary mounting, and actual resonant frequencies.",
    "origin": "system-specific member of an experimental family",
    "family_key": "Passive acoustic resonator arrays: Partial blockage warning",
    "system": "3D-printed coiled-channel array",
    "id": 2700,
    "access_score": 3,
    "measurement_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "distinctness_score": 3,
    "prior_art_risk_penalty": 2,
    "screen_score": 26,
    "resource_class": "equipped laboratory",
    "pilot_time_estimate": "3–8 weeks after apparatus and compatibility checks",
    "cost_estimate": "Not priced; obtain quotes after apparatus inventory",
    "novelty_status": "Unverified; candidate-specific literature search pending",
    "selection_reason": "Direct comparative experiment with an observable outcome; prioritization depends on apparatus access and control of the listed confounders.",
    "status": "not shortlisted: accessibility, diversity, or related-family representative",
    "equipment_starter": "Calibrated acoustic source, microphone array, characterized resonators, and stable mounting.",
    "assessment_limit": "Rule-based first-pass screening, with conservative editorial prior-art exclusions; not an expert review or a probability of truth.",
    "catalog_id": "H2700",
    "study": "study-1",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "shortlist_fields": null,
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0001",
    "hypothesis": "A trapped vortex in a drying droplet could leave a spiral isotope-free concentration record after solidification.",
    "test": "Map tracer deposition against measured vortex handedness.",
    "against": "Deposit handedness ignores circulation.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0001",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A trapped vortex in a drying droplet could leave a spiral isotope-free concentration record after solidification.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0001",
      "hypothesis": "A trapped vortex in a drying droplet could leave a spiral isotope-free concentration record after solidification.",
      "test": "Map tracer deposition against measured vortex handedness.",
      "against": "Deposit handedness ignores circulation.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0001",
      "hypothesis": "A trapped vortex in a drying droplet could leave a spiral isotope-free concentration record after solidification.",
      "test": "Map tracer deposition against measured vortex handedness.",
      "against": "Deposit handedness ignores circulation.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0002",
    "hypothesis": "A mineral's elastic ringing could distinguish internal fluid inclusions from equally sized empty cavities.",
    "test": "Compare vibration spectra with tomography.",
    "against": "Cavity contents remain indistinguishable.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0002",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A mineral's elastic ringing could distinguish internal fluid inclusions from equally sized empty cavities.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0002",
      "hypothesis": "A mineral's elastic ringing could distinguish internal fluid inclusions from equally sized empty cavities.",
      "test": "Compare vibration spectra with tomography.",
      "against": "Cavity contents remain indistinguishable.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0002",
      "hypothesis": "A mineral's elastic ringing could distinguish internal fluid inclusions from equally sized empty cavities.",
      "test": "Compare vibration spectra with tomography.",
      "against": "Cavity contents remain indistinguishable.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0003",
    "hypothesis": "A transparent root analogue could reveal whether mucilage redirects oxygen around temporarily flooded pores.",
    "test": "Image oxygen near matched artificial roots.",
    "against": "Oxygen paths remain unchanged.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0003",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A transparent root analogue could reveal whether mucilage redirects oxygen around temporarily flooded pores.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0003",
      "hypothesis": "A transparent root analogue could reveal whether mucilage redirects oxygen around temporarily flooded pores.",
      "test": "Image oxygen near matched artificial roots.",
      "against": "Oxygen paths remain unchanged.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0003",
      "hypothesis": "A transparent root analogue could reveal whether mucilage redirects oxygen around temporarily flooded pores.",
      "test": "Image oxygen near matched artificial roots.",
      "against": "Oxygen paths remain unchanged.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0004",
    "hypothesis": "An enzyme's reversible surface adsorption could protect it from shear without reducing substrate access.",
    "test": "Measure activity and retention during flow.",
    "against": "Protection requires lost catalytic access.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0004",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "An enzyme's reversible surface adsorption could protect it from shear without reducing substrate access.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0004",
      "hypothesis": "An enzyme's reversible surface adsorption could protect it from shear without reducing substrate access.",
      "test": "Measure activity and retention during flow.",
      "against": "Protection requires lost catalytic access.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0004",
      "hypothesis": "An enzyme's reversible surface adsorption could protect it from shear without reducing substrate access.",
      "test": "Measure activity and retention during flow.",
      "against": "Protection requires lost catalytic access.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0005",
    "hypothesis": "An asymmetric snow-grain contact could pump meltwater laterally during steady solar illumination.",
    "test": "Track meltwater under reversed contact geometry.",
    "against": "Transport follows only gravity.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 73,
    "literature_query": "asymmetric snow-grain contact pump meltwater laterally steady solar illumination experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N0005",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "An asymmetric snow-grain contact could pump meltwater laterally during steady solar illumination.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0005",
      "hypothesis": "An asymmetric snow-grain contact could pump meltwater laterally during steady solar illumination.",
      "test": "Track meltwater under reversed contact geometry.",
      "against": "Transport follows only gravity.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0005",
      "hypothesis": "An asymmetric snow-grain contact could pump meltwater laterally during steady solar illumination.",
      "test": "Track meltwater under reversed contact geometry.",
      "against": "Transport follows only gravity.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 73,
      "literature_query": "asymmetric snow-grain contact pump meltwater laterally steady solar illumination experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "73",
      "id": "N0005",
      "hypothesis": "An asymmetric snow-grain contact could pump meltwater laterally during steady solar illumination.",
      "test": "Track meltwater under reversed contact geometry.",
      "against": "Transport follows only gravity.",
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_score": "21",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pdc327537d867;Pfbad98a1ff8a;Pcdea4a6e9a40;P8a220e6bfec5;Pc8e1b55e30ad;P34dcdfb2d586;Pbcabd5ed50f6",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N0005",
      "hypothesis": "An asymmetric snow-grain contact could pump meltwater laterally during steady solar illumination.",
      "test": "Track meltwater under reversed contact geometry.",
      "against": "Transport follows only gravity.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 73,
      "literature_query": "asymmetric snow-grain contact pump meltwater laterally steady solar illumination experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pdc327537d867;Pfbad98a1ff8a;Pcdea4a6e9a40;P8a220e6bfec5;Pc8e1b55e30ad;P34dcdfb2d586;Pbcabd5ed50f6",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "Pdc327537d867;Pfbad98a1ff8a;Pcdea4a6e9a40;P8a220e6bfec5;Pc8e1b55e30ad;P34dcdfb2d586;Pbcabd5ed50f6",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0006",
    "hypothesis": "A flexible optical mask could encode local strain history through irreversible diffraction-spot splitting.",
    "test": "Measure diffraction after controlled strain paths.",
    "against": "Splitting does not track history.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0006",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A flexible optical mask could encode local strain history through irreversible diffraction-spot splitting.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0006",
      "hypothesis": "A flexible optical mask could encode local strain history through irreversible diffraction-spot splitting.",
      "test": "Measure diffraction after controlled strain paths.",
      "against": "Splitting does not track history.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0006",
      "hypothesis": "A flexible optical mask could encode local strain history through irreversible diffraction-spot splitting.",
      "test": "Measure diffraction after controlled strain paths.",
      "against": "Splitting does not track history.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0007",
    "hypothesis": "A porous floating raft could redistribute buoyancy after local wetting and thereby self-level.",
    "test": "Wet one region and record tilt recovery.",
    "against": "Wetting produces no restoring response.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 74,
    "literature_query": "porous floating raft redistribute buoyancy local wetting thereby self-level experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N0007",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous floating raft could redistribute buoyancy after local wetting and thereby self-level.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0007",
      "hypothesis": "A porous floating raft could redistribute buoyancy after local wetting and thereby self-level.",
      "test": "Wet one region and record tilt recovery.",
      "against": "Wetting produces no restoring response.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0007",
      "hypothesis": "A porous floating raft could redistribute buoyancy after local wetting and thereby self-level.",
      "test": "Wet one region and record tilt recovery.",
      "against": "Wetting produces no restoring response.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 74,
      "literature_query": "porous floating raft redistribute buoyancy local wetting thereby self-level experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "74",
      "id": "N0007",
      "hypothesis": "A porous floating raft could redistribute buoyancy after local wetting and thereby self-level.",
      "test": "Wet one region and record tilt recovery.",
      "against": "Wetting produces no restoring response.",
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_score": "21",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P028ee03cbae2;Pb131a4e4840b;Pd4605fb7c81d;P360fa48eb277;P5a9dbd1aefac;P54ea48f30e33",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N0007",
      "hypothesis": "A porous floating raft could redistribute buoyancy after local wetting and thereby self-level.",
      "test": "Wet one region and record tilt recovery.",
      "against": "Wetting produces no restoring response.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 74,
      "literature_query": "porous floating raft redistribute buoyancy local wetting thereby self-level experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P028ee03cbae2;Pb131a4e4840b;Pd4605fb7c81d;P360fa48eb277;P5a9dbd1aefac;P54ea48f30e33",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P028ee03cbae2;Pb131a4e4840b;Pd4605fb7c81d;P360fa48eb277;P5a9dbd1aefac;P54ea48f30e33",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0008",
    "hypothesis": "An inert gas pocket near a liquid-metal surface could reveal oxide-film elasticity through oscillation asymmetry.",
    "test": "Compare bubble motion with independent oxide measurements.",
    "against": "Asymmetry ignores oxide mechanics.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0008",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "An inert gas pocket near a liquid-metal surface could reveal oxide-film elasticity through oscillation asymmetry.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0008",
      "hypothesis": "An inert gas pocket near a liquid-metal surface could reveal oxide-film elasticity through oscillation asymmetry.",
      "test": "Compare bubble motion with independent oxide measurements.",
      "against": "Asymmetry ignores oxide mechanics.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0008",
      "hypothesis": "An inert gas pocket near a liquid-metal surface could reveal oxide-film elasticity through oscillation asymmetry.",
      "test": "Compare bubble motion with independent oxide measurements.",
      "against": "Asymmetry ignores oxide mechanics.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0009",
    "hypothesis": "A plant seed's internal air channel could determine where its coat first becomes mechanically compliant.",
    "test": "Map hydration and indentation around intact seeds.",
    "against": "Softening ignores channel position.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 12,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0009",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A plant seed's internal air channel could determine where its coat first becomes mechanically compliant.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0009",
      "hypothesis": "A plant seed's internal air channel could determine where its coat first becomes mechanically compliant.",
      "test": "Map hydration and indentation around intact seeds.",
      "against": "Softening ignores channel position.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0009",
      "hypothesis": "A plant seed's internal air channel could determine where its coat first becomes mechanically compliant.",
      "test": "Map hydration and indentation around intact seeds.",
      "against": "Softening ignores channel position.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 12,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0010",
    "hypothesis": "A geometric defect in a crystal could focus a reversible color change without changing average composition.",
    "test": "Image spectral response near characterized defects.",
    "against": "Color response remains spatially uniform.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 75,
    "literature_query": "geometric defect crystal focus reversible color change changing average composition experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N0010",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A geometric defect in a crystal could focus a reversible color change without changing average composition.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0010",
      "hypothesis": "A geometric defect in a crystal could focus a reversible color change without changing average composition.",
      "test": "Image spectral response near characterized defects.",
      "against": "Color response remains spatially uniform.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0010",
      "hypothesis": "A geometric defect in a crystal could focus a reversible color change without changing average composition.",
      "test": "Image spectral response near characterized defects.",
      "against": "Color response remains spatially uniform.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 75,
      "literature_query": "geometric defect crystal focus reversible color change changing average composition experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "75",
      "id": "N0010",
      "hypothesis": "A geometric defect in a crystal could focus a reversible color change without changing average composition.",
      "test": "Image spectral response near characterized defects.",
      "against": "Color response remains spatially uniform.",
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_score": "21",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P05f149aa10d3;Paa0e920211e2;P3dbad480814c;P194115af741d;P2ac67ecf6339;P5d5277aea1c0;Pfb1979e4a22b",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N0010",
      "hypothesis": "A geometric defect in a crystal could focus a reversible color change without changing average composition.",
      "test": "Image spectral response near characterized defects.",
      "against": "Color response remains spatially uniform.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 75,
      "literature_query": "geometric defect crystal focus reversible color change changing average composition experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P05f149aa10d3;Paa0e920211e2;P3dbad480814c;P194115af741d;P2ac67ecf6339;P5d5277aea1c0;Pfb1979e4a22b",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P05f149aa10d3;Paa0e920211e2;P3dbad480814c;P194115af741d;P2ac67ecf6339;P5d5277aea1c0;Pfb1979e4a22b",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0011",
    "hypothesis": "A salt hydrate could record the direction of a past humidity front in its final grain orientation.",
    "test": "Reverse humidity fronts and measure diffraction.",
    "against": "Orientation fails to reverse.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0011",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A salt hydrate could record the direction of a past humidity front in its final grain orientation.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0011",
      "hypothesis": "A salt hydrate could record the direction of a past humidity front in its final grain orientation.",
      "test": "Reverse humidity fronts and measure diffraction.",
      "against": "Orientation fails to reverse.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0011",
      "hypothesis": "A salt hydrate could record the direction of a past humidity front in its final grain orientation.",
      "test": "Reverse humidity fronts and measure diffraction.",
      "against": "Orientation fails to reverse.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0012",
    "hypothesis": "A passive elastic loop could distinguish impulsive from sustained loading through different stable final shapes.",
    "test": "Apply equal-impulse load histories.",
    "against": "Final shapes cannot separate histories.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 18,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0012",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A passive elastic loop could distinguish impulsive from sustained loading through different stable final shapes.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0012",
      "hypothesis": "A passive elastic loop could distinguish impulsive from sustained loading through different stable final shapes.",
      "test": "Apply equal-impulse load histories.",
      "against": "Final shapes cannot separate histories.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0012",
      "hypothesis": "A passive elastic loop could distinguish impulsive from sustained loading through different stable final shapes.",
      "test": "Apply equal-impulse load histories.",
      "against": "Final shapes cannot separate histories.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 18,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0013",
    "hypothesis": "A layered clay platelet could rotate toward a chemical gradient even without a measurable bulk current.",
    "test": "Track isolated platelets alongside flow markers.",
    "against": "Rotation disappears after flow correction.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 76,
    "literature_query": "layered clay platelet rotate toward chemical gradient even measurable bulk current experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N0013",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A layered clay platelet could rotate toward a chemical gradient even without a measurable bulk current.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0013",
      "hypothesis": "A layered clay platelet could rotate toward a chemical gradient even without a measurable bulk current.",
      "test": "Track isolated platelets alongside flow markers.",
      "against": "Rotation disappears after flow correction.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0013",
      "hypothesis": "A layered clay platelet could rotate toward a chemical gradient even without a measurable bulk current.",
      "test": "Track isolated platelets alongside flow markers.",
      "against": "Rotation disappears after flow correction.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 76,
      "literature_query": "layered clay platelet rotate toward chemical gradient even measurable bulk current experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "76",
      "id": "N0013",
      "hypothesis": "A layered clay platelet could rotate toward a chemical gradient even without a measurable bulk current.",
      "test": "Track isolated platelets alongside flow markers.",
      "against": "Rotation disappears after flow correction.",
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_score": "21",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pad0cf09ae759;Pab90acbc3f6f;P8abd9854f1bc;P43299109734c;P77bdc262c638",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N0013",
      "hypothesis": "A layered clay platelet could rotate toward a chemical gradient even without a measurable bulk current.",
      "test": "Track isolated platelets alongside flow markers.",
      "against": "Rotation disappears after flow correction.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 76,
      "literature_query": "layered clay platelet rotate toward chemical gradient even measurable bulk current experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pad0cf09ae759;Pab90acbc3f6f;P8abd9854f1bc;P43299109734c;P77bdc262c638",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "Pad0cf09ae759;Pab90acbc3f6f;P8abd9854f1bc;P43299109734c;P77bdc262c638",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0014",
    "hypothesis": "A growing fungal tip could release mechanical strain through a short-lived local change in wall hydration.",
    "test": "Synchronize strain and hydration microscopy.",
    "against": "Hydration changes follow unrelated growth.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 2,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 15,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0014",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A growing fungal tip could release mechanical strain through a short-lived local change in wall hydration.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0014",
      "hypothesis": "A growing fungal tip could release mechanical strain through a short-lived local change in wall hydration.",
      "test": "Synchronize strain and hydration microscopy.",
      "against": "Hydration changes follow unrelated growth.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0014",
      "hypothesis": "A growing fungal tip could release mechanical strain through a short-lived local change in wall hydration.",
      "test": "Synchronize strain and hydration microscopy.",
      "against": "Hydration changes follow unrelated growth.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 2,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 15,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0015",
    "hypothesis": "A rough ice-water boundary could transmit sound differently before and after incipient surface melting.",
    "test": "Measure acoustic spectra during controlled warming.",
    "against": "Spectra reveal no reproducible precursor.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 77,
    "literature_query": "rough ice-water boundary transmit sound differently incipient surface melting experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N0015",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A rough ice-water boundary could transmit sound differently before and after incipient surface melting.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0015",
      "hypothesis": "A rough ice-water boundary could transmit sound differently before and after incipient surface melting.",
      "test": "Measure acoustic spectra during controlled warming.",
      "against": "Spectra reveal no reproducible precursor.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0015",
      "hypothesis": "A rough ice-water boundary could transmit sound differently before and after incipient surface melting.",
      "test": "Measure acoustic spectra during controlled warming.",
      "against": "Spectra reveal no reproducible precursor.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 77,
      "literature_query": "rough ice-water boundary transmit sound differently incipient surface melting experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "77",
      "id": "N0015",
      "hypothesis": "A rough ice-water boundary could transmit sound differently before and after incipient surface melting.",
      "test": "Measure acoustic spectra during controlled warming.",
      "against": "Spectra reveal no reproducible precursor.",
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_score": "21",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P490625044919;P3af5c9b9dc67;P0550cd4c0d51;P95881ddc0650;Pa3b2927a080e;P3647bbbe6442;Pb9dac550d243;P5de3126a76e5",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N0015",
      "hypothesis": "A rough ice-water boundary could transmit sound differently before and after incipient surface melting.",
      "test": "Measure acoustic spectra during controlled warming.",
      "against": "Spectra reveal no reproducible precursor.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 77,
      "literature_query": "rough ice-water boundary transmit sound differently incipient surface melting experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P490625044919;P3af5c9b9dc67;P0550cd4c0d51;P95881ddc0650;Pa3b2927a080e;P3647bbbe6442;Pb9dac550d243;P5de3126a76e5",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P490625044919;P3af5c9b9dc67;P0550cd4c0d51;P95881ddc0650;Pa3b2927a080e;P3647bbbe6442;Pb9dac550d243;P5de3126a76e5",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0016",
    "hypothesis": "A pair of nonreacting fluorescent tracers could reveal a gel's solvent polarity separately from its water fraction.",
    "test": "Calibrate both responses across independent mixtures.",
    "against": "Responses remain inseparable.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0016",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A pair of nonreacting fluorescent tracers could reveal a gel's solvent polarity separately from its water fraction.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0016",
      "hypothesis": "A pair of nonreacting fluorescent tracers could reveal a gel's solvent polarity separately from its water fraction.",
      "test": "Calibrate both responses across independent mixtures.",
      "against": "Responses remain inseparable.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0016",
      "hypothesis": "A pair of nonreacting fluorescent tracers could reveal a gel's solvent polarity separately from its water fraction.",
      "test": "Calibrate both responses across independent mixtures.",
      "against": "Responses remain inseparable.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0017",
    "hypothesis": "A flexible solar absorber could passively turn away from excessive illumination through differential gas expansion.",
    "test": "Measure orientation and absorbed power.",
    "against": "Motion increases rather than limits absorption.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 78,
    "literature_query": "flexible solar absorber passively turn away excessive illumination differential gas expansion experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N0017",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A flexible solar absorber could passively turn away from excessive illumination through differential gas expansion.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0017",
      "hypothesis": "A flexible solar absorber could passively turn away from excessive illumination through differential gas expansion.",
      "test": "Measure orientation and absorbed power.",
      "against": "Motion increases rather than limits absorption.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0017",
      "hypothesis": "A flexible solar absorber could passively turn away from excessive illumination through differential gas expansion.",
      "test": "Measure orientation and absorbed power.",
      "against": "Motion increases rather than limits absorption.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 78,
      "literature_query": "flexible solar absorber passively turn away excessive illumination differential gas expansion experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "78",
      "id": "N0017",
      "hypothesis": "A flexible solar absorber could passively turn away from excessive illumination through differential gas expansion.",
      "test": "Measure orientation and absorbed power.",
      "against": "Motion increases rather than limits absorption.",
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_score": "21",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P6828a3a1f87a;P6cdb0d7ab4ee;P6035c634b8cd;P6202db06c4e3",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N0017",
      "hypothesis": "A flexible solar absorber could passively turn away from excessive illumination through differential gas expansion.",
      "test": "Measure orientation and absorbed power.",
      "against": "Motion increases rather than limits absorption.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 78,
      "literature_query": "flexible solar absorber passively turn away excessive illumination differential gas expansion experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P6828a3a1f87a;P6cdb0d7ab4ee;P6035c634b8cd;P6202db06c4e3",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P6828a3a1f87a;P6cdb0d7ab4ee;P6035c634b8cd;P6202db06c4e3",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0018",
    "hypothesis": "A buried mineral lens could create a measurable surface thermal echo after a short rainfall analogue.",
    "test": "Track temperature above controlled shallow lenses.",
    "against": "Echo cannot distinguish lens presence.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 79,
    "literature_query": "buried mineral lens create measurable surface thermal echo short rainfall analogue experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N0018",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A buried mineral lens could create a measurable surface thermal echo after a short rainfall analogue.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0018",
      "hypothesis": "A buried mineral lens could create a measurable surface thermal echo after a short rainfall analogue.",
      "test": "Track temperature above controlled shallow lenses.",
      "against": "Echo cannot distinguish lens presence.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0018",
      "hypothesis": "A buried mineral lens could create a measurable surface thermal echo after a short rainfall analogue.",
      "test": "Track temperature above controlled shallow lenses.",
      "against": "Echo cannot distinguish lens presence.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 79,
      "literature_query": "buried mineral lens create measurable surface thermal echo short rainfall analogue experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "79",
      "id": "N0018",
      "hypothesis": "A buried mineral lens could create a measurable surface thermal echo after a short rainfall analogue.",
      "test": "Track temperature above controlled shallow lenses.",
      "against": "Echo cannot distinguish lens presence.",
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_score": "21",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P78f2b3b1250c;Pdebc002448af;P43ca52ffb510;P0aae6dee110d;Pe4bf2804c48d;Pf6676536798d;Pdad7ca696be2;P20b3cc3d0e7e;Pf91623d540f5;P0ec944ecebee;P2c1e998cc2f1;P96f11ffff36e;Pe7b8f7886997",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N0018",
      "hypothesis": "A buried mineral lens could create a measurable surface thermal echo after a short rainfall analogue.",
      "test": "Track temperature above controlled shallow lenses.",
      "against": "Echo cannot distinguish lens presence.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 79,
      "literature_query": "buried mineral lens create measurable surface thermal echo short rainfall analogue experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P78f2b3b1250c;Pdebc002448af;P43ca52ffb510;P0aae6dee110d;Pe4bf2804c48d;Pf6676536798d;Pdad7ca696be2;P20b3cc3d0e7e;Pf91623d540f5;P0ec944ecebee;P2c1e998cc2f1;P96f11ffff36e;Pe7b8f7886997",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P78f2b3b1250c;Pdebc002448af;P43ca52ffb510;P0aae6dee110d;Pe4bf2804c48d;Pf6676536798d;Pdad7ca696be2;P20b3cc3d0e7e;Pf91623d540f5;P0ec944ecebee;P2c1e998cc2f1;P96f11ffff36e;Pe7b8f7886997",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0019",
    "hypothesis": "A single soft inclusion could redirect a shear rupture before the crack reaches its immediate neighborhood.",
    "test": "Image crack trajectories and strain fields.",
    "against": "Deflection begins only at contact.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 80,
    "literature_query": "single soft inclusion redirect shear rupture crack reaches immediate neighborhood experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N0019",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A single soft inclusion could redirect a shear rupture before the crack reaches its immediate neighborhood.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0019",
      "hypothesis": "A single soft inclusion could redirect a shear rupture before the crack reaches its immediate neighborhood.",
      "test": "Image crack trajectories and strain fields.",
      "against": "Deflection begins only at contact.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0019",
      "hypothesis": "A single soft inclusion could redirect a shear rupture before the crack reaches its immediate neighborhood.",
      "test": "Image crack trajectories and strain fields.",
      "against": "Deflection begins only at contact.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 80,
      "literature_query": "single soft inclusion redirect shear rupture crack reaches immediate neighborhood experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "80",
      "id": "N0019",
      "hypothesis": "A single soft inclusion could redirect a shear rupture before the crack reaches its immediate neighborhood.",
      "test": "Image crack trajectories and strain fields.",
      "against": "Deflection begins only at contact.",
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_score": "21",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P40c673fbecb3;Pdc54012413ee;Pe7cff3de549f;P64ac4a8ea890",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N0019",
      "hypothesis": "A single soft inclusion could redirect a shear rupture before the crack reaches its immediate neighborhood.",
      "test": "Image crack trajectories and strain fields.",
      "against": "Deflection begins only at contact.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 80,
      "literature_query": "single soft inclusion redirect shear rupture crack reaches immediate neighborhood experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P40c673fbecb3;Pdc54012413ee;Pe7cff3de549f;P64ac4a8ea890",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P40c673fbecb3;Pdc54012413ee;Pe7cff3de549f;P64ac4a8ea890",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0020",
    "hypothesis": "A dew droplet could recover information about prior surface contamination through its early oscillation decay.",
    "test": "Compare clean and reversibly contaminated substrates.",
    "against": "Decay reflects only droplet size.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 81,
    "literature_query": "dew droplet recover information about prior surface contamination early oscillation decay experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N0020",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A dew droplet could recover information about prior surface contamination through its early oscillation decay.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0020",
      "hypothesis": "A dew droplet could recover information about prior surface contamination through its early oscillation decay.",
      "test": "Compare clean and reversibly contaminated substrates.",
      "against": "Decay reflects only droplet size.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0020",
      "hypothesis": "A dew droplet could recover information about prior surface contamination through its early oscillation decay.",
      "test": "Compare clean and reversibly contaminated substrates.",
      "against": "Decay reflects only droplet size.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 81,
      "literature_query": "dew droplet recover information about prior surface contamination early oscillation decay experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "81",
      "id": "N0020",
      "hypothesis": "A dew droplet could recover information about prior surface contamination through its early oscillation decay.",
      "test": "Compare clean and reversibly contaminated substrates.",
      "against": "Decay reflects only droplet size.",
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_score": "21",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P380472b907f1;Pa128071a4a2e;Pddc0480cb918;P0af200735b7a;P136da3d09534;P610600d31d28;Pce89acc31658",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N0020",
      "hypothesis": "A dew droplet could recover information about prior surface contamination through its early oscillation decay.",
      "test": "Compare clean and reversibly contaminated substrates.",
      "against": "Decay reflects only droplet size.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 81,
      "literature_query": "dew droplet recover information about prior surface contamination early oscillation decay experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P380472b907f1;Pa128071a4a2e;Pddc0480cb918;P0af200735b7a;P136da3d09534;P610600d31d28;Pce89acc31658",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P380472b907f1;Pa128071a4a2e;Pddc0480cb918;P0af200735b7a;P136da3d09534;P610600d31d28;Pce89acc31658",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0021",
    "hypothesis": "A cell-free lipid membrane could filter mechanical frequencies through delayed redistribution of curvature-preferring molecules.",
    "test": "Measure deformation and molecular redistribution together.",
    "against": "Filtering persists without redistribution.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 2,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 17,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0021",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A cell-free lipid membrane could filter mechanical frequencies through delayed redistribution of curvature-preferring molecules.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0021",
      "hypothesis": "A cell-free lipid membrane could filter mechanical frequencies through delayed redistribution of curvature-preferring molecules.",
      "test": "Measure deformation and molecular redistribution together.",
      "against": "Filtering persists without redistribution.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0021",
      "hypothesis": "A cell-free lipid membrane could filter mechanical frequencies through delayed redistribution of curvature-preferring molecules.",
      "test": "Measure deformation and molecular redistribution together.",
      "against": "Filtering persists without redistribution.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 2,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 17,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0022",
    "hypothesis": "A granule containing a sealed cavity could disclose its orientation acoustically while remaining optically opaque.",
    "test": "Rotate granules under acoustic interrogation.",
    "against": "Orientation estimates fail validation.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0022",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A granule containing a sealed cavity could disclose its orientation acoustically while remaining optically opaque.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0022",
      "hypothesis": "A granule containing a sealed cavity could disclose its orientation acoustically while remaining optically opaque.",
      "test": "Rotate granules under acoustic interrogation.",
      "against": "Orientation estimates fail validation.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0022",
      "hypothesis": "A granule containing a sealed cavity could disclose its orientation acoustically while remaining optically opaque.",
      "test": "Rotate granules under acoustic interrogation.",
      "against": "Orientation estimates fail validation.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0023",
    "hypothesis": "A shallow liquid pool could sort floating objects by flexural stiffness rather than mass under a traveling ripple.",
    "test": "Track stiffness-matched mass controls.",
    "against": "Sorting follows mass alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0023",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A shallow liquid pool could sort floating objects by flexural stiffness rather than mass under a traveling ripple.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0023",
      "hypothesis": "A shallow liquid pool could sort floating objects by flexural stiffness rather than mass under a traveling ripple.",
      "test": "Track stiffness-matched mass controls.",
      "against": "Sorting follows mass alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0023",
      "hypothesis": "A shallow liquid pool could sort floating objects by flexural stiffness rather than mass under a traveling ripple.",
      "test": "Track stiffness-matched mass controls.",
      "against": "Sorting follows mass alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0024",
    "hypothesis": "A nonbinding polymer could change mineral etch-pit shape through local viscosity gradients without adsorption.",
    "test": "Measure viscosity, adsorption, and pit geometry.",
    "against": "Pit changes require detectable adsorption.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 82,
    "literature_query": "nonbinding polymer change mineral etch-pit shape local viscosity gradients adsorption experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N0024",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A nonbinding polymer could change mineral etch-pit shape through local viscosity gradients without adsorption.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0024",
      "hypothesis": "A nonbinding polymer could change mineral etch-pit shape through local viscosity gradients without adsorption.",
      "test": "Measure viscosity, adsorption, and pit geometry.",
      "against": "Pit changes require detectable adsorption.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0024",
      "hypothesis": "A nonbinding polymer could change mineral etch-pit shape through local viscosity gradients without adsorption.",
      "test": "Measure viscosity, adsorption, and pit geometry.",
      "against": "Pit changes require detectable adsorption.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 82,
      "literature_query": "nonbinding polymer change mineral etch-pit shape local viscosity gradients adsorption experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "82",
      "id": "N0024",
      "hypothesis": "A nonbinding polymer could change mineral etch-pit shape through local viscosity gradients without adsorption.",
      "test": "Measure viscosity, adsorption, and pit geometry.",
      "against": "Pit changes require detectable adsorption.",
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_score": "21",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P52379983ab02;Pe050ec5491ca;Peb394fd0f93d;P6383e2781ba7;P3b6e41221426",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N0024",
      "hypothesis": "A nonbinding polymer could change mineral etch-pit shape through local viscosity gradients without adsorption.",
      "test": "Measure viscosity, adsorption, and pit geometry.",
      "against": "Pit changes require detectable adsorption.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 82,
      "literature_query": "nonbinding polymer change mineral etch-pit shape local viscosity gradients adsorption experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P52379983ab02;Pe050ec5491ca;Peb394fd0f93d;P6383e2781ba7;P3b6e41221426",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P52379983ab02;Pe050ec5491ca;Peb394fd0f93d;P6383e2781ba7;P3b6e41221426",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0025",
    "hypothesis": "A moss shoot could shed excess water through a passive snap motion at a reproducible retained mass.",
    "test": "Track water mass and shoot curvature.",
    "against": "No mass-linked mechanical transition appears.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 2,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 17,
    "area": "nonhuman biology",
    "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0025",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A moss shoot could shed excess water through a passive snap motion at a reproducible retained mass.",
    "category": "nonhuman biology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0025",
      "hypothesis": "A moss shoot could shed excess water through a passive snap motion at a reproducible retained mass.",
      "test": "Track water mass and shoot curvature.",
      "against": "No mass-linked mechanical transition appears.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0025",
      "hypothesis": "A moss shoot could shed excess water through a passive snap motion at a reproducible retained mass.",
      "test": "Track water mass and shoot curvature.",
      "against": "No mass-linked mechanical transition appears.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 2,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 17,
      "area": "nonhuman biology",
      "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0026",
    "hypothesis": "A porous insulator could cool faster after a pressure step because adsorbed gas temporarily redistributes heat.",
    "test": "Measure temperature and gas uptake simultaneously.",
    "against": "Thermal response follows compression alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 83,
    "literature_query": "porous insulator cool faster pressure step because adsorbed gas temporarily redistributes heat experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N0026",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous insulator could cool faster after a pressure step because adsorbed gas temporarily redistributes heat.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0026",
      "hypothesis": "A porous insulator could cool faster after a pressure step because adsorbed gas temporarily redistributes heat.",
      "test": "Measure temperature and gas uptake simultaneously.",
      "against": "Thermal response follows compression alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0026",
      "hypothesis": "A porous insulator could cool faster after a pressure step because adsorbed gas temporarily redistributes heat.",
      "test": "Measure temperature and gas uptake simultaneously.",
      "against": "Thermal response follows compression alone.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 83,
      "literature_query": "porous insulator cool faster pressure step because adsorbed gas temporarily redistributes heat experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "83",
      "id": "N0026",
      "hypothesis": "A porous insulator could cool faster after a pressure step because adsorbed gas temporarily redistributes heat.",
      "test": "Measure temperature and gas uptake simultaneously.",
      "against": "Thermal response follows compression alone.",
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_score": "21",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pf21999f7ca8b;P4c7af3ec01b7;P108b95663f0f;P1437673a61cd;P94140738a2e9;P9676c0fe516a",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N0026",
      "hypothesis": "A porous insulator could cool faster after a pressure step because adsorbed gas temporarily redistributes heat.",
      "test": "Measure temperature and gas uptake simultaneously.",
      "against": "Thermal response follows compression alone.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 83,
      "literature_query": "porous insulator cool faster pressure step because adsorbed gas temporarily redistributes heat experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pf21999f7ca8b;P4c7af3ec01b7;P108b95663f0f;P1437673a61cd;P94140738a2e9;P9676c0fe516a",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "Pf21999f7ca8b;P4c7af3ec01b7;P108b95663f0f;P1437673a61cd;P94140738a2e9;P9676c0fe516a",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0027",
    "hypothesis": "A transparent adhesive could reveal hidden interface strain through polarized emission from sparse inert markers.",
    "test": "Compare marker signals with independent strain maps.",
    "against": "Emission cannot resolve interface strain.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0027",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A transparent adhesive could reveal hidden interface strain through polarized emission from sparse inert markers.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0027",
      "hypothesis": "A transparent adhesive could reveal hidden interface strain through polarized emission from sparse inert markers.",
      "test": "Compare marker signals with independent strain maps.",
      "against": "Emission cannot resolve interface strain.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0027",
      "hypothesis": "A transparent adhesive could reveal hidden interface strain through polarized emission from sparse inert markers.",
      "test": "Compare marker signals with independent strain maps.",
      "against": "Emission cannot resolve interface strain.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0028",
    "hypothesis": "A vesicle's internal density layering could bias the site of rupture during slow compression.",
    "test": "Image layered and mixed vesicles.",
    "against": "Rupture sites remain randomly distributed.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0028",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A vesicle's internal density layering could bias the site of rupture during slow compression.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0028",
      "hypothesis": "A vesicle's internal density layering could bias the site of rupture during slow compression.",
      "test": "Image layered and mixed vesicles.",
      "against": "Rupture sites remain randomly distributed.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0028",
      "hypothesis": "A vesicle's internal density layering could bias the site of rupture during slow compression.",
      "test": "Image layered and mixed vesicles.",
      "against": "Rupture sites remain randomly distributed.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0029",
    "hypothesis": "A wet mineral powder could retain a direction-dependent dielectric signal after a weak acoustic pulse.",
    "test": "Measure directional dielectric relaxation.",
    "against": "Signal vanishes with acoustic cessation.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 84,
    "literature_query": "wet mineral powder retain direction-dependent dielectric signal weak acoustic pulse experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N0029",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A wet mineral powder could retain a direction-dependent dielectric signal after a weak acoustic pulse.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0029",
      "hypothesis": "A wet mineral powder could retain a direction-dependent dielectric signal after a weak acoustic pulse.",
      "test": "Measure directional dielectric relaxation.",
      "against": "Signal vanishes with acoustic cessation.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0029",
      "hypothesis": "A wet mineral powder could retain a direction-dependent dielectric signal after a weak acoustic pulse.",
      "test": "Measure directional dielectric relaxation.",
      "against": "Signal vanishes with acoustic cessation.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 84,
      "literature_query": "wet mineral powder retain direction-dependent dielectric signal weak acoustic pulse experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "84",
      "id": "N0029",
      "hypothesis": "A wet mineral powder could retain a direction-dependent dielectric signal after a weak acoustic pulse.",
      "test": "Measure directional dielectric relaxation.",
      "against": "Signal vanishes with acoustic cessation.",
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_score": "21",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pd98a03c46334;P65fef8bb1e0f;Pea8c6a4a3994;Pb2fdce13df7b;P2d36f0e09913",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N0029",
      "hypothesis": "A wet mineral powder could retain a direction-dependent dielectric signal after a weak acoustic pulse.",
      "test": "Measure directional dielectric relaxation.",
      "against": "Signal vanishes with acoustic cessation.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 84,
      "literature_query": "wet mineral powder retain direction-dependent dielectric signal weak acoustic pulse experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pd98a03c46334;P65fef8bb1e0f;Pea8c6a4a3994;Pb2fdce13df7b;P2d36f0e09913",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "Pd98a03c46334;P65fef8bb1e0f;Pea8c6a4a3994;Pb2fdce13df7b;P2d36f0e09913",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0030",
    "hypothesis": "A chemical oscillator could synchronize to a moving thermal boundary without synchronizing to uniform heating.",
    "test": "Compare spatial and uniform thermal drives.",
    "against": "Synchronization depends only on mean temperature.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 85,
    "literature_query": "chemical oscillator synchronize moving thermal boundary synchronizing uniform heating experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N0030",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A chemical oscillator could synchronize to a moving thermal boundary without synchronizing to uniform heating.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0030",
      "hypothesis": "A chemical oscillator could synchronize to a moving thermal boundary without synchronizing to uniform heating.",
      "test": "Compare spatial and uniform thermal drives.",
      "against": "Synchronization depends only on mean temperature.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0030",
      "hypothesis": "A chemical oscillator could synchronize to a moving thermal boundary without synchronizing to uniform heating.",
      "test": "Compare spatial and uniform thermal drives.",
      "against": "Synchronization depends only on mean temperature.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 85,
      "literature_query": "chemical oscillator synchronize moving thermal boundary synchronizing uniform heating experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "85",
      "id": "N0030",
      "hypothesis": "A chemical oscillator could synchronize to a moving thermal boundary without synchronizing to uniform heating.",
      "test": "Compare spatial and uniform thermal drives.",
      "against": "Synchronization depends only on mean temperature.",
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_score": "21",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P01c29b2c705e;Pf8d9f27d9aa4;Peab80d75836d;P07e626a4132b;P18ede4e7aded;P1a8bd3138947",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N0030",
      "hypothesis": "A chemical oscillator could synchronize to a moving thermal boundary without synchronizing to uniform heating.",
      "test": "Compare spatial and uniform thermal drives.",
      "against": "Synchronization depends only on mean temperature.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 85,
      "literature_query": "chemical oscillator synchronize moving thermal boundary synchronizing uniform heating experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P01c29b2c705e;Pf8d9f27d9aa4;Peab80d75836d;P07e626a4132b;P18ede4e7aded;P1a8bd3138947",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P01c29b2c705e;Pf8d9f27d9aa4;Peab80d75836d;P07e626a4132b;P18ede4e7aded;P1a8bd3138947",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0031",
    "hypothesis": "A seed's surface hairs could reduce impact damage by trapping an air cushion before liquid contact.",
    "test": "Image seed-inspired replicas during impact.",
    "against": "Hair benefits persist without trapped air.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0031",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A seed's surface hairs could reduce impact damage by trapping an air cushion before liquid contact.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0031",
      "hypothesis": "A seed's surface hairs could reduce impact damage by trapping an air cushion before liquid contact.",
      "test": "Image seed-inspired replicas during impact.",
      "against": "Hair benefits persist without trapped air.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0031",
      "hypothesis": "A seed's surface hairs could reduce impact damage by trapping an air cushion before liquid contact.",
      "test": "Image seed-inspired replicas during impact.",
      "against": "Hair benefits persist without trapped air.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0032",
    "hypothesis": "A translucent ceramic could expose grain-boundary opening through a change in speckle decorrelation times.",
    "test": "Compare speckle with microscopic damage.",
    "against": "Optical timing does not precede damage.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 86,
    "literature_query": "translucent ceramic expose grain-boundary opening change speckle decorrelation times experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N0032",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A translucent ceramic could expose grain-boundary opening through a change in speckle decorrelation times.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0032",
      "hypothesis": "A translucent ceramic could expose grain-boundary opening through a change in speckle decorrelation times.",
      "test": "Compare speckle with microscopic damage.",
      "against": "Optical timing does not precede damage.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0032",
      "hypothesis": "A translucent ceramic could expose grain-boundary opening through a change in speckle decorrelation times.",
      "test": "Compare speckle with microscopic damage.",
      "against": "Optical timing does not precede damage.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 86,
      "literature_query": "translucent ceramic expose grain-boundary opening change speckle decorrelation times experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "86",
      "id": "N0032",
      "hypothesis": "A translucent ceramic could expose grain-boundary opening through a change in speckle decorrelation times.",
      "test": "Compare speckle with microscopic damage.",
      "against": "Optical timing does not precede damage.",
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_score": "21",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pada46f9cf348;P1c5681878e51;P501902d4d7b6;P6a855f9180dc;P234bfde42425",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N0032",
      "hypothesis": "A translucent ceramic could expose grain-boundary opening through a change in speckle decorrelation times.",
      "test": "Compare speckle with microscopic damage.",
      "against": "Optical timing does not precede damage.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 86,
      "literature_query": "translucent ceramic expose grain-boundary opening change speckle decorrelation times experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pada46f9cf348;P1c5681878e51;P501902d4d7b6;P6a855f9180dc;P234bfde42425",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "Pada46f9cf348;P1c5681878e51;P501902d4d7b6;P6a855f9180dc;P234bfde42425",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0033",
    "hypothesis": "A two-solvent gel could expel solvent selectively when bent because its components experience different binding changes.",
    "test": "Measure released composition under bending.",
    "against": "Composition matches passive evaporation controls.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 87,
    "literature_query": "two-solvent gel expel solvent selectively when bent because components experience different binding changes experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N0033",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A two-solvent gel could expel solvent selectively when bent because its components experience different binding changes.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0033",
      "hypothesis": "A two-solvent gel could expel solvent selectively when bent because its components experience different binding changes.",
      "test": "Measure released composition under bending.",
      "against": "Composition matches passive evaporation controls.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0033",
      "hypothesis": "A two-solvent gel could expel solvent selectively when bent because its components experience different binding changes.",
      "test": "Measure released composition under bending.",
      "against": "Composition matches passive evaporation controls.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 87,
      "literature_query": "two-solvent gel expel solvent selectively when bent because components experience different binding changes experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "87",
      "id": "N0033",
      "hypothesis": "A two-solvent gel could expel solvent selectively when bent because its components experience different binding changes.",
      "test": "Measure released composition under bending.",
      "against": "Composition matches passive evaporation controls.",
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_score": "21",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pc5b92386b800;P6c0a71a11e17;P9b61609a55c3;Pc312b8a13af5;Pa34278fa1835;P7156c33a1f3e",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N0033",
      "hypothesis": "A two-solvent gel could expel solvent selectively when bent because its components experience different binding changes.",
      "test": "Measure released composition under bending.",
      "against": "Composition matches passive evaporation controls.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 87,
      "literature_query": "two-solvent gel expel solvent selectively when bent because components experience different binding changes experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pc5b92386b800;P6c0a71a11e17;P9b61609a55c3;Pc312b8a13af5;Pa34278fa1835;P7156c33a1f3e",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "Pc5b92386b800;P6c0a71a11e17;P9b61609a55c3;Pc312b8a13af5;Pa34278fa1835;P7156c33a1f3e",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0034",
    "hypothesis": "A confined gas-liquid interface could store a pressure maximum as a persistent contact-line shape.",
    "test": "Compare final shapes after calibrated peaks.",
    "against": "Shape depends only on final pressure.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0034",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A confined gas-liquid interface could store a pressure maximum as a persistent contact-line shape.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0034",
      "hypothesis": "A confined gas-liquid interface could store a pressure maximum as a persistent contact-line shape.",
      "test": "Compare final shapes after calibrated peaks.",
      "against": "Shape depends only on final pressure.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0034",
      "hypothesis": "A confined gas-liquid interface could store a pressure maximum as a persistent contact-line shape.",
      "test": "Compare final shapes after calibrated peaks.",
      "against": "Shape depends only on final pressure.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0035",
    "hypothesis": "A tree-leaf replica could convert intermittent rain into smoother rootward flow using vein-junction storage.",
    "test": "Measure inflow and collected outflow histories.",
    "against": "Junction storage provides no smoothing.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0035",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A tree-leaf replica could convert intermittent rain into smoother rootward flow using vein-junction storage.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0035",
      "hypothesis": "A tree-leaf replica could convert intermittent rain into smoother rootward flow using vein-junction storage.",
      "test": "Measure inflow and collected outflow histories.",
      "against": "Junction storage provides no smoothing.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0035",
      "hypothesis": "A tree-leaf replica could convert intermittent rain into smoother rootward flow using vein-junction storage.",
      "test": "Measure inflow and collected outflow histories.",
      "against": "Junction storage provides no smoothing.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0036",
    "hypothesis": "A freely suspended porous disk could rotate under a uniform concentration change through unequal surface swelling.",
    "test": "Record rotation with symmetric-porosity controls.",
    "against": "Motion follows residual fluid currents.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 4,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 1,
    "literature_query": "freely suspended porous disk rotate uniform concentration change unequal surface swelling experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N0036",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A freely suspended porous disk could rotate under a uniform concentration change through unequal surface swelling.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0036",
      "hypothesis": "A freely suspended porous disk could rotate under a uniform concentration change through unequal surface swelling.",
      "test": "Record rotation with symmetric-porosity controls.",
      "against": "Motion follows residual fluid currents.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0036",
      "hypothesis": "A freely suspended porous disk could rotate under a uniform concentration change through unequal surface swelling.",
      "test": "Record rotation with symmetric-porosity controls.",
      "against": "Motion follows residual fluid currents.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 1,
      "literature_query": "freely suspended porous disk rotate uniform concentration change unequal surface swelling experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "1",
      "id": "N0036",
      "hypothesis": "A freely suspended porous disk could rotate under a uniform concentration change through unequal surface swelling.",
      "test": "Record rotation with symmetric-porosity controls.",
      "against": "Motion follows residual fluid currents.",
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_score": "24",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P4419a1c233c0;Pa0b41bdfb930;P2749b3830b9b;P83c578145540;Pbff4e11268dd",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N0036",
      "hypothesis": "A freely suspended porous disk could rotate under a uniform concentration change through unequal surface swelling.",
      "test": "Record rotation with symmetric-porosity controls.",
      "against": "Motion follows residual fluid currents.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 1,
      "literature_query": "freely suspended porous disk rotate uniform concentration change unequal surface swelling experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P4419a1c233c0;Pa0b41bdfb930;P2749b3830b9b;P83c578145540;Pbff4e11268dd",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P4419a1c233c0;Pa0b41bdfb930;P2749b3830b9b;P83c578145540;Pbff4e11268dd",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0037",
    "hypothesis": "A mineral particle could experience a reversible adhesion minimum near an optical absorption resonance through local heating.",
    "test": "Sweep illumination wavelength at equal heating.",
    "against": "Adhesion follows temperature without resonance specificity.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0037",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A mineral particle could experience a reversible adhesion minimum near an optical absorption resonance through local heating.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0037",
      "hypothesis": "A mineral particle could experience a reversible adhesion minimum near an optical absorption resonance through local heating.",
      "test": "Sweep illumination wavelength at equal heating.",
      "against": "Adhesion follows temperature without resonance specificity.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0037",
      "hypothesis": "A mineral particle could experience a reversible adhesion minimum near an optical absorption resonance through local heating.",
      "test": "Sweep illumination wavelength at equal heating.",
      "against": "Adhesion follows temperature without resonance specificity.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0038",
    "hypothesis": "A microscopic enzyme crystal could maintain activity after drying better than the same enzyme in an amorphous deposit.",
    "test": "Compare recovered activity at matched residual water.",
    "against": "Crystal advantage disappears after loading correction.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0038",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A microscopic enzyme crystal could maintain activity after drying better than the same enzyme in an amorphous deposit.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0038",
      "hypothesis": "A microscopic enzyme crystal could maintain activity after drying better than the same enzyme in an amorphous deposit.",
      "test": "Compare recovered activity at matched residual water.",
      "against": "Crystal advantage disappears after loading correction.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0038",
      "hypothesis": "A microscopic enzyme crystal could maintain activity after drying better than the same enzyme in an amorphous deposit.",
      "test": "Compare recovered activity at matched residual water.",
      "against": "Crystal advantage disappears after loading correction.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0039",
    "hypothesis": "A soft optical cavity could distinguish shear from compression through opposite shifts of two geometric modes.",
    "test": "Calibrate both modes under independent loads.",
    "against": "Mode responses cannot separate loads.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0039",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A soft optical cavity could distinguish shear from compression through opposite shifts of two geometric modes.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0039",
      "hypothesis": "A soft optical cavity could distinguish shear from compression through opposite shifts of two geometric modes.",
      "test": "Calibrate both modes under independent loads.",
      "against": "Mode responses cannot separate loads.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0039",
      "hypothesis": "A soft optical cavity could distinguish shear from compression through opposite shifts of two geometric modes.",
      "test": "Calibrate both modes under independent loads.",
      "against": "Mode responses cannot separate loads.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0040",
    "hypothesis": "A bubble moving through a branching pore could select its route according to dissolved-gas concentration rather than pressure alone.",
    "test": "Map routing with independently controlled saturation.",
    "against": "Routing ignores dissolved-gas conditions.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0040",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A bubble moving through a branching pore could select its route according to dissolved-gas concentration rather than pressure alone.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0040",
      "hypothesis": "A bubble moving through a branching pore could select its route according to dissolved-gas concentration rather than pressure alone.",
      "test": "Map routing with independently controlled saturation.",
      "against": "Routing ignores dissolved-gas conditions.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0040",
      "hypothesis": "A bubble moving through a branching pore could select its route according to dissolved-gas concentration rather than pressure alone.",
      "test": "Map routing with independently controlled saturation.",
      "against": "Routing ignores dissolved-gas conditions.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0041",
    "hypothesis": "A thin fungal sheet could reveal nutrient transport direction through anisotropic spontaneous mechanical fluctuations.",
    "test": "Compare fluctuation maps with inert tracer transport.",
    "against": "Fluctuations fail to predict transport direction.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 2,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 17,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0041",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A thin fungal sheet could reveal nutrient transport direction through anisotropic spontaneous mechanical fluctuations.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0041",
      "hypothesis": "A thin fungal sheet could reveal nutrient transport direction through anisotropic spontaneous mechanical fluctuations.",
      "test": "Compare fluctuation maps with inert tracer transport.",
      "against": "Fluctuations fail to predict transport direction.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0041",
      "hypothesis": "A thin fungal sheet could reveal nutrient transport direction through anisotropic spontaneous mechanical fluctuations.",
      "test": "Compare fluctuation maps with inert tracer transport.",
      "against": "Fluctuations fail to predict transport direction.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 2,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 17,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0042",
    "hypothesis": "A hydrated polymer knot could tighten under a concentration step while a straight strand simply contracts.",
    "test": "Compare force and shape during solvent changes.",
    "against": "Knot response follows uniform contraction entirely.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 88,
    "literature_query": "hydrated polymer knot tighten concentration step straight strand simply contracts experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N0042",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A hydrated polymer knot could tighten under a concentration step while a straight strand simply contracts.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0042",
      "hypothesis": "A hydrated polymer knot could tighten under a concentration step while a straight strand simply contracts.",
      "test": "Compare force and shape during solvent changes.",
      "against": "Knot response follows uniform contraction entirely.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0042",
      "hypothesis": "A hydrated polymer knot could tighten under a concentration step while a straight strand simply contracts.",
      "test": "Compare force and shape during solvent changes.",
      "against": "Knot response follows uniform contraction entirely.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 88,
      "literature_query": "hydrated polymer knot tighten concentration step straight strand simply contracts experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "88",
      "id": "N0042",
      "hypothesis": "A hydrated polymer knot could tighten under a concentration step while a straight strand simply contracts.",
      "test": "Compare force and shape during solvent changes.",
      "against": "Knot response follows uniform contraction entirely.",
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_score": "21",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P287fcc305ccd;Pfbb4ace29c9d;Pb84fc2ba5f6c;P8e3c10c81cd5;P5703719fea7f;Pfd1b46555aab;P477cc01316e1;Pb1d61149c1cf",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N0042",
      "hypothesis": "A hydrated polymer knot could tighten under a concentration step while a straight strand simply contracts.",
      "test": "Compare force and shape during solvent changes.",
      "against": "Knot response follows uniform contraction entirely.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 88,
      "literature_query": "hydrated polymer knot tighten concentration step straight strand simply contracts experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P287fcc305ccd;Pfbb4ace29c9d;Pb84fc2ba5f6c;P8e3c10c81cd5;P5703719fea7f;Pfd1b46555aab;P477cc01316e1;Pb1d61149c1cf",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P287fcc305ccd;Pfbb4ace29c9d;Pb84fc2ba5f6c;P8e3c10c81cd5;P5703719fea7f;Pfd1b46555aab;P477cc01316e1;Pb1d61149c1cf",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0043",
    "hypothesis": "A granular surface could preserve the arrival order of equal-energy impacts in its subsurface force network.",
    "test": "Probe networks after reversed impact sequences.",
    "against": "Networks depend only on cumulative energy.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 4,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 22,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 63,
    "literature_query": "granular surface preserve arrival order equal-energy impacts subsurface force network experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N0043",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A granular surface could preserve the arrival order of equal-energy impacts in its subsurface force network.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0043",
      "hypothesis": "A granular surface could preserve the arrival order of equal-energy impacts in its subsurface force network.",
      "test": "Probe networks after reversed impact sequences.",
      "against": "Networks depend only on cumulative energy.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0043",
      "hypothesis": "A granular surface could preserve the arrival order of equal-energy impacts in its subsurface force network.",
      "test": "Probe networks after reversed impact sequences.",
      "against": "Networks depend only on cumulative energy.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 22,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 63,
      "literature_query": "granular surface preserve arrival order equal-energy impacts subsurface force network experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "63",
      "id": "N0043",
      "hypothesis": "A granular surface could preserve the arrival order of equal-energy impacts in its subsurface force network.",
      "test": "Probe networks after reversed impact sequences.",
      "against": "Networks depend only on cumulative energy.",
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_score": "22",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P21a189d733c2;P2823af1e8539;P75b8eec59dce;P002f085ef9c8;P7487f88eb720;Pcea4fe460c71",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N0043",
      "hypothesis": "A granular surface could preserve the arrival order of equal-energy impacts in its subsurface force network.",
      "test": "Probe networks after reversed impact sequences.",
      "against": "Networks depend only on cumulative energy.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 22,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 63,
      "literature_query": "granular surface preserve arrival order equal-energy impacts subsurface force network experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P21a189d733c2;P2823af1e8539;P75b8eec59dce;P002f085ef9c8;P7487f88eb720;Pcea4fe460c71",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P21a189d733c2;P2823af1e8539;P75b8eec59dce;P002f085ef9c8;P7487f88eb720;Pcea4fe460c71",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0044",
    "hypothesis": "A weakly conducting liquid could reveal hidden interface motion through a passive voltage transient without applied current.",
    "test": "Measure voltage and interface position together.",
    "against": "Voltage tracks contamination rather than motion.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0044",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A weakly conducting liquid could reveal hidden interface motion through a passive voltage transient without applied current.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0044",
      "hypothesis": "A weakly conducting liquid could reveal hidden interface motion through a passive voltage transient without applied current.",
      "test": "Measure voltage and interface position together.",
      "against": "Voltage tracks contamination rather than motion.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0044",
      "hypothesis": "A weakly conducting liquid could reveal hidden interface motion through a passive voltage transient without applied current.",
      "test": "Measure voltage and interface position together.",
      "against": "Voltage tracks contamination rather than motion.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0045",
    "hypothesis": "A crystal containing isolated solvent pockets could emit discrete acoustic signals as those pockets merge during annealing.",
    "test": "Correlate sound events with three-dimensional imaging.",
    "against": "Events show no pocket-merger association.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0045",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A crystal containing isolated solvent pockets could emit discrete acoustic signals as those pockets merge during annealing.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0045",
      "hypothesis": "A crystal containing isolated solvent pockets could emit discrete acoustic signals as those pockets merge during annealing.",
      "test": "Correlate sound events with three-dimensional imaging.",
      "against": "Events show no pocket-merger association.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0045",
      "hypothesis": "A crystal containing isolated solvent pockets could emit discrete acoustic signals as those pockets merge during annealing.",
      "test": "Correlate sound events with three-dimensional imaging.",
      "against": "Events show no pocket-merger association.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0046",
    "hypothesis": "A reversible molecular cage could suppress unwanted enzyme inhibition by temporarily sequestering inhibitor during substrate pulses.",
    "test": "Measure free inhibitor and catalytic recovery.",
    "against": "Recovery follows dilution alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0046",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A reversible molecular cage could suppress unwanted enzyme inhibition by temporarily sequestering inhibitor during substrate pulses.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0046",
      "hypothesis": "A reversible molecular cage could suppress unwanted enzyme inhibition by temporarily sequestering inhibitor during substrate pulses.",
      "test": "Measure free inhibitor and catalytic recovery.",
      "against": "Recovery follows dilution alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0046",
      "hypothesis": "A reversible molecular cage could suppress unwanted enzyme inhibition by temporarily sequestering inhibitor during substrate pulses.",
      "test": "Measure free inhibitor and catalytic recovery.",
      "against": "Recovery follows dilution alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0047",
    "hypothesis": "A porous membrane could protect a fragile droplet from freezing by directing expansion into a sacrificial cavity.",
    "test": "Image freezing and membrane deformation.",
    "against": "Protected droplets rupture as frequently.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0047",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous membrane could protect a fragile droplet from freezing by directing expansion into a sacrificial cavity.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0047",
      "hypothesis": "A porous membrane could protect a fragile droplet from freezing by directing expansion into a sacrificial cavity.",
      "test": "Image freezing and membrane deformation.",
      "against": "Protected droplets rupture as frequently.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0047",
      "hypothesis": "A porous membrane could protect a fragile droplet from freezing by directing expansion into a sacrificial cavity.",
      "test": "Image freezing and membrane deformation.",
      "against": "Protected droplets rupture as frequently.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0048",
    "hypothesis": "A transparent soil analogue could distinguish capillary uptake from osmotic uptake using opposite tracer motions.",
    "test": "Track two calibrated nonbinding tracers.",
    "against": "Tracer directions cannot identify driving mechanism.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0048",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A transparent soil analogue could distinguish capillary uptake from osmotic uptake using opposite tracer motions.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0048",
      "hypothesis": "A transparent soil analogue could distinguish capillary uptake from osmotic uptake using opposite tracer motions.",
      "test": "Track two calibrated nonbinding tracers.",
      "against": "Tracer directions cannot identify driving mechanism.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0048",
      "hypothesis": "A transparent soil analogue could distinguish capillary uptake from osmotic uptake using opposite tracer motions.",
      "test": "Track two calibrated nonbinding tracers.",
      "against": "Tracer directions cannot identify driving mechanism.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0049",
    "hypothesis": "A magnetically passive inclusion could rotate inside a magnetic fluid because the surrounding chains create anisotropic elastic stress.",
    "test": "Track inclusion torque and chain orientation.",
    "against": "Rotation requires direct magnetic susceptibility.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0049",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A magnetically passive inclusion could rotate inside a magnetic fluid because the surrounding chains create anisotropic elastic stress.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0049",
      "hypothesis": "A magnetically passive inclusion could rotate inside a magnetic fluid because the surrounding chains create anisotropic elastic stress.",
      "test": "Track inclusion torque and chain orientation.",
      "against": "Rotation requires direct magnetic susceptibility.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0049",
      "hypothesis": "A magnetically passive inclusion could rotate inside a magnetic fluid because the surrounding chains create anisotropic elastic stress.",
      "test": "Track inclusion torque and chain orientation.",
      "against": "Rotation requires direct magnetic susceptibility.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0050",
    "hypothesis": "A leaf wax analogue could heal nanoscopic scratches through curvature-driven migration at constant temperature.",
    "test": "Measure scratch closure and wax distribution.",
    "against": "Closure requires external heating or flow.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0050",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A leaf wax analogue could heal nanoscopic scratches through curvature-driven migration at constant temperature.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0050",
      "hypothesis": "A leaf wax analogue could heal nanoscopic scratches through curvature-driven migration at constant temperature.",
      "test": "Measure scratch closure and wax distribution.",
      "against": "Closure requires external heating or flow.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0050",
      "hypothesis": "A leaf wax analogue could heal nanoscopic scratches through curvature-driven migration at constant temperature.",
      "test": "Measure scratch closure and wax distribution.",
      "against": "Closure requires external heating or flow.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0051",
    "hypothesis": "A perforated elastic ribbon could convert uniform swelling into a traveling bend rather than simultaneous deformation.",
    "test": "Image onset times along the ribbon.",
    "against": "Bending begins everywhere simultaneously.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 89,
    "literature_query": "perforated elastic ribbon convert uniform swelling traveling bend simultaneous deformation experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N0051",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A perforated elastic ribbon could convert uniform swelling into a traveling bend rather than simultaneous deformation.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0051",
      "hypothesis": "A perforated elastic ribbon could convert uniform swelling into a traveling bend rather than simultaneous deformation.",
      "test": "Image onset times along the ribbon.",
      "against": "Bending begins everywhere simultaneously.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0051",
      "hypothesis": "A perforated elastic ribbon could convert uniform swelling into a traveling bend rather than simultaneous deformation.",
      "test": "Image onset times along the ribbon.",
      "against": "Bending begins everywhere simultaneously.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 89,
      "literature_query": "perforated elastic ribbon convert uniform swelling traveling bend simultaneous deformation experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "89",
      "id": "N0051",
      "hypothesis": "A perforated elastic ribbon could convert uniform swelling into a traveling bend rather than simultaneous deformation.",
      "test": "Image onset times along the ribbon.",
      "against": "Bending begins everywhere simultaneously.",
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_score": "21",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P8d33a2dd6cfe;P98a3a0ff262a;P123bddd1152a;Pd5a8d8d29729;Pe980b1eef61e;P2a992ac80bd1;P0a97a1634ce9",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N0051",
      "hypothesis": "A perforated elastic ribbon could convert uniform swelling into a traveling bend rather than simultaneous deformation.",
      "test": "Image onset times along the ribbon.",
      "against": "Bending begins everywhere simultaneously.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 89,
      "literature_query": "perforated elastic ribbon convert uniform swelling traveling bend simultaneous deformation experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P8d33a2dd6cfe;P98a3a0ff262a;P123bddd1152a;Pd5a8d8d29729;Pe980b1eef61e;P2a992ac80bd1;P0a97a1634ce9",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P8d33a2dd6cfe;P98a3a0ff262a;P123bddd1152a;Pd5a8d8d29729;Pe980b1eef61e;P2a992ac80bd1;P0a97a1634ce9",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0052",
    "hypothesis": "A sediment pore could preserve dissolved oxygen through local gas exsolution during sudden unloading.",
    "test": "Measure oxygen around model unloading events.",
    "against": "Oxygen remains unchanged after pressure correction.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 90,
    "literature_query": "sediment pore preserve dissolved oxygen local gas exsolution sudden unloading experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N0052",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A sediment pore could preserve dissolved oxygen through local gas exsolution during sudden unloading.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0052",
      "hypothesis": "A sediment pore could preserve dissolved oxygen through local gas exsolution during sudden unloading.",
      "test": "Measure oxygen around model unloading events.",
      "against": "Oxygen remains unchanged after pressure correction.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0052",
      "hypothesis": "A sediment pore could preserve dissolved oxygen through local gas exsolution during sudden unloading.",
      "test": "Measure oxygen around model unloading events.",
      "against": "Oxygen remains unchanged after pressure correction.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 90,
      "literature_query": "sediment pore preserve dissolved oxygen local gas exsolution sudden unloading experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "90",
      "id": "N0052",
      "hypothesis": "A sediment pore could preserve dissolved oxygen through local gas exsolution during sudden unloading.",
      "test": "Measure oxygen around model unloading events.",
      "against": "Oxygen remains unchanged after pressure correction.",
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_score": "21",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P6d4945793613;Pfe7b221b9cec;P784839d867c2;P1a75424ec695",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N0052",
      "hypothesis": "A sediment pore could preserve dissolved oxygen through local gas exsolution during sudden unloading.",
      "test": "Measure oxygen around model unloading events.",
      "against": "Oxygen remains unchanged after pressure correction.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 90,
      "literature_query": "sediment pore preserve dissolved oxygen local gas exsolution sudden unloading experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P6d4945793613;Pfe7b221b9cec;P784839d867c2;P1a75424ec695",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P6d4945793613;Pfe7b221b9cec;P784839d867c2;P1a75424ec695",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0053",
    "hypothesis": "A transparent hydrogel could report local fracture energy through the spatial width of reversible optical whitening.",
    "test": "Compare whitening with independently measured fracture work.",
    "against": "Whitening width lacks predictive value.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 91,
    "literature_query": "transparent hydrogel report local fracture energy spatial width reversible optical whitening experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N0053",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A transparent hydrogel could report local fracture energy through the spatial width of reversible optical whitening.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0053",
      "hypothesis": "A transparent hydrogel could report local fracture energy through the spatial width of reversible optical whitening.",
      "test": "Compare whitening with independently measured fracture work.",
      "against": "Whitening width lacks predictive value.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0053",
      "hypothesis": "A transparent hydrogel could report local fracture energy through the spatial width of reversible optical whitening.",
      "test": "Compare whitening with independently measured fracture work.",
      "against": "Whitening width lacks predictive value.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 91,
      "literature_query": "transparent hydrogel report local fracture energy spatial width reversible optical whitening experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "91",
      "id": "N0053",
      "hypothesis": "A transparent hydrogel could report local fracture energy through the spatial width of reversible optical whitening.",
      "test": "Compare whitening with independently measured fracture work.",
      "against": "Whitening width lacks predictive value.",
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_score": "21",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pf2f9c4fe30ac;P620db3183861;Pfd09f65bc7ea;P9c880f2c2000;P5b6e091746b0;P8253b5f39061;Pba21e89f291a",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N0053",
      "hypothesis": "A transparent hydrogel could report local fracture energy through the spatial width of reversible optical whitening.",
      "test": "Compare whitening with independently measured fracture work.",
      "against": "Whitening width lacks predictive value.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 91,
      "literature_query": "transparent hydrogel report local fracture energy spatial width reversible optical whitening experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pf2f9c4fe30ac;P620db3183861;Pfd09f65bc7ea;P9c880f2c2000;P5b6e091746b0;P8253b5f39061;Pba21e89f291a",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "Pf2f9c4fe30ac;P620db3183861;Pfd09f65bc7ea;P9c880f2c2000;P5b6e091746b0;P8253b5f39061;Pba21e89f291a",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0054",
    "hypothesis": "A colloidal shell could release its contents preferentially through a pre-existing coordination defect under osmotic stress.",
    "test": "Image shell defects and leakage locations.",
    "against": "Leakage sites ignore coordination structure.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 92,
    "literature_query": "colloidal shell release contents preferentially pre-existing coordination defect osmotic stress experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N0054",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A colloidal shell could release its contents preferentially through a pre-existing coordination defect under osmotic stress.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0054",
      "hypothesis": "A colloidal shell could release its contents preferentially through a pre-existing coordination defect under osmotic stress.",
      "test": "Image shell defects and leakage locations.",
      "against": "Leakage sites ignore coordination structure.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0054",
      "hypothesis": "A colloidal shell could release its contents preferentially through a pre-existing coordination defect under osmotic stress.",
      "test": "Image shell defects and leakage locations.",
      "against": "Leakage sites ignore coordination structure.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 92,
      "literature_query": "colloidal shell release contents preferentially pre-existing coordination defect osmotic stress experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "92",
      "id": "N0054",
      "hypothesis": "A colloidal shell could release its contents preferentially through a pre-existing coordination defect under osmotic stress.",
      "test": "Image shell defects and leakage locations.",
      "against": "Leakage sites ignore coordination structure.",
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_score": "21",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P4cdbed9d8afb;P8896146e8067;P63c5cd4f57db;Pac211221068a;P65f269d831ee",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N0054",
      "hypothesis": "A colloidal shell could release its contents preferentially through a pre-existing coordination defect under osmotic stress.",
      "test": "Image shell defects and leakage locations.",
      "against": "Leakage sites ignore coordination structure.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 92,
      "literature_query": "colloidal shell release contents preferentially pre-existing coordination defect osmotic stress experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P4cdbed9d8afb;P8896146e8067;P63c5cd4f57db;Pac211221068a;P65f269d831ee",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P4cdbed9d8afb;P8896146e8067;P63c5cd4f57db;Pac211221068a;P65f269d831ee",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0055",
    "hypothesis": "A compliant container could reduce crystal breakage during stirring by absorbing particle-wall collision energy selectively.",
    "test": "Measure collision velocities and fragment production.",
    "against": "Breakage reduction requires reduced mixing.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 93,
    "literature_query": "compliant container reduce crystal breakage stirring absorbing particle-wall collision energy selectively experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N0055",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A compliant container could reduce crystal breakage during stirring by absorbing particle-wall collision energy selectively.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0055",
      "hypothesis": "A compliant container could reduce crystal breakage during stirring by absorbing particle-wall collision energy selectively.",
      "test": "Measure collision velocities and fragment production.",
      "against": "Breakage reduction requires reduced mixing.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0055",
      "hypothesis": "A compliant container could reduce crystal breakage during stirring by absorbing particle-wall collision energy selectively.",
      "test": "Measure collision velocities and fragment production.",
      "against": "Breakage reduction requires reduced mixing.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 93,
      "literature_query": "compliant container reduce crystal breakage stirring absorbing particle-wall collision energy selectively experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "93",
      "id": "N0055",
      "hypothesis": "A compliant container could reduce crystal breakage during stirring by absorbing particle-wall collision energy selectively.",
      "test": "Measure collision velocities and fragment production.",
      "against": "Breakage reduction requires reduced mixing.",
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_score": "21",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P9dccf74a3ba6;P53167707a765;P3b894220af12;P1a3e8ba4116d;P81d37cd189a1;Pd44d38ecb678",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N0055",
      "hypothesis": "A compliant container could reduce crystal breakage during stirring by absorbing particle-wall collision energy selectively.",
      "test": "Measure collision velocities and fragment production.",
      "against": "Breakage reduction requires reduced mixing.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 93,
      "literature_query": "compliant container reduce crystal breakage stirring absorbing particle-wall collision energy selectively experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P9dccf74a3ba6;P53167707a765;P3b894220af12;P1a3e8ba4116d;P81d37cd189a1;Pd44d38ecb678",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P9dccf74a3ba6;P53167707a765;P3b894220af12;P1a3e8ba4116d;P81d37cd189a1;Pd44d38ecb678",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0056",
    "hypothesis": "A weak illumination gradient could steer the growth direction of a nonphotosynthetic crystal through differential solvent loss.",
    "test": "Map temperature, evaporation, and growth orientation.",
    "against": "Steering disappears after evaporation matching.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 2,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 15,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0056",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A weak illumination gradient could steer the growth direction of a nonphotosynthetic crystal through differential solvent loss.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0056",
      "hypothesis": "A weak illumination gradient could steer the growth direction of a nonphotosynthetic crystal through differential solvent loss.",
      "test": "Map temperature, evaporation, and growth orientation.",
      "against": "Steering disappears after evaporation matching.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0056",
      "hypothesis": "A weak illumination gradient could steer the growth direction of a nonphotosynthetic crystal through differential solvent loss.",
      "test": "Map temperature, evaporation, and growth orientation.",
      "against": "Steering disappears after evaporation matching.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 2,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 15,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0057",
    "hypothesis": "A nonpathogenic microbial colony could alter substrate friction before producing a visible extracellular film.",
    "test": "Track friction and polymer accumulation separately.",
    "against": "Friction changes only after visible film formation.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 2,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 17,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0057",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A nonpathogenic microbial colony could alter substrate friction before producing a visible extracellular film.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0057",
      "hypothesis": "A nonpathogenic microbial colony could alter substrate friction before producing a visible extracellular film.",
      "test": "Track friction and polymer accumulation separately.",
      "against": "Friction changes only after visible film formation.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0057",
      "hypothesis": "A nonpathogenic microbial colony could alter substrate friction before producing a visible extracellular film.",
      "test": "Track friction and polymer accumulation separately.",
      "against": "Friction changes only after visible film formation.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 2,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 17,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0058",
    "hypothesis": "A resonant bead could identify whether it touches a rigid wall or another bead through overtone ratios.",
    "test": "Measure spectra under matched contact forces.",
    "against": "Ratios cannot distinguish contact partners.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0058",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A resonant bead could identify whether it touches a rigid wall or another bead through overtone ratios.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0058",
      "hypothesis": "A resonant bead could identify whether it touches a rigid wall or another bead through overtone ratios.",
      "test": "Measure spectra under matched contact forces.",
      "against": "Ratios cannot distinguish contact partners.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0058",
      "hypothesis": "A resonant bead could identify whether it touches a rigid wall or another bead through overtone ratios.",
      "test": "Measure spectra under matched contact forces.",
      "against": "Ratios cannot distinguish contact partners.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0059",
    "hypothesis": "A thin ice bridge could strengthen temporarily during warming if stress relaxation outpaces melt-induced weakening.",
    "test": "Measure strength across warming rates.",
    "against": "Strength decreases monotonically at all rates.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 94,
    "literature_query": "thin ice bridge strengthen temporarily warming if stress relaxation outpaces melt-induced weakening experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N0059",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A thin ice bridge could strengthen temporarily during warming if stress relaxation outpaces melt-induced weakening.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0059",
      "hypothesis": "A thin ice bridge could strengthen temporarily during warming if stress relaxation outpaces melt-induced weakening.",
      "test": "Measure strength across warming rates.",
      "against": "Strength decreases monotonically at all rates.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0059",
      "hypothesis": "A thin ice bridge could strengthen temporarily during warming if stress relaxation outpaces melt-induced weakening.",
      "test": "Measure strength across warming rates.",
      "against": "Strength decreases monotonically at all rates.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 94,
      "literature_query": "thin ice bridge strengthen temporarily warming if stress relaxation outpaces melt-induced weakening experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "94",
      "id": "N0059",
      "hypothesis": "A thin ice bridge could strengthen temporarily during warming if stress relaxation outpaces melt-induced weakening.",
      "test": "Measure strength across warming rates.",
      "against": "Strength decreases monotonically at all rates.",
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_score": "21",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pd6567c83fc53;Pfc4939b903aa;P1cf38d95b5c3;Pc1b360f95fd6;P92212ea3509d;P0fcc90a6187e",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N0059",
      "hypothesis": "A thin ice bridge could strengthen temporarily during warming if stress relaxation outpaces melt-induced weakening.",
      "test": "Measure strength across warming rates.",
      "against": "Strength decreases monotonically at all rates.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 94,
      "literature_query": "thin ice bridge strengthen temporarily warming if stress relaxation outpaces melt-induced weakening experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pd6567c83fc53;Pfc4939b903aa;P1cf38d95b5c3;Pc1b360f95fd6;P92212ea3509d;P0fcc90a6187e",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "Pd6567c83fc53;Pfc4939b903aa;P1cf38d95b5c3;Pc1b360f95fd6;P92212ea3509d;P0fcc90a6187e",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0060",
    "hypothesis": "A liquid-filled porous prism could bend a pressure wave differently from a thermal wave despite identical outer geometry.",
    "test": "Measure both wavefronts in matched samples.",
    "against": "Deflection follows identical geometric paths.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0060",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A liquid-filled porous prism could bend a pressure wave differently from a thermal wave despite identical outer geometry.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0060",
      "hypothesis": "A liquid-filled porous prism could bend a pressure wave differently from a thermal wave despite identical outer geometry.",
      "test": "Measure both wavefronts in matched samples.",
      "against": "Deflection follows identical geometric paths.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0060",
      "hypothesis": "A liquid-filled porous prism could bend a pressure wave differently from a thermal wave despite identical outer geometry.",
      "test": "Measure both wavefronts in matched samples.",
      "against": "Deflection follows identical geometric paths.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0061",
    "hypothesis": "A protein-free artificial membrane could separate two neutral solutes by their hydration-shell relaxation rather than molecular size.",
    "test": "Compare flux for size-matched model solutes.",
    "against": "Flux differences track size or binding alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0061",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A protein-free artificial membrane could separate two neutral solutes by their hydration-shell relaxation rather than molecular size.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0061",
      "hypothesis": "A protein-free artificial membrane could separate two neutral solutes by their hydration-shell relaxation rather than molecular size.",
      "test": "Compare flux for size-matched model solutes.",
      "against": "Flux differences track size or binding alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0061",
      "hypothesis": "A protein-free artificial membrane could separate two neutral solutes by their hydration-shell relaxation rather than molecular size.",
      "test": "Compare flux for size-matched model solutes.",
      "against": "Flux differences track size or binding alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0062",
    "hypothesis": "A mineral surface could retain a transient electric potential after a crack closes because opposing faces adsorb ions differently.",
    "test": "Measure closure potential and surface chemistry.",
    "against": "Potential vanishes with geometrical closure.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 95,
    "literature_query": "mineral surface retain transient electric potential crack closes because opposing faces adsorb ions differently experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N0062",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A mineral surface could retain a transient electric potential after a crack closes because opposing faces adsorb ions differently.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0062",
      "hypothesis": "A mineral surface could retain a transient electric potential after a crack closes because opposing faces adsorb ions differently.",
      "test": "Measure closure potential and surface chemistry.",
      "against": "Potential vanishes with geometrical closure.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0062",
      "hypothesis": "A mineral surface could retain a transient electric potential after a crack closes because opposing faces adsorb ions differently.",
      "test": "Measure closure potential and surface chemistry.",
      "against": "Potential vanishes with geometrical closure.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 95,
      "literature_query": "mineral surface retain transient electric potential crack closes because opposing faces adsorb ions differently experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "95",
      "id": "N0062",
      "hypothesis": "A mineral surface could retain a transient electric potential after a crack closes because opposing faces adsorb ions differently.",
      "test": "Measure closure potential and surface chemistry.",
      "against": "Potential vanishes with geometrical closure.",
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_score": "21",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P73176399be1a;Pbe95cb1a61c8;P04f053c23624;P561ab13ca241;P51605645d201",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N0062",
      "hypothesis": "A mineral surface could retain a transient electric potential after a crack closes because opposing faces adsorb ions differently.",
      "test": "Measure closure potential and surface chemistry.",
      "against": "Potential vanishes with geometrical closure.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 95,
      "literature_query": "mineral surface retain transient electric potential crack closes because opposing faces adsorb ions differently experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P73176399be1a;Pbe95cb1a61c8;P04f053c23624;P561ab13ca241;P51605645d201",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P73176399be1a;Pbe95cb1a61c8;P04f053c23624;P561ab13ca241;P51605645d201",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0063",
    "hypothesis": "A twisted fiber bundle could transport liquid uphill through a twist-induced pore-pressure gradient.",
    "test": "Measure uptake across twist directions and gravity orientations.",
    "against": "Transport matches untwisted capillary predictions.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0063",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A twisted fiber bundle could transport liquid uphill through a twist-induced pore-pressure gradient.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0063",
      "hypothesis": "A twisted fiber bundle could transport liquid uphill through a twist-induced pore-pressure gradient.",
      "test": "Measure uptake across twist directions and gravity orientations.",
      "against": "Transport matches untwisted capillary predictions.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0063",
      "hypothesis": "A twisted fiber bundle could transport liquid uphill through a twist-induced pore-pressure gradient.",
      "test": "Measure uptake across twist directions and gravity orientations.",
      "against": "Transport matches untwisted capillary predictions.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0064",
    "hypothesis": "A transparent gel could amplify weak magnetic-particle motion into visible birefringent halos without altering particle magnetization.",
    "test": "Compare optical halos with tracked displacements.",
    "against": "Halos require irreversible network damage.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 96,
    "literature_query": "transparent gel amplify weak magnetic-particle motion visible birefringent halos altering particle magnetization experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N0064",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A transparent gel could amplify weak magnetic-particle motion into visible birefringent halos without altering particle magnetization.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0064",
      "hypothesis": "A transparent gel could amplify weak magnetic-particle motion into visible birefringent halos without altering particle magnetization.",
      "test": "Compare optical halos with tracked displacements.",
      "against": "Halos require irreversible network damage.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0064",
      "hypothesis": "A transparent gel could amplify weak magnetic-particle motion into visible birefringent halos without altering particle magnetization.",
      "test": "Compare optical halos with tracked displacements.",
      "against": "Halos require irreversible network damage.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 96,
      "literature_query": "transparent gel amplify weak magnetic-particle motion visible birefringent halos altering particle magnetization experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "96",
      "id": "N0064",
      "hypothesis": "A transparent gel could amplify weak magnetic-particle motion into visible birefringent halos without altering particle magnetization.",
      "test": "Compare optical halos with tracked displacements.",
      "against": "Halos require irreversible network damage.",
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_score": "21",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P679d3c59d8ae;P03751afcea5f;P0d8bbd595168;Pa7b18a21d2ae",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N0064",
      "hypothesis": "A transparent gel could amplify weak magnetic-particle motion into visible birefringent halos without altering particle magnetization.",
      "test": "Compare optical halos with tracked displacements.",
      "against": "Halos require irreversible network damage.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 96,
      "literature_query": "transparent gel amplify weak magnetic-particle motion visible birefringent halos altering particle magnetization experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P679d3c59d8ae;P03751afcea5f;P0d8bbd595168;Pa7b18a21d2ae",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P679d3c59d8ae;P03751afcea5f;P0d8bbd595168;Pa7b18a21d2ae",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0065",
    "hypothesis": "A small air cavity could arrest a solvent-driven delamination front by redistributing vapor pressure ahead of the crack.",
    "test": "Image front motion and cavity pressure.",
    "against": "Arrest depends only on removed bond area.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0065",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A small air cavity could arrest a solvent-driven delamination front by redistributing vapor pressure ahead of the crack.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0065",
      "hypothesis": "A small air cavity could arrest a solvent-driven delamination front by redistributing vapor pressure ahead of the crack.",
      "test": "Image front motion and cavity pressure.",
      "against": "Arrest depends only on removed bond area.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0065",
      "hypothesis": "A small air cavity could arrest a solvent-driven delamination front by redistributing vapor pressure ahead of the crack.",
      "test": "Image front motion and cavity pressure.",
      "against": "Arrest depends only on removed bond area.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0066",
    "hypothesis": "A plant root cap could act as a granular lubricant by releasing particles with a particular deformability range.",
    "test": "Test inert cap analogues with controlled soft debris.",
    "against": "Lubrication ignores debris deformability.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 2,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 15,
    "area": "nonhuman biology",
    "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0066",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A plant root cap could act as a granular lubricant by releasing particles with a particular deformability range.",
    "category": "nonhuman biology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0066",
      "hypothesis": "A plant root cap could act as a granular lubricant by releasing particles with a particular deformability range.",
      "test": "Test inert cap analogues with controlled soft debris.",
      "against": "Lubrication ignores debris deformability.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0066",
      "hypothesis": "A plant root cap could act as a granular lubricant by releasing particles with a particular deformability range.",
      "test": "Test inert cap analogues with controlled soft debris.",
      "against": "Lubrication ignores debris deformability.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 2,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 15,
      "area": "nonhuman biology",
      "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0067",
    "hypothesis": "A suspended droplet could detect minute airborne salt through a reversible change in its acoustic stiffness.",
    "test": "Measure resonance before and after quantified exposure.",
    "against": "Resonance changes are explained by mass alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0067",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A suspended droplet could detect minute airborne salt through a reversible change in its acoustic stiffness.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0067",
      "hypothesis": "A suspended droplet could detect minute airborne salt through a reversible change in its acoustic stiffness.",
      "test": "Measure resonance before and after quantified exposure.",
      "against": "Resonance changes are explained by mass alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0067",
      "hypothesis": "A suspended droplet could detect minute airborne salt through a reversible change in its acoustic stiffness.",
      "test": "Measure resonance before and after quantified exposure.",
      "against": "Resonance changes are explained by mass alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0068",
    "hypothesis": "A porous crystal could release trapped molecules when acoustic strain briefly opens a cooperative pathway.",
    "test": "Measure release synchronized with low-amplitude acoustic loading.",
    "against": "Release follows temperature or irreversible cracking.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 97,
    "literature_query": "porous crystal release trapped molecules when acoustic strain briefly opens cooperative pathway experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N0068",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous crystal could release trapped molecules when acoustic strain briefly opens a cooperative pathway.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0068",
      "hypothesis": "A porous crystal could release trapped molecules when acoustic strain briefly opens a cooperative pathway.",
      "test": "Measure release synchronized with low-amplitude acoustic loading.",
      "against": "Release follows temperature or irreversible cracking.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0068",
      "hypothesis": "A porous crystal could release trapped molecules when acoustic strain briefly opens a cooperative pathway.",
      "test": "Measure release synchronized with low-amplitude acoustic loading.",
      "against": "Release follows temperature or irreversible cracking.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 97,
      "literature_query": "porous crystal release trapped molecules when acoustic strain briefly opens cooperative pathway experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "97",
      "id": "N0068",
      "hypothesis": "A porous crystal could release trapped molecules when acoustic strain briefly opens a cooperative pathway.",
      "test": "Measure release synchronized with low-amplitude acoustic loading.",
      "against": "Release follows temperature or irreversible cracking.",
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_score": "21",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P4d774277978f;Pafdeb093cdac;P2e4b109abc5d;P817e3a0ea19c;P1aa40ae8890f;P51a3bc047978",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N0068",
      "hypothesis": "A porous crystal could release trapped molecules when acoustic strain briefly opens a cooperative pathway.",
      "test": "Measure release synchronized with low-amplitude acoustic loading.",
      "against": "Release follows temperature or irreversible cracking.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 97,
      "literature_query": "porous crystal release trapped molecules when acoustic strain briefly opens cooperative pathway experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P4d774277978f;Pafdeb093cdac;P2e4b109abc5d;P817e3a0ea19c;P1aa40ae8890f;P51a3bc047978",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P4d774277978f;Pafdeb093cdac;P2e4b109abc5d;P817e3a0ea19c;P1aa40ae8890f;P51a3bc047978",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0069",
    "hypothesis": "A foam could extinguish a propagating rupture by transferring liquid through a deliberately wet perimeter ring.",
    "test": "Track rupture fronts and ring drainage.",
    "against": "The ring does not interrupt propagation.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0069",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A foam could extinguish a propagating rupture by transferring liquid through a deliberately wet perimeter ring.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0069",
      "hypothesis": "A foam could extinguish a propagating rupture by transferring liquid through a deliberately wet perimeter ring.",
      "test": "Track rupture fronts and ring drainage.",
      "against": "The ring does not interrupt propagation.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0069",
      "hypothesis": "A foam could extinguish a propagating rupture by transferring liquid through a deliberately wet perimeter ring.",
      "test": "Track rupture fronts and ring drainage.",
      "against": "The ring does not interrupt propagation.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0070",
    "hypothesis": "A low-density mineral flake could descend faster after mild illumination because asymmetric heating changes its orientation.",
    "test": "Track orientation, temperature, and settling velocity.",
    "against": "Speed changes occur without orientation changes.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 98,
    "literature_query": "low-density mineral flake descend faster mild illumination because asymmetric heating changes orientation experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N0070",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A low-density mineral flake could descend faster after mild illumination because asymmetric heating changes its orientation.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0070",
      "hypothesis": "A low-density mineral flake could descend faster after mild illumination because asymmetric heating changes its orientation.",
      "test": "Track orientation, temperature, and settling velocity.",
      "against": "Speed changes occur without orientation changes.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0070",
      "hypothesis": "A low-density mineral flake could descend faster after mild illumination because asymmetric heating changes its orientation.",
      "test": "Track orientation, temperature, and settling velocity.",
      "against": "Speed changes occur without orientation changes.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 98,
      "literature_query": "low-density mineral flake descend faster mild illumination because asymmetric heating changes orientation experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "98",
      "id": "N0070",
      "hypothesis": "A low-density mineral flake could descend faster after mild illumination because asymmetric heating changes its orientation.",
      "test": "Track orientation, temperature, and settling velocity.",
      "against": "Speed changes occur without orientation changes.",
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_score": "21",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P8979fac03a6d;P7e8a2d5ef428;P1c0ae1a261f9;Pc302c5d932fd;P7c404ec5e621;P7db02c5d216f",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N0070",
      "hypothesis": "A low-density mineral flake could descend faster after mild illumination because asymmetric heating changes its orientation.",
      "test": "Track orientation, temperature, and settling velocity.",
      "against": "Speed changes occur without orientation changes.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 98,
      "literature_query": "low-density mineral flake descend faster mild illumination because asymmetric heating changes orientation experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P8979fac03a6d;P7e8a2d5ef428;P1c0ae1a261f9;Pc302c5d932fd;P7c404ec5e621;P7db02c5d216f",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P8979fac03a6d;P7e8a2d5ef428;P1c0ae1a261f9;Pc302c5d932fd;P7c404ec5e621;P7db02c5d216f",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0071",
    "hypothesis": "A cell-free enzyme mixture could maintain a moving reaction boundary through reversible local enzyme immobilization.",
    "test": "Image enzyme location and product fronts.",
    "against": "Boundary motion persists without immobilization.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0071",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A cell-free enzyme mixture could maintain a moving reaction boundary through reversible local enzyme immobilization.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0071",
      "hypothesis": "A cell-free enzyme mixture could maintain a moving reaction boundary through reversible local enzyme immobilization.",
      "test": "Image enzyme location and product fronts.",
      "against": "Boundary motion persists without immobilization.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0071",
      "hypothesis": "A cell-free enzyme mixture could maintain a moving reaction boundary through reversible local enzyme immobilization.",
      "test": "Image enzyme location and product fronts.",
      "against": "Boundary motion persists without immobilization.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0072",
    "hypothesis": "A submillimeter elastic arch could identify the order of two pressure pulses through noncommuting snap transitions.",
    "test": "Apply reversed pulse sequences with equal amplitudes.",
    "against": "Final states cannot encode order.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 18,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0072",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A submillimeter elastic arch could identify the order of two pressure pulses through noncommuting snap transitions.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0072",
      "hypothesis": "A submillimeter elastic arch could identify the order of two pressure pulses through noncommuting snap transitions.",
      "test": "Apply reversed pulse sequences with equal amplitudes.",
      "against": "Final states cannot encode order.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0072",
      "hypothesis": "A submillimeter elastic arch could identify the order of two pressure pulses through noncommuting snap transitions.",
      "test": "Apply reversed pulse sequences with equal amplitudes.",
      "against": "Final states cannot encode order.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 18,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0073",
    "hypothesis": "A droplet containing inert rods could freeze with less shape distortion because rods redistribute stress during solidification.",
    "test": "Image freezing fronts and final deformation.",
    "against": "Distortion tracks heat transport alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0073",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A droplet containing inert rods could freeze with less shape distortion because rods redistribute stress during solidification.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0073",
      "hypothesis": "A droplet containing inert rods could freeze with less shape distortion because rods redistribute stress during solidification.",
      "test": "Image freezing fronts and final deformation.",
      "against": "Distortion tracks heat transport alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0073",
      "hypothesis": "A droplet containing inert rods could freeze with less shape distortion because rods redistribute stress during solidification.",
      "test": "Image freezing fronts and final deformation.",
      "against": "Distortion tracks heat transport alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0074",
    "hypothesis": "A thin clay lining could prevent gas bubbles merging by maintaining separate hydrated contact patches.",
    "test": "Compare merger rates with equal-wetting nonclay linings.",
    "against": "Merger reduction follows wettability alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 99,
    "literature_query": "thin clay lining prevent gas bubbles merging maintaining separate hydrated contact patches experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N0074",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A thin clay lining could prevent gas bubbles merging by maintaining separate hydrated contact patches.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0074",
      "hypothesis": "A thin clay lining could prevent gas bubbles merging by maintaining separate hydrated contact patches.",
      "test": "Compare merger rates with equal-wetting nonclay linings.",
      "against": "Merger reduction follows wettability alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0074",
      "hypothesis": "A thin clay lining could prevent gas bubbles merging by maintaining separate hydrated contact patches.",
      "test": "Compare merger rates with equal-wetting nonclay linings.",
      "against": "Merger reduction follows wettability alone.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 99,
      "literature_query": "thin clay lining prevent gas bubbles merging maintaining separate hydrated contact patches experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "99",
      "id": "N0074",
      "hypothesis": "A thin clay lining could prevent gas bubbles merging by maintaining separate hydrated contact patches.",
      "test": "Compare merger rates with equal-wetting nonclay linings.",
      "against": "Merger reduction follows wettability alone.",
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_score": "21",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pb9a80b08c4be;P625bb28af089;P51c8b47bc702;P910639efe57b;P045432bf0907;P0a23fd0bd50d;P740cef919334",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N0074",
      "hypothesis": "A thin clay lining could prevent gas bubbles merging by maintaining separate hydrated contact patches.",
      "test": "Compare merger rates with equal-wetting nonclay linings.",
      "against": "Merger reduction follows wettability alone.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 99,
      "literature_query": "thin clay lining prevent gas bubbles merging maintaining separate hydrated contact patches experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pb9a80b08c4be;P625bb28af089;P51c8b47bc702;P910639efe57b;P045432bf0907;P0a23fd0bd50d;P740cef919334",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "Pb9a80b08c4be;P625bb28af089;P51c8b47bc702;P910639efe57b;P045432bf0907;P0a23fd0bd50d;P740cef919334",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0075",
    "hypothesis": "A solid-state dye film could distinguish mechanical wear from chemical fading by the spatial correlation of emission changes.",
    "test": "Apply separately quantified wear and chemical exposure.",
    "against": "Patterns cannot classify the two processes.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 18,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0075",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A solid-state dye film could distinguish mechanical wear from chemical fading by the spatial correlation of emission changes.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0075",
      "hypothesis": "A solid-state dye film could distinguish mechanical wear from chemical fading by the spatial correlation of emission changes.",
      "test": "Apply separately quantified wear and chemical exposure.",
      "against": "Patterns cannot classify the two processes.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0075",
      "hypothesis": "A solid-state dye film could distinguish mechanical wear from chemical fading by the spatial correlation of emission changes.",
      "test": "Apply separately quantified wear and chemical exposure.",
      "against": "Patterns cannot classify the two processes.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 18,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0076",
    "hypothesis": "A granular bed could become acoustically quieter just before a localized collapse as contacts synchronize temporarily.",
    "test": "Record sound and force networks during slow loading.",
    "against": "No reproducible quiet precursor precedes collapse.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 4,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 2,
    "literature_query": "granular bed become acoustically quieter just localized collapse contacts synchronize temporarily experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N0076",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A granular bed could become acoustically quieter just before a localized collapse as contacts synchronize temporarily.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0076",
      "hypothesis": "A granular bed could become acoustically quieter just before a localized collapse as contacts synchronize temporarily.",
      "test": "Record sound and force networks during slow loading.",
      "against": "No reproducible quiet precursor precedes collapse.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0076",
      "hypothesis": "A granular bed could become acoustically quieter just before a localized collapse as contacts synchronize temporarily.",
      "test": "Record sound and force networks during slow loading.",
      "against": "No reproducible quiet precursor precedes collapse.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 2,
      "literature_query": "granular bed become acoustically quieter just localized collapse contacts synchronize temporarily experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "2",
      "id": "N0076",
      "hypothesis": "A granular bed could become acoustically quieter just before a localized collapse as contacts synchronize temporarily.",
      "test": "Record sound and force networks during slow loading.",
      "against": "No reproducible quiet precursor precedes collapse.",
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_score": "24",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P1a8e2abba193;P7493e449336d;Pf5226ed00d4e;P7487f88eb720;P7088d87db506;P6c4cec61b9e3;P3b2a7924b859",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N0076",
      "hypothesis": "A granular bed could become acoustically quieter just before a localized collapse as contacts synchronize temporarily.",
      "test": "Record sound and force networks during slow loading.",
      "against": "No reproducible quiet precursor precedes collapse.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 2,
      "literature_query": "granular bed become acoustically quieter just localized collapse contacts synchronize temporarily experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P1a8e2abba193;P7493e449336d;Pf5226ed00d4e;P7487f88eb720;P7088d87db506;P6c4cec61b9e3;P3b2a7924b859",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P1a8e2abba193;P7493e449336d;Pf5226ed00d4e;P7487f88eb720;P7088d87db506;P6c4cec61b9e3;P3b2a7924b859",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0077",
    "hypothesis": "A seed-inspired capsule could open at a specific hydration integral rather than a specific instantaneous humidity.",
    "test": "Compare histories with equal integrated uptake.",
    "against": "Opening follows current moisture alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "nonhuman biology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 100,
    "literature_query": "seed-inspired capsule open specific hydration integral specific instantaneous humidity experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N0077",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A seed-inspired capsule could open at a specific hydration integral rather than a specific instantaneous humidity.",
    "category": "nonhuman biology",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0077",
      "hypothesis": "A seed-inspired capsule could open at a specific hydration integral rather than a specific instantaneous humidity.",
      "test": "Compare histories with equal integrated uptake.",
      "against": "Opening follows current moisture alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0077",
      "hypothesis": "A seed-inspired capsule could open at a specific hydration integral rather than a specific instantaneous humidity.",
      "test": "Compare histories with equal integrated uptake.",
      "against": "Opening follows current moisture alone.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "nonhuman biology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 100,
      "literature_query": "seed-inspired capsule open specific hydration integral specific instantaneous humidity experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "100",
      "id": "N0077",
      "hypothesis": "A seed-inspired capsule could open at a specific hydration integral rather than a specific instantaneous humidity.",
      "test": "Compare histories with equal integrated uptake.",
      "against": "Opening follows current moisture alone.",
      "area": "nonhuman biology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_score": "21",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pa026761a9e41;P52c220e6b44b;P74b671a3adaf;P8e07003b2b6e;P1a83b3bbc174",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N0077",
      "hypothesis": "A seed-inspired capsule could open at a specific hydration integral rather than a specific instantaneous humidity.",
      "test": "Compare histories with equal integrated uptake.",
      "against": "Opening follows current moisture alone.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "nonhuman biology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 100,
      "literature_query": "seed-inspired capsule open specific hydration integral specific instantaneous humidity experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pa026761a9e41;P52c220e6b44b;P74b671a3adaf;P8e07003b2b6e;P1a83b3bbc174",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "Pa026761a9e41;P52c220e6b44b;P74b671a3adaf;P8e07003b2b6e;P1a83b3bbc174",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0078",
    "hypothesis": "A magnetically driven stirrer could mix a viscoelastic liquid more efficiently through intermittent reversal of elastic recoil.",
    "test": "Measure concentration variance and actual stirring work.",
    "against": "Efficiency gain disappears after work matching.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0078",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A magnetically driven stirrer could mix a viscoelastic liquid more efficiently through intermittent reversal of elastic recoil.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0078",
      "hypothesis": "A magnetically driven stirrer could mix a viscoelastic liquid more efficiently through intermittent reversal of elastic recoil.",
      "test": "Measure concentration variance and actual stirring work.",
      "against": "Efficiency gain disappears after work matching.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0078",
      "hypothesis": "A magnetically driven stirrer could mix a viscoelastic liquid more efficiently through intermittent reversal of elastic recoil.",
      "test": "Measure concentration variance and actual stirring work.",
      "against": "Efficiency gain disappears after work matching.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0079",
    "hypothesis": "A mineral-water interface could nucleate nanoscopic gas preferentially where a dissolving impurity leaves tensile surface stress.",
    "test": "Map impurity loss, strain, and bubble origins.",
    "against": "Bubble sites correlate only with roughness.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 12,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0079",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A mineral-water interface could nucleate nanoscopic gas preferentially where a dissolving impurity leaves tensile surface stress.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0079",
      "hypothesis": "A mineral-water interface could nucleate nanoscopic gas preferentially where a dissolving impurity leaves tensile surface stress.",
      "test": "Map impurity loss, strain, and bubble origins.",
      "against": "Bubble sites correlate only with roughness.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0079",
      "hypothesis": "A mineral-water interface could nucleate nanoscopic gas preferentially where a dissolving impurity leaves tensile surface stress.",
      "test": "Map impurity loss, strain, and bubble origins.",
      "against": "Bubble sites correlate only with roughness.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 12,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0080",
    "hypothesis": "A layered acoustic absorber could expose internal moisture location through the relative phase of transmitted harmonics.",
    "test": "Validate phase predictions against known wet layers.",
    "against": "Phase cannot localize moisture independently.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 12,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0080",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A layered acoustic absorber could expose internal moisture location through the relative phase of transmitted harmonics.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0080",
      "hypothesis": "A layered acoustic absorber could expose internal moisture location through the relative phase of transmitted harmonics.",
      "test": "Validate phase predictions against known wet layers.",
      "against": "Phase cannot localize moisture independently.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0080",
      "hypothesis": "A layered acoustic absorber could expose internal moisture location through the relative phase of transmitted harmonics.",
      "test": "Validate phase predictions against known wet layers.",
      "against": "Phase cannot localize moisture independently.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 12,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0081",
    "hypothesis": "A gel-coated fiber could carry isolated nutrient packets by localized swelling waves without bulk liquid pumping.",
    "test": "Track inert nutrient analogues and coating motion.",
    "against": "Packets disperse without net wave-driven transport.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0081",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A gel-coated fiber could carry isolated nutrient packets by localized swelling waves without bulk liquid pumping.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0081",
      "hypothesis": "A gel-coated fiber could carry isolated nutrient packets by localized swelling waves without bulk liquid pumping.",
      "test": "Track inert nutrient analogues and coating motion.",
      "against": "Packets disperse without net wave-driven transport.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0081",
      "hypothesis": "A gel-coated fiber could carry isolated nutrient packets by localized swelling waves without bulk liquid pumping.",
      "test": "Track inert nutrient analogues and coating motion.",
      "against": "Packets disperse without net wave-driven transport.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0082",
    "hypothesis": "A chemically uniform rough surface could direct crystallization through anisotropic thermal contact rather than wetting contrast.",
    "test": "Measure thermal fields and nucleus positions.",
    "against": "Orientation disappears after thermal matching.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0082",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A chemically uniform rough surface could direct crystallization through anisotropic thermal contact rather than wetting contrast.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0082",
      "hypothesis": "A chemically uniform rough surface could direct crystallization through anisotropic thermal contact rather than wetting contrast.",
      "test": "Measure thermal fields and nucleus positions.",
      "against": "Orientation disappears after thermal matching.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0082",
      "hypothesis": "A chemically uniform rough surface could direct crystallization through anisotropic thermal contact rather than wetting contrast.",
      "test": "Measure thermal fields and nucleus positions.",
      "against": "Orientation disappears after thermal matching.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0083",
    "hypothesis": "A soft robot joint could self-limit torque through reversible solvent expulsion under overload.",
    "test": "Measure torque, solvent flow, and recovery.",
    "against": "Limiting requires permanent material damage.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 101,
    "literature_query": "soft robot joint self-limit torque reversible solvent expulsion overload experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N0083",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A soft robot joint could self-limit torque through reversible solvent expulsion under overload.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0083",
      "hypothesis": "A soft robot joint could self-limit torque through reversible solvent expulsion under overload.",
      "test": "Measure torque, solvent flow, and recovery.",
      "against": "Limiting requires permanent material damage.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0083",
      "hypothesis": "A soft robot joint could self-limit torque through reversible solvent expulsion under overload.",
      "test": "Measure torque, solvent flow, and recovery.",
      "against": "Limiting requires permanent material damage.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 101,
      "literature_query": "soft robot joint self-limit torque reversible solvent expulsion overload experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "101",
      "id": "N0083",
      "hypothesis": "A soft robot joint could self-limit torque through reversible solvent expulsion under overload.",
      "test": "Measure torque, solvent flow, and recovery.",
      "against": "Limiting requires permanent material damage.",
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_score": "21",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P0b73a9192ed6;Pf280ae283fef;P59ecbb59a5ab;P1888df3c259b;P115d01ad025c;P5e8be16bd178;P5c69bca5e91d;P84594d3cae50",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N0083",
      "hypothesis": "A soft robot joint could self-limit torque through reversible solvent expulsion under overload.",
      "test": "Measure torque, solvent flow, and recovery.",
      "against": "Limiting requires permanent material damage.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 101,
      "literature_query": "soft robot joint self-limit torque reversible solvent expulsion overload experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P0b73a9192ed6;Pf280ae283fef;P59ecbb59a5ab;P1888df3c259b;P115d01ad025c;P5e8be16bd178;P5c69bca5e91d;P84594d3cae50",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P0b73a9192ed6;Pf280ae283fef;P59ecbb59a5ab;P1888df3c259b;P115d01ad025c;P5e8be16bd178;P5c69bca5e91d;P84594d3cae50",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0084",
    "hypothesis": "A microalgal aggregate could stabilize its own light exposure by changing buoyancy as internal gas dissolves.",
    "test": "Track aggregate gas, density, and light history.",
    "against": "Buoyancy changes ignore internal gas content.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0084",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A microalgal aggregate could stabilize its own light exposure by changing buoyancy as internal gas dissolves.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0084",
      "hypothesis": "A microalgal aggregate could stabilize its own light exposure by changing buoyancy as internal gas dissolves.",
      "test": "Track aggregate gas, density, and light history.",
      "against": "Buoyancy changes ignore internal gas content.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0084",
      "hypothesis": "A microalgal aggregate could stabilize its own light exposure by changing buoyancy as internal gas dissolves.",
      "test": "Track aggregate gas, density, and light history.",
      "against": "Buoyancy changes ignore internal gas content.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0085",
    "hypothesis": "A porous electrode-free sensor could detect ion exchange by mechanical resonance while rejecting neutral-solute uptake.",
    "test": "Calibrate resonance against independently measured swelling and exchange.",
    "against": "Signals cannot separate exchange from swelling.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0085",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous electrode-free sensor could detect ion exchange by mechanical resonance while rejecting neutral-solute uptake.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0085",
      "hypothesis": "A porous electrode-free sensor could detect ion exchange by mechanical resonance while rejecting neutral-solute uptake.",
      "test": "Calibrate resonance against independently measured swelling and exchange.",
      "against": "Signals cannot separate exchange from swelling.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0085",
      "hypothesis": "A porous electrode-free sensor could detect ion exchange by mechanical resonance while rejecting neutral-solute uptake.",
      "test": "Calibrate resonance against independently measured swelling and exchange.",
      "against": "Signals cannot separate exchange from swelling.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0086",
    "hypothesis": "A brittle coating could fragment into a narrower size distribution when detached from a compliant substrate than from a rigid one.",
    "test": "Measure fragment sizes at matched stored energy.",
    "against": "Fragment spread remains unchanged.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 102,
    "literature_query": "brittle coating fragment narrower size distribution when detached compliant substrate rigid one experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N0086",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A brittle coating could fragment into a narrower size distribution when detached from a compliant substrate than from a rigid one.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0086",
      "hypothesis": "A brittle coating could fragment into a narrower size distribution when detached from a compliant substrate than from a rigid one.",
      "test": "Measure fragment sizes at matched stored energy.",
      "against": "Fragment spread remains unchanged.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0086",
      "hypothesis": "A brittle coating could fragment into a narrower size distribution when detached from a compliant substrate than from a rigid one.",
      "test": "Measure fragment sizes at matched stored energy.",
      "against": "Fragment spread remains unchanged.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 102,
      "literature_query": "brittle coating fragment narrower size distribution when detached compliant substrate rigid one experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "102",
      "id": "N0086",
      "hypothesis": "A brittle coating could fragment into a narrower size distribution when detached from a compliant substrate than from a rigid one.",
      "test": "Measure fragment sizes at matched stored energy.",
      "against": "Fragment spread remains unchanged.",
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_score": "21",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P098cdaef6cca;P5ec373d6e6fb",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N0086",
      "hypothesis": "A brittle coating could fragment into a narrower size distribution when detached from a compliant substrate than from a rigid one.",
      "test": "Measure fragment sizes at matched stored energy.",
      "against": "Fragment spread remains unchanged.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 102,
      "literature_query": "brittle coating fragment narrower size distribution when detached compliant substrate rigid one experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P098cdaef6cca;P5ec373d6e6fb",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P098cdaef6cca;P5ec373d6e6fb",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0087",
    "hypothesis": "A pulsed thermal lens could locate a buried liquid pathway before liquid reaches the visible surface.",
    "test": "Compare optical signals with independently mapped wet fronts.",
    "against": "Detection occurs only after surface wetting.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0087",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A pulsed thermal lens could locate a buried liquid pathway before liquid reaches the visible surface.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0087",
      "hypothesis": "A pulsed thermal lens could locate a buried liquid pathway before liquid reaches the visible surface.",
      "test": "Compare optical signals with independently mapped wet fronts.",
      "against": "Detection occurs only after surface wetting.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0087",
      "hypothesis": "A pulsed thermal lens could locate a buried liquid pathway before liquid reaches the visible surface.",
      "test": "Compare optical signals with independently mapped wet fronts.",
      "against": "Detection occurs only after surface wetting.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0088",
    "hypothesis": "A confined liquid crystal could encode the direction of a passing acoustic wave in a long-lived defect orientation.",
    "test": "Reverse wave travel and map defects.",
    "against": "Orientation fails directional reversal.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0088",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A confined liquid crystal could encode the direction of a passing acoustic wave in a long-lived defect orientation.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0088",
      "hypothesis": "A confined liquid crystal could encode the direction of a passing acoustic wave in a long-lived defect orientation.",
      "test": "Reverse wave travel and map defects.",
      "against": "Orientation fails directional reversal.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0088",
      "hypothesis": "A confined liquid crystal could encode the direction of a passing acoustic wave in a long-lived defect orientation.",
      "test": "Reverse wave travel and map defects.",
      "against": "Orientation fails directional reversal.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0089",
    "hypothesis": "A nonbinding sugar could alter vesicle fusion by slowing interfacial water escape without changing membrane elasticity.",
    "test": "Measure fusion and hydration-layer relaxation independently.",
    "against": "Fusion changes require altered elasticity or binding.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0089",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A nonbinding sugar could alter vesicle fusion by slowing interfacial water escape without changing membrane elasticity.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0089",
      "hypothesis": "A nonbinding sugar could alter vesicle fusion by slowing interfacial water escape without changing membrane elasticity.",
      "test": "Measure fusion and hydration-layer relaxation independently.",
      "against": "Fusion changes require altered elasticity or binding.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0089",
      "hypothesis": "A nonbinding sugar could alter vesicle fusion by slowing interfacial water escape without changing membrane elasticity.",
      "test": "Measure fusion and hydration-layer relaxation independently.",
      "against": "Fusion changes require altered elasticity or binding.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0090",
    "hypothesis": "A rotating mineral grain could generate a measurable ion-concentration wake through asymmetric dissolution.",
    "test": "Image concentration around grains at controlled rotation.",
    "against": "Wake follows fluid mixing without dissolution asymmetry.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 103,
    "literature_query": "rotating mineral grain generate measurable ion-concentration wake asymmetric dissolution experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N0090",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A rotating mineral grain could generate a measurable ion-concentration wake through asymmetric dissolution.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0090",
      "hypothesis": "A rotating mineral grain could generate a measurable ion-concentration wake through asymmetric dissolution.",
      "test": "Image concentration around grains at controlled rotation.",
      "against": "Wake follows fluid mixing without dissolution asymmetry.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0090",
      "hypothesis": "A rotating mineral grain could generate a measurable ion-concentration wake through asymmetric dissolution.",
      "test": "Image concentration around grains at controlled rotation.",
      "against": "Wake follows fluid mixing without dissolution asymmetry.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 103,
      "literature_query": "rotating mineral grain generate measurable ion-concentration wake asymmetric dissolution experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "103",
      "id": "N0090",
      "hypothesis": "A rotating mineral grain could generate a measurable ion-concentration wake through asymmetric dissolution.",
      "test": "Image concentration around grains at controlled rotation.",
      "against": "Wake follows fluid mixing without dissolution asymmetry.",
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_score": "21",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pb5086be7e53b;P8ede87006d76;P05bbc0c285e3",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N0090",
      "hypothesis": "A rotating mineral grain could generate a measurable ion-concentration wake through asymmetric dissolution.",
      "test": "Image concentration around grains at controlled rotation.",
      "against": "Wake follows fluid mixing without dissolution asymmetry.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 103,
      "literature_query": "rotating mineral grain generate measurable ion-concentration wake asymmetric dissolution experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pb5086be7e53b;P8ede87006d76;P05bbc0c285e3",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "Pb5086be7e53b;P8ede87006d76;P05bbc0c285e3",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0091",
    "hypothesis": "A flexible mesh could release trapped leaves or inert flakes through local inversion while retaining spherical particles.",
    "test": "Measure release by particle shape at matched sizes.",
    "against": "Release selectivity follows size alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 104,
    "literature_query": "flexible mesh release trapped leaves inert flakes local inversion retaining spherical particles experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N0091",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A flexible mesh could release trapped leaves or inert flakes through local inversion while retaining spherical particles.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0091",
      "hypothesis": "A flexible mesh could release trapped leaves or inert flakes through local inversion while retaining spherical particles.",
      "test": "Measure release by particle shape at matched sizes.",
      "against": "Release selectivity follows size alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0091",
      "hypothesis": "A flexible mesh could release trapped leaves or inert flakes through local inversion while retaining spherical particles.",
      "test": "Measure release by particle shape at matched sizes.",
      "against": "Release selectivity follows size alone.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 104,
      "literature_query": "flexible mesh release trapped leaves inert flakes local inversion retaining spherical particles experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "104",
      "id": "N0091",
      "hypothesis": "A flexible mesh could release trapped leaves or inert flakes through local inversion while retaining spherical particles.",
      "test": "Measure release by particle shape at matched sizes.",
      "against": "Release selectivity follows size alone.",
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_score": "21",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pae40e8ab83f4;Pd24f7d6e6d60;Pfd258d74374a;P155b4d50ae3d;Pdc3bca60d8dc;Pf06a4f6d0974",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N0091",
      "hypothesis": "A flexible mesh could release trapped leaves or inert flakes through local inversion while retaining spherical particles.",
      "test": "Measure release by particle shape at matched sizes.",
      "against": "Release selectivity follows size alone.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 104,
      "literature_query": "flexible mesh release trapped leaves inert flakes local inversion retaining spherical particles experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pae40e8ab83f4;Pd24f7d6e6d60;Pfd258d74374a;P155b4d50ae3d;Pdc3bca60d8dc;Pf06a4f6d0974",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "Pae40e8ab83f4;Pd24f7d6e6d60;Pfd258d74374a;P155b4d50ae3d;Pdc3bca60d8dc;Pf06a4f6d0974",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0092",
    "hypothesis": "A salt crystal's crack could close chemically faster when fluid supply arrives perpendicular to the crack plane.",
    "test": "Measure closure and delivered solute under rotated flow.",
    "against": "Closure depends only on total solute supply.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 4,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 3,
    "literature_query": "salt crystal s crack close chemically faster when fluid supply arrives perpendicular crack plane experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N0092",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A salt crystal's crack could close chemically faster when fluid supply arrives perpendicular to the crack plane.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0092",
      "hypothesis": "A salt crystal's crack could close chemically faster when fluid supply arrives perpendicular to the crack plane.",
      "test": "Measure closure and delivered solute under rotated flow.",
      "against": "Closure depends only on total solute supply.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0092",
      "hypothesis": "A salt crystal's crack could close chemically faster when fluid supply arrives perpendicular to the crack plane.",
      "test": "Measure closure and delivered solute under rotated flow.",
      "against": "Closure depends only on total solute supply.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 3,
      "literature_query": "salt crystal s crack close chemically faster when fluid supply arrives perpendicular crack plane experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "3",
      "id": "N0092",
      "hypothesis": "A salt crystal's crack could close chemically faster when fluid supply arrives perpendicular to the crack plane.",
      "test": "Measure closure and delivered solute under rotated flow.",
      "against": "Closure depends only on total solute supply.",
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_score": "24",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P2edee8ba528b;Pc8725a522dea;P1a405b1fb3e1;Pb02c626f3242;Pbb16b74fefef;Pb7beaffd6848;P0c919fd68450",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N0092",
      "hypothesis": "A salt crystal's crack could close chemically faster when fluid supply arrives perpendicular to the crack plane.",
      "test": "Measure closure and delivered solute under rotated flow.",
      "against": "Closure depends only on total solute supply.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 3,
      "literature_query": "salt crystal s crack close chemically faster when fluid supply arrives perpendicular crack plane experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P2edee8ba528b;Pc8725a522dea;P1a405b1fb3e1;Pb02c626f3242;Pbb16b74fefef;Pb7beaffd6848;P0c919fd68450",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P2edee8ba528b;Pc8725a522dea;P1a405b1fb3e1;Pb02c626f3242;Pbb16b74fefef;Pb7beaffd6848;P0c919fd68450",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0093",
    "hypothesis": "A layered polymer could convert a uniform pressure increase into opposite optical shifts at its two faces.",
    "test": "Measure face-resolved spectra under reversible pressure.",
    "against": "Both faces shift identically after temperature correction.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 105,
    "literature_query": "layered polymer convert uniform pressure increase opposite optical shifts two faces experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N0093",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A layered polymer could convert a uniform pressure increase into opposite optical shifts at its two faces.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0093",
      "hypothesis": "A layered polymer could convert a uniform pressure increase into opposite optical shifts at its two faces.",
      "test": "Measure face-resolved spectra under reversible pressure.",
      "against": "Both faces shift identically after temperature correction.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0093",
      "hypothesis": "A layered polymer could convert a uniform pressure increase into opposite optical shifts at its two faces.",
      "test": "Measure face-resolved spectra under reversible pressure.",
      "against": "Both faces shift identically after temperature correction.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 105,
      "literature_query": "layered polymer convert uniform pressure increase opposite optical shifts two faces experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "105",
      "id": "N0093",
      "hypothesis": "A layered polymer could convert a uniform pressure increase into opposite optical shifts at its two faces.",
      "test": "Measure face-resolved spectra under reversible pressure.",
      "against": "Both faces shift identically after temperature correction.",
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_score": "21",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P2362ef9d262d;Pa3a19681c617;Pbd7506c30ce6",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N0093",
      "hypothesis": "A layered polymer could convert a uniform pressure increase into opposite optical shifts at its two faces.",
      "test": "Measure face-resolved spectra under reversible pressure.",
      "against": "Both faces shift identically after temperature correction.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 105,
      "literature_query": "layered polymer convert uniform pressure increase opposite optical shifts two faces experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P2362ef9d262d;Pa3a19681c617;Pbd7506c30ce6",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P2362ef9d262d;Pa3a19681c617;Pbd7506c30ce6",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0094",
    "hypothesis": "A root-inspired porous sleeve could prevent soil analogue shrinkage from disconnecting its water supply.",
    "test": "Image sleeve contacts and hydraulic continuity during drying.",
    "against": "Supply fails at the same shrinkage threshold.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 106,
    "literature_query": "root-inspired porous sleeve prevent soil analogue shrinkage disconnecting water supply experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N0094",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A root-inspired porous sleeve could prevent soil analogue shrinkage from disconnecting its water supply.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0094",
      "hypothesis": "A root-inspired porous sleeve could prevent soil analogue shrinkage from disconnecting its water supply.",
      "test": "Image sleeve contacts and hydraulic continuity during drying.",
      "against": "Supply fails at the same shrinkage threshold.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0094",
      "hypothesis": "A root-inspired porous sleeve could prevent soil analogue shrinkage from disconnecting its water supply.",
      "test": "Image sleeve contacts and hydraulic continuity during drying.",
      "against": "Supply fails at the same shrinkage threshold.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 106,
      "literature_query": "root-inspired porous sleeve prevent soil analogue shrinkage disconnecting water supply experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "106",
      "id": "N0094",
      "hypothesis": "A root-inspired porous sleeve could prevent soil analogue shrinkage from disconnecting its water supply.",
      "test": "Image sleeve contacts and hydraulic continuity during drying.",
      "against": "Supply fails at the same shrinkage threshold.",
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_score": "21",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pa898e5be2d7c;P554a51af273c;Pc151f532c381;P8955759dfdc7",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N0094",
      "hypothesis": "A root-inspired porous sleeve could prevent soil analogue shrinkage from disconnecting its water supply.",
      "test": "Image sleeve contacts and hydraulic continuity during drying.",
      "against": "Supply fails at the same shrinkage threshold.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 106,
      "literature_query": "root-inspired porous sleeve prevent soil analogue shrinkage disconnecting water supply experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pa898e5be2d7c;P554a51af273c;Pc151f532c381;P8955759dfdc7",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "Pa898e5be2d7c;P554a51af273c;Pc151f532c381;P8955759dfdc7",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0095",
    "hypothesis": "A droplet on a vibrating fiber could reveal fiber tension through a shift in the coalescence threshold.",
    "test": "Measure collision outcomes across independently calibrated tensions.",
    "against": "Threshold shifts follow fiber motion amplitude alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0095",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A droplet on a vibrating fiber could reveal fiber tension through a shift in the coalescence threshold.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0095",
      "hypothesis": "A droplet on a vibrating fiber could reveal fiber tension through a shift in the coalescence threshold.",
      "test": "Measure collision outcomes across independently calibrated tensions.",
      "against": "Threshold shifts follow fiber motion amplitude alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0095",
      "hypothesis": "A droplet on a vibrating fiber could reveal fiber tension through a shift in the coalescence threshold.",
      "test": "Measure collision outcomes across independently calibrated tensions.",
      "against": "Threshold shifts follow fiber motion amplitude alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0096",
    "hypothesis": "A carbon-free mineral coating could accelerate photochemical probe conversion by retaining a structured water layer after drainage.",
    "test": "Measure retained water and verified products.",
    "against": "Conversion tracks bulk water alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0096",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A carbon-free mineral coating could accelerate photochemical probe conversion by retaining a structured water layer after drainage.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0096",
      "hypothesis": "A carbon-free mineral coating could accelerate photochemical probe conversion by retaining a structured water layer after drainage.",
      "test": "Measure retained water and verified products.",
      "against": "Conversion tracks bulk water alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0096",
      "hypothesis": "A carbon-free mineral coating could accelerate photochemical probe conversion by retaining a structured water layer after drainage.",
      "test": "Measure retained water and verified products.",
      "against": "Conversion tracks bulk water alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0097",
    "hypothesis": "A narrow elastic slit could sort capsules by permeability through their delayed recovery after passage.",
    "test": "Track recovery and route choice for matched stiffness capsules.",
    "against": "Sorting disappears after size correction.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 107,
    "literature_query": "narrow elastic slit sort capsules permeability delayed recovery passage experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N0097",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A narrow elastic slit could sort capsules by permeability through their delayed recovery after passage.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0097",
      "hypothesis": "A narrow elastic slit could sort capsules by permeability through their delayed recovery after passage.",
      "test": "Track recovery and route choice for matched stiffness capsules.",
      "against": "Sorting disappears after size correction.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0097",
      "hypothesis": "A narrow elastic slit could sort capsules by permeability through their delayed recovery after passage.",
      "test": "Track recovery and route choice for matched stiffness capsules.",
      "against": "Sorting disappears after size correction.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 107,
      "literature_query": "narrow elastic slit sort capsules permeability delayed recovery passage experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "107",
      "id": "N0097",
      "hypothesis": "A narrow elastic slit could sort capsules by permeability through their delayed recovery after passage.",
      "test": "Track recovery and route choice for matched stiffness capsules.",
      "against": "Sorting disappears after size correction.",
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_score": "21",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P624ad80c575e;Pd9f7b8cfbfe8;P6b55939399e2;P1964cc6b73e2;Pf216d193e6ae;Pcc4c74f089c1;Pb152f16d23c7",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N0097",
      "hypothesis": "A narrow elastic slit could sort capsules by permeability through their delayed recovery after passage.",
      "test": "Track recovery and route choice for matched stiffness capsules.",
      "against": "Sorting disappears after size correction.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 107,
      "literature_query": "narrow elastic slit sort capsules permeability delayed recovery passage experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P624ad80c575e;Pd9f7b8cfbfe8;P6b55939399e2;P1964cc6b73e2;Pf216d193e6ae;Pcc4c74f089c1;Pb152f16d23c7",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P624ad80c575e;Pd9f7b8cfbfe8;P6b55939399e2;P1964cc6b73e2;Pf216d193e6ae;Pcc4c74f089c1;Pb152f16d23c7",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0098",
    "hypothesis": "A reversible molecular assembly could remember cooling speed through solvent accessibility while retaining the same average structure.",
    "test": "Compare tracer access and scattering after controlled cooling.",
    "against": "Accessibility converges whenever average structure matches.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0098",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A reversible molecular assembly could remember cooling speed through solvent accessibility while retaining the same average structure.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0098",
      "hypothesis": "A reversible molecular assembly could remember cooling speed through solvent accessibility while retaining the same average structure.",
      "test": "Compare tracer access and scattering after controlled cooling.",
      "against": "Accessibility converges whenever average structure matches.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0098",
      "hypothesis": "A reversible molecular assembly could remember cooling speed through solvent accessibility while retaining the same average structure.",
      "test": "Compare tracer access and scattering after controlled cooling.",
      "against": "Accessibility converges whenever average structure matches.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0099",
    "hypothesis": "A wetting front could stop at a geometrical saddle because neighboring capillary pressures cancel despite open connectivity.",
    "test": "Image front arrest in transparent saddle-shaped networks.",
    "against": "Arrest is explained by contamination or closed pores.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0099",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A wetting front could stop at a geometrical saddle because neighboring capillary pressures cancel despite open connectivity.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0099",
      "hypothesis": "A wetting front could stop at a geometrical saddle because neighboring capillary pressures cancel despite open connectivity.",
      "test": "Image front arrest in transparent saddle-shaped networks.",
      "against": "Arrest is explained by contamination or closed pores.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0099",
      "hypothesis": "A wetting front could stop at a geometrical saddle because neighboring capillary pressures cancel despite open connectivity.",
      "test": "Image front arrest in transparent saddle-shaped networks.",
      "against": "Arrest is explained by contamination or closed pores.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0100",
    "hypothesis": "A transparent granular crystal could reveal force redistribution through acoustic polarization rotation before particles rearrange.",
    "test": "Measure polarization and image particle coordinates simultaneously.",
    "against": "Polarization changes only after rearrangement.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0100",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A transparent granular crystal could reveal force redistribution through acoustic polarization rotation before particles rearrange.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0100",
      "hypothesis": "A transparent granular crystal could reveal force redistribution through acoustic polarization rotation before particles rearrange.",
      "test": "Measure polarization and image particle coordinates simultaneously.",
      "against": "Polarization changes only after rearrangement.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0100",
      "hypothesis": "A transparent granular crystal could reveal force redistribution through acoustic polarization rotation before particles rearrange.",
      "test": "Measure polarization and image particle coordinates simultaneously.",
      "against": "Polarization changes only after rearrangement.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0101",
    "hypothesis": "Two ice grains could weld faster when their crystallographic axes mismatch moderately.",
    "test": "Measure contact growth versus orientation.",
    "against": "Growth lacks orientation dependence.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 108,
    "literature_query": "Two ice grains weld faster when crystallographic axes mismatch moderately experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N0101",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "Two ice grains could weld faster when their crystallographic axes mismatch moderately.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0101",
      "hypothesis": "Two ice grains could weld faster when their crystallographic axes mismatch moderately.",
      "test": "Measure contact growth versus orientation.",
      "against": "Growth lacks orientation dependence.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0101",
      "hypothesis": "Two ice grains could weld faster when their crystallographic axes mismatch moderately.",
      "test": "Measure contact growth versus orientation.",
      "against": "Growth lacks orientation dependence.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 108,
      "literature_query": "Two ice grains weld faster when crystallographic axes mismatch moderately experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "108",
      "id": "N0101",
      "hypothesis": "Two ice grains could weld faster when their crystallographic axes mismatch moderately.",
      "test": "Measure contact growth versus orientation.",
      "against": "Growth lacks orientation dependence.",
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_score": "21",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P3b4c923b97e0;P5e59f95c66e9;P5ad66d0ce07c;Pab5df8be7c76;P9ba798c7a097;Pe482ecfe6a41;P3337ae085d88;Pd6aa829c9dd3",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N0101",
      "hypothesis": "Two ice grains could weld faster when their crystallographic axes mismatch moderately.",
      "test": "Measure contact growth versus orientation.",
      "against": "Growth lacks orientation dependence.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 108,
      "literature_query": "Two ice grains weld faster when crystallographic axes mismatch moderately experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P3b4c923b97e0;P5e59f95c66e9;P5ad66d0ce07c;Pab5df8be7c76;P9ba798c7a097;Pe482ecfe6a41;P3337ae085d88;Pd6aa829c9dd3",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P3b4c923b97e0;P5e59f95c66e9;P5ad66d0ce07c;Pab5df8be7c76;P9ba798c7a097;Pe482ecfe6a41;P3337ae085d88;Pd6aa829c9dd3",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0102",
    "hypothesis": "A buried gas lens could reverse the curvature of an advancing hydration front.",
    "test": "Image fronts above artificial lenses.",
    "against": "Curvature ignores lens presence.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 109,
    "literature_query": "buried gas lens reverse curvature advancing hydration front experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N0102",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A buried gas lens could reverse the curvature of an advancing hydration front.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0102",
      "hypothesis": "A buried gas lens could reverse the curvature of an advancing hydration front.",
      "test": "Image fronts above artificial lenses.",
      "against": "Curvature ignores lens presence.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0102",
      "hypothesis": "A buried gas lens could reverse the curvature of an advancing hydration front.",
      "test": "Image fronts above artificial lenses.",
      "against": "Curvature ignores lens presence.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 109,
      "literature_query": "buried gas lens reverse curvature advancing hydration front experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "109",
      "id": "N0102",
      "hypothesis": "A buried gas lens could reverse the curvature of an advancing hydration front.",
      "test": "Image fronts above artificial lenses.",
      "against": "Curvature ignores lens presence.",
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_score": "21",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P55758c6a22e5;Peac264f2b2e2;Pd7ae0729e23b;P94d19bd7732d;P1a0286e9fcf7;P932ea0129a40",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N0102",
      "hypothesis": "A buried gas lens could reverse the curvature of an advancing hydration front.",
      "test": "Image fronts above artificial lenses.",
      "against": "Curvature ignores lens presence.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 109,
      "literature_query": "buried gas lens reverse curvature advancing hydration front experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P55758c6a22e5;Peac264f2b2e2;Pd7ae0729e23b;P94d19bd7732d;P1a0286e9fcf7;P932ea0129a40",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P55758c6a22e5;Peac264f2b2e2;Pd7ae0729e23b;P94d19bd7732d;P1a0286e9fcf7;P932ea0129a40",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0103",
    "hypothesis": "An oscillating leaf replica could harvest charge from contact-line motion without solid contact.",
    "test": "Measure charge and droplet motion.",
    "against": "Charge requires solid rubbing.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "nonhuman biology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 110,
    "literature_query": "oscillating leaf replica harvest charge contact-line motion solid contact experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N0103",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "An oscillating leaf replica could harvest charge from contact-line motion without solid contact.",
    "category": "nonhuman biology",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0103",
      "hypothesis": "An oscillating leaf replica could harvest charge from contact-line motion without solid contact.",
      "test": "Measure charge and droplet motion.",
      "against": "Charge requires solid rubbing.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0103",
      "hypothesis": "An oscillating leaf replica could harvest charge from contact-line motion without solid contact.",
      "test": "Measure charge and droplet motion.",
      "against": "Charge requires solid rubbing.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "nonhuman biology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 110,
      "literature_query": "oscillating leaf replica harvest charge contact-line motion solid contact experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "110",
      "id": "N0103",
      "hypothesis": "An oscillating leaf replica could harvest charge from contact-line motion without solid contact.",
      "test": "Measure charge and droplet motion.",
      "against": "Charge requires solid rubbing.",
      "area": "nonhuman biology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_score": "21",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pae8b0d94bf76;P22cc2f4542a8;Pf44d995f5360;P660456ff3182;Pda5b2c8f6bee;Pf45202b2464b;P8066a78e33c4;P68724e7193e0",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N0103",
      "hypothesis": "An oscillating leaf replica could harvest charge from contact-line motion without solid contact.",
      "test": "Measure charge and droplet motion.",
      "against": "Charge requires solid rubbing.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "nonhuman biology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 110,
      "literature_query": "oscillating leaf replica harvest charge contact-line motion solid contact experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pae8b0d94bf76;P22cc2f4542a8;Pf44d995f5360;P660456ff3182;Pda5b2c8f6bee;Pf45202b2464b;P8066a78e33c4;P68724e7193e0",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "Pae8b0d94bf76;P22cc2f4542a8;Pf44d995f5360;P660456ff3182;Pda5b2c8f6bee;Pf45202b2464b;P8066a78e33c4;P68724e7193e0",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0104",
    "hypothesis": "A catalyst bead could reveal local poisoning through asymmetric thermal noise.",
    "test": "Map temperature fluctuations and activity.",
    "against": "Fluctuations ignore activity loss.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 12,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0104",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A catalyst bead could reveal local poisoning through asymmetric thermal noise.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0104",
      "hypothesis": "A catalyst bead could reveal local poisoning through asymmetric thermal noise.",
      "test": "Map temperature fluctuations and activity.",
      "against": "Fluctuations ignore activity loss.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0104",
      "hypothesis": "A catalyst bead could reveal local poisoning through asymmetric thermal noise.",
      "test": "Map temperature fluctuations and activity.",
      "against": "Fluctuations ignore activity loss.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 12,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0105",
    "hypothesis": "An optical vortex could rotate an absorbing flake differently before and after reversible hydration.",
    "test": "Track torque at equal absorption.",
    "against": "Torque follows absorption alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 111,
    "literature_query": "optical vortex rotate absorbing flake differently reversible hydration experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N0105",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "An optical vortex could rotate an absorbing flake differently before and after reversible hydration.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0105",
      "hypothesis": "An optical vortex could rotate an absorbing flake differently before and after reversible hydration.",
      "test": "Track torque at equal absorption.",
      "against": "Torque follows absorption alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0105",
      "hypothesis": "An optical vortex could rotate an absorbing flake differently before and after reversible hydration.",
      "test": "Track torque at equal absorption.",
      "against": "Torque follows absorption alone.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 111,
      "literature_query": "optical vortex rotate absorbing flake differently reversible hydration experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "111",
      "id": "N0105",
      "hypothesis": "An optical vortex could rotate an absorbing flake differently before and after reversible hydration.",
      "test": "Track torque at equal absorption.",
      "against": "Torque follows absorption alone.",
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_score": "21",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Peee9f6090e49;P1df1a7715ad3;Pefad0b14d363;P77433fd72c71;P8bff9e25f61f;Pc2bfc12f8baf;Pb524cdc9ae03",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N0105",
      "hypothesis": "An optical vortex could rotate an absorbing flake differently before and after reversible hydration.",
      "test": "Track torque at equal absorption.",
      "against": "Torque follows absorption alone.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 111,
      "literature_query": "optical vortex rotate absorbing flake differently reversible hydration experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Peee9f6090e49;P1df1a7715ad3;Pefad0b14d363;P77433fd72c71;P8bff9e25f61f;Pc2bfc12f8baf;Pb524cdc9ae03",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "Peee9f6090e49;P1df1a7715ad3;Pefad0b14d363;P77433fd72c71;P8bff9e25f61f;Pc2bfc12f8baf;Pb524cdc9ae03",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0106",
    "hypothesis": "A porous seed coat could suppress fungal attachment through transient outward water flux.",
    "test": "Compare attachment and measured exudation.",
    "against": "Attachment ignores flux direction.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 2,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 17,
    "area": "nonhuman biology",
    "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0106",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous seed coat could suppress fungal attachment through transient outward water flux.",
    "category": "nonhuman biology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0106",
      "hypothesis": "A porous seed coat could suppress fungal attachment through transient outward water flux.",
      "test": "Compare attachment and measured exudation.",
      "against": "Attachment ignores flux direction.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0106",
      "hypothesis": "A porous seed coat could suppress fungal attachment through transient outward water flux.",
      "test": "Compare attachment and measured exudation.",
      "against": "Attachment ignores flux direction.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 2,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 17,
      "area": "nonhuman biology",
      "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0107",
    "hypothesis": "A soft cavity could trap a traveling deformation pulse and release it after unloading.",
    "test": "Track strain and release timing.",
    "against": "No delayed pulse emerges.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 112,
    "literature_query": "soft cavity trap traveling deformation pulse release it unloading experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N0107",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A soft cavity could trap a traveling deformation pulse and release it after unloading.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0107",
      "hypothesis": "A soft cavity could trap a traveling deformation pulse and release it after unloading.",
      "test": "Track strain and release timing.",
      "against": "No delayed pulse emerges.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0107",
      "hypothesis": "A soft cavity could trap a traveling deformation pulse and release it after unloading.",
      "test": "Track strain and release timing.",
      "against": "No delayed pulse emerges.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 112,
      "literature_query": "soft cavity trap traveling deformation pulse release it unloading experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "112",
      "id": "N0107",
      "hypothesis": "A soft cavity could trap a traveling deformation pulse and release it after unloading.",
      "test": "Track strain and release timing.",
      "against": "No delayed pulse emerges.",
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_score": "21",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P84ac7367a296;P8c9f5eb4dc44;P4d774277978f;Pe673ffd8f5c9",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N0107",
      "hypothesis": "A soft cavity could trap a traveling deformation pulse and release it after unloading.",
      "test": "Track strain and release timing.",
      "against": "No delayed pulse emerges.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 112,
      "literature_query": "soft cavity trap traveling deformation pulse release it unloading experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P84ac7367a296;P8c9f5eb4dc44;P4d774277978f;Pe673ffd8f5c9",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P84ac7367a296;P8c9f5eb4dc44;P4d774277978f;Pe673ffd8f5c9",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0108",
    "hypothesis": "Mineral twins could channel trace-ion release into directional bursts during mild dissolution.",
    "test": "Map ion release and twin boundaries.",
    "against": "Bursts lack boundary association.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0108",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "Mineral twins could channel trace-ion release into directional bursts during mild dissolution.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0108",
      "hypothesis": "Mineral twins could channel trace-ion release into directional bursts during mild dissolution.",
      "test": "Map ion release and twin boundaries.",
      "against": "Bursts lack boundary association.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0108",
      "hypothesis": "Mineral twins could channel trace-ion release into directional bursts during mild dissolution.",
      "test": "Map ion release and twin boundaries.",
      "against": "Bursts lack boundary association.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0109",
    "hypothesis": "A liquid bridge could distinguish torsional from tensile loading through its emitted sound.",
    "test": "Record rupture sounds under calibrated loads.",
    "against": "Sounds cannot distinguish loading modes.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0109",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A liquid bridge could distinguish torsional from tensile loading through its emitted sound.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0109",
      "hypothesis": "A liquid bridge could distinguish torsional from tensile loading through its emitted sound.",
      "test": "Record rupture sounds under calibrated loads.",
      "against": "Sounds cannot distinguish loading modes.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0109",
      "hypothesis": "A liquid bridge could distinguish torsional from tensile loading through its emitted sound.",
      "test": "Record rupture sounds under calibrated loads.",
      "against": "Sounds cannot distinguish loading modes.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0110",
    "hypothesis": "A reversible polymer aggregate could reject damaged chains during repeated disassembly.",
    "test": "Track labeled intact and damaged chains.",
    "against": "Partitioning ignores chain damage.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 113,
    "literature_query": "reversible polymer aggregate reject damaged chains repeated disassembly experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N0110",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A reversible polymer aggregate could reject damaged chains during repeated disassembly.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0110",
      "hypothesis": "A reversible polymer aggregate could reject damaged chains during repeated disassembly.",
      "test": "Track labeled intact and damaged chains.",
      "against": "Partitioning ignores chain damage.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0110",
      "hypothesis": "A reversible polymer aggregate could reject damaged chains during repeated disassembly.",
      "test": "Track labeled intact and damaged chains.",
      "against": "Partitioning ignores chain damage.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 113,
      "literature_query": "reversible polymer aggregate reject damaged chains repeated disassembly experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "113",
      "id": "N0110",
      "hypothesis": "A reversible polymer aggregate could reject damaged chains during repeated disassembly.",
      "test": "Track labeled intact and damaged chains.",
      "against": "Partitioning ignores chain damage.",
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_score": "21",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P4e96b85739cc;P27b864c7c2a2;Pc05923bf5534;P4f79e3e84f8f",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N0110",
      "hypothesis": "A reversible polymer aggregate could reject damaged chains during repeated disassembly.",
      "test": "Track labeled intact and damaged chains.",
      "against": "Partitioning ignores chain damage.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 113,
      "literature_query": "reversible polymer aggregate reject damaged chains repeated disassembly experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P4e96b85739cc;P27b864c7c2a2;Pc05923bf5534;P4f79e3e84f8f",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P4e96b85739cc;P27b864c7c2a2;Pc05923bf5534;P4f79e3e84f8f",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0111",
    "hypothesis": "A thin water film could transport heat preferentially along aligned surface hydroxyl groups.",
    "test": "Measure directional thermal response.",
    "against": "Anisotropy follows topography only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 114,
    "literature_query": "thin water film transport heat preferentially along aligned surface hydroxyl groups experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N0111",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A thin water film could transport heat preferentially along aligned surface hydroxyl groups.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0111",
      "hypothesis": "A thin water film could transport heat preferentially along aligned surface hydroxyl groups.",
      "test": "Measure directional thermal response.",
      "against": "Anisotropy follows topography only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0111",
      "hypothesis": "A thin water film could transport heat preferentially along aligned surface hydroxyl groups.",
      "test": "Measure directional thermal response.",
      "against": "Anisotropy follows topography only.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 114,
      "literature_query": "thin water film transport heat preferentially along aligned surface hydroxyl groups experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "114",
      "id": "N0111",
      "hypothesis": "A thin water film could transport heat preferentially along aligned surface hydroxyl groups.",
      "test": "Measure directional thermal response.",
      "against": "Anisotropy follows topography only.",
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_score": "21",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P4b71de0a69f7;P7b0dc39f31f7;P0d8ff3091743;Pe6d60ce40d76;P15d3212d5caa;P43f305720f31;Pa75ce2335756",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N0111",
      "hypothesis": "A thin water film could transport heat preferentially along aligned surface hydroxyl groups.",
      "test": "Measure directional thermal response.",
      "against": "Anisotropy follows topography only.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 114,
      "literature_query": "thin water film transport heat preferentially along aligned surface hydroxyl groups experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P4b71de0a69f7;P7b0dc39f31f7;P0d8ff3091743;Pe6d60ce40d76;P15d3212d5caa;P43f305720f31;Pa75ce2335756",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P4b71de0a69f7;P7b0dc39f31f7;P0d8ff3091743;Pe6d60ce40d76;P15d3212d5caa;P43f305720f31;Pa75ce2335756",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0112",
    "hypothesis": "A capsule with unequal internal chambers could navigate a constriction through pressure-induced shape sequencing.",
    "test": "Image chamber deformation and passage.",
    "against": "Passage follows total stiffness alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0112",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A capsule with unequal internal chambers could navigate a constriction through pressure-induced shape sequencing.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0112",
      "hypothesis": "A capsule with unequal internal chambers could navigate a constriction through pressure-induced shape sequencing.",
      "test": "Image chamber deformation and passage.",
      "against": "Passage follows total stiffness alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0112",
      "hypothesis": "A capsule with unequal internal chambers could navigate a constriction through pressure-induced shape sequencing.",
      "test": "Image chamber deformation and passage.",
      "against": "Passage follows total stiffness alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0113",
    "hypothesis": "A mineral's luminescence decay could reveal whether strain is tensile or compressive.",
    "test": "Calibrate decay under signed strain.",
    "against": "Responses are indistinguishable.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0113",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A mineral's luminescence decay could reveal whether strain is tensile or compressive.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0113",
      "hypothesis": "A mineral's luminescence decay could reveal whether strain is tensile or compressive.",
      "test": "Calibrate decay under signed strain.",
      "against": "Responses are indistinguishable.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0113",
      "hypothesis": "A mineral's luminescence decay could reveal whether strain is tensile or compressive.",
      "test": "Calibrate decay under signed strain.",
      "against": "Responses are indistinguishable.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0114",
    "hypothesis": "A drying biofilm analogue could preserve electrical connectivity through rotating conductive inclusions.",
    "test": "Track orientation and conductivity.",
    "against": "Connectivity ignores inclusion rotation.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 115,
    "literature_query": "drying biofilm analogue preserve electrical connectivity rotating conductive inclusions experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N0114",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A drying biofilm analogue could preserve electrical connectivity through rotating conductive inclusions.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0114",
      "hypothesis": "A drying biofilm analogue could preserve electrical connectivity through rotating conductive inclusions.",
      "test": "Track orientation and conductivity.",
      "against": "Connectivity ignores inclusion rotation.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0114",
      "hypothesis": "A drying biofilm analogue could preserve electrical connectivity through rotating conductive inclusions.",
      "test": "Track orientation and conductivity.",
      "against": "Connectivity ignores inclusion rotation.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 115,
      "literature_query": "drying biofilm analogue preserve electrical connectivity rotating conductive inclusions experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "115",
      "id": "N0114",
      "hypothesis": "A drying biofilm analogue could preserve electrical connectivity through rotating conductive inclusions.",
      "test": "Track orientation and conductivity.",
      "against": "Connectivity ignores inclusion rotation.",
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_score": "21",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P801bcf6bf769;P689b2b853bcf;Pc5d8dd42abf2;Pe810acea3adf;Pf4afdc36f698;P738c34c2c4bb;Pf4bd93246890",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N0114",
      "hypothesis": "A drying biofilm analogue could preserve electrical connectivity through rotating conductive inclusions.",
      "test": "Track orientation and conductivity.",
      "against": "Connectivity ignores inclusion rotation.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 115,
      "literature_query": "drying biofilm analogue preserve electrical connectivity rotating conductive inclusions experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P801bcf6bf769;P689b2b853bcf;Pc5d8dd42abf2;Pe810acea3adf;Pf4afdc36f698;P738c34c2c4bb;Pf4bd93246890",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P801bcf6bf769;P689b2b853bcf;Pc5d8dd42abf2;Pe810acea3adf;Pf4afdc36f698;P738c34c2c4bb;Pf4bd93246890",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0115",
    "hypothesis": "A bubble necklace could transmit pressure signals while filtering dissolved-solute fluctuations.",
    "test": "Measure pressure and tracer transmission.",
    "against": "Both signals attenuate equally.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 116,
    "literature_query": "bubble necklace transmit pressure signals filtering dissolved-solute fluctuations experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N0115",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A bubble necklace could transmit pressure signals while filtering dissolved-solute fluctuations.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0115",
      "hypothesis": "A bubble necklace could transmit pressure signals while filtering dissolved-solute fluctuations.",
      "test": "Measure pressure and tracer transmission.",
      "against": "Both signals attenuate equally.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0115",
      "hypothesis": "A bubble necklace could transmit pressure signals while filtering dissolved-solute fluctuations.",
      "test": "Measure pressure and tracer transmission.",
      "against": "Both signals attenuate equally.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 116,
      "literature_query": "bubble necklace transmit pressure signals filtering dissolved-solute fluctuations experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "116",
      "id": "N0115",
      "hypothesis": "A bubble necklace could transmit pressure signals while filtering dissolved-solute fluctuations.",
      "test": "Measure pressure and tracer transmission.",
      "against": "Both signals attenuate equally.",
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_score": "21",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pf314e4090e33;Pa86f9ade171a;Pa174dbebdeb5;P2af0028535ba;Pd595d2cf0729",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N0115",
      "hypothesis": "A bubble necklace could transmit pressure signals while filtering dissolved-solute fluctuations.",
      "test": "Measure pressure and tracer transmission.",
      "against": "Both signals attenuate equally.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 116,
      "literature_query": "bubble necklace transmit pressure signals filtering dissolved-solute fluctuations experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pf314e4090e33;Pa86f9ade171a;Pa174dbebdeb5;P2af0028535ba;Pd595d2cf0729",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "Pf314e4090e33;Pa86f9ade171a;Pa174dbebdeb5;P2af0028535ba;Pd595d2cf0729",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0116",
    "hypothesis": "A nonbinding nanoparticle could stabilize an enzyme interface by scavenging denatured fragments.",
    "test": "Measure fragment adsorption and activity.",
    "against": "Activity gains require intact-enzyme adsorption.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0116",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A nonbinding nanoparticle could stabilize an enzyme interface by scavenging denatured fragments.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0116",
      "hypothesis": "A nonbinding nanoparticle could stabilize an enzyme interface by scavenging denatured fragments.",
      "test": "Measure fragment adsorption and activity.",
      "against": "Activity gains require intact-enzyme adsorption.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0116",
      "hypothesis": "A nonbinding nanoparticle could stabilize an enzyme interface by scavenging denatured fragments.",
      "test": "Measure fragment adsorption and activity.",
      "against": "Activity gains require intact-enzyme adsorption.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0117",
    "hypothesis": "A fractured ice surface could nucleate dew along stress-relaxed rather than maximally rough regions.",
    "test": "Map strain and condensation sites.",
    "against": "Sites follow roughness alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0117",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A fractured ice surface could nucleate dew along stress-relaxed rather than maximally rough regions.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0117",
      "hypothesis": "A fractured ice surface could nucleate dew along stress-relaxed rather than maximally rough regions.",
      "test": "Map strain and condensation sites.",
      "against": "Sites follow roughness alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0117",
      "hypothesis": "A fractured ice surface could nucleate dew along stress-relaxed rather than maximally rough regions.",
      "test": "Map strain and condensation sites.",
      "against": "Sites follow roughness alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0118",
    "hypothesis": "A mechanically frustrated ring could amplify a tiny temperature difference into directional rolling.",
    "test": "Measure rolling under reversed gradients.",
    "against": "Rolling does not reverse.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 117,
    "literature_query": "mechanically frustrated ring amplify tiny temperature difference directional rolling experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N0118",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A mechanically frustrated ring could amplify a tiny temperature difference into directional rolling.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0118",
      "hypothesis": "A mechanically frustrated ring could amplify a tiny temperature difference into directional rolling.",
      "test": "Measure rolling under reversed gradients.",
      "against": "Rolling does not reverse.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0118",
      "hypothesis": "A mechanically frustrated ring could amplify a tiny temperature difference into directional rolling.",
      "test": "Measure rolling under reversed gradients.",
      "against": "Rolling does not reverse.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 117,
      "literature_query": "mechanically frustrated ring amplify tiny temperature difference directional rolling experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "117",
      "id": "N0118",
      "hypothesis": "A mechanically frustrated ring could amplify a tiny temperature difference into directional rolling.",
      "test": "Measure rolling under reversed gradients.",
      "against": "Rolling does not reverse.",
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_score": "21",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P3ce120a78980;P5cb6e1f8cba3;P8d6e96641b00;P65a06e9df6bd",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N0118",
      "hypothesis": "A mechanically frustrated ring could amplify a tiny temperature difference into directional rolling.",
      "test": "Measure rolling under reversed gradients.",
      "against": "Rolling does not reverse.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 117,
      "literature_query": "mechanically frustrated ring amplify tiny temperature difference directional rolling experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P3ce120a78980;P5cb6e1f8cba3;P8d6e96641b00;P65a06e9df6bd",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P3ce120a78980;P5cb6e1f8cba3;P8d6e96641b00;P65a06e9df6bd",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0119",
    "hypothesis": "A soil analogue could preserve pore connectivity by distributing shrinkage into rotating rigid flakes.",
    "test": "Image drying-induced pore topology.",
    "against": "Flakes do not preserve connectivity.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 118,
    "literature_query": "soil analogue preserve pore connectivity distributing shrinkage rotating rigid flakes experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N0119",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A soil analogue could preserve pore connectivity by distributing shrinkage into rotating rigid flakes.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0119",
      "hypothesis": "A soil analogue could preserve pore connectivity by distributing shrinkage into rotating rigid flakes.",
      "test": "Image drying-induced pore topology.",
      "against": "Flakes do not preserve connectivity.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0119",
      "hypothesis": "A soil analogue could preserve pore connectivity by distributing shrinkage into rotating rigid flakes.",
      "test": "Image drying-induced pore topology.",
      "against": "Flakes do not preserve connectivity.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 118,
      "literature_query": "soil analogue preserve pore connectivity distributing shrinkage rotating rigid flakes experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "118",
      "id": "N0119",
      "hypothesis": "A soil analogue could preserve pore connectivity by distributing shrinkage into rotating rigid flakes.",
      "test": "Image drying-induced pore topology.",
      "against": "Flakes do not preserve connectivity.",
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_score": "21",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P8e13e060c962;P7164c0ea7b14;P81ba28e6a905;P312031377397;Pcb410289fbb2",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N0119",
      "hypothesis": "A soil analogue could preserve pore connectivity by distributing shrinkage into rotating rigid flakes.",
      "test": "Image drying-induced pore topology.",
      "against": "Flakes do not preserve connectivity.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 118,
      "literature_query": "soil analogue preserve pore connectivity distributing shrinkage rotating rigid flakes experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P8e13e060c962;P7164c0ea7b14;P81ba28e6a905;P312031377397;Pcb410289fbb2",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P8e13e060c962;P7164c0ea7b14;P81ba28e6a905;P312031377397;Pcb410289fbb2",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0120",
    "hypothesis": "A fluorescent crystal could expose solvent exchange through moving dark domains before average emission changes.",
    "test": "Track domains and solvent uptake.",
    "against": "Domain changes follow average fading.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 119,
    "literature_query": "fluorescent crystal expose solvent exchange moving dark domains average emission changes experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N0120",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A fluorescent crystal could expose solvent exchange through moving dark domains before average emission changes.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0120",
      "hypothesis": "A fluorescent crystal could expose solvent exchange through moving dark domains before average emission changes.",
      "test": "Track domains and solvent uptake.",
      "against": "Domain changes follow average fading.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0120",
      "hypothesis": "A fluorescent crystal could expose solvent exchange through moving dark domains before average emission changes.",
      "test": "Track domains and solvent uptake.",
      "against": "Domain changes follow average fading.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 119,
      "literature_query": "fluorescent crystal expose solvent exchange moving dark domains average emission changes experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "119",
      "id": "N0120",
      "hypothesis": "A fluorescent crystal could expose solvent exchange through moving dark domains before average emission changes.",
      "test": "Track domains and solvent uptake.",
      "against": "Domain changes follow average fading.",
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_score": "21",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P72907acd7fcd;P55ccf724b0e4;P01820f71eab6;P816c9d69ad8e;P2e448be70e77;Pc71fc7317e14",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N0120",
      "hypothesis": "A fluorescent crystal could expose solvent exchange through moving dark domains before average emission changes.",
      "test": "Track domains and solvent uptake.",
      "against": "Domain changes follow average fading.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 119,
      "literature_query": "fluorescent crystal expose solvent exchange moving dark domains average emission changes experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P72907acd7fcd;P55ccf724b0e4;P01820f71eab6;P816c9d69ad8e;P2e448be70e77;Pc71fc7317e14",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P72907acd7fcd;P55ccf724b0e4;P01820f71eab6;P816c9d69ad8e;P2e448be70e77;Pc71fc7317e14",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0121",
    "hypothesis": "A porous rotor could create a concentration gradient through rotation-dependent adsorption residence times.",
    "test": "Map solute around rotating pores.",
    "against": "Gradients match hydrodynamic mixing alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0121",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous rotor could create a concentration gradient through rotation-dependent adsorption residence times.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0121",
      "hypothesis": "A porous rotor could create a concentration gradient through rotation-dependent adsorption residence times.",
      "test": "Map solute around rotating pores.",
      "against": "Gradients match hydrodynamic mixing alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0121",
      "hypothesis": "A porous rotor could create a concentration gradient through rotation-dependent adsorption residence times.",
      "test": "Map solute around rotating pores.",
      "against": "Gradients match hydrodynamic mixing alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0122",
    "hypothesis": "A moss cell wall could dissipate repeated bending through reversible ion exchange.",
    "test": "Measure mechanics and ion release.",
    "against": "Damping ignores exchange suppression.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 120,
    "literature_query": "moss cell wall dissipate repeated bending reversible ion exchange experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N0122",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A moss cell wall could dissipate repeated bending through reversible ion exchange.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0122",
      "hypothesis": "A moss cell wall could dissipate repeated bending through reversible ion exchange.",
      "test": "Measure mechanics and ion release.",
      "against": "Damping ignores exchange suppression.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0122",
      "hypothesis": "A moss cell wall could dissipate repeated bending through reversible ion exchange.",
      "test": "Measure mechanics and ion release.",
      "against": "Damping ignores exchange suppression.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 120,
      "literature_query": "moss cell wall dissipate repeated bending reversible ion exchange experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "120",
      "id": "N0122",
      "hypothesis": "A moss cell wall could dissipate repeated bending through reversible ion exchange.",
      "test": "Measure mechanics and ion release.",
      "against": "Damping ignores exchange suppression.",
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_score": "21",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P5b380b854132;Pa3723f3e1de4;P46ba27903fb2;P3e7ddc7d597d;Pf5afc27ebf1f",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N0122",
      "hypothesis": "A moss cell wall could dissipate repeated bending through reversible ion exchange.",
      "test": "Measure mechanics and ion release.",
      "against": "Damping ignores exchange suppression.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 120,
      "literature_query": "moss cell wall dissipate repeated bending reversible ion exchange experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P5b380b854132;Pa3723f3e1de4;P46ba27903fb2;P3e7ddc7d597d;Pf5afc27ebf1f",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P5b380b854132;Pa3723f3e1de4;P46ba27903fb2;P3e7ddc7d597d;Pf5afc27ebf1f",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0123",
    "hypothesis": "A floating membrane could reject particles that match its capillary-wave frequency.",
    "test": "Sweep waves and count capture.",
    "against": "Capture lacks frequency-specific rejection.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0123",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A floating membrane could reject particles that match its capillary-wave frequency.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0123",
      "hypothesis": "A floating membrane could reject particles that match its capillary-wave frequency.",
      "test": "Sweep waves and count capture.",
      "against": "Capture lacks frequency-specific rejection.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0123",
      "hypothesis": "A floating membrane could reject particles that match its capillary-wave frequency.",
      "test": "Sweep waves and count capture.",
      "against": "Capture lacks frequency-specific rejection.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0124",
    "hypothesis": "A gel's fracture wake could retain higher permeability after visible crack closure.",
    "test": "Measure local tracer diffusion.",
    "against": "Permeability returns with closure.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 121,
    "literature_query": "gel s fracture wake retain higher permeability visible crack closure experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N0124",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A gel's fracture wake could retain higher permeability after visible crack closure.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0124",
      "hypothesis": "A gel's fracture wake could retain higher permeability after visible crack closure.",
      "test": "Measure local tracer diffusion.",
      "against": "Permeability returns with closure.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0124",
      "hypothesis": "A gel's fracture wake could retain higher permeability after visible crack closure.",
      "test": "Measure local tracer diffusion.",
      "against": "Permeability returns with closure.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 121,
      "literature_query": "gel s fracture wake retain higher permeability visible crack closure experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "121",
      "id": "N0124",
      "hypothesis": "A gel's fracture wake could retain higher permeability after visible crack closure.",
      "test": "Measure local tracer diffusion.",
      "against": "Permeability returns with closure.",
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_score": "21",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pc7089a15ac13;P017d1926c7aa;P0492ef40f70e",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N0124",
      "hypothesis": "A gel's fracture wake could retain higher permeability after visible crack closure.",
      "test": "Measure local tracer diffusion.",
      "against": "Permeability returns with closure.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 121,
      "literature_query": "gel s fracture wake retain higher permeability visible crack closure experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pc7089a15ac13;P017d1926c7aa;P0492ef40f70e",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "Pc7089a15ac13;P017d1926c7aa;P0492ef40f70e",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0125",
    "hypothesis": "A crystal-growth inhibitor could improve optical transparency by preventing trapped subcritical clusters.",
    "test": "Measure transmission and inclusion density.",
    "against": "Transparency tracks crystal size alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 122,
    "literature_query": "crystal-growth inhibitor improve optical transparency preventing trapped subcritical clusters experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N0125",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A crystal-growth inhibitor could improve optical transparency by preventing trapped subcritical clusters.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0125",
      "hypothesis": "A crystal-growth inhibitor could improve optical transparency by preventing trapped subcritical clusters.",
      "test": "Measure transmission and inclusion density.",
      "against": "Transparency tracks crystal size alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0125",
      "hypothesis": "A crystal-growth inhibitor could improve optical transparency by preventing trapped subcritical clusters.",
      "test": "Measure transmission and inclusion density.",
      "against": "Transparency tracks crystal size alone.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 122,
      "literature_query": "crystal-growth inhibitor improve optical transparency preventing trapped subcritical clusters experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "122",
      "id": "N0125",
      "hypothesis": "A crystal-growth inhibitor could improve optical transparency by preventing trapped subcritical clusters.",
      "test": "Measure transmission and inclusion density.",
      "against": "Transparency tracks crystal size alone.",
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_score": "21",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P7f8ed17cdf05;P67ed94269d51;Pc73558ad4062;P81afa394be15;Pb3a98c50d80b;P6911517292d7",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N0125",
      "hypothesis": "A crystal-growth inhibitor could improve optical transparency by preventing trapped subcritical clusters.",
      "test": "Measure transmission and inclusion density.",
      "against": "Transparency tracks crystal size alone.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 122,
      "literature_query": "crystal-growth inhibitor improve optical transparency preventing trapped subcritical clusters experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P7f8ed17cdf05;P67ed94269d51;Pc73558ad4062;P81afa394be15;Pb3a98c50d80b;P6911517292d7",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P7f8ed17cdf05;P67ed94269d51;Pc73558ad4062;P81afa394be15;Pb3a98c50d80b;P6911517292d7",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0126",
    "hypothesis": "A brine pocket could migrate through ice toward lower cyclic stress rather than warmer regions.",
    "test": "Track pockets under separated gradients.",
    "against": "Migration follows temperature only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 123,
    "literature_query": "brine pocket migrate ice toward lower cyclic stress warmer regions experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N0126",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A brine pocket could migrate through ice toward lower cyclic stress rather than warmer regions.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0126",
      "hypothesis": "A brine pocket could migrate through ice toward lower cyclic stress rather than warmer regions.",
      "test": "Track pockets under separated gradients.",
      "against": "Migration follows temperature only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0126",
      "hypothesis": "A brine pocket could migrate through ice toward lower cyclic stress rather than warmer regions.",
      "test": "Track pockets under separated gradients.",
      "against": "Migration follows temperature only.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 123,
      "literature_query": "brine pocket migrate ice toward lower cyclic stress warmer regions experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "123",
      "id": "N0126",
      "hypothesis": "A brine pocket could migrate through ice toward lower cyclic stress rather than warmer regions.",
      "test": "Track pockets under separated gradients.",
      "against": "Migration follows temperature only.",
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_score": "21",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P5848e78ca652;P0f7425a835dd;P361a7c37dcbe;P3fb06b5c289c",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N0126",
      "hypothesis": "A brine pocket could migrate through ice toward lower cyclic stress rather than warmer regions.",
      "test": "Track pockets under separated gradients.",
      "against": "Migration follows temperature only.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 123,
      "literature_query": "brine pocket migrate ice toward lower cyclic stress warmer regions experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P5848e78ca652;P0f7425a835dd;P361a7c37dcbe;P3fb06b5c289c",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P5848e78ca652;P0f7425a835dd;P361a7c37dcbe;P3fb06b5c289c",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0127",
    "hypothesis": "A compressible coating could convert turbulent pressure fluctuations into a steady solvent flux.",
    "test": "Measure mean flux under zero-mean forcing.",
    "against": "Flux vanishes after pressure-offset correction.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 124,
    "literature_query": "compressible coating convert turbulent pressure fluctuations steady solvent flux experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N0127",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A compressible coating could convert turbulent pressure fluctuations into a steady solvent flux.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0127",
      "hypothesis": "A compressible coating could convert turbulent pressure fluctuations into a steady solvent flux.",
      "test": "Measure mean flux under zero-mean forcing.",
      "against": "Flux vanishes after pressure-offset correction.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0127",
      "hypothesis": "A compressible coating could convert turbulent pressure fluctuations into a steady solvent flux.",
      "test": "Measure mean flux under zero-mean forcing.",
      "against": "Flux vanishes after pressure-offset correction.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 124,
      "literature_query": "compressible coating convert turbulent pressure fluctuations steady solvent flux experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "124",
      "id": "N0127",
      "hypothesis": "A compressible coating could convert turbulent pressure fluctuations into a steady solvent flux.",
      "test": "Measure mean flux under zero-mean forcing.",
      "against": "Flux vanishes after pressure-offset correction.",
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_score": "21",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P8906276d943b;P1856d5c4c4c1;P3dfe9771ac2d;Pc321d1776cd9;Pe390fa6c4dd0",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N0127",
      "hypothesis": "A compressible coating could convert turbulent pressure fluctuations into a steady solvent flux.",
      "test": "Measure mean flux under zero-mean forcing.",
      "against": "Flux vanishes after pressure-offset correction.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 124,
      "literature_query": "compressible coating convert turbulent pressure fluctuations steady solvent flux experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P8906276d943b;P1856d5c4c4c1;P3dfe9771ac2d;Pc321d1776cd9;Pe390fa6c4dd0",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P8906276d943b;P1856d5c4c4c1;P3dfe9771ac2d;Pc321d1776cd9;Pe390fa6c4dd0",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0128",
    "hypothesis": "A noncoding RNA could fold reproducibly when its solvent boundary moves rather than changes uniformly.",
    "test": "Compare structures after matched solvent histories.",
    "against": "Moving boundaries add no reproducibility.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0128",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A noncoding RNA could fold reproducibly when its solvent boundary moves rather than changes uniformly.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0128",
      "hypothesis": "A noncoding RNA could fold reproducibly when its solvent boundary moves rather than changes uniformly.",
      "test": "Compare structures after matched solvent histories.",
      "against": "Moving boundaries add no reproducibility.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0128",
      "hypothesis": "A noncoding RNA could fold reproducibly when its solvent boundary moves rather than changes uniformly.",
      "test": "Compare structures after matched solvent histories.",
      "against": "Moving boundaries add no reproducibility.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0129",
    "hypothesis": "A granular arch could become stronger after a weak transverse impulse without increased packing.",
    "test": "Measure arch strength and geometry.",
    "against": "Strength changes require denser packing.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 125,
    "literature_query": "granular arch become stronger weak transverse impulse increased packing experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N0129",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A granular arch could become stronger after a weak transverse impulse without increased packing.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0129",
      "hypothesis": "A granular arch could become stronger after a weak transverse impulse without increased packing.",
      "test": "Measure arch strength and geometry.",
      "against": "Strength changes require denser packing.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0129",
      "hypothesis": "A granular arch could become stronger after a weak transverse impulse without increased packing.",
      "test": "Measure arch strength and geometry.",
      "against": "Strength changes require denser packing.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 125,
      "literature_query": "granular arch become stronger weak transverse impulse increased packing experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "125",
      "id": "N0129",
      "hypothesis": "A granular arch could become stronger after a weak transverse impulse without increased packing.",
      "test": "Measure arch strength and geometry.",
      "against": "Strength changes require denser packing.",
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_score": "21",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P08ceea52de67;P96ce579f1dbb;P1d6f778daeef;P3cfcd41b53e6;P75b65b6384c2;Pd591c0b4e8d9;Pa350f9dbe7dd",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N0129",
      "hypothesis": "A granular arch could become stronger after a weak transverse impulse without increased packing.",
      "test": "Measure arch strength and geometry.",
      "against": "Strength changes require denser packing.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 125,
      "literature_query": "granular arch become stronger weak transverse impulse increased packing experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P08ceea52de67;P96ce579f1dbb;P1d6f778daeef;P3cfcd41b53e6;P75b65b6384c2;Pd591c0b4e8d9;Pa350f9dbe7dd",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P08ceea52de67;P96ce579f1dbb;P1d6f778daeef;P3cfcd41b53e6;P75b65b6384c2;Pd591c0b4e8d9;Pa350f9dbe7dd",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0130",
    "hypothesis": "A passive optical tag could identify solvent exposure order through crossed diffusion barriers.",
    "test": "Apply reversed solvent sequences.",
    "against": "Final spectra encode only composition.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 18,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0130",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A passive optical tag could identify solvent exposure order through crossed diffusion barriers.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0130",
      "hypothesis": "A passive optical tag could identify solvent exposure order through crossed diffusion barriers.",
      "test": "Apply reversed solvent sequences.",
      "against": "Final spectra encode only composition.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0130",
      "hypothesis": "A passive optical tag could identify solvent exposure order through crossed diffusion barriers.",
      "test": "Apply reversed solvent sequences.",
      "against": "Final spectra encode only composition.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 18,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0131",
    "hypothesis": "An air-water meniscus could suppress a nearby chemical oscillator through selective volatile removal.",
    "test": "Compare oscillations with vapor-blocking controls.",
    "against": "Suppression persists without volatile transport.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 126,
    "literature_query": "air-water meniscus suppress nearby chemical oscillator selective volatile removal experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N0131",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "An air-water meniscus could suppress a nearby chemical oscillator through selective volatile removal.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0131",
      "hypothesis": "An air-water meniscus could suppress a nearby chemical oscillator through selective volatile removal.",
      "test": "Compare oscillations with vapor-blocking controls.",
      "against": "Suppression persists without volatile transport.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0131",
      "hypothesis": "An air-water meniscus could suppress a nearby chemical oscillator through selective volatile removal.",
      "test": "Compare oscillations with vapor-blocking controls.",
      "against": "Suppression persists without volatile transport.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 126,
      "literature_query": "air-water meniscus suppress nearby chemical oscillator selective volatile removal experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "126",
      "id": "N0131",
      "hypothesis": "An air-water meniscus could suppress a nearby chemical oscillator through selective volatile removal.",
      "test": "Compare oscillations with vapor-blocking controls.",
      "against": "Suppression persists without volatile transport.",
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_score": "21",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P52474f155aac;P40a0012d94db;P8528f4f522af;P5b0ff1f3a1f9;P701ccf079ae5;Pb2afb4a5c850;P6e25ff4bafc6",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N0131",
      "hypothesis": "An air-water meniscus could suppress a nearby chemical oscillator through selective volatile removal.",
      "test": "Compare oscillations with vapor-blocking controls.",
      "against": "Suppression persists without volatile transport.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 126,
      "literature_query": "air-water meniscus suppress nearby chemical oscillator selective volatile removal experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P52474f155aac;P40a0012d94db;P8528f4f522af;P5b0ff1f3a1f9;P701ccf079ae5;Pb2afb4a5c850;P6e25ff4bafc6",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P52474f155aac;P40a0012d94db;P8528f4f522af;P5b0ff1f3a1f9;P701ccf079ae5;Pb2afb4a5c850;P6e25ff4bafc6",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0132",
    "hypothesis": "A plant-inspired fiber coil could measure evaporation through rotation rather than extension.",
    "test": "Calibrate angular motion against mass loss.",
    "against": "Rotation lacks reproducible calibration.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0132",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A plant-inspired fiber coil could measure evaporation through rotation rather than extension.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0132",
      "hypothesis": "A plant-inspired fiber coil could measure evaporation through rotation rather than extension.",
      "test": "Calibrate angular motion against mass loss.",
      "against": "Rotation lacks reproducible calibration.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0132",
      "hypothesis": "A plant-inspired fiber coil could measure evaporation through rotation rather than extension.",
      "test": "Calibrate angular motion against mass loss.",
      "against": "Rotation lacks reproducible calibration.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0133",
    "hypothesis": "A charged mineral step could enrich neutral polar molecules through oriented hydration water.",
    "test": "Measure enrichment with adsorption controls.",
    "against": "Enrichment requires direct chemical binding.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 127,
    "literature_query": "charged mineral step enrich neutral polar molecules oriented hydration water experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N0133",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A charged mineral step could enrich neutral polar molecules through oriented hydration water.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0133",
      "hypothesis": "A charged mineral step could enrich neutral polar molecules through oriented hydration water.",
      "test": "Measure enrichment with adsorption controls.",
      "against": "Enrichment requires direct chemical binding.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0133",
      "hypothesis": "A charged mineral step could enrich neutral polar molecules through oriented hydration water.",
      "test": "Measure enrichment with adsorption controls.",
      "against": "Enrichment requires direct chemical binding.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 127,
      "literature_query": "charged mineral step enrich neutral polar molecules oriented hydration water experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "127",
      "id": "N0133",
      "hypothesis": "A charged mineral step could enrich neutral polar molecules through oriented hydration water.",
      "test": "Measure enrichment with adsorption controls.",
      "against": "Enrichment requires direct chemical binding.",
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_score": "21",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pec61ddc9909f;Pd57cbc28a767;P0ef6c604da6a;P1cb317012614;Pf0ee26e87c15;P482c7fb36498",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N0133",
      "hypothesis": "A charged mineral step could enrich neutral polar molecules through oriented hydration water.",
      "test": "Measure enrichment with adsorption controls.",
      "against": "Enrichment requires direct chemical binding.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 127,
      "literature_query": "charged mineral step enrich neutral polar molecules oriented hydration water experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pec61ddc9909f;Pd57cbc28a767;P0ef6c604da6a;P1cb317012614;Pf0ee26e87c15;P482c7fb36498",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "Pec61ddc9909f;Pd57cbc28a767;P0ef6c604da6a;P1cb317012614;Pf0ee26e87c15;P482c7fb36498",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0134",
    "hypothesis": "A gel-confined bubble could rupture preferentially at the interface's slowest-relaxing region.",
    "test": "Map relaxation and rupture location.",
    "against": "Rupture ignores relaxation maps.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0134",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A gel-confined bubble could rupture preferentially at the interface's slowest-relaxing region.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0134",
      "hypothesis": "A gel-confined bubble could rupture preferentially at the interface's slowest-relaxing region.",
      "test": "Map relaxation and rupture location.",
      "against": "Rupture ignores relaxation maps.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0134",
      "hypothesis": "A gel-confined bubble could rupture preferentially at the interface's slowest-relaxing region.",
      "test": "Map relaxation and rupture location.",
      "against": "Rupture ignores relaxation maps.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0135",
    "hypothesis": "A porous optical mirror could track salinity through opposite phase shifts at two incidence angles.",
    "test": "Calibrate angular phase responses.",
    "against": "Salinity remains confounded with temperature.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 128,
    "literature_query": "porous optical mirror track salinity opposite phase shifts two incidence angles experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N0135",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous optical mirror could track salinity through opposite phase shifts at two incidence angles.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0135",
      "hypothesis": "A porous optical mirror could track salinity through opposite phase shifts at two incidence angles.",
      "test": "Calibrate angular phase responses.",
      "against": "Salinity remains confounded with temperature.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0135",
      "hypothesis": "A porous optical mirror could track salinity through opposite phase shifts at two incidence angles.",
      "test": "Calibrate angular phase responses.",
      "against": "Salinity remains confounded with temperature.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 128,
      "literature_query": "porous optical mirror track salinity opposite phase shifts two incidence angles experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "128",
      "id": "N0135",
      "hypothesis": "A porous optical mirror could track salinity through opposite phase shifts at two incidence angles.",
      "test": "Calibrate angular phase responses.",
      "against": "Salinity remains confounded with temperature.",
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_score": "21",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pdeecfadabef7;P736ee89cd83a",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N0135",
      "hypothesis": "A porous optical mirror could track salinity through opposite phase shifts at two incidence angles.",
      "test": "Calibrate angular phase responses.",
      "against": "Salinity remains confounded with temperature.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 128,
      "literature_query": "porous optical mirror track salinity opposite phase shifts two incidence angles experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pdeecfadabef7;P736ee89cd83a",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "Pdeecfadabef7;P736ee89cd83a",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0136",
    "hypothesis": "A dry fungal network could preserve preferred rehydration routes through residual wall strain.",
    "test": "Map strain and first wet paths.",
    "against": "Routes follow pore size only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 2,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 15,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0136",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A dry fungal network could preserve preferred rehydration routes through residual wall strain.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0136",
      "hypothesis": "A dry fungal network could preserve preferred rehydration routes through residual wall strain.",
      "test": "Map strain and first wet paths.",
      "against": "Routes follow pore size only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0136",
      "hypothesis": "A dry fungal network could preserve preferred rehydration routes through residual wall strain.",
      "test": "Map strain and first wet paths.",
      "against": "Routes follow pore size only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 2,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 15,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0137",
    "hypothesis": "An elastic inclusions network could suppress thermal crack avalanches by distributing stress over time.",
    "test": "Record cracks and local relaxation.",
    "against": "Avalanche size remains unchanged.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 129,
    "literature_query": "elastic inclusions network suppress thermal crack avalanches distributing stress over time experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N0137",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "An elastic inclusions network could suppress thermal crack avalanches by distributing stress over time.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0137",
      "hypothesis": "An elastic inclusions network could suppress thermal crack avalanches by distributing stress over time.",
      "test": "Record cracks and local relaxation.",
      "against": "Avalanche size remains unchanged.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0137",
      "hypothesis": "An elastic inclusions network could suppress thermal crack avalanches by distributing stress over time.",
      "test": "Record cracks and local relaxation.",
      "against": "Avalanche size remains unchanged.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 129,
      "literature_query": "elastic inclusions network suppress thermal crack avalanches distributing stress over time experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "129",
      "id": "N0137",
      "hypothesis": "An elastic inclusions network could suppress thermal crack avalanches by distributing stress over time.",
      "test": "Record cracks and local relaxation.",
      "against": "Avalanche size remains unchanged.",
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_score": "21",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pdaac88b171c8;P1680053d52a8;P5484b8426fa8;Pc1b43c952170",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N0137",
      "hypothesis": "An elastic inclusions network could suppress thermal crack avalanches by distributing stress over time.",
      "test": "Record cracks and local relaxation.",
      "against": "Avalanche size remains unchanged.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 129,
      "literature_query": "elastic inclusions network suppress thermal crack avalanches distributing stress over time experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pdaac88b171c8;P1680053d52a8;P5484b8426fa8;Pc1b43c952170",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "Pdaac88b171c8;P1680053d52a8;P5484b8426fa8;Pc1b43c952170",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0138",
    "hypothesis": "A neutral tracer could distinguish reversible gel binding from geometric confinement through displacement skewness.",
    "test": "Compare trajectories in characterized gels.",
    "against": "Skewness cannot separate mechanisms.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0138",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A neutral tracer could distinguish reversible gel binding from geometric confinement through displacement skewness.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0138",
      "hypothesis": "A neutral tracer could distinguish reversible gel binding from geometric confinement through displacement skewness.",
      "test": "Compare trajectories in characterized gels.",
      "against": "Skewness cannot separate mechanisms.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0138",
      "hypothesis": "A neutral tracer could distinguish reversible gel binding from geometric confinement through displacement skewness.",
      "test": "Compare trajectories in characterized gels.",
      "against": "Skewness cannot separate mechanisms.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0139",
    "hypothesis": "A snowflake-like collector could release captured fog when its wet mass detunes vibration.",
    "test": "Track capture, resonance, and shedding.",
    "against": "Shedding ignores resonance changes.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 130,
    "literature_query": "snowflake-like collector release captured fog when wet mass detunes vibration experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N0139",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A snowflake-like collector could release captured fog when its wet mass detunes vibration.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0139",
      "hypothesis": "A snowflake-like collector could release captured fog when its wet mass detunes vibration.",
      "test": "Track capture, resonance, and shedding.",
      "against": "Shedding ignores resonance changes.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0139",
      "hypothesis": "A snowflake-like collector could release captured fog when its wet mass detunes vibration.",
      "test": "Track capture, resonance, and shedding.",
      "against": "Shedding ignores resonance changes.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 130,
      "literature_query": "snowflake-like collector release captured fog when wet mass detunes vibration experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "130",
      "id": "N0139",
      "hypothesis": "A snowflake-like collector could release captured fog when its wet mass detunes vibration.",
      "test": "Track capture, resonance, and shedding.",
      "against": "Shedding ignores resonance changes.",
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_score": "21",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pbe6bbfb45abf;P62f187ff61fd;P934911be9f72;P64bc9973b737;Pa26126dd38cb",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N0139",
      "hypothesis": "A snowflake-like collector could release captured fog when its wet mass detunes vibration.",
      "test": "Track capture, resonance, and shedding.",
      "against": "Shedding ignores resonance changes.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 130,
      "literature_query": "snowflake-like collector release captured fog when wet mass detunes vibration experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pbe6bbfb45abf;P62f187ff61fd;P934911be9f72;P64bc9973b737;Pa26126dd38cb",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "Pbe6bbfb45abf;P62f187ff61fd;P934911be9f72;P64bc9973b737;Pa26126dd38cb",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0140",
    "hypothesis": "A catalyst-free reaction could accelerate inside a strained droplet because pressure shifts local partitioning.",
    "test": "Measure products and internal composition.",
    "against": "Rate follows heating alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0140",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A catalyst-free reaction could accelerate inside a strained droplet because pressure shifts local partitioning.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0140",
      "hypothesis": "A catalyst-free reaction could accelerate inside a strained droplet because pressure shifts local partitioning.",
      "test": "Measure products and internal composition.",
      "against": "Rate follows heating alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0140",
      "hypothesis": "A catalyst-free reaction could accelerate inside a strained droplet because pressure shifts local partitioning.",
      "test": "Measure products and internal composition.",
      "against": "Rate follows heating alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0141",
    "hypothesis": "A mineral membrane could seal itself selectively where dissolved gas first escapes.",
    "test": "Image precipitation and gas outlets.",
    "against": "Sealing locations ignore gas escape.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 131,
    "literature_query": "mineral membrane seal selectively where dissolved gas first escapes experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N0141",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A mineral membrane could seal itself selectively where dissolved gas first escapes.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0141",
      "hypothesis": "A mineral membrane could seal itself selectively where dissolved gas first escapes.",
      "test": "Image precipitation and gas outlets.",
      "against": "Sealing locations ignore gas escape.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0141",
      "hypothesis": "A mineral membrane could seal itself selectively where dissolved gas first escapes.",
      "test": "Image precipitation and gas outlets.",
      "against": "Sealing locations ignore gas escape.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 131,
      "literature_query": "mineral membrane seal selectively where dissolved gas first escapes experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "131",
      "id": "N0141",
      "hypothesis": "A mineral membrane could seal itself selectively where dissolved gas first escapes.",
      "test": "Image precipitation and gas outlets.",
      "against": "Sealing locations ignore gas escape.",
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_score": "21",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pda939e06158b;P0a23fd0bd50d;Pf76ae9b82df4;P77c82ef7cf3a",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N0141",
      "hypothesis": "A mineral membrane could seal itself selectively where dissolved gas first escapes.",
      "test": "Image precipitation and gas outlets.",
      "against": "Sealing locations ignore gas escape.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 131,
      "literature_query": "mineral membrane seal selectively where dissolved gas first escapes experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pda939e06158b;P0a23fd0bd50d;Pf76ae9b82df4;P77c82ef7cf3a",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "Pda939e06158b;P0a23fd0bd50d;Pf76ae9b82df4;P77c82ef7cf3a",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0142",
    "hypothesis": "A stretched crystal could selectively admit one solvent conformer without changing chemical composition.",
    "test": "Measure uptake under reversible strain.",
    "against": "Conformer selectivity remains unchanged.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 132,
    "literature_query": "stretched crystal selectively admit one solvent conformer changing chemical composition experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N0142",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A stretched crystal could selectively admit one solvent conformer without changing chemical composition.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0142",
      "hypothesis": "A stretched crystal could selectively admit one solvent conformer without changing chemical composition.",
      "test": "Measure uptake under reversible strain.",
      "against": "Conformer selectivity remains unchanged.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0142",
      "hypothesis": "A stretched crystal could selectively admit one solvent conformer without changing chemical composition.",
      "test": "Measure uptake under reversible strain.",
      "against": "Conformer selectivity remains unchanged.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 132,
      "literature_query": "stretched crystal selectively admit one solvent conformer changing chemical composition experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "132",
      "id": "N0142",
      "hypothesis": "A stretched crystal could selectively admit one solvent conformer without changing chemical composition.",
      "test": "Measure uptake under reversible strain.",
      "against": "Conformer selectivity remains unchanged.",
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_score": "21",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P02071a7255dd;P832424d969fd;Pe8aa56937f2f;P9d861de58fa5;P4937a6eadcba;Pea0bc066e2e8",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N0142",
      "hypothesis": "A stretched crystal could selectively admit one solvent conformer without changing chemical composition.",
      "test": "Measure uptake under reversible strain.",
      "against": "Conformer selectivity remains unchanged.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 132,
      "literature_query": "stretched crystal selectively admit one solvent conformer changing chemical composition experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P02071a7255dd;P832424d969fd;Pe8aa56937f2f;P9d861de58fa5;P4937a6eadcba;Pea0bc066e2e8",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P02071a7255dd;P832424d969fd;Pe8aa56937f2f;P9d861de58fa5;P4937a6eadcba;Pea0bc066e2e8",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0143",
    "hypothesis": "A granular lens could focus vibration more sharply after mild gravitational settling.",
    "test": "Measure transmitted fields and contacts.",
    "against": "Focusing tracks density alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 133,
    "literature_query": "granular lens focus vibration sharply mild gravitational settling experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N0143",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A granular lens could focus vibration more sharply after mild gravitational settling.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0143",
      "hypothesis": "A granular lens could focus vibration more sharply after mild gravitational settling.",
      "test": "Measure transmitted fields and contacts.",
      "against": "Focusing tracks density alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0143",
      "hypothesis": "A granular lens could focus vibration more sharply after mild gravitational settling.",
      "test": "Measure transmitted fields and contacts.",
      "against": "Focusing tracks density alone.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 133,
      "literature_query": "granular lens focus vibration sharply mild gravitational settling experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "133",
      "id": "N0143",
      "hypothesis": "A granular lens could focus vibration more sharply after mild gravitational settling.",
      "test": "Measure transmitted fields and contacts.",
      "against": "Focusing tracks density alone.",
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_score": "21",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P333eca025488;P87d4002d4cb8;P5f66579ba323;P799c012b2644;Pddb7acd1b504",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N0143",
      "hypothesis": "A granular lens could focus vibration more sharply after mild gravitational settling.",
      "test": "Measure transmitted fields and contacts.",
      "against": "Focusing tracks density alone.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 133,
      "literature_query": "granular lens focus vibration sharply mild gravitational settling experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P333eca025488;P87d4002d4cb8;P5f66579ba323;P799c012b2644;Pddb7acd1b504",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P333eca025488;P87d4002d4cb8;P5f66579ba323;P799c012b2644;Pddb7acd1b504",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0144",
    "hypothesis": "A hydrated fiber could transport a thermal pulse faster after torsion than after axial stretching.",
    "test": "Compare thermal travel times.",
    "against": "Changes follow cross-section alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 134,
    "literature_query": "hydrated fiber transport thermal pulse faster torsion axial stretching experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N0144",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A hydrated fiber could transport a thermal pulse faster after torsion than after axial stretching.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0144",
      "hypothesis": "A hydrated fiber could transport a thermal pulse faster after torsion than after axial stretching.",
      "test": "Compare thermal travel times.",
      "against": "Changes follow cross-section alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0144",
      "hypothesis": "A hydrated fiber could transport a thermal pulse faster after torsion than after axial stretching.",
      "test": "Compare thermal travel times.",
      "against": "Changes follow cross-section alone.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 134,
      "literature_query": "hydrated fiber transport thermal pulse faster torsion axial stretching experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "134",
      "id": "N0144",
      "hypothesis": "A hydrated fiber could transport a thermal pulse faster after torsion than after axial stretching.",
      "test": "Compare thermal travel times.",
      "against": "Changes follow cross-section alone.",
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_score": "21",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pb89c7a707963;P1574b2b431fa;P89199f85a4f9;Pa0ee341165ec;P20b3cc3d0e7e;P0a0f7ed8ed72",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N0144",
      "hypothesis": "A hydrated fiber could transport a thermal pulse faster after torsion than after axial stretching.",
      "test": "Compare thermal travel times.",
      "against": "Changes follow cross-section alone.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 134,
      "literature_query": "hydrated fiber transport thermal pulse faster torsion axial stretching experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pb89c7a707963;P1574b2b431fa;P89199f85a4f9;Pa0ee341165ec;P20b3cc3d0e7e;P0a0f7ed8ed72",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "Pb89c7a707963;P1574b2b431fa;P89199f85a4f9;Pa0ee341165ec;P20b3cc3d0e7e;P0a0f7ed8ed72",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0145",
    "hypothesis": "A soft particle could store an indentation's orientation in internal solvent circulation.",
    "test": "Track internal tracers after unloading.",
    "against": "Circulation loses directional memory immediately.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0145",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A soft particle could store an indentation's orientation in internal solvent circulation.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0145",
      "hypothesis": "A soft particle could store an indentation's orientation in internal solvent circulation.",
      "test": "Track internal tracers after unloading.",
      "against": "Circulation loses directional memory immediately.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0145",
      "hypothesis": "A soft particle could store an indentation's orientation in internal solvent circulation.",
      "test": "Track internal tracers after unloading.",
      "against": "Circulation loses directional memory immediately.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0146",
    "hypothesis": "A photosynthetic membrane analogue could reduce photodamage by mechanically ejecting excess sensitizer molecules.",
    "test": "Measure sensitizer loss and photochemistry.",
    "against": "Protection occurs without selective ejection.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 2,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 17,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0146",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A photosynthetic membrane analogue could reduce photodamage by mechanically ejecting excess sensitizer molecules.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0146",
      "hypothesis": "A photosynthetic membrane analogue could reduce photodamage by mechanically ejecting excess sensitizer molecules.",
      "test": "Measure sensitizer loss and photochemistry.",
      "against": "Protection occurs without selective ejection.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0146",
      "hypothesis": "A photosynthetic membrane analogue could reduce photodamage by mechanically ejecting excess sensitizer molecules.",
      "test": "Measure sensitizer loss and photochemistry.",
      "against": "Protection occurs without selective ejection.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 2,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 17,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0147",
    "hypothesis": "A rough mineral wall could steer gas fingers through dissolution-induced smoothing of preferred paths.",
    "test": "Image gas invasion and wall retreat.",
    "against": "Paths remain fixed despite smoothing.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 135,
    "literature_query": "rough mineral wall steer gas fingers dissolution-induced smoothing preferred paths experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N0147",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A rough mineral wall could steer gas fingers through dissolution-induced smoothing of preferred paths.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0147",
      "hypothesis": "A rough mineral wall could steer gas fingers through dissolution-induced smoothing of preferred paths.",
      "test": "Image gas invasion and wall retreat.",
      "against": "Paths remain fixed despite smoothing.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0147",
      "hypothesis": "A rough mineral wall could steer gas fingers through dissolution-induced smoothing of preferred paths.",
      "test": "Image gas invasion and wall retreat.",
      "against": "Paths remain fixed despite smoothing.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 135,
      "literature_query": "rough mineral wall steer gas fingers dissolution-induced smoothing preferred paths experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "135",
      "id": "N0147",
      "hypothesis": "A rough mineral wall could steer gas fingers through dissolution-induced smoothing of preferred paths.",
      "test": "Image gas invasion and wall retreat.",
      "against": "Paths remain fixed despite smoothing.",
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_score": "21",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P2ea6cbc37398;P42954a5d790c;P3d8c0654bba4;P4d78bcbe4a75;Pc8fdaed23928;Pa7fc4d02804c;P3b96a90e7271",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N0147",
      "hypothesis": "A rough mineral wall could steer gas fingers through dissolution-induced smoothing of preferred paths.",
      "test": "Image gas invasion and wall retreat.",
      "against": "Paths remain fixed despite smoothing.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 135,
      "literature_query": "rough mineral wall steer gas fingers dissolution-induced smoothing preferred paths experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P2ea6cbc37398;P42954a5d790c;P3d8c0654bba4;P4d78bcbe4a75;Pc8fdaed23928;Pa7fc4d02804c;P3b96a90e7271",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P2ea6cbc37398;P42954a5d790c;P3d8c0654bba4;P4d78bcbe4a75;Pc8fdaed23928;Pa7fc4d02804c;P3b96a90e7271",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0148",
    "hypothesis": "A reversible adhesive could become easier to detach after brief lateral cooling without bulk temperature change.",
    "test": "Measure interface temperature and peel work.",
    "against": "Peel work follows bulk temperature only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 136,
    "literature_query": "reversible adhesive become easier detach brief lateral cooling bulk temperature change experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N0148",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A reversible adhesive could become easier to detach after brief lateral cooling without bulk temperature change.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0148",
      "hypothesis": "A reversible adhesive could become easier to detach after brief lateral cooling without bulk temperature change.",
      "test": "Measure interface temperature and peel work.",
      "against": "Peel work follows bulk temperature only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0148",
      "hypothesis": "A reversible adhesive could become easier to detach after brief lateral cooling without bulk temperature change.",
      "test": "Measure interface temperature and peel work.",
      "against": "Peel work follows bulk temperature only.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 136,
      "literature_query": "reversible adhesive become easier detach brief lateral cooling bulk temperature change experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "136",
      "id": "N0148",
      "hypothesis": "A reversible adhesive could become easier to detach after brief lateral cooling without bulk temperature change.",
      "test": "Measure interface temperature and peel work.",
      "against": "Peel work follows bulk temperature only.",
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_score": "21",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P9da96ba20d88;P00da93364022;P6dd8d4b7872b;P72d6405258bd;P47cf6091fcbe;P53b0728e298e;Pc229011250ac",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N0148",
      "hypothesis": "A reversible adhesive could become easier to detach after brief lateral cooling without bulk temperature change.",
      "test": "Measure interface temperature and peel work.",
      "against": "Peel work follows bulk temperature only.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 136,
      "literature_query": "reversible adhesive become easier detach brief lateral cooling bulk temperature change experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P9da96ba20d88;P00da93364022;P6dd8d4b7872b;P72d6405258bd;P47cf6091fcbe;P53b0728e298e;Pc229011250ac",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P9da96ba20d88;P00da93364022;P6dd8d4b7872b;P72d6405258bd;P47cf6091fcbe;P53b0728e298e;Pc229011250ac",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0149",
    "hypothesis": "A microfluidic trap could sort droplets by compressibility through delayed pressure equalization.",
    "test": "Track deformation and exit timing.",
    "against": "Sorting follows viscosity alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0149",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A microfluidic trap could sort droplets by compressibility through delayed pressure equalization.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0149",
      "hypothesis": "A microfluidic trap could sort droplets by compressibility through delayed pressure equalization.",
      "test": "Track deformation and exit timing.",
      "against": "Sorting follows viscosity alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0149",
      "hypothesis": "A microfluidic trap could sort droplets by compressibility through delayed pressure equalization.",
      "test": "Track deformation and exit timing.",
      "against": "Sorting follows viscosity alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0150",
    "hypothesis": "An acoustic cavity could detect vapor condensation from discrete changes in mode coupling.",
    "test": "Measure modes and condensate images.",
    "against": "Coupling changes are continuous thermal drift.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0150",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "An acoustic cavity could detect vapor condensation from discrete changes in mode coupling.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0150",
      "hypothesis": "An acoustic cavity could detect vapor condensation from discrete changes in mode coupling.",
      "test": "Measure modes and condensate images.",
      "against": "Coupling changes are continuous thermal drift.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0150",
      "hypothesis": "An acoustic cavity could detect vapor condensation from discrete changes in mode coupling.",
      "test": "Measure modes and condensate images.",
      "against": "Coupling changes are continuous thermal drift.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0151",
    "hypothesis": "A polyelectrolyte could selectively release counterions during curvature changes without macroscopic swelling.",
    "test": "Measure ions under controlled bending.",
    "against": "Release requires bulk swelling.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 137,
    "literature_query": "polyelectrolyte selectively release counterions curvature changes macroscopic swelling experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N0151",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A polyelectrolyte could selectively release counterions during curvature changes without macroscopic swelling.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0151",
      "hypothesis": "A polyelectrolyte could selectively release counterions during curvature changes without macroscopic swelling.",
      "test": "Measure ions under controlled bending.",
      "against": "Release requires bulk swelling.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0151",
      "hypothesis": "A polyelectrolyte could selectively release counterions during curvature changes without macroscopic swelling.",
      "test": "Measure ions under controlled bending.",
      "against": "Release requires bulk swelling.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 137,
      "literature_query": "polyelectrolyte selectively release counterions curvature changes macroscopic swelling experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "137",
      "id": "N0151",
      "hypothesis": "A polyelectrolyte could selectively release counterions during curvature changes without macroscopic swelling.",
      "test": "Measure ions under controlled bending.",
      "against": "Release requires bulk swelling.",
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_score": "21",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P500101a84d7b;P427453ea8057;Pa537407cf82f;Pd1371f03879a;Pdcc1ddb659c2;P4797af096860;P3aa10c8f59dc;P46b5b3c75966",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N0151",
      "hypothesis": "A polyelectrolyte could selectively release counterions during curvature changes without macroscopic swelling.",
      "test": "Measure ions under controlled bending.",
      "against": "Release requires bulk swelling.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 137,
      "literature_query": "polyelectrolyte selectively release counterions curvature changes macroscopic swelling experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P500101a84d7b;P427453ea8057;Pa537407cf82f;Pd1371f03879a;Pdcc1ddb659c2;P4797af096860;P3aa10c8f59dc;P46b5b3c75966",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P500101a84d7b;P427453ea8057;Pa537407cf82f;Pd1371f03879a;Pdcc1ddb659c2;P4797af096860;P3aa10c8f59dc;P46b5b3c75966",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0152",
    "hypothesis": "A pigment-free shell could change color through drying-induced internal air redistribution.",
    "test": "Map voids and reflected spectra.",
    "against": "Color tracks irreversible fracture.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 12,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0152",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A pigment-free shell could change color through drying-induced internal air redistribution.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0152",
      "hypothesis": "A pigment-free shell could change color through drying-induced internal air redistribution.",
      "test": "Map voids and reflected spectra.",
      "against": "Color tracks irreversible fracture.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0152",
      "hypothesis": "A pigment-free shell could change color through drying-induced internal air redistribution.",
      "test": "Map voids and reflected spectra.",
      "against": "Color tracks irreversible fracture.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 12,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0153",
    "hypothesis": "A liquid crystal defect could guide a droplet toward a chemical source without bulk convection.",
    "test": "Track droplets with reversed source placement.",
    "against": "Motion follows residual convection.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0153",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A liquid crystal defect could guide a droplet toward a chemical source without bulk convection.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0153",
      "hypothesis": "A liquid crystal defect could guide a droplet toward a chemical source without bulk convection.",
      "test": "Track droplets with reversed source placement.",
      "against": "Motion follows residual convection.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0153",
      "hypothesis": "A liquid crystal defect could guide a droplet toward a chemical source without bulk convection.",
      "test": "Track droplets with reversed source placement.",
      "against": "Motion follows residual convection.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0154",
    "hypothesis": "A mineral seed could reduce crystallization strain by imposing a rotating growth orientation.",
    "test": "Measure stress and crystal texture.",
    "against": "Stress follows grain size only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 138,
    "literature_query": "mineral seed reduce crystallization strain imposing rotating growth orientation experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N0154",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A mineral seed could reduce crystallization strain by imposing a rotating growth orientation.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0154",
      "hypothesis": "A mineral seed could reduce crystallization strain by imposing a rotating growth orientation.",
      "test": "Measure stress and crystal texture.",
      "against": "Stress follows grain size only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0154",
      "hypothesis": "A mineral seed could reduce crystallization strain by imposing a rotating growth orientation.",
      "test": "Measure stress and crystal texture.",
      "against": "Stress follows grain size only.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 138,
      "literature_query": "mineral seed reduce crystallization strain imposing rotating growth orientation experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "138",
      "id": "N0154",
      "hypothesis": "A mineral seed could reduce crystallization strain by imposing a rotating growth orientation.",
      "test": "Measure stress and crystal texture.",
      "against": "Stress follows grain size only.",
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_score": "21",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P59ffc5e64b05;Pe9302e34f55a;P426e0d517862;P1af3643264ee;P320de9653a4f;P05e1cf23f3cd;P126019a5f794;P22617c55c212",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N0154",
      "hypothesis": "A mineral seed could reduce crystallization strain by imposing a rotating growth orientation.",
      "test": "Measure stress and crystal texture.",
      "against": "Stress follows grain size only.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 138,
      "literature_query": "mineral seed reduce crystallization strain imposing rotating growth orientation experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P59ffc5e64b05;Pe9302e34f55a;P426e0d517862;P1af3643264ee;P320de9653a4f;P05e1cf23f3cd;P126019a5f794;P22617c55c212",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P59ffc5e64b05;Pe9302e34f55a;P426e0d517862;P1af3643264ee;P320de9653a4f;P05e1cf23f3cd;P126019a5f794;P22617c55c212",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0155",
    "hypothesis": "A capillary sling could eject water only after accumulated droplets reach a geometrical resonance.",
    "test": "Measure mass, shape, and ejection.",
    "against": "Threshold depends solely on gravity.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0155",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A capillary sling could eject water only after accumulated droplets reach a geometrical resonance.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0155",
      "hypothesis": "A capillary sling could eject water only after accumulated droplets reach a geometrical resonance.",
      "test": "Measure mass, shape, and ejection.",
      "against": "Threshold depends solely on gravity.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0155",
      "hypothesis": "A capillary sling could eject water only after accumulated droplets reach a geometrical resonance.",
      "test": "Measure mass, shape, and ejection.",
      "against": "Threshold depends solely on gravity.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0156",
    "hypothesis": "A gel containing inert lamellae could arrest a swelling shock without slowing equilibrium uptake.",
    "test": "Image strain fronts and final hydration.",
    "against": "Arrest requires reduced overall transport.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 139,
    "literature_query": "gel containing inert lamellae arrest swelling shock slowing equilibrium uptake experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N0156",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A gel containing inert lamellae could arrest a swelling shock without slowing equilibrium uptake.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0156",
      "hypothesis": "A gel containing inert lamellae could arrest a swelling shock without slowing equilibrium uptake.",
      "test": "Image strain fronts and final hydration.",
      "against": "Arrest requires reduced overall transport.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0156",
      "hypothesis": "A gel containing inert lamellae could arrest a swelling shock without slowing equilibrium uptake.",
      "test": "Image strain fronts and final hydration.",
      "against": "Arrest requires reduced overall transport.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 139,
      "literature_query": "gel containing inert lamellae arrest swelling shock slowing equilibrium uptake experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "139",
      "id": "N0156",
      "hypothesis": "A gel containing inert lamellae could arrest a swelling shock without slowing equilibrium uptake.",
      "test": "Image strain fronts and final hydration.",
      "against": "Arrest requires reduced overall transport.",
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_score": "21",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pc11831ab3d9b;P9e00329fba25;Pe2bb432129e2;Pdc8149ab2a57;Pcbd8518556de;Pd85878164bff;Pf9f1e723975b;Pf74257197a32",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N0156",
      "hypothesis": "A gel containing inert lamellae could arrest a swelling shock without slowing equilibrium uptake.",
      "test": "Image strain fronts and final hydration.",
      "against": "Arrest requires reduced overall transport.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 139,
      "literature_query": "gel containing inert lamellae arrest swelling shock slowing equilibrium uptake experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pc11831ab3d9b;P9e00329fba25;Pe2bb432129e2;Pdc8149ab2a57;Pcbd8518556de;Pd85878164bff;Pf9f1e723975b;Pf74257197a32",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "Pc11831ab3d9b;P9e00329fba25;Pe2bb432129e2;Pdc8149ab2a57;Pcbd8518556de;Pd85878164bff;Pf9f1e723975b;Pf74257197a32",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0157",
    "hypothesis": "A hollow grain could emit an acoustic warning before its shell collapses under compression.",
    "test": "Track resonances and collapse load.",
    "against": "Warning appears only after cracking.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 140,
    "literature_query": "hollow grain emit acoustic warning shell collapses compression experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N0157",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A hollow grain could emit an acoustic warning before its shell collapses under compression.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0157",
      "hypothesis": "A hollow grain could emit an acoustic warning before its shell collapses under compression.",
      "test": "Track resonances and collapse load.",
      "against": "Warning appears only after cracking.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0157",
      "hypothesis": "A hollow grain could emit an acoustic warning before its shell collapses under compression.",
      "test": "Track resonances and collapse load.",
      "against": "Warning appears only after cracking.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 140,
      "literature_query": "hollow grain emit acoustic warning shell collapses compression experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "140",
      "id": "N0157",
      "hypothesis": "A hollow grain could emit an acoustic warning before its shell collapses under compression.",
      "test": "Track resonances and collapse load.",
      "against": "Warning appears only after cracking.",
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_score": "21",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pacf8977eb992;P9a6f31239ff4;P0f6dc3676be6;P38536b988478",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N0157",
      "hypothesis": "A hollow grain could emit an acoustic warning before its shell collapses under compression.",
      "test": "Track resonances and collapse load.",
      "against": "Warning appears only after cracking.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 140,
      "literature_query": "hollow grain emit acoustic warning shell collapses compression experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pacf8977eb992;P9a6f31239ff4;P0f6dc3676be6;P38536b988478",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "Pacf8977eb992;P9a6f31239ff4;P0f6dc3676be6;P38536b988478",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0158",
    "hypothesis": "An enzyme could retain catalytic orientation longer on a fluctuating tether than a fixed tether.",
    "test": "Measure orientation and turnover.",
    "against": "Orientation lifetime does not increase.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0158",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "An enzyme could retain catalytic orientation longer on a fluctuating tether than a fixed tether.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0158",
      "hypothesis": "An enzyme could retain catalytic orientation longer on a fluctuating tether than a fixed tether.",
      "test": "Measure orientation and turnover.",
      "against": "Orientation lifetime does not increase.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0158",
      "hypothesis": "An enzyme could retain catalytic orientation longer on a fluctuating tether than a fixed tether.",
      "test": "Measure orientation and turnover.",
      "against": "Orientation lifetime does not increase.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0159",
    "hypothesis": "A water-filled crack could transmit shear through temporary ice filaments above bulk freezing temperature under confinement.",
    "test": "Measure temperature and shear response.",
    "against": "No independently verified filaments appear.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 141,
    "literature_query": "water-filled crack transmit shear temporary ice filaments above bulk freezing temperature confinement experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N0159",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A water-filled crack could transmit shear through temporary ice filaments above bulk freezing temperature under confinement.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0159",
      "hypothesis": "A water-filled crack could transmit shear through temporary ice filaments above bulk freezing temperature under confinement.",
      "test": "Measure temperature and shear response.",
      "against": "No independently verified filaments appear.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0159",
      "hypothesis": "A water-filled crack could transmit shear through temporary ice filaments above bulk freezing temperature under confinement.",
      "test": "Measure temperature and shear response.",
      "against": "No independently verified filaments appear.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 141,
      "literature_query": "water-filled crack transmit shear temporary ice filaments above bulk freezing temperature confinement experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "141",
      "id": "N0159",
      "hypothesis": "A water-filled crack could transmit shear through temporary ice filaments above bulk freezing temperature under confinement.",
      "test": "Measure temperature and shear response.",
      "against": "No independently verified filaments appear.",
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_score": "21",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pd59c8d414099;Pfbe071da1783;Pefb0d8b1a0cf;P6e8a765cf83b;P85ff1296cf4b",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N0159",
      "hypothesis": "A water-filled crack could transmit shear through temporary ice filaments above bulk freezing temperature under confinement.",
      "test": "Measure temperature and shear response.",
      "against": "No independently verified filaments appear.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 141,
      "literature_query": "water-filled crack transmit shear temporary ice filaments above bulk freezing temperature confinement experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pd59c8d414099;Pfbe071da1783;Pefb0d8b1a0cf;P6e8a765cf83b;P85ff1296cf4b",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "Pd59c8d414099;Pfbe071da1783;Pefb0d8b1a0cf;P6e8a765cf83b;P85ff1296cf4b",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0160",
    "hypothesis": "A porous surface could suppress frost growth by returning sublimated vapor to warmer internal pores.",
    "test": "Map vapor and ice accumulation.",
    "against": "Suppression follows temperature differences alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 12,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0160",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous surface could suppress frost growth by returning sublimated vapor to warmer internal pores.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0160",
      "hypothesis": "A porous surface could suppress frost growth by returning sublimated vapor to warmer internal pores.",
      "test": "Map vapor and ice accumulation.",
      "against": "Suppression follows temperature differences alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0160",
      "hypothesis": "A porous surface could suppress frost growth by returning sublimated vapor to warmer internal pores.",
      "test": "Map vapor and ice accumulation.",
      "against": "Suppression follows temperature differences alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 12,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0161",
    "hypothesis": "A folded membrane could passively separate liquid and gas during reversal of gravity orientation.",
    "test": "Rotate a transparent flow fixture.",
    "against": "Phase routing fails upon reversal.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0161",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A folded membrane could passively separate liquid and gas during reversal of gravity orientation.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0161",
      "hypothesis": "A folded membrane could passively separate liquid and gas during reversal of gravity orientation.",
      "test": "Rotate a transparent flow fixture.",
      "against": "Phase routing fails upon reversal.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0161",
      "hypothesis": "A folded membrane could passively separate liquid and gas during reversal of gravity orientation.",
      "test": "Rotate a transparent flow fixture.",
      "against": "Phase routing fails upon reversal.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0162",
    "hypothesis": "A mineral aggregate could mechanically soften before dissolving appreciably as hydrated contacts detach.",
    "test": "Measure modulus and released ions.",
    "against": "Softening tracks bulk mass loss.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 142,
    "literature_query": "mineral aggregate mechanically soften dissolving appreciably hydrated contacts detach experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N0162",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A mineral aggregate could mechanically soften before dissolving appreciably as hydrated contacts detach.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0162",
      "hypothesis": "A mineral aggregate could mechanically soften before dissolving appreciably as hydrated contacts detach.",
      "test": "Measure modulus and released ions.",
      "against": "Softening tracks bulk mass loss.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0162",
      "hypothesis": "A mineral aggregate could mechanically soften before dissolving appreciably as hydrated contacts detach.",
      "test": "Measure modulus and released ions.",
      "against": "Softening tracks bulk mass loss.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 142,
      "literature_query": "mineral aggregate mechanically soften dissolving appreciably hydrated contacts detach experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "142",
      "id": "N0162",
      "hypothesis": "A mineral aggregate could mechanically soften before dissolving appreciably as hydrated contacts detach.",
      "test": "Measure modulus and released ions.",
      "against": "Softening tracks bulk mass loss.",
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_score": "21",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P0d04e4e7c775;P6efa42f6360a;Pabb4a62c44ab;P879374c412d8;Peb12cab047b3;P84725f401aaa",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N0162",
      "hypothesis": "A mineral aggregate could mechanically soften before dissolving appreciably as hydrated contacts detach.",
      "test": "Measure modulus and released ions.",
      "against": "Softening tracks bulk mass loss.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 142,
      "literature_query": "mineral aggregate mechanically soften dissolving appreciably hydrated contacts detach experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P0d04e4e7c775;P6efa42f6360a;Pabb4a62c44ab;P879374c412d8;Peb12cab047b3;P84725f401aaa",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P0d04e4e7c775;P6efa42f6360a;Pabb4a62c44ab;P879374c412d8;Peb12cab047b3;P84725f401aaa",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0163",
    "hypothesis": "A nonpathogenic bacterial cell could sense confinement through changes in flagellar load before wall contact.",
    "test": "Track swimming near calibrated gaps.",
    "against": "Behavior changes only after contact.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 2,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 17,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0163",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A nonpathogenic bacterial cell could sense confinement through changes in flagellar load before wall contact.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0163",
      "hypothesis": "A nonpathogenic bacterial cell could sense confinement through changes in flagellar load before wall contact.",
      "test": "Track swimming near calibrated gaps.",
      "against": "Behavior changes only after contact.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0163",
      "hypothesis": "A nonpathogenic bacterial cell could sense confinement through changes in flagellar load before wall contact.",
      "test": "Track swimming near calibrated gaps.",
      "against": "Behavior changes only after contact.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 2,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 17,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0164",
    "hypothesis": "A suspended dust analogue could reveal humidity through a shift in its preferred aerodynamic orientation.",
    "test": "Measure orientation across humidities.",
    "against": "Orientation follows charge alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0164",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A suspended dust analogue could reveal humidity through a shift in its preferred aerodynamic orientation.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0164",
      "hypothesis": "A suspended dust analogue could reveal humidity through a shift in its preferred aerodynamic orientation.",
      "test": "Measure orientation across humidities.",
      "against": "Orientation follows charge alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0164",
      "hypothesis": "A suspended dust analogue could reveal humidity through a shift in its preferred aerodynamic orientation.",
      "test": "Measure orientation across humidities.",
      "against": "Orientation follows charge alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0165",
    "hypothesis": "A polymer film could retain an image of local cooling rate through spatially selective gas permeability.",
    "test": "Map permeability after patterned cooling.",
    "against": "Permeability ignores cooling history.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0165",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A polymer film could retain an image of local cooling rate through spatially selective gas permeability.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0165",
      "hypothesis": "A polymer film could retain an image of local cooling rate through spatially selective gas permeability.",
      "test": "Map permeability after patterned cooling.",
      "against": "Permeability ignores cooling history.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0165",
      "hypothesis": "A polymer film could retain an image of local cooling rate through spatially selective gas permeability.",
      "test": "Map permeability after patterned cooling.",
      "against": "Permeability ignores cooling history.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0166",
    "hypothesis": "A chemically uniform pore could distinguish flexible from rigid molecules by transit-time intermittency.",
    "test": "Measure single-molecule transit distributions.",
    "against": "Intermittency follows size alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0166",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A chemically uniform pore could distinguish flexible from rigid molecules by transit-time intermittency.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0166",
      "hypothesis": "A chemically uniform pore could distinguish flexible from rigid molecules by transit-time intermittency.",
      "test": "Measure single-molecule transit distributions.",
      "against": "Intermittency follows size alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0166",
      "hypothesis": "A chemically uniform pore could distinguish flexible from rigid molecules by transit-time intermittency.",
      "test": "Measure single-molecule transit distributions.",
      "against": "Intermittency follows size alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0167",
    "hypothesis": "A freezing droplet could shed embedded particles toward a free surface through curvature-driven front deflection.",
    "test": "Track particles and freeze fronts.",
    "against": "Expulsion follows density segregation only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0167",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A freezing droplet could shed embedded particles toward a free surface through curvature-driven front deflection.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0167",
      "hypothesis": "A freezing droplet could shed embedded particles toward a free surface through curvature-driven front deflection.",
      "test": "Track particles and freeze fronts.",
      "against": "Expulsion follows density segregation only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0167",
      "hypothesis": "A freezing droplet could shed embedded particles toward a free surface through curvature-driven front deflection.",
      "test": "Track particles and freeze fronts.",
      "against": "Expulsion follows density segregation only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0168",
    "hypothesis": "A soft optical grating could distinguish absorbed liquid from adsorbed vapor through different relaxation modes.",
    "test": "Measure diffraction after matched uptake.",
    "against": "Modes cannot identify uptake form.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0168",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A soft optical grating could distinguish absorbed liquid from adsorbed vapor through different relaxation modes.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0168",
      "hypothesis": "A soft optical grating could distinguish absorbed liquid from adsorbed vapor through different relaxation modes.",
      "test": "Measure diffraction after matched uptake.",
      "against": "Modes cannot identify uptake form.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0168",
      "hypothesis": "A soft optical grating could distinguish absorbed liquid from adsorbed vapor through different relaxation modes.",
      "test": "Measure diffraction after matched uptake.",
      "against": "Modes cannot identify uptake form.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0169",
    "hypothesis": "A small elastic fin could reduce acoustic cavitation by redistributing nuclei before pressure minima.",
    "test": "Image nuclei and cavitation onset.",
    "against": "Suppression requires lower acoustic pressure.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0169",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A small elastic fin could reduce acoustic cavitation by redistributing nuclei before pressure minima.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0169",
      "hypothesis": "A small elastic fin could reduce acoustic cavitation by redistributing nuclei before pressure minima.",
      "test": "Image nuclei and cavitation onset.",
      "against": "Suppression requires lower acoustic pressure.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0169",
      "hypothesis": "A small elastic fin could reduce acoustic cavitation by redistributing nuclei before pressure minima.",
      "test": "Image nuclei and cavitation onset.",
      "against": "Suppression requires lower acoustic pressure.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0170",
    "hypothesis": "A mineral grain boundary could act as a reversible reservoir for dissolved organic carbon under stress.",
    "test": "Measure release during elastic loading.",
    "against": "Carbon exchange ignores stress.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0170",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A mineral grain boundary could act as a reversible reservoir for dissolved organic carbon under stress.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0170",
      "hypothesis": "A mineral grain boundary could act as a reversible reservoir for dissolved organic carbon under stress.",
      "test": "Measure release during elastic loading.",
      "against": "Carbon exchange ignores stress.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0170",
      "hypothesis": "A mineral grain boundary could act as a reversible reservoir for dissolved organic carbon under stress.",
      "test": "Measure release during elastic loading.",
      "against": "Carbon exchange ignores stress.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0171",
    "hypothesis": "A hollow fungal fiber could resist collapse through longitudinal redistribution of cytoplasm before wall stiffening.",
    "test": "Measure internal flow and deformation.",
    "against": "Resistance changes without redistribution.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 2,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 17,
    "area": "nonhuman biology",
    "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0171",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A hollow fungal fiber could resist collapse through longitudinal redistribution of cytoplasm before wall stiffening.",
    "category": "nonhuman biology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0171",
      "hypothesis": "A hollow fungal fiber could resist collapse through longitudinal redistribution of cytoplasm before wall stiffening.",
      "test": "Measure internal flow and deformation.",
      "against": "Resistance changes without redistribution.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0171",
      "hypothesis": "A hollow fungal fiber could resist collapse through longitudinal redistribution of cytoplasm before wall stiffening.",
      "test": "Measure internal flow and deformation.",
      "against": "Resistance changes without redistribution.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 2,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 17,
      "area": "nonhuman biology",
      "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0172",
    "hypothesis": "An evaporating droplet could create a transient magnetic susceptibility gradient through selective solvent loss.",
    "test": "Map composition and magnetic response.",
    "against": "Gradient follows temperature alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0172",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "An evaporating droplet could create a transient magnetic susceptibility gradient through selective solvent loss.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0172",
      "hypothesis": "An evaporating droplet could create a transient magnetic susceptibility gradient through selective solvent loss.",
      "test": "Map composition and magnetic response.",
      "against": "Gradient follows temperature alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0172",
      "hypothesis": "An evaporating droplet could create a transient magnetic susceptibility gradient through selective solvent loss.",
      "test": "Map composition and magnetic response.",
      "against": "Gradient follows temperature alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0173",
    "hypothesis": "A porous hydrogel lens could change focal depth while maintaining optical aperture through internal water routing.",
    "test": "Measure shape and focal response.",
    "against": "Aperture changes proportionally with focus.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0173",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous hydrogel lens could change focal depth while maintaining optical aperture through internal water routing.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0173",
      "hypothesis": "A porous hydrogel lens could change focal depth while maintaining optical aperture through internal water routing.",
      "test": "Measure shape and focal response.",
      "against": "Aperture changes proportionally with focus.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0173",
      "hypothesis": "A porous hydrogel lens could change focal depth while maintaining optical aperture through internal water routing.",
      "test": "Measure shape and focal response.",
      "against": "Aperture changes proportionally with focus.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0174",
    "hypothesis": "A multilayer crystal could deflect a crack into an acoustically detectable loop before failure.",
    "test": "Image cracks and sound localization.",
    "against": "Acoustic events lack loop correspondence.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0174",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A multilayer crystal could deflect a crack into an acoustically detectable loop before failure.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0174",
      "hypothesis": "A multilayer crystal could deflect a crack into an acoustically detectable loop before failure.",
      "test": "Image cracks and sound localization.",
      "against": "Acoustic events lack loop correspondence.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0174",
      "hypothesis": "A multilayer crystal could deflect a crack into an acoustically detectable loop before failure.",
      "test": "Image cracks and sound localization.",
      "against": "Acoustic events lack loop correspondence.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0175",
    "hypothesis": "A floating fiber mat could reject an oil analogue through capillary recoil rather than chemical repellency.",
    "test": "Image droplet contact and recoil.",
    "against": "Rejection requires changed surface chemistry.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 4,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 4,
    "literature_query": "floating fiber mat reject oil analogue capillary recoil chemical repellency experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N0175",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A floating fiber mat could reject an oil analogue through capillary recoil rather than chemical repellency.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0175",
      "hypothesis": "A floating fiber mat could reject an oil analogue through capillary recoil rather than chemical repellency.",
      "test": "Image droplet contact and recoil.",
      "against": "Rejection requires changed surface chemistry.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0175",
      "hypothesis": "A floating fiber mat could reject an oil analogue through capillary recoil rather than chemical repellency.",
      "test": "Image droplet contact and recoil.",
      "against": "Rejection requires changed surface chemistry.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 4,
      "literature_query": "floating fiber mat reject oil analogue capillary recoil chemical repellency experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "4",
      "id": "N0175",
      "hypothesis": "A floating fiber mat could reject an oil analogue through capillary recoil rather than chemical repellency.",
      "test": "Image droplet contact and recoil.",
      "against": "Rejection requires changed surface chemistry.",
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_score": "24",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P0756da20ef6c;P8a094c4c61eb;P7b1fd164126f;P9a09cc83fdbb;Pbe2c5aaa42fb",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N0175",
      "hypothesis": "A floating fiber mat could reject an oil analogue through capillary recoil rather than chemical repellency.",
      "test": "Image droplet contact and recoil.",
      "against": "Rejection requires changed surface chemistry.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 4,
      "literature_query": "floating fiber mat reject oil analogue capillary recoil chemical repellency experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P0756da20ef6c;P8a094c4c61eb;P7b1fd164126f;P9a09cc83fdbb;Pbe2c5aaa42fb",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P0756da20ef6c;P8a094c4c61eb;P7b1fd164126f;P9a09cc83fdbb;Pbe2c5aaa42fb",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0176",
    "hypothesis": "A solvent-swollen knot could release mechanical energy at a selected chemical concentration.",
    "test": "Measure force during concentration ramps.",
    "against": "Release concentration lacks reproducibility.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0176",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A solvent-swollen knot could release mechanical energy at a selected chemical concentration.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0176",
      "hypothesis": "A solvent-swollen knot could release mechanical energy at a selected chemical concentration.",
      "test": "Measure force during concentration ramps.",
      "against": "Release concentration lacks reproducibility.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0176",
      "hypothesis": "A solvent-swollen knot could release mechanical energy at a selected chemical concentration.",
      "test": "Measure force during concentration ramps.",
      "against": "Release concentration lacks reproducibility.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0177",
    "hypothesis": "A clay-lined cavity could delay oxygen loss by creating a stagnant hydration boundary layer.",
    "test": "Measure oxygen and local diffusivity.",
    "against": "Delay matches geometric dead volume only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0177",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A clay-lined cavity could delay oxygen loss by creating a stagnant hydration boundary layer.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0177",
      "hypothesis": "A clay-lined cavity could delay oxygen loss by creating a stagnant hydration boundary layer.",
      "test": "Measure oxygen and local diffusivity.",
      "against": "Delay matches geometric dead volume only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0177",
      "hypothesis": "A clay-lined cavity could delay oxygen loss by creating a stagnant hydration boundary layer.",
      "test": "Measure oxygen and local diffusivity.",
      "against": "Delay matches geometric dead volume only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0178",
    "hypothesis": "An elastic crystal scaffold could improve protein crystallization by relaxing growth-induced stress locally.",
    "test": "Compare crystal defects and scaffold deformation.",
    "against": "Defects decrease only through slower growth.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0178",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "An elastic crystal scaffold could improve protein crystallization by relaxing growth-induced stress locally.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0178",
      "hypothesis": "An elastic crystal scaffold could improve protein crystallization by relaxing growth-induced stress locally.",
      "test": "Compare crystal defects and scaffold deformation.",
      "against": "Defects decrease only through slower growth.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0178",
      "hypothesis": "An elastic crystal scaffold could improve protein crystallization by relaxing growth-induced stress locally.",
      "test": "Compare crystal defects and scaffold deformation.",
      "against": "Defects decrease only through slower growth.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0179",
    "hypothesis": "A magnetically aligned liquid interface could measure viscosity through rotational phase lag without particle contact.",
    "test": "Measure lag across calibrated liquids.",
    "against": "Lag depends predominantly on adhesion.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0179",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A magnetically aligned liquid interface could measure viscosity through rotational phase lag without particle contact.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0179",
      "hypothesis": "A magnetically aligned liquid interface could measure viscosity through rotational phase lag without particle contact.",
      "test": "Measure lag across calibrated liquids.",
      "against": "Lag depends predominantly on adhesion.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0179",
      "hypothesis": "A magnetically aligned liquid interface could measure viscosity through rotational phase lag without particle contact.",
      "test": "Measure lag across calibrated liquids.",
      "against": "Lag depends predominantly on adhesion.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0180",
    "hypothesis": "A porous stone could reveal hidden salt through asymmetric ultrasonic response to humidity changes.",
    "test": "Compare ultrasound and salt maps.",
    "against": "Response is explained by water alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0180",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous stone could reveal hidden salt through asymmetric ultrasonic response to humidity changes.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0180",
      "hypothesis": "A porous stone could reveal hidden salt through asymmetric ultrasonic response to humidity changes.",
      "test": "Compare ultrasound and salt maps.",
      "against": "Response is explained by water alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0180",
      "hypothesis": "A porous stone could reveal hidden salt through asymmetric ultrasonic response to humidity changes.",
      "test": "Compare ultrasound and salt maps.",
      "against": "Response is explained by water alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0181",
    "hypothesis": "A vesicle could release smaller solutes first during controlled mechanical buckling without forming permanent pores.",
    "test": "Measure size-resolved leakage and recovery.",
    "against": "Release requires irreversible membrane defects.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0181",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A vesicle could release smaller solutes first during controlled mechanical buckling without forming permanent pores.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0181",
      "hypothesis": "A vesicle could release smaller solutes first during controlled mechanical buckling without forming permanent pores.",
      "test": "Measure size-resolved leakage and recovery.",
      "against": "Release requires irreversible membrane defects.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0181",
      "hypothesis": "A vesicle could release smaller solutes first during controlled mechanical buckling without forming permanent pores.",
      "test": "Measure size-resolved leakage and recovery.",
      "against": "Release requires irreversible membrane defects.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0182",
    "hypothesis": "A soft grain bed could direct an intruder toward stiffer regions through asymmetric force-chain collapse.",
    "test": "Track intruders in stiffness gradients.",
    "against": "Migration follows density gradients only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0182",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A soft grain bed could direct an intruder toward stiffer regions through asymmetric force-chain collapse.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0182",
      "hypothesis": "A soft grain bed could direct an intruder toward stiffer regions through asymmetric force-chain collapse.",
      "test": "Track intruders in stiffness gradients.",
      "against": "Migration follows density gradients only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0182",
      "hypothesis": "A soft grain bed could direct an intruder toward stiffer regions through asymmetric force-chain collapse.",
      "test": "Track intruders in stiffness gradients.",
      "against": "Migration follows density gradients only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0183",
    "hypothesis": "A seed-coat replica could cool its contents through humidity-triggered opening of radial vents.",
    "test": "Measure internal temperature and vent motion.",
    "against": "Cooling requires external airflow changes.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0183",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A seed-coat replica could cool its contents through humidity-triggered opening of radial vents.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0183",
      "hypothesis": "A seed-coat replica could cool its contents through humidity-triggered opening of radial vents.",
      "test": "Measure internal temperature and vent motion.",
      "against": "Cooling requires external airflow changes.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0183",
      "hypothesis": "A seed-coat replica could cool its contents through humidity-triggered opening of radial vents.",
      "test": "Measure internal temperature and vent motion.",
      "against": "Cooling requires external airflow changes.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0184",
    "hypothesis": "A molecularly thin lubricant could reveal surface wear through loss of directional diffusion before friction rises.",
    "test": "Measure tracer motion and friction.",
    "against": "Diffusion changes occur only after friction increase.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0184",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A molecularly thin lubricant could reveal surface wear through loss of directional diffusion before friction rises.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0184",
      "hypothesis": "A molecularly thin lubricant could reveal surface wear through loss of directional diffusion before friction rises.",
      "test": "Measure tracer motion and friction.",
      "against": "Diffusion changes occur only after friction increase.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0184",
      "hypothesis": "A molecularly thin lubricant could reveal surface wear through loss of directional diffusion before friction rises.",
      "test": "Measure tracer motion and friction.",
      "against": "Diffusion changes occur only after friction increase.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0185",
    "hypothesis": "A mineral-organic interface could accumulate elastic stress during dark periods and relax photochemically under light.",
    "test": "Measure strain and chemical state.",
    "against": "Relaxation follows photothermal heating alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0185",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A mineral-organic interface could accumulate elastic stress during dark periods and relax photochemically under light.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0185",
      "hypothesis": "A mineral-organic interface could accumulate elastic stress during dark periods and relax photochemically under light.",
      "test": "Measure strain and chemical state.",
      "against": "Relaxation follows photothermal heating alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0185",
      "hypothesis": "A mineral-organic interface could accumulate elastic stress during dark periods and relax photochemically under light.",
      "test": "Measure strain and chemical state.",
      "against": "Relaxation follows photothermal heating alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0186",
    "hypothesis": "A pressure-driven gel valve could resist clogging by changing shape in response to local solute accumulation.",
    "test": "Measure shape and passage during concentration pulses.",
    "against": "Unclogging requires increased pressure alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0186",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A pressure-driven gel valve could resist clogging by changing shape in response to local solute accumulation.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0186",
      "hypothesis": "A pressure-driven gel valve could resist clogging by changing shape in response to local solute accumulation.",
      "test": "Measure shape and passage during concentration pulses.",
      "against": "Unclogging requires increased pressure alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0186",
      "hypothesis": "A pressure-driven gel valve could resist clogging by changing shape in response to local solute accumulation.",
      "test": "Measure shape and passage during concentration pulses.",
      "against": "Unclogging requires increased pressure alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0187",
    "hypothesis": "A microalga could retain a mechanical deformation signature in chloroplast position after cell shape recovers.",
    "test": "Track organelles and cell outlines.",
    "against": "Organelle positions recover simultaneously.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 2,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 17,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0187",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A microalga could retain a mechanical deformation signature in chloroplast position after cell shape recovers.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0187",
      "hypothesis": "A microalga could retain a mechanical deformation signature in chloroplast position after cell shape recovers.",
      "test": "Track organelles and cell outlines.",
      "against": "Organelle positions recover simultaneously.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0187",
      "hypothesis": "A microalga could retain a mechanical deformation signature in chloroplast position after cell shape recovers.",
      "test": "Track organelles and cell outlines.",
      "against": "Organelle positions recover simultaneously.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 2,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 17,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0188",
    "hypothesis": "A salt-bearing porous film could distinguish condensation from immersion through opposite electrical transients.",
    "test": "Apply matched water uptake histories.",
    "against": "Transients have identical signs and timing.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 18,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0188",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A salt-bearing porous film could distinguish condensation from immersion through opposite electrical transients.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0188",
      "hypothesis": "A salt-bearing porous film could distinguish condensation from immersion through opposite electrical transients.",
      "test": "Apply matched water uptake histories.",
      "against": "Transients have identical signs and timing.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0188",
      "hypothesis": "A salt-bearing porous film could distinguish condensation from immersion through opposite electrical transients.",
      "test": "Apply matched water uptake histories.",
      "against": "Transients have identical signs and timing.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 18,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0189",
    "hypothesis": "A narrow liquid channel could reverse tracer dispersion when its walls relax on the transit timescale.",
    "test": "Measure dispersion across wall relaxation times.",
    "against": "Dispersion follows static geometry alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0189",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A narrow liquid channel could reverse tracer dispersion when its walls relax on the transit timescale.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0189",
      "hypothesis": "A narrow liquid channel could reverse tracer dispersion when its walls relax on the transit timescale.",
      "test": "Measure dispersion across wall relaxation times.",
      "against": "Dispersion follows static geometry alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0189",
      "hypothesis": "A narrow liquid channel could reverse tracer dispersion when its walls relax on the transit timescale.",
      "test": "Measure dispersion across wall relaxation times.",
      "against": "Dispersion follows static geometry alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0190",
    "hypothesis": "A photonic particle could reveal its contact-force distribution through splitting of internal optical modes.",
    "test": "Calibrate modes against known contacts.",
    "against": "Mode splitting cannot recover contact pattern.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0190",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A photonic particle could reveal its contact-force distribution through splitting of internal optical modes.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0190",
      "hypothesis": "A photonic particle could reveal its contact-force distribution through splitting of internal optical modes.",
      "test": "Calibrate modes against known contacts.",
      "against": "Mode splitting cannot recover contact pattern.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0190",
      "hypothesis": "A photonic particle could reveal its contact-force distribution through splitting of internal optical modes.",
      "test": "Calibrate modes against known contacts.",
      "against": "Mode splitting cannot recover contact pattern.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0191",
    "hypothesis": "A plant wax film could reduce crystal nucleation by reversibly burying polar groups during cooling.",
    "test": "Measure group orientation and freezing events.",
    "against": "Nucleation tracks temperature without reorientation.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0191",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A plant wax film could reduce crystal nucleation by reversibly burying polar groups during cooling.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0191",
      "hypothesis": "A plant wax film could reduce crystal nucleation by reversibly burying polar groups during cooling.",
      "test": "Measure group orientation and freezing events.",
      "against": "Nucleation tracks temperature without reorientation.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0191",
      "hypothesis": "A plant wax film could reduce crystal nucleation by reversibly burying polar groups during cooling.",
      "test": "Measure group orientation and freezing events.",
      "against": "Nucleation tracks temperature without reorientation.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0192",
    "hypothesis": "A porous rotating sphere could retain a dissolved solute wake after rotation stops through internal exchange.",
    "test": "Image tracer persistence and pore filling.",
    "against": "Wake lifetime matches external diffusion alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0192",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous rotating sphere could retain a dissolved solute wake after rotation stops through internal exchange.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0192",
      "hypothesis": "A porous rotating sphere could retain a dissolved solute wake after rotation stops through internal exchange.",
      "test": "Image tracer persistence and pore filling.",
      "against": "Wake lifetime matches external diffusion alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0192",
      "hypothesis": "A porous rotating sphere could retain a dissolved solute wake after rotation stops through internal exchange.",
      "test": "Image tracer persistence and pore filling.",
      "against": "Wake lifetime matches external diffusion alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0193",
    "hypothesis": "A thin gel sheet could release trapped gas through localized wrinkling before bulk desaturation.",
    "test": "Track gas and wrinkle onset.",
    "against": "Gas release ignores wrinkle position.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0193",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A thin gel sheet could release trapped gas through localized wrinkling before bulk desaturation.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0193",
      "hypothesis": "A thin gel sheet could release trapped gas through localized wrinkling before bulk desaturation.",
      "test": "Track gas and wrinkle onset.",
      "against": "Gas release ignores wrinkle position.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0193",
      "hypothesis": "A thin gel sheet could release trapped gas through localized wrinkling before bulk desaturation.",
      "test": "Track gas and wrinkle onset.",
      "against": "Gas release ignores wrinkle position.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0194",
    "hypothesis": "A pressure pulse could orient nonmagnetic rods in a sealed elastic cavity through wall-mediated recoil.",
    "test": "Image rods with rigid-wall controls.",
    "against": "Orientation requires sustained bulk flow.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0194",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A pressure pulse could orient nonmagnetic rods in a sealed elastic cavity through wall-mediated recoil.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0194",
      "hypothesis": "A pressure pulse could orient nonmagnetic rods in a sealed elastic cavity through wall-mediated recoil.",
      "test": "Image rods with rigid-wall controls.",
      "against": "Orientation requires sustained bulk flow.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0194",
      "hypothesis": "A pressure pulse could orient nonmagnetic rods in a sealed elastic cavity through wall-mediated recoil.",
      "test": "Image rods with rigid-wall controls.",
      "against": "Orientation requires sustained bulk flow.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0195",
    "hypothesis": "A mineral could develop a reversible permeability valve when one dissolution product reprecipitates at a narrower outlet.",
    "test": "Measure chemistry and flow simultaneously.",
    "against": "Flow loss lacks localized precipitation.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0195",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A mineral could develop a reversible permeability valve when one dissolution product reprecipitates at a narrower outlet.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0195",
      "hypothesis": "A mineral could develop a reversible permeability valve when one dissolution product reprecipitates at a narrower outlet.",
      "test": "Measure chemistry and flow simultaneously.",
      "against": "Flow loss lacks localized precipitation.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0195",
      "hypothesis": "A mineral could develop a reversible permeability valve when one dissolution product reprecipitates at a narrower outlet.",
      "test": "Measure chemistry and flow simultaneously.",
      "against": "Flow loss lacks localized precipitation.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0196",
    "hypothesis": "A hygroscopic fiber could discriminate mist from humid air through the handedness of its first twist.",
    "test": "Compare early motion under matched uptake.",
    "against": "Twist direction does not distinguish exposure.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0196",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A hygroscopic fiber could discriminate mist from humid air through the handedness of its first twist.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0196",
      "hypothesis": "A hygroscopic fiber could discriminate mist from humid air through the handedness of its first twist.",
      "test": "Compare early motion under matched uptake.",
      "against": "Twist direction does not distinguish exposure.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0196",
      "hypothesis": "A hygroscopic fiber could discriminate mist from humid air through the handedness of its first twist.",
      "test": "Compare early motion under matched uptake.",
      "against": "Twist direction does not distinguish exposure.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0197",
    "hypothesis": "A gel-coated resonator could measure the ratio of bound to free water through harmonic damping contrast.",
    "test": "Compare harmonics with independent water-state measurements.",
    "against": "Damping tracks total water only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0197",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A gel-coated resonator could measure the ratio of bound to free water through harmonic damping contrast.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0197",
      "hypothesis": "A gel-coated resonator could measure the ratio of bound to free water through harmonic damping contrast.",
      "test": "Compare harmonics with independent water-state measurements.",
      "against": "Damping tracks total water only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0197",
      "hypothesis": "A gel-coated resonator could measure the ratio of bound to free water through harmonic damping contrast.",
      "test": "Compare harmonics with independent water-state measurements.",
      "against": "Damping tracks total water only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0198",
    "hypothesis": "A flock of inert floating disks could form a stable rotating cluster under a standing surface wave.",
    "test": "Track collective motion with reversed wave phase.",
    "against": "Rotation follows accidental mean currents.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0198",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A flock of inert floating disks could form a stable rotating cluster under a standing surface wave.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0198",
      "hypothesis": "A flock of inert floating disks could form a stable rotating cluster under a standing surface wave.",
      "test": "Track collective motion with reversed wave phase.",
      "against": "Rotation follows accidental mean currents.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0198",
      "hypothesis": "A flock of inert floating disks could form a stable rotating cluster under a standing surface wave.",
      "test": "Track collective motion with reversed wave phase.",
      "against": "Rotation follows accidental mean currents.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0199",
    "hypothesis": "A crystal's subsurface void could steer an external wetting front through localized elastic deformation.",
    "test": "Map strain and contact-line travel.",
    "against": "Wetting changes require exposed voids.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 12,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0199",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A crystal's subsurface void could steer an external wetting front through localized elastic deformation.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0199",
      "hypothesis": "A crystal's subsurface void could steer an external wetting front through localized elastic deformation.",
      "test": "Map strain and contact-line travel.",
      "against": "Wetting changes require exposed voids.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0199",
      "hypothesis": "A crystal's subsurface void could steer an external wetting front through localized elastic deformation.",
      "test": "Map strain and contact-line travel.",
      "against": "Wetting changes require exposed voids.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 12,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0200",
    "hypothesis": "A porous dielectric could reveal the direction of ion migration through delayed mechanical recoil after field removal.",
    "test": "Measure ion maps and recoil.",
    "against": "Recoil cannot identify migration direction.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0200",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous dielectric could reveal the direction of ion migration through delayed mechanical recoil after field removal.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0200",
      "hypothesis": "A porous dielectric could reveal the direction of ion migration through delayed mechanical recoil after field removal.",
      "test": "Measure ion maps and recoil.",
      "against": "Recoil cannot identify migration direction.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0200",
      "hypothesis": "A porous dielectric could reveal the direction of ion migration through delayed mechanical recoil after field removal.",
      "test": "Measure ion maps and recoil.",
      "against": "Recoil cannot identify migration direction.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0201",
    "hypothesis": "A dusty plasma crystal could reveal charge fluctuations through spontaneous rotation of a deliberately missing-site defect.",
    "test": "Track defects and particle charge.",
    "against": "Rotation ignores charge noise.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0201",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A dusty plasma crystal could reveal charge fluctuations through spontaneous rotation of a deliberately missing-site defect.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0201",
      "hypothesis": "A dusty plasma crystal could reveal charge fluctuations through spontaneous rotation of a deliberately missing-site defect.",
      "test": "Track defects and particle charge.",
      "against": "Rotation ignores charge noise.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0201",
      "hypothesis": "A dusty plasma crystal could reveal charge fluctuations through spontaneous rotation of a deliberately missing-site defect.",
      "test": "Track defects and particle charge.",
      "against": "Rotation ignores charge noise.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0202",
    "hypothesis": "A cryogenic mineral surface could preserve molecular arrival order as a depth-dependent desorption spectrum.",
    "test": "Reverse deposition sequences and warm slowly.",
    "against": "Spectra encode only total composition.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 12,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0202",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A cryogenic mineral surface could preserve molecular arrival order as a depth-dependent desorption spectrum.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0202",
      "hypothesis": "A cryogenic mineral surface could preserve molecular arrival order as a depth-dependent desorption spectrum.",
      "test": "Reverse deposition sequences and warm slowly.",
      "against": "Spectra encode only total composition.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0202",
      "hypothesis": "A cryogenic mineral surface could preserve molecular arrival order as a depth-dependent desorption spectrum.",
      "test": "Reverse deposition sequences and warm slowly.",
      "against": "Spectra encode only total composition.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 12,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0203",
    "hypothesis": "An acoustic analogue horizon could shift its emission spectrum when dispersion changes locally downstream.",
    "test": "Measure waves across controlled dispersion gradients.",
    "against": "Spectrum follows boundary reflections alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0203",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "An acoustic analogue horizon could shift its emission spectrum when dispersion changes locally downstream.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0203",
      "hypothesis": "An acoustic analogue horizon could shift its emission spectrum when dispersion changes locally downstream.",
      "test": "Measure waves across controlled dispersion gradients.",
      "against": "Spectrum follows boundary reflections alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0203",
      "hypothesis": "An acoustic analogue horizon could shift its emission spectrum when dispersion changes locally downstream.",
      "test": "Measure waves across controlled dispersion gradients.",
      "against": "Spectrum follows boundary reflections alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0204",
    "hypothesis": "A superconducting loop could distinguish localized heating from uniform heating through unequal flux-relaxation pathways.",
    "test": "Compare calibrated thermal perturbations.",
    "against": "Flux responses remain indistinguishable.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0204",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A superconducting loop could distinguish localized heating from uniform heating through unequal flux-relaxation pathways.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0204",
      "hypothesis": "A superconducting loop could distinguish localized heating from uniform heating through unequal flux-relaxation pathways.",
      "test": "Compare calibrated thermal perturbations.",
      "against": "Flux responses remain indistinguishable.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0204",
      "hypothesis": "A superconducting loop could distinguish localized heating from uniform heating through unequal flux-relaxation pathways.",
      "test": "Compare calibrated thermal perturbations.",
      "against": "Flux responses remain indistinguishable.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0205",
    "hypothesis": "A levitated dielectric could sense gas accommodation through orientation-dependent cooling after an optical pulse.",
    "test": "Measure cooling during controlled rotation.",
    "against": "Cooling follows projected area alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0205",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A levitated dielectric could sense gas accommodation through orientation-dependent cooling after an optical pulse.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0205",
      "hypothesis": "A levitated dielectric could sense gas accommodation through orientation-dependent cooling after an optical pulse.",
      "test": "Measure cooling during controlled rotation.",
      "against": "Cooling follows projected area alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0205",
      "hypothesis": "A levitated dielectric could sense gas accommodation through orientation-dependent cooling after an optical pulse.",
      "test": "Measure cooling during controlled rotation.",
      "against": "Cooling follows projected area alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0206",
    "hypothesis": "A granular asteroid analogue could retain a cavity after slow spin-down through frictional locking.",
    "test": "Image rotating aggregate interiors.",
    "against": "Cavities collapse immediately during deceleration.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0206",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A granular asteroid analogue could retain a cavity after slow spin-down through frictional locking.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0206",
      "hypothesis": "A granular asteroid analogue could retain a cavity after slow spin-down through frictional locking.",
      "test": "Image rotating aggregate interiors.",
      "against": "Cavities collapse immediately during deceleration.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0206",
      "hypothesis": "A granular asteroid analogue could retain a cavity after slow spin-down through frictional locking.",
      "test": "Image rotating aggregate interiors.",
      "against": "Cavities collapse immediately during deceleration.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0207",
    "hypothesis": "A transparent magnetic domain wall could scatter light differently when crossing a chemically silent strain defect.",
    "test": "Track scattering and wall position.",
    "against": "Scattering ignores strain boundaries.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0207",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A transparent magnetic domain wall could scatter light differently when crossing a chemically silent strain defect.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0207",
      "hypothesis": "A transparent magnetic domain wall could scatter light differently when crossing a chemically silent strain defect.",
      "test": "Track scattering and wall position.",
      "against": "Scattering ignores strain boundaries.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0207",
      "hypothesis": "A transparent magnetic domain wall could scatter light differently when crossing a chemically silent strain defect.",
      "test": "Track scattering and wall position.",
      "against": "Scattering ignores strain boundaries.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0208",
    "hypothesis": "A phononic lattice could trap heat-carrying vibrations near a temporary mechanical dislocation.",
    "test": "Measure localized vibrational energy.",
    "against": "Localization requires permanent damage.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0208",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A phononic lattice could trap heat-carrying vibrations near a temporary mechanical dislocation.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0208",
      "hypothesis": "A phononic lattice could trap heat-carrying vibrations near a temporary mechanical dislocation.",
      "test": "Measure localized vibrational energy.",
      "against": "Localization requires permanent damage.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0208",
      "hypothesis": "A phononic lattice could trap heat-carrying vibrations near a temporary mechanical dislocation.",
      "test": "Measure localized vibrational energy.",
      "against": "Localization requires permanent damage.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0209",
    "hypothesis": "A microresonator could detect weak molecular binding through frequency-noise asymmetry before its mean frequency shifts.",
    "test": "Measure noise and independently quantified binding.",
    "against": "Noise adds no earlier sensitivity.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0209",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A microresonator could detect weak molecular binding through frequency-noise asymmetry before its mean frequency shifts.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0209",
      "hypothesis": "A microresonator could detect weak molecular binding through frequency-noise asymmetry before its mean frequency shifts.",
      "test": "Measure noise and independently quantified binding.",
      "against": "Noise adds no earlier sensitivity.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0209",
      "hypothesis": "A microresonator could detect weak molecular binding through frequency-noise asymmetry before its mean frequency shifts.",
      "test": "Measure noise and independently quantified binding.",
      "against": "Noise adds no earlier sensitivity.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0210",
    "hypothesis": "A lunar-regolith analogue could develop a conductive skin through repeated neutral-particle impacts without net charging.",
    "test": "Measure surface conduction and chemistry.",
    "against": "Conduction requires retained charge.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0210",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A lunar-regolith analogue could develop a conductive skin through repeated neutral-particle impacts without net charging.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0210",
      "hypothesis": "A lunar-regolith analogue could develop a conductive skin through repeated neutral-particle impacts without net charging.",
      "test": "Measure surface conduction and chemistry.",
      "against": "Conduction requires retained charge.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0210",
      "hypothesis": "A lunar-regolith analogue could develop a conductive skin through repeated neutral-particle impacts without net charging.",
      "test": "Measure surface conduction and chemistry.",
      "against": "Conduction requires retained charge.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0211",
    "hypothesis": "A polariton fluid could route an excitation according to the direction of a slowly moving density defect.",
    "test": "Reverse defect motion and measure transport.",
    "against": "Routing ignores defect velocity.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0211",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A polariton fluid could route an excitation according to the direction of a slowly moving density defect.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0211",
      "hypothesis": "A polariton fluid could route an excitation according to the direction of a slowly moving density defect.",
      "test": "Reverse defect motion and measure transport.",
      "against": "Routing ignores defect velocity.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0211",
      "hypothesis": "A polariton fluid could route an excitation according to the direction of a slowly moving density defect.",
      "test": "Reverse defect motion and measure transport.",
      "against": "Routing ignores defect velocity.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0212",
    "hypothesis": "A thermal acoustic engine could self-select oscillation frequency through reversible pore filling.",
    "test": "Track pore saturation and frequency.",
    "against": "Frequency follows temperature alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0212",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A thermal acoustic engine could self-select oscillation frequency through reversible pore filling.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0212",
      "hypothesis": "A thermal acoustic engine could self-select oscillation frequency through reversible pore filling.",
      "test": "Track pore saturation and frequency.",
      "against": "Frequency follows temperature alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0212",
      "hypothesis": "A thermal acoustic engine could self-select oscillation frequency through reversible pore filling.",
      "test": "Track pore saturation and frequency.",
      "against": "Frequency follows temperature alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0213",
    "hypothesis": "An optical fiber ring could retain a polarization signature of a passing torsional pulse after mechanical recovery.",
    "test": "Compare polarimetry and strain relaxation.",
    "against": "Polarization recovers with strain.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0213",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "An optical fiber ring could retain a polarization signature of a passing torsional pulse after mechanical recovery.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0213",
      "hypothesis": "An optical fiber ring could retain a polarization signature of a passing torsional pulse after mechanical recovery.",
      "test": "Compare polarimetry and strain relaxation.",
      "against": "Polarization recovers with strain.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0213",
      "hypothesis": "An optical fiber ring could retain a polarization signature of a passing torsional pulse after mechanical recovery.",
      "test": "Compare polarimetry and strain relaxation.",
      "against": "Polarization recovers with strain.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0214",
    "hypothesis": "A cryogenic porous ice could segregate noble gases by release time rather than equilibrium adsorption strength.",
    "test": "Measure time-resolved desorption mixtures.",
    "against": "Ordering follows equilibrium binding entirely.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0214",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A cryogenic porous ice could segregate noble gases by release time rather than equilibrium adsorption strength.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0214",
      "hypothesis": "A cryogenic porous ice could segregate noble gases by release time rather than equilibrium adsorption strength.",
      "test": "Measure time-resolved desorption mixtures.",
      "against": "Ordering follows equilibrium binding entirely.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0214",
      "hypothesis": "A cryogenic porous ice could segregate noble gases by release time rather than equilibrium adsorption strength.",
      "test": "Measure time-resolved desorption mixtures.",
      "against": "Ordering follows equilibrium binding entirely.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0215",
    "hypothesis": "A magnetic nanoparticle ensemble could identify field rotation sense through unequal relaxation of chiral clusters.",
    "test": "Reverse rotation and measure relaxation.",
    "against": "Responses lack handedness dependence.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0215",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A magnetic nanoparticle ensemble could identify field rotation sense through unequal relaxation of chiral clusters.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0215",
      "hypothesis": "A magnetic nanoparticle ensemble could identify field rotation sense through unequal relaxation of chiral clusters.",
      "test": "Reverse rotation and measure relaxation.",
      "against": "Responses lack handedness dependence.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0215",
      "hypothesis": "A magnetic nanoparticle ensemble could identify field rotation sense through unequal relaxation of chiral clusters.",
      "test": "Reverse rotation and measure relaxation.",
      "against": "Responses lack handedness dependence.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0216",
    "hypothesis": "A thin-film oscillator could reject common thermal noise through anti-correlated expansion of patterned supports.",
    "test": "Measure phase noise under uniform heating.",
    "against": "Noise reduction comes only from lower sensitivity.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0216",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A thin-film oscillator could reject common thermal noise through anti-correlated expansion of patterned supports.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0216",
      "hypothesis": "A thin-film oscillator could reject common thermal noise through anti-correlated expansion of patterned supports.",
      "test": "Measure phase noise under uniform heating.",
      "against": "Noise reduction comes only from lower sensitivity.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0216",
      "hypothesis": "A thin-film oscillator could reject common thermal noise through anti-correlated expansion of patterned supports.",
      "test": "Measure phase noise under uniform heating.",
      "against": "Noise reduction comes only from lower sensitivity.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0217",
    "hypothesis": "A comet analogue could redirect escaping gas through a fracture that closes mechanically behind the flow.",
    "test": "Track gas paths and crack motion.",
    "against": "Routing requires permanently open cracks.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0217",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A comet analogue could redirect escaping gas through a fracture that closes mechanically behind the flow.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0217",
      "hypothesis": "A comet analogue could redirect escaping gas through a fracture that closes mechanically behind the flow.",
      "test": "Track gas paths and crack motion.",
      "against": "Routing requires permanently open cracks.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0217",
      "hypothesis": "A comet analogue could redirect escaping gas through a fracture that closes mechanically behind the flow.",
      "test": "Track gas paths and crack motion.",
      "against": "Routing requires permanently open cracks.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0218",
    "hypothesis": "A waveguide with one mobile defect could transport trapped sound without changing its central frequency.",
    "test": "Move the defect and map modes.",
    "against": "Transport necessarily shifts frequency strongly.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0218",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A waveguide with one mobile defect could transport trapped sound without changing its central frequency.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0218",
      "hypothesis": "A waveguide with one mobile defect could transport trapped sound without changing its central frequency.",
      "test": "Move the defect and map modes.",
      "against": "Transport necessarily shifts frequency strongly.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0218",
      "hypothesis": "A waveguide with one mobile defect could transport trapped sound without changing its central frequency.",
      "test": "Move the defect and map modes.",
      "against": "Transport necessarily shifts frequency strongly.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0219",
    "hypothesis": "A zero-mean electric drive could rotate an asymmetric polarizable particle through delayed solvent polarization.",
    "test": "Measure torque across drive frequencies.",
    "against": "Rotation follows unintended DC fields.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0219",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A zero-mean electric drive could rotate an asymmetric polarizable particle through delayed solvent polarization.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0219",
      "hypothesis": "A zero-mean electric drive could rotate an asymmetric polarizable particle through delayed solvent polarization.",
      "test": "Measure torque across drive frequencies.",
      "against": "Rotation follows unintended DC fields.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0219",
      "hypothesis": "A zero-mean electric drive could rotate an asymmetric polarizable particle through delayed solvent polarization.",
      "test": "Measure torque across drive frequencies.",
      "against": "Rotation follows unintended DC fields.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0220",
    "hypothesis": "A crystalline membrane could reveal isotopic mass disorder through thermal-noise spatial correlations.",
    "test": "Map vibrations in controlled isotope mixtures.",
    "against": "Correlations reflect structural defects only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 12,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0220",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A crystalline membrane could reveal isotopic mass disorder through thermal-noise spatial correlations.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0220",
      "hypothesis": "A crystalline membrane could reveal isotopic mass disorder through thermal-noise spatial correlations.",
      "test": "Map vibrations in controlled isotope mixtures.",
      "against": "Correlations reflect structural defects only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0220",
      "hypothesis": "A crystalline membrane could reveal isotopic mass disorder through thermal-noise spatial correlations.",
      "test": "Map vibrations in controlled isotope mixtures.",
      "against": "Correlations reflect structural defects only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 12,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0221",
    "hypothesis": "A granular ring could develop a persistent density wave when driven only by a localized vibrating boundary.",
    "test": "Track density around the ring.",
    "against": "Waves vanish outside the driven region.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0221",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A granular ring could develop a persistent density wave when driven only by a localized vibrating boundary.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0221",
      "hypothesis": "A granular ring could develop a persistent density wave when driven only by a localized vibrating boundary.",
      "test": "Track density around the ring.",
      "against": "Waves vanish outside the driven region.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0221",
      "hypothesis": "A granular ring could develop a persistent density wave when driven only by a localized vibrating boundary.",
      "test": "Track density around the ring.",
      "against": "Waves vanish outside the driven region.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0222",
    "hypothesis": "A diamond color center could distinguish surface hydration from bulk strain through paired optical transitions.",
    "test": "Calibrate both perturbations independently.",
    "against": "Transition responses remain inseparable.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0222",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A diamond color center could distinguish surface hydration from bulk strain through paired optical transitions.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0222",
      "hypothesis": "A diamond color center could distinguish surface hydration from bulk strain through paired optical transitions.",
      "test": "Calibrate both perturbations independently.",
      "against": "Transition responses remain inseparable.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0222",
      "hypothesis": "A diamond color center could distinguish surface hydration from bulk strain through paired optical transitions.",
      "test": "Calibrate both perturbations independently.",
      "against": "Transition responses remain inseparable.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0223",
    "hypothesis": "An optically levitated aggregate could compact internally before its scattering cross-section measurably changes.",
    "test": "Track resonances and angular scattering.",
    "against": "Internal changes appear only with bulk scattering shifts.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0223",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "An optically levitated aggregate could compact internally before its scattering cross-section measurably changes.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0223",
      "hypothesis": "An optically levitated aggregate could compact internally before its scattering cross-section measurably changes.",
      "test": "Track resonances and angular scattering.",
      "against": "Internal changes appear only with bulk scattering shifts.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0223",
      "hypothesis": "An optically levitated aggregate could compact internally before its scattering cross-section measurably changes.",
      "test": "Track resonances and angular scattering.",
      "against": "Internal changes appear only with bulk scattering shifts.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0224",
    "hypothesis": "A photonic crystal could exhibit a reversible defect mode generated solely by local gas adsorption pressure.",
    "test": "Measure spectra and surface stress.",
    "against": "Mode creation requires chemical modification.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0224",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A photonic crystal could exhibit a reversible defect mode generated solely by local gas adsorption pressure.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0224",
      "hypothesis": "A photonic crystal could exhibit a reversible defect mode generated solely by local gas adsorption pressure.",
      "test": "Measure spectra and surface stress.",
      "against": "Mode creation requires chemical modification.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0224",
      "hypothesis": "A photonic crystal could exhibit a reversible defect mode generated solely by local gas adsorption pressure.",
      "test": "Measure spectra and surface stress.",
      "against": "Mode creation requires chemical modification.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0225",
    "hypothesis": "A soft metamaterial could store thermal fluctuation energy temporarily in a mechanically dark mode.",
    "test": "Measure cross-mode energy flow.",
    "against": "Dark-mode occupancy follows equipartition without delay.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0225",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A soft metamaterial could store thermal fluctuation energy temporarily in a mechanically dark mode.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0225",
      "hypothesis": "A soft metamaterial could store thermal fluctuation energy temporarily in a mechanically dark mode.",
      "test": "Measure cross-mode energy flow.",
      "against": "Dark-mode occupancy follows equipartition without delay.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0225",
      "hypothesis": "A soft metamaterial could store thermal fluctuation energy temporarily in a mechanically dark mode.",
      "test": "Measure cross-mode energy flow.",
      "against": "Dark-mode occupancy follows equipartition without delay.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0226",
    "hypothesis": "A charged dust chain could break preferentially at sites with slower local charging dynamics.",
    "test": "Measure charging times and breakup locations.",
    "against": "Breakup follows geometry alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0226",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A charged dust chain could break preferentially at sites with slower local charging dynamics.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0226",
      "hypothesis": "A charged dust chain could break preferentially at sites with slower local charging dynamics.",
      "test": "Measure charging times and breakup locations.",
      "against": "Breakup follows geometry alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0226",
      "hypothesis": "A charged dust chain could break preferentially at sites with slower local charging dynamics.",
      "test": "Measure charging times and breakup locations.",
      "against": "Breakup follows geometry alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0227",
    "hypothesis": "A spin-wave guide could redirect signals around a temporary thermal spot without permanent magnetic writing.",
    "test": "Map spin-wave paths during heating.",
    "against": "Diversion requires irreversible domain changes.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 12,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0227",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A spin-wave guide could redirect signals around a temporary thermal spot without permanent magnetic writing.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0227",
      "hypothesis": "A spin-wave guide could redirect signals around a temporary thermal spot without permanent magnetic writing.",
      "test": "Map spin-wave paths during heating.",
      "against": "Diversion requires irreversible domain changes.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0227",
      "hypothesis": "A spin-wave guide could redirect signals around a temporary thermal spot without permanent magnetic writing.",
      "test": "Map spin-wave paths during heating.",
      "against": "Diversion requires irreversible domain changes.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 12,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0228",
    "hypothesis": "A cryogenic gas film could show acoustic hysteresis caused by island coalescence rather than adsorption amount.",
    "test": "Measure morphology and acoustic impedance.",
    "against": "Hysteresis follows coverage alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0228",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A cryogenic gas film could show acoustic hysteresis caused by island coalescence rather than adsorption amount.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0228",
      "hypothesis": "A cryogenic gas film could show acoustic hysteresis caused by island coalescence rather than adsorption amount.",
      "test": "Measure morphology and acoustic impedance.",
      "against": "Hysteresis follows coverage alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0228",
      "hypothesis": "A cryogenic gas film could show acoustic hysteresis caused by island coalescence rather than adsorption amount.",
      "test": "Measure morphology and acoustic impedance.",
      "against": "Hysteresis follows coverage alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0229",
    "hypothesis": "A rotating optical trap could distinguish aggregate chirality from birefringence using reversal of illumination direction.",
    "test": "Measure torques under dual reversals.",
    "against": "The mechanisms cannot be separated.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0229",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A rotating optical trap could distinguish aggregate chirality from birefringence using reversal of illumination direction.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0229",
      "hypothesis": "A rotating optical trap could distinguish aggregate chirality from birefringence using reversal of illumination direction.",
      "test": "Measure torques under dual reversals.",
      "against": "The mechanisms cannot be separated.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0229",
      "hypothesis": "A rotating optical trap could distinguish aggregate chirality from birefringence using reversal of illumination direction.",
      "test": "Measure torques under dual reversals.",
      "against": "The mechanisms cannot be separated.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0230",
    "hypothesis": "A microfabricated vacuum gap could reveal adsorbate migration through correlated force-noise bursts.",
    "test": "Measure force noise and surface coverage.",
    "against": "Bursts persist without mobile adsorbates.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0230",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A microfabricated vacuum gap could reveal adsorbate migration through correlated force-noise bursts.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0230",
      "hypothesis": "A microfabricated vacuum gap could reveal adsorbate migration through correlated force-noise bursts.",
      "test": "Measure force noise and surface coverage.",
      "against": "Bursts persist without mobile adsorbates.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0230",
      "hypothesis": "A microfabricated vacuum gap could reveal adsorbate migration through correlated force-noise bursts.",
      "test": "Measure force noise and surface coverage.",
      "against": "Bursts persist without mobile adsorbates.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0231",
    "hypothesis": "A granular impact analogue could produce a delayed ejecta pulse through collapse of a buried weak layer.",
    "test": "Image subsurface collapse and ejecta timing.",
    "against": "Delayed ejecta lacks layer-collapse association.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0231",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A granular impact analogue could produce a delayed ejecta pulse through collapse of a buried weak layer.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0231",
      "hypothesis": "A granular impact analogue could produce a delayed ejecta pulse through collapse of a buried weak layer.",
      "test": "Image subsurface collapse and ejecta timing.",
      "against": "Delayed ejecta lacks layer-collapse association.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0231",
      "hypothesis": "A granular impact analogue could produce a delayed ejecta pulse through collapse of a buried weak layer.",
      "test": "Image subsurface collapse and ejecta timing.",
      "against": "Delayed ejecta lacks layer-collapse association.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0232",
    "hypothesis": "A cavity containing two gases could detect compositional stratification through mode-shape changes at constant pressure.",
    "test": "Measure acoustic modes and gas profiles.",
    "against": "Modes reflect only mean sound speed.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0232",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A cavity containing two gases could detect compositional stratification through mode-shape changes at constant pressure.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0232",
      "hypothesis": "A cavity containing two gases could detect compositional stratification through mode-shape changes at constant pressure.",
      "test": "Measure acoustic modes and gas profiles.",
      "against": "Modes reflect only mean sound speed.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0232",
      "hypothesis": "A cavity containing two gases could detect compositional stratification through mode-shape changes at constant pressure.",
      "test": "Measure acoustic modes and gas profiles.",
      "against": "Modes reflect only mean sound speed.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0233",
    "hypothesis": "A magnetic film could retain a trace of a passing elastic wave as a reversible domain-wall displacement.",
    "test": "Measure wall position after wave passage.",
    "against": "Displacement disappears with vibration.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0233",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A magnetic film could retain a trace of a passing elastic wave as a reversible domain-wall displacement.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0233",
      "hypothesis": "A magnetic film could retain a trace of a passing elastic wave as a reversible domain-wall displacement.",
      "test": "Measure wall position after wave passage.",
      "against": "Displacement disappears with vibration.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0233",
      "hypothesis": "A magnetic film could retain a trace of a passing elastic wave as a reversible domain-wall displacement.",
      "test": "Measure wall position after wave passage.",
      "against": "Displacement disappears with vibration.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0234",
    "hypothesis": "A beam carrying periodic liquid droplets could exhibit a vibration bandgap controlled by droplet coalescence.",
    "test": "Measure beam transmission before merging.",
    "against": "Band changes follow added mass alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0234",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A beam carrying periodic liquid droplets could exhibit a vibration bandgap controlled by droplet coalescence.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0234",
      "hypothesis": "A beam carrying periodic liquid droplets could exhibit a vibration bandgap controlled by droplet coalescence.",
      "test": "Measure beam transmission before merging.",
      "against": "Band changes follow added mass alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0234",
      "hypothesis": "A beam carrying periodic liquid droplets could exhibit a vibration bandgap controlled by droplet coalescence.",
      "test": "Measure beam transmission before merging.",
      "against": "Band changes follow added mass alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0235",
    "hypothesis": "A cryogenic dust coating could change ice nucleation through phonon coupling without direct liquid contact.",
    "test": "Compare separated and touching coatings.",
    "against": "Effects require chemical contact.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0235",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A cryogenic dust coating could change ice nucleation through phonon coupling without direct liquid contact.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0235",
      "hypothesis": "A cryogenic dust coating could change ice nucleation through phonon coupling without direct liquid contact.",
      "test": "Compare separated and touching coatings.",
      "against": "Effects require chemical contact.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0235",
      "hypothesis": "A cryogenic dust coating could change ice nucleation through phonon coupling without direct liquid contact.",
      "test": "Compare separated and touching coatings.",
      "against": "Effects require chemical contact.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0236",
    "hypothesis": "A defect-rich semiconductor could release trapped carriers in mechanical pulses synchronized with acoustic strain sign.",
    "test": "Measure charge release under reversed strain.",
    "against": "Release tracks heating only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0236",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A defect-rich semiconductor could release trapped carriers in mechanical pulses synchronized with acoustic strain sign.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0236",
      "hypothesis": "A defect-rich semiconductor could release trapped carriers in mechanical pulses synchronized with acoustic strain sign.",
      "test": "Measure charge release under reversed strain.",
      "against": "Release tracks heating only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0236",
      "hypothesis": "A defect-rich semiconductor could release trapped carriers in mechanical pulses synchronized with acoustic strain sign.",
      "test": "Measure charge release under reversed strain.",
      "against": "Release tracks heating only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0237",
    "hypothesis": "A solar-sail analogue could passively reduce flutter through illumination-dependent stiffness redistribution.",
    "test": "Measure flutter and spatial modulus.",
    "against": "Stability changes require lower illumination.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0237",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A solar-sail analogue could passively reduce flutter through illumination-dependent stiffness redistribution.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0237",
      "hypothesis": "A solar-sail analogue could passively reduce flutter through illumination-dependent stiffness redistribution.",
      "test": "Measure flutter and spatial modulus.",
      "against": "Stability changes require lower illumination.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0237",
      "hypothesis": "A solar-sail analogue could passively reduce flutter through illumination-dependent stiffness redistribution.",
      "test": "Measure flutter and spatial modulus.",
      "against": "Stability changes require lower illumination.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0238",
    "hypothesis": "A transparent fluid vortex could act as a transient polarization filter for suspended anisotropic molecules.",
    "test": "Measure polarimetry and velocity fields.",
    "against": "Filtering reflects concentration gradients alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0238",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A transparent fluid vortex could act as a transient polarization filter for suspended anisotropic molecules.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0238",
      "hypothesis": "A transparent fluid vortex could act as a transient polarization filter for suspended anisotropic molecules.",
      "test": "Measure polarimetry and velocity fields.",
      "against": "Filtering reflects concentration gradients alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0238",
      "hypothesis": "A transparent fluid vortex could act as a transient polarization filter for suspended anisotropic molecules.",
      "test": "Measure polarimetry and velocity fields.",
      "against": "Filtering reflects concentration gradients alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0239",
    "hypothesis": "A resonator array could identify one broken connection through redistribution of thermal vibration amplitudes.",
    "test": "Measure passive fluctuation maps.",
    "against": "Localization needs active probing.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0239",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A resonator array could identify one broken connection through redistribution of thermal vibration amplitudes.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0239",
      "hypothesis": "A resonator array could identify one broken connection through redistribution of thermal vibration amplitudes.",
      "test": "Measure passive fluctuation maps.",
      "against": "Localization needs active probing.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0239",
      "hypothesis": "A resonator array could identify one broken connection through redistribution of thermal vibration amplitudes.",
      "test": "Measure passive fluctuation maps.",
      "against": "Localization needs active probing.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0240",
    "hypothesis": "A porous cryogenic surface could separate methane from carbon dioxide through moving sublimation boundaries.",
    "test": "Measure gas release and boundary travel.",
    "against": "Selectivity follows equilibrium volatility only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0240",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous cryogenic surface could separate methane from carbon dioxide through moving sublimation boundaries.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0240",
      "hypothesis": "A porous cryogenic surface could separate methane from carbon dioxide through moving sublimation boundaries.",
      "test": "Measure gas release and boundary travel.",
      "against": "Selectivity follows equilibrium volatility only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0240",
      "hypothesis": "A porous cryogenic surface could separate methane from carbon dioxide through moving sublimation boundaries.",
      "test": "Measure gas release and boundary travel.",
      "against": "Selectivity follows equilibrium volatility only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0241",
    "hypothesis": "An elastic quasicrystal could localize an impact into predictable sparse channels without periodic resonators.",
    "test": "Map impulse propagation and compare defects.",
    "against": "Channels lack reproducibility.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0241",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "An elastic quasicrystal could localize an impact into predictable sparse channels without periodic resonators.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0241",
      "hypothesis": "An elastic quasicrystal could localize an impact into predictable sparse channels without periodic resonators.",
      "test": "Map impulse propagation and compare defects.",
      "against": "Channels lack reproducibility.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0241",
      "hypothesis": "An elastic quasicrystal could localize an impact into predictable sparse channels without periodic resonators.",
      "test": "Map impulse propagation and compare defects.",
      "against": "Channels lack reproducibility.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0242",
    "hypothesis": "A superconducting sensor's low-frequency noise could distinguish surface diffusion from magnetic impurity motion.",
    "test": "Compare noise under independent surface treatments.",
    "against": "Noise models remain experimentally indistinguishable.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0242",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A superconducting sensor's low-frequency noise could distinguish surface diffusion from magnetic impurity motion.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0242",
      "hypothesis": "A superconducting sensor's low-frequency noise could distinguish surface diffusion from magnetic impurity motion.",
      "test": "Compare noise under independent surface treatments.",
      "against": "Noise models remain experimentally indistinguishable.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0242",
      "hypothesis": "A superconducting sensor's low-frequency noise could distinguish surface diffusion from magnetic impurity motion.",
      "test": "Compare noise under independent surface treatments.",
      "against": "Noise models remain experimentally indistinguishable.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0243",
    "hypothesis": "A trapped-ion structural transition could be delayed by deliberately asymmetric cooling of transverse modes.",
    "test": "Measure mode temperatures and transition times.",
    "against": "Delay follows mean temperature only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0243",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A trapped-ion structural transition could be delayed by deliberately asymmetric cooling of transverse modes.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0243",
      "hypothesis": "A trapped-ion structural transition could be delayed by deliberately asymmetric cooling of transverse modes.",
      "test": "Measure mode temperatures and transition times.",
      "against": "Delay follows mean temperature only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0243",
      "hypothesis": "A trapped-ion structural transition could be delayed by deliberately asymmetric cooling of transverse modes.",
      "test": "Measure mode temperatures and transition times.",
      "against": "Delay follows mean temperature only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0244",
    "hypothesis": "A gas-filled elastic sphere could measure external viscosity through the splitting of shape-mode lifetimes.",
    "test": "Calibrate lifetimes in known liquids.",
    "against": "Splitting tracks density alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0244",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A gas-filled elastic sphere could measure external viscosity through the splitting of shape-mode lifetimes.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0244",
      "hypothesis": "A gas-filled elastic sphere could measure external viscosity through the splitting of shape-mode lifetimes.",
      "test": "Calibrate lifetimes in known liquids.",
      "against": "Splitting tracks density alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0244",
      "hypothesis": "A gas-filled elastic sphere could measure external viscosity through the splitting of shape-mode lifetimes.",
      "test": "Calibrate lifetimes in known liquids.",
      "against": "Splitting tracks density alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0245",
    "hypothesis": "A microgravity analogue could expose capillary self-assembly pathways hidden by slow sedimentation.",
    "test": "Compare density-matched and sedimenting controls.",
    "against": "Assembly pathways differ only in collision frequency.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0245",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A microgravity analogue could expose capillary self-assembly pathways hidden by slow sedimentation.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0245",
      "hypothesis": "A microgravity analogue could expose capillary self-assembly pathways hidden by slow sedimentation.",
      "test": "Compare density-matched and sedimenting controls.",
      "against": "Assembly pathways differ only in collision frequency.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0245",
      "hypothesis": "A microgravity analogue could expose capillary self-assembly pathways hidden by slow sedimentation.",
      "test": "Compare density-matched and sedimenting controls.",
      "against": "Assembly pathways differ only in collision frequency.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0246",
    "hypothesis": "A magnetoelastic strip could convert a static chemical gradient into a propagating magnetic domain change.",
    "test": "Measure chemistry, strain, and domains.",
    "against": "Domain changes require direct magnetic chemistry.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0246",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A magnetoelastic strip could convert a static chemical gradient into a propagating magnetic domain change.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0246",
      "hypothesis": "A magnetoelastic strip could convert a static chemical gradient into a propagating magnetic domain change.",
      "test": "Measure chemistry, strain, and domains.",
      "against": "Domain changes require direct magnetic chemistry.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0246",
      "hypothesis": "A magnetoelastic strip could convert a static chemical gradient into a propagating magnetic domain change.",
      "test": "Measure chemistry, strain, and domains.",
      "against": "Domain changes require direct magnetic chemistry.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0247",
    "hypothesis": "A dusty ice surface could exhibit a transient temperature plateau when buried gas redistributes during sublimation.",
    "test": "Measure gas flux and thermal maps.",
    "against": "Plateau follows illumination changes alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0247",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A dusty ice surface could exhibit a transient temperature plateau when buried gas redistributes during sublimation.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0247",
      "hypothesis": "A dusty ice surface could exhibit a transient temperature plateau when buried gas redistributes during sublimation.",
      "test": "Measure gas flux and thermal maps.",
      "against": "Plateau follows illumination changes alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0247",
      "hypothesis": "A dusty ice surface could exhibit a transient temperature plateau when buried gas redistributes during sublimation.",
      "test": "Measure gas flux and thermal maps.",
      "against": "Plateau follows illumination changes alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0248",
    "hypothesis": "A phonon wave packet could cross a mechanically softened region with reduced reflection despite slower local propagation.",
    "test": "Measure speed and reflected energy.",
    "against": "Softening increases reflection in every tested regime.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0248",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A phonon wave packet could cross a mechanically softened region with reduced reflection despite slower local propagation.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0248",
      "hypothesis": "A phonon wave packet could cross a mechanically softened region with reduced reflection despite slower local propagation.",
      "test": "Measure speed and reflected energy.",
      "against": "Softening increases reflection in every tested regime.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0248",
      "hypothesis": "A phonon wave packet could cross a mechanically softened region with reduced reflection despite slower local propagation.",
      "test": "Measure speed and reflected energy.",
      "against": "Softening increases reflection in every tested regime.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0249",
    "hypothesis": "A disordered optical network could identify local refractive changes through time-reversed intensity correlations.",
    "test": "Measure correlations under known perturbations.",
    "against": "Localization fails blind tests.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0249",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A disordered optical network could identify local refractive changes through time-reversed intensity correlations.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0249",
      "hypothesis": "A disordered optical network could identify local refractive changes through time-reversed intensity correlations.",
      "test": "Measure correlations under known perturbations.",
      "against": "Localization fails blind tests.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0249",
      "hypothesis": "A disordered optical network could identify local refractive changes through time-reversed intensity correlations.",
      "test": "Measure correlations under known perturbations.",
      "against": "Localization fails blind tests.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0250",
    "hypothesis": "A weakly ionized gas could retain flow direction in metastable-state populations after mean motion stops.",
    "test": "Measure state populations and residual velocity.",
    "against": "Population asymmetry vanishes with flow.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0250",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A weakly ionized gas could retain flow direction in metastable-state populations after mean motion stops.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0250",
      "hypothesis": "A weakly ionized gas could retain flow direction in metastable-state populations after mean motion stops.",
      "test": "Measure state populations and residual velocity.",
      "against": "Population asymmetry vanishes with flow.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0250",
      "hypothesis": "A weakly ionized gas could retain flow direction in metastable-state populations after mean motion stops.",
      "test": "Measure state populations and residual velocity.",
      "against": "Population asymmetry vanishes with flow.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0251",
    "hypothesis": "A beam's thermal-noise spectrum could reveal whether a crack contains liquid before its stiffness changes.",
    "test": "Compare filled and empty cracks.",
    "against": "Spectra cannot identify filling independently.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0251",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A beam's thermal-noise spectrum could reveal whether a crack contains liquid before its stiffness changes.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0251",
      "hypothesis": "A beam's thermal-noise spectrum could reveal whether a crack contains liquid before its stiffness changes.",
      "test": "Compare filled and empty cracks.",
      "against": "Spectra cannot identify filling independently.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0251",
      "hypothesis": "A beam's thermal-noise spectrum could reveal whether a crack contains liquid before its stiffness changes.",
      "test": "Compare filled and empty cracks.",
      "against": "Spectra cannot identify filling independently.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0252",
    "hypothesis": "A topological acoustic edge mode could be switched by reversible contact formation rather than material replacement.",
    "test": "Measure modes during controlled contact.",
    "against": "Switching requires irreversible geometry change.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0252",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A topological acoustic edge mode could be switched by reversible contact formation rather than material replacement.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0252",
      "hypothesis": "A topological acoustic edge mode could be switched by reversible contact formation rather than material replacement.",
      "test": "Measure modes during controlled contact.",
      "against": "Switching requires irreversible geometry change.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0252",
      "hypothesis": "A topological acoustic edge mode could be switched by reversible contact formation rather than material replacement.",
      "test": "Measure modes during controlled contact.",
      "against": "Switching requires irreversible geometry change.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0253",
    "hypothesis": "A levitated water droplet could detect dissolved-gas disequilibrium through nonexponential cooling.",
    "test": "Measure gas exchange and temperature.",
    "against": "Cooling remains single-rate after controls.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0253",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A levitated water droplet could detect dissolved-gas disequilibrium through nonexponential cooling.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0253",
      "hypothesis": "A levitated water droplet could detect dissolved-gas disequilibrium through nonexponential cooling.",
      "test": "Measure gas exchange and temperature.",
      "against": "Cooling remains single-rate after controls.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0253",
      "hypothesis": "A levitated water droplet could detect dissolved-gas disequilibrium through nonexponential cooling.",
      "test": "Measure gas exchange and temperature.",
      "against": "Cooling remains single-rate after controls.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0254",
    "hypothesis": "A granular crater wall could stabilize through grain rotation before measurable compaction.",
    "test": "Track grain orientation and collapse threshold.",
    "against": "Stability requires increased packing.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0254",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A granular crater wall could stabilize through grain rotation before measurable compaction.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0254",
      "hypothesis": "A granular crater wall could stabilize through grain rotation before measurable compaction.",
      "test": "Track grain orientation and collapse threshold.",
      "against": "Stability requires increased packing.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0254",
      "hypothesis": "A granular crater wall could stabilize through grain rotation before measurable compaction.",
      "test": "Track grain orientation and collapse threshold.",
      "against": "Stability requires increased packing.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0255",
    "hypothesis": "A photoelastic solid could retain the maximum wave amplitude as a reversible molecular alignment pattern.",
    "test": "Measure alignment after calibrated pulses.",
    "against": "Pattern depends only on total energy.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0255",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A photoelastic solid could retain the maximum wave amplitude as a reversible molecular alignment pattern.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0255",
      "hypothesis": "A photoelastic solid could retain the maximum wave amplitude as a reversible molecular alignment pattern.",
      "test": "Measure alignment after calibrated pulses.",
      "against": "Pattern depends only on total energy.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0255",
      "hypothesis": "A photoelastic solid could retain the maximum wave amplitude as a reversible molecular alignment pattern.",
      "test": "Measure alignment after calibrated pulses.",
      "against": "Pattern depends only on total energy.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0256",
    "hypothesis": "An ice-coated resonator could distinguish frost densification from melting through opposite overtone damping trends.",
    "test": "Calibrate both transformations independently.",
    "against": "Damping signatures overlap completely.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0256",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "An ice-coated resonator could distinguish frost densification from melting through opposite overtone damping trends.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0256",
      "hypothesis": "An ice-coated resonator could distinguish frost densification from melting through opposite overtone damping trends.",
      "test": "Calibrate both transformations independently.",
      "against": "Damping signatures overlap completely.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0256",
      "hypothesis": "An ice-coated resonator could distinguish frost densification from melting through opposite overtone damping trends.",
      "test": "Calibrate both transformations independently.",
      "against": "Damping signatures overlap completely.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0257",
    "hypothesis": "A dielectric multilayer could amplify a tiny acoustic displacement through a reversible optical avoided crossing.",
    "test": "Measure displacement and mode splitting.",
    "against": "Sensitivity gain vanishes after noise accounting.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0257",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A dielectric multilayer could amplify a tiny acoustic displacement through a reversible optical avoided crossing.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0257",
      "hypothesis": "A dielectric multilayer could amplify a tiny acoustic displacement through a reversible optical avoided crossing.",
      "test": "Measure displacement and mode splitting.",
      "against": "Sensitivity gain vanishes after noise accounting.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0257",
      "hypothesis": "A dielectric multilayer could amplify a tiny acoustic displacement through a reversible optical avoided crossing.",
      "test": "Measure displacement and mode splitting.",
      "against": "Sensitivity gain vanishes after noise accounting.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0258",
    "hypothesis": "A magnetic vortex could alter its switching threshold when coupled to a slowly relaxing polymer substrate.",
    "test": "Measure switching and substrate relaxation.",
    "against": "Threshold follows static strain alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0258",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A magnetic vortex could alter its switching threshold when coupled to a slowly relaxing polymer substrate.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0258",
      "hypothesis": "A magnetic vortex could alter its switching threshold when coupled to a slowly relaxing polymer substrate.",
      "test": "Measure switching and substrate relaxation.",
      "against": "Threshold follows static strain alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0258",
      "hypothesis": "A magnetic vortex could alter its switching threshold when coupled to a slowly relaxing polymer substrate.",
      "test": "Measure switching and substrate relaxation.",
      "against": "Threshold follows static strain alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0259",
    "hypothesis": "A vapor-filled pore could produce a reproducible pressure echo when condensation starts at its narrowest segment.",
    "test": "Measure pressure and phase location.",
    "against": "Echo is unrelated to condensation onset.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0259",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A vapor-filled pore could produce a reproducible pressure echo when condensation starts at its narrowest segment.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0259",
      "hypothesis": "A vapor-filled pore could produce a reproducible pressure echo when condensation starts at its narrowest segment.",
      "test": "Measure pressure and phase location.",
      "against": "Echo is unrelated to condensation onset.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0259",
      "hypothesis": "A vapor-filled pore could produce a reproducible pressure echo when condensation starts at its narrowest segment.",
      "test": "Measure pressure and phase location.",
      "against": "Echo is unrelated to condensation onset.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0260",
    "hypothesis": "A rotating granular shell could create a stable internal void with less cohesion than a uniform solid aggregate.",
    "test": "Image voids across cohesion values.",
    "against": "Voids require equal or greater cohesion.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0260",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A rotating granular shell could create a stable internal void with less cohesion than a uniform solid aggregate.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0260",
      "hypothesis": "A rotating granular shell could create a stable internal void with less cohesion than a uniform solid aggregate.",
      "test": "Image voids across cohesion values.",
      "against": "Voids require equal or greater cohesion.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0260",
      "hypothesis": "A rotating granular shell could create a stable internal void with less cohesion than a uniform solid aggregate.",
      "test": "Image voids across cohesion values.",
      "against": "Voids require equal or greater cohesion.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0261",
    "hypothesis": "A thin quantum material could expose adsorbate rearrangement through telegraph-noise cross-correlations between contacts.",
    "test": "Measure synchronized transport fluctuations.",
    "against": "Correlations reflect electronic drift only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0261",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A thin quantum material could expose adsorbate rearrangement through telegraph-noise cross-correlations between contacts.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0261",
      "hypothesis": "A thin quantum material could expose adsorbate rearrangement through telegraph-noise cross-correlations between contacts.",
      "test": "Measure synchronized transport fluctuations.",
      "against": "Correlations reflect electronic drift only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0261",
      "hypothesis": "A thin quantum material could expose adsorbate rearrangement through telegraph-noise cross-correlations between contacts.",
      "test": "Measure synchronized transport fluctuations.",
      "against": "Correlations reflect electronic drift only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0262",
    "hypothesis": "A magnetically trapped droplet could redistribute heat through shape oscillations without net translational movement.",
    "test": "Measure internal temperatures and shape.",
    "against": "Mixing requires bulk translation.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0262",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A magnetically trapped droplet could redistribute heat through shape oscillations without net translational movement.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0262",
      "hypothesis": "A magnetically trapped droplet could redistribute heat through shape oscillations without net translational movement.",
      "test": "Measure internal temperatures and shape.",
      "against": "Mixing requires bulk translation.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0262",
      "hypothesis": "A magnetically trapped droplet could redistribute heat through shape oscillations without net translational movement.",
      "test": "Measure internal temperatures and shape.",
      "against": "Mixing requires bulk translation.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0263",
    "hypothesis": "A metamaterial cavity could distinguish an added mass from an added stiffness through mode localization entropy.",
    "test": "Calibrate localized perturbations separately.",
    "against": "Entropy signatures cannot separate perturbations.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0263",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A metamaterial cavity could distinguish an added mass from an added stiffness through mode localization entropy.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0263",
      "hypothesis": "A metamaterial cavity could distinguish an added mass from an added stiffness through mode localization entropy.",
      "test": "Calibrate localized perturbations separately.",
      "against": "Entropy signatures cannot separate perturbations.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0263",
      "hypothesis": "A metamaterial cavity could distinguish an added mass from an added stiffness through mode localization entropy.",
      "test": "Calibrate localized perturbations separately.",
      "against": "Entropy signatures cannot separate perturbations.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0264",
    "hypothesis": "A porous ice grain could retain a volatile molecule through mechanical closure of its exit neck.",
    "test": "Image closure and desorption.",
    "against": "Retention follows temperature alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0264",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous ice grain could retain a volatile molecule through mechanical closure of its exit neck.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0264",
      "hypothesis": "A porous ice grain could retain a volatile molecule through mechanical closure of its exit neck.",
      "test": "Image closure and desorption.",
      "against": "Retention follows temperature alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0264",
      "hypothesis": "A porous ice grain could retain a volatile molecule through mechanical closure of its exit neck.",
      "test": "Image closure and desorption.",
      "against": "Retention follows temperature alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0265",
    "hypothesis": "A laser-heated membrane could buckle toward cooler regions because gas damping redistributes stress.",
    "test": "Measure buckling with controlled ambient gas.",
    "against": "Direction persists unchanged in vacuum.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0265",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A laser-heated membrane could buckle toward cooler regions because gas damping redistributes stress.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0265",
      "hypothesis": "A laser-heated membrane could buckle toward cooler regions because gas damping redistributes stress.",
      "test": "Measure buckling with controlled ambient gas.",
      "against": "Direction persists unchanged in vacuum.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0265",
      "hypothesis": "A laser-heated membrane could buckle toward cooler regions because gas damping redistributes stress.",
      "test": "Measure buckling with controlled ambient gas.",
      "against": "Direction persists unchanged in vacuum.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0266",
    "hypothesis": "An acoustic particle trap could distinguish compressibility anisotropy from shape anisotropy through two-frequency orientation.",
    "test": "Measure orientation across calibrated frequencies.",
    "against": "The two causes remain inseparable.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0266",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "An acoustic particle trap could distinguish compressibility anisotropy from shape anisotropy through two-frequency orientation.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0266",
      "hypothesis": "An acoustic particle trap could distinguish compressibility anisotropy from shape anisotropy through two-frequency orientation.",
      "test": "Measure orientation across calibrated frequencies.",
      "against": "The two causes remain inseparable.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0266",
      "hypothesis": "An acoustic particle trap could distinguish compressibility anisotropy from shape anisotropy through two-frequency orientation.",
      "test": "Measure orientation across calibrated frequencies.",
      "against": "The two causes remain inseparable.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0267",
    "hypothesis": "A charged insulating crack could guide neutral polar vapor before liquid condensation occurs.",
    "test": "Map vapor with field-neutralized controls.",
    "against": "Guidance requires condensed liquid.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0267",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A charged insulating crack could guide neutral polar vapor before liquid condensation occurs.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0267",
      "hypothesis": "A charged insulating crack could guide neutral polar vapor before liquid condensation occurs.",
      "test": "Map vapor with field-neutralized controls.",
      "against": "Guidance requires condensed liquid.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0267",
      "hypothesis": "A charged insulating crack could guide neutral polar vapor before liquid condensation occurs.",
      "test": "Map vapor with field-neutralized controls.",
      "against": "Guidance requires condensed liquid.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0268",
    "hypothesis": "A strained optical crystal could recover its original spectrum while retaining altered acoustic dispersion.",
    "test": "Measure both after unloading.",
    "against": "Both properties recover together.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0268",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A strained optical crystal could recover its original spectrum while retaining altered acoustic dispersion.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0268",
      "hypothesis": "A strained optical crystal could recover its original spectrum while retaining altered acoustic dispersion.",
      "test": "Measure both after unloading.",
      "against": "Both properties recover together.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0268",
      "hypothesis": "A strained optical crystal could recover its original spectrum while retaining altered acoustic dispersion.",
      "test": "Measure both after unloading.",
      "against": "Both properties recover together.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0269",
    "hypothesis": "A low-pressure granular plume could sort porous from solid grains of equal mass through outgassing recoil.",
    "test": "Track trajectories and gas release.",
    "against": "Separation follows aerodynamic drag alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0269",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A low-pressure granular plume could sort porous from solid grains of equal mass through outgassing recoil.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0269",
      "hypothesis": "A low-pressure granular plume could sort porous from solid grains of equal mass through outgassing recoil.",
      "test": "Track trajectories and gas release.",
      "against": "Separation follows aerodynamic drag alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0269",
      "hypothesis": "A low-pressure granular plume could sort porous from solid grains of equal mass through outgassing recoil.",
      "test": "Track trajectories and gas release.",
      "against": "Separation follows aerodynamic drag alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0270",
    "hypothesis": "A microcavity could detect chemical exchange through correlated linewidth fluctuations rather than resonance shifts.",
    "test": "Measure paired modes during exchange.",
    "against": "Correlations add no exchange specificity.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0270",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A microcavity could detect chemical exchange through correlated linewidth fluctuations rather than resonance shifts.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0270",
      "hypothesis": "A microcavity could detect chemical exchange through correlated linewidth fluctuations rather than resonance shifts.",
      "test": "Measure paired modes during exchange.",
      "against": "Correlations add no exchange specificity.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0270",
      "hypothesis": "A microcavity could detect chemical exchange through correlated linewidth fluctuations rather than resonance shifts.",
      "test": "Measure paired modes during exchange.",
      "against": "Correlations add no exchange specificity.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0271",
    "hypothesis": "A soft spintronic substrate could suppress mechanical fatigue by releasing stored strain through domain reconfiguration.",
    "test": "Track strain and magnetic domains.",
    "against": "Fatigue reduction persists without domain motion.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0271",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A soft spintronic substrate could suppress mechanical fatigue by releasing stored strain through domain reconfiguration.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0271",
      "hypothesis": "A soft spintronic substrate could suppress mechanical fatigue by releasing stored strain through domain reconfiguration.",
      "test": "Track strain and magnetic domains.",
      "against": "Fatigue reduction persists without domain motion.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0271",
      "hypothesis": "A soft spintronic substrate could suppress mechanical fatigue by releasing stored strain through domain reconfiguration.",
      "test": "Track strain and magnetic domains.",
      "against": "Fatigue reduction persists without domain motion.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0272",
    "hypothesis": "A multistable acoustic shell could record the strongest frequency component of a broadband pulse.",
    "test": "Apply equal-energy spectra and inspect states.",
    "against": "States reflect only total impulse.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0272",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A multistable acoustic shell could record the strongest frequency component of a broadband pulse.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0272",
      "hypothesis": "A multistable acoustic shell could record the strongest frequency component of a broadband pulse.",
      "test": "Apply equal-energy spectra and inspect states.",
      "against": "States reflect only total impulse.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0272",
      "hypothesis": "A multistable acoustic shell could record the strongest frequency component of a broadband pulse.",
      "test": "Apply equal-energy spectra and inspect states.",
      "against": "States reflect only total impulse.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0273",
    "hypothesis": "A fluid interface could sustain a localized wave packet through a moving viscosity boundary.",
    "test": "Measure packet spreading and boundary speed.",
    "against": "Localization requires external confinement.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0273",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A fluid interface could sustain a localized wave packet through a moving viscosity boundary.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0273",
      "hypothesis": "A fluid interface could sustain a localized wave packet through a moving viscosity boundary.",
      "test": "Measure packet spreading and boundary speed.",
      "against": "Localization requires external confinement.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0273",
      "hypothesis": "A fluid interface could sustain a localized wave packet through a moving viscosity boundary.",
      "test": "Measure packet spreading and boundary speed.",
      "against": "Localization requires external confinement.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0274",
    "hypothesis": "A regolith analogue could release trapped charge faster under torsion than under equal-energy compression.",
    "test": "Measure charge decay during loading.",
    "against": "Decay follows contact area alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0274",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A regolith analogue could release trapped charge faster under torsion than under equal-energy compression.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0274",
      "hypothesis": "A regolith analogue could release trapped charge faster under torsion than under equal-energy compression.",
      "test": "Measure charge decay during loading.",
      "against": "Decay follows contact area alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0274",
      "hypothesis": "A regolith analogue could release trapped charge faster under torsion than under equal-energy compression.",
      "test": "Measure charge decay during loading.",
      "against": "Decay follows contact area alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0275",
    "hypothesis": "A polar crystal's fracture surfaces could recombine with reduced adhesion after exposure to a nonbinding dipolar gas.",
    "test": "Measure surface potential and adhesion.",
    "against": "Adhesion changes require chemical adsorption.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0275",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A polar crystal's fracture surfaces could recombine with reduced adhesion after exposure to a nonbinding dipolar gas.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0275",
      "hypothesis": "A polar crystal's fracture surfaces could recombine with reduced adhesion after exposure to a nonbinding dipolar gas.",
      "test": "Measure surface potential and adhesion.",
      "against": "Adhesion changes require chemical adsorption.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0275",
      "hypothesis": "A polar crystal's fracture surfaces could recombine with reduced adhesion after exposure to a nonbinding dipolar gas.",
      "test": "Measure surface potential and adhesion.",
      "against": "Adhesion changes require chemical adsorption.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0276",
    "hypothesis": "A resonant membrane could estimate gas-mixture diffusivity from the recovery of a localized thermal spot.",
    "test": "Measure thermal relaxation and composition.",
    "against": "Relaxation reveals only conductivity.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0276",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A resonant membrane could estimate gas-mixture diffusivity from the recovery of a localized thermal spot.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0276",
      "hypothesis": "A resonant membrane could estimate gas-mixture diffusivity from the recovery of a localized thermal spot.",
      "test": "Measure thermal relaxation and composition.",
      "against": "Relaxation reveals only conductivity.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0276",
      "hypothesis": "A resonant membrane could estimate gas-mixture diffusivity from the recovery of a localized thermal spot.",
      "test": "Measure thermal relaxation and composition.",
      "against": "Relaxation reveals only conductivity.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0277",
    "hypothesis": "A mechanically dithered optical cavity could separate true absorption from slow scattering drift.",
    "test": "Compare independent absorbers and scatterers.",
    "against": "Recovered absorption remains equally biased.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0277",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A mechanically dithered optical cavity could separate true absorption from slow scattering drift.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0277",
      "hypothesis": "A mechanically dithered optical cavity could separate true absorption from slow scattering drift.",
      "test": "Compare independent absorbers and scatterers.",
      "against": "Recovered absorption remains equally biased.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0277",
      "hypothesis": "A mechanically dithered optical cavity could separate true absorption from slow scattering drift.",
      "test": "Compare independent absorbers and scatterers.",
      "against": "Recovered absorption remains equally biased.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0278",
    "hypothesis": "A granular analogue of a landslide could stop through dynamic alignment of plate-like grains rather than reduced slope.",
    "test": "Image orientations during arrest.",
    "against": "Arrest occurs without alignment changes.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0278",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A granular analogue of a landslide could stop through dynamic alignment of plate-like grains rather than reduced slope.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0278",
      "hypothesis": "A granular analogue of a landslide could stop through dynamic alignment of plate-like grains rather than reduced slope.",
      "test": "Image orientations during arrest.",
      "against": "Arrest occurs without alignment changes.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0278",
      "hypothesis": "A granular analogue of a landslide could stop through dynamic alignment of plate-like grains rather than reduced slope.",
      "test": "Image orientations during arrest.",
      "against": "Arrest occurs without alignment changes.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0279",
    "hypothesis": "A deformable photonic lattice could preserve phase information while changing the route of an optical pulse.",
    "test": "Measure phase during mechanical rerouting.",
    "against": "Rerouting destroys phase reproducibility.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0279",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A deformable photonic lattice could preserve phase information while changing the route of an optical pulse.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0279",
      "hypothesis": "A deformable photonic lattice could preserve phase information while changing the route of an optical pulse.",
      "test": "Measure phase during mechanical rerouting.",
      "against": "Rerouting destroys phase reproducibility.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0279",
      "hypothesis": "A deformable photonic lattice could preserve phase information while changing the route of an optical pulse.",
      "test": "Measure phase during mechanical rerouting.",
      "against": "Rerouting destroys phase reproducibility.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0280",
    "hypothesis": "A cold gas could form a persistent density notch when released from an asymmetric elastic boundary.",
    "test": "Track density after boundary relaxation.",
    "against": "Notches arise only from temperature gradients.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0280",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A cold gas could form a persistent density notch when released from an asymmetric elastic boundary.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0280",
      "hypothesis": "A cold gas could form a persistent density notch when released from an asymmetric elastic boundary.",
      "test": "Track density after boundary relaxation.",
      "against": "Notches arise only from temperature gradients.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0280",
      "hypothesis": "A cold gas could form a persistent density notch when released from an asymmetric elastic boundary.",
      "test": "Track density after boundary relaxation.",
      "against": "Notches arise only from temperature gradients.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0281",
    "hypothesis": "A liquid-metal droplet could reveal oxide fracture through discrete changes in levitation resonance.",
    "test": "Measure resonance and oxide images.",
    "against": "Resonance shifts track shape continuously.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0281",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A liquid-metal droplet could reveal oxide fracture through discrete changes in levitation resonance.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0281",
      "hypothesis": "A liquid-metal droplet could reveal oxide fracture through discrete changes in levitation resonance.",
      "test": "Measure resonance and oxide images.",
      "against": "Resonance shifts track shape continuously.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0281",
      "hypothesis": "A liquid-metal droplet could reveal oxide fracture through discrete changes in levitation resonance.",
      "test": "Measure resonance and oxide images.",
      "against": "Resonance shifts track shape continuously.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0282",
    "hypothesis": "An acoustic standing wave could measure particle permeability through orientation-dependent radiation-force lag.",
    "test": "Track force lag in porous replicas.",
    "against": "Lag is explained by external drag.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0282",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "An acoustic standing wave could measure particle permeability through orientation-dependent radiation-force lag.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0282",
      "hypothesis": "An acoustic standing wave could measure particle permeability through orientation-dependent radiation-force lag.",
      "test": "Track force lag in porous replicas.",
      "against": "Lag is explained by external drag.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0282",
      "hypothesis": "An acoustic standing wave could measure particle permeability through orientation-dependent radiation-force lag.",
      "test": "Track force lag in porous replicas.",
      "against": "Lag is explained by external drag.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0283",
    "hypothesis": "A weak magnetic field could alter crystallization only near a mechanical instability in a paramagnetic droplet.",
    "test": "Map growth and deformation thresholds.",
    "against": "Growth effects occur independently of instability.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0283",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A weak magnetic field could alter crystallization only near a mechanical instability in a paramagnetic droplet.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0283",
      "hypothesis": "A weak magnetic field could alter crystallization only near a mechanical instability in a paramagnetic droplet.",
      "test": "Map growth and deformation thresholds.",
      "against": "Growth effects occur independently of instability.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0283",
      "hypothesis": "A weak magnetic field could alter crystallization only near a mechanical instability in a paramagnetic droplet.",
      "test": "Map growth and deformation thresholds.",
      "against": "Growth effects occur independently of instability.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0284",
    "hypothesis": "A transparent oscillator could identify internal gas exchange through a change in thermal-noise non-Gaussianity.",
    "test": "Measure fluctuations and gas composition.",
    "against": "Statistics follow instrument noise alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0284",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A transparent oscillator could identify internal gas exchange through a change in thermal-noise non-Gaussianity.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0284",
      "hypothesis": "A transparent oscillator could identify internal gas exchange through a change in thermal-noise non-Gaussianity.",
      "test": "Measure fluctuations and gas composition.",
      "against": "Statistics follow instrument noise alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0284",
      "hypothesis": "A transparent oscillator could identify internal gas exchange through a change in thermal-noise non-Gaussianity.",
      "test": "Measure fluctuations and gas composition.",
      "against": "Statistics follow instrument noise alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0285",
    "hypothesis": "A structured ice surface could trap short-wave radiation more effectively after partial sublimation rounds sharp tips.",
    "test": "Measure geometry and spectral absorption.",
    "against": "Absorption declines monotonically with rounding.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0285",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A structured ice surface could trap short-wave radiation more effectively after partial sublimation rounds sharp tips.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0285",
      "hypothesis": "A structured ice surface could trap short-wave radiation more effectively after partial sublimation rounds sharp tips.",
      "test": "Measure geometry and spectral absorption.",
      "against": "Absorption declines monotonically with rounding.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0285",
      "hypothesis": "A structured ice surface could trap short-wave radiation more effectively after partial sublimation rounds sharp tips.",
      "test": "Measure geometry and spectral absorption.",
      "against": "Absorption declines monotonically with rounding.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0286",
    "hypothesis": "A soft mechanical waveguide could transmit a pulse around a corner by temporarily storing it as local rotation.",
    "test": "Map strain and rotational motion.",
    "against": "Transmission lacks rotational storage.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0286",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A soft mechanical waveguide could transmit a pulse around a corner by temporarily storing it as local rotation.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0286",
      "hypothesis": "A soft mechanical waveguide could transmit a pulse around a corner by temporarily storing it as local rotation.",
      "test": "Map strain and rotational motion.",
      "against": "Transmission lacks rotational storage.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0286",
      "hypothesis": "A soft mechanical waveguide could transmit a pulse around a corner by temporarily storing it as local rotation.",
      "test": "Map strain and rotational motion.",
      "against": "Transmission lacks rotational storage.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0287",
    "hypothesis": "A cryogenic molecular film could retain a pressure history in its orientational disorder after pressure release.",
    "test": "Measure scattering after controlled histories.",
    "against": "Disorder follows final temperature alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0287",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A cryogenic molecular film could retain a pressure history in its orientational disorder after pressure release.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0287",
      "hypothesis": "A cryogenic molecular film could retain a pressure history in its orientational disorder after pressure release.",
      "test": "Measure scattering after controlled histories.",
      "against": "Disorder follows final temperature alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0287",
      "hypothesis": "A cryogenic molecular film could retain a pressure history in its orientational disorder after pressure release.",
      "test": "Measure scattering after controlled histories.",
      "against": "Disorder follows final temperature alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0288",
    "hypothesis": "A granular rotor could select its rotation direction from a concentration gradient rather than asymmetric collisions.",
    "test": "Reverse concentration gradients at matched agitation.",
    "against": "Rotation follows hardware asymmetry only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0288",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A granular rotor could select its rotation direction from a concentration gradient rather than asymmetric collisions.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0288",
      "hypothesis": "A granular rotor could select its rotation direction from a concentration gradient rather than asymmetric collisions.",
      "test": "Reverse concentration gradients at matched agitation.",
      "against": "Rotation follows hardware asymmetry only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0288",
      "hypothesis": "A granular rotor could select its rotation direction from a concentration gradient rather than asymmetric collisions.",
      "test": "Reverse concentration gradients at matched agitation.",
      "against": "Rotation follows hardware asymmetry only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0289",
    "hypothesis": "A magneto-optic film could distinguish stress relaxation from temperature relaxation through different polarization trajectories.",
    "test": "Apply independently calibrated perturbations.",
    "against": "Trajectories cannot identify the processes.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0289",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A magneto-optic film could distinguish stress relaxation from temperature relaxation through different polarization trajectories.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0289",
      "hypothesis": "A magneto-optic film could distinguish stress relaxation from temperature relaxation through different polarization trajectories.",
      "test": "Apply independently calibrated perturbations.",
      "against": "Trajectories cannot identify the processes.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0289",
      "hypothesis": "A magneto-optic film could distinguish stress relaxation from temperature relaxation through different polarization trajectories.",
      "test": "Apply independently calibrated perturbations.",
      "against": "Trajectories cannot identify the processes.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0290",
    "hypothesis": "A passive microwave cavity could reveal liquid connectivity inside opaque porous material before total water content changes.",
    "test": "Compare modes with connectivity imaging.",
    "against": "Response tracks water fraction alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0290",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A passive microwave cavity could reveal liquid connectivity inside opaque porous material before total water content changes.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0290",
      "hypothesis": "A passive microwave cavity could reveal liquid connectivity inside opaque porous material before total water content changes.",
      "test": "Compare modes with connectivity imaging.",
      "against": "Response tracks water fraction alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0290",
      "hypothesis": "A passive microwave cavity could reveal liquid connectivity inside opaque porous material before total water content changes.",
      "test": "Compare modes with connectivity imaging.",
      "against": "Response tracks water fraction alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0291",
    "hypothesis": "A nanoscale drum could identify a loosely attached particle by amplitude-dependent phase noise.",
    "test": "Compare attached and bonded particles.",
    "against": "Noise depends only on added mass.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0291",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A nanoscale drum could identify a loosely attached particle by amplitude-dependent phase noise.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0291",
      "hypothesis": "A nanoscale drum could identify a loosely attached particle by amplitude-dependent phase noise.",
      "test": "Compare attached and bonded particles.",
      "against": "Noise depends only on added mass.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0291",
      "hypothesis": "A nanoscale drum could identify a loosely attached particle by amplitude-dependent phase noise.",
      "test": "Compare attached and bonded particles.",
      "against": "Noise depends only on added mass.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0292",
    "hypothesis": "A cryogenic hydrate could release gas in synchronized bursts when elastic interactions connect isolated inclusions.",
    "test": "Measure emission timing and strain.",
    "against": "Bursts remain independent after coupling changes.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0292",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A cryogenic hydrate could release gas in synchronized bursts when elastic interactions connect isolated inclusions.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0292",
      "hypothesis": "A cryogenic hydrate could release gas in synchronized bursts when elastic interactions connect isolated inclusions.",
      "test": "Measure emission timing and strain.",
      "against": "Bursts remain independent after coupling changes.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0292",
      "hypothesis": "A cryogenic hydrate could release gas in synchronized bursts when elastic interactions connect isolated inclusions.",
      "test": "Measure emission timing and strain.",
      "against": "Bursts remain independent after coupling changes.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0293",
    "hypothesis": "A rotating optical field could trap a nonspherical particle at a viscosity-dependent orbit radius.",
    "test": "Calibrate orbits across liquids.",
    "against": "Radius depends solely on optical intensity.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0293",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A rotating optical field could trap a nonspherical particle at a viscosity-dependent orbit radius.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0293",
      "hypothesis": "A rotating optical field could trap a nonspherical particle at a viscosity-dependent orbit radius.",
      "test": "Calibrate orbits across liquids.",
      "against": "Radius depends solely on optical intensity.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0293",
      "hypothesis": "A rotating optical field could trap a nonspherical particle at a viscosity-dependent orbit radius.",
      "test": "Calibrate orbits across liquids.",
      "against": "Radius depends solely on optical intensity.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0294",
    "hypothesis": "A granular cushion could convert an impact into a delayed torsional pulse through embedded chiral contacts.",
    "test": "Measure force and torque histories.",
    "against": "Torque arises only from impact misalignment.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0294",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A granular cushion could convert an impact into a delayed torsional pulse through embedded chiral contacts.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0294",
      "hypothesis": "A granular cushion could convert an impact into a delayed torsional pulse through embedded chiral contacts.",
      "test": "Measure force and torque histories.",
      "against": "Torque arises only from impact misalignment.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0294",
      "hypothesis": "A granular cushion could convert an impact into a delayed torsional pulse through embedded chiral contacts.",
      "test": "Measure force and torque histories.",
      "against": "Torque arises only from impact misalignment.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0295",
    "hypothesis": "A fluid-filled crystal defect could produce a localized sound-speed minimum before macroscopic damage.",
    "test": "Measure acoustic maps during loading.",
    "against": "Minimum appears only after cracking.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0295",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A fluid-filled crystal defect could produce a localized sound-speed minimum before macroscopic damage.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0295",
      "hypothesis": "A fluid-filled crystal defect could produce a localized sound-speed minimum before macroscopic damage.",
      "test": "Measure acoustic maps during loading.",
      "against": "Minimum appears only after cracking.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0295",
      "hypothesis": "A fluid-filled crystal defect could produce a localized sound-speed minimum before macroscopic damage.",
      "test": "Measure acoustic maps during loading.",
      "against": "Minimum appears only after cracking.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0296",
    "hypothesis": "A porous reflector could determine aerosol wetness from the polarization of backscattered light at grazing incidence.",
    "test": "Compare wet and dry equal-size particles.",
    "against": "Polarization cannot separate wetness from shape.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0296",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous reflector could determine aerosol wetness from the polarization of backscattered light at grazing incidence.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0296",
      "hypothesis": "A porous reflector could determine aerosol wetness from the polarization of backscattered light at grazing incidence.",
      "test": "Compare wet and dry equal-size particles.",
      "against": "Polarization cannot separate wetness from shape.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0296",
      "hypothesis": "A porous reflector could determine aerosol wetness from the polarization of backscattered light at grazing incidence.",
      "test": "Compare wet and dry equal-size particles.",
      "against": "Polarization cannot separate wetness from shape.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0297",
    "hypothesis": "A magnetic gel could remember field gradient magnitude through spatial redistribution while forgetting field direction.",
    "test": "Measure particle maps after field sequences.",
    "against": "Both magnitude and direction remain coupled.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0297",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A magnetic gel could remember field gradient magnitude through spatial redistribution while forgetting field direction.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0297",
      "hypothesis": "A magnetic gel could remember field gradient magnitude through spatial redistribution while forgetting field direction.",
      "test": "Measure particle maps after field sequences.",
      "against": "Both magnitude and direction remain coupled.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0297",
      "hypothesis": "A magnetic gel could remember field gradient magnitude through spatial redistribution while forgetting field direction.",
      "test": "Measure particle maps after field sequences.",
      "against": "Both magnitude and direction remain coupled.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0298",
    "hypothesis": "A vacuum-compatible elastic membrane could self-clean through controlled release of stored electrostatic strain.",
    "test": "Measure particle loss and membrane motion.",
    "against": "Cleaning requires direct particle charging.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0298",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A vacuum-compatible elastic membrane could self-clean through controlled release of stored electrostatic strain.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0298",
      "hypothesis": "A vacuum-compatible elastic membrane could self-clean through controlled release of stored electrostatic strain.",
      "test": "Measure particle loss and membrane motion.",
      "against": "Cleaning requires direct particle charging.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0298",
      "hypothesis": "A vacuum-compatible elastic membrane could self-clean through controlled release of stored electrostatic strain.",
      "test": "Measure particle loss and membrane motion.",
      "against": "Cleaning requires direct particle charging.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0299",
    "hypothesis": "A volatile-coated grain could orient its spin axis through anisotropic sublimation recoil.",
    "test": "Track rotation with reversed coating patterns.",
    "against": "Spin axes ignore sublimation geometry.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0299",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A volatile-coated grain could orient its spin axis through anisotropic sublimation recoil.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0299",
      "hypothesis": "A volatile-coated grain could orient its spin axis through anisotropic sublimation recoil.",
      "test": "Track rotation with reversed coating patterns.",
      "against": "Spin axes ignore sublimation geometry.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0299",
      "hypothesis": "A volatile-coated grain could orient its spin axis through anisotropic sublimation recoil.",
      "test": "Track rotation with reversed coating patterns.",
      "against": "Spin axes ignore sublimation geometry.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0300",
    "hypothesis": "A layered wave absorber could reject one disturbance direction through time-dependent internal friction.",
    "test": "Measure directional transmission during controlled cycling.",
    "against": "Directionality disappears after energy accounting.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0300",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A layered wave absorber could reject one disturbance direction through time-dependent internal friction.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0300",
      "hypothesis": "A layered wave absorber could reject one disturbance direction through time-dependent internal friction.",
      "test": "Measure directional transmission during controlled cycling.",
      "against": "Directionality disappears after energy accounting.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0300",
      "hypothesis": "A layered wave absorber could reject one disturbance direction through time-dependent internal friction.",
      "test": "Measure directional transmission during controlled cycling.",
      "against": "Directionality disappears after energy accounting.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0301",
    "hypothesis": "A purified enzyme could recover activity after pressure release through cooperative refolding of neighboring immobilized molecules.",
    "test": "Measure activity across surface densities.",
    "against": "Recovery ignores neighbor spacing.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0301",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A purified enzyme could recover activity after pressure release through cooperative refolding of neighboring immobilized molecules.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0301",
      "hypothesis": "A purified enzyme could recover activity after pressure release through cooperative refolding of neighboring immobilized molecules.",
      "test": "Measure activity across surface densities.",
      "against": "Recovery ignores neighbor spacing.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0301",
      "hypothesis": "A purified enzyme could recover activity after pressure release through cooperative refolding of neighboring immobilized molecules.",
      "test": "Measure activity across surface densities.",
      "against": "Recovery ignores neighbor spacing.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0302",
    "hypothesis": "A synthetic peptide pore could distinguish solute flexibility through reversible gating noise.",
    "test": "Measure current and solute transit.",
    "against": "Noise tracks size alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0302",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A synthetic peptide pore could distinguish solute flexibility through reversible gating noise.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0302",
      "hypothesis": "A synthetic peptide pore could distinguish solute flexibility through reversible gating noise.",
      "test": "Measure current and solute transit.",
      "against": "Noise tracks size alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0302",
      "hypothesis": "A synthetic peptide pore could distinguish solute flexibility through reversible gating noise.",
      "test": "Measure current and solute transit.",
      "against": "Noise tracks size alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0303",
    "hypothesis": "A noncoding RNA condensate could exclude misfolded RNA through different interfacial residence times.",
    "test": "Track folding state and partitioning.",
    "against": "Partitioning ignores folding state.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0303",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A noncoding RNA condensate could exclude misfolded RNA through different interfacial residence times.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0303",
      "hypothesis": "A noncoding RNA condensate could exclude misfolded RNA through different interfacial residence times.",
      "test": "Track folding state and partitioning.",
      "against": "Partitioning ignores folding state.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0303",
      "hypothesis": "A noncoding RNA condensate could exclude misfolded RNA through different interfacial residence times.",
      "test": "Track folding state and partitioning.",
      "against": "Partitioning ignores folding state.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0304",
    "hypothesis": "A lipid bilayer could transmit a chemical signal through a wave of reversible molecular tilt.",
    "test": "Map tilt and downstream response.",
    "against": "Signal requires solute diffusion.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 12,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0304",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A lipid bilayer could transmit a chemical signal through a wave of reversible molecular tilt.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0304",
      "hypothesis": "A lipid bilayer could transmit a chemical signal through a wave of reversible molecular tilt.",
      "test": "Map tilt and downstream response.",
      "against": "Signal requires solute diffusion.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0304",
      "hypothesis": "A lipid bilayer could transmit a chemical signal through a wave of reversible molecular tilt.",
      "test": "Map tilt and downstream response.",
      "against": "Signal requires solute diffusion.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 12,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0305",
    "hypothesis": "A protein crystal could release functional molecules preferentially from strained corners.",
    "test": "Measure local dissolution and activity.",
    "against": "Release follows exposed area only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0305",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A protein crystal could release functional molecules preferentially from strained corners.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0305",
      "hypothesis": "A protein crystal could release functional molecules preferentially from strained corners.",
      "test": "Measure local dissolution and activity.",
      "against": "Release follows exposed area only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0305",
      "hypothesis": "A protein crystal could release functional molecules preferentially from strained corners.",
      "test": "Measure local dissolution and activity.",
      "against": "Release follows exposed area only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0306",
    "hypothesis": "A cell-free metabolic analogue could stabilize its output through product-induced relocation of a catalyst.",
    "test": "Track catalyst position and flux.",
    "against": "Relocation adds no stability.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0306",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A cell-free metabolic analogue could stabilize its output through product-induced relocation of a catalyst.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0306",
      "hypothesis": "A cell-free metabolic analogue could stabilize its output through product-induced relocation of a catalyst.",
      "test": "Track catalyst position and flux.",
      "against": "Relocation adds no stability.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0306",
      "hypothesis": "A cell-free metabolic analogue could stabilize its output through product-induced relocation of a catalyst.",
      "test": "Track catalyst position and flux.",
      "against": "Relocation adds no stability.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0307",
    "hypothesis": "A DNA origami hinge could measure solvent viscosity through equilibrium transition timing rather than mean angle.",
    "test": "Calibrate trajectories across compatible solvents.",
    "against": "Timing follows binding changes only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0307",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A DNA origami hinge could measure solvent viscosity through equilibrium transition timing rather than mean angle.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0307",
      "hypothesis": "A DNA origami hinge could measure solvent viscosity through equilibrium transition timing rather than mean angle.",
      "test": "Calibrate trajectories across compatible solvents.",
      "against": "Timing follows binding changes only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0307",
      "hypothesis": "A DNA origami hinge could measure solvent viscosity through equilibrium transition timing rather than mean angle.",
      "test": "Calibrate trajectories across compatible solvents.",
      "against": "Timing follows binding changes only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0308",
    "hypothesis": "A reversible protein filament could select its fracture site through a traveling pH front.",
    "test": "Map pH and break positions.",
    "against": "Breaks follow static defects alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 12,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0308",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A reversible protein filament could select its fracture site through a traveling pH front.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0308",
      "hypothesis": "A reversible protein filament could select its fracture site through a traveling pH front.",
      "test": "Map pH and break positions.",
      "against": "Breaks follow static defects alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0308",
      "hypothesis": "A reversible protein filament could select its fracture site through a traveling pH front.",
      "test": "Map pH and break positions.",
      "against": "Breaks follow static defects alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 12,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0309",
    "hypothesis": "A molecular motor assay could distinguish cargo softness through stepping correlations without changing load magnitude.",
    "test": "Track steps with matched loads.",
    "against": "Correlations ignore cargo compliance.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0309",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A molecular motor assay could distinguish cargo softness through stepping correlations without changing load magnitude.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0309",
      "hypothesis": "A molecular motor assay could distinguish cargo softness through stepping correlations without changing load magnitude.",
      "test": "Track steps with matched loads.",
      "against": "Correlations ignore cargo compliance.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0309",
      "hypothesis": "A molecular motor assay could distinguish cargo softness through stepping correlations without changing load magnitude.",
      "test": "Track steps with matched loads.",
      "against": "Correlations ignore cargo compliance.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0310",
    "hypothesis": "A vesicle could maintain internal enzyme activity by exporting only aggregation-prone fragments through transient pores.",
    "test": "Measure size-resolved release and turnover.",
    "against": "Activity protection requires intact-enzyme loss.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0310",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A vesicle could maintain internal enzyme activity by exporting only aggregation-prone fragments through transient pores.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0310",
      "hypothesis": "A vesicle could maintain internal enzyme activity by exporting only aggregation-prone fragments through transient pores.",
      "test": "Measure size-resolved release and turnover.",
      "against": "Activity protection requires intact-enzyme loss.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0310",
      "hypothesis": "A vesicle could maintain internal enzyme activity by exporting only aggregation-prone fragments through transient pores.",
      "test": "Measure size-resolved release and turnover.",
      "against": "Activity protection requires intact-enzyme loss.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0311",
    "hypothesis": "A polysaccharide network could resist oxidative damage by spatially concentrating benign sacrificial scavengers at stressed junctions.",
    "test": "Map scavengers and damage.",
    "against": "Protection follows uniform concentration alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0311",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A polysaccharide network could resist oxidative damage by spatially concentrating benign sacrificial scavengers at stressed junctions.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0311",
      "hypothesis": "A polysaccharide network could resist oxidative damage by spatially concentrating benign sacrificial scavengers at stressed junctions.",
      "test": "Map scavengers and damage.",
      "against": "Protection follows uniform concentration alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0311",
      "hypothesis": "A polysaccharide network could resist oxidative damage by spatially concentrating benign sacrificial scavengers at stressed junctions.",
      "test": "Map scavengers and damage.",
      "against": "Protection follows uniform concentration alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0312",
    "hypothesis": "A protein-free membrane could reversibly thicken near an ionic gradient without changing average area.",
    "test": "Measure thickness and ion profiles.",
    "against": "Changes require net swelling.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0312",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A protein-free membrane could reversibly thicken near an ionic gradient without changing average area.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0312",
      "hypothesis": "A protein-free membrane could reversibly thicken near an ionic gradient without changing average area.",
      "test": "Measure thickness and ion profiles.",
      "against": "Changes require net swelling.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0312",
      "hypothesis": "A protein-free membrane could reversibly thicken near an ionic gradient without changing average area.",
      "test": "Measure thickness and ion profiles.",
      "against": "Changes require net swelling.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0313",
    "hypothesis": "A cell-free translation reaction could reduce stalled products when amino-acid delivery follows measured consumption fluctuations.",
    "test": "Measure complete products and resource histories.",
    "against": "Benefits follow total dose alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 2,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 17,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0313",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A cell-free translation reaction could reduce stalled products when amino-acid delivery follows measured consumption fluctuations.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0313",
      "hypothesis": "A cell-free translation reaction could reduce stalled products when amino-acid delivery follows measured consumption fluctuations.",
      "test": "Measure complete products and resource histories.",
      "against": "Benefits follow total dose alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0313",
      "hypothesis": "A cell-free translation reaction could reduce stalled products when amino-acid delivery follows measured consumption fluctuations.",
      "test": "Measure complete products and resource histories.",
      "against": "Benefits follow total dose alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 2,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 17,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0314",
    "hypothesis": "A purified helicase could display altered processivity when its substrate is elastically twisted without tension changes.",
    "test": "Measure processivity and torque independently.",
    "against": "Processivity follows tension only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0314",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A purified helicase could display altered processivity when its substrate is elastically twisted without tension changes.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0314",
      "hypothesis": "A purified helicase could display altered processivity when its substrate is elastically twisted without tension changes.",
      "test": "Measure processivity and torque independently.",
      "against": "Processivity follows tension only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0314",
      "hypothesis": "A purified helicase could display altered processivity when its substrate is elastically twisted without tension changes.",
      "test": "Measure processivity and torque independently.",
      "against": "Processivity follows tension only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0315",
    "hypothesis": "A reversible enzyme inhibitor could protect an active site during drying and leave during rehydration.",
    "test": "Measure inhibitor departure and recovered activity.",
    "against": "Protection requires persistent inhibition.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0315",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A reversible enzyme inhibitor could protect an active site during drying and leave during rehydration.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0315",
      "hypothesis": "A reversible enzyme inhibitor could protect an active site during drying and leave during rehydration.",
      "test": "Measure inhibitor departure and recovered activity.",
      "against": "Protection requires persistent inhibition.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0315",
      "hypothesis": "A reversible enzyme inhibitor could protect an active site during drying and leave during rehydration.",
      "test": "Measure inhibitor departure and recovered activity.",
      "against": "Protection requires persistent inhibition.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0316",
    "hypothesis": "A membrane-bound fluorescent molecule could report leaflet sliding through directional rotational diffusion.",
    "test": "Measure rotation during controlled shear.",
    "against": "Signals reflect overall membrane motion.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "nonhuman biology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0316",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A membrane-bound fluorescent molecule could report leaflet sliding through directional rotational diffusion.",
    "category": "nonhuman biology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0316",
      "hypothesis": "A membrane-bound fluorescent molecule could report leaflet sliding through directional rotational diffusion.",
      "test": "Measure rotation during controlled shear.",
      "against": "Signals reflect overall membrane motion.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0316",
      "hypothesis": "A membrane-bound fluorescent molecule could report leaflet sliding through directional rotational diffusion.",
      "test": "Measure rotation during controlled shear.",
      "against": "Signals reflect overall membrane motion.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "nonhuman biology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0317",
    "hypothesis": "A designed benign peptide aggregate could dissolve selectively where mechanical work has accumulated.",
    "test": "Map work and aggregate loss.",
    "against": "Dissolution follows heating alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0317",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A designed benign peptide aggregate could dissolve selectively where mechanical work has accumulated.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0317",
      "hypothesis": "A designed benign peptide aggregate could dissolve selectively where mechanical work has accumulated.",
      "test": "Map work and aggregate loss.",
      "against": "Dissolution follows heating alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0317",
      "hypothesis": "A designed benign peptide aggregate could dissolve selectively where mechanical work has accumulated.",
      "test": "Map work and aggregate loss.",
      "against": "Dissolution follows heating alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0318",
    "hypothesis": "A cell-free oscillator could produce spatial phase domains through competition for a diffusible cofactor.",
    "test": "Measure cofactor and phase maps.",
    "against": "Domains persist without cofactor competition.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 2,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 17,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0318",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A cell-free oscillator could produce spatial phase domains through competition for a diffusible cofactor.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0318",
      "hypothesis": "A cell-free oscillator could produce spatial phase domains through competition for a diffusible cofactor.",
      "test": "Measure cofactor and phase maps.",
      "against": "Domains persist without cofactor competition.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0318",
      "hypothesis": "A cell-free oscillator could produce spatial phase domains through competition for a diffusible cofactor.",
      "test": "Measure cofactor and phase maps.",
      "against": "Domains persist without cofactor competition.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 2,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 17,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0319",
    "hypothesis": "A protein cage could separate molecular charge from size using mechanically modulated entrances.",
    "test": "Measure uptake under controlled cage deformation.",
    "against": "Selectivity follows static pore size.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0319",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A protein cage could separate molecular charge from size using mechanically modulated entrances.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0319",
      "hypothesis": "A protein cage could separate molecular charge from size using mechanically modulated entrances.",
      "test": "Measure uptake under controlled cage deformation.",
      "against": "Selectivity follows static pore size.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0319",
      "hypothesis": "A protein cage could separate molecular charge from size using mechanically modulated entrances.",
      "test": "Measure uptake under controlled cage deformation.",
      "against": "Selectivity follows static pore size.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0320",
    "hypothesis": "A purified nucleic-acid duplex could release torsional energy as a localized hydration pulse.",
    "test": "Measure solvent response and torque release.",
    "against": "Hydration changes track temperature only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0320",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A purified nucleic-acid duplex could release torsional energy as a localized hydration pulse.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0320",
      "hypothesis": "A purified nucleic-acid duplex could release torsional energy as a localized hydration pulse.",
      "test": "Measure solvent response and torque release.",
      "against": "Hydration changes track temperature only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0320",
      "hypothesis": "A purified nucleic-acid duplex could release torsional energy as a localized hydration pulse.",
      "test": "Measure solvent response and torque release.",
      "against": "Hydration changes track temperature only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0321",
    "hypothesis": "A lipid tube could propagate a constriction without transporting its membrane molecules appreciably.",
    "test": "Track tube shape and labeled lipids.",
    "against": "Shape motion requires equal lipid transport.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0321",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A lipid tube could propagate a constriction without transporting its membrane molecules appreciably.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0321",
      "hypothesis": "A lipid tube could propagate a constriction without transporting its membrane molecules appreciably.",
      "test": "Track tube shape and labeled lipids.",
      "against": "Shape motion requires equal lipid transport.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0321",
      "hypothesis": "A lipid tube could propagate a constriction without transporting its membrane molecules appreciably.",
      "test": "Track tube shape and labeled lipids.",
      "against": "Shape motion requires equal lipid transport.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0322",
    "hypothesis": "An enzyme-coated droplet could regulate its own radius through reaction-induced solvent partitioning.",
    "test": "Measure products, radius, and interfacial tension.",
    "against": "Radius changes follow evaporation alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0322",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "An enzyme-coated droplet could regulate its own radius through reaction-induced solvent partitioning.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0322",
      "hypothesis": "An enzyme-coated droplet could regulate its own radius through reaction-induced solvent partitioning.",
      "test": "Measure products, radius, and interfacial tension.",
      "against": "Radius changes follow evaporation alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0322",
      "hypothesis": "An enzyme-coated droplet could regulate its own radius through reaction-induced solvent partitioning.",
      "test": "Measure products, radius, and interfacial tension.",
      "against": "Radius changes follow evaporation alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0323",
    "hypothesis": "A protein gel could reveal hidden bond exchange through mechanical echo after a reversed strain sequence.",
    "test": "Compare echoes with exchange-blocked controls.",
    "against": "Echoes are ordinary elastic recoil.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0323",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A protein gel could reveal hidden bond exchange through mechanical echo after a reversed strain sequence.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0323",
      "hypothesis": "A protein gel could reveal hidden bond exchange through mechanical echo after a reversed strain sequence.",
      "test": "Compare echoes with exchange-blocked controls.",
      "against": "Echoes are ordinary elastic recoil.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0323",
      "hypothesis": "A protein gel could reveal hidden bond exchange through mechanical echo after a reversed strain sequence.",
      "test": "Compare echoes with exchange-blocked controls.",
      "against": "Echoes are ordinary elastic recoil.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0324",
    "hypothesis": "A folded RNA could reject a competing ligand through mechanical fluctuation timing rather than equilibrium affinity.",
    "test": "Measure binding under matched affinities.",
    "against": "Selection follows affinity alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0324",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A folded RNA could reject a competing ligand through mechanical fluctuation timing rather than equilibrium affinity.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0324",
      "hypothesis": "A folded RNA could reject a competing ligand through mechanical fluctuation timing rather than equilibrium affinity.",
      "test": "Measure binding under matched affinities.",
      "against": "Selection follows affinity alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0324",
      "hypothesis": "A folded RNA could reject a competing ligand through mechanical fluctuation timing rather than equilibrium affinity.",
      "test": "Measure binding under matched affinities.",
      "against": "Selection follows affinity alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0325",
    "hypothesis": "A lipid-coated mineral could catalyze a benign reaction only when its coating crosses a packing transition.",
    "test": "Measure reaction and coating order.",
    "against": "Rate follows uncovered mineral area.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0325",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A lipid-coated mineral could catalyze a benign reaction only when its coating crosses a packing transition.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0325",
      "hypothesis": "A lipid-coated mineral could catalyze a benign reaction only when its coating crosses a packing transition.",
      "test": "Measure reaction and coating order.",
      "against": "Rate follows uncovered mineral area.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0325",
      "hypothesis": "A lipid-coated mineral could catalyze a benign reaction only when its coating crosses a packing transition.",
      "test": "Measure reaction and coating order.",
      "against": "Rate follows uncovered mineral area.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0326",
    "hypothesis": "A purified photosynthetic complex could recover faster when excess excitation escapes through a mechanically coupled acceptor.",
    "test": "Measure energy transfer and recovery.",
    "against": "Recovery requires reduced excitation input.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 2,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 17,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0326",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A purified photosynthetic complex could recover faster when excess excitation escapes through a mechanically coupled acceptor.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0326",
      "hypothesis": "A purified photosynthetic complex could recover faster when excess excitation escapes through a mechanically coupled acceptor.",
      "test": "Measure energy transfer and recovery.",
      "against": "Recovery requires reduced excitation input.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0326",
      "hypothesis": "A purified photosynthetic complex could recover faster when excess excitation escapes through a mechanically coupled acceptor.",
      "test": "Measure energy transfer and recovery.",
      "against": "Recovery requires reduced excitation input.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 2,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 17,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0327",
    "hypothesis": "A molecular chaperone-free folding assay could improve yield through temporary confinement that opens after compaction.",
    "test": "Measure structure and active yield.",
    "against": "Confinement merely selects pre-folded molecules.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0327",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A molecular chaperone-free folding assay could improve yield through temporary confinement that opens after compaction.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0327",
      "hypothesis": "A molecular chaperone-free folding assay could improve yield through temporary confinement that opens after compaction.",
      "test": "Measure structure and active yield.",
      "against": "Confinement merely selects pre-folded molecules.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0327",
      "hypothesis": "A molecular chaperone-free folding assay could improve yield through temporary confinement that opens after compaction.",
      "test": "Measure structure and active yield.",
      "against": "Confinement merely selects pre-folded molecules.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0328",
    "hypothesis": "A vesicle ensemble could synchronize release through osmotic coupling without membrane fusion.",
    "test": "Track release and fusion markers.",
    "against": "Synchronization requires fusion events.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0328",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A vesicle ensemble could synchronize release through osmotic coupling without membrane fusion.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0328",
      "hypothesis": "A vesicle ensemble could synchronize release through osmotic coupling without membrane fusion.",
      "test": "Track release and fusion markers.",
      "against": "Synchronization requires fusion events.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0328",
      "hypothesis": "A vesicle ensemble could synchronize release through osmotic coupling without membrane fusion.",
      "test": "Track release and fusion markers.",
      "against": "Synchronization requires fusion events.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0329",
    "hypothesis": "A protein-bound water layer could retain a pressure signature detectable through isotope-free infrared spectroscopy.",
    "test": "Compare spectra after pressure histories.",
    "against": "Spectra track residual strain only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0329",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A protein-bound water layer could retain a pressure signature detectable through isotope-free infrared spectroscopy.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0329",
      "hypothesis": "A protein-bound water layer could retain a pressure signature detectable through isotope-free infrared spectroscopy.",
      "test": "Compare spectra after pressure histories.",
      "against": "Spectra track residual strain only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0329",
      "hypothesis": "A protein-bound water layer could retain a pressure signature detectable through isotope-free infrared spectroscopy.",
      "test": "Compare spectra after pressure histories.",
      "against": "Spectra track residual strain only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0330",
    "hypothesis": "A reversible crosslinker could migrate toward a growing crack and strengthen an enzyme-compatible gel locally.",
    "test": "Map crosslinker and fracture resistance.",
    "against": "Strength gains require bulk concentration changes.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 12,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0330",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A reversible crosslinker could migrate toward a growing crack and strengthen an enzyme-compatible gel locally.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0330",
      "hypothesis": "A reversible crosslinker could migrate toward a growing crack and strengthen an enzyme-compatible gel locally.",
      "test": "Map crosslinker and fracture resistance.",
      "against": "Strength gains require bulk concentration changes.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0330",
      "hypothesis": "A reversible crosslinker could migrate toward a growing crack and strengthen an enzyme-compatible gel locally.",
      "test": "Map crosslinker and fracture resistance.",
      "against": "Strength gains require bulk concentration changes.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 12,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0331",
    "hypothesis": "A cell-free catalytic cascade could change direction when intermediates partition into competing droplets.",
    "test": "Measure flux and partitioning.",
    "against": "Direction follows bulk reactant ratios only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0331",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A cell-free catalytic cascade could change direction when intermediates partition into competing droplets.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0331",
      "hypothesis": "A cell-free catalytic cascade could change direction when intermediates partition into competing droplets.",
      "test": "Measure flux and partitioning.",
      "against": "Direction follows bulk reactant ratios only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0331",
      "hypothesis": "A cell-free catalytic cascade could change direction when intermediates partition into competing droplets.",
      "test": "Measure flux and partitioning.",
      "against": "Direction follows bulk reactant ratios only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0332",
    "hypothesis": "A synthetic nucleic-acid loop could discriminate transient from sustained acidity through a kinetic latch.",
    "test": "Apply equal-integral pH histories.",
    "against": "Responses encode current pH only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0332",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A synthetic nucleic-acid loop could discriminate transient from sustained acidity through a kinetic latch.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0332",
      "hypothesis": "A synthetic nucleic-acid loop could discriminate transient from sustained acidity through a kinetic latch.",
      "test": "Apply equal-integral pH histories.",
      "against": "Responses encode current pH only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0332",
      "hypothesis": "A synthetic nucleic-acid loop could discriminate transient from sustained acidity through a kinetic latch.",
      "test": "Apply equal-integral pH histories.",
      "against": "Responses encode current pH only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0333",
    "hypothesis": "A membrane defect could close faster when neighboring lipids carry a gradient of chain mobility.",
    "test": "Measure closure and mobility maps.",
    "against": "Closure follows average fluidity alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0333",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A membrane defect could close faster when neighboring lipids carry a gradient of chain mobility.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0333",
      "hypothesis": "A membrane defect could close faster when neighboring lipids carry a gradient of chain mobility.",
      "test": "Measure closure and mobility maps.",
      "against": "Closure follows average fluidity alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0333",
      "hypothesis": "A membrane defect could close faster when neighboring lipids carry a gradient of chain mobility.",
      "test": "Measure closure and mobility maps.",
      "against": "Closure follows average fluidity alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0334",
    "hypothesis": "A purified enzyme could switch substrate preference under reversible hydrostatic pressure without unfolding.",
    "test": "Measure selectivity and structural markers.",
    "against": "Preference changes require denaturation.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0334",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A purified enzyme could switch substrate preference under reversible hydrostatic pressure without unfolding.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0334",
      "hypothesis": "A purified enzyme could switch substrate preference under reversible hydrostatic pressure without unfolding.",
      "test": "Measure selectivity and structural markers.",
      "against": "Preference changes require denaturation.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0334",
      "hypothesis": "A purified enzyme could switch substrate preference under reversible hydrostatic pressure without unfolding.",
      "test": "Measure selectivity and structural markers.",
      "against": "Preference changes require denaturation.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0335",
    "hypothesis": "A protein condensate could protect an RNA reaction by excluding catalytic metal impurities selectively.",
    "test": "Measure impurities and reaction fidelity.",
    "against": "Protection follows dilution alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0335",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A protein condensate could protect an RNA reaction by excluding catalytic metal impurities selectively.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0335",
      "hypothesis": "A protein condensate could protect an RNA reaction by excluding catalytic metal impurities selectively.",
      "test": "Measure impurities and reaction fidelity.",
      "against": "Protection follows dilution alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0335",
      "hypothesis": "A protein condensate could protect an RNA reaction by excluding catalytic metal impurities selectively.",
      "test": "Measure impurities and reaction fidelity.",
      "against": "Protection follows dilution alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0336",
    "hypothesis": "A polysaccharide brush could rectify enzyme motion through reversible substrate capture along a density gradient.",
    "test": "Track purified enzymes and substrate.",
    "against": "Motion requires bulk flow.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0336",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A polysaccharide brush could rectify enzyme motion through reversible substrate capture along a density gradient.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0336",
      "hypothesis": "A polysaccharide brush could rectify enzyme motion through reversible substrate capture along a density gradient.",
      "test": "Track purified enzymes and substrate.",
      "against": "Motion requires bulk flow.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0336",
      "hypothesis": "A polysaccharide brush could rectify enzyme motion through reversible substrate capture along a density gradient.",
      "test": "Track purified enzymes and substrate.",
      "against": "Motion requires bulk flow.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0337",
    "hypothesis": "A molecular pore could reveal hydration-shell stripping through heat fluctuations synchronized with transit.",
    "test": "Measure transit and local thermal signals.",
    "against": "Signals reflect electrical dissipation only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0337",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A molecular pore could reveal hydration-shell stripping through heat fluctuations synchronized with transit.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0337",
      "hypothesis": "A molecular pore could reveal hydration-shell stripping through heat fluctuations synchronized with transit.",
      "test": "Measure transit and local thermal signals.",
      "against": "Signals reflect electrical dissipation only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0337",
      "hypothesis": "A molecular pore could reveal hydration-shell stripping through heat fluctuations synchronized with transit.",
      "test": "Measure transit and local thermal signals.",
      "against": "Signals reflect electrical dissipation only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0338",
    "hypothesis": "A cell-free membrane-growth system could self-correct leaflet imbalance through curvature-triggered lipid exchange.",
    "test": "Track curvature and leaflet composition.",
    "against": "Correction requires membrane rupture.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 2,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 17,
    "area": "nonhuman biology",
    "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0338",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A cell-free membrane-growth system could self-correct leaflet imbalance through curvature-triggered lipid exchange.",
    "category": "nonhuman biology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0338",
      "hypothesis": "A cell-free membrane-growth system could self-correct leaflet imbalance through curvature-triggered lipid exchange.",
      "test": "Track curvature and leaflet composition.",
      "against": "Correction requires membrane rupture.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0338",
      "hypothesis": "A cell-free membrane-growth system could self-correct leaflet imbalance through curvature-triggered lipid exchange.",
      "test": "Track curvature and leaflet composition.",
      "against": "Correction requires membrane rupture.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 2,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 17,
      "area": "nonhuman biology",
      "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0339",
    "hypothesis": "A purified protein could nucleate crystals more reproducibly after reversible stretching that exposes a specific binding face.",
    "test": "Measure conformation and nucleation variance.",
    "against": "Benefits follow aggregate removal alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0339",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A purified protein could nucleate crystals more reproducibly after reversible stretching that exposes a specific binding face.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0339",
      "hypothesis": "A purified protein could nucleate crystals more reproducibly after reversible stretching that exposes a specific binding face.",
      "test": "Measure conformation and nucleation variance.",
      "against": "Benefits follow aggregate removal alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0339",
      "hypothesis": "A purified protein could nucleate crystals more reproducibly after reversible stretching that exposes a specific binding face.",
      "test": "Measure conformation and nucleation variance.",
      "against": "Benefits follow aggregate removal alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0340",
    "hypothesis": "An enzyme reaction front could split around an inert obstacle and rejoin with a lasting phase offset.",
    "test": "Image product fronts around controlled obstacles.",
    "against": "Offsets vanish immediately after rejoining.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0340",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "An enzyme reaction front could split around an inert obstacle and rejoin with a lasting phase offset.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0340",
      "hypothesis": "An enzyme reaction front could split around an inert obstacle and rejoin with a lasting phase offset.",
      "test": "Image product fronts around controlled obstacles.",
      "against": "Offsets vanish immediately after rejoining.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0340",
      "hypothesis": "An enzyme reaction front could split around an inert obstacle and rejoin with a lasting phase offset.",
      "test": "Image product fronts around controlled obstacles.",
      "against": "Offsets vanish immediately after rejoining.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0341",
    "hypothesis": "A DNA-based mechanical spring could retain its stiffness while selectively changing solvent accessibility.",
    "test": "Measure mechanics and probe entry.",
    "against": "Accessibility shifts require stiffness changes.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0341",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A DNA-based mechanical spring could retain its stiffness while selectively changing solvent accessibility.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0341",
      "hypothesis": "A DNA-based mechanical spring could retain its stiffness while selectively changing solvent accessibility.",
      "test": "Measure mechanics and probe entry.",
      "against": "Accessibility shifts require stiffness changes.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0341",
      "hypothesis": "A DNA-based mechanical spring could retain its stiffness while selectively changing solvent accessibility.",
      "test": "Measure mechanics and probe entry.",
      "against": "Accessibility shifts require stiffness changes.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0342",
    "hypothesis": "A vesicle containing asymmetric enzyme activity could rotate through internal reaction-driven interfacial stress.",
    "test": "Measure rotation and reaction localization.",
    "against": "Rotation follows external concentration gradients.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0342",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A vesicle containing asymmetric enzyme activity could rotate through internal reaction-driven interfacial stress.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0342",
      "hypothesis": "A vesicle containing asymmetric enzyme activity could rotate through internal reaction-driven interfacial stress.",
      "test": "Measure rotation and reaction localization.",
      "against": "Rotation follows external concentration gradients.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0342",
      "hypothesis": "A vesicle containing asymmetric enzyme activity could rotate through internal reaction-driven interfacial stress.",
      "test": "Measure rotation and reaction localization.",
      "against": "Rotation follows external concentration gradients.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0343",
    "hypothesis": "A purified protein film could preserve active orientation by releasing surface tension through reversible wrinkles.",
    "test": "Measure orientation, wrinkles, and activity.",
    "against": "Activity follows retained mass alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0343",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A purified protein film could preserve active orientation by releasing surface tension through reversible wrinkles.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0343",
      "hypothesis": "A purified protein film could preserve active orientation by releasing surface tension through reversible wrinkles.",
      "test": "Measure orientation, wrinkles, and activity.",
      "against": "Activity follows retained mass alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0343",
      "hypothesis": "A purified protein film could preserve active orientation by releasing surface tension through reversible wrinkles.",
      "test": "Measure orientation, wrinkles, and activity.",
      "against": "Activity follows retained mass alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0344",
    "hypothesis": "A cell-free redox chain could suppress runaway reactions through reversible sequestration of electron carriers.",
    "test": "Measure carrier partition and reaction rate.",
    "against": "Suppression requires irreversible carrier damage.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 2,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 17,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0344",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A cell-free redox chain could suppress runaway reactions through reversible sequestration of electron carriers.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0344",
      "hypothesis": "A cell-free redox chain could suppress runaway reactions through reversible sequestration of electron carriers.",
      "test": "Measure carrier partition and reaction rate.",
      "against": "Suppression requires irreversible carrier damage.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0344",
      "hypothesis": "A cell-free redox chain could suppress runaway reactions through reversible sequestration of electron carriers.",
      "test": "Measure carrier partition and reaction rate.",
      "against": "Suppression requires irreversible carrier damage.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 2,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 17,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0345",
    "hypothesis": "A benign peptide coating could prevent enzyme aggregation by matching its surface fluctuation timescale.",
    "test": "Measure fluctuation spectra and aggregation.",
    "against": "Protection tracks mean charge only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0345",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A benign peptide coating could prevent enzyme aggregation by matching its surface fluctuation timescale.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0345",
      "hypothesis": "A benign peptide coating could prevent enzyme aggregation by matching its surface fluctuation timescale.",
      "test": "Measure fluctuation spectra and aggregation.",
      "against": "Protection tracks mean charge only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0345",
      "hypothesis": "A benign peptide coating could prevent enzyme aggregation by matching its surface fluctuation timescale.",
      "test": "Measure fluctuation spectra and aggregation.",
      "against": "Protection tracks mean charge only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0346",
    "hypothesis": "A membrane-bound catalyst could alter neighboring permeability through reversible local proton accumulation.",
    "test": "Measure pH and neutral-tracer flux.",
    "against": "Permeability follows bulk pH alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0346",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A membrane-bound catalyst could alter neighboring permeability through reversible local proton accumulation.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0346",
      "hypothesis": "A membrane-bound catalyst could alter neighboring permeability through reversible local proton accumulation.",
      "test": "Measure pH and neutral-tracer flux.",
      "against": "Permeability follows bulk pH alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0346",
      "hypothesis": "A membrane-bound catalyst could alter neighboring permeability through reversible local proton accumulation.",
      "test": "Measure pH and neutral-tracer flux.",
      "against": "Permeability follows bulk pH alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0347",
    "hypothesis": "A molecular assembly could distinguish two temperature histories with identical maxima through irreversible topology changes.",
    "test": "Compare topology after matched thermal peaks.",
    "against": "Only peak temperature determines topology.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0347",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A molecular assembly could distinguish two temperature histories with identical maxima through irreversible topology changes.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0347",
      "hypothesis": "A molecular assembly could distinguish two temperature histories with identical maxima through irreversible topology changes.",
      "test": "Compare topology after matched thermal peaks.",
      "against": "Only peak temperature determines topology.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0347",
      "hypothesis": "A molecular assembly could distinguish two temperature histories with identical maxima through irreversible topology changes.",
      "test": "Compare topology after matched thermal peaks.",
      "against": "Only peak temperature determines topology.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0348",
    "hypothesis": "A purified motor filament could steer transport toward regions of lower substrate bending energy.",
    "test": "Track cargo on patterned compliant substrates.",
    "against": "Routing ignores bending-energy gradients.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0348",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A purified motor filament could steer transport toward regions of lower substrate bending energy.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0348",
      "hypothesis": "A purified motor filament could steer transport toward regions of lower substrate bending energy.",
      "test": "Track cargo on patterned compliant substrates.",
      "against": "Routing ignores bending-energy gradients.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0348",
      "hypothesis": "A purified motor filament could steer transport toward regions of lower substrate bending energy.",
      "test": "Track cargo on patterned compliant substrates.",
      "against": "Routing ignores bending-energy gradients.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0349",
    "hypothesis": "A protein microcrystal could act as a passive concentration clamp by reversible growth and dissolution.",
    "test": "Measure free concentration during feed pulses.",
    "against": "Concentration variance is not reduced.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0349",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A protein microcrystal could act as a passive concentration clamp by reversible growth and dissolution.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0349",
      "hypothesis": "A protein microcrystal could act as a passive concentration clamp by reversible growth and dissolution.",
      "test": "Measure free concentration during feed pulses.",
      "against": "Concentration variance is not reduced.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0349",
      "hypothesis": "A protein microcrystal could act as a passive concentration clamp by reversible growth and dissolution.",
      "test": "Measure free concentration during feed pulses.",
      "against": "Concentration variance is not reduced.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0350",
    "hypothesis": "A vesicle's trapped inert polymer could delay pore closure through internal osmotic relaxation.",
    "test": "Measure polymer distribution and pore lifetime.",
    "against": "Closure follows membrane tension only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0350",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A vesicle's trapped inert polymer could delay pore closure through internal osmotic relaxation.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0350",
      "hypothesis": "A vesicle's trapped inert polymer could delay pore closure through internal osmotic relaxation.",
      "test": "Measure polymer distribution and pore lifetime.",
      "against": "Closure follows membrane tension only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0350",
      "hypothesis": "A vesicle's trapped inert polymer could delay pore closure through internal osmotic relaxation.",
      "test": "Measure polymer distribution and pore lifetime.",
      "against": "Closure follows membrane tension only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0351",
    "hypothesis": "A cell-free reaction could amplify trace mineral dissolution into an optical signal without binding the mineral.",
    "test": "Measure ions and product formation.",
    "against": "Signal requires direct surface adsorption.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 2,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 17,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0351",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A cell-free reaction could amplify trace mineral dissolution into an optical signal without binding the mineral.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0351",
      "hypothesis": "A cell-free reaction could amplify trace mineral dissolution into an optical signal without binding the mineral.",
      "test": "Measure ions and product formation.",
      "against": "Signal requires direct surface adsorption.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0351",
      "hypothesis": "A cell-free reaction could amplify trace mineral dissolution into an optical signal without binding the mineral.",
      "test": "Measure ions and product formation.",
      "against": "Signal requires direct surface adsorption.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 2,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 17,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0352",
    "hypothesis": "A nucleic-acid duplex could distinguish shear orientation through transient unstacking at deliberately off-axis defects.",
    "test": "Measure unstacking under rotated shear.",
    "against": "Response follows total stress only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0352",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A nucleic-acid duplex could distinguish shear orientation through transient unstacking at deliberately off-axis defects.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0352",
      "hypothesis": "A nucleic-acid duplex could distinguish shear orientation through transient unstacking at deliberately off-axis defects.",
      "test": "Measure unstacking under rotated shear.",
      "against": "Response follows total stress only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0352",
      "hypothesis": "A nucleic-acid duplex could distinguish shear orientation through transient unstacking at deliberately off-axis defects.",
      "test": "Measure unstacking under rotated shear.",
      "against": "Response follows total stress only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0353",
    "hypothesis": "A purified enzyme could remain active longer when anchored through a reversible sacrificial linker.",
    "test": "Measure detachment and activity retention.",
    "against": "Protection requires permanent anchor loss.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0353",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A purified enzyme could remain active longer when anchored through a reversible sacrificial linker.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0353",
      "hypothesis": "A purified enzyme could remain active longer when anchored through a reversible sacrificial linker.",
      "test": "Measure detachment and activity retention.",
      "against": "Protection requires permanent anchor loss.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0353",
      "hypothesis": "A purified enzyme could remain active longer when anchored through a reversible sacrificial linker.",
      "test": "Measure detachment and activity retention.",
      "against": "Protection requires permanent anchor loss.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0354",
    "hypothesis": "A lipid droplet could transfer a catalyst to another droplet through fleeting contact without bulk fusion.",
    "test": "Track catalyst and phase markers.",
    "against": "Transfer occurs only during fusion.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0354",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A lipid droplet could transfer a catalyst to another droplet through fleeting contact without bulk fusion.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0354",
      "hypothesis": "A lipid droplet could transfer a catalyst to another droplet through fleeting contact without bulk fusion.",
      "test": "Track catalyst and phase markers.",
      "against": "Transfer occurs only during fusion.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0354",
      "hypothesis": "A lipid droplet could transfer a catalyst to another droplet through fleeting contact without bulk fusion.",
      "test": "Track catalyst and phase markers.",
      "against": "Transfer occurs only during fusion.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0355",
    "hypothesis": "A reversible protein network could form a temporary mechanical shield around concentrated osmotic stress.",
    "test": "Map stiffness during localized osmotic steps.",
    "against": "Shielding reflects local dehydration alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 12,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0355",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A reversible protein network could form a temporary mechanical shield around concentrated osmotic stress.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0355",
      "hypothesis": "A reversible protein network could form a temporary mechanical shield around concentrated osmotic stress.",
      "test": "Map stiffness during localized osmotic steps.",
      "against": "Shielding reflects local dehydration alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0355",
      "hypothesis": "A reversible protein network could form a temporary mechanical shield around concentrated osmotic stress.",
      "test": "Map stiffness during localized osmotic steps.",
      "against": "Shielding reflects local dehydration alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 12,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0356",
    "hypothesis": "A cell-free oscillator could encode total substrate availability in wave spacing rather than oscillation amplitude.",
    "test": "Measure waves across controlled substrate pools.",
    "against": "Spacing follows reactor geometry only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 2,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 17,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0356",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A cell-free oscillator could encode total substrate availability in wave spacing rather than oscillation amplitude.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0356",
      "hypothesis": "A cell-free oscillator could encode total substrate availability in wave spacing rather than oscillation amplitude.",
      "test": "Measure waves across controlled substrate pools.",
      "against": "Spacing follows reactor geometry only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0356",
      "hypothesis": "A cell-free oscillator could encode total substrate availability in wave spacing rather than oscillation amplitude.",
      "test": "Measure waves across controlled substrate pools.",
      "against": "Spacing follows reactor geometry only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 2,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 17,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0357",
    "hypothesis": "A membrane protein analogue could orient through solvent flow inside a porous support before membrane insertion.",
    "test": "Measure orientation and insertion efficiency.",
    "against": "Flow changes only total insertion yield.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0357",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A membrane protein analogue could orient through solvent flow inside a porous support before membrane insertion.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0357",
      "hypothesis": "A membrane protein analogue could orient through solvent flow inside a porous support before membrane insertion.",
      "test": "Measure orientation and insertion efficiency.",
      "against": "Flow changes only total insertion yield.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0357",
      "hypothesis": "A membrane protein analogue could orient through solvent flow inside a porous support before membrane insertion.",
      "test": "Measure orientation and insertion efficiency.",
      "against": "Flow changes only total insertion yield.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0358",
    "hypothesis": "A purified RNA catalyst could show higher turnover when its product is mechanically peeled from a support.",
    "test": "Measure product release and catalysis.",
    "against": "Apparent gains are detection artifacts.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0358",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A purified RNA catalyst could show higher turnover when its product is mechanically peeled from a support.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0358",
      "hypothesis": "A purified RNA catalyst could show higher turnover when its product is mechanically peeled from a support.",
      "test": "Measure product release and catalysis.",
      "against": "Apparent gains are detection artifacts.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0358",
      "hypothesis": "A purified RNA catalyst could show higher turnover when its product is mechanically peeled from a support.",
      "test": "Measure product release and catalysis.",
      "against": "Apparent gains are detection artifacts.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0359",
    "hypothesis": "A polysaccharide capsule could delay digestion by arranging identical bonds into mechanically inaccessible folds.",
    "test": "Measure cleavage with matched chemistry.",
    "against": "Rate differences follow enzyme adsorption alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0359",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A polysaccharide capsule could delay digestion by arranging identical bonds into mechanically inaccessible folds.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0359",
      "hypothesis": "A polysaccharide capsule could delay digestion by arranging identical bonds into mechanically inaccessible folds.",
      "test": "Measure cleavage with matched chemistry.",
      "against": "Rate differences follow enzyme adsorption alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0359",
      "hypothesis": "A polysaccharide capsule could delay digestion by arranging identical bonds into mechanically inaccessible folds.",
      "test": "Measure cleavage with matched chemistry.",
      "against": "Rate differences follow enzyme adsorption alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0360",
    "hypothesis": "A benign peptide could accumulate at gas-liquid interfaces according to backbone flexibility rather than hydrophobicity.",
    "test": "Measure adsorption of matched sequences.",
    "against": "Hydrophobicity explains all partitioning.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0360",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A benign peptide could accumulate at gas-liquid interfaces according to backbone flexibility rather than hydrophobicity.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0360",
      "hypothesis": "A benign peptide could accumulate at gas-liquid interfaces according to backbone flexibility rather than hydrophobicity.",
      "test": "Measure adsorption of matched sequences.",
      "against": "Hydrophobicity explains all partitioning.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0360",
      "hypothesis": "A benign peptide could accumulate at gas-liquid interfaces according to backbone flexibility rather than hydrophobicity.",
      "test": "Measure adsorption of matched sequences.",
      "against": "Hydrophobicity explains all partitioning.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0361",
    "hypothesis": "A cell-free phosphorylation analogue could retain an oscillation memory in reversible mineral adsorption.",
    "test": "Track bound intermediates and restarted oscillations.",
    "against": "Memory survives adsorption suppression unchanged.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 2,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 17,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0361",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A cell-free phosphorylation analogue could retain an oscillation memory in reversible mineral adsorption.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0361",
      "hypothesis": "A cell-free phosphorylation analogue could retain an oscillation memory in reversible mineral adsorption.",
      "test": "Track bound intermediates and restarted oscillations.",
      "against": "Memory survives adsorption suppression unchanged.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0361",
      "hypothesis": "A cell-free phosphorylation analogue could retain an oscillation memory in reversible mineral adsorption.",
      "test": "Track bound intermediates and restarted oscillations.",
      "against": "Memory survives adsorption suppression unchanged.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 2,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 17,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0362",
    "hypothesis": "A vesicle could detect external shear by redistributing internal droplets before its outline deforms visibly.",
    "test": "Track internal positions and shell shape.",
    "against": "Internal motion follows visible deformation.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0362",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A vesicle could detect external shear by redistributing internal droplets before its outline deforms visibly.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0362",
      "hypothesis": "A vesicle could detect external shear by redistributing internal droplets before its outline deforms visibly.",
      "test": "Track internal positions and shell shape.",
      "against": "Internal motion follows visible deformation.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0362",
      "hypothesis": "A vesicle could detect external shear by redistributing internal droplets before its outline deforms visibly.",
      "test": "Track internal positions and shell shape.",
      "against": "Internal motion follows visible deformation.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0363",
    "hypothesis": "A protein-bound chromophore could reveal local hydration exchange through polarization-dependent blinking.",
    "test": "Measure blinking and solvent exchange.",
    "against": "Blinking follows photobleaching only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0363",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A protein-bound chromophore could reveal local hydration exchange through polarization-dependent blinking.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0363",
      "hypothesis": "A protein-bound chromophore could reveal local hydration exchange through polarization-dependent blinking.",
      "test": "Measure blinking and solvent exchange.",
      "against": "Blinking follows photobleaching only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0363",
      "hypothesis": "A protein-bound chromophore could reveal local hydration exchange through polarization-dependent blinking.",
      "test": "Measure blinking and solvent exchange.",
      "against": "Blinking follows photobleaching only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0364",
    "hypothesis": "A mechanically active gel could accelerate enzyme mixing through internal fluctuations without mean convection.",
    "test": "Track tracers and reaction completion.",
    "against": "Acceleration requires bulk flow.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0364",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A mechanically active gel could accelerate enzyme mixing through internal fluctuations without mean convection.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0364",
      "hypothesis": "A mechanically active gel could accelerate enzyme mixing through internal fluctuations without mean convection.",
      "test": "Track tracers and reaction completion.",
      "against": "Acceleration requires bulk flow.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0364",
      "hypothesis": "A mechanically active gel could accelerate enzyme mixing through internal fluctuations without mean convection.",
      "test": "Track tracers and reaction completion.",
      "against": "Acceleration requires bulk flow.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0365",
    "hypothesis": "A reversible molecular fiber could self-repair preferentially where its acoustic vibration is strongest.",
    "test": "Map vibration and monomer addition.",
    "against": "Repair follows damage size alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 12,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0365",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A reversible molecular fiber could self-repair preferentially where its acoustic vibration is strongest.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0365",
      "hypothesis": "A reversible molecular fiber could self-repair preferentially where its acoustic vibration is strongest.",
      "test": "Map vibration and monomer addition.",
      "against": "Repair follows damage size alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0365",
      "hypothesis": "A reversible molecular fiber could self-repair preferentially where its acoustic vibration is strongest.",
      "test": "Map vibration and monomer addition.",
      "against": "Repair follows damage size alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 12,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0366",
    "hypothesis": "A cell-free membrane could favor one reaction pathway by concentrating reactants at saddle-shaped regions.",
    "test": "Map products and membrane curvature.",
    "against": "Selectivity follows reactant concentration alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 2,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 15,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0366",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A cell-free membrane could favor one reaction pathway by concentrating reactants at saddle-shaped regions.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0366",
      "hypothesis": "A cell-free membrane could favor one reaction pathway by concentrating reactants at saddle-shaped regions.",
      "test": "Map products and membrane curvature.",
      "against": "Selectivity follows reactant concentration alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0366",
      "hypothesis": "A cell-free membrane could favor one reaction pathway by concentrating reactants at saddle-shaped regions.",
      "test": "Map products and membrane curvature.",
      "against": "Selectivity follows reactant concentration alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 2,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 15,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0367",
    "hypothesis": "A purified enzyme complex could disassemble under crowding release and reassemble with improved stoichiometric uniformity.",
    "test": "Measure composition before and after release.",
    "against": "Uniformity remains unchanged.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0367",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A purified enzyme complex could disassemble under crowding release and reassemble with improved stoichiometric uniformity.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0367",
      "hypothesis": "A purified enzyme complex could disassemble under crowding release and reassemble with improved stoichiometric uniformity.",
      "test": "Measure composition before and after release.",
      "against": "Uniformity remains unchanged.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0367",
      "hypothesis": "A purified enzyme complex could disassemble under crowding release and reassemble with improved stoichiometric uniformity.",
      "test": "Measure composition before and after release.",
      "against": "Uniformity remains unchanged.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0368",
    "hypothesis": "A hydrogel-supported RNA reaction could reject inhibitors through pressure-induced solvent redistribution.",
    "test": "Measure inhibitor access and reaction rate.",
    "against": "Protection requires direct inhibitor binding.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0368",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A hydrogel-supported RNA reaction could reject inhibitors through pressure-induced solvent redistribution.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0368",
      "hypothesis": "A hydrogel-supported RNA reaction could reject inhibitors through pressure-induced solvent redistribution.",
      "test": "Measure inhibitor access and reaction rate.",
      "against": "Protection requires direct inhibitor binding.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0368",
      "hypothesis": "A hydrogel-supported RNA reaction could reject inhibitors through pressure-induced solvent redistribution.",
      "test": "Measure inhibitor access and reaction rate.",
      "against": "Protection requires direct inhibitor binding.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0369",
    "hypothesis": "A protein cage could emit different acoustic relaxation signatures when empty and molecularly occupied.",
    "test": "Measure spectra at matched cage concentration.",
    "against": "Differences follow aggregation alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0369",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A protein cage could emit different acoustic relaxation signatures when empty and molecularly occupied.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0369",
      "hypothesis": "A protein cage could emit different acoustic relaxation signatures when empty and molecularly occupied.",
      "test": "Measure spectra at matched cage concentration.",
      "against": "Differences follow aggregation alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0369",
      "hypothesis": "A protein cage could emit different acoustic relaxation signatures when empty and molecularly occupied.",
      "test": "Measure spectra at matched cage concentration.",
      "against": "Differences follow aggregation alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0370",
    "hypothesis": "A lipid bilayer could preserve asymmetric solute permeability after a transient mechanical twist.",
    "test": "Measure permeability after geometric recovery.",
    "against": "Asymmetry disappears with twist removal.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0370",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A lipid bilayer could preserve asymmetric solute permeability after a transient mechanical twist.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0370",
      "hypothesis": "A lipid bilayer could preserve asymmetric solute permeability after a transient mechanical twist.",
      "test": "Measure permeability after geometric recovery.",
      "against": "Asymmetry disappears with twist removal.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0370",
      "hypothesis": "A lipid bilayer could preserve asymmetric solute permeability after a transient mechanical twist.",
      "test": "Measure permeability after geometric recovery.",
      "against": "Asymmetry disappears with twist removal.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0371",
    "hypothesis": "A cell-free synthetic metabolism could stabilize internal pH through reversible carbonate mineral formation.",
    "test": "Measure pH and solid-phase exchange.",
    "against": "Stability requires net buffer consumption.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0371",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A cell-free synthetic metabolism could stabilize internal pH through reversible carbonate mineral formation.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0371",
      "hypothesis": "A cell-free synthetic metabolism could stabilize internal pH through reversible carbonate mineral formation.",
      "test": "Measure pH and solid-phase exchange.",
      "against": "Stability requires net buffer consumption.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0371",
      "hypothesis": "A cell-free synthetic metabolism could stabilize internal pH through reversible carbonate mineral formation.",
      "test": "Measure pH and solid-phase exchange.",
      "against": "Stability requires net buffer consumption.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0372",
    "hypothesis": "A purified enzyme could distinguish substrate presentation speed through transient active-site dehydration.",
    "test": "Measure hydration and reaction rates.",
    "against": "Rates follow diffusion alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0372",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A purified enzyme could distinguish substrate presentation speed through transient active-site dehydration.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0372",
      "hypothesis": "A purified enzyme could distinguish substrate presentation speed through transient active-site dehydration.",
      "test": "Measure hydration and reaction rates.",
      "against": "Rates follow diffusion alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0372",
      "hypothesis": "A purified enzyme could distinguish substrate presentation speed through transient active-site dehydration.",
      "test": "Measure hydration and reaction rates.",
      "against": "Rates follow diffusion alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0373",
    "hypothesis": "A coassembled peptide shell could suppress small-solute leakage by rearranging defects during osmotic loading.",
    "test": "Image defects and leakage histories.",
    "against": "Leakage falls only after shell thickening.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0373",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A coassembled peptide shell could suppress small-solute leakage by rearranging defects during osmotic loading.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0373",
      "hypothesis": "A coassembled peptide shell could suppress small-solute leakage by rearranging defects during osmotic loading.",
      "test": "Image defects and leakage histories.",
      "against": "Leakage falls only after shell thickening.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0373",
      "hypothesis": "A coassembled peptide shell could suppress small-solute leakage by rearranging defects during osmotic loading.",
      "test": "Image defects and leakage histories.",
      "against": "Leakage falls only after shell thickening.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0374",
    "hypothesis": "A nucleic-acid hairpin could detect the direction of a moving solvent front through asymmetric opening kinetics.",
    "test": "Reverse front travel and record opening.",
    "against": "Opening ignores travel direction.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0374",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A nucleic-acid hairpin could detect the direction of a moving solvent front through asymmetric opening kinetics.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0374",
      "hypothesis": "A nucleic-acid hairpin could detect the direction of a moving solvent front through asymmetric opening kinetics.",
      "test": "Reverse front travel and record opening.",
      "against": "Opening ignores travel direction.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0374",
      "hypothesis": "A nucleic-acid hairpin could detect the direction of a moving solvent front through asymmetric opening kinetics.",
      "test": "Reverse front travel and record opening.",
      "against": "Opening ignores travel direction.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0375",
    "hypothesis": "A protein filament could break into reproducible lengths under ultrasound by concentrating strain at recurring soft domains.",
    "test": "Measure fragments and domain maps.",
    "against": "Fragment lengths follow exposure energy only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0375",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A protein filament could break into reproducible lengths under ultrasound by concentrating strain at recurring soft domains.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0375",
      "hypothesis": "A protein filament could break into reproducible lengths under ultrasound by concentrating strain at recurring soft domains.",
      "test": "Measure fragments and domain maps.",
      "against": "Fragment lengths follow exposure energy only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0375",
      "hypothesis": "A protein filament could break into reproducible lengths under ultrasound by concentrating strain at recurring soft domains.",
      "test": "Measure fragments and domain maps.",
      "against": "Fragment lengths follow exposure energy only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0376",
    "hypothesis": "A cell-free enzyme reactor could reuse dissipated mechanical energy to redistribute an inhibitory product.",
    "test": "Measure product transport during passive recoil.",
    "against": "Transport requires continued external work.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0376",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A cell-free enzyme reactor could reuse dissipated mechanical energy to redistribute an inhibitory product.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0376",
      "hypothesis": "A cell-free enzyme reactor could reuse dissipated mechanical energy to redistribute an inhibitory product.",
      "test": "Measure product transport during passive recoil.",
      "against": "Transport requires continued external work.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0376",
      "hypothesis": "A cell-free enzyme reactor could reuse dissipated mechanical energy to redistribute an inhibitory product.",
      "test": "Measure product transport during passive recoil.",
      "against": "Transport requires continued external work.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0377",
    "hypothesis": "A membrane-coated bead could sort other beads by reversible ligand rearrangement during collision.",
    "test": "Track ligand motion and capture selectivity.",
    "against": "Selectivity follows static ligand density.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0377",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A membrane-coated bead could sort other beads by reversible ligand rearrangement during collision.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0377",
      "hypothesis": "A membrane-coated bead could sort other beads by reversible ligand rearrangement during collision.",
      "test": "Track ligand motion and capture selectivity.",
      "against": "Selectivity follows static ligand density.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0377",
      "hypothesis": "A membrane-coated bead could sort other beads by reversible ligand rearrangement during collision.",
      "test": "Track ligand motion and capture selectivity.",
      "against": "Selectivity follows static ligand density.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0378",
    "hypothesis": "A purified enzyme could show reduced product inhibition inside a droplet with a selectively evaporating cosolvent.",
    "test": "Measure composition, products, and turnover.",
    "against": "Benefit is explained by temperature or dilution.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0378",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A purified enzyme could show reduced product inhibition inside a droplet with a selectively evaporating cosolvent.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0378",
      "hypothesis": "A purified enzyme could show reduced product inhibition inside a droplet with a selectively evaporating cosolvent.",
      "test": "Measure composition, products, and turnover.",
      "against": "Benefit is explained by temperature or dilution.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0378",
      "hypothesis": "A purified enzyme could show reduced product inhibition inside a droplet with a selectively evaporating cosolvent.",
      "test": "Measure composition, products, and turnover.",
      "against": "Benefit is explained by temperature or dilution.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0379",
    "hypothesis": "A protein-free artificial cell could divide through delayed elastic recoil after localized solvent uptake.",
    "test": "Image shape, uptake, and separation.",
    "against": "Division requires externally imposed shear.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0379",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A protein-free artificial cell could divide through delayed elastic recoil after localized solvent uptake.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0379",
      "hypothesis": "A protein-free artificial cell could divide through delayed elastic recoil after localized solvent uptake.",
      "test": "Image shape, uptake, and separation.",
      "against": "Division requires externally imposed shear.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0379",
      "hypothesis": "A protein-free artificial cell could divide through delayed elastic recoil after localized solvent uptake.",
      "test": "Image shape, uptake, and separation.",
      "against": "Division requires externally imposed shear.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0380",
    "hypothesis": "A benign molecular aggregate could report oxidative exposure by changing mechanical compliance before optical color.",
    "test": "Measure mechanics and oxidation markers.",
    "against": "Color changes occur first.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0380",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A benign molecular aggregate could report oxidative exposure by changing mechanical compliance before optical color.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0380",
      "hypothesis": "A benign molecular aggregate could report oxidative exposure by changing mechanical compliance before optical color.",
      "test": "Measure mechanics and oxidation markers.",
      "against": "Color changes occur first.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0380",
      "hypothesis": "A benign molecular aggregate could report oxidative exposure by changing mechanical compliance before optical color.",
      "test": "Measure mechanics and oxidation markers.",
      "against": "Color changes occur first.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0381",
    "hypothesis": "A cell-free catalyst could migrate along a mineral surface toward its own reaction products.",
    "test": "Track catalysts with flow controls.",
    "against": "Movement follows nonspecific gradients alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0381",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A cell-free catalyst could migrate along a mineral surface toward its own reaction products.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0381",
      "hypothesis": "A cell-free catalyst could migrate along a mineral surface toward its own reaction products.",
      "test": "Track catalysts with flow controls.",
      "against": "Movement follows nonspecific gradients alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0381",
      "hypothesis": "A cell-free catalyst could migrate along a mineral surface toward its own reaction products.",
      "test": "Track catalysts with flow controls.",
      "against": "Movement follows nonspecific gradients alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0382",
    "hypothesis": "A reversible protein coating could distinguish dissolved from particulate substrate through different mechanical loading patterns.",
    "test": "Measure coating strain and reaction.",
    "against": "Patterns cannot identify substrate form.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0382",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A reversible protein coating could distinguish dissolved from particulate substrate through different mechanical loading patterns.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0382",
      "hypothesis": "A reversible protein coating could distinguish dissolved from particulate substrate through different mechanical loading patterns.",
      "test": "Measure coating strain and reaction.",
      "against": "Patterns cannot identify substrate form.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0382",
      "hypothesis": "A reversible protein coating could distinguish dissolved from particulate substrate through different mechanical loading patterns.",
      "test": "Measure coating strain and reaction.",
      "against": "Patterns cannot identify substrate form.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0383",
    "hypothesis": "A nucleic-acid mesh could localize rare catalytic events through transient collapse around reaction products.",
    "test": "Image collapse and verified products.",
    "against": "Collapse follows nonspecific ionic changes.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0383",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A nucleic-acid mesh could localize rare catalytic events through transient collapse around reaction products.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0383",
      "hypothesis": "A nucleic-acid mesh could localize rare catalytic events through transient collapse around reaction products.",
      "test": "Image collapse and verified products.",
      "against": "Collapse follows nonspecific ionic changes.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0383",
      "hypothesis": "A nucleic-acid mesh could localize rare catalytic events through transient collapse around reaction products.",
      "test": "Image collapse and verified products.",
      "against": "Collapse follows nonspecific ionic changes.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0384",
    "hypothesis": "A vesicle could maintain a concentration gradient through gravity-driven internal phase relocation.",
    "test": "Measure phase position and solute profiles.",
    "against": "Gradient maintenance requires external pumping.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0384",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A vesicle could maintain a concentration gradient through gravity-driven internal phase relocation.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0384",
      "hypothesis": "A vesicle could maintain a concentration gradient through gravity-driven internal phase relocation.",
      "test": "Measure phase position and solute profiles.",
      "against": "Gradient maintenance requires external pumping.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0384",
      "hypothesis": "A vesicle could maintain a concentration gradient through gravity-driven internal phase relocation.",
      "test": "Measure phase position and solute profiles.",
      "against": "Gradient maintenance requires external pumping.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0385",
    "hypothesis": "A purified enzyme pair could reduce waste intermediates by exchanging bound molecules during brief direct contacts.",
    "test": "Measure contacts and intermediate balance.",
    "against": "Benefits follow increased overall concentration.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0385",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A purified enzyme pair could reduce waste intermediates by exchanging bound molecules during brief direct contacts.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0385",
      "hypothesis": "A purified enzyme pair could reduce waste intermediates by exchanging bound molecules during brief direct contacts.",
      "test": "Measure contacts and intermediate balance.",
      "against": "Benefits follow increased overall concentration.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0385",
      "hypothesis": "A purified enzyme pair could reduce waste intermediates by exchanging bound molecules during brief direct contacts.",
      "test": "Measure contacts and intermediate balance.",
      "against": "Benefits follow increased overall concentration.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0386",
    "hypothesis": "A molecular rotor embedded in a protein film could separate local viscosity from binding strength through trajectory intermittency.",
    "test": "Calibrate both properties independently.",
    "against": "The parameters remain unidentifiable.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0386",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A molecular rotor embedded in a protein film could separate local viscosity from binding strength through trajectory intermittency.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0386",
      "hypothesis": "A molecular rotor embedded in a protein film could separate local viscosity from binding strength through trajectory intermittency.",
      "test": "Calibrate both properties independently.",
      "against": "The parameters remain unidentifiable.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0386",
      "hypothesis": "A molecular rotor embedded in a protein film could separate local viscosity from binding strength through trajectory intermittency.",
      "test": "Calibrate both properties independently.",
      "against": "The parameters remain unidentifiable.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0387",
    "hypothesis": "A cell-free chemical network could recover from dilution faster when catalysts occupy a mechanically connected scaffold.",
    "test": "Measure recovery and scaffold transport.",
    "against": "Recovery follows catalyst retention alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0387",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A cell-free chemical network could recover from dilution faster when catalysts occupy a mechanically connected scaffold.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0387",
      "hypothesis": "A cell-free chemical network could recover from dilution faster when catalysts occupy a mechanically connected scaffold.",
      "test": "Measure recovery and scaffold transport.",
      "against": "Recovery follows catalyst retention alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0387",
      "hypothesis": "A cell-free chemical network could recover from dilution faster when catalysts occupy a mechanically connected scaffold.",
      "test": "Measure recovery and scaffold transport.",
      "against": "Recovery follows catalyst retention alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0388",
    "hypothesis": "A lipid shell could block ice propagation while allowing liquid exchange through dynamically closing defects.",
    "test": "Image freezing fronts and tracer flow.",
    "against": "Blocking requires complete impermeability.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0388",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A lipid shell could block ice propagation while allowing liquid exchange through dynamically closing defects.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0388",
      "hypothesis": "A lipid shell could block ice propagation while allowing liquid exchange through dynamically closing defects.",
      "test": "Image freezing fronts and tracer flow.",
      "against": "Blocking requires complete impermeability.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0388",
      "hypothesis": "A lipid shell could block ice propagation while allowing liquid exchange through dynamically closing defects.",
      "test": "Image freezing fronts and tracer flow.",
      "against": "Blocking requires complete impermeability.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0389",
    "hypothesis": "A purified protein could retain functional allosteric memory after a short nonbinding osmotic pulse.",
    "test": "Measure structure and activity recovery.",
    "against": "Memory follows residual osmolyte binding.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0389",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A purified protein could retain functional allosteric memory after a short nonbinding osmotic pulse.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0389",
      "hypothesis": "A purified protein could retain functional allosteric memory after a short nonbinding osmotic pulse.",
      "test": "Measure structure and activity recovery.",
      "against": "Memory follows residual osmolyte binding.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0389",
      "hypothesis": "A purified protein could retain functional allosteric memory after a short nonbinding osmotic pulse.",
      "test": "Measure structure and activity recovery.",
      "against": "Memory follows residual osmolyte binding.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0390",
    "hypothesis": "A membrane-bound reaction could generate a traveling permeability pulse without a propagating concentration front.",
    "test": "Measure permeability and solute profiles.",
    "against": "The two fronts always coincide.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0390",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A membrane-bound reaction could generate a traveling permeability pulse without a propagating concentration front.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0390",
      "hypothesis": "A membrane-bound reaction could generate a traveling permeability pulse without a propagating concentration front.",
      "test": "Measure permeability and solute profiles.",
      "against": "The two fronts always coincide.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0390",
      "hypothesis": "A membrane-bound reaction could generate a traveling permeability pulse without a propagating concentration front.",
      "test": "Measure permeability and solute profiles.",
      "against": "The two fronts always coincide.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0391",
    "hypothesis": "A reversible peptide gel could discriminate cutting from stretching through different soluble fragment spectra.",
    "test": "Measure fragments after matched work.",
    "against": "Spectra depend only on damage amount.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0391",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A reversible peptide gel could discriminate cutting from stretching through different soluble fragment spectra.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0391",
      "hypothesis": "A reversible peptide gel could discriminate cutting from stretching through different soluble fragment spectra.",
      "test": "Measure fragments after matched work.",
      "against": "Spectra depend only on damage amount.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0391",
      "hypothesis": "A reversible peptide gel could discriminate cutting from stretching through different soluble fragment spectra.",
      "test": "Measure fragments after matched work.",
      "against": "Spectra depend only on damage amount.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0392",
    "hypothesis": "A cell-free nucleation assay could become more reproducible when unstable molecular clusters are continuously recycled mechanically.",
    "test": "Measure cluster populations and nuclei.",
    "against": "Improvement requires lower supersaturation.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0392",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A cell-free nucleation assay could become more reproducible when unstable molecular clusters are continuously recycled mechanically.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0392",
      "hypothesis": "A cell-free nucleation assay could become more reproducible when unstable molecular clusters are continuously recycled mechanically.",
      "test": "Measure cluster populations and nuclei.",
      "against": "Improvement requires lower supersaturation.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0392",
      "hypothesis": "A cell-free nucleation assay could become more reproducible when unstable molecular clusters are continuously recycled mechanically.",
      "test": "Measure cluster populations and nuclei.",
      "against": "Improvement requires lower supersaturation.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0393",
    "hypothesis": "A vesicle could align its internal polymer network to protect a localized weak membrane region.",
    "test": "Track network orientation and rupture.",
    "against": "Protection ignores network alignment.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0393",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A vesicle could align its internal polymer network to protect a localized weak membrane region.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0393",
      "hypothesis": "A vesicle could align its internal polymer network to protect a localized weak membrane region.",
      "test": "Track network orientation and rupture.",
      "against": "Protection ignores network alignment.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0393",
      "hypothesis": "A vesicle could align its internal polymer network to protect a localized weak membrane region.",
      "test": "Track network orientation and rupture.",
      "against": "Protection ignores network alignment.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0394",
    "hypothesis": "A purified enzyme could increase specificity when constrained to a surface that flexes only after correct binding.",
    "test": "Measure selectivity with matched affinity controls.",
    "against": "Selectivity gains follow affinity changes alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0394",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A purified enzyme could increase specificity when constrained to a surface that flexes only after correct binding.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0394",
      "hypothesis": "A purified enzyme could increase specificity when constrained to a surface that flexes only after correct binding.",
      "test": "Measure selectivity with matched affinity controls.",
      "against": "Selectivity gains follow affinity changes alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0394",
      "hypothesis": "A purified enzyme could increase specificity when constrained to a surface that flexes only after correct binding.",
      "test": "Measure selectivity with matched affinity controls.",
      "against": "Selectivity gains follow affinity changes alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0395",
    "hypothesis": "A molecular assembly could retain chemical sequence information through the order of topological links it forms.",
    "test": "Apply reversed reagent sequences.",
    "against": "Final topology records composition only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 12,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0395",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A molecular assembly could retain chemical sequence information through the order of topological links it forms.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0395",
      "hypothesis": "A molecular assembly could retain chemical sequence information through the order of topological links it forms.",
      "test": "Apply reversed reagent sequences.",
      "against": "Final topology records composition only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0395",
      "hypothesis": "A molecular assembly could retain chemical sequence information through the order of topological links it forms.",
      "test": "Apply reversed reagent sequences.",
      "against": "Final topology records composition only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 12,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0396",
    "hypothesis": "A protein-free membrane could sort molecules by vibrational energy transfer under weak acoustic driving.",
    "test": "Measure flux and temperature independently.",
    "against": "Selectivity follows heating alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0396",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A protein-free membrane could sort molecules by vibrational energy transfer under weak acoustic driving.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0396",
      "hypothesis": "A protein-free membrane could sort molecules by vibrational energy transfer under weak acoustic driving.",
      "test": "Measure flux and temperature independently.",
      "against": "Selectivity follows heating alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0396",
      "hypothesis": "A protein-free membrane could sort molecules by vibrational energy transfer under weak acoustic driving.",
      "test": "Measure flux and temperature independently.",
      "against": "Selectivity follows heating alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0397",
    "hypothesis": "A cell-free reactor could maintain a stable reaction zone by matching catalyst diffusion to product-induced gelation.",
    "test": "Image catalyst and gel fronts.",
    "against": "Zone stability is unrelated to diffusivity matching.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0397",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A cell-free reactor could maintain a stable reaction zone by matching catalyst diffusion to product-induced gelation.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0397",
      "hypothesis": "A cell-free reactor could maintain a stable reaction zone by matching catalyst diffusion to product-induced gelation.",
      "test": "Image catalyst and gel fronts.",
      "against": "Zone stability is unrelated to diffusivity matching.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0397",
      "hypothesis": "A cell-free reactor could maintain a stable reaction zone by matching catalyst diffusion to product-induced gelation.",
      "test": "Image catalyst and gel fronts.",
      "against": "Zone stability is unrelated to diffusivity matching.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0398",
    "hypothesis": "A purified protein crystal could sense dissolved oxygen through reversible lattice breathing without an added dye.",
    "test": "Measure lattice spacing and oxygen.",
    "against": "Response follows pH or temperature alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0398",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A purified protein crystal could sense dissolved oxygen through reversible lattice breathing without an added dye.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0398",
      "hypothesis": "A purified protein crystal could sense dissolved oxygen through reversible lattice breathing without an added dye.",
      "test": "Measure lattice spacing and oxygen.",
      "against": "Response follows pH or temperature alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0398",
      "hypothesis": "A purified protein crystal could sense dissolved oxygen through reversible lattice breathing without an added dye.",
      "test": "Measure lattice spacing and oxygen.",
      "against": "Response follows pH or temperature alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0399",
    "hypothesis": "A reversible nucleic-acid scaffold could suppress enzyme crowding by expanding locally as turnover accelerates.",
    "test": "Measure local spacing and flux.",
    "against": "Expansion follows nonspecific swelling.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0399",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A reversible nucleic-acid scaffold could suppress enzyme crowding by expanding locally as turnover accelerates.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0399",
      "hypothesis": "A reversible nucleic-acid scaffold could suppress enzyme crowding by expanding locally as turnover accelerates.",
      "test": "Measure local spacing and flux.",
      "against": "Expansion follows nonspecific swelling.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0399",
      "hypothesis": "A reversible nucleic-acid scaffold could suppress enzyme crowding by expanding locally as turnover accelerates.",
      "test": "Measure local spacing and flux.",
      "against": "Expansion follows nonspecific swelling.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0400",
    "hypothesis": "A vesicle-coated mineral could release cargo only when mechanical stress and acidity arrive in a particular order.",
    "test": "Reverse the two stimuli.",
    "against": "Release depends solely on simultaneous conditions.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 12,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0400",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A vesicle-coated mineral could release cargo only when mechanical stress and acidity arrive in a particular order.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0400",
      "hypothesis": "A vesicle-coated mineral could release cargo only when mechanical stress and acidity arrive in a particular order.",
      "test": "Reverse the two stimuli.",
      "against": "Release depends solely on simultaneous conditions.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0400",
      "hypothesis": "A vesicle-coated mineral could release cargo only when mechanical stress and acidity arrive in a particular order.",
      "test": "Reverse the two stimuli.",
      "against": "Release depends solely on simultaneous conditions.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 12,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0401",
    "hypothesis": "A root tip could redirect growth before contact by detecting the mechanical signature of a nearby rigid inclusion.",
    "test": "Track roots with matched chemical conditions.",
    "against": "Turning begins only after contact.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 2,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 17,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0401",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A root tip could redirect growth before contact by detecting the mechanical signature of a nearby rigid inclusion.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0401",
      "hypothesis": "A root tip could redirect growth before contact by detecting the mechanical signature of a nearby rigid inclusion.",
      "test": "Track roots with matched chemical conditions.",
      "against": "Turning begins only after contact.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0401",
      "hypothesis": "A root tip could redirect growth before contact by detecting the mechanical signature of a nearby rigid inclusion.",
      "test": "Track roots with matched chemical conditions.",
      "against": "Turning begins only after contact.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 2,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 17,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0402",
    "hypothesis": "A moss canopy could reduce nutrient loss by trapping rewetting pulses in temporarily collapsed leaf pockets.",
    "test": "Measure pocket shape and tracer retention.",
    "against": "Retention ignores pocket collapse.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0402",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A moss canopy could reduce nutrient loss by trapping rewetting pulses in temporarily collapsed leaf pockets.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0402",
      "hypothesis": "A moss canopy could reduce nutrient loss by trapping rewetting pulses in temporarily collapsed leaf pockets.",
      "test": "Measure pocket shape and tracer retention.",
      "against": "Retention ignores pocket collapse.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0402",
      "hypothesis": "A moss canopy could reduce nutrient loss by trapping rewetting pulses in temporarily collapsed leaf pockets.",
      "test": "Measure pocket shape and tracer retention.",
      "against": "Retention ignores pocket collapse.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0403",
    "hypothesis": "A nonpathogenic fungus could reroute carbon around damaged cords using pressure changes before new branches grow.",
    "test": "Track tracer flux and network pressure.",
    "against": "Rerouting requires new growth.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 2,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 17,
    "area": "nonhuman biology",
    "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0403",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A nonpathogenic fungus could reroute carbon around damaged cords using pressure changes before new branches grow.",
    "category": "nonhuman biology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0403",
      "hypothesis": "A nonpathogenic fungus could reroute carbon around damaged cords using pressure changes before new branches grow.",
      "test": "Track tracer flux and network pressure.",
      "against": "Rerouting requires new growth.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0403",
      "hypothesis": "A nonpathogenic fungus could reroute carbon around damaged cords using pressure changes before new branches grow.",
      "test": "Track tracer flux and network pressure.",
      "against": "Rerouting requires new growth.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 2,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 17,
      "area": "nonhuman biology",
      "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0404",
    "hypothesis": "A seed could delay germination until two different wetting directions have been experienced.",
    "test": "Compare directional hydration histories.",
    "against": "Timing follows total uptake alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0404",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A seed could delay germination until two different wetting directions have been experienced.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0404",
      "hypothesis": "A seed could delay germination until two different wetting directions have been experienced.",
      "test": "Compare directional hydration histories.",
      "against": "Timing follows total uptake alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0404",
      "hypothesis": "A seed could delay germination until two different wetting directions have been experienced.",
      "test": "Compare directional hydration histories.",
      "against": "Timing follows total uptake alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0405",
    "hypothesis": "A microalga could reduce sinking by reshaping an extracellular coat without changing cell volume.",
    "test": "Measure coats, buoyancy, and shape.",
    "against": "Sinking changes require cell-volume changes.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 2,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 17,
    "area": "nonhuman biology",
    "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0405",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A microalga could reduce sinking by reshaping an extracellular coat without changing cell volume.",
    "category": "nonhuman biology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0405",
      "hypothesis": "A microalga could reduce sinking by reshaping an extracellular coat without changing cell volume.",
      "test": "Measure coats, buoyancy, and shape.",
      "against": "Sinking changes require cell-volume changes.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0405",
      "hypothesis": "A microalga could reduce sinking by reshaping an extracellular coat without changing cell volume.",
      "test": "Measure coats, buoyancy, and shape.",
      "against": "Sinking changes require cell-volume changes.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 2,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 17,
      "area": "nonhuman biology",
      "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0406",
    "hypothesis": "A plant leaf could reduce thermal hotspots through reversible relocation of internal air-water interfaces.",
    "test": "Image interfaces and thermal maps.",
    "against": "Cooling follows stomatal changes only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0406",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A plant leaf could reduce thermal hotspots through reversible relocation of internal air-water interfaces.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0406",
      "hypothesis": "A plant leaf could reduce thermal hotspots through reversible relocation of internal air-water interfaces.",
      "test": "Image interfaces and thermal maps.",
      "against": "Cooling follows stomatal changes only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0406",
      "hypothesis": "A plant leaf could reduce thermal hotspots through reversible relocation of internal air-water interfaces.",
      "test": "Image interfaces and thermal maps.",
      "against": "Cooling follows stomatal changes only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0407",
    "hypothesis": "A bacterial swarm's edge could arrest on a surface whose elastic recoil outruns cell reorientation.",
    "test": "Track edge speed and substrate recovery.",
    "against": "Arrest follows chemistry alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 2,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 17,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0407",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A bacterial swarm's edge could arrest on a surface whose elastic recoil outruns cell reorientation.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0407",
      "hypothesis": "A bacterial swarm's edge could arrest on a surface whose elastic recoil outruns cell reorientation.",
      "test": "Track edge speed and substrate recovery.",
      "against": "Arrest follows chemistry alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0407",
      "hypothesis": "A bacterial swarm's edge could arrest on a surface whose elastic recoil outruns cell reorientation.",
      "test": "Track edge speed and substrate recovery.",
      "against": "Arrest follows chemistry alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 2,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 17,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0408",
    "hypothesis": "A fungal spore analogue could disperse farther by releasing stored torsion only after aerodynamic alignment.",
    "test": "Track spin and flight of inert replicas.",
    "against": "Torsion provides no range benefit.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 2,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 17,
    "area": "nonhuman biology",
    "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0408",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A fungal spore analogue could disperse farther by releasing stored torsion only after aerodynamic alignment.",
    "category": "nonhuman biology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0408",
      "hypothesis": "A fungal spore analogue could disperse farther by releasing stored torsion only after aerodynamic alignment.",
      "test": "Track spin and flight of inert replicas.",
      "against": "Torsion provides no range benefit.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0408",
      "hypothesis": "A fungal spore analogue could disperse farther by releasing stored torsion only after aerodynamic alignment.",
      "test": "Track spin and flight of inert replicas.",
      "against": "Torsion provides no range benefit.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 2,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 17,
      "area": "nonhuman biology",
      "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0409",
    "hypothesis": "A root hair could maintain uptake during soil separation by extending a thin liquid sleeve.",
    "test": "Image contact loss and water transport.",
    "against": "Uptake stops before sleeve rupture.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0409",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A root hair could maintain uptake during soil separation by extending a thin liquid sleeve.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0409",
      "hypothesis": "A root hair could maintain uptake during soil separation by extending a thin liquid sleeve.",
      "test": "Image contact loss and water transport.",
      "against": "Uptake stops before sleeve rupture.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0409",
      "hypothesis": "A root hair could maintain uptake during soil separation by extending a thin liquid sleeve.",
      "test": "Image contact loss and water transport.",
      "against": "Uptake stops before sleeve rupture.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0410",
    "hypothesis": "A lichen-like nonpathogenic association could buffer light fluctuations through partner-specific water redistribution.",
    "test": "Measure hydration and photosynthetic response.",
    "against": "Buffering occurs without water transfer.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 2,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 17,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0410",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A lichen-like nonpathogenic association could buffer light fluctuations through partner-specific water redistribution.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0410",
      "hypothesis": "A lichen-like nonpathogenic association could buffer light fluctuations through partner-specific water redistribution.",
      "test": "Measure hydration and photosynthetic response.",
      "against": "Buffering occurs without water transfer.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0410",
      "hypothesis": "A lichen-like nonpathogenic association could buffer light fluctuations through partner-specific water redistribution.",
      "test": "Measure hydration and photosynthetic response.",
      "against": "Buffering occurs without water transfer.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 2,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 17,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0411",
    "hypothesis": "A seedling could use nocturnal stem strain to redistribute water toward newly formed tissues.",
    "test": "Measure strain and tracer movement.",
    "against": "Redistribution follows pressure gradients alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0411",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A seedling could use nocturnal stem strain to redistribute water toward newly formed tissues.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0411",
      "hypothesis": "A seedling could use nocturnal stem strain to redistribute water toward newly formed tissues.",
      "test": "Measure strain and tracer movement.",
      "against": "Redistribution follows pressure gradients alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0411",
      "hypothesis": "A seedling could use nocturnal stem strain to redistribute water toward newly formed tissues.",
      "test": "Measure strain and tracer movement.",
      "against": "Redistribution follows pressure gradients alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0412",
    "hypothesis": "A microalgal colony could divide preferentially where local light fluctuations are least correlated.",
    "test": "Map division and light histories.",
    "against": "Division follows mean light only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 2,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 15,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0412",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A microalgal colony could divide preferentially where local light fluctuations are least correlated.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0412",
      "hypothesis": "A microalgal colony could divide preferentially where local light fluctuations are least correlated.",
      "test": "Map division and light histories.",
      "against": "Division follows mean light only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0412",
      "hypothesis": "A microalgal colony could divide preferentially where local light fluctuations are least correlated.",
      "test": "Map division and light histories.",
      "against": "Division follows mean light only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 2,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 15,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0413",
    "hypothesis": "A fungal network could retain a route preference after nutrient removal through altered cord compliance.",
    "test": "Measure transport and mechanical maps.",
    "against": "Preference disappears when concentration equalizes.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 2,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 17,
    "area": "nonhuman biology",
    "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0413",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A fungal network could retain a route preference after nutrient removal through altered cord compliance.",
    "category": "nonhuman biology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0413",
      "hypothesis": "A fungal network could retain a route preference after nutrient removal through altered cord compliance.",
      "test": "Measure transport and mechanical maps.",
      "against": "Preference disappears when concentration equalizes.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0413",
      "hypothesis": "A fungal network could retain a route preference after nutrient removal through altered cord compliance.",
      "test": "Measure transport and mechanical maps.",
      "against": "Preference disappears when concentration equalizes.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 2,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 17,
      "area": "nonhuman biology",
      "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0414",
    "hypothesis": "A plant cuticle could reduce solute leakage by closing hydration-dependent nanofolds under tension.",
    "test": "Measure folds, strain, and permeability.",
    "against": "Leakage ignores fold closure.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "nonhuman biology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0414",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A plant cuticle could reduce solute leakage by closing hydration-dependent nanofolds under tension.",
    "category": "nonhuman biology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0414",
      "hypothesis": "A plant cuticle could reduce solute leakage by closing hydration-dependent nanofolds under tension.",
      "test": "Measure folds, strain, and permeability.",
      "against": "Leakage ignores fold closure.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0414",
      "hypothesis": "A plant cuticle could reduce solute leakage by closing hydration-dependent nanofolds under tension.",
      "test": "Measure folds, strain, and permeability.",
      "against": "Leakage ignores fold closure.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "nonhuman biology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0415",
    "hypothesis": "A nonpathogenic bacterium could switch attachment mode when surface vibrations match flagellar beat variability.",
    "test": "Sweep vibrations and track attachment.",
    "against": "Attachment follows vibration amplitude only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 2,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 17,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0415",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A nonpathogenic bacterium could switch attachment mode when surface vibrations match flagellar beat variability.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0415",
      "hypothesis": "A nonpathogenic bacterium could switch attachment mode when surface vibrations match flagellar beat variability.",
      "test": "Sweep vibrations and track attachment.",
      "against": "Attachment follows vibration amplitude only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0415",
      "hypothesis": "A nonpathogenic bacterium could switch attachment mode when surface vibrations match flagellar beat variability.",
      "test": "Sweep vibrations and track attachment.",
      "against": "Attachment follows vibration amplitude only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 2,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 17,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0416",
    "hypothesis": "A moss mat could stabilize slope sediment by moving water laterally before increasing mechanical cohesion.",
    "test": "Measure water routes and shear resistance.",
    "against": "Stabilization requires increased cohesion.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0416",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A moss mat could stabilize slope sediment by moving water laterally before increasing mechanical cohesion.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0416",
      "hypothesis": "A moss mat could stabilize slope sediment by moving water laterally before increasing mechanical cohesion.",
      "test": "Measure water routes and shear resistance.",
      "against": "Stabilization requires increased cohesion.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0416",
      "hypothesis": "A moss mat could stabilize slope sediment by moving water laterally before increasing mechanical cohesion.",
      "test": "Measure water routes and shear resistance.",
      "against": "Stabilization requires increased cohesion.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0417",
    "hypothesis": "A seed coat could release its weakest seam through a spatial oxygen gradient rather than uniform hydration.",
    "test": "Map seam opening and oxygen.",
    "against": "Opening follows local water content alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "nonhuman biology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0417",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A seed coat could release its weakest seam through a spatial oxygen gradient rather than uniform hydration.",
    "category": "nonhuman biology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0417",
      "hypothesis": "A seed coat could release its weakest seam through a spatial oxygen gradient rather than uniform hydration.",
      "test": "Map seam opening and oxygen.",
      "against": "Opening follows local water content alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0417",
      "hypothesis": "A seed coat could release its weakest seam through a spatial oxygen gradient rather than uniform hydration.",
      "test": "Map seam opening and oxygen.",
      "against": "Opening follows local water content alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "nonhuman biology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0418",
    "hypothesis": "A root branching site could be selected by the persistence of a pore-pressure fluctuation.",
    "test": "Measure branching under controlled pressure pulses.",
    "against": "Branching tracks average pressure only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0418",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A root branching site could be selected by the persistence of a pore-pressure fluctuation.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0418",
      "hypothesis": "A root branching site could be selected by the persistence of a pore-pressure fluctuation.",
      "test": "Measure branching under controlled pressure pulses.",
      "against": "Branching tracks average pressure only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0418",
      "hypothesis": "A root branching site could be selected by the persistence of a pore-pressure fluctuation.",
      "test": "Measure branching under controlled pressure pulses.",
      "against": "Branching tracks average pressure only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0419",
    "hypothesis": "A microalgal cell could preserve a light-direction memory in the distribution of storage droplets.",
    "test": "Track droplets after light reorientation.",
    "against": "Distribution follows gravity alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 2,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 17,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0419",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A microalgal cell could preserve a light-direction memory in the distribution of storage droplets.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0419",
      "hypothesis": "A microalgal cell could preserve a light-direction memory in the distribution of storage droplets.",
      "test": "Track droplets after light reorientation.",
      "against": "Distribution follows gravity alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0419",
      "hypothesis": "A microalgal cell could preserve a light-direction memory in the distribution of storage droplets.",
      "test": "Track droplets after light reorientation.",
      "against": "Distribution follows gravity alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 2,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 17,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0420",
    "hypothesis": "A fungal tip could avoid a drying zone by sensing vapor-flow direction independently of humidity.",
    "test": "Control vapor motion and humidity separately.",
    "against": "Avoidance follows humidity only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 2,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 15,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0420",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A fungal tip could avoid a drying zone by sensing vapor-flow direction independently of humidity.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0420",
      "hypothesis": "A fungal tip could avoid a drying zone by sensing vapor-flow direction independently of humidity.",
      "test": "Control vapor motion and humidity separately.",
      "against": "Avoidance follows humidity only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0420",
      "hypothesis": "A fungal tip could avoid a drying zone by sensing vapor-flow direction independently of humidity.",
      "test": "Control vapor motion and humidity separately.",
      "against": "Avoidance follows humidity only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 2,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 15,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0421",
    "hypothesis": "A plant vein junction could passively divert embolism bubbles toward expendable side branches.",
    "test": "Image bubbles in transparent vein analogues.",
    "against": "Routing follows branch diameter alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "nonhuman biology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0421",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A plant vein junction could passively divert embolism bubbles toward expendable side branches.",
    "category": "nonhuman biology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0421",
      "hypothesis": "A plant vein junction could passively divert embolism bubbles toward expendable side branches.",
      "test": "Image bubbles in transparent vein analogues.",
      "against": "Routing follows branch diameter alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0421",
      "hypothesis": "A plant vein junction could passively divert embolism bubbles toward expendable side branches.",
      "test": "Image bubbles in transparent vein analogues.",
      "against": "Routing follows branch diameter alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "nonhuman biology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0422",
    "hypothesis": "A bacterial biofilm could shed inactive outer material through stress-driven sorting before chemical degradation.",
    "test": "Map activity and detachment.",
    "against": "Shedding ignores mechanical stress maps.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 2,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 15,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0422",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A bacterial biofilm could shed inactive outer material through stress-driven sorting before chemical degradation.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0422",
      "hypothesis": "A bacterial biofilm could shed inactive outer material through stress-driven sorting before chemical degradation.",
      "test": "Map activity and detachment.",
      "against": "Shedding ignores mechanical stress maps.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0422",
      "hypothesis": "A bacterial biofilm could shed inactive outer material through stress-driven sorting before chemical degradation.",
      "test": "Map activity and detachment.",
      "against": "Shedding ignores mechanical stress maps.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 2,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 15,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0423",
    "hypothesis": "A seed-inspired awn could distinguish repeated drizzle from one heavy wetting event through slip accumulation.",
    "test": "Compare motion under equal water doses.",
    "against": "Displacement depends only on final moisture.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0423",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A seed-inspired awn could distinguish repeated drizzle from one heavy wetting event through slip accumulation.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0423",
      "hypothesis": "A seed-inspired awn could distinguish repeated drizzle from one heavy wetting event through slip accumulation.",
      "test": "Compare motion under equal water doses.",
      "against": "Displacement depends only on final moisture.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0423",
      "hypothesis": "A seed-inspired awn could distinguish repeated drizzle from one heavy wetting event through slip accumulation.",
      "test": "Compare motion under equal water doses.",
      "against": "Displacement depends only on final moisture.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0424",
    "hypothesis": "A moss leaf could recover photosynthesis faster when rewetting starts at its attachment point.",
    "test": "Compare directional rewetting with fluorescence.",
    "against": "Recovery ignores wetting origin.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 2,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 17,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0424",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A moss leaf could recover photosynthesis faster when rewetting starts at its attachment point.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0424",
      "hypothesis": "A moss leaf could recover photosynthesis faster when rewetting starts at its attachment point.",
      "test": "Compare directional rewetting with fluorescence.",
      "against": "Recovery ignores wetting origin.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0424",
      "hypothesis": "A moss leaf could recover photosynthesis faster when rewetting starts at its attachment point.",
      "test": "Compare directional rewetting with fluorescence.",
      "against": "Recovery ignores wetting origin.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 2,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 17,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0425",
    "hypothesis": "A nonpathogenic fungus could coordinate branching through elastic waves in its substrate.",
    "test": "Measure branching after isolated mechanical pulses.",
    "against": "Coordination requires diffusible signals.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 2,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 17,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0425",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A nonpathogenic fungus could coordinate branching through elastic waves in its substrate.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0425",
      "hypothesis": "A nonpathogenic fungus could coordinate branching through elastic waves in its substrate.",
      "test": "Measure branching after isolated mechanical pulses.",
      "against": "Coordination requires diffusible signals.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0425",
      "hypothesis": "A nonpathogenic fungus could coordinate branching through elastic waves in its substrate.",
      "test": "Measure branching after isolated mechanical pulses.",
      "against": "Coordination requires diffusible signals.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 2,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 17,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0426",
    "hypothesis": "A plant root could stabilize oxygen uptake by selectively opening intercellular gas pathways during compression.",
    "test": "Image gas connectivity and oxygen transport.",
    "against": "Transport changes require tissue damage.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "nonhuman biology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0426",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A plant root could stabilize oxygen uptake by selectively opening intercellular gas pathways during compression.",
    "category": "nonhuman biology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0426",
      "hypothesis": "A plant root could stabilize oxygen uptake by selectively opening intercellular gas pathways during compression.",
      "test": "Image gas connectivity and oxygen transport.",
      "against": "Transport changes require tissue damage.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0426",
      "hypothesis": "A plant root could stabilize oxygen uptake by selectively opening intercellular gas pathways during compression.",
      "test": "Image gas connectivity and oxygen transport.",
      "against": "Transport changes require tissue damage.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "nonhuman biology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0427",
    "hypothesis": "A microalgal suspension could self-organize into light-sharing layers through reversible aggregation strength.",
    "test": "Measure light fields and aggregate dynamics.",
    "against": "Layering follows sedimentation alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 2,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 17,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0427",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A microalgal suspension could self-organize into light-sharing layers through reversible aggregation strength.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0427",
      "hypothesis": "A microalgal suspension could self-organize into light-sharing layers through reversible aggregation strength.",
      "test": "Measure light fields and aggregate dynamics.",
      "against": "Layering follows sedimentation alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0427",
      "hypothesis": "A microalgal suspension could self-organize into light-sharing layers through reversible aggregation strength.",
      "test": "Measure light fields and aggregate dynamics.",
      "against": "Layering follows sedimentation alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 2,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 17,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0428",
    "hypothesis": "A seed could retain a memory of brief mechanical confinement in later coat permeability.",
    "test": "Measure permeability after unloading.",
    "against": "Permeability recovers immediately.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0428",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A seed could retain a memory of brief mechanical confinement in later coat permeability.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0428",
      "hypothesis": "A seed could retain a memory of brief mechanical confinement in later coat permeability.",
      "test": "Measure permeability after unloading.",
      "against": "Permeability recovers immediately.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0428",
      "hypothesis": "A seed could retain a memory of brief mechanical confinement in later coat permeability.",
      "test": "Measure permeability after unloading.",
      "against": "Permeability recovers immediately.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0429",
    "hypothesis": "A fungal cord could export excess heat preferentially along water-rich transport routes.",
    "test": "Map heat and water tracers.",
    "against": "Thermal anisotropy follows geometry alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 2,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 15,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0429",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A fungal cord could export excess heat preferentially along water-rich transport routes.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0429",
      "hypothesis": "A fungal cord could export excess heat preferentially along water-rich transport routes.",
      "test": "Map heat and water tracers.",
      "against": "Thermal anisotropy follows geometry alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0429",
      "hypothesis": "A fungal cord could export excess heat preferentially along water-rich transport routes.",
      "test": "Map heat and water tracers.",
      "against": "Thermal anisotropy follows geometry alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 2,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 15,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0430",
    "hypothesis": "A plant surface hair could collect dissolved minerals by pumping droplets during its elastic recovery.",
    "test": "Track solute and hair motion.",
    "against": "Transport requires net external flow.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0430",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A plant surface hair could collect dissolved minerals by pumping droplets during its elastic recovery.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0430",
      "hypothesis": "A plant surface hair could collect dissolved minerals by pumping droplets during its elastic recovery.",
      "test": "Track solute and hair motion.",
      "against": "Transport requires net external flow.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0430",
      "hypothesis": "A plant surface hair could collect dissolved minerals by pumping droplets during its elastic recovery.",
      "test": "Track solute and hair motion.",
      "against": "Transport requires net external flow.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0431",
    "hypothesis": "A bacterial microcolony could suppress neighbors through depletion of mechanical space before nutrient depletion.",
    "test": "Separate confinement and nutrient fields.",
    "against": "Growth effects follow nutrients only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 2,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 15,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0431",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A bacterial microcolony could suppress neighbors through depletion of mechanical space before nutrient depletion.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0431",
      "hypothesis": "A bacterial microcolony could suppress neighbors through depletion of mechanical space before nutrient depletion.",
      "test": "Separate confinement and nutrient fields.",
      "against": "Growth effects follow nutrients only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0431",
      "hypothesis": "A bacterial microcolony could suppress neighbors through depletion of mechanical space before nutrient depletion.",
      "test": "Separate confinement and nutrient fields.",
      "against": "Growth effects follow nutrients only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 2,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 15,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0432",
    "hypothesis": "A moss canopy could preserve small habitats of high humidity through alternating surface curvature.",
    "test": "Map vapor fields in matched replicas.",
    "against": "Humidity follows biomass alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 12,
    "area": "nonhuman biology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0432",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A moss canopy could preserve small habitats of high humidity through alternating surface curvature.",
    "category": "nonhuman biology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0432",
      "hypothesis": "A moss canopy could preserve small habitats of high humidity through alternating surface curvature.",
      "test": "Map vapor fields in matched replicas.",
      "against": "Humidity follows biomass alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0432",
      "hypothesis": "A moss canopy could preserve small habitats of high humidity through alternating surface curvature.",
      "test": "Map vapor fields in matched replicas.",
      "against": "Humidity follows biomass alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 12,
      "area": "nonhuman biology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0433",
    "hypothesis": "A seedling's root angle could respond to cyclic changes in soil conductivity without an imposed electric field.",
    "test": "Control conductivity independently of nutrients.",
    "against": "Angles follow nutrient changes only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "nonhuman biology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0433",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A seedling's root angle could respond to cyclic changes in soil conductivity without an imposed electric field.",
    "category": "nonhuman biology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0433",
      "hypothesis": "A seedling's root angle could respond to cyclic changes in soil conductivity without an imposed electric field.",
      "test": "Control conductivity independently of nutrients.",
      "against": "Angles follow nutrient changes only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0433",
      "hypothesis": "A seedling's root angle could respond to cyclic changes in soil conductivity without an imposed electric field.",
      "test": "Control conductivity independently of nutrients.",
      "against": "Angles follow nutrient changes only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "nonhuman biology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0434",
    "hypothesis": "A fungal membrane could reduce leakage during dehydration by temporarily concentrating compatible solutes at curved regions.",
    "test": "Map solutes and membrane geometry.",
    "against": "Protection reflects bulk concentration alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 2,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 15,
    "area": "nonhuman biology",
    "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0434",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A fungal membrane could reduce leakage during dehydration by temporarily concentrating compatible solutes at curved regions.",
    "category": "nonhuman biology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0434",
      "hypothesis": "A fungal membrane could reduce leakage during dehydration by temporarily concentrating compatible solutes at curved regions.",
      "test": "Map solutes and membrane geometry.",
      "against": "Protection reflects bulk concentration alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0434",
      "hypothesis": "A fungal membrane could reduce leakage during dehydration by temporarily concentrating compatible solutes at curved regions.",
      "test": "Map solutes and membrane geometry.",
      "against": "Protection reflects bulk concentration alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 2,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 15,
      "area": "nonhuman biology",
      "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0435",
    "hypothesis": "A microalga could change scattering before pigment concentration changes during nutrient recovery.",
    "test": "Measure scattering and pigments independently.",
    "against": "Scattering follows cell size only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 2,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 17,
    "area": "nonhuman biology",
    "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0435",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A microalga could change scattering before pigment concentration changes during nutrient recovery.",
    "category": "nonhuman biology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0435",
      "hypothesis": "A microalga could change scattering before pigment concentration changes during nutrient recovery.",
      "test": "Measure scattering and pigments independently.",
      "against": "Scattering follows cell size only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0435",
      "hypothesis": "A microalga could change scattering before pigment concentration changes during nutrient recovery.",
      "test": "Measure scattering and pigments independently.",
      "against": "Scattering follows cell size only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 2,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 17,
      "area": "nonhuman biology",
      "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0436",
    "hypothesis": "A root cap could distinguish loose from cemented grains through the spectrum of contact-force fluctuations.",
    "test": "Track cap responses and contact forces.",
    "against": "Responses follow mean resistance alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 2,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 17,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0436",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A root cap could distinguish loose from cemented grains through the spectrum of contact-force fluctuations.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0436",
      "hypothesis": "A root cap could distinguish loose from cemented grains through the spectrum of contact-force fluctuations.",
      "test": "Track cap responses and contact forces.",
      "against": "Responses follow mean resistance alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0436",
      "hypothesis": "A root cap could distinguish loose from cemented grains through the spectrum of contact-force fluctuations.",
      "test": "Track cap responses and contact forces.",
      "against": "Responses follow mean resistance alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 2,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 17,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0437",
    "hypothesis": "A seed coat could protect embryos from rapid cooling by delaying freezing specifically around gas-filled channels.",
    "test": "Image freeze fronts in model coats.",
    "against": "Delay follows thickness alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0437",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A seed coat could protect embryos from rapid cooling by delaying freezing specifically around gas-filled channels.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0437",
      "hypothesis": "A seed coat could protect embryos from rapid cooling by delaying freezing specifically around gas-filled channels.",
      "test": "Image freeze fronts in model coats.",
      "against": "Delay follows thickness alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0437",
      "hypothesis": "A seed coat could protect embryos from rapid cooling by delaying freezing specifically around gas-filled channels.",
      "test": "Image freeze fronts in model coats.",
      "against": "Delay follows thickness alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0438",
    "hypothesis": "A moss shoot could wick water from neighboring shoots without direct contact through a persistent vapor bridge.",
    "test": "Measure transfer with liquid-contact exclusion.",
    "against": "Transfer matches ordinary diffusion only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 2,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 17,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0438",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A moss shoot could wick water from neighboring shoots without direct contact through a persistent vapor bridge.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0438",
      "hypothesis": "A moss shoot could wick water from neighboring shoots without direct contact through a persistent vapor bridge.",
      "test": "Measure transfer with liquid-contact exclusion.",
      "against": "Transfer matches ordinary diffusion only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0438",
      "hypothesis": "A moss shoot could wick water from neighboring shoots without direct contact through a persistent vapor bridge.",
      "test": "Measure transfer with liquid-contact exclusion.",
      "against": "Transfer matches ordinary diffusion only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 2,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 17,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0439",
    "hypothesis": "A nonpathogenic fungal sheet could mechanically isolate a damaged region through reversible cord buckling.",
    "test": "Map strain before and after injury.",
    "against": "Isolation requires cord breakage.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 2,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 15,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0439",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A nonpathogenic fungal sheet could mechanically isolate a damaged region through reversible cord buckling.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0439",
      "hypothesis": "A nonpathogenic fungal sheet could mechanically isolate a damaged region through reversible cord buckling.",
      "test": "Map strain before and after injury.",
      "against": "Isolation requires cord breakage.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0439",
      "hypothesis": "A nonpathogenic fungal sheet could mechanically isolate a damaged region through reversible cord buckling.",
      "test": "Map strain before and after injury.",
      "against": "Isolation requires cord breakage.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 2,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 15,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0440",
    "hypothesis": "A plant leaf could store a wind-direction trace in reversible wax crystal orientation.",
    "test": "Measure wax texture after airflow histories.",
    "against": "Orientation follows surface abrasion only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 2,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 17,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0440",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A plant leaf could store a wind-direction trace in reversible wax crystal orientation.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0440",
      "hypothesis": "A plant leaf could store a wind-direction trace in reversible wax crystal orientation.",
      "test": "Measure wax texture after airflow histories.",
      "against": "Orientation follows surface abrasion only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0440",
      "hypothesis": "A plant leaf could store a wind-direction trace in reversible wax crystal orientation.",
      "test": "Measure wax texture after airflow histories.",
      "against": "Orientation follows surface abrasion only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 2,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 17,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0441",
    "hypothesis": "A bacterial aggregate could develop a protective rotating outer layer under weak shear.",
    "test": "Track cell trajectories and inner stress.",
    "against": "Rotation does not reduce inner loading.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 2,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 17,
    "area": "nonhuman biology",
    "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0441",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A bacterial aggregate could develop a protective rotating outer layer under weak shear.",
    "category": "nonhuman biology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0441",
      "hypothesis": "A bacterial aggregate could develop a protective rotating outer layer under weak shear.",
      "test": "Track cell trajectories and inner stress.",
      "against": "Rotation does not reduce inner loading.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0441",
      "hypothesis": "A bacterial aggregate could develop a protective rotating outer layer under weak shear.",
      "test": "Track cell trajectories and inner stress.",
      "against": "Rotation does not reduce inner loading.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 2,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 17,
      "area": "nonhuman biology",
      "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0442",
    "hypothesis": "A microalgal cell could alter ion uptake through orientation relative to a weak thermal gradient.",
    "test": "Measure uptake and orientation separately.",
    "against": "Uptake follows temperature alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 2,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 17,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0442",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A microalgal cell could alter ion uptake through orientation relative to a weak thermal gradient.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0442",
      "hypothesis": "A microalgal cell could alter ion uptake through orientation relative to a weak thermal gradient.",
      "test": "Measure uptake and orientation separately.",
      "against": "Uptake follows temperature alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0442",
      "hypothesis": "A microalgal cell could alter ion uptake through orientation relative to a weak thermal gradient.",
      "test": "Measure uptake and orientation separately.",
      "against": "Uptake follows temperature alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 2,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 17,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0443",
    "hypothesis": "A root mucilage film could selectively retain phosphorus-bearing particles through relaxation-matched contacts.",
    "test": "Compare particle retention and contact mechanics.",
    "against": "Retention follows particle charge only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0443",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A root mucilage film could selectively retain phosphorus-bearing particles through relaxation-matched contacts.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0443",
      "hypothesis": "A root mucilage film could selectively retain phosphorus-bearing particles through relaxation-matched contacts.",
      "test": "Compare particle retention and contact mechanics.",
      "against": "Retention follows particle charge only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0443",
      "hypothesis": "A root mucilage film could selectively retain phosphorus-bearing particles through relaxation-matched contacts.",
      "test": "Compare particle retention and contact mechanics.",
      "against": "Retention follows particle charge only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0444",
    "hypothesis": "A seed could reduce repeated-impact damage by redistributing internal moisture after the first collision.",
    "test": "Image moisture and later damage.",
    "against": "Protection appears without redistribution.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0444",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A seed could reduce repeated-impact damage by redistributing internal moisture after the first collision.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0444",
      "hypothesis": "A seed could reduce repeated-impact damage by redistributing internal moisture after the first collision.",
      "test": "Image moisture and later damage.",
      "against": "Protection appears without redistribution.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0444",
      "hypothesis": "A seed could reduce repeated-impact damage by redistributing internal moisture after the first collision.",
      "test": "Image moisture and later damage.",
      "against": "Protection appears without redistribution.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0445",
    "hypothesis": "A fungus could increase transport efficiency by periodically emptying low-use hyphal loops.",
    "test": "Track lumen filling and tracer flux.",
    "against": "Efficiency follows biomass reduction alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 2,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 17,
    "area": "nonhuman biology",
    "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0445",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A fungus could increase transport efficiency by periodically emptying low-use hyphal loops.",
    "category": "nonhuman biology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0445",
      "hypothesis": "A fungus could increase transport efficiency by periodically emptying low-use hyphal loops.",
      "test": "Track lumen filling and tracer flux.",
      "against": "Efficiency follows biomass reduction alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0445",
      "hypothesis": "A fungus could increase transport efficiency by periodically emptying low-use hyphal loops.",
      "test": "Track lumen filling and tracer flux.",
      "against": "Efficiency follows biomass reduction alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 2,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 17,
      "area": "nonhuman biology",
      "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0446",
    "hypothesis": "A moss-covered rock could preserve liquid beneath its surface during short heating pulses through evaporative shading.",
    "test": "Compare water and thermal profiles.",
    "against": "Retention follows insulation alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0446",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A moss-covered rock could preserve liquid beneath its surface during short heating pulses through evaporative shading.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0446",
      "hypothesis": "A moss-covered rock could preserve liquid beneath its surface during short heating pulses through evaporative shading.",
      "test": "Compare water and thermal profiles.",
      "against": "Retention follows insulation alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0446",
      "hypothesis": "A moss-covered rock could preserve liquid beneath its surface during short heating pulses through evaporative shading.",
      "test": "Compare water and thermal profiles.",
      "against": "Retention follows insulation alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0447",
    "hypothesis": "A plant stem could distinguish slow drought from abrupt dehydration through the spatial order of vessel collapse.",
    "test": "Map vessel events under matched final water loss.",
    "against": "Event order is unchanged.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 18,
    "area": "nonhuman biology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0447",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A plant stem could distinguish slow drought from abrupt dehydration through the spatial order of vessel collapse.",
    "category": "nonhuman biology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0447",
      "hypothesis": "A plant stem could distinguish slow drought from abrupt dehydration through the spatial order of vessel collapse.",
      "test": "Map vessel events under matched final water loss.",
      "against": "Event order is unchanged.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0447",
      "hypothesis": "A plant stem could distinguish slow drought from abrupt dehydration through the spatial order of vessel collapse.",
      "test": "Map vessel events under matched final water loss.",
      "against": "Event order is unchanged.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 18,
      "area": "nonhuman biology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0448",
    "hypothesis": "A bacterial surface layer could transmit mechanical information farther when extracellular polymers reversibly bind calcium.",
    "test": "Measure propagation and ion-binding controls.",
    "against": "Range follows bulk stiffness only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 2,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 17,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0448",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A bacterial surface layer could transmit mechanical information farther when extracellular polymers reversibly bind calcium.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0448",
      "hypothesis": "A bacterial surface layer could transmit mechanical information farther when extracellular polymers reversibly bind calcium.",
      "test": "Measure propagation and ion-binding controls.",
      "against": "Range follows bulk stiffness only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0448",
      "hypothesis": "A bacterial surface layer could transmit mechanical information farther when extracellular polymers reversibly bind calcium.",
      "test": "Measure propagation and ion-binding controls.",
      "against": "Range follows bulk stiffness only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 2,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 17,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0449",
    "hypothesis": "A microalgal colony could maintain its swimming direction after flagellar disruption through stored body rotation.",
    "test": "Track rotation and trajectories.",
    "against": "Directional memory vanishes immediately.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 2,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 17,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0449",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A microalgal colony could maintain its swimming direction after flagellar disruption through stored body rotation.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0449",
      "hypothesis": "A microalgal colony could maintain its swimming direction after flagellar disruption through stored body rotation.",
      "test": "Track rotation and trajectories.",
      "against": "Directional memory vanishes immediately.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0449",
      "hypothesis": "A microalgal colony could maintain its swimming direction after flagellar disruption through stored body rotation.",
      "test": "Track rotation and trajectories.",
      "against": "Directional memory vanishes immediately.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 2,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 17,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0450",
    "hypothesis": "A seedling could redistribute growth toward mechanically quiet pores even at equal nutrient availability.",
    "test": "Control pore vibrations and nutrients.",
    "against": "Growth ignores mechanical noise.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0450",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A seedling could redistribute growth toward mechanically quiet pores even at equal nutrient availability.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0450",
      "hypothesis": "A seedling could redistribute growth toward mechanically quiet pores even at equal nutrient availability.",
      "test": "Control pore vibrations and nutrients.",
      "against": "Growth ignores mechanical noise.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0450",
      "hypothesis": "A seedling could redistribute growth toward mechanically quiet pores even at equal nutrient availability.",
      "test": "Control pore vibrations and nutrients.",
      "against": "Growth ignores mechanical noise.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0451",
    "hypothesis": "A fungal spore wall could release water preferentially through defects created during maturation.",
    "test": "Map wall age and water loss.",
    "against": "Release follows current wall thickness only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 2,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 15,
    "area": "nonhuman biology",
    "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0451",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A fungal spore wall could release water preferentially through defects created during maturation.",
    "category": "nonhuman biology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0451",
      "hypothesis": "A fungal spore wall could release water preferentially through defects created during maturation.",
      "test": "Map wall age and water loss.",
      "against": "Release follows current wall thickness only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0451",
      "hypothesis": "A fungal spore wall could release water preferentially through defects created during maturation.",
      "test": "Map wall age and water loss.",
      "against": "Release follows current wall thickness only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 2,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 15,
      "area": "nonhuman biology",
      "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0452",
    "hypothesis": "A plant root network could stabilize soil moisture by alternating uptake among hydraulically isolated branches.",
    "test": "Measure branch-specific water extraction.",
    "against": "Extraction simply follows available water.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "nonhuman biology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0452",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A plant root network could stabilize soil moisture by alternating uptake among hydraulically isolated branches.",
    "category": "nonhuman biology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0452",
      "hypothesis": "A plant root network could stabilize soil moisture by alternating uptake among hydraulically isolated branches.",
      "test": "Measure branch-specific water extraction.",
      "against": "Extraction simply follows available water.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0452",
      "hypothesis": "A plant root network could stabilize soil moisture by alternating uptake among hydraulically isolated branches.",
      "test": "Measure branch-specific water extraction.",
      "against": "Extraction simply follows available water.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "nonhuman biology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0453",
    "hypothesis": "A moss leaf could reduce photobleaching through hydration-triggered curling that preserves diffuse illumination.",
    "test": "Measure geometry and absorbed spectra.",
    "against": "Protection requires reduced total light only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "nonhuman biology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0453",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A moss leaf could reduce photobleaching through hydration-triggered curling that preserves diffuse illumination.",
    "category": "nonhuman biology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0453",
      "hypothesis": "A moss leaf could reduce photobleaching through hydration-triggered curling that preserves diffuse illumination.",
      "test": "Measure geometry and absorbed spectra.",
      "against": "Protection requires reduced total light only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0453",
      "hypothesis": "A moss leaf could reduce photobleaching through hydration-triggered curling that preserves diffuse illumination.",
      "test": "Measure geometry and absorbed spectra.",
      "against": "Protection requires reduced total light only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "nonhuman biology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0454",
    "hypothesis": "A nonpathogenic biofilm could recover permeability after drying by sacrificing a thin outer polymer layer.",
    "test": "Track layer release and tracer flow.",
    "against": "Recovery requires wholesale structural failure.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 2,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 17,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0454",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A nonpathogenic biofilm could recover permeability after drying by sacrificing a thin outer polymer layer.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0454",
      "hypothesis": "A nonpathogenic biofilm could recover permeability after drying by sacrificing a thin outer polymer layer.",
      "test": "Track layer release and tracer flow.",
      "against": "Recovery requires wholesale structural failure.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0454",
      "hypothesis": "A nonpathogenic biofilm could recover permeability after drying by sacrificing a thin outer polymer layer.",
      "test": "Track layer release and tracer flow.",
      "against": "Recovery requires wholesale structural failure.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 2,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 17,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0455",
    "hypothesis": "A seed coat could select its opening location through a temporary gradient in bound water.",
    "test": "Measure water states and seam mechanics.",
    "against": "Opening follows total hydration alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "nonhuman biology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0455",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A seed coat could select its opening location through a temporary gradient in bound water.",
    "category": "nonhuman biology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0455",
      "hypothesis": "A seed coat could select its opening location through a temporary gradient in bound water.",
      "test": "Measure water states and seam mechanics.",
      "against": "Opening follows total hydration alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0455",
      "hypothesis": "A seed coat could select its opening location through a temporary gradient in bound water.",
      "test": "Measure water states and seam mechanics.",
      "against": "Opening follows total hydration alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "nonhuman biology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0456",
    "hypothesis": "A microalga could avoid overheating by transiently reducing colony packing without changing cell number.",
    "test": "Measure spacing and temperature.",
    "against": "Cooling follows altered flow alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 2,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 17,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0456",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A microalga could avoid overheating by transiently reducing colony packing without changing cell number.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0456",
      "hypothesis": "A microalga could avoid overheating by transiently reducing colony packing without changing cell number.",
      "test": "Measure spacing and temperature.",
      "against": "Cooling follows altered flow alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0456",
      "hypothesis": "A microalga could avoid overheating by transiently reducing colony packing without changing cell number.",
      "test": "Measure spacing and temperature.",
      "against": "Cooling follows altered flow alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 2,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 17,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0457",
    "hypothesis": "A fungal junction could behave as a mechanical diode for pressure pulses.",
    "test": "Measure transmission in both directions.",
    "against": "Asymmetry follows static diameter only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 2,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 17,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0457",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A fungal junction could behave as a mechanical diode for pressure pulses.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0457",
      "hypothesis": "A fungal junction could behave as a mechanical diode for pressure pulses.",
      "test": "Measure transmission in both directions.",
      "against": "Asymmetry follows static diameter only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0457",
      "hypothesis": "A fungal junction could behave as a mechanical diode for pressure pulses.",
      "test": "Measure transmission in both directions.",
      "against": "Asymmetry follows static diameter only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 2,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 17,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0458",
    "hypothesis": "A plant leaf replica could passively route icy droplets away from its warmest vein region.",
    "test": "Image droplet paths during controlled freezing.",
    "against": "Routing follows surface slope only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 2,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 17,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0458",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A plant leaf replica could passively route icy droplets away from its warmest vein region.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0458",
      "hypothesis": "A plant leaf replica could passively route icy droplets away from its warmest vein region.",
      "test": "Image droplet paths during controlled freezing.",
      "against": "Routing follows surface slope only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0458",
      "hypothesis": "A plant leaf replica could passively route icy droplets away from its warmest vein region.",
      "test": "Image droplet paths during controlled freezing.",
      "against": "Routing follows surface slope only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 2,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 17,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0459",
    "hypothesis": "A root-associated nonpathogenic microbe could attach preferentially where root motion creates intermittent rather than steady contact.",
    "test": "Compare attachment under matched exposure.",
    "against": "Attachment follows contact duration alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 2,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 17,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0459",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A root-associated nonpathogenic microbe could attach preferentially where root motion creates intermittent rather than steady contact.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0459",
      "hypothesis": "A root-associated nonpathogenic microbe could attach preferentially where root motion creates intermittent rather than steady contact.",
      "test": "Compare attachment under matched exposure.",
      "against": "Attachment follows contact duration alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0459",
      "hypothesis": "A root-associated nonpathogenic microbe could attach preferentially where root motion creates intermittent rather than steady contact.",
      "test": "Compare attachment under matched exposure.",
      "against": "Attachment follows contact duration alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 2,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 17,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0460",
    "hypothesis": "A moss mat could resist frost lifting by redistributing water before ice bridges connect shoots.",
    "test": "Image water movement and frost forces.",
    "against": "Resistance appears without redistribution.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "nonhuman biology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0460",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A moss mat could resist frost lifting by redistributing water before ice bridges connect shoots.",
    "category": "nonhuman biology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0460",
      "hypothesis": "A moss mat could resist frost lifting by redistributing water before ice bridges connect shoots.",
      "test": "Image water movement and frost forces.",
      "against": "Resistance appears without redistribution.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0460",
      "hypothesis": "A moss mat could resist frost lifting by redistributing water before ice bridges connect shoots.",
      "test": "Image water movement and frost forces.",
      "against": "Resistance appears without redistribution.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "nonhuman biology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0461",
    "hypothesis": "A seedling could store a brief gravity reversal in the timing of later growth pulses.",
    "test": "Track growth after controlled reorientation.",
    "against": "Only current orientation predicts growth.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "nonhuman biology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0461",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A seedling could store a brief gravity reversal in the timing of later growth pulses.",
    "category": "nonhuman biology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0461",
      "hypothesis": "A seedling could store a brief gravity reversal in the timing of later growth pulses.",
      "test": "Track growth after controlled reorientation.",
      "against": "Only current orientation predicts growth.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0461",
      "hypothesis": "A seedling could store a brief gravity reversal in the timing of later growth pulses.",
      "test": "Track growth after controlled reorientation.",
      "against": "Only current orientation predicts growth.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "nonhuman biology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0462",
    "hypothesis": "A fungal cord could maintain solute movement through local rhythmic diameter changes without a sustained pressure gradient.",
    "test": "Measure diameter and tracer motion.",
    "against": "Transport requires net imposed pressure.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 2,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 17,
    "area": "nonhuman biology",
    "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0462",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A fungal cord could maintain solute movement through local rhythmic diameter changes without a sustained pressure gradient.",
    "category": "nonhuman biology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0462",
      "hypothesis": "A fungal cord could maintain solute movement through local rhythmic diameter changes without a sustained pressure gradient.",
      "test": "Measure diameter and tracer motion.",
      "against": "Transport requires net imposed pressure.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0462",
      "hypothesis": "A fungal cord could maintain solute movement through local rhythmic diameter changes without a sustained pressure gradient.",
      "test": "Measure diameter and tracer motion.",
      "against": "Transport requires net imposed pressure.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 2,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 17,
      "area": "nonhuman biology",
      "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0463",
    "hypothesis": "A plant cuticle could separate water loss from gas exchange through mechanically distinct transport pathways.",
    "test": "Measure both during controlled stretching.",
    "against": "Both fluxes change proportionally.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0463",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A plant cuticle could separate water loss from gas exchange through mechanically distinct transport pathways.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0463",
      "hypothesis": "A plant cuticle could separate water loss from gas exchange through mechanically distinct transport pathways.",
      "test": "Measure both during controlled stretching.",
      "against": "Both fluxes change proportionally.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0463",
      "hypothesis": "A plant cuticle could separate water loss from gas exchange through mechanically distinct transport pathways.",
      "test": "Measure both during controlled stretching.",
      "against": "Both fluxes change proportionally.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0464",
    "hypothesis": "A microalgal aggregate could exclude inactive cells by buoyancy-driven internal rearrangement.",
    "test": "Map activity, density, and position.",
    "against": "Sorting follows cell size alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 12,
    "area": "nonhuman biology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0464",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A microalgal aggregate could exclude inactive cells by buoyancy-driven internal rearrangement.",
    "category": "nonhuman biology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0464",
      "hypothesis": "A microalgal aggregate could exclude inactive cells by buoyancy-driven internal rearrangement.",
      "test": "Map activity, density, and position.",
      "against": "Sorting follows cell size alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0464",
      "hypothesis": "A microalgal aggregate could exclude inactive cells by buoyancy-driven internal rearrangement.",
      "test": "Map activity, density, and position.",
      "against": "Sorting follows cell size alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 12,
      "area": "nonhuman biology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0465",
    "hypothesis": "A bacterial colony could reduce shear damage by synchronizing short-lived detachment events.",
    "test": "Track detachments and residual stress.",
    "against": "Synchronization increases rather than reduces damage.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 2,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 17,
    "area": "nonhuman biology",
    "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0465",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A bacterial colony could reduce shear damage by synchronizing short-lived detachment events.",
    "category": "nonhuman biology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0465",
      "hypothesis": "A bacterial colony could reduce shear damage by synchronizing short-lived detachment events.",
      "test": "Track detachments and residual stress.",
      "against": "Synchronization increases rather than reduces damage.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0465",
      "hypothesis": "A bacterial colony could reduce shear damage by synchronizing short-lived detachment events.",
      "test": "Track detachments and residual stress.",
      "against": "Synchronization increases rather than reduces damage.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 2,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 17,
      "area": "nonhuman biology",
      "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0466",
    "hypothesis": "A seed-inspired capsule could self-bury through alternating friction caused by surface condensation.",
    "test": "Track inert capsules during humidity changes.",
    "against": "Burial requires externally imposed vibration.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0466",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A seed-inspired capsule could self-bury through alternating friction caused by surface condensation.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0466",
      "hypothesis": "A seed-inspired capsule could self-bury through alternating friction caused by surface condensation.",
      "test": "Track inert capsules during humidity changes.",
      "against": "Burial requires externally imposed vibration.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0466",
      "hypothesis": "A seed-inspired capsule could self-bury through alternating friction caused by surface condensation.",
      "test": "Track inert capsules during humidity changes.",
      "against": "Burial requires externally imposed vibration.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0467",
    "hypothesis": "A moss shoot could retrieve water from a collapsed neighboring shoot through contact-induced reopening of capillary spaces.",
    "test": "Image bridges and transferred mass.",
    "against": "Transfer occurs without structural reopening.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 2,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 17,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0467",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A moss shoot could retrieve water from a collapsed neighboring shoot through contact-induced reopening of capillary spaces.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0467",
      "hypothesis": "A moss shoot could retrieve water from a collapsed neighboring shoot through contact-induced reopening of capillary spaces.",
      "test": "Image bridges and transferred mass.",
      "against": "Transfer occurs without structural reopening.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0467",
      "hypothesis": "A moss shoot could retrieve water from a collapsed neighboring shoot through contact-induced reopening of capillary spaces.",
      "test": "Image bridges and transferred mass.",
      "against": "Transfer occurs without structural reopening.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 2,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 17,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0468",
    "hypothesis": "A plant root could identify pore connectivity through the recovery time after its own pressure perturbation.",
    "test": "Measure growth choices and pressure echoes.",
    "against": "Choices follow pore width alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "nonhuman biology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0468",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A plant root could identify pore connectivity through the recovery time after its own pressure perturbation.",
    "category": "nonhuman biology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0468",
      "hypothesis": "A plant root could identify pore connectivity through the recovery time after its own pressure perturbation.",
      "test": "Measure growth choices and pressure echoes.",
      "against": "Choices follow pore width alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0468",
      "hypothesis": "A plant root could identify pore connectivity through the recovery time after its own pressure perturbation.",
      "test": "Measure growth choices and pressure echoes.",
      "against": "Choices follow pore width alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "nonhuman biology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0469",
    "hypothesis": "A fungus could reduce nutrient transport noise by partitioning ions into moving vacuolar packets.",
    "test": "Track packets and downstream concentration.",
    "against": "Noise reduction follows mean flux alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 2,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 17,
    "area": "nonhuman biology",
    "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0469",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A fungus could reduce nutrient transport noise by partitioning ions into moving vacuolar packets.",
    "category": "nonhuman biology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0469",
      "hypothesis": "A fungus could reduce nutrient transport noise by partitioning ions into moving vacuolar packets.",
      "test": "Track packets and downstream concentration.",
      "against": "Noise reduction follows mean flux alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0469",
      "hypothesis": "A fungus could reduce nutrient transport noise by partitioning ions into moving vacuolar packets.",
      "test": "Track packets and downstream concentration.",
      "against": "Noise reduction follows mean flux alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 2,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 17,
      "area": "nonhuman biology",
      "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0470",
    "hypothesis": "A microalga could change its effective drag through reversible release of a nonadhesive extracellular strand.",
    "test": "Measure strands and swimming resistance.",
    "against": "Drag changes require cell-shape changes.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 2,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 17,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0470",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A microalga could change its effective drag through reversible release of a nonadhesive extracellular strand.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0470",
      "hypothesis": "A microalga could change its effective drag through reversible release of a nonadhesive extracellular strand.",
      "test": "Measure strands and swimming resistance.",
      "against": "Drag changes require cell-shape changes.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0470",
      "hypothesis": "A microalga could change its effective drag through reversible release of a nonadhesive extracellular strand.",
      "test": "Measure strands and swimming resistance.",
      "against": "Drag changes require cell-shape changes.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 2,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 17,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0471",
    "hypothesis": "A seed coat could attenuate acoustic shocks through locally trapped vapor that forms during impact heating.",
    "test": "Measure gas and transmitted pulses.",
    "against": "Attenuation occurs without vapor formation.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0471",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A seed coat could attenuate acoustic shocks through locally trapped vapor that forms during impact heating.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0471",
      "hypothesis": "A seed coat could attenuate acoustic shocks through locally trapped vapor that forms during impact heating.",
      "test": "Measure gas and transmitted pulses.",
      "against": "Attenuation occurs without vapor formation.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0471",
      "hypothesis": "A seed coat could attenuate acoustic shocks through locally trapped vapor that forms during impact heating.",
      "test": "Measure gas and transmitted pulses.",
      "against": "Attenuation occurs without vapor formation.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0472",
    "hypothesis": "A plant leaf could equalize local water potential through transient contact between normally separated internal surfaces.",
    "test": "Image contacts and water redistribution.",
    "against": "Equalization ignores contact events.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "nonhuman biology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0472",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A plant leaf could equalize local water potential through transient contact between normally separated internal surfaces.",
    "category": "nonhuman biology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0472",
      "hypothesis": "A plant leaf could equalize local water potential through transient contact between normally separated internal surfaces.",
      "test": "Image contacts and water redistribution.",
      "against": "Equalization ignores contact events.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0472",
      "hypothesis": "A plant leaf could equalize local water potential through transient contact between normally separated internal surfaces.",
      "test": "Image contacts and water redistribution.",
      "against": "Equalization ignores contact events.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "nonhuman biology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0473",
    "hypothesis": "A bacterial cellulose mat could organize mineral growth by directing local strain rather than chemical binding.",
    "test": "Measure strain and crystal orientation.",
    "against": "Orientation follows binding-site density only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 2,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 17,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0473",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A bacterial cellulose mat could organize mineral growth by directing local strain rather than chemical binding.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0473",
      "hypothesis": "A bacterial cellulose mat could organize mineral growth by directing local strain rather than chemical binding.",
      "test": "Measure strain and crystal orientation.",
      "against": "Orientation follows binding-site density only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0473",
      "hypothesis": "A bacterial cellulose mat could organize mineral growth by directing local strain rather than chemical binding.",
      "test": "Measure strain and crystal orientation.",
      "against": "Orientation follows binding-site density only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 2,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 17,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0474",
    "hypothesis": "A fungal tip could recognize a previously traversed route through substrate deformation left after solute washout.",
    "test": "Compare growth on mechanically reset substrates.",
    "against": "Route preference survives deformation removal.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 2,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 17,
    "area": "nonhuman biology",
    "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0474",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A fungal tip could recognize a previously traversed route through substrate deformation left after solute washout.",
    "category": "nonhuman biology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0474",
      "hypothesis": "A fungal tip could recognize a previously traversed route through substrate deformation left after solute washout.",
      "test": "Compare growth on mechanically reset substrates.",
      "against": "Route preference survives deformation removal.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0474",
      "hypothesis": "A fungal tip could recognize a previously traversed route through substrate deformation left after solute washout.",
      "test": "Compare growth on mechanically reset substrates.",
      "against": "Route preference survives deformation removal.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 2,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 17,
      "area": "nonhuman biology",
      "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0475",
    "hypothesis": "A moss colony could redistribute light through wetness-dependent refractive coupling between leaves.",
    "test": "Measure internal optical paths and hydration.",
    "against": "Light distribution follows pigment absorption alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0475",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A moss colony could redistribute light through wetness-dependent refractive coupling between leaves.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0475",
      "hypothesis": "A moss colony could redistribute light through wetness-dependent refractive coupling between leaves.",
      "test": "Measure internal optical paths and hydration.",
      "against": "Light distribution follows pigment absorption alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0475",
      "hypothesis": "A moss colony could redistribute light through wetness-dependent refractive coupling between leaves.",
      "test": "Measure internal optical paths and hydration.",
      "against": "Light distribution follows pigment absorption alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0476",
    "hypothesis": "A seedling root could reduce friction by oscillating its growth direction at a pore-dependent frequency.",
    "test": "Track motion and resistance.",
    "against": "Oscillation has no frictional benefit.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0476",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A seedling root could reduce friction by oscillating its growth direction at a pore-dependent frequency.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0476",
      "hypothesis": "A seedling root could reduce friction by oscillating its growth direction at a pore-dependent frequency.",
      "test": "Track motion and resistance.",
      "against": "Oscillation has no frictional benefit.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0476",
      "hypothesis": "A seedling root could reduce friction by oscillating its growth direction at a pore-dependent frequency.",
      "test": "Track motion and resistance.",
      "against": "Oscillation has no frictional benefit.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0477",
    "hypothesis": "A microalgal culture could retain nutrient-pulse memory in membrane permeability after internal stores equalize.",
    "test": "Measure transport and storage separately.",
    "against": "Memory vanishes when stores match.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "nonhuman biology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0477",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A microalgal culture could retain nutrient-pulse memory in membrane permeability after internal stores equalize.",
    "category": "nonhuman biology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0477",
      "hypothesis": "A microalgal culture could retain nutrient-pulse memory in membrane permeability after internal stores equalize.",
      "test": "Measure transport and storage separately.",
      "against": "Memory vanishes when stores match.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0477",
      "hypothesis": "A microalgal culture could retain nutrient-pulse memory in membrane permeability after internal stores equalize.",
      "test": "Measure transport and storage separately.",
      "against": "Memory vanishes when stores match.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "nonhuman biology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0478",
    "hypothesis": "A plant surface could prevent repeated droplet impacts from accumulating damage through rapid capillary stress relaxation.",
    "test": "Measure impact strain and recovery.",
    "against": "Protection follows surface thickness only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0478",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A plant surface could prevent repeated droplet impacts from accumulating damage through rapid capillary stress relaxation.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0478",
      "hypothesis": "A plant surface could prevent repeated droplet impacts from accumulating damage through rapid capillary stress relaxation.",
      "test": "Measure impact strain and recovery.",
      "against": "Protection follows surface thickness only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0478",
      "hypothesis": "A plant surface could prevent repeated droplet impacts from accumulating damage through rapid capillary stress relaxation.",
      "test": "Measure impact strain and recovery.",
      "against": "Protection follows surface thickness only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0479",
    "hypothesis": "A nonpathogenic bacterial filament could steer around obstacles by redistributing internal elastic strain before bending.",
    "test": "Map strain and trajectories.",
    "against": "Strain redistribution follows bending only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 12,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0479",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A nonpathogenic bacterial filament could steer around obstacles by redistributing internal elastic strain before bending.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0479",
      "hypothesis": "A nonpathogenic bacterial filament could steer around obstacles by redistributing internal elastic strain before bending.",
      "test": "Map strain and trajectories.",
      "against": "Strain redistribution follows bending only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0479",
      "hypothesis": "A nonpathogenic bacterial filament could steer around obstacles by redistributing internal elastic strain before bending.",
      "test": "Map strain and trajectories.",
      "against": "Strain redistribution follows bending only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 12,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0480",
    "hypothesis": "A fungus could actively separate hydraulic and chemical transport routes through changing septal permeability.",
    "test": "Measure pressure and solute transmission.",
    "against": "Both routes remain obligatorily coupled.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 2,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 17,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0480",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A fungus could actively separate hydraulic and chemical transport routes through changing septal permeability.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0480",
      "hypothesis": "A fungus could actively separate hydraulic and chemical transport routes through changing septal permeability.",
      "test": "Measure pressure and solute transmission.",
      "against": "Both routes remain obligatorily coupled.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0480",
      "hypothesis": "A fungus could actively separate hydraulic and chemical transport routes through changing septal permeability.",
      "test": "Measure pressure and solute transmission.",
      "against": "Both routes remain obligatorily coupled.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 2,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 17,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0481",
    "hypothesis": "A seed coat could buffer salinity pulses by temporarily storing ions in nonliving wall compartments.",
    "test": "Measure compartment ions and embryo exposure.",
    "against": "Buffering reflects delayed water uptake only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "nonhuman biology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0481",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A seed coat could buffer salinity pulses by temporarily storing ions in nonliving wall compartments.",
    "category": "nonhuman biology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0481",
      "hypothesis": "A seed coat could buffer salinity pulses by temporarily storing ions in nonliving wall compartments.",
      "test": "Measure compartment ions and embryo exposure.",
      "against": "Buffering reflects delayed water uptake only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0481",
      "hypothesis": "A seed coat could buffer salinity pulses by temporarily storing ions in nonliving wall compartments.",
      "test": "Measure compartment ions and embryo exposure.",
      "against": "Buffering reflects delayed water uptake only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "nonhuman biology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0482",
    "hypothesis": "A moss leaf could release trapped air during rehydration through edge-first flexure.",
    "test": "Track bubbles and leaf deformation.",
    "against": "Air exits independently of flexure.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "nonhuman biology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0482",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A moss leaf could release trapped air during rehydration through edge-first flexure.",
    "category": "nonhuman biology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0482",
      "hypothesis": "A moss leaf could release trapped air during rehydration through edge-first flexure.",
      "test": "Track bubbles and leaf deformation.",
      "against": "Air exits independently of flexure.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0482",
      "hypothesis": "A moss leaf could release trapped air during rehydration through edge-first flexure.",
      "test": "Track bubbles and leaf deformation.",
      "against": "Air exits independently of flexure.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "nonhuman biology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0483",
    "hypothesis": "A plant root could grow preferentially into a mechanically recoverable rather than permanently yielding substrate.",
    "test": "Match stiffness while varying recovery.",
    "against": "Preference follows stiffness alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0483",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A plant root could grow preferentially into a mechanically recoverable rather than permanently yielding substrate.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0483",
      "hypothesis": "A plant root could grow preferentially into a mechanically recoverable rather than permanently yielding substrate.",
      "test": "Match stiffness while varying recovery.",
      "against": "Preference follows stiffness alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0483",
      "hypothesis": "A plant root could grow preferentially into a mechanically recoverable rather than permanently yielding substrate.",
      "test": "Match stiffness while varying recovery.",
      "against": "Preference follows stiffness alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0484",
    "hypothesis": "A microalga could protect its photosynthetic machinery by moving reflective inclusions toward the illuminated side.",
    "test": "Track inclusions and absorbed energy.",
    "against": "Protection occurs without directed relocation.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 2,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 17,
    "area": "nonhuman biology",
    "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0484",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A microalga could protect its photosynthetic machinery by moving reflective inclusions toward the illuminated side.",
    "category": "nonhuman biology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0484",
      "hypothesis": "A microalga could protect its photosynthetic machinery by moving reflective inclusions toward the illuminated side.",
      "test": "Track inclusions and absorbed energy.",
      "against": "Protection occurs without directed relocation.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0484",
      "hypothesis": "A microalga could protect its photosynthetic machinery by moving reflective inclusions toward the illuminated side.",
      "test": "Track inclusions and absorbed energy.",
      "against": "Protection occurs without directed relocation.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 2,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 17,
      "area": "nonhuman biology",
      "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0485",
    "hypothesis": "A fungal cord could detect partial blockage through changes in its own spontaneous pressure fluctuations.",
    "test": "Measure fluctuations before tracer slowdown.",
    "against": "Signals appear only after transport decline.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 2,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 17,
    "area": "nonhuman biology",
    "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0485",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A fungal cord could detect partial blockage through changes in its own spontaneous pressure fluctuations.",
    "category": "nonhuman biology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0485",
      "hypothesis": "A fungal cord could detect partial blockage through changes in its own spontaneous pressure fluctuations.",
      "test": "Measure fluctuations before tracer slowdown.",
      "against": "Signals appear only after transport decline.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0485",
      "hypothesis": "A fungal cord could detect partial blockage through changes in its own spontaneous pressure fluctuations.",
      "test": "Measure fluctuations before tracer slowdown.",
      "against": "Signals appear only after transport decline.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 2,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 17,
      "area": "nonhuman biology",
      "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0486",
    "hypothesis": "A bacterial aggregate could become less adhesive after a short hydration overshoot because outer polymers untangle.",
    "test": "Measure polymer conformation and attachment.",
    "against": "Adhesion follows water content only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 2,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 17,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0486",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A bacterial aggregate could become less adhesive after a short hydration overshoot because outer polymers untangle.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0486",
      "hypothesis": "A bacterial aggregate could become less adhesive after a short hydration overshoot because outer polymers untangle.",
      "test": "Measure polymer conformation and attachment.",
      "against": "Adhesion follows water content only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0486",
      "hypothesis": "A bacterial aggregate could become less adhesive after a short hydration overshoot because outer polymers untangle.",
      "test": "Measure polymer conformation and attachment.",
      "against": "Adhesion follows water content only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 2,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 17,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0487",
    "hypothesis": "A seedling could reduce mineral uptake imbalance by changing root-hair spacing locally rather than transporter activity.",
    "test": "Measure hairs and ion uptake.",
    "against": "Compensation requires transporter changes alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0487",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A seedling could reduce mineral uptake imbalance by changing root-hair spacing locally rather than transporter activity.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0487",
      "hypothesis": "A seedling could reduce mineral uptake imbalance by changing root-hair spacing locally rather than transporter activity.",
      "test": "Measure hairs and ion uptake.",
      "against": "Compensation requires transporter changes alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0487",
      "hypothesis": "A seedling could reduce mineral uptake imbalance by changing root-hair spacing locally rather than transporter activity.",
      "test": "Measure hairs and ion uptake.",
      "against": "Compensation requires transporter changes alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0488",
    "hypothesis": "A moss mat could maintain vapor exchange while submerged through connected microscopic air reservoirs.",
    "test": "Image gas paths and exchange.",
    "against": "Exchange stops when external bubbles leave.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0488",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A moss mat could maintain vapor exchange while submerged through connected microscopic air reservoirs.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0488",
      "hypothesis": "A moss mat could maintain vapor exchange while submerged through connected microscopic air reservoirs.",
      "test": "Image gas paths and exchange.",
      "against": "Exchange stops when external bubbles leave.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0488",
      "hypothesis": "A moss mat could maintain vapor exchange while submerged through connected microscopic air reservoirs.",
      "test": "Image gas paths and exchange.",
      "against": "Exchange stops when external bubbles leave.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0489",
    "hypothesis": "A plant vein analogue could recover after freezing by directing meltwater into intact neighboring channels.",
    "test": "Image melt and restored flow.",
    "against": "Recovery requires uniform warming only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "nonhuman biology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0489",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A plant vein analogue could recover after freezing by directing meltwater into intact neighboring channels.",
    "category": "nonhuman biology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0489",
      "hypothesis": "A plant vein analogue could recover after freezing by directing meltwater into intact neighboring channels.",
      "test": "Image melt and restored flow.",
      "against": "Recovery requires uniform warming only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0489",
      "hypothesis": "A plant vein analogue could recover after freezing by directing meltwater into intact neighboring channels.",
      "test": "Image melt and restored flow.",
      "against": "Recovery requires uniform warming only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "nonhuman biology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0490",
    "hypothesis": "A fungal network could dissipate an impact by sending pressure into unused side branches.",
    "test": "Measure branch pressure and main-cord stress.",
    "against": "Side branches provide no selective protection.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 2,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 17,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0490",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A fungal network could dissipate an impact by sending pressure into unused side branches.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0490",
      "hypothesis": "A fungal network could dissipate an impact by sending pressure into unused side branches.",
      "test": "Measure branch pressure and main-cord stress.",
      "against": "Side branches provide no selective protection.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0490",
      "hypothesis": "A fungal network could dissipate an impact by sending pressure into unused side branches.",
      "test": "Measure branch pressure and main-cord stress.",
      "against": "Side branches provide no selective protection.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 2,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 17,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0491",
    "hypothesis": "A microalgal cell could infer flow reversals from differential relaxation of its two flagella.",
    "test": "Measure flagellar motion after reversals.",
    "against": "Responses follow instantaneous shear only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 2,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 17,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0491",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A microalgal cell could infer flow reversals from differential relaxation of its two flagella.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0491",
      "hypothesis": "A microalgal cell could infer flow reversals from differential relaxation of its two flagella.",
      "test": "Measure flagellar motion after reversals.",
      "against": "Responses follow instantaneous shear only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0491",
      "hypothesis": "A microalgal cell could infer flow reversals from differential relaxation of its two flagella.",
      "test": "Measure flagellar motion after reversals.",
      "against": "Responses follow instantaneous shear only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 2,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 17,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0492",
    "hypothesis": "A nonpathogenic biofilm could retain catalytic activity after detachment by packaging enzymes into cohesive fragments.",
    "test": "Measure fragment structure and activity.",
    "against": "Activity follows total enzyme mass only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0492",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A nonpathogenic biofilm could retain catalytic activity after detachment by packaging enzymes into cohesive fragments.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0492",
      "hypothesis": "A nonpathogenic biofilm could retain catalytic activity after detachment by packaging enzymes into cohesive fragments.",
      "test": "Measure fragment structure and activity.",
      "against": "Activity follows total enzyme mass only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0492",
      "hypothesis": "A nonpathogenic biofilm could retain catalytic activity after detachment by packaging enzymes into cohesive fragments.",
      "test": "Measure fragment structure and activity.",
      "against": "Activity follows total enzyme mass only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0493",
    "hypothesis": "A seed could reduce oxygen demand during short flooding through reversible internal phase separation.",
    "test": "Track oxygen use and intracellular organization.",
    "against": "Metabolic changes precede and ignore phase changes.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "nonhuman biology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0493",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A seed could reduce oxygen demand during short flooding through reversible internal phase separation.",
    "category": "nonhuman biology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0493",
      "hypothesis": "A seed could reduce oxygen demand during short flooding through reversible internal phase separation.",
      "test": "Track oxygen use and intracellular organization.",
      "against": "Metabolic changes precede and ignore phase changes.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0493",
      "hypothesis": "A seed could reduce oxygen demand during short flooding through reversible internal phase separation.",
      "test": "Track oxygen use and intracellular organization.",
      "against": "Metabolic changes precede and ignore phase changes.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "nonhuman biology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0494",
    "hypothesis": "A plant root could create a stable liquid pathway by mechanically aligning nearby elongated soil particles.",
    "test": "Image particles and hydraulic conductance.",
    "against": "Conductance changes without particle alignment.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0494",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A plant root could create a stable liquid pathway by mechanically aligning nearby elongated soil particles.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0494",
      "hypothesis": "A plant root could create a stable liquid pathway by mechanically aligning nearby elongated soil particles.",
      "test": "Image particles and hydraulic conductance.",
      "against": "Conductance changes without particle alignment.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0494",
      "hypothesis": "A plant root could create a stable liquid pathway by mechanically aligning nearby elongated soil particles.",
      "test": "Image particles and hydraulic conductance.",
      "against": "Conductance changes without particle alignment.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0495",
    "hypothesis": "A moss leaf could reject mineral dust through humidity-driven twisting before water droplets form.",
    "test": "Measure dust loss and surface condensation.",
    "against": "Removal requires liquid droplets.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0495",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A moss leaf could reject mineral dust through humidity-driven twisting before water droplets form.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0495",
      "hypothesis": "A moss leaf could reject mineral dust through humidity-driven twisting before water droplets form.",
      "test": "Measure dust loss and surface condensation.",
      "against": "Removal requires liquid droplets.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0495",
      "hypothesis": "A moss leaf could reject mineral dust through humidity-driven twisting before water droplets form.",
      "test": "Measure dust loss and surface condensation.",
      "against": "Removal requires liquid droplets.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0496",
    "hypothesis": "A fungal fruiting-body analogue could spread spores with less energy through delayed release of an elastic pressure wave.",
    "test": "Track inert particles and shell motion.",
    "against": "Range gain requires greater input energy.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 2,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 17,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0496",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A fungal fruiting-body analogue could spread spores with less energy through delayed release of an elastic pressure wave.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0496",
      "hypothesis": "A fungal fruiting-body analogue could spread spores with less energy through delayed release of an elastic pressure wave.",
      "test": "Track inert particles and shell motion.",
      "against": "Range gain requires greater input energy.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0496",
      "hypothesis": "A fungal fruiting-body analogue could spread spores with less energy through delayed release of an elastic pressure wave.",
      "test": "Track inert particles and shell motion.",
      "against": "Range gain requires greater input energy.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 2,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 17,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0497",
    "hypothesis": "A bacterial colony could distinguish surface softness from surface viscosity through different reorientation times.",
    "test": "Independently control both substrate properties.",
    "against": "Responses cannot separate the properties.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 2,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 15,
    "area": "nonhuman biology",
    "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0497",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A bacterial colony could distinguish surface softness from surface viscosity through different reorientation times.",
    "category": "nonhuman biology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0497",
      "hypothesis": "A bacterial colony could distinguish surface softness from surface viscosity through different reorientation times.",
      "test": "Independently control both substrate properties.",
      "against": "Responses cannot separate the properties.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0497",
      "hypothesis": "A bacterial colony could distinguish surface softness from surface viscosity through different reorientation times.",
      "test": "Independently control both substrate properties.",
      "against": "Responses cannot separate the properties.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 2,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 15,
      "area": "nonhuman biology",
      "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0498",
    "hypothesis": "A microalga could maintain osmotic stability by exchanging volume between organelles before changing total cell volume.",
    "test": "Track organelle and cell volumes.",
    "against": "Compensation requires total-volume changes.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 2,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 17,
    "area": "nonhuman biology",
    "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0498",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A microalga could maintain osmotic stability by exchanging volume between organelles before changing total cell volume.",
    "category": "nonhuman biology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0498",
      "hypothesis": "A microalga could maintain osmotic stability by exchanging volume between organelles before changing total cell volume.",
      "test": "Track organelle and cell volumes.",
      "against": "Compensation requires total-volume changes.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0498",
      "hypothesis": "A microalga could maintain osmotic stability by exchanging volume between organelles before changing total cell volume.",
      "test": "Track organelle and cell volumes.",
      "against": "Compensation requires total-volume changes.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 2,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 17,
      "area": "nonhuman biology",
      "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0499",
    "hypothesis": "A seed coat could reduce evaporative loss after partial damage by redirecting swelling toward the damaged edge.",
    "test": "Map swelling and water loss.",
    "against": "Damage repair follows uniform swelling only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0499",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A seed coat could reduce evaporative loss after partial damage by redirecting swelling toward the damaged edge.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0499",
      "hypothesis": "A seed coat could reduce evaporative loss after partial damage by redirecting swelling toward the damaged edge.",
      "test": "Map swelling and water loss.",
      "against": "Damage repair follows uniform swelling only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0499",
      "hypothesis": "A seed coat could reduce evaporative loss after partial damage by redirecting swelling toward the damaged edge.",
      "test": "Map swelling and water loss.",
      "against": "Damage repair follows uniform swelling only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0500",
    "hypothesis": "A plant root network could preserve access to patchy water through mechanically triggered branch dormancy.",
    "test": "Measure growth and water availability separately.",
    "against": "Dormancy follows chemistry alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 2,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 17,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0500",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A plant root network could preserve access to patchy water through mechanically triggered branch dormancy.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0500",
      "hypothesis": "A plant root network could preserve access to patchy water through mechanically triggered branch dormancy.",
      "test": "Measure growth and water availability separately.",
      "against": "Dormancy follows chemistry alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0500",
      "hypothesis": "A plant root network could preserve access to patchy water through mechanically triggered branch dormancy.",
      "test": "Measure growth and water availability separately.",
      "against": "Dormancy follows chemistry alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 2,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 17,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0501",
    "hypothesis": "A benign autocatalytic reaction could stop itself by changing the wettability of its reaction vessel.",
    "test": "Measure conversion and contact angle.",
    "against": "Stopping follows reagent exhaustion only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0501",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A benign autocatalytic reaction could stop itself by changing the wettability of its reaction vessel.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0501",
      "hypothesis": "A benign autocatalytic reaction could stop itself by changing the wettability of its reaction vessel.",
      "test": "Measure conversion and contact angle.",
      "against": "Stopping follows reagent exhaustion only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0501",
      "hypothesis": "A benign autocatalytic reaction could stop itself by changing the wettability of its reaction vessel.",
      "test": "Measure conversion and contact angle.",
      "against": "Stopping follows reagent exhaustion only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0502",
    "hypothesis": "A molecular sieve could separate geometric isomers through different entrance waiting times rather than equilibrium uptake.",
    "test": "Measure single-pulse breakthrough and occupancy.",
    "against": "Timing follows adsorption strength alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0502",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A molecular sieve could separate geometric isomers through different entrance waiting times rather than equilibrium uptake.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0502",
      "hypothesis": "A molecular sieve could separate geometric isomers through different entrance waiting times rather than equilibrium uptake.",
      "test": "Measure single-pulse breakthrough and occupancy.",
      "against": "Timing follows adsorption strength alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0502",
      "hypothesis": "A molecular sieve could separate geometric isomers through different entrance waiting times rather than equilibrium uptake.",
      "test": "Measure single-pulse breakthrough and occupancy.",
      "against": "Timing follows adsorption strength alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0503",
    "hypothesis": "A reversible dye aggregate could reveal solvent microheterogeneity through asymmetric spectral recovery after dilution.",
    "test": "Measure spectra and independent solvent structure.",
    "against": "Recovery tracks concentration alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0503",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A reversible dye aggregate could reveal solvent microheterogeneity through asymmetric spectral recovery after dilution.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0503",
      "hypothesis": "A reversible dye aggregate could reveal solvent microheterogeneity through asymmetric spectral recovery after dilution.",
      "test": "Measure spectra and independent solvent structure.",
      "against": "Recovery tracks concentration alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0503",
      "hypothesis": "A reversible dye aggregate could reveal solvent microheterogeneity through asymmetric spectral recovery after dilution.",
      "test": "Measure spectra and independent solvent structure.",
      "against": "Recovery tracks concentration alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0504",
    "hypothesis": "A catalyst support could route heat toward inactive regions and thereby reduce localized deactivation.",
    "test": "Map heat and active sites.",
    "against": "Protection requires lower overall conversion.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 12,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0504",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A catalyst support could route heat toward inactive regions and thereby reduce localized deactivation.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0504",
      "hypothesis": "A catalyst support could route heat toward inactive regions and thereby reduce localized deactivation.",
      "test": "Map heat and active sites.",
      "against": "Protection requires lower overall conversion.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0504",
      "hypothesis": "A catalyst support could route heat toward inactive regions and thereby reduce localized deactivation.",
      "test": "Map heat and active sites.",
      "against": "Protection requires lower overall conversion.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 12,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0505",
    "hypothesis": "A precipitating salt could purify itself by mechanically ejecting inclusions during a controlled lattice transition.",
    "test": "Measure inclusions before and after transition.",
    "against": "Purity changes require dissolution.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0505",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A precipitating salt could purify itself by mechanically ejecting inclusions during a controlled lattice transition.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0505",
      "hypothesis": "A precipitating salt could purify itself by mechanically ejecting inclusions during a controlled lattice transition.",
      "test": "Measure inclusions before and after transition.",
      "against": "Purity changes require dissolution.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0505",
      "hypothesis": "A precipitating salt could purify itself by mechanically ejecting inclusions during a controlled lattice transition.",
      "test": "Measure inclusions before and after transition.",
      "against": "Purity changes require dissolution.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0506",
    "hypothesis": "A porous reagent pellet could maintain a nearly constant output concentration through reaction-front geometry.",
    "test": "Map front shape and outlet composition.",
    "against": "Output simply decays with reagent depletion.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0506",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous reagent pellet could maintain a nearly constant output concentration through reaction-front geometry.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0506",
      "hypothesis": "A porous reagent pellet could maintain a nearly constant output concentration through reaction-front geometry.",
      "test": "Map front shape and outlet composition.",
      "against": "Output simply decays with reagent depletion.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0506",
      "hypothesis": "A porous reagent pellet could maintain a nearly constant output concentration through reaction-front geometry.",
      "test": "Map front shape and outlet composition.",
      "against": "Output simply decays with reagent depletion.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0507",
    "hypothesis": "A neutral molecular host could distinguish dissolved gases by pressure-dependent opening kinetics.",
    "test": "Measure uptake under matched pressure steps.",
    "against": "Selectivity follows equilibrium solubility alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0507",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A neutral molecular host could distinguish dissolved gases by pressure-dependent opening kinetics.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0507",
      "hypothesis": "A neutral molecular host could distinguish dissolved gases by pressure-dependent opening kinetics.",
      "test": "Measure uptake under matched pressure steps.",
      "against": "Selectivity follows equilibrium solubility alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0507",
      "hypothesis": "A neutral molecular host could distinguish dissolved gases by pressure-dependent opening kinetics.",
      "test": "Measure uptake under matched pressure steps.",
      "against": "Selectivity follows equilibrium solubility alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0508",
    "hypothesis": "A chemical indicator could record maximum acidity through irreversible ring closure while rejecting brief thermal peaks.",
    "test": "Apply independent acidity and temperature histories.",
    "against": "Temperature produces indistinguishable records.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0508",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A chemical indicator could record maximum acidity through irreversible ring closure while rejecting brief thermal peaks.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0508",
      "hypothesis": "A chemical indicator could record maximum acidity through irreversible ring closure while rejecting brief thermal peaks.",
      "test": "Apply independent acidity and temperature histories.",
      "against": "Temperature produces indistinguishable records.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0508",
      "hypothesis": "A chemical indicator could record maximum acidity through irreversible ring closure while rejecting brief thermal peaks.",
      "test": "Apply independent acidity and temperature histories.",
      "against": "Temperature produces indistinguishable records.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0509",
    "hypothesis": "A catalyst-free emulsion reaction could accelerate when products drive interfacial folding.",
    "test": "Track products and interface area.",
    "against": "Rate gain follows added area only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0509",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A catalyst-free emulsion reaction could accelerate when products drive interfacial folding.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0509",
      "hypothesis": "A catalyst-free emulsion reaction could accelerate when products drive interfacial folding.",
      "test": "Track products and interface area.",
      "against": "Rate gain follows added area only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0509",
      "hypothesis": "A catalyst-free emulsion reaction could accelerate when products drive interfacial folding.",
      "test": "Track products and interface area.",
      "against": "Rate gain follows added area only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0510",
    "hypothesis": "A mineral surface could selectively regenerate binding sites through mechanical removal of product-rich terraces.",
    "test": "Measure terraces and site activity.",
    "against": "Recovery requires chemical cleaning.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0510",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A mineral surface could selectively regenerate binding sites through mechanical removal of product-rich terraces.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0510",
      "hypothesis": "A mineral surface could selectively regenerate binding sites through mechanical removal of product-rich terraces.",
      "test": "Measure terraces and site activity.",
      "against": "Recovery requires chemical cleaning.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0510",
      "hypothesis": "A mineral surface could selectively regenerate binding sites through mechanical removal of product-rich terraces.",
      "test": "Measure terraces and site activity.",
      "against": "Recovery requires chemical cleaning.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0511",
    "hypothesis": "A porous adsorbent could self-sort strong and weak binders into different depths during stopped flow.",
    "test": "Map depth-resolved occupancy.",
    "against": "Sorting requires continued convection.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0511",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous adsorbent could self-sort strong and weak binders into different depths during stopped flow.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0511",
      "hypothesis": "A porous adsorbent could self-sort strong and weak binders into different depths during stopped flow.",
      "test": "Map depth-resolved occupancy.",
      "against": "Sorting requires continued convection.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0511",
      "hypothesis": "A porous adsorbent could self-sort strong and weak binders into different depths during stopped flow.",
      "test": "Map depth-resolved occupancy.",
      "against": "Sorting requires continued convection.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0512",
    "hypothesis": "A reversible crystal could store solvent activity in defect density after returning to its initial composition.",
    "test": "Measure composition and defects.",
    "against": "Defects disappear when composition recovers.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0512",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A reversible crystal could store solvent activity in defect density after returning to its initial composition.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0512",
      "hypothesis": "A reversible crystal could store solvent activity in defect density after returning to its initial composition.",
      "test": "Measure composition and defects.",
      "against": "Defects disappear when composition recovers.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0512",
      "hypothesis": "A reversible crystal could store solvent activity in defect density after returning to its initial composition.",
      "test": "Measure composition and defects.",
      "against": "Defects disappear when composition recovers.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0513",
    "hypothesis": "A low-temperature reaction could change selectivity when confined solvent clusters rotate collectively.",
    "test": "Measure solvent order and products.",
    "against": "Selectivity tracks mean polarity only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0513",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A low-temperature reaction could change selectivity when confined solvent clusters rotate collectively.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0513",
      "hypothesis": "A low-temperature reaction could change selectivity when confined solvent clusters rotate collectively.",
      "test": "Measure solvent order and products.",
      "against": "Selectivity tracks mean polarity only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0513",
      "hypothesis": "A low-temperature reaction could change selectivity when confined solvent clusters rotate collectively.",
      "test": "Measure solvent order and products.",
      "against": "Selectivity tracks mean polarity only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0514",
    "hypothesis": "A supported catalyst could resist poisoning by transferring adsorbates onto mobile inert carriers.",
    "test": "Measure carrier loading and activity.",
    "against": "Protection requires catalyst shedding.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0514",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A supported catalyst could resist poisoning by transferring adsorbates onto mobile inert carriers.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0514",
      "hypothesis": "A supported catalyst could resist poisoning by transferring adsorbates onto mobile inert carriers.",
      "test": "Measure carrier loading and activity.",
      "against": "Protection requires catalyst shedding.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0514",
      "hypothesis": "A supported catalyst could resist poisoning by transferring adsorbates onto mobile inert carriers.",
      "test": "Measure carrier loading and activity.",
      "against": "Protection requires catalyst shedding.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0515",
    "hypothesis": "A molecular assembly could amplify a tiny impurity concentration into a reversible macroscopic twist.",
    "test": "Measure impurity binding and chirality.",
    "against": "Twist follows random assembly defects.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0515",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A molecular assembly could amplify a tiny impurity concentration into a reversible macroscopic twist.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0515",
      "hypothesis": "A molecular assembly could amplify a tiny impurity concentration into a reversible macroscopic twist.",
      "test": "Measure impurity binding and chirality.",
      "against": "Twist follows random assembly defects.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0515",
      "hypothesis": "A molecular assembly could amplify a tiny impurity concentration into a reversible macroscopic twist.",
      "test": "Measure impurity binding and chirality.",
      "against": "Twist follows random assembly defects.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0516",
    "hypothesis": "A dissolving pellet could stabilize local pH through shape-dependent exposure of different crystal faces.",
    "test": "Measure face retreat and pH.",
    "against": "Buffering follows total dissolution only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0516",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A dissolving pellet could stabilize local pH through shape-dependent exposure of different crystal faces.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0516",
      "hypothesis": "A dissolving pellet could stabilize local pH through shape-dependent exposure of different crystal faces.",
      "test": "Measure face retreat and pH.",
      "against": "Buffering follows total dissolution only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0516",
      "hypothesis": "A dissolving pellet could stabilize local pH through shape-dependent exposure of different crystal faces.",
      "test": "Measure face retreat and pH.",
      "against": "Buffering follows total dissolution only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0517",
    "hypothesis": "A two-phase solvent could extract a solute more selectively when its interface is periodically stretched without mixing phases.",
    "test": "Measure partitioning and interface motion.",
    "against": "Selectivity follows equilibrium partition alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0517",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A two-phase solvent could extract a solute more selectively when its interface is periodically stretched without mixing phases.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0517",
      "hypothesis": "A two-phase solvent could extract a solute more selectively when its interface is periodically stretched without mixing phases.",
      "test": "Measure partitioning and interface motion.",
      "against": "Selectivity follows equilibrium partition alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0517",
      "hypothesis": "A two-phase solvent could extract a solute more selectively when its interface is periodically stretched without mixing phases.",
      "test": "Measure partitioning and interface motion.",
      "against": "Selectivity follows equilibrium partition alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0518",
    "hypothesis": "A benign photoreaction could be directed by an acoustic standing wave through temporary concentration nodes.",
    "test": "Measure node concentration and products.",
    "against": "Effects vanish after temperature matching.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0518",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A benign photoreaction could be directed by an acoustic standing wave through temporary concentration nodes.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0518",
      "hypothesis": "A benign photoreaction could be directed by an acoustic standing wave through temporary concentration nodes.",
      "test": "Measure node concentration and products.",
      "against": "Effects vanish after temperature matching.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0518",
      "hypothesis": "A benign photoreaction could be directed by an acoustic standing wave through temporary concentration nodes.",
      "test": "Measure node concentration and products.",
      "against": "Effects vanish after temperature matching.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0519",
    "hypothesis": "A porous polymer could discriminate alcohol chain branching through recovery kinetics after uptake.",
    "test": "Measure desorption of size-matched alcohols.",
    "against": "Differences follow boiling points alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0519",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous polymer could discriminate alcohol chain branching through recovery kinetics after uptake.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0519",
      "hypothesis": "A porous polymer could discriminate alcohol chain branching through recovery kinetics after uptake.",
      "test": "Measure desorption of size-matched alcohols.",
      "against": "Differences follow boiling points alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0519",
      "hypothesis": "A porous polymer could discriminate alcohol chain branching through recovery kinetics after uptake.",
      "test": "Measure desorption of size-matched alcohols.",
      "against": "Differences follow boiling points alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0520",
    "hypothesis": "A reactive mineral film could seal microcracks while leaving adjacent transport channels open through ion depletion.",
    "test": "Map precipitation and flow.",
    "against": "Sealing spreads indiscriminately across channels.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0520",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A reactive mineral film could seal microcracks while leaving adjacent transport channels open through ion depletion.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0520",
      "hypothesis": "A reactive mineral film could seal microcracks while leaving adjacent transport channels open through ion depletion.",
      "test": "Map precipitation and flow.",
      "against": "Sealing spreads indiscriminately across channels.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0520",
      "hypothesis": "A reactive mineral film could seal microcracks while leaving adjacent transport channels open through ion depletion.",
      "test": "Map precipitation and flow.",
      "against": "Sealing spreads indiscriminately across channels.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0521",
    "hypothesis": "A molecular switch could become more reproducible when neighboring switches are mechanically decoupled.",
    "test": "Measure switching distributions and interactions.",
    "against": "Variation follows chemical purity alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0521",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A molecular switch could become more reproducible when neighboring switches are mechanically decoupled.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0521",
      "hypothesis": "A molecular switch could become more reproducible when neighboring switches are mechanically decoupled.",
      "test": "Measure switching distributions and interactions.",
      "against": "Variation follows chemical purity alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0521",
      "hypothesis": "A molecular switch could become more reproducible when neighboring switches are mechanically decoupled.",
      "test": "Measure switching distributions and interactions.",
      "against": "Variation follows chemical purity alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0522",
    "hypothesis": "A nonreactive surface could steer a reaction front by selectively retaining heat rather than reagents.",
    "test": "Measure temperature and concentration maps.",
    "against": "Steering requires reagent adsorption.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0522",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A nonreactive surface could steer a reaction front by selectively retaining heat rather than reagents.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0522",
      "hypothesis": "A nonreactive surface could steer a reaction front by selectively retaining heat rather than reagents.",
      "test": "Measure temperature and concentration maps.",
      "against": "Steering requires reagent adsorption.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0522",
      "hypothesis": "A nonreactive surface could steer a reaction front by selectively retaining heat rather than reagents.",
      "test": "Measure temperature and concentration maps.",
      "against": "Steering requires reagent adsorption.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0523",
    "hypothesis": "A crystalline adsorbent could release molecules in order of their rotational freedom rather than binding energy.",
    "test": "Measure rotation and programmed desorption.",
    "against": "Release order follows binding energy entirely.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0523",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A crystalline adsorbent could release molecules in order of their rotational freedom rather than binding energy.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0523",
      "hypothesis": "A crystalline adsorbent could release molecules in order of their rotational freedom rather than binding energy.",
      "test": "Measure rotation and programmed desorption.",
      "against": "Release order follows binding energy entirely.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0523",
      "hypothesis": "A crystalline adsorbent could release molecules in order of their rotational freedom rather than binding energy.",
      "test": "Measure rotation and programmed desorption.",
      "against": "Release order follows binding energy entirely.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0524",
    "hypothesis": "A reversible gel catalyst could suspend activity during overheating by hiding active sites behind collapsed chains.",
    "test": "Measure accessibility and turnover.",
    "against": "Protection requires permanent deactivation.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0524",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A reversible gel catalyst could suspend activity during overheating by hiding active sites behind collapsed chains.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0524",
      "hypothesis": "A reversible gel catalyst could suspend activity during overheating by hiding active sites behind collapsed chains.",
      "test": "Measure accessibility and turnover.",
      "against": "Protection requires permanent deactivation.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0524",
      "hypothesis": "A reversible gel catalyst could suspend activity during overheating by hiding active sites behind collapsed chains.",
      "test": "Measure accessibility and turnover.",
      "against": "Protection requires permanent deactivation.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0525",
    "hypothesis": "A salt mixture could prevent complete pore blockage by forming mechanically weak mixed-crystal bridges.",
    "test": "Measure bridge composition and failure.",
    "against": "Bridges remain equally strong.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0525",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A salt mixture could prevent complete pore blockage by forming mechanically weak mixed-crystal bridges.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0525",
      "hypothesis": "A salt mixture could prevent complete pore blockage by forming mechanically weak mixed-crystal bridges.",
      "test": "Measure bridge composition and failure.",
      "against": "Bridges remain equally strong.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0525",
      "hypothesis": "A salt mixture could prevent complete pore blockage by forming mechanically weak mixed-crystal bridges.",
      "test": "Measure bridge composition and failure.",
      "against": "Bridges remain equally strong.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0526",
    "hypothesis": "A chemical oscillator could detect an inert obstacle's permeability through wavefront phase shifts.",
    "test": "Compare equal-size obstacles with known permeability.",
    "against": "Phase shifts follow geometry alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0526",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A chemical oscillator could detect an inert obstacle's permeability through wavefront phase shifts.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0526",
      "hypothesis": "A chemical oscillator could detect an inert obstacle's permeability through wavefront phase shifts.",
      "test": "Compare equal-size obstacles with known permeability.",
      "against": "Phase shifts follow geometry alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0526",
      "hypothesis": "A chemical oscillator could detect an inert obstacle's permeability through wavefront phase shifts.",
      "test": "Compare equal-size obstacles with known permeability.",
      "against": "Phase shifts follow geometry alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0527",
    "hypothesis": "A molecular coating could distinguish liquid contact from vapor exposure through different conformational pathways.",
    "test": "Measure time-resolved conformation.",
    "against": "Pathways converge before detection.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0527",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A molecular coating could distinguish liquid contact from vapor exposure through different conformational pathways.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0527",
      "hypothesis": "A molecular coating could distinguish liquid contact from vapor exposure through different conformational pathways.",
      "test": "Measure time-resolved conformation.",
      "against": "Pathways converge before detection.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0527",
      "hypothesis": "A molecular coating could distinguish liquid contact from vapor exposure through different conformational pathways.",
      "test": "Measure time-resolved conformation.",
      "against": "Pathways converge before detection.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0528",
    "hypothesis": "A porous crystal could selectively transport a solute along grain boundaries that open under osmotic stress.",
    "test": "Map transport and boundary width.",
    "against": "Flux follows bulk porosity only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0528",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous crystal could selectively transport a solute along grain boundaries that open under osmotic stress.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0528",
      "hypothesis": "A porous crystal could selectively transport a solute along grain boundaries that open under osmotic stress.",
      "test": "Map transport and boundary width.",
      "against": "Flux follows bulk porosity only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0528",
      "hypothesis": "A porous crystal could selectively transport a solute along grain boundaries that open under osmotic stress.",
      "test": "Map transport and boundary width.",
      "against": "Flux follows bulk porosity only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0529",
    "hypothesis": "A catalytic droplet could autonomously alternate reaction sites through local product-induced passivation.",
    "test": "Image site activity and product accumulation.",
    "against": "Activity changes require external modulation.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0529",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A catalytic droplet could autonomously alternate reaction sites through local product-induced passivation.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0529",
      "hypothesis": "A catalytic droplet could autonomously alternate reaction sites through local product-induced passivation.",
      "test": "Image site activity and product accumulation.",
      "against": "Activity changes require external modulation.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0529",
      "hypothesis": "A catalytic droplet could autonomously alternate reaction sites through local product-induced passivation.",
      "test": "Image site activity and product accumulation.",
      "against": "Activity changes require external modulation.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0530",
    "hypothesis": "A reversible complex could trap a contaminant only during rapid concentration rises and release it during slow changes.",
    "test": "Compare matched concentration endpoints.",
    "against": "Binding follows equilibrium concentration only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0530",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A reversible complex could trap a contaminant only during rapid concentration rises and release it during slow changes.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0530",
      "hypothesis": "A reversible complex could trap a contaminant only during rapid concentration rises and release it during slow changes.",
      "test": "Compare matched concentration endpoints.",
      "against": "Binding follows equilibrium concentration only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0530",
      "hypothesis": "A reversible complex could trap a contaminant only during rapid concentration rises and release it during slow changes.",
      "test": "Compare matched concentration endpoints.",
      "against": "Binding follows equilibrium concentration only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0531",
    "hypothesis": "A weak chemical gradient could organize inert platelets into a protective surface layer without net adsorption.",
    "test": "Track assembly and chemical uptake.",
    "against": "Assembly requires direct gradient-species binding.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0531",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A weak chemical gradient could organize inert platelets into a protective surface layer without net adsorption.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0531",
      "hypothesis": "A weak chemical gradient could organize inert platelets into a protective surface layer without net adsorption.",
      "test": "Track assembly and chemical uptake.",
      "against": "Assembly requires direct gradient-species binding.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0531",
      "hypothesis": "A weak chemical gradient could organize inert platelets into a protective surface layer without net adsorption.",
      "test": "Track assembly and chemical uptake.",
      "against": "Assembly requires direct gradient-species binding.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0532",
    "hypothesis": "A catalyst could exhibit a mechanical recovery echo after inhibitor removal if its support stores strain.",
    "test": "Measure activity and support relaxation.",
    "against": "Activity follows inhibitor washout alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0532",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A catalyst could exhibit a mechanical recovery echo after inhibitor removal if its support stores strain.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0532",
      "hypothesis": "A catalyst could exhibit a mechanical recovery echo after inhibitor removal if its support stores strain.",
      "test": "Measure activity and support relaxation.",
      "against": "Activity follows inhibitor washout alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0532",
      "hypothesis": "A catalyst could exhibit a mechanical recovery echo after inhibitor removal if its support stores strain.",
      "test": "Measure activity and support relaxation.",
      "against": "Activity follows inhibitor washout alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0533",
    "hypothesis": "A molecularly porous film could distinguish two gases with identical diffusion coefficients through different collision-induced fluorescence.",
    "test": "Measure fluorescence during calibrated transport.",
    "against": "Signals follow gas concentration alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0533",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A molecularly porous film could distinguish two gases with identical diffusion coefficients through different collision-induced fluorescence.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0533",
      "hypothesis": "A molecularly porous film could distinguish two gases with identical diffusion coefficients through different collision-induced fluorescence.",
      "test": "Measure fluorescence during calibrated transport.",
      "against": "Signals follow gas concentration alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0533",
      "hypothesis": "A molecularly porous film could distinguish two gases with identical diffusion coefficients through different collision-induced fluorescence.",
      "test": "Measure fluorescence during calibrated transport.",
      "against": "Signals follow gas concentration alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0534",
    "hypothesis": "A precipitate could reduce its own nucleation rate by exporting heat through a newly formed conductive network.",
    "test": "Map temperature and nucleation events.",
    "against": "Suppression follows solute depletion only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0534",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A precipitate could reduce its own nucleation rate by exporting heat through a newly formed conductive network.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0534",
      "hypothesis": "A precipitate could reduce its own nucleation rate by exporting heat through a newly formed conductive network.",
      "test": "Map temperature and nucleation events.",
      "against": "Suppression follows solute depletion only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0534",
      "hypothesis": "A precipitate could reduce its own nucleation rate by exporting heat through a newly formed conductive network.",
      "test": "Map temperature and nucleation events.",
      "against": "Suppression follows solute depletion only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0535",
    "hypothesis": "A reversible solvent complex could expose hidden water contamination through a discontinuity in mechanical relaxation.",
    "test": "Measure water and rheological spectra.",
    "against": "Relaxation changes smoothly without a diagnostic feature.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0535",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A reversible solvent complex could expose hidden water contamination through a discontinuity in mechanical relaxation.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0535",
      "hypothesis": "A reversible solvent complex could expose hidden water contamination through a discontinuity in mechanical relaxation.",
      "test": "Measure water and rheological spectra.",
      "against": "Relaxation changes smoothly without a diagnostic feature.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0535",
      "hypothesis": "A reversible solvent complex could expose hidden water contamination through a discontinuity in mechanical relaxation.",
      "test": "Measure water and rheological spectra.",
      "against": "Relaxation changes smoothly without a diagnostic feature.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0536",
    "hypothesis": "A reaction cascade could suppress side products by localizing an intermediate in transient nanobubbles.",
    "test": "Measure phase partition and product balance.",
    "against": "Selectivity changes require altered gas chemistry.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0536",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A reaction cascade could suppress side products by localizing an intermediate in transient nanobubbles.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0536",
      "hypothesis": "A reaction cascade could suppress side products by localizing an intermediate in transient nanobubbles.",
      "test": "Measure phase partition and product balance.",
      "against": "Selectivity changes require altered gas chemistry.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0536",
      "hypothesis": "A reaction cascade could suppress side products by localizing an intermediate in transient nanobubbles.",
      "test": "Measure phase partition and product balance.",
      "against": "Selectivity changes require altered gas chemistry.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0537",
    "hypothesis": "A porous oxide could retain catalytic selectivity after washing through a persistent surface-strain pattern.",
    "test": "Measure strain and reaction products.",
    "against": "Memory requires residual adsorbates.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0537",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous oxide could retain catalytic selectivity after washing through a persistent surface-strain pattern.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0537",
      "hypothesis": "A porous oxide could retain catalytic selectivity after washing through a persistent surface-strain pattern.",
      "test": "Measure strain and reaction products.",
      "against": "Memory requires residual adsorbates.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0537",
      "hypothesis": "A porous oxide could retain catalytic selectivity after washing through a persistent surface-strain pattern.",
      "test": "Measure strain and reaction products.",
      "against": "Memory requires residual adsorbates.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0538",
    "hypothesis": "A molecular liquid could exhibit a transient viscosity minimum after two compatible solvents mix at equal temperature.",
    "test": "Measure mixing and rapid rheology.",
    "against": "Viscosity follows equilibrium composition only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0538",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A molecular liquid could exhibit a transient viscosity minimum after two compatible solvents mix at equal temperature.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0538",
      "hypothesis": "A molecular liquid could exhibit a transient viscosity minimum after two compatible solvents mix at equal temperature.",
      "test": "Measure mixing and rapid rheology.",
      "against": "Viscosity follows equilibrium composition only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0538",
      "hypothesis": "A molecular liquid could exhibit a transient viscosity minimum after two compatible solvents mix at equal temperature.",
      "test": "Measure mixing and rapid rheology.",
      "against": "Viscosity follows equilibrium composition only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0539",
    "hypothesis": "A crystal could repair a missing surface row by drawing molecules from a distant high-curvature edge.",
    "test": "Track molecular mass redistribution.",
    "against": "Repair requires dissolved external supply.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0539",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A crystal could repair a missing surface row by drawing molecules from a distant high-curvature edge.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0539",
      "hypothesis": "A crystal could repair a missing surface row by drawing molecules from a distant high-curvature edge.",
      "test": "Track molecular mass redistribution.",
      "against": "Repair requires dissolved external supply.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0539",
      "hypothesis": "A crystal could repair a missing surface row by drawing molecules from a distant high-curvature edge.",
      "test": "Track molecular mass redistribution.",
      "against": "Repair requires dissolved external supply.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0540",
    "hypothesis": "A chemically patterned pore could separate solutes by the timing of their orientation flips.",
    "test": "Measure orientation-sensitive transit signals.",
    "against": "Transit differences follow static charge alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0540",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A chemically patterned pore could separate solutes by the timing of their orientation flips.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0540",
      "hypothesis": "A chemically patterned pore could separate solutes by the timing of their orientation flips.",
      "test": "Measure orientation-sensitive transit signals.",
      "against": "Transit differences follow static charge alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0540",
      "hypothesis": "A chemically patterned pore could separate solutes by the timing of their orientation flips.",
      "test": "Measure orientation-sensitive transit signals.",
      "against": "Transit differences follow static charge alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0541",
    "hypothesis": "A reversible inhibitor could increase total enzyme yield by preventing activity during the most damaging preparation stage.",
    "test": "Measure final active enzyme amount.",
    "against": "Yield gain follows reduced turnover only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0541",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A reversible inhibitor could increase total enzyme yield by preventing activity during the most damaging preparation stage.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0541",
      "hypothesis": "A reversible inhibitor could increase total enzyme yield by preventing activity during the most damaging preparation stage.",
      "test": "Measure final active enzyme amount.",
      "against": "Yield gain follows reduced turnover only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0541",
      "hypothesis": "A reversible inhibitor could increase total enzyme yield by preventing activity during the most damaging preparation stage.",
      "test": "Measure final active enzyme amount.",
      "against": "Yield gain follows reduced turnover only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0542",
    "hypothesis": "A catalyst pellet could emit a passive acoustic signature specific to internal diffusion limitation.",
    "test": "Measure sound and concentration profiles.",
    "against": "Signals track external flow noise only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0542",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A catalyst pellet could emit a passive acoustic signature specific to internal diffusion limitation.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0542",
      "hypothesis": "A catalyst pellet could emit a passive acoustic signature specific to internal diffusion limitation.",
      "test": "Measure sound and concentration profiles.",
      "against": "Signals track external flow noise only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0542",
      "hypothesis": "A catalyst pellet could emit a passive acoustic signature specific to internal diffusion limitation.",
      "test": "Measure sound and concentration profiles.",
      "against": "Signals track external flow noise only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0543",
    "hypothesis": "A benign reaction could generate a stable concentration ring through product-dependent solvent compressibility.",
    "test": "Map pressure and product concentration.",
    "against": "Ring formation follows convection alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0543",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A benign reaction could generate a stable concentration ring through product-dependent solvent compressibility.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0543",
      "hypothesis": "A benign reaction could generate a stable concentration ring through product-dependent solvent compressibility.",
      "test": "Map pressure and product concentration.",
      "against": "Ring formation follows convection alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0543",
      "hypothesis": "A benign reaction could generate a stable concentration ring through product-dependent solvent compressibility.",
      "test": "Map pressure and product concentration.",
      "against": "Ring formation follows convection alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0544",
    "hypothesis": "A porous salt crystal could reject one impurity through elastic mismatch during growth.",
    "test": "Measure strain and impurity incorporation.",
    "against": "Exclusion follows solubility only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 4,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 5,
    "literature_query": "porous salt crystal reject one impurity elastic mismatch growth experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N0544",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous salt crystal could reject one impurity through elastic mismatch during growth.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0544",
      "hypothesis": "A porous salt crystal could reject one impurity through elastic mismatch during growth.",
      "test": "Measure strain and impurity incorporation.",
      "against": "Exclusion follows solubility only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0544",
      "hypothesis": "A porous salt crystal could reject one impurity through elastic mismatch during growth.",
      "test": "Measure strain and impurity incorporation.",
      "against": "Exclusion follows solubility only.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 5,
      "literature_query": "porous salt crystal reject one impurity elastic mismatch growth experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "5",
      "id": "N0544",
      "hypothesis": "A porous salt crystal could reject one impurity through elastic mismatch during growth.",
      "test": "Measure strain and impurity incorporation.",
      "against": "Exclusion follows solubility only.",
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory; characterization may dominate feasibility",
      "screen_score": "24",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pc86ce4c11a7c;P7180d1a29fa0;P6911517292d7;P4fc2f715aa57;Pd743d4bb92e7;P976e5bc81e81;Pd43d45f2be0e",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N0544",
      "hypothesis": "A porous salt crystal could reject one impurity through elastic mismatch during growth.",
      "test": "Measure strain and impurity incorporation.",
      "against": "Exclusion follows solubility only.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory; characterization may dominate feasibility",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 5,
      "literature_query": "porous salt crystal reject one impurity elastic mismatch growth experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pc86ce4c11a7c;P7180d1a29fa0;P6911517292d7;P4fc2f715aa57;Pd743d4bb92e7;P976e5bc81e81;Pd43d45f2be0e",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "Pc86ce4c11a7c;P7180d1a29fa0;P6911517292d7;P4fc2f715aa57;Pd743d4bb92e7;P976e5bc81e81;Pd43d45f2be0e",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0545",
    "hypothesis": "A molecular sensor could distinguish oxidation from protonation through different mechanical relaxation directions.",
    "test": "Calibrate both chemical changes.",
    "against": "Mechanical responses remain inseparable.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0545",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A molecular sensor could distinguish oxidation from protonation through different mechanical relaxation directions.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0545",
      "hypothesis": "A molecular sensor could distinguish oxidation from protonation through different mechanical relaxation directions.",
      "test": "Calibrate both chemical changes.",
      "against": "Mechanical responses remain inseparable.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0545",
      "hypothesis": "A molecular sensor could distinguish oxidation from protonation through different mechanical relaxation directions.",
      "test": "Calibrate both chemical changes.",
      "against": "Mechanical responses remain inseparable.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0546",
    "hypothesis": "A reversible coordination network could absorb a pressure pulse by transiently relocating solvent between cages.",
    "test": "Measure pressure and solvent occupancy.",
    "against": "Absorption requires irreversible bond rupture.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0546",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A reversible coordination network could absorb a pressure pulse by transiently relocating solvent between cages.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0546",
      "hypothesis": "A reversible coordination network could absorb a pressure pulse by transiently relocating solvent between cages.",
      "test": "Measure pressure and solvent occupancy.",
      "against": "Absorption requires irreversible bond rupture.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0546",
      "hypothesis": "A reversible coordination network could absorb a pressure pulse by transiently relocating solvent between cages.",
      "test": "Measure pressure and solvent occupancy.",
      "against": "Absorption requires irreversible bond rupture.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0547",
    "hypothesis": "A photocatalytic interface could preserve selectivity by dynamically shadowing overactive sites with reversible deposits.",
    "test": "Map light, deposits, and products.",
    "against": "Selectivity improves only through lower conversion.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 12,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0547",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A photocatalytic interface could preserve selectivity by dynamically shadowing overactive sites with reversible deposits.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0547",
      "hypothesis": "A photocatalytic interface could preserve selectivity by dynamically shadowing overactive sites with reversible deposits.",
      "test": "Map light, deposits, and products.",
      "against": "Selectivity improves only through lower conversion.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0547",
      "hypothesis": "A photocatalytic interface could preserve selectivity by dynamically shadowing overactive sites with reversible deposits.",
      "test": "Map light, deposits, and products.",
      "against": "Selectivity improves only through lower conversion.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 12,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0548",
    "hypothesis": "A molecular aggregate could separate enantiomers through unequal mechanical relaxation during adsorption without a permanent chiral surface.",
    "test": "Measure enrichment with reversal controls.",
    "against": "No reproducible enrichment occurs.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0548",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A molecular aggregate could separate enantiomers through unequal mechanical relaxation during adsorption without a permanent chiral surface.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0548",
      "hypothesis": "A molecular aggregate could separate enantiomers through unequal mechanical relaxation during adsorption without a permanent chiral surface.",
      "test": "Measure enrichment with reversal controls.",
      "against": "No reproducible enrichment occurs.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0548",
      "hypothesis": "A molecular aggregate could separate enantiomers through unequal mechanical relaxation during adsorption without a permanent chiral surface.",
      "test": "Measure enrichment with reversal controls.",
      "against": "No reproducible enrichment occurs.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0549",
    "hypothesis": "A mineral slurry could accelerate a benign reaction through collision-generated concentration pockets without heating.",
    "test": "Measure local concentrations and products.",
    "against": "Acceleration follows temperature alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0549",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A mineral slurry could accelerate a benign reaction through collision-generated concentration pockets without heating.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0549",
      "hypothesis": "A mineral slurry could accelerate a benign reaction through collision-generated concentration pockets without heating.",
      "test": "Measure local concentrations and products.",
      "against": "Acceleration follows temperature alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0549",
      "hypothesis": "A mineral slurry could accelerate a benign reaction through collision-generated concentration pockets without heating.",
      "test": "Measure local concentrations and products.",
      "against": "Acceleration follows temperature alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0550",
    "hypothesis": "A reversible polymer host could release a solute when external viscosity changes at constant solvent composition.",
    "test": "Measure host conformation and release.",
    "against": "Release requires chemical-composition changes.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0550",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A reversible polymer host could release a solute when external viscosity changes at constant solvent composition.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0550",
      "hypothesis": "A reversible polymer host could release a solute when external viscosity changes at constant solvent composition.",
      "test": "Measure host conformation and release.",
      "against": "Release requires chemical-composition changes.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0550",
      "hypothesis": "A reversible polymer host could release a solute when external viscosity changes at constant solvent composition.",
      "test": "Measure host conformation and release.",
      "against": "Release requires chemical-composition changes.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0551",
    "hypothesis": "A catalyst film could detect its own developing diffusion barrier through a change in reaction-noise skewness.",
    "test": "Measure products and fluctuation statistics.",
    "against": "Noise changes follow mean rate only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0551",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A catalyst film could detect its own developing diffusion barrier through a change in reaction-noise skewness.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0551",
      "hypothesis": "A catalyst film could detect its own developing diffusion barrier through a change in reaction-noise skewness.",
      "test": "Measure products and fluctuation statistics.",
      "against": "Noise changes follow mean rate only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0551",
      "hypothesis": "A catalyst film could detect its own developing diffusion barrier through a change in reaction-noise skewness.",
      "test": "Measure products and fluctuation statistics.",
      "against": "Noise changes follow mean rate only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0552",
    "hypothesis": "A soluble crystal seed could suppress unwanted polymorphs by briefly consuming local solvent rather than supplying lattice contacts.",
    "test": "Compare separated and contacting seeds.",
    "against": "Suppression requires direct crystal contact.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0552",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A soluble crystal seed could suppress unwanted polymorphs by briefly consuming local solvent rather than supplying lattice contacts.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0552",
      "hypothesis": "A soluble crystal seed could suppress unwanted polymorphs by briefly consuming local solvent rather than supplying lattice contacts.",
      "test": "Compare separated and contacting seeds.",
      "against": "Suppression requires direct crystal contact.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0552",
      "hypothesis": "A soluble crystal seed could suppress unwanted polymorphs by briefly consuming local solvent rather than supplying lattice contacts.",
      "test": "Compare separated and contacting seeds.",
      "against": "Suppression requires direct crystal contact.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0553",
    "hypothesis": "A nonbinding surface additive could alter reaction selectivity by modifying interfacial water exchange times.",
    "test": "Measure exchange and products.",
    "against": "Selectivity follows surface coverage only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0553",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A nonbinding surface additive could alter reaction selectivity by modifying interfacial water exchange times.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0553",
      "hypothesis": "A nonbinding surface additive could alter reaction selectivity by modifying interfacial water exchange times.",
      "test": "Measure exchange and products.",
      "against": "Selectivity follows surface coverage only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0553",
      "hypothesis": "A nonbinding surface additive could alter reaction selectivity by modifying interfacial water exchange times.",
      "test": "Measure exchange and products.",
      "against": "Selectivity follows surface coverage only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0554",
    "hypothesis": "A molecular cage could protect a dye from photobleaching by temporarily exporting excitation into a reversible vibration.",
    "test": "Measure energy flow and bleaching.",
    "against": "Protection requires reduced absorption.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0554",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A molecular cage could protect a dye from photobleaching by temporarily exporting excitation into a reversible vibration.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0554",
      "hypothesis": "A molecular cage could protect a dye from photobleaching by temporarily exporting excitation into a reversible vibration.",
      "test": "Measure energy flow and bleaching.",
      "against": "Protection requires reduced absorption.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0554",
      "hypothesis": "A molecular cage could protect a dye from photobleaching by temporarily exporting excitation into a reversible vibration.",
      "test": "Measure energy flow and bleaching.",
      "against": "Protection requires reduced absorption.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0555",
    "hypothesis": "A precipitation front could reveal an invisible flow channel through branching asymmetry before tracer arrival.",
    "test": "Compare front geometry and flow maps.",
    "against": "Asymmetry appears only after tracer arrival.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0555",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A precipitation front could reveal an invisible flow channel through branching asymmetry before tracer arrival.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0555",
      "hypothesis": "A precipitation front could reveal an invisible flow channel through branching asymmetry before tracer arrival.",
      "test": "Compare front geometry and flow maps.",
      "against": "Asymmetry appears only after tracer arrival.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0555",
      "hypothesis": "A precipitation front could reveal an invisible flow channel through branching asymmetry before tracer arrival.",
      "test": "Compare front geometry and flow maps.",
      "against": "Asymmetry appears only after tracer arrival.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0556",
    "hypothesis": "A reactive porous bead could maintain an internal reservoir of a short-lived intermediate by spatially separating its formation and loss.",
    "test": "Map intermediate and catalyst positions.",
    "against": "Lifetime follows total catalyst concentration only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 12,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0556",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A reactive porous bead could maintain an internal reservoir of a short-lived intermediate by spatially separating its formation and loss.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0556",
      "hypothesis": "A reactive porous bead could maintain an internal reservoir of a short-lived intermediate by spatially separating its formation and loss.",
      "test": "Map intermediate and catalyst positions.",
      "against": "Lifetime follows total catalyst concentration only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0556",
      "hypothesis": "A reactive porous bead could maintain an internal reservoir of a short-lived intermediate by spatially separating its formation and loss.",
      "test": "Map intermediate and catalyst positions.",
      "against": "Lifetime follows total catalyst concentration only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 12,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0557",
    "hypothesis": "A crystal surface could change reaction pathways when an acoustic wave reverses the orientation of adsorbed molecules.",
    "test": "Measure orientation and products.",
    "against": "Changes follow acoustic heating alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0557",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A crystal surface could change reaction pathways when an acoustic wave reverses the orientation of adsorbed molecules.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0557",
      "hypothesis": "A crystal surface could change reaction pathways when an acoustic wave reverses the orientation of adsorbed molecules.",
      "test": "Measure orientation and products.",
      "against": "Changes follow acoustic heating alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0557",
      "hypothesis": "A crystal surface could change reaction pathways when an acoustic wave reverses the orientation of adsorbed molecules.",
      "test": "Measure orientation and products.",
      "against": "Changes follow acoustic heating alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0558",
    "hypothesis": "A reversible metal-free catalyst could resist overoxidation by mechanically closing its active pocket.",
    "test": "Measure pocket access and degradation.",
    "against": "Protection requires inactive chemical conversion.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0558",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A reversible metal-free catalyst could resist overoxidation by mechanically closing its active pocket.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0558",
      "hypothesis": "A reversible metal-free catalyst could resist overoxidation by mechanically closing its active pocket.",
      "test": "Measure pocket access and degradation.",
      "against": "Protection requires inactive chemical conversion.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0558",
      "hypothesis": "A reversible metal-free catalyst could resist overoxidation by mechanically closing its active pocket.",
      "test": "Measure pocket access and degradation.",
      "against": "Protection requires inactive chemical conversion.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0559",
    "hypothesis": "A salt-bearing film could preserve a selected hydration state through mechanical confinement rather than ambient humidity.",
    "test": "Measure phase and confining stress.",
    "against": "State follows humidity alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0559",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A salt-bearing film could preserve a selected hydration state through mechanical confinement rather than ambient humidity.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0559",
      "hypothesis": "A salt-bearing film could preserve a selected hydration state through mechanical confinement rather than ambient humidity.",
      "test": "Measure phase and confining stress.",
      "against": "State follows humidity alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0559",
      "hypothesis": "A salt-bearing film could preserve a selected hydration state through mechanical confinement rather than ambient humidity.",
      "test": "Measure phase and confining stress.",
      "against": "State follows humidity alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0560",
    "hypothesis": "A molecular liquid could reveal trace branching impurities through disproportionate changes in rotational relaxation tails.",
    "test": "Measure impurity fraction and relaxation.",
    "against": "Tails follow viscosity alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0560",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A molecular liquid could reveal trace branching impurities through disproportionate changes in rotational relaxation tails.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0560",
      "hypothesis": "A molecular liquid could reveal trace branching impurities through disproportionate changes in rotational relaxation tails.",
      "test": "Measure impurity fraction and relaxation.",
      "against": "Tails follow viscosity alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0560",
      "hypothesis": "A molecular liquid could reveal trace branching impurities through disproportionate changes in rotational relaxation tails.",
      "test": "Measure impurity fraction and relaxation.",
      "against": "Tails follow viscosity alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0561",
    "hypothesis": "A porous adsorbent could separate isotopically identical conformers through vibration-assisted gate opening.",
    "test": "Measure conformers during controlled excitation.",
    "against": "Selectivity disappears after temperature correction.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0561",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous adsorbent could separate isotopically identical conformers through vibration-assisted gate opening.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0561",
      "hypothesis": "A porous adsorbent could separate isotopically identical conformers through vibration-assisted gate opening.",
      "test": "Measure conformers during controlled excitation.",
      "against": "Selectivity disappears after temperature correction.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0561",
      "hypothesis": "A porous adsorbent could separate isotopically identical conformers through vibration-assisted gate opening.",
      "test": "Measure conformers during controlled excitation.",
      "against": "Selectivity disappears after temperature correction.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0562",
    "hypothesis": "A chemically uniform droplet could sustain a reaction at one pole through shape-dependent diffusion alone.",
    "test": "Measure reaction and shape under fixed chemistry.",
    "against": "Localization requires chemical surface patterns.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0562",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A chemically uniform droplet could sustain a reaction at one pole through shape-dependent diffusion alone.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0562",
      "hypothesis": "A chemically uniform droplet could sustain a reaction at one pole through shape-dependent diffusion alone.",
      "test": "Measure reaction and shape under fixed chemistry.",
      "against": "Localization requires chemical surface patterns.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0562",
      "hypothesis": "A chemically uniform droplet could sustain a reaction at one pole through shape-dependent diffusion alone.",
      "test": "Measure reaction and shape under fixed chemistry.",
      "against": "Localization requires chemical surface patterns.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0563",
    "hypothesis": "A transient crystal hydrate could lower separation energy by releasing solvent only after mechanical unloading.",
    "test": "Measure release and work balance.",
    "against": "Energy advantage vanishes over complete cycles.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0563",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A transient crystal hydrate could lower separation energy by releasing solvent only after mechanical unloading.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0563",
      "hypothesis": "A transient crystal hydrate could lower separation energy by releasing solvent only after mechanical unloading.",
      "test": "Measure release and work balance.",
      "against": "Energy advantage vanishes over complete cycles.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0563",
      "hypothesis": "A transient crystal hydrate could lower separation energy by releasing solvent only after mechanical unloading.",
      "test": "Measure release and work balance.",
      "against": "Energy advantage vanishes over complete cycles.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0564",
    "hypothesis": "A catalyst-free redox analogue could use a mineral's flexural strain as a reversible selectivity control.",
    "test": "Measure products under elastic bending.",
    "against": "Selectivity follows dissolved impurities only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0564",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A catalyst-free redox analogue could use a mineral's flexural strain as a reversible selectivity control.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0564",
      "hypothesis": "A catalyst-free redox analogue could use a mineral's flexural strain as a reversible selectivity control.",
      "test": "Measure products under elastic bending.",
      "against": "Selectivity follows dissolved impurities only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0564",
      "hypothesis": "A catalyst-free redox analogue could use a mineral's flexural strain as a reversible selectivity control.",
      "test": "Measure products under elastic bending.",
      "against": "Selectivity follows dissolved impurities only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0565",
    "hypothesis": "A molecular coating could reduce fouling by moving captured species toward its own defects for release.",
    "test": "Track bound molecules and defect locations.",
    "against": "Release sites are randomly distributed.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0565",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A molecular coating could reduce fouling by moving captured species toward its own defects for release.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0565",
      "hypothesis": "A molecular coating could reduce fouling by moving captured species toward its own defects for release.",
      "test": "Track bound molecules and defect locations.",
      "against": "Release sites are randomly distributed.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0565",
      "hypothesis": "A molecular coating could reduce fouling by moving captured species toward its own defects for release.",
      "test": "Track bound molecules and defect locations.",
      "against": "Release sites are randomly distributed.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0566",
    "hypothesis": "A polymer-supported catalyst could become more selective after mild compression aligns access pathways.",
    "test": "Measure pore orientation and product ratios.",
    "against": "Selectivity follows reduced throughput alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0566",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A polymer-supported catalyst could become more selective after mild compression aligns access pathways.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0566",
      "hypothesis": "A polymer-supported catalyst could become more selective after mild compression aligns access pathways.",
      "test": "Measure pore orientation and product ratios.",
      "against": "Selectivity follows reduced throughput alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0566",
      "hypothesis": "A polymer-supported catalyst could become more selective after mild compression aligns access pathways.",
      "test": "Measure pore orientation and product ratios.",
      "against": "Selectivity follows reduced throughput alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0567",
    "hypothesis": "A dissolution front could erase weak concentration fluctuations while amplifying strong ones through curvature-dependent transport.",
    "test": "Measure controlled perturbation growth.",
    "against": "All fluctuations decay proportionally.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0567",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A dissolution front could erase weak concentration fluctuations while amplifying strong ones through curvature-dependent transport.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0567",
      "hypothesis": "A dissolution front could erase weak concentration fluctuations while amplifying strong ones through curvature-dependent transport.",
      "test": "Measure controlled perturbation growth.",
      "against": "All fluctuations decay proportionally.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0567",
      "hypothesis": "A dissolution front could erase weak concentration fluctuations while amplifying strong ones through curvature-dependent transport.",
      "test": "Measure controlled perturbation growth.",
      "against": "All fluctuations decay proportionally.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0568",
    "hypothesis": "A reversible reagent capsule could open only when solvent activity changes faster than a preset relaxation rate.",
    "test": "Apply activity ramps at fixed endpoints.",
    "against": "Opening depends only on final activity.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0568",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A reversible reagent capsule could open only when solvent activity changes faster than a preset relaxation rate.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0568",
      "hypothesis": "A reversible reagent capsule could open only when solvent activity changes faster than a preset relaxation rate.",
      "test": "Apply activity ramps at fixed endpoints.",
      "against": "Opening depends only on final activity.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0568",
      "hypothesis": "A reversible reagent capsule could open only when solvent activity changes faster than a preset relaxation rate.",
      "test": "Apply activity ramps at fixed endpoints.",
      "against": "Opening depends only on final activity.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0569",
    "hypothesis": "A benign reaction could exhibit a mechanical induction period when its product plasticizes the surrounding matrix.",
    "test": "Measure modulus and reaction onset.",
    "against": "Induction follows chemical kinetics alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0569",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A benign reaction could exhibit a mechanical induction period when its product plasticizes the surrounding matrix.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0569",
      "hypothesis": "A benign reaction could exhibit a mechanical induction period when its product plasticizes the surrounding matrix.",
      "test": "Measure modulus and reaction onset.",
      "against": "Induction follows chemical kinetics alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0569",
      "hypothesis": "A benign reaction could exhibit a mechanical induction period when its product plasticizes the surrounding matrix.",
      "test": "Measure modulus and reaction onset.",
      "against": "Induction follows chemical kinetics alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0570",
    "hypothesis": "A mineral-organic coating could preserve adsorption sites by rotating rigid domains during wetting.",
    "test": "Image domain motion and retained capacity.",
    "against": "Capacity retention ignores domain rotation.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0570",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A mineral-organic coating could preserve adsorption sites by rotating rigid domains during wetting.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0570",
      "hypothesis": "A mineral-organic coating could preserve adsorption sites by rotating rigid domains during wetting.",
      "test": "Image domain motion and retained capacity.",
      "against": "Capacity retention ignores domain rotation.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0570",
      "hypothesis": "A mineral-organic coating could preserve adsorption sites by rotating rigid domains during wetting.",
      "test": "Image domain motion and retained capacity.",
      "against": "Capacity retention ignores domain rotation.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0571",
    "hypothesis": "A molecular sieve could preferentially reject a solute after partial occupation by a chemically inert guest.",
    "test": "Measure selectivity and guest occupancy.",
    "against": "Rejection follows lost pore volume alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0571",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A molecular sieve could preferentially reject a solute after partial occupation by a chemically inert guest.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0571",
      "hypothesis": "A molecular sieve could preferentially reject a solute after partial occupation by a chemically inert guest.",
      "test": "Measure selectivity and guest occupancy.",
      "against": "Rejection follows lost pore volume alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0571",
      "hypothesis": "A molecular sieve could preferentially reject a solute after partial occupation by a chemically inert guest.",
      "test": "Measure selectivity and guest occupancy.",
      "against": "Rejection follows lost pore volume alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0572",
    "hypothesis": "A chemical oscillation could travel through a dry-looking surface via an adsorbed molecular water network.",
    "test": "Measure waves and surface hydration.",
    "against": "Propagation requires a bulk liquid film.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0572",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A chemical oscillation could travel through a dry-looking surface via an adsorbed molecular water network.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0572",
      "hypothesis": "A chemical oscillation could travel through a dry-looking surface via an adsorbed molecular water network.",
      "test": "Measure waves and surface hydration.",
      "against": "Propagation requires a bulk liquid film.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0572",
      "hypothesis": "A chemical oscillation could travel through a dry-looking surface via an adsorbed molecular water network.",
      "test": "Measure waves and surface hydration.",
      "against": "Propagation requires a bulk liquid film.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0573",
    "hypothesis": "A crystalline reaction vessel could bias product crystallinity by exchanging elastic strain through its wall.",
    "test": "Measure products with mechanically isolated controls.",
    "against": "Effects require direct chemical contamination.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0573",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A crystalline reaction vessel could bias product crystallinity by exchanging elastic strain through its wall.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0573",
      "hypothesis": "A crystalline reaction vessel could bias product crystallinity by exchanging elastic strain through its wall.",
      "test": "Measure products with mechanically isolated controls.",
      "against": "Effects require direct chemical contamination.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0573",
      "hypothesis": "A crystalline reaction vessel could bias product crystallinity by exchanging elastic strain through its wall.",
      "test": "Measure products with mechanically isolated controls.",
      "against": "Effects require direct chemical contamination.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0574",
    "hypothesis": "A reversible dye pair could report solvent hydrogen-bond directionality independently of polarity.",
    "test": "Calibrate against orthogonal solvent descriptors.",
    "against": "Signals remain correlated with polarity only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0574",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A reversible dye pair could report solvent hydrogen-bond directionality independently of polarity.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0574",
      "hypothesis": "A reversible dye pair could report solvent hydrogen-bond directionality independently of polarity.",
      "test": "Calibrate against orthogonal solvent descriptors.",
      "against": "Signals remain correlated with polarity only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0574",
      "hypothesis": "A reversible dye pair could report solvent hydrogen-bond directionality independently of polarity.",
      "test": "Calibrate against orthogonal solvent descriptors.",
      "against": "Signals remain correlated with polarity only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0575",
    "hypothesis": "A porous catalyst could suppress runaway local heating through endothermic guest release that later reverses.",
    "test": "Measure heat and guest mass balance.",
    "against": "Stabilization consumes guests irreversibly.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0575",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous catalyst could suppress runaway local heating through endothermic guest release that later reverses.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0575",
      "hypothesis": "A porous catalyst could suppress runaway local heating through endothermic guest release that later reverses.",
      "test": "Measure heat and guest mass balance.",
      "against": "Stabilization consumes guests irreversibly.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0575",
      "hypothesis": "A porous catalyst could suppress runaway local heating through endothermic guest release that later reverses.",
      "test": "Measure heat and guest mass balance.",
      "against": "Stabilization consumes guests irreversibly.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0576",
    "hypothesis": "A mineral grain could distinguish two dissolved ligands through different acoustic adsorption transients.",
    "test": "Measure uptake and resonant response.",
    "against": "Responses follow bound mass alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0576",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A mineral grain could distinguish two dissolved ligands through different acoustic adsorption transients.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0576",
      "hypothesis": "A mineral grain could distinguish two dissolved ligands through different acoustic adsorption transients.",
      "test": "Measure uptake and resonant response.",
      "against": "Responses follow bound mass alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0576",
      "hypothesis": "A mineral grain could distinguish two dissolved ligands through different acoustic adsorption transients.",
      "test": "Measure uptake and resonant response.",
      "against": "Responses follow bound mass alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0577",
    "hypothesis": "A chemical front could retain the sign of a crossed thermal gradient after temperatures equalize.",
    "test": "Track front orientation and product pattern.",
    "against": "Memory requires remaining thermal gradients.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0577",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A chemical front could retain the sign of a crossed thermal gradient after temperatures equalize.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0577",
      "hypothesis": "A chemical front could retain the sign of a crossed thermal gradient after temperatures equalize.",
      "test": "Track front orientation and product pattern.",
      "against": "Memory requires remaining thermal gradients.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0577",
      "hypothesis": "A chemical front could retain the sign of a crossed thermal gradient after temperatures equalize.",
      "test": "Track front orientation and product pattern.",
      "against": "Memory requires remaining thermal gradients.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0578",
    "hypothesis": "A molecular film could selectively shed damaged chromophores while retaining intact ones through differential mobility.",
    "test": "Track damage state and released molecules.",
    "against": "Shedding follows molecular size only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0578",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A molecular film could selectively shed damaged chromophores while retaining intact ones through differential mobility.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0578",
      "hypothesis": "A molecular film could selectively shed damaged chromophores while retaining intact ones through differential mobility.",
      "test": "Track damage state and released molecules.",
      "against": "Shedding follows molecular size only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0578",
      "hypothesis": "A molecular film could selectively shed damaged chromophores while retaining intact ones through differential mobility.",
      "test": "Track damage state and released molecules.",
      "against": "Shedding follows molecular size only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0579",
    "hypothesis": "A reversible salt bridge could act as a concentration fuse that disconnects transport before severe precipitation.",
    "test": "Measure conductivity and crystal growth.",
    "against": "Disconnection occurs only after blockage.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0579",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A reversible salt bridge could act as a concentration fuse that disconnects transport before severe precipitation.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0579",
      "hypothesis": "A reversible salt bridge could act as a concentration fuse that disconnects transport before severe precipitation.",
      "test": "Measure conductivity and crystal growth.",
      "against": "Disconnection occurs only after blockage.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0579",
      "hypothesis": "A reversible salt bridge could act as a concentration fuse that disconnects transport before severe precipitation.",
      "test": "Measure conductivity and crystal growth.",
      "against": "Disconnection occurs only after blockage.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0580",
    "hypothesis": "A catalyst support could increase accessible activity by flexing in response to local product accumulation.",
    "test": "Measure deformation and site access.",
    "against": "Activity gains require bulk stirring.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0580",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A catalyst support could increase accessible activity by flexing in response to local product accumulation.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0580",
      "hypothesis": "A catalyst support could increase accessible activity by flexing in response to local product accumulation.",
      "test": "Measure deformation and site access.",
      "against": "Activity gains require bulk stirring.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0580",
      "hypothesis": "A catalyst support could increase accessible activity by flexing in response to local product accumulation.",
      "test": "Measure deformation and site access.",
      "against": "Activity gains require bulk stirring.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0581",
    "hypothesis": "A porous reagent bed could reveal its exhaustion depth through passive thermal fluctuations.",
    "test": "Measure fluctuation profiles and remaining reagent.",
    "against": "Fluctuations track ambient noise only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0581",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous reagent bed could reveal its exhaustion depth through passive thermal fluctuations.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0581",
      "hypothesis": "A porous reagent bed could reveal its exhaustion depth through passive thermal fluctuations.",
      "test": "Measure fluctuation profiles and remaining reagent.",
      "against": "Fluctuations track ambient noise only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0581",
      "hypothesis": "A porous reagent bed could reveal its exhaustion depth through passive thermal fluctuations.",
      "test": "Measure fluctuation profiles and remaining reagent.",
      "against": "Fluctuations track ambient noise only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0582",
    "hypothesis": "A molecular host could distinguish kinetic from thermodynamic binding through a mechanically triggered release pulse.",
    "test": "Measure release after controlled contact times.",
    "against": "Pulse response follows occupancy alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0582",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A molecular host could distinguish kinetic from thermodynamic binding through a mechanically triggered release pulse.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0582",
      "hypothesis": "A molecular host could distinguish kinetic from thermodynamic binding through a mechanically triggered release pulse.",
      "test": "Measure release after controlled contact times.",
      "against": "Pulse response follows occupancy alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0582",
      "hypothesis": "A molecular host could distinguish kinetic from thermodynamic binding through a mechanically triggered release pulse.",
      "test": "Measure release after controlled contact times.",
      "against": "Pulse response follows occupancy alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0583",
    "hypothesis": "A crystal could develop a useful compositional gradient under zero mean flow because dissolution and regrowth differ spatially.",
    "test": "Measure profiles after symmetric cycles.",
    "against": "Profiles vanish with flow offsets removed.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0583",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A crystal could develop a useful compositional gradient under zero mean flow because dissolution and regrowth differ spatially.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0583",
      "hypothesis": "A crystal could develop a useful compositional gradient under zero mean flow because dissolution and regrowth differ spatially.",
      "test": "Measure profiles after symmetric cycles.",
      "against": "Profiles vanish with flow offsets removed.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0583",
      "hypothesis": "A crystal could develop a useful compositional gradient under zero mean flow because dissolution and regrowth differ spatially.",
      "test": "Measure profiles after symmetric cycles.",
      "against": "Profiles vanish with flow offsets removed.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0584",
    "hypothesis": "A reversible chemical network could suppress rare extreme excursions through selective trapping of high-concentration intermediates.",
    "test": "Measure excursion statistics and trapping.",
    "against": "Only the mean concentration changes.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0584",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A reversible chemical network could suppress rare extreme excursions through selective trapping of high-concentration intermediates.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0584",
      "hypothesis": "A reversible chemical network could suppress rare extreme excursions through selective trapping of high-concentration intermediates.",
      "test": "Measure excursion statistics and trapping.",
      "against": "Only the mean concentration changes.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0584",
      "hypothesis": "A reversible chemical network could suppress rare extreme excursions through selective trapping of high-concentration intermediates.",
      "test": "Measure excursion statistics and trapping.",
      "against": "Only the mean concentration changes.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0585",
    "hypothesis": "A soft catalyst layer could change product ratio when substrate arrival becomes clustered rather than uniform.",
    "test": "Compare equal total substrate delivery.",
    "against": "Product ratios depend only on average concentration.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0585",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A soft catalyst layer could change product ratio when substrate arrival becomes clustered rather than uniform.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0585",
      "hypothesis": "A soft catalyst layer could change product ratio when substrate arrival becomes clustered rather than uniform.",
      "test": "Compare equal total substrate delivery.",
      "against": "Product ratios depend only on average concentration.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0585",
      "hypothesis": "A soft catalyst layer could change product ratio when substrate arrival becomes clustered rather than uniform.",
      "test": "Compare equal total substrate delivery.",
      "against": "Product ratios depend only on average concentration.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0586",
    "hypothesis": "A porous oxide could separate neutral molecules by hydration energy through an interfacial-water bottleneck.",
    "test": "Measure flux and hydration descriptors.",
    "against": "Size and adsorption explain all differences.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0586",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous oxide could separate neutral molecules by hydration energy through an interfacial-water bottleneck.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0586",
      "hypothesis": "A porous oxide could separate neutral molecules by hydration energy through an interfacial-water bottleneck.",
      "test": "Measure flux and hydration descriptors.",
      "against": "Size and adsorption explain all differences.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0586",
      "hypothesis": "A porous oxide could separate neutral molecules by hydration energy through an interfacial-water bottleneck.",
      "test": "Measure flux and hydration descriptors.",
      "against": "Size and adsorption explain all differences.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0587",
    "hypothesis": "A molecular assembly could reveal chemical aging through growing spatial correlations before average spectroscopy shifts.",
    "test": "Measure correlation lengths and chemical markers.",
    "against": "Correlations change only with mean spectra.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0587",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A molecular assembly could reveal chemical aging through growing spatial correlations before average spectroscopy shifts.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0587",
      "hypothesis": "A molecular assembly could reveal chemical aging through growing spatial correlations before average spectroscopy shifts.",
      "test": "Measure correlation lengths and chemical markers.",
      "against": "Correlations change only with mean spectra.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0587",
      "hypothesis": "A molecular assembly could reveal chemical aging through growing spatial correlations before average spectroscopy shifts.",
      "test": "Measure correlation lengths and chemical markers.",
      "against": "Correlations change only with mean spectra.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0588",
    "hypothesis": "A controlled defect could make crystal dissolution produce regular solute pulses without external modulation.",
    "test": "Measure time-resolved release and defect evolution.",
    "against": "Pulses follow pump instability.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0588",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A controlled defect could make crystal dissolution produce regular solute pulses without external modulation.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0588",
      "hypothesis": "A controlled defect could make crystal dissolution produce regular solute pulses without external modulation.",
      "test": "Measure time-resolved release and defect evolution.",
      "against": "Pulses follow pump instability.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0588",
      "hypothesis": "A controlled defect could make crystal dissolution produce regular solute pulses without external modulation.",
      "test": "Measure time-resolved release and defect evolution.",
      "against": "Pulses follow pump instability.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0589",
    "hypothesis": "A reversible coacervate could extract a reactive intermediate only while its surrounding reaction accelerates.",
    "test": "Measure partitioning and reaction derivatives.",
    "against": "Extraction follows concentration alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0589",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A reversible coacervate could extract a reactive intermediate only while its surrounding reaction accelerates.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0589",
      "hypothesis": "A reversible coacervate could extract a reactive intermediate only while its surrounding reaction accelerates.",
      "test": "Measure partitioning and reaction derivatives.",
      "against": "Extraction follows concentration alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0589",
      "hypothesis": "A reversible coacervate could extract a reactive intermediate only while its surrounding reaction accelerates.",
      "test": "Measure partitioning and reaction derivatives.",
      "against": "Extraction follows concentration alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0590",
    "hypothesis": "A catalyst could reduce product contamination by dissolving its weakest support bonds selectively during washing.",
    "test": "Measure support loss and impurity release.",
    "against": "Purification requires substantial catalyst loss.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0590",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A catalyst could reduce product contamination by dissolving its weakest support bonds selectively during washing.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0590",
      "hypothesis": "A catalyst could reduce product contamination by dissolving its weakest support bonds selectively during washing.",
      "test": "Measure support loss and impurity release.",
      "against": "Purification requires substantial catalyst loss.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0590",
      "hypothesis": "A catalyst could reduce product contamination by dissolving its weakest support bonds selectively during washing.",
      "test": "Measure support loss and impurity release.",
      "against": "Purification requires substantial catalyst loss.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0591",
    "hypothesis": "A molecular sensor could distinguish true chemical inhibition from transport starvation using a local mechanical perturbation.",
    "test": "Apply calibrated agitation pulses.",
    "against": "Responses cannot identify inhibition mechanism.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0591",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A molecular sensor could distinguish true chemical inhibition from transport starvation using a local mechanical perturbation.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0591",
      "hypothesis": "A molecular sensor could distinguish true chemical inhibition from transport starvation using a local mechanical perturbation.",
      "test": "Apply calibrated agitation pulses.",
      "against": "Responses cannot identify inhibition mechanism.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0591",
      "hypothesis": "A molecular sensor could distinguish true chemical inhibition from transport starvation using a local mechanical perturbation.",
      "test": "Apply calibrated agitation pulses.",
      "against": "Responses cannot identify inhibition mechanism.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0592",
    "hypothesis": "A salt crystal could retain less mechanical stress when grown under a moving concentration minimum.",
    "test": "Map strain and growth histories.",
    "against": "Stress tracks growth speed only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 4,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 22,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 64,
    "literature_query": "salt crystal retain mechanical stress when grown moving concentration minimum experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N0592",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A salt crystal could retain less mechanical stress when grown under a moving concentration minimum.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0592",
      "hypothesis": "A salt crystal could retain less mechanical stress when grown under a moving concentration minimum.",
      "test": "Map strain and growth histories.",
      "against": "Stress tracks growth speed only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0592",
      "hypothesis": "A salt crystal could retain less mechanical stress when grown under a moving concentration minimum.",
      "test": "Map strain and growth histories.",
      "against": "Stress tracks growth speed only.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 22,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 64,
      "literature_query": "salt crystal retain mechanical stress when grown moving concentration minimum experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "64",
      "id": "N0592",
      "hypothesis": "A salt crystal could retain less mechanical stress when grown under a moving concentration minimum.",
      "test": "Map strain and growth histories.",
      "against": "Stress tracks growth speed only.",
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_score": "22",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P4fc2f715aa57;Pc8725a522dea;Pfb8a812ba55a;Pd743d4bb92e7;P3c1ce83be6d1;P17390f9583fe;P3a43df75de04",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N0592",
      "hypothesis": "A salt crystal could retain less mechanical stress when grown under a moving concentration minimum.",
      "test": "Map strain and growth histories.",
      "against": "Stress tracks growth speed only.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 22,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 64,
      "literature_query": "salt crystal retain mechanical stress when grown moving concentration minimum experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P4fc2f715aa57;Pc8725a522dea;Pfb8a812ba55a;Pd743d4bb92e7;P3c1ce83be6d1;P17390f9583fe;P3a43df75de04",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P4fc2f715aa57;Pc8725a522dea;Pfb8a812ba55a;Pd743d4bb92e7;P3c1ce83be6d1;P17390f9583fe;P3a43df75de04",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0593",
    "hypothesis": "A porous polymer could reject a foulant through reversible internal phase inversion without releasing coating material.",
    "test": "Measure phases, rejection, and mass loss.",
    "against": "Rejection requires irreversible material shedding.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0593",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous polymer could reject a foulant through reversible internal phase inversion without releasing coating material.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0593",
      "hypothesis": "A porous polymer could reject a foulant through reversible internal phase inversion without releasing coating material.",
      "test": "Measure phases, rejection, and mass loss.",
      "against": "Rejection requires irreversible material shedding.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0593",
      "hypothesis": "A porous polymer could reject a foulant through reversible internal phase inversion without releasing coating material.",
      "test": "Measure phases, rejection, and mass loss.",
      "against": "Rejection requires irreversible material shedding.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0594",
    "hypothesis": "A benign reaction could stabilize an unstable interface by producing a solute that preferentially adsorbs at protrusions.",
    "test": "Map curvature and product adsorption.",
    "against": "Stabilization follows viscosity increase alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0594",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A benign reaction could stabilize an unstable interface by producing a solute that preferentially adsorbs at protrusions.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0594",
      "hypothesis": "A benign reaction could stabilize an unstable interface by producing a solute that preferentially adsorbs at protrusions.",
      "test": "Map curvature and product adsorption.",
      "against": "Stabilization follows viscosity increase alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0594",
      "hypothesis": "A benign reaction could stabilize an unstable interface by producing a solute that preferentially adsorbs at protrusions.",
      "test": "Map curvature and product adsorption.",
      "against": "Stabilization follows viscosity increase alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0595",
    "hypothesis": "A molecular spring could measure cumulative chemical bond exchange through irreversible winding.",
    "test": "Compare winding and independently measured exchange.",
    "against": "Winding reflects thermal cycling only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0595",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A molecular spring could measure cumulative chemical bond exchange through irreversible winding.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0595",
      "hypothesis": "A molecular spring could measure cumulative chemical bond exchange through irreversible winding.",
      "test": "Compare winding and independently measured exchange.",
      "against": "Winding reflects thermal cycling only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0595",
      "hypothesis": "A molecular spring could measure cumulative chemical bond exchange through irreversible winding.",
      "test": "Compare winding and independently measured exchange.",
      "against": "Winding reflects thermal cycling only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0596",
    "hypothesis": "A catalyst pair could share a short-lived intermediate through an adsorbed water wire instead of bulk diffusion.",
    "test": "Interrupt surface continuity and measure flux.",
    "against": "Flux follows bulk diffusion unchanged.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0596",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A catalyst pair could share a short-lived intermediate through an adsorbed water wire instead of bulk diffusion.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0596",
      "hypothesis": "A catalyst pair could share a short-lived intermediate through an adsorbed water wire instead of bulk diffusion.",
      "test": "Interrupt surface continuity and measure flux.",
      "against": "Flux follows bulk diffusion unchanged.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0596",
      "hypothesis": "A catalyst pair could share a short-lived intermediate through an adsorbed water wire instead of bulk diffusion.",
      "test": "Interrupt surface continuity and measure flux.",
      "against": "Flux follows bulk diffusion unchanged.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0597",
    "hypothesis": "A reversible precipitate could sort inert particles by their surface hydration times during crystal engulfment.",
    "test": "Measure engulfment and hydration independently.",
    "against": "Sorting follows particle size only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0597",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A reversible precipitate could sort inert particles by their surface hydration times during crystal engulfment.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0597",
      "hypothesis": "A reversible precipitate could sort inert particles by their surface hydration times during crystal engulfment.",
      "test": "Measure engulfment and hydration independently.",
      "against": "Sorting follows particle size only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0597",
      "hypothesis": "A reversible precipitate could sort inert particles by their surface hydration times during crystal engulfment.",
      "test": "Measure engulfment and hydration independently.",
      "against": "Sorting follows particle size only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0598",
    "hypothesis": "A crystalline adsorbent could recover capacity after controlled acoustic rest through guest reorientation rather than desorption.",
    "test": "Measure orientation, loading, and capacity.",
    "against": "Recovery requires guest mass loss.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0598",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A crystalline adsorbent could recover capacity after controlled acoustic rest through guest reorientation rather than desorption.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0598",
      "hypothesis": "A crystalline adsorbent could recover capacity after controlled acoustic rest through guest reorientation rather than desorption.",
      "test": "Measure orientation, loading, and capacity.",
      "against": "Recovery requires guest mass loss.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0598",
      "hypothesis": "A crystalline adsorbent could recover capacity after controlled acoustic rest through guest reorientation rather than desorption.",
      "test": "Measure orientation, loading, and capacity.",
      "against": "Recovery requires guest mass loss.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0599",
    "hypothesis": "A chemical indicator could distinguish repeated small exposures from one large exposure using a reversible oligomer-length distribution.",
    "test": "Compare equal-dose exposure histories.",
    "against": "Distributions depend only on total dose.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0599",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A chemical indicator could distinguish repeated small exposures from one large exposure using a reversible oligomer-length distribution.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0599",
      "hypothesis": "A chemical indicator could distinguish repeated small exposures from one large exposure using a reversible oligomer-length distribution.",
      "test": "Compare equal-dose exposure histories.",
      "against": "Distributions depend only on total dose.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0599",
      "hypothesis": "A chemical indicator could distinguish repeated small exposures from one large exposure using a reversible oligomer-length distribution.",
      "test": "Compare equal-dose exposure histories.",
      "against": "Distributions depend only on total dose.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0600",
    "hypothesis": "A shallow fracture could preserve rainfall intensity information in the orientation of newly deposited mineral bridges.",
    "test": "Compare bridges after controlled rain histories.",
    "against": "Orientation follows total water only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0600",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A shallow fracture could preserve rainfall intensity information in the orientation of newly deposited mineral bridges.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0600",
      "hypothesis": "A shallow fracture could preserve rainfall intensity information in the orientation of newly deposited mineral bridges.",
      "test": "Compare bridges after controlled rain histories.",
      "against": "Orientation follows total water only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0600",
      "hypothesis": "A shallow fracture could preserve rainfall intensity information in the orientation of newly deposited mineral bridges.",
      "test": "Compare bridges after controlled rain histories.",
      "against": "Orientation follows total water only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0601",
    "hypothesis": "A clay seam could redirect slow earthquake-analogue slip through delayed pore-pressure recovery.",
    "test": "Measure slip and local pressure.",
    "against": "Routing follows static friction alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0601",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A clay seam could redirect slow earthquake-analogue slip through delayed pore-pressure recovery.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0601",
      "hypothesis": "A clay seam could redirect slow earthquake-analogue slip through delayed pore-pressure recovery.",
      "test": "Measure slip and local pressure.",
      "against": "Routing follows static friction alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0601",
      "hypothesis": "A clay seam could redirect slow earthquake-analogue slip through delayed pore-pressure recovery.",
      "test": "Measure slip and local pressure.",
      "against": "Routing follows static friction alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0602",
    "hypothesis": "A porous basalt analogue could trap atmospheric carbon more evenly when gas enters through a moving wetting boundary.",
    "test": "Map carbonate and gas access.",
    "against": "Uniformity follows total exposure alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0602",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous basalt analogue could trap atmospheric carbon more evenly when gas enters through a moving wetting boundary.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0602",
      "hypothesis": "A porous basalt analogue could trap atmospheric carbon more evenly when gas enters through a moving wetting boundary.",
      "test": "Map carbonate and gas access.",
      "against": "Uniformity follows total exposure alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0602",
      "hypothesis": "A porous basalt analogue could trap atmospheric carbon more evenly when gas enters through a moving wetting boundary.",
      "test": "Map carbonate and gas access.",
      "against": "Uniformity follows total exposure alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0603",
    "hypothesis": "A sand dune analogue could retain wind-direction memory below its visible surface after crest reversal.",
    "test": "Image buried tracer layers.",
    "against": "Memory disappears when the crest reverses.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 4,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 45,
    "literature_query": "sand dune analogue retain wind-direction memory below visible surface crest reversal experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N0603",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A sand dune analogue could retain wind-direction memory below its visible surface after crest reversal.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0603",
      "hypothesis": "A sand dune analogue could retain wind-direction memory below its visible surface after crest reversal.",
      "test": "Image buried tracer layers.",
      "against": "Memory disappears when the crest reverses.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0603",
      "hypothesis": "A sand dune analogue could retain wind-direction memory below its visible surface after crest reversal.",
      "test": "Image buried tracer layers.",
      "against": "Memory disappears when the crest reverses.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 23,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 45,
      "literature_query": "sand dune analogue retain wind-direction memory below visible surface crest reversal experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "45",
      "id": "N0603",
      "hypothesis": "A sand dune analogue could retain wind-direction memory below its visible surface after crest reversal.",
      "test": "Image buried tracer layers.",
      "against": "Memory disappears when the crest reverses.",
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_score": "23",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P27252e53b35e;Pf915813463e7;Pfe0ec481f72a;Pbd9ff8e38d8f;Pa061dfd11c50;P9f22a78b66b1;P96843c622644",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N0603",
      "hypothesis": "A sand dune analogue could retain wind-direction memory below its visible surface after crest reversal.",
      "test": "Image buried tracer layers.",
      "against": "Memory disappears when the crest reverses.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 23,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 45,
      "literature_query": "sand dune analogue retain wind-direction memory below visible surface crest reversal experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P27252e53b35e;Pf915813463e7;Pfe0ec481f72a;Pbd9ff8e38d8f;Pa061dfd11c50;P9f22a78b66b1;P96843c622644",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P27252e53b35e;Pf915813463e7;Pfe0ec481f72a;Pbd9ff8e38d8f;Pa061dfd11c50;P9f22a78b66b1;P96843c622644",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0604",
    "hypothesis": "A glacier-bed analogue could reduce friction by routing meltwater through strain-opened side pockets.",
    "test": "Measure friction and water connectivity.",
    "against": "Reduction requires continuous channels only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0604",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A glacier-bed analogue could reduce friction by routing meltwater through strain-opened side pockets.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0604",
      "hypothesis": "A glacier-bed analogue could reduce friction by routing meltwater through strain-opened side pockets.",
      "test": "Measure friction and water connectivity.",
      "against": "Reduction requires continuous channels only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0604",
      "hypothesis": "A glacier-bed analogue could reduce friction by routing meltwater through strain-opened side pockets.",
      "test": "Measure friction and water connectivity.",
      "against": "Reduction requires continuous channels only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0605",
    "hypothesis": "A mineral dust particle could alter cloud-droplet chemistry by repeatedly crossing its air-water interface.",
    "test": "Measure dissolution and interface crossings.",
    "against": "Chemistry follows immersion time only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0605",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A mineral dust particle could alter cloud-droplet chemistry by repeatedly crossing its air-water interface.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0605",
      "hypothesis": "A mineral dust particle could alter cloud-droplet chemistry by repeatedly crossing its air-water interface.",
      "test": "Measure dissolution and interface crossings.",
      "against": "Chemistry follows immersion time only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0605",
      "hypothesis": "A mineral dust particle could alter cloud-droplet chemistry by repeatedly crossing its air-water interface.",
      "test": "Measure dissolution and interface crossings.",
      "against": "Chemistry follows immersion time only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0606",
    "hypothesis": "A layered rock could emit a distinctive pressure-recovery signal when a sealed fracture reconnects.",
    "test": "Record pressure and fracture imaging.",
    "against": "Signals cannot identify reconnection.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0606",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A layered rock could emit a distinctive pressure-recovery signal when a sealed fracture reconnects.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0606",
      "hypothesis": "A layered rock could emit a distinctive pressure-recovery signal when a sealed fracture reconnects.",
      "test": "Record pressure and fracture imaging.",
      "against": "Signals cannot identify reconnection.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0606",
      "hypothesis": "A layered rock could emit a distinctive pressure-recovery signal when a sealed fracture reconnects.",
      "test": "Record pressure and fracture imaging.",
      "against": "Signals cannot identify reconnection.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0607",
    "hypothesis": "A soil crust could recover infiltration after light vibration rearranges only its finest grains.",
    "test": "Track grains and infiltration.",
    "against": "Recovery requires bulk crust fracture.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0607",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A soil crust could recover infiltration after light vibration rearranges only its finest grains.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0607",
      "hypothesis": "A soil crust could recover infiltration after light vibration rearranges only its finest grains.",
      "test": "Track grains and infiltration.",
      "against": "Recovery requires bulk crust fracture.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0607",
      "hypothesis": "A soil crust could recover infiltration after light vibration rearranges only its finest grains.",
      "test": "Track grains and infiltration.",
      "against": "Recovery requires bulk crust fracture.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0608",
    "hypothesis": "A saline lake analogue could preserve seasonal mixing order in the porosity of its precipitated bottom layer.",
    "test": "Reverse mixing sequences and image sediment.",
    "against": "Porosity follows final composition only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0608",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A saline lake analogue could preserve seasonal mixing order in the porosity of its precipitated bottom layer.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0608",
      "hypothesis": "A saline lake analogue could preserve seasonal mixing order in the porosity of its precipitated bottom layer.",
      "test": "Reverse mixing sequences and image sediment.",
      "against": "Porosity follows final composition only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0608",
      "hypothesis": "A saline lake analogue could preserve seasonal mixing order in the porosity of its precipitated bottom layer.",
      "test": "Reverse mixing sequences and image sediment.",
      "against": "Porosity follows final composition only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0609",
    "hypothesis": "A geothermal mineral deposit could self-limit growth by thermally isolating its own active front.",
    "test": "Measure temperature and growth.",
    "against": "Growth stops only after reagent depletion.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0609",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A geothermal mineral deposit could self-limit growth by thermally isolating its own active front.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0609",
      "hypothesis": "A geothermal mineral deposit could self-limit growth by thermally isolating its own active front.",
      "test": "Measure temperature and growth.",
      "against": "Growth stops only after reagent depletion.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0609",
      "hypothesis": "A geothermal mineral deposit could self-limit growth by thermally isolating its own active front.",
      "test": "Measure temperature and growth.",
      "against": "Growth stops only after reagent depletion.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0610",
    "hypothesis": "A wet fault analogue could strengthen during a loading pause through gas dissolution at contacts.",
    "test": "Measure gas content and restart friction.",
    "against": "Strengthening ignores dissolved gas.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0610",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A wet fault analogue could strengthen during a loading pause through gas dissolution at contacts.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0610",
      "hypothesis": "A wet fault analogue could strengthen during a loading pause through gas dissolution at contacts.",
      "test": "Measure gas content and restart friction.",
      "against": "Strengthening ignores dissolved gas.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0610",
      "hypothesis": "A wet fault analogue could strengthen during a loading pause through gas dissolution at contacts.",
      "test": "Measure gas content and restart friction.",
      "against": "Strengthening ignores dissolved gas.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0611",
    "hypothesis": "A thawing permafrost analogue could release solutes before bulk drainage through connected unfrozen films.",
    "test": "Measure solute and water flux separately.",
    "against": "Release begins only with bulk flow.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0611",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A thawing permafrost analogue could release solutes before bulk drainage through connected unfrozen films.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0611",
      "hypothesis": "A thawing permafrost analogue could release solutes before bulk drainage through connected unfrozen films.",
      "test": "Measure solute and water flux separately.",
      "against": "Release begins only with bulk flow.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0611",
      "hypothesis": "A thawing permafrost analogue could release solutes before bulk drainage through connected unfrozen films.",
      "test": "Measure solute and water flux separately.",
      "against": "Release begins only with bulk flow.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0612",
    "hypothesis": "A volcanic-ash analogue could aggregate under weak electric fluctuations despite zero mean charge.",
    "test": "Track charge and aggregation.",
    "against": "Aggregation requires net charging.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0612",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A volcanic-ash analogue could aggregate under weak electric fluctuations despite zero mean charge.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0612",
      "hypothesis": "A volcanic-ash analogue could aggregate under weak electric fluctuations despite zero mean charge.",
      "test": "Track charge and aggregation.",
      "against": "Aggregation requires net charging.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0612",
      "hypothesis": "A volcanic-ash analogue could aggregate under weak electric fluctuations despite zero mean charge.",
      "test": "Track charge and aggregation.",
      "against": "Aggregation requires net charging.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0613",
    "hypothesis": "A porous coastal rock could develop directional salt transport under symmetric tides because wetting and drying use different pores.",
    "test": "Map tidal tracer movement.",
    "against": "Net transport vanishes after offsets removed.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0613",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous coastal rock could develop directional salt transport under symmetric tides because wetting and drying use different pores.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0613",
      "hypothesis": "A porous coastal rock could develop directional salt transport under symmetric tides because wetting and drying use different pores.",
      "test": "Map tidal tracer movement.",
      "against": "Net transport vanishes after offsets removed.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0613",
      "hypothesis": "A porous coastal rock could develop directional salt transport under symmetric tides because wetting and drying use different pores.",
      "test": "Map tidal tracer movement.",
      "against": "Net transport vanishes after offsets removed.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0614",
    "hypothesis": "A sediment layer could reveal a buried obstacle through asymmetric spontaneous pore-pressure fluctuations.",
    "test": "Compare pressure maps with known obstacles.",
    "against": "Asymmetry follows boundary forcing only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0614",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A sediment layer could reveal a buried obstacle through asymmetric spontaneous pore-pressure fluctuations.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0614",
      "hypothesis": "A sediment layer could reveal a buried obstacle through asymmetric spontaneous pore-pressure fluctuations.",
      "test": "Compare pressure maps with known obstacles.",
      "against": "Asymmetry follows boundary forcing only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0614",
      "hypothesis": "A sediment layer could reveal a buried obstacle through asymmetric spontaneous pore-pressure fluctuations.",
      "test": "Compare pressure maps with known obstacles.",
      "against": "Asymmetry follows boundary forcing only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0615",
    "hypothesis": "A thin mineral coating could protect a rock from freeze-thaw damage by redistributing water before freezing.",
    "test": "Image water and crack growth.",
    "against": "Protection follows thermal insulation alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0615",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A thin mineral coating could protect a rock from freeze-thaw damage by redistributing water before freezing.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0615",
      "hypothesis": "A thin mineral coating could protect a rock from freeze-thaw damage by redistributing water before freezing.",
      "test": "Image water and crack growth.",
      "against": "Protection follows thermal insulation alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0615",
      "hypothesis": "A thin mineral coating could protect a rock from freeze-thaw damage by redistributing water before freezing.",
      "test": "Image water and crack growth.",
      "against": "Protection follows thermal insulation alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0616",
    "hypothesis": "A streambed analogue could stabilize through rotation of flat grains into pressure-shielded positions.",
    "test": "Track grain orientation and erosion.",
    "against": "Stability requires increased grain cohesion.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0616",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A streambed analogue could stabilize through rotation of flat grains into pressure-shielded positions.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0616",
      "hypothesis": "A streambed analogue could stabilize through rotation of flat grains into pressure-shielded positions.",
      "test": "Track grain orientation and erosion.",
      "against": "Stability requires increased grain cohesion.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0616",
      "hypothesis": "A streambed analogue could stabilize through rotation of flat grains into pressure-shielded positions.",
      "test": "Track grain orientation and erosion.",
      "against": "Stability requires increased grain cohesion.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0617",
    "hypothesis": "A partially molten rock analogue could form a transport channel through oscillatory stress without net strain.",
    "test": "Image melt paths and flux.",
    "against": "Channels require permanent bulk deformation.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0617",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A partially molten rock analogue could form a transport channel through oscillatory stress without net strain.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0617",
      "hypothesis": "A partially molten rock analogue could form a transport channel through oscillatory stress without net strain.",
      "test": "Image melt paths and flux.",
      "against": "Channels require permanent bulk deformation.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0617",
      "hypothesis": "A partially molten rock analogue could form a transport channel through oscillatory stress without net strain.",
      "test": "Image melt paths and flux.",
      "against": "Channels require permanent bulk deformation.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0618",
    "hypothesis": "A soil aggregate could preserve chemical gradients longer when its internal cracks close sequentially during wetting.",
    "test": "Map crack closure and tracer diffusion.",
    "against": "Persistence follows final porosity alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 12,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0618",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A soil aggregate could preserve chemical gradients longer when its internal cracks close sequentially during wetting.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0618",
      "hypothesis": "A soil aggregate could preserve chemical gradients longer when its internal cracks close sequentially during wetting.",
      "test": "Map crack closure and tracer diffusion.",
      "against": "Persistence follows final porosity alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0618",
      "hypothesis": "A soil aggregate could preserve chemical gradients longer when its internal cracks close sequentially during wetting.",
      "test": "Map crack closure and tracer diffusion.",
      "against": "Persistence follows final porosity alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 12,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0619",
    "hypothesis": "A saline aerosol could nucleate ice preferentially after a prior nonfreezing compression event.",
    "test": "Measure freezing and particle morphology.",
    "against": "Effects disappear after size matching.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0619",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A saline aerosol could nucleate ice preferentially after a prior nonfreezing compression event.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0619",
      "hypothesis": "A saline aerosol could nucleate ice preferentially after a prior nonfreezing compression event.",
      "test": "Measure freezing and particle morphology.",
      "against": "Effects disappear after size matching.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0619",
      "hypothesis": "A saline aerosol could nucleate ice preferentially after a prior nonfreezing compression event.",
      "test": "Measure freezing and particle morphology.",
      "against": "Effects disappear after size matching.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0620",
    "hypothesis": "A fractured mineral could reveal its loading direction through anisotropic dissolution after unloading.",
    "test": "Map etch patterns and residual strain.",
    "against": "Patterns follow crystal orientation alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 18,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0620",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A fractured mineral could reveal its loading direction through anisotropic dissolution after unloading.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0620",
      "hypothesis": "A fractured mineral could reveal its loading direction through anisotropic dissolution after unloading.",
      "test": "Map etch patterns and residual strain.",
      "against": "Patterns follow crystal orientation alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0620",
      "hypothesis": "A fractured mineral could reveal its loading direction through anisotropic dissolution after unloading.",
      "test": "Map etch patterns and residual strain.",
      "against": "Patterns follow crystal orientation alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 18,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0621",
    "hypothesis": "A snowpack analogue could vent gas through pathways selected by acoustic vibration rather than permeability maxima.",
    "test": "Track gas and acoustic fields.",
    "against": "Routing follows static permeability only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0621",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A snowpack analogue could vent gas through pathways selected by acoustic vibration rather than permeability maxima.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0621",
      "hypothesis": "A snowpack analogue could vent gas through pathways selected by acoustic vibration rather than permeability maxima.",
      "test": "Track gas and acoustic fields.",
      "against": "Routing follows static permeability only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0621",
      "hypothesis": "A snowpack analogue could vent gas through pathways selected by acoustic vibration rather than permeability maxima.",
      "test": "Track gas and acoustic fields.",
      "against": "Routing follows static permeability only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0622",
    "hypothesis": "A river-junction analogue could sort porous grains by transient saturation during collision.",
    "test": "Measure saturation and particle routes.",
    "against": "Sorting follows dry density alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0622",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A river-junction analogue could sort porous grains by transient saturation during collision.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0622",
      "hypothesis": "A river-junction analogue could sort porous grains by transient saturation during collision.",
      "test": "Measure saturation and particle routes.",
      "against": "Sorting follows dry density alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0622",
      "hypothesis": "A river-junction analogue could sort porous grains by transient saturation during collision.",
      "test": "Measure saturation and particle routes.",
      "against": "Sorting follows dry density alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0623",
    "hypothesis": "A groundwater analogue could retain a contaminant plume in a moving chemical boundary without strong adsorption.",
    "test": "Map plume and reaction front.",
    "against": "Retention requires measurable surface binding.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0623",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A groundwater analogue could retain a contaminant plume in a moving chemical boundary without strong adsorption.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0623",
      "hypothesis": "A groundwater analogue could retain a contaminant plume in a moving chemical boundary without strong adsorption.",
      "test": "Map plume and reaction front.",
      "against": "Retention requires measurable surface binding.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0623",
      "hypothesis": "A groundwater analogue could retain a contaminant plume in a moving chemical boundary without strong adsorption.",
      "test": "Map plume and reaction front.",
      "against": "Retention requires measurable surface binding.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0624",
    "hypothesis": "A clay-rich sediment could reduce swelling damage by exporting ions into mechanically generated microvoids.",
    "test": "Map ions and void development.",
    "against": "Protection follows water loss only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0624",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A clay-rich sediment could reduce swelling damage by exporting ions into mechanically generated microvoids.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0624",
      "hypothesis": "A clay-rich sediment could reduce swelling damage by exporting ions into mechanically generated microvoids.",
      "test": "Map ions and void development.",
      "against": "Protection follows water loss only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0624",
      "hypothesis": "A clay-rich sediment could reduce swelling damage by exporting ions into mechanically generated microvoids.",
      "test": "Map ions and void development.",
      "against": "Protection follows water loss only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0625",
    "hypothesis": "A mineral dust coating could reverse the sign of a surface's radiative temperature response after dew formation.",
    "test": "Measure spectra and temperatures.",
    "against": "Temperature changes follow evaporation alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0625",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A mineral dust coating could reverse the sign of a surface's radiative temperature response after dew formation.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0625",
      "hypothesis": "A mineral dust coating could reverse the sign of a surface's radiative temperature response after dew formation.",
      "test": "Measure spectra and temperatures.",
      "against": "Temperature changes follow evaporation alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0625",
      "hypothesis": "A mineral dust coating could reverse the sign of a surface's radiative temperature response after dew formation.",
      "test": "Measure spectra and temperatures.",
      "against": "Temperature changes follow evaporation alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0626",
    "hypothesis": "A rock pore could generate a measurable chemical pulse when a gas bubble snaps through a narrow throat.",
    "test": "Synchronize ions and bubble motion.",
    "against": "Chemical pulses follow pump artifacts.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0626",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A rock pore could generate a measurable chemical pulse when a gas bubble snaps through a narrow throat.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0626",
      "hypothesis": "A rock pore could generate a measurable chemical pulse when a gas bubble snaps through a narrow throat.",
      "test": "Synchronize ions and bubble motion.",
      "against": "Chemical pulses follow pump artifacts.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0626",
      "hypothesis": "A rock pore could generate a measurable chemical pulse when a gas bubble snaps through a narrow throat.",
      "test": "Synchronize ions and bubble motion.",
      "against": "Chemical pulses follow pump artifacts.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0627",
    "hypothesis": "A freeze-concentrated brine could form a temporary conductive path before a continuous liquid network appears optically.",
    "test": "Measure conductivity and three-dimensional liquid geometry.",
    "against": "Conduction requires visible connectivity.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0627",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A freeze-concentrated brine could form a temporary conductive path before a continuous liquid network appears optically.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0627",
      "hypothesis": "A freeze-concentrated brine could form a temporary conductive path before a continuous liquid network appears optically.",
      "test": "Measure conductivity and three-dimensional liquid geometry.",
      "against": "Conduction requires visible connectivity.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0627",
      "hypothesis": "A freeze-concentrated brine could form a temporary conductive path before a continuous liquid network appears optically.",
      "test": "Measure conductivity and three-dimensional liquid geometry.",
      "against": "Conduction requires visible connectivity.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0628",
    "hypothesis": "A granular cliff analogue could develop a precursor dilation band before surface displacement.",
    "test": "Measure internal density and motion.",
    "against": "Dilation occurs only after slipping.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0628",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A granular cliff analogue could develop a precursor dilation band before surface displacement.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0628",
      "hypothesis": "A granular cliff analogue could develop a precursor dilation band before surface displacement.",
      "test": "Measure internal density and motion.",
      "against": "Dilation occurs only after slipping.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0628",
      "hypothesis": "A granular cliff analogue could develop a precursor dilation band before surface displacement.",
      "test": "Measure internal density and motion.",
      "against": "Dilation occurs only after slipping.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0629",
    "hypothesis": "A sediment's acoustic scattering could separate trapped gas from organic coatings at equal water content.",
    "test": "Calibrate gas and inert organic analogues.",
    "against": "Signals remain inseparable.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0629",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A sediment's acoustic scattering could separate trapped gas from organic coatings at equal water content.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0629",
      "hypothesis": "A sediment's acoustic scattering could separate trapped gas from organic coatings at equal water content.",
      "test": "Calibrate gas and inert organic analogues.",
      "against": "Signals remain inseparable.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0629",
      "hypothesis": "A sediment's acoustic scattering could separate trapped gas from organic coatings at equal water content.",
      "test": "Calibrate gas and inert organic analogues.",
      "against": "Signals remain inseparable.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0630",
    "hypothesis": "A porous limestone analogue could preserve channel diversity through periodic reversal of dissolution fronts.",
    "test": "Map channel topology and chemistry.",
    "against": "Reversal simply enlarges dominant channels.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0630",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous limestone analogue could preserve channel diversity through periodic reversal of dissolution fronts.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0630",
      "hypothesis": "A porous limestone analogue could preserve channel diversity through periodic reversal of dissolution fronts.",
      "test": "Map channel topology and chemistry.",
      "against": "Reversal simply enlarges dominant channels.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0630",
      "hypothesis": "A porous limestone analogue could preserve channel diversity through periodic reversal of dissolution fronts.",
      "test": "Map channel topology and chemistry.",
      "against": "Reversal simply enlarges dominant channels.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0631",
    "hypothesis": "A dune-grain coating could change abrasion rate through humidity-dependent bond exchange without changing hardness.",
    "test": "Measure wear and surface mechanics.",
    "against": "Wear changes require hardness changes.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0631",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A dune-grain coating could change abrasion rate through humidity-dependent bond exchange without changing hardness.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0631",
      "hypothesis": "A dune-grain coating could change abrasion rate through humidity-dependent bond exchange without changing hardness.",
      "test": "Measure wear and surface mechanics.",
      "against": "Wear changes require hardness changes.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0631",
      "hypothesis": "A dune-grain coating could change abrasion rate through humidity-dependent bond exchange without changing hardness.",
      "test": "Measure wear and surface mechanics.",
      "against": "Wear changes require hardness changes.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0632",
    "hypothesis": "A thin ice lens could migrate toward a local stress minimum against a weak temperature gradient.",
    "test": "Track lenses under separated gradients.",
    "against": "Motion follows temperature alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0632",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A thin ice lens could migrate toward a local stress minimum against a weak temperature gradient.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0632",
      "hypothesis": "A thin ice lens could migrate toward a local stress minimum against a weak temperature gradient.",
      "test": "Track lenses under separated gradients.",
      "against": "Motion follows temperature alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0632",
      "hypothesis": "A thin ice lens could migrate toward a local stress minimum against a weak temperature gradient.",
      "test": "Track lenses under separated gradients.",
      "against": "Motion follows temperature alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0633",
    "hypothesis": "A groundwater mineral interface could sustain redox separation through an electrically connected but hydraulically isolated path.",
    "test": "Measure potentials and species transport.",
    "against": "Separation requires fluid exchange.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0633",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A groundwater mineral interface could sustain redox separation through an electrically connected but hydraulically isolated path.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0633",
      "hypothesis": "A groundwater mineral interface could sustain redox separation through an electrically connected but hydraulically isolated path.",
      "test": "Measure potentials and species transport.",
      "against": "Separation requires fluid exchange.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0633",
      "hypothesis": "A groundwater mineral interface could sustain redox separation through an electrically connected but hydraulically isolated path.",
      "test": "Measure potentials and species transport.",
      "against": "Separation requires fluid exchange.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0634",
    "hypothesis": "A layered soil analogue could trap more air after rapid decompression than after equally rapid drying.",
    "test": "Image gas topology at matched saturation.",
    "against": "Topology depends only on water content.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0634",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A layered soil analogue could trap more air after rapid decompression than after equally rapid drying.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0634",
      "hypothesis": "A layered soil analogue could trap more air after rapid decompression than after equally rapid drying.",
      "test": "Image gas topology at matched saturation.",
      "against": "Topology depends only on water content.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0634",
      "hypothesis": "A layered soil analogue could trap more air after rapid decompression than after equally rapid drying.",
      "test": "Image gas topology at matched saturation.",
      "against": "Topology depends only on water content.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0635",
    "hypothesis": "A pumice-like particle could keep floating through asymmetric pore closure during wetting.",
    "test": "Image closure and buoyancy.",
    "against": "Floating time follows pore volume only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0635",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A pumice-like particle could keep floating through asymmetric pore closure during wetting.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0635",
      "hypothesis": "A pumice-like particle could keep floating through asymmetric pore closure during wetting.",
      "test": "Image closure and buoyancy.",
      "against": "Floating time follows pore volume only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0635",
      "hypothesis": "A pumice-like particle could keep floating through asymmetric pore closure during wetting.",
      "test": "Image closure and buoyancy.",
      "against": "Floating time follows pore volume only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0636",
    "hypothesis": "A weathered rock skin could detach in regular flakes because chemical fronts synchronize mechanical buckling.",
    "test": "Track reaction and buckling wavelength.",
    "against": "Flakes follow pre-existing cracks exclusively.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0636",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A weathered rock skin could detach in regular flakes because chemical fronts synchronize mechanical buckling.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0636",
      "hypothesis": "A weathered rock skin could detach in regular flakes because chemical fronts synchronize mechanical buckling.",
      "test": "Track reaction and buckling wavelength.",
      "against": "Flakes follow pre-existing cracks exclusively.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0636",
      "hypothesis": "A weathered rock skin could detach in regular flakes because chemical fronts synchronize mechanical buckling.",
      "test": "Track reaction and buckling wavelength.",
      "against": "Flakes follow pre-existing cracks exclusively.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0637",
    "hypothesis": "A granular avalanche analogue could leave a charge pattern that predicts its internal flow regime.",
    "test": "Measure surface charge and velocity profiles.",
    "against": "Patterns track wall friction only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0637",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A granular avalanche analogue could leave a charge pattern that predicts its internal flow regime.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0637",
      "hypothesis": "A granular avalanche analogue could leave a charge pattern that predicts its internal flow regime.",
      "test": "Measure surface charge and velocity profiles.",
      "against": "Patterns track wall friction only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0637",
      "hypothesis": "A granular avalanche analogue could leave a charge pattern that predicts its internal flow regime.",
      "test": "Measure surface charge and velocity profiles.",
      "against": "Patterns track wall friction only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0638",
    "hypothesis": "A saturated sediment could transmit a thermal pulse along gas boundaries faster than along its main water pathways.",
    "test": "Map heat and phase connectivity.",
    "against": "Heat follows bulk conductivity alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0638",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A saturated sediment could transmit a thermal pulse along gas boundaries faster than along its main water pathways.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0638",
      "hypothesis": "A saturated sediment could transmit a thermal pulse along gas boundaries faster than along its main water pathways.",
      "test": "Map heat and phase connectivity.",
      "against": "Heat follows bulk conductivity alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0638",
      "hypothesis": "A saturated sediment could transmit a thermal pulse along gas boundaries faster than along its main water pathways.",
      "test": "Map heat and phase connectivity.",
      "against": "Heat follows bulk conductivity alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0639",
    "hypothesis": "A mineral surface could preserve evidence of transient anoxia through a reversible defect population after reoxygenation.",
    "test": "Measure defects and oxygen history.",
    "against": "Defects reflect final oxygen only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0639",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A mineral surface could preserve evidence of transient anoxia through a reversible defect population after reoxygenation.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0639",
      "hypothesis": "A mineral surface could preserve evidence of transient anoxia through a reversible defect population after reoxygenation.",
      "test": "Measure defects and oxygen history.",
      "against": "Defects reflect final oxygen only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0639",
      "hypothesis": "A mineral surface could preserve evidence of transient anoxia through a reversible defect population after reoxygenation.",
      "test": "Measure defects and oxygen history.",
      "against": "Defects reflect final oxygen only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0640",
    "hypothesis": "A clay-coated grain could shed its coating selectively during rotational rather than translational collisions.",
    "test": "Compare equal-energy collision modes.",
    "against": "Coating loss follows energy alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0640",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A clay-coated grain could shed its coating selectively during rotational rather than translational collisions.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0640",
      "hypothesis": "A clay-coated grain could shed its coating selectively during rotational rather than translational collisions.",
      "test": "Compare equal-energy collision modes.",
      "against": "Coating loss follows energy alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0640",
      "hypothesis": "A clay-coated grain could shed its coating selectively during rotational rather than translational collisions.",
      "test": "Compare equal-energy collision modes.",
      "against": "Coating loss follows energy alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0641",
    "hypothesis": "A soil pore network could retain a pressure maximum as a persistent arrangement of disconnected liquid films.",
    "test": "Image films after pressure cycles.",
    "against": "Final topology follows saturation alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0641",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A soil pore network could retain a pressure maximum as a persistent arrangement of disconnected liquid films.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0641",
      "hypothesis": "A soil pore network could retain a pressure maximum as a persistent arrangement of disconnected liquid films.",
      "test": "Image films after pressure cycles.",
      "against": "Final topology follows saturation alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0641",
      "hypothesis": "A soil pore network could retain a pressure maximum as a persistent arrangement of disconnected liquid films.",
      "test": "Image films after pressure cycles.",
      "against": "Final topology follows saturation alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0642",
    "hypothesis": "A coastal-spray analogue could enrich one benign salt through bubble-film rupture rather than bulk evaporation.",
    "test": "Measure aerosol composition and rupture geometry.",
    "against": "Enrichment follows volatility alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0642",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A coastal-spray analogue could enrich one benign salt through bubble-film rupture rather than bulk evaporation.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0642",
      "hypothesis": "A coastal-spray analogue could enrich one benign salt through bubble-film rupture rather than bulk evaporation.",
      "test": "Measure aerosol composition and rupture geometry.",
      "against": "Enrichment follows volatility alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0642",
      "hypothesis": "A coastal-spray analogue could enrich one benign salt through bubble-film rupture rather than bulk evaporation.",
      "test": "Measure aerosol composition and rupture geometry.",
      "against": "Enrichment follows volatility alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0643",
    "hypothesis": "A fault-gouge analogue could become more permeable while becoming mechanically stronger through contact reorganization.",
    "test": "Measure strength and permeability together.",
    "against": "The properties always change oppositely.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0643",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A fault-gouge analogue could become more permeable while becoming mechanically stronger through contact reorganization.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0643",
      "hypothesis": "A fault-gouge analogue could become more permeable while becoming mechanically stronger through contact reorganization.",
      "test": "Measure strength and permeability together.",
      "against": "The properties always change oppositely.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0643",
      "hypothesis": "A fault-gouge analogue could become more permeable while becoming mechanically stronger through contact reorganization.",
      "test": "Measure strength and permeability together.",
      "against": "The properties always change oppositely.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0644",
    "hypothesis": "A melting snow analogue could route the first nutrient pulse away from its main later drainage channel.",
    "test": "Compare early and late tracers.",
    "against": "All pulses share identical pathways.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0644",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A melting snow analogue could route the first nutrient pulse away from its main later drainage channel.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0644",
      "hypothesis": "A melting snow analogue could route the first nutrient pulse away from its main later drainage channel.",
      "test": "Compare early and late tracers.",
      "against": "All pulses share identical pathways.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0644",
      "hypothesis": "A melting snow analogue could route the first nutrient pulse away from its main later drainage channel.",
      "test": "Compare early and late tracers.",
      "against": "All pulses share identical pathways.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0645",
    "hypothesis": "A porous mineral grain could generate internal convection from dissolution heat at otherwise uniform temperature.",
    "test": "Map internal tracers and thermal fields.",
    "against": "Circulation follows imposed flow only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 12,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0645",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous mineral grain could generate internal convection from dissolution heat at otherwise uniform temperature.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0645",
      "hypothesis": "A porous mineral grain could generate internal convection from dissolution heat at otherwise uniform temperature.",
      "test": "Map internal tracers and thermal fields.",
      "against": "Circulation follows imposed flow only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0645",
      "hypothesis": "A porous mineral grain could generate internal convection from dissolution heat at otherwise uniform temperature.",
      "test": "Map internal tracers and thermal fields.",
      "against": "Circulation follows imposed flow only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 12,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0646",
    "hypothesis": "A sediment cap could suppress methane-analogue gas release by directing bubbles into dissolving side pockets.",
    "test": "Use inert gas and image routing.",
    "against": "Suppression requires lower gas input.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0646",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A sediment cap could suppress methane-analogue gas release by directing bubbles into dissolving side pockets.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0646",
      "hypothesis": "A sediment cap could suppress methane-analogue gas release by directing bubbles into dissolving side pockets.",
      "test": "Use inert gas and image routing.",
      "against": "Suppression requires lower gas input.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0646",
      "hypothesis": "A sediment cap could suppress methane-analogue gas release by directing bubbles into dissolving side pockets.",
      "test": "Use inert gas and image routing.",
      "against": "Suppression requires lower gas input.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0647",
    "hypothesis": "A wet rock analogue could reveal crack connectivity through phase delays of pressure-induced luminescence.",
    "test": "Measure optics and independent pore maps.",
    "against": "Phase follows strain amplitude only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0647",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A wet rock analogue could reveal crack connectivity through phase delays of pressure-induced luminescence.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0647",
      "hypothesis": "A wet rock analogue could reveal crack connectivity through phase delays of pressure-induced luminescence.",
      "test": "Measure optics and independent pore maps.",
      "against": "Phase follows strain amplitude only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0647",
      "hypothesis": "A wet rock analogue could reveal crack connectivity through phase delays of pressure-induced luminescence.",
      "test": "Measure optics and independent pore maps.",
      "against": "Phase follows strain amplitude only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0648",
    "hypothesis": "A dust aggregate could become less ice-active after gentle compression that buries active surface defects.",
    "test": "Measure nucleation and defect exposure.",
    "against": "Changes follow reduced surface area alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0648",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A dust aggregate could become less ice-active after gentle compression that buries active surface defects.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0648",
      "hypothesis": "A dust aggregate could become less ice-active after gentle compression that buries active surface defects.",
      "test": "Measure nucleation and defect exposure.",
      "against": "Changes follow reduced surface area alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0648",
      "hypothesis": "A dust aggregate could become less ice-active after gentle compression that buries active surface defects.",
      "test": "Measure nucleation and defect exposure.",
      "against": "Changes follow reduced surface area alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0649",
    "hypothesis": "A riverbed analogue could maintain a fine-grain refuge through recirculation inside flexible plant-like obstacles.",
    "test": "Track grains and flow within replicas.",
    "against": "Retention follows static shelter geometry only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "nonhuman biology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0649",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A riverbed analogue could maintain a fine-grain refuge through recirculation inside flexible plant-like obstacles.",
    "category": "nonhuman biology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0649",
      "hypothesis": "A riverbed analogue could maintain a fine-grain refuge through recirculation inside flexible plant-like obstacles.",
      "test": "Track grains and flow within replicas.",
      "against": "Retention follows static shelter geometry only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0649",
      "hypothesis": "A riverbed analogue could maintain a fine-grain refuge through recirculation inside flexible plant-like obstacles.",
      "test": "Track grains and flow within replicas.",
      "against": "Retention follows static shelter geometry only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "nonhuman biology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0650",
    "hypothesis": "A salt-weathering front could become less damaging when crystal growth is redirected into a mechanically softer adjacent layer.",
    "test": "Measure stress and crystal location.",
    "against": "Damage falls only with less salt.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0650",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A salt-weathering front could become less damaging when crystal growth is redirected into a mechanically softer adjacent layer.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0650",
      "hypothesis": "A salt-weathering front could become less damaging when crystal growth is redirected into a mechanically softer adjacent layer.",
      "test": "Measure stress and crystal location.",
      "against": "Damage falls only with less salt.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0650",
      "hypothesis": "A salt-weathering front could become less damaging when crystal growth is redirected into a mechanically softer adjacent layer.",
      "test": "Measure stress and crystal location.",
      "against": "Damage falls only with less salt.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0651",
    "hypothesis": "A soil's evaporation front could split into stable branches through competition between local cooling and capillary supply.",
    "test": "Map temperature and water fronts.",
    "against": "Branching follows pore geometry alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0651",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A soil's evaporation front could split into stable branches through competition between local cooling and capillary supply.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0651",
      "hypothesis": "A soil's evaporation front could split into stable branches through competition between local cooling and capillary supply.",
      "test": "Map temperature and water fronts.",
      "against": "Branching follows pore geometry alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0651",
      "hypothesis": "A soil's evaporation front could split into stable branches through competition between local cooling and capillary supply.",
      "test": "Map temperature and water fronts.",
      "against": "Branching follows pore geometry alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0652",
    "hypothesis": "A porous volcanic-glass analogue could release trace ions in the sequence of bond strain rather than concentration.",
    "test": "Measure strain and release spectra.",
    "against": "Sequence follows abundance only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0652",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous volcanic-glass analogue could release trace ions in the sequence of bond strain rather than concentration.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0652",
      "hypothesis": "A porous volcanic-glass analogue could release trace ions in the sequence of bond strain rather than concentration.",
      "test": "Measure strain and release spectra.",
      "against": "Sequence follows abundance only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0652",
      "hypothesis": "A porous volcanic-glass analogue could release trace ions in the sequence of bond strain rather than concentration.",
      "test": "Measure strain and release spectra.",
      "against": "Sequence follows abundance only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0653",
    "hypothesis": "A submerged sand ripple could preserve a memory of flow acceleration in its internal contact anisotropy.",
    "test": "Probe contacts after matched final shapes.",
    "against": "Anisotropy follows final geometry only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 12,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0653",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A submerged sand ripple could preserve a memory of flow acceleration in its internal contact anisotropy.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0653",
      "hypothesis": "A submerged sand ripple could preserve a memory of flow acceleration in its internal contact anisotropy.",
      "test": "Probe contacts after matched final shapes.",
      "against": "Anisotropy follows final geometry only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0653",
      "hypothesis": "A submerged sand ripple could preserve a memory of flow acceleration in its internal contact anisotropy.",
      "test": "Probe contacts after matched final shapes.",
      "against": "Anisotropy follows final geometry only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 12,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0654",
    "hypothesis": "A mineral vein could reseal faster when pressure oscillations move its dissolved products across the crack repeatedly.",
    "test": "Track chemistry and aperture closure.",
    "against": "Closure gain follows extra solute input.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0654",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A mineral vein could reseal faster when pressure oscillations move its dissolved products across the crack repeatedly.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0654",
      "hypothesis": "A mineral vein could reseal faster when pressure oscillations move its dissolved products across the crack repeatedly.",
      "test": "Track chemistry and aperture closure.",
      "against": "Closure gain follows extra solute input.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0654",
      "hypothesis": "A mineral vein could reseal faster when pressure oscillations move its dissolved products across the crack repeatedly.",
      "test": "Track chemistry and aperture closure.",
      "against": "Closure gain follows extra solute input.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0655",
    "hypothesis": "A frost-heaved soil analogue could recover pore connectivity through local grain recoil during thaw.",
    "test": "Image recoil and tracer transport.",
    "against": "Recovery requires bulk settlement.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0655",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A frost-heaved soil analogue could recover pore connectivity through local grain recoil during thaw.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0655",
      "hypothesis": "A frost-heaved soil analogue could recover pore connectivity through local grain recoil during thaw.",
      "test": "Image recoil and tracer transport.",
      "against": "Recovery requires bulk settlement.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0655",
      "hypothesis": "A frost-heaved soil analogue could recover pore connectivity through local grain recoil during thaw.",
      "test": "Image recoil and tracer transport.",
      "against": "Recovery requires bulk settlement.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0656",
    "hypothesis": "A rock's thermal noise could reveal fluid exchange between isolated inclusions before macroscopic permeability changes.",
    "test": "Measure noise and inclusion chemistry.",
    "against": "Noise changes only with bulk flow.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0656",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A rock's thermal noise could reveal fluid exchange between isolated inclusions before macroscopic permeability changes.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0656",
      "hypothesis": "A rock's thermal noise could reveal fluid exchange between isolated inclusions before macroscopic permeability changes.",
      "test": "Measure noise and inclusion chemistry.",
      "against": "Noise changes only with bulk flow.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0656",
      "hypothesis": "A rock's thermal noise could reveal fluid exchange between isolated inclusions before macroscopic permeability changes.",
      "test": "Measure noise and inclusion chemistry.",
      "against": "Noise changes only with bulk flow.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0657",
    "hypothesis": "A saline sediment could buffer acidity by exposing new mineral faces during reversible grain rocking.",
    "test": "Measure face exposure and pH.",
    "against": "Buffering follows total abrasion alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0657",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A saline sediment could buffer acidity by exposing new mineral faces during reversible grain rocking.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0657",
      "hypothesis": "A saline sediment could buffer acidity by exposing new mineral faces during reversible grain rocking.",
      "test": "Measure face exposure and pH.",
      "against": "Buffering follows total abrasion alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0657",
      "hypothesis": "A saline sediment could buffer acidity by exposing new mineral faces during reversible grain rocking.",
      "test": "Measure face exposure and pH.",
      "against": "Buffering follows total abrasion alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0658",
    "hypothesis": "A wetting front could preferentially invade mechanically relaxed pores even when pore sizes are matched.",
    "test": "Map stress and invasion order.",
    "against": "Invasion follows size alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0658",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A wetting front could preferentially invade mechanically relaxed pores even when pore sizes are matched.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0658",
      "hypothesis": "A wetting front could preferentially invade mechanically relaxed pores even when pore sizes are matched.",
      "test": "Map stress and invasion order.",
      "against": "Invasion follows size alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0658",
      "hypothesis": "A wetting front could preferentially invade mechanically relaxed pores even when pore sizes are matched.",
      "test": "Map stress and invasion order.",
      "against": "Invasion follows size alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0659",
    "hypothesis": "A low-gravity regolith analogue could retain water longer through rotational locking of wet grains.",
    "test": "Compare controlled effective-gravity conditions.",
    "against": "Retention follows capillary force scaling only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0659",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A low-gravity regolith analogue could retain water longer through rotational locking of wet grains.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0659",
      "hypothesis": "A low-gravity regolith analogue could retain water longer through rotational locking of wet grains.",
      "test": "Compare controlled effective-gravity conditions.",
      "against": "Retention follows capillary force scaling only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0659",
      "hypothesis": "A low-gravity regolith analogue could retain water longer through rotational locking of wet grains.",
      "test": "Compare controlled effective-gravity conditions.",
      "against": "Retention follows capillary force scaling only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0660",
    "hypothesis": "A mineral crust could protect underlying ice from sublimation by redirecting vapor laterally into cooler zones.",
    "test": "Measure vapor and thermal maps.",
    "against": "Protection follows shading alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0660",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A mineral crust could protect underlying ice from sublimation by redirecting vapor laterally into cooler zones.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0660",
      "hypothesis": "A mineral crust could protect underlying ice from sublimation by redirecting vapor laterally into cooler zones.",
      "test": "Measure vapor and thermal maps.",
      "against": "Protection follows shading alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0660",
      "hypothesis": "A mineral crust could protect underlying ice from sublimation by redirecting vapor laterally into cooler zones.",
      "test": "Measure vapor and thermal maps.",
      "against": "Protection follows shading alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0661",
    "hypothesis": "A sediment plume could separate hollow from solid grains through transient pore-pressure lag during deceleration.",
    "test": "Track particle pressure response and settling.",
    "against": "Separation follows buoyant density only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0661",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A sediment plume could separate hollow from solid grains through transient pore-pressure lag during deceleration.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0661",
      "hypothesis": "A sediment plume could separate hollow from solid grains through transient pore-pressure lag during deceleration.",
      "test": "Track particle pressure response and settling.",
      "against": "Separation follows buoyant density only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0661",
      "hypothesis": "A sediment plume could separate hollow from solid grains through transient pore-pressure lag during deceleration.",
      "test": "Track particle pressure response and settling.",
      "against": "Separation follows buoyant density only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0662",
    "hypothesis": "A soil aggregate could become acoustically anisotropic before visibly cracking during osmotic drying.",
    "test": "Measure wave polarization and images.",
    "against": "Anisotropy follows visible fracture only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0662",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A soil aggregate could become acoustically anisotropic before visibly cracking during osmotic drying.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0662",
      "hypothesis": "A soil aggregate could become acoustically anisotropic before visibly cracking during osmotic drying.",
      "test": "Measure wave polarization and images.",
      "against": "Anisotropy follows visible fracture only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0662",
      "hypothesis": "A soil aggregate could become acoustically anisotropic before visibly cracking during osmotic drying.",
      "test": "Measure wave polarization and images.",
      "against": "Anisotropy follows visible fracture only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0663",
    "hypothesis": "A sandstone analogue could switch dominant flow routes when a nonbinding solute changes interfacial slip.",
    "test": "Measure slip and pore-scale transport.",
    "against": "Routing follows viscosity alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 4,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 6,
    "literature_query": "sandstone analogue switch dominant flow routes when nonbinding solute changes interfacial slip experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N0663",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A sandstone analogue could switch dominant flow routes when a nonbinding solute changes interfacial slip.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0663",
      "hypothesis": "A sandstone analogue could switch dominant flow routes when a nonbinding solute changes interfacial slip.",
      "test": "Measure slip and pore-scale transport.",
      "against": "Routing follows viscosity alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0663",
      "hypothesis": "A sandstone analogue could switch dominant flow routes when a nonbinding solute changes interfacial slip.",
      "test": "Measure slip and pore-scale transport.",
      "against": "Routing follows viscosity alone.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 6,
      "literature_query": "sandstone analogue switch dominant flow routes when nonbinding solute changes interfacial slip experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "6",
      "id": "N0663",
      "hypothesis": "A sandstone analogue could switch dominant flow routes when a nonbinding solute changes interfacial slip.",
      "test": "Measure slip and pore-scale transport.",
      "against": "Routing follows viscosity alone.",
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory; characterization may dominate feasibility",
      "screen_score": "24",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pe18cc9edd8fb;P13cc92a27580",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N0663",
      "hypothesis": "A sandstone analogue could switch dominant flow routes when a nonbinding solute changes interfacial slip.",
      "test": "Measure slip and pore-scale transport.",
      "against": "Routing follows viscosity alone.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory; characterization may dominate feasibility",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 6,
      "literature_query": "sandstone analogue switch dominant flow routes when nonbinding solute changes interfacial slip experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pe18cc9edd8fb;P13cc92a27580",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "Pe18cc9edd8fb;P13cc92a27580",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0664",
    "hypothesis": "A brine-filled crack could resist closure through crystallization confined to its mechanically unloaded edges.",
    "test": "Map stress and precipitation.",
    "against": "Resistance requires crystals at peak stress.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0664",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A brine-filled crack could resist closure through crystallization confined to its mechanically unloaded edges.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0664",
      "hypothesis": "A brine-filled crack could resist closure through crystallization confined to its mechanically unloaded edges.",
      "test": "Map stress and precipitation.",
      "against": "Resistance requires crystals at peak stress.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0664",
      "hypothesis": "A brine-filled crack could resist closure through crystallization confined to its mechanically unloaded edges.",
      "test": "Map stress and precipitation.",
      "against": "Resistance requires crystals at peak stress.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0665",
    "hypothesis": "A clay membrane could preserve a dissolved-gas gradient through unequal adsorption of water at its two faces.",
    "test": "Measure water states and gas flux.",
    "against": "Gradient vanishes after pressure equalization.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0665",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A clay membrane could preserve a dissolved-gas gradient through unequal adsorption of water at its two faces.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0665",
      "hypothesis": "A clay membrane could preserve a dissolved-gas gradient through unequal adsorption of water at its two faces.",
      "test": "Measure water states and gas flux.",
      "against": "Gradient vanishes after pressure equalization.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0665",
      "hypothesis": "A clay membrane could preserve a dissolved-gas gradient through unequal adsorption of water at its two faces.",
      "test": "Measure water states and gas flux.",
      "against": "Gradient vanishes after pressure equalization.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0666",
    "hypothesis": "A granular tidal-flat analogue could develop persistent channels from alternating gas invasion and liquid drainage without erosion.",
    "test": "Image topology under zero grain motion.",
    "against": "Channels require grain displacement.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0666",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A granular tidal-flat analogue could develop persistent channels from alternating gas invasion and liquid drainage without erosion.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0666",
      "hypothesis": "A granular tidal-flat analogue could develop persistent channels from alternating gas invasion and liquid drainage without erosion.",
      "test": "Image topology under zero grain motion.",
      "against": "Channels require grain displacement.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0666",
      "hypothesis": "A granular tidal-flat analogue could develop persistent channels from alternating gas invasion and liquid drainage without erosion.",
      "test": "Image topology under zero grain motion.",
      "against": "Channels require grain displacement.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0667",
    "hypothesis": "A mineral pigment could reveal whether a rock surface experienced wet heat or dry heat through paired optical relaxations.",
    "test": "Calibrate matched thermal histories.",
    "against": "Signals reflect temperature alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0667",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A mineral pigment could reveal whether a rock surface experienced wet heat or dry heat through paired optical relaxations.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0667",
      "hypothesis": "A mineral pigment could reveal whether a rock surface experienced wet heat or dry heat through paired optical relaxations.",
      "test": "Calibrate matched thermal histories.",
      "against": "Signals reflect temperature alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0667",
      "hypothesis": "A mineral pigment could reveal whether a rock surface experienced wet heat or dry heat through paired optical relaxations.",
      "test": "Calibrate matched thermal histories.",
      "against": "Signals reflect temperature alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0668",
    "hypothesis": "A buried ice inclusion could reduce rather than increase local fracture stress if its shape permits rotational expansion.",
    "test": "Measure strain around shaped inclusions.",
    "against": "Stress always rises with freezing.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0668",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A buried ice inclusion could reduce rather than increase local fracture stress if its shape permits rotational expansion.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0668",
      "hypothesis": "A buried ice inclusion could reduce rather than increase local fracture stress if its shape permits rotational expansion.",
      "test": "Measure strain around shaped inclusions.",
      "against": "Stress always rises with freezing.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0668",
      "hypothesis": "A buried ice inclusion could reduce rather than increase local fracture stress if its shape permits rotational expansion.",
      "test": "Measure strain around shaped inclusions.",
      "against": "Stress always rises with freezing.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0669",
    "hypothesis": "A soil analogue could retain nitrate-like benign anions through hydration-shell trapping in transient micropores.",
    "test": "Measure release and pore dynamics.",
    "against": "Retention requires electrostatic adsorption.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0669",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A soil analogue could retain nitrate-like benign anions through hydration-shell trapping in transient micropores.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0669",
      "hypothesis": "A soil analogue could retain nitrate-like benign anions through hydration-shell trapping in transient micropores.",
      "test": "Measure release and pore dynamics.",
      "against": "Retention requires electrostatic adsorption.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0669",
      "hypothesis": "A soil analogue could retain nitrate-like benign anions through hydration-shell trapping in transient micropores.",
      "test": "Measure release and pore dynamics.",
      "against": "Retention requires electrostatic adsorption.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0670",
    "hypothesis": "A grain bed could distinguish upstream turbulence sources through spatial correlations of tiny surface motions.",
    "test": "Apply calibrated flow disturbances.",
    "against": "Correlations reveal only local shear.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0670",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A grain bed could distinguish upstream turbulence sources through spatial correlations of tiny surface motions.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0670",
      "hypothesis": "A grain bed could distinguish upstream turbulence sources through spatial correlations of tiny surface motions.",
      "test": "Apply calibrated flow disturbances.",
      "against": "Correlations reveal only local shear.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0670",
      "hypothesis": "A grain bed could distinguish upstream turbulence sources through spatial correlations of tiny surface motions.",
      "test": "Apply calibrated flow disturbances.",
      "against": "Correlations reveal only local shear.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0671",
    "hypothesis": "A porous carbonate could form a protective dissolution shadow behind a gas bubble even after it departs.",
    "test": "Map retreat and chemical recovery.",
    "against": "Shadow vanishes immediately with departure.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0671",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous carbonate could form a protective dissolution shadow behind a gas bubble even after it departs.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0671",
      "hypothesis": "A porous carbonate could form a protective dissolution shadow behind a gas bubble even after it departs.",
      "test": "Map retreat and chemical recovery.",
      "against": "Shadow vanishes immediately with departure.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0671",
      "hypothesis": "A porous carbonate could form a protective dissolution shadow behind a gas bubble even after it departs.",
      "test": "Map retreat and chemical recovery.",
      "against": "Shadow vanishes immediately with departure.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0672",
    "hypothesis": "A fine-sediment layer could transmit a chemical front faster after reversible acoustic densification.",
    "test": "Measure porosity and front speed.",
    "against": "Acceleration follows new cracks only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0672",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A fine-sediment layer could transmit a chemical front faster after reversible acoustic densification.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0672",
      "hypothesis": "A fine-sediment layer could transmit a chemical front faster after reversible acoustic densification.",
      "test": "Measure porosity and front speed.",
      "against": "Acceleration follows new cracks only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0672",
      "hypothesis": "A fine-sediment layer could transmit a chemical front faster after reversible acoustic densification.",
      "test": "Measure porosity and front speed.",
      "against": "Acceleration follows new cracks only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0673",
    "hypothesis": "A thin mineral film could release stored tectonic-analogue strain through reversible hydration rather than fracture.",
    "test": "Measure strain and hydration reversibility.",
    "against": "Relaxation requires permanent cracks.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0673",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A thin mineral film could release stored tectonic-analogue strain through reversible hydration rather than fracture.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0673",
      "hypothesis": "A thin mineral film could release stored tectonic-analogue strain through reversible hydration rather than fracture.",
      "test": "Measure strain and hydration reversibility.",
      "against": "Relaxation requires permanent cracks.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0673",
      "hypothesis": "A thin mineral film could release stored tectonic-analogue strain through reversible hydration rather than fracture.",
      "test": "Measure strain and hydration reversibility.",
      "against": "Relaxation requires permanent cracks.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0674",
    "hypothesis": "A snow-grain contact could retain a liquid conduit through unequal thermal contraction of adjacent grains.",
    "test": "Map cooling and contact wetness.",
    "against": "Liquid persistence follows impurities alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0674",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A snow-grain contact could retain a liquid conduit through unequal thermal contraction of adjacent grains.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0674",
      "hypothesis": "A snow-grain contact could retain a liquid conduit through unequal thermal contraction of adjacent grains.",
      "test": "Map cooling and contact wetness.",
      "against": "Liquid persistence follows impurities alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0674",
      "hypothesis": "A snow-grain contact could retain a liquid conduit through unequal thermal contraction of adjacent grains.",
      "test": "Map cooling and contact wetness.",
      "against": "Liquid persistence follows impurities alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0675",
    "hypothesis": "A wet sediment could retain fewer trapped bubbles when loaded in torsion than in compression at equal work.",
    "test": "Measure gas topology after loading.",
    "against": "Differences follow final density only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0675",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A wet sediment could retain fewer trapped bubbles when loaded in torsion than in compression at equal work.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0675",
      "hypothesis": "A wet sediment could retain fewer trapped bubbles when loaded in torsion than in compression at equal work.",
      "test": "Measure gas topology after loading.",
      "against": "Differences follow final density only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0675",
      "hypothesis": "A wet sediment could retain fewer trapped bubbles when loaded in torsion than in compression at equal work.",
      "test": "Measure gas topology after loading.",
      "against": "Differences follow final density only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0676",
    "hypothesis": "A rock-pore surface could selectively attract a growing crystal's most strained face.",
    "test": "Measure orientation and lattice strain.",
    "against": "Orientation follows surface chemistry only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0676",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A rock-pore surface could selectively attract a growing crystal's most strained face.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0676",
      "hypothesis": "A rock-pore surface could selectively attract a growing crystal's most strained face.",
      "test": "Measure orientation and lattice strain.",
      "against": "Orientation follows surface chemistry only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0676",
      "hypothesis": "A rock-pore surface could selectively attract a growing crystal's most strained face.",
      "test": "Measure orientation and lattice strain.",
      "against": "Orientation follows surface chemistry only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0677",
    "hypothesis": "A soil crust could break into larger pieces when its moisture gradient opposes its stiffness gradient.",
    "test": "Map both gradients and fragments.",
    "against": "Fragmentation follows mean moisture alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0677",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A soil crust could break into larger pieces when its moisture gradient opposes its stiffness gradient.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0677",
      "hypothesis": "A soil crust could break into larger pieces when its moisture gradient opposes its stiffness gradient.",
      "test": "Map both gradients and fragments.",
      "against": "Fragmentation follows mean moisture alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0677",
      "hypothesis": "A soil crust could break into larger pieces when its moisture gradient opposes its stiffness gradient.",
      "test": "Map both gradients and fragments.",
      "against": "Fragmentation follows mean moisture alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0678",
    "hypothesis": "A mineral-water boundary could support a moving electrical potential wave during localized dissolution.",
    "test": "Map voltage and concentration fronts.",
    "against": "Signals follow electrode contamination.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0678",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A mineral-water boundary could support a moving electrical potential wave during localized dissolution.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0678",
      "hypothesis": "A mineral-water boundary could support a moving electrical potential wave during localized dissolution.",
      "test": "Map voltage and concentration fronts.",
      "against": "Signals follow electrode contamination.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0678",
      "hypothesis": "A mineral-water boundary could support a moving electrical potential wave during localized dissolution.",
      "test": "Map voltage and concentration fronts.",
      "against": "Signals follow electrode contamination.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0679",
    "hypothesis": "A frost layer could indicate prior wind intermittency through the branching statistics of its underside.",
    "test": "Image underside growth after matched airflow doses.",
    "against": "Statistics follow mean wind only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0679",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A frost layer could indicate prior wind intermittency through the branching statistics of its underside.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0679",
      "hypothesis": "A frost layer could indicate prior wind intermittency through the branching statistics of its underside.",
      "test": "Image underside growth after matched airflow doses.",
      "against": "Statistics follow mean wind only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0679",
      "hypothesis": "A frost layer could indicate prior wind intermittency through the branching statistics of its underside.",
      "test": "Image underside growth after matched airflow doses.",
      "against": "Statistics follow mean wind only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0680",
    "hypothesis": "A groundwater analogue could separate fast and slow pollutants through reversible gas partitioning in blind pores.",
    "test": "Measure paired tracer breakthrough.",
    "against": "Separation follows ordinary diffusion alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0680",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A groundwater analogue could separate fast and slow pollutants through reversible gas partitioning in blind pores.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0680",
      "hypothesis": "A groundwater analogue could separate fast and slow pollutants through reversible gas partitioning in blind pores.",
      "test": "Measure paired tracer breakthrough.",
      "against": "Separation follows ordinary diffusion alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0680",
      "hypothesis": "A groundwater analogue could separate fast and slow pollutants through reversible gas partitioning in blind pores.",
      "test": "Measure paired tracer breakthrough.",
      "against": "Separation follows ordinary diffusion alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0681",
    "hypothesis": "A granular bank analogue could resist undercutting through stress-induced alignment of elongated inclusions.",
    "test": "Track alignment and collapse threshold.",
    "against": "Resistance follows inclusion concentration only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0681",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A granular bank analogue could resist undercutting through stress-induced alignment of elongated inclusions.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0681",
      "hypothesis": "A granular bank analogue could resist undercutting through stress-induced alignment of elongated inclusions.",
      "test": "Track alignment and collapse threshold.",
      "against": "Resistance follows inclusion concentration only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0681",
      "hypothesis": "A granular bank analogue could resist undercutting through stress-induced alignment of elongated inclusions.",
      "test": "Track alignment and collapse threshold.",
      "against": "Resistance follows inclusion concentration only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0682",
    "hypothesis": "A heated mineral inclusion could draw water toward itself even when evaporation is suppressed by confinement.",
    "test": "Measure water motion and temperature.",
    "against": "Motion requires vapor loss.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0682",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A heated mineral inclusion could draw water toward itself even when evaporation is suppressed by confinement.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0682",
      "hypothesis": "A heated mineral inclusion could draw water toward itself even when evaporation is suppressed by confinement.",
      "test": "Measure water motion and temperature.",
      "against": "Motion requires vapor loss.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0682",
      "hypothesis": "A heated mineral inclusion could draw water toward itself even when evaporation is suppressed by confinement.",
      "test": "Measure water motion and temperature.",
      "against": "Motion requires vapor loss.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0683",
    "hypothesis": "A sediment's settling history could be reconstructed from its directional poroelastic relaxation spectrum.",
    "test": "Measure relaxation after known histories.",
    "against": "Spectra depend only on final density.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0683",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A sediment's settling history could be reconstructed from its directional poroelastic relaxation spectrum.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0683",
      "hypothesis": "A sediment's settling history could be reconstructed from its directional poroelastic relaxation spectrum.",
      "test": "Measure relaxation after known histories.",
      "against": "Spectra depend only on final density.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0683",
      "hypothesis": "A sediment's settling history could be reconstructed from its directional poroelastic relaxation spectrum.",
      "test": "Measure relaxation after known histories.",
      "against": "Spectra depend only on final density.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0684",
    "hypothesis": "A clay-rich fault analogue could produce fewer rapid slip events when ion exchange is spatially heterogeneous.",
    "test": "Measure exchange maps and slip statistics.",
    "against": "Differences follow mean friction alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0684",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A clay-rich fault analogue could produce fewer rapid slip events when ion exchange is spatially heterogeneous.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0684",
      "hypothesis": "A clay-rich fault analogue could produce fewer rapid slip events when ion exchange is spatially heterogeneous.",
      "test": "Measure exchange maps and slip statistics.",
      "against": "Differences follow mean friction alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0684",
      "hypothesis": "A clay-rich fault analogue could produce fewer rapid slip events when ion exchange is spatially heterogeneous.",
      "test": "Measure exchange maps and slip statistics.",
      "against": "Differences follow mean friction alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0685",
    "hypothesis": "A porous salt crust could self-detach through vapor-pressure accumulation at a locally sealed base.",
    "test": "Measure basal pressure and detachment.",
    "against": "Detachment follows thermal expansion only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0685",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous salt crust could self-detach through vapor-pressure accumulation at a locally sealed base.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0685",
      "hypothesis": "A porous salt crust could self-detach through vapor-pressure accumulation at a locally sealed base.",
      "test": "Measure basal pressure and detachment.",
      "against": "Detachment follows thermal expansion only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0685",
      "hypothesis": "A porous salt crust could self-detach through vapor-pressure accumulation at a locally sealed base.",
      "test": "Measure basal pressure and detachment.",
      "against": "Detachment follows thermal expansion only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0686",
    "hypothesis": "A mineral grain could preserve the direction of a transient electric field in its later dissolution morphology.",
    "test": "Apply fields before dissolution.",
    "against": "Morphology ignores field history.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0686",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A mineral grain could preserve the direction of a transient electric field in its later dissolution morphology.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0686",
      "hypothesis": "A mineral grain could preserve the direction of a transient electric field in its later dissolution morphology.",
      "test": "Apply fields before dissolution.",
      "against": "Morphology ignores field history.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0686",
      "hypothesis": "A mineral grain could preserve the direction of a transient electric field in its later dissolution morphology.",
      "test": "Apply fields before dissolution.",
      "against": "Morphology ignores field history.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0687",
    "hypothesis": "A soil analogue could remain hydraulically connected after shrinkage through rotation of curved pore walls.",
    "test": "Image wall motion and conductance.",
    "against": "Connectivity follows residual water only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0687",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A soil analogue could remain hydraulically connected after shrinkage through rotation of curved pore walls.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0687",
      "hypothesis": "A soil analogue could remain hydraulically connected after shrinkage through rotation of curved pore walls.",
      "test": "Image wall motion and conductance.",
      "against": "Connectivity follows residual water only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0687",
      "hypothesis": "A soil analogue could remain hydraulically connected after shrinkage through rotation of curved pore walls.",
      "test": "Image wall motion and conductance.",
      "against": "Connectivity follows residual water only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0688",
    "hypothesis": "A glacier-ice analogue could route gas inclusions away from a crack tip through pressure-driven melting and refreezing.",
    "test": "Track inclusions and phase changes.",
    "against": "Routing requires bulk crack motion.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0688",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A glacier-ice analogue could route gas inclusions away from a crack tip through pressure-driven melting and refreezing.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0688",
      "hypothesis": "A glacier-ice analogue could route gas inclusions away from a crack tip through pressure-driven melting and refreezing.",
      "test": "Track inclusions and phase changes.",
      "against": "Routing requires bulk crack motion.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0688",
      "hypothesis": "A glacier-ice analogue could route gas inclusions away from a crack tip through pressure-driven melting and refreezing.",
      "test": "Track inclusions and phase changes.",
      "against": "Routing requires bulk crack motion.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0689",
    "hypothesis": "A sediment layer could reveal chemical cementation through a mismatch between acoustic and mechanical recovery times.",
    "test": "Measure both after controlled loading.",
    "against": "Timescales change proportionally.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0689",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A sediment layer could reveal chemical cementation through a mismatch between acoustic and mechanical recovery times.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0689",
      "hypothesis": "A sediment layer could reveal chemical cementation through a mismatch between acoustic and mechanical recovery times.",
      "test": "Measure both after controlled loading.",
      "against": "Timescales change proportionally.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0689",
      "hypothesis": "A sediment layer could reveal chemical cementation through a mismatch between acoustic and mechanical recovery times.",
      "test": "Measure both after controlled loading.",
      "against": "Timescales change proportionally.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0690",
    "hypothesis": "A dune analogue could reduce dust emission through weak surface vibrations that compact only loose fines.",
    "test": "Measure fine motion and emissions.",
    "against": "Suppression requires bulk densification.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0690",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A dune analogue could reduce dust emission through weak surface vibrations that compact only loose fines.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0690",
      "hypothesis": "A dune analogue could reduce dust emission through weak surface vibrations that compact only loose fines.",
      "test": "Measure fine motion and emissions.",
      "against": "Suppression requires bulk densification.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0690",
      "hypothesis": "A dune analogue could reduce dust emission through weak surface vibrations that compact only loose fines.",
      "test": "Measure fine motion and emissions.",
      "against": "Suppression requires bulk densification.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0691",
    "hypothesis": "A mineral coating could maintain a metastable wetting state by reversibly exchanging water with internal inclusions.",
    "test": "Measure wetting and inclusion content.",
    "against": "State persistence follows roughness alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0691",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A mineral coating could maintain a metastable wetting state by reversibly exchanging water with internal inclusions.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0691",
      "hypothesis": "A mineral coating could maintain a metastable wetting state by reversibly exchanging water with internal inclusions.",
      "test": "Measure wetting and inclusion content.",
      "against": "State persistence follows roughness alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0691",
      "hypothesis": "A mineral coating could maintain a metastable wetting state by reversibly exchanging water with internal inclusions.",
      "test": "Measure wetting and inclusion content.",
      "against": "State persistence follows roughness alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0692",
    "hypothesis": "A saline pore network could produce a concentration echo after clean water reverses the original invasion route.",
    "test": "Measure outlet concentration and pore occupancy.",
    "against": "Echo matches dead-volume dilution alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0692",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A saline pore network could produce a concentration echo after clean water reverses the original invasion route.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0692",
      "hypothesis": "A saline pore network could produce a concentration echo after clean water reverses the original invasion route.",
      "test": "Measure outlet concentration and pore occupancy.",
      "against": "Echo matches dead-volume dilution alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0692",
      "hypothesis": "A saline pore network could produce a concentration echo after clean water reverses the original invasion route.",
      "test": "Measure outlet concentration and pore occupancy.",
      "against": "Echo matches dead-volume dilution alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0693",
    "hypothesis": "A thawing sediment could mechanically sort salts from inert grains through differential lubrication at ice boundaries.",
    "test": "Track particles and ion maps.",
    "against": "Sorting follows density only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0693",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A thawing sediment could mechanically sort salts from inert grains through differential lubrication at ice boundaries.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0693",
      "hypothesis": "A thawing sediment could mechanically sort salts from inert grains through differential lubrication at ice boundaries.",
      "test": "Track particles and ion maps.",
      "against": "Sorting follows density only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0693",
      "hypothesis": "A thawing sediment could mechanically sort salts from inert grains through differential lubrication at ice boundaries.",
      "test": "Track particles and ion maps.",
      "against": "Sorting follows density only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0694",
    "hypothesis": "A rock analogue could arrest a crack through fluid transfer into a nearby unconnected compliant inclusion.",
    "test": "Measure pressure and crack velocity.",
    "against": "Arrest requires direct hydraulic connection.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0694",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A rock analogue could arrest a crack through fluid transfer into a nearby unconnected compliant inclusion.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0694",
      "hypothesis": "A rock analogue could arrest a crack through fluid transfer into a nearby unconnected compliant inclusion.",
      "test": "Measure pressure and crack velocity.",
      "against": "Arrest requires direct hydraulic connection.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0694",
      "hypothesis": "A rock analogue could arrest a crack through fluid transfer into a nearby unconnected compliant inclusion.",
      "test": "Measure pressure and crack velocity.",
      "against": "Arrest requires direct hydraulic connection.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0695",
    "hypothesis": "A porous dust grain could reveal its irradiation history through the timing of water uptake rather than equilibrium capacity.",
    "test": "Measure uptake after controlled illumination.",
    "against": "Timing follows surface contamination alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0695",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous dust grain could reveal its irradiation history through the timing of water uptake rather than equilibrium capacity.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0695",
      "hypothesis": "A porous dust grain could reveal its irradiation history through the timing of water uptake rather than equilibrium capacity.",
      "test": "Measure uptake after controlled illumination.",
      "against": "Timing follows surface contamination alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0695",
      "hypothesis": "A porous dust grain could reveal its irradiation history through the timing of water uptake rather than equilibrium capacity.",
      "test": "Measure uptake after controlled illumination.",
      "against": "Timing follows surface contamination alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0696",
    "hypothesis": "A sedimentary lamina could retain a record of storm pulse spacing through alternating permeability bands.",
    "test": "Compare layers formed under matched sediment doses.",
    "against": "Bands reflect grain-size changes only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0696",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A sedimentary lamina could retain a record of storm pulse spacing through alternating permeability bands.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0696",
      "hypothesis": "A sedimentary lamina could retain a record of storm pulse spacing through alternating permeability bands.",
      "test": "Compare layers formed under matched sediment doses.",
      "against": "Bands reflect grain-size changes only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0696",
      "hypothesis": "A sedimentary lamina could retain a record of storm pulse spacing through alternating permeability bands.",
      "test": "Compare layers formed under matched sediment doses.",
      "against": "Bands reflect grain-size changes only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0697",
    "hypothesis": "A mineral bridge could strengthen under mild dissolution if weak asperities disappear before load-bearing necks.",
    "test": "Measure strength and surface retreat.",
    "against": "Strength decreases monotonically.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0697",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A mineral bridge could strengthen under mild dissolution if weak asperities disappear before load-bearing necks.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0697",
      "hypothesis": "A mineral bridge could strengthen under mild dissolution if weak asperities disappear before load-bearing necks.",
      "test": "Measure strength and surface retreat.",
      "against": "Strength decreases monotonically.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0697",
      "hypothesis": "A mineral bridge could strengthen under mild dissolution if weak asperities disappear before load-bearing necks.",
      "test": "Measure strength and surface retreat.",
      "against": "Strength decreases monotonically.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0698",
    "hypothesis": "A soil-root analogue could maintain an oxygen refuge by storing air in reentrant contacts during flooding.",
    "test": "Map gas and dissolved oxygen.",
    "against": "Refuge disappears after bulk air exits.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0698",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A soil-root analogue could maintain an oxygen refuge by storing air in reentrant contacts during flooding.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0698",
      "hypothesis": "A soil-root analogue could maintain an oxygen refuge by storing air in reentrant contacts during flooding.",
      "test": "Map gas and dissolved oxygen.",
      "against": "Refuge disappears after bulk air exits.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0698",
      "hypothesis": "A soil-root analogue could maintain an oxygen refuge by storing air in reentrant contacts during flooding.",
      "test": "Map gas and dissolved oxygen.",
      "against": "Refuge disappears after bulk air exits.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0699",
    "hypothesis": "A cold porous rock could redirect a salt front through local freezing-point depression without a visible ice barrier.",
    "test": "Measure phase state and ion paths.",
    "against": "Routing requires continuous ice blockage.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0699",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A cold porous rock could redirect a salt front through local freezing-point depression without a visible ice barrier.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0699",
      "hypothesis": "A cold porous rock could redirect a salt front through local freezing-point depression without a visible ice barrier.",
      "test": "Measure phase state and ion paths.",
      "against": "Routing requires continuous ice blockage.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0699",
      "hypothesis": "A cold porous rock could redirect a salt front through local freezing-point depression without a visible ice barrier.",
      "test": "Measure phase state and ion paths.",
      "against": "Routing requires continuous ice blockage.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0700",
    "hypothesis": "A mechanical logic gate could reject uncertain inputs by temporarily storing them as reversible strain.",
    "test": "Measure states under noisy forces.",
    "against": "Uncertainty produces ordinary switching errors.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0700",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A mechanical logic gate could reject uncertain inputs by temporarily storing them as reversible strain.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0700",
      "hypothesis": "A mechanical logic gate could reject uncertain inputs by temporarily storing them as reversible strain.",
      "test": "Measure states under noisy forces.",
      "against": "Uncertainty produces ordinary switching errors.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0700",
      "hypothesis": "A mechanical logic gate could reject uncertain inputs by temporarily storing them as reversible strain.",
      "test": "Measure states under noisy forces.",
      "against": "Uncertainty produces ordinary switching errors.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0701",
    "hypothesis": "An analog reservoir computer could improve physical prediction when its slowest modes are intermittently reset.",
    "test": "Predict held-out nonhuman dynamical signals.",
    "against": "Gains vanish at equal reset energy.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0701",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "An analog reservoir computer could improve physical prediction when its slowest modes are intermittently reset.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0701",
      "hypothesis": "An analog reservoir computer could improve physical prediction when its slowest modes are intermittently reset.",
      "test": "Predict held-out nonhuman dynamical signals.",
      "against": "Gains vanish at equal reset energy.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0701",
      "hypothesis": "An analog reservoir computer could improve physical prediction when its slowest modes are intermittently reset.",
      "test": "Predict held-out nonhuman dynamical signals.",
      "against": "Gains vanish at equal reset energy.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0702",
    "hypothesis": "A photonic classifier could distinguish sensor drift from real changes through a passive reference mode.",
    "test": "Apply independently controlled optical changes.",
    "against": "Reference mode cannot separate causes.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 18,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0702",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A photonic classifier could distinguish sensor drift from real changes through a passive reference mode.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0702",
      "hypothesis": "A photonic classifier could distinguish sensor drift from real changes through a passive reference mode.",
      "test": "Apply independently controlled optical changes.",
      "against": "Reference mode cannot separate causes.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0702",
      "hypothesis": "A photonic classifier could distinguish sensor drift from real changes through a passive reference mode.",
      "test": "Apply independently controlled optical changes.",
      "against": "Reference mode cannot separate causes.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 18,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0703",
    "hypothesis": "A pneumatic memory cell could retain information longer by trapping its pressure in a bistable wall shape.",
    "test": "Measure retention without active supply.",
    "against": "Lifetime follows leakage alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0703",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A pneumatic memory cell could retain information longer by trapping its pressure in a bistable wall shape.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0703",
      "hypothesis": "A pneumatic memory cell could retain information longer by trapping its pressure in a bistable wall shape.",
      "test": "Measure retention without active supply.",
      "against": "Lifetime follows leakage alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0703",
      "hypothesis": "A pneumatic memory cell could retain information longer by trapping its pressure in a bistable wall shape.",
      "test": "Measure retention without active supply.",
      "against": "Lifetime follows leakage alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0704",
    "hypothesis": "A passive thermal circuit could perform temporal integration using reversible phase boundaries instead of electronics.",
    "test": "Compare output with calibrated heat histories.",
    "against": "Response cannot represent integrated input.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0704",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A passive thermal circuit could perform temporal integration using reversible phase boundaries instead of electronics.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0704",
      "hypothesis": "A passive thermal circuit could perform temporal integration using reversible phase boundaries instead of electronics.",
      "test": "Compare output with calibrated heat histories.",
      "against": "Response cannot represent integrated input.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0704",
      "hypothesis": "A passive thermal circuit could perform temporal integration using reversible phase boundaries instead of electronics.",
      "test": "Compare output with calibrated heat histories.",
      "against": "Response cannot represent integrated input.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0705",
    "hypothesis": "A soft gripper could identify fragile objects through pre-contact acoustic loading rather than squeeze force.",
    "test": "Measure echoes and known stiffness.",
    "against": "Classification requires physical compression.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0705",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A soft gripper could identify fragile objects through pre-contact acoustic loading rather than squeeze force.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0705",
      "hypothesis": "A soft gripper could identify fragile objects through pre-contact acoustic loading rather than squeeze force.",
      "test": "Measure echoes and known stiffness.",
      "against": "Classification requires physical compression.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0705",
      "hypothesis": "A soft gripper could identify fragile objects through pre-contact acoustic loading rather than squeeze force.",
      "test": "Measure echoes and known stiffness.",
      "against": "Classification requires physical compression.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0706",
    "hypothesis": "A fluidic comparator could remain accurate during viscosity changes by referencing two equal-history paths.",
    "test": "Measure thresholds across compatible liquids.",
    "against": "Thresholds drift with viscosity unchanged.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0706",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A fluidic comparator could remain accurate during viscosity changes by referencing two equal-history paths.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0706",
      "hypothesis": "A fluidic comparator could remain accurate during viscosity changes by referencing two equal-history paths.",
      "test": "Measure thresholds across compatible liquids.",
      "against": "Thresholds drift with viscosity unchanged.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0706",
      "hypothesis": "A fluidic comparator could remain accurate during viscosity changes by referencing two equal-history paths.",
      "test": "Measure thresholds across compatible liquids.",
      "against": "Thresholds drift with viscosity unchanged.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0707",
    "hypothesis": "A chemical sensor array could recover failed channels by exploiting physical conservation constraints among measured species.",
    "test": "Remove channels during calibrated mixtures.",
    "against": "Recovery fails independent validation.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0707",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A chemical sensor array could recover failed channels by exploiting physical conservation constraints among measured species.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0707",
      "hypothesis": "A chemical sensor array could recover failed channels by exploiting physical conservation constraints among measured species.",
      "test": "Remove channels during calibrated mixtures.",
      "against": "Recovery fails independent validation.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0707",
      "hypothesis": "A chemical sensor array could recover failed channels by exploiting physical conservation constraints among measured species.",
      "test": "Remove channels during calibrated mixtures.",
      "against": "Recovery fails independent validation.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0708",
    "hypothesis": "A mechanical network could compute the direction of a force using strain ratios insensitive to magnitude.",
    "test": "Apply blind force directions and amplitudes.",
    "against": "Direction errors scale strongly with amplitude.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0708",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A mechanical network could compute the direction of a force using strain ratios insensitive to magnitude.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0708",
      "hypothesis": "A mechanical network could compute the direction of a force using strain ratios insensitive to magnitude.",
      "test": "Apply blind force directions and amplitudes.",
      "against": "Direction errors scale strongly with amplitude.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0708",
      "hypothesis": "A mechanical network could compute the direction of a force using strain ratios insensitive to magnitude.",
      "test": "Apply blind force directions and amplitudes.",
      "against": "Direction errors scale strongly with amplitude.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0709",
    "hypothesis": "An optical memory could erase damaged regions selectively through local changes in thermal conductance.",
    "test": "Measure erasure and neighboring retention.",
    "against": "Erasure spreads beyond damaged regions.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0709",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "An optical memory could erase damaged regions selectively through local changes in thermal conductance.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0709",
      "hypothesis": "An optical memory could erase damaged regions selectively through local changes in thermal conductance.",
      "test": "Measure erasure and neighboring retention.",
      "against": "Erasure spreads beyond damaged regions.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0709",
      "hypothesis": "An optical memory could erase damaged regions selectively through local changes in thermal conductance.",
      "test": "Measure erasure and neighboring retention.",
      "against": "Erasure spreads beyond damaged regions.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0710",
    "hypothesis": "A self-powered valve could distinguish a leak from intended slow flow through different pressure-noise signatures.",
    "test": "Compare matched mean flows.",
    "against": "Signatures remain indistinguishable.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0710",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A self-powered valve could distinguish a leak from intended slow flow through different pressure-noise signatures.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0710",
      "hypothesis": "A self-powered valve could distinguish a leak from intended slow flow through different pressure-noise signatures.",
      "test": "Compare matched mean flows.",
      "against": "Signatures remain indistinguishable.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0710",
      "hypothesis": "A self-powered valve could distinguish a leak from intended slow flow through different pressure-noise signatures.",
      "test": "Compare matched mean flows.",
      "against": "Signatures remain indistinguishable.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0711",
    "hypothesis": "A flexible antenna could retain frequency tuning while its geometry changes through compensating dielectric redistribution.",
    "test": "Measure resonance during deformation.",
    "against": "Compensation requires external feedback.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0711",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A flexible antenna could retain frequency tuning while its geometry changes through compensating dielectric redistribution.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0711",
      "hypothesis": "A flexible antenna could retain frequency tuning while its geometry changes through compensating dielectric redistribution.",
      "test": "Measure resonance during deformation.",
      "against": "Compensation requires external feedback.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0711",
      "hypothesis": "A flexible antenna could retain frequency tuning while its geometry changes through compensating dielectric redistribution.",
      "test": "Measure resonance during deformation.",
      "against": "Compensation requires external feedback.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0712",
    "hypothesis": "A microfluidic processor could sort input pulse order through reversible contact-line memory.",
    "test": "Apply reversed equal-dose pulse trains.",
    "against": "Outputs encode total dose only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 12,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0712",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A microfluidic processor could sort input pulse order through reversible contact-line memory.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0712",
      "hypothesis": "A microfluidic processor could sort input pulse order through reversible contact-line memory.",
      "test": "Apply reversed equal-dose pulse trains.",
      "against": "Outputs encode total dose only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0712",
      "hypothesis": "A microfluidic processor could sort input pulse order through reversible contact-line memory.",
      "test": "Apply reversed equal-dose pulse trains.",
      "against": "Outputs encode total dose only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 12,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0713",
    "hypothesis": "A thermal camera calibration target could expose reflected-radiation errors through differently oriented identical cavities.",
    "test": "Compare readings with independent temperatures.",
    "against": "Orientation adds no diagnostic information.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0713",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A thermal camera calibration target could expose reflected-radiation errors through differently oriented identical cavities.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0713",
      "hypothesis": "A thermal camera calibration target could expose reflected-radiation errors through differently oriented identical cavities.",
      "test": "Compare readings with independent temperatures.",
      "against": "Orientation adds no diagnostic information.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0713",
      "hypothesis": "A thermal camera calibration target could expose reflected-radiation errors through differently oriented identical cavities.",
      "test": "Compare readings with independent temperatures.",
      "against": "Orientation adds no diagnostic information.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0714",
    "hypothesis": "A robotic tactile surface could localize slips before gross motion by tracking propagating contact-area fluctuations.",
    "test": "Measure contact maps and slip onset.",
    "against": "Warnings arrive only after sliding.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0714",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A robotic tactile surface could localize slips before gross motion by tracking propagating contact-area fluctuations.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0714",
      "hypothesis": "A robotic tactile surface could localize slips before gross motion by tracking propagating contact-area fluctuations.",
      "test": "Measure contact maps and slip onset.",
      "against": "Warnings arrive only after sliding.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0714",
      "hypothesis": "A robotic tactile surface could localize slips before gross motion by tracking propagating contact-area fluctuations.",
      "test": "Measure contact maps and slip onset.",
      "against": "Warnings arrive only after sliding.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0715",
    "hypothesis": "A passive vibration sensor could distinguish repeated weak impacts from one strong impact using nested mechanical thresholds.",
    "test": "Compare equal-energy histories.",
    "against": "Final states cannot separate histories.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0715",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A passive vibration sensor could distinguish repeated weak impacts from one strong impact using nested mechanical thresholds.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0715",
      "hypothesis": "A passive vibration sensor could distinguish repeated weak impacts from one strong impact using nested mechanical thresholds.",
      "test": "Compare equal-energy histories.",
      "against": "Final states cannot separate histories.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0715",
      "hypothesis": "A passive vibration sensor could distinguish repeated weak impacts from one strong impact using nested mechanical thresholds.",
      "test": "Compare equal-energy histories.",
      "against": "Final states cannot separate histories.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0716",
    "hypothesis": "A soft actuator could estimate its own internal damage from the difference between mechanical and electrical relaxation.",
    "test": "Measure relaxation and independent damage.",
    "against": "Timescale mismatch reflects temperature only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0716",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A soft actuator could estimate its own internal damage from the difference between mechanical and electrical relaxation.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0716",
      "hypothesis": "A soft actuator could estimate its own internal damage from the difference between mechanical and electrical relaxation.",
      "test": "Measure relaxation and independent damage.",
      "against": "Timescale mismatch reflects temperature only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0716",
      "hypothesis": "A soft actuator could estimate its own internal damage from the difference between mechanical and electrical relaxation.",
      "test": "Measure relaxation and independent damage.",
      "against": "Timescale mismatch reflects temperature only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0717",
    "hypothesis": "An optical flow meter could reject bubble artifacts through joint speckle and polarization trajectories.",
    "test": "Compare calibrated liquid and bubble flows.",
    "against": "Joint signals add no robustness.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0717",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "An optical flow meter could reject bubble artifacts through joint speckle and polarization trajectories.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0717",
      "hypothesis": "An optical flow meter could reject bubble artifacts through joint speckle and polarization trajectories.",
      "test": "Compare calibrated liquid and bubble flows.",
      "against": "Joint signals add no robustness.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0717",
      "hypothesis": "An optical flow meter could reject bubble artifacts through joint speckle and polarization trajectories.",
      "test": "Compare calibrated liquid and bubble flows.",
      "against": "Joint signals add no robustness.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0718",
    "hypothesis": "A physical random-number source could reveal hidden deterministic forcing through cross-scale waiting-time correlations.",
    "test": "Apply controlled weak forcing.",
    "against": "Correlations fail to detect forcing.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 18,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0718",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A physical random-number source could reveal hidden deterministic forcing through cross-scale waiting-time correlations.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0718",
      "hypothesis": "A physical random-number source could reveal hidden deterministic forcing through cross-scale waiting-time correlations.",
      "test": "Apply controlled weak forcing.",
      "against": "Correlations fail to detect forcing.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0718",
      "hypothesis": "A physical random-number source could reveal hidden deterministic forcing through cross-scale waiting-time correlations.",
      "test": "Apply controlled weak forcing.",
      "against": "Correlations fail to detect forcing.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 18,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0719",
    "hypothesis": "A mechanical latch could encode cumulative solvent exposure while remaining insensitive to peak concentration.",
    "test": "Compare matched cumulative exposures.",
    "against": "Latch state follows peaks only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0719",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A mechanical latch could encode cumulative solvent exposure while remaining insensitive to peak concentration.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0719",
      "hypothesis": "A mechanical latch could encode cumulative solvent exposure while remaining insensitive to peak concentration.",
      "test": "Compare matched cumulative exposures.",
      "against": "Latch state follows peaks only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0719",
      "hypothesis": "A mechanical latch could encode cumulative solvent exposure while remaining insensitive to peak concentration.",
      "test": "Compare matched cumulative exposures.",
      "against": "Latch state follows peaks only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0720",
    "hypothesis": "A fluidic oscillator could estimate liquid compressibility from mode switching rather than frequency shifts.",
    "test": "Calibrate liquids with matched viscosity.",
    "against": "Switching follows viscosity alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0720",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A fluidic oscillator could estimate liquid compressibility from mode switching rather than frequency shifts.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0720",
      "hypothesis": "A fluidic oscillator could estimate liquid compressibility from mode switching rather than frequency shifts.",
      "test": "Calibrate liquids with matched viscosity.",
      "against": "Switching follows viscosity alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0720",
      "hypothesis": "A fluidic oscillator could estimate liquid compressibility from mode switching rather than frequency shifts.",
      "test": "Calibrate liquids with matched viscosity.",
      "against": "Switching follows viscosity alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0721",
    "hypothesis": "A network of passive acoustic tags could locate a moving crack through thermal-noise correlations.",
    "test": "Compare inferred positions with imaging.",
    "against": "Localization requires active excitation.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0721",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A network of passive acoustic tags could locate a moving crack through thermal-noise correlations.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0721",
      "hypothesis": "A network of passive acoustic tags could locate a moving crack through thermal-noise correlations.",
      "test": "Compare inferred positions with imaging.",
      "against": "Localization requires active excitation.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0721",
      "hypothesis": "A network of passive acoustic tags could locate a moving crack through thermal-noise correlations.",
      "test": "Compare inferred positions with imaging.",
      "against": "Localization requires active excitation.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0722",
    "hypothesis": "A flexible circuit could identify local delamination through directional resistance noise before continuity changes.",
    "test": "Measure noise and interface images.",
    "against": "Noise changes follow contact leads only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0722",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A flexible circuit could identify local delamination through directional resistance noise before continuity changes.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0722",
      "hypothesis": "A flexible circuit could identify local delamination through directional resistance noise before continuity changes.",
      "test": "Measure noise and interface images.",
      "against": "Noise changes follow contact leads only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0722",
      "hypothesis": "A flexible circuit could identify local delamination through directional resistance noise before continuity changes.",
      "test": "Measure noise and interface images.",
      "against": "Noise changes follow contact leads only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0723",
    "hypothesis": "A hydraulic logic element could self-reset when a reaction product changes its local surface tension.",
    "test": "Measure reset and product concentration.",
    "against": "Reset requires net pressure reversal.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0723",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A hydraulic logic element could self-reset when a reaction product changes its local surface tension.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0723",
      "hypothesis": "A hydraulic logic element could self-reset when a reaction product changes its local surface tension.",
      "test": "Measure reset and product concentration.",
      "against": "Reset requires net pressure reversal.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0723",
      "hypothesis": "A hydraulic logic element could self-reset when a reaction product changes its local surface tension.",
      "test": "Measure reset and product concentration.",
      "against": "Reset requires net pressure reversal.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0724",
    "hypothesis": "An analog optical filter could compensate its own temperature drift through unequal expansion of a coupled reference cavity.",
    "test": "Measure filtering across thermal cycles.",
    "against": "Compensation fails outside calibration points.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0724",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "An analog optical filter could compensate its own temperature drift through unequal expansion of a coupled reference cavity.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0724",
      "hypothesis": "An analog optical filter could compensate its own temperature drift through unequal expansion of a coupled reference cavity.",
      "test": "Measure filtering across thermal cycles.",
      "against": "Compensation fails outside calibration points.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0724",
      "hypothesis": "An analog optical filter could compensate its own temperature drift through unequal expansion of a coupled reference cavity.",
      "test": "Measure filtering across thermal cycles.",
      "against": "Compensation fails outside calibration points.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0725",
    "hypothesis": "A mechanical counter could count complete load cycles while ignoring partial cycles through topological state changes.",
    "test": "Apply mixed-amplitude histories.",
    "against": "Partial cycles corrupt the count.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0725",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A mechanical counter could count complete load cycles while ignoring partial cycles through topological state changes.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0725",
      "hypothesis": "A mechanical counter could count complete load cycles while ignoring partial cycles through topological state changes.",
      "test": "Apply mixed-amplitude histories.",
      "against": "Partial cycles corrupt the count.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0725",
      "hypothesis": "A mechanical counter could count complete load cycles while ignoring partial cycles through topological state changes.",
      "test": "Apply mixed-amplitude histories.",
      "against": "Partial cycles corrupt the count.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0726",
    "hypothesis": "A gas sensor could identify diffusion-limited response through the lag between spatially separated sensing regions.",
    "test": "Measure local signals and known transport.",
    "against": "Lag follows electronic delays only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0726",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A gas sensor could identify diffusion-limited response through the lag between spatially separated sensing regions.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0726",
      "hypothesis": "A gas sensor could identify diffusion-limited response through the lag between spatially separated sensing regions.",
      "test": "Measure local signals and known transport.",
      "against": "Lag follows electronic delays only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0726",
      "hypothesis": "A gas sensor could identify diffusion-limited response through the lag between spatially separated sensing regions.",
      "test": "Measure local signals and known transport.",
      "against": "Lag follows electronic delays only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0727",
    "hypothesis": "A soft robot could infer ground porosity from the recoil of an internally generated pressure pulse.",
    "test": "Compare substrates with matched stiffness.",
    "against": "Inference follows stiffness alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0727",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A soft robot could infer ground porosity from the recoil of an internally generated pressure pulse.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0727",
      "hypothesis": "A soft robot could infer ground porosity from the recoil of an internally generated pressure pulse.",
      "test": "Compare substrates with matched stiffness.",
      "against": "Inference follows stiffness alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0727",
      "hypothesis": "A soft robot could infer ground porosity from the recoil of an internally generated pressure pulse.",
      "test": "Compare substrates with matched stiffness.",
      "against": "Inference follows stiffness alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0728",
    "hypothesis": "An acoustic imaging system could separate moving liquid from deforming walls using opposite propagation directions.",
    "test": "Measure calibrated flows and wall motion.",
    "against": "Reconstructions remain confounded.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0728",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "An acoustic imaging system could separate moving liquid from deforming walls using opposite propagation directions.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0728",
      "hypothesis": "An acoustic imaging system could separate moving liquid from deforming walls using opposite propagation directions.",
      "test": "Measure calibrated flows and wall motion.",
      "against": "Reconstructions remain confounded.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0728",
      "hypothesis": "An acoustic imaging system could separate moving liquid from deforming walls using opposite propagation directions.",
      "test": "Measure calibrated flows and wall motion.",
      "against": "Reconstructions remain confounded.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0729",
    "hypothesis": "A physical optimizer could avoid weak local minima when its damping changes with accumulated motion.",
    "test": "Compare known energy landscapes.",
    "against": "Benefits require extra injected energy.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0729",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A physical optimizer could avoid weak local minima when its damping changes with accumulated motion.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0729",
      "hypothesis": "A physical optimizer could avoid weak local minima when its damping changes with accumulated motion.",
      "test": "Compare known energy landscapes.",
      "against": "Benefits require extra injected energy.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0729",
      "hypothesis": "A physical optimizer could avoid weak local minima when its damping changes with accumulated motion.",
      "test": "Compare known energy landscapes.",
      "against": "Benefits require extra injected energy.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0730",
    "hypothesis": "A transparent strain sensor could preserve calibration by moving excess deformation into optically inactive hinges.",
    "test": "Measure local strain and output.",
    "against": "Calibration gains follow lower active strain only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0730",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A transparent strain sensor could preserve calibration by moving excess deformation into optically inactive hinges.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0730",
      "hypothesis": "A transparent strain sensor could preserve calibration by moving excess deformation into optically inactive hinges.",
      "test": "Measure local strain and output.",
      "against": "Calibration gains follow lower active strain only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0730",
      "hypothesis": "A transparent strain sensor could preserve calibration by moving excess deformation into optically inactive hinges.",
      "test": "Measure local strain and output.",
      "against": "Calibration gains follow lower active strain only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0731",
    "hypothesis": "A passive chemical timer could pause during drying and resume on rewetting without losing elapsed reaction history.",
    "test": "Apply interrupted wet intervals.",
    "against": "Restart depends only on fresh hydration.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 18,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0731",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A passive chemical timer could pause during drying and resume on rewetting without losing elapsed reaction history.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0731",
      "hypothesis": "A passive chemical timer could pause during drying and resume on rewetting without losing elapsed reaction history.",
      "test": "Apply interrupted wet intervals.",
      "against": "Restart depends only on fresh hydration.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0731",
      "hypothesis": "A passive chemical timer could pause during drying and resume on rewetting without losing elapsed reaction history.",
      "test": "Apply interrupted wet intervals.",
      "against": "Restart depends only on fresh hydration.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 18,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0732",
    "hypothesis": "A microfluidic clock could maintain period under pressure variations through reversible bubble compression feedback.",
    "test": "Measure timing across pressure pulses.",
    "against": "Period tracks input pressure directly.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0732",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A microfluidic clock could maintain period under pressure variations through reversible bubble compression feedback.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0732",
      "hypothesis": "A microfluidic clock could maintain period under pressure variations through reversible bubble compression feedback.",
      "test": "Measure timing across pressure pulses.",
      "against": "Period tracks input pressure directly.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0732",
      "hypothesis": "A microfluidic clock could maintain period under pressure variations through reversible bubble compression feedback.",
      "test": "Measure timing across pressure pulses.",
      "against": "Period tracks input pressure directly.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0733",
    "hypothesis": "A mechanical neural analogue could learn a load path through reversible bond redistribution without changing total connectivity.",
    "test": "Measure response before and after training.",
    "against": "Learning requires permanent connection changes.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0733",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A mechanical neural analogue could learn a load path through reversible bond redistribution without changing total connectivity.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0733",
      "hypothesis": "A mechanical neural analogue could learn a load path through reversible bond redistribution without changing total connectivity.",
      "test": "Measure response before and after training.",
      "against": "Learning requires permanent connection changes.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0733",
      "hypothesis": "A mechanical neural analogue could learn a load path through reversible bond redistribution without changing total connectivity.",
      "test": "Measure response before and after training.",
      "against": "Learning requires permanent connection changes.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0734",
    "hypothesis": "An optical particle counter could detect coincidence events through transient spectral broadening rather than intensity alone.",
    "test": "Compare independently counted particle passages.",
    "against": "Broadening cannot distinguish overlap events.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0734",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "An optical particle counter could detect coincidence events through transient spectral broadening rather than intensity alone.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0734",
      "hypothesis": "An optical particle counter could detect coincidence events through transient spectral broadening rather than intensity alone.",
      "test": "Compare independently counted particle passages.",
      "against": "Broadening cannot distinguish overlap events.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0734",
      "hypothesis": "An optical particle counter could detect coincidence events through transient spectral broadening rather than intensity alone.",
      "test": "Compare independently counted particle passages.",
      "against": "Broadening cannot distinguish overlap events.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0735",
    "hypothesis": "A self-calibrating humidity sensor could separate hysteresis from drift by traversing a closed miniature thermal loop.",
    "test": "Measure responses against independent humidity.",
    "against": "Loop correction adds no accuracy.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0735",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A self-calibrating humidity sensor could separate hysteresis from drift by traversing a closed miniature thermal loop.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0735",
      "hypothesis": "A self-calibrating humidity sensor could separate hysteresis from drift by traversing a closed miniature thermal loop.",
      "test": "Measure responses against independent humidity.",
      "against": "Loop correction adds no accuracy.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0735",
      "hypothesis": "A self-calibrating humidity sensor could separate hysteresis from drift by traversing a closed miniature thermal loop.",
      "test": "Measure responses against independent humidity.",
      "against": "Loop correction adds no accuracy.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0736",
    "hypothesis": "A passive fluidic fuse could protect downstream devices by diverting only high-acceleration flow events.",
    "test": "Compare flow ramps at matched peaks.",
    "against": "Diversion follows peak pressure only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0736",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A passive fluidic fuse could protect downstream devices by diverting only high-acceleration flow events.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0736",
      "hypothesis": "A passive fluidic fuse could protect downstream devices by diverting only high-acceleration flow events.",
      "test": "Compare flow ramps at matched peaks.",
      "against": "Diversion follows peak pressure only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0736",
      "hypothesis": "A passive fluidic fuse could protect downstream devices by diverting only high-acceleration flow events.",
      "test": "Compare flow ramps at matched peaks.",
      "against": "Diversion follows peak pressure only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0737",
    "hypothesis": "A mechanical state machine could detect the sign of energy transfer between two coupled oscillators.",
    "test": "Measure transitions against known coupling.",
    "against": "States track amplitudes rather than transfer direction.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0737",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A mechanical state machine could detect the sign of energy transfer between two coupled oscillators.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0737",
      "hypothesis": "A mechanical state machine could detect the sign of energy transfer between two coupled oscillators.",
      "test": "Measure transitions against known coupling.",
      "against": "States track amplitudes rather than transfer direction.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0737",
      "hypothesis": "A mechanical state machine could detect the sign of energy transfer between two coupled oscillators.",
      "test": "Measure transitions against known coupling.",
      "against": "States track amplitudes rather than transfer direction.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0738",
    "hypothesis": "A flexible optical display analogue could refresh damaged pixels through solvent delivery from neighboring intact regions.",
    "test": "Track optical recovery and solvent flux.",
    "against": "Recovery spreads damage to neighbors.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0738",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A flexible optical display analogue could refresh damaged pixels through solvent delivery from neighboring intact regions.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0738",
      "hypothesis": "A flexible optical display analogue could refresh damaged pixels through solvent delivery from neighboring intact regions.",
      "test": "Track optical recovery and solvent flux.",
      "against": "Recovery spreads damage to neighbors.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0738",
      "hypothesis": "A flexible optical display analogue could refresh damaged pixels through solvent delivery from neighboring intact regions.",
      "test": "Track optical recovery and solvent flux.",
      "against": "Recovery spreads damage to neighbors.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0739",
    "hypothesis": "An electrochemical instrument could distinguish contact degradation from bulk aging through switched current-path geometry.",
    "test": "Introduce known faults independently.",
    "against": "Fault types remain indistinguishable.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 12,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0739",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "An electrochemical instrument could distinguish contact degradation from bulk aging through switched current-path geometry.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0739",
      "hypothesis": "An electrochemical instrument could distinguish contact degradation from bulk aging through switched current-path geometry.",
      "test": "Introduce known faults independently.",
      "against": "Fault types remain indistinguishable.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0739",
      "hypothesis": "An electrochemical instrument could distinguish contact degradation from bulk aging through switched current-path geometry.",
      "test": "Introduce known faults independently.",
      "against": "Fault types remain indistinguishable.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 12,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0740",
    "hypothesis": "A passive resonant sensor could reject environmental noise by encoding signals in mode-shape ratios.",
    "test": "Compare signal recovery under calibrated noise.",
    "against": "Ratios lose sensitivity equally.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0740",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A passive resonant sensor could reject environmental noise by encoding signals in mode-shape ratios.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0740",
      "hypothesis": "A passive resonant sensor could reject environmental noise by encoding signals in mode-shape ratios.",
      "test": "Compare signal recovery under calibrated noise.",
      "against": "Ratios lose sensitivity equally.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0740",
      "hypothesis": "A passive resonant sensor could reject environmental noise by encoding signals in mode-shape ratios.",
      "test": "Compare signal recovery under calibrated noise.",
      "against": "Ratios lose sensitivity equally.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0741",
    "hypothesis": "A fluidic diode could diagnose its own fouling through the asymmetry of small probe pulses.",
    "test": "Measure pulses and known deposits.",
    "against": "Signals reflect changing viscosity only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0741",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A fluidic diode could diagnose its own fouling through the asymmetry of small probe pulses.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0741",
      "hypothesis": "A fluidic diode could diagnose its own fouling through the asymmetry of small probe pulses.",
      "test": "Measure pulses and known deposits.",
      "against": "Signals reflect changing viscosity only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0741",
      "hypothesis": "A fluidic diode could diagnose its own fouling through the asymmetry of small probe pulses.",
      "test": "Measure pulses and known deposits.",
      "against": "Signals reflect changing viscosity only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0742",
    "hypothesis": "A soft mechanical memory could preserve relative timing between two stimuli through unequal relaxation channels.",
    "test": "Apply blind delay sequences.",
    "against": "States encode only stimulus order.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 18,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0742",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A soft mechanical memory could preserve relative timing between two stimuli through unequal relaxation channels.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0742",
      "hypothesis": "A soft mechanical memory could preserve relative timing between two stimuli through unequal relaxation channels.",
      "test": "Apply blind delay sequences.",
      "against": "States encode only stimulus order.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0742",
      "hypothesis": "A soft mechanical memory could preserve relative timing between two stimuli through unequal relaxation channels.",
      "test": "Apply blind delay sequences.",
      "against": "States encode only stimulus order.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 18,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0743",
    "hypothesis": "An acoustic flow straightener could reduce turbulent intermittency while preserving mean transport through synchronized flexible vanes.",
    "test": "Measure spectra and pumping work.",
    "against": "Suppression requires reduced throughput.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0743",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "An acoustic flow straightener could reduce turbulent intermittency while preserving mean transport through synchronized flexible vanes.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0743",
      "hypothesis": "An acoustic flow straightener could reduce turbulent intermittency while preserving mean transport through synchronized flexible vanes.",
      "test": "Measure spectra and pumping work.",
      "against": "Suppression requires reduced throughput.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0743",
      "hypothesis": "An acoustic flow straightener could reduce turbulent intermittency while preserving mean transport through synchronized flexible vanes.",
      "test": "Measure spectra and pumping work.",
      "against": "Suppression requires reduced throughput.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0744",
    "hypothesis": "A photonic sensor could detect sample movement separately from refractive change through differential transverse modes.",
    "test": "Apply controlled translation and composition steps.",
    "against": "Modes cannot separate perturbations.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 18,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0744",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A photonic sensor could detect sample movement separately from refractive change through differential transverse modes.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0744",
      "hypothesis": "A photonic sensor could detect sample movement separately from refractive change through differential transverse modes.",
      "test": "Apply controlled translation and composition steps.",
      "against": "Modes cannot separate perturbations.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0744",
      "hypothesis": "A photonic sensor could detect sample movement separately from refractive change through differential transverse modes.",
      "test": "Apply controlled translation and composition steps.",
      "against": "Modes cannot separate perturbations.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 18,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0745",
    "hypothesis": "A passive mechanical router could direct packets of vibrational energy according to their duration.",
    "test": "Apply equal-energy pulses of varied widths.",
    "against": "Routing follows frequency content alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0745",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A passive mechanical router could direct packets of vibrational energy according to their duration.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0745",
      "hypothesis": "A passive mechanical router could direct packets of vibrational energy according to their duration.",
      "test": "Apply equal-energy pulses of varied widths.",
      "against": "Routing follows frequency content alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0745",
      "hypothesis": "A passive mechanical router could direct packets of vibrational energy according to their duration.",
      "test": "Apply equal-energy pulses of varied widths.",
      "against": "Routing follows frequency content alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0746",
    "hypothesis": "A chemical recording film could identify local exposure duration independently of concentration using two reaction fronts.",
    "test": "Map fronts under calibrated exposures.",
    "against": "Duration and concentration remain coupled.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0746",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A chemical recording film could identify local exposure duration independently of concentration using two reaction fronts.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0746",
      "hypothesis": "A chemical recording film could identify local exposure duration independently of concentration using two reaction fronts.",
      "test": "Map fronts under calibrated exposures.",
      "against": "Duration and concentration remain coupled.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0746",
      "hypothesis": "A chemical recording film could identify local exposure duration independently of concentration using two reaction fronts.",
      "test": "Map fronts under calibrated exposures.",
      "against": "Duration and concentration remain coupled.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0747",
    "hypothesis": "A flexible sensor bus could isolate a short circuit by a reversible local swelling barrier.",
    "test": "Measure isolation and subsequent recovery.",
    "against": "Isolation requires irreversible damage.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0747",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A flexible sensor bus could isolate a short circuit by a reversible local swelling barrier.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0747",
      "hypothesis": "A flexible sensor bus could isolate a short circuit by a reversible local swelling barrier.",
      "test": "Measure isolation and subsequent recovery.",
      "against": "Isolation requires irreversible damage.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0747",
      "hypothesis": "A flexible sensor bus could isolate a short circuit by a reversible local swelling barrier.",
      "test": "Measure isolation and subsequent recovery.",
      "against": "Isolation requires irreversible damage.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0748",
    "hypothesis": "A physical encryption tag could retain authentication while rejecting environmentally induced optical changes through invariant mode topology.",
    "test": "Measure blind tags across conditions.",
    "against": "Invariant signatures are not discriminative.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0748",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A physical encryption tag could retain authentication while rejecting environmentally induced optical changes through invariant mode topology.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0748",
      "hypothesis": "A physical encryption tag could retain authentication while rejecting environmentally induced optical changes through invariant mode topology.",
      "test": "Measure blind tags across conditions.",
      "against": "Invariant signatures are not discriminative.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0748",
      "hypothesis": "A physical encryption tag could retain authentication while rejecting environmentally induced optical changes through invariant mode topology.",
      "test": "Measure blind tags across conditions.",
      "against": "Invariant signatures are not discriminative.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0749",
    "hypothesis": "An acoustic microscope could reveal pore-wall compliance through phase-dependent imaging distortion rather than resolution loss.",
    "test": "Compare characterized rigid and soft pores.",
    "against": "Distortion follows imaging artifacts only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0749",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "An acoustic microscope could reveal pore-wall compliance through phase-dependent imaging distortion rather than resolution loss.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0749",
      "hypothesis": "An acoustic microscope could reveal pore-wall compliance through phase-dependent imaging distortion rather than resolution loss.",
      "test": "Compare characterized rigid and soft pores.",
      "against": "Distortion follows imaging artifacts only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0749",
      "hypothesis": "An acoustic microscope could reveal pore-wall compliance through phase-dependent imaging distortion rather than resolution loss.",
      "test": "Compare characterized rigid and soft pores.",
      "against": "Distortion follows imaging artifacts only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0750",
    "hypothesis": "A passive actuator could regulate force through redistribution of an internal granular phase.",
    "test": "Measure force and grain motion.",
    "against": "Regulation requires external control.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0750",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A passive actuator could regulate force through redistribution of an internal granular phase.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0750",
      "hypothesis": "A passive actuator could regulate force through redistribution of an internal granular phase.",
      "test": "Measure force and grain motion.",
      "against": "Regulation requires external control.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0750",
      "hypothesis": "A passive actuator could regulate force through redistribution of an internal granular phase.",
      "test": "Measure force and grain motion.",
      "against": "Regulation requires external control.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0751",
    "hypothesis": "A mechanical differentiator could detect rapid chemical changes through the mismatch of two swelling pathways.",
    "test": "Apply concentration ramps.",
    "against": "Output follows concentration rather than rate.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 18,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 150,
    "literature_query": "mechanical differentiator detect rapid chemical changes mismatch two swelling pathways experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N0751",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A mechanical differentiator could detect rapid chemical changes through the mismatch of two swelling pathways.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": true,
    "conditional_model_analysis": true,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 3,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0751",
      "hypothesis": "A mechanical differentiator could detect rapid chemical changes through the mismatch of two swelling pathways.",
      "test": "Apply concentration ramps.",
      "against": "Output follows concentration rather than rate.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0751",
      "hypothesis": "A mechanical differentiator could detect rapid chemical changes through the mismatch of two swelling pathways.",
      "test": "Apply concentration ramps.",
      "against": "Output follows concentration rather than rate.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 18,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 150,
      "literature_query": "mechanical differentiator detect rapid chemical changes mismatch two swelling pathways experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "150",
      "id": "N0751",
      "hypothesis": "A mechanical differentiator could detect rapid chemical changes through the mismatch of two swelling pathways.",
      "test": "Apply concentration ramps.",
      "against": "Output follows concentration rather than rate.",
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_score": "18",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pb042d869a6b6;P839409094e74;P8946c572c63c;P8d9d5667d7a6;P807d4afcc551;Pd4b5db58aae0;Paa71a5b13003",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N0751",
      "hypothesis": "A mechanical differentiator could detect rapid chemical changes through the mismatch of two swelling pathways.",
      "test": "Apply concentration ramps.",
      "against": "Output follows concentration rather than rate.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 18,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 150,
      "literature_query": "mechanical differentiator detect rapid chemical changes mismatch two swelling pathways experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pb042d869a6b6;P839409094e74;P8946c572c63c;P8d9d5667d7a6;P807d4afcc551;Pd4b5db58aae0;Paa71a5b13003",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "Pb042d869a6b6;P839409094e74;P8946c572c63c;P8d9d5667d7a6;P807d4afcc551;Pd4b5db58aae0;Paa71a5b13003",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": {
      "rank": "2",
      "id": "N0751",
      "hypothesis": "A mechanical differentiator could detect rapid chemical changes through the mismatch of two swelling pathways.",
      "primary_outcome": "Differential displacement response to concentration steps, ramps, and sinusoids; report static residual and finite-frequency sensitivity separately.",
      "comparison": "Two swelling paths with matched equilibrium gain but different measured response times versus either path alone and a matched-time pair.",
      "controls": "Input delivery time; actual concentration; temperature; equilibrium gain; mechanical lever ratio; drift; hysteresis; swelling-induced geometry changes.",
      "plan": "Begin with benign humidity changes in a calibrated chamber and independently measured input. Fit each path separately using pilot data, freeze parameters, and predict the differential output on new waveforms. Use small changes where a linear approximation can be tested.",
      "against": "If gains do not match, constant inputs leave a false differential signal. If both time constants match, the ideal signal vanishes. Very rapid fluctuations can be filtered out, so do not claim unlimited bandwidth.",
      "evidence": "Published swelling sensors show measurable response times and chamber-induced delays. The differential band-pass construction is a model-backed engineering question, not an established new sensing principle.",
      "source": "https://doi.org/10.1021/acsapm.9b00957",
      "novelty": "Unverified; a familiar mechanism or existing method is not a new discovery.",
      "physical_data": "none collected"
    },
    "focused_assessment_fields": {
      "id": "N0751",
      "primary_outcome": "Differential displacement response to concentration steps, ramps, and sinusoids; report static residual and finite-frequency sensitivity separately.",
      "comparison": "Two swelling paths with matched equilibrium gain but different measured response times versus either path alone and a matched-time pair.",
      "critical_controls": "Input delivery time; actual concentration; temperature; equilibrium gain; mechanical lever ratio; drift; hysteresis; swelling-induced geometry changes.",
      "testing_plan": "Begin with benign humidity changes in a calibrated chamber and independently measured input. Fit each path separately using pilot data, freeze parameters, and predict the differential output on new waveforms. Use small changes where a linear approximation can be tested.",
      "against": "If gains do not match, constant inputs leave a false differential signal. If both time constants match, the ideal signal vanishes. Very rapid fluctuations can be filtered out, so do not claim unlimited bandwidth.",
      "evidence_assessment": "Published swelling sensors show measurable response times and chamber-induced delays. The differential band-pass construction is a model-backed engineering question, not an established new sensing principle.",
      "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1021/acsapm.9b00957",
      "novelty": "Unverified; a familiar mechanism or existing method is not a new discovery.",
      "rank15": 2
    },
    "primary_outcome": "Differential displacement response to concentration steps, ramps, and sinusoids; report static residual and finite-frequency sensitivity separately.",
    "comparison": "Two swelling paths with matched equilibrium gain but different measured response times versus either path alone and a matched-time pair.",
    "controls": "Input delivery time; actual concentration; temperature; equilibrium gain; mechanical lever ratio; drift; hysteresis; swelling-induced geometry changes.",
    "plan": "Begin with benign humidity changes in a calibrated chamber and independently measured input. Fit each path separately using pilot data, freeze parameters, and predict the differential output on new waveforms. Use small changes where a linear approximation can be tested.",
    "evidence": "Published swelling sensors show measurable response times and chamber-induced delays. The differential band-pass construction is a model-backed engineering question, not an established new sensing principle.",
    "source": "https://doi.org/10.1021/acsapm.9b00957",
    "physical_data": "none collected",
    "conditional_model_fields": {
      "rank": "2",
      "id": "N0751",
      "hypothesis": "A mechanical differentiator could detect rapid chemical changes through the mismatch of two swelling pathways.",
      "primary_outcome": "Differential displacement response to concentration steps, ramps, and sinusoids; report static residual and finite-frequency sensitivity separately.",
      "comparison": "Two swelling paths with matched equilibrium gain but different measured response times versus either path alone and a matched-time pair.",
      "controls": "Input delivery time; actual concentration; temperature; equilibrium gain; mechanical lever ratio; drift; hysteresis; swelling-induced geometry changes.",
      "plan": "Begin with benign humidity changes in a calibrated chamber and independently measured input. Fit each path separately using pilot data, freeze parameters, and predict the differential output on new waveforms. Use small changes where a linear approximation can be tested.",
      "against": "If gains do not match, constant inputs leave a false differential signal. If both time constants match, the ideal signal vanishes. Very rapid fluctuations can be filtered out, so do not claim unlimited bandwidth.",
      "evidence": "Published swelling sensors show measurable response times and chamber-induced delays. The differential band-pass construction is a model-backed engineering question, not an established new sensing principle.",
      "source": "https://doi.org/10.1021/acsapm.9b00957",
      "novelty": "Unverified; a familiar mechanism or existing method is not a new discovery.",
      "physical_data": "none collected"
    },
    "conditional_model_proof_file": "2/proofs/N0751-Differential-swelling.md",
    "dossier_text": "# 02. N0751\n\n## Prediction\n\nA mechanical differentiator could detect rapid chemical changes through the mismatch of two swelling pathways.\n\n## Primary measurement\n\nDifferential displacement response to concentration steps, ramps, and sinusoids; report static residual and finite-frequency sensitivity separately.\n\n## Comparison\n\nTwo swelling paths with matched equilibrium gain but different measured response times versus either path alone and a matched-time pair.\n\n## Controls\n\nInput delivery time; actual concentration; temperature; equilibrium gain; mechanical lever ratio; drift; hysteresis; swelling-induced geometry changes.\n\n## Testing plan\n\nBegin with benign humidity changes in a calibrated chamber and independently measured input. Fit each path separately using pilot data, freeze parameters, and predict the differential output on new waveforms. Use small changes where a linear approximation can be tested.\n\n## Stop or revise\n\nIf gains do not match, constant inputs leave a false differential signal. If both time constants match, the ideal signal vanishes. Very rapid fluctuations can be filtered out, so do not claim unlimited bandwidth.\n\n## Evidence and limits\n\nPublished swelling sensors show measurable response times and chamber-induced delays. The differential band-pass construction is a model-backed engineering question, not an established new sensing principle.\n\nRelated primary-source lead: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsapm.9b00957\n\nUnverified; a familiar mechanism or existing method is not a new discovery.\n\n## Replication gate\n\nCalibrate measurement uncertainty first. Define a minimum meaningful effect in the primary outcome's units, then estimate variability across independently prepared specimens or assemblies. Use that variance for a design-specific confirmatory sample calculation. Images and repeated readings from one specimen are technical repeats, not independent replications. Randomize run order and blind labels where practical. Freeze exclusions and analysis before confirmation.\n\nA narrow interval excluding the chosen meaningful effect can count against the bounded claim; a wide interval is inconclusive. Report null and adverse results. The outline requires material and apparatus compatibility checks and is not a complete laboratory protocol.\n"
  },
  {
    "id": "N0752",
    "hypothesis": "An optical chemical sensor could identify its own saturation by detecting a change in fluctuation symmetry.",
    "test": "Measure response across calibrated concentrations.",
    "against": "Symmetry changes only after usable range is lost.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0752",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "An optical chemical sensor could identify its own saturation by detecting a change in fluctuation symmetry.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0752",
      "hypothesis": "An optical chemical sensor could identify its own saturation by detecting a change in fluctuation symmetry.",
      "test": "Measure response across calibrated concentrations.",
      "against": "Symmetry changes only after usable range is lost.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0752",
      "hypothesis": "An optical chemical sensor could identify its own saturation by detecting a change in fluctuation symmetry.",
      "test": "Measure response across calibrated concentrations.",
      "against": "Symmetry changes only after usable range is lost.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0753",
    "hypothesis": "A fluidic memory array could reduce cross-talk through temporary isolation by pinned gas interfaces.",
    "test": "Measure neighboring-cell disturbances.",
    "against": "Isolation requires lowered operating pressure.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0753",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A fluidic memory array could reduce cross-talk through temporary isolation by pinned gas interfaces.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0753",
      "hypothesis": "A fluidic memory array could reduce cross-talk through temporary isolation by pinned gas interfaces.",
      "test": "Measure neighboring-cell disturbances.",
      "against": "Isolation requires lowered operating pressure.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0753",
      "hypothesis": "A fluidic memory array could reduce cross-talk through temporary isolation by pinned gas interfaces.",
      "test": "Measure neighboring-cell disturbances.",
      "against": "Isolation requires lowered operating pressure.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0754",
    "hypothesis": "A soft manipulator could infer an object's internal cavity from the phase of a low-force deformation wave.",
    "test": "Compare cavity-bearing and solid replicas.",
    "against": "Inference follows external geometry only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0754",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A soft manipulator could infer an object's internal cavity from the phase of a low-force deformation wave.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0754",
      "hypothesis": "A soft manipulator could infer an object's internal cavity from the phase of a low-force deformation wave.",
      "test": "Compare cavity-bearing and solid replicas.",
      "against": "Inference follows external geometry only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0754",
      "hypothesis": "A soft manipulator could infer an object's internal cavity from the phase of a low-force deformation wave.",
      "test": "Compare cavity-bearing and solid replicas.",
      "against": "Inference follows external geometry only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0755",
    "hypothesis": "A physical network could reconstruct missing boundary measurements by enforcing local energy balance.",
    "test": "Withhold calibrated sensor channels.",
    "against": "Reconstruction fails held-out conditions.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 143,
    "literature_query": "physical network reconstruct missing boundary measurements enforcing local energy balance experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N0755",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A physical network could reconstruct missing boundary measurements by enforcing local energy balance.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": true,
    "conditional_model_analysis": true,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 3,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0755",
      "hypothesis": "A physical network could reconstruct missing boundary measurements by enforcing local energy balance.",
      "test": "Withhold calibrated sensor channels.",
      "against": "Reconstruction fails held-out conditions.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0755",
      "hypothesis": "A physical network could reconstruct missing boundary measurements by enforcing local energy balance.",
      "test": "Withhold calibrated sensor channels.",
      "against": "Reconstruction fails held-out conditions.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 143,
      "literature_query": "physical network reconstruct missing boundary measurements enforcing local energy balance experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "143",
      "id": "N0755",
      "hypothesis": "A physical network could reconstruct missing boundary measurements by enforcing local energy balance.",
      "test": "Withhold calibrated sensor channels.",
      "against": "Reconstruction fails held-out conditions.",
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_score": "21",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pca9c591010fc;P28ddbc237f5c;P245a82f1098c",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N0755",
      "hypothesis": "A physical network could reconstruct missing boundary measurements by enforcing local energy balance.",
      "test": "Withhold calibrated sensor channels.",
      "against": "Reconstruction fails held-out conditions.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 143,
      "literature_query": "physical network reconstruct missing boundary measurements enforcing local energy balance experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pca9c591010fc;P28ddbc237f5c;P245a82f1098c",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "Pca9c591010fc;P28ddbc237f5c;P245a82f1098c",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": {
      "rank": "1",
      "id": "N0755",
      "hypothesis": "A physical network could reconstruct missing boundary measurements by enforcing local energy balance.",
      "primary_outcome": "Held-out temperature error at deliberately hidden measurement nodes, in K, plus energy-balance residuals.",
      "comparison": "Known thermal network with full observation versus blinded removal of selected temperature channels; compare balance reconstruction with a stated simple baseline.",
      "controls": "Independently calibrated conductances; known heater and sink powers; boundary exchanges; actual steady state; anchor temperature; topology.",
      "plan": "First run the exact model checks in Desktop/2. Then use an instrumented low-power thermal network. Hide measurements only from the analysis, not from independent ground truth. Freeze the network before testing withheld nodes. Repeat across independently assembled contacts.",
      "against": "Unknown losses, wrong conductance, floating components, or residuals larger than calibration uncertainty invalidate the reconstruction assumptions. Successful synthetic reconstruction alone is not physical validation.",
      "evidence": "Energy-balance reconstruction has strong theoretical support under closure and anchoring. Closely related missing-node thermal-network research already exists; novelty of the broad method is weak.",
      "source": "https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1474034626007056",
      "novelty": "Unverified; a familiar mechanism or existing method is not a new discovery.",
      "physical_data": "none collected"
    },
    "focused_assessment_fields": {
      "id": "N0755",
      "primary_outcome": "Held-out temperature error at deliberately hidden measurement nodes, in K, plus energy-balance residuals.",
      "comparison": "Known thermal network with full observation versus blinded removal of selected temperature channels; compare balance reconstruction with a stated simple baseline.",
      "critical_controls": "Independently calibrated conductances; known heater and sink powers; boundary exchanges; actual steady state; anchor temperature; topology.",
      "testing_plan": "First run the exact model checks in Desktop/2. Then use an instrumented low-power thermal network. Hide measurements only from the analysis, not from independent ground truth. Freeze the network before testing withheld nodes. Repeat across independently assembled contacts.",
      "against": "Unknown losses, wrong conductance, floating components, or residuals larger than calibration uncertainty invalidate the reconstruction assumptions. Successful synthetic reconstruction alone is not physical validation.",
      "evidence_assessment": "Energy-balance reconstruction has strong theoretical support under closure and anchoring. Closely related missing-node thermal-network research already exists; novelty of the broad method is weak.",
      "source_url": "https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1474034626007056",
      "novelty": "Unverified; a familiar mechanism or existing method is not a new discovery.",
      "rank15": 1
    },
    "primary_outcome": "Held-out temperature error at deliberately hidden measurement nodes, in K, plus energy-balance residuals.",
    "comparison": "Known thermal network with full observation versus blinded removal of selected temperature channels; compare balance reconstruction with a stated simple baseline.",
    "controls": "Independently calibrated conductances; known heater and sink powers; boundary exchanges; actual steady state; anchor temperature; topology.",
    "plan": "First run the exact model checks in Desktop/2. Then use an instrumented low-power thermal network. Hide measurements only from the analysis, not from independent ground truth. Freeze the network before testing withheld nodes. Repeat across independently assembled contacts.",
    "evidence": "Energy-balance reconstruction has strong theoretical support under closure and anchoring. Closely related missing-node thermal-network research already exists; novelty of the broad method is weak.",
    "source": "https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1474034626007056",
    "physical_data": "none collected",
    "conditional_model_fields": {
      "rank": "1",
      "id": "N0755",
      "hypothesis": "A physical network could reconstruct missing boundary measurements by enforcing local energy balance.",
      "primary_outcome": "Held-out temperature error at deliberately hidden measurement nodes, in K, plus energy-balance residuals.",
      "comparison": "Known thermal network with full observation versus blinded removal of selected temperature channels; compare balance reconstruction with a stated simple baseline.",
      "controls": "Independently calibrated conductances; known heater and sink powers; boundary exchanges; actual steady state; anchor temperature; topology.",
      "plan": "First run the exact model checks in Desktop/2. Then use an instrumented low-power thermal network. Hide measurements only from the analysis, not from independent ground truth. Freeze the network before testing withheld nodes. Repeat across independently assembled contacts.",
      "against": "Unknown losses, wrong conductance, floating components, or residuals larger than calibration uncertainty invalidate the reconstruction assumptions. Successful synthetic reconstruction alone is not physical validation.",
      "evidence": "Energy-balance reconstruction has strong theoretical support under closure and anchoring. Closely related missing-node thermal-network research already exists; novelty of the broad method is weak.",
      "source": "https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1474034626007056",
      "novelty": "Unverified; a familiar mechanism or existing method is not a new discovery.",
      "physical_data": "none collected"
    },
    "conditional_model_proof_file": "2/proofs/N0755-Closed-network-reconstruction.md",
    "dossier_text": "# 01. N0755\n\n## Prediction\n\nA physical network could reconstruct missing boundary measurements by enforcing local energy balance.\n\n## Primary measurement\n\nHeld-out temperature error at deliberately hidden measurement nodes, in K, plus energy-balance residuals.\n\n## Comparison\n\nKnown thermal network with full observation versus blinded removal of selected temperature channels; compare balance reconstruction with a stated simple baseline.\n\n## Controls\n\nIndependently calibrated conductances; known heater and sink powers; boundary exchanges; actual steady state; anchor temperature; topology.\n\n## Testing plan\n\nFirst run the exact model checks in Desktop/2. Then use an instrumented low-power thermal network. Hide measurements only from the analysis, not from independent ground truth. Freeze the network before testing withheld nodes. Repeat across independently assembled contacts.\n\n## Stop or revise\n\nUnknown losses, wrong conductance, floating components, or residuals larger than calibration uncertainty invalidate the reconstruction assumptions. Successful synthetic reconstruction alone is not physical validation.\n\n## Evidence and limits\n\nEnergy-balance reconstruction has strong theoretical support under closure and anchoring. Closely related missing-node thermal-network research already exists; novelty of the broad method is weak.\n\nRelated primary-source lead: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1474034626007056\n\nUnverified; a familiar mechanism or existing method is not a new discovery.\n\n## Replication gate\n\nCalibrate measurement uncertainty first. Define a minimum meaningful effect in the primary outcome's units, then estimate variability across independently prepared specimens or assemblies. Use that variance for a design-specific confirmatory sample calculation. Images and repeated readings from one specimen are technical repeats, not independent replications. Randomize run order and blind labels where practical. Freeze exclusions and analysis before confirmation.\n\nA narrow interval excluding the chosen meaningful effect can count against the bounded claim; a wide interval is inconclusive. Report null and adverse results. The outline requires material and apparatus compatibility checks and is not a complete laboratory protocol.\n"
  },
  {
    "id": "N0756",
    "hypothesis": "A pressure sensor could remain accurate during fouling by measuring deformation at two mechanical length scales.",
    "test": "Compare known deposits and pressures.",
    "against": "Two scales add no correction power.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0756",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A pressure sensor could remain accurate during fouling by measuring deformation at two mechanical length scales.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0756",
      "hypothesis": "A pressure sensor could remain accurate during fouling by measuring deformation at two mechanical length scales.",
      "test": "Compare known deposits and pressures.",
      "against": "Two scales add no correction power.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0756",
      "hypothesis": "A pressure sensor could remain accurate during fouling by measuring deformation at two mechanical length scales.",
      "test": "Compare known deposits and pressures.",
      "against": "Two scales add no correction power.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0757",
    "hypothesis": "A passive acoustic switch could turn on only for a particular sequence of frequencies.",
    "test": "Apply permuted equal-energy tones.",
    "against": "Switching depends only on total spectral energy.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0757",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A passive acoustic switch could turn on only for a particular sequence of frequencies.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0757",
      "hypothesis": "A passive acoustic switch could turn on only for a particular sequence of frequencies.",
      "test": "Apply permuted equal-energy tones.",
      "against": "Switching depends only on total spectral energy.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0757",
      "hypothesis": "A passive acoustic switch could turn on only for a particular sequence of frequencies.",
      "test": "Apply permuted equal-energy tones.",
      "against": "Switching depends only on total spectral energy.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0758",
    "hypothesis": "A flexible battery-package analogue could reveal internal gas formation through a local curvature mode before overall swelling.",
    "test": "Measure modes and introduced inert gas.",
    "against": "Detection requires visible expansion.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0758",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A flexible battery-package analogue could reveal internal gas formation through a local curvature mode before overall swelling.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0758",
      "hypothesis": "A flexible battery-package analogue could reveal internal gas formation through a local curvature mode before overall swelling.",
      "test": "Measure modes and introduced inert gas.",
      "against": "Detection requires visible expansion.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0758",
      "hypothesis": "A flexible battery-package analogue could reveal internal gas formation through a local curvature mode before overall swelling.",
      "test": "Measure modes and introduced inert gas.",
      "against": "Detection requires visible expansion.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0759",
    "hypothesis": "A physical clock could compensate aging by comparing relaxation pathways with different defect sensitivity.",
    "test": "Track timing under controlled aging.",
    "against": "Compensation fails independent aging modes.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0759",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A physical clock could compensate aging by comparing relaxation pathways with different defect sensitivity.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0759",
      "hypothesis": "A physical clock could compensate aging by comparing relaxation pathways with different defect sensitivity.",
      "test": "Track timing under controlled aging.",
      "against": "Compensation fails independent aging modes.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0759",
      "hypothesis": "A physical clock could compensate aging by comparing relaxation pathways with different defect sensitivity.",
      "test": "Track timing under controlled aging.",
      "against": "Compensation fails independent aging modes.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0760",
    "hypothesis": "An optical concentration meter could separate scattering particles from dissolved absorbers using temporal speckle persistence.",
    "test": "Calibrate mixtures independently.",
    "against": "Concentration estimates remain biased.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0760",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "An optical concentration meter could separate scattering particles from dissolved absorbers using temporal speckle persistence.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0760",
      "hypothesis": "An optical concentration meter could separate scattering particles from dissolved absorbers using temporal speckle persistence.",
      "test": "Calibrate mixtures independently.",
      "against": "Concentration estimates remain biased.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0760",
      "hypothesis": "An optical concentration meter could separate scattering particles from dissolved absorbers using temporal speckle persistence.",
      "test": "Calibrate mixtures independently.",
      "against": "Concentration estimates remain biased.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0761",
    "hypothesis": "A hydraulic reservoir could compute a moving average without changing its mean transit time through paired compliant compartments.",
    "test": "Measure impulse response and delay.",
    "against": "Smoothing requires greater mean delay.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0761",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A hydraulic reservoir could compute a moving average without changing its mean transit time through paired compliant compartments.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0761",
      "hypothesis": "A hydraulic reservoir could compute a moving average without changing its mean transit time through paired compliant compartments.",
      "test": "Measure impulse response and delay.",
      "against": "Smoothing requires greater mean delay.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0761",
      "hypothesis": "A hydraulic reservoir could compute a moving average without changing its mean transit time through paired compliant compartments.",
      "test": "Measure impulse response and delay.",
      "against": "Smoothing requires greater mean delay.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0762",
    "hypothesis": "A mechanical probe could distinguish reversible plasticity from viscoelasticity through a closed stress loop.",
    "test": "Apply predeclared load paths.",
    "against": "Loop signatures cannot separate mechanisms.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 18,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0762",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A mechanical probe could distinguish reversible plasticity from viscoelasticity through a closed stress loop.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0762",
      "hypothesis": "A mechanical probe could distinguish reversible plasticity from viscoelasticity through a closed stress loop.",
      "test": "Apply predeclared load paths.",
      "against": "Loop signatures cannot separate mechanisms.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0762",
      "hypothesis": "A mechanical probe could distinguish reversible plasticity from viscoelasticity through a closed stress loop.",
      "test": "Apply predeclared load paths.",
      "against": "Loop signatures cannot separate mechanisms.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 18,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0763",
    "hypothesis": "A passive gas sampler could retain a time-resolved exposure record by translating its adsorption boundary mechanically.",
    "test": "Measure boundary travel and recovered composition.",
    "against": "Record collapses to total uptake.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0763",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A passive gas sampler could retain a time-resolved exposure record by translating its adsorption boundary mechanically.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0763",
      "hypothesis": "A passive gas sampler could retain a time-resolved exposure record by translating its adsorption boundary mechanically.",
      "test": "Measure boundary travel and recovered composition.",
      "against": "Record collapses to total uptake.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0763",
      "hypothesis": "A passive gas sampler could retain a time-resolved exposure record by translating its adsorption boundary mechanically.",
      "test": "Measure boundary travel and recovered composition.",
      "against": "Record collapses to total uptake.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0764",
    "hypothesis": "A fluidic alarm could activate only when two independent concentration thresholds occur close in time.",
    "test": "Control pulse intervals independently.",
    "against": "Activation depends solely on either threshold.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0764",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A fluidic alarm could activate only when two independent concentration thresholds occur close in time.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0764",
      "hypothesis": "A fluidic alarm could activate only when two independent concentration thresholds occur close in time.",
      "test": "Control pulse intervals independently.",
      "against": "Activation depends solely on either threshold.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0764",
      "hypothesis": "A fluidic alarm could activate only when two independent concentration thresholds occur close in time.",
      "test": "Control pulse intervals independently.",
      "against": "Activation depends solely on either threshold.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0765",
    "hypothesis": "A deformable waveguide could detect internal solvent leakage by a change in polarization reversibility.",
    "test": "Compare loading cycles before leakage.",
    "against": "Changes follow external strain only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0765",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A deformable waveguide could detect internal solvent leakage by a change in polarization reversibility.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0765",
      "hypothesis": "A deformable waveguide could detect internal solvent leakage by a change in polarization reversibility.",
      "test": "Compare loading cycles before leakage.",
      "against": "Changes follow external strain only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0765",
      "hypothesis": "A deformable waveguide could detect internal solvent leakage by a change in polarization reversibility.",
      "test": "Compare loading cycles before leakage.",
      "against": "Changes follow external strain only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0766",
    "hypothesis": "An optical microscope could estimate local specimen heating from the motion of embedded nonbinding tracers.",
    "test": "Compare with independent thermometry.",
    "against": "Motion reflects drift or viscosity only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0766",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "An optical microscope could estimate local specimen heating from the motion of embedded nonbinding tracers.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0766",
      "hypothesis": "An optical microscope could estimate local specimen heating from the motion of embedded nonbinding tracers.",
      "test": "Compare with independent thermometry.",
      "against": "Motion reflects drift or viscosity only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0766",
      "hypothesis": "An optical microscope could estimate local specimen heating from the motion of embedded nonbinding tracers.",
      "test": "Compare with independent thermometry.",
      "against": "Motion reflects drift or viscosity only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0767",
    "hypothesis": "A physical reservoir network could classify flow disturbances with less calibration when its geometry preserves mass balance locally.",
    "test": "Test unfamiliar waveforms.",
    "against": "Accuracy gains vanish on held-out inputs.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0767",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A physical reservoir network could classify flow disturbances with less calibration when its geometry preserves mass balance locally.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0767",
      "hypothesis": "A physical reservoir network could classify flow disturbances with less calibration when its geometry preserves mass balance locally.",
      "test": "Test unfamiliar waveforms.",
      "against": "Accuracy gains vanish on held-out inputs.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0767",
      "hypothesis": "A physical reservoir network could classify flow disturbances with less calibration when its geometry preserves mass balance locally.",
      "test": "Test unfamiliar waveforms.",
      "against": "Accuracy gains vanish on held-out inputs.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0768",
    "hypothesis": "A mechanical contact sensor could measure adhesion aging without detaching the object through small phase probes.",
    "test": "Compare probe response and later detachment.",
    "against": "Probes perturb the aging process strongly.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0768",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A mechanical contact sensor could measure adhesion aging without detaching the object through small phase probes.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0768",
      "hypothesis": "A mechanical contact sensor could measure adhesion aging without detaching the object through small phase probes.",
      "test": "Compare probe response and later detachment.",
      "against": "Probes perturb the aging process strongly.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0768",
      "hypothesis": "A mechanical contact sensor could measure adhesion aging without detaching the object through small phase probes.",
      "test": "Compare probe response and later detachment.",
      "against": "Probes perturb the aging process strongly.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0769",
    "hypothesis": "A passive thermal recorder could preserve several past extrema through sequential irreversible microbuckling.",
    "test": "Apply known heat histories.",
    "against": "States cannot recover distinct extrema.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0769",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A passive thermal recorder could preserve several past extrema through sequential irreversible microbuckling.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0769",
      "hypothesis": "A passive thermal recorder could preserve several past extrema through sequential irreversible microbuckling.",
      "test": "Apply known heat histories.",
      "against": "States cannot recover distinct extrema.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0769",
      "hypothesis": "A passive thermal recorder could preserve several past extrema through sequential irreversible microbuckling.",
      "test": "Apply known heat histories.",
      "against": "States cannot recover distinct extrema.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0770",
    "hypothesis": "A soft robot skin could reject uniform pressure while detecting localized defects through spatial strain subtraction.",
    "test": "Apply broad and local loads.",
    "against": "Localized sensitivity falls with background rejection.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0770",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A soft robot skin could reject uniform pressure while detecting localized defects through spatial strain subtraction.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0770",
      "hypothesis": "A soft robot skin could reject uniform pressure while detecting localized defects through spatial strain subtraction.",
      "test": "Apply broad and local loads.",
      "against": "Localized sensitivity falls with background rejection.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0770",
      "hypothesis": "A soft robot skin could reject uniform pressure while detecting localized defects through spatial strain subtraction.",
      "test": "Apply broad and local loads.",
      "against": "Localized sensitivity falls with background rejection.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0771",
    "hypothesis": "A fluidic oscillator could signal impending bubble blockage through phase wandering before mean frequency changes.",
    "test": "Image bubbles and oscillator phase.",
    "against": "Wandering provides no advance warning.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0771",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A fluidic oscillator could signal impending bubble blockage through phase wandering before mean frequency changes.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0771",
      "hypothesis": "A fluidic oscillator could signal impending bubble blockage through phase wandering before mean frequency changes.",
      "test": "Image bubbles and oscillator phase.",
      "against": "Wandering provides no advance warning.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0771",
      "hypothesis": "A fluidic oscillator could signal impending bubble blockage through phase wandering before mean frequency changes.",
      "test": "Image bubbles and oscillator phase.",
      "against": "Wandering provides no advance warning.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0772",
    "hypothesis": "A mechanical substrate could transform spatially uniform stimulation into localized computation through disorder-selected soft spots.",
    "test": "Measure state maps across repeated inputs.",
    "against": "Output locations are irreproducible.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0772",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A mechanical substrate could transform spatially uniform stimulation into localized computation through disorder-selected soft spots.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0772",
      "hypothesis": "A mechanical substrate could transform spatially uniform stimulation into localized computation through disorder-selected soft spots.",
      "test": "Measure state maps across repeated inputs.",
      "against": "Output locations are irreproducible.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0772",
      "hypothesis": "A mechanical substrate could transform spatially uniform stimulation into localized computation through disorder-selected soft spots.",
      "test": "Measure state maps across repeated inputs.",
      "against": "Output locations are irreproducible.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0773",
    "hypothesis": "An optical humidity map could remain accurate under uneven illumination by using local lifetime ratios instead of intensity.",
    "test": "Apply independent lighting gradients.",
    "against": "Ratios retain comparable lighting bias.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0773",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "An optical humidity map could remain accurate under uneven illumination by using local lifetime ratios instead of intensity.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0773",
      "hypothesis": "An optical humidity map could remain accurate under uneven illumination by using local lifetime ratios instead of intensity.",
      "test": "Apply independent lighting gradients.",
      "against": "Ratios retain comparable lighting bias.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0773",
      "hypothesis": "An optical humidity map could remain accurate under uneven illumination by using local lifetime ratios instead of intensity.",
      "test": "Apply independent lighting gradients.",
      "against": "Ratios retain comparable lighting bias.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0774",
    "hypothesis": "A passive separator could route particles by viscoelastic recovery time through a timed elastic gate.",
    "test": "Track shape recovery and passage.",
    "against": "Sorting follows particle size alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0774",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A passive separator could route particles by viscoelastic recovery time through a timed elastic gate.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0774",
      "hypothesis": "A passive separator could route particles by viscoelastic recovery time through a timed elastic gate.",
      "test": "Track shape recovery and passage.",
      "against": "Sorting follows particle size alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0774",
      "hypothesis": "A passive separator could route particles by viscoelastic recovery time through a timed elastic gate.",
      "test": "Track shape recovery and passage.",
      "against": "Sorting follows particle size alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0775",
    "hypothesis": "A pressure-tolerant sampling vessel could preserve dissolved-gas ratios by mechanically matching external pressure during collection.",
    "test": "Compare captured and source compositions.",
    "against": "Ratios drift despite pressure matching.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0775",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A pressure-tolerant sampling vessel could preserve dissolved-gas ratios by mechanically matching external pressure during collection.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0775",
      "hypothesis": "A pressure-tolerant sampling vessel could preserve dissolved-gas ratios by mechanically matching external pressure during collection.",
      "test": "Compare captured and source compositions.",
      "against": "Ratios drift despite pressure matching.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0775",
      "hypothesis": "A pressure-tolerant sampling vessel could preserve dissolved-gas ratios by mechanically matching external pressure during collection.",
      "test": "Compare captured and source compositions.",
      "against": "Ratios drift despite pressure matching.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0776",
    "hypothesis": "A mechanical logic chain could reveal its first damaged link through reversal of pulse polarity.",
    "test": "Introduce blinded defects.",
    "against": "Reversal cannot localize damage.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 12,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0776",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A mechanical logic chain could reveal its first damaged link through reversal of pulse polarity.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0776",
      "hypothesis": "A mechanical logic chain could reveal its first damaged link through reversal of pulse polarity.",
      "test": "Introduce blinded defects.",
      "against": "Reversal cannot localize damage.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0776",
      "hypothesis": "A mechanical logic chain could reveal its first damaged link through reversal of pulse polarity.",
      "test": "Introduce blinded defects.",
      "against": "Reversal cannot localize damage.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 12,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0777",
    "hypothesis": "A flexible electrical sensor could infer its own contact area through two independently relaxing conductive networks.",
    "test": "Measure area and network signals.",
    "against": "Area remains confounded with force.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0777",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A flexible electrical sensor could infer its own contact area through two independently relaxing conductive networks.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0777",
      "hypothesis": "A flexible electrical sensor could infer its own contact area through two independently relaxing conductive networks.",
      "test": "Measure area and network signals.",
      "against": "Area remains confounded with force.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0777",
      "hypothesis": "A flexible electrical sensor could infer its own contact area through two independently relaxing conductive networks.",
      "test": "Measure area and network signals.",
      "against": "Area remains confounded with force.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0778",
    "hypothesis": "A passive optical comparator could identify equal chemical potentials without measuring either concentration directly.",
    "test": "Compare opposing swelling elements.",
    "against": "Balance follows concentration rather than potential.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0778",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A passive optical comparator could identify equal chemical potentials without measuring either concentration directly.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0778",
      "hypothesis": "A passive optical comparator could identify equal chemical potentials without measuring either concentration directly.",
      "test": "Compare opposing swelling elements.",
      "against": "Balance follows concentration rather than potential.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0778",
      "hypothesis": "A passive optical comparator could identify equal chemical potentials without measuring either concentration directly.",
      "test": "Compare opposing swelling elements.",
      "against": "Balance follows concentration rather than potential.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0779",
    "hypothesis": "A fluidic integrator could forget old inputs at a controllable rate through reversible wall permeability.",
    "test": "Measure impulse histories.",
    "against": "Memory decay is not independently tunable.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0779",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A fluidic integrator could forget old inputs at a controllable rate through reversible wall permeability.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0779",
      "hypothesis": "A fluidic integrator could forget old inputs at a controllable rate through reversible wall permeability.",
      "test": "Measure impulse histories.",
      "against": "Memory decay is not independently tunable.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0779",
      "hypothesis": "A fluidic integrator could forget old inputs at a controllable rate through reversible wall permeability.",
      "test": "Measure impulse histories.",
      "against": "Memory decay is not independently tunable.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0780",
    "hypothesis": "A soft mechanical tag could indicate whether an overload occurred before or after wetting.",
    "test": "Reverse load and hydration sequence.",
    "against": "States encode only the strongest stimulus.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0780",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A soft mechanical tag could indicate whether an overload occurred before or after wetting.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0780",
      "hypothesis": "A soft mechanical tag could indicate whether an overload occurred before or after wetting.",
      "test": "Reverse load and hydration sequence.",
      "against": "States encode only the strongest stimulus.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0780",
      "hypothesis": "A soft mechanical tag could indicate whether an overload occurred before or after wetting.",
      "test": "Reverse load and hydration sequence.",
      "against": "States encode only the strongest stimulus.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0781",
    "hypothesis": "An acoustic sensor could identify a loose bond through harmonic generation at zero net strain.",
    "test": "Compare known bond states.",
    "against": "Harmonics follow instrument nonlinearity only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0781",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "An acoustic sensor could identify a loose bond through harmonic generation at zero net strain.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0781",
      "hypothesis": "An acoustic sensor could identify a loose bond through harmonic generation at zero net strain.",
      "test": "Compare known bond states.",
      "against": "Harmonics follow instrument nonlinearity only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0781",
      "hypothesis": "An acoustic sensor could identify a loose bond through harmonic generation at zero net strain.",
      "test": "Compare known bond states.",
      "against": "Harmonics follow instrument nonlinearity only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0782",
    "hypothesis": "A passive thermal valve could direct heat toward a colder branch through reversible contact-area exchange.",
    "test": "Measure branch heat flow.",
    "against": "Directionality disappears after contact calibration.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0782",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A passive thermal valve could direct heat toward a colder branch through reversible contact-area exchange.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0782",
      "hypothesis": "A passive thermal valve could direct heat toward a colder branch through reversible contact-area exchange.",
      "test": "Measure branch heat flow.",
      "against": "Directionality disappears after contact calibration.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0782",
      "hypothesis": "A passive thermal valve could direct heat toward a colder branch through reversible contact-area exchange.",
      "test": "Measure branch heat flow.",
      "against": "Directionality disappears after contact calibration.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0783",
    "hypothesis": "A physical network could become more fault-tolerant when weak couplings carry diagnostic fluctuations before carrying useful signals.",
    "test": "Remove known connections.",
    "against": "Warnings do not precede functional failure.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0783",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A physical network could become more fault-tolerant when weak couplings carry diagnostic fluctuations before carrying useful signals.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0783",
      "hypothesis": "A physical network could become more fault-tolerant when weak couplings carry diagnostic fluctuations before carrying useful signals.",
      "test": "Remove known connections.",
      "against": "Warnings do not precede functional failure.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0783",
      "hypothesis": "A physical network could become more fault-tolerant when weak couplings carry diagnostic fluctuations before carrying useful signals.",
      "test": "Remove known connections.",
      "against": "Warnings do not precede functional failure.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0784",
    "hypothesis": "A flexible lens could self-correct slow focus drift by redistributing internal gas pressure.",
    "test": "Measure focus and chamber pressures.",
    "against": "Correction requires active pumping.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0784",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A flexible lens could self-correct slow focus drift by redistributing internal gas pressure.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0784",
      "hypothesis": "A flexible lens could self-correct slow focus drift by redistributing internal gas pressure.",
      "test": "Measure focus and chamber pressures.",
      "against": "Correction requires active pumping.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0784",
      "hypothesis": "A flexible lens could self-correct slow focus drift by redistributing internal gas pressure.",
      "test": "Measure focus and chamber pressures.",
      "against": "Correction requires active pumping.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0785",
    "hypothesis": "A fluidic sorting junction could distinguish particle hollowness through pressure-wave scattering before contact.",
    "test": "Use equal-size equal-mass replicas.",
    "against": "Scattering follows external shape only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 18,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0785",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A fluidic sorting junction could distinguish particle hollowness through pressure-wave scattering before contact.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0785",
      "hypothesis": "A fluidic sorting junction could distinguish particle hollowness through pressure-wave scattering before contact.",
      "test": "Use equal-size equal-mass replicas.",
      "against": "Scattering follows external shape only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0785",
      "hypothesis": "A fluidic sorting junction could distinguish particle hollowness through pressure-wave scattering before contact.",
      "test": "Use equal-size equal-mass replicas.",
      "against": "Scattering follows external shape only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 18,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0786",
    "hypothesis": "An optical film could encode cumulative strain while remaining insensitive to reversible bending direction.",
    "test": "Apply matched strain histories.",
    "against": "Signal follows final orientation only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0786",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "An optical film could encode cumulative strain while remaining insensitive to reversible bending direction.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0786",
      "hypothesis": "An optical film could encode cumulative strain while remaining insensitive to reversible bending direction.",
      "test": "Apply matched strain histories.",
      "against": "Signal follows final orientation only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0786",
      "hypothesis": "An optical film could encode cumulative strain while remaining insensitive to reversible bending direction.",
      "test": "Apply matched strain histories.",
      "against": "Signal follows final orientation only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0787",
    "hypothesis": "A passive concentration sensor could reset through ambient humidity without releasing the sensed species to the environment.",
    "test": "Measure mass balance and reset.",
    "against": "Reset requires analyte emission.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0787",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A passive concentration sensor could reset through ambient humidity without releasing the sensed species to the environment.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0787",
      "hypothesis": "A passive concentration sensor could reset through ambient humidity without releasing the sensed species to the environment.",
      "test": "Measure mass balance and reset.",
      "against": "Reset requires analyte emission.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0787",
      "hypothesis": "A passive concentration sensor could reset through ambient humidity without releasing the sensed species to the environment.",
      "test": "Measure mass balance and reset.",
      "against": "Reset requires analyte emission.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0788",
    "hypothesis": "A mechanical decision element could signal uncertainty through persistent oscillation instead of choosing a final state.",
    "test": "Apply near-threshold inputs.",
    "against": "Oscillation merely reflects uncontrolled noise.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0788",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A mechanical decision element could signal uncertainty through persistent oscillation instead of choosing a final state.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0788",
      "hypothesis": "A mechanical decision element could signal uncertainty through persistent oscillation instead of choosing a final state.",
      "test": "Apply near-threshold inputs.",
      "against": "Oscillation merely reflects uncontrolled noise.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0788",
      "hypothesis": "A mechanical decision element could signal uncertainty through persistent oscillation instead of choosing a final state.",
      "test": "Apply near-threshold inputs.",
      "against": "Oscillation merely reflects uncontrolled noise.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0789",
    "hypothesis": "An acoustic coating could measure accumulated erosion from changes in surface-wave localization.",
    "test": "Compare localization with measured material loss.",
    "against": "Signals track temperature alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0789",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "An acoustic coating could measure accumulated erosion from changes in surface-wave localization.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0789",
      "hypothesis": "An acoustic coating could measure accumulated erosion from changes in surface-wave localization.",
      "test": "Compare localization with measured material loss.",
      "against": "Signals track temperature alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0789",
      "hypothesis": "An acoustic coating could measure accumulated erosion from changes in surface-wave localization.",
      "test": "Compare localization with measured material loss.",
      "against": "Signals track temperature alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0790",
    "hypothesis": "A fluidic junction could reject bubbles while passing droplets by exploiting opposite compressibility responses.",
    "test": "Track matched-size two-phase objects.",
    "against": "Sorting follows buoyancy alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0790",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A fluidic junction could reject bubbles while passing droplets by exploiting opposite compressibility responses.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0790",
      "hypothesis": "A fluidic junction could reject bubbles while passing droplets by exploiting opposite compressibility responses.",
      "test": "Track matched-size two-phase objects.",
      "against": "Sorting follows buoyancy alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0790",
      "hypothesis": "A fluidic junction could reject bubbles while passing droplets by exploiting opposite compressibility responses.",
      "test": "Track matched-size two-phase objects.",
      "against": "Sorting follows buoyancy alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0791",
    "hypothesis": "A soft optical device could retain alignment during vibration by moving its support nodes toward low-strain positions.",
    "test": "Measure nodes and optical stability.",
    "against": "Stability gains require lower vibration input.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0791",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A soft optical device could retain alignment during vibration by moving its support nodes toward low-strain positions.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0791",
      "hypothesis": "A soft optical device could retain alignment during vibration by moving its support nodes toward low-strain positions.",
      "test": "Measure nodes and optical stability.",
      "against": "Stability gains require lower vibration input.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0791",
      "hypothesis": "A soft optical device could retain alignment during vibration by moving its support nodes toward low-strain positions.",
      "test": "Measure nodes and optical stability.",
      "against": "Stability gains require lower vibration input.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0792",
    "hypothesis": "A passive sensor could detect chemical sensor poisoning by monitoring fluctuations under a chemically inert probe.",
    "test": "Apply independently characterized poison levels.",
    "against": "Probe fluctuations fail to predict lost sensitivity.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 18,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0792",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A passive sensor could detect chemical sensor poisoning by monitoring fluctuations under a chemically inert probe.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0792",
      "hypothesis": "A passive sensor could detect chemical sensor poisoning by monitoring fluctuations under a chemically inert probe.",
      "test": "Apply independently characterized poison levels.",
      "against": "Probe fluctuations fail to predict lost sensitivity.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0792",
      "hypothesis": "A passive sensor could detect chemical sensor poisoning by monitoring fluctuations under a chemically inert probe.",
      "test": "Apply independently characterized poison levels.",
      "against": "Probe fluctuations fail to predict lost sensitivity.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 18,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0793",
    "hypothesis": "A mechanical wave filter could automatically retune when one resonator fails through redistribution of prestress.",
    "test": "Remove a resonator and measure transmission.",
    "against": "Retuning requires external adjustment.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0793",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A mechanical wave filter could automatically retune when one resonator fails through redistribution of prestress.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0793",
      "hypothesis": "A mechanical wave filter could automatically retune when one resonator fails through redistribution of prestress.",
      "test": "Remove a resonator and measure transmission.",
      "against": "Retuning requires external adjustment.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0793",
      "hypothesis": "A mechanical wave filter could automatically retune when one resonator fails through redistribution of prestress.",
      "test": "Remove a resonator and measure transmission.",
      "against": "Retuning requires external adjustment.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0794",
    "hypothesis": "An optical flow sensor could distinguish liquid slip from calibration drift through opposite-direction illumination.",
    "test": "Calibrate known slip surfaces.",
    "against": "Direction reversal adds no identifiability.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0794",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "An optical flow sensor could distinguish liquid slip from calibration drift through opposite-direction illumination.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0794",
      "hypothesis": "An optical flow sensor could distinguish liquid slip from calibration drift through opposite-direction illumination.",
      "test": "Calibrate known slip surfaces.",
      "against": "Direction reversal adds no identifiability.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0794",
      "hypothesis": "An optical flow sensor could distinguish liquid slip from calibration drift through opposite-direction illumination.",
      "test": "Calibrate known slip surfaces.",
      "against": "Direction reversal adds no identifiability.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0795",
    "hypothesis": "A physical information store could protect frequently used states by redirecting mechanical wear to unused pathways.",
    "test": "Track state usage and damage.",
    "against": "Protection follows load redistribution alone without memory.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0795",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A physical information store could protect frequently used states by redirecting mechanical wear to unused pathways.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0795",
      "hypothesis": "A physical information store could protect frequently used states by redirecting mechanical wear to unused pathways.",
      "test": "Track state usage and damage.",
      "against": "Protection follows load redistribution alone without memory.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0795",
      "hypothesis": "A physical information store could protect frequently used states by redirecting mechanical wear to unused pathways.",
      "test": "Track state usage and damage.",
      "against": "Protection follows load redistribution alone without memory.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0796",
    "hypothesis": "A passive sampler could separate an exposure's peak from its duration using coupled irreversible and reversible adsorption fronts.",
    "test": "Apply blind exposure histories.",
    "against": "The two parameters remain unidentifiable.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0796",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A passive sampler could separate an exposure's peak from its duration using coupled irreversible and reversible adsorption fronts.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0796",
      "hypothesis": "A passive sampler could separate an exposure's peak from its duration using coupled irreversible and reversible adsorption fronts.",
      "test": "Apply blind exposure histories.",
      "against": "The two parameters remain unidentifiable.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0796",
      "hypothesis": "A passive sampler could separate an exposure's peak from its duration using coupled irreversible and reversible adsorption fronts.",
      "test": "Apply blind exposure histories.",
      "against": "The two parameters remain unidentifiable.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0797",
    "hypothesis": "A deformable channel could measure fluid elasticity through recoil-induced motion after both ends close.",
    "test": "Compare known elastic and viscous liquids.",
    "against": "Motion follows residual pressure only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0797",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A deformable channel could measure fluid elasticity through recoil-induced motion after both ends close.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0797",
      "hypothesis": "A deformable channel could measure fluid elasticity through recoil-induced motion after both ends close.",
      "test": "Compare known elastic and viscous liquids.",
      "against": "Motion follows residual pressure only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0797",
      "hypothesis": "A deformable channel could measure fluid elasticity through recoil-induced motion after both ends close.",
      "test": "Compare known elastic and viscous liquids.",
      "against": "Motion follows residual pressure only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0798",
    "hypothesis": "A sensor array could identify hidden convection by violations of reciprocal heat-pulse travel times.",
    "test": "Measure paired thermal propagation.",
    "against": "Asymmetry reflects contact mismatch alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0798",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A sensor array could identify hidden convection by violations of reciprocal heat-pulse travel times.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0798",
      "hypothesis": "A sensor array could identify hidden convection by violations of reciprocal heat-pulse travel times.",
      "test": "Measure paired thermal propagation.",
      "against": "Asymmetry reflects contact mismatch alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0798",
      "hypothesis": "A sensor array could identify hidden convection by violations of reciprocal heat-pulse travel times.",
      "test": "Measure paired thermal propagation.",
      "against": "Asymmetry reflects contact mismatch alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0799",
    "hypothesis": "A mechanical analog computer could reveal an incorrect physical model through persistent energy-balance residuals.",
    "test": "Drive known and mismatched models.",
    "against": "Residuals cannot distinguish model error from noise.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 18,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0799",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A mechanical analog computer could reveal an incorrect physical model through persistent energy-balance residuals.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0799",
      "hypothesis": "A mechanical analog computer could reveal an incorrect physical model through persistent energy-balance residuals.",
      "test": "Drive known and mismatched models.",
      "against": "Residuals cannot distinguish model error from noise.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0799",
      "hypothesis": "A mechanical analog computer could reveal an incorrect physical model through persistent energy-balance residuals.",
      "test": "Drive known and mismatched models.",
      "against": "Residuals cannot distinguish model error from noise.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 18,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0800",
    "hypothesis": "A woven composite could redirect a puncture into reversible yarn sliding before fibers break.",
    "test": "Image yarn motion and damage.",
    "against": "Protection requires fiber fracture.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0800",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A woven composite could redirect a puncture into reversible yarn sliding before fibers break.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0800",
      "hypothesis": "A woven composite could redirect a puncture into reversible yarn sliding before fibers break.",
      "test": "Image yarn motion and damage.",
      "against": "Protection requires fiber fracture.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0800",
      "hypothesis": "A woven composite could redirect a puncture into reversible yarn sliding before fibers break.",
      "test": "Image yarn motion and damage.",
      "against": "Protection requires fiber fracture.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0801",
    "hypothesis": "A glass surface could recover scratch resistance through humidity-assisted relaxation without measurable material deposition.",
    "test": "Measure scratches and surface composition.",
    "against": "Recovery requires added material.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0801",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A glass surface could recover scratch resistance through humidity-assisted relaxation without measurable material deposition.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0801",
      "hypothesis": "A glass surface could recover scratch resistance through humidity-assisted relaxation without measurable material deposition.",
      "test": "Measure scratches and surface composition.",
      "against": "Recovery requires added material.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0801",
      "hypothesis": "A glass surface could recover scratch resistance through humidity-assisted relaxation without measurable material deposition.",
      "test": "Measure scratches and surface composition.",
      "against": "Recovery requires added material.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0802",
    "hypothesis": "A ceramic joint could reduce thermal stress by rotating microscopic interlocking grains.",
    "test": "Track orientation during heating.",
    "against": "Stress changes require grain fracture.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0802",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A ceramic joint could reduce thermal stress by rotating microscopic interlocking grains.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0802",
      "hypothesis": "A ceramic joint could reduce thermal stress by rotating microscopic interlocking grains.",
      "test": "Track orientation during heating.",
      "against": "Stress changes require grain fracture.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0802",
      "hypothesis": "A ceramic joint could reduce thermal stress by rotating microscopic interlocking grains.",
      "test": "Track orientation during heating.",
      "against": "Stress changes require grain fracture.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0803",
    "hypothesis": "A polymer blend could resist fatigue by moving its soft phase toward repeatedly loaded regions.",
    "test": "Map phases and cyclic strain.",
    "against": "Redistribution follows irreversible cracking.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0803",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A polymer blend could resist fatigue by moving its soft phase toward repeatedly loaded regions.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0803",
      "hypothesis": "A polymer blend could resist fatigue by moving its soft phase toward repeatedly loaded regions.",
      "test": "Map phases and cyclic strain.",
      "against": "Redistribution follows irreversible cracking.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0803",
      "hypothesis": "A polymer blend could resist fatigue by moving its soft phase toward repeatedly loaded regions.",
      "test": "Map phases and cyclic strain.",
      "against": "Redistribution follows irreversible cracking.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0804",
    "hypothesis": "A metal foil could reveal early embrittlement through a change in mechanical-noise intermittency.",
    "test": "Measure noise and later fracture.",
    "against": "Noise follows surface friction only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0804",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A metal foil could reveal early embrittlement through a change in mechanical-noise intermittency.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0804",
      "hypothesis": "A metal foil could reveal early embrittlement through a change in mechanical-noise intermittency.",
      "test": "Measure noise and later fracture.",
      "against": "Noise follows surface friction only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0804",
      "hypothesis": "A metal foil could reveal early embrittlement through a change in mechanical-noise intermittency.",
      "test": "Measure noise and later fracture.",
      "against": "Noise follows surface friction only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0805",
    "hypothesis": "A porous rubber could absorb impact energy through reversible internal liquid transfer without increased peak force.",
    "test": "Measure force and liquid motion.",
    "against": "Damping requires higher peak force.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0805",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous rubber could absorb impact energy through reversible internal liquid transfer without increased peak force.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0805",
      "hypothesis": "A porous rubber could absorb impact energy through reversible internal liquid transfer without increased peak force.",
      "test": "Measure force and liquid motion.",
      "against": "Damping requires higher peak force.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0805",
      "hypothesis": "A porous rubber could absorb impact energy through reversible internal liquid transfer without increased peak force.",
      "test": "Measure force and liquid motion.",
      "against": "Damping requires higher peak force.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0806",
    "hypothesis": "A fiber bundle could repair load sharing by selectively releasing overloaded crossover contacts.",
    "test": "Track contact slips and fiber forces.",
    "against": "Failure proceeds without adaptive redistribution.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0806",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A fiber bundle could repair load sharing by selectively releasing overloaded crossover contacts.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0806",
      "hypothesis": "A fiber bundle could repair load sharing by selectively releasing overloaded crossover contacts.",
      "test": "Track contact slips and fiber forces.",
      "against": "Failure proceeds without adaptive redistribution.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0806",
      "hypothesis": "A fiber bundle could repair load sharing by selectively releasing overloaded crossover contacts.",
      "test": "Track contact slips and fiber forces.",
      "against": "Failure proceeds without adaptive redistribution.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0807",
    "hypothesis": "A transparent ceramic could expose residual-stress sign through opposite optical responses at neighboring grain boundaries.",
    "test": "Calibrate stress and optical maps.",
    "against": "Boundary responses remain ambiguous.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0807",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A transparent ceramic could expose residual-stress sign through opposite optical responses at neighboring grain boundaries.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0807",
      "hypothesis": "A transparent ceramic could expose residual-stress sign through opposite optical responses at neighboring grain boundaries.",
      "test": "Calibrate stress and optical maps.",
      "against": "Boundary responses remain ambiguous.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0807",
      "hypothesis": "A transparent ceramic could expose residual-stress sign through opposite optical responses at neighboring grain boundaries.",
      "test": "Calibrate stress and optical maps.",
      "against": "Boundary responses remain ambiguous.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0808",
    "hypothesis": "A hydrogel composite could retain toughness after solvent loss by forming temporary particle bridges.",
    "test": "Map contacts and fracture energy.",
    "against": "Toughness follows water fraction only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0808",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A hydrogel composite could retain toughness after solvent loss by forming temporary particle bridges.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0808",
      "hypothesis": "A hydrogel composite could retain toughness after solvent loss by forming temporary particle bridges.",
      "test": "Map contacts and fracture energy.",
      "against": "Toughness follows water fraction only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0808",
      "hypothesis": "A hydrogel composite could retain toughness after solvent loss by forming temporary particle bridges.",
      "test": "Map contacts and fracture energy.",
      "against": "Toughness follows water fraction only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0809",
    "hypothesis": "A reversible adhesive could distinguish contamination from aging through recovery after a mild mechanical reset.",
    "test": "Measure adhesion before and after reset.",
    "against": "Recovery cannot identify failure cause.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0809",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A reversible adhesive could distinguish contamination from aging through recovery after a mild mechanical reset.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0809",
      "hypothesis": "A reversible adhesive could distinguish contamination from aging through recovery after a mild mechanical reset.",
      "test": "Measure adhesion before and after reset.",
      "against": "Recovery cannot identify failure cause.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0809",
      "hypothesis": "A reversible adhesive could distinguish contamination from aging through recovery after a mild mechanical reset.",
      "test": "Measure adhesion before and after reset.",
      "against": "Recovery cannot identify failure cause.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0810",
    "hypothesis": "A patterned metal sheet could dissipate bending fatigue through reversible grain-boundary sliding confined to selected regions.",
    "test": "Map grain motion and damage.",
    "against": "Localization accelerates fracture.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0810",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A patterned metal sheet could dissipate bending fatigue through reversible grain-boundary sliding confined to selected regions.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0810",
      "hypothesis": "A patterned metal sheet could dissipate bending fatigue through reversible grain-boundary sliding confined to selected regions.",
      "test": "Map grain motion and damage.",
      "against": "Localization accelerates fracture.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0810",
      "hypothesis": "A patterned metal sheet could dissipate bending fatigue through reversible grain-boundary sliding confined to selected regions.",
      "test": "Map grain motion and damage.",
      "against": "Localization accelerates fracture.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0811",
    "hypothesis": "A cellulose film could become more tear-resistant after controlled reorientation of its weakest fibrils.",
    "test": "Measure orientation and crack paths.",
    "against": "Resistance tracks density alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0811",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A cellulose film could become more tear-resistant after controlled reorientation of its weakest fibrils.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0811",
      "hypothesis": "A cellulose film could become more tear-resistant after controlled reorientation of its weakest fibrils.",
      "test": "Measure orientation and crack paths.",
      "against": "Resistance tracks density alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0811",
      "hypothesis": "A cellulose film could become more tear-resistant after controlled reorientation of its weakest fibrils.",
      "test": "Measure orientation and crack paths.",
      "against": "Resistance tracks density alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0812",
    "hypothesis": "A ceramic foam could resist thermal shock by storing expansion in closed compliant cavities.",
    "test": "Measure cavity strain and cracking.",
    "against": "Protection requires lower temperature gradients.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0812",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A ceramic foam could resist thermal shock by storing expansion in closed compliant cavities.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0812",
      "hypothesis": "A ceramic foam could resist thermal shock by storing expansion in closed compliant cavities.",
      "test": "Measure cavity strain and cracking.",
      "against": "Protection requires lower temperature gradients.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0812",
      "hypothesis": "A ceramic foam could resist thermal shock by storing expansion in closed compliant cavities.",
      "test": "Measure cavity strain and cracking.",
      "against": "Protection requires lower temperature gradients.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0813",
    "hypothesis": "A polymer brush could reduce wear by transporting lubricant toward high-shear contacts.",
    "test": "Track lubricant and contact stress.",
    "against": "Transport follows concentration gradients only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0813",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A polymer brush could reduce wear by transporting lubricant toward high-shear contacts.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0813",
      "hypothesis": "A polymer brush could reduce wear by transporting lubricant toward high-shear contacts.",
      "test": "Track lubricant and contact stress.",
      "against": "Transport follows concentration gradients only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0813",
      "hypothesis": "A polymer brush could reduce wear by transporting lubricant toward high-shear contacts.",
      "test": "Track lubricant and contact stress.",
      "against": "Transport follows concentration gradients only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0814",
    "hypothesis": "A fiber-reinforced gel could spread a cut's opening over a wider area through delayed interfacial slip.",
    "test": "Measure crack opening and slip.",
    "against": "Slip increases local damage only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0814",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A fiber-reinforced gel could spread a cut's opening over a wider area through delayed interfacial slip.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0814",
      "hypothesis": "A fiber-reinforced gel could spread a cut's opening over a wider area through delayed interfacial slip.",
      "test": "Measure crack opening and slip.",
      "against": "Slip increases local damage only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0814",
      "hypothesis": "A fiber-reinforced gel could spread a cut's opening over a wider area through delayed interfacial slip.",
      "test": "Measure crack opening and slip.",
      "against": "Slip increases local damage only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0815",
    "hypothesis": "A crystalline coating could self-mark repeated overload through a persistent but reversible color-boundary migration.",
    "test": "Track optical boundaries and loading.",
    "against": "Color tracks heat rather than stress.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0815",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A crystalline coating could self-mark repeated overload through a persistent but reversible color-boundary migration.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0815",
      "hypothesis": "A crystalline coating could self-mark repeated overload through a persistent but reversible color-boundary migration.",
      "test": "Track optical boundaries and loading.",
      "against": "Color tracks heat rather than stress.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0815",
      "hypothesis": "A crystalline coating could self-mark repeated overload through a persistent but reversible color-boundary migration.",
      "test": "Track optical boundaries and loading.",
      "against": "Color tracks heat rather than stress.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0816",
    "hypothesis": "A lightweight panel could reject dent formation by converting local indentation into distributed twist.",
    "test": "Measure strain and residual dent.",
    "against": "Twist causes equal permanent damage.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0816",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A lightweight panel could reject dent formation by converting local indentation into distributed twist.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0816",
      "hypothesis": "A lightweight panel could reject dent formation by converting local indentation into distributed twist.",
      "test": "Measure strain and residual dent.",
      "against": "Twist causes equal permanent damage.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0816",
      "hypothesis": "A lightweight panel could reject dent formation by converting local indentation into distributed twist.",
      "test": "Measure strain and residual dent.",
      "against": "Twist causes equal permanent damage.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0817",
    "hypothesis": "A porous metal could reveal blocked cooling paths through elastic resonances without internal temperature sensors.",
    "test": "Compare modes and known blockages.",
    "against": "Modes follow total fluid mass only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0817",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous metal could reveal blocked cooling paths through elastic resonances without internal temperature sensors.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0817",
      "hypothesis": "A porous metal could reveal blocked cooling paths through elastic resonances without internal temperature sensors.",
      "test": "Compare modes and known blockages.",
      "against": "Modes follow total fluid mass only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0817",
      "hypothesis": "A porous metal could reveal blocked cooling paths through elastic resonances without internal temperature sensors.",
      "test": "Compare modes and known blockages.",
      "against": "Modes follow total fluid mass only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0818",
    "hypothesis": "A soft inclusion could protect a brittle interface by cavitating reversibly before the interface opens.",
    "test": "Image cavities and crack initiation.",
    "against": "Cavitation permanently weakens the interface.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0818",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A soft inclusion could protect a brittle interface by cavitating reversibly before the interface opens.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0818",
      "hypothesis": "A soft inclusion could protect a brittle interface by cavitating reversibly before the interface opens.",
      "test": "Image cavities and crack initiation.",
      "against": "Cavitation permanently weakens the interface.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0818",
      "hypothesis": "A soft inclusion could protect a brittle interface by cavitating reversibly before the interface opens.",
      "test": "Image cavities and crack initiation.",
      "against": "Cavitation permanently weakens the interface.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0819",
    "hypothesis": "A polymer's molecular entanglements could retain a directional acoustic signature after visible strain recovery.",
    "test": "Measure wave transmission during rest.",
    "against": "Signature vanishes with shape recovery.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0819",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A polymer's molecular entanglements could retain a directional acoustic signature after visible strain recovery.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0819",
      "hypothesis": "A polymer's molecular entanglements could retain a directional acoustic signature after visible strain recovery.",
      "test": "Measure wave transmission during rest.",
      "against": "Signature vanishes with shape recovery.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0819",
      "hypothesis": "A polymer's molecular entanglements could retain a directional acoustic signature after visible strain recovery.",
      "test": "Measure wave transmission during rest.",
      "against": "Signature vanishes with shape recovery.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0820",
    "hypothesis": "A wood-derived laminate could resist moisture cycling by allowing controlled interlayer translation without delamination.",
    "test": "Track slip and strength retention.",
    "against": "Slip inevitably causes bond failure.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 4,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 7,
    "literature_query": "wood-derived laminate resist moisture cycling allowing controlled interlayer translation delamination experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N0820",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A wood-derived laminate could resist moisture cycling by allowing controlled interlayer translation without delamination.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0820",
      "hypothesis": "A wood-derived laminate could resist moisture cycling by allowing controlled interlayer translation without delamination.",
      "test": "Track slip and strength retention.",
      "against": "Slip inevitably causes bond failure.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0820",
      "hypothesis": "A wood-derived laminate could resist moisture cycling by allowing controlled interlayer translation without delamination.",
      "test": "Track slip and strength retention.",
      "against": "Slip inevitably causes bond failure.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 7,
      "literature_query": "wood-derived laminate resist moisture cycling allowing controlled interlayer translation delamination experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "7",
      "id": "N0820",
      "hypothesis": "A wood-derived laminate could resist moisture cycling by allowing controlled interlayer translation without delamination.",
      "test": "Track slip and strength retention.",
      "against": "Slip inevitably causes bond failure.",
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_score": "24",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P35095004745c;Pcc476ca8b73d;Pbed4a72a29a4",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N0820",
      "hypothesis": "A wood-derived laminate could resist moisture cycling by allowing controlled interlayer translation without delamination.",
      "test": "Track slip and strength retention.",
      "against": "Slip inevitably causes bond failure.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 7,
      "literature_query": "wood-derived laminate resist moisture cycling allowing controlled interlayer translation delamination experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P35095004745c;Pcc476ca8b73d;Pbed4a72a29a4",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P35095004745c;Pcc476ca8b73d;Pbed4a72a29a4",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0821",
    "hypothesis": "A ceramic surface could reduce particle erosion by ejecting only sacrificial microscopic asperities.",
    "test": "Measure mass loss and underlying damage.",
    "against": "Sacrifice accelerates bulk erosion.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0821",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A ceramic surface could reduce particle erosion by ejecting only sacrificial microscopic asperities.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0821",
      "hypothesis": "A ceramic surface could reduce particle erosion by ejecting only sacrificial microscopic asperities.",
      "test": "Measure mass loss and underlying damage.",
      "against": "Sacrifice accelerates bulk erosion.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0821",
      "hypothesis": "A ceramic surface could reduce particle erosion by ejecting only sacrificial microscopic asperities.",
      "test": "Measure mass loss and underlying damage.",
      "against": "Sacrifice accelerates bulk erosion.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0822",
    "hypothesis": "A granular composite could maintain a stable modulus by exchanging load between frictional and elastic contacts.",
    "test": "Measure contact forces during cycles.",
    "against": "Modulus stability requires fixed contact states.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0822",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A granular composite could maintain a stable modulus by exchanging load between frictional and elastic contacts.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0822",
      "hypothesis": "A granular composite could maintain a stable modulus by exchanging load between frictional and elastic contacts.",
      "test": "Measure contact forces during cycles.",
      "against": "Modulus stability requires fixed contact states.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0822",
      "hypothesis": "A granular composite could maintain a stable modulus by exchanging load between frictional and elastic contacts.",
      "test": "Measure contact forces during cycles.",
      "against": "Modulus stability requires fixed contact states.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0823",
    "hypothesis": "A reversible bond network could erase manufacturing strain while preserving reinforcement alignment.",
    "test": "Measure residual stress and orientation.",
    "against": "Stress removal destroys alignment.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0823",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A reversible bond network could erase manufacturing strain while preserving reinforcement alignment.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0823",
      "hypothesis": "A reversible bond network could erase manufacturing strain while preserving reinforcement alignment.",
      "test": "Measure residual stress and orientation.",
      "against": "Stress removal destroys alignment.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0823",
      "hypothesis": "A reversible bond network could erase manufacturing strain while preserving reinforcement alignment.",
      "test": "Measure residual stress and orientation.",
      "against": "Stress removal destroys alignment.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0824",
    "hypothesis": "A transparent elastomer could reveal locally trapped gas through delayed recovery of birefringence after compression.",
    "test": "Measure gas and optical relaxation.",
    "against": "Signals track polymer relaxation alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0824",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A transparent elastomer could reveal locally trapped gas through delayed recovery of birefringence after compression.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0824",
      "hypothesis": "A transparent elastomer could reveal locally trapped gas through delayed recovery of birefringence after compression.",
      "test": "Measure gas and optical relaxation.",
      "against": "Signals track polymer relaxation alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0824",
      "hypothesis": "A transparent elastomer could reveal locally trapped gas through delayed recovery of birefringence after compression.",
      "test": "Measure gas and optical relaxation.",
      "against": "Signals track polymer relaxation alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0825",
    "hypothesis": "A fiber knot could increase joint toughness by untying in a controlled sequence under load.",
    "test": "Image knot motion and energy absorption.",
    "against": "Untying reduces total absorbed energy.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0825",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A fiber knot could increase joint toughness by untying in a controlled sequence under load.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0825",
      "hypothesis": "A fiber knot could increase joint toughness by untying in a controlled sequence under load.",
      "test": "Image knot motion and energy absorption.",
      "against": "Untying reduces total absorbed energy.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0825",
      "hypothesis": "A fiber knot could increase joint toughness by untying in a controlled sequence under load.",
      "test": "Image knot motion and energy absorption.",
      "against": "Untying reduces total absorbed energy.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0826",
    "hypothesis": "A porous coating could resist corrosion by mechanically closing the smallest cracks during wetting.",
    "test": "Measure crack width and ion penetration.",
    "against": "Protection follows inhibitor chemistry only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0826",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous coating could resist corrosion by mechanically closing the smallest cracks during wetting.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0826",
      "hypothesis": "A porous coating could resist corrosion by mechanically closing the smallest cracks during wetting.",
      "test": "Measure crack width and ion penetration.",
      "against": "Protection follows inhibitor chemistry only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0826",
      "hypothesis": "A porous coating could resist corrosion by mechanically closing the smallest cracks during wetting.",
      "test": "Measure crack width and ion penetration.",
      "against": "Protection follows inhibitor chemistry only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0827",
    "hypothesis": "A layered ceramic could emit a directional acoustic precursor when one interface begins slipping.",
    "test": "Localize sound and interface motion.",
    "against": "Events cannot distinguish slipping from cracking.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0827",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A layered ceramic could emit a directional acoustic precursor when one interface begins slipping.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0827",
      "hypothesis": "A layered ceramic could emit a directional acoustic precursor when one interface begins slipping.",
      "test": "Localize sound and interface motion.",
      "against": "Events cannot distinguish slipping from cracking.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0827",
      "hypothesis": "A layered ceramic could emit a directional acoustic precursor when one interface begins slipping.",
      "test": "Localize sound and interface motion.",
      "against": "Events cannot distinguish slipping from cracking.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0828",
    "hypothesis": "A polymer shell could resist buckling by transferring internal liquid between remote compartments.",
    "test": "Measure pressure and deformation.",
    "against": "Resistance follows wall thickness alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0828",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A polymer shell could resist buckling by transferring internal liquid between remote compartments.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0828",
      "hypothesis": "A polymer shell could resist buckling by transferring internal liquid between remote compartments.",
      "test": "Measure pressure and deformation.",
      "against": "Resistance follows wall thickness alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0828",
      "hypothesis": "A polymer shell could resist buckling by transferring internal liquid between remote compartments.",
      "test": "Measure pressure and deformation.",
      "against": "Resistance follows wall thickness alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0829",
    "hypothesis": "A particulate adhesive could release cleanly by creating a temporary connected gas layer at detachment.",
    "test": "Image gas and residue.",
    "against": "Clean release requires adhesive fracture.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0829",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A particulate adhesive could release cleanly by creating a temporary connected gas layer at detachment.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0829",
      "hypothesis": "A particulate adhesive could release cleanly by creating a temporary connected gas layer at detachment.",
      "test": "Image gas and residue.",
      "against": "Clean release requires adhesive fracture.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0829",
      "hypothesis": "A particulate adhesive could release cleanly by creating a temporary connected gas layer at detachment.",
      "test": "Image gas and residue.",
      "against": "Clean release requires adhesive fracture.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0830",
    "hypothesis": "A synthetic fiber could dissipate torsion through reversible internal helical rearrangement rather than stretching.",
    "test": "Measure internal orientation and torque.",
    "against": "Dissipation follows axial strain only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0830",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A synthetic fiber could dissipate torsion through reversible internal helical rearrangement rather than stretching.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0830",
      "hypothesis": "A synthetic fiber could dissipate torsion through reversible internal helical rearrangement rather than stretching.",
      "test": "Measure internal orientation and torque.",
      "against": "Dissipation follows axial strain only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0830",
      "hypothesis": "A synthetic fiber could dissipate torsion through reversible internal helical rearrangement rather than stretching.",
      "test": "Measure internal orientation and torque.",
      "against": "Dissipation follows axial strain only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0831",
    "hypothesis": "A brittle film could tolerate larger strain when its harmless microcracks open in a coordinated order.",
    "test": "Track crack timing and electrical continuity.",
    "against": "Coordination provides no usable strain gain.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0831",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A brittle film could tolerate larger strain when its harmless microcracks open in a coordinated order.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0831",
      "hypothesis": "A brittle film could tolerate larger strain when its harmless microcracks open in a coordinated order.",
      "test": "Track crack timing and electrical continuity.",
      "against": "Coordination provides no usable strain gain.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0831",
      "hypothesis": "A brittle film could tolerate larger strain when its harmless microcracks open in a coordinated order.",
      "test": "Track crack timing and electrical continuity.",
      "against": "Coordination provides no usable strain gain.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0832",
    "hypothesis": "A gel-supported mineral could retain catalytic accessibility during bending by rotating surface platelets.",
    "test": "Measure orientation and accessible sites.",
    "against": "Accessibility tracks exposed area only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0832",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A gel-supported mineral could retain catalytic accessibility during bending by rotating surface platelets.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0832",
      "hypothesis": "A gel-supported mineral could retain catalytic accessibility during bending by rotating surface platelets.",
      "test": "Measure orientation and accessible sites.",
      "against": "Accessibility tracks exposed area only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0832",
      "hypothesis": "A gel-supported mineral could retain catalytic accessibility during bending by rotating surface platelets.",
      "test": "Measure orientation and accessible sites.",
      "against": "Accessibility tracks exposed area only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0833",
    "hypothesis": "A metallic lattice could preserve impact protection after one strut breaks through local contact formation.",
    "test": "Image contacts and subsequent loading.",
    "against": "New contacts transmit damaging force spikes.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0833",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A metallic lattice could preserve impact protection after one strut breaks through local contact formation.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0833",
      "hypothesis": "A metallic lattice could preserve impact protection after one strut breaks through local contact formation.",
      "test": "Image contacts and subsequent loading.",
      "against": "New contacts transmit damaging force spikes.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0833",
      "hypothesis": "A metallic lattice could preserve impact protection after one strut breaks through local contact formation.",
      "test": "Image contacts and subsequent loading.",
      "against": "New contacts transmit damaging force spikes.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0834",
    "hypothesis": "A porous membrane could tolerate puncture through solvent-induced migration of loose chains into the opening.",
    "test": "Track chains and leakage recovery.",
    "against": "Closure requires bulk dissolution.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0834",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous membrane could tolerate puncture through solvent-induced migration of loose chains into the opening.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0834",
      "hypothesis": "A porous membrane could tolerate puncture through solvent-induced migration of loose chains into the opening.",
      "test": "Track chains and leakage recovery.",
      "against": "Closure requires bulk dissolution.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0834",
      "hypothesis": "A porous membrane could tolerate puncture through solvent-induced migration of loose chains into the opening.",
      "test": "Track chains and leakage recovery.",
      "against": "Closure requires bulk dissolution.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0835",
    "hypothesis": "A coating could reveal fatigue direction through anisotropic fluorescence recovery after unloading.",
    "test": "Measure spectra under reversed loading axes.",
    "against": "Recovery follows damage amount alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0835",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A coating could reveal fatigue direction through anisotropic fluorescence recovery after unloading.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0835",
      "hypothesis": "A coating could reveal fatigue direction through anisotropic fluorescence recovery after unloading.",
      "test": "Measure spectra under reversed loading axes.",
      "against": "Recovery follows damage amount alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0835",
      "hypothesis": "A coating could reveal fatigue direction through anisotropic fluorescence recovery after unloading.",
      "test": "Measure spectra under reversed loading axes.",
      "against": "Recovery follows damage amount alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0836",
    "hypothesis": "A composite beam could reduce creep by transferring load slowly from a viscous matrix into frictional inclusions.",
    "test": "Measure phase-specific strain over time.",
    "against": "Creep reduction follows filler fraction only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0836",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A composite beam could reduce creep by transferring load slowly from a viscous matrix into frictional inclusions.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0836",
      "hypothesis": "A composite beam could reduce creep by transferring load slowly from a viscous matrix into frictional inclusions.",
      "test": "Measure phase-specific strain over time.",
      "against": "Creep reduction follows filler fraction only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0836",
      "hypothesis": "A composite beam could reduce creep by transferring load slowly from a viscous matrix into frictional inclusions.",
      "test": "Measure phase-specific strain over time.",
      "against": "Creep reduction follows filler fraction only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0837",
    "hypothesis": "A polymer foam could expel trapped moisture during compression without losing its initial pore structure.",
    "test": "Measure water and three-dimensional pores.",
    "against": "Drying requires irreversible collapse.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0837",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A polymer foam could expel trapped moisture during compression without losing its initial pore structure.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0837",
      "hypothesis": "A polymer foam could expel trapped moisture during compression without losing its initial pore structure.",
      "test": "Measure water and three-dimensional pores.",
      "against": "Drying requires irreversible collapse.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0837",
      "hypothesis": "A polymer foam could expel trapped moisture during compression without losing its initial pore structure.",
      "test": "Measure water and three-dimensional pores.",
      "against": "Drying requires irreversible collapse.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0838",
    "hypothesis": "A ceramic seal could recover after abrasion through controlled swelling of a buried benign oxide layer.",
    "test": "Measure gap closure and chemistry.",
    "against": "Recovery creates new cracks.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0838",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A ceramic seal could recover after abrasion through controlled swelling of a buried benign oxide layer.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0838",
      "hypothesis": "A ceramic seal could recover after abrasion through controlled swelling of a buried benign oxide layer.",
      "test": "Measure gap closure and chemistry.",
      "against": "Recovery creates new cracks.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0838",
      "hypothesis": "A ceramic seal could recover after abrasion through controlled swelling of a buried benign oxide layer.",
      "test": "Measure gap closure and chemistry.",
      "against": "Recovery creates new cracks.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0839",
    "hypothesis": "A soft laminate could isolate an impact from its back face by launching a sideways deformation pulse.",
    "test": "Map front and rear velocities.",
    "against": "Isolation requires greater total mass.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0839",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A soft laminate could isolate an impact from its back face by launching a sideways deformation pulse.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0839",
      "hypothesis": "A soft laminate could isolate an impact from its back face by launching a sideways deformation pulse.",
      "test": "Map front and rear velocities.",
      "against": "Isolation requires greater total mass.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0839",
      "hypothesis": "A soft laminate could isolate an impact from its back face by launching a sideways deformation pulse.",
      "test": "Map front and rear velocities.",
      "against": "Isolation requires greater total mass.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0840",
    "hypothesis": "A fiber's surface chemistry could change friction under load through reversible exposure of buried groups.",
    "test": "Measure group orientation and friction.",
    "against": "Changes require permanent abrasion.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0840",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A fiber's surface chemistry could change friction under load through reversible exposure of buried groups.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0840",
      "hypothesis": "A fiber's surface chemistry could change friction under load through reversible exposure of buried groups.",
      "test": "Measure group orientation and friction.",
      "against": "Changes require permanent abrasion.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0840",
      "hypothesis": "A fiber's surface chemistry could change friction under load through reversible exposure of buried groups.",
      "test": "Measure group orientation and friction.",
      "against": "Changes require permanent abrasion.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0841",
    "hypothesis": "A transparent gel could distinguish crack initiation from bulk yielding through different speckle anisotropies.",
    "test": "Compare optical maps with strain.",
    "against": "Signals cannot separate failure modes.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0841",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A transparent gel could distinguish crack initiation from bulk yielding through different speckle anisotropies.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0841",
      "hypothesis": "A transparent gel could distinguish crack initiation from bulk yielding through different speckle anisotropies.",
      "test": "Compare optical maps with strain.",
      "against": "Signals cannot separate failure modes.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0841",
      "hypothesis": "A transparent gel could distinguish crack initiation from bulk yielding through different speckle anisotropies.",
      "test": "Compare optical maps with strain.",
      "against": "Signals cannot separate failure modes.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0842",
    "hypothesis": "A metal-polymer interface could resist humidity damage by distributing swelling strain across mobile anchors.",
    "test": "Track anchors and bond retention.",
    "against": "Retention follows coating permeability alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0842",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A metal-polymer interface could resist humidity damage by distributing swelling strain across mobile anchors.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0842",
      "hypothesis": "A metal-polymer interface could resist humidity damage by distributing swelling strain across mobile anchors.",
      "test": "Track anchors and bond retention.",
      "against": "Retention follows coating permeability alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0842",
      "hypothesis": "A metal-polymer interface could resist humidity damage by distributing swelling strain across mobile anchors.",
      "test": "Track anchors and bond retention.",
      "against": "Retention follows coating permeability alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0843",
    "hypothesis": "A ceramic grain network could reduce strength variability by allowing weak contacts to rearrange before sintering completes.",
    "test": "Track contacts and final strength.",
    "against": "Rearrangement introduces greater defect variability.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0843",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A ceramic grain network could reduce strength variability by allowing weak contacts to rearrange before sintering completes.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0843",
      "hypothesis": "A ceramic grain network could reduce strength variability by allowing weak contacts to rearrange before sintering completes.",
      "test": "Track contacts and final strength.",
      "against": "Rearrangement introduces greater defect variability.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0843",
      "hypothesis": "A ceramic grain network could reduce strength variability by allowing weak contacts to rearrange before sintering completes.",
      "test": "Track contacts and final strength.",
      "against": "Rearrangement introduces greater defect variability.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0844",
    "hypothesis": "A polymer microcapsule could survive repeated freezing by relocating its weakest seam away from the advancing ice front.",
    "test": "Image seam motion and freezing.",
    "against": "Survival requires thicker walls.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0844",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A polymer microcapsule could survive repeated freezing by relocating its weakest seam away from the advancing ice front.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0844",
      "hypothesis": "A polymer microcapsule could survive repeated freezing by relocating its weakest seam away from the advancing ice front.",
      "test": "Image seam motion and freezing.",
      "against": "Survival requires thicker walls.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0844",
      "hypothesis": "A polymer microcapsule could survive repeated freezing by relocating its weakest seam away from the advancing ice front.",
      "test": "Image seam motion and freezing.",
      "against": "Survival requires thicker walls.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0845",
    "hypothesis": "A woven sheet could self-tighten around a tear through friction-driven rotation of looped fibers.",
    "test": "Track loops and tear growth.",
    "against": "Tightening merely transfers the tear elsewhere.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0845",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A woven sheet could self-tighten around a tear through friction-driven rotation of looped fibers.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0845",
      "hypothesis": "A woven sheet could self-tighten around a tear through friction-driven rotation of looped fibers.",
      "test": "Track loops and tear growth.",
      "against": "Tightening merely transfers the tear elsewhere.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0845",
      "hypothesis": "A woven sheet could self-tighten around a tear through friction-driven rotation of looped fibers.",
      "test": "Track loops and tear growth.",
      "against": "Tightening merely transfers the tear elsewhere.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0846",
    "hypothesis": "A porous hard coating could suppress squeal by absorbing lubricant pressure fluctuations locally.",
    "test": "Measure pressure and sound.",
    "against": "Noise reduction follows mean friction only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0846",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous hard coating could suppress squeal by absorbing lubricant pressure fluctuations locally.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0846",
      "hypothesis": "A porous hard coating could suppress squeal by absorbing lubricant pressure fluctuations locally.",
      "test": "Measure pressure and sound.",
      "against": "Noise reduction follows mean friction only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0846",
      "hypothesis": "A porous hard coating could suppress squeal by absorbing lubricant pressure fluctuations locally.",
      "test": "Measure pressure and sound.",
      "against": "Noise reduction follows mean friction only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0847",
    "hypothesis": "A reversible gel could retain a load-bearing skeleton while selectively replacing damaged solvent-rich regions.",
    "test": "Track exchanged regions and strength.",
    "against": "Replacement disrupts the entire network.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0847",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A reversible gel could retain a load-bearing skeleton while selectively replacing damaged solvent-rich regions.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0847",
      "hypothesis": "A reversible gel could retain a load-bearing skeleton while selectively replacing damaged solvent-rich regions.",
      "test": "Track exchanged regions and strength.",
      "against": "Replacement disrupts the entire network.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0847",
      "hypothesis": "A reversible gel could retain a load-bearing skeleton while selectively replacing damaged solvent-rich regions.",
      "test": "Track exchanged regions and strength.",
      "against": "Replacement disrupts the entire network.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0848",
    "hypothesis": "A composite could expose hidden debonding through thermal phase lag before bulk conductivity changes.",
    "test": "Map thermal phase and interface images.",
    "against": "Lag changes only after conductivity decline.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0848",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A composite could expose hidden debonding through thermal phase lag before bulk conductivity changes.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0848",
      "hypothesis": "A composite could expose hidden debonding through thermal phase lag before bulk conductivity changes.",
      "test": "Map thermal phase and interface images.",
      "against": "Lag changes only after conductivity decline.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0848",
      "hypothesis": "A composite could expose hidden debonding through thermal phase lag before bulk conductivity changes.",
      "test": "Map thermal phase and interface images.",
      "against": "Lag changes only after conductivity decline.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0849",
    "hypothesis": "A polymer sheet could recover optical clarity after scratching by redistributing internal stress rather than closing grooves.",
    "test": "Measure stress and scattering.",
    "against": "Clarity requires topographic healing.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0849",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A polymer sheet could recover optical clarity after scratching by redistributing internal stress rather than closing grooves.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0849",
      "hypothesis": "A polymer sheet could recover optical clarity after scratching by redistributing internal stress rather than closing grooves.",
      "test": "Measure stress and scattering.",
      "against": "Clarity requires topographic healing.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0849",
      "hypothesis": "A polymer sheet could recover optical clarity after scratching by redistributing internal stress rather than closing grooves.",
      "test": "Measure stress and scattering.",
      "against": "Clarity requires topographic healing.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0850",
    "hypothesis": "A ceramic surface could change its wetting anisotropy through elastic rotation of exposed crystal facets.",
    "test": "Measure facets and droplet motion.",
    "against": "Anisotropy requires chemical treatment.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0850",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A ceramic surface could change its wetting anisotropy through elastic rotation of exposed crystal facets.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0850",
      "hypothesis": "A ceramic surface could change its wetting anisotropy through elastic rotation of exposed crystal facets.",
      "test": "Measure facets and droplet motion.",
      "against": "Anisotropy requires chemical treatment.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0850",
      "hypothesis": "A ceramic surface could change its wetting anisotropy through elastic rotation of exposed crystal facets.",
      "test": "Measure facets and droplet motion.",
      "against": "Anisotropy requires chemical treatment.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0851",
    "hypothesis": "A soft gasket could maintain sealing pressure by slowly transferring gas into unloaded internal cells.",
    "test": "Measure cell pressures and leakage.",
    "against": "Sealing follows external compression only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0851",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A soft gasket could maintain sealing pressure by slowly transferring gas into unloaded internal cells.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0851",
      "hypothesis": "A soft gasket could maintain sealing pressure by slowly transferring gas into unloaded internal cells.",
      "test": "Measure cell pressures and leakage.",
      "against": "Sealing follows external compression only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0851",
      "hypothesis": "A soft gasket could maintain sealing pressure by slowly transferring gas into unloaded internal cells.",
      "test": "Measure cell pressures and leakage.",
      "against": "Sealing follows external compression only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0852",
    "hypothesis": "A reinforced film could arrest a tear through reversible folding of embedded ribbons ahead of the tip.",
    "test": "Image ribbons and crack speed.",
    "against": "Arrest requires ribbon breakage.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0852",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A reinforced film could arrest a tear through reversible folding of embedded ribbons ahead of the tip.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0852",
      "hypothesis": "A reinforced film could arrest a tear through reversible folding of embedded ribbons ahead of the tip.",
      "test": "Image ribbons and crack speed.",
      "against": "Arrest requires ribbon breakage.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0852",
      "hypothesis": "A reinforced film could arrest a tear through reversible folding of embedded ribbons ahead of the tip.",
      "test": "Image ribbons and crack speed.",
      "against": "Arrest requires ribbon breakage.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0853",
    "hypothesis": "A conductive composite could preserve signal quality through a crack by rerouting current across reversible particle contacts.",
    "test": "Map current and contact recovery.",
    "against": "Rerouting requires permanent welding.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0853",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A conductive composite could preserve signal quality through a crack by rerouting current across reversible particle contacts.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0853",
      "hypothesis": "A conductive composite could preserve signal quality through a crack by rerouting current across reversible particle contacts.",
      "test": "Map current and contact recovery.",
      "against": "Rerouting requires permanent welding.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0853",
      "hypothesis": "A conductive composite could preserve signal quality through a crack by rerouting current across reversible particle contacts.",
      "test": "Map current and contact recovery.",
      "against": "Rerouting requires permanent welding.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0854",
    "hypothesis": "A fiber mat could detect local overloading through spontaneous mechanical oscillations before irreversible set.",
    "test": "Measure local motion and recovery.",
    "against": "Oscillations appear only after damage.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 4,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 46,
    "literature_query": "fiber mat detect local overloading spontaneous mechanical oscillations irreversible set experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N0854",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A fiber mat could detect local overloading through spontaneous mechanical oscillations before irreversible set.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0854",
      "hypothesis": "A fiber mat could detect local overloading through spontaneous mechanical oscillations before irreversible set.",
      "test": "Measure local motion and recovery.",
      "against": "Oscillations appear only after damage.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0854",
      "hypothesis": "A fiber mat could detect local overloading through spontaneous mechanical oscillations before irreversible set.",
      "test": "Measure local motion and recovery.",
      "against": "Oscillations appear only after damage.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 23,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 46,
      "literature_query": "fiber mat detect local overloading spontaneous mechanical oscillations irreversible set experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "46",
      "id": "N0854",
      "hypothesis": "A fiber mat could detect local overloading through spontaneous mechanical oscillations before irreversible set.",
      "test": "Measure local motion and recovery.",
      "against": "Oscillations appear only after damage.",
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_score": "23",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P3b9f9a975c3c;P39a9d494637f;P6356f6d62568;P89f5ab3fbd26",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N0854",
      "hypothesis": "A fiber mat could detect local overloading through spontaneous mechanical oscillations before irreversible set.",
      "test": "Measure local motion and recovery.",
      "against": "Oscillations appear only after damage.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 23,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 46,
      "literature_query": "fiber mat detect local overloading spontaneous mechanical oscillations irreversible set experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P3b9f9a975c3c;P39a9d494637f;P6356f6d62568;P89f5ab3fbd26",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P3b9f9a975c3c;P39a9d494637f;P6356f6d62568;P89f5ab3fbd26",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0855",
    "hypothesis": "A porous ceramic could reduce chemical degradation by moving reaction-generated vapor away from stressed boundaries.",
    "test": "Measure vapor paths and boundary chemistry.",
    "against": "Protection follows lower reaction rate only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0855",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous ceramic could reduce chemical degradation by moving reaction-generated vapor away from stressed boundaries.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0855",
      "hypothesis": "A porous ceramic could reduce chemical degradation by moving reaction-generated vapor away from stressed boundaries.",
      "test": "Measure vapor paths and boundary chemistry.",
      "against": "Protection follows lower reaction rate only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0855",
      "hypothesis": "A porous ceramic could reduce chemical degradation by moving reaction-generated vapor away from stressed boundaries.",
      "test": "Measure vapor paths and boundary chemistry.",
      "against": "Protection follows lower reaction rate only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0856",
    "hypothesis": "A polymer hinge could retain angle calibration by relocating creep into an auxiliary sacrificial region.",
    "test": "Map strain and angle drift.",
    "against": "Auxiliary creep alters the calibrated angle equally.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0856",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A polymer hinge could retain angle calibration by relocating creep into an auxiliary sacrificial region.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0856",
      "hypothesis": "A polymer hinge could retain angle calibration by relocating creep into an auxiliary sacrificial region.",
      "test": "Map strain and angle drift.",
      "against": "Auxiliary creep alters the calibrated angle equally.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0856",
      "hypothesis": "A polymer hinge could retain angle calibration by relocating creep into an auxiliary sacrificial region.",
      "test": "Map strain and angle drift.",
      "against": "Auxiliary creep alters the calibrated angle equally.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0857",
    "hypothesis": "A particle-filled gel could increase tear resistance through negative-pressure pockets that form only near the crack.",
    "test": "Measure pressure and crack work.",
    "against": "Resistance increase persists without pockets.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0857",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A particle-filled gel could increase tear resistance through negative-pressure pockets that form only near the crack.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0857",
      "hypothesis": "A particle-filled gel could increase tear resistance through negative-pressure pockets that form only near the crack.",
      "test": "Measure pressure and crack work.",
      "against": "Resistance increase persists without pockets.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0857",
      "hypothesis": "A particle-filled gel could increase tear resistance through negative-pressure pockets that form only near the crack.",
      "test": "Measure pressure and crack work.",
      "against": "Resistance increase persists without pockets.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0858",
    "hypothesis": "A layered film could reject abrasion particles by vibrating locally after each collision.",
    "test": "Measure post-impact motion and retention.",
    "against": "Rejection requires externally driven vibration.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0858",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A layered film could reject abrasion particles by vibrating locally after each collision.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0858",
      "hypothesis": "A layered film could reject abrasion particles by vibrating locally after each collision.",
      "test": "Measure post-impact motion and retention.",
      "against": "Rejection requires externally driven vibration.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0858",
      "hypothesis": "A layered film could reject abrasion particles by vibrating locally after each collision.",
      "test": "Measure post-impact motion and retention.",
      "against": "Rejection requires externally driven vibration.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0859",
    "hypothesis": "A metal foil could be sorted by residual stress using its response to a weak acoustic standing field.",
    "test": "Compare motion and stress maps.",
    "against": "Sorting follows thickness alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0859",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A metal foil could be sorted by residual stress using its response to a weak acoustic standing field.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0859",
      "hypothesis": "A metal foil could be sorted by residual stress using its response to a weak acoustic standing field.",
      "test": "Compare motion and stress maps.",
      "against": "Sorting follows thickness alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0859",
      "hypothesis": "A metal foil could be sorted by residual stress using its response to a weak acoustic standing field.",
      "test": "Compare motion and stress maps.",
      "against": "Sorting follows thickness alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0860",
    "hypothesis": "A composite panel could distinguish water ingress from internal cracking through opposite changes in modal coupling.",
    "test": "Introduce faults separately.",
    "against": "Modes cannot distinguish fault types.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 12,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0860",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A composite panel could distinguish water ingress from internal cracking through opposite changes in modal coupling.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0860",
      "hypothesis": "A composite panel could distinguish water ingress from internal cracking through opposite changes in modal coupling.",
      "test": "Introduce faults separately.",
      "against": "Modes cannot distinguish fault types.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0860",
      "hypothesis": "A composite panel could distinguish water ingress from internal cracking through opposite changes in modal coupling.",
      "test": "Introduce faults separately.",
      "against": "Modes cannot distinguish fault types.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 12,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0861",
    "hypothesis": "A synthetic tendon analogue could store repeated loading history in the distribution of reversible crosslink lengths.",
    "test": "Measure crosslinks and mechanical response.",
    "against": "History disappears after force removal.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0861",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A synthetic tendon analogue could store repeated loading history in the distribution of reversible crosslink lengths.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0861",
      "hypothesis": "A synthetic tendon analogue could store repeated loading history in the distribution of reversible crosslink lengths.",
      "test": "Measure crosslinks and mechanical response.",
      "against": "History disappears after force removal.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0861",
      "hypothesis": "A synthetic tendon analogue could store repeated loading history in the distribution of reversible crosslink lengths.",
      "test": "Measure crosslinks and mechanical response.",
      "against": "History disappears after force removal.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0862",
    "hypothesis": "A porous adhesive could release at lower force when detached along its preferred internal drainage direction.",
    "test": "Measure pressure and peel work.",
    "against": "Direction effects follow surface texture only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0862",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous adhesive could release at lower force when detached along its preferred internal drainage direction.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0862",
      "hypothesis": "A porous adhesive could release at lower force when detached along its preferred internal drainage direction.",
      "test": "Measure pressure and peel work.",
      "against": "Direction effects follow surface texture only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0862",
      "hypothesis": "A porous adhesive could release at lower force when detached along its preferred internal drainage direction.",
      "test": "Measure pressure and peel work.",
      "against": "Direction effects follow surface texture only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0863",
    "hypothesis": "A ceramic microstructure could scatter damaging stress waves while transmitting useful low-frequency motion through rotational defects.",
    "test": "Measure broadband transmission.",
    "against": "Isolation suppresses both bands equally.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0863",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A ceramic microstructure could scatter damaging stress waves while transmitting useful low-frequency motion through rotational defects.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0863",
      "hypothesis": "A ceramic microstructure could scatter damaging stress waves while transmitting useful low-frequency motion through rotational defects.",
      "test": "Measure broadband transmission.",
      "against": "Isolation suppresses both bands equally.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0863",
      "hypothesis": "A ceramic microstructure could scatter damaging stress waves while transmitting useful low-frequency motion through rotational defects.",
      "test": "Measure broadband transmission.",
      "against": "Isolation suppresses both bands equally.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0864",
    "hypothesis": "A polymer coating could self-limit solvent uptake by mechanically sealing its most permeable domains.",
    "test": "Image domains and uptake rates.",
    "against": "Sealing requires permanent chemical change.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0864",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A polymer coating could self-limit solvent uptake by mechanically sealing its most permeable domains.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0864",
      "hypothesis": "A polymer coating could self-limit solvent uptake by mechanically sealing its most permeable domains.",
      "test": "Image domains and uptake rates.",
      "against": "Sealing requires permanent chemical change.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0864",
      "hypothesis": "A polymer coating could self-limit solvent uptake by mechanically sealing its most permeable domains.",
      "test": "Image domains and uptake rates.",
      "against": "Sealing requires permanent chemical change.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0865",
    "hypothesis": "A fiber composite could reveal manufacturing misalignment through passive thermal expansion patterns without destructive imaging.",
    "test": "Compare patterns with known alignment.",
    "against": "Patterns reflect thickness variations only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0865",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A fiber composite could reveal manufacturing misalignment through passive thermal expansion patterns without destructive imaging.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0865",
      "hypothesis": "A fiber composite could reveal manufacturing misalignment through passive thermal expansion patterns without destructive imaging.",
      "test": "Compare patterns with known alignment.",
      "against": "Patterns reflect thickness variations only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0865",
      "hypothesis": "A fiber composite could reveal manufacturing misalignment through passive thermal expansion patterns without destructive imaging.",
      "test": "Compare patterns with known alignment.",
      "against": "Patterns reflect thickness variations only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0866",
    "hypothesis": "A soft seal could reject dust by cycling contact area during normal pressure fluctuations.",
    "test": "Track contact and particle removal.",
    "against": "Removal requires increased leakage.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0866",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A soft seal could reject dust by cycling contact area during normal pressure fluctuations.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0866",
      "hypothesis": "A soft seal could reject dust by cycling contact area during normal pressure fluctuations.",
      "test": "Track contact and particle removal.",
      "against": "Removal requires increased leakage.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0866",
      "hypothesis": "A soft seal could reject dust by cycling contact area during normal pressure fluctuations.",
      "test": "Track contact and particle removal.",
      "against": "Removal requires increased leakage.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0867",
    "hypothesis": "A brittle crystal could become tougher through reversible motion of a nonreactive internal liquid inclusion.",
    "test": "Measure inclusion motion and fracture.",
    "against": "Toughness follows hydrostatic compression alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0867",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A brittle crystal could become tougher through reversible motion of a nonreactive internal liquid inclusion.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0867",
      "hypothesis": "A brittle crystal could become tougher through reversible motion of a nonreactive internal liquid inclusion.",
      "test": "Measure inclusion motion and fracture.",
      "against": "Toughness follows hydrostatic compression alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0867",
      "hypothesis": "A brittle crystal could become tougher through reversible motion of a nonreactive internal liquid inclusion.",
      "test": "Measure inclusion motion and fracture.",
      "against": "Toughness follows hydrostatic compression alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0868",
    "hypothesis": "A porous elastomer could direct a tear toward a predefined removable edge through gas-pressure redistribution.",
    "test": "Image pressure and crack direction.",
    "against": "Steering follows weakened material paths only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0868",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous elastomer could direct a tear toward a predefined removable edge through gas-pressure redistribution.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0868",
      "hypothesis": "A porous elastomer could direct a tear toward a predefined removable edge through gas-pressure redistribution.",
      "test": "Image pressure and crack direction.",
      "against": "Steering follows weakened material paths only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0868",
      "hypothesis": "A porous elastomer could direct a tear toward a predefined removable edge through gas-pressure redistribution.",
      "test": "Image pressure and crack direction.",
      "against": "Steering follows weakened material paths only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0869",
    "hypothesis": "A polymer joint could preserve stiffness during aging by exchanging load among chemically identical reversible bonds.",
    "test": "Measure bond kinetics and stiffness.",
    "against": "Stability requires permanent crosslink formation.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0869",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A polymer joint could preserve stiffness during aging by exchanging load among chemically identical reversible bonds.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0869",
      "hypothesis": "A polymer joint could preserve stiffness during aging by exchanging load among chemically identical reversible bonds.",
      "test": "Measure bond kinetics and stiffness.",
      "against": "Stability requires permanent crosslink formation.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0869",
      "hypothesis": "A polymer joint could preserve stiffness during aging by exchanging load among chemically identical reversible bonds.",
      "test": "Measure bond kinetics and stiffness.",
      "against": "Stability requires permanent crosslink formation.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0870",
    "hypothesis": "A woven optical fiber mat could locate damage from the loss of reciprocal light paths.",
    "test": "Introduce blinded cuts.",
    "against": "Localization fails beyond simple intensity loss.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 4,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 22,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 65,
    "literature_query": "woven optical fiber mat locate damage loss reciprocal light paths experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N0870",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A woven optical fiber mat could locate damage from the loss of reciprocal light paths.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0870",
      "hypothesis": "A woven optical fiber mat could locate damage from the loss of reciprocal light paths.",
      "test": "Introduce blinded cuts.",
      "against": "Localization fails beyond simple intensity loss.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0870",
      "hypothesis": "A woven optical fiber mat could locate damage from the loss of reciprocal light paths.",
      "test": "Introduce blinded cuts.",
      "against": "Localization fails beyond simple intensity loss.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 22,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 65,
      "literature_query": "woven optical fiber mat locate damage loss reciprocal light paths experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "65",
      "id": "N0870",
      "hypothesis": "A woven optical fiber mat could locate damage from the loss of reciprocal light paths.",
      "test": "Introduce blinded cuts.",
      "against": "Localization fails beyond simple intensity loss.",
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_score": "22",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pd2633b47e6c0",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N0870",
      "hypothesis": "A woven optical fiber mat could locate damage from the loss of reciprocal light paths.",
      "test": "Introduce blinded cuts.",
      "against": "Localization fails beyond simple intensity loss.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 22,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 65,
      "literature_query": "woven optical fiber mat locate damage loss reciprocal light paths experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pd2633b47e6c0",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "Pd2633b47e6c0",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0871",
    "hypothesis": "A ceramic-particle film could redistribute heat more uniformly when particles rotate slightly under thermal stress.",
    "test": "Measure orientation and temperature.",
    "against": "Uniformity changes require cracking.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0871",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A ceramic-particle film could redistribute heat more uniformly when particles rotate slightly under thermal stress.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0871",
      "hypothesis": "A ceramic-particle film could redistribute heat more uniformly when particles rotate slightly under thermal stress.",
      "test": "Measure orientation and temperature.",
      "against": "Uniformity changes require cracking.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0871",
      "hypothesis": "A ceramic-particle film could redistribute heat more uniformly when particles rotate slightly under thermal stress.",
      "test": "Measure orientation and temperature.",
      "against": "Uniformity changes require cracking.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0872",
    "hypothesis": "A gel could reduce hysteresis by draining solvent only from high-strain regions during unloading.",
    "test": "Map flow and mechanical loops.",
    "against": "Hysteresis falls only with less total strain.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0872",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A gel could reduce hysteresis by draining solvent only from high-strain regions during unloading.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0872",
      "hypothesis": "A gel could reduce hysteresis by draining solvent only from high-strain regions during unloading.",
      "test": "Map flow and mechanical loops.",
      "against": "Hysteresis falls only with less total strain.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0872",
      "hypothesis": "A gel could reduce hysteresis by draining solvent only from high-strain regions during unloading.",
      "test": "Map flow and mechanical loops.",
      "against": "Hysteresis falls only with less total strain.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0873",
    "hypothesis": "A soft shell could resist localized heating by moving its internal insulating layer toward the hotspot.",
    "test": "Track layer motion and temperature.",
    "against": "Protection follows bulk expansion alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0873",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A soft shell could resist localized heating by moving its internal insulating layer toward the hotspot.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0873",
      "hypothesis": "A soft shell could resist localized heating by moving its internal insulating layer toward the hotspot.",
      "test": "Track layer motion and temperature.",
      "against": "Protection follows bulk expansion alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0873",
      "hypothesis": "A soft shell could resist localized heating by moving its internal insulating layer toward the hotspot.",
      "test": "Track layer motion and temperature.",
      "against": "Protection follows bulk expansion alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0874",
    "hypothesis": "A polymer's acoustic damping could reveal whether aging created chain scission or new crosslinks.",
    "test": "Compare independently characterized aging routes.",
    "against": "Damping signatures remain indistinguishable.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0874",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A polymer's acoustic damping could reveal whether aging created chain scission or new crosslinks.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0874",
      "hypothesis": "A polymer's acoustic damping could reveal whether aging created chain scission or new crosslinks.",
      "test": "Compare independently characterized aging routes.",
      "against": "Damping signatures remain indistinguishable.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0874",
      "hypothesis": "A polymer's acoustic damping could reveal whether aging created chain scission or new crosslinks.",
      "test": "Compare independently characterized aging routes.",
      "against": "Damping signatures remain indistinguishable.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0875",
    "hypothesis": "A particulate coating could protect a surface by shedding aggregates at a critical stored elastic energy.",
    "test": "Measure coating strain and shedding.",
    "against": "Shedding follows impact energy only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0875",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A particulate coating could protect a surface by shedding aggregates at a critical stored elastic energy.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0875",
      "hypothesis": "A particulate coating could protect a surface by shedding aggregates at a critical stored elastic energy.",
      "test": "Measure coating strain and shedding.",
      "against": "Shedding follows impact energy only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0875",
      "hypothesis": "A particulate coating could protect a surface by shedding aggregates at a critical stored elastic energy.",
      "test": "Measure coating strain and shedding.",
      "against": "Shedding follows impact energy only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0876",
    "hypothesis": "A fiber bundle could resist sudden overload by transferring force through capillary bridges before dry contacts engage.",
    "test": "Measure force and liquid distribution.",
    "against": "Protection requires increased steady preload.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0876",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A fiber bundle could resist sudden overload by transferring force through capillary bridges before dry contacts engage.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0876",
      "hypothesis": "A fiber bundle could resist sudden overload by transferring force through capillary bridges before dry contacts engage.",
      "test": "Measure force and liquid distribution.",
      "against": "Protection requires increased steady preload.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0876",
      "hypothesis": "A fiber bundle could resist sudden overload by transferring force through capillary bridges before dry contacts engage.",
      "test": "Measure force and liquid distribution.",
      "against": "Protection requires increased steady preload.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0877",
    "hypothesis": "A ceramic interface could reduce moisture-driven crack growth through reversible ion migration that relaxes local stress.",
    "test": "Map ions and stress.",
    "against": "Crack slowing follows chemical passivation only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0877",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A ceramic interface could reduce moisture-driven crack growth through reversible ion migration that relaxes local stress.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0877",
      "hypothesis": "A ceramic interface could reduce moisture-driven crack growth through reversible ion migration that relaxes local stress.",
      "test": "Map ions and stress.",
      "against": "Crack slowing follows chemical passivation only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0877",
      "hypothesis": "A ceramic interface could reduce moisture-driven crack growth through reversible ion migration that relaxes local stress.",
      "test": "Map ions and stress.",
      "against": "Crack slowing follows chemical passivation only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0878",
    "hypothesis": "A soft transparent solid could visualize the direction of a recent pressure wave through delayed anisotropic swelling.",
    "test": "Measure swelling after known waves.",
    "against": "Anisotropy follows boundary restraint alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0878",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A soft transparent solid could visualize the direction of a recent pressure wave through delayed anisotropic swelling.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0878",
      "hypothesis": "A soft transparent solid could visualize the direction of a recent pressure wave through delayed anisotropic swelling.",
      "test": "Measure swelling after known waves.",
      "against": "Anisotropy follows boundary restraint alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0878",
      "hypothesis": "A soft transparent solid could visualize the direction of a recent pressure wave through delayed anisotropic swelling.",
      "test": "Measure swelling after known waves.",
      "against": "Anisotropy follows boundary restraint alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0879",
    "hypothesis": "A polymer membrane could retain high permeability while rejecting a foulant through reversible surface buckling.",
    "test": "Measure flux and foulant contact.",
    "against": "Rejection requires lower permeability.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0879",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A polymer membrane could retain high permeability while rejecting a foulant through reversible surface buckling.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0879",
      "hypothesis": "A polymer membrane could retain high permeability while rejecting a foulant through reversible surface buckling.",
      "test": "Measure flux and foulant contact.",
      "against": "Rejection requires lower permeability.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0879",
      "hypothesis": "A polymer membrane could retain high permeability while rejecting a foulant through reversible surface buckling.",
      "test": "Measure flux and foulant contact.",
      "against": "Rejection requires lower permeability.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0880",
    "hypothesis": "A composite spring could maintain its resonant frequency during fatigue through opposing stiffness changes in two phases.",
    "test": "Track phase moduli and resonance.",
    "against": "Compensation fails before useful lifetime.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0880",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A composite spring could maintain its resonant frequency during fatigue through opposing stiffness changes in two phases.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0880",
      "hypothesis": "A composite spring could maintain its resonant frequency during fatigue through opposing stiffness changes in two phases.",
      "test": "Track phase moduli and resonance.",
      "against": "Compensation fails before useful lifetime.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0880",
      "hypothesis": "A composite spring could maintain its resonant frequency during fatigue through opposing stiffness changes in two phases.",
      "test": "Track phase moduli and resonance.",
      "against": "Compensation fails before useful lifetime.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0881",
    "hypothesis": "A porous film could detect internal delamination by reversing vapor-flow direction and comparing acoustic transients.",
    "test": "Introduce known defects.",
    "against": "Transients remain directionally identical.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 12,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0881",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous film could detect internal delamination by reversing vapor-flow direction and comparing acoustic transients.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0881",
      "hypothesis": "A porous film could detect internal delamination by reversing vapor-flow direction and comparing acoustic transients.",
      "test": "Introduce known defects.",
      "against": "Transients remain directionally identical.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0881",
      "hypothesis": "A porous film could detect internal delamination by reversing vapor-flow direction and comparing acoustic transients.",
      "test": "Introduce known defects.",
      "against": "Transients remain directionally identical.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 12,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0882",
    "hypothesis": "A synthetic ligament analogue could dissipate repeated strain through reversible sliding of chemically uniform helical bundles.",
    "test": "Measure bundle motion and hysteresis.",
    "against": "Damping requires molecular damage.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0882",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A synthetic ligament analogue could dissipate repeated strain through reversible sliding of chemically uniform helical bundles.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0882",
      "hypothesis": "A synthetic ligament analogue could dissipate repeated strain through reversible sliding of chemically uniform helical bundles.",
      "test": "Measure bundle motion and hysteresis.",
      "against": "Damping requires molecular damage.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0882",
      "hypothesis": "A synthetic ligament analogue could dissipate repeated strain through reversible sliding of chemically uniform helical bundles.",
      "test": "Measure bundle motion and hysteresis.",
      "against": "Damping requires molecular damage.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0883",
    "hypothesis": "A hard coating could reduce its own surface stress by ejecting trapped gas through newly formed safe micropaths.",
    "test": "Measure gas release and stress.",
    "against": "Relaxation requires damaging cracks.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0883",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A hard coating could reduce its own surface stress by ejecting trapped gas through newly formed safe micropaths.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0883",
      "hypothesis": "A hard coating could reduce its own surface stress by ejecting trapped gas through newly formed safe micropaths.",
      "test": "Measure gas release and stress.",
      "against": "Relaxation requires damaging cracks.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0883",
      "hypothesis": "A hard coating could reduce its own surface stress by ejecting trapped gas through newly formed safe micropaths.",
      "test": "Measure gas release and stress.",
      "against": "Relaxation requires damaging cracks.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0884",
    "hypothesis": "A gel-particle packing could transmit force differently after a single particle changes permeability without changing stiffness.",
    "test": "Measure force networks and solvent flow.",
    "against": "Changes follow particle stiffness only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0884",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A gel-particle packing could transmit force differently after a single particle changes permeability without changing stiffness.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0884",
      "hypothesis": "A gel-particle packing could transmit force differently after a single particle changes permeability without changing stiffness.",
      "test": "Measure force networks and solvent flow.",
      "against": "Changes follow particle stiffness only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0884",
      "hypothesis": "A gel-particle packing could transmit force differently after a single particle changes permeability without changing stiffness.",
      "test": "Measure force networks and solvent flow.",
      "against": "Changes follow particle stiffness only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0885",
    "hypothesis": "A layered polymer could reduce crack-tip heating by sending a cooling solvent pulse ahead of the crack.",
    "test": "Image temperature and solvent motion.",
    "against": "Cooling occurs only behind the tip.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0885",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A layered polymer could reduce crack-tip heating by sending a cooling solvent pulse ahead of the crack.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0885",
      "hypothesis": "A layered polymer could reduce crack-tip heating by sending a cooling solvent pulse ahead of the crack.",
      "test": "Image temperature and solvent motion.",
      "against": "Cooling occurs only behind the tip.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0885",
      "hypothesis": "A layered polymer could reduce crack-tip heating by sending a cooling solvent pulse ahead of the crack.",
      "test": "Image temperature and solvent motion.",
      "against": "Cooling occurs only behind the tip.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0886",
    "hypothesis": "A fibrous separator could preserve filtration selectivity under stretch by rotating pores instead of enlarging them.",
    "test": "Measure pore geometry and rejection.",
    "against": "Selectivity falls with any useful stretch.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0886",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A fibrous separator could preserve filtration selectivity under stretch by rotating pores instead of enlarging them.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0886",
      "hypothesis": "A fibrous separator could preserve filtration selectivity under stretch by rotating pores instead of enlarging them.",
      "test": "Measure pore geometry and rejection.",
      "against": "Selectivity falls with any useful stretch.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0886",
      "hypothesis": "A fibrous separator could preserve filtration selectivity under stretch by rotating pores instead of enlarging them.",
      "test": "Measure pore geometry and rejection.",
      "against": "Selectivity falls with any useful stretch.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0887",
    "hypothesis": "A ceramic surface could retain a reversible chemical gradient through strain-dependent adsorption at equivalent sites.",
    "test": "Measure strain and coverage.",
    "against": "Gradient follows permanent defects only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0887",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A ceramic surface could retain a reversible chemical gradient through strain-dependent adsorption at equivalent sites.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0887",
      "hypothesis": "A ceramic surface could retain a reversible chemical gradient through strain-dependent adsorption at equivalent sites.",
      "test": "Measure strain and coverage.",
      "against": "Gradient follows permanent defects only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0887",
      "hypothesis": "A ceramic surface could retain a reversible chemical gradient through strain-dependent adsorption at equivalent sites.",
      "test": "Measure strain and coverage.",
      "against": "Gradient follows permanent defects only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0888",
    "hypothesis": "A soft mechanical fastener could release selectively under torsion while retaining equal tensile strength.",
    "test": "Measure loading-mode failure maps.",
    "against": "Selectivity requires lower overall strength.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0888",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A soft mechanical fastener could release selectively under torsion while retaining equal tensile strength.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0888",
      "hypothesis": "A soft mechanical fastener could release selectively under torsion while retaining equal tensile strength.",
      "test": "Measure loading-mode failure maps.",
      "against": "Selectivity requires lower overall strength.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0888",
      "hypothesis": "A soft mechanical fastener could release selectively under torsion while retaining equal tensile strength.",
      "test": "Measure loading-mode failure maps.",
      "against": "Selectivity requires lower overall strength.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0889",
    "hypothesis": "A polymer foam could identify its own densification limit through a sharp change in internal airflow noise.",
    "test": "Measure sound and compression.",
    "against": "Noise follows external leakage only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0889",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A polymer foam could identify its own densification limit through a sharp change in internal airflow noise.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0889",
      "hypothesis": "A polymer foam could identify its own densification limit through a sharp change in internal airflow noise.",
      "test": "Measure sound and compression.",
      "against": "Noise follows external leakage only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0889",
      "hypothesis": "A polymer foam could identify its own densification limit through a sharp change in internal airflow noise.",
      "test": "Measure sound and compression.",
      "against": "Noise follows external leakage only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0890",
    "hypothesis": "A composite film could reduce optical distortion by moving strain into a refractively matched phase.",
    "test": "Measure strain maps and imaging quality.",
    "against": "Improvement follows reduced total strain only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0890",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A composite film could reduce optical distortion by moving strain into a refractively matched phase.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0890",
      "hypothesis": "A composite film could reduce optical distortion by moving strain into a refractively matched phase.",
      "test": "Measure strain maps and imaging quality.",
      "against": "Improvement follows reduced total strain only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0890",
      "hypothesis": "A composite film could reduce optical distortion by moving strain into a refractively matched phase.",
      "test": "Measure strain maps and imaging quality.",
      "against": "Improvement follows reduced total strain only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0891",
    "hypothesis": "A porous rigid scaffold could stabilize a gel's volume through reversible liquid storage in mechanically isolated cavities.",
    "test": "Measure cavity filling and dimensions.",
    "against": "Stability requires external solvent supply.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0891",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous rigid scaffold could stabilize a gel's volume through reversible liquid storage in mechanically isolated cavities.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0891",
      "hypothesis": "A porous rigid scaffold could stabilize a gel's volume through reversible liquid storage in mechanically isolated cavities.",
      "test": "Measure cavity filling and dimensions.",
      "against": "Stability requires external solvent supply.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0891",
      "hypothesis": "A porous rigid scaffold could stabilize a gel's volume through reversible liquid storage in mechanically isolated cavities.",
      "test": "Measure cavity filling and dimensions.",
      "against": "Stability requires external solvent supply.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0892",
    "hypothesis": "A metal surface could reveal subcritical fatigue through changes in wetting-front roughness after cleaning.",
    "test": "Compare fronts and independent damage maps.",
    "against": "Roughness follows contamination alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0892",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A metal surface could reveal subcritical fatigue through changes in wetting-front roughness after cleaning.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0892",
      "hypothesis": "A metal surface could reveal subcritical fatigue through changes in wetting-front roughness after cleaning.",
      "test": "Compare fronts and independent damage maps.",
      "against": "Roughness follows contamination alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0892",
      "hypothesis": "A metal surface could reveal subcritical fatigue through changes in wetting-front roughness after cleaning.",
      "test": "Compare fronts and independent damage maps.",
      "against": "Roughness follows contamination alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0893",
    "hypothesis": "A fiber-reinforced coating could prevent blister growth by routing gas along the fibers toward safe vents.",
    "test": "Track gas and blisters.",
    "against": "Venting requires coating debonding.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0893",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A fiber-reinforced coating could prevent blister growth by routing gas along the fibers toward safe vents.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0893",
      "hypothesis": "A fiber-reinforced coating could prevent blister growth by routing gas along the fibers toward safe vents.",
      "test": "Track gas and blisters.",
      "against": "Venting requires coating debonding.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0893",
      "hypothesis": "A fiber-reinforced coating could prevent blister growth by routing gas along the fibers toward safe vents.",
      "test": "Track gas and blisters.",
      "against": "Venting requires coating debonding.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0894",
    "hypothesis": "A soft lattice could recover after collapse by storing an asymmetry in small reversible contact bonds.",
    "test": "Measure contacts and recovery direction.",
    "against": "Recovery requires external guidance.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0894",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A soft lattice could recover after collapse by storing an asymmetry in small reversible contact bonds.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0894",
      "hypothesis": "A soft lattice could recover after collapse by storing an asymmetry in small reversible contact bonds.",
      "test": "Measure contacts and recovery direction.",
      "against": "Recovery requires external guidance.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0894",
      "hypothesis": "A soft lattice could recover after collapse by storing an asymmetry in small reversible contact bonds.",
      "test": "Measure contacts and recovery direction.",
      "against": "Recovery requires external guidance.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0895",
    "hypothesis": "A polymer coating could distinguish heat aging from ultraviolet aging through different solvent-uptake spatial correlations.",
    "test": "Calibrate aging routes.",
    "against": "Maps reflect damage amount only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0895",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A polymer coating could distinguish heat aging from ultraviolet aging through different solvent-uptake spatial correlations.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0895",
      "hypothesis": "A polymer coating could distinguish heat aging from ultraviolet aging through different solvent-uptake spatial correlations.",
      "test": "Calibrate aging routes.",
      "against": "Maps reflect damage amount only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0895",
      "hypothesis": "A polymer coating could distinguish heat aging from ultraviolet aging through different solvent-uptake spatial correlations.",
      "test": "Calibrate aging routes.",
      "against": "Maps reflect damage amount only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0896",
    "hypothesis": "A ceramic foam could store mechanical load direction as a reversible arrangement of adsorbed water.",
    "test": "Measure water maps after unloading.",
    "against": "Arrangement follows gravity alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0896",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A ceramic foam could store mechanical load direction as a reversible arrangement of adsorbed water.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0896",
      "hypothesis": "A ceramic foam could store mechanical load direction as a reversible arrangement of adsorbed water.",
      "test": "Measure water maps after unloading.",
      "against": "Arrangement follows gravity alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0896",
      "hypothesis": "A ceramic foam could store mechanical load direction as a reversible arrangement of adsorbed water.",
      "test": "Measure water maps after unloading.",
      "against": "Arrangement follows gravity alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0897",
    "hypothesis": "A transparent adhesive could reduce bond-edge stress by mechanically migrating its free surface inward during cure.",
    "test": "Track geometry and residual stress.",
    "against": "Stress reduction requires lost bonded area.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0897",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A transparent adhesive could reduce bond-edge stress by mechanically migrating its free surface inward during cure.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0897",
      "hypothesis": "A transparent adhesive could reduce bond-edge stress by mechanically migrating its free surface inward during cure.",
      "test": "Track geometry and residual stress.",
      "against": "Stress reduction requires lost bonded area.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0897",
      "hypothesis": "A transparent adhesive could reduce bond-edge stress by mechanically migrating its free surface inward during cure.",
      "test": "Track geometry and residual stress.",
      "against": "Stress reduction requires lost bonded area.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0898",
    "hypothesis": "A particulate solid could become easier to machine when an inert fluid selectively weakens non-load-bearing contacts.",
    "test": "Measure cutting work and retained strength.",
    "against": "Machinability gains require bulk weakening.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0898",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A particulate solid could become easier to machine when an inert fluid selectively weakens non-load-bearing contacts.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0898",
      "hypothesis": "A particulate solid could become easier to machine when an inert fluid selectively weakens non-load-bearing contacts.",
      "test": "Measure cutting work and retained strength.",
      "against": "Machinability gains require bulk weakening.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0898",
      "hypothesis": "A particulate solid could become easier to machine when an inert fluid selectively weakens non-load-bearing contacts.",
      "test": "Measure cutting work and retained strength.",
      "against": "Machinability gains require bulk weakening.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0899",
    "hypothesis": "A gel laminate could retain shape accuracy by redistributing osmotic pressure between adjacent layers after motion stops.",
    "test": "Measure pressure and shape drift.",
    "against": "Correction requires additional stimulus input.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0899",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A gel laminate could retain shape accuracy by redistributing osmotic pressure between adjacent layers after motion stops.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0899",
      "hypothesis": "A gel laminate could retain shape accuracy by redistributing osmotic pressure between adjacent layers after motion stops.",
      "test": "Measure pressure and shape drift.",
      "against": "Correction requires additional stimulus input.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0899",
      "hypothesis": "A gel laminate could retain shape accuracy by redistributing osmotic pressure between adjacent layers after motion stops.",
      "test": "Measure pressure and shape drift.",
      "against": "Correction requires additional stimulus input.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0900",
    "hypothesis": "A falling liquid sheet could retain nozzle asymmetry as a persistent pattern of thickness fluctuations after its mean shape becomes symmetric.",
    "test": "Measure thickness downstream.",
    "against": "Fluctuations lose directional memory immediately.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0900",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A falling liquid sheet could retain nozzle asymmetry as a persistent pattern of thickness fluctuations after its mean shape becomes symmetric.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0900",
      "hypothesis": "A falling liquid sheet could retain nozzle asymmetry as a persistent pattern of thickness fluctuations after its mean shape becomes symmetric.",
      "test": "Measure thickness downstream.",
      "against": "Fluctuations lose directional memory immediately.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0900",
      "hypothesis": "A falling liquid sheet could retain nozzle asymmetry as a persistent pattern of thickness fluctuations after its mean shape becomes symmetric.",
      "test": "Measure thickness downstream.",
      "against": "Fluctuations lose directional memory immediately.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0901",
    "hypothesis": "A droplet pair could exchange solute through a vapor bridge without measurable net water transfer.",
    "test": "Track solute and water separately.",
    "against": "Transfer requires liquid contact.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0901",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A droplet pair could exchange solute through a vapor bridge without measurable net water transfer.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0901",
      "hypothesis": "A droplet pair could exchange solute through a vapor bridge without measurable net water transfer.",
      "test": "Track solute and water separately.",
      "against": "Transfer requires liquid contact.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0901",
      "hypothesis": "A droplet pair could exchange solute through a vapor bridge without measurable net water transfer.",
      "test": "Track solute and water separately.",
      "against": "Transfer requires liquid contact.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0902",
    "hypothesis": "A viscoelastic jet could avoid breakup when a weak lateral oscillation disrupts synchronized necking.",
    "test": "Measure neck timing and fragments.",
    "against": "Stability requires lower flow speed.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0902",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A viscoelastic jet could avoid breakup when a weak lateral oscillation disrupts synchronized necking.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0902",
      "hypothesis": "A viscoelastic jet could avoid breakup when a weak lateral oscillation disrupts synchronized necking.",
      "test": "Measure neck timing and fragments.",
      "against": "Stability requires lower flow speed.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0902",
      "hypothesis": "A viscoelastic jet could avoid breakup when a weak lateral oscillation disrupts synchronized necking.",
      "test": "Measure neck timing and fragments.",
      "against": "Stability requires lower flow speed.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0903",
    "hypothesis": "A shallow pool could transport suspended particles toward cooler regions through deformation of its free surface rather than thermophoresis.",
    "test": "Track flow and particles.",
    "against": "Motion persists with a rigid interface.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0903",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A shallow pool could transport suspended particles toward cooler regions through deformation of its free surface rather than thermophoresis.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0903",
      "hypothesis": "A shallow pool could transport suspended particles toward cooler regions through deformation of its free surface rather than thermophoresis.",
      "test": "Track flow and particles.",
      "against": "Motion persists with a rigid interface.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0903",
      "hypothesis": "A shallow pool could transport suspended particles toward cooler regions through deformation of its free surface rather than thermophoresis.",
      "test": "Track flow and particles.",
      "against": "Motion persists with a rigid interface.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0904",
    "hypothesis": "A porous wall could suppress vortex shedding by breathing fluid only near pressure extrema.",
    "test": "Measure wall flux and wake.",
    "against": "Suppression requires substantial net suction.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0904",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous wall could suppress vortex shedding by breathing fluid only near pressure extrema.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0904",
      "hypothesis": "A porous wall could suppress vortex shedding by breathing fluid only near pressure extrema.",
      "test": "Measure wall flux and wake.",
      "against": "Suppression requires substantial net suction.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0904",
      "hypothesis": "A porous wall could suppress vortex shedding by breathing fluid only near pressure extrema.",
      "test": "Measure wall flux and wake.",
      "against": "Suppression requires substantial net suction.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0905",
    "hypothesis": "A bubble could identify liquid elastic memory through its asymmetric rebound after collapse stops short of cavitation.",
    "test": "Measure shape and rheology.",
    "against": "Asymmetry follows viscosity alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0905",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A bubble could identify liquid elastic memory through its asymmetric rebound after collapse stops short of cavitation.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0905",
      "hypothesis": "A bubble could identify liquid elastic memory through its asymmetric rebound after collapse stops short of cavitation.",
      "test": "Measure shape and rheology.",
      "against": "Asymmetry follows viscosity alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0905",
      "hypothesis": "A bubble could identify liquid elastic memory through its asymmetric rebound after collapse stops short of cavitation.",
      "test": "Measure shape and rheology.",
      "against": "Asymmetry follows viscosity alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0906",
    "hypothesis": "A floating ring could stabilize a droplet against coalescence by redistributing capillary waves.",
    "test": "Image interface waves and contact.",
    "against": "Protection requires chemical surfactants.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0906",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A floating ring could stabilize a droplet against coalescence by redistributing capillary waves.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0906",
      "hypothesis": "A floating ring could stabilize a droplet against coalescence by redistributing capillary waves.",
      "test": "Image interface waves and contact.",
      "against": "Protection requires chemical surfactants.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0906",
      "hypothesis": "A floating ring could stabilize a droplet against coalescence by redistributing capillary waves.",
      "test": "Image interface waves and contact.",
      "against": "Protection requires chemical surfactants.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0907",
    "hypothesis": "A liquid film could reject particles through traveling thickness minima generated by its own drainage.",
    "test": "Track particles and film shape.",
    "against": "Rejection follows mean flow only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0907",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A liquid film could reject particles through traveling thickness minima generated by its own drainage.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0907",
      "hypothesis": "A liquid film could reject particles through traveling thickness minima generated by its own drainage.",
      "test": "Track particles and film shape.",
      "against": "Rejection follows mean flow only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0907",
      "hypothesis": "A liquid film could reject particles through traveling thickness minima generated by its own drainage.",
      "test": "Track particles and film shape.",
      "against": "Rejection follows mean flow only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0908",
    "hypothesis": "A compliant pipe could develop a reversible flow bottleneck that limits acceleration more than steady flow.",
    "test": "Measure pressure-flow transients.",
    "against": "Steady conductance falls equally.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0908",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A compliant pipe could develop a reversible flow bottleneck that limits acceleration more than steady flow.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0908",
      "hypothesis": "A compliant pipe could develop a reversible flow bottleneck that limits acceleration more than steady flow.",
      "test": "Measure pressure-flow transients.",
      "against": "Steady conductance falls equally.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0908",
      "hypothesis": "A compliant pipe could develop a reversible flow bottleneck that limits acceleration more than steady flow.",
      "test": "Measure pressure-flow transients.",
      "against": "Steady conductance falls equally.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0909",
    "hypothesis": "A soft capsule could select a branching path according to the phase of its internal fluid circulation.",
    "test": "Track circulation and routes.",
    "against": "Routing follows position alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0909",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A soft capsule could select a branching path according to the phase of its internal fluid circulation.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0909",
      "hypothesis": "A soft capsule could select a branching path according to the phase of its internal fluid circulation.",
      "test": "Track circulation and routes.",
      "against": "Routing follows position alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0909",
      "hypothesis": "A soft capsule could select a branching path according to the phase of its internal fluid circulation.",
      "test": "Track circulation and routes.",
      "against": "Routing follows position alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0910",
    "hypothesis": "A rotating liquid layer could separate particles of equal density by rotational drag anisotropy.",
    "test": "Measure orientation and migration.",
    "against": "Separation follows density differences.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0910",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A rotating liquid layer could separate particles of equal density by rotational drag anisotropy.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0910",
      "hypothesis": "A rotating liquid layer could separate particles of equal density by rotational drag anisotropy.",
      "test": "Measure orientation and migration.",
      "against": "Separation follows density differences.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0910",
      "hypothesis": "A rotating liquid layer could separate particles of equal density by rotational drag anisotropy.",
      "test": "Measure orientation and migration.",
      "against": "Separation follows density differences.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0911",
    "hypothesis": "A pinned droplet could erase a chemical gradient through acoustic streaming while preserving a temperature gradient.",
    "test": "Map both fields.",
    "against": "Both gradients decay proportionally.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0911",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A pinned droplet could erase a chemical gradient through acoustic streaming while preserving a temperature gradient.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0911",
      "hypothesis": "A pinned droplet could erase a chemical gradient through acoustic streaming while preserving a temperature gradient.",
      "test": "Map both fields.",
      "against": "Both gradients decay proportionally.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0911",
      "hypothesis": "A pinned droplet could erase a chemical gradient through acoustic streaming while preserving a temperature gradient.",
      "test": "Map both fields.",
      "against": "Both gradients decay proportionally.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0912",
    "hypothesis": "A narrow annular channel could amplify tiny wall-slip differences into opposite circulation directions.",
    "test": "Measure slip and velocity.",
    "against": "Circulation follows inlet asymmetry only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0912",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A narrow annular channel could amplify tiny wall-slip differences into opposite circulation directions.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0912",
      "hypothesis": "A narrow annular channel could amplify tiny wall-slip differences into opposite circulation directions.",
      "test": "Measure slip and velocity.",
      "against": "Circulation follows inlet asymmetry only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0912",
      "hypothesis": "A narrow annular channel could amplify tiny wall-slip differences into opposite circulation directions.",
      "test": "Measure slip and velocity.",
      "against": "Circulation follows inlet asymmetry only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0913",
    "hypothesis": "A rising bubble could leave a mechanically persistent wake in a yield-stress liquid after velocity vanishes.",
    "test": "Probe local modulus after passage.",
    "against": "Wake disappears with flow cessation.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0913",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A rising bubble could leave a mechanically persistent wake in a yield-stress liquid after velocity vanishes.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0913",
      "hypothesis": "A rising bubble could leave a mechanically persistent wake in a yield-stress liquid after velocity vanishes.",
      "test": "Probe local modulus after passage.",
      "against": "Wake disappears with flow cessation.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0913",
      "hypothesis": "A rising bubble could leave a mechanically persistent wake in a yield-stress liquid after velocity vanishes.",
      "test": "Probe local modulus after passage.",
      "against": "Wake disappears with flow cessation.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0914",
    "hypothesis": "A deformable droplet could pass a constriction more easily after a preliminary subthreshold squeeze changes internal circulation.",
    "test": "Measure circulation and passage pressure.",
    "against": "Benefits require altered droplet size.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0914",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A deformable droplet could pass a constriction more easily after a preliminary subthreshold squeeze changes internal circulation.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0914",
      "hypothesis": "A deformable droplet could pass a constriction more easily after a preliminary subthreshold squeeze changes internal circulation.",
      "test": "Measure circulation and passage pressure.",
      "against": "Benefits require altered droplet size.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0914",
      "hypothesis": "A deformable droplet could pass a constriction more easily after a preliminary subthreshold squeeze changes internal circulation.",
      "test": "Measure circulation and passage pressure.",
      "against": "Benefits require altered droplet size.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0915",
    "hypothesis": "A layered liquid could reverse its mixing preference when an interface stores elastic energy.",
    "test": "Measure mixing and interfacial rheology.",
    "against": "Preference follows density contrast alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0915",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A layered liquid could reverse its mixing preference when an interface stores elastic energy.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0915",
      "hypothesis": "A layered liquid could reverse its mixing preference when an interface stores elastic energy.",
      "test": "Measure mixing and interfacial rheology.",
      "against": "Preference follows density contrast alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0915",
      "hypothesis": "A layered liquid could reverse its mixing preference when an interface stores elastic energy.",
      "test": "Measure mixing and interfacial rheology.",
      "against": "Preference follows density contrast alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0916",
    "hypothesis": "A flowing gel suspension could reduce wall erosion by temporarily forming a sliding particle cushion.",
    "test": "Image near-wall contacts and wear.",
    "against": "Protection requires lower particle flux.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0916",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A flowing gel suspension could reduce wall erosion by temporarily forming a sliding particle cushion.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0916",
      "hypothesis": "A flowing gel suspension could reduce wall erosion by temporarily forming a sliding particle cushion.",
      "test": "Image near-wall contacts and wear.",
      "against": "Protection requires lower particle flux.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0916",
      "hypothesis": "A flowing gel suspension could reduce wall erosion by temporarily forming a sliding particle cushion.",
      "test": "Image near-wall contacts and wear.",
      "against": "Protection requires lower particle flux.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0917",
    "hypothesis": "A capillary wave could reveal the direction of a buried liquid current through unequal damping in opposite directions.",
    "test": "Measure paired waves.",
    "against": "Asymmetry follows boundary reflection only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0917",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A capillary wave could reveal the direction of a buried liquid current through unequal damping in opposite directions.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0917",
      "hypothesis": "A capillary wave could reveal the direction of a buried liquid current through unequal damping in opposite directions.",
      "test": "Measure paired waves.",
      "against": "Asymmetry follows boundary reflection only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0917",
      "hypothesis": "A capillary wave could reveal the direction of a buried liquid current through unequal damping in opposite directions.",
      "test": "Measure paired waves.",
      "against": "Asymmetry follows boundary reflection only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0918",
    "hypothesis": "A droplet on an elastic arch could release its water through a snap triggered by evaporative mass loss.",
    "test": "Track mass and shape.",
    "against": "Release follows contact-angle changes alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0918",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A droplet on an elastic arch could release its water through a snap triggered by evaporative mass loss.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0918",
      "hypothesis": "A droplet on an elastic arch could release its water through a snap triggered by evaporative mass loss.",
      "test": "Track mass and shape.",
      "against": "Release follows contact-angle changes alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0918",
      "hypothesis": "A droplet on an elastic arch could release its water through a snap triggered by evaporative mass loss.",
      "test": "Track mass and shape.",
      "against": "Release follows contact-angle changes alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0919",
    "hypothesis": "A gas-liquid slug could preserve a pressure-pulse sequence in its downstream spacing pattern.",
    "test": "Apply reversed pulse sequences.",
    "against": "Spacing encodes mean flow only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0919",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A gas-liquid slug could preserve a pressure-pulse sequence in its downstream spacing pattern.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0919",
      "hypothesis": "A gas-liquid slug could preserve a pressure-pulse sequence in its downstream spacing pattern.",
      "test": "Apply reversed pulse sequences.",
      "against": "Spacing encodes mean flow only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0919",
      "hypothesis": "A gas-liquid slug could preserve a pressure-pulse sequence in its downstream spacing pattern.",
      "test": "Apply reversed pulse sequences.",
      "against": "Spacing encodes mean flow only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0920",
    "hypothesis": "A nonwetting inclusion could reduce internal circulation inside a droplet while increasing external mixing.",
    "test": "Measure both velocity fields.",
    "against": "Both circulations change together.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0920",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A nonwetting inclusion could reduce internal circulation inside a droplet while increasing external mixing.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0920",
      "hypothesis": "A nonwetting inclusion could reduce internal circulation inside a droplet while increasing external mixing.",
      "test": "Measure both velocity fields.",
      "against": "Both circulations change together.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0920",
      "hypothesis": "A nonwetting inclusion could reduce internal circulation inside a droplet while increasing external mixing.",
      "test": "Measure both velocity fields.",
      "against": "Both circulations change together.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0921",
    "hypothesis": "A liquid bridge could act as a passive overload fuse by changing its rupture geometry with loading rate.",
    "test": "Measure rupture under controlled rates.",
    "against": "Threshold follows viscous force alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0921",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A liquid bridge could act as a passive overload fuse by changing its rupture geometry with loading rate.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0921",
      "hypothesis": "A liquid bridge could act as a passive overload fuse by changing its rupture geometry with loading rate.",
      "test": "Measure rupture under controlled rates.",
      "against": "Threshold follows viscous force alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0921",
      "hypothesis": "A liquid bridge could act as a passive overload fuse by changing its rupture geometry with loading rate.",
      "test": "Measure rupture under controlled rates.",
      "against": "Threshold follows viscous force alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0922",
    "hypothesis": "A soft channel network could reroute flow away from blockages through elastic collapse of unused branches.",
    "test": "Image branch deformation and transport.",
    "against": "Rerouting requires higher inlet pressure.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0922",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A soft channel network could reroute flow away from blockages through elastic collapse of unused branches.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0922",
      "hypothesis": "A soft channel network could reroute flow away from blockages through elastic collapse of unused branches.",
      "test": "Image branch deformation and transport.",
      "against": "Rerouting requires higher inlet pressure.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0922",
      "hypothesis": "A soft channel network could reroute flow away from blockages through elastic collapse of unused branches.",
      "test": "Image branch deformation and transport.",
      "against": "Rerouting requires higher inlet pressure.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0923",
    "hypothesis": "A pair of vortices could exchange dissolved gas without exchanging equal volumes of liquid.",
    "test": "Track gas and liquid markers.",
    "against": "Exchange ratios remain identical.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0923",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A pair of vortices could exchange dissolved gas without exchanging equal volumes of liquid.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0923",
      "hypothesis": "A pair of vortices could exchange dissolved gas without exchanging equal volumes of liquid.",
      "test": "Track gas and liquid markers.",
      "against": "Exchange ratios remain identical.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0923",
      "hypothesis": "A pair of vortices could exchange dissolved gas without exchanging equal volumes of liquid.",
      "test": "Track gas and liquid markers.",
      "against": "Exchange ratios remain identical.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0924",
    "hypothesis": "A floating porous disk could move against a weak surface flow through asymmetric drainage recoil.",
    "test": "Measure drainage and drift.",
    "against": "Motion follows uncontrolled surface tension gradients.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 4,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 8,
    "literature_query": "floating porous disk move against weak surface flow asymmetric drainage recoil experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N0924",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A floating porous disk could move against a weak surface flow through asymmetric drainage recoil.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0924",
      "hypothesis": "A floating porous disk could move against a weak surface flow through asymmetric drainage recoil.",
      "test": "Measure drainage and drift.",
      "against": "Motion follows uncontrolled surface tension gradients.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0924",
      "hypothesis": "A floating porous disk could move against a weak surface flow through asymmetric drainage recoil.",
      "test": "Measure drainage and drift.",
      "against": "Motion follows uncontrolled surface tension gradients.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 8,
      "literature_query": "floating porous disk move against weak surface flow asymmetric drainage recoil experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "8",
      "id": "N0924",
      "hypothesis": "A floating porous disk could move against a weak surface flow through asymmetric drainage recoil.",
      "test": "Measure drainage and drift.",
      "against": "Motion follows uncontrolled surface tension gradients.",
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_score": "24",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P9cc1dae06844;P729577a413cd;P1bbe8e8b4c04;Pf2957f216190;P0edb4f7104ea;P775098f0c567;P760649b1184a",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N0924",
      "hypothesis": "A floating porous disk could move against a weak surface flow through asymmetric drainage recoil.",
      "test": "Measure drainage and drift.",
      "against": "Motion follows uncontrolled surface tension gradients.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 8,
      "literature_query": "floating porous disk move against weak surface flow asymmetric drainage recoil experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P9cc1dae06844;P729577a413cd;P1bbe8e8b4c04;Pf2957f216190;P0edb4f7104ea;P775098f0c567;P760649b1184a",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P9cc1dae06844;P729577a413cd;P1bbe8e8b4c04;Pf2957f216190;P0edb4f7104ea;P775098f0c567;P760649b1184a",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0925",
    "hypothesis": "A shear-thinning liquid could retain a temporary high-conductance route after a localized flow pulse.",
    "test": "Measure later tracer transport.",
    "against": "Route disappears with imposed flow.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0925",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A shear-thinning liquid could retain a temporary high-conductance route after a localized flow pulse.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0925",
      "hypothesis": "A shear-thinning liquid could retain a temporary high-conductance route after a localized flow pulse.",
      "test": "Measure later tracer transport.",
      "against": "Route disappears with imposed flow.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0925",
      "hypothesis": "A shear-thinning liquid could retain a temporary high-conductance route after a localized flow pulse.",
      "test": "Measure later tracer transport.",
      "against": "Route disappears with imposed flow.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0926",
    "hypothesis": "A droplet containing rigid flakes could reduce rebound by transferring impact energy into persistent internal rotation.",
    "test": "Measure rotation and rebound.",
    "against": "Energy loss follows viscosity only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0926",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A droplet containing rigid flakes could reduce rebound by transferring impact energy into persistent internal rotation.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0926",
      "hypothesis": "A droplet containing rigid flakes could reduce rebound by transferring impact energy into persistent internal rotation.",
      "test": "Measure rotation and rebound.",
      "against": "Energy loss follows viscosity only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0926",
      "hypothesis": "A droplet containing rigid flakes could reduce rebound by transferring impact energy into persistent internal rotation.",
      "test": "Measure rotation and rebound.",
      "against": "Energy loss follows viscosity only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0927",
    "hypothesis": "A curved microchannel could sort soft capsules by membrane relaxation without substantial deformation at its outlet.",
    "test": "Track relaxation and lateral position.",
    "against": "Sorting requires permanent deformation.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0927",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A curved microchannel could sort soft capsules by membrane relaxation without substantial deformation at its outlet.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0927",
      "hypothesis": "A curved microchannel could sort soft capsules by membrane relaxation without substantial deformation at its outlet.",
      "test": "Track relaxation and lateral position.",
      "against": "Sorting requires permanent deformation.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0927",
      "hypothesis": "A curved microchannel could sort soft capsules by membrane relaxation without substantial deformation at its outlet.",
      "test": "Track relaxation and lateral position.",
      "against": "Sorting requires permanent deformation.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0928",
    "hypothesis": "A wavy interface could trap soluble gas more effectively than a flat interface at equal area.",
    "test": "Measure transfer and flow fields.",
    "against": "Difference is explained by area alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0928",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A wavy interface could trap soluble gas more effectively than a flat interface at equal area.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0928",
      "hypothesis": "A wavy interface could trap soluble gas more effectively than a flat interface at equal area.",
      "test": "Measure transfer and flow fields.",
      "against": "Difference is explained by area alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0928",
      "hypothesis": "A wavy interface could trap soluble gas more effectively than a flat interface at equal area.",
      "test": "Measure transfer and flow fields.",
      "against": "Difference is explained by area alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0929",
    "hypothesis": "A liquid thread could reveal trace surfactant through the timing of satellite-droplet formation rather than breakup length.",
    "test": "Measure trace concentration and fragments.",
    "against": "Timing adds no independent sensitivity.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 4,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 47,
    "literature_query": "liquid thread reveal trace surfactant timing satellite-droplet formation breakup length experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N0929",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A liquid thread could reveal trace surfactant through the timing of satellite-droplet formation rather than breakup length.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0929",
      "hypothesis": "A liquid thread could reveal trace surfactant through the timing of satellite-droplet formation rather than breakup length.",
      "test": "Measure trace concentration and fragments.",
      "against": "Timing adds no independent sensitivity.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0929",
      "hypothesis": "A liquid thread could reveal trace surfactant through the timing of satellite-droplet formation rather than breakup length.",
      "test": "Measure trace concentration and fragments.",
      "against": "Timing adds no independent sensitivity.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 23,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 47,
      "literature_query": "liquid thread reveal trace surfactant timing satellite-droplet formation breakup length experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "47",
      "id": "N0929",
      "hypothesis": "A liquid thread could reveal trace surfactant through the timing of satellite-droplet formation rather than breakup length.",
      "test": "Measure trace concentration and fragments.",
      "against": "Timing adds no independent sensitivity.",
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_score": "23",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P28a2327b5e66;P79e38be8363f;Pbc608251edeb;P379e4a1681dc;Pecb3cff3dbf9;P3eac13a4eac4;P629ce9ebaa34",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N0929",
      "hypothesis": "A liquid thread could reveal trace surfactant through the timing of satellite-droplet formation rather than breakup length.",
      "test": "Measure trace concentration and fragments.",
      "against": "Timing adds no independent sensitivity.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 23,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 47,
      "literature_query": "liquid thread reveal trace surfactant timing satellite-droplet formation breakup length experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P28a2327b5e66;P79e38be8363f;Pbc608251edeb;P379e4a1681dc;Pecb3cff3dbf9;P3eac13a4eac4;P629ce9ebaa34",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P28a2327b5e66;P79e38be8363f;Pbc608251edeb;P379e4a1681dc;Pecb3cff3dbf9;P3eac13a4eac4;P629ce9ebaa34",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0930",
    "hypothesis": "A compliant reservoir could smooth random inflow while preserving sharp concentration pulses.",
    "test": "Measure flow and tracer histories.",
    "against": "Smoothing necessarily erases concentration pulses.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0930",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A compliant reservoir could smooth random inflow while preserving sharp concentration pulses.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0930",
      "hypothesis": "A compliant reservoir could smooth random inflow while preserving sharp concentration pulses.",
      "test": "Measure flow and tracer histories.",
      "against": "Smoothing necessarily erases concentration pulses.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0930",
      "hypothesis": "A compliant reservoir could smooth random inflow while preserving sharp concentration pulses.",
      "test": "Measure flow and tracer histories.",
      "against": "Smoothing necessarily erases concentration pulses.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0931",
    "hypothesis": "A rotating droplet could lose angular momentum primarily through internal phase-boundary motion.",
    "test": "Track phases and angular decay.",
    "against": "Decay follows external drag alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0931",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A rotating droplet could lose angular momentum primarily through internal phase-boundary motion.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0931",
      "hypothesis": "A rotating droplet could lose angular momentum primarily through internal phase-boundary motion.",
      "test": "Track phases and angular decay.",
      "against": "Decay follows external drag alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0931",
      "hypothesis": "A rotating droplet could lose angular momentum primarily through internal phase-boundary motion.",
      "test": "Track phases and angular decay.",
      "against": "Decay follows external drag alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0932",
    "hypothesis": "A liquid film could sustain isolated dry spots without global rupture when its substrate deforms locally.",
    "test": "Image film and substrate.",
    "against": "Stability requires changed wettability.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0932",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A liquid film could sustain isolated dry spots without global rupture when its substrate deforms locally.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0932",
      "hypothesis": "A liquid film could sustain isolated dry spots without global rupture when its substrate deforms locally.",
      "test": "Image film and substrate.",
      "against": "Stability requires changed wettability.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0932",
      "hypothesis": "A liquid film could sustain isolated dry spots without global rupture when its substrate deforms locally.",
      "test": "Image film and substrate.",
      "against": "Stability requires changed wettability.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0933",
    "hypothesis": "A bubble entering a soft cavity could excite a mechanical mode that returns it to its original branch.",
    "test": "Track bubble and cavity motion.",
    "against": "Return follows pressure reversal only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0933",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A bubble entering a soft cavity could excite a mechanical mode that returns it to its original branch.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0933",
      "hypothesis": "A bubble entering a soft cavity could excite a mechanical mode that returns it to its original branch.",
      "test": "Track bubble and cavity motion.",
      "against": "Return follows pressure reversal only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0933",
      "hypothesis": "A bubble entering a soft cavity could excite a mechanical mode that returns it to its original branch.",
      "test": "Track bubble and cavity motion.",
      "against": "Return follows pressure reversal only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0934",
    "hypothesis": "A concentrated suspension could distinguish pulse direction through anisotropic rebuilding of its contact network.",
    "test": "Measure contacts after reversed pulses.",
    "against": "Response follows accumulated strain alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0934",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A concentrated suspension could distinguish pulse direction through anisotropic rebuilding of its contact network.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0934",
      "hypothesis": "A concentrated suspension could distinguish pulse direction through anisotropic rebuilding of its contact network.",
      "test": "Measure contacts after reversed pulses.",
      "against": "Response follows accumulated strain alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0934",
      "hypothesis": "A concentrated suspension could distinguish pulse direction through anisotropic rebuilding of its contact network.",
      "test": "Measure contacts after reversed pulses.",
      "against": "Response follows accumulated strain alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0935",
    "hypothesis": "A droplet could migrate toward a region of lower acoustic loss even when acoustic pressure is uniform.",
    "test": "Map loss and droplet motion.",
    "against": "Migration follows pressure gradients only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0935",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A droplet could migrate toward a region of lower acoustic loss even when acoustic pressure is uniform.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0935",
      "hypothesis": "A droplet could migrate toward a region of lower acoustic loss even when acoustic pressure is uniform.",
      "test": "Map loss and droplet motion.",
      "against": "Migration follows pressure gradients only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0935",
      "hypothesis": "A droplet could migrate toward a region of lower acoustic loss even when acoustic pressure is uniform.",
      "test": "Map loss and droplet motion.",
      "against": "Migration follows pressure gradients only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0936",
    "hypothesis": "A small obstacle could reduce total drag in an elastic liquid by disrupting a high-stress wake.",
    "test": "Measure total force and stresses.",
    "against": "Any gain disappears after obstacle drag included.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0936",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A small obstacle could reduce total drag in an elastic liquid by disrupting a high-stress wake.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0936",
      "hypothesis": "A small obstacle could reduce total drag in an elastic liquid by disrupting a high-stress wake.",
      "test": "Measure total force and stresses.",
      "against": "Any gain disappears after obstacle drag included.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0936",
      "hypothesis": "A small obstacle could reduce total drag in an elastic liquid by disrupting a high-stress wake.",
      "test": "Measure total force and stresses.",
      "against": "Any gain disappears after obstacle drag included.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0937",
    "hypothesis": "A liquid front could repeatedly split and reconnect through elastic recoil without chemical patterning.",
    "test": "Track fronts in compliant networks.",
    "against": "Splitting requires fixed wetting defects.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0937",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A liquid front could repeatedly split and reconnect through elastic recoil without chemical patterning.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0937",
      "hypothesis": "A liquid front could repeatedly split and reconnect through elastic recoil without chemical patterning.",
      "test": "Track fronts in compliant networks.",
      "against": "Splitting requires fixed wetting defects.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0937",
      "hypothesis": "A liquid front could repeatedly split and reconnect through elastic recoil without chemical patterning.",
      "test": "Track fronts in compliant networks.",
      "against": "Splitting requires fixed wetting defects.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0938",
    "hypothesis": "A gas film could remain stable between approaching droplets when one interface relaxes faster than the other.",
    "test": "Measure drainage and coalescence.",
    "against": "Stability follows surfactant amount only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0938",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A gas film could remain stable between approaching droplets when one interface relaxes faster than the other.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0938",
      "hypothesis": "A gas film could remain stable between approaching droplets when one interface relaxes faster than the other.",
      "test": "Measure drainage and coalescence.",
      "against": "Stability follows surfactant amount only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0938",
      "hypothesis": "A gas film could remain stable between approaching droplets when one interface relaxes faster than the other.",
      "test": "Measure drainage and coalescence.",
      "against": "Stability follows surfactant amount only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0939",
    "hypothesis": "A fluid vortex could trap an elastic fiber in a stable off-center orbit selected by bending stiffness.",
    "test": "Measure orbits across calibrated fibers.",
    "against": "Orbit radius follows length alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0939",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A fluid vortex could trap an elastic fiber in a stable off-center orbit selected by bending stiffness.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0939",
      "hypothesis": "A fluid vortex could trap an elastic fiber in a stable off-center orbit selected by bending stiffness.",
      "test": "Measure orbits across calibrated fibers.",
      "against": "Orbit radius follows length alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0939",
      "hypothesis": "A fluid vortex could trap an elastic fiber in a stable off-center orbit selected by bending stiffness.",
      "test": "Measure orbits across calibrated fibers.",
      "against": "Orbit radius follows length alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0940",
    "hypothesis": "A porous floor could reduce wave-driven sediment motion by absorbing oscillatory pressure without removing liquid.",
    "test": "Measure pressure and grain motion.",
    "against": "Protection requires net drainage.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0940",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous floor could reduce wave-driven sediment motion by absorbing oscillatory pressure without removing liquid.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0940",
      "hypothesis": "A porous floor could reduce wave-driven sediment motion by absorbing oscillatory pressure without removing liquid.",
      "test": "Measure pressure and grain motion.",
      "against": "Protection requires net drainage.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0940",
      "hypothesis": "A porous floor could reduce wave-driven sediment motion by absorbing oscillatory pressure without removing liquid.",
      "test": "Measure pressure and grain motion.",
      "against": "Protection requires net drainage.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0941",
    "hypothesis": "A liquid-crystal droplet could sort external colloids through defect rearrangement under weak flow.",
    "test": "Map defects and particle capture.",
    "against": "Sorting follows surface charge alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 12,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0941",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A liquid-crystal droplet could sort external colloids through defect rearrangement under weak flow.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0941",
      "hypothesis": "A liquid-crystal droplet could sort external colloids through defect rearrangement under weak flow.",
      "test": "Map defects and particle capture.",
      "against": "Sorting follows surface charge alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0941",
      "hypothesis": "A liquid-crystal droplet could sort external colloids through defect rearrangement under weak flow.",
      "test": "Map defects and particle capture.",
      "against": "Sorting follows surface charge alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 12,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0942",
    "hypothesis": "A thin liquid ribbon could reveal viscosity gradients through the handedness of its first buckling mode.",
    "test": "Measure buckling under reversed gradients.",
    "against": "Handedness remains random.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0942",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A thin liquid ribbon could reveal viscosity gradients through the handedness of its first buckling mode.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0942",
      "hypothesis": "A thin liquid ribbon could reveal viscosity gradients through the handedness of its first buckling mode.",
      "test": "Measure buckling under reversed gradients.",
      "against": "Handedness remains random.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0942",
      "hypothesis": "A thin liquid ribbon could reveal viscosity gradients through the handedness of its first buckling mode.",
      "test": "Measure buckling under reversed gradients.",
      "against": "Handedness remains random.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0943",
    "hypothesis": "A bubble cluster could reduce acoustic scattering by synchronizing volume oscillations out of phase.",
    "test": "Measure bubble motion and far-field sound.",
    "against": "Scattering follows total gas volume only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0943",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A bubble cluster could reduce acoustic scattering by synchronizing volume oscillations out of phase.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0943",
      "hypothesis": "A bubble cluster could reduce acoustic scattering by synchronizing volume oscillations out of phase.",
      "test": "Measure bubble motion and far-field sound.",
      "against": "Scattering follows total gas volume only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0943",
      "hypothesis": "A bubble cluster could reduce acoustic scattering by synchronizing volume oscillations out of phase.",
      "test": "Measure bubble motion and far-field sound.",
      "against": "Scattering follows total gas volume only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0944",
    "hypothesis": "A soft-walled junction could separate a concentration pulse from its associated pressure pulse.",
    "test": "Measure both downstream signals.",
    "against": "Separation requires active control.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0944",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A soft-walled junction could separate a concentration pulse from its associated pressure pulse.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0944",
      "hypothesis": "A soft-walled junction could separate a concentration pulse from its associated pressure pulse.",
      "test": "Measure both downstream signals.",
      "against": "Separation requires active control.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0944",
      "hypothesis": "A soft-walled junction could separate a concentration pulse from its associated pressure pulse.",
      "test": "Measure both downstream signals.",
      "against": "Separation requires active control.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0945",
    "hypothesis": "A droplet could retain less contamination when its contact line retraces a different microscopic path during withdrawal.",
    "test": "Map residues and contact-line routes.",
    "against": "Residue follows wetted area alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0945",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A droplet could retain less contamination when its contact line retraces a different microscopic path during withdrawal.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0945",
      "hypothesis": "A droplet could retain less contamination when its contact line retraces a different microscopic path during withdrawal.",
      "test": "Map residues and contact-line routes.",
      "against": "Residue follows wetted area alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0945",
      "hypothesis": "A droplet could retain less contamination when its contact line retraces a different microscopic path during withdrawal.",
      "test": "Map residues and contact-line routes.",
      "against": "Residue follows wetted area alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0946",
    "hypothesis": "A viscoelastic liquid could carry a chemical signal upstream through elastic recoil after pumping stops.",
    "test": "Measure tracer movement and stress.",
    "against": "Upstream transfer requires reversed pressure.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0946",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A viscoelastic liquid could carry a chemical signal upstream through elastic recoil after pumping stops.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0946",
      "hypothesis": "A viscoelastic liquid could carry a chemical signal upstream through elastic recoil after pumping stops.",
      "test": "Measure tracer movement and stress.",
      "against": "Upstream transfer requires reversed pressure.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0946",
      "hypothesis": "A viscoelastic liquid could carry a chemical signal upstream through elastic recoil after pumping stops.",
      "test": "Measure tracer movement and stress.",
      "against": "Upstream transfer requires reversed pressure.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0947",
    "hypothesis": "A moving meniscus could identify pore-wall permeability through a measurable lag in its apparent contact angle.",
    "test": "Compare characterized walls.",
    "against": "Lag follows surface chemistry only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0947",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A moving meniscus could identify pore-wall permeability through a measurable lag in its apparent contact angle.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0947",
      "hypothesis": "A moving meniscus could identify pore-wall permeability through a measurable lag in its apparent contact angle.",
      "test": "Compare characterized walls.",
      "against": "Lag follows surface chemistry only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0947",
      "hypothesis": "A moving meniscus could identify pore-wall permeability through a measurable lag in its apparent contact angle.",
      "test": "Compare characterized walls.",
      "against": "Lag follows surface chemistry only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0948",
    "hypothesis": "A floating fibrous raft could damp surface waves by converting vertical motion into reversible internal shear.",
    "test": "Measure waves and fiber motion.",
    "against": "Damping requires irreversible rearrangement.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0948",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A floating fibrous raft could damp surface waves by converting vertical motion into reversible internal shear.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0948",
      "hypothesis": "A floating fibrous raft could damp surface waves by converting vertical motion into reversible internal shear.",
      "test": "Measure waves and fiber motion.",
      "against": "Damping requires irreversible rearrangement.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0948",
      "hypothesis": "A floating fibrous raft could damp surface waves by converting vertical motion into reversible internal shear.",
      "test": "Measure waves and fiber motion.",
      "against": "Damping requires irreversible rearrangement.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0949",
    "hypothesis": "A liquid mixture could develop a transient density inversion around a growing crystal that steers impurities away.",
    "test": "Map density and impurity motion.",
    "against": "Impurity rejection follows diffusion only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0949",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A liquid mixture could develop a transient density inversion around a growing crystal that steers impurities away.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0949",
      "hypothesis": "A liquid mixture could develop a transient density inversion around a growing crystal that steers impurities away.",
      "test": "Map density and impurity motion.",
      "against": "Impurity rejection follows diffusion only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0949",
      "hypothesis": "A liquid mixture could develop a transient density inversion around a growing crystal that steers impurities away.",
      "test": "Map density and impurity motion.",
      "against": "Impurity rejection follows diffusion only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0950",
    "hypothesis": "A deformable pipe could suppress long-lived recirculation by traveling wall relaxation rather than imposed squeezing.",
    "test": "Track wall motion and vortices.",
    "against": "Suppression requires continuous external work.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0950",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A deformable pipe could suppress long-lived recirculation by traveling wall relaxation rather than imposed squeezing.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0950",
      "hypothesis": "A deformable pipe could suppress long-lived recirculation by traveling wall relaxation rather than imposed squeezing.",
      "test": "Track wall motion and vortices.",
      "against": "Suppression requires continuous external work.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0950",
      "hypothesis": "A deformable pipe could suppress long-lived recirculation by traveling wall relaxation rather than imposed squeezing.",
      "test": "Track wall motion and vortices.",
      "against": "Suppression requires continuous external work.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0951",
    "hypothesis": "A droplet train could organize itself into alternating speeds through vapor-mediated cooling.",
    "test": "Measure temperature and velocity.",
    "against": "Speed changes follow hydrodynamic interaction alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0951",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A droplet train could organize itself into alternating speeds through vapor-mediated cooling.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0951",
      "hypothesis": "A droplet train could organize itself into alternating speeds through vapor-mediated cooling.",
      "test": "Measure temperature and velocity.",
      "against": "Speed changes follow hydrodynamic interaction alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0951",
      "hypothesis": "A droplet train could organize itself into alternating speeds through vapor-mediated cooling.",
      "test": "Measure temperature and velocity.",
      "against": "Speed changes follow hydrodynamic interaction alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0952",
    "hypothesis": "A nonbinding particle could slow a liquid front by storing energy in reversible rotation.",
    "test": "Measure rotation and front speed.",
    "against": "Slowing follows blockage alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0952",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A nonbinding particle could slow a liquid front by storing energy in reversible rotation.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0952",
      "hypothesis": "A nonbinding particle could slow a liquid front by storing energy in reversible rotation.",
      "test": "Measure rotation and front speed.",
      "against": "Slowing follows blockage alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0952",
      "hypothesis": "A nonbinding particle could slow a liquid front by storing energy in reversible rotation.",
      "test": "Measure rotation and front speed.",
      "against": "Slowing follows blockage alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0953",
    "hypothesis": "A gas pocket could act as a temporary concentration capacitor through selective dissolution of one mixture component.",
    "test": "Measure composition during pulses.",
    "against": "Buffering follows pressure compression only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0953",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A gas pocket could act as a temporary concentration capacitor through selective dissolution of one mixture component.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0953",
      "hypothesis": "A gas pocket could act as a temporary concentration capacitor through selective dissolution of one mixture component.",
      "test": "Measure composition during pulses.",
      "against": "Buffering follows pressure compression only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0953",
      "hypothesis": "A gas pocket could act as a temporary concentration capacitor through selective dissolution of one mixture component.",
      "test": "Measure composition during pulses.",
      "against": "Buffering follows pressure compression only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0954",
    "hypothesis": "A curved liquid bridge could support directional particle transport under symmetric shaking.",
    "test": "Reverse bridge curvature.",
    "against": "Transport follows net shaking bias.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0954",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A curved liquid bridge could support directional particle transport under symmetric shaking.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0954",
      "hypothesis": "A curved liquid bridge could support directional particle transport under symmetric shaking.",
      "test": "Reverse bridge curvature.",
      "against": "Transport follows net shaking bias.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0954",
      "hypothesis": "A curved liquid bridge could support directional particle transport under symmetric shaking.",
      "test": "Reverse bridge curvature.",
      "against": "Transport follows net shaking bias.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0955",
    "hypothesis": "A yielding slurry could protect a sensor by forming a stagnant sheath only during strong flow.",
    "test": "Image sheath and sensor loading.",
    "against": "Protection requires permanent fouling.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0955",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A yielding slurry could protect a sensor by forming a stagnant sheath only during strong flow.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0955",
      "hypothesis": "A yielding slurry could protect a sensor by forming a stagnant sheath only during strong flow.",
      "test": "Image sheath and sensor loading.",
      "against": "Protection requires permanent fouling.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0955",
      "hypothesis": "A yielding slurry could protect a sensor by forming a stagnant sheath only during strong flow.",
      "test": "Image sheath and sensor loading.",
      "against": "Protection requires permanent fouling.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0956",
    "hypothesis": "A droplet's evaporation rate could become less sensitive to airflow when its internal circulation opposes external shear.",
    "test": "Measure both flow fields.",
    "against": "Evaporation follows external transfer alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0956",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A droplet's evaporation rate could become less sensitive to airflow when its internal circulation opposes external shear.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0956",
      "hypothesis": "A droplet's evaporation rate could become less sensitive to airflow when its internal circulation opposes external shear.",
      "test": "Measure both flow fields.",
      "against": "Evaporation follows external transfer alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0956",
      "hypothesis": "A droplet's evaporation rate could become less sensitive to airflow when its internal circulation opposes external shear.",
      "test": "Measure both flow fields.",
      "against": "Evaporation follows external transfer alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0957",
    "hypothesis": "A bubble could redirect heat by carrying an interfacial thermal gradient through a branching network.",
    "test": "Track thermal fields and bubbles.",
    "against": "Heat transfer follows liquid displacement only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0957",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A bubble could redirect heat by carrying an interfacial thermal gradient through a branching network.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0957",
      "hypothesis": "A bubble could redirect heat by carrying an interfacial thermal gradient through a branching network.",
      "test": "Track thermal fields and bubbles.",
      "against": "Heat transfer follows liquid displacement only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0957",
      "hypothesis": "A bubble could redirect heat by carrying an interfacial thermal gradient through a branching network.",
      "test": "Track thermal fields and bubbles.",
      "against": "Heat transfer follows liquid displacement only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0958",
    "hypothesis": "A capillary interface could measure pressure-pulse duration through the number of metastable shapes visited.",
    "test": "Record shapes under calibrated pulses.",
    "against": "State count follows pulse amplitude alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0958",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A capillary interface could measure pressure-pulse duration through the number of metastable shapes visited.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0958",
      "hypothesis": "A capillary interface could measure pressure-pulse duration through the number of metastable shapes visited.",
      "test": "Record shapes under calibrated pulses.",
      "against": "State count follows pulse amplitude alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0958",
      "hypothesis": "A capillary interface could measure pressure-pulse duration through the number of metastable shapes visited.",
      "test": "Record shapes under calibrated pulses.",
      "against": "State count follows pulse amplitude alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0959",
    "hypothesis": "A concentrated emulsion could maintain low flow resistance by dynamically swapping which droplets touch the wall.",
    "test": "Track contacts and pressure loss.",
    "against": "Resistance reduction requires smaller droplets.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0959",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A concentrated emulsion could maintain low flow resistance by dynamically swapping which droplets touch the wall.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0959",
      "hypothesis": "A concentrated emulsion could maintain low flow resistance by dynamically swapping which droplets touch the wall.",
      "test": "Track contacts and pressure loss.",
      "against": "Resistance reduction requires smaller droplets.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0959",
      "hypothesis": "A concentrated emulsion could maintain low flow resistance by dynamically swapping which droplets touch the wall.",
      "test": "Track contacts and pressure loss.",
      "against": "Resistance reduction requires smaller droplets.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0960",
    "hypothesis": "A liquid-filled elastic loop could turn a brief concentration gradient into a measurable mechanical circulation.",
    "test": "Measure loop deformation and internal flow.",
    "against": "Circulation requires sustained chemical gradients.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0960",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A liquid-filled elastic loop could turn a brief concentration gradient into a measurable mechanical circulation.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0960",
      "hypothesis": "A liquid-filled elastic loop could turn a brief concentration gradient into a measurable mechanical circulation.",
      "test": "Measure loop deformation and internal flow.",
      "against": "Circulation requires sustained chemical gradients.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0960",
      "hypothesis": "A liquid-filled elastic loop could turn a brief concentration gradient into a measurable mechanical circulation.",
      "test": "Measure loop deformation and internal flow.",
      "against": "Circulation requires sustained chemical gradients.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0961",
    "hypothesis": "A flowing suspension could form a reversible particle-free lane through feedback between particle stress and wall deformation.",
    "test": "Map particles and walls.",
    "against": "Lane formation follows sedimentation only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0961",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A flowing suspension could form a reversible particle-free lane through feedback between particle stress and wall deformation.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0961",
      "hypothesis": "A flowing suspension could form a reversible particle-free lane through feedback between particle stress and wall deformation.",
      "test": "Map particles and walls.",
      "against": "Lane formation follows sedimentation only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0961",
      "hypothesis": "A flowing suspension could form a reversible particle-free lane through feedback between particle stress and wall deformation.",
      "test": "Map particles and walls.",
      "against": "Lane formation follows sedimentation only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0962",
    "hypothesis": "A gas-liquid interface could preserve weak spatial concentration patterns by locally slowing molecular diffusion.",
    "test": "Measure tracer spread and interface structure.",
    "against": "Persistence follows adsorption alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0962",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A gas-liquid interface could preserve weak spatial concentration patterns by locally slowing molecular diffusion.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0962",
      "hypothesis": "A gas-liquid interface could preserve weak spatial concentration patterns by locally slowing molecular diffusion.",
      "test": "Measure tracer spread and interface structure.",
      "against": "Persistence follows adsorption alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0962",
      "hypothesis": "A gas-liquid interface could preserve weak spatial concentration patterns by locally slowing molecular diffusion.",
      "test": "Measure tracer spread and interface structure.",
      "against": "Persistence follows adsorption alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0963",
    "hypothesis": "A droplet collision could reveal internal gelation before bulk rheology detects it.",
    "test": "Compare collision outcomes and independent gel markers.",
    "against": "Changes occur only after bulk gelation.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0963",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A droplet collision could reveal internal gelation before bulk rheology detects it.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0963",
      "hypothesis": "A droplet collision could reveal internal gelation before bulk rheology detects it.",
      "test": "Compare collision outcomes and independent gel markers.",
      "against": "Changes occur only after bulk gelation.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0963",
      "hypothesis": "A droplet collision could reveal internal gelation before bulk rheology detects it.",
      "test": "Compare collision outcomes and independent gel markers.",
      "against": "Changes occur only after bulk gelation.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0964",
    "hypothesis": "A liquid front could avoid a narrow pore because neighboring pores supply a transient opposing capillary pressure.",
    "test": "Measure invasion and local pressure.",
    "against": "Avoidance follows static pore size only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0964",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A liquid front could avoid a narrow pore because neighboring pores supply a transient opposing capillary pressure.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0964",
      "hypothesis": "A liquid front could avoid a narrow pore because neighboring pores supply a transient opposing capillary pressure.",
      "test": "Measure invasion and local pressure.",
      "against": "Avoidance follows static pore size only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0964",
      "hypothesis": "A liquid front could avoid a narrow pore because neighboring pores supply a transient opposing capillary pressure.",
      "test": "Measure invasion and local pressure.",
      "against": "Avoidance follows static pore size only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0965",
    "hypothesis": "A flexible fin could pump liquid using its passive relaxation after a single chemical swelling event.",
    "test": "Measure displacement and complete energy balance.",
    "against": "Net pumping requires repeated active forcing.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0965",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A flexible fin could pump liquid using its passive relaxation after a single chemical swelling event.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0965",
      "hypothesis": "A flexible fin could pump liquid using its passive relaxation after a single chemical swelling event.",
      "test": "Measure displacement and complete energy balance.",
      "against": "Net pumping requires repeated active forcing.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0965",
      "hypothesis": "A flexible fin could pump liquid using its passive relaxation after a single chemical swelling event.",
      "test": "Measure displacement and complete energy balance.",
      "against": "Net pumping requires repeated active forcing.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0966",
    "hypothesis": "A bubble attached to a fiber could shield a downstream segment from particle impact without reducing flow.",
    "test": "Track particles and impacts.",
    "against": "Protection follows reduced local velocity alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0966",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A bubble attached to a fiber could shield a downstream segment from particle impact without reducing flow.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0966",
      "hypothesis": "A bubble attached to a fiber could shield a downstream segment from particle impact without reducing flow.",
      "test": "Track particles and impacts.",
      "against": "Protection follows reduced local velocity alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0966",
      "hypothesis": "A bubble attached to a fiber could shield a downstream segment from particle impact without reducing flow.",
      "test": "Track particles and impacts.",
      "against": "Protection follows reduced local velocity alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0967",
    "hypothesis": "A rotating liquid-metal analogue could expose oxide yielding through sudden changes in surface-wave chirality.",
    "test": "Measure waves and oxide mechanics.",
    "against": "Changes track angular speed only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0967",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A rotating liquid-metal analogue could expose oxide yielding through sudden changes in surface-wave chirality.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0967",
      "hypothesis": "A rotating liquid-metal analogue could expose oxide yielding through sudden changes in surface-wave chirality.",
      "test": "Measure waves and oxide mechanics.",
      "against": "Changes track angular speed only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0967",
      "hypothesis": "A rotating liquid-metal analogue could expose oxide yielding through sudden changes in surface-wave chirality.",
      "test": "Measure waves and oxide mechanics.",
      "against": "Changes track angular speed only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0968",
    "hypothesis": "A microchannel could become temporarily more selective after flow cessation redistributes flexible polymer molecules.",
    "test": "Measure post-rest transport.",
    "against": "Selectivity follows retained concentration only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0968",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A microchannel could become temporarily more selective after flow cessation redistributes flexible polymer molecules.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0968",
      "hypothesis": "A microchannel could become temporarily more selective after flow cessation redistributes flexible polymer molecules.",
      "test": "Measure post-rest transport.",
      "against": "Selectivity follows retained concentration only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0968",
      "hypothesis": "A microchannel could become temporarily more selective after flow cessation redistributes flexible polymer molecules.",
      "test": "Measure post-rest transport.",
      "against": "Selectivity follows retained concentration only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0969",
    "hypothesis": "A droplet could reject a second droplet through elastic recoil of their shared soft substrate.",
    "test": "Measure substrate motion and approach.",
    "against": "Rejection requires electrostatic charging.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0969",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A droplet could reject a second droplet through elastic recoil of their shared soft substrate.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0969",
      "hypothesis": "A droplet could reject a second droplet through elastic recoil of their shared soft substrate.",
      "test": "Measure substrate motion and approach.",
      "against": "Rejection requires electrostatic charging.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0969",
      "hypothesis": "A droplet could reject a second droplet through elastic recoil of their shared soft substrate.",
      "test": "Measure substrate motion and approach.",
      "against": "Rejection requires electrostatic charging.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0970",
    "hypothesis": "A fluid boundary layer could reveal roughness connectivity through the spatial persistence of pressure fluctuations.",
    "test": "Compare connected and isolated features.",
    "against": "Persistence follows roughness height alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0970",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A fluid boundary layer could reveal roughness connectivity through the spatial persistence of pressure fluctuations.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0970",
      "hypothesis": "A fluid boundary layer could reveal roughness connectivity through the spatial persistence of pressure fluctuations.",
      "test": "Compare connected and isolated features.",
      "against": "Persistence follows roughness height alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0970",
      "hypothesis": "A fluid boundary layer could reveal roughness connectivity through the spatial persistence of pressure fluctuations.",
      "test": "Compare connected and isolated features.",
      "against": "Persistence follows roughness height alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0971",
    "hypothesis": "A porous bubble trap could release gas preferentially during low solute concentration because interfacial elasticity weakens.",
    "test": "Measure release and interface rheology.",
    "against": "Release follows pressure only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0971",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous bubble trap could release gas preferentially during low solute concentration because interfacial elasticity weakens.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0971",
      "hypothesis": "A porous bubble trap could release gas preferentially during low solute concentration because interfacial elasticity weakens.",
      "test": "Measure release and interface rheology.",
      "against": "Release follows pressure only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0971",
      "hypothesis": "A porous bubble trap could release gas preferentially during low solute concentration because interfacial elasticity weakens.",
      "test": "Measure release and interface rheology.",
      "against": "Release follows pressure only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0972",
    "hypothesis": "A thin liquid sheet could cool more uniformly when small holes repeatedly open and reseal.",
    "test": "Measure temperature and liquid loss.",
    "against": "Uniformity requires lower average heat input.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0972",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A thin liquid sheet could cool more uniformly when small holes repeatedly open and reseal.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0972",
      "hypothesis": "A thin liquid sheet could cool more uniformly when small holes repeatedly open and reseal.",
      "test": "Measure temperature and liquid loss.",
      "against": "Uniformity requires lower average heat input.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0972",
      "hypothesis": "A thin liquid sheet could cool more uniformly when small holes repeatedly open and reseal.",
      "test": "Measure temperature and liquid loss.",
      "against": "Uniformity requires lower average heat input.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0973",
    "hypothesis": "A capsule could maintain cargo orientation while tumbling by internal slip at a lubricated shell.",
    "test": "Track shell and cargo separately.",
    "against": "Cargo rotates rigidly with the shell.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0973",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A capsule could maintain cargo orientation while tumbling by internal slip at a lubricated shell.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0973",
      "hypothesis": "A capsule could maintain cargo orientation while tumbling by internal slip at a lubricated shell.",
      "test": "Track shell and cargo separately.",
      "against": "Cargo rotates rigidly with the shell.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0973",
      "hypothesis": "A capsule could maintain cargo orientation while tumbling by internal slip at a lubricated shell.",
      "test": "Track shell and cargo separately.",
      "against": "Cargo rotates rigidly with the shell.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0974",
    "hypothesis": "A droplet could determine the direction of an earlier surface shear through anisotropic spreading after rest.",
    "test": "Apply shear then standardized drops.",
    "against": "Spreading reflects residual contamination only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0974",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A droplet could determine the direction of an earlier surface shear through anisotropic spreading after rest.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0974",
      "hypothesis": "A droplet could determine the direction of an earlier surface shear through anisotropic spreading after rest.",
      "test": "Apply shear then standardized drops.",
      "against": "Spreading reflects residual contamination only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0974",
      "hypothesis": "A droplet could determine the direction of an earlier surface shear through anisotropic spreading after rest.",
      "test": "Apply shear then standardized drops.",
      "against": "Spreading reflects residual contamination only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0975",
    "hypothesis": "A self-generated Marangoni flow could stop itself by moving a surfactant into a reversible interfacial trap.",
    "test": "Measure surfactant and velocity.",
    "against": "Stopping follows evaporation depletion only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0975",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A self-generated Marangoni flow could stop itself by moving a surfactant into a reversible interfacial trap.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0975",
      "hypothesis": "A self-generated Marangoni flow could stop itself by moving a surfactant into a reversible interfacial trap.",
      "test": "Measure surfactant and velocity.",
      "against": "Stopping follows evaporation depletion only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0975",
      "hypothesis": "A self-generated Marangoni flow could stop itself by moving a surfactant into a reversible interfacial trap.",
      "test": "Measure surfactant and velocity.",
      "against": "Stopping follows evaporation depletion only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0976",
    "hypothesis": "A curved porous channel could split a gas pulse by dissolution rather than mechanical bubble breakup.",
    "test": "Track gas mass and interfaces.",
    "against": "Pulse splitting requires interface fragmentation.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0976",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A curved porous channel could split a gas pulse by dissolution rather than mechanical bubble breakup.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0976",
      "hypothesis": "A curved porous channel could split a gas pulse by dissolution rather than mechanical bubble breakup.",
      "test": "Track gas mass and interfaces.",
      "against": "Pulse splitting requires interface fragmentation.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0976",
      "hypothesis": "A curved porous channel could split a gas pulse by dissolution rather than mechanical bubble breakup.",
      "test": "Track gas mass and interfaces.",
      "against": "Pulse splitting requires interface fragmentation.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0977",
    "hypothesis": "A soft particle could cross a barrier through delayed volume exchange even when its equilibrium size exceeds the opening.",
    "test": "Measure volume and passage.",
    "against": "Crossing requires permanent deformation.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0977",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A soft particle could cross a barrier through delayed volume exchange even when its equilibrium size exceeds the opening.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0977",
      "hypothesis": "A soft particle could cross a barrier through delayed volume exchange even when its equilibrium size exceeds the opening.",
      "test": "Measure volume and passage.",
      "against": "Crossing requires permanent deformation.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0977",
      "hypothesis": "A soft particle could cross a barrier through delayed volume exchange even when its equilibrium size exceeds the opening.",
      "test": "Measure volume and passage.",
      "against": "Crossing requires permanent deformation.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0978",
    "hypothesis": "A dense suspension could transmit pressure faster along recently sheared directions after flow stops.",
    "test": "Measure directional pulse travel.",
    "against": "Anisotropy vanishes immediately.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0978",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A dense suspension could transmit pressure faster along recently sheared directions after flow stops.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0978",
      "hypothesis": "A dense suspension could transmit pressure faster along recently sheared directions after flow stops.",
      "test": "Measure directional pulse travel.",
      "against": "Anisotropy vanishes immediately.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0978",
      "hypothesis": "A dense suspension could transmit pressure faster along recently sheared directions after flow stops.",
      "test": "Measure directional pulse travel.",
      "against": "Anisotropy vanishes immediately.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0979",
    "hypothesis": "A droplet on a textured membrane could detect hidden leaks through directional vibration damping.",
    "test": "Introduce blinded membrane leaks.",
    "against": "Damping follows droplet mass alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 18,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0979",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A droplet on a textured membrane could detect hidden leaks through directional vibration damping.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0979",
      "hypothesis": "A droplet on a textured membrane could detect hidden leaks through directional vibration damping.",
      "test": "Introduce blinded membrane leaks.",
      "against": "Damping follows droplet mass alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0979",
      "hypothesis": "A droplet on a textured membrane could detect hidden leaks through directional vibration damping.",
      "test": "Introduce blinded membrane leaks.",
      "against": "Damping follows droplet mass alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 18,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0980",
    "hypothesis": "A two-layer flow could amplify tiny interfacial chemical changes into a reversible lateral displacement.",
    "test": "Measure chemistry and interface position.",
    "against": "Displacement follows viscosity changes only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0980",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A two-layer flow could amplify tiny interfacial chemical changes into a reversible lateral displacement.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0980",
      "hypothesis": "A two-layer flow could amplify tiny interfacial chemical changes into a reversible lateral displacement.",
      "test": "Measure chemistry and interface position.",
      "against": "Displacement follows viscosity changes only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0980",
      "hypothesis": "A two-layer flow could amplify tiny interfacial chemical changes into a reversible lateral displacement.",
      "test": "Measure chemistry and interface position.",
      "against": "Displacement follows viscosity changes only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0981",
    "hypothesis": "A free liquid jet could preserve a concentration boundary farther downstream when elastic stresses suppress radial exchange.",
    "test": "Map tracer boundaries and stress.",
    "against": "Persistence follows reduced turbulence alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0981",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A free liquid jet could preserve a concentration boundary farther downstream when elastic stresses suppress radial exchange.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0981",
      "hypothesis": "A free liquid jet could preserve a concentration boundary farther downstream when elastic stresses suppress radial exchange.",
      "test": "Map tracer boundaries and stress.",
      "against": "Persistence follows reduced turbulence alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0981",
      "hypothesis": "A free liquid jet could preserve a concentration boundary farther downstream when elastic stresses suppress radial exchange.",
      "test": "Map tracer boundaries and stress.",
      "against": "Persistence follows reduced turbulence alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0982",
    "hypothesis": "A porous paddle could produce net mixing during symmetric motion through delayed pore filling.",
    "test": "Measure mixing and actual work.",
    "against": "Mixing matches impermeable controls.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0982",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous paddle could produce net mixing during symmetric motion through delayed pore filling.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0982",
      "hypothesis": "A porous paddle could produce net mixing during symmetric motion through delayed pore filling.",
      "test": "Measure mixing and actual work.",
      "against": "Mixing matches impermeable controls.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0982",
      "hypothesis": "A porous paddle could produce net mixing during symmetric motion through delayed pore filling.",
      "test": "Measure mixing and actual work.",
      "against": "Mixing matches impermeable controls.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0983",
    "hypothesis": "A bubble could sense the age of a liquid interface through its detachment acceleration rather than detachment size.",
    "test": "Measure motion and interface age.",
    "against": "Acceleration follows size alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0983",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A bubble could sense the age of a liquid interface through its detachment acceleration rather than detachment size.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0983",
      "hypothesis": "A bubble could sense the age of a liquid interface through its detachment acceleration rather than detachment size.",
      "test": "Measure motion and interface age.",
      "against": "Acceleration follows size alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0983",
      "hypothesis": "A bubble could sense the age of a liquid interface through its detachment acceleration rather than detachment size.",
      "test": "Measure motion and interface age.",
      "against": "Acceleration follows size alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0984",
    "hypothesis": "A thin film could drain toward a thicker region when elastic substrate stresses outweigh capillary leveling.",
    "test": "Measure pressure and thickness evolution.",
    "against": "Flow always follows capillary pressure alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0984",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A thin film could drain toward a thicker region when elastic substrate stresses outweigh capillary leveling.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0984",
      "hypothesis": "A thin film could drain toward a thicker region when elastic substrate stresses outweigh capillary leveling.",
      "test": "Measure pressure and thickness evolution.",
      "against": "Flow always follows capillary pressure alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0984",
      "hypothesis": "A thin film could drain toward a thicker region when elastic substrate stresses outweigh capillary leveling.",
      "test": "Measure pressure and thickness evolution.",
      "against": "Flow always follows capillary pressure alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0985",
    "hypothesis": "A suspension could show reversible drag reduction when particles form rotating clusters instead of static chains.",
    "test": "Track clusters and pressure drop.",
    "against": "Drag changes require lower solid fraction.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0985",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A suspension could show reversible drag reduction when particles form rotating clusters instead of static chains.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0985",
      "hypothesis": "A suspension could show reversible drag reduction when particles form rotating clusters instead of static chains.",
      "test": "Track clusters and pressure drop.",
      "against": "Drag changes require lower solid fraction.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0985",
      "hypothesis": "A suspension could show reversible drag reduction when particles form rotating clusters instead of static chains.",
      "test": "Track clusters and pressure drop.",
      "against": "Drag changes require lower solid fraction.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0986",
    "hypothesis": "A deformable liquid conduit could distinguish gas from vapor bubbles through different recoil after compression.",
    "test": "Measure phase exchange and wall recovery.",
    "against": "Recoil reflects compressibility alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0986",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A deformable liquid conduit could distinguish gas from vapor bubbles through different recoil after compression.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0986",
      "hypothesis": "A deformable liquid conduit could distinguish gas from vapor bubbles through different recoil after compression.",
      "test": "Measure phase exchange and wall recovery.",
      "against": "Recoil reflects compressibility alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0986",
      "hypothesis": "A deformable liquid conduit could distinguish gas from vapor bubbles through different recoil after compression.",
      "test": "Measure phase exchange and wall recovery.",
      "against": "Recoil reflects compressibility alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0987",
    "hypothesis": "A droplet containing inert porous grains could delay freezing by redistributing supercooled liquid away from early nuclei.",
    "test": "Image liquid routes and freezing.",
    "against": "Delay follows contamination effects only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0987",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A droplet containing inert porous grains could delay freezing by redistributing supercooled liquid away from early nuclei.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0987",
      "hypothesis": "A droplet containing inert porous grains could delay freezing by redistributing supercooled liquid away from early nuclei.",
      "test": "Image liquid routes and freezing.",
      "against": "Delay follows contamination effects only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0987",
      "hypothesis": "A droplet containing inert porous grains could delay freezing by redistributing supercooled liquid away from early nuclei.",
      "test": "Image liquid routes and freezing.",
      "against": "Delay follows contamination effects only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0988",
    "hypothesis": "A capillary channel could separate a dissolved species from a moving temperature pulse through unequal wall storage.",
    "test": "Measure concentration and thermal histories.",
    "against": "Both travel with the same delay.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0988",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A capillary channel could separate a dissolved species from a moving temperature pulse through unequal wall storage.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0988",
      "hypothesis": "A capillary channel could separate a dissolved species from a moving temperature pulse through unequal wall storage.",
      "test": "Measure concentration and thermal histories.",
      "against": "Both travel with the same delay.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0988",
      "hypothesis": "A capillary channel could separate a dissolved species from a moving temperature pulse through unequal wall storage.",
      "test": "Measure concentration and thermal histories.",
      "against": "Both travel with the same delay.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0989",
    "hypothesis": "A liquid surface could guide a floating capsule toward a local stiffness defect in its supporting membrane.",
    "test": "Track trajectories and membrane strain.",
    "against": "Motion follows membrane height only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0989",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A liquid surface could guide a floating capsule toward a local stiffness defect in its supporting membrane.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0989",
      "hypothesis": "A liquid surface could guide a floating capsule toward a local stiffness defect in its supporting membrane.",
      "test": "Track trajectories and membrane strain.",
      "against": "Motion follows membrane height only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0989",
      "hypothesis": "A liquid surface could guide a floating capsule toward a local stiffness defect in its supporting membrane.",
      "test": "Track trajectories and membrane strain.",
      "against": "Motion follows membrane height only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0990",
    "hypothesis": "A vortex could release trapped particles selectively when the driving flow pauses for a specific relaxation interval.",
    "test": "Measure release across pauses.",
    "against": "Selection follows particle size alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0990",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A vortex could release trapped particles selectively when the driving flow pauses for a specific relaxation interval.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0990",
      "hypothesis": "A vortex could release trapped particles selectively when the driving flow pauses for a specific relaxation interval.",
      "test": "Measure release across pauses.",
      "against": "Selection follows particle size alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0990",
      "hypothesis": "A vortex could release trapped particles selectively when the driving flow pauses for a specific relaxation interval.",
      "test": "Measure release across pauses.",
      "against": "Selection follows particle size alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0991",
    "hypothesis": "A soft pore could reduce droplet fragmentation by releasing stored elastic energy after the droplet exits.",
    "test": "Image deformation and fragments.",
    "against": "Energy release increases breakup.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0991",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A soft pore could reduce droplet fragmentation by releasing stored elastic energy after the droplet exits.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0991",
      "hypothesis": "A soft pore could reduce droplet fragmentation by releasing stored elastic energy after the droplet exits.",
      "test": "Image deformation and fragments.",
      "against": "Energy release increases breakup.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0991",
      "hypothesis": "A soft pore could reduce droplet fragmentation by releasing stored elastic energy after the droplet exits.",
      "test": "Image deformation and fragments.",
      "against": "Energy release increases breakup.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0992",
    "hypothesis": "A water bridge could transfer mechanical information between two surfaces before transferring measurable liquid volume.",
    "test": "Measure force and tracer exchange.",
    "against": "Force appears only with bulk transfer.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0992",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A water bridge could transfer mechanical information between two surfaces before transferring measurable liquid volume.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0992",
      "hypothesis": "A water bridge could transfer mechanical information between two surfaces before transferring measurable liquid volume.",
      "test": "Measure force and tracer exchange.",
      "against": "Force appears only with bulk transfer.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0992",
      "hypothesis": "A water bridge could transfer mechanical information between two surfaces before transferring measurable liquid volume.",
      "test": "Measure force and tracer exchange.",
      "against": "Force appears only with bulk transfer.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0993",
    "hypothesis": "A fluid mixture could retain a short-lived memory of mixing direction in its interfacial tension fluctuations.",
    "test": "Measure fluctuations after reversed stirring.",
    "against": "Memory follows residual flow only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0993",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A fluid mixture could retain a short-lived memory of mixing direction in its interfacial tension fluctuations.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0993",
      "hypothesis": "A fluid mixture could retain a short-lived memory of mixing direction in its interfacial tension fluctuations.",
      "test": "Measure fluctuations after reversed stirring.",
      "against": "Memory follows residual flow only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0993",
      "hypothesis": "A fluid mixture could retain a short-lived memory of mixing direction in its interfacial tension fluctuations.",
      "test": "Measure fluctuations after reversed stirring.",
      "against": "Memory follows residual flow only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0994",
    "hypothesis": "A porous membrane could sort bubbles by internal composition through composition-dependent wall lubrication.",
    "test": "Use equal-size calibrated gas mixtures.",
    "against": "Sorting follows bubble size only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0994",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous membrane could sort bubbles by internal composition through composition-dependent wall lubrication.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0994",
      "hypothesis": "A porous membrane could sort bubbles by internal composition through composition-dependent wall lubrication.",
      "test": "Use equal-size calibrated gas mixtures.",
      "against": "Sorting follows bubble size only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0994",
      "hypothesis": "A porous membrane could sort bubbles by internal composition through composition-dependent wall lubrication.",
      "test": "Use equal-size calibrated gas mixtures.",
      "against": "Sorting follows bubble size only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0995",
    "hypothesis": "A floating elastic plate could suppress wave focusing by changing curvature under accumulated wave pressure.",
    "test": "Measure shape and wave energy.",
    "against": "Suppression requires added damping material.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0995",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A floating elastic plate could suppress wave focusing by changing curvature under accumulated wave pressure.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0995",
      "hypothesis": "A floating elastic plate could suppress wave focusing by changing curvature under accumulated wave pressure.",
      "test": "Measure shape and wave energy.",
      "against": "Suppression requires added damping material.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0995",
      "hypothesis": "A floating elastic plate could suppress wave focusing by changing curvature under accumulated wave pressure.",
      "test": "Measure shape and wave energy.",
      "against": "Suppression requires added damping material.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0996",
    "hypothesis": "A droplet could release an adsorbed solute pulse when its shape crosses a mechanical instability.",
    "test": "Measure shape and solute release.",
    "against": "Release follows surface-area loss alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0996",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A droplet could release an adsorbed solute pulse when its shape crosses a mechanical instability.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0996",
      "hypothesis": "A droplet could release an adsorbed solute pulse when its shape crosses a mechanical instability.",
      "test": "Measure shape and solute release.",
      "against": "Release follows surface-area loss alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0996",
      "hypothesis": "A droplet could release an adsorbed solute pulse when its shape crosses a mechanical instability.",
      "test": "Measure shape and solute release.",
      "against": "Release follows surface-area loss alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0997",
    "hypothesis": "A liquid-filled crack could stabilize a neighboring dry crack by redistributing stress without direct fluid exchange.",
    "test": "Measure both crack tips.",
    "against": "Stabilization requires hydraulic connection.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0997",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A liquid-filled crack could stabilize a neighboring dry crack by redistributing stress without direct fluid exchange.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0997",
      "hypothesis": "A liquid-filled crack could stabilize a neighboring dry crack by redistributing stress without direct fluid exchange.",
      "test": "Measure both crack tips.",
      "against": "Stabilization requires hydraulic connection.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0997",
      "hypothesis": "A liquid-filled crack could stabilize a neighboring dry crack by redistributing stress without direct fluid exchange.",
      "test": "Measure both crack tips.",
      "against": "Stabilization requires hydraulic connection.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0998",
    "hypothesis": "A turbulent puff could reveal an upstream compliant obstacle through delayed velocity-correlation echoes.",
    "test": "Measure correlations at matched mean flow.",
    "against": "Echoes follow ordinary reflection only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0998",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A turbulent puff could reveal an upstream compliant obstacle through delayed velocity-correlation echoes.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0998",
      "hypothesis": "A turbulent puff could reveal an upstream compliant obstacle through delayed velocity-correlation echoes.",
      "test": "Measure correlations at matched mean flow.",
      "against": "Echoes follow ordinary reflection only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0998",
      "hypothesis": "A turbulent puff could reveal an upstream compliant obstacle through delayed velocity-correlation echoes.",
      "test": "Measure correlations at matched mean flow.",
      "against": "Echoes follow ordinary reflection only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N0999",
    "hypothesis": "A capillary valve could distinguish the order of two miscible liquids through transient wall solvation.",
    "test": "Reverse delivery order.",
    "against": "Opening depends only on final composition.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 18,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N0999",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A capillary valve could distinguish the order of two miscible liquids through transient wall solvation.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N0999",
      "hypothesis": "A capillary valve could distinguish the order of two miscible liquids through transient wall solvation.",
      "test": "Reverse delivery order.",
      "against": "Opening depends only on final composition.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N0999",
      "hypothesis": "A capillary valve could distinguish the order of two miscible liquids through transient wall solvation.",
      "test": "Reverse delivery order.",
      "against": "Opening depends only on final composition.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 18,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1000",
    "hypothesis": "A thermal store could reduce standby losses by passively disconnecting its hottest internal pathway during rest.",
    "test": "Measure contact and heat leakage.",
    "against": "Loss reduction requires lower stored energy.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1000",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A thermal store could reduce standby losses by passively disconnecting its hottest internal pathway during rest.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1000",
      "hypothesis": "A thermal store could reduce standby losses by passively disconnecting its hottest internal pathway during rest.",
      "test": "Measure contact and heat leakage.",
      "against": "Loss reduction requires lower stored energy.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1000",
      "hypothesis": "A thermal store could reduce standby losses by passively disconnecting its hottest internal pathway during rest.",
      "test": "Measure contact and heat leakage.",
      "against": "Loss reduction requires lower stored energy.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1001",
    "hypothesis": "A piezoelectric harvester could capture irregular impacts better by releasing preload only between events.",
    "test": "Measure delivered energy and preload.",
    "against": "Gains vanish over complete cycles.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1001",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A piezoelectric harvester could capture irregular impacts better by releasing preload only between events.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1001",
      "hypothesis": "A piezoelectric harvester could capture irregular impacts better by releasing preload only between events.",
      "test": "Measure delivered energy and preload.",
      "against": "Gains vanish over complete cycles.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1001",
      "hypothesis": "A piezoelectric harvester could capture irregular impacts better by releasing preload only between events.",
      "test": "Measure delivered energy and preload.",
      "against": "Gains vanish over complete cycles.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1002",
    "hypothesis": "A solar absorber could reject overheating through a reversible change in convective geometry rather than optical reflectance.",
    "test": "Measure airflow and absorbed light.",
    "against": "Cooling requires less absorption.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1002",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A solar absorber could reject overheating through a reversible change in convective geometry rather than optical reflectance.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1002",
      "hypothesis": "A solar absorber could reject overheating through a reversible change in convective geometry rather than optical reflectance.",
      "test": "Measure airflow and absorbed light.",
      "against": "Cooling requires less absorption.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1002",
      "hypothesis": "A solar absorber could reject overheating through a reversible change in convective geometry rather than optical reflectance.",
      "test": "Measure airflow and absorbed light.",
      "against": "Cooling requires less absorption.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1003",
    "hypothesis": "A porous evaporator could preserve freshwater output by mechanically relocating salt before crystallization.",
    "test": "Track ions and pore motion.",
    "against": "Salt removal requires extra flushing.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1003",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous evaporator could preserve freshwater output by mechanically relocating salt before crystallization.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1003",
      "hypothesis": "A porous evaporator could preserve freshwater output by mechanically relocating salt before crystallization.",
      "test": "Track ions and pore motion.",
      "against": "Salt removal requires extra flushing.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1003",
      "hypothesis": "A porous evaporator could preserve freshwater output by mechanically relocating salt before crystallization.",
      "test": "Track ions and pore motion.",
      "against": "Salt removal requires extra flushing.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1004",
    "hypothesis": "An aqueous model cell could reveal incipient electrode isolation through thermal fluctuations before voltage loss.",
    "test": "Measure temperature noise and local current.",
    "against": "Noise changes follow bulk heating only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1004",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "An aqueous model cell could reveal incipient electrode isolation through thermal fluctuations before voltage loss.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1004",
      "hypothesis": "An aqueous model cell could reveal incipient electrode isolation through thermal fluctuations before voltage loss.",
      "test": "Measure temperature noise and local current.",
      "against": "Noise changes follow bulk heating only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1004",
      "hypothesis": "An aqueous model cell could reveal incipient electrode isolation through thermal fluctuations before voltage loss.",
      "test": "Measure temperature noise and local current.",
      "against": "Noise changes follow bulk heating only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1005",
    "hypothesis": "A reversible heat switch could close at a thermal-gradient threshold rather than absolute temperature.",
    "test": "Control both temperatures independently.",
    "against": "Switching follows mean temperature alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1005",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A reversible heat switch could close at a thermal-gradient threshold rather than absolute temperature.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1005",
      "hypothesis": "A reversible heat switch could close at a thermal-gradient threshold rather than absolute temperature.",
      "test": "Control both temperatures independently.",
      "against": "Switching follows mean temperature alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1005",
      "hypothesis": "A reversible heat switch could close at a thermal-gradient threshold rather than absolute temperature.",
      "test": "Control both temperatures independently.",
      "against": "Switching follows mean temperature alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1006",
    "hypothesis": "A mechanical energy store could reduce creep losses by rotating its load-bearing contact network during storage.",
    "test": "Track contacts and recovered work.",
    "against": "Rotation consumes the saved energy.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1006",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A mechanical energy store could reduce creep losses by rotating its load-bearing contact network during storage.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1006",
      "hypothesis": "A mechanical energy store could reduce creep losses by rotating its load-bearing contact network during storage.",
      "test": "Track contacts and recovered work.",
      "against": "Rotation consumes the saved energy.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1006",
      "hypothesis": "A mechanical energy store could reduce creep losses by rotating its load-bearing contact network during storage.",
      "test": "Track contacts and recovered work.",
      "against": "Rotation consumes the saved energy.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1007",
    "hypothesis": "A thermoelectric interface could maintain contact pressure through moisture-driven compensation of thermal expansion.",
    "test": "Measure pressure and conversion.",
    "against": "Compensation requires active humidity control.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1007",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A thermoelectric interface could maintain contact pressure through moisture-driven compensation of thermal expansion.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1007",
      "hypothesis": "A thermoelectric interface could maintain contact pressure through moisture-driven compensation of thermal expansion.",
      "test": "Measure pressure and conversion.",
      "against": "Compensation requires active humidity control.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1007",
      "hypothesis": "A thermoelectric interface could maintain contact pressure through moisture-driven compensation of thermal expansion.",
      "test": "Measure pressure and conversion.",
      "against": "Compensation requires active humidity control.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1008",
    "hypothesis": "A flow battery analogue could reduce mixing losses by using reversible density matching during transfer.",
    "test": "Measure species crossover and pumping work.",
    "against": "Benefits require lower throughput.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1008",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A flow battery analogue could reduce mixing losses by using reversible density matching during transfer.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1008",
      "hypothesis": "A flow battery analogue could reduce mixing losses by using reversible density matching during transfer.",
      "test": "Measure species crossover and pumping work.",
      "against": "Benefits require lower throughput.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1008",
      "hypothesis": "A flow battery analogue could reduce mixing losses by using reversible density matching during transfer.",
      "test": "Measure species crossover and pumping work.",
      "against": "Benefits require lower throughput.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1009",
    "hypothesis": "A passive radiator could direct heat toward the sky by changing its angular emission pattern as it warms.",
    "test": "Measure angle-resolved spectra.",
    "against": "Cooling follows total emissivity only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1009",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A passive radiator could direct heat toward the sky by changing its angular emission pattern as it warms.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1009",
      "hypothesis": "A passive radiator could direct heat toward the sky by changing its angular emission pattern as it warms.",
      "test": "Measure angle-resolved spectra.",
      "against": "Cooling follows total emissivity only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1009",
      "hypothesis": "A passive radiator could direct heat toward the sky by changing its angular emission pattern as it warms.",
      "test": "Measure angle-resolved spectra.",
      "against": "Cooling follows total emissivity only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1010",
    "hypothesis": "An acoustic energy harvester could avoid saturation by temporarily moving energy into a coupled fluid cavity.",
    "test": "Measure energy paths and output.",
    "against": "Extra cavity reduces net yield.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1010",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "An acoustic energy harvester could avoid saturation by temporarily moving energy into a coupled fluid cavity.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1010",
      "hypothesis": "An acoustic energy harvester could avoid saturation by temporarily moving energy into a coupled fluid cavity.",
      "test": "Measure energy paths and output.",
      "against": "Extra cavity reduces net yield.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1010",
      "hypothesis": "An acoustic energy harvester could avoid saturation by temporarily moving energy into a coupled fluid cavity.",
      "test": "Measure energy paths and output.",
      "against": "Extra cavity reduces net yield.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1011",
    "hypothesis": "A phase-change store could reveal trapped unmelted regions through the delay of a small thermal echo.",
    "test": "Compare echoes with melt imaging.",
    "against": "Echoes reflect wall contacts alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1011",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A phase-change store could reveal trapped unmelted regions through the delay of a small thermal echo.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1011",
      "hypothesis": "A phase-change store could reveal trapped unmelted regions through the delay of a small thermal echo.",
      "test": "Compare echoes with melt imaging.",
      "against": "Echoes reflect wall contacts alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1011",
      "hypothesis": "A phase-change store could reveal trapped unmelted regions through the delay of a small thermal echo.",
      "test": "Compare echoes with melt imaging.",
      "against": "Echoes reflect wall contacts alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1012",
    "hypothesis": "A benign electrochemical sensor could distinguish gas coverage from catalyst aging through reversible pressure microsteps.",
    "test": "Measure local bubbles and current.",
    "against": "Responses remain confounded.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1012",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A benign electrochemical sensor could distinguish gas coverage from catalyst aging through reversible pressure microsteps.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1012",
      "hypothesis": "A benign electrochemical sensor could distinguish gas coverage from catalyst aging through reversible pressure microsteps.",
      "test": "Measure local bubbles and current.",
      "against": "Responses remain confounded.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1012",
      "hypothesis": "A benign electrochemical sensor could distinguish gas coverage from catalyst aging through reversible pressure microsteps.",
      "test": "Measure local bubbles and current.",
      "against": "Responses remain confounded.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1013",
    "hypothesis": "A solar desalination film could retain efficiency after damage by redirecting capillary supply around dry defects.",
    "test": "Map wetness and evaporation.",
    "against": "Recovery requires external reconnection.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1013",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A solar desalination film could retain efficiency after damage by redirecting capillary supply around dry defects.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1013",
      "hypothesis": "A solar desalination film could retain efficiency after damage by redirecting capillary supply around dry defects.",
      "test": "Map wetness and evaporation.",
      "against": "Recovery requires external reconnection.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1013",
      "hypothesis": "A solar desalination film could retain efficiency after damage by redirecting capillary supply around dry defects.",
      "test": "Map wetness and evaporation.",
      "against": "Recovery requires external reconnection.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1014",
    "hypothesis": "A thermal diode could rectify more strongly when its contact area responds to temperature difference with a delay.",
    "test": "Measure full transient energy balance.",
    "against": "Rectification vanishes after steady equilibration.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1014",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A thermal diode could rectify more strongly when its contact area responds to temperature difference with a delay.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1014",
      "hypothesis": "A thermal diode could rectify more strongly when its contact area responds to temperature difference with a delay.",
      "test": "Measure full transient energy balance.",
      "against": "Rectification vanishes after steady equilibration.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1014",
      "hypothesis": "A thermal diode could rectify more strongly when its contact area responds to temperature difference with a delay.",
      "test": "Measure full transient energy balance.",
      "against": "Rectification vanishes after steady equilibration.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1015",
    "hypothesis": "A vibration harvester could detect its own detuning through phase-noise changes before useful power declines.",
    "test": "Measure noise and output.",
    "against": "Warnings follow power loss.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1015",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A vibration harvester could detect its own detuning through phase-noise changes before useful power declines.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1015",
      "hypothesis": "A vibration harvester could detect its own detuning through phase-noise changes before useful power declines.",
      "test": "Measure noise and output.",
      "against": "Warnings follow power loss.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1015",
      "hypothesis": "A vibration harvester could detect its own detuning through phase-noise changes before useful power declines.",
      "test": "Measure noise and output.",
      "against": "Warnings follow power loss.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1016",
    "hypothesis": "A porous electrode could recover accessible area through gas dissolution triggered by a mild concentration change.",
    "test": "Measure gas and electrochemical area.",
    "against": "Recovery follows surface chemistry changes only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1016",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous electrode could recover accessible area through gas dissolution triggered by a mild concentration change.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1016",
      "hypothesis": "A porous electrode could recover accessible area through gas dissolution triggered by a mild concentration change.",
      "test": "Measure gas and electrochemical area.",
      "against": "Recovery follows surface chemistry changes only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1016",
      "hypothesis": "A porous electrode could recover accessible area through gas dissolution triggered by a mild concentration change.",
      "test": "Measure gas and electrochemical area.",
      "against": "Recovery follows surface chemistry changes only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1017",
    "hypothesis": "A heat exchanger could suppress fouling by periodically reversing local thermal gradients without reversing bulk flow.",
    "test": "Measure deposits and pumping work.",
    "against": "Suppression requires reduced heat transfer.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1017",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A heat exchanger could suppress fouling by periodically reversing local thermal gradients without reversing bulk flow.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1017",
      "hypothesis": "A heat exchanger could suppress fouling by periodically reversing local thermal gradients without reversing bulk flow.",
      "test": "Measure deposits and pumping work.",
      "against": "Suppression requires reduced heat transfer.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1017",
      "hypothesis": "A heat exchanger could suppress fouling by periodically reversing local thermal gradients without reversing bulk flow.",
      "test": "Measure deposits and pumping work.",
      "against": "Suppression requires reduced heat transfer.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1018",
    "hypothesis": "A gravity-driven generator analogue could smooth output using a mechanically delayed release of liquid packets.",
    "test": "Measure packet timing and energy.",
    "against": "Smoothing causes excessive conversion loss.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1018",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A gravity-driven generator analogue could smooth output using a mechanically delayed release of liquid packets.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1018",
      "hypothesis": "A gravity-driven generator analogue could smooth output using a mechanically delayed release of liquid packets.",
      "test": "Measure packet timing and energy.",
      "against": "Smoothing causes excessive conversion loss.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1018",
      "hypothesis": "A gravity-driven generator analogue could smooth output using a mechanically delayed release of liquid packets.",
      "test": "Measure packet timing and energy.",
      "against": "Smoothing causes excessive conversion loss.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1019",
    "hypothesis": "A thermal blanket could become more insulating only under a large gradient through reversible pore-wall contact loss.",
    "test": "Measure conductivity and contacts.",
    "against": "Insulation follows average temperature alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1019",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A thermal blanket could become more insulating only under a large gradient through reversible pore-wall contact loss.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1019",
      "hypothesis": "A thermal blanket could become more insulating only under a large gradient through reversible pore-wall contact loss.",
      "test": "Measure conductivity and contacts.",
      "against": "Insulation follows average temperature alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1019",
      "hypothesis": "A thermal blanket could become more insulating only under a large gradient through reversible pore-wall contact loss.",
      "test": "Measure conductivity and contacts.",
      "against": "Insulation follows average temperature alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1020",
    "hypothesis": "An aqueous storage device could identify reversible versus irreversible self-discharge through the spatial pattern of local potential recovery.",
    "test": "Measure local potentials and recovered charge.",
    "against": "Patterns cannot classify losses.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1020",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "An aqueous storage device could identify reversible versus irreversible self-discharge through the spatial pattern of local potential recovery.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1020",
      "hypothesis": "An aqueous storage device could identify reversible versus irreversible self-discharge through the spatial pattern of local potential recovery.",
      "test": "Measure local potentials and recovered charge.",
      "against": "Patterns cannot classify losses.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1020",
      "hypothesis": "An aqueous storage device could identify reversible versus irreversible self-discharge through the spatial pattern of local potential recovery.",
      "test": "Measure local potentials and recovered charge.",
      "against": "Patterns cannot classify losses.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1021",
    "hypothesis": "A solar collector could reduce shading losses by mechanically rotating only poorly illuminated subelements.",
    "test": "Measure rotation and net power.",
    "against": "Motion costs exceed recovered energy.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1021",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A solar collector could reduce shading losses by mechanically rotating only poorly illuminated subelements.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1021",
      "hypothesis": "A solar collector could reduce shading losses by mechanically rotating only poorly illuminated subelements.",
      "test": "Measure rotation and net power.",
      "against": "Motion costs exceed recovered energy.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1021",
      "hypothesis": "A solar collector could reduce shading losses by mechanically rotating only poorly illuminated subelements.",
      "test": "Measure rotation and net power.",
      "against": "Motion costs exceed recovered energy.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1022",
    "hypothesis": "A soft hydraulic accumulator could retain efficiency by expelling dissolved gas before nucleation occurs.",
    "test": "Measure gas saturation and cycle work.",
    "against": "Benefits require additional degassing energy.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1022",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A soft hydraulic accumulator could retain efficiency by expelling dissolved gas before nucleation occurs.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1022",
      "hypothesis": "A soft hydraulic accumulator could retain efficiency by expelling dissolved gas before nucleation occurs.",
      "test": "Measure gas saturation and cycle work.",
      "against": "Benefits require additional degassing energy.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1022",
      "hypothesis": "A soft hydraulic accumulator could retain efficiency by expelling dissolved gas before nucleation occurs.",
      "test": "Measure gas saturation and cycle work.",
      "against": "Benefits require additional degassing energy.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1023",
    "hypothesis": "A thermally driven pump could increase net flow by matching vapor-bubble collapse to elastic recoil.",
    "test": "Measure bubble timing and transport.",
    "against": "Flow depends only on peak temperature.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1023",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A thermally driven pump could increase net flow by matching vapor-bubble collapse to elastic recoil.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1023",
      "hypothesis": "A thermally driven pump could increase net flow by matching vapor-bubble collapse to elastic recoil.",
      "test": "Measure bubble timing and transport.",
      "against": "Flow depends only on peak temperature.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1023",
      "hypothesis": "A thermally driven pump could increase net flow by matching vapor-bubble collapse to elastic recoil.",
      "test": "Measure bubble timing and transport.",
      "against": "Flow depends only on peak temperature.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1024",
    "hypothesis": "A passive coolant loop could self-start through unequal gas solubility in its hot and cold sections.",
    "test": "Measure gas and startup flow.",
    "against": "Startup requires external pumping.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1024",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A passive coolant loop could self-start through unequal gas solubility in its hot and cold sections.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1024",
      "hypothesis": "A passive coolant loop could self-start through unequal gas solubility in its hot and cold sections.",
      "test": "Measure gas and startup flow.",
      "against": "Startup requires external pumping.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1024",
      "hypothesis": "A passive coolant loop could self-start through unequal gas solubility in its hot and cold sections.",
      "test": "Measure gas and startup flow.",
      "against": "Startup requires external pumping.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1025",
    "hypothesis": "A light-harvesting film could protect itself by temporarily transferring excitation into a reversible dark molecular state.",
    "test": "Measure state occupation and damage.",
    "against": "Protection requires reduced photon absorption.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1025",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A light-harvesting film could protect itself by temporarily transferring excitation into a reversible dark molecular state.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1025",
      "hypothesis": "A light-harvesting film could protect itself by temporarily transferring excitation into a reversible dark molecular state.",
      "test": "Measure state occupation and damage.",
      "against": "Protection requires reduced photon absorption.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1025",
      "hypothesis": "A light-harvesting film could protect itself by temporarily transferring excitation into a reversible dark molecular state.",
      "test": "Measure state occupation and damage.",
      "against": "Protection requires reduced photon absorption.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1026",
    "hypothesis": "A porous thermal interface could restore contact after cycling by moving an internal liquid toward newly opened gaps.",
    "test": "Map liquid and thermal resistance.",
    "against": "Recovery requires external pressure increase.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 12,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1026",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous thermal interface could restore contact after cycling by moving an internal liquid toward newly opened gaps.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1026",
      "hypothesis": "A porous thermal interface could restore contact after cycling by moving an internal liquid toward newly opened gaps.",
      "test": "Map liquid and thermal resistance.",
      "against": "Recovery requires external pressure increase.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1026",
      "hypothesis": "A porous thermal interface could restore contact after cycling by moving an internal liquid toward newly opened gaps.",
      "test": "Map liquid and thermal resistance.",
      "against": "Recovery requires external pressure increase.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 12,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1027",
    "hypothesis": "A wave-energy absorber analogue could reject destructive pulses by changing its natural frequency through entrained air redistribution.",
    "test": "Measure frequency and impact loads.",
    "against": "Protection reduces ordinary energy capture equally.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1027",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A wave-energy absorber analogue could reject destructive pulses by changing its natural frequency through entrained air redistribution.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1027",
      "hypothesis": "A wave-energy absorber analogue could reject destructive pulses by changing its natural frequency through entrained air redistribution.",
      "test": "Measure frequency and impact loads.",
      "against": "Protection reduces ordinary energy capture equally.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1027",
      "hypothesis": "A wave-energy absorber analogue could reject destructive pulses by changing its natural frequency through entrained air redistribution.",
      "test": "Measure frequency and impact loads.",
      "against": "Protection reduces ordinary energy capture equally.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1028",
    "hypothesis": "A model aqueous electrode could reduce side reactions by releasing stored interfacial strain between charge pulses.",
    "test": "Measure strain and verified products.",
    "against": "Improvement follows longer rest only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1028",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A model aqueous electrode could reduce side reactions by releasing stored interfacial strain between charge pulses.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1028",
      "hypothesis": "A model aqueous electrode could reduce side reactions by releasing stored interfacial strain between charge pulses.",
      "test": "Measure strain and verified products.",
      "against": "Improvement follows longer rest only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1028",
      "hypothesis": "A model aqueous electrode could reduce side reactions by releasing stored interfacial strain between charge pulses.",
      "test": "Measure strain and verified products.",
      "against": "Improvement follows longer rest only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1029",
    "hypothesis": "A heat-storage capsule could redistribute nucleation sites after each melt and thereby reduce cycle variability.",
    "test": "Map sites and thermal response.",
    "against": "Variability remains unchanged.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1029",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A heat-storage capsule could redistribute nucleation sites after each melt and thereby reduce cycle variability.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1029",
      "hypothesis": "A heat-storage capsule could redistribute nucleation sites after each melt and thereby reduce cycle variability.",
      "test": "Map sites and thermal response.",
      "against": "Variability remains unchanged.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1029",
      "hypothesis": "A heat-storage capsule could redistribute nucleation sites after each melt and thereby reduce cycle variability.",
      "test": "Map sites and thermal response.",
      "against": "Variability remains unchanged.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1030",
    "hypothesis": "A solar evaporator could distinguish salt clogging from water starvation using paired temperature and acoustic transients.",
    "test": "Introduce faults independently.",
    "against": "Signals cannot separate failure causes.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 18,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1030",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A solar evaporator could distinguish salt clogging from water starvation using paired temperature and acoustic transients.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1030",
      "hypothesis": "A solar evaporator could distinguish salt clogging from water starvation using paired temperature and acoustic transients.",
      "test": "Introduce faults independently.",
      "against": "Signals cannot separate failure causes.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1030",
      "hypothesis": "A solar evaporator could distinguish salt clogging from water starvation using paired temperature and acoustic transients.",
      "test": "Introduce faults independently.",
      "against": "Signals cannot separate failure causes.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 18,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1031",
    "hypothesis": "A mechanical harvester could exploit friction aging to release energy only when an electrical load can accept it.",
    "test": "Measure friction and delivered energy.",
    "against": "Timing gains vanish after energy accounting.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1031",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A mechanical harvester could exploit friction aging to release energy only when an electrical load can accept it.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1031",
      "hypothesis": "A mechanical harvester could exploit friction aging to release energy only when an electrical load can accept it.",
      "test": "Measure friction and delivered energy.",
      "against": "Timing gains vanish after energy accounting.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1031",
      "hypothesis": "A mechanical harvester could exploit friction aging to release energy only when an electrical load can accept it.",
      "test": "Measure friction and delivered energy.",
      "against": "Timing gains vanish after energy accounting.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1032",
    "hypothesis": "A phase-change wall could shift its active melting region toward a moving hotspot without bulk liquid transport.",
    "test": "Map phase and fluid motion.",
    "against": "Tracking requires convection.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1032",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A phase-change wall could shift its active melting region toward a moving hotspot without bulk liquid transport.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1032",
      "hypothesis": "A phase-change wall could shift its active melting region toward a moving hotspot without bulk liquid transport.",
      "test": "Map phase and fluid motion.",
      "against": "Tracking requires convection.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1032",
      "hypothesis": "A phase-change wall could shift its active melting region toward a moving hotspot without bulk liquid transport.",
      "test": "Map phase and fluid motion.",
      "against": "Tracking requires convection.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1033",
    "hypothesis": "A thermoelectric material could reveal local degradation through unequal response to heating and cooling pulses.",
    "test": "Compare known damaged regions.",
    "against": "Asymmetry follows contact resistance only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1033",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A thermoelectric material could reveal local degradation through unequal response to heating and cooling pulses.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1033",
      "hypothesis": "A thermoelectric material could reveal local degradation through unequal response to heating and cooling pulses.",
      "test": "Compare known damaged regions.",
      "against": "Asymmetry follows contact resistance only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1033",
      "hypothesis": "A thermoelectric material could reveal local degradation through unequal response to heating and cooling pulses.",
      "test": "Compare known damaged regions.",
      "against": "Asymmetry follows contact resistance only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1034",
    "hypothesis": "A compressed-air analogue could reduce expansion icing by releasing adsorbed water before the pressure drop.",
    "test": "Measure moisture and ice formation.",
    "against": "Protection requires added heating.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1034",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A compressed-air analogue could reduce expansion icing by releasing adsorbed water before the pressure drop.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1034",
      "hypothesis": "A compressed-air analogue could reduce expansion icing by releasing adsorbed water before the pressure drop.",
      "test": "Measure moisture and ice formation.",
      "against": "Protection requires added heating.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1034",
      "hypothesis": "A compressed-air analogue could reduce expansion icing by releasing adsorbed water before the pressure drop.",
      "test": "Measure moisture and ice formation.",
      "against": "Protection requires added heating.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1035",
    "hypothesis": "A passive solar reflector could maintain alignment through daily humidity-induced shape changes.",
    "test": "Measure pointing under controlled cycles.",
    "against": "Alignment follows humidity inconsistently.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1035",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A passive solar reflector could maintain alignment through daily humidity-induced shape changes.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1035",
      "hypothesis": "A passive solar reflector could maintain alignment through daily humidity-induced shape changes.",
      "test": "Measure pointing under controlled cycles.",
      "against": "Alignment follows humidity inconsistently.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1035",
      "hypothesis": "A passive solar reflector could maintain alignment through daily humidity-induced shape changes.",
      "test": "Measure pointing under controlled cycles.",
      "against": "Alignment follows humidity inconsistently.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1036",
    "hypothesis": "A porous electrode could distribute current more uniformly when its electrolyte pathways swell selectively under high local current.",
    "test": "Map swelling and current.",
    "against": "Uniformity requires lower total current.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 12,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1036",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous electrode could distribute current more uniformly when its electrolyte pathways swell selectively under high local current.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1036",
      "hypothesis": "A porous electrode could distribute current more uniformly when its electrolyte pathways swell selectively under high local current.",
      "test": "Map swelling and current.",
      "against": "Uniformity requires lower total current.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1036",
      "hypothesis": "A porous electrode could distribute current more uniformly when its electrolyte pathways swell selectively under high local current.",
      "test": "Map swelling and current.",
      "against": "Uniformity requires lower total current.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 12,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1037",
    "hypothesis": "A thermal store could preserve output temperature by sequentially coupling compartments through reversible mechanical contacts.",
    "test": "Measure contacts and discharge temperature.",
    "against": "Stability requires sacrificing recoverable energy.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1037",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A thermal store could preserve output temperature by sequentially coupling compartments through reversible mechanical contacts.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1037",
      "hypothesis": "A thermal store could preserve output temperature by sequentially coupling compartments through reversible mechanical contacts.",
      "test": "Measure contacts and discharge temperature.",
      "against": "Stability requires sacrificing recoverable energy.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1037",
      "hypothesis": "A thermal store could preserve output temperature by sequentially coupling compartments through reversible mechanical contacts.",
      "test": "Measure contacts and discharge temperature.",
      "against": "Stability requires sacrificing recoverable energy.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1038",
    "hypothesis": "A fluidic energy harvester could identify its optimal load from internal phase lag without measuring output power directly.",
    "test": "Compare inferred and measured optima.",
    "against": "Inference fails unfamiliar waveforms.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1038",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A fluidic energy harvester could identify its optimal load from internal phase lag without measuring output power directly.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1038",
      "hypothesis": "A fluidic energy harvester could identify its optimal load from internal phase lag without measuring output power directly.",
      "test": "Compare inferred and measured optima.",
      "against": "Inference fails unfamiliar waveforms.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1038",
      "hypothesis": "A fluidic energy harvester could identify its optimal load from internal phase lag without measuring output power directly.",
      "test": "Compare inferred and measured optima.",
      "against": "Inference fails unfamiliar waveforms.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1039",
    "hypothesis": "A radiative coating could separate dew collection from thermal insulation by changing only infrared-active pore filling.",
    "test": "Measure spectra and collected water.",
    "against": "Benefits follow altered surface wetting only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1039",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A radiative coating could separate dew collection from thermal insulation by changing only infrared-active pore filling.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1039",
      "hypothesis": "A radiative coating could separate dew collection from thermal insulation by changing only infrared-active pore filling.",
      "test": "Measure spectra and collected water.",
      "against": "Benefits follow altered surface wetting only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1039",
      "hypothesis": "A radiative coating could separate dew collection from thermal insulation by changing only infrared-active pore filling.",
      "test": "Measure spectra and collected water.",
      "against": "Benefits follow altered surface wetting only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1040",
    "hypothesis": "A low-pressure steam analogue could suppress oscillatory flow by converting pressure fluctuations into reversible membrane bending.",
    "test": "Measure pressure and dissipated work.",
    "against": "Stabilization requires large mean pressure loss.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1040",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A low-pressure steam analogue could suppress oscillatory flow by converting pressure fluctuations into reversible membrane bending.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1040",
      "hypothesis": "A low-pressure steam analogue could suppress oscillatory flow by converting pressure fluctuations into reversible membrane bending.",
      "test": "Measure pressure and dissipated work.",
      "against": "Stabilization requires large mean pressure loss.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1040",
      "hypothesis": "A low-pressure steam analogue could suppress oscillatory flow by converting pressure fluctuations into reversible membrane bending.",
      "test": "Measure pressure and dissipated work.",
      "against": "Stabilization requires large mean pressure loss.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1041",
    "hypothesis": "A solar cell analogue could detect moisture ingress through a mechanical resonance shift before electrical leakage.",
    "test": "Measure modes and independent moisture.",
    "against": "Detection follows leakage onset.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1041",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A solar cell analogue could detect moisture ingress through a mechanical resonance shift before electrical leakage.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1041",
      "hypothesis": "A solar cell analogue could detect moisture ingress through a mechanical resonance shift before electrical leakage.",
      "test": "Measure modes and independent moisture.",
      "against": "Detection follows leakage onset.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1041",
      "hypothesis": "A solar cell analogue could detect moisture ingress through a mechanical resonance shift before electrical leakage.",
      "test": "Measure modes and independent moisture.",
      "against": "Detection follows leakage onset.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1042",
    "hypothesis": "A phase-change slurry could reduce pumping energy by breaking aggregates only at constrictions.",
    "test": "Track clusters and hydraulic work.",
    "against": "Energy savings vanish after mixing costs included.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1042",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A phase-change slurry could reduce pumping energy by breaking aggregates only at constrictions.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1042",
      "hypothesis": "A phase-change slurry could reduce pumping energy by breaking aggregates only at constrictions.",
      "test": "Track clusters and hydraulic work.",
      "against": "Energy savings vanish after mixing costs included.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1042",
      "hypothesis": "A phase-change slurry could reduce pumping energy by breaking aggregates only at constrictions.",
      "test": "Track clusters and hydraulic work.",
      "against": "Energy savings vanish after mixing costs included.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1043",
    "hypothesis": "A heat switch could retain a selected state through capillary adhesion while requiring little holding energy.",
    "test": "Measure switching and leakage.",
    "against": "Retention requires continuous active power.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1043",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A heat switch could retain a selected state through capillary adhesion while requiring little holding energy.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1043",
      "hypothesis": "A heat switch could retain a selected state through capillary adhesion while requiring little holding energy.",
      "test": "Measure switching and leakage.",
      "against": "Retention requires continuous active power.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1043",
      "hypothesis": "A heat switch could retain a selected state through capillary adhesion while requiring little holding energy.",
      "test": "Measure switching and leakage.",
      "against": "Retention requires continuous active power.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1044",
    "hypothesis": "A model capacitor could separate lost pore access from increased contact resistance through mechanically modulated impedance.",
    "test": "Introduce known defects.",
    "against": "Parameters remain unidentifiable.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1044",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A model capacitor could separate lost pore access from increased contact resistance through mechanically modulated impedance.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1044",
      "hypothesis": "A model capacitor could separate lost pore access from increased contact resistance through mechanically modulated impedance.",
      "test": "Introduce known defects.",
      "against": "Parameters remain unidentifiable.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1044",
      "hypothesis": "A model capacitor could separate lost pore access from increased contact resistance through mechanically modulated impedance.",
      "test": "Introduce known defects.",
      "against": "Parameters remain unidentifiable.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1045",
    "hypothesis": "A passive cooling surface could route condensate toward regions with the greatest thermal resistance.",
    "test": "Map temperature, flow, and resistance.",
    "against": "Routing follows slope alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1045",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A passive cooling surface could route condensate toward regions with the greatest thermal resistance.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1045",
      "hypothesis": "A passive cooling surface could route condensate toward regions with the greatest thermal resistance.",
      "test": "Map temperature, flow, and resistance.",
      "against": "Routing follows slope alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1045",
      "hypothesis": "A passive cooling surface could route condensate toward regions with the greatest thermal resistance.",
      "test": "Map temperature, flow, and resistance.",
      "against": "Routing follows slope alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1046",
    "hypothesis": "A wave-driven pump could maintain direction under reversed forcing through a stored elastic asymmetry.",
    "test": "Reverse waves and measure transport.",
    "against": "Direction follows forcing reversal.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1046",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A wave-driven pump could maintain direction under reversed forcing through a stored elastic asymmetry.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1046",
      "hypothesis": "A wave-driven pump could maintain direction under reversed forcing through a stored elastic asymmetry.",
      "test": "Reverse waves and measure transport.",
      "against": "Direction follows forcing reversal.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1046",
      "hypothesis": "A wave-driven pump could maintain direction under reversed forcing through a stored elastic asymmetry.",
      "test": "Reverse waves and measure transport.",
      "against": "Direction follows forcing reversal.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1047",
    "hypothesis": "A thermal-energy harvester could use delayed crystallization to synchronize mechanical work with an external load.",
    "test": "Measure phase timing and useful work.",
    "against": "Synchronization consumes more energy than gained.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1047",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A thermal-energy harvester could use delayed crystallization to synchronize mechanical work with an external load.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1047",
      "hypothesis": "A thermal-energy harvester could use delayed crystallization to synchronize mechanical work with an external load.",
      "test": "Measure phase timing and useful work.",
      "against": "Synchronization consumes more energy than gained.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1047",
      "hypothesis": "A thermal-energy harvester could use delayed crystallization to synchronize mechanical work with an external load.",
      "test": "Measure phase timing and useful work.",
      "against": "Synchronization consumes more energy than gained.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1048",
    "hypothesis": "A porous solar absorber could expose hidden delamination through changes in its cooling trajectory after illumination ends.",
    "test": "Compare known interface defects.",
    "against": "Trajectories follow emissivity changes only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1048",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous solar absorber could expose hidden delamination through changes in its cooling trajectory after illumination ends.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1048",
      "hypothesis": "A porous solar absorber could expose hidden delamination through changes in its cooling trajectory after illumination ends.",
      "test": "Compare known interface defects.",
      "against": "Trajectories follow emissivity changes only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1048",
      "hypothesis": "A porous solar absorber could expose hidden delamination through changes in its cooling trajectory after illumination ends.",
      "test": "Compare known interface defects.",
      "against": "Trajectories follow emissivity changes only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1049",
    "hypothesis": "An aqueous battery analogue could reduce concentration imbalance by mechanically redistributing electrolyte during idle periods.",
    "test": "Map ions and cycle efficiency.",
    "against": "Benefit requires continued external pumping.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1049",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "An aqueous battery analogue could reduce concentration imbalance by mechanically redistributing electrolyte during idle periods.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1049",
      "hypothesis": "An aqueous battery analogue could reduce concentration imbalance by mechanically redistributing electrolyte during idle periods.",
      "test": "Map ions and cycle efficiency.",
      "against": "Benefit requires continued external pumping.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1049",
      "hypothesis": "An aqueous battery analogue could reduce concentration imbalance by mechanically redistributing electrolyte during idle periods.",
      "test": "Map ions and cycle efficiency.",
      "against": "Benefit requires continued external pumping.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1050",
    "hypothesis": "A heat-exchanger coating could delay scale attachment by making fresh crystals rotate during early growth.",
    "test": "Image crystal rotation and adhesion.",
    "against": "Delay follows lower supersaturation only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1050",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A heat-exchanger coating could delay scale attachment by making fresh crystals rotate during early growth.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1050",
      "hypothesis": "A heat-exchanger coating could delay scale attachment by making fresh crystals rotate during early growth.",
      "test": "Image crystal rotation and adhesion.",
      "against": "Delay follows lower supersaturation only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1050",
      "hypothesis": "A heat-exchanger coating could delay scale attachment by making fresh crystals rotate during early growth.",
      "test": "Image crystal rotation and adhesion.",
      "against": "Delay follows lower supersaturation only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1051",
    "hypothesis": "A compliant turbine analogue could shed overload through a reversible shape mode while preserving normal-flow efficiency.",
    "test": "Measure shape and full performance curves.",
    "against": "Protection requires lower normal efficiency.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1051",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A compliant turbine analogue could shed overload through a reversible shape mode while preserving normal-flow efficiency.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1051",
      "hypothesis": "A compliant turbine analogue could shed overload through a reversible shape mode while preserving normal-flow efficiency.",
      "test": "Measure shape and full performance curves.",
      "against": "Protection requires lower normal efficiency.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1051",
      "hypothesis": "A compliant turbine analogue could shed overload through a reversible shape mode while preserving normal-flow efficiency.",
      "test": "Measure shape and full performance curves.",
      "against": "Protection requires lower normal efficiency.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1052",
    "hypothesis": "A phase-change material could release heat in smaller controllable bursts when its crystal network mechanically partitions.",
    "test": "Measure network and heat flux.",
    "against": "Burst sizes follow container geometry only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1052",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A phase-change material could release heat in smaller controllable bursts when its crystal network mechanically partitions.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1052",
      "hypothesis": "A phase-change material could release heat in smaller controllable bursts when its crystal network mechanically partitions.",
      "test": "Measure network and heat flux.",
      "against": "Burst sizes follow container geometry only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1052",
      "hypothesis": "A phase-change material could release heat in smaller controllable bursts when its crystal network mechanically partitions.",
      "test": "Measure network and heat flux.",
      "against": "Burst sizes follow container geometry only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1053",
    "hypothesis": "A thermal sensor could detect a cooling-path blockage from the direction of local temperature-noise propagation.",
    "test": "Compare calibrated obstructions.",
    "against": "Propagation follows sensor placement only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1053",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A thermal sensor could detect a cooling-path blockage from the direction of local temperature-noise propagation.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1053",
      "hypothesis": "A thermal sensor could detect a cooling-path blockage from the direction of local temperature-noise propagation.",
      "test": "Compare calibrated obstructions.",
      "against": "Propagation follows sensor placement only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1053",
      "hypothesis": "A thermal sensor could detect a cooling-path blockage from the direction of local temperature-noise propagation.",
      "test": "Compare calibrated obstructions.",
      "against": "Propagation follows sensor placement only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1054",
    "hypothesis": "A porous current collector could reveal incipient corrosion through pressure-dependent contact noise.",
    "test": "Measure noise and independent corrosion.",
    "against": "Noise follows contact load alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1054",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous current collector could reveal incipient corrosion through pressure-dependent contact noise.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1054",
      "hypothesis": "A porous current collector could reveal incipient corrosion through pressure-dependent contact noise.",
      "test": "Measure noise and independent corrosion.",
      "against": "Noise follows contact load alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1054",
      "hypothesis": "A porous current collector could reveal incipient corrosion through pressure-dependent contact noise.",
      "test": "Measure noise and independent corrosion.",
      "against": "Noise follows contact load alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1055",
    "hypothesis": "A passive solar still could retain yield after tilt changes by relocating its condensate reservoir mechanically.",
    "test": "Measure reservoir and collected water.",
    "against": "Yield changes follow wetted area only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1055",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A passive solar still could retain yield after tilt changes by relocating its condensate reservoir mechanically.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1055",
      "hypothesis": "A passive solar still could retain yield after tilt changes by relocating its condensate reservoir mechanically.",
      "test": "Measure reservoir and collected water.",
      "against": "Yield changes follow wetted area only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1055",
      "hypothesis": "A passive solar still could retain yield after tilt changes by relocating its condensate reservoir mechanically.",
      "test": "Measure reservoir and collected water.",
      "against": "Yield changes follow wetted area only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1056",
    "hypothesis": "A vibration-isolated thermal store could lose less latent capacity because acoustic disturbances trigger fewer unwanted nuclei.",
    "test": "Measure nucleation and stored energy.",
    "against": "Capacity follows thermal history alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1056",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A vibration-isolated thermal store could lose less latent capacity because acoustic disturbances trigger fewer unwanted nuclei.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1056",
      "hypothesis": "A vibration-isolated thermal store could lose less latent capacity because acoustic disturbances trigger fewer unwanted nuclei.",
      "test": "Measure nucleation and stored energy.",
      "against": "Capacity follows thermal history alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1056",
      "hypothesis": "A vibration-isolated thermal store could lose less latent capacity because acoustic disturbances trigger fewer unwanted nuclei.",
      "test": "Measure nucleation and stored energy.",
      "against": "Capacity follows thermal history alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1057",
    "hypothesis": "A mechanical pressure exchanger could reduce cross-contamination by maintaining a moving neutral-pressure plane.",
    "test": "Map tracer crossover and pressure.",
    "against": "Plane motion adds no separation benefit.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1057",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A mechanical pressure exchanger could reduce cross-contamination by maintaining a moving neutral-pressure plane.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1057",
      "hypothesis": "A mechanical pressure exchanger could reduce cross-contamination by maintaining a moving neutral-pressure plane.",
      "test": "Map tracer crossover and pressure.",
      "against": "Plane motion adds no separation benefit.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1057",
      "hypothesis": "A mechanical pressure exchanger could reduce cross-contamination by maintaining a moving neutral-pressure plane.",
      "test": "Map tracer crossover and pressure.",
      "against": "Plane motion adds no separation benefit.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1058",
    "hypothesis": "A thermal battery analogue could protect its hottest region by reversible internal vapor redistribution.",
    "test": "Measure vapor and local temperature.",
    "against": "Protection requires permanent venting.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1058",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A thermal battery analogue could protect its hottest region by reversible internal vapor redistribution.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1058",
      "hypothesis": "A thermal battery analogue could protect its hottest region by reversible internal vapor redistribution.",
      "test": "Measure vapor and local temperature.",
      "against": "Protection requires permanent venting.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1058",
      "hypothesis": "A thermal battery analogue could protect its hottest region by reversible internal vapor redistribution.",
      "test": "Measure vapor and local temperature.",
      "against": "Protection requires permanent venting.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1059",
    "hypothesis": "An optical absorber could convert transient saturation into mechanical shuttering without an external sensor.",
    "test": "Measure light and shutter dynamics.",
    "against": "Shuttering follows average temperature too slowly.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1059",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "An optical absorber could convert transient saturation into mechanical shuttering without an external sensor.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1059",
      "hypothesis": "An optical absorber could convert transient saturation into mechanical shuttering without an external sensor.",
      "test": "Measure light and shutter dynamics.",
      "against": "Shuttering follows average temperature too slowly.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1059",
      "hypothesis": "An optical absorber could convert transient saturation into mechanical shuttering without an external sensor.",
      "test": "Measure light and shutter dynamics.",
      "against": "Shuttering follows average temperature too slowly.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1060",
    "hypothesis": "A low-energy desalination membrane could reduce back-diffusion by temporarily storing ions during pressure relaxation.",
    "test": "Measure ions and water flux.",
    "against": "Selectivity gain requires reduced water output.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1060",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A low-energy desalination membrane could reduce back-diffusion by temporarily storing ions during pressure relaxation.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1060",
      "hypothesis": "A low-energy desalination membrane could reduce back-diffusion by temporarily storing ions during pressure relaxation.",
      "test": "Measure ions and water flux.",
      "against": "Selectivity gain requires reduced water output.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1060",
      "hypothesis": "A low-energy desalination membrane could reduce back-diffusion by temporarily storing ions during pressure relaxation.",
      "test": "Measure ions and water flux.",
      "against": "Selectivity gain requires reduced water output.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1061",
    "hypothesis": "A thermal contact could self-diagnose dryout through opposite changes in mechanical stiffness and conductance.",
    "test": "Measure both during controlled drying.",
    "against": "Changes cannot distinguish dryout from damage.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1061",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A thermal contact could self-diagnose dryout through opposite changes in mechanical stiffness and conductance.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1061",
      "hypothesis": "A thermal contact could self-diagnose dryout through opposite changes in mechanical stiffness and conductance.",
      "test": "Measure both during controlled drying.",
      "against": "Changes cannot distinguish dryout from damage.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1061",
      "hypothesis": "A thermal contact could self-diagnose dryout through opposite changes in mechanical stiffness and conductance.",
      "test": "Measure both during controlled drying.",
      "against": "Changes cannot distinguish dryout from damage.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1062",
    "hypothesis": "A solar-heated capsule could maintain a safe pressure by shifting its internal condensation surface toward the hotspot.",
    "test": "Map condensation and pressure.",
    "against": "Relief requires fluid loss.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 12,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1062",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A solar-heated capsule could maintain a safe pressure by shifting its internal condensation surface toward the hotspot.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1062",
      "hypothesis": "A solar-heated capsule could maintain a safe pressure by shifting its internal condensation surface toward the hotspot.",
      "test": "Map condensation and pressure.",
      "against": "Relief requires fluid loss.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1062",
      "hypothesis": "A solar-heated capsule could maintain a safe pressure by shifting its internal condensation surface toward the hotspot.",
      "test": "Map condensation and pressure.",
      "against": "Relief requires fluid loss.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 12,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1063",
    "hypothesis": "A small energy harvester could gain bandwidth by allowing its proof mass to change shape reversibly.",
    "test": "Measure energy capture across spectra.",
    "against": "Bandwidth gain sacrifices total useful energy.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1063",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A small energy harvester could gain bandwidth by allowing its proof mass to change shape reversibly.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1063",
      "hypothesis": "A small energy harvester could gain bandwidth by allowing its proof mass to change shape reversibly.",
      "test": "Measure energy capture across spectra.",
      "against": "Bandwidth gain sacrifices total useful energy.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1063",
      "hypothesis": "A small energy harvester could gain bandwidth by allowing its proof mass to change shape reversibly.",
      "test": "Measure energy capture across spectra.",
      "against": "Bandwidth gain sacrifices total useful energy.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1064",
    "hypothesis": "A porous electrode could avoid local overheating by releasing a reversible hydration reserve at active hotspots.",
    "test": "Map hydration and heat.",
    "against": "Protection requires irreversible water consumption.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 12,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1064",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous electrode could avoid local overheating by releasing a reversible hydration reserve at active hotspots.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1064",
      "hypothesis": "A porous electrode could avoid local overheating by releasing a reversible hydration reserve at active hotspots.",
      "test": "Map hydration and heat.",
      "against": "Protection requires irreversible water consumption.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1064",
      "hypothesis": "A porous electrode could avoid local overheating by releasing a reversible hydration reserve at active hotspots.",
      "test": "Map hydration and heat.",
      "against": "Protection requires irreversible water consumption.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 12,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1065",
    "hypothesis": "A passive heat spreader could direct heat away from mechanically stressed regions through stress-dependent contact opening.",
    "test": "Map stress and heat routes.",
    "against": "Routing causes higher overall peak temperature.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1065",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A passive heat spreader could direct heat away from mechanically stressed regions through stress-dependent contact opening.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1065",
      "hypothesis": "A passive heat spreader could direct heat away from mechanically stressed regions through stress-dependent contact opening.",
      "test": "Map stress and heat routes.",
      "against": "Routing causes higher overall peak temperature.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1065",
      "hypothesis": "A passive heat spreader could direct heat away from mechanically stressed regions through stress-dependent contact opening.",
      "test": "Map stress and heat routes.",
      "against": "Routing causes higher overall peak temperature.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1066",
    "hypothesis": "A phase-change interface could act as a thermal fuse that reconnects after safe cooling.",
    "test": "Measure switching cycles and heat leakage.",
    "against": "Recovery requires manual intervention.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1066",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A phase-change interface could act as a thermal fuse that reconnects after safe cooling.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1066",
      "hypothesis": "A phase-change interface could act as a thermal fuse that reconnects after safe cooling.",
      "test": "Measure switching cycles and heat leakage.",
      "against": "Recovery requires manual intervention.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1066",
      "hypothesis": "A phase-change interface could act as a thermal fuse that reconnects after safe cooling.",
      "test": "Measure switching cycles and heat leakage.",
      "against": "Recovery requires manual intervention.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1067",
    "hypothesis": "A wind-energy analogue could reduce startup torque through humidity-mediated release of bearing adhesion.",
    "test": "Measure torque and humidity.",
    "against": "Benefits vanish after corrosion controls.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1067",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A wind-energy analogue could reduce startup torque through humidity-mediated release of bearing adhesion.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1067",
      "hypothesis": "A wind-energy analogue could reduce startup torque through humidity-mediated release of bearing adhesion.",
      "test": "Measure torque and humidity.",
      "against": "Benefits vanish after corrosion controls.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1067",
      "hypothesis": "A wind-energy analogue could reduce startup torque through humidity-mediated release of bearing adhesion.",
      "test": "Measure torque and humidity.",
      "against": "Benefits vanish after corrosion controls.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1068",
    "hypothesis": "A soft energy-storage element could preserve work during long rest by transferring strain from viscous to geometric modes.",
    "test": "Measure mode occupation and returned work.",
    "against": "Transfer itself dissipates the stored energy.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1068",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A soft energy-storage element could preserve work during long rest by transferring strain from viscous to geometric modes.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1068",
      "hypothesis": "A soft energy-storage element could preserve work during long rest by transferring strain from viscous to geometric modes.",
      "test": "Measure mode occupation and returned work.",
      "against": "Transfer itself dissipates the stored energy.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1068",
      "hypothesis": "A soft energy-storage element could preserve work during long rest by transferring strain from viscous to geometric modes.",
      "test": "Measure mode occupation and returned work.",
      "against": "Transfer itself dissipates the stored energy.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1069",
    "hypothesis": "A thermal coating could reveal accumulated ultraviolet aging from the phase of its photothermal response.",
    "test": "Compare independently aged specimens.",
    "against": "Phase tracks absorptivity alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1069",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A thermal coating could reveal accumulated ultraviolet aging from the phase of its photothermal response.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1069",
      "hypothesis": "A thermal coating could reveal accumulated ultraviolet aging from the phase of its photothermal response.",
      "test": "Compare independently aged specimens.",
      "against": "Phase tracks absorptivity alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1069",
      "hypothesis": "A thermal coating could reveal accumulated ultraviolet aging from the phase of its photothermal response.",
      "test": "Compare independently aged specimens.",
      "against": "Phase tracks absorptivity alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1070",
    "hypothesis": "A membrane heat pump analogue could reduce losses by matching solvent exchange to mechanical relaxation.",
    "test": "Measure work and heat over full cycles.",
    "against": "Gain disappears at equal cycle duration.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1070",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A membrane heat pump analogue could reduce losses by matching solvent exchange to mechanical relaxation.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1070",
      "hypothesis": "A membrane heat pump analogue could reduce losses by matching solvent exchange to mechanical relaxation.",
      "test": "Measure work and heat over full cycles.",
      "against": "Gain disappears at equal cycle duration.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1070",
      "hypothesis": "A membrane heat pump analogue could reduce losses by matching solvent exchange to mechanical relaxation.",
      "test": "Measure work and heat over full cycles.",
      "against": "Gain disappears at equal cycle duration.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1071",
    "hypothesis": "A solar absorber could suppress salt crystallization at its optical surface through a mechanically maintained subsurface vapor gap.",
    "test": "Measure gap and salt location.",
    "against": "Protection requires reduced evaporation.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 4,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 9,
    "literature_query": "solar absorber suppress salt crystallization optical surface mechanically maintained subsurface vapor gap experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N1071",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A solar absorber could suppress salt crystallization at its optical surface through a mechanically maintained subsurface vapor gap.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1071",
      "hypothesis": "A solar absorber could suppress salt crystallization at its optical surface through a mechanically maintained subsurface vapor gap.",
      "test": "Measure gap and salt location.",
      "against": "Protection requires reduced evaporation.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1071",
      "hypothesis": "A solar absorber could suppress salt crystallization at its optical surface through a mechanically maintained subsurface vapor gap.",
      "test": "Measure gap and salt location.",
      "against": "Protection requires reduced evaporation.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 9,
      "literature_query": "solar absorber suppress salt crystallization optical surface mechanically maintained subsurface vapor gap experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "9",
      "id": "N1071",
      "hypothesis": "A solar absorber could suppress salt crystallization at its optical surface through a mechanically maintained subsurface vapor gap.",
      "test": "Measure gap and salt location.",
      "against": "Protection requires reduced evaporation.",
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_score": "24",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P7f9a73104a03;P7d6f915e2405;Pab368761ee63;Pcb050caf358a;P5a6a8dda50fe",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N1071",
      "hypothesis": "A solar absorber could suppress salt crystallization at its optical surface through a mechanically maintained subsurface vapor gap.",
      "test": "Measure gap and salt location.",
      "against": "Protection requires reduced evaporation.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 9,
      "literature_query": "solar absorber suppress salt crystallization optical surface mechanically maintained subsurface vapor gap experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P7f9a73104a03;P7d6f915e2405;Pab368761ee63;Pcb050caf358a;P5a6a8dda50fe",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P7f9a73104a03;P7d6f915e2405;Pab368761ee63;Pcb050caf358a;P5a6a8dda50fe",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1072",
    "hypothesis": "A current-limited aqueous device could prevent electrode hotspots by reversible local gas nucleation.",
    "test": "Map current and bubbles.",
    "against": "Gas increases rather than limits hotspots.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 12,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1072",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A current-limited aqueous device could prevent electrode hotspots by reversible local gas nucleation.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1072",
      "hypothesis": "A current-limited aqueous device could prevent electrode hotspots by reversible local gas nucleation.",
      "test": "Map current and bubbles.",
      "against": "Gas increases rather than limits hotspots.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1072",
      "hypothesis": "A current-limited aqueous device could prevent electrode hotspots by reversible local gas nucleation.",
      "test": "Map current and bubbles.",
      "against": "Gas increases rather than limits hotspots.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 12,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1073",
    "hypothesis": "A thermal store could distinguish phase segregation from ordinary aging through spatially resolved melting echoes.",
    "test": "Introduce known segregation patterns.",
    "against": "Echoes follow container contacts only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 18,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1073",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A thermal store could distinguish phase segregation from ordinary aging through spatially resolved melting echoes.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1073",
      "hypothesis": "A thermal store could distinguish phase segregation from ordinary aging through spatially resolved melting echoes.",
      "test": "Introduce known segregation patterns.",
      "against": "Echoes follow container contacts only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1073",
      "hypothesis": "A thermal store could distinguish phase segregation from ordinary aging through spatially resolved melting echoes.",
      "test": "Introduce known segregation patterns.",
      "against": "Echoes follow container contacts only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 18,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1074",
    "hypothesis": "A wave harvester could retain directional efficiency through passive rotation of its damping axis.",
    "test": "Measure orientation and energy capture.",
    "against": "Rotation merely follows the largest force.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1074",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A wave harvester could retain directional efficiency through passive rotation of its damping axis.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1074",
      "hypothesis": "A wave harvester could retain directional efficiency through passive rotation of its damping axis.",
      "test": "Measure orientation and energy capture.",
      "against": "Rotation merely follows the largest force.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1074",
      "hypothesis": "A wave harvester could retain directional efficiency through passive rotation of its damping axis.",
      "test": "Measure orientation and energy capture.",
      "against": "Rotation merely follows the largest force.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1075",
    "hypothesis": "A porous cooling wick could warn of imminent failure through increasing spatial intermittency of evaporation.",
    "test": "Measure wetness and vapor flux.",
    "against": "Intermittency rises only after failure.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 4,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 10,
    "literature_query": "porous cooling wick warn imminent failure increasing spatial intermittency evaporation experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N1075",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous cooling wick could warn of imminent failure through increasing spatial intermittency of evaporation.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": true,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1075",
      "hypothesis": "A porous cooling wick could warn of imminent failure through increasing spatial intermittency of evaporation.",
      "test": "Measure wetness and vapor flux.",
      "against": "Intermittency rises only after failure.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1075",
      "hypothesis": "A porous cooling wick could warn of imminent failure through increasing spatial intermittency of evaporation.",
      "test": "Measure wetness and vapor flux.",
      "against": "Intermittency rises only after failure.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 10,
      "literature_query": "porous cooling wick warn imminent failure increasing spatial intermittency evaporation experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "10",
      "id": "N1075",
      "hypothesis": "A porous cooling wick could warn of imminent failure through increasing spatial intermittency of evaporation.",
      "test": "Measure wetness and vapor flux.",
      "against": "Intermittency rises only after failure.",
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_score": "24",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P343df40e486d;Pa9c8c274faad;P3fcb17b62cd8;P6d9233372d45;P501981902960;P8701e0233cc1",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N1075",
      "hypothesis": "A porous cooling wick could warn of imminent failure through increasing spatial intermittency of evaporation.",
      "test": "Measure wetness and vapor flux.",
      "against": "Intermittency rises only after failure.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 10,
      "literature_query": "porous cooling wick warn imminent failure increasing spatial intermittency evaporation experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P343df40e486d;Pa9c8c274faad;P3fcb17b62cd8;P6d9233372d45;P501981902960;P8701e0233cc1",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P343df40e486d;Pa9c8c274faad;P3fcb17b62cd8;P6d9233372d45;P501981902960;P8701e0233cc1",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": {
      "rank": "10",
      "id": "N1075",
      "hypothesis": "A porous cooling wick could warn of imminent failure through increasing spatial intermittency of evaporation.",
      "primary_outcome": "Lead time and false-alarm rate of a registered spatial-intermittency metric before a predefined dry-out failure.",
      "comparison": "Wick cooling under gradually increasing load versus stable non-failing operation; add partial supply blockage.",
      "controls": "Imaging resolution; lighting; initial saturation; heat input; airflow; water purity; marker influence; data-processing thresholds.",
      "plan": "Choose failure independently from the proposed warning metric, such as a specified thermal resistance increase. Train thresholds only on pilot runs and test on new wick preparations. Preserve negative and failed-warning runs.",
      "against": "No useful warning exists if the metric changes only after failure, requires retrospective threshold tuning, or has excessive false alarms.",
      "evidence": "Evaporator studies report spatial dry-out and transient temperature changes. Early-warning specificity and lead time remain unproved.",
      "source": "https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12217-024-10122-y",
      "novelty": "Unverified; a familiar mechanism or existing method is not a new discovery.",
      "physical_data": "none collected"
    },
    "focused_assessment_fields": {
      "id": "N1075",
      "primary_outcome": "Lead time and false-alarm rate of a registered spatial-intermittency metric before a predefined dry-out failure.",
      "comparison": "Wick cooling under gradually increasing load versus stable non-failing operation; add partial supply blockage.",
      "critical_controls": "Imaging resolution; lighting; initial saturation; heat input; airflow; water purity; marker influence; data-processing thresholds.",
      "testing_plan": "Choose failure independently from the proposed warning metric, such as a specified thermal resistance increase. Train thresholds only on pilot runs and test on new wick preparations. Preserve negative and failed-warning runs.",
      "against": "No useful warning exists if the metric changes only after failure, requires retrospective threshold tuning, or has excessive false alarms.",
      "evidence_assessment": "Evaporator studies report spatial dry-out and transient temperature changes. Early-warning specificity and lead time remain unproved.",
      "source_url": "https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12217-024-10122-y",
      "novelty": "Unverified; a familiar mechanism or existing method is not a new discovery.",
      "rank15": 10
    },
    "primary_outcome": "Lead time and false-alarm rate of a registered spatial-intermittency metric before a predefined dry-out failure.",
    "comparison": "Wick cooling under gradually increasing load versus stable non-failing operation; add partial supply blockage.",
    "controls": "Imaging resolution; lighting; initial saturation; heat input; airflow; water purity; marker influence; data-processing thresholds.",
    "plan": "Choose failure independently from the proposed warning metric, such as a specified thermal resistance increase. Train thresholds only on pilot runs and test on new wick preparations. Preserve negative and failed-warning runs.",
    "evidence": "Evaporator studies report spatial dry-out and transient temperature changes. Early-warning specificity and lead time remain unproved.",
    "source": "https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12217-024-10122-y",
    "physical_data": "none collected",
    "dossier_text": "# 10. N1075\n\n## Prediction\n\nA porous cooling wick could warn of imminent failure through increasing spatial intermittency of evaporation.\n\n## Primary measurement\n\nLead time and false-alarm rate of a registered spatial-intermittency metric before a predefined dry-out failure.\n\n## Comparison\n\nWick cooling under gradually increasing load versus stable non-failing operation; add partial supply blockage.\n\n## Controls\n\nImaging resolution; lighting; initial saturation; heat input; airflow; water purity; marker influence; data-processing thresholds.\n\n## Testing plan\n\nChoose failure independently from the proposed warning metric, such as a specified thermal resistance increase. Train thresholds only on pilot runs and test on new wick preparations. Preserve negative and failed-warning runs.\n\n## Stop or revise\n\nNo useful warning exists if the metric changes only after failure, requires retrospective threshold tuning, or has excessive false alarms.\n\n## Evidence and limits\n\nEvaporator studies report spatial dry-out and transient temperature changes. Early-warning specificity and lead time remain unproved.\n\nRelated primary-source lead: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12217-024-10122-y\n\nUnverified; a familiar mechanism or existing method is not a new discovery.\n\n## Replication gate\n\nCalibrate measurement uncertainty first. Define a minimum meaningful effect in the primary outcome's units, then estimate variability across independently prepared specimens or assemblies. Use that variance for a design-specific confirmatory sample calculation. Images and repeated readings from one specimen are technical repeats, not independent replications. Randomize run order and blind labels where practical. Freeze exclusions and analysis before confirmation.\n\nA narrow interval excluding the chosen meaningful effect can count against the bounded claim; a wide interval is inconclusive. Report null and adverse results. The outline requires material and apparatus compatibility checks and is not a complete laboratory protocol.\n"
  },
  {
    "id": "N1076",
    "hypothesis": "A flexible thermoelectric interface could maintain low resistance through capillary self-clamping.",
    "test": "Measure contact pressure and conversion.",
    "against": "Clamping energy exceeds recovered output.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1076",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A flexible thermoelectric interface could maintain low resistance through capillary self-clamping.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1076",
      "hypothesis": "A flexible thermoelectric interface could maintain low resistance through capillary self-clamping.",
      "test": "Measure contact pressure and conversion.",
      "against": "Clamping energy exceeds recovered output.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1076",
      "hypothesis": "A flexible thermoelectric interface could maintain low resistance through capillary self-clamping.",
      "test": "Measure contact pressure and conversion.",
      "against": "Clamping energy exceeds recovered output.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1077",
    "hypothesis": "A phase-change capsule could reduce thermal hysteresis by mechanically reconnecting isolated solid remnants.",
    "test": "Image remnants and cycling response.",
    "against": "Hysteresis changes follow residual solid mass only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1077",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A phase-change capsule could reduce thermal hysteresis by mechanically reconnecting isolated solid remnants.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1077",
      "hypothesis": "A phase-change capsule could reduce thermal hysteresis by mechanically reconnecting isolated solid remnants.",
      "test": "Image remnants and cycling response.",
      "against": "Hysteresis changes follow residual solid mass only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1077",
      "hypothesis": "A phase-change capsule could reduce thermal hysteresis by mechanically reconnecting isolated solid remnants.",
      "test": "Image remnants and cycling response.",
      "against": "Hysteresis changes follow residual solid mass only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1078",
    "hypothesis": "A solar desalination analogue could separate optical heating from salt transport using a reversible liquid-liquid interface.",
    "test": "Measure heat and ion routes.",
    "against": "Decoupling requires incompatible solvents.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1078",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A solar desalination analogue could separate optical heating from salt transport using a reversible liquid-liquid interface.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1078",
      "hypothesis": "A solar desalination analogue could separate optical heating from salt transport using a reversible liquid-liquid interface.",
      "test": "Measure heat and ion routes.",
      "against": "Decoupling requires incompatible solvents.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1078",
      "hypothesis": "A solar desalination analogue could separate optical heating from salt transport using a reversible liquid-liquid interface.",
      "test": "Measure heat and ion routes.",
      "against": "Decoupling requires incompatible solvents.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1079",
    "hypothesis": "A mechanical generator could distinguish useful resonance from destructive resonance through local entropy production proxies.",
    "test": "Measure heat and mechanical energy.",
    "against": "Proxies cannot classify the modes.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1079",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A mechanical generator could distinguish useful resonance from destructive resonance through local entropy production proxies.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1079",
      "hypothesis": "A mechanical generator could distinguish useful resonance from destructive resonance through local entropy production proxies.",
      "test": "Measure heat and mechanical energy.",
      "against": "Proxies cannot classify the modes.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1079",
      "hypothesis": "A mechanical generator could distinguish useful resonance from destructive resonance through local entropy production proxies.",
      "test": "Measure heat and mechanical energy.",
      "against": "Proxies cannot classify the modes.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1080",
    "hypothesis": "A porous thermal barrier could preserve insulation after wetting by routing water into disconnected storage cells.",
    "test": "Map water and heat flow.",
    "against": "Insulation follows total water only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1080",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous thermal barrier could preserve insulation after wetting by routing water into disconnected storage cells.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1080",
      "hypothesis": "A porous thermal barrier could preserve insulation after wetting by routing water into disconnected storage cells.",
      "test": "Map water and heat flow.",
      "against": "Insulation follows total water only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1080",
      "hypothesis": "A porous thermal barrier could preserve insulation after wetting by routing water into disconnected storage cells.",
      "test": "Map water and heat flow.",
      "against": "Insulation follows total water only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1081",
    "hypothesis": "A model battery separator could redistribute compressive stress through reversible pore-fluid pressure before pores close.",
    "test": "Measure pressure and permeability.",
    "against": "Protection requires lower external load.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1081",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A model battery separator could redistribute compressive stress through reversible pore-fluid pressure before pores close.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1081",
      "hypothesis": "A model battery separator could redistribute compressive stress through reversible pore-fluid pressure before pores close.",
      "test": "Measure pressure and permeability.",
      "against": "Protection requires lower external load.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1081",
      "hypothesis": "A model battery separator could redistribute compressive stress through reversible pore-fluid pressure before pores close.",
      "test": "Measure pressure and permeability.",
      "against": "Protection requires lower external load.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1082",
    "hypothesis": "A passive thermal regulator could reject rapid heating while admitting slow warming through competing relaxation times.",
    "test": "Apply equal-energy thermal histories.",
    "against": "Response follows only average power.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1082",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A passive thermal regulator could reject rapid heating while admitting slow warming through competing relaxation times.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1082",
      "hypothesis": "A passive thermal regulator could reject rapid heating while admitting slow warming through competing relaxation times.",
      "test": "Apply equal-energy thermal histories.",
      "against": "Response follows only average power.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1082",
      "hypothesis": "A passive thermal regulator could reject rapid heating while admitting slow warming through competing relaxation times.",
      "test": "Apply equal-energy thermal histories.",
      "against": "Response follows only average power.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1083",
    "hypothesis": "An energy-harvesting membrane could reveal microdamage through changes in the symmetry of its recoil.",
    "test": "Compare recoil and independent crack maps.",
    "against": "Symmetry changes follow mounting drift only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1083",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "An energy-harvesting membrane could reveal microdamage through changes in the symmetry of its recoil.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1083",
      "hypothesis": "An energy-harvesting membrane could reveal microdamage through changes in the symmetry of its recoil.",
      "test": "Compare recoil and independent crack maps.",
      "against": "Symmetry changes follow mounting drift only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1083",
      "hypothesis": "An energy-harvesting membrane could reveal microdamage through changes in the symmetry of its recoil.",
      "test": "Compare recoil and independent crack maps.",
      "against": "Symmetry changes follow mounting drift only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1084",
    "hypothesis": "A solar collector could improve recovery after dust deposition through thermal expansion that preferentially lifts particles at low-adhesion sites.",
    "test": "Track particle release.",
    "against": "Cleaning requires damaging temperature cycles.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1084",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A solar collector could improve recovery after dust deposition through thermal expansion that preferentially lifts particles at low-adhesion sites.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1084",
      "hypothesis": "A solar collector could improve recovery after dust deposition through thermal expansion that preferentially lifts particles at low-adhesion sites.",
      "test": "Track particle release.",
      "against": "Cleaning requires damaging temperature cycles.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1084",
      "hypothesis": "A solar collector could improve recovery after dust deposition through thermal expansion that preferentially lifts particles at low-adhesion sites.",
      "test": "Track particle release.",
      "against": "Cleaning requires damaging temperature cycles.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1085",
    "hypothesis": "A flow-driven generator analogue could reduce noise by distributing vortex release across mechanically coupled elements.",
    "test": "Measure acoustic and energy output.",
    "against": "Noise reduction sacrifices equal power.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1085",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A flow-driven generator analogue could reduce noise by distributing vortex release across mechanically coupled elements.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1085",
      "hypothesis": "A flow-driven generator analogue could reduce noise by distributing vortex release across mechanically coupled elements.",
      "test": "Measure acoustic and energy output.",
      "against": "Noise reduction sacrifices equal power.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1085",
      "hypothesis": "A flow-driven generator analogue could reduce noise by distributing vortex release across mechanically coupled elements.",
      "test": "Measure acoustic and energy output.",
      "against": "Noise reduction sacrifices equal power.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1086",
    "hypothesis": "A thermal store could release heat preferentially toward a cold load through reversible wetting of internal contacts.",
    "test": "Measure directional heat flux.",
    "against": "Effect follows temperature gradient alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1086",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A thermal store could release heat preferentially toward a cold load through reversible wetting of internal contacts.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1086",
      "hypothesis": "A thermal store could release heat preferentially toward a cold load through reversible wetting of internal contacts.",
      "test": "Measure directional heat flux.",
      "against": "Effect follows temperature gradient alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1086",
      "hypothesis": "A thermal store could release heat preferentially toward a cold load through reversible wetting of internal contacts.",
      "test": "Measure directional heat flux.",
      "against": "Effect follows temperature gradient alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1087",
    "hypothesis": "A porous electrochemical electrode could preserve reaction uniformity by exporting bubbles through a mechanically softer perimeter.",
    "test": "Map bubbles and local current.",
    "against": "Uniformity follows reduced active area only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 12,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1087",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous electrochemical electrode could preserve reaction uniformity by exporting bubbles through a mechanically softer perimeter.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1087",
      "hypothesis": "A porous electrochemical electrode could preserve reaction uniformity by exporting bubbles through a mechanically softer perimeter.",
      "test": "Map bubbles and local current.",
      "against": "Uniformity follows reduced active area only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1087",
      "hypothesis": "A porous electrochemical electrode could preserve reaction uniformity by exporting bubbles through a mechanically softer perimeter.",
      "test": "Map bubbles and local current.",
      "against": "Uniformity follows reduced active area only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 12,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1088",
    "hypothesis": "A radiative surface could reveal hidden moisture accumulation through changes in angular polarization before mass uptake is resolved.",
    "test": "Measure spectra and gravimetry.",
    "against": "Optical warning follows detectable mass change.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1088",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A radiative surface could reveal hidden moisture accumulation through changes in angular polarization before mass uptake is resolved.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1088",
      "hypothesis": "A radiative surface could reveal hidden moisture accumulation through changes in angular polarization before mass uptake is resolved.",
      "test": "Measure spectra and gravimetry.",
      "against": "Optical warning follows detectable mass change.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1088",
      "hypothesis": "A radiative surface could reveal hidden moisture accumulation through changes in angular polarization before mass uptake is resolved.",
      "test": "Measure spectra and gravimetry.",
      "against": "Optical warning follows detectable mass change.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1089",
    "hypothesis": "A mechanical energy store could signal overload through a reversible acoustic mode before irreversible deformation.",
    "test": "Measure mode changes and strain.",
    "against": "Warning occurs only after damage.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1089",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A mechanical energy store could signal overload through a reversible acoustic mode before irreversible deformation.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1089",
      "hypothesis": "A mechanical energy store could signal overload through a reversible acoustic mode before irreversible deformation.",
      "test": "Measure mode changes and strain.",
      "against": "Warning occurs only after damage.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1089",
      "hypothesis": "A mechanical energy store could signal overload through a reversible acoustic mode before irreversible deformation.",
      "test": "Measure mode changes and strain.",
      "against": "Warning occurs only after damage.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1090",
    "hypothesis": "A phase-change slurry could suppress settling through transient crystal shape changes driven by mild thermal fluctuations.",
    "test": "Track particles and phase state.",
    "against": "Stability requires increased viscosity only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1090",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A phase-change slurry could suppress settling through transient crystal shape changes driven by mild thermal fluctuations.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1090",
      "hypothesis": "A phase-change slurry could suppress settling through transient crystal shape changes driven by mild thermal fluctuations.",
      "test": "Track particles and phase state.",
      "against": "Stability requires increased viscosity only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1090",
      "hypothesis": "A phase-change slurry could suppress settling through transient crystal shape changes driven by mild thermal fluctuations.",
      "test": "Track particles and phase state.",
      "against": "Stability requires increased viscosity only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1091",
    "hypothesis": "A passive coolant manifold could redistribute flow toward a hotspot through local fluid expansion without moving solid valves.",
    "test": "Measure branches and temperature.",
    "against": "Redistribution follows viscosity alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1091",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A passive coolant manifold could redistribute flow toward a hotspot through local fluid expansion without moving solid valves.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1091",
      "hypothesis": "A passive coolant manifold could redistribute flow toward a hotspot through local fluid expansion without moving solid valves.",
      "test": "Measure branches and temperature.",
      "against": "Redistribution follows viscosity alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1091",
      "hypothesis": "A passive coolant manifold could redistribute flow toward a hotspot through local fluid expansion without moving solid valves.",
      "test": "Measure branches and temperature.",
      "against": "Redistribution follows viscosity alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1092",
    "hypothesis": "An optical power limiter could reset faster when stored heat leaves through a phase-selective path.",
    "test": "Measure recovery and phase distribution.",
    "against": "Reset gains require reduced limiting strength.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1092",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "An optical power limiter could reset faster when stored heat leaves through a phase-selective path.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1092",
      "hypothesis": "An optical power limiter could reset faster when stored heat leaves through a phase-selective path.",
      "test": "Measure recovery and phase distribution.",
      "against": "Reset gains require reduced limiting strength.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1092",
      "hypothesis": "An optical power limiter could reset faster when stored heat leaves through a phase-selective path.",
      "test": "Measure recovery and phase distribution.",
      "against": "Reset gains require reduced limiting strength.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1093",
    "hypothesis": "A model capacitor could retain more charge under vibration when flexible collectors convert relative motion into higher contact pressure.",
    "test": "Measure charge and contact.",
    "against": "Retention follows mechanical shielding only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1093",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A model capacitor could retain more charge under vibration when flexible collectors convert relative motion into higher contact pressure.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1093",
      "hypothesis": "A model capacitor could retain more charge under vibration when flexible collectors convert relative motion into higher contact pressure.",
      "test": "Measure charge and contact.",
      "against": "Retention follows mechanical shielding only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1093",
      "hypothesis": "A model capacitor could retain more charge under vibration when flexible collectors convert relative motion into higher contact pressure.",
      "test": "Measure charge and contact.",
      "against": "Retention follows mechanical shielding only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1094",
    "hypothesis": "A solar evaporation surface could preserve permeability by pushing crystal growth toward already dry regions.",
    "test": "Map crystal and water fronts.",
    "against": "Growth location follows initial defects only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1094",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A solar evaporation surface could preserve permeability by pushing crystal growth toward already dry regions.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1094",
      "hypothesis": "A solar evaporation surface could preserve permeability by pushing crystal growth toward already dry regions.",
      "test": "Map crystal and water fronts.",
      "against": "Growth location follows initial defects only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1094",
      "hypothesis": "A solar evaporation surface could preserve permeability by pushing crystal growth toward already dry regions.",
      "test": "Map crystal and water fronts.",
      "against": "Growth location follows initial defects only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1095",
    "hypothesis": "A thermal actuator could distinguish cumulative heating from peak heating through two competing internal phase transitions.",
    "test": "Apply matched thermal histories.",
    "against": "Final state reflects peak only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 12,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1095",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A thermal actuator could distinguish cumulative heating from peak heating through two competing internal phase transitions.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1095",
      "hypothesis": "A thermal actuator could distinguish cumulative heating from peak heating through two competing internal phase transitions.",
      "test": "Apply matched thermal histories.",
      "against": "Final state reflects peak only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1095",
      "hypothesis": "A thermal actuator could distinguish cumulative heating from peak heating through two competing internal phase transitions.",
      "test": "Apply matched thermal histories.",
      "against": "Final state reflects peak only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 12,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1096",
    "hypothesis": "A porous insulating layer could recover after compression by using trapped gas dissolution rather than gas compression alone.",
    "test": "Measure gas and shape recovery.",
    "against": "Recovery ignores dissolution suppression.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1096",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous insulating layer could recover after compression by using trapped gas dissolution rather than gas compression alone.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1096",
      "hypothesis": "A porous insulating layer could recover after compression by using trapped gas dissolution rather than gas compression alone.",
      "test": "Measure gas and shape recovery.",
      "against": "Recovery ignores dissolution suppression.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1096",
      "hypothesis": "A porous insulating layer could recover after compression by using trapped gas dissolution rather than gas compression alone.",
      "test": "Measure gas and shape recovery.",
      "against": "Recovery ignores dissolution suppression.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1097",
    "hypothesis": "A fluidic energy converter could reduce startup losses by retaining a small organized vortex between operating periods.",
    "test": "Measure vortex and startup work.",
    "against": "Savings disappear after retention costs included.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1097",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A fluidic energy converter could reduce startup losses by retaining a small organized vortex between operating periods.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1097",
      "hypothesis": "A fluidic energy converter could reduce startup losses by retaining a small organized vortex between operating periods.",
      "test": "Measure vortex and startup work.",
      "against": "Savings disappear after retention costs included.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1097",
      "hypothesis": "A fluidic energy converter could reduce startup losses by retaining a small organized vortex between operating periods.",
      "test": "Measure vortex and startup work.",
      "against": "Savings disappear after retention costs included.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1098",
    "hypothesis": "A heat-transfer surface could reduce bubble crowding through thermally driven motion of flexible microscopic flaps.",
    "test": "Image flaps and bubbles.",
    "against": "Benefits require lower heating power.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1098",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A heat-transfer surface could reduce bubble crowding through thermally driven motion of flexible microscopic flaps.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1098",
      "hypothesis": "A heat-transfer surface could reduce bubble crowding through thermally driven motion of flexible microscopic flaps.",
      "test": "Image flaps and bubbles.",
      "against": "Benefits require lower heating power.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1098",
      "hypothesis": "A heat-transfer surface could reduce bubble crowding through thermally driven motion of flexible microscopic flaps.",
      "test": "Image flaps and bubbles.",
      "against": "Benefits require lower heating power.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1099",
    "hypothesis": "A mechanical harvester could protect its storage element by rejecting pulses whose rise time is too short.",
    "test": "Apply matched-energy pulses.",
    "against": "Rejection follows pulse amplitude only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1099",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A mechanical harvester could protect its storage element by rejecting pulses whose rise time is too short.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1099",
      "hypothesis": "A mechanical harvester could protect its storage element by rejecting pulses whose rise time is too short.",
      "test": "Apply matched-energy pulses.",
      "against": "Rejection follows pulse amplitude only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1099",
      "hypothesis": "A mechanical harvester could protect its storage element by rejecting pulses whose rise time is too short.",
      "test": "Apply matched-energy pulses.",
      "against": "Rejection follows pulse amplitude only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1100",
    "hypothesis": "A fog layer could retain droplet-size memory after relative humidity returns to its initial value.",
    "test": "Measure size spectra through humidity excursions.",
    "against": "Spectra recover immediately.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1100",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A fog layer could retain droplet-size memory after relative humidity returns to its initial value.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1100",
      "hypothesis": "A fog layer could retain droplet-size memory after relative humidity returns to its initial value.",
      "test": "Measure size spectra through humidity excursions.",
      "against": "Spectra recover immediately.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1100",
      "hypothesis": "A fog layer could retain droplet-size memory after relative humidity returns to its initial value.",
      "test": "Measure size spectra through humidity excursions.",
      "against": "Spectra recover immediately.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1101",
    "hypothesis": "A mineral aerosol could change cloud-droplet collision efficiency through a reversible hydration shell.",
    "test": "Measure collisions and shell thickness.",
    "against": "Efficiency follows particle size alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1101",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A mineral aerosol could change cloud-droplet collision efficiency through a reversible hydration shell.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1101",
      "hypothesis": "A mineral aerosol could change cloud-droplet collision efficiency through a reversible hydration shell.",
      "test": "Measure collisions and shell thickness.",
      "against": "Efficiency follows particle size alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1101",
      "hypothesis": "A mineral aerosol could change cloud-droplet collision efficiency through a reversible hydration shell.",
      "test": "Measure collisions and shell thickness.",
      "against": "Efficiency follows particle size alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1102",
    "hypothesis": "A dew-forming surface could create a local downward air current before visible droplets appear.",
    "test": "Measure airflow and condensation onset.",
    "against": "Air motion follows external drafts only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1102",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A dew-forming surface could create a local downward air current before visible droplets appear.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1102",
      "hypothesis": "A dew-forming surface could create a local downward air current before visible droplets appear.",
      "test": "Measure airflow and condensation onset.",
      "against": "Air motion follows external drafts only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1102",
      "hypothesis": "A dew-forming surface could create a local downward air current before visible droplets appear.",
      "test": "Measure airflow and condensation onset.",
      "against": "Air motion follows external drafts only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1103",
    "hypothesis": "A thin snow cover could redistribute trace gases through thermal breathing during daily heating.",
    "test": "Measure gas profiles and temperature.",
    "against": "Transport follows mean diffusion only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1103",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A thin snow cover could redistribute trace gases through thermal breathing during daily heating.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1103",
      "hypothesis": "A thin snow cover could redistribute trace gases through thermal breathing during daily heating.",
      "test": "Measure gas profiles and temperature.",
      "against": "Transport follows mean diffusion only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1103",
      "hypothesis": "A thin snow cover could redistribute trace gases through thermal breathing during daily heating.",
      "test": "Measure gas profiles and temperature.",
      "against": "Transport follows mean diffusion only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1104",
    "hypothesis": "A canopy analogue could reduce fog loss by synchronizing droplet release across neighboring collectors.",
    "test": "Track release timing and collection.",
    "against": "Synchronization increases missed droplets.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1104",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A canopy analogue could reduce fog loss by synchronizing droplet release across neighboring collectors.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1104",
      "hypothesis": "A canopy analogue could reduce fog loss by synchronizing droplet release across neighboring collectors.",
      "test": "Track release timing and collection.",
      "against": "Synchronization increases missed droplets.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1104",
      "hypothesis": "A canopy analogue could reduce fog loss by synchronizing droplet release across neighboring collectors.",
      "test": "Track release timing and collection.",
      "against": "Synchronization increases missed droplets.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1105",
    "hypothesis": "A soil-vapor interface could buffer atmospheric humidity through mechanically gated pore openings.",
    "test": "Measure pores and vapor flux.",
    "against": "Buffering follows adsorption alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1105",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A soil-vapor interface could buffer atmospheric humidity through mechanically gated pore openings.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1105",
      "hypothesis": "A soil-vapor interface could buffer atmospheric humidity through mechanically gated pore openings.",
      "test": "Measure pores and vapor flux.",
      "against": "Buffering follows adsorption alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1105",
      "hypothesis": "A soil-vapor interface could buffer atmospheric humidity through mechanically gated pore openings.",
      "test": "Measure pores and vapor flux.",
      "against": "Buffering follows adsorption alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1106",
    "hypothesis": "An aerosol aggregate could become more light-absorbing after partial wetting rotates its internal particles.",
    "test": "Map structure and absorption.",
    "against": "Changes follow refractive index only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 12,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1106",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "An aerosol aggregate could become more light-absorbing after partial wetting rotates its internal particles.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1106",
      "hypothesis": "An aerosol aggregate could become more light-absorbing after partial wetting rotates its internal particles.",
      "test": "Map structure and absorption.",
      "against": "Changes follow refractive index only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1106",
      "hypothesis": "An aerosol aggregate could become more light-absorbing after partial wetting rotates its internal particles.",
      "test": "Map structure and absorption.",
      "against": "Changes follow refractive index only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 12,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1107",
    "hypothesis": "A porous frost layer could suppress local wind turbulence by absorbing pressure fluctuations.",
    "test": "Measure turbulence and pore pressure.",
    "against": "Suppression follows roughness height only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1107",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous frost layer could suppress local wind turbulence by absorbing pressure fluctuations.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1107",
      "hypothesis": "A porous frost layer could suppress local wind turbulence by absorbing pressure fluctuations.",
      "test": "Measure turbulence and pore pressure.",
      "against": "Suppression follows roughness height only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1107",
      "hypothesis": "A porous frost layer could suppress local wind turbulence by absorbing pressure fluctuations.",
      "test": "Measure turbulence and pore pressure.",
      "against": "Suppression follows roughness height only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1108",
    "hypothesis": "A raindrop could retain a chemical signature of the cloud region where its last coalescence occurred.",
    "test": "Trace controlled droplet mergers.",
    "against": "Signature is erased by internal mixing.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1108",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A raindrop could retain a chemical signature of the cloud region where its last coalescence occurred.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1108",
      "hypothesis": "A raindrop could retain a chemical signature of the cloud region where its last coalescence occurred.",
      "test": "Trace controlled droplet mergers.",
      "against": "Signature is erased by internal mixing.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1108",
      "hypothesis": "A raindrop could retain a chemical signature of the cloud region where its last coalescence occurred.",
      "test": "Trace controlled droplet mergers.",
      "against": "Signature is erased by internal mixing.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1109",
    "hypothesis": "A leaf-litter analogue could release water vapor preferentially during weak airflow rather than strong gusts.",
    "test": "Measure vapor and internal moisture.",
    "against": "Flux increases monotonically with airflow.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1109",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A leaf-litter analogue could release water vapor preferentially during weak airflow rather than strong gusts.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1109",
      "hypothesis": "A leaf-litter analogue could release water vapor preferentially during weak airflow rather than strong gusts.",
      "test": "Measure vapor and internal moisture.",
      "against": "Flux increases monotonically with airflow.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1109",
      "hypothesis": "A leaf-litter analogue could release water vapor preferentially during weak airflow rather than strong gusts.",
      "test": "Measure vapor and internal moisture.",
      "against": "Flux increases monotonically with airflow.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1110",
    "hypothesis": "A dust deposit could change its resuspension threshold after a brief sub-condensation humidity event.",
    "test": "Measure adhesion and release.",
    "against": "Threshold follows final humidity only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1110",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A dust deposit could change its resuspension threshold after a brief sub-condensation humidity event.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1110",
      "hypothesis": "A dust deposit could change its resuspension threshold after a brief sub-condensation humidity event.",
      "test": "Measure adhesion and release.",
      "against": "Threshold follows final humidity only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1110",
      "hypothesis": "A dust deposit could change its resuspension threshold after a brief sub-condensation humidity event.",
      "test": "Measure adhesion and release.",
      "against": "Threshold follows final humidity only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1111",
    "hypothesis": "A suspended ice crystal could reveal local supersaturation through fluctuations in its rotational drag.",
    "test": "Measure rotation and growth.",
    "against": "Drag changes follow size only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1111",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A suspended ice crystal could reveal local supersaturation through fluctuations in its rotational drag.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1111",
      "hypothesis": "A suspended ice crystal could reveal local supersaturation through fluctuations in its rotational drag.",
      "test": "Measure rotation and growth.",
      "against": "Drag changes follow size only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1111",
      "hypothesis": "A suspended ice crystal could reveal local supersaturation through fluctuations in its rotational drag.",
      "test": "Measure rotation and growth.",
      "against": "Drag changes follow size only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1112",
    "hypothesis": "A saline droplet aerosol could release solute-rich fragments through internal crystallization before complete drying.",
    "test": "Image fragments and composition.",
    "against": "Release requires external mechanical breakup.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1112",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A saline droplet aerosol could release solute-rich fragments through internal crystallization before complete drying.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1112",
      "hypothesis": "A saline droplet aerosol could release solute-rich fragments through internal crystallization before complete drying.",
      "test": "Image fragments and composition.",
      "against": "Release requires external mechanical breakup.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1112",
      "hypothesis": "A saline droplet aerosol could release solute-rich fragments through internal crystallization before complete drying.",
      "test": "Image fragments and composition.",
      "against": "Release requires external mechanical breakup.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1113",
    "hypothesis": "A surface temperature mosaic could alter dew onset beyond its mean cooling power by coupling neighboring vapor depletion zones.",
    "test": "Map vapor and nucleation.",
    "against": "Onset follows local temperature alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1113",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A surface temperature mosaic could alter dew onset beyond its mean cooling power by coupling neighboring vapor depletion zones.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1113",
      "hypothesis": "A surface temperature mosaic could alter dew onset beyond its mean cooling power by coupling neighboring vapor depletion zones.",
      "test": "Map vapor and nucleation.",
      "against": "Onset follows local temperature alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1113",
      "hypothesis": "A surface temperature mosaic could alter dew onset beyond its mean cooling power by coupling neighboring vapor depletion zones.",
      "test": "Map vapor and nucleation.",
      "against": "Onset follows local temperature alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1114",
    "hypothesis": "A thin cloud analogue could self-organize into alternating transparent and opaque bands through droplet-settling feedback.",
    "test": "Measure light and particle fields.",
    "against": "Bands require imposed flow patterns.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1114",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A thin cloud analogue could self-organize into alternating transparent and opaque bands through droplet-settling feedback.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1114",
      "hypothesis": "A thin cloud analogue could self-organize into alternating transparent and opaque bands through droplet-settling feedback.",
      "test": "Measure light and particle fields.",
      "against": "Bands require imposed flow patterns.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1114",
      "hypothesis": "A thin cloud analogue could self-organize into alternating transparent and opaque bands through droplet-settling feedback.",
      "test": "Measure light and particle fields.",
      "against": "Bands require imposed flow patterns.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1115",
    "hypothesis": "A wet porous surface could reduce atmospheric electric-field fluctuations by redistributing ions through connected films.",
    "test": "Measure fields and film connectivity.",
    "against": "Effects follow conductivity alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1115",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A wet porous surface could reduce atmospheric electric-field fluctuations by redistributing ions through connected films.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1115",
      "hypothesis": "A wet porous surface could reduce atmospheric electric-field fluctuations by redistributing ions through connected films.",
      "test": "Measure fields and film connectivity.",
      "against": "Effects follow conductivity alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1115",
      "hypothesis": "A wet porous surface could reduce atmospheric electric-field fluctuations by redistributing ions through connected films.",
      "test": "Measure fields and film connectivity.",
      "against": "Effects follow conductivity alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1116",
    "hypothesis": "A snow-grain coating could delay pollutant release until a capillary network percolates during melting.",
    "test": "Measure solute and liquid connectivity.",
    "against": "Release follows melt fraction alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1116",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A snow-grain coating could delay pollutant release until a capillary network percolates during melting.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1116",
      "hypothesis": "A snow-grain coating could delay pollutant release until a capillary network percolates during melting.",
      "test": "Measure solute and liquid connectivity.",
      "against": "Release follows melt fraction alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1116",
      "hypothesis": "A snow-grain coating could delay pollutant release until a capillary network percolates during melting.",
      "test": "Measure solute and liquid connectivity.",
      "against": "Release follows melt fraction alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1117",
    "hypothesis": "A windblown dust analogue could sort surface coatings by their humidity-response speed.",
    "test": "Track coated equal-size grains.",
    "against": "Sorting follows dry drag only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1117",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A windblown dust analogue could sort surface coatings by their humidity-response speed.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1117",
      "hypothesis": "A windblown dust analogue could sort surface coatings by their humidity-response speed.",
      "test": "Track coated equal-size grains.",
      "against": "Sorting follows dry drag only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1117",
      "hypothesis": "A windblown dust analogue could sort surface coatings by their humidity-response speed.",
      "test": "Track coated equal-size grains.",
      "against": "Sorting follows dry drag only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1118",
    "hypothesis": "A fog collector could improve capture by oscillating its local air permeability as it becomes wet.",
    "test": "Measure airflow and collected water.",
    "against": "Benefits follow wetted area alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1118",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A fog collector could improve capture by oscillating its local air permeability as it becomes wet.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1118",
      "hypothesis": "A fog collector could improve capture by oscillating its local air permeability as it becomes wet.",
      "test": "Measure airflow and collected water.",
      "against": "Benefits follow wetted area alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1118",
      "hypothesis": "A fog collector could improve capture by oscillating its local air permeability as it becomes wet.",
      "test": "Measure airflow and collected water.",
      "against": "Benefits follow wetted area alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1119",
    "hypothesis": "A freezing aerosol could emit a pressure pulse that affects nearby droplet nucleation.",
    "test": "Measure pulses and neighbor events.",
    "against": "Neighbor changes follow shared cooling only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1119",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A freezing aerosol could emit a pressure pulse that affects nearby droplet nucleation.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1119",
      "hypothesis": "A freezing aerosol could emit a pressure pulse that affects nearby droplet nucleation.",
      "test": "Measure pulses and neighbor events.",
      "against": "Neighbor changes follow shared cooling only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1119",
      "hypothesis": "A freezing aerosol could emit a pressure pulse that affects nearby droplet nucleation.",
      "test": "Measure pulses and neighbor events.",
      "against": "Neighbor changes follow shared cooling only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1120",
    "hypothesis": "A desert-crust analogue could retain dawn moisture through reversible mineral expansion that closes vapor exits.",
    "test": "Image pores and water loss.",
    "against": "Retention follows lower temperature only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1120",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A desert-crust analogue could retain dawn moisture through reversible mineral expansion that closes vapor exits.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1120",
      "hypothesis": "A desert-crust analogue could retain dawn moisture through reversible mineral expansion that closes vapor exits.",
      "test": "Image pores and water loss.",
      "against": "Retention follows lower temperature only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1120",
      "hypothesis": "A desert-crust analogue could retain dawn moisture through reversible mineral expansion that closes vapor exits.",
      "test": "Image pores and water loss.",
      "against": "Retention follows lower temperature only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1121",
    "hypothesis": "A cloud-water analogue could partition benign organic solutes differently after repeated droplet impacts.",
    "test": "Measure partitioning at equal composition.",
    "against": "Impact history adds no effect.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1121",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A cloud-water analogue could partition benign organic solutes differently after repeated droplet impacts.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1121",
      "hypothesis": "A cloud-water analogue could partition benign organic solutes differently after repeated droplet impacts.",
      "test": "Measure partitioning at equal composition.",
      "against": "Impact history adds no effect.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1121",
      "hypothesis": "A cloud-water analogue could partition benign organic solutes differently after repeated droplet impacts.",
      "test": "Measure partitioning at equal composition.",
      "against": "Impact history adds no effect.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1122",
    "hypothesis": "A translucent ice layer could focus radiation into buried brine channels that then redirect heat.",
    "test": "Map light, brine, and temperature.",
    "against": "Heating follows absorption alone without channel feedback.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1122",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A translucent ice layer could focus radiation into buried brine channels that then redirect heat.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1122",
      "hypothesis": "A translucent ice layer could focus radiation into buried brine channels that then redirect heat.",
      "test": "Map light, brine, and temperature.",
      "against": "Heating follows absorption alone without channel feedback.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1122",
      "hypothesis": "A translucent ice layer could focus radiation into buried brine channels that then redirect heat.",
      "test": "Map light, brine, and temperature.",
      "against": "Heating follows absorption alone without channel feedback.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1123",
    "hypothesis": "A porous surface could distinguish drizzle from dew through different subsurface gas-pressure histories.",
    "test": "Measure gas and wetting fronts.",
    "against": "Histories depend only on water mass.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1123",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous surface could distinguish drizzle from dew through different subsurface gas-pressure histories.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1123",
      "hypothesis": "A porous surface could distinguish drizzle from dew through different subsurface gas-pressure histories.",
      "test": "Measure gas and wetting fronts.",
      "against": "Histories depend only on water mass.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1123",
      "hypothesis": "A porous surface could distinguish drizzle from dew through different subsurface gas-pressure histories.",
      "test": "Measure gas and wetting fronts.",
      "against": "Histories depend only on water mass.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1124",
    "hypothesis": "A suspended dust particle could become less reactive when an electric field reorients its adsorbed water.",
    "test": "Measure water orientation and probe chemistry.",
    "against": "Rate follows ion concentration only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1124",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A suspended dust particle could become less reactive when an electric field reorients its adsorbed water.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1124",
      "hypothesis": "A suspended dust particle could become less reactive when an electric field reorients its adsorbed water.",
      "test": "Measure water orientation and probe chemistry.",
      "against": "Rate follows ion concentration only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1124",
      "hypothesis": "A suspended dust particle could become less reactive when an electric field reorients its adsorbed water.",
      "test": "Measure water orientation and probe chemistry.",
      "against": "Rate follows ion concentration only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1125",
    "hypothesis": "A snowpack analogue could retain mechanical compaction history in vapor-diffusion anisotropy after density equalizes.",
    "test": "Measure transport and density.",
    "against": "Anisotropy follows density only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1125",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A snowpack analogue could retain mechanical compaction history in vapor-diffusion anisotropy after density equalizes.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1125",
      "hypothesis": "A snowpack analogue could retain mechanical compaction history in vapor-diffusion anisotropy after density equalizes.",
      "test": "Measure transport and density.",
      "against": "Anisotropy follows density only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1125",
      "hypothesis": "A snowpack analogue could retain mechanical compaction history in vapor-diffusion anisotropy after density equalizes.",
      "test": "Measure transport and density.",
      "against": "Anisotropy follows density only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1126",
    "hypothesis": "A fog droplet could avoid evaporation through transient shielding by a nearby warmer droplet.",
    "test": "Measure paired temperatures and lifetimes.",
    "against": "Shielding is explained by vapor alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1126",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A fog droplet could avoid evaporation through transient shielding by a nearby warmer droplet.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1126",
      "hypothesis": "A fog droplet could avoid evaporation through transient shielding by a nearby warmer droplet.",
      "test": "Measure paired temperatures and lifetimes.",
      "against": "Shielding is explained by vapor alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1126",
      "hypothesis": "A fog droplet could avoid evaporation through transient shielding by a nearby warmer droplet.",
      "test": "Measure paired temperatures and lifetimes.",
      "against": "Shielding is explained by vapor alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1127",
    "hypothesis": "A sediment aerosol source could show delayed emission after a gust because elastic plant-like fibers release grains during recoil.",
    "test": "Track fibers and particle emission.",
    "against": "Emission occurs only during peak wind.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1127",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A sediment aerosol source could show delayed emission after a gust because elastic plant-like fibers release grains during recoil.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1127",
      "hypothesis": "A sediment aerosol source could show delayed emission after a gust because elastic plant-like fibers release grains during recoil.",
      "test": "Track fibers and particle emission.",
      "against": "Emission occurs only during peak wind.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1127",
      "hypothesis": "A sediment aerosol source could show delayed emission after a gust because elastic plant-like fibers release grains during recoil.",
      "test": "Track fibers and particle emission.",
      "against": "Emission occurs only during peak wind.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1128",
    "hypothesis": "A capillary surface could create a stable humidity boundary separating two otherwise mixed air streams.",
    "test": "Map water vapor and flow.",
    "against": "Boundary disappears without bulk flow separation.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1128",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A capillary surface could create a stable humidity boundary separating two otherwise mixed air streams.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1128",
      "hypothesis": "A capillary surface could create a stable humidity boundary separating two otherwise mixed air streams.",
      "test": "Map water vapor and flow.",
      "against": "Boundary disappears without bulk flow separation.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1128",
      "hypothesis": "A capillary surface could create a stable humidity boundary separating two otherwise mixed air streams.",
      "test": "Map water vapor and flow.",
      "against": "Boundary disappears without bulk flow separation.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1129",
    "hypothesis": "A cold porous material could absorb vapor through channels that remain dry by transporting latent heat elsewhere.",
    "test": "Measure condensation and heat paths.",
    "against": "Uptake requires channel flooding.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1129",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A cold porous material could absorb vapor through channels that remain dry by transporting latent heat elsewhere.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1129",
      "hypothesis": "A cold porous material could absorb vapor through channels that remain dry by transporting latent heat elsewhere.",
      "test": "Measure condensation and heat paths.",
      "against": "Uptake requires channel flooding.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1129",
      "hypothesis": "A cold porous material could absorb vapor through channels that remain dry by transporting latent heat elsewhere.",
      "test": "Measure condensation and heat paths.",
      "against": "Uptake requires channel flooding.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1130",
    "hypothesis": "A fog layer could amplify an acoustic signal through synchronized evaporation and condensation under specific forcing.",
    "test": "Measure sound energy and droplet response.",
    "against": "No net amplification survives energy accounting.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1130",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A fog layer could amplify an acoustic signal through synchronized evaporation and condensation under specific forcing.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1130",
      "hypothesis": "A fog layer could amplify an acoustic signal through synchronized evaporation and condensation under specific forcing.",
      "test": "Measure sound energy and droplet response.",
      "against": "No net amplification survives energy accounting.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1130",
      "hypothesis": "A fog layer could amplify an acoustic signal through synchronized evaporation and condensation under specific forcing.",
      "test": "Measure sound energy and droplet response.",
      "against": "No net amplification survives energy accounting.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1131",
    "hypothesis": "A mineral-rich droplet could preserve an uneven pH pattern long after mechanical mixing stops.",
    "test": "Measure pH and mineral location.",
    "against": "Pattern follows unmixed liquid only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1131",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A mineral-rich droplet could preserve an uneven pH pattern long after mechanical mixing stops.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1131",
      "hypothesis": "A mineral-rich droplet could preserve an uneven pH pattern long after mechanical mixing stops.",
      "test": "Measure pH and mineral location.",
      "against": "Pattern follows unmixed liquid only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1131",
      "hypothesis": "A mineral-rich droplet could preserve an uneven pH pattern long after mechanical mixing stops.",
      "test": "Measure pH and mineral location.",
      "against": "Pattern follows unmixed liquid only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1132",
    "hypothesis": "A snow-albedo analogue could darken temporarily during refreezing because gas pockets move toward its surface.",
    "test": "Map gas and reflectance.",
    "against": "Darkening follows liquid fraction alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1132",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A snow-albedo analogue could darken temporarily during refreezing because gas pockets move toward its surface.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1132",
      "hypothesis": "A snow-albedo analogue could darken temporarily during refreezing because gas pockets move toward its surface.",
      "test": "Map gas and reflectance.",
      "against": "Darkening follows liquid fraction alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1132",
      "hypothesis": "A snow-albedo analogue could darken temporarily during refreezing because gas pockets move toward its surface.",
      "test": "Map gas and reflectance.",
      "against": "Darkening follows liquid fraction alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1133",
    "hypothesis": "A porous ground cover could reduce nighttime cooling by releasing adsorbed heat only near radiative hotspots.",
    "test": "Measure adsorption and thermal maps.",
    "against": "Heat release is spatially uniform.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1133",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous ground cover could reduce nighttime cooling by releasing adsorbed heat only near radiative hotspots.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1133",
      "hypothesis": "A porous ground cover could reduce nighttime cooling by releasing adsorbed heat only near radiative hotspots.",
      "test": "Measure adsorption and thermal maps.",
      "against": "Heat release is spatially uniform.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1133",
      "hypothesis": "A porous ground cover could reduce nighttime cooling by releasing adsorbed heat only near radiative hotspots.",
      "test": "Measure adsorption and thermal maps.",
      "against": "Heat release is spatially uniform.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1134",
    "hypothesis": "A cloud-droplet analogue could distinguish volatile from nonvolatile contamination through the timing of shape oscillation decay.",
    "test": "Calibrate compositions.",
    "against": "Decay tracks viscosity alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1134",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A cloud-droplet analogue could distinguish volatile from nonvolatile contamination through the timing of shape oscillation decay.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1134",
      "hypothesis": "A cloud-droplet analogue could distinguish volatile from nonvolatile contamination through the timing of shape oscillation decay.",
      "test": "Calibrate compositions.",
      "against": "Decay tracks viscosity alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1134",
      "hypothesis": "A cloud-droplet analogue could distinguish volatile from nonvolatile contamination through the timing of shape oscillation decay.",
      "test": "Calibrate compositions.",
      "against": "Decay tracks viscosity alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1135",
    "hypothesis": "A wet fibrous surface could generate a weak pressure rhythm from synchronized capillary refill events.",
    "test": "Record refill and pressure.",
    "against": "Rhythm follows external pump noise.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1135",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A wet fibrous surface could generate a weak pressure rhythm from synchronized capillary refill events.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1135",
      "hypothesis": "A wet fibrous surface could generate a weak pressure rhythm from synchronized capillary refill events.",
      "test": "Record refill and pressure.",
      "against": "Rhythm follows external pump noise.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1135",
      "hypothesis": "A wet fibrous surface could generate a weak pressure rhythm from synchronized capillary refill events.",
      "test": "Record refill and pressure.",
      "against": "Rhythm follows external pump noise.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1136",
    "hypothesis": "A suspended mineral flake could stabilize its flight through humidity-induced curvature changes.",
    "test": "Measure shape and trajectory.",
    "against": "Stability follows added water mass only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1136",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A suspended mineral flake could stabilize its flight through humidity-induced curvature changes.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1136",
      "hypothesis": "A suspended mineral flake could stabilize its flight through humidity-induced curvature changes.",
      "test": "Measure shape and trajectory.",
      "against": "Stability follows added water mass only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1136",
      "hypothesis": "A suspended mineral flake could stabilize its flight through humidity-induced curvature changes.",
      "test": "Measure shape and trajectory.",
      "against": "Stability follows added water mass only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1137",
    "hypothesis": "A frost-covered sensor could retain useful acoustic access through naturally formed air channels.",
    "test": "Map channels and sound transmission.",
    "against": "Transmission vanishes with surface coverage.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1137",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A frost-covered sensor could retain useful acoustic access through naturally formed air channels.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1137",
      "hypothesis": "A frost-covered sensor could retain useful acoustic access through naturally formed air channels.",
      "test": "Map channels and sound transmission.",
      "against": "Transmission vanishes with surface coverage.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1137",
      "hypothesis": "A frost-covered sensor could retain useful acoustic access through naturally formed air channels.",
      "test": "Map channels and sound transmission.",
      "against": "Transmission vanishes with surface coverage.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1138",
    "hypothesis": "A soil evaporation front could detect nearby plant-like sinks through asymmetric temperature fluctuations before mean moisture changes.",
    "test": "Measure fluctuations and sink position.",
    "against": "Asymmetry follows mean moisture only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1138",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A soil evaporation front could detect nearby plant-like sinks through asymmetric temperature fluctuations before mean moisture changes.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1138",
      "hypothesis": "A soil evaporation front could detect nearby plant-like sinks through asymmetric temperature fluctuations before mean moisture changes.",
      "test": "Measure fluctuations and sink position.",
      "against": "Asymmetry follows mean moisture only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1138",
      "hypothesis": "A soil evaporation front could detect nearby plant-like sinks through asymmetric temperature fluctuations before mean moisture changes.",
      "test": "Measure fluctuations and sink position.",
      "against": "Asymmetry follows mean moisture only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1139",
    "hypothesis": "A fog collector's first captured droplets could change later capture through local electrostatic screening.",
    "test": "Measure charge and collection histories.",
    "against": "Capture follows wetting alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1139",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A fog collector's first captured droplets could change later capture through local electrostatic screening.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1139",
      "hypothesis": "A fog collector's first captured droplets could change later capture through local electrostatic screening.",
      "test": "Measure charge and collection histories.",
      "against": "Capture follows wetting alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1139",
      "hypothesis": "A fog collector's first captured droplets could change later capture through local electrostatic screening.",
      "test": "Measure charge and collection histories.",
      "against": "Capture follows wetting alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1140",
    "hypothesis": "A porous ice surface could release different gas mixtures during warming and pressure reduction at equal total release.",
    "test": "Measure time-resolved composition.",
    "against": "Mixtures depend only on initial loading.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1140",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous ice surface could release different gas mixtures during warming and pressure reduction at equal total release.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1140",
      "hypothesis": "A porous ice surface could release different gas mixtures during warming and pressure reduction at equal total release.",
      "test": "Measure time-resolved composition.",
      "against": "Mixtures depend only on initial loading.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1140",
      "hypothesis": "A porous ice surface could release different gas mixtures during warming and pressure reduction at equal total release.",
      "test": "Measure time-resolved composition.",
      "against": "Mixtures depend only on initial loading.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1141",
    "hypothesis": "A thin wet dust layer could become mechanically stronger after a short warming pulse that reorganizes capillary bridges.",
    "test": "Measure bridge geometry and strength.",
    "against": "Strength follows water loss only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1141",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A thin wet dust layer could become mechanically stronger after a short warming pulse that reorganizes capillary bridges.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1141",
      "hypothesis": "A thin wet dust layer could become mechanically stronger after a short warming pulse that reorganizes capillary bridges.",
      "test": "Measure bridge geometry and strength.",
      "against": "Strength follows water loss only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1141",
      "hypothesis": "A thin wet dust layer could become mechanically stronger after a short warming pulse that reorganizes capillary bridges.",
      "test": "Measure bridge geometry and strength.",
      "against": "Strength follows water loss only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1142",
    "hypothesis": "A rain-fed porous slab could preserve event timing in successive luminescence changes without added dyes.",
    "test": "Measure natural emission and hydration.",
    "against": "Signals encode only final water content.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1142",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A rain-fed porous slab could preserve event timing in successive luminescence changes without added dyes.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1142",
      "hypothesis": "A rain-fed porous slab could preserve event timing in successive luminescence changes without added dyes.",
      "test": "Measure natural emission and hydration.",
      "against": "Signals encode only final water content.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1142",
      "hypothesis": "A rain-fed porous slab could preserve event timing in successive luminescence changes without added dyes.",
      "test": "Measure natural emission and hydration.",
      "against": "Signals encode only final water content.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1143",
    "hypothesis": "An aerosol coating could suppress reactive uptake through reversible molecular alignment induced by airflow.",
    "test": "Measure alignment and uptake.",
    "against": "Effects follow gas transport alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1143",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "An aerosol coating could suppress reactive uptake through reversible molecular alignment induced by airflow.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1143",
      "hypothesis": "An aerosol coating could suppress reactive uptake through reversible molecular alignment induced by airflow.",
      "test": "Measure alignment and uptake.",
      "against": "Effects follow gas transport alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1143",
      "hypothesis": "An aerosol coating could suppress reactive uptake through reversible molecular alignment induced by airflow.",
      "test": "Measure alignment and uptake.",
      "against": "Effects follow gas transport alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1144",
    "hypothesis": "A layered frost surface could shed more ice under gentle sound than uniform frost of equal mass.",
    "test": "Measure detachment and internal layers.",
    "against": "Benefits follow reduced adhesion area only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1144",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A layered frost surface could shed more ice under gentle sound than uniform frost of equal mass.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1144",
      "hypothesis": "A layered frost surface could shed more ice under gentle sound than uniform frost of equal mass.",
      "test": "Measure detachment and internal layers.",
      "against": "Benefits follow reduced adhesion area only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1144",
      "hypothesis": "A layered frost surface could shed more ice under gentle sound than uniform frost of equal mass.",
      "test": "Measure detachment and internal layers.",
      "against": "Benefits follow reduced adhesion area only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1145",
    "hypothesis": "A ground analogue could direct dew toward roots through subsurface thermal conductivity gradients without surface grooves.",
    "test": "Map water and heat.",
    "against": "Routing follows surface slope only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1145",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A ground analogue could direct dew toward roots through subsurface thermal conductivity gradients without surface grooves.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1145",
      "hypothesis": "A ground analogue could direct dew toward roots through subsurface thermal conductivity gradients without surface grooves.",
      "test": "Map water and heat.",
      "against": "Routing follows surface slope only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1145",
      "hypothesis": "A ground analogue could direct dew toward roots through subsurface thermal conductivity gradients without surface grooves.",
      "test": "Map water and heat.",
      "against": "Routing follows surface slope only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1146",
    "hypothesis": "A droplet cloud could reveal hidden turbulence intermittency through correlated spectral color fluctuations.",
    "test": "Measure scattering and velocity fields.",
    "against": "Colors track concentration alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1146",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A droplet cloud could reveal hidden turbulence intermittency through correlated spectral color fluctuations.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1146",
      "hypothesis": "A droplet cloud could reveal hidden turbulence intermittency through correlated spectral color fluctuations.",
      "test": "Measure scattering and velocity fields.",
      "against": "Colors track concentration alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1146",
      "hypothesis": "A droplet cloud could reveal hidden turbulence intermittency through correlated spectral color fluctuations.",
      "test": "Measure scattering and velocity fields.",
      "against": "Colors track concentration alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1147",
    "hypothesis": "A dust-covered ice analogue could create a vapor chimney through localized sublimation feedback.",
    "test": "Image chimney growth and vapor.",
    "against": "Channels follow initial cracks only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1147",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A dust-covered ice analogue could create a vapor chimney through localized sublimation feedback.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1147",
      "hypothesis": "A dust-covered ice analogue could create a vapor chimney through localized sublimation feedback.",
      "test": "Image chimney growth and vapor.",
      "against": "Channels follow initial cracks only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1147",
      "hypothesis": "A dust-covered ice analogue could create a vapor chimney through localized sublimation feedback.",
      "test": "Image chimney growth and vapor.",
      "against": "Channels follow initial cracks only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1148",
    "hypothesis": "A porous vegetation analogue could suppress heat stress by storing a short humidity pulse in shaded internal contacts.",
    "test": "Measure storage and temperature.",
    "against": "Protection follows total water mass only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1148",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous vegetation analogue could suppress heat stress by storing a short humidity pulse in shaded internal contacts.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1148",
      "hypothesis": "A porous vegetation analogue could suppress heat stress by storing a short humidity pulse in shaded internal contacts.",
      "test": "Measure storage and temperature.",
      "against": "Protection follows total water mass only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1148",
      "hypothesis": "A porous vegetation analogue could suppress heat stress by storing a short humidity pulse in shaded internal contacts.",
      "test": "Measure storage and temperature.",
      "against": "Protection follows total water mass only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1149",
    "hypothesis": "A cloud-condensation nucleus could retain its activation history through mechanical deformation of its dry residue.",
    "test": "Measure shape and later activation.",
    "against": "History disappears after size matching.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1149",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A cloud-condensation nucleus could retain its activation history through mechanical deformation of its dry residue.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1149",
      "hypothesis": "A cloud-condensation nucleus could retain its activation history through mechanical deformation of its dry residue.",
      "test": "Measure shape and later activation.",
      "against": "History disappears after size matching.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1149",
      "hypothesis": "A cloud-condensation nucleus could retain its activation history through mechanical deformation of its dry residue.",
      "test": "Measure shape and later activation.",
      "against": "History disappears after size matching.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1150",
    "hypothesis": "A snow surface could develop a preferred vapor-release direction after unidirectional acoustic excitation.",
    "test": "Measure vapor maps.",
    "against": "Directionality requires residual heating gradients.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1150",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A snow surface could develop a preferred vapor-release direction after unidirectional acoustic excitation.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1150",
      "hypothesis": "A snow surface could develop a preferred vapor-release direction after unidirectional acoustic excitation.",
      "test": "Measure vapor maps.",
      "against": "Directionality requires residual heating gradients.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1150",
      "hypothesis": "A snow surface could develop a preferred vapor-release direction after unidirectional acoustic excitation.",
      "test": "Measure vapor maps.",
      "against": "Directionality requires residual heating gradients.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1151",
    "hypothesis": "A wet mineral film could reduce ozone-analogue uptake after repeated pressure pulses by expelling trapped gas from reactive pores.",
    "test": "Use benign probe gases.",
    "against": "Uptake changes require chemical aging.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1151",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A wet mineral film could reduce ozone-analogue uptake after repeated pressure pulses by expelling trapped gas from reactive pores.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1151",
      "hypothesis": "A wet mineral film could reduce ozone-analogue uptake after repeated pressure pulses by expelling trapped gas from reactive pores.",
      "test": "Use benign probe gases.",
      "against": "Uptake changes require chemical aging.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1151",
      "hypothesis": "A wet mineral film could reduce ozone-analogue uptake after repeated pressure pulses by expelling trapped gas from reactive pores.",
      "test": "Use benign probe gases.",
      "against": "Uptake changes require chemical aging.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1152",
    "hypothesis": "A porous collector could sort raindrop momentum from water mass using delayed internal pressure recovery.",
    "test": "Apply calibrated drops.",
    "against": "Signals cannot separate mass and speed.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1152",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous collector could sort raindrop momentum from water mass using delayed internal pressure recovery.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1152",
      "hypothesis": "A porous collector could sort raindrop momentum from water mass using delayed internal pressure recovery.",
      "test": "Apply calibrated drops.",
      "against": "Signals cannot separate mass and speed.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1152",
      "hypothesis": "A porous collector could sort raindrop momentum from water mass using delayed internal pressure recovery.",
      "test": "Apply calibrated drops.",
      "against": "Signals cannot separate mass and speed.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1153",
    "hypothesis": "A dust aggregate could fragment more gently during hydration if internal water arrives through multiple disconnected paths.",
    "test": "Image water routes and fragments.",
    "against": "Fragmentation follows uptake rate alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1153",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A dust aggregate could fragment more gently during hydration if internal water arrives through multiple disconnected paths.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1153",
      "hypothesis": "A dust aggregate could fragment more gently during hydration if internal water arrives through multiple disconnected paths.",
      "test": "Image water routes and fragments.",
      "against": "Fragmentation follows uptake rate alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1153",
      "hypothesis": "A dust aggregate could fragment more gently during hydration if internal water arrives through multiple disconnected paths.",
      "test": "Image water routes and fragments.",
      "against": "Fragmentation follows uptake rate alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1154",
    "hypothesis": "A thin ice coating could measure local wind-direction variability through the orientation spread of sublimation pits.",
    "test": "Compare controlled wind histories.",
    "against": "Pits reflect crystal orientation only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1154",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A thin ice coating could measure local wind-direction variability through the orientation spread of sublimation pits.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1154",
      "hypothesis": "A thin ice coating could measure local wind-direction variability through the orientation spread of sublimation pits.",
      "test": "Compare controlled wind histories.",
      "against": "Pits reflect crystal orientation only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1154",
      "hypothesis": "A thin ice coating could measure local wind-direction variability through the orientation spread of sublimation pits.",
      "test": "Compare controlled wind histories.",
      "against": "Pits reflect crystal orientation only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1155",
    "hypothesis": "A fog-harvesting surface could reduce re-entrainment by releasing water in mechanically shielded packets.",
    "test": "Track droplet loss and airflow.",
    "against": "Protection requires reduced collection area.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1155",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A fog-harvesting surface could reduce re-entrainment by releasing water in mechanically shielded packets.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1155",
      "hypothesis": "A fog-harvesting surface could reduce re-entrainment by releasing water in mechanically shielded packets.",
      "test": "Track droplet loss and airflow.",
      "against": "Protection requires reduced collection area.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1155",
      "hypothesis": "A fog-harvesting surface could reduce re-entrainment by releasing water in mechanically shielded packets.",
      "test": "Track droplet loss and airflow.",
      "against": "Protection requires reduced collection area.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1156",
    "hypothesis": "A soil-vapor chamber could sustain a temperature oscillation through delayed adsorption heat without external periodic forcing.",
    "test": "Measure energy balance and cycles.",
    "against": "Oscillation follows ambient temperature noise.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1156",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A soil-vapor chamber could sustain a temperature oscillation through delayed adsorption heat without external periodic forcing.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1156",
      "hypothesis": "A soil-vapor chamber could sustain a temperature oscillation through delayed adsorption heat without external periodic forcing.",
      "test": "Measure energy balance and cycles.",
      "against": "Oscillation follows ambient temperature noise.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1156",
      "hypothesis": "A soil-vapor chamber could sustain a temperature oscillation through delayed adsorption heat without external periodic forcing.",
      "test": "Measure energy balance and cycles.",
      "against": "Oscillation follows ambient temperature noise.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1157",
    "hypothesis": "A cloud-water analogue could concentrate a benign catalyst at collision-generated transient interfaces.",
    "test": "Measure catalyst location and reaction.",
    "against": "Rate follows total surface area only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1157",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A cloud-water analogue could concentrate a benign catalyst at collision-generated transient interfaces.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1157",
      "hypothesis": "A cloud-water analogue could concentrate a benign catalyst at collision-generated transient interfaces.",
      "test": "Measure catalyst location and reaction.",
      "against": "Rate follows total surface area only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1157",
      "hypothesis": "A cloud-water analogue could concentrate a benign catalyst at collision-generated transient interfaces.",
      "test": "Measure catalyst location and reaction.",
      "against": "Rate follows total surface area only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1158",
    "hypothesis": "A porous snow analogue could retain less pollutant when melt begins from below rather than above.",
    "test": "Measure tracer release at equal melt fraction.",
    "against": "Release depends only on melt amount.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1158",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous snow analogue could retain less pollutant when melt begins from below rather than above.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1158",
      "hypothesis": "A porous snow analogue could retain less pollutant when melt begins from below rather than above.",
      "test": "Measure tracer release at equal melt fraction.",
      "against": "Release depends only on melt amount.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1158",
      "hypothesis": "A porous snow analogue could retain less pollutant when melt begins from below rather than above.",
      "test": "Measure tracer release at equal melt fraction.",
      "against": "Release depends only on melt amount.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1159",
    "hypothesis": "A wet dust layer could reveal particle-contact topology through its thermal response to a brief shadow.",
    "test": "Compare topology and cooling.",
    "against": "Response follows average density only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1159",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A wet dust layer could reveal particle-contact topology through its thermal response to a brief shadow.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1159",
      "hypothesis": "A wet dust layer could reveal particle-contact topology through its thermal response to a brief shadow.",
      "test": "Compare topology and cooling.",
      "against": "Response follows average density only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1159",
      "hypothesis": "A wet dust layer could reveal particle-contact topology through its thermal response to a brief shadow.",
      "test": "Compare topology and cooling.",
      "against": "Response follows average density only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1160",
    "hypothesis": "A floating vegetation analogue could reduce evaporation by redistributing its shade toward warmer water.",
    "test": "Measure motion and mass loss.",
    "against": "Benefits require greater shaded area.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1160",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A floating vegetation analogue could reduce evaporation by redistributing its shade toward warmer water.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1160",
      "hypothesis": "A floating vegetation analogue could reduce evaporation by redistributing its shade toward warmer water.",
      "test": "Measure motion and mass loss.",
      "against": "Benefits require greater shaded area.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1160",
      "hypothesis": "A floating vegetation analogue could reduce evaporation by redistributing its shade toward warmer water.",
      "test": "Measure motion and mass loss.",
      "against": "Benefits require greater shaded area.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1161",
    "hypothesis": "A dew film could transfer thermal information laterally faster than liquid mass through propagating condensation fronts.",
    "test": "Measure heat and tracer travel.",
    "against": "Both propagate at the same rate.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1161",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A dew film could transfer thermal information laterally faster than liquid mass through propagating condensation fronts.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1161",
      "hypothesis": "A dew film could transfer thermal information laterally faster than liquid mass through propagating condensation fronts.",
      "test": "Measure heat and tracer travel.",
      "against": "Both propagate at the same rate.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1161",
      "hypothesis": "A dew film could transfer thermal information laterally faster than liquid mass through propagating condensation fronts.",
      "test": "Measure heat and tracer travel.",
      "against": "Both propagate at the same rate.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1162",
    "hypothesis": "A mineral aerosol could reveal whether its water is surface-bound or internal through rotational relaxation after electric-field removal.",
    "test": "Measure states independently.",
    "against": "Relaxation follows total water only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1162",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A mineral aerosol could reveal whether its water is surface-bound or internal through rotational relaxation after electric-field removal.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1162",
      "hypothesis": "A mineral aerosol could reveal whether its water is surface-bound or internal through rotational relaxation after electric-field removal.",
      "test": "Measure states independently.",
      "against": "Relaxation follows total water only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1162",
      "hypothesis": "A mineral aerosol could reveal whether its water is surface-bound or internal through rotational relaxation after electric-field removal.",
      "test": "Measure states independently.",
      "against": "Relaxation follows total water only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1163",
    "hypothesis": "A frost layer could resist contamination by trapping particles in sacrificial outer branches that later sublime first.",
    "test": "Track particles and ice loss.",
    "against": "Purification requires complete frost removal.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1163",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A frost layer could resist contamination by trapping particles in sacrificial outer branches that later sublime first.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1163",
      "hypothesis": "A frost layer could resist contamination by trapping particles in sacrificial outer branches that later sublime first.",
      "test": "Track particles and ice loss.",
      "against": "Purification requires complete frost removal.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1163",
      "hypothesis": "A frost layer could resist contamination by trapping particles in sacrificial outer branches that later sublime first.",
      "test": "Track particles and ice loss.",
      "against": "Purification requires complete frost removal.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1164",
    "hypothesis": "A porous soil cover could maintain oxygen exchange during rainfall through hydrophobic paths that open under pressure.",
    "test": "Measure gas and water transport.",
    "against": "Paths leak excessive liquid.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1164",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous soil cover could maintain oxygen exchange during rainfall through hydrophobic paths that open under pressure.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1164",
      "hypothesis": "A porous soil cover could maintain oxygen exchange during rainfall through hydrophobic paths that open under pressure.",
      "test": "Measure gas and water transport.",
      "against": "Paths leak excessive liquid.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1164",
      "hypothesis": "A porous soil cover could maintain oxygen exchange during rainfall through hydrophobic paths that open under pressure.",
      "test": "Measure gas and water transport.",
      "against": "Paths leak excessive liquid.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1165",
    "hypothesis": "A fog droplet could record a short acidity pulse in a persistent surfactant-free interfacial structure.",
    "test": "Measure interface and bulk pH recovery.",
    "against": "Structure disappears with pH recovery.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1165",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A fog droplet could record a short acidity pulse in a persistent surfactant-free interfacial structure.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1165",
      "hypothesis": "A fog droplet could record a short acidity pulse in a persistent surfactant-free interfacial structure.",
      "test": "Measure interface and bulk pH recovery.",
      "against": "Structure disappears with pH recovery.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1165",
      "hypothesis": "A fog droplet could record a short acidity pulse in a persistent surfactant-free interfacial structure.",
      "test": "Measure interface and bulk pH recovery.",
      "against": "Structure disappears with pH recovery.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1166",
    "hypothesis": "A granular surface could emit fewer particles after a weak pre-gust mechanically closes loose contacts.",
    "test": "Measure contacts and emissions.",
    "against": "Suppression requires permanent compaction.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 4,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 11,
    "literature_query": "granular surface emit fewer particles weak pre-gust mechanically closes loose contacts experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N1166",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A granular surface could emit fewer particles after a weak pre-gust mechanically closes loose contacts.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1166",
      "hypothesis": "A granular surface could emit fewer particles after a weak pre-gust mechanically closes loose contacts.",
      "test": "Measure contacts and emissions.",
      "against": "Suppression requires permanent compaction.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1166",
      "hypothesis": "A granular surface could emit fewer particles after a weak pre-gust mechanically closes loose contacts.",
      "test": "Measure contacts and emissions.",
      "against": "Suppression requires permanent compaction.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 11,
      "literature_query": "granular surface emit fewer particles weak pre-gust mechanically closes loose contacts experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "11",
      "id": "N1166",
      "hypothesis": "A granular surface could emit fewer particles after a weak pre-gust mechanically closes loose contacts.",
      "test": "Measure contacts and emissions.",
      "against": "Suppression requires permanent compaction.",
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_score": "24",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P79e1b48421fa;Pbb22415605a7;P834ec07ddc48",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N1166",
      "hypothesis": "A granular surface could emit fewer particles after a weak pre-gust mechanically closes loose contacts.",
      "test": "Measure contacts and emissions.",
      "against": "Suppression requires permanent compaction.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 11,
      "literature_query": "granular surface emit fewer particles weak pre-gust mechanically closes loose contacts experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P79e1b48421fa;Pbb22415605a7;P834ec07ddc48",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P79e1b48421fa;Pbb22415605a7;P834ec07ddc48",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1167",
    "hypothesis": "A snow-crystal cluster could rotate under uneven sublimation and thereby reduce its own heating.",
    "test": "Track rotation and absorbed light.",
    "against": "Rotation increases heating or is random.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1167",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A snow-crystal cluster could rotate under uneven sublimation and thereby reduce its own heating.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1167",
      "hypothesis": "A snow-crystal cluster could rotate under uneven sublimation and thereby reduce its own heating.",
      "test": "Track rotation and absorbed light.",
      "against": "Rotation increases heating or is random.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1167",
      "hypothesis": "A snow-crystal cluster could rotate under uneven sublimation and thereby reduce its own heating.",
      "test": "Track rotation and absorbed light.",
      "against": "Rotation increases heating or is random.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1168",
    "hypothesis": "A thin mist could delay freezing on a surface by continuously replacing warm interfacial air.",
    "test": "Measure gas motion and freezing.",
    "against": "Delay follows added sensible heat only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1168",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A thin mist could delay freezing on a surface by continuously replacing warm interfacial air.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1168",
      "hypothesis": "A thin mist could delay freezing on a surface by continuously replacing warm interfacial air.",
      "test": "Measure gas motion and freezing.",
      "against": "Delay follows added sensible heat only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1168",
      "hypothesis": "A thin mist could delay freezing on a surface by continuously replacing warm interfacial air.",
      "test": "Measure gas motion and freezing.",
      "against": "Delay follows added sensible heat only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1169",
    "hypothesis": "A porous dew collector could maintain capture under fouling by relocating its coldest region away from deposits.",
    "test": "Measure heat routes and collection.",
    "against": "Relocation requires active control.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1169",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous dew collector could maintain capture under fouling by relocating its coldest region away from deposits.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1169",
      "hypothesis": "A porous dew collector could maintain capture under fouling by relocating its coldest region away from deposits.",
      "test": "Measure heat routes and collection.",
      "against": "Relocation requires active control.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1169",
      "hypothesis": "A porous dew collector could maintain capture under fouling by relocating its coldest region away from deposits.",
      "test": "Measure heat routes and collection.",
      "against": "Relocation requires active control.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1170",
    "hypothesis": "A mineral dust analogue could distinguish repeated freeze-thaw from repeated wet-dry exposure through its fragmentation spectrum.",
    "test": "Compare matched damage histories.",
    "against": "Spectra depend only on total damage.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1170",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A mineral dust analogue could distinguish repeated freeze-thaw from repeated wet-dry exposure through its fragmentation spectrum.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1170",
      "hypothesis": "A mineral dust analogue could distinguish repeated freeze-thaw from repeated wet-dry exposure through its fragmentation spectrum.",
      "test": "Compare matched damage histories.",
      "against": "Spectra depend only on total damage.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1170",
      "hypothesis": "A mineral dust analogue could distinguish repeated freeze-thaw from repeated wet-dry exposure through its fragmentation spectrum.",
      "test": "Compare matched damage histories.",
      "against": "Spectra depend only on total damage.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1171",
    "hypothesis": "A canopy-like mesh could reduce spray drift by converting large gusts into short internal circulation loops.",
    "test": "Measure airflow and spray escape.",
    "against": "Reduction requires lower mean permeability.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1171",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A canopy-like mesh could reduce spray drift by converting large gusts into short internal circulation loops.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1171",
      "hypothesis": "A canopy-like mesh could reduce spray drift by converting large gusts into short internal circulation loops.",
      "test": "Measure airflow and spray escape.",
      "against": "Reduction requires lower mean permeability.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1171",
      "hypothesis": "A canopy-like mesh could reduce spray drift by converting large gusts into short internal circulation loops.",
      "test": "Measure airflow and spray escape.",
      "against": "Reduction requires lower mean permeability.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1172",
    "hypothesis": "A partially frozen droplet could selectively release neutral solutes as its ice shell flexes.",
    "test": "Measure release and shell strain.",
    "against": "Release follows crack area alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1172",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A partially frozen droplet could selectively release neutral solutes as its ice shell flexes.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1172",
      "hypothesis": "A partially frozen droplet could selectively release neutral solutes as its ice shell flexes.",
      "test": "Measure release and shell strain.",
      "against": "Release follows crack area alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1172",
      "hypothesis": "A partially frozen droplet could selectively release neutral solutes as its ice shell flexes.",
      "test": "Measure release and shell strain.",
      "against": "Release follows crack area alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1173",
    "hypothesis": "A wet porous boundary could preserve a local cool region against airflow through evaporation-induced pore closure.",
    "test": "Measure pore state and cooling.",
    "against": "Closure suppresses cooling entirely.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1173",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A wet porous boundary could preserve a local cool region against airflow through evaporation-induced pore closure.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1173",
      "hypothesis": "A wet porous boundary could preserve a local cool region against airflow through evaporation-induced pore closure.",
      "test": "Measure pore state and cooling.",
      "against": "Closure suppresses cooling entirely.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1173",
      "hypothesis": "A wet porous boundary could preserve a local cool region against airflow through evaporation-induced pore closure.",
      "test": "Measure pore state and cooling.",
      "against": "Closure suppresses cooling entirely.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1174",
    "hypothesis": "A cloud-droplet analogue could retain circulation chirality after coalescence when viscosity differs internally.",
    "test": "Track internal flows.",
    "against": "Chirality is randomized immediately.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1174",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A cloud-droplet analogue could retain circulation chirality after coalescence when viscosity differs internally.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1174",
      "hypothesis": "A cloud-droplet analogue could retain circulation chirality after coalescence when viscosity differs internally.",
      "test": "Track internal flows.",
      "against": "Chirality is randomized immediately.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1174",
      "hypothesis": "A cloud-droplet analogue could retain circulation chirality after coalescence when viscosity differs internally.",
      "test": "Track internal flows.",
      "against": "Chirality is randomized immediately.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1175",
    "hypothesis": "A frost-free cold surface could be maintained longer by storing vapor in an adjacent warmer adsorbent connected through air.",
    "test": "Measure vapor and ice onset.",
    "against": "Benefit follows lower local humidity only without recoverability.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1175",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A frost-free cold surface could be maintained longer by storing vapor in an adjacent warmer adsorbent connected through air.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1175",
      "hypothesis": "A frost-free cold surface could be maintained longer by storing vapor in an adjacent warmer adsorbent connected through air.",
      "test": "Measure vapor and ice onset.",
      "against": "Benefit follows lower local humidity only without recoverability.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1175",
      "hypothesis": "A frost-free cold surface could be maintained longer by storing vapor in an adjacent warmer adsorbent connected through air.",
      "test": "Measure vapor and ice onset.",
      "against": "Benefit follows lower local humidity only without recoverability.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1176",
    "hypothesis": "A dust-coated leaf analogue could recover optical transmission through cyclic expansion of adsorbed water layers.",
    "test": "Track dust and transmission.",
    "against": "Cleaning requires liquid washing.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1176",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A dust-coated leaf analogue could recover optical transmission through cyclic expansion of adsorbed water layers.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1176",
      "hypothesis": "A dust-coated leaf analogue could recover optical transmission through cyclic expansion of adsorbed water layers.",
      "test": "Track dust and transmission.",
      "against": "Cleaning requires liquid washing.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1176",
      "hypothesis": "A dust-coated leaf analogue could recover optical transmission through cyclic expansion of adsorbed water layers.",
      "test": "Track dust and transmission.",
      "against": "Cleaning requires liquid washing.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1177",
    "hypothesis": "A soil-air interface could reveal the depth of a wet layer through the delay of a humidity pulse after pressure release.",
    "test": "Calibrate buried layers.",
    "against": "Delay follows surface roughness only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1177",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A soil-air interface could reveal the depth of a wet layer through the delay of a humidity pulse after pressure release.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1177",
      "hypothesis": "A soil-air interface could reveal the depth of a wet layer through the delay of a humidity pulse after pressure release.",
      "test": "Calibrate buried layers.",
      "against": "Delay follows surface roughness only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1177",
      "hypothesis": "A soil-air interface could reveal the depth of a wet layer through the delay of a humidity pulse after pressure release.",
      "test": "Calibrate buried layers.",
      "against": "Delay follows surface roughness only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1178",
    "hypothesis": "A fog collector could identify impending drainage failure through growing correlations among drop-detachment times.",
    "test": "Measure timing and flooding.",
    "against": "Correlations appear only after flooding.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1178",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A fog collector could identify impending drainage failure through growing correlations among drop-detachment times.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1178",
      "hypothesis": "A fog collector could identify impending drainage failure through growing correlations among drop-detachment times.",
      "test": "Measure timing and flooding.",
      "against": "Correlations appear only after flooding.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1178",
      "hypothesis": "A fog collector could identify impending drainage failure through growing correlations among drop-detachment times.",
      "test": "Measure timing and flooding.",
      "against": "Correlations appear only after flooding.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1179",
    "hypothesis": "A snowpack analogue could suppress melt-channel localization by allowing weak lateral grain motion.",
    "test": "Image grains and channels.",
    "against": "Uniformity requires slower melting.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1179",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A snowpack analogue could suppress melt-channel localization by allowing weak lateral grain motion.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1179",
      "hypothesis": "A snowpack analogue could suppress melt-channel localization by allowing weak lateral grain motion.",
      "test": "Image grains and channels.",
      "against": "Uniformity requires slower melting.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1179",
      "hypothesis": "A snowpack analogue could suppress melt-channel localization by allowing weak lateral grain motion.",
      "test": "Image grains and channels.",
      "against": "Uniformity requires slower melting.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1180",
    "hypothesis": "A mineral aerosol could preserve a chemical gradient inside one particle through a mechanically sealed outer rim.",
    "test": "Map chemistry and rim strain.",
    "against": "Gradient follows low diffusivity alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1180",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A mineral aerosol could preserve a chemical gradient inside one particle through a mechanically sealed outer rim.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1180",
      "hypothesis": "A mineral aerosol could preserve a chemical gradient inside one particle through a mechanically sealed outer rim.",
      "test": "Map chemistry and rim strain.",
      "against": "Gradient follows low diffusivity alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1180",
      "hypothesis": "A mineral aerosol could preserve a chemical gradient inside one particle through a mechanically sealed outer rim.",
      "test": "Map chemistry and rim strain.",
      "against": "Gradient follows low diffusivity alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1181",
    "hypothesis": "A dew-covered surface could separate thermal and chemical contamination through opposite motions of its contact-line noise spectrum.",
    "test": "Apply contaminants independently.",
    "against": "Spectra remain confounded.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1181",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A dew-covered surface could separate thermal and chemical contamination through opposite motions of its contact-line noise spectrum.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1181",
      "hypothesis": "A dew-covered surface could separate thermal and chemical contamination through opposite motions of its contact-line noise spectrum.",
      "test": "Apply contaminants independently.",
      "against": "Spectra remain confounded.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1181",
      "hypothesis": "A dew-covered surface could separate thermal and chemical contamination through opposite motions of its contact-line noise spectrum.",
      "test": "Apply contaminants independently.",
      "against": "Spectra remain confounded.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1182",
    "hypothesis": "A porous windbreak could retain effectiveness after wetting by reversible internal rearrangement rather than reduced pore area.",
    "test": "Measure airflow and structure.",
    "against": "Effectiveness follows porosity alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1182",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous windbreak could retain effectiveness after wetting by reversible internal rearrangement rather than reduced pore area.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1182",
      "hypothesis": "A porous windbreak could retain effectiveness after wetting by reversible internal rearrangement rather than reduced pore area.",
      "test": "Measure airflow and structure.",
      "against": "Effectiveness follows porosity alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1182",
      "hypothesis": "A porous windbreak could retain effectiveness after wetting by reversible internal rearrangement rather than reduced pore area.",
      "test": "Measure airflow and structure.",
      "against": "Effectiveness follows porosity alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1183",
    "hypothesis": "A cloud analogue could undergo delayed clearing when droplet evaporation changes the gas's thermal stratification.",
    "test": "Measure droplets and temperature.",
    "against": "Clearing follows humidity alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1183",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A cloud analogue could undergo delayed clearing when droplet evaporation changes the gas's thermal stratification.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1183",
      "hypothesis": "A cloud analogue could undergo delayed clearing when droplet evaporation changes the gas's thermal stratification.",
      "test": "Measure droplets and temperature.",
      "against": "Clearing follows humidity alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1183",
      "hypothesis": "A cloud analogue could undergo delayed clearing when droplet evaporation changes the gas's thermal stratification.",
      "test": "Measure droplets and temperature.",
      "against": "Clearing follows humidity alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1184",
    "hypothesis": "A frost layer could reveal buried liquid leakage through directional crystal growth before a warm spot becomes measurable.",
    "test": "Compare imaging and thermometry.",
    "against": "Growth changes follow detectable warming only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1184",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A frost layer could reveal buried liquid leakage through directional crystal growth before a warm spot becomes measurable.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1184",
      "hypothesis": "A frost layer could reveal buried liquid leakage through directional crystal growth before a warm spot becomes measurable.",
      "test": "Compare imaging and thermometry.",
      "against": "Growth changes follow detectable warming only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1184",
      "hypothesis": "A frost layer could reveal buried liquid leakage through directional crystal growth before a warm spot becomes measurable.",
      "test": "Compare imaging and thermometry.",
      "against": "Growth changes follow detectable warming only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1185",
    "hypothesis": "A wet mineral mat could retain phosphorus-like benign solutes by cyclically closing internal liquid films.",
    "test": "Measure film geometry and release.",
    "against": "Retention follows adsorption only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1185",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A wet mineral mat could retain phosphorus-like benign solutes by cyclically closing internal liquid films.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1185",
      "hypothesis": "A wet mineral mat could retain phosphorus-like benign solutes by cyclically closing internal liquid films.",
      "test": "Measure film geometry and release.",
      "against": "Retention follows adsorption only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1185",
      "hypothesis": "A wet mineral mat could retain phosphorus-like benign solutes by cyclically closing internal liquid films.",
      "test": "Measure film geometry and release.",
      "against": "Retention follows adsorption only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1186",
    "hypothesis": "A fog-droplet train could suppress electrical charging through sequential rather than simultaneous surface contacts.",
    "test": "Measure charge at equal water dose.",
    "against": "Charging depends only on contact area.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1186",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A fog-droplet train could suppress electrical charging through sequential rather than simultaneous surface contacts.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1186",
      "hypothesis": "A fog-droplet train could suppress electrical charging through sequential rather than simultaneous surface contacts.",
      "test": "Measure charge at equal water dose.",
      "against": "Charging depends only on contact area.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1186",
      "hypothesis": "A fog-droplet train could suppress electrical charging through sequential rather than simultaneous surface contacts.",
      "test": "Measure charge at equal water dose.",
      "against": "Charging depends only on contact area.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1187",
    "hypothesis": "A porous ice analogue could transmit a chemical pulse through vapor while blocking the corresponding liquid pulse.",
    "test": "Track separate tracers.",
    "against": "Chemical transport requires liquid connection.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1187",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous ice analogue could transmit a chemical pulse through vapor while blocking the corresponding liquid pulse.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1187",
      "hypothesis": "A porous ice analogue could transmit a chemical pulse through vapor while blocking the corresponding liquid pulse.",
      "test": "Track separate tracers.",
      "against": "Chemical transport requires liquid connection.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1187",
      "hypothesis": "A porous ice analogue could transmit a chemical pulse through vapor while blocking the corresponding liquid pulse.",
      "test": "Track separate tracers.",
      "against": "Chemical transport requires liquid connection.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1188",
    "hypothesis": "A dust crust could become more transparent after mild vibration aligns plate-like grains without reducing mass.",
    "test": "Measure orientation and spectra.",
    "against": "Transparency requires particle removal.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1188",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A dust crust could become more transparent after mild vibration aligns plate-like grains without reducing mass.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1188",
      "hypothesis": "A dust crust could become more transparent after mild vibration aligns plate-like grains without reducing mass.",
      "test": "Measure orientation and spectra.",
      "against": "Transparency requires particle removal.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1188",
      "hypothesis": "A dust crust could become more transparent after mild vibration aligns plate-like grains without reducing mass.",
      "test": "Measure orientation and spectra.",
      "against": "Transparency requires particle removal.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1189",
    "hypothesis": "A ground-cover analogue could preserve nocturnal dew by converting sunrise heat into reversible internal deformation.",
    "test": "Measure deformation and water retention.",
    "against": "Retention follows insulation alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1189",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A ground-cover analogue could preserve nocturnal dew by converting sunrise heat into reversible internal deformation.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1189",
      "hypothesis": "A ground-cover analogue could preserve nocturnal dew by converting sunrise heat into reversible internal deformation.",
      "test": "Measure deformation and water retention.",
      "against": "Retention follows insulation alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1189",
      "hypothesis": "A ground-cover analogue could preserve nocturnal dew by converting sunrise heat into reversible internal deformation.",
      "test": "Measure deformation and water retention.",
      "against": "Retention follows insulation alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1190",
    "hypothesis": "A cloud-water microreactor could detect trace mineral activity through the spatial timing of harmless precipitation.",
    "test": "Measure nuclei and mineral composition.",
    "against": "Timing follows solute concentration alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1190",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A cloud-water microreactor could detect trace mineral activity through the spatial timing of harmless precipitation.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1190",
      "hypothesis": "A cloud-water microreactor could detect trace mineral activity through the spatial timing of harmless precipitation.",
      "test": "Measure nuclei and mineral composition.",
      "against": "Timing follows solute concentration alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1190",
      "hypothesis": "A cloud-water microreactor could detect trace mineral activity through the spatial timing of harmless precipitation.",
      "test": "Measure nuclei and mineral composition.",
      "against": "Timing follows solute concentration alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1191",
    "hypothesis": "A porous frost layer could reveal airflow reversal through a persistent asymmetry in its gas permeability.",
    "test": "Measure before and after reversal.",
    "against": "Asymmetry follows ice mass only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1191",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous frost layer could reveal airflow reversal through a persistent asymmetry in its gas permeability.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1191",
      "hypothesis": "A porous frost layer could reveal airflow reversal through a persistent asymmetry in its gas permeability.",
      "test": "Measure before and after reversal.",
      "against": "Asymmetry follows ice mass only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1191",
      "hypothesis": "A porous frost layer could reveal airflow reversal through a persistent asymmetry in its gas permeability.",
      "test": "Measure before and after reversal.",
      "against": "Asymmetry follows ice mass only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1192",
    "hypothesis": "A fine mist could transport heat against a weak temperature gradient through evaporation-condensation cycling between moving droplets.",
    "test": "Measure heat and complete work input.",
    "against": "Apparent transport is ordinary advection.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1192",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A fine mist could transport heat against a weak temperature gradient through evaporation-condensation cycling between moving droplets.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1192",
      "hypothesis": "A fine mist could transport heat against a weak temperature gradient through evaporation-condensation cycling between moving droplets.",
      "test": "Measure heat and complete work input.",
      "against": "Apparent transport is ordinary advection.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1192",
      "hypothesis": "A fine mist could transport heat against a weak temperature gradient through evaporation-condensation cycling between moving droplets.",
      "test": "Measure heat and complete work input.",
      "against": "Apparent transport is ordinary advection.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1193",
    "hypothesis": "A dust particle could reduce its own residence on a surface by storing humidity-induced elastic energy.",
    "test": "Measure shape and detachment.",
    "against": "Release requires external vibration.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1193",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A dust particle could reduce its own residence on a surface by storing humidity-induced elastic energy.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1193",
      "hypothesis": "A dust particle could reduce its own residence on a surface by storing humidity-induced elastic energy.",
      "test": "Measure shape and detachment.",
      "against": "Release requires external vibration.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1193",
      "hypothesis": "A dust particle could reduce its own residence on a surface by storing humidity-induced elastic energy.",
      "test": "Measure shape and detachment.",
      "against": "Release requires external vibration.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1194",
    "hypothesis": "A snowpack analogue could retain different oxygen profiles under equal mean temperature depending on thermal-cycle order.",
    "test": "Measure gas exchange histories.",
    "against": "Profiles follow mean temperature only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1194",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A snowpack analogue could retain different oxygen profiles under equal mean temperature depending on thermal-cycle order.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1194",
      "hypothesis": "A snowpack analogue could retain different oxygen profiles under equal mean temperature depending on thermal-cycle order.",
      "test": "Measure gas exchange histories.",
      "against": "Profiles follow mean temperature only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1194",
      "hypothesis": "A snowpack analogue could retain different oxygen profiles under equal mean temperature depending on thermal-cycle order.",
      "test": "Measure gas exchange histories.",
      "against": "Profiles follow mean temperature only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1195",
    "hypothesis": "A porous rain collector could equalize chemical composition across intermittent events through reversible internal storage.",
    "test": "Measure outlet composition.",
    "against": "Equalization requires irreversible analyte loss.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1195",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous rain collector could equalize chemical composition across intermittent events through reversible internal storage.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1195",
      "hypothesis": "A porous rain collector could equalize chemical composition across intermittent events through reversible internal storage.",
      "test": "Measure outlet composition.",
      "against": "Equalization requires irreversible analyte loss.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1195",
      "hypothesis": "A porous rain collector could equalize chemical composition across intermittent events through reversible internal storage.",
      "test": "Measure outlet composition.",
      "against": "Equalization requires irreversible analyte loss.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1196",
    "hypothesis": "A fog layer could act as a transient acoustic filter whose cutoff tracks evaporation kinetics rather than droplet size alone.",
    "test": "Measure spectra and mass loss.",
    "against": "Cutoff follows size entirely.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1196",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A fog layer could act as a transient acoustic filter whose cutoff tracks evaporation kinetics rather than droplet size alone.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1196",
      "hypothesis": "A fog layer could act as a transient acoustic filter whose cutoff tracks evaporation kinetics rather than droplet size alone.",
      "test": "Measure spectra and mass loss.",
      "against": "Cutoff follows size entirely.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1196",
      "hypothesis": "A fog layer could act as a transient acoustic filter whose cutoff tracks evaporation kinetics rather than droplet size alone.",
      "test": "Measure spectra and mass loss.",
      "against": "Cutoff follows size entirely.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1197",
    "hypothesis": "A cold mineral coating could prevent ice anchoring by mechanically relocating condensed droplets before nucleation.",
    "test": "Track droplets and ice.",
    "against": "Protection requires chemical repellency changes.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1197",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A cold mineral coating could prevent ice anchoring by mechanically relocating condensed droplets before nucleation.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1197",
      "hypothesis": "A cold mineral coating could prevent ice anchoring by mechanically relocating condensed droplets before nucleation.",
      "test": "Track droplets and ice.",
      "against": "Protection requires chemical repellency changes.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1197",
      "hypothesis": "A cold mineral coating could prevent ice anchoring by mechanically relocating condensed droplets before nucleation.",
      "test": "Track droplets and ice.",
      "against": "Protection requires chemical repellency changes.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1198",
    "hypothesis": "A vapor-absorbing surface could preserve atmospheric pulse timing through a sequence of mechanically gated pores.",
    "test": "Apply calibrated humidity pulses.",
    "against": "Recorded timing blurs beyond recovery.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1198",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A vapor-absorbing surface could preserve atmospheric pulse timing through a sequence of mechanically gated pores.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1198",
      "hypothesis": "A vapor-absorbing surface could preserve atmospheric pulse timing through a sequence of mechanically gated pores.",
      "test": "Apply calibrated humidity pulses.",
      "against": "Recorded timing blurs beyond recovery.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1198",
      "hypothesis": "A vapor-absorbing surface could preserve atmospheric pulse timing through a sequence of mechanically gated pores.",
      "test": "Apply calibrated humidity pulses.",
      "against": "Recorded timing blurs beyond recovery.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1199",
    "hypothesis": "A feather-inspired vane could maintain water repellency after local damage by rotating neighboring branches into the gap.",
    "test": "Image branches and wetting.",
    "against": "Recovery requires new surface chemistry.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1199",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A feather-inspired vane could maintain water repellency after local damage by rotating neighboring branches into the gap.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1199",
      "hypothesis": "A feather-inspired vane could maintain water repellency after local damage by rotating neighboring branches into the gap.",
      "test": "Image branches and wetting.",
      "against": "Recovery requires new surface chemistry.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1199",
      "hypothesis": "A feather-inspired vane could maintain water repellency after local damage by rotating neighboring branches into the gap.",
      "test": "Image branches and wetting.",
      "against": "Recovery requires new surface chemistry.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1200",
    "hypothesis": "A spider-silk analogue could retain toughness through selective hydration of its most strained segments.",
    "test": "Map water and local extension.",
    "against": "Toughness follows average hydration only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1200",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A spider-silk analogue could retain toughness through selective hydration of its most strained segments.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1200",
      "hypothesis": "A spider-silk analogue could retain toughness through selective hydration of its most strained segments.",
      "test": "Map water and local extension.",
      "against": "Toughness follows average hydration only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1200",
      "hypothesis": "A spider-silk analogue could retain toughness through selective hydration of its most strained segments.",
      "test": "Map water and local extension.",
      "against": "Toughness follows average hydration only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1201",
    "hypothesis": "A snail-mucus analogue could reduce adhesion during release by separating into a lubricating surface phase.",
    "test": "Measure phase state and detachment.",
    "against": "Release follows total water loss only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1201",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A snail-mucus analogue could reduce adhesion during release by separating into a lubricating surface phase.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1201",
      "hypothesis": "A snail-mucus analogue could reduce adhesion during release by separating into a lubricating surface phase.",
      "test": "Measure phase state and detachment.",
      "against": "Release follows total water loss only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1201",
      "hypothesis": "A snail-mucus analogue could reduce adhesion during release by separating into a lubricating surface phase.",
      "test": "Measure phase state and detachment.",
      "against": "Release follows total water loss only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1202",
    "hypothesis": "A pollen-inspired shell could filter impact frequencies through reversible opening of its apertures.",
    "test": "Measure transmitted pulses and apertures.",
    "against": "Filtering follows shell thickness alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1202",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A pollen-inspired shell could filter impact frequencies through reversible opening of its apertures.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1202",
      "hypothesis": "A pollen-inspired shell could filter impact frequencies through reversible opening of its apertures.",
      "test": "Measure transmitted pulses and apertures.",
      "against": "Filtering follows shell thickness alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1202",
      "hypothesis": "A pollen-inspired shell could filter impact frequencies through reversible opening of its apertures.",
      "test": "Measure transmitted pulses and apertures.",
      "against": "Filtering follows shell thickness alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1203",
    "hypothesis": "A fish-scale analogue could reduce drag after scratches by lifting adjacent scale edges toward the damaged region.",
    "test": "Track scale motion and drag.",
    "against": "Compensation requires lower flow speed.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1203",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A fish-scale analogue could reduce drag after scratches by lifting adjacent scale edges toward the damaged region.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1203",
      "hypothesis": "A fish-scale analogue could reduce drag after scratches by lifting adjacent scale edges toward the damaged region.",
      "test": "Track scale motion and drag.",
      "against": "Compensation requires lower flow speed.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1203",
      "hypothesis": "A fish-scale analogue could reduce drag after scratches by lifting adjacent scale edges toward the damaged region.",
      "test": "Track scale motion and drag.",
      "against": "Compensation requires lower flow speed.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1204",
    "hypothesis": "A bird-down analogue could retain insulation after wetting through asymmetric fiber recoil.",
    "test": "Measure fiber shape and conductivity.",
    "against": "Recovery requires complete drying.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1204",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A bird-down analogue could retain insulation after wetting through asymmetric fiber recoil.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1204",
      "hypothesis": "A bird-down analogue could retain insulation after wetting through asymmetric fiber recoil.",
      "test": "Measure fiber shape and conductivity.",
      "against": "Recovery requires complete drying.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1204",
      "hypothesis": "A bird-down analogue could retain insulation after wetting through asymmetric fiber recoil.",
      "test": "Measure fiber shape and conductivity.",
      "against": "Recovery requires complete drying.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1205",
    "hypothesis": "A seed-wing analogue could recover stable autorotation after damage by shifting its center of pressure mechanically.",
    "test": "Track shape and flight.",
    "against": "Stability follows mass redistribution alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1205",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A seed-wing analogue could recover stable autorotation after damage by shifting its center of pressure mechanically.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1205",
      "hypothesis": "A seed-wing analogue could recover stable autorotation after damage by shifting its center of pressure mechanically.",
      "test": "Track shape and flight.",
      "against": "Stability follows mass redistribution alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1205",
      "hypothesis": "A seed-wing analogue could recover stable autorotation after damage by shifting its center of pressure mechanically.",
      "test": "Track shape and flight.",
      "against": "Stability follows mass redistribution alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1206",
    "hypothesis": "A mushroom-cap analogue could distribute condensation away from its attachment point through curvature-controlled coalescence.",
    "test": "Measure drop paths.",
    "against": "Routing follows gravity alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1206",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A mushroom-cap analogue could distribute condensation away from its attachment point through curvature-controlled coalescence.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1206",
      "hypothesis": "A mushroom-cap analogue could distribute condensation away from its attachment point through curvature-controlled coalescence.",
      "test": "Measure drop paths.",
      "against": "Routing follows gravity alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1206",
      "hypothesis": "A mushroom-cap analogue could distribute condensation away from its attachment point through curvature-controlled coalescence.",
      "test": "Measure drop paths.",
      "against": "Routing follows gravity alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1207",
    "hypothesis": "A cactus-spine analogue could separate fog droplets by salinity through different contact-line relaxation.",
    "test": "Use calibrated benign salt mixtures.",
    "against": "Sorting follows droplet size only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1207",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A cactus-spine analogue could separate fog droplets by salinity through different contact-line relaxation.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1207",
      "hypothesis": "A cactus-spine analogue could separate fog droplets by salinity through different contact-line relaxation.",
      "test": "Use calibrated benign salt mixtures.",
      "against": "Sorting follows droplet size only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1207",
      "hypothesis": "A cactus-spine analogue could separate fog droplets by salinity through different contact-line relaxation.",
      "test": "Use calibrated benign salt mixtures.",
      "against": "Sorting follows droplet size only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1208",
    "hypothesis": "A butterfly-wing analogue could reveal mechanical fatigue through polarization changes before color fading.",
    "test": "Measure polarization and structural damage.",
    "against": "Signals follow pigment degradation only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1208",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A butterfly-wing analogue could reveal mechanical fatigue through polarization changes before color fading.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1208",
      "hypothesis": "A butterfly-wing analogue could reveal mechanical fatigue through polarization changes before color fading.",
      "test": "Measure polarization and structural damage.",
      "against": "Signals follow pigment degradation only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1208",
      "hypothesis": "A butterfly-wing analogue could reveal mechanical fatigue through polarization changes before color fading.",
      "test": "Measure polarization and structural damage.",
      "against": "Signals follow pigment degradation only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1209",
    "hypothesis": "An eggshell membrane analogue could resist repeated pressure shocks through reversible fiber uncrimping.",
    "test": "Measure strain and transmitted pressure.",
    "against": "Protection requires permanent stretching.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1209",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "An eggshell membrane analogue could resist repeated pressure shocks through reversible fiber uncrimping.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1209",
      "hypothesis": "An eggshell membrane analogue could resist repeated pressure shocks through reversible fiber uncrimping.",
      "test": "Measure strain and transmitted pressure.",
      "against": "Protection requires permanent stretching.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1209",
      "hypothesis": "An eggshell membrane analogue could resist repeated pressure shocks through reversible fiber uncrimping.",
      "test": "Measure strain and transmitted pressure.",
      "against": "Protection requires permanent stretching.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1210",
    "hypothesis": "A pinecone-inspired joint could distinguish seasonal humidity shifts from short weather pulses through nested relaxation.",
    "test": "Apply controlled humidity histories.",
    "against": "Motion follows current humidity only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 18,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1210",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A pinecone-inspired joint could distinguish seasonal humidity shifts from short weather pulses through nested relaxation.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1210",
      "hypothesis": "A pinecone-inspired joint could distinguish seasonal humidity shifts from short weather pulses through nested relaxation.",
      "test": "Apply controlled humidity histories.",
      "against": "Motion follows current humidity only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1210",
      "hypothesis": "A pinecone-inspired joint could distinguish seasonal humidity shifts from short weather pulses through nested relaxation.",
      "test": "Apply controlled humidity histories.",
      "against": "Motion follows current humidity only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 18,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1211",
    "hypothesis": "A leaf-vein analogue could retain useful stiffness after puncture through capillary tension in intact channels.",
    "test": "Measure stiffness and channel filling.",
    "against": "Stiffness follows solid structure only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1211",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A leaf-vein analogue could retain useful stiffness after puncture through capillary tension in intact channels.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1211",
      "hypothesis": "A leaf-vein analogue could retain useful stiffness after puncture through capillary tension in intact channels.",
      "test": "Measure stiffness and channel filling.",
      "against": "Stiffness follows solid structure only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1211",
      "hypothesis": "A leaf-vein analogue could retain useful stiffness after puncture through capillary tension in intact channels.",
      "test": "Measure stiffness and channel filling.",
      "against": "Stiffness follows solid structure only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1212",
    "hypothesis": "A beetle-shell analogue could redirect cracks by temporarily separating helicoidal layers rather than breaking them.",
    "test": "Image layer motion and crack paths.",
    "against": "Toughening requires irreversible delamination.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1212",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A beetle-shell analogue could redirect cracks by temporarily separating helicoidal layers rather than breaking them.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1212",
      "hypothesis": "A beetle-shell analogue could redirect cracks by temporarily separating helicoidal layers rather than breaking them.",
      "test": "Image layer motion and crack paths.",
      "against": "Toughening requires irreversible delamination.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1212",
      "hypothesis": "A beetle-shell analogue could redirect cracks by temporarily separating helicoidal layers rather than breaking them.",
      "test": "Image layer motion and crack paths.",
      "against": "Toughening requires irreversible delamination.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1213",
    "hypothesis": "A jellyfish-inspired membrane could reduce actuation work by storing vortical energy between strokes.",
    "test": "Measure fluid energy and work.",
    "against": "Retention costs erase savings.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1213",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A jellyfish-inspired membrane could reduce actuation work by storing vortical energy between strokes.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1213",
      "hypothesis": "A jellyfish-inspired membrane could reduce actuation work by storing vortical energy between strokes.",
      "test": "Measure fluid energy and work.",
      "against": "Retention costs erase savings.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1213",
      "hypothesis": "A jellyfish-inspired membrane could reduce actuation work by storing vortical energy between strokes.",
      "test": "Measure fluid energy and work.",
      "against": "Retention costs erase savings.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1214",
    "hypothesis": "A dandelion-like porous disk could change descent rate through humidity-driven pore redistribution without changing total area.",
    "test": "Measure pores and flight.",
    "against": "Descent follows projected area only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 4,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 12,
    "literature_query": "dandelion-like porous disk change descent rate humidity-driven pore redistribution changing total area experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N1214",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A dandelion-like porous disk could change descent rate through humidity-driven pore redistribution without changing total area.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1214",
      "hypothesis": "A dandelion-like porous disk could change descent rate through humidity-driven pore redistribution without changing total area.",
      "test": "Measure pores and flight.",
      "against": "Descent follows projected area only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1214",
      "hypothesis": "A dandelion-like porous disk could change descent rate through humidity-driven pore redistribution without changing total area.",
      "test": "Measure pores and flight.",
      "against": "Descent follows projected area only.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 12,
      "literature_query": "dandelion-like porous disk change descent rate humidity-driven pore redistribution changing total area experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "12",
      "id": "N1214",
      "hypothesis": "A dandelion-like porous disk could change descent rate through humidity-driven pore redistribution without changing total area.",
      "test": "Measure pores and flight.",
      "against": "Descent follows projected area only.",
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_score": "24",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P0e23e8b5f93b;Pbfcc54ee3359;Pccdc92a148bb;P28c32ae81356;Pc8ee56655a70;P584784d88cf3",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N1214",
      "hypothesis": "A dandelion-like porous disk could change descent rate through humidity-driven pore redistribution without changing total area.",
      "test": "Measure pores and flight.",
      "against": "Descent follows projected area only.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 12,
      "literature_query": "dandelion-like porous disk change descent rate humidity-driven pore redistribution changing total area experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P0e23e8b5f93b;Pbfcc54ee3359;Pccdc92a148bb;P28c32ae81356;Pc8ee56655a70;P584784d88cf3",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P0e23e8b5f93b;Pbfcc54ee3359;Pccdc92a148bb;P28c32ae81356;Pc8ee56655a70;P584784d88cf3",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1215",
    "hypothesis": "A silk-fiber junction could strengthen after repeated subcritical loading by aligning bound-water bridges.",
    "test": "Measure junction strength and hydration.",
    "against": "Strengthening follows permanent fiber alignment alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1215",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A silk-fiber junction could strengthen after repeated subcritical loading by aligning bound-water bridges.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1215",
      "hypothesis": "A silk-fiber junction could strengthen after repeated subcritical loading by aligning bound-water bridges.",
      "test": "Measure junction strength and hydration.",
      "against": "Strengthening follows permanent fiber alignment alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1215",
      "hypothesis": "A silk-fiber junction could strengthen after repeated subcritical loading by aligning bound-water bridges.",
      "test": "Measure junction strength and hydration.",
      "against": "Strengthening follows permanent fiber alignment alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1216",
    "hypothesis": "A lotus-like surface could preserve droplet mobility under condensation by moving nuclei toward sacrificial wetting spots.",
    "test": "Map nuclei and shedding.",
    "against": "Mobility gains require less condensation.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1216",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A lotus-like surface could preserve droplet mobility under condensation by moving nuclei toward sacrificial wetting spots.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1216",
      "hypothesis": "A lotus-like surface could preserve droplet mobility under condensation by moving nuclei toward sacrificial wetting spots.",
      "test": "Map nuclei and shedding.",
      "against": "Mobility gains require less condensation.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1216",
      "hypothesis": "A lotus-like surface could preserve droplet mobility under condensation by moving nuclei toward sacrificial wetting spots.",
      "test": "Map nuclei and shedding.",
      "against": "Mobility gains require less condensation.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1217",
    "hypothesis": "A gecko-inspired adhesive analogue could detect poor contact through collective fibril oscillations before slipping.",
    "test": "Measure fibril motion and contact.",
    "against": "Oscillations follow slip onset only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1217",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A gecko-inspired adhesive analogue could detect poor contact through collective fibril oscillations before slipping.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1217",
      "hypothesis": "A gecko-inspired adhesive analogue could detect poor contact through collective fibril oscillations before slipping.",
      "test": "Measure fibril motion and contact.",
      "against": "Oscillations follow slip onset only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1217",
      "hypothesis": "A gecko-inspired adhesive analogue could detect poor contact through collective fibril oscillations before slipping.",
      "test": "Measure fibril motion and contact.",
      "against": "Oscillations follow slip onset only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1218",
    "hypothesis": "A fern-spore-inspired launcher could vary release timing according to vapor-pressure change rate rather than absolute humidity.",
    "test": "Measure shell motion.",
    "against": "Timing follows humidity alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1218",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A fern-spore-inspired launcher could vary release timing according to vapor-pressure change rate rather than absolute humidity.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1218",
      "hypothesis": "A fern-spore-inspired launcher could vary release timing according to vapor-pressure change rate rather than absolute humidity.",
      "test": "Measure shell motion.",
      "against": "Timing follows humidity alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1218",
      "hypothesis": "A fern-spore-inspired launcher could vary release timing according to vapor-pressure change rate rather than absolute humidity.",
      "test": "Measure shell motion.",
      "against": "Timing follows humidity alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1219",
    "hypothesis": "A woodpecker-inspired layered cushion could protect against repeated impacts by shifting its fluid layer between events.",
    "test": "Measure fluid and transmitted force.",
    "against": "Protection follows longer rest only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 4,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 13,
    "literature_query": "woodpecker-inspired layered cushion protect against repeated impacts shifting fluid layer between events experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N1219",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A woodpecker-inspired layered cushion could protect against repeated impacts by shifting its fluid layer between events.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1219",
      "hypothesis": "A woodpecker-inspired layered cushion could protect against repeated impacts by shifting its fluid layer between events.",
      "test": "Measure fluid and transmitted force.",
      "against": "Protection follows longer rest only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1219",
      "hypothesis": "A woodpecker-inspired layered cushion could protect against repeated impacts by shifting its fluid layer between events.",
      "test": "Measure fluid and transmitted force.",
      "against": "Protection follows longer rest only.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 13,
      "literature_query": "woodpecker-inspired layered cushion protect against repeated impacts shifting fluid layer between events experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "13",
      "id": "N1219",
      "hypothesis": "A woodpecker-inspired layered cushion could protect against repeated impacts by shifting its fluid layer between events.",
      "test": "Measure fluid and transmitted force.",
      "against": "Protection follows longer rest only.",
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_score": "24",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P4c8a158456be;P733e383bc254;P2cc19b508f80;Pe17df4532549;Pea6126734a81",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N1219",
      "hypothesis": "A woodpecker-inspired layered cushion could protect against repeated impacts by shifting its fluid layer between events.",
      "test": "Measure fluid and transmitted force.",
      "against": "Protection follows longer rest only.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 13,
      "literature_query": "woodpecker-inspired layered cushion protect against repeated impacts shifting fluid layer between events experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P4c8a158456be;P733e383bc254;P2cc19b508f80;Pe17df4532549;Pea6126734a81",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P4c8a158456be;P733e383bc254;P2cc19b508f80;Pe17df4532549;Pea6126734a81",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1220",
    "hypothesis": "A shark-skin analogue could suppress biofilm attachment by generating contact-scale shear reversals under steady flow.",
    "test": "Measure local flow and inert adhesion probes.",
    "against": "Benefits follow roughness alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1220",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A shark-skin analogue could suppress biofilm attachment by generating contact-scale shear reversals under steady flow.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1220",
      "hypothesis": "A shark-skin analogue could suppress biofilm attachment by generating contact-scale shear reversals under steady flow.",
      "test": "Measure local flow and inert adhesion probes.",
      "against": "Benefits follow roughness alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1220",
      "hypothesis": "A shark-skin analogue could suppress biofilm attachment by generating contact-scale shear reversals under steady flow.",
      "test": "Measure local flow and inert adhesion probes.",
      "against": "Benefits follow roughness alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1221",
    "hypothesis": "A mangrove-root analogue could retain oxygen transport while excluding saline water through mechanically responsive pores.",
    "test": "Measure gas and ion flux.",
    "against": "Selectivity requires chemical changes.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1221",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A mangrove-root analogue could retain oxygen transport while excluding saline water through mechanically responsive pores.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1221",
      "hypothesis": "A mangrove-root analogue could retain oxygen transport while excluding saline water through mechanically responsive pores.",
      "test": "Measure gas and ion flux.",
      "against": "Selectivity requires chemical changes.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1221",
      "hypothesis": "A mangrove-root analogue could retain oxygen transport while excluding saline water through mechanically responsive pores.",
      "test": "Measure gas and ion flux.",
      "against": "Selectivity requires chemical changes.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1222",
    "hypothesis": "A sponge-like filter could preserve capture efficiency by rotating clogged channels out of the main flow.",
    "test": "Image channel routing and capture.",
    "against": "Adaptation requires active pumping.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1222",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A sponge-like filter could preserve capture efficiency by rotating clogged channels out of the main flow.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1222",
      "hypothesis": "A sponge-like filter could preserve capture efficiency by rotating clogged channels out of the main flow.",
      "test": "Image channel routing and capture.",
      "against": "Adaptation requires active pumping.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1222",
      "hypothesis": "A sponge-like filter could preserve capture efficiency by rotating clogged channels out of the main flow.",
      "test": "Image channel routing and capture.",
      "against": "Adaptation requires active pumping.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1223",
    "hypothesis": "A diatom-shell analogue could reveal internal pressure through polarization splitting while retaining strength.",
    "test": "Calibrate optical modes and pressure.",
    "against": "Signals require damaging deformation.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1223",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A diatom-shell analogue could reveal internal pressure through polarization splitting while retaining strength.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1223",
      "hypothesis": "A diatom-shell analogue could reveal internal pressure through polarization splitting while retaining strength.",
      "test": "Calibrate optical modes and pressure.",
      "against": "Signals require damaging deformation.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1223",
      "hypothesis": "A diatom-shell analogue could reveal internal pressure through polarization splitting while retaining strength.",
      "test": "Calibrate optical modes and pressure.",
      "against": "Signals require damaging deformation.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1224",
    "hypothesis": "A grass-blade analogue could reduce frost attachment by changing its bending mode as ice accumulates.",
    "test": "Measure modes and detachment.",
    "against": "Release follows ice mass alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1224",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A grass-blade analogue could reduce frost attachment by changing its bending mode as ice accumulates.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1224",
      "hypothesis": "A grass-blade analogue could reduce frost attachment by changing its bending mode as ice accumulates.",
      "test": "Measure modes and detachment.",
      "against": "Release follows ice mass alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1224",
      "hypothesis": "A grass-blade analogue could reduce frost attachment by changing its bending mode as ice accumulates.",
      "test": "Measure modes and detachment.",
      "against": "Release follows ice mass alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1225",
    "hypothesis": "A seed-pod analogue could distribute released particles more evenly by storing local moisture differences as twist.",
    "test": "Track particle trajectories.",
    "against": "Dispersion follows launch speed only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "nonhuman biology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1225",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A seed-pod analogue could distribute released particles more evenly by storing local moisture differences as twist.",
    "category": "nonhuman biology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1225",
      "hypothesis": "A seed-pod analogue could distribute released particles more evenly by storing local moisture differences as twist.",
      "test": "Track particle trajectories.",
      "against": "Dispersion follows launch speed only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1225",
      "hypothesis": "A seed-pod analogue could distribute released particles more evenly by storing local moisture differences as twist.",
      "test": "Track particle trajectories.",
      "against": "Dispersion follows launch speed only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "nonhuman biology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1226",
    "hypothesis": "A feather barbule analogue could repair separation using vibration generated by ordinary airflow.",
    "test": "Measure reattachment and air motion.",
    "against": "Repair requires manual alignment.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1226",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A feather barbule analogue could repair separation using vibration generated by ordinary airflow.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1226",
      "hypothesis": "A feather barbule analogue could repair separation using vibration generated by ordinary airflow.",
      "test": "Measure reattachment and air motion.",
      "against": "Repair requires manual alignment.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1226",
      "hypothesis": "A feather barbule analogue could repair separation using vibration generated by ordinary airflow.",
      "test": "Measure reattachment and air motion.",
      "against": "Repair requires manual alignment.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1227",
    "hypothesis": "A marine-shell analogue could reduce chemical erosion by exposing sacrificial organic layers only at fresh defects.",
    "test": "Map chemistry and erosion.",
    "against": "Protection follows total organic coverage only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1227",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A marine-shell analogue could reduce chemical erosion by exposing sacrificial organic layers only at fresh defects.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1227",
      "hypothesis": "A marine-shell analogue could reduce chemical erosion by exposing sacrificial organic layers only at fresh defects.",
      "test": "Map chemistry and erosion.",
      "against": "Protection follows total organic coverage only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1227",
      "hypothesis": "A marine-shell analogue could reduce chemical erosion by exposing sacrificial organic layers only at fresh defects.",
      "test": "Map chemistry and erosion.",
      "against": "Protection follows total organic coverage only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1228",
    "hypothesis": "A dragonfly-wing analogue could shed rain without losing aerodynamic stiffness through local chordwise buckling.",
    "test": "Measure rain impact and stiffness.",
    "against": "Water shedding causes global collapse.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1228",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A dragonfly-wing analogue could shed rain without losing aerodynamic stiffness through local chordwise buckling.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1228",
      "hypothesis": "A dragonfly-wing analogue could shed rain without losing aerodynamic stiffness through local chordwise buckling.",
      "test": "Measure rain impact and stiffness.",
      "against": "Water shedding causes global collapse.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1228",
      "hypothesis": "A dragonfly-wing analogue could shed rain without losing aerodynamic stiffness through local chordwise buckling.",
      "test": "Measure rain impact and stiffness.",
      "against": "Water shedding causes global collapse.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1229",
    "hypothesis": "A moss-capsule analogue could maintain release reliability by converting accumulated contamination into extra opening torque.",
    "test": "Measure contamination and release.",
    "against": "Contamination only increases failure.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "nonhuman biology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1229",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A moss-capsule analogue could maintain release reliability by converting accumulated contamination into extra opening torque.",
    "category": "nonhuman biology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1229",
      "hypothesis": "A moss-capsule analogue could maintain release reliability by converting accumulated contamination into extra opening torque.",
      "test": "Measure contamination and release.",
      "against": "Contamination only increases failure.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1229",
      "hypothesis": "A moss-capsule analogue could maintain release reliability by converting accumulated contamination into extra opening torque.",
      "test": "Measure contamination and release.",
      "against": "Contamination only increases failure.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "nonhuman biology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1230",
    "hypothesis": "A tendon-inspired rope could equalize fiber loading through reversible solvent movement between helical bundles.",
    "test": "Measure bundle forces and water.",
    "against": "Equalization requires fiber sliding only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1230",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A tendon-inspired rope could equalize fiber loading through reversible solvent movement between helical bundles.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1230",
      "hypothesis": "A tendon-inspired rope could equalize fiber loading through reversible solvent movement between helical bundles.",
      "test": "Measure bundle forces and water.",
      "against": "Equalization requires fiber sliding only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1230",
      "hypothesis": "A tendon-inspired rope could equalize fiber loading through reversible solvent movement between helical bundles.",
      "test": "Measure bundle forces and water.",
      "against": "Equalization requires fiber sliding only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1231",
    "hypothesis": "A leaf-stoma analogue could distinguish thermal from osmotic stress through opposite torsional responses.",
    "test": "Apply independent stimuli.",
    "against": "Motion remains mechanically indistinguishable.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 18,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1231",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A leaf-stoma analogue could distinguish thermal from osmotic stress through opposite torsional responses.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1231",
      "hypothesis": "A leaf-stoma analogue could distinguish thermal from osmotic stress through opposite torsional responses.",
      "test": "Apply independent stimuli.",
      "against": "Motion remains mechanically indistinguishable.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1231",
      "hypothesis": "A leaf-stoma analogue could distinguish thermal from osmotic stress through opposite torsional responses.",
      "test": "Apply independent stimuli.",
      "against": "Motion remains mechanically indistinguishable.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 18,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1232",
    "hypothesis": "A seaweed-inspired ribbon could reduce fatigue by moving its dominant bending node as flow changes.",
    "test": "Track nodes and damage.",
    "against": "Protection follows lower total strain only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1232",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A seaweed-inspired ribbon could reduce fatigue by moving its dominant bending node as flow changes.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1232",
      "hypothesis": "A seaweed-inspired ribbon could reduce fatigue by moving its dominant bending node as flow changes.",
      "test": "Track nodes and damage.",
      "against": "Protection follows lower total strain only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1232",
      "hypothesis": "A seaweed-inspired ribbon could reduce fatigue by moving its dominant bending node as flow changes.",
      "test": "Track nodes and damage.",
      "against": "Protection follows lower total strain only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1233",
    "hypothesis": "A seed-coat analogue could preserve a dry interior while transporting absorbed heat outward through hydrated outer channels.",
    "test": "Measure water and temperature.",
    "against": "Cooling requires interior wetting.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1233",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A seed-coat analogue could preserve a dry interior while transporting absorbed heat outward through hydrated outer channels.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1233",
      "hypothesis": "A seed-coat analogue could preserve a dry interior while transporting absorbed heat outward through hydrated outer channels.",
      "test": "Measure water and temperature.",
      "against": "Cooling requires interior wetting.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1233",
      "hypothesis": "A seed-coat analogue could preserve a dry interior while transporting absorbed heat outward through hydrated outer channels.",
      "test": "Measure water and temperature.",
      "against": "Cooling requires interior wetting.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1234",
    "hypothesis": "A nacre-like assembly could retain toughness after partial dissolution through reorganization of flexible interlayers.",
    "test": "Measure structure and fracture.",
    "against": "Toughness tracks remaining mineral mass only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1234",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A nacre-like assembly could retain toughness after partial dissolution through reorganization of flexible interlayers.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1234",
      "hypothesis": "A nacre-like assembly could retain toughness after partial dissolution through reorganization of flexible interlayers.",
      "test": "Measure structure and fracture.",
      "against": "Toughness tracks remaining mineral mass only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1234",
      "hypothesis": "A nacre-like assembly could retain toughness after partial dissolution through reorganization of flexible interlayers.",
      "test": "Measure structure and fracture.",
      "against": "Toughness tracks remaining mineral mass only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1235",
    "hypothesis": "A spiderweb-inspired sensor could locate damage using passive wind-driven phase differences.",
    "test": "Introduce blinded missing strands.",
    "against": "Localization requires active excitation.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1235",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A spiderweb-inspired sensor could locate damage using passive wind-driven phase differences.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1235",
      "hypothesis": "A spiderweb-inspired sensor could locate damage using passive wind-driven phase differences.",
      "test": "Introduce blinded missing strands.",
      "against": "Localization requires active excitation.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1235",
      "hypothesis": "A spiderweb-inspired sensor could locate damage using passive wind-driven phase differences.",
      "test": "Introduce blinded missing strands.",
      "against": "Localization requires active excitation.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1236",
    "hypothesis": "A ciliated-surface analogue could move particles with no net fluid pumping through phase-shifted elastic recovery.",
    "test": "Track particles and liquid.",
    "against": "Transport follows net flow only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1236",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A ciliated-surface analogue could move particles with no net fluid pumping through phase-shifted elastic recovery.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1236",
      "hypothesis": "A ciliated-surface analogue could move particles with no net fluid pumping through phase-shifted elastic recovery.",
      "test": "Track particles and liquid.",
      "against": "Transport follows net flow only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1236",
      "hypothesis": "A ciliated-surface analogue could move particles with no net fluid pumping through phase-shifted elastic recovery.",
      "test": "Track particles and liquid.",
      "against": "Transport follows net flow only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1237",
    "hypothesis": "A leaf-litter analogue could prevent persistent waterlogging by switching permeability after mechanical saturation strain.",
    "test": "Measure strain and drainage.",
    "against": "Switching follows pore filling alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1237",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A leaf-litter analogue could prevent persistent waterlogging by switching permeability after mechanical saturation strain.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1237",
      "hypothesis": "A leaf-litter analogue could prevent persistent waterlogging by switching permeability after mechanical saturation strain.",
      "test": "Measure strain and drainage.",
      "against": "Switching follows pore filling alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1237",
      "hypothesis": "A leaf-litter analogue could prevent persistent waterlogging by switching permeability after mechanical saturation strain.",
      "test": "Measure strain and drainage.",
      "against": "Switching follows pore filling alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1238",
    "hypothesis": "A seed-husk analogue could buffer acoustic shocks through distributed microcavity resonance without added bulk mass.",
    "test": "Measure transmission spectra.",
    "against": "Protection matches ordinary foam controls.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1238",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A seed-husk analogue could buffer acoustic shocks through distributed microcavity resonance without added bulk mass.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1238",
      "hypothesis": "A seed-husk analogue could buffer acoustic shocks through distributed microcavity resonance without added bulk mass.",
      "test": "Measure transmission spectra.",
      "against": "Protection matches ordinary foam controls.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1238",
      "hypothesis": "A seed-husk analogue could buffer acoustic shocks through distributed microcavity resonance without added bulk mass.",
      "test": "Measure transmission spectra.",
      "against": "Protection matches ordinary foam controls.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1239",
    "hypothesis": "A feather-inspired composite could separate thermal insulation from acoustic absorption through different branch connectivity scales.",
    "test": "Measure both properties.",
    "against": "Improving either necessarily worsens the other.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1239",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A feather-inspired composite could separate thermal insulation from acoustic absorption through different branch connectivity scales.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1239",
      "hypothesis": "A feather-inspired composite could separate thermal insulation from acoustic absorption through different branch connectivity scales.",
      "test": "Measure both properties.",
      "against": "Improving either necessarily worsens the other.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1239",
      "hypothesis": "A feather-inspired composite could separate thermal insulation from acoustic absorption through different branch connectivity scales.",
      "test": "Measure both properties.",
      "against": "Improving either necessarily worsens the other.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1240",
    "hypothesis": "A mollusk-inspired soft valve could resist contamination by shedding only its outermost contact film.",
    "test": "Measure residue and seal performance.",
    "against": "Shedding destroys the seal.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1240",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A mollusk-inspired soft valve could resist contamination by shedding only its outermost contact film.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1240",
      "hypothesis": "A mollusk-inspired soft valve could resist contamination by shedding only its outermost contact film.",
      "test": "Measure residue and seal performance.",
      "against": "Shedding destroys the seal.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1240",
      "hypothesis": "A mollusk-inspired soft valve could resist contamination by shedding only its outermost contact film.",
      "test": "Measure residue and seal performance.",
      "against": "Shedding destroys the seal.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1241",
    "hypothesis": "A bamboo-node analogue could limit crack growth by directing fluid toward the stressed node during bending.",
    "test": "Map fluid and cracks.",
    "against": "Protection follows solid reinforcement alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1241",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A bamboo-node analogue could limit crack growth by directing fluid toward the stressed node during bending.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1241",
      "hypothesis": "A bamboo-node analogue could limit crack growth by directing fluid toward the stressed node during bending.",
      "test": "Map fluid and cracks.",
      "against": "Protection follows solid reinforcement alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1241",
      "hypothesis": "A bamboo-node analogue could limit crack growth by directing fluid toward the stressed node during bending.",
      "test": "Map fluid and cracks.",
      "against": "Protection follows solid reinforcement alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1242",
    "hypothesis": "A flower-petal analogue could reveal dehydration direction through chirality of its first fold.",
    "test": "Apply directional drying.",
    "against": "Fold chirality remains random.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 18,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1242",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A flower-petal analogue could reveal dehydration direction through chirality of its first fold.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1242",
      "hypothesis": "A flower-petal analogue could reveal dehydration direction through chirality of its first fold.",
      "test": "Apply directional drying.",
      "against": "Fold chirality remains random.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1242",
      "hypothesis": "A flower-petal analogue could reveal dehydration direction through chirality of its first fold.",
      "test": "Apply directional drying.",
      "against": "Fold chirality remains random.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 18,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1243",
    "hypothesis": "A fish-gill analogue could separate suspended particles by deformability while retaining dissolved-gas exchange.",
    "test": "Measure capture and gas flux.",
    "against": "Selectivity requires reduced gas transfer.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1243",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A fish-gill analogue could separate suspended particles by deformability while retaining dissolved-gas exchange.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1243",
      "hypothesis": "A fish-gill analogue could separate suspended particles by deformability while retaining dissolved-gas exchange.",
      "test": "Measure capture and gas flux.",
      "against": "Selectivity requires reduced gas transfer.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1243",
      "hypothesis": "A fish-gill analogue could separate suspended particles by deformability while retaining dissolved-gas exchange.",
      "test": "Measure capture and gas flux.",
      "against": "Selectivity requires reduced gas transfer.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1244",
    "hypothesis": "A seed-awning analogue could reduce peak temperature through vapor-triggered geometric expansion.",
    "test": "Measure shade and temperature.",
    "against": "Cooling follows material absorption only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1244",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A seed-awning analogue could reduce peak temperature through vapor-triggered geometric expansion.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1244",
      "hypothesis": "A seed-awning analogue could reduce peak temperature through vapor-triggered geometric expansion.",
      "test": "Measure shade and temperature.",
      "against": "Cooling follows material absorption only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1244",
      "hypothesis": "A seed-awning analogue could reduce peak temperature through vapor-triggered geometric expansion.",
      "test": "Measure shade and temperature.",
      "against": "Cooling follows material absorption only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1245",
    "hypothesis": "A fungal-gill analogue could prevent droplet bridges from spreading through oscillatory capillary recoil.",
    "test": "Track bridge propagation.",
    "against": "Arrest follows spacing alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 2,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 17,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1245",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A fungal-gill analogue could prevent droplet bridges from spreading through oscillatory capillary recoil.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1245",
      "hypothesis": "A fungal-gill analogue could prevent droplet bridges from spreading through oscillatory capillary recoil.",
      "test": "Track bridge propagation.",
      "against": "Arrest follows spacing alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1245",
      "hypothesis": "A fungal-gill analogue could prevent droplet bridges from spreading through oscillatory capillary recoil.",
      "test": "Track bridge propagation.",
      "against": "Arrest follows spacing alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 2,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 17,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1246",
    "hypothesis": "A flax-fiber composite could self-report microscopic load transfer through natural fluorescence anisotropy.",
    "test": "Measure fluorescence and strain.",
    "against": "Optical changes follow water content only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1246",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A flax-fiber composite could self-report microscopic load transfer through natural fluorescence anisotropy.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1246",
      "hypothesis": "A flax-fiber composite could self-report microscopic load transfer through natural fluorescence anisotropy.",
      "test": "Measure fluorescence and strain.",
      "against": "Optical changes follow water content only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1246",
      "hypothesis": "A flax-fiber composite could self-report microscopic load transfer through natural fluorescence anisotropy.",
      "test": "Measure fluorescence and strain.",
      "against": "Optical changes follow water content only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1247",
    "hypothesis": "A feather-shaft analogue could remain torsionally stable after internal cracking through redistribution of gas pressure.",
    "test": "Measure cracks and torque.",
    "against": "Stability follows wall geometry alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1247",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A feather-shaft analogue could remain torsionally stable after internal cracking through redistribution of gas pressure.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1247",
      "hypothesis": "A feather-shaft analogue could remain torsionally stable after internal cracking through redistribution of gas pressure.",
      "test": "Measure cracks and torque.",
      "against": "Stability follows wall geometry alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1247",
      "hypothesis": "A feather-shaft analogue could remain torsionally stable after internal cracking through redistribution of gas pressure.",
      "test": "Measure cracks and torque.",
      "against": "Stability follows wall geometry alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1248",
    "hypothesis": "A pitcher-leaf analogue could reject benign oil contamination by cyclically moving an immiscible lubricating film.",
    "test": "Measure contamination and film motion.",
    "against": "Cleaning requires lubricant loss.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "nonhuman biology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1248",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A pitcher-leaf analogue could reject benign oil contamination by cyclically moving an immiscible lubricating film.",
    "category": "nonhuman biology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1248",
      "hypothesis": "A pitcher-leaf analogue could reject benign oil contamination by cyclically moving an immiscible lubricating film.",
      "test": "Measure contamination and film motion.",
      "against": "Cleaning requires lubricant loss.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1248",
      "hypothesis": "A pitcher-leaf analogue could reject benign oil contamination by cyclically moving an immiscible lubricating film.",
      "test": "Measure contamination and film motion.",
      "against": "Cleaning requires lubricant loss.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "nonhuman biology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1249",
    "hypothesis": "A pine-needle analogue could collect fog efficiently while resisting icing through separate thermal and drainage pathways.",
    "test": "Measure collection and ice.",
    "against": "Improvement requires less captured water.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1249",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A pine-needle analogue could collect fog efficiently while resisting icing through separate thermal and drainage pathways.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1249",
      "hypothesis": "A pine-needle analogue could collect fog efficiently while resisting icing through separate thermal and drainage pathways.",
      "test": "Measure collection and ice.",
      "against": "Improvement requires less captured water.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1249",
      "hypothesis": "A pine-needle analogue could collect fog efficiently while resisting icing through separate thermal and drainage pathways.",
      "test": "Measure collection and ice.",
      "against": "Improvement requires less captured water.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1250",
    "hypothesis": "A silk cocoon analogue could protect an enclosed sensor from humidity spikes through delayed vapor routing.",
    "test": "Measure internal humidity.",
    "against": "Delay follows thickness only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1250",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A silk cocoon analogue could protect an enclosed sensor from humidity spikes through delayed vapor routing.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1250",
      "hypothesis": "A silk cocoon analogue could protect an enclosed sensor from humidity spikes through delayed vapor routing.",
      "test": "Measure internal humidity.",
      "against": "Delay follows thickness only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1250",
      "hypothesis": "A silk cocoon analogue could protect an enclosed sensor from humidity spikes through delayed vapor routing.",
      "test": "Measure internal humidity.",
      "against": "Delay follows thickness only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1251",
    "hypothesis": "A root-bark analogue could retain mechanical protection while opening local gas exchange paths under compression.",
    "test": "Measure strength and gas flux.",
    "against": "Opening weakens the whole barrier.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1251",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A root-bark analogue could retain mechanical protection while opening local gas exchange paths under compression.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1251",
      "hypothesis": "A root-bark analogue could retain mechanical protection while opening local gas exchange paths under compression.",
      "test": "Measure strength and gas flux.",
      "against": "Opening weakens the whole barrier.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1251",
      "hypothesis": "A root-bark analogue could retain mechanical protection while opening local gas exchange paths under compression.",
      "test": "Measure strength and gas flux.",
      "against": "Opening weakens the whole barrier.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1252",
    "hypothesis": "A maple-seed analogue could encode impact location in a reversible change of its flight orbit.",
    "test": "Track controlled impacts and descent.",
    "against": "Orbit changes follow mass loss only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1252",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A maple-seed analogue could encode impact location in a reversible change of its flight orbit.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1252",
      "hypothesis": "A maple-seed analogue could encode impact location in a reversible change of its flight orbit.",
      "test": "Track controlled impacts and descent.",
      "against": "Orbit changes follow mass loss only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1252",
      "hypothesis": "A maple-seed analogue could encode impact location in a reversible change of its flight orbit.",
      "test": "Track controlled impacts and descent.",
      "against": "Orbit changes follow mass loss only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1253",
    "hypothesis": "A shell-inspired mineral laminate could suppress corrosion through stress-directed release of benign buffering ions.",
    "test": "Map stress and ion release.",
    "against": "Protection requires uniform dissolution.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1253",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A shell-inspired mineral laminate could suppress corrosion through stress-directed release of benign buffering ions.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1253",
      "hypothesis": "A shell-inspired mineral laminate could suppress corrosion through stress-directed release of benign buffering ions.",
      "test": "Map stress and ion release.",
      "against": "Protection requires uniform dissolution.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1253",
      "hypothesis": "A shell-inspired mineral laminate could suppress corrosion through stress-directed release of benign buffering ions.",
      "test": "Map stress and ion release.",
      "against": "Protection requires uniform dissolution.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1254",
    "hypothesis": "A honeycomb-inspired film could shed liquid through sequential cell inversion without external vibration.",
    "test": "Measure cell motion and drainage.",
    "against": "Inversion requires continuous external work.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1254",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A honeycomb-inspired film could shed liquid through sequential cell inversion without external vibration.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1254",
      "hypothesis": "A honeycomb-inspired film could shed liquid through sequential cell inversion without external vibration.",
      "test": "Measure cell motion and drainage.",
      "against": "Inversion requires continuous external work.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1254",
      "hypothesis": "A honeycomb-inspired film could shed liquid through sequential cell inversion without external vibration.",
      "test": "Measure cell motion and drainage.",
      "against": "Inversion requires continuous external work.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1255",
    "hypothesis": "A grass-root-inspired mesh could stabilize loose grains through capillary connectors that disappear after unloading.",
    "test": "Track connectors and strength.",
    "against": "Stabilization requires permanent bonding.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1255",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A grass-root-inspired mesh could stabilize loose grains through capillary connectors that disappear after unloading.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1255",
      "hypothesis": "A grass-root-inspired mesh could stabilize loose grains through capillary connectors that disappear after unloading.",
      "test": "Track connectors and strength.",
      "against": "Stabilization requires permanent bonding.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1255",
      "hypothesis": "A grass-root-inspired mesh could stabilize loose grains through capillary connectors that disappear after unloading.",
      "test": "Track connectors and strength.",
      "against": "Stabilization requires permanent bonding.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1256",
    "hypothesis": "A feather-coating analogue could distinguish salt contamination from dust through different hydration-induced color trajectories.",
    "test": "Apply controlled deposits.",
    "against": "Trajectories reflect deposit mass only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 18,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1256",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A feather-coating analogue could distinguish salt contamination from dust through different hydration-induced color trajectories.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1256",
      "hypothesis": "A feather-coating analogue could distinguish salt contamination from dust through different hydration-induced color trajectories.",
      "test": "Apply controlled deposits.",
      "against": "Trajectories reflect deposit mass only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1256",
      "hypothesis": "A feather-coating analogue could distinguish salt contamination from dust through different hydration-induced color trajectories.",
      "test": "Apply controlled deposits.",
      "against": "Trajectories reflect deposit mass only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 18,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1257",
    "hypothesis": "A sea-cucumber-inspired gel could switch stiffness by relocating reversible bonds rather than changing their total number.",
    "test": "Measure bond maps and modulus.",
    "against": "Modulus follows bond count alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1257",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A sea-cucumber-inspired gel could switch stiffness by relocating reversible bonds rather than changing their total number.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1257",
      "hypothesis": "A sea-cucumber-inspired gel could switch stiffness by relocating reversible bonds rather than changing their total number.",
      "test": "Measure bond maps and modulus.",
      "against": "Modulus follows bond count alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1257",
      "hypothesis": "A sea-cucumber-inspired gel could switch stiffness by relocating reversible bonds rather than changing their total number.",
      "test": "Measure bond maps and modulus.",
      "against": "Modulus follows bond count alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1258",
    "hypothesis": "A seed-surface analogue could release attached particles according to their wetting kinetics instead of size.",
    "test": "Measure particle release.",
    "against": "Sorting follows diameter only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1258",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A seed-surface analogue could release attached particles according to their wetting kinetics instead of size.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1258",
      "hypothesis": "A seed-surface analogue could release attached particles according to their wetting kinetics instead of size.",
      "test": "Measure particle release.",
      "against": "Sorting follows diameter only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1258",
      "hypothesis": "A seed-surface analogue could release attached particles according to their wetting kinetics instead of size.",
      "test": "Measure particle release.",
      "against": "Sorting follows diameter only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1259",
    "hypothesis": "A leaf-like membrane could maintain gas exchange during deformation by rotating elongated pores.",
    "test": "Measure pore shapes and flux.",
    "against": "Flux falls with all useful deformation.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "nonhuman biology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1259",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A leaf-like membrane could maintain gas exchange during deformation by rotating elongated pores.",
    "category": "nonhuman biology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1259",
      "hypothesis": "A leaf-like membrane could maintain gas exchange during deformation by rotating elongated pores.",
      "test": "Measure pore shapes and flux.",
      "against": "Flux falls with all useful deformation.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1259",
      "hypothesis": "A leaf-like membrane could maintain gas exchange during deformation by rotating elongated pores.",
      "test": "Measure pore shapes and flux.",
      "against": "Flux falls with all useful deformation.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "nonhuman biology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1260",
    "hypothesis": "A sponge-inspired scaffold could distribute catalytic activity toward channels with the shortest residence time.",
    "test": "Measure catalyst migration and conversion.",
    "against": "Distribution follows concentration alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1260",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A sponge-inspired scaffold could distribute catalytic activity toward channels with the shortest residence time.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1260",
      "hypothesis": "A sponge-inspired scaffold could distribute catalytic activity toward channels with the shortest residence time.",
      "test": "Measure catalyst migration and conversion.",
      "against": "Distribution follows concentration alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1260",
      "hypothesis": "A sponge-inspired scaffold could distribute catalytic activity toward channels with the shortest residence time.",
      "test": "Measure catalyst migration and conversion.",
      "against": "Distribution follows concentration alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1261",
    "hypothesis": "A feather-edge analogue could suppress droplet splashing by converting impact into distributed torsion.",
    "test": "Measure splash and strain.",
    "against": "Suppression requires lower impact speed.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1261",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A feather-edge analogue could suppress droplet splashing by converting impact into distributed torsion.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1261",
      "hypothesis": "A feather-edge analogue could suppress droplet splashing by converting impact into distributed torsion.",
      "test": "Measure splash and strain.",
      "against": "Suppression requires lower impact speed.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1261",
      "hypothesis": "A feather-edge analogue could suppress droplet splashing by converting impact into distributed torsion.",
      "test": "Measure splash and strain.",
      "against": "Suppression requires lower impact speed.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1262",
    "hypothesis": "A twig-like branched rod could recover stiffness after a cut by engaging neighboring branches mechanically.",
    "test": "Measure contacts and bending.",
    "against": "Recovery requires chemical repair.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1262",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A twig-like branched rod could recover stiffness after a cut by engaging neighboring branches mechanically.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1262",
      "hypothesis": "A twig-like branched rod could recover stiffness after a cut by engaging neighboring branches mechanically.",
      "test": "Measure contacts and bending.",
      "against": "Recovery requires chemical repair.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1262",
      "hypothesis": "A twig-like branched rod could recover stiffness after a cut by engaging neighboring branches mechanically.",
      "test": "Measure contacts and bending.",
      "against": "Recovery requires chemical repair.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1263",
    "hypothesis": "A cactus-rib analogue could preserve cooling during dehydration by moving evaporating area toward remaining liquid.",
    "test": "Map wetness and thermal fields.",
    "against": "Cooling follows total wet area only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1263",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A cactus-rib analogue could preserve cooling during dehydration by moving evaporating area toward remaining liquid.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1263",
      "hypothesis": "A cactus-rib analogue could preserve cooling during dehydration by moving evaporating area toward remaining liquid.",
      "test": "Map wetness and thermal fields.",
      "against": "Cooling follows total wet area only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1263",
      "hypothesis": "A cactus-rib analogue could preserve cooling during dehydration by moving evaporating area toward remaining liquid.",
      "test": "Map wetness and thermal fields.",
      "against": "Cooling follows total wet area only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1264",
    "hypothesis": "A fish-scale coating could identify flow reversal through a persistent change in its optical texture.",
    "test": "Measure texture after matched flows.",
    "against": "Texture recovers immediately.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1264",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A fish-scale coating could identify flow reversal through a persistent change in its optical texture.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1264",
      "hypothesis": "A fish-scale coating could identify flow reversal through a persistent change in its optical texture.",
      "test": "Measure texture after matched flows.",
      "against": "Texture recovers immediately.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1264",
      "hypothesis": "A fish-scale coating could identify flow reversal through a persistent change in its optical texture.",
      "test": "Measure texture after matched flows.",
      "against": "Texture recovers immediately.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1265",
    "hypothesis": "A seed-capsule analogue could release its contents only after a complete wet-dry loop rather than either state alone.",
    "test": "Apply interrupted loops.",
    "against": "Release follows peak moisture only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "nonhuman biology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1265",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A seed-capsule analogue could release its contents only after a complete wet-dry loop rather than either state alone.",
    "category": "nonhuman biology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1265",
      "hypothesis": "A seed-capsule analogue could release its contents only after a complete wet-dry loop rather than either state alone.",
      "test": "Apply interrupted loops.",
      "against": "Release follows peak moisture only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1265",
      "hypothesis": "A seed-capsule analogue could release its contents only after a complete wet-dry loop rather than either state alone.",
      "test": "Apply interrupted loops.",
      "against": "Release follows peak moisture only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "nonhuman biology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1266",
    "hypothesis": "A spider-silk-inspired fiber could discriminate acidic from saline exposure through opposite recoil timing.",
    "test": "Calibrate chemistry separately.",
    "against": "Responses remain inseparable.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1266",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A spider-silk-inspired fiber could discriminate acidic from saline exposure through opposite recoil timing.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1266",
      "hypothesis": "A spider-silk-inspired fiber could discriminate acidic from saline exposure through opposite recoil timing.",
      "test": "Calibrate chemistry separately.",
      "against": "Responses remain inseparable.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1266",
      "hypothesis": "A spider-silk-inspired fiber could discriminate acidic from saline exposure through opposite recoil timing.",
      "test": "Calibrate chemistry separately.",
      "against": "Responses remain inseparable.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1267",
    "hypothesis": "A leaf-vein-inspired membrane could reroute cracks around functioning transport paths through local stress relaxation.",
    "test": "Track cracks and flow.",
    "against": "Cracks preferentially destroy active paths.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1267",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A leaf-vein-inspired membrane could reroute cracks around functioning transport paths through local stress relaxation.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1267",
      "hypothesis": "A leaf-vein-inspired membrane could reroute cracks around functioning transport paths through local stress relaxation.",
      "test": "Track cracks and flow.",
      "against": "Cracks preferentially destroy active paths.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1267",
      "hypothesis": "A leaf-vein-inspired membrane could reroute cracks around functioning transport paths through local stress relaxation.",
      "test": "Track cracks and flow.",
      "against": "Cracks preferentially destroy active paths.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1268",
    "hypothesis": "A porous shell analogue could preserve buoyancy after puncture by trapping air in mechanically closing cells.",
    "test": "Measure gas and flotation.",
    "against": "Recovery requires an intact outer skin.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1268",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous shell analogue could preserve buoyancy after puncture by trapping air in mechanically closing cells.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1268",
      "hypothesis": "A porous shell analogue could preserve buoyancy after puncture by trapping air in mechanically closing cells.",
      "test": "Measure gas and flotation.",
      "against": "Recovery requires an intact outer skin.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1268",
      "hypothesis": "A porous shell analogue could preserve buoyancy after puncture by trapping air in mechanically closing cells.",
      "test": "Measure gas and flotation.",
      "against": "Recovery requires an intact outer skin.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1269",
    "hypothesis": "A feather-inspired mat could reduce ice accumulation by concentrating crystallization on easily detached tips.",
    "test": "Map ice and removal force.",
    "against": "Benefits follow reduced condensation only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1269",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A feather-inspired mat could reduce ice accumulation by concentrating crystallization on easily detached tips.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1269",
      "hypothesis": "A feather-inspired mat could reduce ice accumulation by concentrating crystallization on easily detached tips.",
      "test": "Map ice and removal force.",
      "against": "Benefits follow reduced condensation only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1269",
      "hypothesis": "A feather-inspired mat could reduce ice accumulation by concentrating crystallization on easily detached tips.",
      "test": "Map ice and removal force.",
      "against": "Benefits follow reduced condensation only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1270",
    "hypothesis": "A bamboo-like tube could reveal internal water loss through a change in torsional resonance before mass measurements resolve it.",
    "test": "Compare modalities.",
    "against": "Resonance follows external temperature only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1270",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A bamboo-like tube could reveal internal water loss through a change in torsional resonance before mass measurements resolve it.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1270",
      "hypothesis": "A bamboo-like tube could reveal internal water loss through a change in torsional resonance before mass measurements resolve it.",
      "test": "Compare modalities.",
      "against": "Resonance follows external temperature only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1270",
      "hypothesis": "A bamboo-like tube could reveal internal water loss through a change in torsional resonance before mass measurements resolve it.",
      "test": "Compare modalities.",
      "against": "Resonance follows external temperature only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1271",
    "hypothesis": "A seed-wing coating could avoid photochemical damage by dynamically changing molecular orientation during bending.",
    "test": "Measure orientation and degradation.",
    "against": "Protection requires reduced illumination.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1271",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A seed-wing coating could avoid photochemical damage by dynamically changing molecular orientation during bending.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1271",
      "hypothesis": "A seed-wing coating could avoid photochemical damage by dynamically changing molecular orientation during bending.",
      "test": "Measure orientation and degradation.",
      "against": "Protection requires reduced illumination.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1271",
      "hypothesis": "A seed-wing coating could avoid photochemical damage by dynamically changing molecular orientation during bending.",
      "test": "Measure orientation and degradation.",
      "against": "Protection requires reduced illumination.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1272",
    "hypothesis": "A soft coral analogue could distribute flow evenly by changing branch spacing under local drag.",
    "test": "Measure flow and geometry.",
    "against": "Uniformity requires reduced total transport.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1272",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A soft coral analogue could distribute flow evenly by changing branch spacing under local drag.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1272",
      "hypothesis": "A soft coral analogue could distribute flow evenly by changing branch spacing under local drag.",
      "test": "Measure flow and geometry.",
      "against": "Uniformity requires reduced total transport.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1272",
      "hypothesis": "A soft coral analogue could distribute flow evenly by changing branch spacing under local drag.",
      "test": "Measure flow and geometry.",
      "against": "Uniformity requires reduced total transport.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1273",
    "hypothesis": "A root-inspired probe could enter granular material with less force by releasing water only at high-stress contacts.",
    "test": "Map contact water and insertion force.",
    "against": "Benefits follow bulk lubrication alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1273",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A root-inspired probe could enter granular material with less force by releasing water only at high-stress contacts.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1273",
      "hypothesis": "A root-inspired probe could enter granular material with less force by releasing water only at high-stress contacts.",
      "test": "Map contact water and insertion force.",
      "against": "Benefits follow bulk lubrication alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1273",
      "hypothesis": "A root-inspired probe could enter granular material with less force by releasing water only at high-stress contacts.",
      "test": "Map contact water and insertion force.",
      "against": "Benefits follow bulk lubrication alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1274",
    "hypothesis": "A flower-inspired surface could sort condensate by dissolved-solute concentration through differential petal curling.",
    "test": "Measure chemistry and drainage.",
    "against": "Routing follows liquid volume only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1274",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A flower-inspired surface could sort condensate by dissolved-solute concentration through differential petal curling.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1274",
      "hypothesis": "A flower-inspired surface could sort condensate by dissolved-solute concentration through differential petal curling.",
      "test": "Measure chemistry and drainage.",
      "against": "Routing follows liquid volume only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1274",
      "hypothesis": "A flower-inspired surface could sort condensate by dissolved-solute concentration through differential petal curling.",
      "test": "Measure chemistry and drainage.",
      "against": "Routing follows liquid volume only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1275",
    "hypothesis": "A tendon-inspired composite could prevent fiber rupture by moving bound water toward the fastest-loaded bundle.",
    "test": "Measure local hydration and failure.",
    "against": "Protection follows loading rate alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1275",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A tendon-inspired composite could prevent fiber rupture by moving bound water toward the fastest-loaded bundle.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1275",
      "hypothesis": "A tendon-inspired composite could prevent fiber rupture by moving bound water toward the fastest-loaded bundle.",
      "test": "Measure local hydration and failure.",
      "against": "Protection follows loading rate alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1275",
      "hypothesis": "A tendon-inspired composite could prevent fiber rupture by moving bound water toward the fastest-loaded bundle.",
      "test": "Measure local hydration and failure.",
      "against": "Protection follows loading rate alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1276",
    "hypothesis": "A moss-inspired porous cover could preserve optical access while buffering humidity through hidden backside storage.",
    "test": "Measure transmission and humidity.",
    "against": "Buffering requires visible surface wetting.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1276",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A moss-inspired porous cover could preserve optical access while buffering humidity through hidden backside storage.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1276",
      "hypothesis": "A moss-inspired porous cover could preserve optical access while buffering humidity through hidden backside storage.",
      "test": "Measure transmission and humidity.",
      "against": "Buffering requires visible surface wetting.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1276",
      "hypothesis": "A moss-inspired porous cover could preserve optical access while buffering humidity through hidden backside storage.",
      "test": "Measure transmission and humidity.",
      "against": "Buffering requires visible surface wetting.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1277",
    "hypothesis": "A shell-inspired coating could tolerate repeated abrasion by rotating hard plates into exposed soft gaps.",
    "test": "Image plates and wear.",
    "against": "Reorganization accelerates damage.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1277",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A shell-inspired coating could tolerate repeated abrasion by rotating hard plates into exposed soft gaps.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1277",
      "hypothesis": "A shell-inspired coating could tolerate repeated abrasion by rotating hard plates into exposed soft gaps.",
      "test": "Image plates and wear.",
      "against": "Reorganization accelerates damage.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1277",
      "hypothesis": "A shell-inspired coating could tolerate repeated abrasion by rotating hard plates into exposed soft gaps.",
      "test": "Image plates and wear.",
      "against": "Reorganization accelerates damage.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1278",
    "hypothesis": "A seed-inspired granular capsule could maintain orientation underground through asymmetric friction activated by hydration.",
    "test": "Track motion in transparent soil.",
    "against": "Orientation follows gravity only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1278",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A seed-inspired granular capsule could maintain orientation underground through asymmetric friction activated by hydration.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1278",
      "hypothesis": "A seed-inspired granular capsule could maintain orientation underground through asymmetric friction activated by hydration.",
      "test": "Track motion in transparent soil.",
      "against": "Orientation follows gravity only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1278",
      "hypothesis": "A seed-inspired granular capsule could maintain orientation underground through asymmetric friction activated by hydration.",
      "test": "Track motion in transparent soil.",
      "against": "Orientation follows gravity only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1279",
    "hypothesis": "A feather-microstructure analogue could distinguish liquid oils by the delay before its branches collapse.",
    "test": "Measure collapse with known liquids.",
    "against": "Delay follows viscosity alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1279",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A feather-microstructure analogue could distinguish liquid oils by the delay before its branches collapse.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1279",
      "hypothesis": "A feather-microstructure analogue could distinguish liquid oils by the delay before its branches collapse.",
      "test": "Measure collapse with known liquids.",
      "against": "Delay follows viscosity alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1279",
      "hypothesis": "A feather-microstructure analogue could distinguish liquid oils by the delay before its branches collapse.",
      "test": "Measure collapse with known liquids.",
      "against": "Delay follows viscosity alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1280",
    "hypothesis": "A fungal-network analogue could isolate a leak by locally swelling the connections that feed it.",
    "test": "Measure routing and swelling.",
    "against": "Isolation requires global flow reduction.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 2,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 17,
    "area": "nonhuman biology",
    "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1280",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A fungal-network analogue could isolate a leak by locally swelling the connections that feed it.",
    "category": "nonhuman biology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1280",
      "hypothesis": "A fungal-network analogue could isolate a leak by locally swelling the connections that feed it.",
      "test": "Measure routing and swelling.",
      "against": "Isolation requires global flow reduction.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1280",
      "hypothesis": "A fungal-network analogue could isolate a leak by locally swelling the connections that feed it.",
      "test": "Measure routing and swelling.",
      "against": "Isolation requires global flow reduction.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 2,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 17,
      "area": "nonhuman biology",
      "resource_class": "equipped biological or specialist laboratory",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1281",
    "hypothesis": "A leaf-wax analogue could regenerate roughness after flattening through redistribution of existing molecules.",
    "test": "Measure topography and mass balance.",
    "against": "Recovery requires new deposition.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 4,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "area": "nonhuman biology",
    "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 14,
    "literature_query": "leaf-wax analogue regenerate roughness flattening redistribution existing molecules experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N1281",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A leaf-wax analogue could regenerate roughness after flattening through redistribution of existing molecules.",
    "category": "nonhuman biology",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1281",
      "hypothesis": "A leaf-wax analogue could regenerate roughness after flattening through redistribution of existing molecules.",
      "test": "Measure topography and mass balance.",
      "against": "Recovery requires new deposition.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1281",
      "hypothesis": "A leaf-wax analogue could regenerate roughness after flattening through redistribution of existing molecules.",
      "test": "Measure topography and mass balance.",
      "against": "Recovery requires new deposition.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "area": "nonhuman biology",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 14,
      "literature_query": "leaf-wax analogue regenerate roughness flattening redistribution existing molecules experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "14",
      "id": "N1281",
      "hypothesis": "A leaf-wax analogue could regenerate roughness after flattening through redistribution of existing molecules.",
      "test": "Measure topography and mass balance.",
      "against": "Recovery requires new deposition.",
      "area": "nonhuman biology",
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory; characterization may dominate feasibility",
      "screen_score": "24",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pf37f69d7a170;P48bebc223cd9;P283d2ff5ba93;P13b334fac622;Pe1de1522d7da;Pc7ea08b50cdc;P9288561a5db7",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N1281",
      "hypothesis": "A leaf-wax analogue could regenerate roughness after flattening through redistribution of existing molecules.",
      "test": "Measure topography and mass balance.",
      "against": "Recovery requires new deposition.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "area": "nonhuman biology",
      "resource_class": "equipped laboratory; characterization may dominate feasibility",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 14,
      "literature_query": "leaf-wax analogue regenerate roughness flattening redistribution existing molecules experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pf37f69d7a170;P48bebc223cd9;P283d2ff5ba93;P13b334fac622;Pe1de1522d7da;Pc7ea08b50cdc;P9288561a5db7",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "Pf37f69d7a170;P48bebc223cd9;P283d2ff5ba93;P13b334fac622;Pe1de1522d7da;Pc7ea08b50cdc;P9288561a5db7",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1282",
    "hypothesis": "A diatom-inspired optical shell could report mechanical damage through mode splitting without losing transparency.",
    "test": "Measure optics and cracks.",
    "against": "Detection requires strong scattering.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1282",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A diatom-inspired optical shell could report mechanical damage through mode splitting without losing transparency.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1282",
      "hypothesis": "A diatom-inspired optical shell could report mechanical damage through mode splitting without losing transparency.",
      "test": "Measure optics and cracks.",
      "against": "Detection requires strong scattering.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1282",
      "hypothesis": "A diatom-inspired optical shell could report mechanical damage through mode splitting without losing transparency.",
      "test": "Measure optics and cracks.",
      "against": "Detection requires strong scattering.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1283",
    "hypothesis": "A reed-like hollow fiber could resist water invasion through capillary pressure stored in side chambers.",
    "test": "Measure pressure and invasion.",
    "against": "Resistance follows contact angle only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1283",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A reed-like hollow fiber could resist water invasion through capillary pressure stored in side chambers.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1283",
      "hypothesis": "A reed-like hollow fiber could resist water invasion through capillary pressure stored in side chambers.",
      "test": "Measure pressure and invasion.",
      "against": "Resistance follows contact angle only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1283",
      "hypothesis": "A reed-like hollow fiber could resist water invasion through capillary pressure stored in side chambers.",
      "test": "Measure pressure and invasion.",
      "against": "Resistance follows contact angle only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1284",
    "hypothesis": "A seed-pod-inspired hinge could harvest random humidity changes through irreversible small-step motion and reversible local strain.",
    "test": "Measure full cycle work.",
    "against": "Motion yields no net recoverable energy.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1284",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A seed-pod-inspired hinge could harvest random humidity changes through irreversible small-step motion and reversible local strain.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1284",
      "hypothesis": "A seed-pod-inspired hinge could harvest random humidity changes through irreversible small-step motion and reversible local strain.",
      "test": "Measure full cycle work.",
      "against": "Motion yields no net recoverable energy.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1284",
      "hypothesis": "A seed-pod-inspired hinge could harvest random humidity changes through irreversible small-step motion and reversible local strain.",
      "test": "Measure full cycle work.",
      "against": "Motion yields no net recoverable energy.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1285",
    "hypothesis": "A squid-skin-inspired benign optical film could separate pressure and temperature through different structural-color trajectories.",
    "test": "Calibrate both signals.",
    "against": "Trajectories remain confounded.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1285",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A squid-skin-inspired benign optical film could separate pressure and temperature through different structural-color trajectories.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1285",
      "hypothesis": "A squid-skin-inspired benign optical film could separate pressure and temperature through different structural-color trajectories.",
      "test": "Calibrate both signals.",
      "against": "Trajectories remain confounded.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1285",
      "hypothesis": "A squid-skin-inspired benign optical film could separate pressure and temperature through different structural-color trajectories.",
      "test": "Calibrate both signals.",
      "against": "Trajectories remain confounded.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1286",
    "hypothesis": "A tree-bark analogue could reduce surface heating by selectively opening vapor paths near hotspots.",
    "test": "Measure pores and temperature.",
    "against": "Cooling requires increased bulk water loss.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1286",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A tree-bark analogue could reduce surface heating by selectively opening vapor paths near hotspots.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1286",
      "hypothesis": "A tree-bark analogue could reduce surface heating by selectively opening vapor paths near hotspots.",
      "test": "Measure pores and temperature.",
      "against": "Cooling requires increased bulk water loss.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1286",
      "hypothesis": "A tree-bark analogue could reduce surface heating by selectively opening vapor paths near hotspots.",
      "test": "Measure pores and temperature.",
      "against": "Cooling requires increased bulk water loss.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1287",
    "hypothesis": "A web-inspired structure could retain load capacity after damage by moving prestrain toward intact connections.",
    "test": "Measure strain redistribution.",
    "against": "Redistribution triggers cascading failure.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1287",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A web-inspired structure could retain load capacity after damage by moving prestrain toward intact connections.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1287",
      "hypothesis": "A web-inspired structure could retain load capacity after damage by moving prestrain toward intact connections.",
      "test": "Measure strain redistribution.",
      "against": "Redistribution triggers cascading failure.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1287",
      "hypothesis": "A web-inspired structure could retain load capacity after damage by moving prestrain toward intact connections.",
      "test": "Measure strain redistribution.",
      "against": "Redistribution triggers cascading failure.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1288",
    "hypothesis": "A scale-like coating could self-clean through shear-driven contact-line propagation between neighboring elements.",
    "test": "Track liquid and dirt.",
    "against": "Cleaning requires detached coating material.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1288",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A scale-like coating could self-clean through shear-driven contact-line propagation between neighboring elements.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1288",
      "hypothesis": "A scale-like coating could self-clean through shear-driven contact-line propagation between neighboring elements.",
      "test": "Track liquid and dirt.",
      "against": "Cleaning requires detached coating material.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1288",
      "hypothesis": "A scale-like coating could self-clean through shear-driven contact-line propagation between neighboring elements.",
      "test": "Track liquid and dirt.",
      "against": "Cleaning requires detached coating material.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1289",
    "hypothesis": "A leaf-inspired gas exchanger could reduce fouling by periodically inverting only its exposed microchannels.",
    "test": "Measure flux and deposits.",
    "against": "Cleaning compromises exchange performance.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "nonhuman biology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1289",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A leaf-inspired gas exchanger could reduce fouling by periodically inverting only its exposed microchannels.",
    "category": "nonhuman biology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1289",
      "hypothesis": "A leaf-inspired gas exchanger could reduce fouling by periodically inverting only its exposed microchannels.",
      "test": "Measure flux and deposits.",
      "against": "Cleaning compromises exchange performance.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1289",
      "hypothesis": "A leaf-inspired gas exchanger could reduce fouling by periodically inverting only its exposed microchannels.",
      "test": "Measure flux and deposits.",
      "against": "Cleaning compromises exchange performance.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "nonhuman biology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1290",
    "hypothesis": "A silk-inspired membrane could remember stress duration through the fraction of hydrogen-bond clusters that reform after unloading.",
    "test": "Measure clusters and mechanics.",
    "against": "Memory follows maximum stress only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1290",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A silk-inspired membrane could remember stress duration through the fraction of hydrogen-bond clusters that reform after unloading.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1290",
      "hypothesis": "A silk-inspired membrane could remember stress duration through the fraction of hydrogen-bond clusters that reform after unloading.",
      "test": "Measure clusters and mechanics.",
      "against": "Memory follows maximum stress only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1290",
      "hypothesis": "A silk-inspired membrane could remember stress duration through the fraction of hydrogen-bond clusters that reform after unloading.",
      "test": "Measure clusters and mechanics.",
      "against": "Memory follows maximum stress only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1291",
    "hypothesis": "A seed-shell analogue could damp pressure shocks while transmitting slow chemical concentration changes.",
    "test": "Measure both signal types.",
    "against": "Both are attenuated equally.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1291",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A seed-shell analogue could damp pressure shocks while transmitting slow chemical concentration changes.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1291",
      "hypothesis": "A seed-shell analogue could damp pressure shocks while transmitting slow chemical concentration changes.",
      "test": "Measure both signal types.",
      "against": "Both are attenuated equally.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1291",
      "hypothesis": "A seed-shell analogue could damp pressure shocks while transmitting slow chemical concentration changes.",
      "test": "Measure both signal types.",
      "against": "Both are attenuated equally.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1292",
    "hypothesis": "A coral-inspired porous block could protect reaction sites from bubbles by directing gas toward nonreactive cavities.",
    "test": "Map bubbles and conversion.",
    "against": "Protection follows lower gas generation only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1292",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A coral-inspired porous block could protect reaction sites from bubbles by directing gas toward nonreactive cavities.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1292",
      "hypothesis": "A coral-inspired porous block could protect reaction sites from bubbles by directing gas toward nonreactive cavities.",
      "test": "Map bubbles and conversion.",
      "against": "Protection follows lower gas generation only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1292",
      "hypothesis": "A coral-inspired porous block could protect reaction sites from bubbles by directing gas toward nonreactive cavities.",
      "test": "Map bubbles and conversion.",
      "against": "Protection follows lower gas generation only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1293",
    "hypothesis": "A feather-like flexible blade could retain aerodynamic lift after local wetting by twisting only the affected section.",
    "test": "Measure local shape and lift.",
    "against": "Recovery requires drying.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1293",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A feather-like flexible blade could retain aerodynamic lift after local wetting by twisting only the affected section.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1293",
      "hypothesis": "A feather-like flexible blade could retain aerodynamic lift after local wetting by twisting only the affected section.",
      "test": "Measure local shape and lift.",
      "against": "Recovery requires drying.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1293",
      "hypothesis": "A feather-like flexible blade could retain aerodynamic lift after local wetting by twisting only the affected section.",
      "test": "Measure local shape and lift.",
      "against": "Recovery requires drying.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1294",
    "hypothesis": "A root-mucilage-inspired lubricant could adapt friction to loading frequency without changing average viscosity.",
    "test": "Measure rheology and friction.",
    "against": "Frequency response follows viscosity alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1294",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A root-mucilage-inspired lubricant could adapt friction to loading frequency without changing average viscosity.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1294",
      "hypothesis": "A root-mucilage-inspired lubricant could adapt friction to loading frequency without changing average viscosity.",
      "test": "Measure rheology and friction.",
      "against": "Frequency response follows viscosity alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1294",
      "hypothesis": "A root-mucilage-inspired lubricant could adapt friction to loading frequency without changing average viscosity.",
      "test": "Measure rheology and friction.",
      "against": "Frequency response follows viscosity alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1295",
    "hypothesis": "A nacre-inspired optical layer could identify a hidden crack through a traveling color boundary under gentle bending.",
    "test": "Compare optical and crack maps.",
    "against": "Boundary follows strain without crack specificity.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1295",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A nacre-inspired optical layer could identify a hidden crack through a traveling color boundary under gentle bending.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1295",
      "hypothesis": "A nacre-inspired optical layer could identify a hidden crack through a traveling color boundary under gentle bending.",
      "test": "Compare optical and crack maps.",
      "against": "Boundary follows strain without crack specificity.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1295",
      "hypothesis": "A nacre-inspired optical layer could identify a hidden crack through a traveling color boundary under gentle bending.",
      "test": "Compare optical and crack maps.",
      "against": "Boundary follows strain without crack specificity.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1296",
    "hypothesis": "A seed-awn analogue could transport heat away from a wet contact through hydration-triggered uncoiling.",
    "test": "Measure heat paths and shape.",
    "against": "Effect follows ordinary area increase only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1296",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A seed-awn analogue could transport heat away from a wet contact through hydration-triggered uncoiling.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1296",
      "hypothesis": "A seed-awn analogue could transport heat away from a wet contact through hydration-triggered uncoiling.",
      "test": "Measure heat paths and shape.",
      "against": "Effect follows ordinary area increase only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1296",
      "hypothesis": "A seed-awn analogue could transport heat away from a wet contact through hydration-triggered uncoiling.",
      "test": "Measure heat paths and shape.",
      "against": "Effect follows ordinary area increase only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1297",
    "hypothesis": "A sponge-inspired filter could select a cleaning route according to where particles accumulate most rapidly.",
    "test": "Measure routing and deposit growth.",
    "against": "Routes depend only on initial geometry.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1297",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A sponge-inspired filter could select a cleaning route according to where particles accumulate most rapidly.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1297",
      "hypothesis": "A sponge-inspired filter could select a cleaning route according to where particles accumulate most rapidly.",
      "test": "Measure routing and deposit growth.",
      "against": "Routes depend only on initial geometry.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1297",
      "hypothesis": "A sponge-inspired filter could select a cleaning route according to where particles accumulate most rapidly.",
      "test": "Measure routing and deposit growth.",
      "against": "Routes depend only on initial geometry.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1298",
    "hypothesis": "A leaf-petiole analogue could prevent fatigue by storing torsional strain in reversible internal fluid motion.",
    "test": "Measure torque and fluid flow.",
    "against": "Protection requires permanent softening.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1298",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A leaf-petiole analogue could prevent fatigue by storing torsional strain in reversible internal fluid motion.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1298",
      "hypothesis": "A leaf-petiole analogue could prevent fatigue by storing torsional strain in reversible internal fluid motion.",
      "test": "Measure torque and fluid flow.",
      "against": "Protection requires permanent softening.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1298",
      "hypothesis": "A leaf-petiole analogue could prevent fatigue by storing torsional strain in reversible internal fluid motion.",
      "test": "Measure torque and fluid flow.",
      "against": "Protection requires permanent softening.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1299",
    "hypothesis": "A folded paper channel could retain a liquid front's acceleration history in its later spreading asymmetry.",
    "test": "Compare equal-volume wetting pulses.",
    "against": "Asymmetry follows final wet footprint only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 4,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 48,
    "literature_query": "folded paper channel retain liquid front s acceleration history later spreading asymmetry experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N1299",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A folded paper channel could retain a liquid front's acceleration history in its later spreading asymmetry.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1299",
      "hypothesis": "A folded paper channel could retain a liquid front's acceleration history in its later spreading asymmetry.",
      "test": "Compare equal-volume wetting pulses.",
      "against": "Asymmetry follows final wet footprint only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1299",
      "hypothesis": "A folded paper channel could retain a liquid front's acceleration history in its later spreading asymmetry.",
      "test": "Compare equal-volume wetting pulses.",
      "against": "Asymmetry follows final wet footprint only.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 23,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 48,
      "literature_query": "folded paper channel retain liquid front s acceleration history later spreading asymmetry experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "48",
      "id": "N1299",
      "hypothesis": "A folded paper channel could retain a liquid front's acceleration history in its later spreading asymmetry.",
      "test": "Compare equal-volume wetting pulses.",
      "against": "Asymmetry follows final wet footprint only.",
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_score": "23",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P090874179a82;P44551e496c2a;Pcd5fab148796;Pde3222824c05;P17718b84ede4",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N1299",
      "hypothesis": "A folded paper channel could retain a liquid front's acceleration history in its later spreading asymmetry.",
      "test": "Compare equal-volume wetting pulses.",
      "against": "Asymmetry follows final wet footprint only.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 23,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 48,
      "literature_query": "folded paper channel retain liquid front s acceleration history later spreading asymmetry experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P090874179a82;P44551e496c2a;Pcd5fab148796;Pde3222824c05;P17718b84ede4",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P090874179a82;P44551e496c2a;Pcd5fab148796;Pde3222824c05;P17718b84ede4",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1300",
    "hypothesis": "A salt-coated thread could reveal local humidity variation through the spacing of spontaneous crystal jumps.",
    "test": "Record motion and calibrated humidity.",
    "against": "Jumps follow vibration noise only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 4,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 49,
    "literature_query": "salt-coated thread reveal local humidity variation spacing spontaneous crystal jumps experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N1300",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A salt-coated thread could reveal local humidity variation through the spacing of spontaneous crystal jumps.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1300",
      "hypothesis": "A salt-coated thread could reveal local humidity variation through the spacing of spontaneous crystal jumps.",
      "test": "Record motion and calibrated humidity.",
      "against": "Jumps follow vibration noise only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1300",
      "hypothesis": "A salt-coated thread could reveal local humidity variation through the spacing of spontaneous crystal jumps.",
      "test": "Record motion and calibrated humidity.",
      "against": "Jumps follow vibration noise only.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 23,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 49,
      "literature_query": "salt-coated thread reveal local humidity variation spacing spontaneous crystal jumps experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "49",
      "id": "N1300",
      "hypothesis": "A salt-coated thread could reveal local humidity variation through the spacing of spontaneous crystal jumps.",
      "test": "Record motion and calibrated humidity.",
      "against": "Jumps follow vibration noise only.",
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_score": "23",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pe4f3bb8d3101;P90158fadeeae;Pc2a4676ec23e;Pc8725a522dea;P7a29de2871f4;P16982640306d;P0eaa6e2d23c5",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N1300",
      "hypothesis": "A salt-coated thread could reveal local humidity variation through the spacing of spontaneous crystal jumps.",
      "test": "Record motion and calibrated humidity.",
      "against": "Jumps follow vibration noise only.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 23,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 49,
      "literature_query": "salt-coated thread reveal local humidity variation spacing spontaneous crystal jumps experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pe4f3bb8d3101;P90158fadeeae;Pc2a4676ec23e;Pc8725a522dea;P7a29de2871f4;P16982640306d;P0eaa6e2d23c5",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "Pe4f3bb8d3101;P90158fadeeae;Pc2a4676ec23e;Pc8725a522dea;P7a29de2871f4;P16982640306d;P0eaa6e2d23c5",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1301",
    "hypothesis": "A transparent starch gel could expose internal drying stress through drifting extinction bands under crossed polarizers.",
    "test": "Compare optics and indentation.",
    "against": "Bands follow concentration alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1301",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A transparent starch gel could expose internal drying stress through drifting extinction bands under crossed polarizers.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1301",
      "hypothesis": "A transparent starch gel could expose internal drying stress through drifting extinction bands under crossed polarizers.",
      "test": "Compare optics and indentation.",
      "against": "Bands follow concentration alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1301",
      "hypothesis": "A transparent starch gel could expose internal drying stress through drifting extinction bands under crossed polarizers.",
      "test": "Compare optics and indentation.",
      "against": "Bands follow concentration alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1302",
    "hypothesis": "A porous ceramic cup could reduce solute deposition at its rim by changing local airflow direction passively.",
    "test": "Measure flow and deposit maps.",
    "against": "Benefits follow lower evaporation only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1302",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous ceramic cup could reduce solute deposition at its rim by changing local airflow direction passively.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1302",
      "hypothesis": "A porous ceramic cup could reduce solute deposition at its rim by changing local airflow direction passively.",
      "test": "Measure flow and deposit maps.",
      "against": "Benefits follow lower evaporation only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1302",
      "hypothesis": "A porous ceramic cup could reduce solute deposition at its rim by changing local airflow direction passively.",
      "test": "Measure flow and deposit maps.",
      "against": "Benefits follow lower evaporation only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1303",
    "hypothesis": "A wax-coated fiber knot could separate adhesion from friction through unequal release under reversed sliding.",
    "test": "Measure both loading directions.",
    "against": "Release follows geometric asymmetry only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 4,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 15,
    "literature_query": "wax-coated fiber knot separate adhesion friction unequal release reversed sliding experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N1303",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A wax-coated fiber knot could separate adhesion from friction through unequal release under reversed sliding.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1303",
      "hypothesis": "A wax-coated fiber knot could separate adhesion from friction through unequal release under reversed sliding.",
      "test": "Measure both loading directions.",
      "against": "Release follows geometric asymmetry only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1303",
      "hypothesis": "A wax-coated fiber knot could separate adhesion from friction through unequal release under reversed sliding.",
      "test": "Measure both loading directions.",
      "against": "Release follows geometric asymmetry only.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 15,
      "literature_query": "wax-coated fiber knot separate adhesion friction unequal release reversed sliding experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "15",
      "id": "N1303",
      "hypothesis": "A wax-coated fiber knot could separate adhesion from friction through unequal release under reversed sliding.",
      "test": "Measure both loading directions.",
      "against": "Release follows geometric asymmetry only.",
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_score": "24",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pdef488685349;Pa597581309f3;Pcd7ab7e56ea8;Pe8e517ac73e9;P9c0082334499;P38f94ea370c0;Pd0850de494ed",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N1303",
      "hypothesis": "A wax-coated fiber knot could separate adhesion from friction through unequal release under reversed sliding.",
      "test": "Measure both loading directions.",
      "against": "Release follows geometric asymmetry only.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 15,
      "literature_query": "wax-coated fiber knot separate adhesion friction unequal release reversed sliding experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pdef488685349;Pa597581309f3;Pcd7ab7e56ea8;Pe8e517ac73e9;P9c0082334499;P38f94ea370c0;Pd0850de494ed",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "Pdef488685349;Pa597581309f3;Pcd7ab7e56ea8;Pe8e517ac73e9;P9c0082334499;P38f94ea370c0;Pd0850de494ed",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1304",
    "hypothesis": "A thin rubber diaphragm could distinguish an attached water film from equal added solid mass through damping history.",
    "test": "Compare controlled loads.",
    "against": "Signals depend on total mass only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 4,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 50,
    "literature_query": "thin rubber diaphragm distinguish attached water film equal added solid mass damping history experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N1304",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A thin rubber diaphragm could distinguish an attached water film from equal added solid mass through damping history.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": true,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1304",
      "hypothesis": "A thin rubber diaphragm could distinguish an attached water film from equal added solid mass through damping history.",
      "test": "Compare controlled loads.",
      "against": "Signals depend on total mass only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1304",
      "hypothesis": "A thin rubber diaphragm could distinguish an attached water film from equal added solid mass through damping history.",
      "test": "Compare controlled loads.",
      "against": "Signals depend on total mass only.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 23,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 50,
      "literature_query": "thin rubber diaphragm distinguish attached water film equal added solid mass damping history experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "50",
      "id": "N1304",
      "hypothesis": "A thin rubber diaphragm could distinguish an attached water film from equal added solid mass through damping history.",
      "test": "Compare controlled loads.",
      "against": "Signals depend on total mass only.",
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_score": "23",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P28f6bec6efd4;Pe603499c20ad;Pc48370c9d0ae",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N1304",
      "hypothesis": "A thin rubber diaphragm could distinguish an attached water film from equal added solid mass through damping history.",
      "test": "Compare controlled loads.",
      "against": "Signals depend on total mass only.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 23,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 50,
      "literature_query": "thin rubber diaphragm distinguish attached water film equal added solid mass damping history experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P28f6bec6efd4;Pe603499c20ad;Pc48370c9d0ae",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P28f6bec6efd4;Pe603499c20ad;Pc48370c9d0ae",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": {
      "rank": "3",
      "id": "N1304",
      "hypothesis": "A thin rubber diaphragm could distinguish an attached water film from equal added solid mass through damping history.",
      "primary_outcome": "Logarithmic decrement or fitted damping rate after a standardized small deflection, with resonant frequency reported separately.",
      "comparison": "Rubber diaphragm carrying a thin water film versus equal added solid mass, plus unloaded and immobile-liquid references.",
      "controls": "Added mass distribution; clamping; membrane tension; temperature; evaporation; water spreading; amplitude-dependent damping.",
      "plan": "Calibrate displacement from video or an optical sensor. Use repeatable small release amplitudes and record complete decay. Check whether the film actually moves relative to the membrane. Randomize independently prepared loading arrangements.",
      "against": "Reject the discrimination claim if observed differences disappear after matching mass location, clamp tension, and amplitude. A resonance shift alone demonstrates added mass, not a liquid-specific signal.",
      "evidence": "Fluid loading and membrane dynamics are established. The equal-mass liquid-versus-solid discrimination remains a narrower comparison; returned added-mass theory is indirect support.",
      "source": "https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S088997469890175X",
      "novelty": "Unverified; a familiar mechanism or existing method is not a new discovery.",
      "physical_data": "none collected"
    },
    "focused_assessment_fields": {
      "id": "N1304",
      "primary_outcome": "Logarithmic decrement or fitted damping rate after a standardized small deflection, with resonant frequency reported separately.",
      "comparison": "Rubber diaphragm carrying a thin water film versus equal added solid mass, plus unloaded and immobile-liquid references.",
      "critical_controls": "Added mass distribution; clamping; membrane tension; temperature; evaporation; water spreading; amplitude-dependent damping.",
      "testing_plan": "Calibrate displacement from video or an optical sensor. Use repeatable small release amplitudes and record complete decay. Check whether the film actually moves relative to the membrane. Randomize independently prepared loading arrangements.",
      "against": "Reject the discrimination claim if observed differences disappear after matching mass location, clamp tension, and amplitude. A resonance shift alone demonstrates added mass, not a liquid-specific signal.",
      "evidence_assessment": "Fluid loading and membrane dynamics are established. The equal-mass liquid-versus-solid discrimination remains a narrower comparison; returned added-mass theory is indirect support.",
      "source_url": "https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S088997469890175X",
      "novelty": "Unverified; a familiar mechanism or existing method is not a new discovery.",
      "rank15": 3
    },
    "primary_outcome": "Logarithmic decrement or fitted damping rate after a standardized small deflection, with resonant frequency reported separately.",
    "comparison": "Rubber diaphragm carrying a thin water film versus equal added solid mass, plus unloaded and immobile-liquid references.",
    "controls": "Added mass distribution; clamping; membrane tension; temperature; evaporation; water spreading; amplitude-dependent damping.",
    "plan": "Calibrate displacement from video or an optical sensor. Use repeatable small release amplitudes and record complete decay. Check whether the film actually moves relative to the membrane. Randomize independently prepared loading arrangements.",
    "evidence": "Fluid loading and membrane dynamics are established. The equal-mass liquid-versus-solid discrimination remains a narrower comparison; returned added-mass theory is indirect support.",
    "source": "https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S088997469890175X",
    "physical_data": "none collected",
    "dossier_text": "# 03. N1304\n\n## Prediction\n\nA thin rubber diaphragm could distinguish an attached water film from equal added solid mass through damping history.\n\n## Primary measurement\n\nLogarithmic decrement or fitted damping rate after a standardized small deflection, with resonant frequency reported separately.\n\n## Comparison\n\nRubber diaphragm carrying a thin water film versus equal added solid mass, plus unloaded and immobile-liquid references.\n\n## Controls\n\nAdded mass distribution; clamping; membrane tension; temperature; evaporation; water spreading; amplitude-dependent damping.\n\n## Testing plan\n\nCalibrate displacement from video or an optical sensor. Use repeatable small release amplitudes and record complete decay. Check whether the film actually moves relative to the membrane. Randomize independently prepared loading arrangements.\n\n## Stop or revise\n\nReject the discrimination claim if observed differences disappear after matching mass location, clamp tension, and amplitude. A resonance shift alone demonstrates added mass, not a liquid-specific signal.\n\n## Evidence and limits\n\nFluid loading and membrane dynamics are established. The equal-mass liquid-versus-solid discrimination remains a narrower comparison; returned added-mass theory is indirect support.\n\nRelated primary-source lead: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S088997469890175X\n\nUnverified; a familiar mechanism or existing method is not a new discovery.\n\n## Replication gate\n\nCalibrate measurement uncertainty first. Define a minimum meaningful effect in the primary outcome's units, then estimate variability across independently prepared specimens or assemblies. Use that variance for a design-specific confirmatory sample calculation. Images and repeated readings from one specimen are technical repeats, not independent replications. Randomize run order and blind labels where practical. Freeze exclusions and analysis before confirmation.\n\nA narrow interval excluding the chosen meaningful effect can count against the bounded claim; a wide interval is inconclusive. Report null and adverse results. The outline requires material and apparatus compatibility checks and is not a complete laboratory protocol.\n"
  },
  {
    "id": "N1305",
    "hypothesis": "A sand-filled tube could retain an impact's location in its later acoustic transmission pattern.",
    "test": "Apply blinded impacts and probe sound.",
    "against": "Patterns reveal energy but not location.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 4,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 22,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 66,
    "literature_query": "sand-filled tube retain impact s location later acoustic transmission pattern experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N1305",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A sand-filled tube could retain an impact's location in its later acoustic transmission pattern.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1305",
      "hypothesis": "A sand-filled tube could retain an impact's location in its later acoustic transmission pattern.",
      "test": "Apply blinded impacts and probe sound.",
      "against": "Patterns reveal energy but not location.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1305",
      "hypothesis": "A sand-filled tube could retain an impact's location in its later acoustic transmission pattern.",
      "test": "Apply blinded impacts and probe sound.",
      "against": "Patterns reveal energy but not location.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 22,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 66,
      "literature_query": "sand-filled tube retain impact s location later acoustic transmission pattern experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "66",
      "id": "N1305",
      "hypothesis": "A sand-filled tube could retain an impact's location in its later acoustic transmission pattern.",
      "test": "Apply blinded impacts and probe sound.",
      "against": "Patterns reveal energy but not location.",
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_score": "22",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P642f990174ba;P2440d936d311;P0c68708cafa4;P95b7c0e1e13e;Pdc300d9c184f;P9eac9073b9cb",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N1305",
      "hypothesis": "A sand-filled tube could retain an impact's location in its later acoustic transmission pattern.",
      "test": "Apply blinded impacts and probe sound.",
      "against": "Patterns reveal energy but not location.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 22,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 66,
      "literature_query": "sand-filled tube retain impact s location later acoustic transmission pattern experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P642f990174ba;P2440d936d311;P0c68708cafa4;P95b7c0e1e13e;Pdc300d9c184f;P9eac9073b9cb",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P642f990174ba;P2440d936d311;P0c68708cafa4;P95b7c0e1e13e;Pdc300d9c184f;P9eac9073b9cb",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1306",
    "hypothesis": "A wet cellulose strip could route heat toward its less swollen side despite equal external cooling.",
    "test": "Measure water and heat maps.",
    "against": "Routing follows thickness alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1306",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A wet cellulose strip could route heat toward its less swollen side despite equal external cooling.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1306",
      "hypothesis": "A wet cellulose strip could route heat toward its less swollen side despite equal external cooling.",
      "test": "Measure water and heat maps.",
      "against": "Routing follows thickness alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1306",
      "hypothesis": "A wet cellulose strip could route heat toward its less swollen side despite equal external cooling.",
      "test": "Measure water and heat maps.",
      "against": "Routing follows thickness alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1307",
    "hypothesis": "A soft clay disk could reveal hidden air through delayed surface ripples after gentle tapping.",
    "test": "Compare ripples with known cavities.",
    "against": "Delay follows bulk stiffness only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1307",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A soft clay disk could reveal hidden air through delayed surface ripples after gentle tapping.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1307",
      "hypothesis": "A soft clay disk could reveal hidden air through delayed surface ripples after gentle tapping.",
      "test": "Compare ripples with known cavities.",
      "against": "Delay follows bulk stiffness only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1307",
      "hypothesis": "A soft clay disk could reveal hidden air through delayed surface ripples after gentle tapping.",
      "test": "Compare ripples with known cavities.",
      "against": "Delay follows bulk stiffness only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1308",
    "hypothesis": "A transparent tape bond could predict later peeling direction from the orientation of small internal air pockets.",
    "test": "Measure pockets and peel paths.",
    "against": "Paths follow application direction only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1308",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A transparent tape bond could predict later peeling direction from the orientation of small internal air pockets.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1308",
      "hypothesis": "A transparent tape bond could predict later peeling direction from the orientation of small internal air pockets.",
      "test": "Measure pockets and peel paths.",
      "against": "Paths follow application direction only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1308",
      "hypothesis": "A transparent tape bond could predict later peeling direction from the orientation of small internal air pockets.",
      "test": "Measure pockets and peel paths.",
      "against": "Paths follow application direction only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1309",
    "hypothesis": "A floating porous sponge could self-center under a water jet through asymmetric saturation rather than shape.",
    "test": "Map saturation and drift.",
    "against": "Centering follows external geometry alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1309",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A floating porous sponge could self-center under a water jet through asymmetric saturation rather than shape.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1309",
      "hypothesis": "A floating porous sponge could self-center under a water jet through asymmetric saturation rather than shape.",
      "test": "Map saturation and drift.",
      "against": "Centering follows external geometry alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1309",
      "hypothesis": "A floating porous sponge could self-center under a water jet through asymmetric saturation rather than shape.",
      "test": "Map saturation and drift.",
      "against": "Centering follows external geometry alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1310",
    "hypothesis": "A droplet on a curved glass rod could measure rod torsion through unequal capillary oscillation frequencies.",
    "test": "Calibrate torsion independently.",
    "against": "Frequency splitting follows droplet shape only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1310",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A droplet on a curved glass rod could measure rod torsion through unequal capillary oscillation frequencies.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1310",
      "hypothesis": "A droplet on a curved glass rod could measure rod torsion through unequal capillary oscillation frequencies.",
      "test": "Calibrate torsion independently.",
      "against": "Frequency splitting follows droplet shape only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1310",
      "hypothesis": "A droplet on a curved glass rod could measure rod torsion through unequal capillary oscillation frequencies.",
      "test": "Calibrate torsion independently.",
      "against": "Frequency splitting follows droplet shape only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1311",
    "hypothesis": "A starch-particle suspension could separate reversible thickening from aggregation through acoustic recovery after flow stops.",
    "test": "Measure sound and microscopy.",
    "against": "Both processes yield identical recovery.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 4,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 16,
    "literature_query": "starch-particle suspension separate reversible thickening aggregation acoustic recovery flow stops experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N1311",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A starch-particle suspension could separate reversible thickening from aggregation through acoustic recovery after flow stops.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1311",
      "hypothesis": "A starch-particle suspension could separate reversible thickening from aggregation through acoustic recovery after flow stops.",
      "test": "Measure sound and microscopy.",
      "against": "Both processes yield identical recovery.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1311",
      "hypothesis": "A starch-particle suspension could separate reversible thickening from aggregation through acoustic recovery after flow stops.",
      "test": "Measure sound and microscopy.",
      "against": "Both processes yield identical recovery.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 16,
      "literature_query": "starch-particle suspension separate reversible thickening aggregation acoustic recovery flow stops experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "16",
      "id": "N1311",
      "hypothesis": "A starch-particle suspension could separate reversible thickening from aggregation through acoustic recovery after flow stops.",
      "test": "Measure sound and microscopy.",
      "against": "Both processes yield identical recovery.",
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_score": "24",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pcfd65787eee9;Padcad2641d7a;Pcbbd73cdce77;P02929ac957a6;Pff8db94bf358",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N1311",
      "hypothesis": "A starch-particle suspension could separate reversible thickening from aggregation through acoustic recovery after flow stops.",
      "test": "Measure sound and microscopy.",
      "against": "Both processes yield identical recovery.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 16,
      "literature_query": "starch-particle suspension separate reversible thickening aggregation acoustic recovery flow stops experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pcfd65787eee9;Padcad2641d7a;Pcbbd73cdce77;P02929ac957a6;Pff8db94bf358",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "Pcfd65787eee9;Padcad2641d7a;Pcbbd73cdce77;P02929ac957a6;Pff8db94bf358",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1312",
    "hypothesis": "A thin aluminum-paper laminate could register maximum local wetting through permanent microcurvature without visible staining.",
    "test": "Compare known wetting patterns.",
    "against": "Curvature follows temperature exposure alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 4,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 17,
    "literature_query": "thin aluminum-paper laminate register maximum local wetting permanent microcurvature visible staining experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N1312",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A thin aluminum-paper laminate could register maximum local wetting through permanent microcurvature without visible staining.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1312",
      "hypothesis": "A thin aluminum-paper laminate could register maximum local wetting through permanent microcurvature without visible staining.",
      "test": "Compare known wetting patterns.",
      "against": "Curvature follows temperature exposure alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1312",
      "hypothesis": "A thin aluminum-paper laminate could register maximum local wetting through permanent microcurvature without visible staining.",
      "test": "Compare known wetting patterns.",
      "against": "Curvature follows temperature exposure alone.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 17,
      "literature_query": "thin aluminum-paper laminate register maximum local wetting permanent microcurvature visible staining experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "17",
      "id": "N1312",
      "hypothesis": "A thin aluminum-paper laminate could register maximum local wetting through permanent microcurvature without visible staining.",
      "test": "Compare known wetting patterns.",
      "against": "Curvature follows temperature exposure alone.",
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_score": "24",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pc9b91b04b33e;Pd3b1b4d21d1e;P174572e9866d;P691e92e171db;P53e950c15102;Pe2bed2646e26",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N1312",
      "hypothesis": "A thin aluminum-paper laminate could register maximum local wetting through permanent microcurvature without visible staining.",
      "test": "Compare known wetting patterns.",
      "against": "Curvature follows temperature exposure alone.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 17,
      "literature_query": "thin aluminum-paper laminate register maximum local wetting permanent microcurvature visible staining experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pc9b91b04b33e;Pd3b1b4d21d1e;P174572e9866d;P691e92e171db;P53e950c15102;Pe2bed2646e26",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "Pc9b91b04b33e;Pd3b1b4d21d1e;P174572e9866d;P691e92e171db;P53e950c15102;Pe2bed2646e26",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1313",
    "hypothesis": "A packed bead column could distinguish contamination at its entrance from contamination deep inside through reversed pressure-noise spectra.",
    "test": "Introduce known deposits.",
    "against": "Spectra cannot localize contamination.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 4,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1313",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A packed bead column could distinguish contamination at its entrance from contamination deep inside through reversed pressure-noise spectra.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1313",
      "hypothesis": "A packed bead column could distinguish contamination at its entrance from contamination deep inside through reversed pressure-noise spectra.",
      "test": "Introduce known deposits.",
      "against": "Spectra cannot localize contamination.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1313",
      "hypothesis": "A packed bead column could distinguish contamination at its entrance from contamination deep inside through reversed pressure-noise spectra.",
      "test": "Introduce known deposits.",
      "against": "Spectra cannot localize contamination.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1314",
    "hypothesis": "A dissolving sugar crystal could reveal local stagnant zones through the orientation of surviving ridges.",
    "test": "Map flow and ridge geometry.",
    "against": "Ridges follow crystal axes only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 4,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 144,
    "literature_query": "dissolving sugar crystal reveal local stagnant zones orientation surviving ridges experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N1314",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A dissolving sugar crystal could reveal local stagnant zones through the orientation of surviving ridges.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": true,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1314",
      "hypothesis": "A dissolving sugar crystal could reveal local stagnant zones through the orientation of surviving ridges.",
      "test": "Map flow and ridge geometry.",
      "against": "Ridges follow crystal axes only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1314",
      "hypothesis": "A dissolving sugar crystal could reveal local stagnant zones through the orientation of surviving ridges.",
      "test": "Map flow and ridge geometry.",
      "against": "Ridges follow crystal axes only.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 144,
      "literature_query": "dissolving sugar crystal reveal local stagnant zones orientation surviving ridges experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "144",
      "id": "N1314",
      "hypothesis": "A dissolving sugar crystal could reveal local stagnant zones through the orientation of surviving ridges.",
      "test": "Map flow and ridge geometry.",
      "against": "Ridges follow crystal axes only.",
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_score": "21",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pd6b147b5a15f;P0b93caf9c193;P9ee8dda5e026;P91486dd373e1;P92ca1b448236;Pae64ec82e22a",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N1314",
      "hypothesis": "A dissolving sugar crystal could reveal local stagnant zones through the orientation of surviving ridges.",
      "test": "Map flow and ridge geometry.",
      "against": "Ridges follow crystal axes only.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 144,
      "literature_query": "dissolving sugar crystal reveal local stagnant zones orientation surviving ridges experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pd6b147b5a15f;P0b93caf9c193;P9ee8dda5e026;P91486dd373e1;P92ca1b448236;Pae64ec82e22a",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "Pd6b147b5a15f;P0b93caf9c193;P9ee8dda5e026;P91486dd373e1;P92ca1b448236;Pae64ec82e22a",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": {
      "rank": "8",
      "id": "N1314",
      "hypothesis": "A dissolving sugar crystal could reveal local stagnant zones through the orientation of surviving ridges.",
      "primary_outcome": "Agreement between residual ridge orientation and independently measured low-flow regions around a dissolving sugar specimen.",
      "comparison": "Known external flow geometries versus quiescent water and rotated specimens.",
      "controls": "Crystal orientation; initial shape; solution concentration; temperature; density-driven self-convection; illumination heating.",
      "plan": "Use controlled sugar specimens and independent flow tracers. Record shape evolution and the flow field simultaneously. Test a prediction rule on new orientations before claiming stagnant-zone inference.",
      "against": "If ridges follow crystal axes or self-generated convection rather than the imposed flow, the intended inference fails.",
      "evidence": "Primary dissolution experiments show strong feedback between sugar shape and naturally generated flow. This also supplies a major alternative explanation that must be measured.",
      "source": "https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7519309/",
      "novelty": "Unverified; a familiar mechanism or existing method is not a new discovery.",
      "physical_data": "none collected"
    },
    "focused_assessment_fields": {
      "id": "N1314",
      "primary_outcome": "Agreement between residual ridge orientation and independently measured low-flow regions around a dissolving sugar specimen.",
      "comparison": "Known external flow geometries versus quiescent water and rotated specimens.",
      "critical_controls": "Crystal orientation; initial shape; solution concentration; temperature; density-driven self-convection; illumination heating.",
      "testing_plan": "Use controlled sugar specimens and independent flow tracers. Record shape evolution and the flow field simultaneously. Test a prediction rule on new orientations before claiming stagnant-zone inference.",
      "against": "If ridges follow crystal axes or self-generated convection rather than the imposed flow, the intended inference fails.",
      "evidence_assessment": "Primary dissolution experiments show strong feedback between sugar shape and naturally generated flow. This also supplies a major alternative explanation that must be measured.",
      "source_url": "https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7519309/",
      "novelty": "Unverified; a familiar mechanism or existing method is not a new discovery.",
      "rank15": 8
    },
    "primary_outcome": "Agreement between residual ridge orientation and independently measured low-flow regions around a dissolving sugar specimen.",
    "comparison": "Known external flow geometries versus quiescent water and rotated specimens.",
    "controls": "Crystal orientation; initial shape; solution concentration; temperature; density-driven self-convection; illumination heating.",
    "plan": "Use controlled sugar specimens and independent flow tracers. Record shape evolution and the flow field simultaneously. Test a prediction rule on new orientations before claiming stagnant-zone inference.",
    "evidence": "Primary dissolution experiments show strong feedback between sugar shape and naturally generated flow. This also supplies a major alternative explanation that must be measured.",
    "source": "https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7519309/",
    "physical_data": "none collected",
    "dossier_text": "# 08. N1314\n\n## Prediction\n\nA dissolving sugar crystal could reveal local stagnant zones through the orientation of surviving ridges.\n\n## Primary measurement\n\nAgreement between residual ridge orientation and independently measured low-flow regions around a dissolving sugar specimen.\n\n## Comparison\n\nKnown external flow geometries versus quiescent water and rotated specimens.\n\n## Controls\n\nCrystal orientation; initial shape; solution concentration; temperature; density-driven self-convection; illumination heating.\n\n## Testing plan\n\nUse controlled sugar specimens and independent flow tracers. Record shape evolution and the flow field simultaneously. Test a prediction rule on new orientations before claiming stagnant-zone inference.\n\n## Stop or revise\n\nIf ridges follow crystal axes or self-generated convection rather than the imposed flow, the intended inference fails.\n\n## Evidence and limits\n\nPrimary dissolution experiments show strong feedback between sugar shape and naturally generated flow. This also supplies a major alternative explanation that must be measured.\n\nRelated primary-source lead: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7519309/\n\nUnverified; a familiar mechanism or existing method is not a new discovery.\n\n## Replication gate\n\nCalibrate measurement uncertainty first. Define a minimum meaningful effect in the primary outcome's units, then estimate variability across independently prepared specimens or assemblies. Use that variance for a design-specific confirmatory sample calculation. Images and repeated readings from one specimen are technical repeats, not independent replications. Randomize run order and blind labels where practical. Freeze exclusions and analysis before confirmation.\n\nA narrow interval excluding the chosen meaningful effect can count against the bounded claim; a wide interval is inconclusive. Report null and adverse results. The outline requires material and apparatus compatibility checks and is not a complete laboratory protocol.\n"
  },
  {
    "id": "N1315",
    "hypothesis": "A wet textile could identify whether water entered from vapor or droplets through the spatial order of electrical connection.",
    "test": "Measure conductivity maps.",
    "against": "Order follows total uptake alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 4,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 51,
    "literature_query": "wet textile identify whether water entered vapor droplets spatial order electrical connection experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N1315",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A wet textile could identify whether water entered from vapor or droplets through the spatial order of electrical connection.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1315",
      "hypothesis": "A wet textile could identify whether water entered from vapor or droplets through the spatial order of electrical connection.",
      "test": "Measure conductivity maps.",
      "against": "Order follows total uptake alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1315",
      "hypothesis": "A wet textile could identify whether water entered from vapor or droplets through the spatial order of electrical connection.",
      "test": "Measure conductivity maps.",
      "against": "Order follows total uptake alone.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 23,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 51,
      "literature_query": "wet textile identify whether water entered vapor droplets spatial order electrical connection experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "51",
      "id": "N1315",
      "hypothesis": "A wet textile could identify whether water entered from vapor or droplets through the spatial order of electrical connection.",
      "test": "Measure conductivity maps.",
      "against": "Order follows total uptake alone.",
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_score": "23",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P7b6e70e374cd;Pc84e1da06632;Pfc00be33bdee",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N1315",
      "hypothesis": "A wet textile could identify whether water entered from vapor or droplets through the spatial order of electrical connection.",
      "test": "Measure conductivity maps.",
      "against": "Order follows total uptake alone.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 23,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 51,
      "literature_query": "wet textile identify whether water entered vapor droplets spatial order electrical connection experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P7b6e70e374cd;Pc84e1da06632;Pfc00be33bdee",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P7b6e70e374cd;Pc84e1da06632;Pfc00be33bdee",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1316",
    "hypothesis": "A flexible straw-like tube could reduce bubble blockage by bending locally toward the bubble's low-pressure side.",
    "test": "Track bends and release.",
    "against": "Unblocking requires external squeezing.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1316",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A flexible straw-like tube could reduce bubble blockage by bending locally toward the bubble's low-pressure side.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1316",
      "hypothesis": "A flexible straw-like tube could reduce bubble blockage by bending locally toward the bubble's low-pressure side.",
      "test": "Track bends and release.",
      "against": "Unblocking requires external squeezing.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1316",
      "hypothesis": "A flexible straw-like tube could reduce bubble blockage by bending locally toward the bubble's low-pressure side.",
      "test": "Track bends and release.",
      "against": "Unblocking requires external squeezing.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1317",
    "hypothesis": "A clay-lined paper cup could retain heat longer after prewetting because evaporation closes conductive contacts.",
    "test": "Measure contacts and cooling.",
    "against": "Retention follows added heat capacity only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 4,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 18,
    "literature_query": "clay-lined paper cup retain heat longer prewetting because evaporation closes conductive contacts experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N1317",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A clay-lined paper cup could retain heat longer after prewetting because evaporation closes conductive contacts.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1317",
      "hypothesis": "A clay-lined paper cup could retain heat longer after prewetting because evaporation closes conductive contacts.",
      "test": "Measure contacts and cooling.",
      "against": "Retention follows added heat capacity only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1317",
      "hypothesis": "A clay-lined paper cup could retain heat longer after prewetting because evaporation closes conductive contacts.",
      "test": "Measure contacts and cooling.",
      "against": "Retention follows added heat capacity only.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 18,
      "literature_query": "clay-lined paper cup retain heat longer prewetting because evaporation closes conductive contacts experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "18",
      "id": "N1317",
      "hypothesis": "A clay-lined paper cup could retain heat longer after prewetting because evaporation closes conductive contacts.",
      "test": "Measure contacts and cooling.",
      "against": "Retention follows added heat capacity only.",
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_score": "24",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P00b77db82674;Pcfc23b1860b6;P6db475612a07;Pbf2bb5f3772f",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N1317",
      "hypothesis": "A clay-lined paper cup could retain heat longer after prewetting because evaporation closes conductive contacts.",
      "test": "Measure contacts and cooling.",
      "against": "Retention follows added heat capacity only.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 18,
      "literature_query": "clay-lined paper cup retain heat longer prewetting because evaporation closes conductive contacts experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P00b77db82674;Pcfc23b1860b6;P6db475612a07;Pbf2bb5f3772f",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P00b77db82674;Pcfc23b1860b6;P6db475612a07;Pbf2bb5f3772f",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1318",
    "hypothesis": "A patterned soap film could detect ambient flow reversals through persistent asymmetric drainage.",
    "test": "Measure thickness histories.",
    "against": "Asymmetry disappears immediately.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 4,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 52,
    "literature_query": "patterned soap film detect ambient flow reversals persistent asymmetric drainage experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N1318",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A patterned soap film could detect ambient flow reversals through persistent asymmetric drainage.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1318",
      "hypothesis": "A patterned soap film could detect ambient flow reversals through persistent asymmetric drainage.",
      "test": "Measure thickness histories.",
      "against": "Asymmetry disappears immediately.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1318",
      "hypothesis": "A patterned soap film could detect ambient flow reversals through persistent asymmetric drainage.",
      "test": "Measure thickness histories.",
      "against": "Asymmetry disappears immediately.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 23,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 52,
      "literature_query": "patterned soap film detect ambient flow reversals persistent asymmetric drainage experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "52",
      "id": "N1318",
      "hypothesis": "A patterned soap film could detect ambient flow reversals through persistent asymmetric drainage.",
      "test": "Measure thickness histories.",
      "against": "Asymmetry disappears immediately.",
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_score": "23",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P55da5ae5f00a;P2f7ea109b548;P17fd53832166;P1c0a60bac027;P78344fbd130a;Pe3c6b8751a4e;P04194882eca7",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N1318",
      "hypothesis": "A patterned soap film could detect ambient flow reversals through persistent asymmetric drainage.",
      "test": "Measure thickness histories.",
      "against": "Asymmetry disappears immediately.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 23,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 52,
      "literature_query": "patterned soap film detect ambient flow reversals persistent asymmetric drainage experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P55da5ae5f00a;P2f7ea109b548;P17fd53832166;P1c0a60bac027;P78344fbd130a;Pe3c6b8751a4e;P04194882eca7",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P55da5ae5f00a;P2f7ea109b548;P17fd53832166;P1c0a60bac027;P78344fbd130a;Pe3c6b8751a4e;P04194882eca7",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1319",
    "hypothesis": "A foam block could distinguish repeated squeezing from prolonged squeezing through its recovered gas distribution.",
    "test": "Image gas after matched strain dose.",
    "against": "Distribution depends only on final density.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 4,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 53,
    "literature_query": "foam block distinguish repeated squeezing prolonged squeezing recovered gas distribution experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N1319",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A foam block could distinguish repeated squeezing from prolonged squeezing through its recovered gas distribution.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1319",
      "hypothesis": "A foam block could distinguish repeated squeezing from prolonged squeezing through its recovered gas distribution.",
      "test": "Image gas after matched strain dose.",
      "against": "Distribution depends only on final density.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1319",
      "hypothesis": "A foam block could distinguish repeated squeezing from prolonged squeezing through its recovered gas distribution.",
      "test": "Image gas after matched strain dose.",
      "against": "Distribution depends only on final density.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 23,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 53,
      "literature_query": "foam block distinguish repeated squeezing prolonged squeezing recovered gas distribution experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "53",
      "id": "N1319",
      "hypothesis": "A foam block could distinguish repeated squeezing from prolonged squeezing through its recovered gas distribution.",
      "test": "Image gas after matched strain dose.",
      "against": "Distribution depends only on final density.",
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_score": "23",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P6abf42cc9613;Pa1e896ce1b46;P1259d4da7547",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N1319",
      "hypothesis": "A foam block could distinguish repeated squeezing from prolonged squeezing through its recovered gas distribution.",
      "test": "Image gas after matched strain dose.",
      "against": "Distribution depends only on final density.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 23,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 53,
      "literature_query": "foam block distinguish repeated squeezing prolonged squeezing recovered gas distribution experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P6abf42cc9613;Pa1e896ce1b46;P1259d4da7547",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P6abf42cc9613;Pa1e896ce1b46;P1259d4da7547",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1320",
    "hypothesis": "A wet sand bridge could reveal incipient failure through a change in the phase of a tiny thermal pulse.",
    "test": "Measure phase and collapse.",
    "against": "Thermal changes follow visible damage only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 4,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 54,
    "literature_query": "wet sand bridge reveal incipient failure change phase tiny thermal pulse experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N1320",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A wet sand bridge could reveal incipient failure through a change in the phase of a tiny thermal pulse.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1320",
      "hypothesis": "A wet sand bridge could reveal incipient failure through a change in the phase of a tiny thermal pulse.",
      "test": "Measure phase and collapse.",
      "against": "Thermal changes follow visible damage only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1320",
      "hypothesis": "A wet sand bridge could reveal incipient failure through a change in the phase of a tiny thermal pulse.",
      "test": "Measure phase and collapse.",
      "against": "Thermal changes follow visible damage only.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 23,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 54,
      "literature_query": "wet sand bridge reveal incipient failure change phase tiny thermal pulse experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "54",
      "id": "N1320",
      "hypothesis": "A wet sand bridge could reveal incipient failure through a change in the phase of a tiny thermal pulse.",
      "test": "Measure phase and collapse.",
      "against": "Thermal changes follow visible damage only.",
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_score": "23",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P4132697ee440;Pfd5e8f20ac0b;P5f8ee3beb1d5;Pab9bb99a4352;P2d5661cf2a90;Pd5dc656a1b09;P0aae6dee110d",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N1320",
      "hypothesis": "A wet sand bridge could reveal incipient failure through a change in the phase of a tiny thermal pulse.",
      "test": "Measure phase and collapse.",
      "against": "Thermal changes follow visible damage only.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 23,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 54,
      "literature_query": "wet sand bridge reveal incipient failure change phase tiny thermal pulse experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P4132697ee440;Pfd5e8f20ac0b;P5f8ee3beb1d5;Pab9bb99a4352;P2d5661cf2a90;Pd5dc656a1b09;P0aae6dee110d",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P4132697ee440;Pfd5e8f20ac0b;P5f8ee3beb1d5;Pab9bb99a4352;P2d5661cf2a90;Pd5dc656a1b09;P0aae6dee110d",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1321",
    "hypothesis": "A folded polymer strip could open at a reproducible solvent-vapor dose through sequential release of contacts.",
    "test": "Measure dose and contact sequence.",
    "against": "Opening follows peak concentration only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1321",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A folded polymer strip could open at a reproducible solvent-vapor dose through sequential release of contacts.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1321",
      "hypothesis": "A folded polymer strip could open at a reproducible solvent-vapor dose through sequential release of contacts.",
      "test": "Measure dose and contact sequence.",
      "against": "Opening follows peak concentration only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1321",
      "hypothesis": "A folded polymer strip could open at a reproducible solvent-vapor dose through sequential release of contacts.",
      "test": "Measure dose and contact sequence.",
      "against": "Opening follows peak concentration only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1322",
    "hypothesis": "A cellulose-particle raft could sort droplets by salt concentration through concentration-dependent sinking of local regions.",
    "test": "Measure chemistry and raft motion.",
    "against": "Sorting follows droplet mass only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1322",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A cellulose-particle raft could sort droplets by salt concentration through concentration-dependent sinking of local regions.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1322",
      "hypothesis": "A cellulose-particle raft could sort droplets by salt concentration through concentration-dependent sinking of local regions.",
      "test": "Measure chemistry and raft motion.",
      "against": "Sorting follows droplet mass only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1322",
      "hypothesis": "A cellulose-particle raft could sort droplets by salt concentration through concentration-dependent sinking of local regions.",
      "test": "Measure chemistry and raft motion.",
      "against": "Sorting follows droplet mass only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1323",
    "hypothesis": "A thin gelatin sheet could reduce cut propagation when its edges are allowed to rotate freely.",
    "test": "Measure crack work and rotation.",
    "against": "Effects follow altered tensile load only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1323",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A thin gelatin sheet could reduce cut propagation when its edges are allowed to rotate freely.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1323",
      "hypothesis": "A thin gelatin sheet could reduce cut propagation when its edges are allowed to rotate freely.",
      "test": "Measure crack work and rotation.",
      "against": "Effects follow altered tensile load only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1323",
      "hypothesis": "A thin gelatin sheet could reduce cut propagation when its edges are allowed to rotate freely.",
      "test": "Measure crack work and rotation.",
      "against": "Effects follow altered tensile load only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1324",
    "hypothesis": "A porous chalk slab could expose old wetting paths through faster uptake of a later harmless tracer.",
    "test": "Compare known path histories.",
    "against": "Preference follows remaining solute only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 4,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 19,
    "literature_query": "porous chalk slab expose old wetting paths faster uptake later harmless tracer experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N1324",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous chalk slab could expose old wetting paths through faster uptake of a later harmless tracer.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": true,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1324",
      "hypothesis": "A porous chalk slab could expose old wetting paths through faster uptake of a later harmless tracer.",
      "test": "Compare known path histories.",
      "against": "Preference follows remaining solute only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1324",
      "hypothesis": "A porous chalk slab could expose old wetting paths through faster uptake of a later harmless tracer.",
      "test": "Compare known path histories.",
      "against": "Preference follows remaining solute only.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 19,
      "literature_query": "porous chalk slab expose old wetting paths faster uptake later harmless tracer experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "19",
      "id": "N1324",
      "hypothesis": "A porous chalk slab could expose old wetting paths through faster uptake of a later harmless tracer.",
      "test": "Compare known path histories.",
      "against": "Preference follows remaining solute only.",
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_score": "24",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pc71bd3ad91b7;Peed26d27b8a4;Pdba96626537f",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N1324",
      "hypothesis": "A porous chalk slab could expose old wetting paths through faster uptake of a later harmless tracer.",
      "test": "Compare known path histories.",
      "against": "Preference follows remaining solute only.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 19,
      "literature_query": "porous chalk slab expose old wetting paths faster uptake later harmless tracer experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pc71bd3ad91b7;Peed26d27b8a4;Pdba96626537f",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "Pc71bd3ad91b7;Peed26d27b8a4;Pdba96626537f",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": {
      "rank": "13",
      "id": "N1324",
      "hypothesis": "A porous chalk slab could expose old wetting paths through faster uptake of a later harmless tracer.",
      "primary_outcome": "Prediction accuracy for later tracer uptake paths from a previously imposed water-only wetting route.",
      "comparison": "Localized first wetting versus uniform first wetting and previously unwetted chalk; control final drying duration.",
      "controls": "Chalk composition; pore structure; dissolution; residual solute; contact angle; moisture; tracer binding; specimen orientation.",
      "plan": "Use water-only conditioning so the first pass leaves no dye. Quantify mass change and moisture before the later tracer. Test independently prepared slabs and compare against pore geometry known before conditioning.",
      "against": "If the path is explained by residual tracer, remaining water, or a pre-existing crack, it is not evidence for the proposed additional structural memory.",
      "evidence": "Chalk and porous-media studies show path-dependent transport. Whether localized prior wetting predicts a later path after the selected reset remains an open comparative question.",
      "source": "https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR018254",
      "novelty": "Unverified; a familiar mechanism or existing method is not a new discovery.",
      "physical_data": "none collected"
    },
    "focused_assessment_fields": {
      "id": "N1324",
      "primary_outcome": "Prediction accuracy for later tracer uptake paths from a previously imposed water-only wetting route.",
      "comparison": "Localized first wetting versus uniform first wetting and previously unwetted chalk; control final drying duration.",
      "critical_controls": "Chalk composition; pore structure; dissolution; residual solute; contact angle; moisture; tracer binding; specimen orientation.",
      "testing_plan": "Use water-only conditioning so the first pass leaves no dye. Quantify mass change and moisture before the later tracer. Test independently prepared slabs and compare against pore geometry known before conditioning.",
      "against": "If the path is explained by residual tracer, remaining water, or a pre-existing crack, it is not evidence for the proposed additional structural memory.",
      "evidence_assessment": "Chalk and porous-media studies show path-dependent transport. Whether localized prior wetting predicts a later path after the selected reset remains an open comparative question.",
      "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR018254",
      "novelty": "Unverified; a familiar mechanism or existing method is not a new discovery.",
      "rank15": 13
    },
    "primary_outcome": "Prediction accuracy for later tracer uptake paths from a previously imposed water-only wetting route.",
    "comparison": "Localized first wetting versus uniform first wetting and previously unwetted chalk; control final drying duration.",
    "controls": "Chalk composition; pore structure; dissolution; residual solute; contact angle; moisture; tracer binding; specimen orientation.",
    "plan": "Use water-only conditioning so the first pass leaves no dye. Quantify mass change and moisture before the later tracer. Test independently prepared slabs and compare against pore geometry known before conditioning.",
    "evidence": "Chalk and porous-media studies show path-dependent transport. Whether localized prior wetting predicts a later path after the selected reset remains an open comparative question.",
    "source": "https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR018254",
    "physical_data": "none collected",
    "dossier_text": "# 13. N1324\n\n## Prediction\n\nA porous chalk slab could expose old wetting paths through faster uptake of a later harmless tracer.\n\n## Primary measurement\n\nPrediction accuracy for later tracer uptake paths from a previously imposed water-only wetting route.\n\n## Comparison\n\nLocalized first wetting versus uniform first wetting and previously unwetted chalk; control final drying duration.\n\n## Controls\n\nChalk composition; pore structure; dissolution; residual solute; contact angle; moisture; tracer binding; specimen orientation.\n\n## Testing plan\n\nUse water-only conditioning so the first pass leaves no dye. Quantify mass change and moisture before the later tracer. Test independently prepared slabs and compare against pore geometry known before conditioning.\n\n## Stop or revise\n\nIf the path is explained by residual tracer, remaining water, or a pre-existing crack, it is not evidence for the proposed additional structural memory.\n\n## Evidence and limits\n\nChalk and porous-media studies show path-dependent transport. Whether localized prior wetting predicts a later path after the selected reset remains an open comparative question.\n\nRelated primary-source lead: https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR018254\n\nUnverified; a familiar mechanism or existing method is not a new discovery.\n\n## Replication gate\n\nCalibrate measurement uncertainty first. Define a minimum meaningful effect in the primary outcome's units, then estimate variability across independently prepared specimens or assemblies. Use that variance for a design-specific confirmatory sample calculation. Images and repeated readings from one specimen are technical repeats, not independent replications. Randomize run order and blind labels where practical. Freeze exclusions and analysis before confirmation.\n\nA narrow interval excluding the chosen meaningful effect can count against the bounded claim; a wide interval is inconclusive. Report null and adverse results. The outline requires material and apparatus compatibility checks and is not a complete laboratory protocol.\n"
  },
  {
    "id": "N1325",
    "hypothesis": "A smooth glass channel could reveal liquid contamination through a change in capillary-wave reflection phase.",
    "test": "Calibrate benign contaminants.",
    "against": "Phase tracks surface tension alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1325",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A smooth glass channel could reveal liquid contamination through a change in capillary-wave reflection phase.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1325",
      "hypothesis": "A smooth glass channel could reveal liquid contamination through a change in capillary-wave reflection phase.",
      "test": "Calibrate benign contaminants.",
      "against": "Phase tracks surface tension alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1325",
      "hypothesis": "A smooth glass channel could reveal liquid contamination through a change in capillary-wave reflection phase.",
      "test": "Calibrate benign contaminants.",
      "against": "Phase tracks surface tension alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1326",
    "hypothesis": "A flexible mesh could separate leaves from rounded grains through a reversible twist under equal flow.",
    "test": "Measure shape-selective passage.",
    "against": "Sorting follows size only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1326",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A flexible mesh could separate leaves from rounded grains through a reversible twist under equal flow.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1326",
      "hypothesis": "A flexible mesh could separate leaves from rounded grains through a reversible twist under equal flow.",
      "test": "Measure shape-selective passage.",
      "against": "Sorting follows size only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1326",
      "hypothesis": "A flexible mesh could separate leaves from rounded grains through a reversible twist under equal flow.",
      "test": "Measure shape-selective passage.",
      "against": "Sorting follows size only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1327",
    "hypothesis": "A starch-coated thread could retain a mechanical load history through delayed hydration rather than visible deformation.",
    "test": "Measure uptake after unloading.",
    "against": "Uptake follows residual shape alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 4,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 55,
    "literature_query": "starch-coated thread retain mechanical load history delayed hydration visible deformation experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N1327",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A starch-coated thread could retain a mechanical load history through delayed hydration rather than visible deformation.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1327",
      "hypothesis": "A starch-coated thread could retain a mechanical load history through delayed hydration rather than visible deformation.",
      "test": "Measure uptake after unloading.",
      "against": "Uptake follows residual shape alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1327",
      "hypothesis": "A starch-coated thread could retain a mechanical load history through delayed hydration rather than visible deformation.",
      "test": "Measure uptake after unloading.",
      "against": "Uptake follows residual shape alone.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 23,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 55,
      "literature_query": "starch-coated thread retain mechanical load history delayed hydration visible deformation experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "55",
      "id": "N1327",
      "hypothesis": "A starch-coated thread could retain a mechanical load history through delayed hydration rather than visible deformation.",
      "test": "Measure uptake after unloading.",
      "against": "Uptake follows residual shape alone.",
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_score": "23",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pf1b7f6015dd2;Pf022dcdd5f30;Pab9b097a5cda;P4a82612e1a00",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N1327",
      "hypothesis": "A starch-coated thread could retain a mechanical load history through delayed hydration rather than visible deformation.",
      "test": "Measure uptake after unloading.",
      "against": "Uptake follows residual shape alone.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 23,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 55,
      "literature_query": "starch-coated thread retain mechanical load history delayed hydration visible deformation experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pf1b7f6015dd2;Pf022dcdd5f30;Pab9b097a5cda;P4a82612e1a00",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "Pf1b7f6015dd2;Pf022dcdd5f30;Pab9b097a5cda;P4a82612e1a00",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1328",
    "hypothesis": "A moist paper stack could reduce pressure peaks by moving vapor between sheets during compression.",
    "test": "Measure vapor and force.",
    "against": "Damping requires liquid squeezing only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 4,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 20,
    "literature_query": "moist paper stack reduce pressure peaks moving vapor between sheets compression experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N1328",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A moist paper stack could reduce pressure peaks by moving vapor between sheets during compression.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1328",
      "hypothesis": "A moist paper stack could reduce pressure peaks by moving vapor between sheets during compression.",
      "test": "Measure vapor and force.",
      "against": "Damping requires liquid squeezing only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1328",
      "hypothesis": "A moist paper stack could reduce pressure peaks by moving vapor between sheets during compression.",
      "test": "Measure vapor and force.",
      "against": "Damping requires liquid squeezing only.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 20,
      "literature_query": "moist paper stack reduce pressure peaks moving vapor between sheets compression experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "20",
      "id": "N1328",
      "hypothesis": "A moist paper stack could reduce pressure peaks by moving vapor between sheets during compression.",
      "test": "Measure vapor and force.",
      "against": "Damping requires liquid squeezing only.",
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_score": "24",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P614175f502d3;P03cb9d87d7ff;Pf3335f2b1504",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N1328",
      "hypothesis": "A moist paper stack could reduce pressure peaks by moving vapor between sheets during compression.",
      "test": "Measure vapor and force.",
      "against": "Damping requires liquid squeezing only.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 20,
      "literature_query": "moist paper stack reduce pressure peaks moving vapor between sheets compression experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P614175f502d3;P03cb9d87d7ff;Pf3335f2b1504",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P614175f502d3;P03cb9d87d7ff;Pf3335f2b1504",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1329",
    "hypothesis": "A water-soaked wooden ring could reveal grain-direction defects through uneven recovery after a thermal pulse.",
    "test": "Map deformation and grain.",
    "against": "Unevenness follows initial geometry only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 4,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1329",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A water-soaked wooden ring could reveal grain-direction defects through uneven recovery after a thermal pulse.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1329",
      "hypothesis": "A water-soaked wooden ring could reveal grain-direction defects through uneven recovery after a thermal pulse.",
      "test": "Map deformation and grain.",
      "against": "Unevenness follows initial geometry only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1329",
      "hypothesis": "A water-soaked wooden ring could reveal grain-direction defects through uneven recovery after a thermal pulse.",
      "test": "Map deformation and grain.",
      "against": "Unevenness follows initial geometry only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1330",
    "hypothesis": "A thin clay film could redistribute fine particles toward developing cracks before they become optically visible.",
    "test": "Track particles and crack onset.",
    "against": "Particles move only after opening.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 145,
    "literature_query": "thin clay film redistribute fine particles toward developing cracks they become optically visible experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N1330",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A thin clay film could redistribute fine particles toward developing cracks before they become optically visible.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": true,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1330",
      "hypothesis": "A thin clay film could redistribute fine particles toward developing cracks before they become optically visible.",
      "test": "Track particles and crack onset.",
      "against": "Particles move only after opening.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1330",
      "hypothesis": "A thin clay film could redistribute fine particles toward developing cracks before they become optically visible.",
      "test": "Track particles and crack onset.",
      "against": "Particles move only after opening.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 145,
      "literature_query": "thin clay film redistribute fine particles toward developing cracks they become optically visible experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "145",
      "id": "N1330",
      "hypothesis": "A thin clay film could redistribute fine particles toward developing cracks before they become optically visible.",
      "test": "Track particles and crack onset.",
      "against": "Particles move only after opening.",
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_score": "21",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P19b9695e9000;Pba8924c3ab47;P3ea3f3c9b46d;Pf0c4fd260628",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N1330",
      "hypothesis": "A thin clay film could redistribute fine particles toward developing cracks before they become optically visible.",
      "test": "Track particles and crack onset.",
      "against": "Particles move only after opening.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 145,
      "literature_query": "thin clay film redistribute fine particles toward developing cracks they become optically visible experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P19b9695e9000;Pba8924c3ab47;P3ea3f3c9b46d;Pf0c4fd260628",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P19b9695e9000;Pba8924c3ab47;P3ea3f3c9b46d;Pf0c4fd260628",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": {
      "rank": "11",
      "id": "N1330",
      "hypothesis": "A thin clay film could redistribute fine particles toward developing cracks before they become optically visible.",
      "primary_outcome": "Particle migration toward independently located developing cracks before a fixed optical crack-detection threshold.",
      "comparison": "Drying clay film with mobile inert tracer particles versus non-drying, noncracking, and immobilized-tracer references.",
      "controls": "Film thickness; substrate restraint; evaporation; particle adhesion; imaging resolution; initial concentration; bulk shrinkage.",
      "plan": "Register optical resolution in advance and track particle motion relative to the moving solid, not the camera. Independently measure local strain. Distinguish migration from apparent movement caused by whole-film deformation.",
      "against": "If particle motion follows the matrix or starts only after crack opening at the stated resolution, it is not the proposed precursor.",
      "evidence": "Primary drying-colloid work links pore flow, tensile stress, and crack formation. That does not directly show fines migrating toward unseen cracks.",
      "source": "https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11389785",
      "novelty": "Unverified; a familiar mechanism or existing method is not a new discovery.",
      "physical_data": "none collected"
    },
    "focused_assessment_fields": {
      "id": "N1330",
      "primary_outcome": "Particle migration toward independently located developing cracks before a fixed optical crack-detection threshold.",
      "comparison": "Drying clay film with mobile inert tracer particles versus non-drying, noncracking, and immobilized-tracer references.",
      "critical_controls": "Film thickness; substrate restraint; evaporation; particle adhesion; imaging resolution; initial concentration; bulk shrinkage.",
      "testing_plan": "Register optical resolution in advance and track particle motion relative to the moving solid, not the camera. Independently measure local strain. Distinguish migration from apparent movement caused by whole-film deformation.",
      "against": "If particle motion follows the matrix or starts only after crack opening at the stated resolution, it is not the proposed precursor.",
      "evidence_assessment": "Primary drying-colloid work links pore flow, tensile stress, and crack formation. That does not directly show fines migrating toward unseen cracks.",
      "source_url": "https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11389785",
      "novelty": "Unverified; a familiar mechanism or existing method is not a new discovery.",
      "rank15": 11
    },
    "primary_outcome": "Particle migration toward independently located developing cracks before a fixed optical crack-detection threshold.",
    "comparison": "Drying clay film with mobile inert tracer particles versus non-drying, noncracking, and immobilized-tracer references.",
    "controls": "Film thickness; substrate restraint; evaporation; particle adhesion; imaging resolution; initial concentration; bulk shrinkage.",
    "plan": "Register optical resolution in advance and track particle motion relative to the moving solid, not the camera. Independently measure local strain. Distinguish migration from apparent movement caused by whole-film deformation.",
    "evidence": "Primary drying-colloid work links pore flow, tensile stress, and crack formation. That does not directly show fines migrating toward unseen cracks.",
    "source": "https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11389785",
    "physical_data": "none collected",
    "dossier_text": "# 11. N1330\n\n## Prediction\n\nA thin clay film could redistribute fine particles toward developing cracks before they become optically visible.\n\n## Primary measurement\n\nParticle migration toward independently located developing cracks before a fixed optical crack-detection threshold.\n\n## Comparison\n\nDrying clay film with mobile inert tracer particles versus non-drying, noncracking, and immobilized-tracer references.\n\n## Controls\n\nFilm thickness; substrate restraint; evaporation; particle adhesion; imaging resolution; initial concentration; bulk shrinkage.\n\n## Testing plan\n\nRegister optical resolution in advance and track particle motion relative to the moving solid, not the camera. Independently measure local strain. Distinguish migration from apparent movement caused by whole-film deformation.\n\n## Stop or revise\n\nIf particle motion follows the matrix or starts only after crack opening at the stated resolution, it is not the proposed precursor.\n\n## Evidence and limits\n\nPrimary drying-colloid work links pore flow, tensile stress, and crack formation. That does not directly show fines migrating toward unseen cracks.\n\nRelated primary-source lead: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11389785\n\nUnverified; a familiar mechanism or existing method is not a new discovery.\n\n## Replication gate\n\nCalibrate measurement uncertainty first. Define a minimum meaningful effect in the primary outcome's units, then estimate variability across independently prepared specimens or assemblies. Use that variance for a design-specific confirmatory sample calculation. Images and repeated readings from one specimen are technical repeats, not independent replications. Randomize run order and blind labels where practical. Freeze exclusions and analysis before confirmation.\n\nA narrow interval excluding the chosen meaningful effect can count against the bounded claim; a wide interval is inconclusive. Report null and adverse results. The outline requires material and apparatus compatibility checks and is not a complete laboratory protocol.\n"
  },
  {
    "id": "N1331",
    "hypothesis": "A packed powder could retain less static charge when its container has a compliant rather than rigid base.",
    "test": "Measure charge and contact forces.",
    "against": "Reduction follows grounding differences only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1331",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A packed powder could retain less static charge when its container has a compliant rather than rigid base.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1331",
      "hypothesis": "A packed powder could retain less static charge when its container has a compliant rather than rigid base.",
      "test": "Measure charge and contact forces.",
      "against": "Reduction follows grounding differences only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1331",
      "hypothesis": "A packed powder could retain less static charge when its container has a compliant rather than rigid base.",
      "test": "Measure charge and contact forces.",
      "against": "Reduction follows grounding differences only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1332",
    "hypothesis": "A droplet on a vibrating reed could detect reed damage through hysteresis of its oscillation axis.",
    "test": "Compare known damage states.",
    "against": "Hysteresis follows droplet size only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1332",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A droplet on a vibrating reed could detect reed damage through hysteresis of its oscillation axis.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1332",
      "hypothesis": "A droplet on a vibrating reed could detect reed damage through hysteresis of its oscillation axis.",
      "test": "Compare known damage states.",
      "against": "Hysteresis follows droplet size only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1332",
      "hypothesis": "A droplet on a vibrating reed could detect reed damage through hysteresis of its oscillation axis.",
      "test": "Compare known damage states.",
      "against": "Hysteresis follows droplet size only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1333",
    "hypothesis": "A porous wick could release a dissolved probe in periodic bursts when its supply reservoir is held at constant level.",
    "test": "Measure fronts and outlet composition.",
    "against": "Bursts reflect reservoir fluctuations.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 4,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 21,
    "literature_query": "porous wick release dissolved probe periodic bursts when supply reservoir is held constant level experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N1333",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous wick could release a dissolved probe in periodic bursts when its supply reservoir is held at constant level.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1333",
      "hypothesis": "A porous wick could release a dissolved probe in periodic bursts when its supply reservoir is held at constant level.",
      "test": "Measure fronts and outlet composition.",
      "against": "Bursts reflect reservoir fluctuations.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1333",
      "hypothesis": "A porous wick could release a dissolved probe in periodic bursts when its supply reservoir is held at constant level.",
      "test": "Measure fronts and outlet composition.",
      "against": "Bursts reflect reservoir fluctuations.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 21,
      "literature_query": "porous wick release dissolved probe periodic bursts when supply reservoir is held constant level experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "21",
      "id": "N1333",
      "hypothesis": "A porous wick could release a dissolved probe in periodic bursts when its supply reservoir is held at constant level.",
      "test": "Measure fronts and outlet composition.",
      "against": "Bursts reflect reservoir fluctuations.",
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_score": "24",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P3fcb17b62cd8;Pa96b65f91bdd",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N1333",
      "hypothesis": "A porous wick could release a dissolved probe in periodic bursts when its supply reservoir is held at constant level.",
      "test": "Measure fronts and outlet composition.",
      "against": "Bursts reflect reservoir fluctuations.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 21,
      "literature_query": "porous wick release dissolved probe periodic bursts when supply reservoir is held constant level experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P3fcb17b62cd8;Pa96b65f91bdd",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P3fcb17b62cd8;Pa96b65f91bdd",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1334",
    "hypothesis": "A paper honeycomb could maintain stiffness after local wetting by transferring compression to neighboring dry cells.",
    "test": "Map cell forces.",
    "against": "Retention requires reduced applied load.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 4,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 22,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 67,
    "literature_query": "paper honeycomb maintain stiffness local wetting transferring compression neighboring dry cells experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N1334",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A paper honeycomb could maintain stiffness after local wetting by transferring compression to neighboring dry cells.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1334",
      "hypothesis": "A paper honeycomb could maintain stiffness after local wetting by transferring compression to neighboring dry cells.",
      "test": "Map cell forces.",
      "against": "Retention requires reduced applied load.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1334",
      "hypothesis": "A paper honeycomb could maintain stiffness after local wetting by transferring compression to neighboring dry cells.",
      "test": "Map cell forces.",
      "against": "Retention requires reduced applied load.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 22,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 67,
      "literature_query": "paper honeycomb maintain stiffness local wetting transferring compression neighboring dry cells experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "67",
      "id": "N1334",
      "hypothesis": "A paper honeycomb could maintain stiffness after local wetting by transferring compression to neighboring dry cells.",
      "test": "Map cell forces.",
      "against": "Retention requires reduced applied load.",
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_score": "22",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P6a5ca6103a58;P30ba0490b6f1;P0e6215515b43;P42867b341678;Pe0eb115f3f4b;Pa7e8bd440a97",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N1334",
      "hypothesis": "A paper honeycomb could maintain stiffness after local wetting by transferring compression to neighboring dry cells.",
      "test": "Map cell forces.",
      "against": "Retention requires reduced applied load.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 22,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 67,
      "literature_query": "paper honeycomb maintain stiffness local wetting transferring compression neighboring dry cells experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P6a5ca6103a58;P30ba0490b6f1;P0e6215515b43;P42867b341678;Pe0eb115f3f4b;Pa7e8bd440a97",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P6a5ca6103a58;P30ba0490b6f1;P0e6215515b43;P42867b341678;Pe0eb115f3f4b;Pa7e8bd440a97",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1335",
    "hypothesis": "A smooth rubber sheet could shed inert powder through recoil from a localized water droplet.",
    "test": "Measure particles and sheet motion.",
    "against": "Removal requires water contact with powder.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 4,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 22,
    "literature_query": "smooth rubber sheet shed inert powder recoil localized water droplet experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N1335",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A smooth rubber sheet could shed inert powder through recoil from a localized water droplet.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1335",
      "hypothesis": "A smooth rubber sheet could shed inert powder through recoil from a localized water droplet.",
      "test": "Measure particles and sheet motion.",
      "against": "Removal requires water contact with powder.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1335",
      "hypothesis": "A smooth rubber sheet could shed inert powder through recoil from a localized water droplet.",
      "test": "Measure particles and sheet motion.",
      "against": "Removal requires water contact with powder.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 22,
      "literature_query": "smooth rubber sheet shed inert powder recoil localized water droplet experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "22",
      "id": "N1335",
      "hypothesis": "A smooth rubber sheet could shed inert powder through recoil from a localized water droplet.",
      "test": "Measure particles and sheet motion.",
      "against": "Removal requires water contact with powder.",
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_score": "24",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pc8a780db8d44;Pab1b4184aea8;P34940896ac28;P28d535b88350",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N1335",
      "hypothesis": "A smooth rubber sheet could shed inert powder through recoil from a localized water droplet.",
      "test": "Measure particles and sheet motion.",
      "against": "Removal requires water contact with powder.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 22,
      "literature_query": "smooth rubber sheet shed inert powder recoil localized water droplet experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pc8a780db8d44;Pab1b4184aea8;P34940896ac28;P28d535b88350",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "Pc8a780db8d44;Pab1b4184aea8;P34940896ac28;P28d535b88350",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1336",
    "hypothesis": "A salt-containing gel could reveal internal concentration gradients through directional acoustic attenuation at equal average salinity.",
    "test": "Measure gradients independently.",
    "against": "Attenuation follows mean salinity only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1336",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A salt-containing gel could reveal internal concentration gradients through directional acoustic attenuation at equal average salinity.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1336",
      "hypothesis": "A salt-containing gel could reveal internal concentration gradients through directional acoustic attenuation at equal average salinity.",
      "test": "Measure gradients independently.",
      "against": "Attenuation follows mean salinity only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1336",
      "hypothesis": "A salt-containing gel could reveal internal concentration gradients through directional acoustic attenuation at equal average salinity.",
      "test": "Measure gradients independently.",
      "against": "Attenuation follows mean salinity only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1337",
    "hypothesis": "A capillary tube bundle could smooth concentration fluctuations without equally smoothing flow pulses.",
    "test": "Measure both signals.",
    "against": "Both smoothing times remain identical.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 4,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 23,
    "literature_query": "capillary tube bundle smooth concentration fluctuations equally smoothing flow pulses experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N1337",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A capillary tube bundle could smooth concentration fluctuations without equally smoothing flow pulses.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": true,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1337",
      "hypothesis": "A capillary tube bundle could smooth concentration fluctuations without equally smoothing flow pulses.",
      "test": "Measure both signals.",
      "against": "Both smoothing times remain identical.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1337",
      "hypothesis": "A capillary tube bundle could smooth concentration fluctuations without equally smoothing flow pulses.",
      "test": "Measure both signals.",
      "against": "Both smoothing times remain identical.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 23,
      "literature_query": "capillary tube bundle smooth concentration fluctuations equally smoothing flow pulses experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "23",
      "id": "N1337",
      "hypothesis": "A capillary tube bundle could smooth concentration fluctuations without equally smoothing flow pulses.",
      "test": "Measure both signals.",
      "against": "Both smoothing times remain identical.",
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_score": "24",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P0bf9a355f7da;P92e7bc756bc0;P94314ba335b8;P0471eaf7b9fc;Paad4e3bf0a3a",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N1337",
      "hypothesis": "A capillary tube bundle could smooth concentration fluctuations without equally smoothing flow pulses.",
      "test": "Measure both signals.",
      "against": "Both smoothing times remain identical.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 23,
      "literature_query": "capillary tube bundle smooth concentration fluctuations equally smoothing flow pulses experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P0bf9a355f7da;P92e7bc756bc0;P94314ba335b8;P0471eaf7b9fc;Paad4e3bf0a3a",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P0bf9a355f7da;P92e7bc756bc0;P94314ba335b8;P0471eaf7b9fc;Paad4e3bf0a3a",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": {
      "rank": "4",
      "id": "N1337",
      "hypothesis": "A capillary tube bundle could smooth concentration fluctuations without equally smoothing flow pulses.",
      "primary_outcome": "Ratio of concentration-pulse broadening to flow-pulse broadening, using independently measured arrival times.",
      "comparison": "Capillary bundle versus an equal-volume single path; measure concentration and pressure/flow impulse responses independently.",
      "controls": "Tube length, radius distribution, compliance, inlet dose, tracer adsorption, flow regime, total volume, and detector bandwidth.",
      "plan": "Use a compatible nonbinding tracer and low-pressure flow. Characterize transit distributions before comparing pulse smoothing. Record pressure and collected volume as well as tracer signal. Do not compare detectors with different uncorrected time response.",
      "against": "If both signals broaden equally or differences follow adsorption and sensor lag, the proposed selective smoothing is unsupported.",
      "evidence": "Taylor dispersion establishes a mechanism for solute spreading distinct from pressure propagation. It does not by itself validate a particular bundle design or preservation of sharp flow pulses.",
      "source": "https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1953.0139",
      "novelty": "Unverified; a familiar mechanism or existing method is not a new discovery.",
      "physical_data": "none collected"
    },
    "focused_assessment_fields": {
      "id": "N1337",
      "primary_outcome": "Ratio of concentration-pulse broadening to flow-pulse broadening, using independently measured arrival times.",
      "comparison": "Capillary bundle versus an equal-volume single path; measure concentration and pressure/flow impulse responses independently.",
      "critical_controls": "Tube length, radius distribution, compliance, inlet dose, tracer adsorption, flow regime, total volume, and detector bandwidth.",
      "testing_plan": "Use a compatible nonbinding tracer and low-pressure flow. Characterize transit distributions before comparing pulse smoothing. Record pressure and collected volume as well as tracer signal. Do not compare detectors with different uncorrected time response.",
      "against": "If both signals broaden equally or differences follow adsorption and sensor lag, the proposed selective smoothing is unsupported.",
      "evidence_assessment": "Taylor dispersion establishes a mechanism for solute spreading distinct from pressure propagation. It does not by itself validate a particular bundle design or preservation of sharp flow pulses.",
      "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1953.0139",
      "novelty": "Unverified; a familiar mechanism or existing method is not a new discovery.",
      "rank15": 4
    },
    "primary_outcome": "Ratio of concentration-pulse broadening to flow-pulse broadening, using independently measured arrival times.",
    "comparison": "Capillary bundle versus an equal-volume single path; measure concentration and pressure/flow impulse responses independently.",
    "controls": "Tube length, radius distribution, compliance, inlet dose, tracer adsorption, flow regime, total volume, and detector bandwidth.",
    "plan": "Use a compatible nonbinding tracer and low-pressure flow. Characterize transit distributions before comparing pulse smoothing. Record pressure and collected volume as well as tracer signal. Do not compare detectors with different uncorrected time response.",
    "evidence": "Taylor dispersion establishes a mechanism for solute spreading distinct from pressure propagation. It does not by itself validate a particular bundle design or preservation of sharp flow pulses.",
    "source": "https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1953.0139",
    "physical_data": "none collected",
    "dossier_text": "# 04. N1337\n\n## Prediction\n\nA capillary tube bundle could smooth concentration fluctuations without equally smoothing flow pulses.\n\n## Primary measurement\n\nRatio of concentration-pulse broadening to flow-pulse broadening, using independently measured arrival times.\n\n## Comparison\n\nCapillary bundle versus an equal-volume single path; measure concentration and pressure/flow impulse responses independently.\n\n## Controls\n\nTube length, radius distribution, compliance, inlet dose, tracer adsorption, flow regime, total volume, and detector bandwidth.\n\n## Testing plan\n\nUse a compatible nonbinding tracer and low-pressure flow. Characterize transit distributions before comparing pulse smoothing. Record pressure and collected volume as well as tracer signal. Do not compare detectors with different uncorrected time response.\n\n## Stop or revise\n\nIf both signals broaden equally or differences follow adsorption and sensor lag, the proposed selective smoothing is unsupported.\n\n## Evidence and limits\n\nTaylor dispersion establishes a mechanism for solute spreading distinct from pressure propagation. It does not by itself validate a particular bundle design or preservation of sharp flow pulses.\n\nRelated primary-source lead: https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1953.0139\n\nUnverified; a familiar mechanism or existing method is not a new discovery.\n\n## Replication gate\n\nCalibrate measurement uncertainty first. Define a minimum meaningful effect in the primary outcome's units, then estimate variability across independently prepared specimens or assemblies. Use that variance for a design-specific confirmatory sample calculation. Images and repeated readings from one specimen are technical repeats, not independent replications. Randomize run order and blind labels where practical. Freeze exclusions and analysis before confirmation.\n\nA narrow interval excluding the chosen meaningful effect can count against the bounded claim; a wide interval is inconclusive. Report null and adverse results. The outline requires material and apparatus compatibility checks and is not a complete laboratory protocol.\n"
  },
  {
    "id": "N1338",
    "hypothesis": "A thin resin film could identify a buried grain through the direction of a propagating optical stress halo.",
    "test": "Compare halos and inclusion position.",
    "against": "Localization follows visible surface defects only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1338",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A thin resin film could identify a buried grain through the direction of a propagating optical stress halo.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1338",
      "hypothesis": "A thin resin film could identify a buried grain through the direction of a propagating optical stress halo.",
      "test": "Compare halos and inclusion position.",
      "against": "Localization follows visible surface defects only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1338",
      "hypothesis": "A thin resin film could identify a buried grain through the direction of a propagating optical stress halo.",
      "test": "Compare halos and inclusion position.",
      "against": "Localization follows visible surface defects only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1339",
    "hypothesis": "A porous plaster block could become more resistant to wet abrasion after a controlled redistribution of fine crystals.",
    "test": "Measure surface structure and wear.",
    "against": "Resistance requires higher bulk density.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 4,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 24,
    "literature_query": "porous plaster block become resistant wet abrasion controlled redistribution fine crystals experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N1339",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous plaster block could become more resistant to wet abrasion after a controlled redistribution of fine crystals.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1339",
      "hypothesis": "A porous plaster block could become more resistant to wet abrasion after a controlled redistribution of fine crystals.",
      "test": "Measure surface structure and wear.",
      "against": "Resistance requires higher bulk density.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1339",
      "hypothesis": "A porous plaster block could become more resistant to wet abrasion after a controlled redistribution of fine crystals.",
      "test": "Measure surface structure and wear.",
      "against": "Resistance requires higher bulk density.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 24,
      "literature_query": "porous plaster block become resistant wet abrasion controlled redistribution fine crystals experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "24",
      "id": "N1339",
      "hypothesis": "A porous plaster block could become more resistant to wet abrasion after a controlled redistribution of fine crystals.",
      "test": "Measure surface structure and wear.",
      "against": "Resistance requires higher bulk density.",
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_score": "24",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pe200166f77fb;P1d217a4ddce0;Pa0286ab7271f;Pf77a62e5eaeb;Pbfc4bf2bc0c8",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N1339",
      "hypothesis": "A porous plaster block could become more resistant to wet abrasion after a controlled redistribution of fine crystals.",
      "test": "Measure surface structure and wear.",
      "against": "Resistance requires higher bulk density.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 24,
      "literature_query": "porous plaster block become resistant wet abrasion controlled redistribution fine crystals experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pe200166f77fb;P1d217a4ddce0;Pa0286ab7271f;Pf77a62e5eaeb;Pbfc4bf2bc0c8",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "Pe200166f77fb;P1d217a4ddce0;Pa0286ab7271f;Pf77a62e5eaeb;Pbfc4bf2bc0c8",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1340",
    "hypothesis": "A wet fiber loop could convert evaporation into repeated small mechanical steps by alternately pinning its contact line.",
    "test": "Track mass and displacement.",
    "against": "Motion is only continuous shrinkage.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1340",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A wet fiber loop could convert evaporation into repeated small mechanical steps by alternately pinning its contact line.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1340",
      "hypothesis": "A wet fiber loop could convert evaporation into repeated small mechanical steps by alternately pinning its contact line.",
      "test": "Track mass and displacement.",
      "against": "Motion is only continuous shrinkage.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1340",
      "hypothesis": "A wet fiber loop could convert evaporation into repeated small mechanical steps by alternately pinning its contact line.",
      "test": "Track mass and displacement.",
      "against": "Motion is only continuous shrinkage.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1341",
    "hypothesis": "A textured glass plate could separate retained droplets by their internal particle concentration during gentle tilting.",
    "test": "Measure composition and motion.",
    "against": "Separation follows volume alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1341",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A textured glass plate could separate retained droplets by their internal particle concentration during gentle tilting.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1341",
      "hypothesis": "A textured glass plate could separate retained droplets by their internal particle concentration during gentle tilting.",
      "test": "Measure composition and motion.",
      "against": "Separation follows volume alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1341",
      "hypothesis": "A textured glass plate could separate retained droplets by their internal particle concentration during gentle tilting.",
      "test": "Measure composition and motion.",
      "against": "Separation follows volume alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1342",
    "hypothesis": "A thin foam sheet could report where it was previously bent through local differences in rewetting speed.",
    "test": "Compare uptake maps after shape recovery.",
    "against": "Differences require permanent cracks.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 4,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 25,
    "literature_query": "thin foam sheet report where it was previously bent local differences rewetting speed experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N1342",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A thin foam sheet could report where it was previously bent through local differences in rewetting speed.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": true,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1342",
      "hypothesis": "A thin foam sheet could report where it was previously bent through local differences in rewetting speed.",
      "test": "Compare uptake maps after shape recovery.",
      "against": "Differences require permanent cracks.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1342",
      "hypothesis": "A thin foam sheet could report where it was previously bent through local differences in rewetting speed.",
      "test": "Compare uptake maps after shape recovery.",
      "against": "Differences require permanent cracks.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 25,
      "literature_query": "thin foam sheet report where it was previously bent local differences rewetting speed experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "25",
      "id": "N1342",
      "hypothesis": "A thin foam sheet could report where it was previously bent through local differences in rewetting speed.",
      "test": "Compare uptake maps after shape recovery.",
      "against": "Differences require permanent cracks.",
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_score": "24",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P3b36b8008d30;P798c04761e00;Pe502f67a6e9d;Pd4aa671f399b;P7525152c4b7d",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N1342",
      "hypothesis": "A thin foam sheet could report where it was previously bent through local differences in rewetting speed.",
      "test": "Compare uptake maps after shape recovery.",
      "against": "Differences require permanent cracks.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 25,
      "literature_query": "thin foam sheet report where it was previously bent local differences rewetting speed experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P3b36b8008d30;P798c04761e00;Pe502f67a6e9d;Pd4aa671f399b;P7525152c4b7d",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P3b36b8008d30;P798c04761e00;Pe502f67a6e9d;Pd4aa671f399b;P7525152c4b7d",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": {
      "rank": "14",
      "id": "N1342",
      "hypothesis": "A thin foam sheet could report where it was previously bent through local differences in rewetting speed.",
      "primary_outcome": "Spatial classification accuracy for previously bent foam regions from normalized later uptake time.",
      "comparison": "Locally bent foam versus unbent foam and deliberately microcracked foam, all with recovered overall thickness.",
      "controls": "Open versus closed cells; surface finish; density; residual deformation; microcracks; hydrophobicity; water temperature.",
      "plan": "First verify that the chosen foam has measurable repeatable uptake. Blind the loading locations and compare uptake maps with independent pore-damage images. Separate persistent damage from reversible mechanical memory.",
      "against": "If only cracked foam gives a signal, report damage detection rather than a reversible bend-memory mechanism.",
      "evidence": "Fatigue experiments document persistent changes in foam cells despite partial macroscopic recovery. This supports a possible signal while threatening the claimed reversible interpretation.",
      "source": "https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014294182300274X",
      "novelty": "Unverified; a familiar mechanism or existing method is not a new discovery.",
      "physical_data": "none collected"
    },
    "focused_assessment_fields": {
      "id": "N1342",
      "primary_outcome": "Spatial classification accuracy for previously bent foam regions from normalized later uptake time.",
      "comparison": "Locally bent foam versus unbent foam and deliberately microcracked foam, all with recovered overall thickness.",
      "critical_controls": "Open versus closed cells; surface finish; density; residual deformation; microcracks; hydrophobicity; water temperature.",
      "testing_plan": "First verify that the chosen foam has measurable repeatable uptake. Blind the loading locations and compare uptake maps with independent pore-damage images. Separate persistent damage from reversible mechanical memory.",
      "against": "If only cracked foam gives a signal, report damage detection rather than a reversible bend-memory mechanism.",
      "evidence_assessment": "Fatigue experiments document persistent changes in foam cells despite partial macroscopic recovery. This supports a possible signal while threatening the claimed reversible interpretation.",
      "source_url": "https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014294182300274X",
      "novelty": "Unverified; a familiar mechanism or existing method is not a new discovery.",
      "rank15": 14
    },
    "primary_outcome": "Spatial classification accuracy for previously bent foam regions from normalized later uptake time.",
    "comparison": "Locally bent foam versus unbent foam and deliberately microcracked foam, all with recovered overall thickness.",
    "controls": "Open versus closed cells; surface finish; density; residual deformation; microcracks; hydrophobicity; water temperature.",
    "plan": "First verify that the chosen foam has measurable repeatable uptake. Blind the loading locations and compare uptake maps with independent pore-damage images. Separate persistent damage from reversible mechanical memory.",
    "evidence": "Fatigue experiments document persistent changes in foam cells despite partial macroscopic recovery. This supports a possible signal while threatening the claimed reversible interpretation.",
    "source": "https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014294182300274X",
    "physical_data": "none collected",
    "dossier_text": "# 14. N1342\n\n## Prediction\n\nA thin foam sheet could report where it was previously bent through local differences in rewetting speed.\n\n## Primary measurement\n\nSpatial classification accuracy for previously bent foam regions from normalized later uptake time.\n\n## Comparison\n\nLocally bent foam versus unbent foam and deliberately microcracked foam, all with recovered overall thickness.\n\n## Controls\n\nOpen versus closed cells; surface finish; density; residual deformation; microcracks; hydrophobicity; water temperature.\n\n## Testing plan\n\nFirst verify that the chosen foam has measurable repeatable uptake. Blind the loading locations and compare uptake maps with independent pore-damage images. Separate persistent damage from reversible mechanical memory.\n\n## Stop or revise\n\nIf only cracked foam gives a signal, report damage detection rather than a reversible bend-memory mechanism.\n\n## Evidence and limits\n\nFatigue experiments document persistent changes in foam cells despite partial macroscopic recovery. This supports a possible signal while threatening the claimed reversible interpretation.\n\nRelated primary-source lead: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014294182300274X\n\nUnverified; a familiar mechanism or existing method is not a new discovery.\n\n## Replication gate\n\nCalibrate measurement uncertainty first. Define a minimum meaningful effect in the primary outcome's units, then estimate variability across independently prepared specimens or assemblies. Use that variance for a design-specific confirmatory sample calculation. Images and repeated readings from one specimen are technical repeats, not independent replications. Randomize run order and blind labels where practical. Freeze exclusions and analysis before confirmation.\n\nA narrow interval excluding the chosen meaningful effect can count against the bounded claim; a wide interval is inconclusive. Report null and adverse results. The outline requires material and apparatus compatibility checks and is not a complete laboratory protocol.\n"
  },
  {
    "id": "N1343",
    "hypothesis": "A cellulose sponge could suppress odorless benign vapor bursts through reversible internal condensation rather than adsorption.",
    "test": "Measure phase and outlet vapor.",
    "against": "Buffering follows adsorption capacity only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1343",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A cellulose sponge could suppress odorless benign vapor bursts through reversible internal condensation rather than adsorption.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1343",
      "hypothesis": "A cellulose sponge could suppress odorless benign vapor bursts through reversible internal condensation rather than adsorption.",
      "test": "Measure phase and outlet vapor.",
      "against": "Buffering follows adsorption capacity only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1343",
      "hypothesis": "A cellulose sponge could suppress odorless benign vapor bursts through reversible internal condensation rather than adsorption.",
      "test": "Measure phase and outlet vapor.",
      "against": "Buffering follows adsorption capacity only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1344",
    "hypothesis": "A sand bed could reveal a buried drain through the spatial timing of surface cooling after wetting.",
    "test": "Compare cooling and known drain locations.",
    "against": "Timing follows surface moisture alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 4,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 56,
    "literature_query": "sand bed reveal buried drain spatial timing surface cooling wetting experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N1344",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A sand bed could reveal a buried drain through the spatial timing of surface cooling after wetting.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": true,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1344",
      "hypothesis": "A sand bed could reveal a buried drain through the spatial timing of surface cooling after wetting.",
      "test": "Compare cooling and known drain locations.",
      "against": "Timing follows surface moisture alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1344",
      "hypothesis": "A sand bed could reveal a buried drain through the spatial timing of surface cooling after wetting.",
      "test": "Compare cooling and known drain locations.",
      "against": "Timing follows surface moisture alone.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 23,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 56,
      "literature_query": "sand bed reveal buried drain spatial timing surface cooling wetting experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "56",
      "id": "N1344",
      "hypothesis": "A sand bed could reveal a buried drain through the spatial timing of surface cooling after wetting.",
      "test": "Compare cooling and known drain locations.",
      "against": "Timing follows surface moisture alone.",
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_score": "23",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P71523b4735c8;P0aae6dee110d;Pf28fc9395af7;P4aefaf450f59;P5ce367be1bc3;Pdd402d87bf40",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N1344",
      "hypothesis": "A sand bed could reveal a buried drain through the spatial timing of surface cooling after wetting.",
      "test": "Compare cooling and known drain locations.",
      "against": "Timing follows surface moisture alone.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 23,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 56,
      "literature_query": "sand bed reveal buried drain spatial timing surface cooling wetting experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P71523b4735c8;P0aae6dee110d;Pf28fc9395af7;P4aefaf450f59;P5ce367be1bc3;Pdd402d87bf40",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P71523b4735c8;P0aae6dee110d;Pf28fc9395af7;P4aefaf450f59;P5ce367be1bc3;Pdd402d87bf40",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": {
      "rank": "6",
      "id": "N1344",
      "hypothesis": "A sand bed could reveal a buried drain through the spatial timing of surface cooling after wetting.",
      "primary_outcome": "Blind localization error for a buried drain from post-wetting surface cooling times.",
      "comparison": "Active drain, sealed thermally matched pipe, and no-pipe sand beds at several predefined depths.",
      "controls": "Sand packing; initial moisture; total irrigation; boundary heat input; pipe material; evaporation; external temperature.",
      "plan": "Use a transparent or instrumented sand box with an independent water-route measurement. Record temperature and moisture together. Fit a detection rule in pilots, then test new drain positions and separately packed beds.",
      "against": "If the signature follows pipe conductivity without drainage, the result is buried-object detection rather than evidence for the proposed wetting-path mechanism.",
      "evidence": "Heat-flow experiments and moisture-dependent sand conductivity support a measurable thermal contrast. Detectability at the intended depth must still be established.",
      "source": "https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2009.0095",
      "novelty": "Unverified; a familiar mechanism or existing method is not a new discovery.",
      "physical_data": "none collected"
    },
    "focused_assessment_fields": {
      "id": "N1344",
      "primary_outcome": "Blind localization error for a buried drain from post-wetting surface cooling times.",
      "comparison": "Active drain, sealed thermally matched pipe, and no-pipe sand beds at several predefined depths.",
      "critical_controls": "Sand packing; initial moisture; total irrigation; boundary heat input; pipe material; evaporation; external temperature.",
      "testing_plan": "Use a transparent or instrumented sand box with an independent water-route measurement. Record temperature and moisture together. Fit a detection rule in pilots, then test new drain positions and separately packed beds.",
      "against": "If the signature follows pipe conductivity without drainage, the result is buried-object detection rather than evidence for the proposed wetting-path mechanism.",
      "evidence_assessment": "Heat-flow experiments and moisture-dependent sand conductivity support a measurable thermal contrast. Detectability at the intended depth must still be established.",
      "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2009.0095",
      "novelty": "Unverified; a familiar mechanism or existing method is not a new discovery.",
      "rank15": 6
    },
    "primary_outcome": "Blind localization error for a buried drain from post-wetting surface cooling times.",
    "comparison": "Active drain, sealed thermally matched pipe, and no-pipe sand beds at several predefined depths.",
    "controls": "Sand packing; initial moisture; total irrigation; boundary heat input; pipe material; evaporation; external temperature.",
    "plan": "Use a transparent or instrumented sand box with an independent water-route measurement. Record temperature and moisture together. Fit a detection rule in pilots, then test new drain positions and separately packed beds.",
    "evidence": "Heat-flow experiments and moisture-dependent sand conductivity support a measurable thermal contrast. Detectability at the intended depth must still be established.",
    "source": "https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2009.0095",
    "physical_data": "none collected",
    "dossier_text": "# 06. N1344\n\n## Prediction\n\nA sand bed could reveal a buried drain through the spatial timing of surface cooling after wetting.\n\n## Primary measurement\n\nBlind localization error for a buried drain from post-wetting surface cooling times.\n\n## Comparison\n\nActive drain, sealed thermally matched pipe, and no-pipe sand beds at several predefined depths.\n\n## Controls\n\nSand packing; initial moisture; total irrigation; boundary heat input; pipe material; evaporation; external temperature.\n\n## Testing plan\n\nUse a transparent or instrumented sand box with an independent water-route measurement. Record temperature and moisture together. Fit a detection rule in pilots, then test new drain positions and separately packed beds.\n\n## Stop or revise\n\nIf the signature follows pipe conductivity without drainage, the result is buried-object detection rather than evidence for the proposed wetting-path mechanism.\n\n## Evidence and limits\n\nHeat-flow experiments and moisture-dependent sand conductivity support a measurable thermal contrast. Detectability at the intended depth must still be established.\n\nRelated primary-source lead: https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2009.0095\n\nUnverified; a familiar mechanism or existing method is not a new discovery.\n\n## Replication gate\n\nCalibrate measurement uncertainty first. Define a minimum meaningful effect in the primary outcome's units, then estimate variability across independently prepared specimens or assemblies. Use that variance for a design-specific confirmatory sample calculation. Images and repeated readings from one specimen are technical repeats, not independent replications. Randomize run order and blind labels where practical. Freeze exclusions and analysis before confirmation.\n\nA narrow interval excluding the chosen meaningful effect can count against the bounded claim; a wide interval is inconclusive. Report null and adverse results. The outline requires material and apparatus compatibility checks and is not a complete laboratory protocol.\n"
  },
  {
    "id": "N1345",
    "hypothesis": "A polymer film could resist edge tearing by generating a local compressive wrinkle ahead of the crack.",
    "test": "Measure strain and crack speed.",
    "against": "Wrinkle formation accelerates tearing.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 146,
    "literature_query": "polymer film resist edge tearing generating local compressive wrinkle ahead crack experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N1345",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A polymer film could resist edge tearing by generating a local compressive wrinkle ahead of the crack.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": true,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1345",
      "hypothesis": "A polymer film could resist edge tearing by generating a local compressive wrinkle ahead of the crack.",
      "test": "Measure strain and crack speed.",
      "against": "Wrinkle formation accelerates tearing.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1345",
      "hypothesis": "A polymer film could resist edge tearing by generating a local compressive wrinkle ahead of the crack.",
      "test": "Measure strain and crack speed.",
      "against": "Wrinkle formation accelerates tearing.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 146,
      "literature_query": "polymer film resist edge tearing generating local compressive wrinkle ahead crack experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "146",
      "id": "N1345",
      "hypothesis": "A polymer film could resist edge tearing by generating a local compressive wrinkle ahead of the crack.",
      "test": "Measure strain and crack speed.",
      "against": "Wrinkle formation accelerates tearing.",
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_score": "21",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P4ca4dbdf16cc;Pc0d07fd8885f;Pe798bd570f29;P27b41a3ca5bf;P882d80b89b54;Pe6997e2a8542;Pdc48f3bd1d39;P8d38fce23219",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N1345",
      "hypothesis": "A polymer film could resist edge tearing by generating a local compressive wrinkle ahead of the crack.",
      "test": "Measure strain and crack speed.",
      "against": "Wrinkle formation accelerates tearing.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 146,
      "literature_query": "polymer film resist edge tearing generating local compressive wrinkle ahead crack experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P4ca4dbdf16cc;Pc0d07fd8885f;Pe798bd570f29;P27b41a3ca5bf;P882d80b89b54;Pe6997e2a8542;Pdc48f3bd1d39;P8d38fce23219",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P4ca4dbdf16cc;Pc0d07fd8885f;Pe798bd570f29;P27b41a3ca5bf;P882d80b89b54;Pe6997e2a8542;Pdc48f3bd1d39;P8d38fce23219",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": {
      "rank": "12",
      "id": "N1345",
      "hypothesis": "A polymer film could resist edge tearing by generating a local compressive wrinkle ahead of the crack.",
      "primary_outcome": "Tear propagation work and crack speed at matched remote loading, with the pre-tip compressive strain field measured.",
      "comparison": "Film geometry permitting a local wrinkle versus a constrained nonwrinkling reference, keeping thickness and polymer identical.",
      "controls": "Remote load; stored elastic energy; film thickness; rate; temperature; mounting; wrinkle amplitude; crack-tip plasticity.",
      "plan": "Begin with a macroscopically observable compatible film rather than assuming nanofilm results transfer. Use calibrated force-displacement and image-based strain. Record whether the wrinkle leads or follows crack advance.",
      "against": "Wrinkles can be a consequence of fracture. Reject a protective mechanism if they form only afterward or if load matching removes the benefit.",
      "evidence": "Primary ultrathin-film experiments use wrinkles to visualize crack-tip stress. They do not establish that making a wrinkle improves toughness.",
      "source": "https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9954313/",
      "novelty": "Unverified; a familiar mechanism or existing method is not a new discovery.",
      "physical_data": "none collected"
    },
    "focused_assessment_fields": {
      "id": "N1345",
      "primary_outcome": "Tear propagation work and crack speed at matched remote loading, with the pre-tip compressive strain field measured.",
      "comparison": "Film geometry permitting a local wrinkle versus a constrained nonwrinkling reference, keeping thickness and polymer identical.",
      "critical_controls": "Remote load; stored elastic energy; film thickness; rate; temperature; mounting; wrinkle amplitude; crack-tip plasticity.",
      "testing_plan": "Begin with a macroscopically observable compatible film rather than assuming nanofilm results transfer. Use calibrated force-displacement and image-based strain. Record whether the wrinkle leads or follows crack advance.",
      "against": "Wrinkles can be a consequence of fracture. Reject a protective mechanism if they form only afterward or if load matching removes the benefit.",
      "evidence_assessment": "Primary ultrathin-film experiments use wrinkles to visualize crack-tip stress. They do not establish that making a wrinkle improves toughness.",
      "source_url": "https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9954313/",
      "novelty": "Unverified; a familiar mechanism or existing method is not a new discovery.",
      "rank15": 12
    },
    "primary_outcome": "Tear propagation work and crack speed at matched remote loading, with the pre-tip compressive strain field measured.",
    "comparison": "Film geometry permitting a local wrinkle versus a constrained nonwrinkling reference, keeping thickness and polymer identical.",
    "controls": "Remote load; stored elastic energy; film thickness; rate; temperature; mounting; wrinkle amplitude; crack-tip plasticity.",
    "plan": "Begin with a macroscopically observable compatible film rather than assuming nanofilm results transfer. Use calibrated force-displacement and image-based strain. Record whether the wrinkle leads or follows crack advance.",
    "evidence": "Primary ultrathin-film experiments use wrinkles to visualize crack-tip stress. They do not establish that making a wrinkle improves toughness.",
    "source": "https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9954313/",
    "physical_data": "none collected",
    "dossier_text": "# 12. N1345\n\n## Prediction\n\nA polymer film could resist edge tearing by generating a local compressive wrinkle ahead of the crack.\n\n## Primary measurement\n\nTear propagation work and crack speed at matched remote loading, with the pre-tip compressive strain field measured.\n\n## Comparison\n\nFilm geometry permitting a local wrinkle versus a constrained nonwrinkling reference, keeping thickness and polymer identical.\n\n## Controls\n\nRemote load; stored elastic energy; film thickness; rate; temperature; mounting; wrinkle amplitude; crack-tip plasticity.\n\n## Testing plan\n\nBegin with a macroscopically observable compatible film rather than assuming nanofilm results transfer. Use calibrated force-displacement and image-based strain. Record whether the wrinkle leads or follows crack advance.\n\n## Stop or revise\n\nWrinkles can be a consequence of fracture. Reject a protective mechanism if they form only afterward or if load matching removes the benefit.\n\n## Evidence and limits\n\nPrimary ultrathin-film experiments use wrinkles to visualize crack-tip stress. They do not establish that making a wrinkle improves toughness.\n\nRelated primary-source lead: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9954313/\n\nUnverified; a familiar mechanism or existing method is not a new discovery.\n\n## Replication gate\n\nCalibrate measurement uncertainty first. Define a minimum meaningful effect in the primary outcome's units, then estimate variability across independently prepared specimens or assemblies. Use that variance for a design-specific confirmatory sample calculation. Images and repeated readings from one specimen are technical repeats, not independent replications. Randomize run order and blind labels where practical. Freeze exclusions and analysis before confirmation.\n\nA narrow interval excluding the chosen meaningful effect can count against the bounded claim; a wide interval is inconclusive. Report null and adverse results. The outline requires material and apparatus compatibility checks and is not a complete laboratory protocol.\n"
  },
  {
    "id": "N1346",
    "hypothesis": "A thin ice sheet could identify embedded grain density through the timing of crack branching under gentle flexure.",
    "test": "Compare controlled inclusions.",
    "against": "Branching follows grain size only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1346",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A thin ice sheet could identify embedded grain density through the timing of crack branching under gentle flexure.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1346",
      "hypothesis": "A thin ice sheet could identify embedded grain density through the timing of crack branching under gentle flexure.",
      "test": "Compare controlled inclusions.",
      "against": "Branching follows grain size only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1346",
      "hypothesis": "A thin ice sheet could identify embedded grain density through the timing of crack branching under gentle flexure.",
      "test": "Compare controlled inclusions.",
      "against": "Branching follows grain size only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1347",
    "hypothesis": "A porous disk could keep a droplet centered during evaporation through a dynamically moving wetting boundary.",
    "test": "Track droplet and wet regions.",
    "against": "Centering requires fixed chemical patterns.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 4,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 26,
    "literature_query": "porous disk keep droplet centered evaporation dynamically moving wetting boundary experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N1347",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous disk could keep a droplet centered during evaporation through a dynamically moving wetting boundary.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1347",
      "hypothesis": "A porous disk could keep a droplet centered during evaporation through a dynamically moving wetting boundary.",
      "test": "Track droplet and wet regions.",
      "against": "Centering requires fixed chemical patterns.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1347",
      "hypothesis": "A porous disk could keep a droplet centered during evaporation through a dynamically moving wetting boundary.",
      "test": "Track droplet and wet regions.",
      "against": "Centering requires fixed chemical patterns.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 26,
      "literature_query": "porous disk keep droplet centered evaporation dynamically moving wetting boundary experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "26",
      "id": "N1347",
      "hypothesis": "A porous disk could keep a droplet centered during evaporation through a dynamically moving wetting boundary.",
      "test": "Track droplet and wet regions.",
      "against": "Centering requires fixed chemical patterns.",
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_score": "24",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pe1e01f5e6842;Pfd77d87c0d86;Pafe77385afcd;Pf792b1acb24e;Pe30daca05816;Pe32ad2382500",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N1347",
      "hypothesis": "A porous disk could keep a droplet centered during evaporation through a dynamically moving wetting boundary.",
      "test": "Track droplet and wet regions.",
      "against": "Centering requires fixed chemical patterns.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 26,
      "literature_query": "porous disk keep droplet centered evaporation dynamically moving wetting boundary experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pe1e01f5e6842;Pfd77d87c0d86;Pafe77385afcd;Pf792b1acb24e;Pe30daca05816;Pe32ad2382500",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "Pe1e01f5e6842;Pfd77d87c0d86;Pafe77385afcd;Pf792b1acb24e;Pe30daca05816;Pe32ad2382500",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1348",
    "hypothesis": "A water-filled flexible pouch could distinguish a slow leak from temperature-driven contraction using relaxation asymmetry.",
    "test": "Apply calibrated changes.",
    "against": "The signatures remain indistinguishable.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1348",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A water-filled flexible pouch could distinguish a slow leak from temperature-driven contraction using relaxation asymmetry.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1348",
      "hypothesis": "A water-filled flexible pouch could distinguish a slow leak from temperature-driven contraction using relaxation asymmetry.",
      "test": "Apply calibrated changes.",
      "against": "The signatures remain indistinguishable.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1348",
      "hypothesis": "A water-filled flexible pouch could distinguish a slow leak from temperature-driven contraction using relaxation asymmetry.",
      "test": "Apply calibrated changes.",
      "against": "The signatures remain indistinguishable.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1349",
    "hypothesis": "A bead-filled flexible bag could recover its original shape by redistributing liquid bridges after unloading.",
    "test": "Image bridges and recovery.",
    "against": "Recovery requires gas pressure changes.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1349",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A bead-filled flexible bag could recover its original shape by redistributing liquid bridges after unloading.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1349",
      "hypothesis": "A bead-filled flexible bag could recover its original shape by redistributing liquid bridges after unloading.",
      "test": "Image bridges and recovery.",
      "against": "Recovery requires gas pressure changes.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1349",
      "hypothesis": "A bead-filled flexible bag could recover its original shape by redistributing liquid bridges after unloading.",
      "test": "Image bridges and recovery.",
      "against": "Recovery requires gas pressure changes.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1350",
    "hypothesis": "A paper-based separation strip could improve band uniformity when its support is allowed to slide freely during wetting.",
    "test": "Measure stress and bands.",
    "against": "Benefits follow changed solvent delivery only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 4,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 27,
    "literature_query": "paper-based separation strip improve band uniformity when support is allowed slide freely wetting experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N1350",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A paper-based separation strip could improve band uniformity when its support is allowed to slide freely during wetting.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": true,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1350",
      "hypothesis": "A paper-based separation strip could improve band uniformity when its support is allowed to slide freely during wetting.",
      "test": "Measure stress and bands.",
      "against": "Benefits follow changed solvent delivery only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1350",
      "hypothesis": "A paper-based separation strip could improve band uniformity when its support is allowed to slide freely during wetting.",
      "test": "Measure stress and bands.",
      "against": "Benefits follow changed solvent delivery only.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 27,
      "literature_query": "paper-based separation strip improve band uniformity when support is allowed slide freely wetting experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "27",
      "id": "N1350",
      "hypothesis": "A paper-based separation strip could improve band uniformity when its support is allowed to slide freely during wetting.",
      "test": "Measure stress and bands.",
      "against": "Benefits follow changed solvent delivery only.",
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_score": "24",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P5ed2016a1f8f;Pcd774353fe31;P61f7e7779518;P068abc3732a9;P1ccff0dbcac3;Pb053ffaa1651",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N1350",
      "hypothesis": "A paper-based separation strip could improve band uniformity when its support is allowed to slide freely during wetting.",
      "test": "Measure stress and bands.",
      "against": "Benefits follow changed solvent delivery only.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 27,
      "literature_query": "paper-based separation strip improve band uniformity when support is allowed slide freely wetting experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P5ed2016a1f8f;Pcd774353fe31;P61f7e7779518;P068abc3732a9;P1ccff0dbcac3;Pb053ffaa1651",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P5ed2016a1f8f;Pcd774353fe31;P61f7e7779518;P068abc3732a9;P1ccff0dbcac3;Pb053ffaa1651",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": {
      "rank": "7",
      "id": "N1350",
      "hypothesis": "A paper-based separation strip could improve band uniformity when its support is allowed to slide freely during wetting.",
      "primary_outcome": "Tracer-band centerline variance and width at a fixed migration distance.",
      "comparison": "Paper separation strips with freely sliding versus restrained supports; include matched initial tension.",
      "controls": "Paper batch; solvent; load; evaporation; support contact; initial strain; front speed; paper orientation.",
      "plan": "Validate a benign separable tracer first. Image paper deformation and the solvent front, then compare band distortion with blinded support labels. Normalize separately for initial spot width and migration speed.",
      "against": "If free supports merely change solvent supply or detector geometry, the experiment does not isolate wetting-stress release.",
      "evidence": "Paper swelling and cockling are established and directly measurable. The retrieved grid-wetting paper was not a direct paper-constraint study; use the relevant paper-deformation source below.",
      "source": "https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9906801/",
      "novelty": "Unverified; a familiar mechanism or existing method is not a new discovery.",
      "physical_data": "none collected"
    },
    "focused_assessment_fields": {
      "id": "N1350",
      "primary_outcome": "Tracer-band centerline variance and width at a fixed migration distance.",
      "comparison": "Paper separation strips with freely sliding versus restrained supports; include matched initial tension.",
      "critical_controls": "Paper batch; solvent; load; evaporation; support contact; initial strain; front speed; paper orientation.",
      "testing_plan": "Validate a benign separable tracer first. Image paper deformation and the solvent front, then compare band distortion with blinded support labels. Normalize separately for initial spot width and migration speed.",
      "against": "If free supports merely change solvent supply or detector geometry, the experiment does not isolate wetting-stress release.",
      "evidence_assessment": "Paper swelling and cockling are established and directly measurable. The retrieved grid-wetting paper was not a direct paper-constraint study; use the relevant paper-deformation source below.",
      "source_url": "https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9906801/",
      "novelty": "Unverified; a familiar mechanism or existing method is not a new discovery.",
      "rank15": 7
    },
    "primary_outcome": "Tracer-band centerline variance and width at a fixed migration distance.",
    "comparison": "Paper separation strips with freely sliding versus restrained supports; include matched initial tension.",
    "controls": "Paper batch; solvent; load; evaporation; support contact; initial strain; front speed; paper orientation.",
    "plan": "Validate a benign separable tracer first. Image paper deformation and the solvent front, then compare band distortion with blinded support labels. Normalize separately for initial spot width and migration speed.",
    "evidence": "Paper swelling and cockling are established and directly measurable. The retrieved grid-wetting paper was not a direct paper-constraint study; use the relevant paper-deformation source below.",
    "source": "https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9906801/",
    "physical_data": "none collected",
    "dossier_text": "# 07. N1350\n\n## Prediction\n\nA paper-based separation strip could improve band uniformity when its support is allowed to slide freely during wetting.\n\n## Primary measurement\n\nTracer-band centerline variance and width at a fixed migration distance.\n\n## Comparison\n\nPaper separation strips with freely sliding versus restrained supports; include matched initial tension.\n\n## Controls\n\nPaper batch; solvent; load; evaporation; support contact; initial strain; front speed; paper orientation.\n\n## Testing plan\n\nValidate a benign separable tracer first. Image paper deformation and the solvent front, then compare band distortion with blinded support labels. Normalize separately for initial spot width and migration speed.\n\n## Stop or revise\n\nIf free supports merely change solvent supply or detector geometry, the experiment does not isolate wetting-stress release.\n\n## Evidence and limits\n\nPaper swelling and cockling are established and directly measurable. The retrieved grid-wetting paper was not a direct paper-constraint study; use the relevant paper-deformation source below.\n\nRelated primary-source lead: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9906801/\n\nUnverified; a familiar mechanism or existing method is not a new discovery.\n\n## Replication gate\n\nCalibrate measurement uncertainty first. Define a minimum meaningful effect in the primary outcome's units, then estimate variability across independently prepared specimens or assemblies. Use that variance for a design-specific confirmatory sample calculation. Images and repeated readings from one specimen are technical repeats, not independent replications. Randomize run order and blind labels where practical. Freeze exclusions and analysis before confirmation.\n\nA narrow interval excluding the chosen meaningful effect can count against the bounded claim; a wide interval is inconclusive. Report null and adverse results. The outline requires material and apparatus compatibility checks and is not a complete laboratory protocol.\n"
  },
  {
    "id": "N1351",
    "hypothesis": "A clay-coated fiber could detect the direction of water flow through the orientation of deposited microcrystals.",
    "test": "Measure deposits after reversed flows.",
    "against": "Orientation follows fiber grooves only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1351",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A clay-coated fiber could detect the direction of water flow through the orientation of deposited microcrystals.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1351",
      "hypothesis": "A clay-coated fiber could detect the direction of water flow through the orientation of deposited microcrystals.",
      "test": "Measure deposits after reversed flows.",
      "against": "Orientation follows fiber grooves only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1351",
      "hypothesis": "A clay-coated fiber could detect the direction of water flow through the orientation of deposited microcrystals.",
      "test": "Measure deposits after reversed flows.",
      "against": "Orientation follows fiber grooves only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1352",
    "hypothesis": "A foamed gel could reduce gas loss during bending by moving liquid into the most stretched cell walls.",
    "test": "Map walls and gas release.",
    "against": "Retention follows bulk liquid content only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1352",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A foamed gel could reduce gas loss during bending by moving liquid into the most stretched cell walls.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1352",
      "hypothesis": "A foamed gel could reduce gas loss during bending by moving liquid into the most stretched cell walls.",
      "test": "Map walls and gas release.",
      "against": "Retention follows bulk liquid content only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1352",
      "hypothesis": "A foamed gel could reduce gas loss during bending by moving liquid into the most stretched cell walls.",
      "test": "Map walls and gas release.",
      "against": "Retention follows bulk liquid content only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1353",
    "hypothesis": "A porous wooden cube could reveal a shallow crack through a delayed moisture echo after a brief vapor pulse.",
    "test": "Compare known cracks.",
    "against": "Echo follows grain direction only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 4,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 57,
    "literature_query": "porous wooden cube reveal shallow crack delayed moisture echo brief vapor pulse experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N1353",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous wooden cube could reveal a shallow crack through a delayed moisture echo after a brief vapor pulse.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1353",
      "hypothesis": "A porous wooden cube could reveal a shallow crack through a delayed moisture echo after a brief vapor pulse.",
      "test": "Compare known cracks.",
      "against": "Echo follows grain direction only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1353",
      "hypothesis": "A porous wooden cube could reveal a shallow crack through a delayed moisture echo after a brief vapor pulse.",
      "test": "Compare known cracks.",
      "against": "Echo follows grain direction only.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 23,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 57,
      "literature_query": "porous wooden cube reveal shallow crack delayed moisture echo brief vapor pulse experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "57",
      "id": "N1353",
      "hypothesis": "A porous wooden cube could reveal a shallow crack through a delayed moisture echo after a brief vapor pulse.",
      "test": "Compare known cracks.",
      "against": "Echo follows grain direction only.",
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_score": "23",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P133a9879895e;P17c101269df7;P7a60ca5c6299;P4e75aac91609;P38ebc7bb3e65;P0a03e09f3acb",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N1353",
      "hypothesis": "A porous wooden cube could reveal a shallow crack through a delayed moisture echo after a brief vapor pulse.",
      "test": "Compare known cracks.",
      "against": "Echo follows grain direction only.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 23,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 57,
      "literature_query": "porous wooden cube reveal shallow crack delayed moisture echo brief vapor pulse experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P133a9879895e;P17c101269df7;P7a60ca5c6299;P4e75aac91609;P38ebc7bb3e65;P0a03e09f3acb",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P133a9879895e;P17c101269df7;P7a60ca5c6299;P4e75aac91609;P38ebc7bb3e65;P0a03e09f3acb",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1354",
    "hypothesis": "A soft adhesive pad could reject roughness-induced false contact signals through the relaxation of edge strain.",
    "test": "Compare contact maps and signals.",
    "against": "Correction removes true force sensitivity too.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1354",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A soft adhesive pad could reject roughness-induced false contact signals through the relaxation of edge strain.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1354",
      "hypothesis": "A soft adhesive pad could reject roughness-induced false contact signals through the relaxation of edge strain.",
      "test": "Compare contact maps and signals.",
      "against": "Correction removes true force sensitivity too.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1354",
      "hypothesis": "A soft adhesive pad could reject roughness-induced false contact signals through the relaxation of edge strain.",
      "test": "Compare contact maps and signals.",
      "against": "Correction removes true force sensitivity too.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1355",
    "hypothesis": "A folded waxed-paper container could prevent droplet escape by absorbing impulse in reversible crease motion.",
    "test": "Measure deformation and leakage.",
    "against": "Protection follows increased wall height only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 4,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 28,
    "literature_query": "folded waxed-paper container prevent droplet escape absorbing impulse reversible crease motion experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N1355",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A folded waxed-paper container could prevent droplet escape by absorbing impulse in reversible crease motion.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1355",
      "hypothesis": "A folded waxed-paper container could prevent droplet escape by absorbing impulse in reversible crease motion.",
      "test": "Measure deformation and leakage.",
      "against": "Protection follows increased wall height only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1355",
      "hypothesis": "A folded waxed-paper container could prevent droplet escape by absorbing impulse in reversible crease motion.",
      "test": "Measure deformation and leakage.",
      "against": "Protection follows increased wall height only.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 28,
      "literature_query": "folded waxed-paper container prevent droplet escape absorbing impulse reversible crease motion experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "28",
      "id": "N1355",
      "hypothesis": "A folded waxed-paper container could prevent droplet escape by absorbing impulse in reversible crease motion.",
      "test": "Measure deformation and leakage.",
      "against": "Protection follows increased wall height only.",
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_score": "24",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pa795078b2723;P112006cca9ec",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N1355",
      "hypothesis": "A folded waxed-paper container could prevent droplet escape by absorbing impulse in reversible crease motion.",
      "test": "Measure deformation and leakage.",
      "against": "Protection follows increased wall height only.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 28,
      "literature_query": "folded waxed-paper container prevent droplet escape absorbing impulse reversible crease motion experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pa795078b2723;P112006cca9ec",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "Pa795078b2723;P112006cca9ec",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1356",
    "hypothesis": "A wet granular slope could detect a developing subsurface channel through changes in surface acoustic emission direction.",
    "test": "Measure sound and channel images.",
    "against": "Signals appear only after erosion emerges.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1356",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A wet granular slope could detect a developing subsurface channel through changes in surface acoustic emission direction.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1356",
      "hypothesis": "A wet granular slope could detect a developing subsurface channel through changes in surface acoustic emission direction.",
      "test": "Measure sound and channel images.",
      "against": "Signals appear only after erosion emerges.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1356",
      "hypothesis": "A wet granular slope could detect a developing subsurface channel through changes in surface acoustic emission direction.",
      "test": "Measure sound and channel images.",
      "against": "Signals appear only after erosion emerges.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1357",
    "hypothesis": "A thin polymer membrane could classify dissolved versus suspended contamination by the spatial pattern of swelling.",
    "test": "Apply calibrated probes.",
    "against": "Maps follow total solute mass only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1357",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A thin polymer membrane could classify dissolved versus suspended contamination by the spatial pattern of swelling.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1357",
      "hypothesis": "A thin polymer membrane could classify dissolved versus suspended contamination by the spatial pattern of swelling.",
      "test": "Apply calibrated probes.",
      "against": "Maps follow total solute mass only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1357",
      "hypothesis": "A thin polymer membrane could classify dissolved versus suspended contamination by the spatial pattern of swelling.",
      "test": "Apply calibrated probes.",
      "against": "Maps follow total solute mass only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1358",
    "hypothesis": "A capillary sponge could maintain a selected fluid level by mechanically sealing its lowest pores as it loads.",
    "test": "Measure pore closure and level.",
    "against": "Control follows reservoir pressure alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1358",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A capillary sponge could maintain a selected fluid level by mechanically sealing its lowest pores as it loads.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1358",
      "hypothesis": "A capillary sponge could maintain a selected fluid level by mechanically sealing its lowest pores as it loads.",
      "test": "Measure pore closure and level.",
      "against": "Control follows reservoir pressure alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1358",
      "hypothesis": "A capillary sponge could maintain a selected fluid level by mechanically sealing its lowest pores as it loads.",
      "test": "Measure pore closure and level.",
      "against": "Control follows reservoir pressure alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1359",
    "hypothesis": "A water droplet could measure a surface's relaxation spectrum through its sequence of small recoil motions.",
    "test": "Compare recoil and rheology.",
    "against": "Motions follow contact-angle hysteresis only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1359",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A water droplet could measure a surface's relaxation spectrum through its sequence of small recoil motions.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1359",
      "hypothesis": "A water droplet could measure a surface's relaxation spectrum through its sequence of small recoil motions.",
      "test": "Compare recoil and rheology.",
      "against": "Motions follow contact-angle hysteresis only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1359",
      "hypothesis": "A water droplet could measure a surface's relaxation spectrum through its sequence of small recoil motions.",
      "test": "Compare recoil and rheology.",
      "against": "Motions follow contact-angle hysteresis only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1360",
    "hypothesis": "A cellulose film could resist repeated folding when hydration is confined to the fold's compressive side.",
    "test": "Measure local water and fatigue.",
    "against": "Benefits follow average moisture only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1360",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A cellulose film could resist repeated folding when hydration is confined to the fold's compressive side.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1360",
      "hypothesis": "A cellulose film could resist repeated folding when hydration is confined to the fold's compressive side.",
      "test": "Measure local water and fatigue.",
      "against": "Benefits follow average moisture only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1360",
      "hypothesis": "A cellulose film could resist repeated folding when hydration is confined to the fold's compressive side.",
      "test": "Measure local water and fatigue.",
      "against": "Benefits follow average moisture only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1361",
    "hypothesis": "A sand column could release fewer fine particles after a brief gas pulse creates temporary capillary anchoring.",
    "test": "Measure fines and liquid bridges.",
    "against": "Suppression requires permanent compaction.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 4,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 29,
    "literature_query": "sand column release fewer fine particles brief gas pulse creates temporary capillary anchoring experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N1361",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A sand column could release fewer fine particles after a brief gas pulse creates temporary capillary anchoring.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1361",
      "hypothesis": "A sand column could release fewer fine particles after a brief gas pulse creates temporary capillary anchoring.",
      "test": "Measure fines and liquid bridges.",
      "against": "Suppression requires permanent compaction.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1361",
      "hypothesis": "A sand column could release fewer fine particles after a brief gas pulse creates temporary capillary anchoring.",
      "test": "Measure fines and liquid bridges.",
      "against": "Suppression requires permanent compaction.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 29,
      "literature_query": "sand column release fewer fine particles brief gas pulse creates temporary capillary anchoring experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "29",
      "id": "N1361",
      "hypothesis": "A sand column could release fewer fine particles after a brief gas pulse creates temporary capillary anchoring.",
      "test": "Measure fines and liquid bridges.",
      "against": "Suppression requires permanent compaction.",
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_score": "24",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P812e91b15c4b;P1ad10a4dd959;P2476de4c5671;P4d7ed63c06c0;Pc2eb91e7163f;P89dcfae88eba",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N1361",
      "hypothesis": "A sand column could release fewer fine particles after a brief gas pulse creates temporary capillary anchoring.",
      "test": "Measure fines and liquid bridges.",
      "against": "Suppression requires permanent compaction.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 29,
      "literature_query": "sand column release fewer fine particles brief gas pulse creates temporary capillary anchoring experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P812e91b15c4b;P1ad10a4dd959;P2476de4c5671;P4d7ed63c06c0;Pc2eb91e7163f;P89dcfae88eba",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P812e91b15c4b;P1ad10a4dd959;P2476de4c5671;P4d7ed63c06c0;Pc2eb91e7163f;P89dcfae88eba",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1362",
    "hypothesis": "A transparent soap bubble could distinguish a wall defect from a chemical patch through different approach trajectories.",
    "test": "Calibrate independent surface changes.",
    "against": "Trajectories cannot separate causes.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 4,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 58,
    "literature_query": "transparent soap bubble distinguish wall defect chemical patch different approach trajectories experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N1362",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A transparent soap bubble could distinguish a wall defect from a chemical patch through different approach trajectories.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1362",
      "hypothesis": "A transparent soap bubble could distinguish a wall defect from a chemical patch through different approach trajectories.",
      "test": "Calibrate independent surface changes.",
      "against": "Trajectories cannot separate causes.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1362",
      "hypothesis": "A transparent soap bubble could distinguish a wall defect from a chemical patch through different approach trajectories.",
      "test": "Calibrate independent surface changes.",
      "against": "Trajectories cannot separate causes.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 23,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 58,
      "literature_query": "transparent soap bubble distinguish wall defect chemical patch different approach trajectories experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "58",
      "id": "N1362",
      "hypothesis": "A transparent soap bubble could distinguish a wall defect from a chemical patch through different approach trajectories.",
      "test": "Calibrate independent surface changes.",
      "against": "Trajectories cannot separate causes.",
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_score": "23",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P08c85e887e33;P5c0583aba6fb;P6e917b437ea2;P29501408a54e",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N1362",
      "hypothesis": "A transparent soap bubble could distinguish a wall defect from a chemical patch through different approach trajectories.",
      "test": "Calibrate independent surface changes.",
      "against": "Trajectories cannot separate causes.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 23,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 58,
      "literature_query": "transparent soap bubble distinguish wall defect chemical patch different approach trajectories experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P08c85e887e33;P5c0583aba6fb;P6e917b437ea2;P29501408a54e",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P08c85e887e33;P5c0583aba6fb;P6e917b437ea2;P29501408a54e",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1363",
    "hypothesis": "A porous salt tablet could deliver a steadier concentration when its supporting surface deforms during dissolution.",
    "test": "Measure shape and release.",
    "against": "Stability follows lower dissolution rate only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1363",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous salt tablet could deliver a steadier concentration when its supporting surface deforms during dissolution.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1363",
      "hypothesis": "A porous salt tablet could deliver a steadier concentration when its supporting surface deforms during dissolution.",
      "test": "Measure shape and release.",
      "against": "Stability follows lower dissolution rate only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1363",
      "hypothesis": "A porous salt tablet could deliver a steadier concentration when its supporting surface deforms during dissolution.",
      "test": "Measure shape and release.",
      "against": "Stability follows lower dissolution rate only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1364",
    "hypothesis": "A rubber-coated particle could reveal contact aging through delayed rebound after a very small tap.",
    "test": "Measure rebound and later adhesion.",
    "against": "Rebound follows bulk viscoelasticity only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 4,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 59,
    "literature_query": "rubber-coated particle reveal contact aging delayed rebound very small tap experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N1364",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A rubber-coated particle could reveal contact aging through delayed rebound after a very small tap.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1364",
      "hypothesis": "A rubber-coated particle could reveal contact aging through delayed rebound after a very small tap.",
      "test": "Measure rebound and later adhesion.",
      "against": "Rebound follows bulk viscoelasticity only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1364",
      "hypothesis": "A rubber-coated particle could reveal contact aging through delayed rebound after a very small tap.",
      "test": "Measure rebound and later adhesion.",
      "against": "Rebound follows bulk viscoelasticity only.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 23,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 59,
      "literature_query": "rubber-coated particle reveal contact aging delayed rebound very small tap experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "59",
      "id": "N1364",
      "hypothesis": "A rubber-coated particle could reveal contact aging through delayed rebound after a very small tap.",
      "test": "Measure rebound and later adhesion.",
      "against": "Rebound follows bulk viscoelasticity only.",
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_score": "23",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pb473ad7179a6;Pb38620c50a2a",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N1364",
      "hypothesis": "A rubber-coated particle could reveal contact aging through delayed rebound after a very small tap.",
      "test": "Measure rebound and later adhesion.",
      "against": "Rebound follows bulk viscoelasticity only.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 23,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 59,
      "literature_query": "rubber-coated particle reveal contact aging delayed rebound very small tap experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pb473ad7179a6;Pb38620c50a2a",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "Pb473ad7179a6;Pb38620c50a2a",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1365",
    "hypothesis": "A thin gelatin membrane could route a tear away from a hydrated spot through local compressive stress.",
    "test": "Measure water and strain.",
    "against": "Routing follows stiffness contrast alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1365",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A thin gelatin membrane could route a tear away from a hydrated spot through local compressive stress.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1365",
      "hypothesis": "A thin gelatin membrane could route a tear away from a hydrated spot through local compressive stress.",
      "test": "Measure water and strain.",
      "against": "Routing follows stiffness contrast alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1365",
      "hypothesis": "A thin gelatin membrane could route a tear away from a hydrated spot through local compressive stress.",
      "test": "Measure water and strain.",
      "against": "Routing follows stiffness contrast alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1366",
    "hypothesis": "A paper wick could avoid permanent staining by directing solute toward removable terminal branches.",
    "test": "Measure mass balance and spatial deposits.",
    "against": "Cleaning requires lower solute loading.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 4,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 30,
    "literature_query": "paper wick avoid permanent staining directing solute toward removable terminal branches experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N1366",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A paper wick could avoid permanent staining by directing solute toward removable terminal branches.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1366",
      "hypothesis": "A paper wick could avoid permanent staining by directing solute toward removable terminal branches.",
      "test": "Measure mass balance and spatial deposits.",
      "against": "Cleaning requires lower solute loading.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1366",
      "hypothesis": "A paper wick could avoid permanent staining by directing solute toward removable terminal branches.",
      "test": "Measure mass balance and spatial deposits.",
      "against": "Cleaning requires lower solute loading.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 30,
      "literature_query": "paper wick avoid permanent staining directing solute toward removable terminal branches experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "30",
      "id": "N1366",
      "hypothesis": "A paper wick could avoid permanent staining by directing solute toward removable terminal branches.",
      "test": "Measure mass balance and spatial deposits.",
      "against": "Cleaning requires lower solute loading.",
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_score": "24",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pb65ea182ecdd;P85b6ee126384;P916e26a7bb57",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N1366",
      "hypothesis": "A paper wick could avoid permanent staining by directing solute toward removable terminal branches.",
      "test": "Measure mass balance and spatial deposits.",
      "against": "Cleaning requires lower solute loading.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 30,
      "literature_query": "paper wick avoid permanent staining directing solute toward removable terminal branches experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pb65ea182ecdd;P85b6ee126384;P916e26a7bb57",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "Pb65ea182ecdd;P85b6ee126384;P916e26a7bb57",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1367",
    "hypothesis": "A granular-filled tube could attenuate sound more strongly after reversible hydration without becoming heavier overall.",
    "test": "Control mass and water redistribution.",
    "against": "Attenuation follows total mass only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1367",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A granular-filled tube could attenuate sound more strongly after reversible hydration without becoming heavier overall.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1367",
      "hypothesis": "A granular-filled tube could attenuate sound more strongly after reversible hydration without becoming heavier overall.",
      "test": "Control mass and water redistribution.",
      "against": "Attenuation follows total mass only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1367",
      "hypothesis": "A granular-filled tube could attenuate sound more strongly after reversible hydration without becoming heavier overall.",
      "test": "Control mass and water redistribution.",
      "against": "Attenuation follows total mass only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1368",
    "hypothesis": "A patterned glass surface could reveal the history of a moving droplet through nonvolatile tracer alignment rather than residue amount.",
    "test": "Reverse trajectories.",
    "against": "Alignment records surface scratches only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 18,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1368",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A patterned glass surface could reveal the history of a moving droplet through nonvolatile tracer alignment rather than residue amount.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1368",
      "hypothesis": "A patterned glass surface could reveal the history of a moving droplet through nonvolatile tracer alignment rather than residue amount.",
      "test": "Reverse trajectories.",
      "against": "Alignment records surface scratches only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1368",
      "hypothesis": "A patterned glass surface could reveal the history of a moving droplet through nonvolatile tracer alignment rather than residue amount.",
      "test": "Reverse trajectories.",
      "against": "Alignment records surface scratches only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 18,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1369",
    "hypothesis": "A flexible porous cup could reject a sudden overflow by storing volume in reversible wall buckling.",
    "test": "Measure flow and wall motion.",
    "against": "Overflow reduction requires lower input volume.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1369",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A flexible porous cup could reject a sudden overflow by storing volume in reversible wall buckling.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1369",
      "hypothesis": "A flexible porous cup could reject a sudden overflow by storing volume in reversible wall buckling.",
      "test": "Measure flow and wall motion.",
      "against": "Overflow reduction requires lower input volume.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1369",
      "hypothesis": "A flexible porous cup could reject a sudden overflow by storing volume in reversible wall buckling.",
      "test": "Measure flow and wall motion.",
      "against": "Overflow reduction requires lower input volume.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1370",
    "hypothesis": "A moist textile could distinguish shear from tension through different vapor-release transients.",
    "test": "Apply equal-work loads.",
    "against": "Transients reflect heating alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 4,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1370",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A moist textile could distinguish shear from tension through different vapor-release transients.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1370",
      "hypothesis": "A moist textile could distinguish shear from tension through different vapor-release transients.",
      "test": "Apply equal-work loads.",
      "against": "Transients reflect heating alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1370",
      "hypothesis": "A moist textile could distinguish shear from tension through different vapor-release transients.",
      "test": "Apply equal-work loads.",
      "against": "Transients reflect heating alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1371",
    "hypothesis": "A starch gel could retain an indentation's depth in its later dissolution profile after mechanical recovery.",
    "test": "Measure dissolution and prior loading.",
    "against": "Profiles follow remaining visible deformation only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 4,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 31,
    "literature_query": "starch gel retain indentation s depth later dissolution profile mechanical recovery experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N1371",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A starch gel could retain an indentation's depth in its later dissolution profile after mechanical recovery.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1371",
      "hypothesis": "A starch gel could retain an indentation's depth in its later dissolution profile after mechanical recovery.",
      "test": "Measure dissolution and prior loading.",
      "against": "Profiles follow remaining visible deformation only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1371",
      "hypothesis": "A starch gel could retain an indentation's depth in its later dissolution profile after mechanical recovery.",
      "test": "Measure dissolution and prior loading.",
      "against": "Profiles follow remaining visible deformation only.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 31,
      "literature_query": "starch gel retain indentation s depth later dissolution profile mechanical recovery experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "31",
      "id": "N1371",
      "hypothesis": "A starch gel could retain an indentation's depth in its later dissolution profile after mechanical recovery.",
      "test": "Measure dissolution and prior loading.",
      "against": "Profiles follow remaining visible deformation only.",
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_score": "24",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pf86ed7adb16d;P8d47630c1025;P39670d618330;Pf1b7f6015dd2;Pad6ec16b4305",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N1371",
      "hypothesis": "A starch gel could retain an indentation's depth in its later dissolution profile after mechanical recovery.",
      "test": "Measure dissolution and prior loading.",
      "against": "Profiles follow remaining visible deformation only.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 31,
      "literature_query": "starch gel retain indentation s depth later dissolution profile mechanical recovery experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pf86ed7adb16d;P8d47630c1025;P39670d618330;Pf1b7f6015dd2;Pad6ec16b4305",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "Pf86ed7adb16d;P8d47630c1025;P39670d618330;Pf1b7f6015dd2;Pad6ec16b4305",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1372",
    "hypothesis": "A porous ceramic tile could reveal thermal-contact defects through where dew first disappears during warming.",
    "test": "Compare dew maps and known defects.",
    "against": "Maps follow local emissivity only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 4,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 60,
    "literature_query": "porous ceramic tile reveal thermal-contact defects where dew first disappears warming experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N1372",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous ceramic tile could reveal thermal-contact defects through where dew first disappears during warming.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": true,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1372",
      "hypothesis": "A porous ceramic tile could reveal thermal-contact defects through where dew first disappears during warming.",
      "test": "Compare dew maps and known defects.",
      "against": "Maps follow local emissivity only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1372",
      "hypothesis": "A porous ceramic tile could reveal thermal-contact defects through where dew first disappears during warming.",
      "test": "Compare dew maps and known defects.",
      "against": "Maps follow local emissivity only.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 23,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 60,
      "literature_query": "porous ceramic tile reveal thermal-contact defects where dew first disappears warming experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "60",
      "id": "N1372",
      "hypothesis": "A porous ceramic tile could reveal thermal-contact defects through where dew first disappears during warming.",
      "test": "Compare dew maps and known defects.",
      "against": "Maps follow local emissivity only.",
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_score": "23",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P7945a95dadc1;Pf7b22fe264af",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N1372",
      "hypothesis": "A porous ceramic tile could reveal thermal-contact defects through where dew first disappears during warming.",
      "test": "Compare dew maps and known defects.",
      "against": "Maps follow local emissivity only.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 23,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 60,
      "literature_query": "porous ceramic tile reveal thermal-contact defects where dew first disappears warming experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P7945a95dadc1;Pf7b22fe264af",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P7945a95dadc1;Pf7b22fe264af",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": {
      "rank": "5",
      "id": "N1372",
      "hypothesis": "A porous ceramic tile could reveal thermal-contact defects through where dew first disappears during warming.",
      "primary_outcome": "Accuracy of locating a blinded thermal-contact defect from the spatial order of dew disappearance.",
      "comparison": "Known contact gaps beneath a porous tile versus bonded references, with an independent temperature map.",
      "controls": "Initial condensate volume; emissivity; porosity; surface chemistry; heater geometry; airflow; defect thermal mass.",
      "plan": "Create benign reversible contact defects without changing the exposed surface. Apply reproducible mild warming and image dew disappearance. Evaluate held-out defect locations rather than tuning image thresholds on the same specimens.",
      "against": "If dew maps only follow initial water thickness, surface wetting, or emissivity, they do not establish buried-contact detection.",
      "evidence": "Primary experiments connect conductor geometry to condensation detection. That is related background, not a demonstration of this dew-based defect map.",
      "source": "https://doi.org/10.1080/15567265.2023.2285745",
      "novelty": "Unverified; a familiar mechanism or existing method is not a new discovery.",
      "physical_data": "none collected"
    },
    "focused_assessment_fields": {
      "id": "N1372",
      "primary_outcome": "Accuracy of locating a blinded thermal-contact defect from the spatial order of dew disappearance.",
      "comparison": "Known contact gaps beneath a porous tile versus bonded references, with an independent temperature map.",
      "critical_controls": "Initial condensate volume; emissivity; porosity; surface chemistry; heater geometry; airflow; defect thermal mass.",
      "testing_plan": "Create benign reversible contact defects without changing the exposed surface. Apply reproducible mild warming and image dew disappearance. Evaluate held-out defect locations rather than tuning image thresholds on the same specimens.",
      "against": "If dew maps only follow initial water thickness, surface wetting, or emissivity, they do not establish buried-contact detection.",
      "evidence_assessment": "Primary experiments connect conductor geometry to condensation detection. That is related background, not a demonstration of this dew-based defect map.",
      "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1080/15567265.2023.2285745",
      "novelty": "Unverified; a familiar mechanism or existing method is not a new discovery.",
      "rank15": 5
    },
    "primary_outcome": "Accuracy of locating a blinded thermal-contact defect from the spatial order of dew disappearance.",
    "comparison": "Known contact gaps beneath a porous tile versus bonded references, with an independent temperature map.",
    "controls": "Initial condensate volume; emissivity; porosity; surface chemistry; heater geometry; airflow; defect thermal mass.",
    "plan": "Create benign reversible contact defects without changing the exposed surface. Apply reproducible mild warming and image dew disappearance. Evaluate held-out defect locations rather than tuning image thresholds on the same specimens.",
    "evidence": "Primary experiments connect conductor geometry to condensation detection. That is related background, not a demonstration of this dew-based defect map.",
    "source": "https://doi.org/10.1080/15567265.2023.2285745",
    "physical_data": "none collected",
    "dossier_text": "# 05. N1372\n\n## Prediction\n\nA porous ceramic tile could reveal thermal-contact defects through where dew first disappears during warming.\n\n## Primary measurement\n\nAccuracy of locating a blinded thermal-contact defect from the spatial order of dew disappearance.\n\n## Comparison\n\nKnown contact gaps beneath a porous tile versus bonded references, with an independent temperature map.\n\n## Controls\n\nInitial condensate volume; emissivity; porosity; surface chemistry; heater geometry; airflow; defect thermal mass.\n\n## Testing plan\n\nCreate benign reversible contact defects without changing the exposed surface. Apply reproducible mild warming and image dew disappearance. Evaluate held-out defect locations rather than tuning image thresholds on the same specimens.\n\n## Stop or revise\n\nIf dew maps only follow initial water thickness, surface wetting, or emissivity, they do not establish buried-contact detection.\n\n## Evidence and limits\n\nPrimary experiments connect conductor geometry to condensation detection. That is related background, not a demonstration of this dew-based defect map.\n\nRelated primary-source lead: https://doi.org/10.1080/15567265.2023.2285745\n\nUnverified; a familiar mechanism or existing method is not a new discovery.\n\n## Replication gate\n\nCalibrate measurement uncertainty first. Define a minimum meaningful effect in the primary outcome's units, then estimate variability across independently prepared specimens or assemblies. Use that variance for a design-specific confirmatory sample calculation. Images and repeated readings from one specimen are technical repeats, not independent replications. Randomize run order and blind labels where practical. Freeze exclusions and analysis before confirmation.\n\nA narrow interval excluding the chosen meaningful effect can count against the bounded claim; a wide interval is inconclusive. Report null and adverse results. The outline requires material and apparatus compatibility checks and is not a complete laboratory protocol.\n"
  },
  {
    "id": "N1373",
    "hypothesis": "A soft bead bed could mechanically filter pressure noise while transmitting mean chemical concentration changes.",
    "test": "Measure both downstream signals.",
    "against": "Chemical information is equally delayed.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1373",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A soft bead bed could mechanically filter pressure noise while transmitting mean chemical concentration changes.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1373",
      "hypothesis": "A soft bead bed could mechanically filter pressure noise while transmitting mean chemical concentration changes.",
      "test": "Measure both downstream signals.",
      "against": "Chemical information is equally delayed.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1373",
      "hypothesis": "A soft bead bed could mechanically filter pressure noise while transmitting mean chemical concentration changes.",
      "test": "Measure both downstream signals.",
      "against": "Chemical information is equally delayed.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1374",
    "hypothesis": "A thin ice coating could detach cleanly when a compliant backing creates a traveling peel wave.",
    "test": "Measure detachment and backing motion.",
    "against": "Clean release requires coating fracture.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1374",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A thin ice coating could detach cleanly when a compliant backing creates a traveling peel wave.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1374",
      "hypothesis": "A thin ice coating could detach cleanly when a compliant backing creates a traveling peel wave.",
      "test": "Measure detachment and backing motion.",
      "against": "Clean release requires coating fracture.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1374",
      "hypothesis": "A thin ice coating could detach cleanly when a compliant backing creates a traveling peel wave.",
      "test": "Measure detachment and backing motion.",
      "against": "Clean release requires coating fracture.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1375",
    "hypothesis": "A cellulose membrane could reject fouling particles by locally expanding around them during a harmless humidity step.",
    "test": "Measure capture and motion.",
    "against": "Rejection requires loss of all retained particles.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1375",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A cellulose membrane could reject fouling particles by locally expanding around them during a harmless humidity step.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1375",
      "hypothesis": "A cellulose membrane could reject fouling particles by locally expanding around them during a harmless humidity step.",
      "test": "Measure capture and motion.",
      "against": "Rejection requires loss of all retained particles.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1375",
      "hypothesis": "A cellulose membrane could reject fouling particles by locally expanding around them during a harmless humidity step.",
      "test": "Measure capture and motion.",
      "against": "Rejection requires loss of all retained particles.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1376",
    "hypothesis": "A sand-water mixture could reveal the location of a hidden soft inclusion through directional surface settlement.",
    "test": "Apply controlled loading.",
    "against": "Settlement follows inclusion depth only without localization.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 4,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1376",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A sand-water mixture could reveal the location of a hidden soft inclusion through directional surface settlement.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1376",
      "hypothesis": "A sand-water mixture could reveal the location of a hidden soft inclusion through directional surface settlement.",
      "test": "Apply controlled loading.",
      "against": "Settlement follows inclusion depth only without localization.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1376",
      "hypothesis": "A sand-water mixture could reveal the location of a hidden soft inclusion through directional surface settlement.",
      "test": "Apply controlled loading.",
      "against": "Settlement follows inclusion depth only without localization.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1377",
    "hypothesis": "A porous strip could record maximum fluid pressure through irreversible relocation of an inert dye-free particle line.",
    "test": "Measure line and pressure.",
    "against": "Position follows total passed volume only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1377",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous strip could record maximum fluid pressure through irreversible relocation of an inert dye-free particle line.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1377",
      "hypothesis": "A porous strip could record maximum fluid pressure through irreversible relocation of an inert dye-free particle line.",
      "test": "Measure line and pressure.",
      "against": "Position follows total passed volume only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1377",
      "hypothesis": "A porous strip could record maximum fluid pressure through irreversible relocation of an inert dye-free particle line.",
      "test": "Measure line and pressure.",
      "against": "Position follows total passed volume only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1378",
    "hypothesis": "A flexible fiber mat could maintain drainage during compression by rotating its main pores into the loading direction.",
    "test": "Image pores and flux.",
    "against": "Drainage requires lower compression.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 4,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 32,
    "literature_query": "flexible fiber mat maintain drainage compression rotating main pores loading direction experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N1378",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A flexible fiber mat could maintain drainage during compression by rotating its main pores into the loading direction.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1378",
      "hypothesis": "A flexible fiber mat could maintain drainage during compression by rotating its main pores into the loading direction.",
      "test": "Image pores and flux.",
      "against": "Drainage requires lower compression.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1378",
      "hypothesis": "A flexible fiber mat could maintain drainage during compression by rotating its main pores into the loading direction.",
      "test": "Image pores and flux.",
      "against": "Drainage requires lower compression.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 32,
      "literature_query": "flexible fiber mat maintain drainage compression rotating main pores loading direction experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "32",
      "id": "N1378",
      "hypothesis": "A flexible fiber mat could maintain drainage during compression by rotating its main pores into the loading direction.",
      "test": "Image pores and flux.",
      "against": "Drainage requires lower compression.",
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_score": "24",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pb82d30da457d;P0da46d89d903;P22bcada13c62",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N1378",
      "hypothesis": "A flexible fiber mat could maintain drainage during compression by rotating its main pores into the loading direction.",
      "test": "Image pores and flux.",
      "against": "Drainage requires lower compression.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 32,
      "literature_query": "flexible fiber mat maintain drainage compression rotating main pores loading direction experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pb82d30da457d;P0da46d89d903;P22bcada13c62",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "Pb82d30da457d;P0da46d89d903;P22bcada13c62",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1379",
    "hypothesis": "A transparent adhesive could reveal contamination through a moving cavitation boundary during gentle unloading.",
    "test": "Compare calibrated contaminants.",
    "against": "Boundary follows contact area only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1379",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A transparent adhesive could reveal contamination through a moving cavitation boundary during gentle unloading.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1379",
      "hypothesis": "A transparent adhesive could reveal contamination through a moving cavitation boundary during gentle unloading.",
      "test": "Compare calibrated contaminants.",
      "against": "Boundary follows contact area only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1379",
      "hypothesis": "A transparent adhesive could reveal contamination through a moving cavitation boundary during gentle unloading.",
      "test": "Compare calibrated contaminants.",
      "against": "Boundary follows contact area only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1380",
    "hypothesis": "A capillary channel could separate input concentration and temperature using the ordering of two natural moving fronts.",
    "test": "Measure both fronts.",
    "against": "Their motions remain inseparable.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1380",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A capillary channel could separate input concentration and temperature using the ordering of two natural moving fronts.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1380",
      "hypothesis": "A capillary channel could separate input concentration and temperature using the ordering of two natural moving fronts.",
      "test": "Measure both fronts.",
      "against": "Their motions remain inseparable.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1380",
      "hypothesis": "A capillary channel could separate input concentration and temperature using the ordering of two natural moving fronts.",
      "test": "Measure both fronts.",
      "against": "Their motions remain inseparable.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1381",
    "hypothesis": "A wet wooden veneer could dissipate torsion more effectively when a moisture gradient crosses rather than follows the grain.",
    "test": "Measure damping and moisture.",
    "against": "Differences follow average stiffness only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 4,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 33,
    "literature_query": "wet wooden veneer dissipate torsion effectively when moisture gradient crosses follows grain experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N1381",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A wet wooden veneer could dissipate torsion more effectively when a moisture gradient crosses rather than follows the grain.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1381",
      "hypothesis": "A wet wooden veneer could dissipate torsion more effectively when a moisture gradient crosses rather than follows the grain.",
      "test": "Measure damping and moisture.",
      "against": "Differences follow average stiffness only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1381",
      "hypothesis": "A wet wooden veneer could dissipate torsion more effectively when a moisture gradient crosses rather than follows the grain.",
      "test": "Measure damping and moisture.",
      "against": "Differences follow average stiffness only.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 33,
      "literature_query": "wet wooden veneer dissipate torsion effectively when moisture gradient crosses follows grain experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "33",
      "id": "N1381",
      "hypothesis": "A wet wooden veneer could dissipate torsion more effectively when a moisture gradient crosses rather than follows the grain.",
      "test": "Measure damping and moisture.",
      "against": "Differences follow average stiffness only.",
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_score": "24",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P6d3f42136dd0;Pbee594dffa0e",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N1381",
      "hypothesis": "A wet wooden veneer could dissipate torsion more effectively when a moisture gradient crosses rather than follows the grain.",
      "test": "Measure damping and moisture.",
      "against": "Differences follow average stiffness only.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 33,
      "literature_query": "wet wooden veneer dissipate torsion effectively when moisture gradient crosses follows grain experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P6d3f42136dd0;Pbee594dffa0e",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P6d3f42136dd0;Pbee594dffa0e",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1382",
    "hypothesis": "A soft foam could identify a previous overload from its response to a weak airflow pulse after thickness recovery.",
    "test": "Measure pressure relaxation.",
    "against": "Signals reflect permanent thickness changes only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1382",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A soft foam could identify a previous overload from its response to a weak airflow pulse after thickness recovery.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1382",
      "hypothesis": "A soft foam could identify a previous overload from its response to a weak airflow pulse after thickness recovery.",
      "test": "Measure pressure relaxation.",
      "against": "Signals reflect permanent thickness changes only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1382",
      "hypothesis": "A soft foam could identify a previous overload from its response to a weak airflow pulse after thickness recovery.",
      "test": "Measure pressure relaxation.",
      "against": "Signals reflect permanent thickness changes only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1383",
    "hypothesis": "A porous glass bead could measure water activity through mechanical resonance while ignoring external liquid volume.",
    "test": "Calibrate activity and immersion.",
    "against": "Resonance follows added mass alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1383",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous glass bead could measure water activity through mechanical resonance while ignoring external liquid volume.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1383",
      "hypothesis": "A porous glass bead could measure water activity through mechanical resonance while ignoring external liquid volume.",
      "test": "Calibrate activity and immersion.",
      "against": "Resonance follows added mass alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1383",
      "hypothesis": "A porous glass bead could measure water activity through mechanical resonance while ignoring external liquid volume.",
      "test": "Calibrate activity and immersion.",
      "against": "Resonance follows added mass alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1384",
    "hypothesis": "A clay-paper composite could retain permeability after drying by distributing shrinkage into many harmless microscopic folds.",
    "test": "Image folds and transport.",
    "against": "Preservation requires larger cracks.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 4,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 34,
    "literature_query": "clay-paper composite retain permeability drying distributing shrinkage many harmless microscopic folds experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N1384",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A clay-paper composite could retain permeability after drying by distributing shrinkage into many harmless microscopic folds.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1384",
      "hypothesis": "A clay-paper composite could retain permeability after drying by distributing shrinkage into many harmless microscopic folds.",
      "test": "Image folds and transport.",
      "against": "Preservation requires larger cracks.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1384",
      "hypothesis": "A clay-paper composite could retain permeability after drying by distributing shrinkage into many harmless microscopic folds.",
      "test": "Image folds and transport.",
      "against": "Preservation requires larger cracks.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 34,
      "literature_query": "clay-paper composite retain permeability drying distributing shrinkage many harmless microscopic folds experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "34",
      "id": "N1384",
      "hypothesis": "A clay-paper composite could retain permeability after drying by distributing shrinkage into many harmless microscopic folds.",
      "test": "Image folds and transport.",
      "against": "Preservation requires larger cracks.",
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_score": "24",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P74a73c90f8ac;Pefa0ebf33184;P67f394d4b9b7;Pb5540800958e;P0b2cc0655596",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N1384",
      "hypothesis": "A clay-paper composite could retain permeability after drying by distributing shrinkage into many harmless microscopic folds.",
      "test": "Image folds and transport.",
      "against": "Preservation requires larger cracks.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 34,
      "literature_query": "clay-paper composite retain permeability drying distributing shrinkage many harmless microscopic folds experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P74a73c90f8ac;Pefa0ebf33184;P67f394d4b9b7;Pb5540800958e;P0b2cc0655596",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P74a73c90f8ac;Pefa0ebf33184;P67f394d4b9b7;Pb5540800958e;P0b2cc0655596",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1385",
    "hypothesis": "A droplet could locate a buried heated wire through its rotation direction without touching the wire.",
    "test": "Measure thermal fields and motion.",
    "against": "Rotation follows random surface defects.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1385",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A droplet could locate a buried heated wire through its rotation direction without touching the wire.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1385",
      "hypothesis": "A droplet could locate a buried heated wire through its rotation direction without touching the wire.",
      "test": "Measure thermal fields and motion.",
      "against": "Rotation follows random surface defects.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1385",
      "hypothesis": "A droplet could locate a buried heated wire through its rotation direction without touching the wire.",
      "test": "Measure thermal fields and motion.",
      "against": "Rotation follows random surface defects.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1386",
    "hypothesis": "A flexible granular container could reduce settling segregation by shifting its wall compliance as particles rearrange.",
    "test": "Measure sorting and wall strain.",
    "against": "Benefits follow external agitation only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1386",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A flexible granular container could reduce settling segregation by shifting its wall compliance as particles rearrange.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1386",
      "hypothesis": "A flexible granular container could reduce settling segregation by shifting its wall compliance as particles rearrange.",
      "test": "Measure sorting and wall strain.",
      "against": "Benefits follow external agitation only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1386",
      "hypothesis": "A flexible granular container could reduce settling segregation by shifting its wall compliance as particles rearrange.",
      "test": "Measure sorting and wall strain.",
      "against": "Benefits follow external agitation only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1387",
    "hypothesis": "A transparent gel could reveal local ion binding through a change in wave propagation before measurable swelling.",
    "test": "Measure ions, waves, and dimensions.",
    "against": "Signals begin only after swelling.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1387",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A transparent gel could reveal local ion binding through a change in wave propagation before measurable swelling.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1387",
      "hypothesis": "A transparent gel could reveal local ion binding through a change in wave propagation before measurable swelling.",
      "test": "Measure ions, waves, and dimensions.",
      "against": "Signals begin only after swelling.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1387",
      "hypothesis": "A transparent gel could reveal local ion binding through a change in wave propagation before measurable swelling.",
      "test": "Measure ions, waves, and dimensions.",
      "against": "Signals begin only after swelling.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1388",
    "hypothesis": "A porous wick could distinguish a blocked outlet from an empty inlet through opposite moisture-front recoil.",
    "test": "Introduce both faults independently.",
    "against": "Recoil signatures remain identical.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 4,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 147,
    "literature_query": "porous wick distinguish blocked outlet empty inlet opposite moisture-front recoil experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N1388",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous wick could distinguish a blocked outlet from an empty inlet through opposite moisture-front recoil.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": true,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1388",
      "hypothesis": "A porous wick could distinguish a blocked outlet from an empty inlet through opposite moisture-front recoil.",
      "test": "Introduce both faults independently.",
      "against": "Recoil signatures remain identical.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1388",
      "hypothesis": "A porous wick could distinguish a blocked outlet from an empty inlet through opposite moisture-front recoil.",
      "test": "Introduce both faults independently.",
      "against": "Recoil signatures remain identical.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 147,
      "literature_query": "porous wick distinguish blocked outlet empty inlet opposite moisture-front recoil experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "147",
      "id": "N1388",
      "hypothesis": "A porous wick could distinguish a blocked outlet from an empty inlet through opposite moisture-front recoil.",
      "test": "Introduce both faults independently.",
      "against": "Recoil signatures remain identical.",
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_score": "21",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P743b99b6215d;P2dbac1421eba;P2ca2e835dc59;Pb6a56218cea5;P8ca0f12d8fce",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N1388",
      "hypothesis": "A porous wick could distinguish a blocked outlet from an empty inlet through opposite moisture-front recoil.",
      "test": "Introduce both faults independently.",
      "against": "Recoil signatures remain identical.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 147,
      "literature_query": "porous wick distinguish blocked outlet empty inlet opposite moisture-front recoil experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P743b99b6215d;P2dbac1421eba;P2ca2e835dc59;Pb6a56218cea5;P8ca0f12d8fce",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P743b99b6215d;P2dbac1421eba;P2ca2e835dc59;Pb6a56218cea5;P8ca0f12d8fce",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": {
      "rank": "9",
      "id": "N1388",
      "hypothesis": "A porous wick could distinguish a blocked outlet from an empty inlet through opposite moisture-front recoil.",
      "primary_outcome": "Classification error between inlet starvation and outlet blockage from a preregistered moisture-front recovery feature.",
      "comparison": "Normally supplied wick, emptied inlet, and blocked outlet with matched initial wetness; include partial faults.",
      "controls": "Evaporation; reservoir height; pore structure; tracer effects; initial saturation; tubing compliance; imposed probe pulse.",
      "plan": "Define exactly which front is measured and when the fault occurs. Apply a small calibrated probe, image wetness, and measure total water mass. Validate the classifier on separately prepared wicks and randomized fault labels.",
      "against": "Opposite recoil is not guaranteed by a generic wick. Reject it if fronts have the same sign under well-matched conditions or classification relies on a trivial view of the reservoir.",
      "evidence": "Capillary-pump studies support sensitivity to liquid-supply failure, but they do not demonstrate this exact fault classifier in a simple paper wick.",
      "source": "https://academic.oup.com/ijlct/article/11/2/184/2198372",
      "novelty": "Unverified; a familiar mechanism or existing method is not a new discovery.",
      "physical_data": "none collected"
    },
    "focused_assessment_fields": {
      "id": "N1388",
      "primary_outcome": "Classification error between inlet starvation and outlet blockage from a preregistered moisture-front recovery feature.",
      "comparison": "Normally supplied wick, emptied inlet, and blocked outlet with matched initial wetness; include partial faults.",
      "critical_controls": "Evaporation; reservoir height; pore structure; tracer effects; initial saturation; tubing compliance; imposed probe pulse.",
      "testing_plan": "Define exactly which front is measured and when the fault occurs. Apply a small calibrated probe, image wetness, and measure total water mass. Validate the classifier on separately prepared wicks and randomized fault labels.",
      "against": "Opposite recoil is not guaranteed by a generic wick. Reject it if fronts have the same sign under well-matched conditions or classification relies on a trivial view of the reservoir.",
      "evidence_assessment": "Capillary-pump studies support sensitivity to liquid-supply failure, but they do not demonstrate this exact fault classifier in a simple paper wick.",
      "source_url": "https://academic.oup.com/ijlct/article/11/2/184/2198372",
      "novelty": "Unverified; a familiar mechanism or existing method is not a new discovery.",
      "rank15": 9
    },
    "primary_outcome": "Classification error between inlet starvation and outlet blockage from a preregistered moisture-front recovery feature.",
    "comparison": "Normally supplied wick, emptied inlet, and blocked outlet with matched initial wetness; include partial faults.",
    "controls": "Evaporation; reservoir height; pore structure; tracer effects; initial saturation; tubing compliance; imposed probe pulse.",
    "plan": "Define exactly which front is measured and when the fault occurs. Apply a small calibrated probe, image wetness, and measure total water mass. Validate the classifier on separately prepared wicks and randomized fault labels.",
    "evidence": "Capillary-pump studies support sensitivity to liquid-supply failure, but they do not demonstrate this exact fault classifier in a simple paper wick.",
    "source": "https://academic.oup.com/ijlct/article/11/2/184/2198372",
    "physical_data": "none collected",
    "dossier_text": "# 09. N1388\n\n## Prediction\n\nA porous wick could distinguish a blocked outlet from an empty inlet through opposite moisture-front recoil.\n\n## Primary measurement\n\nClassification error between inlet starvation and outlet blockage from a preregistered moisture-front recovery feature.\n\n## Comparison\n\nNormally supplied wick, emptied inlet, and blocked outlet with matched initial wetness; include partial faults.\n\n## Controls\n\nEvaporation; reservoir height; pore structure; tracer effects; initial saturation; tubing compliance; imposed probe pulse.\n\n## Testing plan\n\nDefine exactly which front is measured and when the fault occurs. Apply a small calibrated probe, image wetness, and measure total water mass. Validate the classifier on separately prepared wicks and randomized fault labels.\n\n## Stop or revise\n\nOpposite recoil is not guaranteed by a generic wick. Reject it if fronts have the same sign under well-matched conditions or classification relies on a trivial view of the reservoir.\n\n## Evidence and limits\n\nCapillary-pump studies support sensitivity to liquid-supply failure, but they do not demonstrate this exact fault classifier in a simple paper wick.\n\nRelated primary-source lead: https://academic.oup.com/ijlct/article/11/2/184/2198372\n\nUnverified; a familiar mechanism or existing method is not a new discovery.\n\n## Replication gate\n\nCalibrate measurement uncertainty first. Define a minimum meaningful effect in the primary outcome's units, then estimate variability across independently prepared specimens or assemblies. Use that variance for a design-specific confirmatory sample calculation. Images and repeated readings from one specimen are technical repeats, not independent replications. Randomize run order and blind labels where practical. Freeze exclusions and analysis before confirmation.\n\nA narrow interval excluding the chosen meaningful effect can count against the bounded claim; a wide interval is inconclusive. Report null and adverse results. The outline requires material and apparatus compatibility checks and is not a complete laboratory protocol.\n"
  },
  {
    "id": "N1389",
    "hypothesis": "A paper coil could measure cumulative drying through irreversible turn-to-turn slip while remaining insensitive to mechanical shaking.",
    "test": "Apply controlled histories.",
    "against": "Shaking changes the same record.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 4,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 35,
    "literature_query": "paper coil measure cumulative drying irreversible turn-to-turn slip remaining insensitive mechanical shaking experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N1389",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A paper coil could measure cumulative drying through irreversible turn-to-turn slip while remaining insensitive to mechanical shaking.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1389",
      "hypothesis": "A paper coil could measure cumulative drying through irreversible turn-to-turn slip while remaining insensitive to mechanical shaking.",
      "test": "Apply controlled histories.",
      "against": "Shaking changes the same record.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1389",
      "hypothesis": "A paper coil could measure cumulative drying through irreversible turn-to-turn slip while remaining insensitive to mechanical shaking.",
      "test": "Apply controlled histories.",
      "against": "Shaking changes the same record.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 35,
      "literature_query": "paper coil measure cumulative drying irreversible turn-to-turn slip remaining insensitive mechanical shaking experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "35",
      "id": "N1389",
      "hypothesis": "A paper coil could measure cumulative drying through irreversible turn-to-turn slip while remaining insensitive to mechanical shaking.",
      "test": "Apply controlled histories.",
      "against": "Shaking changes the same record.",
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_score": "24",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pb4341b8ba29c;P83de6d22a092;P8a0164081550;P886cbc07d90e",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N1389",
      "hypothesis": "A paper coil could measure cumulative drying through irreversible turn-to-turn slip while remaining insensitive to mechanical shaking.",
      "test": "Apply controlled histories.",
      "against": "Shaking changes the same record.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 35,
      "literature_query": "paper coil measure cumulative drying irreversible turn-to-turn slip remaining insensitive mechanical shaking experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pb4341b8ba29c;P83de6d22a092;P8a0164081550;P886cbc07d90e",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "Pb4341b8ba29c;P83de6d22a092;P8a0164081550;P886cbc07d90e",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1390",
    "hypothesis": "A rubber membrane could detect dissolved gas supersaturation from the timing of microscopic blister recovery.",
    "test": "Measure gas and blister dynamics.",
    "against": "Timing follows surface damage only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 4,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 61,
    "literature_query": "rubber membrane detect dissolved gas supersaturation timing microscopic blister recovery experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N1390",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A rubber membrane could detect dissolved gas supersaturation from the timing of microscopic blister recovery.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1390",
      "hypothesis": "A rubber membrane could detect dissolved gas supersaturation from the timing of microscopic blister recovery.",
      "test": "Measure gas and blister dynamics.",
      "against": "Timing follows surface damage only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1390",
      "hypothesis": "A rubber membrane could detect dissolved gas supersaturation from the timing of microscopic blister recovery.",
      "test": "Measure gas and blister dynamics.",
      "against": "Timing follows surface damage only.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 23,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 61,
      "literature_query": "rubber membrane detect dissolved gas supersaturation timing microscopic blister recovery experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "61",
      "id": "N1390",
      "hypothesis": "A rubber membrane could detect dissolved gas supersaturation from the timing of microscopic blister recovery.",
      "test": "Measure gas and blister dynamics.",
      "against": "Timing follows surface damage only.",
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_score": "23",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pecc514380506;Pd727ef18d7fa;P2ae3103b5bcf;P62b019ee62d3;Pba856af1c4ea",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N1390",
      "hypothesis": "A rubber membrane could detect dissolved gas supersaturation from the timing of microscopic blister recovery.",
      "test": "Measure gas and blister dynamics.",
      "against": "Timing follows surface damage only.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 23,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 61,
      "literature_query": "rubber membrane detect dissolved gas supersaturation timing microscopic blister recovery experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pecc514380506;Pd727ef18d7fa;P2ae3103b5bcf;P62b019ee62d3;Pba856af1c4ea",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "Pecc514380506;Pd727ef18d7fa;P2ae3103b5bcf;P62b019ee62d3;Pba856af1c4ea",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1391",
    "hypothesis": "A salt-crystal bed could protect an underlying surface by directing expansion toward mechanically compliant voids.",
    "test": "Measure stress and crystal motion.",
    "against": "Protection follows lower salt mass only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1391",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A salt-crystal bed could protect an underlying surface by directing expansion toward mechanically compliant voids.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1391",
      "hypothesis": "A salt-crystal bed could protect an underlying surface by directing expansion toward mechanically compliant voids.",
      "test": "Measure stress and crystal motion.",
      "against": "Protection follows lower salt mass only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1391",
      "hypothesis": "A salt-crystal bed could protect an underlying surface by directing expansion toward mechanically compliant voids.",
      "test": "Measure stress and crystal motion.",
      "against": "Protection follows lower salt mass only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1392",
    "hypothesis": "A thin polymer pouch could damp impacts through reversible folding of an internal liquid interface.",
    "test": "Image interface and transmitted force.",
    "against": "Damping follows wall deformation alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1392",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A thin polymer pouch could damp impacts through reversible folding of an internal liquid interface.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1392",
      "hypothesis": "A thin polymer pouch could damp impacts through reversible folding of an internal liquid interface.",
      "test": "Image interface and transmitted force.",
      "against": "Damping follows wall deformation alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1392",
      "hypothesis": "A thin polymer pouch could damp impacts through reversible folding of an internal liquid interface.",
      "test": "Image interface and transmitted force.",
      "against": "Damping follows wall deformation alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1393",
    "hypothesis": "A moist powder could resist caking when weak internal vibration breaks only newly formed crystal bridges.",
    "test": "Measure bridge age and strength.",
    "against": "Benefits require permanent grinding.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1393",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A moist powder could resist caking when weak internal vibration breaks only newly formed crystal bridges.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1393",
      "hypothesis": "A moist powder could resist caking when weak internal vibration breaks only newly formed crystal bridges.",
      "test": "Measure bridge age and strength.",
      "against": "Benefits require permanent grinding.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1393",
      "hypothesis": "A moist powder could resist caking when weak internal vibration breaks only newly formed crystal bridges.",
      "test": "Measure bridge age and strength.",
      "against": "Benefits require permanent grinding.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1394",
    "hypothesis": "A porous reflective film could reveal internal liquid connectivity through its response to a tiny bending pulse.",
    "test": "Measure optics and independent pore maps.",
    "against": "Signals follow total liquid content only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1394",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous reflective film could reveal internal liquid connectivity through its response to a tiny bending pulse.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1394",
      "hypothesis": "A porous reflective film could reveal internal liquid connectivity through its response to a tiny bending pulse.",
      "test": "Measure optics and independent pore maps.",
      "against": "Signals follow total liquid content only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1394",
      "hypothesis": "A porous reflective film could reveal internal liquid connectivity through its response to a tiny bending pulse.",
      "test": "Measure optics and independent pore maps.",
      "against": "Signals follow total liquid content only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1395",
    "hypothesis": "A glass-fiber wick could preserve fluid routing after a local burn-free thermal shock through reversible fiber rearrangement.",
    "test": "Map fibers and liquid paths.",
    "against": "Routing requires unchanged original geometry.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 4,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 22,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 68,
    "literature_query": "glass-fiber wick preserve fluid routing local burn-free thermal shock reversible fiber rearrangement experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N1395",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A glass-fiber wick could preserve fluid routing after a local burn-free thermal shock through reversible fiber rearrangement.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1395",
      "hypothesis": "A glass-fiber wick could preserve fluid routing after a local burn-free thermal shock through reversible fiber rearrangement.",
      "test": "Map fibers and liquid paths.",
      "against": "Routing requires unchanged original geometry.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1395",
      "hypothesis": "A glass-fiber wick could preserve fluid routing after a local burn-free thermal shock through reversible fiber rearrangement.",
      "test": "Map fibers and liquid paths.",
      "against": "Routing requires unchanged original geometry.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 22,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 68,
      "literature_query": "glass-fiber wick preserve fluid routing local burn-free thermal shock reversible fiber rearrangement experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "68",
      "id": "N1395",
      "hypothesis": "A glass-fiber wick could preserve fluid routing after a local burn-free thermal shock through reversible fiber rearrangement.",
      "test": "Map fibers and liquid paths.",
      "against": "Routing requires unchanged original geometry.",
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_score": "22",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P39eabcf44cc5;Pf2c516109b47;Pa0ab6f8235ce;P13e9b1043684;Pc45c91dfe7b2;P19570934b558",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N1395",
      "hypothesis": "A glass-fiber wick could preserve fluid routing after a local burn-free thermal shock through reversible fiber rearrangement.",
      "test": "Map fibers and liquid paths.",
      "against": "Routing requires unchanged original geometry.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 22,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 68,
      "literature_query": "glass-fiber wick preserve fluid routing local burn-free thermal shock reversible fiber rearrangement experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P39eabcf44cc5;Pf2c516109b47;Pa0ab6f8235ce;P13e9b1043684;Pc45c91dfe7b2;P19570934b558",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P39eabcf44cc5;Pf2c516109b47;Pa0ab6f8235ce;P13e9b1043684;Pc45c91dfe7b2;P19570934b558",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1396",
    "hypothesis": "A soft capsule could identify an attached solid particle through a persistent asymmetry in its free oscillation decay.",
    "test": "Calibrate particles and shape.",
    "against": "Signal follows capsule deformation only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1396",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A soft capsule could identify an attached solid particle through a persistent asymmetry in its free oscillation decay.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1396",
      "hypothesis": "A soft capsule could identify an attached solid particle through a persistent asymmetry in its free oscillation decay.",
      "test": "Calibrate particles and shape.",
      "against": "Signal follows capsule deformation only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1396",
      "hypothesis": "A soft capsule could identify an attached solid particle through a persistent asymmetry in its free oscillation decay.",
      "test": "Calibrate particles and shape.",
      "against": "Signal follows capsule deformation only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1397",
    "hypothesis": "A cellulose stack could release stored moisture preferentially toward the colder face through mechanically gated interlayer contacts.",
    "test": "Measure contacts and vapor.",
    "against": "Direction follows ordinary diffusion alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1397",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A cellulose stack could release stored moisture preferentially toward the colder face through mechanically gated interlayer contacts.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1397",
      "hypothesis": "A cellulose stack could release stored moisture preferentially toward the colder face through mechanically gated interlayer contacts.",
      "test": "Measure contacts and vapor.",
      "against": "Direction follows ordinary diffusion alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1397",
      "hypothesis": "A cellulose stack could release stored moisture preferentially toward the colder face through mechanically gated interlayer contacts.",
      "test": "Measure contacts and vapor.",
      "against": "Direction follows ordinary diffusion alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1398",
    "hypothesis": "A wet granular bridge could become stronger after gentle oscillation reorganizes liquid necks without moving grains appreciably.",
    "test": "Image necks and force.",
    "against": "Strength gain requires grain compaction.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1398",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A wet granular bridge could become stronger after gentle oscillation reorganizes liquid necks without moving grains appreciably.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1398",
      "hypothesis": "A wet granular bridge could become stronger after gentle oscillation reorganizes liquid necks without moving grains appreciably.",
      "test": "Image necks and force.",
      "against": "Strength gain requires grain compaction.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1398",
      "hypothesis": "A wet granular bridge could become stronger after gentle oscillation reorganizes liquid necks without moving grains appreciably.",
      "test": "Image necks and force.",
      "against": "Strength gain requires grain compaction.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1399",
    "hypothesis": "A porous tile could retain a transient chemical boundary as a later acoustic contrast after complete rinsing.",
    "test": "Measure chemistry and sound.",
    "against": "Contrast requires residual chemical material.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1399",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous tile could retain a transient chemical boundary as a later acoustic contrast after complete rinsing.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1399",
      "hypothesis": "A porous tile could retain a transient chemical boundary as a later acoustic contrast after complete rinsing.",
      "test": "Measure chemistry and sound.",
      "against": "Contrast requires residual chemical material.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1399",
      "hypothesis": "A porous tile could retain a transient chemical boundary as a later acoustic contrast after complete rinsing.",
      "test": "Measure chemistry and sound.",
      "against": "Contrast requires residual chemical material.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1400",
    "hypothesis": "A porous lens could reveal the direction of water entry through a transient displacement of its optical axis.",
    "test": "Measure axis and wetting front.",
    "against": "Axis motion follows mounting drift only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1400",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous lens could reveal the direction of water entry through a transient displacement of its optical axis.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1400",
      "hypothesis": "A porous lens could reveal the direction of water entry through a transient displacement of its optical axis.",
      "test": "Measure axis and wetting front.",
      "against": "Axis motion follows mounting drift only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1400",
      "hypothesis": "A porous lens could reveal the direction of water entry through a transient displacement of its optical axis.",
      "test": "Measure axis and wetting front.",
      "against": "Axis motion follows mounting drift only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1401",
    "hypothesis": "A mechanical latch could release contamination selectively when its local friction increases beyond a calibrated range.",
    "test": "Measure release and friction.",
    "against": "Release follows applied load only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1401",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A mechanical latch could release contamination selectively when its local friction increases beyond a calibrated range.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1401",
      "hypothesis": "A mechanical latch could release contamination selectively when its local friction increases beyond a calibrated range.",
      "test": "Measure release and friction.",
      "against": "Release follows applied load only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1401",
      "hypothesis": "A mechanical latch could release contamination selectively when its local friction increases beyond a calibrated range.",
      "test": "Measure release and friction.",
      "against": "Release follows applied load only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1402",
    "hypothesis": "A salt-bearing paper could preserve a pressure-pulse duration in the width of a later crystallization band.",
    "test": "Apply equal-peak pressure pulses.",
    "against": "Band width follows total fluid volume only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 4,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 22,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 69,
    "literature_query": "salt-bearing paper preserve pressure-pulse duration width later crystallization band experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N1402",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A salt-bearing paper could preserve a pressure-pulse duration in the width of a later crystallization band.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1402",
      "hypothesis": "A salt-bearing paper could preserve a pressure-pulse duration in the width of a later crystallization band.",
      "test": "Apply equal-peak pressure pulses.",
      "against": "Band width follows total fluid volume only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1402",
      "hypothesis": "A salt-bearing paper could preserve a pressure-pulse duration in the width of a later crystallization band.",
      "test": "Apply equal-peak pressure pulses.",
      "against": "Band width follows total fluid volume only.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 22,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 69,
      "literature_query": "salt-bearing paper preserve pressure-pulse duration width later crystallization band experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "69",
      "id": "N1402",
      "hypothesis": "A salt-bearing paper could preserve a pressure-pulse duration in the width of a later crystallization band.",
      "test": "Apply equal-peak pressure pulses.",
      "against": "Band width follows total fluid volume only.",
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_score": "22",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P1d70280ec742;P4fc2f715aa57;P64f9a2b87aed;Pc8725a522dea;P928f2b239905;P3c1ce83be6d1;P7f182086a7ec;P17390f9583fe",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N1402",
      "hypothesis": "A salt-bearing paper could preserve a pressure-pulse duration in the width of a later crystallization band.",
      "test": "Apply equal-peak pressure pulses.",
      "against": "Band width follows total fluid volume only.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 22,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 69,
      "literature_query": "salt-bearing paper preserve pressure-pulse duration width later crystallization band experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P1d70280ec742;P4fc2f715aa57;P64f9a2b87aed;Pc8725a522dea;P928f2b239905;P3c1ce83be6d1;P7f182086a7ec;P17390f9583fe",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P1d70280ec742;P4fc2f715aa57;P64f9a2b87aed;Pc8725a522dea;P928f2b239905;P3c1ce83be6d1;P7f182086a7ec;P17390f9583fe",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1403",
    "hypothesis": "A transparent capsule could distinguish internal gas loss from liquid leakage through opposite shifts of paired shape modes.",
    "test": "Introduce controlled leaks.",
    "against": "Modes cannot identify lost phase.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 12,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1403",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A transparent capsule could distinguish internal gas loss from liquid leakage through opposite shifts of paired shape modes.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1403",
      "hypothesis": "A transparent capsule could distinguish internal gas loss from liquid leakage through opposite shifts of paired shape modes.",
      "test": "Introduce controlled leaks.",
      "against": "Modes cannot identify lost phase.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1403",
      "hypothesis": "A transparent capsule could distinguish internal gas loss from liquid leakage through opposite shifts of paired shape modes.",
      "test": "Introduce controlled leaks.",
      "against": "Modes cannot identify lost phase.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 12,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1404",
    "hypothesis": "A porous ceramic seam could seal water while passing gas through pressure-driven rearrangement of trapped interfaces.",
    "test": "Measure both fluxes.",
    "against": "Selectivity requires chemical modification.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1404",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous ceramic seam could seal water while passing gas through pressure-driven rearrangement of trapped interfaces.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1404",
      "hypothesis": "A porous ceramic seam could seal water while passing gas through pressure-driven rearrangement of trapped interfaces.",
      "test": "Measure both fluxes.",
      "against": "Selectivity requires chemical modification.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1404",
      "hypothesis": "A porous ceramic seam could seal water while passing gas through pressure-driven rearrangement of trapped interfaces.",
      "test": "Measure both fluxes.",
      "against": "Selectivity requires chemical modification.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1405",
    "hypothesis": "A fiber-reinforced droplet could retain an imposed shape until a specific solvent-exchange rate is exceeded.",
    "test": "Control exchange independently of composition.",
    "against": "Collapse follows final composition only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1405",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A fiber-reinforced droplet could retain an imposed shape until a specific solvent-exchange rate is exceeded.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1405",
      "hypothesis": "A fiber-reinforced droplet could retain an imposed shape until a specific solvent-exchange rate is exceeded.",
      "test": "Control exchange independently of composition.",
      "against": "Collapse follows final composition only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1405",
      "hypothesis": "A fiber-reinforced droplet could retain an imposed shape until a specific solvent-exchange rate is exceeded.",
      "test": "Control exchange independently of composition.",
      "against": "Collapse follows final composition only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1406",
    "hypothesis": "A thin powder layer could identify vibration direction from the spatial pattern of its later water uptake.",
    "test": "Measure wetting after controlled motion.",
    "against": "Pattern follows residual thickness only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1406",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A thin powder layer could identify vibration direction from the spatial pattern of its later water uptake.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1406",
      "hypothesis": "A thin powder layer could identify vibration direction from the spatial pattern of its later water uptake.",
      "test": "Measure wetting after controlled motion.",
      "against": "Pattern follows residual thickness only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1406",
      "hypothesis": "A thin powder layer could identify vibration direction from the spatial pattern of its later water uptake.",
      "test": "Measure wetting after controlled motion.",
      "against": "Pattern follows residual thickness only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1407",
    "hypothesis": "A cellulose actuator could regain its original curvature after aging by redistributing bound rather than free water.",
    "test": "Measure water states and shape.",
    "against": "Recovery requires new chemical treatment.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1407",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A cellulose actuator could regain its original curvature after aging by redistributing bound rather than free water.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1407",
      "hypothesis": "A cellulose actuator could regain its original curvature after aging by redistributing bound rather than free water.",
      "test": "Measure water states and shape.",
      "against": "Recovery requires new chemical treatment.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1407",
      "hypothesis": "A cellulose actuator could regain its original curvature after aging by redistributing bound rather than free water.",
      "test": "Measure water states and shape.",
      "against": "Recovery requires new chemical treatment.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1408",
    "hypothesis": "A liquid-filled acoustic tag could detect slow wall leakage through phase correlations between internal modes.",
    "test": "Measure known leak rates.",
    "against": "Signals follow temperature drift only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1408",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A liquid-filled acoustic tag could detect slow wall leakage through phase correlations between internal modes.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1408",
      "hypothesis": "A liquid-filled acoustic tag could detect slow wall leakage through phase correlations between internal modes.",
      "test": "Measure known leak rates.",
      "against": "Signals follow temperature drift only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1408",
      "hypothesis": "A liquid-filled acoustic tag could detect slow wall leakage through phase correlations between internal modes.",
      "test": "Measure known leak rates.",
      "against": "Signals follow temperature drift only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1409",
    "hypothesis": "A soft coating could reduce particle adhesion by creating a reversible strain moat around each contact.",
    "test": "Map strain and detachment.",
    "against": "Reduction follows lower contact area alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1409",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A soft coating could reduce particle adhesion by creating a reversible strain moat around each contact.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1409",
      "hypothesis": "A soft coating could reduce particle adhesion by creating a reversible strain moat around each contact.",
      "test": "Map strain and detachment.",
      "against": "Reduction follows lower contact area alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1409",
      "hypothesis": "A soft coating could reduce particle adhesion by creating a reversible strain moat around each contact.",
      "test": "Map strain and detachment.",
      "against": "Reduction follows lower contact area alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1410",
    "hypothesis": "A porous stone analogue could record the order of two benign solutes through where each later crystallizes.",
    "test": "Reverse delivery order.",
    "against": "Deposits encode composition only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 148,
    "literature_query": "porous stone analogue record order two benign solutes where each later crystallizes experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N1410",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous stone analogue could record the order of two benign solutes through where each later crystallizes.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": true,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1410",
      "hypothesis": "A porous stone analogue could record the order of two benign solutes through where each later crystallizes.",
      "test": "Reverse delivery order.",
      "against": "Deposits encode composition only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1410",
      "hypothesis": "A porous stone analogue could record the order of two benign solutes through where each later crystallizes.",
      "test": "Reverse delivery order.",
      "against": "Deposits encode composition only.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 148,
      "literature_query": "porous stone analogue record order two benign solutes where each later crystallizes experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "148",
      "id": "N1410",
      "hypothesis": "A porous stone analogue could record the order of two benign solutes through where each later crystallizes.",
      "test": "Reverse delivery order.",
      "against": "Deposits encode composition only.",
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_score": "20",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P30d2ac53b9f1;Pd43d45f2be0e;P6eaa66500985;P4a8e4a9bb1bd;P47276a6e00d1;P9d5d4ba412ac",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N1410",
      "hypothesis": "A porous stone analogue could record the order of two benign solutes through where each later crystallizes.",
      "test": "Reverse delivery order.",
      "against": "Deposits encode composition only.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 148,
      "literature_query": "porous stone analogue record order two benign solutes where each later crystallizes experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P30d2ac53b9f1;Pd43d45f2be0e;P6eaa66500985;P4a8e4a9bb1bd;P47276a6e00d1;P9d5d4ba412ac",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P30d2ac53b9f1;Pd43d45f2be0e;P6eaa66500985;P4a8e4a9bb1bd;P47276a6e00d1;P9d5d4ba412ac",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": {
      "rank": "15",
      "id": "N1410",
      "hypothesis": "A porous stone analogue could record the order of two benign solutes through where each later crystallizes.",
      "primary_outcome": "Blind identification of solute arrival order from final spatial deposits after matched total doses.",
      "comparison": "Two compatible benign solutes delivered A-then-B versus B-then-A, plus a premixed control.",
      "controls": "Chemical reaction; adsorption; total dose; front speed; drying; temperature; pore geometry; selective detection of each solute.",
      "plan": "Validate that the solutes remain chemically compatible and independently detectable. Image transport during loading, then identify final deposits without access to sequence labels. Test fresh specimens and reverse sample orientation.",
      "against": "If order is read only from an unreleased initial residue or chemical reaction, state that mechanism explicitly. Equal final patterns contradict useful sequence recording.",
      "evidence": "Primary porous-material work reports moving crystallization fronts and layered salt deposits. Exact equal-dose sequence decoding remains unverified.",
      "source": "https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022024897003412",
      "novelty": "Unverified; a familiar mechanism or existing method is not a new discovery.",
      "physical_data": "none collected"
    },
    "focused_assessment_fields": {
      "id": "N1410",
      "primary_outcome": "Blind identification of solute arrival order from final spatial deposits after matched total doses.",
      "comparison": "Two compatible benign solutes delivered A-then-B versus B-then-A, plus a premixed control.",
      "critical_controls": "Chemical reaction; adsorption; total dose; front speed; drying; temperature; pore geometry; selective detection of each solute.",
      "testing_plan": "Validate that the solutes remain chemically compatible and independently detectable. Image transport during loading, then identify final deposits without access to sequence labels. Test fresh specimens and reverse sample orientation.",
      "against": "If order is read only from an unreleased initial residue or chemical reaction, state that mechanism explicitly. Equal final patterns contradict useful sequence recording.",
      "evidence_assessment": "Primary porous-material work reports moving crystallization fronts and layered salt deposits. Exact equal-dose sequence decoding remains unverified.",
      "source_url": "https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022024897003412",
      "novelty": "Unverified; a familiar mechanism or existing method is not a new discovery.",
      "rank15": 15
    },
    "primary_outcome": "Blind identification of solute arrival order from final spatial deposits after matched total doses.",
    "comparison": "Two compatible benign solutes delivered A-then-B versus B-then-A, plus a premixed control.",
    "controls": "Chemical reaction; adsorption; total dose; front speed; drying; temperature; pore geometry; selective detection of each solute.",
    "plan": "Validate that the solutes remain chemically compatible and independently detectable. Image transport during loading, then identify final deposits without access to sequence labels. Test fresh specimens and reverse sample orientation.",
    "evidence": "Primary porous-material work reports moving crystallization fronts and layered salt deposits. Exact equal-dose sequence decoding remains unverified.",
    "source": "https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022024897003412",
    "physical_data": "none collected",
    "dossier_text": "# 15. N1410\n\n## Prediction\n\nA porous stone analogue could record the order of two benign solutes through where each later crystallizes.\n\n## Primary measurement\n\nBlind identification of solute arrival order from final spatial deposits after matched total doses.\n\n## Comparison\n\nTwo compatible benign solutes delivered A-then-B versus B-then-A, plus a premixed control.\n\n## Controls\n\nChemical reaction; adsorption; total dose; front speed; drying; temperature; pore geometry; selective detection of each solute.\n\n## Testing plan\n\nValidate that the solutes remain chemically compatible and independently detectable. Image transport during loading, then identify final deposits without access to sequence labels. Test fresh specimens and reverse sample orientation.\n\n## Stop or revise\n\nIf order is read only from an unreleased initial residue or chemical reaction, state that mechanism explicitly. Equal final patterns contradict useful sequence recording.\n\n## Evidence and limits\n\nPrimary porous-material work reports moving crystallization fronts and layered salt deposits. Exact equal-dose sequence decoding remains unverified.\n\nRelated primary-source lead: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022024897003412\n\nUnverified; a familiar mechanism or existing method is not a new discovery.\n\n## Replication gate\n\nCalibrate measurement uncertainty first. Define a minimum meaningful effect in the primary outcome's units, then estimate variability across independently prepared specimens or assemblies. Use that variance for a design-specific confirmatory sample calculation. Images and repeated readings from one specimen are technical repeats, not independent replications. Randomize run order and blind labels where practical. Freeze exclusions and analysis before confirmation.\n\nA narrow interval excluding the chosen meaningful effect can count against the bounded claim; a wide interval is inconclusive. Report null and adverse results. The outline requires material and apparatus compatibility checks and is not a complete laboratory protocol.\n"
  },
  {
    "id": "N1411",
    "hypothesis": "A mechanically constrained gel could release a stored concentration gradient as a directional pulse after unclamping.",
    "test": "Map solute and deformation.",
    "against": "Pulse follows ordinary squeezed flow only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1411",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A mechanically constrained gel could release a stored concentration gradient as a directional pulse after unclamping.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1411",
      "hypothesis": "A mechanically constrained gel could release a stored concentration gradient as a directional pulse after unclamping.",
      "test": "Map solute and deformation.",
      "against": "Pulse follows ordinary squeezed flow only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1411",
      "hypothesis": "A mechanically constrained gel could release a stored concentration gradient as a directional pulse after unclamping.",
      "test": "Map solute and deformation.",
      "against": "Pulse follows ordinary squeezed flow only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1412",
    "hypothesis": "A glass capillary network could identify an unknown blockage type through the recovery trajectory after a standard gas pulse.",
    "test": "Compare known obstructions.",
    "against": "Trajectories reflect obstruction size only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1412",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A glass capillary network could identify an unknown blockage type through the recovery trajectory after a standard gas pulse.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1412",
      "hypothesis": "A glass capillary network could identify an unknown blockage type through the recovery trajectory after a standard gas pulse.",
      "test": "Compare known obstructions.",
      "against": "Trajectories reflect obstruction size only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1412",
      "hypothesis": "A glass capillary network could identify an unknown blockage type through the recovery trajectory after a standard gas pulse.",
      "test": "Compare known obstructions.",
      "against": "Trajectories reflect obstruction size only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1413",
    "hypothesis": "A flexible crystal support could improve growth uniformity by relaxing only the fastest-growing face.",
    "test": "Measure face speed and support strain.",
    "against": "Uniformity requires lower overall growth.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1413",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A flexible crystal support could improve growth uniformity by relaxing only the fastest-growing face.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1413",
      "hypothesis": "A flexible crystal support could improve growth uniformity by relaxing only the fastest-growing face.",
      "test": "Measure face speed and support strain.",
      "against": "Uniformity requires lower overall growth.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1413",
      "hypothesis": "A flexible crystal support could improve growth uniformity by relaxing only the fastest-growing face.",
      "test": "Measure face speed and support strain.",
      "against": "Uniformity requires lower overall growth.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1414",
    "hypothesis": "A wet fiber braid could suppress acoustic echoes from a damaged strand through reversible load redistribution.",
    "test": "Measure strand forces and echoes.",
    "against": "Echo suppression hides rather than protects damage.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1414",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A wet fiber braid could suppress acoustic echoes from a damaged strand through reversible load redistribution.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1414",
      "hypothesis": "A wet fiber braid could suppress acoustic echoes from a damaged strand through reversible load redistribution.",
      "test": "Measure strand forces and echoes.",
      "against": "Echo suppression hides rather than protects damage.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1414",
      "hypothesis": "A wet fiber braid could suppress acoustic echoes from a damaged strand through reversible load redistribution.",
      "test": "Measure strand forces and echoes.",
      "against": "Echo suppression hides rather than protects damage.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1415",
    "hypothesis": "A porous optical film could detect two separate wetting events even after complete apparent drying between them.",
    "test": "Track spectra and residual structure.",
    "against": "Second response matches the first entirely.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 149,
    "literature_query": "porous optical film detect two separate wetting events even complete apparent drying between them experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N1415",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous optical film could detect two separate wetting events even after complete apparent drying between them.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1415",
      "hypothesis": "A porous optical film could detect two separate wetting events even after complete apparent drying between them.",
      "test": "Track spectra and residual structure.",
      "against": "Second response matches the first entirely.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1415",
      "hypothesis": "A porous optical film could detect two separate wetting events even after complete apparent drying between them.",
      "test": "Track spectra and residual structure.",
      "against": "Second response matches the first entirely.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 149,
      "literature_query": "porous optical film detect two separate wetting events even complete apparent drying between them experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "149",
      "id": "N1415",
      "hypothesis": "A porous optical film could detect two separate wetting events even after complete apparent drying between them.",
      "test": "Track spectra and residual structure.",
      "against": "Second response matches the first entirely.",
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_score": "20",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P4132697ee440;P152d6a1b124b;Pf858fa38d7c4;P6fbe5aad362a;P51e9d304e911;P1dbc54b72463",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N1415",
      "hypothesis": "A porous optical film could detect two separate wetting events even after complete apparent drying between them.",
      "test": "Track spectra and residual structure.",
      "against": "Second response matches the first entirely.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 149,
      "literature_query": "porous optical film detect two separate wetting events even complete apparent drying between them experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P4132697ee440;P152d6a1b124b;Pf858fa38d7c4;P6fbe5aad362a;P51e9d304e911;P1dbc54b72463",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P4132697ee440;P152d6a1b124b;Pf858fa38d7c4;P6fbe5aad362a;P51e9d304e911;P1dbc54b72463",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1416",
    "hypothesis": "A capillary gate could open preferentially to a mixture whose viscosity changes most during initial evaporation.",
    "test": "Measure composition and gate opening.",
    "against": "Selection follows initial viscosity alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1416",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A capillary gate could open preferentially to a mixture whose viscosity changes most during initial evaporation.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1416",
      "hypothesis": "A capillary gate could open preferentially to a mixture whose viscosity changes most during initial evaporation.",
      "test": "Measure composition and gate opening.",
      "against": "Selection follows initial viscosity alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1416",
      "hypothesis": "A capillary gate could open preferentially to a mixture whose viscosity changes most during initial evaporation.",
      "test": "Measure composition and gate opening.",
      "against": "Selection follows initial viscosity alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1417",
    "hypothesis": "A granular pad could preserve shock isolation after partial flooding by moving trapped air toward loaded regions.",
    "test": "Map air and transmitted force.",
    "against": "Protection follows buoyancy alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1417",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A granular pad could preserve shock isolation after partial flooding by moving trapped air toward loaded regions.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1417",
      "hypothesis": "A granular pad could preserve shock isolation after partial flooding by moving trapped air toward loaded regions.",
      "test": "Map air and transmitted force.",
      "against": "Protection follows buoyancy alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1417",
      "hypothesis": "A granular pad could preserve shock isolation after partial flooding by moving trapped air toward loaded regions.",
      "test": "Map air and transmitted force.",
      "against": "Protection follows buoyancy alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1418",
    "hypothesis": "A thin elastic shell could use acoustic excitation to relocate an internal bubble away from a stressed seam.",
    "test": "Track bubble and strain.",
    "against": "Relocation requires net liquid pumping.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1418",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A thin elastic shell could use acoustic excitation to relocate an internal bubble away from a stressed seam.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1418",
      "hypothesis": "A thin elastic shell could use acoustic excitation to relocate an internal bubble away from a stressed seam.",
      "test": "Track bubble and strain.",
      "against": "Relocation requires net liquid pumping.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1418",
      "hypothesis": "A thin elastic shell could use acoustic excitation to relocate an internal bubble away from a stressed seam.",
      "test": "Track bubble and strain.",
      "against": "Relocation requires net liquid pumping.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1419",
    "hypothesis": "A porous polymer could distinguish mechanical aging from chemical aging through the ordering of uptake and relaxation times.",
    "test": "Apply independent aging routes.",
    "against": "Timescales remain similarly ordered.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 18,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1419",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous polymer could distinguish mechanical aging from chemical aging through the ordering of uptake and relaxation times.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1419",
      "hypothesis": "A porous polymer could distinguish mechanical aging from chemical aging through the ordering of uptake and relaxation times.",
      "test": "Apply independent aging routes.",
      "against": "Timescales remain similarly ordered.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1419",
      "hypothesis": "A porous polymer could distinguish mechanical aging from chemical aging through the ordering of uptake and relaxation times.",
      "test": "Apply independent aging routes.",
      "against": "Timescales remain similarly ordered.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 18,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1420",
    "hypothesis": "A liquid-crystal film could reveal solvent transport paths through moving orientation boundaries without added tracer.",
    "test": "Compare orientation and independent transport.",
    "against": "Boundaries follow heat only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1420",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A liquid-crystal film could reveal solvent transport paths through moving orientation boundaries without added tracer.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1420",
      "hypothesis": "A liquid-crystal film could reveal solvent transport paths through moving orientation boundaries without added tracer.",
      "test": "Compare orientation and independent transport.",
      "against": "Boundaries follow heat only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1420",
      "hypothesis": "A liquid-crystal film could reveal solvent transport paths through moving orientation boundaries without added tracer.",
      "test": "Compare orientation and independent transport.",
      "against": "Boundaries follow heat only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1421",
    "hypothesis": "A flexible mineral coating could self-limit crack density by releasing local strain through reversible hydration at fresh edges.",
    "test": "Measure hydration and cracking.",
    "against": "Strain release requires dissolution.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1421",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A flexible mineral coating could self-limit crack density by releasing local strain through reversible hydration at fresh edges.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1421",
      "hypothesis": "A flexible mineral coating could self-limit crack density by releasing local strain through reversible hydration at fresh edges.",
      "test": "Measure hydration and cracking.",
      "against": "Strain release requires dissolution.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1421",
      "hypothesis": "A flexible mineral coating could self-limit crack density by releasing local strain through reversible hydration at fresh edges.",
      "test": "Measure hydration and cracking.",
      "against": "Strain release requires dissolution.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1422",
    "hypothesis": "A cotton-thread junction could retain a solute-rich droplet while passing cleaner liquid through another branch.",
    "test": "Measure branch composition.",
    "against": "Separation follows flow partition only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 4,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 36,
    "literature_query": "cotton-thread junction retain solute-rich droplet passing cleaner liquid another branch experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N1422",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A cotton-thread junction could retain a solute-rich droplet while passing cleaner liquid through another branch.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1422",
      "hypothesis": "A cotton-thread junction could retain a solute-rich droplet while passing cleaner liquid through another branch.",
      "test": "Measure branch composition.",
      "against": "Separation follows flow partition only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1422",
      "hypothesis": "A cotton-thread junction could retain a solute-rich droplet while passing cleaner liquid through another branch.",
      "test": "Measure branch composition.",
      "against": "Separation follows flow partition only.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 36,
      "literature_query": "cotton-thread junction retain solute-rich droplet passing cleaner liquid another branch experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "36",
      "id": "N1422",
      "hypothesis": "A cotton-thread junction could retain a solute-rich droplet while passing cleaner liquid through another branch.",
      "test": "Measure branch composition.",
      "against": "Separation follows flow partition only.",
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_score": "24",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P5de98a25d3e7;P0e1a0013a763;P6712af3e2046;Pd9291d1925fa;P7a3556fa0bac;P0e049eda545a;P203215ae8f63;P1ac6ac73af37",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N1422",
      "hypothesis": "A cotton-thread junction could retain a solute-rich droplet while passing cleaner liquid through another branch.",
      "test": "Measure branch composition.",
      "against": "Separation follows flow partition only.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 36,
      "literature_query": "cotton-thread junction retain solute-rich droplet passing cleaner liquid another branch experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P5de98a25d3e7;P0e1a0013a763;P6712af3e2046;Pd9291d1925fa;P7a3556fa0bac;P0e049eda545a;P203215ae8f63;P1ac6ac73af37",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P5de98a25d3e7;P0e1a0013a763;P6712af3e2046;Pd9291d1925fa;P7a3556fa0bac;P0e049eda545a;P203215ae8f63;P1ac6ac73af37",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1423",
    "hypothesis": "A transparent gel could reveal a buried hydrophobic inclusion through a delayed mechanical recoil during drying.",
    "test": "Compare known inclusions.",
    "against": "Recoil follows inclusion stiffness alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1423",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A transparent gel could reveal a buried hydrophobic inclusion through a delayed mechanical recoil during drying.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1423",
      "hypothesis": "A transparent gel could reveal a buried hydrophobic inclusion through a delayed mechanical recoil during drying.",
      "test": "Compare known inclusions.",
      "against": "Recoil follows inclusion stiffness alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1423",
      "hypothesis": "A transparent gel could reveal a buried hydrophobic inclusion through a delayed mechanical recoil during drying.",
      "test": "Compare known inclusions.",
      "against": "Recoil follows inclusion stiffness alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1424",
    "hypothesis": "A porous reflector could maintain a stable optical reference while its surface gets wet through an isolated dry backbone.",
    "test": "Measure modes and wetting.",
    "against": "Reference drifts with overall water content.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1424",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous reflector could maintain a stable optical reference while its surface gets wet through an isolated dry backbone.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1424",
      "hypothesis": "A porous reflector could maintain a stable optical reference while its surface gets wet through an isolated dry backbone.",
      "test": "Measure modes and wetting.",
      "against": "Reference drifts with overall water content.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1424",
      "hypothesis": "A porous reflector could maintain a stable optical reference while its surface gets wet through an isolated dry backbone.",
      "test": "Measure modes and wetting.",
      "against": "Reference drifts with overall water content.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1425",
    "hypothesis": "A water bridge could reduce transmission of rapid concentration changes while passing an equally rapid mechanical pulse.",
    "test": "Measure both responses.",
    "against": "Both delays follow bulk mixing only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1425",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A water bridge could reduce transmission of rapid concentration changes while passing an equally rapid mechanical pulse.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1425",
      "hypothesis": "A water bridge could reduce transmission of rapid concentration changes while passing an equally rapid mechanical pulse.",
      "test": "Measure both responses.",
      "against": "Both delays follow bulk mixing only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1425",
      "hypothesis": "A water bridge could reduce transmission of rapid concentration changes while passing an equally rapid mechanical pulse.",
      "test": "Measure both responses.",
      "against": "Both delays follow bulk mixing only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1426",
    "hypothesis": "A particle-coated capsule could reveal its remaining lifetime through spatial correlations of shell rearrangement.",
    "test": "Track rearrangements before failure.",
    "against": "Correlations offer no predictive gain.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1426",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A particle-coated capsule could reveal its remaining lifetime through spatial correlations of shell rearrangement.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1426",
      "hypothesis": "A particle-coated capsule could reveal its remaining lifetime through spatial correlations of shell rearrangement.",
      "test": "Track rearrangements before failure.",
      "against": "Correlations offer no predictive gain.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1426",
      "hypothesis": "A particle-coated capsule could reveal its remaining lifetime through spatial correlations of shell rearrangement.",
      "test": "Track rearrangements before failure.",
      "against": "Correlations offer no predictive gain.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1427",
    "hypothesis": "A reversible adhesive could regain clean release after contamination by mechanically sorting foreign particles toward its perimeter.",
    "test": "Track particles and adhesion.",
    "against": "Recovery requires loss of adhesive material.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1427",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A reversible adhesive could regain clean release after contamination by mechanically sorting foreign particles toward its perimeter.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1427",
      "hypothesis": "A reversible adhesive could regain clean release after contamination by mechanically sorting foreign particles toward its perimeter.",
      "test": "Track particles and adhesion.",
      "against": "Recovery requires loss of adhesive material.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1427",
      "hypothesis": "A reversible adhesive could regain clean release after contamination by mechanically sorting foreign particles toward its perimeter.",
      "test": "Track particles and adhesion.",
      "against": "Recovery requires loss of adhesive material.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1428",
    "hypothesis": "A porous flexible barrier could identify whether a pressure pulse came from liquid or gas through differing wall-relaxation paths.",
    "test": "Apply calibrated pulses.",
    "against": "Paths follow impulse magnitude only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1428",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous flexible barrier could identify whether a pressure pulse came from liquid or gas through differing wall-relaxation paths.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1428",
      "hypothesis": "A porous flexible barrier could identify whether a pressure pulse came from liquid or gas through differing wall-relaxation paths.",
      "test": "Apply calibrated pulses.",
      "against": "Paths follow impulse magnitude only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1428",
      "hypothesis": "A porous flexible barrier could identify whether a pressure pulse came from liquid or gas through differing wall-relaxation paths.",
      "test": "Apply calibrated pulses.",
      "against": "Paths follow impulse magnitude only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1429",
    "hypothesis": "A starch-based film could lower thermal-cycle damage by moving its most hydrated region away from a rigid attachment.",
    "test": "Map hydration and strain.",
    "against": "Protection follows average moisture only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 4,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 22,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 70,
    "literature_query": "starch-based film lower thermal-cycle damage moving most hydrated region away rigid attachment experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N1429",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A starch-based film could lower thermal-cycle damage by moving its most hydrated region away from a rigid attachment.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1429",
      "hypothesis": "A starch-based film could lower thermal-cycle damage by moving its most hydrated region away from a rigid attachment.",
      "test": "Map hydration and strain.",
      "against": "Protection follows average moisture only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1429",
      "hypothesis": "A starch-based film could lower thermal-cycle damage by moving its most hydrated region away from a rigid attachment.",
      "test": "Map hydration and strain.",
      "against": "Protection follows average moisture only.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 22,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 70,
      "literature_query": "starch-based film lower thermal-cycle damage moving most hydrated region away rigid attachment experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "70",
      "id": "N1429",
      "hypothesis": "A starch-based film could lower thermal-cycle damage by moving its most hydrated region away from a rigid attachment.",
      "test": "Map hydration and strain.",
      "against": "Protection follows average moisture only.",
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_score": "22",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P60b42bcfd4f4;P3a3a9adbc87d;P5c9505e72126;P80d3aa84550c;Pae6f09200503",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N1429",
      "hypothesis": "A starch-based film could lower thermal-cycle damage by moving its most hydrated region away from a rigid attachment.",
      "test": "Map hydration and strain.",
      "against": "Protection follows average moisture only.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 22,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 70,
      "literature_query": "starch-based film lower thermal-cycle damage moving most hydrated region away rigid attachment experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P60b42bcfd4f4;P3a3a9adbc87d;P5c9505e72126;P80d3aa84550c;Pae6f09200503",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P60b42bcfd4f4;P3a3a9adbc87d;P5c9505e72126;P80d3aa84550c;Pae6f09200503",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1430",
    "hypothesis": "A granular surface could retain a weak chemical pattern longer when particles can rotate but cannot translate.",
    "test": "Track pattern decay.",
    "against": "Rotation accelerates homogenization instead.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 4,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 37,
    "literature_query": "granular surface retain weak chemical pattern longer when particles can rotate but cannot translate experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N1430",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A granular surface could retain a weak chemical pattern longer when particles can rotate but cannot translate.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1430",
      "hypothesis": "A granular surface could retain a weak chemical pattern longer when particles can rotate but cannot translate.",
      "test": "Track pattern decay.",
      "against": "Rotation accelerates homogenization instead.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1430",
      "hypothesis": "A granular surface could retain a weak chemical pattern longer when particles can rotate but cannot translate.",
      "test": "Track pattern decay.",
      "against": "Rotation accelerates homogenization instead.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 37,
      "literature_query": "granular surface retain weak chemical pattern longer when particles can rotate but cannot translate experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "37",
      "id": "N1430",
      "hypothesis": "A granular surface could retain a weak chemical pattern longer when particles can rotate but cannot translate.",
      "test": "Track pattern decay.",
      "against": "Rotation accelerates homogenization instead.",
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_score": "24",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pfd930d414216;P4e0cb9955d84;P8662306c23a2",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N1430",
      "hypothesis": "A granular surface could retain a weak chemical pattern longer when particles can rotate but cannot translate.",
      "test": "Track pattern decay.",
      "against": "Rotation accelerates homogenization instead.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 37,
      "literature_query": "granular surface retain weak chemical pattern longer when particles can rotate but cannot translate experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pfd930d414216;P4e0cb9955d84;P8662306c23a2",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "Pfd930d414216;P4e0cb9955d84;P8662306c23a2",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1431",
    "hypothesis": "A capillary condenser could release water more reliably by converting drop growth into gradual rotation of its support.",
    "test": "Measure support and shedding.",
    "against": "Reliability follows droplet mass alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1431",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A capillary condenser could release water more reliably by converting drop growth into gradual rotation of its support.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1431",
      "hypothesis": "A capillary condenser could release water more reliably by converting drop growth into gradual rotation of its support.",
      "test": "Measure support and shedding.",
      "against": "Reliability follows droplet mass alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1431",
      "hypothesis": "A capillary condenser could release water more reliably by converting drop growth into gradual rotation of its support.",
      "test": "Measure support and shedding.",
      "against": "Reliability follows droplet mass alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1432",
    "hypothesis": "A porous mineral bead could identify previous compression through the position of its first evaporation nucleus.",
    "test": "Map nuclei after loading.",
    "against": "Positions follow visible damage only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 18,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1432",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous mineral bead could identify previous compression through the position of its first evaporation nucleus.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1432",
      "hypothesis": "A porous mineral bead could identify previous compression through the position of its first evaporation nucleus.",
      "test": "Map nuclei after loading.",
      "against": "Positions follow visible damage only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1432",
      "hypothesis": "A porous mineral bead could identify previous compression through the position of its first evaporation nucleus.",
      "test": "Map nuclei after loading.",
      "against": "Positions follow visible damage only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 18,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1433",
    "hypothesis": "A soft optical sensor could distinguish a liquid's elastic response from its surface tension through a standardized squeeze-release cycle.",
    "test": "Calibrate both independently.",
    "against": "Parameters remain confounded.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1433",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A soft optical sensor could distinguish a liquid's elastic response from its surface tension through a standardized squeeze-release cycle.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1433",
      "hypothesis": "A soft optical sensor could distinguish a liquid's elastic response from its surface tension through a standardized squeeze-release cycle.",
      "test": "Calibrate both independently.",
      "against": "Parameters remain confounded.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1433",
      "hypothesis": "A soft optical sensor could distinguish a liquid's elastic response from its surface tension through a standardized squeeze-release cycle.",
      "test": "Calibrate both independently.",
      "against": "Parameters remain confounded.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1434",
    "hypothesis": "A layered cellulose strip could maintain transport direction after cutting one layer by moving the wetting front into another.",
    "test": "Image rerouting.",
    "against": "Recovery requires external liquid reconnection.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1434",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A layered cellulose strip could maintain transport direction after cutting one layer by moving the wetting front into another.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1434",
      "hypothesis": "A layered cellulose strip could maintain transport direction after cutting one layer by moving the wetting front into another.",
      "test": "Image rerouting.",
      "against": "Recovery requires external liquid reconnection.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1434",
      "hypothesis": "A layered cellulose strip could maintain transport direction after cutting one layer by moving the wetting front into another.",
      "test": "Image rerouting.",
      "against": "Recovery requires external liquid reconnection.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1435",
    "hypothesis": "A thin porous coating could reveal trapped contaminant depth through delay between optical and acoustic recovery after rinsing.",
    "test": "Compare known depths.",
    "against": "Delay follows contaminant quantity alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1435",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A thin porous coating could reveal trapped contaminant depth through delay between optical and acoustic recovery after rinsing.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1435",
      "hypothesis": "A thin porous coating could reveal trapped contaminant depth through delay between optical and acoustic recovery after rinsing.",
      "test": "Compare known depths.",
      "against": "Delay follows contaminant quantity alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1435",
      "hypothesis": "A thin porous coating could reveal trapped contaminant depth through delay between optical and acoustic recovery after rinsing.",
      "test": "Compare known depths.",
      "against": "Delay follows contaminant quantity alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1436",
    "hypothesis": "A liquid-filled flexible tube could suppress slow drift in its flow resistance by relocating wall folds.",
    "test": "Measure folds and resistance.",
    "against": "Stability requires pressure feedback.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1436",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A liquid-filled flexible tube could suppress slow drift in its flow resistance by relocating wall folds.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1436",
      "hypothesis": "A liquid-filled flexible tube could suppress slow drift in its flow resistance by relocating wall folds.",
      "test": "Measure folds and resistance.",
      "against": "Stability requires pressure feedback.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1436",
      "hypothesis": "A liquid-filled flexible tube could suppress slow drift in its flow resistance by relocating wall folds.",
      "test": "Measure folds and resistance.",
      "against": "Stability requires pressure feedback.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1437",
    "hypothesis": "A salt crystal suspended from a fiber could measure local evaporation anisotropy through torque rather than mass loss.",
    "test": "Measure torque and vapor fields.",
    "against": "Torque follows airflow drag only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 4,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 38,
    "literature_query": "salt crystal suspended fiber measure local evaporation anisotropy torque mass loss experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N1437",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A salt crystal suspended from a fiber could measure local evaporation anisotropy through torque rather than mass loss.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1437",
      "hypothesis": "A salt crystal suspended from a fiber could measure local evaporation anisotropy through torque rather than mass loss.",
      "test": "Measure torque and vapor fields.",
      "against": "Torque follows airflow drag only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1437",
      "hypothesis": "A salt crystal suspended from a fiber could measure local evaporation anisotropy through torque rather than mass loss.",
      "test": "Measure torque and vapor fields.",
      "against": "Torque follows airflow drag only.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 38,
      "literature_query": "salt crystal suspended fiber measure local evaporation anisotropy torque mass loss experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "38",
      "id": "N1437",
      "hypothesis": "A salt crystal suspended from a fiber could measure local evaporation anisotropy through torque rather than mass loss.",
      "test": "Measure torque and vapor fields.",
      "against": "Torque follows airflow drag only.",
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_score": "24",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P0bfb09dbe560;Pe4f3bb8d3101;P28c0a4975b41;Pd21d762a9e92;P8e48081b4baa;P3f78dd1e7dd8",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N1437",
      "hypothesis": "A salt crystal suspended from a fiber could measure local evaporation anisotropy through torque rather than mass loss.",
      "test": "Measure torque and vapor fields.",
      "against": "Torque follows airflow drag only.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 38,
      "literature_query": "salt crystal suspended fiber measure local evaporation anisotropy torque mass loss experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P0bfb09dbe560;Pe4f3bb8d3101;P28c0a4975b41;Pd21d762a9e92;P8e48081b4baa;P3f78dd1e7dd8",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P0bfb09dbe560;Pe4f3bb8d3101;P28c0a4975b41;Pd21d762a9e92;P8e48081b4baa;P3f78dd1e7dd8",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1438",
    "hypothesis": "A porous adhesive joint could resist moisture-induced failure by routing water into mechanically unloaded cavities.",
    "test": "Image water and bond strain.",
    "against": "Protection follows lower permeability alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1438",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous adhesive joint could resist moisture-induced failure by routing water into mechanically unloaded cavities.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1438",
      "hypothesis": "A porous adhesive joint could resist moisture-induced failure by routing water into mechanically unloaded cavities.",
      "test": "Image water and bond strain.",
      "against": "Protection follows lower permeability alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1438",
      "hypothesis": "A porous adhesive joint could resist moisture-induced failure by routing water into mechanically unloaded cavities.",
      "test": "Image water and bond strain.",
      "against": "Protection follows lower permeability alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1439",
    "hypothesis": "A granular membrane could separate particles by shape recovery while remaining insensitive to their initial orientation.",
    "test": "Track orientation and passage.",
    "against": "Selection follows initial geometry only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1439",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A granular membrane could separate particles by shape recovery while remaining insensitive to their initial orientation.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1439",
      "hypothesis": "A granular membrane could separate particles by shape recovery while remaining insensitive to their initial orientation.",
      "test": "Track orientation and passage.",
      "against": "Selection follows initial geometry only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1439",
      "hypothesis": "A granular membrane could separate particles by shape recovery while remaining insensitive to their initial orientation.",
      "test": "Track orientation and passage.",
      "against": "Selection follows initial geometry only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1440",
    "hypothesis": "A wet paper coil could encode a thermal pulse's rise time in its final turn spacing.",
    "test": "Apply matched-energy pulses.",
    "against": "Spacing follows peak temperature only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 4,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 22,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 71,
    "literature_query": "wet paper coil encode thermal pulse s rise time final turn spacing experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N1440",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A wet paper coil could encode a thermal pulse's rise time in its final turn spacing.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1440",
      "hypothesis": "A wet paper coil could encode a thermal pulse's rise time in its final turn spacing.",
      "test": "Apply matched-energy pulses.",
      "against": "Spacing follows peak temperature only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1440",
      "hypothesis": "A wet paper coil could encode a thermal pulse's rise time in its final turn spacing.",
      "test": "Apply matched-energy pulses.",
      "against": "Spacing follows peak temperature only.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 22,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 71,
      "literature_query": "wet paper coil encode thermal pulse s rise time final turn spacing experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "71",
      "id": "N1440",
      "hypothesis": "A wet paper coil could encode a thermal pulse's rise time in its final turn spacing.",
      "test": "Apply matched-energy pulses.",
      "against": "Spacing follows peak temperature only.",
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_score": "22",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pa433f51a2503;P64b80f16d75b;P0fa79b0da297",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N1440",
      "hypothesis": "A wet paper coil could encode a thermal pulse's rise time in its final turn spacing.",
      "test": "Apply matched-energy pulses.",
      "against": "Spacing follows peak temperature only.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 22,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 71,
      "literature_query": "wet paper coil encode thermal pulse s rise time final turn spacing experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pa433f51a2503;P64b80f16d75b;P0fa79b0da297",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "Pa433f51a2503;P64b80f16d75b;P0fa79b0da297",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1441",
    "hypothesis": "A transparent soft solid could reveal a weak interface through the direction of its slowest strain fluctuations.",
    "test": "Compare fluctuation maps and interfaces.",
    "against": "Direction follows sample boundaries only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1441",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A transparent soft solid could reveal a weak interface through the direction of its slowest strain fluctuations.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1441",
      "hypothesis": "A transparent soft solid could reveal a weak interface through the direction of its slowest strain fluctuations.",
      "test": "Compare fluctuation maps and interfaces.",
      "against": "Direction follows sample boundaries only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1441",
      "hypothesis": "A transparent soft solid could reveal a weak interface through the direction of its slowest strain fluctuations.",
      "test": "Compare fluctuation maps and interfaces.",
      "against": "Direction follows sample boundaries only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1442",
    "hypothesis": "A porous hydrophobic plate could release gas through a path chosen by its previous liquid invasion history.",
    "test": "Image gas exits after controlled histories.",
    "against": "Exits follow largest pores only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1442",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous hydrophobic plate could release gas through a path chosen by its previous liquid invasion history.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1442",
      "hypothesis": "A porous hydrophobic plate could release gas through a path chosen by its previous liquid invasion history.",
      "test": "Image gas exits after controlled histories.",
      "against": "Exits follow largest pores only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1442",
      "hypothesis": "A porous hydrophobic plate could release gas through a path chosen by its previous liquid invasion history.",
      "test": "Image gas exits after controlled histories.",
      "against": "Exits follow largest pores only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1443",
    "hypothesis": "A confined droplet could preserve chemical activity while rejecting particle fouling through periodic internal interface renewal.",
    "test": "Measure activity and attachment.",
    "against": "Renewal requires substantial liquid replacement.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1443",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A confined droplet could preserve chemical activity while rejecting particle fouling through periodic internal interface renewal.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1443",
      "hypothesis": "A confined droplet could preserve chemical activity while rejecting particle fouling through periodic internal interface renewal.",
      "test": "Measure activity and attachment.",
      "against": "Renewal requires substantial liquid replacement.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1443",
      "hypothesis": "A confined droplet could preserve chemical activity while rejecting particle fouling through periodic internal interface renewal.",
      "test": "Measure activity and attachment.",
      "against": "Renewal requires substantial liquid replacement.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1444",
    "hypothesis": "A woven sleeve could reduce stress on a swelling core by sliding fibers into newly opened helical paths.",
    "test": "Map fibers and core pressure.",
    "against": "Relief requires permanent sleeve expansion.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1444",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A woven sleeve could reduce stress on a swelling core by sliding fibers into newly opened helical paths.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1444",
      "hypothesis": "A woven sleeve could reduce stress on a swelling core by sliding fibers into newly opened helical paths.",
      "test": "Map fibers and core pressure.",
      "against": "Relief requires permanent sleeve expansion.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1444",
      "hypothesis": "A woven sleeve could reduce stress on a swelling core by sliding fibers into newly opened helical paths.",
      "test": "Map fibers and core pressure.",
      "against": "Relief requires permanent sleeve expansion.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1445",
    "hypothesis": "A thin ice bridge could reveal dissolved-solute distribution through unequal acoustic delays in opposite flexural directions.",
    "test": "Map ions and waves.",
    "against": "Delays follow shape alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 18,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1445",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A thin ice bridge could reveal dissolved-solute distribution through unequal acoustic delays in opposite flexural directions.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1445",
      "hypothesis": "A thin ice bridge could reveal dissolved-solute distribution through unequal acoustic delays in opposite flexural directions.",
      "test": "Map ions and waves.",
      "against": "Delays follow shape alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1445",
      "hypothesis": "A thin ice bridge could reveal dissolved-solute distribution through unequal acoustic delays in opposite flexural directions.",
      "test": "Map ions and waves.",
      "against": "Delays follow shape alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 18,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1446",
    "hypothesis": "A porous dielectric could distinguish reversible water uptake from ionic contamination through the sequence of mechanical mode shifts.",
    "test": "Calibrate both inputs.",
    "against": "Mode sequences remain identical.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1446",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous dielectric could distinguish reversible water uptake from ionic contamination through the sequence of mechanical mode shifts.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1446",
      "hypothesis": "A porous dielectric could distinguish reversible water uptake from ionic contamination through the sequence of mechanical mode shifts.",
      "test": "Calibrate both inputs.",
      "against": "Mode sequences remain identical.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1446",
      "hypothesis": "A porous dielectric could distinguish reversible water uptake from ionic contamination through the sequence of mechanical mode shifts.",
      "test": "Calibrate both inputs.",
      "against": "Mode sequences remain identical.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1447",
    "hypothesis": "A soft particle cushion could reduce repeated-impact heating by transferring energy into slow solvent redistribution.",
    "test": "Measure heat and recovered mechanical work.",
    "against": "Reduced heating merely delays equal dissipation.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1447",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A soft particle cushion could reduce repeated-impact heating by transferring energy into slow solvent redistribution.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1447",
      "hypothesis": "A soft particle cushion could reduce repeated-impact heating by transferring energy into slow solvent redistribution.",
      "test": "Measure heat and recovered mechanical work.",
      "against": "Reduced heating merely delays equal dissipation.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1447",
      "hypothesis": "A soft particle cushion could reduce repeated-impact heating by transferring energy into slow solvent redistribution.",
      "test": "Measure heat and recovered mechanical work.",
      "against": "Reduced heating merely delays equal dissipation.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1448",
    "hypothesis": "A capillary paper valve could preserve threshold repeatability through controlled movement of its dry boundary.",
    "test": "Measure threshold histories.",
    "against": "Repeatability requires replacing the paper.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 4,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 39,
    "literature_query": "capillary paper valve preserve threshold repeatability controlled movement dry boundary experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N1448",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A capillary paper valve could preserve threshold repeatability through controlled movement of its dry boundary.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1448",
      "hypothesis": "A capillary paper valve could preserve threshold repeatability through controlled movement of its dry boundary.",
      "test": "Measure threshold histories.",
      "against": "Repeatability requires replacing the paper.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1448",
      "hypothesis": "A capillary paper valve could preserve threshold repeatability through controlled movement of its dry boundary.",
      "test": "Measure threshold histories.",
      "against": "Repeatability requires replacing the paper.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 39,
      "literature_query": "capillary paper valve preserve threshold repeatability controlled movement dry boundary experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "39",
      "id": "N1448",
      "hypothesis": "A capillary paper valve could preserve threshold repeatability through controlled movement of its dry boundary.",
      "test": "Measure threshold histories.",
      "against": "Repeatability requires replacing the paper.",
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_score": "24",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P5061de736da3;P8d4448f3c498;P64dbfb231b52;P2bd8d86b5cf9;P17d21fc739aa;Pfef120c91ea2",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N1448",
      "hypothesis": "A capillary paper valve could preserve threshold repeatability through controlled movement of its dry boundary.",
      "test": "Measure threshold histories.",
      "against": "Repeatability requires replacing the paper.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 39,
      "literature_query": "capillary paper valve preserve threshold repeatability controlled movement dry boundary experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P5061de736da3;P8d4448f3c498;P64dbfb231b52;P2bd8d86b5cf9;P17d21fc739aa;Pfef120c91ea2",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P5061de736da3;P8d4448f3c498;P64dbfb231b52;P2bd8d86b5cf9;P17d21fc739aa;Pfef120c91ea2",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1449",
    "hypothesis": "A mineral-coated thread could detect local acidity through directional shortening rather than uniform swelling.",
    "test": "Measure chemistry and displacement.",
    "against": "Motion follows salt concentration only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 4,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 23,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 62,
    "literature_query": "mineral-coated thread detect local acidity directional shortening uniform swelling experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N1449",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A mineral-coated thread could detect local acidity through directional shortening rather than uniform swelling.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1449",
      "hypothesis": "A mineral-coated thread could detect local acidity through directional shortening rather than uniform swelling.",
      "test": "Measure chemistry and displacement.",
      "against": "Motion follows salt concentration only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1449",
      "hypothesis": "A mineral-coated thread could detect local acidity through directional shortening rather than uniform swelling.",
      "test": "Measure chemistry and displacement.",
      "against": "Motion follows salt concentration only.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 23,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 62,
      "literature_query": "mineral-coated thread detect local acidity directional shortening uniform swelling experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "62",
      "id": "N1449",
      "hypothesis": "A mineral-coated thread could detect local acidity through directional shortening rather than uniform swelling.",
      "test": "Measure chemistry and displacement.",
      "against": "Motion follows salt concentration only.",
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_score": "23",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P758e05175da3;P5575151eac03;P3f4ebfb5c034;Pe958be8c17cf",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N1449",
      "hypothesis": "A mineral-coated thread could detect local acidity through directional shortening rather than uniform swelling.",
      "test": "Measure chemistry and displacement.",
      "against": "Motion follows salt concentration only.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 23,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 62,
      "literature_query": "mineral-coated thread detect local acidity directional shortening uniform swelling experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P758e05175da3;P5575151eac03;P3f4ebfb5c034;Pe958be8c17cf",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P758e05175da3;P5575151eac03;P3f4ebfb5c034;Pe958be8c17cf",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1450",
    "hypothesis": "A porous optical tag could identify a hidden crack by comparing its response before and after controlled rewetting.",
    "test": "Introduce blinded defects.",
    "against": "Classification follows total water uptake only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 18,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1450",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous optical tag could identify a hidden crack by comparing its response before and after controlled rewetting.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1450",
      "hypothesis": "A porous optical tag could identify a hidden crack by comparing its response before and after controlled rewetting.",
      "test": "Introduce blinded defects.",
      "against": "Classification follows total water uptake only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1450",
      "hypothesis": "A porous optical tag could identify a hidden crack by comparing its response before and after controlled rewetting.",
      "test": "Introduce blinded defects.",
      "against": "Classification follows total water uptake only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 18,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1451",
    "hypothesis": "A flexible granular seal could maintain low leakage by directing grains toward pressure-loaded gaps.",
    "test": "Track grains and leakage.",
    "against": "Repair requires continuous grain loss.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1451",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A flexible granular seal could maintain low leakage by directing grains toward pressure-loaded gaps.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1451",
      "hypothesis": "A flexible granular seal could maintain low leakage by directing grains toward pressure-loaded gaps.",
      "test": "Track grains and leakage.",
      "against": "Repair requires continuous grain loss.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1451",
      "hypothesis": "A flexible granular seal could maintain low leakage by directing grains toward pressure-loaded gaps.",
      "test": "Track grains and leakage.",
      "against": "Repair requires continuous grain loss.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1452",
    "hypothesis": "A gel-coated wire could distinguish slow solvent diffusion from rapid adsorption through two separate bending stages.",
    "test": "Measure uptake and mechanics.",
    "against": "Stages cannot isolate the mechanisms.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1452",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A gel-coated wire could distinguish slow solvent diffusion from rapid adsorption through two separate bending stages.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1452",
      "hypothesis": "A gel-coated wire could distinguish slow solvent diffusion from rapid adsorption through two separate bending stages.",
      "test": "Measure uptake and mechanics.",
      "against": "Stages cannot isolate the mechanisms.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1452",
      "hypothesis": "A gel-coated wire could distinguish slow solvent diffusion from rapid adsorption through two separate bending stages.",
      "test": "Measure uptake and mechanics.",
      "against": "Stages cannot isolate the mechanisms.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1453",
    "hypothesis": "A droplet could reveal buried surface tension gradients through the rotation of an internal inert marker.",
    "test": "Measure interface chemistry and marker motion.",
    "against": "Rotation follows external flow alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1453",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A droplet could reveal buried surface tension gradients through the rotation of an internal inert marker.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1453",
      "hypothesis": "A droplet could reveal buried surface tension gradients through the rotation of an internal inert marker.",
      "test": "Measure interface chemistry and marker motion.",
      "against": "Rotation follows external flow alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1453",
      "hypothesis": "A droplet could reveal buried surface tension gradients through the rotation of an internal inert marker.",
      "test": "Measure interface chemistry and marker motion.",
      "against": "Rotation follows external flow alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1454",
    "hypothesis": "A porous ceramic channel could reduce bubble sticking by generating a short local cooling pulse during contact.",
    "test": "Measure temperature and adhesion.",
    "against": "Release requires net pressure increase.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1454",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous ceramic channel could reduce bubble sticking by generating a short local cooling pulse during contact.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1454",
      "hypothesis": "A porous ceramic channel could reduce bubble sticking by generating a short local cooling pulse during contact.",
      "test": "Measure temperature and adhesion.",
      "against": "Release requires net pressure increase.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1454",
      "hypothesis": "A porous ceramic channel could reduce bubble sticking by generating a short local cooling pulse during contact.",
      "test": "Measure temperature and adhesion.",
      "against": "Release requires net pressure increase.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1455",
    "hypothesis": "A textile could retain a stable moisture gradient through mechanically isolated fiber pathways despite repeated flexing.",
    "test": "Map pathways and hydration.",
    "against": "Gradient vanishes after small bending.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 4,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 22,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 72,
    "literature_query": "textile retain stable moisture gradient mechanically isolated fiber pathways despite repeated flexing experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N1455",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A textile could retain a stable moisture gradient through mechanically isolated fiber pathways despite repeated flexing.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1455",
      "hypothesis": "A textile could retain a stable moisture gradient through mechanically isolated fiber pathways despite repeated flexing.",
      "test": "Map pathways and hydration.",
      "against": "Gradient vanishes after small bending.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1455",
      "hypothesis": "A textile could retain a stable moisture gradient through mechanically isolated fiber pathways despite repeated flexing.",
      "test": "Map pathways and hydration.",
      "against": "Gradient vanishes after small bending.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 22,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 72,
      "literature_query": "textile retain stable moisture gradient mechanically isolated fiber pathways despite repeated flexing experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "72",
      "id": "N1455",
      "hypothesis": "A textile could retain a stable moisture gradient through mechanically isolated fiber pathways despite repeated flexing.",
      "test": "Map pathways and hydration.",
      "against": "Gradient vanishes after small bending.",
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_score": "22",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P7473f96ad557;P55637e841133;P88c8ca57ddea;Pda6fb063e94f;P355fe7a3c6c7",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N1455",
      "hypothesis": "A textile could retain a stable moisture gradient through mechanically isolated fiber pathways despite repeated flexing.",
      "test": "Map pathways and hydration.",
      "against": "Gradient vanishes after small bending.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 22,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 72,
      "literature_query": "textile retain stable moisture gradient mechanically isolated fiber pathways despite repeated flexing experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P7473f96ad557;P55637e841133;P88c8ca57ddea;Pda6fb063e94f;P355fe7a3c6c7",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P7473f96ad557;P55637e841133;P88c8ca57ddea;Pda6fb063e94f;P355fe7a3c6c7",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1456",
    "hypothesis": "A wet powder bed could detect the direction of recent shear through asymmetric vapor release during relaxation.",
    "test": "Measure vapor maps.",
    "against": "Asymmetry follows remaining temperature gradients.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1456",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A wet powder bed could detect the direction of recent shear through asymmetric vapor release during relaxation.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1456",
      "hypothesis": "A wet powder bed could detect the direction of recent shear through asymmetric vapor release during relaxation.",
      "test": "Measure vapor maps.",
      "against": "Asymmetry follows remaining temperature gradients.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1456",
      "hypothesis": "A wet powder bed could detect the direction of recent shear through asymmetric vapor release during relaxation.",
      "test": "Measure vapor maps.",
      "against": "Asymmetry follows remaining temperature gradients.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1457",
    "hypothesis": "A transparent laminate could expose a weak bond through transient color fringes during a mild humidity pulse.",
    "test": "Compare known bonds.",
    "against": "Fringes follow thickness variation only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1457",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A transparent laminate could expose a weak bond through transient color fringes during a mild humidity pulse.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1457",
      "hypothesis": "A transparent laminate could expose a weak bond through transient color fringes during a mild humidity pulse.",
      "test": "Compare known bonds.",
      "against": "Fringes follow thickness variation only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1457",
      "hypothesis": "A transparent laminate could expose a weak bond through transient color fringes during a mild humidity pulse.",
      "test": "Compare known bonds.",
      "against": "Fringes follow thickness variation only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1458",
    "hypothesis": "A salt-bearing wick could separate concentrated and dilute pulses into different terminal branches through transient crystal growth.",
    "test": "Measure branch composition.",
    "against": "Selection follows fixed branch resistance only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 4,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 40,
    "literature_query": "salt-bearing wick separate concentrated dilute pulses different terminal branches transient crystal growth experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N1458",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A salt-bearing wick could separate concentrated and dilute pulses into different terminal branches through transient crystal growth.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1458",
      "hypothesis": "A salt-bearing wick could separate concentrated and dilute pulses into different terminal branches through transient crystal growth.",
      "test": "Measure branch composition.",
      "against": "Selection follows fixed branch resistance only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1458",
      "hypothesis": "A salt-bearing wick could separate concentrated and dilute pulses into different terminal branches through transient crystal growth.",
      "test": "Measure branch composition.",
      "against": "Selection follows fixed branch resistance only.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 40,
      "literature_query": "salt-bearing wick separate concentrated dilute pulses different terminal branches transient crystal growth experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "40",
      "id": "N1458",
      "hypothesis": "A salt-bearing wick could separate concentrated and dilute pulses into different terminal branches through transient crystal growth.",
      "test": "Measure branch composition.",
      "against": "Selection follows fixed branch resistance only.",
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_score": "24",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P421968988b65;Pd743d4bb92e7;P90fe903f3c4a;Ped328063315b;P3a43df75de04;P2cdda9e177ea",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N1458",
      "hypothesis": "A salt-bearing wick could separate concentrated and dilute pulses into different terminal branches through transient crystal growth.",
      "test": "Measure branch composition.",
      "against": "Selection follows fixed branch resistance only.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 40,
      "literature_query": "salt-bearing wick separate concentrated dilute pulses different terminal branches transient crystal growth experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P421968988b65;Pd743d4bb92e7;P90fe903f3c4a;Ped328063315b;P3a43df75de04;P2cdda9e177ea",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P421968988b65;Pd743d4bb92e7;P90fe903f3c4a;Ped328063315b;P3a43df75de04;P2cdda9e177ea",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1459",
    "hypothesis": "A soft membrane could reject brief solvent exposure while responding to sustained exposure through a mechanical waiting state.",
    "test": "Compare equal-dose histories.",
    "against": "Response follows total absorbed mass only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1459",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A soft membrane could reject brief solvent exposure while responding to sustained exposure through a mechanical waiting state.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1459",
      "hypothesis": "A soft membrane could reject brief solvent exposure while responding to sustained exposure through a mechanical waiting state.",
      "test": "Compare equal-dose histories.",
      "against": "Response follows total absorbed mass only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1459",
      "hypothesis": "A soft membrane could reject brief solvent exposure while responding to sustained exposure through a mechanical waiting state.",
      "test": "Compare equal-dose histories.",
      "against": "Response follows total absorbed mass only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1460",
    "hypothesis": "A porous grain could protect internal enzymes from drying by temporarily closing its most conductive vapor paths.",
    "test": "Measure pores and activity.",
    "against": "Protection follows residual water alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1460",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous grain could protect internal enzymes from drying by temporarily closing its most conductive vapor paths.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1460",
      "hypothesis": "A porous grain could protect internal enzymes from drying by temporarily closing its most conductive vapor paths.",
      "test": "Measure pores and activity.",
      "against": "Protection follows residual water alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1460",
      "hypothesis": "A porous grain could protect internal enzymes from drying by temporarily closing its most conductive vapor paths.",
      "test": "Measure pores and activity.",
      "against": "Protection follows residual water alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1461",
    "hypothesis": "A folded film could reveal its maximum previous curvature through the sequence of contacts formed during rewetting.",
    "test": "Apply controlled bends.",
    "against": "Sequence follows final shape only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 18,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1461",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A folded film could reveal its maximum previous curvature through the sequence of contacts formed during rewetting.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1461",
      "hypothesis": "A folded film could reveal its maximum previous curvature through the sequence of contacts formed during rewetting.",
      "test": "Apply controlled bends.",
      "against": "Sequence follows final shape only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1461",
      "hypothesis": "A folded film could reveal its maximum previous curvature through the sequence of contacts formed during rewetting.",
      "test": "Apply controlled bends.",
      "against": "Sequence follows final shape only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 18,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1462",
    "hypothesis": "A capillary surface could reduce contamination transfer by pinning only the cleanest part of a receding droplet.",
    "test": "Map solute and contact lines.",
    "against": "Residue reduction follows smaller wetted area only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1462",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A capillary surface could reduce contamination transfer by pinning only the cleanest part of a receding droplet.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1462",
      "hypothesis": "A capillary surface could reduce contamination transfer by pinning only the cleanest part of a receding droplet.",
      "test": "Map solute and contact lines.",
      "against": "Residue reduction follows smaller wetted area only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1462",
      "hypothesis": "A capillary surface could reduce contamination transfer by pinning only the cleanest part of a receding droplet.",
      "test": "Map solute and contact lines.",
      "against": "Residue reduction follows smaller wetted area only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1463",
    "hypothesis": "A granular column could maintain a stable pressure drop through reversible rearrangement of hollow grains under loading.",
    "test": "Measure geometry and flow.",
    "against": "Stability requires irreversible collapse.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1463",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A granular column could maintain a stable pressure drop through reversible rearrangement of hollow grains under loading.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1463",
      "hypothesis": "A granular column could maintain a stable pressure drop through reversible rearrangement of hollow grains under loading.",
      "test": "Measure geometry and flow.",
      "against": "Stability requires irreversible collapse.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1463",
      "hypothesis": "A granular column could maintain a stable pressure drop through reversible rearrangement of hollow grains under loading.",
      "test": "Measure geometry and flow.",
      "against": "Stability requires irreversible collapse.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1464",
    "hypothesis": "A wet elastic ribbon could identify airflow intermittency through its distribution of pause durations between twists.",
    "test": "Compare known airflow histories.",
    "against": "Statistics follow mean speed only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1464",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A wet elastic ribbon could identify airflow intermittency through its distribution of pause durations between twists.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1464",
      "hypothesis": "A wet elastic ribbon could identify airflow intermittency through its distribution of pause durations between twists.",
      "test": "Compare known airflow histories.",
      "against": "Statistics follow mean speed only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1464",
      "hypothesis": "A wet elastic ribbon could identify airflow intermittency through its distribution of pause durations between twists.",
      "test": "Compare known airflow histories.",
      "against": "Statistics follow mean speed only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1465",
    "hypothesis": "A transparent gel could retain a spatial record of a pressure wave in later crystallization of an inert salt.",
    "test": "Compare waves and deposit maps.",
    "against": "Patterns follow drying conditions alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1465",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A transparent gel could retain a spatial record of a pressure wave in later crystallization of an inert salt.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1465",
      "hypothesis": "A transparent gel could retain a spatial record of a pressure wave in later crystallization of an inert salt.",
      "test": "Compare waves and deposit maps.",
      "against": "Patterns follow drying conditions alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1465",
      "hypothesis": "A transparent gel could retain a spatial record of a pressure wave in later crystallization of an inert salt.",
      "test": "Compare waves and deposit maps.",
      "against": "Patterns follow drying conditions alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1466",
    "hypothesis": "A porous cooling plate could isolate a blocked region thermally by automatically draining its neighboring pores.",
    "test": "Measure liquid and heat routes.",
    "against": "Isolation worsens overall cooling.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1466",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous cooling plate could isolate a blocked region thermally by automatically draining its neighboring pores.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1466",
      "hypothesis": "A porous cooling plate could isolate a blocked region thermally by automatically draining its neighboring pores.",
      "test": "Measure liquid and heat routes.",
      "against": "Isolation worsens overall cooling.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1466",
      "hypothesis": "A porous cooling plate could isolate a blocked region thermally by automatically draining its neighboring pores.",
      "test": "Measure liquid and heat routes.",
      "against": "Isolation worsens overall cooling.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1467",
    "hypothesis": "A fiber mesh could distinguish solid contamination from trapped liquid through opposite changes in torsional and tensile damping.",
    "test": "Calibrate both faults.",
    "against": "Damping changes remain inseparable.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1467",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A fiber mesh could distinguish solid contamination from trapped liquid through opposite changes in torsional and tensile damping.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1467",
      "hypothesis": "A fiber mesh could distinguish solid contamination from trapped liquid through opposite changes in torsional and tensile damping.",
      "test": "Calibrate both faults.",
      "against": "Damping changes remain inseparable.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1467",
      "hypothesis": "A fiber mesh could distinguish solid contamination from trapped liquid through opposite changes in torsional and tensile damping.",
      "test": "Calibrate both faults.",
      "against": "Damping changes remain inseparable.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1468",
    "hypothesis": "A droplet-coated oscillator could reveal local air humidity fluctuations faster than average evaporation measurements.",
    "test": "Compare calibrated humidity signals.",
    "against": "Optical or mechanical response is slower.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1468",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A droplet-coated oscillator could reveal local air humidity fluctuations faster than average evaporation measurements.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1468",
      "hypothesis": "A droplet-coated oscillator could reveal local air humidity fluctuations faster than average evaporation measurements.",
      "test": "Compare calibrated humidity signals.",
      "against": "Optical or mechanical response is slower.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1468",
      "hypothesis": "A droplet-coated oscillator could reveal local air humidity fluctuations faster than average evaporation measurements.",
      "test": "Compare calibrated humidity signals.",
      "against": "Optical or mechanical response is slower.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1469",
    "hypothesis": "A soft mineral-polymer interface could suppress crystallization pressure by rotating nascent crystals into available voids.",
    "test": "Image crystals and stress.",
    "against": "Protection follows reduced crystal mass only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1469",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A soft mineral-polymer interface could suppress crystallization pressure by rotating nascent crystals into available voids.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1469",
      "hypothesis": "A soft mineral-polymer interface could suppress crystallization pressure by rotating nascent crystals into available voids.",
      "test": "Image crystals and stress.",
      "against": "Protection follows reduced crystal mass only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1469",
      "hypothesis": "A soft mineral-polymer interface could suppress crystallization pressure by rotating nascent crystals into available voids.",
      "test": "Image crystals and stress.",
      "against": "Protection follows reduced crystal mass only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1470",
    "hypothesis": "A porous substrate could separate input volume from input pressure through differently moving liquid and gas boundaries.",
    "test": "Measure both boundaries.",
    "against": "The inferred parameters remain confounded.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1470",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous substrate could separate input volume from input pressure through differently moving liquid and gas boundaries.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1470",
      "hypothesis": "A porous substrate could separate input volume from input pressure through differently moving liquid and gas boundaries.",
      "test": "Measure both boundaries.",
      "against": "The inferred parameters remain confounded.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1470",
      "hypothesis": "A porous substrate could separate input volume from input pressure through differently moving liquid and gas boundaries.",
      "test": "Measure both boundaries.",
      "against": "The inferred parameters remain confounded.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1471",
    "hypothesis": "A thin cellulose shell could resist buckling by releasing bound water into compression zones.",
    "test": "Measure hydration and shape.",
    "against": "Resistance requires greater shell thickness.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1471",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A thin cellulose shell could resist buckling by releasing bound water into compression zones.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1471",
      "hypothesis": "A thin cellulose shell could resist buckling by releasing bound water into compression zones.",
      "test": "Measure hydration and shape.",
      "against": "Resistance requires greater shell thickness.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1471",
      "hypothesis": "A thin cellulose shell could resist buckling by releasing bound water into compression zones.",
      "test": "Measure hydration and shape.",
      "against": "Resistance requires greater shell thickness.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1472",
    "hypothesis": "A granular raft could maintain flotation after partial wetting by exchanging load with dry perimeter grains.",
    "test": "Map loads and sinking.",
    "against": "Stability follows trapped gas volume only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1472",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A granular raft could maintain flotation after partial wetting by exchanging load with dry perimeter grains.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1472",
      "hypothesis": "A granular raft could maintain flotation after partial wetting by exchanging load with dry perimeter grains.",
      "test": "Map loads and sinking.",
      "against": "Stability follows trapped gas volume only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1472",
      "hypothesis": "A granular raft could maintain flotation after partial wetting by exchanging load with dry perimeter grains.",
      "test": "Map loads and sinking.",
      "against": "Stability follows trapped gas volume only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1473",
    "hypothesis": "A liquid-filled adhesive channel could reveal crack proximity through asymmetric pressure relaxation.",
    "test": "Compare known crack positions.",
    "against": "Relaxation follows channel length only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1473",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A liquid-filled adhesive channel could reveal crack proximity through asymmetric pressure relaxation.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1473",
      "hypothesis": "A liquid-filled adhesive channel could reveal crack proximity through asymmetric pressure relaxation.",
      "test": "Compare known crack positions.",
      "against": "Relaxation follows channel length only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1473",
      "hypothesis": "A liquid-filled adhesive channel could reveal crack proximity through asymmetric pressure relaxation.",
      "test": "Compare known crack positions.",
      "against": "Relaxation follows channel length only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1474",
    "hypothesis": "A porous film could distinguish dissolved gas loss from solvent loss through opposite shifts in acoustic and optical modes.",
    "test": "Calibrate phase losses.",
    "against": "Mode responses cannot separate them.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1474",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous film could distinguish dissolved gas loss from solvent loss through opposite shifts in acoustic and optical modes.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1474",
      "hypothesis": "A porous film could distinguish dissolved gas loss from solvent loss through opposite shifts in acoustic and optical modes.",
      "test": "Calibrate phase losses.",
      "against": "Mode responses cannot separate them.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1474",
      "hypothesis": "A porous film could distinguish dissolved gas loss from solvent loss through opposite shifts in acoustic and optical modes.",
      "test": "Calibrate phase losses.",
      "against": "Mode responses cannot separate them.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1475",
    "hypothesis": "A flexible glass-fiber pad could recover absorbency after fouling through local torsional motion during drying.",
    "test": "Track torsion and later uptake.",
    "against": "Recovery requires contaminant removal by washing.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1475",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A flexible glass-fiber pad could recover absorbency after fouling through local torsional motion during drying.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1475",
      "hypothesis": "A flexible glass-fiber pad could recover absorbency after fouling through local torsional motion during drying.",
      "test": "Track torsion and later uptake.",
      "against": "Recovery requires contaminant removal by washing.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1475",
      "hypothesis": "A flexible glass-fiber pad could recover absorbency after fouling through local torsional motion during drying.",
      "test": "Track torsion and later uptake.",
      "against": "Recovery requires contaminant removal by washing.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1476",
    "hypothesis": "A seedless biomimetic capsule could open under a selected order of heat, humidity, and pressure without electronic control.",
    "test": "Apply all stimulus orders.",
    "against": "Opening depends only on final state.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1476",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A seedless biomimetic capsule could open under a selected order of heat, humidity, and pressure without electronic control.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1476",
      "hypothesis": "A seedless biomimetic capsule could open under a selected order of heat, humidity, and pressure without electronic control.",
      "test": "Apply all stimulus orders.",
      "against": "Opening depends only on final state.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1476",
      "hypothesis": "A seedless biomimetic capsule could open under a selected order of heat, humidity, and pressure without electronic control.",
      "test": "Apply all stimulus orders.",
      "against": "Opening depends only on final state.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1477",
    "hypothesis": "A soft coating could reveal its own evolving permeability through traveling mechanical ripples during absorption.",
    "test": "Compare ripples and flux.",
    "against": "Ripples follow surface roughness alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1477",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A soft coating could reveal its own evolving permeability through traveling mechanical ripples during absorption.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1477",
      "hypothesis": "A soft coating could reveal its own evolving permeability through traveling mechanical ripples during absorption.",
      "test": "Compare ripples and flux.",
      "against": "Ripples follow surface roughness alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1477",
      "hypothesis": "A soft coating could reveal its own evolving permeability through traveling mechanical ripples during absorption.",
      "test": "Compare ripples and flux.",
      "against": "Ripples follow surface roughness alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1478",
    "hypothesis": "A porous clay membrane could retain useful selectivity after cracking by preferentially swelling only crack-adjacent platelets.",
    "test": "Map swelling and transport.",
    "against": "Selectivity recovers only after complete crack closure.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1478",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous clay membrane could retain useful selectivity after cracking by preferentially swelling only crack-adjacent platelets.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1478",
      "hypothesis": "A porous clay membrane could retain useful selectivity after cracking by preferentially swelling only crack-adjacent platelets.",
      "test": "Map swelling and transport.",
      "against": "Selectivity recovers only after complete crack closure.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1478",
      "hypothesis": "A porous clay membrane could retain useful selectivity after cracking by preferentially swelling only crack-adjacent platelets.",
      "test": "Map swelling and transport.",
      "against": "Selectivity recovers only after complete crack closure.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1479",
    "hypothesis": "A wet textile could route a thermal pulse toward the region with least remaining water.",
    "test": "Measure heat and moisture.",
    "against": "Routing follows solid-fiber orientation only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 4,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "area": "heat and energy",
    "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 41,
    "literature_query": "wet textile route thermal pulse toward region least remaining water experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N1479",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A wet textile could route a thermal pulse toward the region with least remaining water.",
    "category": "heat and energy",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1479",
      "hypothesis": "A wet textile could route a thermal pulse toward the region with least remaining water.",
      "test": "Measure heat and moisture.",
      "against": "Routing follows solid-fiber orientation only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1479",
      "hypothesis": "A wet textile could route a thermal pulse toward the region with least remaining water.",
      "test": "Measure heat and moisture.",
      "against": "Routing follows solid-fiber orientation only.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 41,
      "literature_query": "wet textile route thermal pulse toward region least remaining water experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "41",
      "id": "N1479",
      "hypothesis": "A wet textile could route a thermal pulse toward the region with least remaining water.",
      "test": "Measure heat and moisture.",
      "against": "Routing follows solid-fiber orientation only.",
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_score": "24",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pbd3672656a37;Pc39dd7dc0fea;P55b7b0f0d720;P8735ac4099ac;P1832a87018cb",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N1479",
      "hypothesis": "A wet textile could route a thermal pulse toward the region with least remaining water.",
      "test": "Measure heat and moisture.",
      "against": "Routing follows solid-fiber orientation only.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "area": "heat and energy",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 41,
      "literature_query": "wet textile route thermal pulse toward region least remaining water experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "Pbd3672656a37;Pc39dd7dc0fea;P55b7b0f0d720;P8735ac4099ac;P1832a87018cb",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "Pbd3672656a37;Pc39dd7dc0fea;P55b7b0f0d720;P8735ac4099ac;P1832a87018cb",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1480",
    "hypothesis": "A capillary droplet chain could relay a mechanical disturbance while preventing solute exchange between neighbors.",
    "test": "Measure motion and tracers.",
    "against": "Relay requires coalescence.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1480",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A capillary droplet chain could relay a mechanical disturbance while preventing solute exchange between neighbors.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1480",
      "hypothesis": "A capillary droplet chain could relay a mechanical disturbance while preventing solute exchange between neighbors.",
      "test": "Measure motion and tracers.",
      "against": "Relay requires coalescence.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1480",
      "hypothesis": "A capillary droplet chain could relay a mechanical disturbance while preventing solute exchange between neighbors.",
      "test": "Measure motion and tracers.",
      "against": "Relay requires coalescence.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1481",
    "hypothesis": "A granular-coated film could self-clean by changing which particles bear tensile stress during drying.",
    "test": "Track forces and particle release.",
    "against": "Cleaning follows gravity alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1481",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A granular-coated film could self-clean by changing which particles bear tensile stress during drying.",
    "category": "cross-disciplinary technology",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1481",
      "hypothesis": "A granular-coated film could self-clean by changing which particles bear tensile stress during drying.",
      "test": "Track forces and particle release.",
      "against": "Cleaning follows gravity alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1481",
      "hypothesis": "A granular-coated film could self-clean by changing which particles bear tensile stress during drying.",
      "test": "Track forces and particle release.",
      "against": "Cleaning follows gravity alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "cross-disciplinary technology",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1482",
    "hypothesis": "A transparent hydrogel could detect solvent contamination through a change in the topology of drying wrinkles.",
    "test": "Compare known compositions.",
    "against": "Topology follows drying rate only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1482",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A transparent hydrogel could detect solvent contamination through a change in the topology of drying wrinkles.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1482",
      "hypothesis": "A transparent hydrogel could detect solvent contamination through a change in the topology of drying wrinkles.",
      "test": "Compare known compositions.",
      "against": "Topology follows drying rate only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1482",
      "hypothesis": "A transparent hydrogel could detect solvent contamination through a change in the topology of drying wrinkles.",
      "test": "Compare known compositions.",
      "against": "Topology follows drying rate only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1483",
    "hypothesis": "A porous rigid capsule could reduce impact pressure by converting liquid motion into temporary surface adsorption.",
    "test": "Measure pressure and adsorption.",
    "against": "Pressure reduction follows pore volume alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1483",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous rigid capsule could reduce impact pressure by converting liquid motion into temporary surface adsorption.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1483",
      "hypothesis": "A porous rigid capsule could reduce impact pressure by converting liquid motion into temporary surface adsorption.",
      "test": "Measure pressure and adsorption.",
      "against": "Pressure reduction follows pore volume alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1483",
      "hypothesis": "A porous rigid capsule could reduce impact pressure by converting liquid motion into temporary surface adsorption.",
      "test": "Measure pressure and adsorption.",
      "against": "Pressure reduction follows pore volume alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1484",
    "hypothesis": "A flexible separator could maintain particle rejection after strain by redistributing local hydraulic resistance.",
    "test": "Measure pore flows and rejection.",
    "against": "Recovery requires lower total flux.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1484",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A flexible separator could maintain particle rejection after strain by redistributing local hydraulic resistance.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1484",
      "hypothesis": "A flexible separator could maintain particle rejection after strain by redistributing local hydraulic resistance.",
      "test": "Measure pore flows and rejection.",
      "against": "Recovery requires lower total flux.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1484",
      "hypothesis": "A flexible separator could maintain particle rejection after strain by redistributing local hydraulic resistance.",
      "test": "Measure pore flows and rejection.",
      "against": "Recovery requires lower total flux.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1485",
    "hypothesis": "A salt-doped optical fiber analogue could record whether wetting occurred before or after bending through distinct spectral paths.",
    "test": "Reverse stimulus order.",
    "against": "Spectra reflect final moisture only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1485",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A salt-doped optical fiber analogue could record whether wetting occurred before or after bending through distinct spectral paths.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1485",
      "hypothesis": "A salt-doped optical fiber analogue could record whether wetting occurred before or after bending through distinct spectral paths.",
      "test": "Reverse stimulus order.",
      "against": "Spectra reflect final moisture only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1485",
      "hypothesis": "A salt-doped optical fiber analogue could record whether wetting occurred before or after bending through distinct spectral paths.",
      "test": "Reverse stimulus order.",
      "against": "Spectra reflect final moisture only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1486",
    "hypothesis": "A wet sand surface could suppress localized erosion by routing capillary water toward the first moving grain.",
    "test": "Track water and grains.",
    "against": "Routing occurs only after bulk erosion.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 4,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 42,
    "literature_query": "wet sand surface suppress localized erosion routing capillary water toward first moving grain experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N1486",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A wet sand surface could suppress localized erosion by routing capillary water toward the first moving grain.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1486",
      "hypothesis": "A wet sand surface could suppress localized erosion by routing capillary water toward the first moving grain.",
      "test": "Track water and grains.",
      "against": "Routing occurs only after bulk erosion.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1486",
      "hypothesis": "A wet sand surface could suppress localized erosion by routing capillary water toward the first moving grain.",
      "test": "Track water and grains.",
      "against": "Routing occurs only after bulk erosion.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 42,
      "literature_query": "wet sand surface suppress localized erosion routing capillary water toward first moving grain experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "42",
      "id": "N1486",
      "hypothesis": "A wet sand surface could suppress localized erosion by routing capillary water toward the first moving grain.",
      "test": "Track water and grains.",
      "against": "Routing occurs only after bulk erosion.",
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_score": "24",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P61de1550d3c8;P330285849109;P8bd55d8f49db;P2bc242e3a43d;P17b965983b6f;P4b43023343d7;Pb5b187fb3a1a",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N1486",
      "hypothesis": "A wet sand surface could suppress localized erosion by routing capillary water toward the first moving grain.",
      "test": "Track water and grains.",
      "against": "Routing occurs only after bulk erosion.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 42,
      "literature_query": "wet sand surface suppress localized erosion routing capillary water toward first moving grain experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P61de1550d3c8;P330285849109;P8bd55d8f49db;P2bc242e3a43d;P17b965983b6f;P4b43023343d7;Pb5b187fb3a1a",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P61de1550d3c8;P330285849109;P8bd55d8f49db;P2bc242e3a43d;P17b965983b6f;P4b43023343d7;Pb5b187fb3a1a",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1487",
    "hypothesis": "A porous polymer could distinguish a solvent mixture's mixing age through transient uptake even at equal composition.",
    "test": "Measure uptake after known delays.",
    "against": "Responses converge after temperature matching.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1487",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous polymer could distinguish a solvent mixture's mixing age through transient uptake even at equal composition.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1487",
      "hypothesis": "A porous polymer could distinguish a solvent mixture's mixing age through transient uptake even at equal composition.",
      "test": "Measure uptake after known delays.",
      "against": "Responses converge after temperature matching.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1487",
      "hypothesis": "A porous polymer could distinguish a solvent mixture's mixing age through transient uptake even at equal composition.",
      "test": "Measure uptake after known delays.",
      "against": "Responses converge after temperature matching.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1488",
    "hypothesis": "A soft acoustic resonator could reveal hidden surface fouling through loss of reciprocity between two mechanical modes.",
    "test": "Introduce known deposits.",
    "against": "Asymmetry follows mounting changes only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 18,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1488",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A soft acoustic resonator could reveal hidden surface fouling through loss of reciprocity between two mechanical modes.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1488",
      "hypothesis": "A soft acoustic resonator could reveal hidden surface fouling through loss of reciprocity between two mechanical modes.",
      "test": "Introduce known deposits.",
      "against": "Asymmetry follows mounting changes only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1488",
      "hypothesis": "A soft acoustic resonator could reveal hidden surface fouling through loss of reciprocity between two mechanical modes.",
      "test": "Introduce known deposits.",
      "against": "Asymmetry follows mounting changes only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 18,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1489",
    "hypothesis": "A fiber-reinforced pouch could preserve liquid circulation during bending by rotating its internal channels.",
    "test": "Image channels and flow.",
    "against": "Circulation declines with every bend.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 1,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 14,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1489",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A fiber-reinforced pouch could preserve liquid circulation during bending by rotating its internal channels.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1489",
      "hypothesis": "A fiber-reinforced pouch could preserve liquid circulation during bending by rotating its internal channels.",
      "test": "Image channels and flow.",
      "against": "Circulation declines with every bend.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1489",
      "hypothesis": "A fiber-reinforced pouch could preserve liquid circulation during bending by rotating its internal channels.",
      "test": "Image channels and flow.",
      "against": "Circulation declines with every bend.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 1,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 14,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "specialist facility or synthesis",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1490",
    "hypothesis": "A capillary sensor could infer the location of an evaporation hotspot from the order in which trapped gas pockets disappear.",
    "test": "Map heat and gas.",
    "against": "Order follows initial bubble size only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1490",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A capillary sensor could infer the location of an evaporation hotspot from the order in which trapped gas pockets disappear.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1490",
      "hypothesis": "A capillary sensor could infer the location of an evaporation hotspot from the order in which trapped gas pockets disappear.",
      "test": "Map heat and gas.",
      "against": "Order follows initial bubble size only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1490",
      "hypothesis": "A capillary sensor could infer the location of an evaporation hotspot from the order in which trapped gas pockets disappear.",
      "test": "Map heat and gas.",
      "against": "Order follows initial bubble size only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1491",
    "hypothesis": "A thin clay coating could prevent polymer creep by redistributing water across stressed and unstressed zones.",
    "test": "Measure water and creep.",
    "against": "Benefits follow increased average stiffness only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1491",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A thin clay coating could prevent polymer creep by redistributing water across stressed and unstressed zones.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1491",
      "hypothesis": "A thin clay coating could prevent polymer creep by redistributing water across stressed and unstressed zones.",
      "test": "Measure water and creep.",
      "against": "Benefits follow increased average stiffness only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1491",
      "hypothesis": "A thin clay coating could prevent polymer creep by redistributing water across stressed and unstressed zones.",
      "test": "Measure water and creep.",
      "against": "Benefits follow increased average stiffness only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1492",
    "hypothesis": "A porous optical surface could identify the direction of a prior rinse through anisotropic recovery after complete drying.",
    "test": "Compare known rinse directions.",
    "against": "Recovery follows manufacturing texture only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "optics and acoustics",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1492",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous optical surface could identify the direction of a prior rinse through anisotropic recovery after complete drying.",
    "category": "optics and acoustics",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1492",
      "hypothesis": "A porous optical surface could identify the direction of a prior rinse through anisotropic recovery after complete drying.",
      "test": "Compare known rinse directions.",
      "against": "Recovery follows manufacturing texture only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1492",
      "hypothesis": "A porous optical surface could identify the direction of a prior rinse through anisotropic recovery after complete drying.",
      "test": "Compare known rinse directions.",
      "against": "Recovery follows manufacturing texture only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "optics and acoustics",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1493",
    "hypothesis": "A flexible bead chain could damp an impact through sequential wet-contact release while retaining its original length.",
    "test": "Measure contacts and energy.",
    "against": "Damping requires permanent extension.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1493",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A flexible bead chain could damp an impact through sequential wet-contact release while retaining its original length.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1493",
      "hypothesis": "A flexible bead chain could damp an impact through sequential wet-contact release while retaining its original length.",
      "test": "Measure contacts and energy.",
      "against": "Damping requires permanent extension.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1493",
      "hypothesis": "A flexible bead chain could damp an impact through sequential wet-contact release while retaining its original length.",
      "test": "Measure contacts and energy.",
      "against": "Damping requires permanent extension.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1494",
    "hypothesis": "A salt crystal could measure local confinement through the ratio of mechanical to optical relaxation after a small humidity change.",
    "test": "Compare known confinement.",
    "against": "Ratio follows water uptake only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 4,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 43,
    "literature_query": "salt crystal measure local confinement ratio mechanical optical relaxation small humidity change experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N1494",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A salt crystal could measure local confinement through the ratio of mechanical to optical relaxation after a small humidity change.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1494",
      "hypothesis": "A salt crystal could measure local confinement through the ratio of mechanical to optical relaxation after a small humidity change.",
      "test": "Compare known confinement.",
      "against": "Ratio follows water uptake only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1494",
      "hypothesis": "A salt crystal could measure local confinement through the ratio of mechanical to optical relaxation after a small humidity change.",
      "test": "Compare known confinement.",
      "against": "Ratio follows water uptake only.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 43,
      "literature_query": "salt crystal measure local confinement ratio mechanical optical relaxation small humidity change experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "43",
      "id": "N1494",
      "hypothesis": "A salt crystal could measure local confinement through the ratio of mechanical to optical relaxation after a small humidity change.",
      "test": "Compare known confinement.",
      "against": "Ratio follows water uptake only.",
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_score": "24",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P4fc2f715aa57;P17390f9583fe;Pfdad384a2ae1",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N1494",
      "hypothesis": "A salt crystal could measure local confinement through the ratio of mechanical to optical relaxation after a small humidity change.",
      "test": "Compare known confinement.",
      "against": "Ratio follows water uptake only.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 43,
      "literature_query": "salt crystal measure local confinement ratio mechanical optical relaxation small humidity change experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P4fc2f715aa57;P17390f9583fe;Pfdad384a2ae1",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P4fc2f715aa57;P17390f9583fe;Pfdad384a2ae1",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1495",
    "hypothesis": "A porous sheet could preserve chemical separation during folding by mechanically isolating crossing liquid pathways.",
    "test": "Image tracers during folding.",
    "against": "Cross-talk rises with any useful fold.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1495",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous sheet could preserve chemical separation during folding by mechanically isolating crossing liquid pathways.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1495",
      "hypothesis": "A porous sheet could preserve chemical separation during folding by mechanically isolating crossing liquid pathways.",
      "test": "Image tracers during folding.",
      "against": "Cross-talk rises with any useful fold.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1495",
      "hypothesis": "A porous sheet could preserve chemical separation during folding by mechanically isolating crossing liquid pathways.",
      "test": "Image tracers during folding.",
      "against": "Cross-talk rises with any useful fold.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1496",
    "hypothesis": "A wet gel surface could reveal a buried inclusion's compressibility through its recoil after a tiny pressure release.",
    "test": "Compare calibrated inclusions.",
    "against": "Recoil follows inclusion stiffness only.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1496",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A wet gel surface could reveal a buried inclusion's compressibility through its recoil after a tiny pressure release.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1496",
      "hypothesis": "A wet gel surface could reveal a buried inclusion's compressibility through its recoil after a tiny pressure release.",
      "test": "Compare calibrated inclusions.",
      "against": "Recoil follows inclusion stiffness only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1496",
      "hypothesis": "A wet gel surface could reveal a buried inclusion's compressibility through its recoil after a tiny pressure release.",
      "test": "Compare calibrated inclusions.",
      "against": "Recoil follows inclusion stiffness only.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1497",
    "hypothesis": "A fiber mat could reduce transient solvent emissions by storing vapor in mechanically generated cool regions.",
    "test": "Measure thermal maps and vapor.",
    "against": "Buffering follows adsorption alone.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 4,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 24,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "rank": 44,
    "literature_query": "fiber mat reduce transient solvent emissions storing vapor mechanically generated cool regions experiment research",
    "selected": true,
    "catalog_id": "N1497",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A fiber mat could reduce transient solvent emissions by storing vapor in mechanically generated cool regions.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": true,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 2,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1497",
      "hypothesis": "A fiber mat could reduce transient solvent emissions by storing vapor in mechanically generated cool regions.",
      "test": "Measure thermal maps and vapor.",
      "against": "Buffering follows adsorption alone.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1497",
      "hypothesis": "A fiber mat could reduce transient solvent emissions by storing vapor in mechanically generated cool regions.",
      "test": "Measure thermal maps and vapor.",
      "against": "Buffering follows adsorption alone.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 44,
      "literature_query": "fiber mat reduce transient solvent emissions storing vapor mechanically generated cool regions experiment research",
      "selected": true
    },
    "shortlist_fields": {
      "rank": "44",
      "id": "N1497",
      "hypothesis": "A fiber mat could reduce transient solvent emissions by storing vapor in mechanically generated cool regions.",
      "test": "Measure thermal maps and vapor.",
      "against": "Buffering follows adsorption alone.",
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_score": "24",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P8511c3cfd37c;Pe0833896308d;Pd68fe528dbf7;Peca86e2132d0",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "shortlist_research_fields": {
      "id": "N1497",
      "hypothesis": "A fiber mat could reduce transient solvent emissions by storing vapor in mechanically generated cool regions.",
      "test": "Measure thermal maps and vapor.",
      "against": "Buffering follows adsorption alone.",
      "status": "selected for research triage; unproved",
      "novelty": "Unverified; no exhaustive full-text or patent review",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 4,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 24,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "modest bench with calibrated imaging or sensing",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "rank": 44,
      "literature_query": "fiber mat reduce transient solvent emissions storing vapor mechanically generated cool regions experiment research",
      "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
      "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
      "source_ids": "P8511c3cfd37c;Pe0833896308d;Pd68fe528dbf7;Peca86e2132d0",
      "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
      "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
      "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection."
    },
    "score_interpretation": "Coarse screening score; ties are arbitrary and it is not a calibrated likelihood.",
    "literature_status": "Related source leads returned; exact-claim overlap unresolved",
    "probability_of_success": "Not estimated",
    "source_ids": "P8511c3cfd37c;Pe0833896308d;Pd68fe528dbf7;Peca86e2132d0",
    "practical_gate": "Specify one measurable outcome and the closest alternative explanation; validate materials and instrument resolution before confirmation.",
    "selection_basis": "First-pass accessibility and observability screen, diversity limits, and 15 explicit comparative-test candidates. Not a mathematically optimal selection.",
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1498",
    "hypothesis": "A flexible channel could detect the first formation of a crystal plug through a change in wall-noise propagation.",
    "test": "Image plugs and fluctuations.",
    "against": "Warnings occur only after flow loss.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 3,
    "screen_score": 20,
    "area": "chemistry and materials",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1498",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A flexible channel could detect the first formation of a crystal plug through a change in wall-noise propagation.",
    "category": "chemistry and materials",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1498",
      "hypothesis": "A flexible channel could detect the first formation of a crystal plug through a change in wall-noise propagation.",
      "test": "Image plugs and fluctuations.",
      "against": "Warnings occur only after flow loss.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1498",
      "hypothesis": "A flexible channel could detect the first formation of a crystal plug through a change in wall-noise propagation.",
      "test": "Image plugs and fluctuations.",
      "against": "Warnings occur only after flow loss.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 3,
      "screen_score": 20,
      "area": "chemistry and materials",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1499",
    "hypothesis": "A porous mineral film could preserve a weak chemical pattern through selective mechanical shielding during rinsing.",
    "test": "Map pattern before and after.",
    "against": "Preservation requires stronger chemical binding.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 3,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 19,
    "area": "mechanics and structures",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1499",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A porous mineral film could preserve a weak chemical pattern through selective mechanical shielding during rinsing.",
    "category": "mechanics and structures",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1499",
      "hypothesis": "A porous mineral film could preserve a weak chemical pattern through selective mechanical shielding during rinsing.",
      "test": "Map pattern before and after.",
      "against": "Preservation requires stronger chemical binding.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1499",
      "hypothesis": "A porous mineral film could preserve a weak chemical pattern through selective mechanical shielding during rinsing.",
      "test": "Map pattern before and after.",
      "against": "Preservation requires stronger chemical binding.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 3,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 19,
      "area": "mechanics and structures",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  },
  {
    "id": "N1500",
    "hypothesis": "A water-filled elastic network could verify its own flow reconstruction by comparing pressure work with measured deformation energy.",
    "test": "Introduce known model errors.",
    "against": "Residuals cannot distinguish error from calibration drift.",
    "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
    "novelty": "unverified against literature",
    "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
    "access_score": 3,
    "observable_score": 4,
    "control_score": 4,
    "screen_score": 21,
    "area": "wetting and transport",
    "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
    "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
    "selected": false,
    "catalog_id": "N1500",
    "study": "study-2",
    "title": "A water-filled elastic network could verify its own flow reconstruction by comparing pressure work with measured deformation energy.",
    "category": "wetting and transport",
    "shortlist": false,
    "focused_dossier": false,
    "conditional_model_analysis": false,
    "physical_hypothesis_proved": false,
    "highest_supplied_level": 1,
    "raw_source_fields": {
      "id": "N1500",
      "hypothesis": "A water-filled elastic network could verify its own flow reconstruction by comparing pressure work with measured deformation energy.",
      "test": "Introduce known model errors.",
      "against": "Residuals cannot distinguish error from calibration drift.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion"
    },
    "screening": {
      "id": "N1500",
      "hypothesis": "A water-filled elastic network could verify its own flow reconstruction by comparing pressure work with measured deformation energy.",
      "test": "Introduce known model errors.",
      "against": "Residuals cannot distinguish error from calibration drift.",
      "status": "speculative; not demonstrated",
      "novelty": "unverified against literature",
      "composition": "individually composed proposal; no combinatorial expansion",
      "access_score": 3,
      "observable_score": 4,
      "control_score": 4,
      "screen_score": 21,
      "area": "wetting and transport",
      "resource_class": "instrumented bench or workshop",
      "screen_limit": "Ordinal planning judgment, not probability of success; mechanism and apparatus require validation.",
      "selected": false
    },
    "focused_fields": null
  }
]